In today’s competitive world, many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work. While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel they lack support because of their parents’ absence. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
In the past, it was customary for fathers to be the only breadwinner of the family. Fathers would go out to work and earn money to fulfill the families’ daily needs and mothers would stay home to take care of the children. However, nowadays, it is not rare to find both parents going out to work. Whilst the additional income might bring benefits to everyone, especially the children, there are a number of drawbacks that cannot be overlooked. This essay will confer whether or not it is necessary for both parents to go out to earn money for a living.
In some families, both parents are required to work not because of their own will, but because circumstances demand them to. As the cost of living is skyrocketing in today’s competitive world, some families might not earn enough to cover their living costs if only one parent goes out to work. That being the case, there is nothing anyone can do to help. However, the benefit of the extra income for the children still remains unchanged. With more income, parents will be able to afford more new toys, a better school, and even vacation abroad.
On the other hand, children might feel abandoned due to their parents never being there for them. It is also proven that children whose parents are never at home are more prone to behavioral problems. For instance, my friend, Elaine, whose parents is always working overnight and is never there for her when she needs them, has to battle with her insecurity of being unwanted every day, she in turn tries to seek the attention of her teachers by behaving badly in the class. From my example, you can see how parents’ absence can affect children in the long run.
As far as I am concerned, there is no need for both parents to be working unless it is really necessary. While additional income is benefiting the children, the presence of a mother will be best for the children’s well-being in the long run.
Sample 2:
Modern world products and services put extra costs on families. This has led to many mothers working beside their husbands for their children’s welfare. Although some individuals hold the view that working of both parents may cause problems in children upbringing, others believe parents can pay enough attention to their children as well as work outside.
Some people argue that the working of both parents is not good for children because of some important reasons. First, their children may not have an appropriate upbringing. Parents don’t spend enough time on their children. Thus, they can’t educate necessary life lessons. This lack may direct children to criminal activities. In addition, children may get moral sicknesses. It is because they feel lonely without any support at necessary times. Loneness of children take their self-confidence. Self-confidence shortage can affect their future life.
However, opponents are of the opinion that both parents can work outside without any problem at home. To begin, they say parents can adjust their daily hours to have enough time for their children. Mothers or both parents can work part time. They also can make an accurate daily plan for all family members to use their time more effectively and efficiently. Furthermore, parents can register necessary courses which cover children’s educational needs to both life and school skills. Occupied parents have enough money to spend extra courses costs.
To conclude, though some people believe the working of both parents is not useful for children, others don’t believe in it. In my opinion, the working of both parents is necessary if it doesn’t harm children’s life. My 2 years child has extra costs which make my wife and I work together. Of course, his living will need more money in future. Providing necessary facilities and support for children’s progress needs enough money. Anyway, I hope parents can make a balance between work and family affairs.
Sample 3:
It is a commonly held belief that family plays a significant role in children’s entire life and formation of children is affected positively and negatively by their parents. Parents should carry the accountability for supplying their children with financial and spiritual factors. The argument that a number of families necessarily consider both parents to go out to work is argued by people who are for and against this idea. Supporters’ and detractors’ thoughts will be discussed and recapitulated in this essay.
On one side of the argument, those who support this idea claim that in an effort to provide a family sufficiently, nowadays both parents are subjected to work since the expenditure of today’s family has increased considerably compared to the past. If both parents work somewhere, they can earn more money and it gives the family a plethora of chances to benefit. For instance, if the family income is higher, parents are able to afford to study their children at private schools or universities and also, children can join an array of courses for improving their foreign language skills or various internships for escalating their experiences or travel abroad for broadening their horizons.
On the other hand, those who detract from this argument believe that finance is less imperative than spiritual factor for children. One of two parents in each family should take care of their children and nurture them efficiently. While both parents are working, children may be lonely at home and they can feel forgotten, thus this point can lead to several problems. For example, if parents neglect to control their children, children may be involved in diverse malevolent deeds such as using drugs and joining gangsters. For this reason, at the very least one of two parents should be a housekeeper for children’s upbringing and keep an eye on their children.
In the light of the above discussion, hold the idea that children stand to benefit from the fact that both parents go to work. However, the issue lies in the balance parents strive for between work and family. If parents manage to balance their time spent at their workplace and family, their children’s development is certain to be guaranteed.
Sample 4:
In this competitive world, many parents are bound to go out to work. While some people argue that children of these parents benefit from this extra income, others contend that they lack support as a result of their parents’ absence due to their busy working life. Today’s financial condition pushes both parents to engage in jobs in order to ensure proper maintenance of their children. I am of the opinion that it is hard for both parents to avoid job and so they have to find a way to keep a good balance between work and family life in order to control the drawbacks of this situation.
Having both parents work outside the home can cater to various problems. Firstly, the most fundamental need of a child is love and care. While both parents are busy with their own job responsibilities, children might feel destitute which may translate into severe psychological imbalance. Moreover, in many cases, parents fail to harmonize their family and work life together. This has a direct impact on children’s lives. When parents can spend less time with their kids because of their work pressure, it would decrease interaction and that ultimately harms family bondage. Furthermore, parents are the model for their children. They can learn good morals from their parents. In this case, working parents cannot always be able to serve this purpose. Therefore, the children of working parents often lack values.
However, I contend that parents can ensure their children a cozy life if both of them work. They can afford to send their children to a better school, a better health care service for their children, and so forth. Children of working parents may get whatever they want to. They can be enrolled in extra curriculum activities like after school programs. Job holder parents can provide children with expensive clothes, toys and many learning materials which satisfy these children greatly. In my case, as my parents are both working, I need to do all the things myself such as making my meal or washing my own clothes. This situation makes me self-dependent and at same time I learn time management and can enjoy my freedom. I also learn that work is a crucial part of life.
To recapitulate, both parents have no option but to do jobs in order to bring prosperity to their children. In this context, what parents need is to acknowledge that kids mental and emotional needs are equally worthy as their material needs in order to insure a bright tomorrow for them.
Sample 5:
The increasing rate of development taking place in the last centuries has improved people’s living standard, making our lives much more comfortable. Comfortable as it is, life is not as easy as is supposed but more competitive and complicated. It turns to be much more difficult for a modern family to make both ends meet, and the model of family in which father is the only breadwinner while mother staying at home takes care for the whole family has become irrelevant in many countries nowadays, paving the way for the new model in which both parents have to participate in working to earn money. This situation, though relevant it would be in such a competitive world, still casts doubt on many people, who remain skeptical about the negative impacts of parents’ absence on the development of children. Others, however, believe that children stand to benefit from the additional income.
Firstly, let’s take the first opinion which states that parents’ absence would lead to a lack of support for children. To a certain extent, I agree with this. As life has become more competitive, parents have to spend much more time and effort at work to guarantee a sustainable source of income for the whole family. As a result, time spent with their children have to be reduced. Some children, without parents observing, often find it difficult to self-orientate. They are likely to go with bad friends, getting involved in unhealthy activities. Other children, fortunately, do not become bad ones; however, a lack of support from parents may make them lose direction in their life, becoming autism due to the disappearance of the bond between children and parents. They may turn to friends for help; nonetheless, the help from friends cannot always replace the support from parents.
Some other people subscribe to the view that the situation in which both parents go to work is beneficial to their children. The first benefit, undoubtedly, is the additional income for family as a whole. Children in these families have more possibilities to approach better educational and medical service, which is favorable to their development. There still exist other benefits obtained from the practice. Children in lack of support from parents tend to be much more independent. They are likely to have the ability to make their own decisions without great dependence on their parents. This independence would be very helpful for their future. Another benefit would come from the emotional side. As we all know, parents have significant impacts on the process of shaping the personalities of their children. Children with working parents tend to be much more confident and independent because on observing the work of their parents, they are about to have better understanding about the world of careers, becoming familiar with workplace by listening to the stories about jobs shared by their parents, which in turn proves to be helpful to their future orientation. Some researches have shown that girls with working mother have tendency to be much more independent when they grow up and they are not likely to be desperate victim of gender inequality in their future families or workplaces.
In the light of the above discussion, I, therefore, hold the idea that children stand to benefit from the fact that both parents go to work. The matter, however, lies in the balance parents strive for between work and family. If parents manage to balance their time spent at their workplace and family, their children’s development is certain to be guaranteed.
Sample 6:
With the current economic crisis, it is difficult to maintain a family. Thus, both parents need to work in order to guarantee the economic stability of a family. While some people argue that this is fine, many others think that the absence of parents can have adverse effects on a child’s development. This essay will illustrate the reasons for this.
Nowadays, it is common to see both parents employed. Therefore, the children grow up with babysitters, or with grandparents. These parents can merely find some time for their children because they dedicate much of their time to earning money. For example, some of my colleagues have children, and when I ask them “How much time do you spend with your children?” They reply “Well, around one hour a day. Isn’t it enough?”. It is a common belief among these parents that nannies can replace them, and the children would be fine without their parents.
On the other hand, the lack of presence of parents can have a negative impact on the children. For example, some of my friends grew up without much support from their parents. As a result, I usually see that they have no respect for adults. Moreover, these my friends do not even care about the wellbeing of their parents. It is safe to assume that when these people become parents, they will treat their children the same way they had been treated when they were young.
In my opinion, parent’s presence is a must for the growth of a child. Therefore, they should dedicate much more time to their children.
Sample 7:
In our modern world, it is very rare to find a family where one of the parents is a home keeper even though it was considered the norm for a woman to stay at home to look after the children and maintain the household in the past. Financially speaking, it is difficult for a family to survive on the salary of a single parent.
Times have changed, prices have increased, and basic necessities have become difficult to afford. In addition, the children of today are materialistic, competitive and demanding. It is important for them to keep up with the latest fashion and own the newest gadgets as these products are an indication of their high social status.
Unfortunately, in order to please their children and offer them material wealth, parents often neglect to give their children the appropriate emotional support that is required for their development. Due to their absence, parents do not spend enough quality time with their children, so they do not know them very well. What is more, children often grow up resenting their parents for not giving them any attention. If they had a choice, most children would choose spending time with their parents rather than being spoilt.
To sum up, parents feel guilty that they have to spend so much time away from home and compensate for this by overspending on their children. Although they benefit in terms of having everything they desire, a parent’s support is equally, if not more, important.
Sample 8:
In modern world, women are no longer supposed to stay at home and take after their children like they used to do in the past. It is normal for both parents to have their own job nowadays. As a result, there is a warm controversy among people about whether both parents go out for work, or whether they should give top priority to bringing up their kids.
In my opinion, I think children from families where both parents work may have some certain advantages. First, children are taught about self-awareness and responsibility at their young age, which is really helpful in the future when they start their life without their mom and dad. For example, a child whose parents give too much concern for might be homesick or even shock when they first going far from home like studying in other cities or overseas; meanwhile, an independent kid will have no difficulty in managing their life when they have to live on their own. Second, children can also benefit from extra income if both parents have an occupation.
However, “Every coin has its two sides”. Parents’ regular absence from home can also cause consequences. Sometimes children have problems with their homework, and they need their parents’ help, also children may be with bad friends and commit a crime. Moreover, there are various jobs which require going out a lot for appointments and events that parents cannot pay full attention to their kids in many aspects such as education, health care or entertainment.
To sum up, I believe that both parents should go out to work. They must know how to keep a balance between work and family so that they will not only be great workers with valuable contributions to the society but also be a good father and mother for their kids.
Sample 9:
Competitive life has placed such a financial burden on many families that it is hard to live on one parent’s salary. While some believe that both parents’ income is beneficial for children, I would argue that it is parental support that plays an important role in their life.
On one hand, having more than one breadwinner in a family is advantageous for some reasons. First, it is possible for parents to carry out more satisfactory and rewarding childcare. Children in rural areas, for example, are unfortunately denied the chance of going to school because parents’ income is limited. However, these privileged children whose parents are usually economically successful are more likely to succeed in their future career. Further, taking care of themselves without parental support is also a good way to develop essential life skills such as self-protection.
While the benefits of having additional income may be true to certain extent, I strongly believe that the lack of family bond due to parents’ absence may pose some threats to their children. First, they are not adequately provided with love and care from their birth givers. Parents who are under tremendous time pressure at work are not sensitive enough to notice any changes in teenagers’ mental life and thus unable to share their story. In other words, they may feel more distant from the family and become isolated or even autistic. Parents can also lose control over their children considering little amount of time spent with them. As a result, they are likely to indulge in several social evils such as game-addition or drinking.
From the above-mentioned reasons, it seems to me that it is more essential to build a strong family connection in comparison with a financial state. Therefore, parents’ work should be distributed in order to spend more time with their children.
Sample 10:
Today’s economic situation leaves no doubt for both parents to go out to work. In any case the effects of this behavior on children are of great importance. In this essay I will support how this phenomenon benefits children economically, mentally and socially.
Many people are more concerned about childhood depression or family imbalance as some disadvantages of this situation. One serious threat in such a situation is that parents might gradually forget the most basic and genuine need of their children which is sentimental care. In a simple word, children might be forgotten while both parents are busy with their daily work life. Moreover, many people may suffer from family imbalance which is due to the fact that they cannot harmonize their work and life together. This is a situation which directly degrades a child’s life. As a worst-case example, I can say such an event may lead to parental separation eventually which has a huge impact on a child’s life. However, I think most of mentioned situations can be moderated if parents act wisely.
I believe that parents can make more money and bring more prosperity for the whole family if they both work. As a result, they can put their children in a better social condition. For example, parents can now afford to send their children to language schools which is a result of good family financial condition. Another advantage of this situation is that children can mentally learn that work is an important part of life. Therefore, they intuitively repeat their parents’ pattern when they grow up, so they can pay it forward to their next generations. Last but not least, children can also take benefit of that socially because they have been grown up in a family in which both parents were socialized.
In conclusion, I think the idea of both parents attending professional work brings more advantages to the children in contrast to its flaws. The financial situation of the whole family will be improved, children can learn hard-work from their parents and also it has many benefits for the parents themselves.
Sample 11:
Nowadays, the increasing number of double income families is significantly. The number of parents with jobs is many more than it was a few decades ago. Do we really need doubled income to support our family, while left our children all alone. In this essay, I intend to give both advantages and disadvantages on both sides and, moreover, my own position on this issue.
Firstly, what can children benefit from those additional incomes? As we all know, a proper education is vital to our next generation because it is the key to a better life. With this extra income, children will be able to access a higher quality education, such as a private school or course for skills in music, arts or sports. Secondly, the basic living standard will rise higher. This money not only benefits the children but also benefits all of its family members in better food, housing conditions and advanced healthcare.
In the contract, parents might higher the stander of living and education quality for their kids, but it is possible to have some negative effects because of the absence of both parents during their childhood. It is clear if both parents have jobs, then their children will have more time alone. This situation often leads those kinds into a crime committer because of bad friends.
By way of conclusion, as can be seen above, there are many pros and cons to this issue. This trade, however, seems very hard to be reversed so parents should pay more attention to their children while they keep their career at the same time.
Sample 12:
The world has encountered great revolutions, inventions and wars in the past few centuries. This has led to the change in the way the world and its people function. Gone are the days when women had to do “purdah”, or they were denied voting powers. This is the era when “women empowerment” is being demanded by men. We are living in times when there is more equality and moreover the competitive levels have significantly increased. We all want to live a luxurious life, and this has led to a trend of both parents working.
There are people of the opinion that it is important for both the parents to work in such competitive times, if they want to survive. Working parents do bring great advantages along with them. Firstly, they are able to provide better facilities and standard of living for their children. Secondly, if both parents work, it ensures that they both are making good use of the education that they have taken. Even more, working makes a person more independent.
On the other hand, few believe that if both parents work, it deprives the child of the care and the nurture he/she deserves. This happens when the child is in his/her growing years. Parents are the best teachers, and their absence surely creates a void which no tuition teacher can fill. Even more, if children don’t see their parents often in their growing years, they tend to lose contact with them, causing trouble in later years.
Overall, a balanced life can always be the way out. Leaving a job might make several talented individuals dependent on their better halves and keeping it might be unfair to their children. I believe that both the parents should do their job if they can give their undue attention to the child and his/her life before they go out to work.
Sample 13:
In the past, a typical family consisted of a father who went out to work and a mother who stayed at home and looked after the children. Nowadays, it is the norm for both parents to work. This situation can affect children both positively and negatively.
Some people think that the children of working parents are in an advantages position where their parents are able to afford more luxuries such as new clothes, video games or mobile phones. Proponents of this view argue that children are able to enjoy and experience more from life due to their parents’ extra wealth, for example, by going on foreign holidays.
On the other hand, however, there are those who claim that when both parents work, their children do not get enough support and attention; meaning that these children might not do as well at school because there is no one at home to provide support with such things as homework or exam revision. The absence of parents at home could make it easier for children to get involved in such things as drugs or underage drinking.
When I was growing up, both my parents worked, and I was always well provided for. On the other hand, I think that it would sometimes have been better if I could have seen more of my parents.
In conclusion, I believe that we cannot change the fact that both parents have to work nowadays, it is not an ideal situation, but if parents make time for their children in the evenings and at the weekends, then the children will not suffer in any way. It must be stated that the extra income generated by both parents working makes for a much higher standard of living which benefits the whole family.
Sample 14:
In the modern age, due to/ owing to the increase in price and living costs, it is sometimes a must for both parents to work in order to make enough money to support their children. Some advocate the view that it is the best for both parents to work so as to improve children’s life quality. However, others are of the opinion that as a result of the inefficient/ poor/ improper care from parents, children’s psychology might be affected negatively. This essay will analyze these two views in more detail/ more thoroughly.
On the one hand, additional incomes from both working parents will help to improve the children’s life. In fact, it is believed that those extra earnings will make it possible for parents to support their children with better accommodations, better quality of food, and better schooling. All of these are very important and necessary for the development of children. Children (who are) in good living conditions are more likely to live an enjoyable life without worrying about the food they are eating or the clothes they are wearing. In general, it is apparent that children will benefit significantly from working parents.
On the other hand, a good living condition is not the only thing that children need. I am convinced that other factors regarding love and care from the parents are of greater importance. The frequent absence of parents will adversely affect the children’s psychological development. As a matter of fact, children who are ill – cared for by parents have the tendency to suffer from stress, depression and social anxiety. The lack of interaction or communication among family members on account of parents’ absence may result in misunderstanding, which will discourage children to voice their opinions or express their feelings. In the long run, those children will be more likely to struggle in their adulthood.
In conclusion, even though it is easier said than done, parents should try their best to balance between career and family to provide their children with good living conditions, in terms of facilities and mutual sharing order that they can grow up physically and mentally healthy.
Sample 15:
The obligation for working parents is a precise one: the feeling that one ought to work as if one did not have children - so that the child's future is secure, while raising one’s children as if one did not have a job - so that the child feels secure. The immediate reaction to such a plight is that of wry sadness.
From the parents’ perspective, even if they could choose to work from home, they would miss out on social and professional contact, and the career and development opportunities that brings, as well as feeling more part of the team. This could directly and negatively affect the family’s long-term financial stability. But what many parents forget is the kind of impact this style of life has on the kids.
The tight working schedule means that kids spend lots of time alone at home or at home watching their parents’ work. The parents are completely overwhelmed and their stress levels sky high. Children, in such cases, become resentful of their parents’ careers, and usually act out by resorting to unruly behaviour, which in turn affects their development. Many studies have, in fact, found that time spent with parents, not in classrooms, has a strong impact on a child’s academic success.
It might surprise many young parents to hear that the amount of meaningful time one spends with his family each day is the ultimate measure of success, but the truth remains that social bonding is the only thing that adds to this measure – happiness.
Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 2 file word cấu trúc mới 2026 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The growth of the said trend can be attributed to two main factors. First, it often stems from people’s curiosity about past events. In many cases, this curiosity could lead to the discovery of an intriguing story about how life once was. Take apartment buildings in the Old Quarter of Hanoi for example. Built about 100 years ago, they are now still standing as the testimony of the way of life in the early 1900s and would offer interesting stories to dwellers with an inquisitive nature. Second, people’s interest in the building origins would often concern long-standing properties rather than newly constructed ones. And in old properties, there could be lurking dangers because, after all, these buildings are subject to deterioration following decades in use. Householders therefore need to learn about the house’s history so as to take necessary precautionary measures.
Currently, there are some methods that can be adopted to trace the origins of houses and buildings. The most reliable way is to turn to official records from local authorities. For houses and buildings to be erected, they would often need construction permits from local authorities, and information from them could show an extended history of the house ever since it came to be. Moreover, another approach is to consult the previous owners of the property. It may be a good idea to ask them whether there were any modifications made to the house or if they have the original layout design, which can be of great help if maintenance is needed. Lastly, there might be information about old buildings like the ones in Hanoi Old Quarter on the Internet or in historical libraries. These are also good methods for owners to track down the origins of their own properties.
In conclusion, curiosity and the insights needed for housing maintenance are the main factors contributing to this trend. Besides, with the help of authority, past owners, online tools or even historical books, people can research the history of their properties.
Sample 2:
Many citizens, nowadays, are inquisitive to learn about the home they live in as extensively as possible primarily because they want to learn about the background and style of their house, assess the safety, and find out if it is haunted. I believe nearby elderly citizens and the internet could be two invaluable sources for such curious people to find the best possible information about their buildings.
The knowledge of the background of a house gives people a sense of self-satisfaction. This is why people, especially those who live in a house that was built many years ago, are often interested in finding out more about the adobe. The background often includes how the house was painstakingly built in an era when technology was not so advanced. Thus, exploring the background reveals some unique and fascinating facts. For instance, it was a common misconception for many dwellers in the old part of our city that their houses were built during the English colonial era. In fact, researchers recently found that those houses were built mimicking the English styles but by the local masons. It was fascinating to finally learn about it. Moreover, the construction and the built quality of a house conveys much information about the safety and durability of the houses. Knowing such details could prevent people from facing any disaster like falling victim to a collapsed house. Finally, some people superstitiously think a house might be haunted if it has some bad history. Learning about its history often comes from their personal belief and their motivation to either cleanse the house or move off.
To get proper information about the houses, people can talk to local senior citizens who have been living there for quite a while. They can offer first-hand information about the building and many more details that are not available elsewhere. On top of that, the internet could be another effective source to get details of a house. For instance, many websites store data about the houses in the UK, and anyone can find them online with just a few mouse clicks.
In conclusion, people's motivations to learn about their houses could range from safety reasons to simple curiosity, from superstition to practical reasons. To get the best information they can contact elderly locals and browse the internet.
Sample 3:
The history of a house or a building can be fascinating, sometimes daunting or even mesmerising at times if we try to delve into it. For some people, learning about the history of the houses in which they live, is utterly important for various reasons. This essay attempts to outline some of those possible reasons for this and a couple of methods to research this.
The first possible reason for many to become inquisitive about the past of their houses could be that they actually want to find a connection, if any, between themselves and the buildings. Such connections, or lack thereof, could actually provide an insight to them as to whether those buildings contained anything “unique” at some stages of their existence that would make them- the people that is – feel “special” among the others, or “different” from the rest of the crowds in their neighbourhoods. After all, I think that it feels really good to remain at the centre of attention every now and then.
Some people would be interested to learn about the history of their buildings, especially how they were built, or what kinds of materials were used to construct them because they want to make sure that the buildings are safe enough for living. After all, nobody would want to put their lives at risk by choosing to live in a “weak” building that was built with some “unreliable” materials about a century ago!
But, for whatever reasons that they want to learn about the history of their buildings, it is always better that they ask the locals first to get their information about the former residents of their houses. They could also contact the local municipality or the concerned local authority who could apprise them about how the buildings were made. Finally, people could also visit a local library or the authority that keeps the information about old buildings, to learn about the history of buildings in their respective areas.
To conclude, people are becoming more and more interested in the history of their houses primarily to find a unique feature of it to feel special or to learn about the architectural style and safety features of the house. They can contact local residents, municipality offices and the library to do the research work required to find the history of their houses.
Sample 4:
It is increasingly becoming common practice for people in many places to be inquisitive about the history of the houses or buildings they live in. This trend can be attributed to a variety of reasons, including a desire to understand the cultural and architectural significance of one's home, as well as a sense of personal connection to the past. In this essay, I will explore the reasons for this growing interest in the history of houses and discuss ways in which people can research the history of their homes.
The first reason for this growing interest in house and building history is a desire to understand the cultural and architectural importance of one's home. People may be curious about the style of architecture of their home and how it fits within the broader context of the neighbourhood or city. Additionally, individuals may be interested in learning about the people who have lived in their homes before them and the role the house has played in the community.
Another reason for this interest is a sense of personal connection to the past. People may want to know more about the history of their home because they feel a sense of belonging and connection to the place where they live. This can be particularly true for those who have lived in their home for many years or inherited it from a family member.
People can research the history of their homes in a variety of ways. One way is to start by looking for any historical records or documents that may be available through local historical societies, libraries or archives. These records may include deeds, maps, and photographs that can provide information about the home's history. Another good way to research the history of a home is to speak with long-time residents of the neighbourhood who may have knowledge about the home and its history. Additionally, people can research the history of the home by looking at census records, city directories, and newspaper articles.
In conclusion, understanding the history of one's home can deepen one's appreciation for the place where one lives, and provide a sense of connection to the past. It is believed that history and knowledge about homes would be easily accessible in the future.
Sample 5:
In contemporary society, there has been a marked increase in the number of individuals who display a keen interest in uncovering the historical background of their residences. This essay will examine the impetus behind this phenomenon and discuss various methods that can be employed to facilitate such research.
One of the primary reasons for this growing curiosity can be attributed to the desire for a sense of belonging and connection to one’s abode. As individuals become increasingly transient in their lives, relocating for work or personal reasons, they may seek to find meaning and stability in their living quarters. By delving into the past of their homes, they can establish a link with previous inhabitants, thereby fostering a sense of continuity and attachment.
Moreover, the value of historical preservation has gained prominence in recent years, with more individuals recognizing the importance of conserving architectural heritage. Learning about the past of a house or building contributes to this preservation effort, as it enables the current occupants to appreciate the significance of their dwelling and potentially safeguard it against future alterations or demolitions.
To satiate this thirst for historical knowledge, there are several avenues that can be explored by individuals. Firstly, local archives and libraries can provide a wealth of information, ranging from old maps and photographs to records related to construction and ownership. These resources can help to piece together a comprehensive narrative of the building’s past. Another fruitful approach involves engaging with neighbors or previous occupants, who may possess valuable oral histories and anecdotes that illuminate the lived experiences of the space.
In conclusion, the surge in interest regarding the history of one’s accommodation can be ascribed to the quest for belonging and the increasing awareness of the importance of architectural heritage. Utilizing local archival resources and engaging with community members can prove to be effective methods for conducting this research, enabling individuals to forge a deeper connection with their homes and the past that shaped them.
Sample 6:
In recent years, it has been observed that an increasing number of individuals in certain nations have exhibited a heightened curiosity toward uncovering the historical background of their residences or edifices. This essay will explore the underlying causes of this trend and suggest ways in which people can delve into the past of their abodes.
The primary reason for this burgeoning interest can be attributed to a desire to preserve and appreciate cultural heritage. As societies evolve and modernize, citizens often develop a sense of nostalgia for the past, seeking to understand the origins of their surroundings. For instance, historical structures often boast unique architectural features, which can reveal fascinating insights into the techniques and materials utilized by builders of bygone eras. Consequently, uncovering the narrative behind an edifice piques the interest of individuals who value these distinctive qualities and wish to maintain a connection with their cultural ancestry.
Additionally, understanding the history of a property may have practical implications, such as increasing its monetary value. A residence with a rich historical background or noteworthy past occupants can be perceived as a valuable asset, attracting potential buyers and investors. In this manner, a well-researched lineage of a house can serve as a unique selling point, contributing to its allure in the real estate market.
To embark upon the journey of tracing their property’s history, individuals can employ various research methods. A visit to local archives or libraries can yield valuable information, as they typically house historical records, such as property deeds, maps, and photographs. Furthermore, engaging with community members or local historians can provide anecdotal evidence, offering personal insights into the area’s history. Additionally, online resources, such as historical databases and genealogical websites, serve as convenient tools in supplementing one’s research.
In conclusion, the mounting curiosity toward the historical background of houses and buildings stems from a desire to preserve cultural heritage and capitalize on potential financial gains. To satiate this interest, individuals can utilize a combination of traditional and digital research methods, thus gaining a more profound understanding of their property’s past.
Sample 7:
In several countries, an emerging trend of individuals expressing an amplified interest in discovering the historical roots of their dwellings or constructions has been identified. This essay will delve into the factors contributing to this phenomenon and discuss avenues through which people can investigate the provenance of their habitats.
One possible explanation for this growing curiosity is the human propensity for storytelling and connection. Delving into the history of a building or house allows inhabitants to form a deeper bond with their living spaces, transcending the mere physical aspects of the structure. Another factor that may contribute to this fascination with architectural history is the influence of popular media. Television programs, documentaries, and online content often showcase the transformative potential of restoring and preserving aged structures, igniting public interest in the conservation of architectural heritage.
To satisfy their curiosity and investigate the histories of their dwellings, individuals can pursue various research strategies. One approach is to consult architectural historians or preservationists, who can provide expert guidance on the building’s style, construction techniques, and potential historical significance. Additionally, residents can access public records, such as census data, land registries, and building permits, which often contain information on previous owners, alterations, and construction dates. Finally, local historical societies and museums may house collections of photographs, artifacts, and documents that can shed light on the neighborhood’s past and the development of its architecture.
In summary, the rising interest in uncovering the historical foundations of residential properties can be attributed to the innate human desire for connection and the influence of popular media. By employing a multi-faceted research approach, individuals can unveil the rich tapestry of stories woven into the fabric of their homes, fostering a deeper connection with their living spaces and the broader community.
Sample 8:
In a number of countries, there has been a noticeable surge in individuals expressing a keen interest in uncovering the past of their domiciles or buildings. This essay will examine the factors stimulating this inclination and outline methods through which people can delve into the chronicles of their structures.
The burgeoning interest in the historical context of residences can be attributed to the increasing awareness of environmental sustainability. As societies grapple with the consequences of rapid urbanization, many individuals are embracing the concept of adaptive reuse, which involves repurposing older buildings while preserving their historical significance. By gaining a comprehensive understanding of the architectural background, inhabitants can identify potential restoration opportunities, thereby contributing to a more sustainable and environmentally friendly approach to urban development.
Another compelling factor is the potential for personal growth and enrichment. Studying the historical context of one’s abode offers an opportunity to expand one’s knowledge and understanding of the past, fostering a sense of intellectual curiosity. This pursuit of knowledge enables individuals to develop a more holistic view of their environment, promoting a deeper appreciation of the built heritage and its role in shaping the contemporary landscape.
To conduct research into the history of their homes or constructions, individuals have several avenues at their disposal. One method involves utilizing digital platforms, such as mobile applications and online archives, which provide access to historical records and images. These resources facilitate the process of tracing the architectural lineage, enabling users to uncover vestiges of their buildings’ evolution through time. Alternatively, seeking assistance from local government agencies, which often maintain repositories of historical data, can yield valuable information on building permits, ownership records, and architectural plans. Lastly, engaging in oral history projects, by interviewing long-term community members, can offer unique perspectives on the area’s evolution and the experiences of its inhabitants.
In conclusion, the growing fascination with the historical context of domiciles and constructions can be ascribed to the desire for environmental sustainability and personal enrichment. By employing a range of research methods, individuals can unearth the intricate layers of history embedded within their structures, fostering a more profound connection with their environment and its heritage.
Sample 9:
In several nations, there is a marked increase in individuals exhibiting a heightened curiosity about the historical narrative of their homes or buildings. This essay will discuss the factors that contribute to this emerging trend and propose ways people can investigate the antecedents of their structures.
One potential driving force behind this growing interest is the rise of genealogy and ancestry research, which has ignited a passion for personal history among many individuals. As people delve into their family trees, they naturally become curious about the spaces their ancestors inhabited and the connection between their living environments and family narratives. Consequently, learning about the history of their dwellings allows individuals to establish a more profound connection with their ancestors and enrich their understanding of their family’s past.
Another factor contributing to this enthusiasm for architectural history is the increasing appreciation for craftsmanship and authenticity. In a world characterized by mass production and standardized designs, the allure of unique and historic structures becomes more pronounced. These buildings embody the skill, dedication, and creativity of past artisans, fueling a renewed interest in architectural heritage and inspiring future innovators to push the boundaries of design and construction.
To investigate the history of their edifices, individuals can employ several strategies. One approach is to consult with architectural conservators or restoration specialists who possess expertise in historic building techniques, materials, and styles. These professionals can provide guidance on the age, significance, and architectural lineage of the structure. Another method involves examining primary source materials, such as historical newspapers, city directories, and property tax records, which can offer insights into the building’s past ownership, usage, and modifications. Finally, examining architectural plans, blueprints, or builder’s contracts, if available, can provide valuable information on the original design, construction details, and the vision behind the structure.
In conclusion, the increasing interest in the historical context of homes and buildings can be attributed to the growing enthusiasm for genealogy and the appreciation for craftsmanship and authenticity. By utilizing a variety of research techniques, individuals can unravel the historical tapestry of their living spaces, deepening their connection with both personal and architectural history.
Sample 10:
In recent times, an increasing number of individuals have been captivated by the idea of uncovering the historical background of their residential edifices. This essay will delve into the rationale behind this growing fascination, as well as the methods available for conducting such inquiries.
Firstly, one primary motivation for exploring the past of a dwelling may be the desire to assess its long-term structural stability and maintenance requirements. Older constructions have, over time, undergone various repairs and renovations, which might impact their current condition. Being cognizant of a building’s backstory can empower its inhabitants to make informed decisions, ensuring the safety and preservation of their homes. For instance, awareness of previous termite infestations would prompt the residents to take appropriate preventative measures to avoid a recurrence.
Another reason for this burgeoning interest in a domicile’s history might stem from curiosity regarding potential paranormal or supernatural occurrences within the premises. Such a phenomenon has long captured the human imagination, and many seek to either confirm or debunk these tales. By learning about previous occupants and their experiences, current residents can either embrace the building’s supernatural history or put their minds at ease. For example, a family might become intrigued by a local urban legend surrounding their home, prompting them to research its veracity.
Various approaches can be employed in the quest for historical information. One effective method is participating in local history walks or tours. These events, usually organized by historical societies and community groups, provide a wealth of information on the region’s architectural heritage and often reveal vestiges of the past related to individual buildings. Furthermore, individuals can consult public records, such as land registries and census data, to piece together a chronological narrative of their dwelling’s past.
In conclusion, the growing interest in a building’s history can be attributed to a range of factors, including assessing structural stability and supernatural occurrences. While local history tours offer an engaging way to learn about the past, a more comprehensive understanding can be achieved through the examination of public records. By doing so, individuals can gain a deeper appreciation for their homes and the stories they hold.
Sample 11:
In some countries, there is a growing interest among people in tracing the history of their homes. I think they research this for many reasons, perhaps out of interest, or to find a sense of connection. For help with finding answers, they should turn to the seniors in their neighborhoods.
Some people delve into the stories of their homes simply because they are curious. Many historical buildings have been torn down, which makes those that remain uncommon treasures in the city. As a result, it is likely that residents in the surviving buildings can't help finding out more about them, such as when they were built and why they look the way they do.
There are also people who do research to find a sense of connection. With concrete residential buildings everywhere, neighborhoods nowadays look very alike and, therefore, it is hard for people to feel something special about where they live. However, by learning about the buildings that once stood there and the people who lived in them, for example, a sense of connection and involvement may be fostered.
The best way for people to explore, I believe, is to ask the elderly in their neighborhood. Many seniors have lived in the same neighborhood all their lives. They have seen it change around them. They have witnessed people coming and going. Talking to them can definitely help one uncover some intriguing stories of the place where one lives.
In conclusion, curiosity and a desire to seek a connection are two possible reasons why people investigate the history of their homes. To find answers, they should ask the old people in their neighborhood for help.
Sample 12:
The trend of individuals seeking to uncover the history of their homes is becoming increasingly prevalent in certain countries.
This growing interest in a somewhat contentious subject can be attributed to various factors, with curiosity being the most common motivation. When one moves to a new place, a multitude of inquiries naturally arises, particularly about the origin of their dwelling. This curiosity is similar to the psychology of children, who, upon entering a new home, tend to focus on the security of their surroundings. Therefore, discovering the history of one’s residence becomes an essential aspect of settling in. Some individuals are driven by a desire to assess the feng shui of their house, determining whether it is regarded as auspicious or not.
The way in which people articulate the origin of their homes or buildings is diverse, and technological advancements have significantly facilitated this process. More specifically, the internet plays a crucial role in this exploration. Digital content related to your dwelling, such as blogs on platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok, provides accessible methods for exploring the history of your neighborhood. Alternatively, one can gather information by interacting with neighbors or consulting the previous owner of the residence. The extended period they have spent living and observing the house or building equips them with insights that can be valuable. For example, if there is an unusual arrangement in the garden, consulting the previous owner can provide clarity on the matter.
In conclusion, the increasing fascination with discovering the origin of one’s home or building is now taken as a given. People are inclined to favor the practice of exploring the history of their residences, driven by curiosity and aided by the accessible methods provided by technology.
Sample 13:
There is a necessity to restrict learning history for understanding civilizations or ancient culture. However, these days people from several parts of the globe are inclined towards understanding the history of their own houses and buildings. This essay will highlight a discussion based on the reasons for the rise in this interest area and the sources from which people could obtain more information related to the history of a building. First and foremost, the necessity of understanding the history of a building will help with effective and potential gathering of information based on the age of the building and materials that have been used for its construction. Thus, evaluating this information will help with understanding the durability of the concerned building. Additionally, people also put in their life savings in buying a home, thus, this will help them with deriving an understanding of their property and its sustainability state. On the other hand, another factor that provokes individuals to search the history of their buildings could be due to the increasing rate of crime and paranormal activities across the globe due to which people have become alarmed and cautious. There are a number of sources available that help out in researching the history of a place. Nevertheless, there are a number of documentaries and articles available online that will be more insightful to get in touch with the local population to obtain appropriate information associated with a given area. This is helpful as local people have been longer residents of the given area, they would be a key helper in spotting the abnormalities and inappropriate activities that took place in the past. However, to acquire a detailed and an in-depth understanding of the building, individuals or the owners of houses or buildings can always approach civil engineers or construction workers that will assist them with acquiring appropriate information of building history. To conclude, with this essay, I would like to quote that ease of access to any information online has resulted in people being more cautious about mentioned things.
Sample 14:
There are trends going on that suggest background checks based on the history of particular commercial buildings or residences are becoming common practice. These are mainly observed in particular with commercial buildings or residents while they live in. The major reason behind this research can be highlighted as the interest of individuals in finding family or behaviors of the residents that reside in the past in that building. This will help with ensuring the quality and value of the building in that neighborhood. This essay will be addressing this aspect in the preceding sections and will also highlight methods that can be used to find these details. It is common for human beings to find details about their own properties. To expand this, majorly real estate investors are focused over searching details and information of ancestors that resided in those buildings while searching for their period in those areas. Moreover, individuals these days like to thrive on the fame and reputation of a particular property that was built in earlier ages. Hence, they might look for methods that have been applied to accomplish the construction of a building and materials utilized. Nevertheless, property buyers may acquire details associated with the strength and value of those buildings prior to their purchases. If they wanted to acquire the above details, several methods can be utilized to find these sources from those areas. For instance, engaging in brief discussions with senior citizens in the neighborhood can provide valuable insights based on their experiences over the years. Moreover, they might consider ensuring the applicability of reliable resources that are published in the libraries about the concerned homeowners while going through with the plans relevant to the building that are approved by the councils. Thus, it can be concluded from the above discussion that humans tend to get familiar with the locations that have been used by people to live in and to find out about the reputation it gained.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
It is argued that economic progress in wealthy countries cannot enable their citizens to feel more satisfied. Although I admit that greater affluence can give rise to work demands and widen the gap between social classes, I mostly disagree with this notion since it ensures greater sense of comfort among people in the form of enhanced living conditions and effective solutions to community concerns.
On the one hand, I concede that the citizens of a prosperous nation might not experience greater happiness as a result of further economic prosperity in several aspects. The first one is that individuals often assume a greater workload. More specifically, in order to expand the economy, businesses have to boost their productivity and foster innovation, which normally translates into extended working hours. This may leave employees less time for their personal lives, leading to exacerbating their mental health issues such as stress and depression. Furthermore, expanding the economy has the potential to increase income inequality. This is because the benefits of economic growth are often concentrated in the hands of a few magnates or corporations, rather than being shared equally among all citizens. As a result, employees receiving minimal, or no wage increments may feel discontented.
On the other hand, I consider improving the economy is associated with increased happiness among citizens for several reasons. Most noticeably, an increase in wealth can also result in improved quality of life. Those living in a thriving economy can be offered better living conditions, improved infrastructure and greater access to leisure and entertainment. Therefore, their level of satisfaction can be higher. Another justification is the financial ability to address social problems. To be more specific, economic growth can provide resources for governments to tackle social problems like poverty, inequality and unemployment. If people see that their government is taking action to address these issues, they may feel more optimistic and content with their lives.
In conclusion, while increased wealth can trigger a higher volume of work and income disparity in society, I am of the opinion that it greatly contributes to one’s fulfilment due to better living standards and social issues being tackled to establish more pleasant communities. It is advisable that nations should continue to boost their economic affluence while considering their people’s happiness.
Sample 2:
Some experts claim that once a country has reached a certain level of economic development, any further increase in economic wealth does not result in greater satisfaction for its citizens. However, while there is a boundary to what money can do, I argue that economic growth still plays a key role in improving the quality of life for citizens in a country.
On the one hand, beyond a certain point, economic growth does not necessarily equal increased satisfaction for citizens. Firstly, a person's happiness does not solely rely on a country's wealth. There are other factors, such as social relationships and physical and mental health. For instance, economic growth may not benefit those who suffer from intractable diseases. Secondly, in some cases, the economic development of a country may not lead to an increase in the incomes of the poor. To illustrate, for some poor people, there are financial barriers that limit their access to education, employment, or other resources necessary to participate in the economy.
On the other hand, economic growth can have a positive impact on citizen satisfaction, even in rich countries. For example, economic growth can result in the creation of new job opportunities, which can lead to higher levels of employment and a lower rate of poverty. Additionally, a country's expansion of its economy can improve its global standing. A rich country can have a more prominent role in international affairs, which can lead to greater influence and better diplomatic relations, thereby providing its citizens with more opportunities and benefits.
In conclusion, while there is some merit to the argument that economic growth may not have a significant impact on citizen satisfaction beyond a certain point, I believe that it is still essential for wealthy countries to continue to strive for economic growth.
Sample 3:
Whether economic growth in a well-off country would increase its citizens’ satisfaction has become a topic of discussion. In my opinion, I agree that while there is a limit to what money can bring, an increase in a country’s economic situation would always delight the people.
First, economic wealth is only a part of life satisfaction, therefore, it can only please people to an extent. From my point of view, there is a limitation of material possessions that a person could hoard. Most people only need a roof over their head, food and money that are used to pay for other necessities. Therefore, once these needs are fulfilled, a surplus of other properties is no longer desirable. Additionally, a person’s satisfaction is not made of economic wealth alone but also of their well-being and relationships. To be more specific, a person could be the richest, yet if he were to suffer from a prolonged illness, he would not achieve true satisfaction.
On the other hand, I believe that however prosperous a country is, additional economic growth would always appease its citizens. There are aspects that only a nation’s monetary reserve can solve, thus, the larger the reserve becomes, the more problems it can tackle. Take road infrastructure for example, even if a person drives the most expensive car but the road is bumpy, he would not be able to fully enjoy the experience. In these cases, a country’s economic wealth is important since more money equals better infrastructure. Furthermore, an abundance of possessions will lead to advancements in technology and healthcare. These in turn will benefit its citizens beyond materialistic satisfaction.
In conclusion, although people require more than wealth to be appeased, I strongly support the view that economic prosperity will result in increased satisfaction of a nation’s citizens.
Sample 4:
Many people believe that the additional increase in the national wealth of an affluent country does not necessarily lead to increased satisfaction and happiness among citizens. I completely agree with this opinion because individuals cannot derive more satisfaction from increased wealth due to hedonic adaptation and income disparity.
To begin with, additional economic growth for an already rich country does not make citizens happier because of the hedonic treadmill. Humans tend to adapt to their new circumstances over time. That is to say that as people become richer, they are likely to adjust their desires and expectations accordingly. What was once deemed luxury may turn into a new baseline, driving to a perpetual pursuit of even more material possessions. This phenomenon is termed as the hedonic treadmill. By way of illustration, a person who shifts into a larger apartment may initially be more satisfied, but that satisfaction may gradually decrease as he adapts to his new standard of living and wants to pursue further development.
Likewise, economic growth by a nation cannot make individuals happier as there is always a huge income disparity. In an affluent society, income inequality may prevail, and individuals are likely to compare their status and wealth to those who are wealthier, leading to dissatisfaction. In simple words, if there are considerable disparities in wealth and status within the society, then people in the lower socioeconomic tier may feel dissatisfied despite overall economic growth. A case in point is the Occupy Wall Street movement in the United States, a country with the most robust economy. In 2011, the movement emerged out of concern for growing income inequality.
In conclusion, this essay finds that beyond a particular point, the additional economic wealth cannot lead to a proportional increase in individuals’ contentment due to the hedonic treadmill and income inequality.
Sample 5:
Many people assert that when a country is already affluent, further increases in economic wealth do not necessarily lead to greater satisfaction among its citizens. I tend to agree with this opinion, and in this essay, I will delve into the reasons supporting this viewpoint.
To begin with, once a nation reaches a certain level of economic prosperity, the correlation between wealth and happiness tends to weaken significantly. Research has shown that beyond a certain income threshold that fulfills basic needs and provides a reasonable standard of living, the pursuit of additional wealth does not correspond to a commensurate increase in overall life satisfaction. This is often referred to as the "satiation point," where people experience diminishing returns on their happiness from accumulating more wealth. A study conducted in several developed countries found that individuals who earned above a certain income threshold reported only marginal gains in their life satisfaction as their income increased further.
Moreover, the pursuit of relentless economic growth in already affluent countries can come at the expense of other critical aspects of well-being, such as social cohesion, work-life balance, and environmental sustainability. The prioritization of economic growth above all else can lead to increased stress, longer working hours, and a greater sense of insecurity, which can negatively impact citizens' overall quality of life. For instance, in some highly developed nations, the emphasis on economic growth has led to work cultures characterized by long hours, limited vacation time, and a lack of job security, contributing to stress and reduced life satisfaction.
In conclusion, I concur with the notion that in wealthy countries, the relentless pursuit of economic growth may not significantly enhance citizens' overall satisfaction. Beyond a certain point, the benefits of increased wealth may become marginal, while the negative consequences, such as reduced work-life balance can erode well-being.
Sample 6:
It is often argued by some people that citizens of wealthy countries do not become any more satisfied with their lives as the country’s economic wealth increases. I completely agree with this viewpoint.
Firstly, there is no evidence to suggest that people living in wealthy countries are any more or less satisfied with their lives than those from poorer nations. In fact, rates of suicide, depression, and other mental health issues are often higher in wealthier nations, such as Australia, America, and the UK, when compared to many poor countries. The country of Bhutan, for example, is known as the happiest country in the world, even though the country itself is considered to be relatively poor. America, on the other hand, is one of the most economically powerful countries in the world, and yet suffers from high rates of depression and mental health issues, which could be considered as significant factors when measuring life satisfaction.
Furthermore, it is reasonable to suggest that excessive wealth can actually have detrimental consequences among many people. For example, there are numerous cases where people with vast amounts of wealth have unsuccessfully tried to find happiness through the acquisition of material possessions, such as expensive cars and luxury clothing, only to continually find themselves feeling lonely and empty. This perhaps suggests that it is not how much money people have, but what they do with their money and their time that contributes to their overall feeling of life satisfaction. In addition, there are many factors which may contribute to life satisfaction, and this will vary from culture to culture.
In conclusion, I do not believe that people in wealthy countries stand to gain any higher levels of life satisfaction from the economic growth of their nation as there are many factors involved in measuring personal levels of happiness and contentment within society that are not necessarily connected to wealth.
Sample 7:
Experts have argued that a country's affluence only satisfies its population to a certain degree, and further economic growth offers no additional satisfaction among citizens. I completely agree with this statement, as education and healthcare contribute more to citizen satisfaction.
As a country becomes more prosperous, people may become more focused on academic status and knowledge rather than absolute levels of wealth. This is because an already-wealthy country may have more resources to invest in education and research, increasing the emphasis on knowledge and intellectual pursuits. Additionally, in more affluent societies, there may be a cultural shift towards valuing academic achievements to gain social status and prestige. These countries may also face new challenges and opportunities requiring higher education and knowledge. For example, as technology advances and new industries emerge, such as interstellar travel, there may be greater demand for skilled astronauts and innovators who possess specialized knowledge and expertise from higher education investment rather than purely funds.
Furthermore, in affluent societies, additional increases in wealth do not equate to happiness; instead, people's sense of well-being is determined mainly by the quality of their healthcare services. When people's basic needs for food, water, and shelter are met, they may focus on other areas of their lives, most prominently their health and well-being. People also feel more secure when they know their government is providing them with quality healthcare needed to maintain good health. As access to healthcare is improved, citizens can better care for their health and the health of their families, leading to a healthier and happier population.
In conclusion, when a nation is already financially secure, more money does not bring its residents fulfillment. However, investments in education and healthcare may have a more significant impact.
Sample 8:
In recent years, the number of countries which can be considered wealthy has been increasing rapidly. Interestingly, there is a commonly held belief that any additional growth in materialistic wealth would not result in higher satisfaction among its citizens when a country has already achieved financial stability. In my opinion, I completely agree with this notion.
The main point for my argument is that besides financial wealth, happiness is also derived from many other sources. These include having good physical and mental health, being able to spend time with one's family or doing things which one loves. A survey carried out in a number of developed countries has pointed out the majority of people prioritize these factors over monetary wealth. This is a testament to the statement that becoming ridiculously rich doesn't make a person much more satisfied with his/her life.
Another reason why I do not see much value in astronomical wealth is that once physiological needs have been met, people tend to have no further use for money. Quite the contrary, obsession with money can turn into a never- ending race with the finish line being various mental issues for the ones involved. In addition, wealth, historically, has been generated at the expense of the well-being of nature; and no money can make people feel happy living in polluted environments.
However, we have to admit that financial freedom is still a goal that many people share and that being able to make extra money would make our lives a little bit easier. Being able to save up would allow people to plan better for the next stages of their lives, resulting in higher overall fulfillment.
To conclude, I believe being able to cover basic needs should be enough to make most people contend with their lives. However, it cannot be denied that having access to extra wealth can bring about certain benefits to both individuals and society as a whole.
Sample 9:
Some have opined that a country’s wealth provides diminishing returns to the citizenry’s satisfaction. In other words, past a certain level of prosperity, a country may not be able to make the inhabitants any more pleased. I am inclined to agree with this statement, despite opposing viewpoints.
There are some reasons to believe that the population’s happiness scales with economic growth. The primary explanation, I suppose, is that an economically developed nation can afford to spend more on social programs. Possible benefits would include improvement to welfare, and free public education for children, all of which pay significant dividends in terms of happiness among the citizenries. Another belief, meanwhile, maintains that in a successful economy, the entire society is advantaged thanks to the trickle-down effect. To roughly explain, during a growth period, the elite will raise spending, causing trade to flourish, and consequently, businesses will be paying higher wages to their workers, spreading the benefit to all. Even the lower rungs of society can experience more satisfaction as a result of this development.
On the other hand, the idea that people’s happiness will grow as long as the economy does is not exempt from scrutiny. When additional wealth is generated but other contributing factors to optimism are not proportionally improved, the population is less likely to feel more content. In the case of environmental cleanliness, people can become disgruntled if no money from economic growth is used for conserving the environment, resulting in them living in filth. Law and order are also consequential in this regard. While a country may be affluent, refusing to enforce the law would demoralize the populace, because ordinary people see that criminals roam free and unpunished. Certainly, there are prominent ways where economic development fails to translate into citizens’ pleasure as it progresses.
In conclusion, while prosperity can positively affect satisfaction levels, contentment does not always increase with more wealth generated in the economy. The key to improving a population’s happiness, in my opinion, lies in the ability to spread growth across a multitude of factors.
Sample 10:
Economic growth is one of the top priorities of every state around the world. However, some experts believe that rich nations with any additional increase in economic wealth are unable to create more satisfaction for their citizens. Personally, I hold a different perspective on this notion.
On the one hand, it is argued that individuals from improved societies may not experience greater pleasure because of the heavy workload. Due to the tasks of expanding the economy, businesses are required to boost their productivity and foster innovative progress, leading to increased working hours. Therefore, people may have less time for leisure activities, causing stress and pressure which are the two main indicators when measuring the happiness index in a certain country. For instance, being the most developed economy in the world, the U.S. has the highest suicide rate globally.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that growth in the economy is positively associated with happiness for several reasons. Firstly, it is undeniable that citizens from richer countries can have a higher living standard, including better living conditions with modern facilities and more chances to access the top education system and the world-class healthcare system. As a result, the world has witnessed a huge flow of people from underdeveloped and developing regions migrating to developed nations with the hope of a brighter future. Secondly, with a prosperous economy, wealthier countries can have more resources to overcome social issues, such as unemployment, environmental damage and inequality. To illustrate, during the COVID-19 pandemic, while poorer countries were struggling to meet their citizens' basic needs, including food, medicine and accommodation, individuals from richer ones can easily overcome the pandemic with financial support from their governments.
In conclusion, while growth in the economy can lead to a more stressful workload, I firmly assert that this development contributes significantly to an individual's fulfilment thanks to a higher living standard and social issues being addressed. It is advisable that countries should continuously develop their economies to increase the happiness of their residents.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.