As mass communication and transport continue to grow, societies are becoming more and more alike, leading to a phenomenon known as globalization. Some people fear that globalization will inevitably lead to the total loss of cultural identity. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Sample 1:

Globalisation is the result of societies becoming more and more similar as mass communication and transportation expand. But the fear that it will result in the complete loss of cultural identity is not illogical. I believe that as societies adopt global trends, traditions particular to each culture are at risk of fading away.

One way in which globalization destroys cultural identity is through the influence of Western values and lifestyles. The spread of Western media, fashion, and consumerism often dominates local traditions. Younger generations, influenced by global trends, may find it easier to relate to international icons than to their own cultural heritage. For example, I have seen men and women preferring western outfits like skirt, trousers instead of the ethnic dresses like sarees, dhoti, etc.

Then, the similarity of products and services worldwide decreases the uniqueness of local goods. Global brands offer uniform experiences, replacing the charm of traditional, locally crafted items. As a result, communities may lose pride in their unique creations, contributing to the loss of cultural identity. Also, language, an essential aspect of cultural expression, is affected by globalization. As English becomes the global language, native languages face the risk of destruction.

Finally, while globalization encourages global connectivity and economic growth, it threatens the safety of cultural identity. The power of Western values, the standardization of products, and the generalization of language contribute to a world where distinct cultural expressions are at risk of being lost. So, balancing between global influences and the preservation of local traditions is important to maintaining the variety that makes each society special. 

Sample 2:

Globalization, the connection of societies through mass communication and transport, has undoubtedly brought the world closer. Some individuals worry that cultural identity will eventually completely disappear as a result of it. However, in my opinion, globalization promotes a global exchange of ideas and practices and provides an opportunity for cultures to develop and adapt to a more interconnected world. I will discuss this point of view in the upcoming paragraphs.

Firstly, globalization is the celebration and preservation of cultural diversity. As societies become more exposed to different traditions and customs, there is a growing appreciation for the uniqueness of each culture. For instance, while fast-food chains may be prevalent worldwide, local culinary traditions, like Spanish paella valenciana, Indian butter chicken, Korean bibimbap, Japanese sushi, etc., continue to flourish. Secondly, the exchange of ideas and technologies can enhance rather than ruin cultural identity. Through globalization, communities can integrate advancements while still maintaining their fundamental values and traditions. This adaptability allows cultures to evolve, ensuring their relevance in a changing world.

The fear of cultural identity loss often disregards the strength of local communities. In the face of globalization, many societies actively work to preserve and promote their cultural heritage. Festivals, language programs, and local initiatives help build up a sense of identity and pride, ensuring that traditions are passed down to future generations. Moreover, educational programs, cultural exchanges, and international partnerships demonstrate how globalization can be a force for cultural celebration rather than homogenization.

In conclusion, rather than leading to the total loss of cultural identity, globalization can be a stimulant for cultural enhancement and understanding. Therefore, I think it provides an opportunity for societies to embrace diversity, adapt positively to change, and actively preserve their unique traditions. With a balanced approach, globalization can coexist with the flourishing of cultural identities around the world.

Sample 3:

Globalisation has become integrated through the global network of trade, transportation, communication and immigration. It is feared by many to eventually bring an end to cultural identity. However, I am convinced that not only will globalization help retain and improve local cultures, but it also will strengthen cultural bonds between distant communities.

First of all, people can realise how they are different from others in distant lands, which may lead to their interest in learning about other cultures. This means every culture will have to preserve and present its unique features such as local cuisine or craftsmanship in order to maintain foreign interest in itself and have something to offer in competition with other communities. As a result, a sense of cultural identity can be reinforced – even rekindled and restored where it has already been lost.

Secondly, cultures in different parts of the world familiarise themselves with the ceremonies, food and clothes of other people, it is highly likely that they will begin to improve on their own, thus developing more efficient ways of life while retaining their original characteristics.

Finally, although some people might think that the aforementioned “trade” of cultural features can doom the unique identity of a culture, they need to consider that this will not necessarily result in local people abolishing their culture and fully embracing another. Instead, the communication and exchange involved in globalisation can improve understanding and tolerance in the international community, which certainly can help with the conservation of older cultures and their sense of identity.

In conclusion, I think if the positive aspects of globalisation are considered and stressed, it is not likely to pose any threats to the cultural identity of local communities and will instead contribute to it in a variety of ways.

Sample 4:

Mass communication and transport are growing at a faster rate and provide an opportunity to become a change in international globalisation. Because of this incredible growth we have to limit the world, able to reach people in a smaller span of time and can see and roam all over the globe. Some people think this change is not good for their culture and are strongly against it. In my opinion, change plays a vital role in someone's growth.

If we look at the history, we accepted many changes in our day-to-day life which made our life comfortable and easy to live. We are in the 21st century and we have a solution for almost everything. For example, a patient who is suffering from a severe disease and not getting better treatment in one place, he would have the option to get treatment in another place, maybe in some other country. We get this information via internet, TV, news. This is how people are connected and helping each other to survive and excel in their life.

Yet to another part of above, a culture cannot be represented by the dress someone wears, the language what someone speaks, it’s just a lifestyle which is acceptable by someone and helps lead their life all with happiness. Though humans have different characteristics, they have the same emotions and feelings towards their own family member. They can act differently in some situations, but the pain and sorrows are almost same in all human being because that's God given.

Therefore, I do not agree that mass communication and transport have any negative impact on culture, it is up to each individual to decide what changes they want to incorporate into their life. Hence, criticising other cultures and not giving human value can bring disaster and put us in soup.

Sample 5:

We are living in a globalization era and the whole world has become a global village. Due to this there are no barriers to communicate with each other as well as travel to different places. Some people argue that the identity of any culture will be totally lost due to globalization. I totally agree with this statement and numerous reasons behind it.

Firstly, every nation has its own cultural value which is spoiling day by day due to globalization. When people migrate from developing countries to developed countries then they see different cultures and lifestyles which are followed by local people. As result of it, they try to adopt them to survive easily in that country. That’s why the own identity of a person or cultural values will not exist. For instance, mostly people adopt western culture such as living relationship, live apart from family. So that people’s native culture will definitely affected in future.

Furthermore, persons when they travel to other countries then they communicate with other in foreign language because they think it put great impression on local person. Native language of that person will suffer a lot. For example, developing countries persons such as Indian also face this problem when they communicate to other countries. However, globalization helps to communicate worldwide so with the help of this people expand their business as well as gain knowledge about other countries.

To conclude, globalization help to improve the economy of world but it also loss personal identity as well as culture values.

Sample 6:

Globalization has undoubtedly brought the world closer together, leading to increased cultural exchange and integration. However, I do not believe that it will inevitably lead to the total loss of cultural identity. Instead, I argue that globalization can coexist with the preservation of unique cultural identities.

Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that globalization has indeed led to the spread of certain cultural elements, such as language, food, and fashion, across the globe. This has resulted in a more homogenized global culture in some aspects. However, it is essential to recognize that cultures are dynamic and adaptable. Rather than disappearing, they have the capacity to evolve and incorporate external influences while retaining their core traditions and values.

Furthermore, the advancement of technology and communication has also provided a platform for the preservation and promotion of diverse cultural identities. People can now easily access and share information about their heritage, traditions, and customs, leading to a heightened awareness and appreciation of cultural diversity. This has led to the emergence of global movements aimed at preserving and celebrating cultural heritage.

Moreover, governments and organizations have recognized the importance of safeguarding cultural identities in the face of globalization. Efforts to protect and promote traditional practices, languages, and arts have been increasingly prioritized through policies and initiatives. This demonstrates a commitment to maintaining cultural diversity in the midst of global integration.

In conclusion, while globalization has undoubtedly impacted the way cultures interact and evolve, I believe that it does not necessarily lead to the total loss of cultural identity. Instead, it presents an opportunity for cultures to thrive and coexist in a more interconnected world.

Sample 7:

Nowadays, people start to be cautious about the effects of globalization particularly the total loss of cultural identity. From my point of view, globalization gradually changes the nature of nations and create an international culture. On the other hand, this phenomenon can help nations remove depraved customs which are very difficult with some Asian countries.

First of all, with mass media and international transport as tools, globalization will introduce to countries a new and model culture. Slowly but stably globalization rehabilitates mostly young people who are the future owner of countries to decline their cultural identities and adopt new culture. By assimilating national characters to its ideal custom, globalization will lead to the total loss of countries’ natures.

Furthermore, after blending local custom with its new character, this phenomenon will build up an international culture. This newly-born one will merge all national characters into one and only culture. Therefore, states should take actions to prevent this process of integrating otherwise all cultural identities will fail to exist.

However, people should realize the good side of internationalization to exploit it. It is true that globalization alters countries’ characters including some outdated ones which are harmful for modern societies. In this point of view, this phenomenon can support nations especially Asian countries including Vietnam in their progress of erasing depraved customs.

In conclusion, every country should make sure to put globalization progress under its control to protect its cultural identity and decline depraved customs from its characters.

Sample 8:

The ability to instantly communicate on a global scale has led to the phenomenon of globalisation where the world is becoming more inter-connected. While it is often claimed that this will unavoidably lead to the destruction of some cultures, I believe that it this is not entirely true.

People crave new experiences, so instead of destroying culture, the opening of the world makes the richness of different cultures more available for people to explore. It is only necessary to visit the central business district of a large city to see the wide range of restaurants serving different ethnic foods from all over the world to understand that different cultures have an important place in the world. While culture is about more than food and food, even food can be changed from how it is in the traditional culture, it shows that globalisation can help aspects of different cultures to thrive rather than perish.

Moreover, although it is true that people might follow similar fashion trends and consume the same kinds of entertainment, these trends can be influenced by cultures all over the world. Fashion designers and music producers, for example, increasingly look to different cultures for new ideas and creations. Although, these new globalised products are not always exactly reflective of the culture they came from, the internet allows people who are curious to search more about their background and understand more about the culture in which they originated.

Globalisation might mean all humans have a shared “world” culture, but that means interesting or unique elements of all cultures can be highlighted rather than destroyed. Humans are always looking for something new, and mass communication and globalisation encourages novelty rather than uniformity of culture. 

Sample 9:

Globalization means that in some ways people around the world are becoming more and more similar. We often eat the same food, watch the same TV programmes, listen to the same music and we wear the same clothes. Some of this at least can be blamed on the spread of multinational brands available all over the world. On the surface, it may appear as if the global diversity of cultural identities is being lost.

If, the argument goes, people in Tokyo and London look and dress the same, then that must mean that cultural differences are disappearing. However, I would argue that this is a very narrow definition of culture and that in fact cultural differences are as present as ever. Cultural Identity is built on far more than just the films we watch or the Jeans we wear. The foundation of cultural identity is shared values. When you look in detail at different cultures, you realize that the things that are important to one culture can be very different from the things valued by another culture.

Take my own culture, India, as an example and compare it to a very different culture, Japan. Although I have never visited Japan personally, I believe that it is a culture which places a lot of value on hard work and that people often work very long hours. The Indian people, in contrast, greatly value their leisure time and strive to spend as much lime with their family as they possibly can. Even if we consume the same products, I would argue that there are still some very deep-rooted differences.

To summarize, I do not accept that total loss of cultural identity is inevitable, despite the influence of large companies and their products around the globe.