Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender? What is your view? Explain your opinion.
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
There have always been differences in the types of work men and women have done. However, the trend in modern times has been for both men and women to have greater freedom of choice in terms of employment. Some people might say that there is no need to go further. However, in my view, wherever possible, gender equality should be encouraged.
There may indeed be good arguments for allowing certain posts to remain predominantly male or female. Where all-male or all-female groups exist, there may be a need for related posts to be held by men and women respectively. Patients in all-female hospital wards, for example, would probably appreciate having female nurses to look after them. It could also be argued that certain jobs requiring a great deal of physical strength, coal mining or logging, for example, should continue to be done mainly by men.
However, in the vast majority of situations, making occupations more open to both genders has distinct advantages. Men and women can bring slightly different perspectives and approaches to a job. Female police officers, for example, may have a greater understanding of domestic violence and a better range of strategies for dealing with this problem. Male primary school teachers probably have a better understanding of the needs of young boys and can serve as good role models for them.
The changes that result from allowing men into female-dominated occupations and vice versa may be subtle, but they are far-reaching. However, to benefit the most from this development, it is important not to expect males and females to approach work in identical ways.
Sample 2:
Males and females are often viewed as having differing skill sets. It is agreed that it is correct to exclude people from certain jobs on the basis of their gender, but only in very limited circumstances. This essay will first discuss how physical attributes prevent women from excelling in particular roles; secondly discuss how society at large rejects men from undertaking certain careers, followed by a reasoned conclusion.
For many years the general consensus in the armed forces is that women should not be allowed to participate in combat missions. This is because most women lack the brute strength required for this particular occupation and it is therefore right to prevent them from joining the ranks. For example, the American Army recently allowed some women to fight on the front line and the Department of Defense deemed the experiment a failure, due to lack of fighting effectiveness. Despite this, many women have fought in many wars, famously on the Eastern Front for Russia and the Viet Cong in Vietnam, so maybe it is men’s attitudes that prevent them performing rather than their stature.
Society has yet to accept men in many traditionally female positions, such as nanny or beautician. Businesses feel that it is fine to not hire men for these posts because most of their customers would not be willing to have a man perform that service. I personally know of one example when a friend failed at the interview stage when applying to become kindergarten teacher because he was the wrong sex.
To summarise, in limited circumstances it is just to prohibit people from certain occupations, but only if they cannot physically perform or if the general consensus is that it is a single sex post.
Sample 3:
It is evident that the gender gap is closing in the vast majority of occupations in today’s society. However, some remain with the opinion that females and males are born to have differences in terms of their vocational preferences. Despite this, I would argue in this essay that it is wrong to exclude a certain gender from a certain occupation.
It is undoubtable that a certain gender could be more appreciated in some professions. It is mainly determined by the biological differences between males and females. For example, females are perceived to be more caring and nurturing by nature, so that they could be more suitable working in nurseries and hospitals; whereas males are more likely to be employed in mining and construction industries because they are physically stronger. In those cases, the gender gap may remain in the short future.
However, for the vast majority of professions, making occupations more open to both genders has significant advantages. Different genders could bring different perspectives into work, which could generate more possibilities for a company’s development. For example, a male nurse could offer his unique experience to a female dominated team in order to promote a more holistic care to patients in both genders. Moreover, there is evidence that a mixed gender working environment is often proven to be more efficient. Therefore, companies could benefit from the different perspectives and efficiency that mixed gender teams bring.
To conclude, although some occupations remain to be female- or male-dominant, there are more advantages to allow both genders having the freedom of their vocational choices. Companies that facilitate this equality could benefit from the increased possibilities and efficiency.
Sample 4:
There is a truth that the strengths and weaknesses of men and women quite differ due to the disparity in their genders and apparently, it dramatically affects their opportunities to do a specific work. However, I think that this reason is not strong enough to exclude males or females from certain professions just because of their genders and wherever possible, they should be given freedom of choice and gender equality in employment should be encouraged. On the one hand, the argument that supports the jobs’ orientation based on their genders remains commonly dominant because these males or females seem to have an apparent instinct and physical capability to excel other sex in accomplishing their jobs. For example, women seem to have a predominant role in medical services thanks to their natural instinct of motherhood and femininity. Patients often prefer female nurses over male nurses because they enjoy the tenderness and the enthusiastic caring for the patients of these “white blouse fairies” with their miraculous skills of soothing the patients’ pain. Meanwhile, there are some special jobs requiring a great deal of physical strengths and persistence like coal sea-fare sailing and fishing, mineral mining or forest logging which used to be done mainly by men because they have shown their extraordinary abilities to work under high pressure and long-lasting endurance. On the other hand, in some occupations, the matter of making jobs easily accessible to both genders has brought about some practical advantages, not only for them but also the whole society. For instance: Female police officers may better deal with the domestic violence and child abuse in the families thanks to having a greater understanding of gender inequality and its adverse effects on the emotions of every member and better strategies to tackle the conflict than their male counterparts. Whereas male kindergarten nannies probably have a better understanding of the characters of young boys, leading to helping them form a good dignity and a strong manner. Although these people only account for a little proportion of the whole labour force, we are obliged to respect their freedom of choice in pursuit of a career to bring about their job’s self-satisfaction and respond to various and abundant demands of the society. In conclusion, although the difference in physical abilities and emotional feelings between males and females has a large impact on the choice of jobs and the job assignment of the society, in most of cases, it is possible to allow men to undertake many female-dominated occupations and vice versa so that they can succeed in their chosen careers and serving plentiful requirements of the society.
Sample 5:
Nowadays, when women and men become more equal than those in the past and more and more women are occupying many important positions in society, there is still suggestion that males and females should be excluded from some kinds of job. To a certain extent, I agree with this opinion. First, there are some professions only suitable for men, and one of which is construction work, for example. It is extremely difficult for a woman to climb between girders of Eiffel Tower and paint each of them. Or how can she stand hanging outside a skyscraper cleaning glass window? Another example can be found in military duty which probably causes soldiers lose their lives in battlefield. It is said that what a woman has to do to serve her country is not sacrificing herself, but rather giving birth for future generation. Second, only women’s personality fit them particularly to nursing profession which requires great patience and sacrifice. It is hardly expected that a man characterized by aggressiveness and decisiveness is willing to pamper the elderly fully erratic. And with strong personality, almost no man accepts helping old people with grooming and personal hygiene, which is widely regarded as a humble occupation. However, it is not recommended, in general, to discriminate between men and women in regard to their occupations. They should be equally granted opportunities with the aim of promoting their talent to the limit. As can be seen in practice, we used to witness some exemplary women being successful in science, two of them was Marie Curie awarded 1911 Nobel Prize in Chemistry and Sofia Vasilyevna Kovalevskaya, the first woman appointed to a full professorship in Northern Europe, and we have, at the present time, the most powerful woman politician from Germany, Angela Merkel. In conclusion, we only exclude males or females from a very few exceptional occupations. Otherwise, it would be better to encourage equality of job opportunity between men and woman.
Sample 6:
Woman and men are commonly seen as having different strength and weaknesses. Therefore, they might be fit for different kinds of jobs. But most people have the concept that some certain professions are only for one gender. So, is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender? Personally, I think it can be right or wrong in certain situations. It’s absolutely right to exclude women from some dangerous and very hard works that need a lot of strength and energies such as building, transporting heavy items,…Woman’s body structure is different from man’s, there might be exceptions but I think that most women are weaker than men. Hard work can affect their health if they’re not strong enough, and it’s dangerous if the work causes any lasting injuries to their bodies. Moreover, some professions require working late at night or working in secluded places. Women – main victims of violence and sexual harassment – might be in peril. Unless they’ve prepared carefully to face with any dangers, women should not choose those professions. However, it can be wrong if people exclude males or females from some professions that they are actually good at. What do you think if you see a man making up for others or a woman playing football? Centuries ago, many people thought that women are not fit for intellectual jobs and there were schools for men only, women had to stay at home and do housework. Later, people opposed strongly when they saw a team of women played football because they thought that sports were not for females. And men were also criticized and looked down on if they were found sewing or cooking. Nowadays those negative thoughts have decreased but they haven’t totally disappeared. If the work is not very hard for them to do, if they’re interested in it and they have a flair for it, why don’t we let them do it? Only when they do something that they love can they become successful in the future. The better the workers are, the better results they bring. I think we should encourage any talented person to do whatever he/she is good at, and we shouldn’t consider gender as a problem, it can help develop a nation. Some famous chiefs, make-up artists,… are not females, and some famous engineers, footballers,… are not males, but they can make their own fame and lead a happy, prosperous life. In conclusion, people should consider carefully how the jobs effect men or women before excluding them from certain professions.
Sample 7:
There is no doubt that man and women possess different advantages as well as disadvantages. Thus, some people think that males or females should not be allowed to join several professions because of their gender. I myself disagree with this viewpoint. To begin with, I believe that we should not prohibit males or females from any jobs due to the following reasons. First of all, it is widely admitted that man or woman can now do jobs that has long been for the other sex only. For example, in the past, women were not allowed to join military in a lot of countries. However, nowadays, the percentage of women in the army has significantly increased. Especially, a lot of women are even becoming soldiers in the battlefield like several female pilots of Qatar in the fight against the so-called Islamic State militants. Likewise, we are now witnessing more and more men who are taking part in specific professions that require the women’s skills like tailors, housekeepers, teachers at kindergartens, etc. Second of all, people believe that performance in jobs likely to be better with the participation of both men and women. It might be true that men and women effectively support each other as they have different strength and weaknesses. Interestingly, the working environment seems to be more lovely and flexible with the presence of both genders. In addition, it will not be fair if we exclude males or females from any jobs because we are trying to establish the gender equality. People now are getting opener and opener in assessing men and women. Therefore, grouping them in any professions seems to be an act that goes against efforts of building parity between men and women. However, some claim that women are not suitable for several tough jobs that have long been for men only because these professions require standards like strengths, endurance and strong will. I find it hard to agree because it is proved that women can contribute a lot in whatever role they play. They, for instance, might not be part of military fights, but they will be incredibly useful in preparations or assistances that are always essential, and men can hardly bring out an equal performance. Therefore, there should not be stereotypes in this case no matter what gender they are. In conclusion, though males and females have different capacities, there is still room for them to show their strengths and assist the other sex. From my perspective, recruiters should keep an open mind toward men and women in order to choose employees that they are looking for.
Sample 8:
Gender equality has always been a hot argument ever. Nowadays, men and women have a larger freedom of choosing their occupation. However, many consider that there are still types of work for males or females dominantly. Therefore, they tend to prevent males or females from certain posts because of their sex. In my opinion, I believe that it is not a sensible attitude. Nobody can argue that men have their own distinctive innate strength. It is often said that men are stronger than women so that men are usually employed in several hard work such as labourer in construction site, fishman, gold miner, police officer, etc. On the other hand, women also have inborn advantages. They are supposed to be more minute and careful than men, which help them have detailed posts like sewer, fashion designer, nurse, teacher, etc. But this idea seems not to be practical today. In the modern times, most of the careers, which are supposed to be for males dominantly, are done expertly by females and vice versa. For instance, there are a large number of famous male fashion designer in the world. Their fame and items have claimed that men are completely able to do female-dominated occupations with their passion and efforts. Moreover, men can do a post that is considered only for women – midwife. More and more male midwives are successful in helping mothers give birth to babies. Besides, a female police officer can be more sensitive to comprehend the situation or the motivation of a crime and have right decisions to deal with it. In conclusion, the occupation of a person depends on his liking, passion and fortes, not his inborn characteristics. The difference in terms of sex-based work is gradually fading away.
Sample 9:
Born differently, women and men have their own roles to play in society. It is common for us to see more women in some certain professions, like nurse and teacher, while a larger number of men in other sectors. However, it would never be a wise choice to exclude certain genders in any profession.
To begin with, it is a matter of sex equality. Women have always been depicted as gentle and vulnerable, to the extent that such conventional views often make them be seen as weak or even inferior to men. Nevertheless, the situation has changed in modern society. Women began to appeal for the equal rights, insisting they can also do whatever males can do. Indeed, there is an increasing number in female soldiers, female engineers, etc., the results of which turn out to prove that they can perform excellently in these sectors as well. If those women choose to engage themselves in certain jobs, why should any authority deprive such right of them?
Moreover, the co-operation of women and men in one sector is also conducive to boosting the work efficiency. For instance, those male nurses can help to carry some heavy equipment in the hospitals, which would usually be an arduous task for females. Possessing some different innate natures, men and women can jointly make an achievement by taking advantages of their own strengths.
In fact, men and women working in the same profession can generate much more positive results that we may not expect. A kind of job cannot only be monopolised by one gender without a single person of the opposite sex, as it is not fair nor beneficial.
Sample 10:
It has argued that there are a different pro and con of the male and female people for getting a job based on their physical strength and emotional characterization. For my point of view, the strengths and weaknesses of gender depend on the particular jobs or works they have been applied to.
Firstly, the men seem to dominate to the work related to the strong physical bodies or movements. This is explained why most of the builders or instructors are the male workers. Furthermore, the male people are also suitable to the job which has a technology and engineering involvement such as electronics, telecommunication and others.
However, there are a lot of jobs, which women could overtake men in application. The job is related to society or health care of patients. It is agreed that the nurses or childcare position might be good for women to apply than men. It might be because the women have stronger emotional and more connection to the child or to the patients.
Several jobs which cannot define which gender are better than others. For example, the kitchen works or chefs are the common works of women for everyday life. It seems to advantage for a woman. But actually, most of the professional chefs are the male domination.
In conclusion, it is hard to say that the men are better than the women or the women are better than the men in the professional carriers because of their gender. Some jobs might be suitable for the men and others might be good for the women. Males and females are equaled in the carrier application.
Sample 11:
Gender has always been an issue for both men and women in getting a job. Traditionally, men are the ones who went out to work to earn money to support their family, whereas women sat in the home and spent their time more on domestic chores. With time passes, more women have started to get involved almost in every profession that the males are already involved in. But there are certain professions which accept only a gender and exclude other.
Some people would argue that it is more common that men get involved in jobs which require physical strength, but this is not the case with women. Because unlike the body system of a male, the female body system is comparatively different, and it is unhealthy for the female body system to indulge in physically strenuous activity. The reason is it can cause severe muscular or even chemical changes in the female body system which may lead to certain diseases in their later life.
On the other hand, others would argue that the acceptance of employees should be based on a person’s personal interest, experience and knowledge but not on gender. For instance, form the very beginning, nursing was highly recommended and allowed only for females. But today, more males are interested and qualified in the field, so the superiors are also happy with employing more male nurses than female, particularly for dealing with male patients.
Besides that, there is not much work in the world which specifies only for a certain gender. For almost every job, whether it is high income or low income, both men and women have evenly indulged in it. For instance, there are both males and females who are working as cleaners which is a low income and there are both genders who are qualified in high income jobs such as doctor and engineer.
To sum up, the views support the argument that certain genders should and should not be excluded from certain professions. There are jobs that require hard work such as working on the construction site, doctors and engineers and light work such as graphic designing and office works. But it is more advisable for women to indulge more on light work to avoid physical illness, however, this does not mean that the males are obliged to work in physically demanding jobs while women work in less strenuous jobs. This preferably depends on the strength and the situation of the job, and most importantly the person’s interest in it.
Sample 12:
Stepping in to the competitive world, women have set their foot in every walk of life. However, in much of the world some areas are still male-dominated. Are men impossibly holding their higher ascendancy above women? I believe that a great many people, especially men hold the answers that “it is obviously true”. In my perceptions, success is in the hands of those who dare to walk on the path of fire and thorn to claim their talents. In other words, gender equality should be widely promoted in today’s society, both males and females can assume their responsibility for any professions.
The first point to note is that society does not assign either males or females to do a certain kind of job and gender discrimination is no longer valuable, in comparison with the past. Modern community treats us the same social conditions and the same advanced education. That means we have more and full chances to develop ourselves in every area at the highest level. Thus, the most skillful person will be appointed to an important post, no matter whether they are males or females. It is said that the 21st century marks an unmistakable progress in occupational segregation which has cracked many authorities’ brains. Emerging as a typical example of the success, Japanese government makes the best of reviving a crowded female workforce and promulgating the laws of openness in professions. Historically, Japanese women, especially those who were married, experienced a period of gender discrimination and had no opportunities for promotion at work. It is extremely unfair, and it is the root of commotions in Japanese community. Back up to the issue of occupational segregation, perhaps from now on, no politicians in any countries make the same mistake as Japanese ones in the past. It is crystal clear that politicians value peaceful labour above riots.
Secondly, no one has inborn merits that stand them in good stead. Professions in the fields of mathematics, computer science, the natural sciences and technology are for men and not for women. This attitude is far from being valid. According to a newest study, if a man finds himself working in a “female-oriented” job, he ends up earning 12.5 percent less than his male counterparts, whereas a woman who works in a “male-dominated” field earns 25.9 percent more than her female peers. So interestingly women in fact are earning more than men because of their less committing faults and their capacity of dealing with matters with accuracy and caution. Thus, what is the best solution for the thorny problem of making a more equal workforce? There is no way around but the labor pool must be balanced out by drawing from a supply of trained men or women to cover the skill gaps. But it is tough to achieve in reality if gender discrimination is alive. Therefore, it is time to exclude job stereotyping by gender from our community if we want to see men in the maternity ward and day care centers or women in trucking, construction and heavy machinery operations.
It would be great to achieve an ideal employment balance on a national scale and we believe in the right direction of our government for a workforce that never sleeps.
Sample 13:
Traditionally men and women work in different fields. Though they have always worked together to build a better world, a subtle difference has always been there in the types of employment they have done. The modern world has changed this perspective to a great extent despite some people’s old-fashioned views that a woman should look after the family and a man should be the bread winner. In my view, gender equality is far more important than considering which sectors are more suitable for a particular gender and which are not.
Some people might present traditional arguments regarding the suitability of some posts for females and some others for male, but the modern era teaches us otherwise. In fact, greater freedom of choice in terms of employment can accelerate the development of a nation than the old way of distributed work pattern. For instance, it is believed by many that a female is more suitable for a profession that requires tenderness and caring while men are more adept in doing tasks those demand more physical strength. Thus, according to their opinion, more women should become nurses or teachers than males while logging, mining, and construction works should be solely done by males.
However, making occupations more open to both genders have distinctive advantages and in certain cases, mixed-gender work environment outperforms the single-sex workplace. For instance, having an all-female hospital is quite challenging and not a pragmatic idea at all. Men and women can bring diverse perspectives and approaches to a job and a school with both male and female teachers has better teaching environment than a single-sex-teacher one. It is quite logical that a female patient would feel more comfortable to consult with a female doctor while a female police would better understand the domestic violence and bring superior strategies for dealing with the problems. Though traditional view does not support women to become doctors or police, we can definitely understand their needs.
To conclude, innovations and advantages gender equality in job sectors can bring are far-reaching and have greater benefits for society. The time has come for us to break the traditional and outdated belief of gender-suitable-profession.
Sample 14:
It is generally believed that in some cases, males and females have difference ability, skill weakness, limitations and natural talents, especially in a workplace. I am of the belief that they should be distinguished for certain work fields. Assigning the right person in the right place would enhance performance and increase the profit and productivity. I would explain two examples to reinforce my view.
Initially, women tend to be more patient in teaching toddlers and adolescences than men. In addition, women better understand what children want and like. Moreover, it is common that woman teachers are higher in number than male teachers in nursery and primary schools. This strength could be best used if women have had more opportunities in teaching children, nursery or any fields that relate to the teaching and interacting with the toddler. Likewise, female is naturally caring, and nursing is a great profession for them. It is not uncommon that we can see more female nurses in hospitals that their male counterparts. So from this regards, I agree that some professions are more suitable for female whereas others are to men. Providing that gender base priority in some professions is not a bad idea at all.
Another example is male’s natural strength. On an average, men are physically stronger than women. For example, generally labours are mostly males as this job requires hard work and physical strength. The work fields that require more physical strength could be reserved for male employees. Likewise in many jobs employees need to work at night and work publicly which might be inconvenient for female employees in many countries. For such jobs, males should be given priority, I believe.
Lastly, men tend to use their logic first, but women use their feeling first. Meanwhile, men like extreme challenges than women. Mining offshore is one of the professions that needs logic, bravery, and physical strength at the same time. Men are suitable for doing this job because not only for those requirements but also the commitment to work overtime.
To sum up, it is right to exclude men or women in certain work fields. People work based on their passion and ability. Educational background, enthusiasm, skill, talent and suitability can increase the performance and some jobs could be more suitable for male while others for female.
Sample 15:
Nature has made males and females with a different set of characteristics and these contrasts in feature make them adept at certain tasks, according to the common belief of the society. However, in this era, when gender equality has already been accepted and both males and females proved that they can be equally fit in any job, excluding a certain gender from a particular profession is no longer an acceptable and wise option.
To begin with, according to the common social dogma, women should stay at home, take care of the kitchen and up-bring children while men should have a career, earn money and take important decisions for the family. Though this was a widely accepted idea in the past, it has started changing and women in certain professions have outnumbered their male counterparts. For instance, the number of female teachers has already exceeded the number of male teachers in many countries according to an online report. On the other hand, men have proven that they can be as good as females in childcare and nursing. The time has come to forget the old dogma and accept the fact that gender equality is longer an option, but a must in job sectors. Women are no longer ready to be confined within the walls while males have forgotten their prejudices and started switching the roles.
Furthermore, while selecting someone for a job, the authority should look for a suitable candidate and that person can be either a male or female. The widely held belief that women are less suitable in professions that require physical strength, logical reasoning, mental power, diplomacy and dealing with others is no longer acceptable in the society. Many female presidents and prime ministers in the world have proved that it is a baseless theory and tech giants lie Google, Microsoft, Facebook and Yahoo! Do not employ people based on their gender, rather they put more emphasis on someone’s quality and potential.
To draw a conclusion to the discussion, despite some physical differences, both men and women have similar talents and possibility. The old dogma of gender-based role is no longer tolerable in the modern era and this is why someone’s talent and skill should be the primary reasons for the suitability for a job, not the gender of the candidate.
Sample 16:
Throughout the history, a difference could be observed in the type of jobs men and women have done. However, this old belief that categorises men and women for certain jobs has changed in the modern era and these days, both genders have a greater freedom to choose a career. Some people might possess the old dogma in this regard, I personally, however, believe that gender equality must be encouraged.
One group of thought advocates that male is physically stronger and has less vulnerability while working in a group of people while females are better caretakers and soft-hearted. This is why, according to them, certain works like logging, coal mining and construction works are more suitable for men while teaching, cleaning and nursing should be done by females. While all-female or all-male employee concept is supported by some, I think a balanced workplace, where an equal number of men and women work together, is more suitable in terms of social, economic and gender equality perspectives.
It is more practical to make occupations open to both sexes as it has distinctive advantages. Due to a slightly different way of dealing an event by men and women in general, having both male and female employees in an organisation brings more innovations and open new opportunities. For example, a female police officer may have a greater understanding of domestic violence and a better range of strategies for dealing with the problem while a male nurse can better judge the need of a male patient in a hospital.
To draw the conclusion, gender-based occupation at a first glance may seem beneficial but in reality, the gender equality can ensure better performance, innovation and social progress.
Sample 17:
The idea that males and females are born with distinct characteristics from each other has been a unanimous consensus for as long as human beings first came into existence. However, in my view, these differences should hold little to no significance when it comes to selecting specific careers for both genders.
To start, the exclusion of a gender from particular professions can have a detrimental effect on many groups in society. Clearly, qualifying an applicant based on their gender instead of their abilities will prevent individuals from developing to their full potential. Furthermore, this mode of thinking directly contributes to sexism by reinforcing harmful stereotypes and setting negative examples for younger generations. For example, a young, impressionable girl who witnessed a woman being denied a job simply for being a woman will form biases about which occupation a certain gender can and cannot enter and will inevitably constrain herself and her potentials inside that false mindset.
Advocators of this exclusion present a counterargument, stating that the unique attributes of males (better physical strength, authoritativeness) and females (sentiment, gentleness) might hinder them from efficiently completing certain tasks at work, but this view is fundamentally flawed. Firstly, these traits are not exclusive to a certain gender. Secondly, individual who receives enough training or possesses adequate qualifications will prove themselves suitable for a job, regardless of their sex. Finally, supposing that this exclusion was implemented, the workplace and job culture would experience a severe lack in diversity, which has been proven to reduce employees’ productivity and negatively impact their attitudes towards work.
From the basis of the points mentioned above, it is conclusive to state that leaving out a certain gender from a profession is never a good idea. Companies and employers should always strive for gender equality and offer equivalent work opportunities to all sexes to eliminate harmful, sexist stereotypes and create a welcoming, inclusive work environment for all.
Hot: 1000+ Đề thi giữa kì 2 file word cấu trúc mới 2026 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The growth of the said trend can be attributed to two main factors. First, it often stems from people’s curiosity about past events. In many cases, this curiosity could lead to the discovery of an intriguing story about how life once was. Take apartment buildings in the Old Quarter of Hanoi for example. Built about 100 years ago, they are now still standing as the testimony of the way of life in the early 1900s and would offer interesting stories to dwellers with an inquisitive nature. Second, people’s interest in the building origins would often concern long-standing properties rather than newly constructed ones. And in old properties, there could be lurking dangers because, after all, these buildings are subject to deterioration following decades in use. Householders therefore need to learn about the house’s history so as to take necessary precautionary measures.
Currently, there are some methods that can be adopted to trace the origins of houses and buildings. The most reliable way is to turn to official records from local authorities. For houses and buildings to be erected, they would often need construction permits from local authorities, and information from them could show an extended history of the house ever since it came to be. Moreover, another approach is to consult the previous owners of the property. It may be a good idea to ask them whether there were any modifications made to the house or if they have the original layout design, which can be of great help if maintenance is needed. Lastly, there might be information about old buildings like the ones in Hanoi Old Quarter on the Internet or in historical libraries. These are also good methods for owners to track down the origins of their own properties.
In conclusion, curiosity and the insights needed for housing maintenance are the main factors contributing to this trend. Besides, with the help of authority, past owners, online tools or even historical books, people can research the history of their properties.
Sample 2:
Many citizens, nowadays, are inquisitive to learn about the home they live in as extensively as possible primarily because they want to learn about the background and style of their house, assess the safety, and find out if it is haunted. I believe nearby elderly citizens and the internet could be two invaluable sources for such curious people to find the best possible information about their buildings.
The knowledge of the background of a house gives people a sense of self-satisfaction. This is why people, especially those who live in a house that was built many years ago, are often interested in finding out more about the adobe. The background often includes how the house was painstakingly built in an era when technology was not so advanced. Thus, exploring the background reveals some unique and fascinating facts. For instance, it was a common misconception for many dwellers in the old part of our city that their houses were built during the English colonial era. In fact, researchers recently found that those houses were built mimicking the English styles but by the local masons. It was fascinating to finally learn about it. Moreover, the construction and the built quality of a house conveys much information about the safety and durability of the houses. Knowing such details could prevent people from facing any disaster like falling victim to a collapsed house. Finally, some people superstitiously think a house might be haunted if it has some bad history. Learning about its history often comes from their personal belief and their motivation to either cleanse the house or move off.
To get proper information about the houses, people can talk to local senior citizens who have been living there for quite a while. They can offer first-hand information about the building and many more details that are not available elsewhere. On top of that, the internet could be another effective source to get details of a house. For instance, many websites store data about the houses in the UK, and anyone can find them online with just a few mouse clicks.
In conclusion, people's motivations to learn about their houses could range from safety reasons to simple curiosity, from superstition to practical reasons. To get the best information they can contact elderly locals and browse the internet.
Sample 3:
The history of a house or a building can be fascinating, sometimes daunting or even mesmerising at times if we try to delve into it. For some people, learning about the history of the houses in which they live, is utterly important for various reasons. This essay attempts to outline some of those possible reasons for this and a couple of methods to research this.
The first possible reason for many to become inquisitive about the past of their houses could be that they actually want to find a connection, if any, between themselves and the buildings. Such connections, or lack thereof, could actually provide an insight to them as to whether those buildings contained anything “unique” at some stages of their existence that would make them- the people that is – feel “special” among the others, or “different” from the rest of the crowds in their neighbourhoods. After all, I think that it feels really good to remain at the centre of attention every now and then.
Some people would be interested to learn about the history of their buildings, especially how they were built, or what kinds of materials were used to construct them because they want to make sure that the buildings are safe enough for living. After all, nobody would want to put their lives at risk by choosing to live in a “weak” building that was built with some “unreliable” materials about a century ago!
But, for whatever reasons that they want to learn about the history of their buildings, it is always better that they ask the locals first to get their information about the former residents of their houses. They could also contact the local municipality or the concerned local authority who could apprise them about how the buildings were made. Finally, people could also visit a local library or the authority that keeps the information about old buildings, to learn about the history of buildings in their respective areas.
To conclude, people are becoming more and more interested in the history of their houses primarily to find a unique feature of it to feel special or to learn about the architectural style and safety features of the house. They can contact local residents, municipality offices and the library to do the research work required to find the history of their houses.
Sample 4:
It is increasingly becoming common practice for people in many places to be inquisitive about the history of the houses or buildings they live in. This trend can be attributed to a variety of reasons, including a desire to understand the cultural and architectural significance of one's home, as well as a sense of personal connection to the past. In this essay, I will explore the reasons for this growing interest in the history of houses and discuss ways in which people can research the history of their homes.
The first reason for this growing interest in house and building history is a desire to understand the cultural and architectural importance of one's home. People may be curious about the style of architecture of their home and how it fits within the broader context of the neighbourhood or city. Additionally, individuals may be interested in learning about the people who have lived in their homes before them and the role the house has played in the community.
Another reason for this interest is a sense of personal connection to the past. People may want to know more about the history of their home because they feel a sense of belonging and connection to the place where they live. This can be particularly true for those who have lived in their home for many years or inherited it from a family member.
People can research the history of their homes in a variety of ways. One way is to start by looking for any historical records or documents that may be available through local historical societies, libraries or archives. These records may include deeds, maps, and photographs that can provide information about the home's history. Another good way to research the history of a home is to speak with long-time residents of the neighbourhood who may have knowledge about the home and its history. Additionally, people can research the history of the home by looking at census records, city directories, and newspaper articles.
In conclusion, understanding the history of one's home can deepen one's appreciation for the place where one lives, and provide a sense of connection to the past. It is believed that history and knowledge about homes would be easily accessible in the future.
Sample 5:
In contemporary society, there has been a marked increase in the number of individuals who display a keen interest in uncovering the historical background of their residences. This essay will examine the impetus behind this phenomenon and discuss various methods that can be employed to facilitate such research.
One of the primary reasons for this growing curiosity can be attributed to the desire for a sense of belonging and connection to one’s abode. As individuals become increasingly transient in their lives, relocating for work or personal reasons, they may seek to find meaning and stability in their living quarters. By delving into the past of their homes, they can establish a link with previous inhabitants, thereby fostering a sense of continuity and attachment.
Moreover, the value of historical preservation has gained prominence in recent years, with more individuals recognizing the importance of conserving architectural heritage. Learning about the past of a house or building contributes to this preservation effort, as it enables the current occupants to appreciate the significance of their dwelling and potentially safeguard it against future alterations or demolitions.
To satiate this thirst for historical knowledge, there are several avenues that can be explored by individuals. Firstly, local archives and libraries can provide a wealth of information, ranging from old maps and photographs to records related to construction and ownership. These resources can help to piece together a comprehensive narrative of the building’s past. Another fruitful approach involves engaging with neighbors or previous occupants, who may possess valuable oral histories and anecdotes that illuminate the lived experiences of the space.
In conclusion, the surge in interest regarding the history of one’s accommodation can be ascribed to the quest for belonging and the increasing awareness of the importance of architectural heritage. Utilizing local archival resources and engaging with community members can prove to be effective methods for conducting this research, enabling individuals to forge a deeper connection with their homes and the past that shaped them.
Sample 6:
In recent years, it has been observed that an increasing number of individuals in certain nations have exhibited a heightened curiosity toward uncovering the historical background of their residences or edifices. This essay will explore the underlying causes of this trend and suggest ways in which people can delve into the past of their abodes.
The primary reason for this burgeoning interest can be attributed to a desire to preserve and appreciate cultural heritage. As societies evolve and modernize, citizens often develop a sense of nostalgia for the past, seeking to understand the origins of their surroundings. For instance, historical structures often boast unique architectural features, which can reveal fascinating insights into the techniques and materials utilized by builders of bygone eras. Consequently, uncovering the narrative behind an edifice piques the interest of individuals who value these distinctive qualities and wish to maintain a connection with their cultural ancestry.
Additionally, understanding the history of a property may have practical implications, such as increasing its monetary value. A residence with a rich historical background or noteworthy past occupants can be perceived as a valuable asset, attracting potential buyers and investors. In this manner, a well-researched lineage of a house can serve as a unique selling point, contributing to its allure in the real estate market.
To embark upon the journey of tracing their property’s history, individuals can employ various research methods. A visit to local archives or libraries can yield valuable information, as they typically house historical records, such as property deeds, maps, and photographs. Furthermore, engaging with community members or local historians can provide anecdotal evidence, offering personal insights into the area’s history. Additionally, online resources, such as historical databases and genealogical websites, serve as convenient tools in supplementing one’s research.
In conclusion, the mounting curiosity toward the historical background of houses and buildings stems from a desire to preserve cultural heritage and capitalize on potential financial gains. To satiate this interest, individuals can utilize a combination of traditional and digital research methods, thus gaining a more profound understanding of their property’s past.
Sample 7:
In several countries, an emerging trend of individuals expressing an amplified interest in discovering the historical roots of their dwellings or constructions has been identified. This essay will delve into the factors contributing to this phenomenon and discuss avenues through which people can investigate the provenance of their habitats.
One possible explanation for this growing curiosity is the human propensity for storytelling and connection. Delving into the history of a building or house allows inhabitants to form a deeper bond with their living spaces, transcending the mere physical aspects of the structure. Another factor that may contribute to this fascination with architectural history is the influence of popular media. Television programs, documentaries, and online content often showcase the transformative potential of restoring and preserving aged structures, igniting public interest in the conservation of architectural heritage.
To satisfy their curiosity and investigate the histories of their dwellings, individuals can pursue various research strategies. One approach is to consult architectural historians or preservationists, who can provide expert guidance on the building’s style, construction techniques, and potential historical significance. Additionally, residents can access public records, such as census data, land registries, and building permits, which often contain information on previous owners, alterations, and construction dates. Finally, local historical societies and museums may house collections of photographs, artifacts, and documents that can shed light on the neighborhood’s past and the development of its architecture.
In summary, the rising interest in uncovering the historical foundations of residential properties can be attributed to the innate human desire for connection and the influence of popular media. By employing a multi-faceted research approach, individuals can unveil the rich tapestry of stories woven into the fabric of their homes, fostering a deeper connection with their living spaces and the broader community.
Sample 8:
In a number of countries, there has been a noticeable surge in individuals expressing a keen interest in uncovering the past of their domiciles or buildings. This essay will examine the factors stimulating this inclination and outline methods through which people can delve into the chronicles of their structures.
The burgeoning interest in the historical context of residences can be attributed to the increasing awareness of environmental sustainability. As societies grapple with the consequences of rapid urbanization, many individuals are embracing the concept of adaptive reuse, which involves repurposing older buildings while preserving their historical significance. By gaining a comprehensive understanding of the architectural background, inhabitants can identify potential restoration opportunities, thereby contributing to a more sustainable and environmentally friendly approach to urban development.
Another compelling factor is the potential for personal growth and enrichment. Studying the historical context of one’s abode offers an opportunity to expand one’s knowledge and understanding of the past, fostering a sense of intellectual curiosity. This pursuit of knowledge enables individuals to develop a more holistic view of their environment, promoting a deeper appreciation of the built heritage and its role in shaping the contemporary landscape.
To conduct research into the history of their homes or constructions, individuals have several avenues at their disposal. One method involves utilizing digital platforms, such as mobile applications and online archives, which provide access to historical records and images. These resources facilitate the process of tracing the architectural lineage, enabling users to uncover vestiges of their buildings’ evolution through time. Alternatively, seeking assistance from local government agencies, which often maintain repositories of historical data, can yield valuable information on building permits, ownership records, and architectural plans. Lastly, engaging in oral history projects, by interviewing long-term community members, can offer unique perspectives on the area’s evolution and the experiences of its inhabitants.
In conclusion, the growing fascination with the historical context of domiciles and constructions can be ascribed to the desire for environmental sustainability and personal enrichment. By employing a range of research methods, individuals can unearth the intricate layers of history embedded within their structures, fostering a more profound connection with their environment and its heritage.
Sample 9:
In several nations, there is a marked increase in individuals exhibiting a heightened curiosity about the historical narrative of their homes or buildings. This essay will discuss the factors that contribute to this emerging trend and propose ways people can investigate the antecedents of their structures.
One potential driving force behind this growing interest is the rise of genealogy and ancestry research, which has ignited a passion for personal history among many individuals. As people delve into their family trees, they naturally become curious about the spaces their ancestors inhabited and the connection between their living environments and family narratives. Consequently, learning about the history of their dwellings allows individuals to establish a more profound connection with their ancestors and enrich their understanding of their family’s past.
Another factor contributing to this enthusiasm for architectural history is the increasing appreciation for craftsmanship and authenticity. In a world characterized by mass production and standardized designs, the allure of unique and historic structures becomes more pronounced. These buildings embody the skill, dedication, and creativity of past artisans, fueling a renewed interest in architectural heritage and inspiring future innovators to push the boundaries of design and construction.
To investigate the history of their edifices, individuals can employ several strategies. One approach is to consult with architectural conservators or restoration specialists who possess expertise in historic building techniques, materials, and styles. These professionals can provide guidance on the age, significance, and architectural lineage of the structure. Another method involves examining primary source materials, such as historical newspapers, city directories, and property tax records, which can offer insights into the building’s past ownership, usage, and modifications. Finally, examining architectural plans, blueprints, or builder’s contracts, if available, can provide valuable information on the original design, construction details, and the vision behind the structure.
In conclusion, the increasing interest in the historical context of homes and buildings can be attributed to the growing enthusiasm for genealogy and the appreciation for craftsmanship and authenticity. By utilizing a variety of research techniques, individuals can unravel the historical tapestry of their living spaces, deepening their connection with both personal and architectural history.
Sample 10:
In recent times, an increasing number of individuals have been captivated by the idea of uncovering the historical background of their residential edifices. This essay will delve into the rationale behind this growing fascination, as well as the methods available for conducting such inquiries.
Firstly, one primary motivation for exploring the past of a dwelling may be the desire to assess its long-term structural stability and maintenance requirements. Older constructions have, over time, undergone various repairs and renovations, which might impact their current condition. Being cognizant of a building’s backstory can empower its inhabitants to make informed decisions, ensuring the safety and preservation of their homes. For instance, awareness of previous termite infestations would prompt the residents to take appropriate preventative measures to avoid a recurrence.
Another reason for this burgeoning interest in a domicile’s history might stem from curiosity regarding potential paranormal or supernatural occurrences within the premises. Such a phenomenon has long captured the human imagination, and many seek to either confirm or debunk these tales. By learning about previous occupants and their experiences, current residents can either embrace the building’s supernatural history or put their minds at ease. For example, a family might become intrigued by a local urban legend surrounding their home, prompting them to research its veracity.
Various approaches can be employed in the quest for historical information. One effective method is participating in local history walks or tours. These events, usually organized by historical societies and community groups, provide a wealth of information on the region’s architectural heritage and often reveal vestiges of the past related to individual buildings. Furthermore, individuals can consult public records, such as land registries and census data, to piece together a chronological narrative of their dwelling’s past.
In conclusion, the growing interest in a building’s history can be attributed to a range of factors, including assessing structural stability and supernatural occurrences. While local history tours offer an engaging way to learn about the past, a more comprehensive understanding can be achieved through the examination of public records. By doing so, individuals can gain a deeper appreciation for their homes and the stories they hold.
Sample 11:
In some countries, there is a growing interest among people in tracing the history of their homes. I think they research this for many reasons, perhaps out of interest, or to find a sense of connection. For help with finding answers, they should turn to the seniors in their neighborhoods.
Some people delve into the stories of their homes simply because they are curious. Many historical buildings have been torn down, which makes those that remain uncommon treasures in the city. As a result, it is likely that residents in the surviving buildings can't help finding out more about them, such as when they were built and why they look the way they do.
There are also people who do research to find a sense of connection. With concrete residential buildings everywhere, neighborhoods nowadays look very alike and, therefore, it is hard for people to feel something special about where they live. However, by learning about the buildings that once stood there and the people who lived in them, for example, a sense of connection and involvement may be fostered.
The best way for people to explore, I believe, is to ask the elderly in their neighborhood. Many seniors have lived in the same neighborhood all their lives. They have seen it change around them. They have witnessed people coming and going. Talking to them can definitely help one uncover some intriguing stories of the place where one lives.
In conclusion, curiosity and a desire to seek a connection are two possible reasons why people investigate the history of their homes. To find answers, they should ask the old people in their neighborhood for help.
Sample 12:
The trend of individuals seeking to uncover the history of their homes is becoming increasingly prevalent in certain countries.
This growing interest in a somewhat contentious subject can be attributed to various factors, with curiosity being the most common motivation. When one moves to a new place, a multitude of inquiries naturally arises, particularly about the origin of their dwelling. This curiosity is similar to the psychology of children, who, upon entering a new home, tend to focus on the security of their surroundings. Therefore, discovering the history of one’s residence becomes an essential aspect of settling in. Some individuals are driven by a desire to assess the feng shui of their house, determining whether it is regarded as auspicious or not.
The way in which people articulate the origin of their homes or buildings is diverse, and technological advancements have significantly facilitated this process. More specifically, the internet plays a crucial role in this exploration. Digital content related to your dwelling, such as blogs on platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok, provides accessible methods for exploring the history of your neighborhood. Alternatively, one can gather information by interacting with neighbors or consulting the previous owner of the residence. The extended period they have spent living and observing the house or building equips them with insights that can be valuable. For example, if there is an unusual arrangement in the garden, consulting the previous owner can provide clarity on the matter.
In conclusion, the increasing fascination with discovering the origin of one’s home or building is now taken as a given. People are inclined to favor the practice of exploring the history of their residences, driven by curiosity and aided by the accessible methods provided by technology.
Sample 13:
There is a necessity to restrict learning history for understanding civilizations or ancient culture. However, these days people from several parts of the globe are inclined towards understanding the history of their own houses and buildings. This essay will highlight a discussion based on the reasons for the rise in this interest area and the sources from which people could obtain more information related to the history of a building. First and foremost, the necessity of understanding the history of a building will help with effective and potential gathering of information based on the age of the building and materials that have been used for its construction. Thus, evaluating this information will help with understanding the durability of the concerned building. Additionally, people also put in their life savings in buying a home, thus, this will help them with deriving an understanding of their property and its sustainability state. On the other hand, another factor that provokes individuals to search the history of their buildings could be due to the increasing rate of crime and paranormal activities across the globe due to which people have become alarmed and cautious. There are a number of sources available that help out in researching the history of a place. Nevertheless, there are a number of documentaries and articles available online that will be more insightful to get in touch with the local population to obtain appropriate information associated with a given area. This is helpful as local people have been longer residents of the given area, they would be a key helper in spotting the abnormalities and inappropriate activities that took place in the past. However, to acquire a detailed and an in-depth understanding of the building, individuals or the owners of houses or buildings can always approach civil engineers or construction workers that will assist them with acquiring appropriate information of building history. To conclude, with this essay, I would like to quote that ease of access to any information online has resulted in people being more cautious about mentioned things.
Sample 14:
There are trends going on that suggest background checks based on the history of particular commercial buildings or residences are becoming common practice. These are mainly observed in particular with commercial buildings or residents while they live in. The major reason behind this research can be highlighted as the interest of individuals in finding family or behaviors of the residents that reside in the past in that building. This will help with ensuring the quality and value of the building in that neighborhood. This essay will be addressing this aspect in the preceding sections and will also highlight methods that can be used to find these details. It is common for human beings to find details about their own properties. To expand this, majorly real estate investors are focused over searching details and information of ancestors that resided in those buildings while searching for their period in those areas. Moreover, individuals these days like to thrive on the fame and reputation of a particular property that was built in earlier ages. Hence, they might look for methods that have been applied to accomplish the construction of a building and materials utilized. Nevertheless, property buyers may acquire details associated with the strength and value of those buildings prior to their purchases. If they wanted to acquire the above details, several methods can be utilized to find these sources from those areas. For instance, engaging in brief discussions with senior citizens in the neighborhood can provide valuable insights based on their experiences over the years. Moreover, they might consider ensuring the applicability of reliable resources that are published in the libraries about the concerned homeowners while going through with the plans relevant to the building that are approved by the councils. Thus, it can be concluded from the above discussion that humans tend to get familiar with the locations that have been used by people to live in and to find out about the reputation it gained.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In many societies, there is a growing concern about the increasing number of juvenile offenders committing serious crimes. Some individuals argue that these young offenders should be punished as adults due to the severity of their crimes. However, I firmly disagree with this opinion.
Firstly, it is essential to recognize that young offenders often lack the same level of maturity and judgment as adults. Adolescents are still developing mentally, emotionally, and socially, which may contribute to impulsive decision-making and a heightened vulnerability to peer pressure. For instance, a teenage shoplifter who stole under peer pressure may not fully comprehend the consequences of their actions due to their immature judgment. Therefore, it is crucial to consider these factors when determining the appropriate punishment for young criminals. Punishing them in the same way as adults may not only be unfair but also counterproductive, as it fails to address the root causes of their behavior.
Secondly, rehabilitation should be the primary focus when dealing with young offenders, rather than punitive measures. By providing these individuals with access to education, counseling, and skill-building programs, society can help them to overcome the challenges they face and ultimately reduce the likelihood of reoffending. For example, a young offender who has committed a serious crime could be placed in a juvenile detention center that offers educational programs, counseling services, and vocational training, which helps them address the underlying issues that led to their criminal behavior. As a result, upon reentering society, they are better equipped to make positive choices, reducing recidivism rates and promoting a safer community for all.
In conclusion, punishing young offenders who commit serious crimes in the same manner as adults disregards the unique developmental needs and circumstances of adolescents. Instead, society should focus on rehabilitation and support for these individuals, ensuring they have the opportunity to grow and learn from their mistakes.
Sample 2:
Whether adolescents should be punished for their crimes in the way adults are has gained traction. From my point of view, imposing similar punishments for both young and mature offenders will have a negative impact.
On the one hand, advocates of equal treatment for underaged and adult lawbreakers have grounds to believe that this notion can have positive results. First, more young criminals would emerge if they are pardoned for their wrongdoings due to their age. Some retributions are too light for the seriousness of the felonies committed, hence, cannot deter youngsters from breaking the law. Moreover, giving young offenders lighter sentences is unjust for the victims and their families, as some felonies are too vile for punishments such as being sent to prison. One case in point is in Vietnam, 2017, a robber killed a family of 4, including the parents and their young children. Usually, this man would have been sentenced to death, yet he only got sentenced to 18 years in prison. The fact that he escaped just punishment because he was a few months underaged angered the public for an extended period of time.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that juvenile delinquents should not receive retributions similar to that for adults. To start with, children do not have the moral capacity and thorough understanding of the world as grown-ups. Therefore, they cannot fully comprehend the weight of their wrongdoings or even the sentences. Some young offenders commit crimes without knowing that it is an offense. Thus, giving these criminals leeway and an opportunity to rehabilitate and contributing to society is more humane. Furthermore, adolescents are easily affected by different factors, as compared to adults. Grown-ups have the ability to stop themselves but younger ones, once instigated, may act on impulse and cause regrets.
To conclude, while it is undeniable that inflicting fitting penalties for criminals is important to upholding society’s stability and values, I am of the opinion that young lawbreakers should be tried differently in court from adult offenders.
Sample 3:
There is an opinion that young offenders should be held accountable for their actions just as adults. While I find this view of some people justifiable to some extent, I also argue that treating both young and mature lawbreakers equally may have adverse effects.
On the one hand, I can understand why a young age should be no deterrent to dealing with criminals. If these juvenile delinquents were easily pardoned in place of receiving strict punishments as adults, they would not become fully aware of the serious consequences of their crimes. Therefore, imposing appropriate punishments could prevent them from conducting illegal actions in the future. Besides, young perpetrators usually receive lighter sentences than they deserve, which is an injustice to the victims. In Vietnam, there was a well-known case in which a teenager murdered almost every member of a family deliberately, escaping the death sentence due to being a few months under the responsible age.
On the other hand, I am convinced that juvenile criminals should be tried in a different court from that for adults. Firstly, children are proven not to have sufficient intellectual or moral capacity to understand the outcomes of their misdeeds, so they lack the necessary conditions to be trial defendants as grown-up people. Secondly, when given a second chance, these underage convicts can have an opportunity to successfully rehabilitate and learn a valuable lesson. Thirdly, children can be negatively influenced by some bad role models, which should also be considered to give them a fair trial.
In conclusion, breakers of laws should not be spared of punishments, but I believe young offenders should be dealt with differently from adults.
Sample 4:
In the wake of perpetrations and solemn offences which have only been exacerbated in the past few years, the contention of young people being prosecuted at par with adult criminals has been prevalent. Some opine in the support of equal punishment for all while some hold the viewpoint of tackling the two segments distinctively. I find myself agreeing with the latter standpoint and in the forthcoming sections of this essay, I shall be elucidating the same.
People who argue that everyone should be charged with equal punishment, principally state that for equal crime, the prosecution has to be equivalent. However, for the young and undernourished mindsets that would be too extreme to execute. Juveniles who commit misdemeanors are not mature enough to distinguish between right and wrong. They majorly culminate in committing a serious offence influenced by what they perceive from their surroundings and hence discernment and prudence of judging often don’t get contoured to their maximum capacity in their case. Hence, prosecuting them equally as adult criminals and misdoers shall not be apposite.
The fragile and gullible adolescents, if treated commensurately as adults, shall curb their development and ravaging all the scope of them treading in the right direction. Subjecting juveniles to a strict trial will not only deprive them of their chance and possibility to ameliorate but it may imperil them into adapting a personality that could be immensely diabolical in the later stages of their lives. Bestowing a mild laxity in the case of juvenile delinquency could treat them for their offences and hence letting them know the dire consequences of such peccadillos without being harsh on them that might defeat the whole process of their refinement.
Although people of a younger age could use it as a loop to evade the repercussions of the misdeeds, the threat of possibility couldn’t nullify the factual facet of their deterioration otherwise.
In conclusion, it could thus be argued that punishing everyone with an equal intensity under a similar set of charges could denude the frangible personalities of young people.
Sample 5:
As the remarkable increase in juvenile delinquency has been a serious cause for concern nowadays, it is generally believed that youngsters who are involved in serious crimes such as murder or robbery should be subject to the same sort of punishment as adults. However, from my point of view, while legal deterrence is essential, it is advisable that the degree of detention for juveniles be lower than that for mature people.
Although young people are inexperienced and to a certain extent unconscious of their behaviors, it is wrong to say that they are virtually innocent when attempting a murder or fraud. Recent reports of adolescents below the age of maturity committing murder or swindling people out of their money on the Net are a case in point. Those young criminals seemed to abuse their rights in order to lower or even get away with their sentence. Although titled as “minors” in legal papers, juveniles have nearly the same intelligence and physical strength as adults, who are just several years older than them, so detention as compensation for their crime is vital.
However, I believe that the degree of punishment should not be taken to the extreme. Teenagers have insufficient life experience and are to some extent ignorant of what awaits them after committing a crime, so they should not be applied the highest sort of punishment. Programmes that assist in the progress of re-education of juveniles are wiser and more pragmatic replacements of severe punishment such as lifetime imprisonment or capital punishment.
In conclusion, whereas young criminals are mandated to be subject to detention, it is vital and ethical to put them on a lower scale of punishment than that for adults.
Sample 6:
In modern times, the rate of youths being convicted for serious offenses has increased drastically. There are certain people who believe that young people deserve to be sentenced as adults, others however do not share these views. I completely disagree with youths receiving the same exact punishment as adults even for the same crimes committed.
Though there is a rise in the involvement of teenagers in more crimes lately, I believe that every child needs to have hope and a chance at a good future and hence should not be judged so harshly as an adult for their actions. According to my opinion, every human makes mistakes, but it would be wrong of us to cost the teens their future because of one mistake. First and foremost, governments should not enact the same punishments to resemble crimes regardless of age as though in the short term it may decrease the crime rate but in the long term it will be detrimental to the social cohesion of the society as the youths could not be easily included within the social fabric of any community even after their prison sentence is over. This in general affects negatively the future of a country.
For such instances juvenile detention systems remain the best for younger folks as exposing children to the degraded environment of an adult person can affect their mental health severely and scar them for the rest of their life. In some proven cases it was observed that adult prisons left a bad impact on the young prisoners' minds which led them to turn to more violent crimes in the future. It is usually more beneficial to engage children in some constructive training instead of just sending them away to live in an isolated cell. On the other hand, it has never been proven that extensive jail time corrects the behavior of the convicts. In addition to these, the environment of the child in which they are growing up is also an important factor to be considered as in many cases it has a direct relationship with the crimes being committed by the youths. Young people are easily influenced by adults and as such can also copy their aggressive behavior ultimately leading to something far dangerous.
Altogether, though more and more demands for equal punishment for youths are being raised every day due to the steady increase in the number and nature of violent crimes being committed. I however vehemently disagree and believe the better way to punish them is to detain them in specialized centers where the government will provide professional help for dealing with the minor offenders.
Sample 7:
Crimes can be detestable, while minor offenders and their crimes are from time to time treated with leniency. Thus, some argue that laws should not discriminate, and equally punish minor criminals—an opinion that this essay is against.
To begin with, minors are yet to approach their maturity, and their crimes, albeit serious, should be punished with the consideration of their young age. Internationally speaking, countries might define the start of adulthood differently—18 being the most common—but they commonly believe that there is a distinction between minor crimes and adult crimes. Minors are likely to be given a better chance for rehabilitation when they commit crimes because of their inexperience of life and possibly better life prospects. In that case, milder punishments are inflicted on juvenile delinquents: lesser sentencing and relatively less harsh correction facilities are introduced in their cases.
Moreover, considering the correction process, minor offenders should not be punished equally as adult criminals. Despite the above-mentioned arguments that are in young offenders’ defense, crimes, especially felonies by minors, deserve heavy punishment to deter crimes and reduce the harm of those crimes to the society. However, sending minors to adult prison might entail unexpectedly negative results. First, minors are naturally closer to more sophisticated criminals and crimes, which aggravate juvenile delinquency. Second, when in adult correctional facilities, young criminals might be threatened by assaults by adult prisoners, mostly sexually, which is nowhere closer to the purpose of rehabilitation.
In sum, law breakers, be they minors or not, should be punished for their wrongdoings, but lesser sentences and special correctional facilities might be more reasonable and helpful.
Sample 8:
There are reformers today who argue that adults and young people should be treated equally under the law. In my opinion, despite the ostensible fairness of this proposal, it disregards crucial psychological differences.
Those who believe all ages should receive equal treatment point out that this will engender a greater deterring effect. The main reason that all individuals in society are punished is not for justice alone, but as a means to ensure others will not commit similar crimes. Young people learn in school and the world generally that their actions will have consequences and that crimes are punishable with prison time and other penalties. If these censures are weakened, then the chances a young person will attempt to commit a crime will logically increase, even if the total number of young people engaging in criminal behavior today is lower than at any point in human history.
However, age is a just mitigating factor. Adults who commit crimes have had more time to develop socially and intellectually while young people might not fully grasp the consequences of their choices for themselves and others. For instance, there have been recent cases where young people were influenced by extremist elements now pervasive in social media. Young people are more impressionable in these situations and often lack the confidence and maturity to think for themselves. This vulnerability extends to their emotional and intellectual development and justifies laws that protect young people from receiving overly harsh sentences.
In conclusion, though there are practical reasons to support equal punishments for all ages, this alteration would be unfair to young people. Courts should consider a range of factors before selecting an appropriate punishment.
Sample 9:
The punishment to adolescents for committing crimes is undeniably a contentious matter that has been debated by various people of our society. I believe they should be punished in the same manner. This is a viewpoint with which I strongly concur. I recognise that young individuals over the age of 16 face major penalties for their activities, in my opinion.
To begin with, crime is so awful that punishment was implemented to keep the people safe and improve their lives. This gives people who perpetrated atrocities the opportunity to reconsider their actions and possibly choose the right side. Teenagers are encouraged to commit crimes in these settings because they will face fewer consequences. In a country where drugs are banned, for example, a young man sold something similar, and it wasn't his fault. As a result, regardless of age, adults and children should be penalised equally.
Second, they will discover that their misbehaviour was cruel after punishment. That, in my opinion, is the fundamental reason why not only adults but even young people must go to prison after committing crimes. The greater the penalty, the better for the children. I support the opinions of countless others who have committed similar offences. It would also be beneficial to have the same laws all around the world in order to limit the number of cheaters.
In conclusion, because young individuals already understand how a person should behave in society, they must be held accountable for their crimes as adults. However, measures to assist teenagers in leading honest lives when they are released must be put in place.
Sample 10:
Nowadays many people are observing that the number of minors committing major crimes is increasing. Some people think that teenagers who commit crimes should be punished like adults. I completely agree with this viewpoint. When juvenile offenders are considered adults and are sentenced to the same punishment, it will have a major impact on other juvenile offenders too.
In many countries, youth are subject to less severe punishment when compared to adults. This gives young people the green flag to do what they want without being held accountable for their actions. In India sometimes, teenagers go unpunished even for the most serious crimes. So, if countries implement consequences for youth, they will think twice before breaking the law. Second, some adolescents with particularly aggressive behaviour need to be excluded from society and receive specialized psychological care this will indeed help to prevent such disastrous crimes in the future.
Increasing the severity of punishments will deter other teenagers from committing crimes. In other words, potential young offenders will fear committing a crime because they will be aware of and fearful of the severity of the consequences. This can benefit society and youth in the long run. Regardless of age, a crime is a crime; if minors are given leniency, they will not be aware of the harm they are causing to society. For example, if a college student stabs someone and walks away, he will not understand the seriousness and consequences of his actions.
In conclusion, the problem of increasing juvenile crime can only be solved by providing appropriate punishments regardless of their age.
Sample 11:
In some regions of the world, youth-related crime is increasing. Therefore, some say that children who commit severe crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. This perspective is wrong in my opinion because it exposes adolescents to the corrupt influences of the world.
Firstly, the adolescent years are significant turning points in everyone's lives. They are influenced by violent films and lose the ability to discriminate between truth and fiction as a result. Due to the fact that heroes are admired even after committing a crime, they have a tendency to associate with the wrong people and engage in activities that they must subsequently undergo. They lack advice from their parents and elders as a result. For instance, according to a survey conducted by The Times of India, more than 50% of the criminal activities done by adolescents mirrored the actions shown in movies and video games.
Criminals must be punished because they convey the incorrect message to society, but these adolescents should be given a second chance and compensated by society. They should be sent to rehabilitation clinics where they will be taught life-improving skills and techniques. They must be taught the law and how to be responsible citizens. The government should organise all of this at a facility that can alter a child's outlook.
In conclusion, teenagers who violate significant laws should not be punished as severely as adults and in my opinion, this viewpoint should be promoted as punishing them can have adverse effects on youth.
Sample 12:
It is irrefutable that the rise of crimes has brought see changes in the lifestyle of individuals and rapidly spread across the world. Youngsters should be treated in the same way as adults when they are engaged in an offence. I endorse the statement wholeheartedly. I have some solid ground to explicate at length in the paragraph to come.
The first and foremost reason is that it does not require any harsh punishment for youngsters; when they are involved in a certain type of crime, according to them, they are already in their learning stage, and their minds are not to competently expand, which they are able to neglect that bad habits and evaluate their right decision. for instance, a regular survey conducted by the United States about the increasing the ratio of crimes among the young people and got shocking results and found in most cases were of youngsters who got distracted from their parts and involved in a better society and addressed with the appropriate lessons which were based on the reality of life without giving strict punishment as an adult. Furthermore, violence in the media can attract young people’s attitudes and behaviour. Lack of parental guidance can lead a teenager to delinquency which eventually leads to becoming stubborn and easily committing crimes. Add it, and domestic violence can force young people onto the streets and into bad company.
It is implicit that the age factor of youngsters must be considered while giving any strict punishment, thus leading to there would be become means for the nation and spoil their whole life of the juvenile. For instance, bad behaviour is easier to change when a person is grown-up rather than provide hard punishment. Moreover, a youngster might be negatively influenced by time in adult prison, which is totally acceptable at a minor age. In addition, teenagers need re-education and re-socialization rather than penalization because adult sentences are too serve for youngsters. Such as, in the middle east, the Australian government organized several rules and conducted an abundance of seminars for taking care of minors, which they found any crime before the age of 18.
To put it in and nutshell, I pen down saying that juveniles need to know that law is serious, and punishment is a good way to teach them this and also get familiar with their mistakes. Therefore, the government must develop a committee, especially for teenagers, which brings them accurate morals and crucial aspects of the lifestyle of the youngsters.
Sample 13:
It is argued that the same punishments should be applied to both young criminals and adults who commit offenses. In my opinion, I agree with this point of view only if the crime is serious.
There are several reasons why it is wrong to impose the same punishments on both adolescent and adult criminals. Firstly, perhaps young people could only commit minor crimes, and this causes very little damage to society. It is better to send them back to family or school for rehabilitation. Secondly, they are not mature enough to understand that their misbehaviors could have negative impacts on the society, and these behaviors often come from peer pressures. For example, those who suffer from school discipline problems, such as bullying, are forced by their bulliers to pursue illegalities such as robbing or stealing which can exert serious effects on others.
However, I would argue that strict punishments like prison sentences should be imposed on young offenders who commit dangerous crimes. This is because only such punishments could demonstrate to the adolescents that heinous actions will have consequences, and this can help to dispel any ideas of committing crimes of young people in communities. In some countries, Vietnam for example, young offenders aged below eighteen will be put on probation, even if they commit a serious crime such as murder. As a result, the number of young people who break the law in Vietnam has been increasing rapidly. Therefore, it is necessary for governments to implement a policy of zero tolerance to dangerous crimes regardless of age.
In conclusion, it seems to me that juvenile offenders who commit dangerous crimes should deserve the same treatments as adults.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo
Hỏi bài tập