2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án (Phần 10)

Sample 1:

The advent of online communication has dismantled geographical barriers, allowing individuals who would otherwise never have the opportunity to interact, to engage in cross-border conversations. However, this digital connectivity also poses certain challenges. In this essay, I will explore the advantages and disadvantages of international communication online.

One of the significant advantages of online international communication is the enrichment of cultural exchange. People from different parts of the world can share their traditions, customs, and perspectives, fostering a global understanding and promoting tolerance. For instance, social media platforms enable individuals to connect with peers from diverse backgrounds, leading to a deeper appreciation of cultural diversity.

Another notable benefit is the ease of collaboration in education and business. Online communication tools facilitate virtual classrooms, allowing students to learn from experts around the world. Similarly, remote work and cross-border collaborations have become feasible, leading to increased productivity and innovative solutions. For instance, multinational companies can bring together experts from different locations to work on projects, harnessing a variety of skills and expertise.

However, international communication online also presents challenges, with privacy and security concerns being at the forefront. The digital realm is susceptible to cyberattacks and breaches, jeopardizing sensitive information and personal data. For instance, phishing attacks and hacking incidents can lead to identity theft and financial losses for individuals and organizations alike.

Additionally, online communication can contribute to the spread of misinformation and the amplification of divisive narratives. Social media platforms, while connecting people, can also serve as echo chambers that reinforce pre-existing beliefs and fuel misinformation. For example, the rapid spread of fake news and conspiracy theories through online channels can lead to social polarization and undermine societal cohesion.

In conclusion, international communication online offers numerous advantages, such as cultural exchange and enhanced collaboration, but it also brings forth disadvantages, including privacy concerns and the proliferation of misinformation. While the benefits of global connectivity are undeniable, addressing the challenges posed by online communication is essential to ensure its positive impact on society.

Sample 2:

Online communication today is blurring national boundaries, and allowing people to communicate what was impossible otherwise. There are myriads of advantages, albeit few disadvantages, and in this essay, I will highlight some of these benefits and drawbacks of online interactions.

To begin with, online communication confers considerable advantages. One of major positive aspects is that online interaction removes conventional constraints, such as time and space. With the advent of sophisticated digital devices, people can communicate from one end of the globe to the other in the blink of an eye. Another decisive advantage is freedom of delivering messages. This means that messages no longer flow exclusively from the political elites to the mass. Messages now are also transferred from people, multimodally as well as interactively. By disintermediating corporate and government control of communication, online communication has established horizontal communication networks and therefore opening up a new landscape of social and political change. Talking for a long time with dear ones who live far away was unbelievably expensive in the past, but all it costs now is the internet bills which is quite ignorable.

On the flip side, like everything else, there are few disadvantages of this too. The primary disadvantage of online communication is security threats. To illustrate, everything people share on the webs is stored somewhere, and the information could cause financial or personal risk if it gets in the wrong hands. Hackers are growingly skilled in gleaning credit card or other financial information through email address, phone number or other personal information and individuals can be victims of identity theft. Aside from security threats, the lack of physical cues can lead to miscommunication. In simple words, without facial expressions, gestures or tone in voice, there is a huge possibility of misunderstanding.

In conclusion, despite some negative aspects, online communication is a real boon to humankind in the sense that it has disembodied time and space and has empowered mass people to communicate at an affordable price.

Sample 3:

The world is a global village and with the coming of internet the communication has gone online. In present times, most people tend to prefer communicating online as compared to offline. This has allowed to bridge gap between people living at far off places and allowing people to interact with friends and family living at any corner of the world.

Interacting behind the screen has brought about great benefits. One of the major advantages of online interaction is that people can keep in touch with their loved ones at any moment. For instance, a person who works in Australia need not to wait for days to interact with his or her family living overseas but can chat any moment either in social media or use any of the applications available.

Secondly, it allows faster communication among people. Example, if a businessman wants to share an information or want to get an information from other individual, he or she can get is faster than before. Even more, it allows for greater communication between people from different countries allowing cross cultural interaction.

On the other hand, international communications have opened up door for some drawbacks as well. Firstly, people are now more likely to get lost in the world of online interaction, losing a touch with people who are near to them. Secondly, often people waste their time and energy talking with people they will never see in their life and miss out on building relationships in real life.

Overall, international communications have brought people closer and made interacting easier. However, completely immersing oneself into the cyber space often leads to random wandering of people, leading them nowhere.

Sample 4:

The internet has revolutionized the way people communicate, allowing individuals from different corners of the globe to connect and interact with ease. This online international communication has numerous advantages, breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people who would normally never have the chance to meet to engage in meaningful conversations. However, it is essential to recognize that this form of communication also comes with potential disadvantages that should be acknowledged.

One of the key advantages of international communication online is the ability to transcend geographical limitations. Through digital platforms, individuals can connect with others from different countries and cultures, fostering a global community. This opens up opportunities for cross-cultural understanding and appreciation, promoting tolerance and empathy. Moreover, it enables people to forge friendships and professional connections that would otherwise be difficult or impossible to establish.

Additionally, online international communication facilitates collaboration and knowledge sharing. Through virtual platforms, individuals can work together on projects, exchange ideas, and pool resources regardless of their physical locations. This promotes innovation, as diverse perspectives and expertise converge to tackle common challenges. It also allows for the dissemination of knowledge on a global scale, enhancing education and empowering individuals with information that was once limited to specific regions.

However, it is important to recognize the potential disadvantages of online international communication. Language and cultural barriers can impede effective communication, leading to misunderstandings or misinterpretations. Differences in language fluency and cultural norms may result in unintended offense or confusion. Moreover, the digital divide presents a significant challenge, as not everyone has equal access to technology and the internet. This inequality limits the opportunities for certain individuals and communities to participate fully in online international communication.

Another concern is online security and privacy. With the exchange of personal information and the potential for online scams or hacking, individuals must be cautious and vigilant in protecting their privacy and ensuring their safety while engaging in online interactions. The risk of misinformation and fake news is also heightened in the digital realm, necessitating critical thinking and fact-checking to navigate the vast sea of information available.

In conclusion, online international communication offers significant advantages in breaking down geographical barriers, promoting cross-cultural understanding, and fostering collaboration. However, it is important to acknowledge the potential disadvantages, including language and cultural barriers, the digital divide, and security concerns. As we continue to embrace the opportunities presented by online international communication, it is crucial to do so responsibly, with respect for cultural differences and a commitment to privacy and security. By harnessing the benefits while addressing the challenges, we can create a more inclusive and interconnected global community.

Sample 5:

In the digital age, the ability to communicate with individuals from all corners of the globe has become increasingly accessible. This has undoubtedly broken down geographical barriers and allowed people who would never have had the opportunity to meet in person to connect and communicate. The advantages of international communication online are numerous, but there are also some disadvantages to consider.

One of the most significant advantages of international communication online is the opportunity for cultural exchange and understanding. Through platforms such as social media, individuals can interact with people from different countries, sharing their customs, traditions, and beliefs. This fosters a greater sense of global unity and empathy, as individuals gain insight into the lives and experiences of others.

Furthermore, online communication allows for the exchange of ideas and knowledge on a global scale. Through forums, discussion groups, and video conferences, individuals can collaborate and learn from one another regardless of their physical location. This has led to advancements in various fields, including science, technology, and education.

However, there are also disadvantages to consider. One potential drawback is the risk of miscommunication and misunderstandings due to language barriers and cultural differences. Without the nuances of face-to-face communication, it can be challenging to accurately convey tone and intent, leading to potential conflicts.

Additionally, the reliance on online communication may lead to a lack of real-life interpersonal skills. As individuals spend more time interacting through screens, they may struggle to develop the necessary social skills for in-person interactions, leading to feelings of isolation and disconnect.

In conclusion, the advantages of international communication online are vast, including cultural exchange and global collaboration. However, it is essential to be mindful of the potential disadvantages, such as miscommunication and the impact on interpersonal skills. Finding a balance between online and offline communication is crucial for fostering meaningful connections in a globalized world.

Sample 1:

The issue ‘with the development of the technology traditional skills and the conventional lifestyle die’ is a controversial one and needs deeper argument before supporting or opposing the issue. Overall, I disagree with the opinion expressed; I would like to begin by pointing out that ‘traditional skills and ways of life’ have not totally vanished from one country, culture or community because of the introduction of technology.

In many ways, the history of civilisation is the history of technology: from the discovery of fire to the invention of the wheel to the development of the Internet we have been moving on from previous ways of doing things. Some technologies, such as weapons of mass destruction, are of negative impact. Others, such as medical advances, positively help people to live better or longer, and so very much help traditional ways of life. Surely, few people would seek to preserve such traditions as living in caves. Technology will always follow its own footsteps no matter what we, some people think about it. Technology advances because we need it. So, there is no way to prevent the advancement of technology, but we should embrace it positively. The generation of a country is responsible for preserving their own custom and tradition and if people feel eager to save a tradition, then there is no way technological advancement will destroy it. There are many cases where technology replaces human labour to create certain things, for example, handmade sari, which is still popular in many countries. Technology, in this case, has not destroyed the old tradition but has introduced faster and less expensive ways to create the same thing.   

Interestingly, technology can positively contribute to the keeping alive of traditional skills and ways of life. For example, the populations of some islands are too small to have normal schools. Rather than breaking up families by sending children to the mainland, education authorities have been able to use the Internet to deliver schooling online. In addition, the Internet, and modern refrigeration techniques are being used to keep alive the traditional skills of producing salmon; it can now be ordered from, and delivered to, anywhere in the world.

In conclusion, without suggesting that all technology is necessarily good, I think it is by no means ‘pointless’, in any way, to try to keep traditions alive with technology. We should not ignore technology because it can be our friend and support our way of life.

Sample 2:

The technological revolution affects all countries around the world in many ways significantly. It seems that the traditional skills and the ways life used to be present have disappeared. This essay will discuss how technology has led to this case and whether it is worth attempting to save people's traditional life or not.

To begin with, there are various reasons why traditional skills no longer exist as it was many years ago. One major reason is the development of technology. For illustrations, modern technology has been used for many tasks such as agriculture, industries, and machines have replaced people’s manual tasks in most cases. Moreover, the internet alters the way of communication dramatically; instead of visiting family these days, for example, people speak with each other over the phone or chat using social media like Facebook or Twitter. Perhaps, that is why the traditional skills are expiring with the demand of time and modernization.

Let's move to another point in the statement: some people argue that the traditional experience shouldn't be saved. The principal reason for their opinion is that global advertising encourages everyone to buy the same products. For instance, people wear similar clothes, rather than traditional costumes, and eat from the same types of restaurants such as KFC and Mac Donald and their branches are present all over the world. This shows that it does not make sense to keep the traditional skills alive.

To conclude, this essay has looked at the possible reasons for dying out of traditional life, such as the revolution in technology and popularity of the internet, and also the reason why it is aimless to keep them alive.

Sample 3:

Increasingly technological developments are aggressively pushing traditional lifestyle and skills out of the picture. Some believe that this diminishing process is too extraordinary to stop or reverse. However, I believe that valuable traditions will be preserved in particular ways by providing alternative ways of living and being inspirations for modern technological developments.

First of all, traditional lifestyle and skills are gradually becoming popular recently, particularly among young people who live in busy urban areas, by offering alternative ways of life. For instance, a cozy country style Thai restaurant where traditional cooking herbs and vegetables are freshly harvested from its own backyard garden, and spices are 100% homemade with traditional spicy preserving skills, has drawn much attention and popularity from people who are bored of mass-produced food and the highly industrialised environment. Such traditional skills and way of life would continue to have their place in this modern era.

Furthermore, conventional skills can be a great source of inspiration for modern technologies development. Evidence has shown that engineers and designers of modern times are still constantly inspired by the traditional skills. For example, sparked by a traditional bamboo braiding skills from a rural Asian area, a world widely famous furniture designer, working with equally talented engineers, invented production lines to manufacture designed modern furniture that however has that particular traditional braid style touch. Such inspiration has boosted the business, therefore, in turn, would result in more money allocated for preserving those valuable skills for further development.

To conclude, although it is hard to stop most of our traditional skills and ways of life vanishing from this modern world, some traditional skills and lifestyle would not just survive, but also thrive by proving alternative ways of living and being innovative for modern technology.

Sample 4:

Nowadays, technological advancement and their rapid and wide applications are having a significant impact on a nation's traditional skills and ways of life. Some argue that such impact is so extraordinary that it would make conventional skills and lifestyles obsolete. However, I believe they would continue to thrive by providing alternatives to modern ways of life, and innovative ideas for modern technologies.

First of all, traditional skills and ways of life are becoming an alternative solution to the problems caused by "mainstreamed" ways of life which are greatly influenced by modern technologies. For instance, a cozy restaurant where traditional, home-brewed beer is served, offers another experience to people who are bored with branded beers that have the same flavour and come out of mass production with new technologies. It is in such a venue where traditional skills are preserved, people become relaxed and educated. Providing diversity and thus enriching modern ways of life, such traditional skills and ways of life would continue to have their place.

Furthermore, conventional skills provide innovative ideas for the development of modern technologies. For example, sparkled by how the word "Love" is traditionally knitted into a sweater by some ethnic minority women in some parts of Asia, some business managers from textile industry have developed some production lines by applying the traditional skills to Computer-Aided Designs (CAD). The products have boosted the companies' sales which in turn have increased their investment in preserving traditional skills for further developing their technologies.

To conclude, traditional skills and lifestyles are increasingly becoming a useful alternative to the homogeneity brought by global applications of modern technologies. However, the evolution of technologies is a selection process, whereby some would become obsolete, but there is no doubt that some would thrive when their roles are appreciated.

Sample 5:

During the last century, science and technology have expanded to a great extent. As a nation focuses more on technology, it is true that the conventional skills and previous lifestyle vanishes. I strongly agree that there is no point in retaining them. This can be proven by analysing how technology can save a lot of time as well as be accurate enough.

It is apparent that the latest machines can do a lot of work with minimal time. For instance, in a construction industry, a crane can lift a block of heavy materials within a fraction of a minute. By using the traditional skills, it will take at least a day to uplift bulky items to the top of a building. Thus, it is obvious that it makes no sense to focus on previous skills and ways. Similarly, when automated machines can sew more than thousands of clothes, there is no point to involve manual labour to produce only hundred per day!

It is a fact that almost all industries prefer computers for account related tasks as they are very much accurate and faster. For example, consider a bank which has to calculate the turnover for its past decade. By using a software, it would be possible to get the exact value. Even though there are a lot of algorithms used by the old generation, it is not guaranteed that the calculation will be so precise and faster. Hence it is clear that there is not much benefit in focusing on traditional expertise.

By analysing how science has helped in getting the work done faster with precise results, it is very clear that there is not much advantage in retaining old skills and lifestyle. It is considered that the community will create this awareness among the masses.

Sample 6:

Many people think that traditional cultures will vanish due to the rapid development of new technology. Therefore, it is useless to spend some time preserving the traditional ways of life. To a certain point, I would agree that modern technology has brought some benefits to our life. But I disagree if we should abandon all the old-fashioned cultures, as I believe that some traditional ways are still beneficial for us.

It is a fact that many traditional ways have disappeared due to the existence of new technology. Many people have abandoned their traditional ways and equipment, as they become more productive with modern tools. For example, instead of using carts and manpower, many farmers in develop countries are using tractors and bulldozers to cultivate their plants these days. By using these machines, it saves a lot of time, money and energy. Therefore, many people prefer to use modern technology than to maintain the traditional ways.

Despite the benefits of modern technology, some traditional ways of life are still important and valid for our lives nowadays. One of the examples is that people in the past were concerned about honesty and integrity. In the olden days, people did business based on trust and respect, as they had no contracts and due to the lack of paper resources. In the modern world, legalised agreements have become an essential part of a business deal due to some parties might do any illegal and inappropriate act. These kinds of traditional cultures should be preserved and carried forward to the future generation.

In conclusion, to a certain extent, I would agree that some traditional cultures should be abandoned and replaced with technology and modern ways. But some of the traditional ways are still valid and applicable to the modern world, and it is necessary to maintain and preserve them.

Sample 7:

Old traditional skills and lifestyles are dying due to technological advances. It is a contentious issue. Many individuals believe that it is pointless to put too much effort into saving it. In my opinion, I don’t agree that it’s pointless saving the traditional skills and techniques. In the following paragraphs, I shall explain my point of view and provide supporting reasons.

Many traditions and talents throughout the world are being abandoned and replaced by machines in this new technological era. One of the most prominent instances of this phenomenon is the worldwide decline in hand-made fabrics. Today, factories create millions of machine-printed fabrics, which have replaced hand-knitted fabrics. The production costs are reduced, and designs appeal to the majority of buyers throughout the world, due to which many artists have lost their jobs. Local marketplaces are dwindling in popularity and people are suffering.

Besides that, life is becoming computerized, forcing ancient practices to become obsolete. Conventional skills provide innovative ideas for the development of modern technologies. Our predecessors’ invisible thread of old traditional skills and practices connect us with them. It helps us learn how things are created better to understand our culture, community, and nationality. These talents and skills help define and communicate a group’s beliefs and abilities, as well as how they interact with their environment.

However, technology has indeed made the life of people simpler. Almost everything nowadays is done with contemporary technology, which makes physical labour easier. Yet, one cannot overlook the wealth of knowledge that individuals gain from traditional skills and techniques.

Overall, traditional skills and practices are undeniably dwindling. One must acknowledge that traditional skills and techniques are a means of tying people together and educating them about their culture, society, country, and many other topics.

Sample 8:

Technology is an integral part of everybody’s lives, and it clearly assists us in adapting to consistent developments. I disagree with the perception that traditional skills should disappear with the technological development in a nation. There are two major reasons that I shall discuss in the forthcoming paragraphs.

On the one hand, traditional skills are considered the heritage that we have taken over from our ancestors. Thus, it is our responsibility to preserve them and pass them on to the next generation. The technological development is an enormous benefit for traditional skills. With the help of technology, we can enhance our skills and introduce innovations by combining technology and traditional skills. For example, handmade painting is a traditional skill. With the help of technology-induced Photoshop, people can give it a unique, more appropriate touch. The combination between photoshop and handmade painting could be a considerable innovation. People cannot just create wonders but earn massively as well.

On the other hand, though technology is developing at a sharp rate, the traditional skill used products still have a high position in the market. For instance, Indian traditional products, including handcrafted decor items, are still being sold at a global level. There are thousands of artisans earning their bread and butter by selling these handmade items to foreign tourists and established companies. It proves that traditional products still have higher demand in the market.

While the traditions that are not being used by a lot of people won’t make a difference if extinct, on a larger scale, improvements in these traditions can always be beneficial.

To sum it up, traditional skills are alive, even though the technology is increasing dramatically. It has a special place in everyone’s lives. Also, the popularity of traditional skills can enhance if the combination with technology is tried and tested at a larger scale.

Sample 9:

In recent times, technology has played a pivotal role in the transformation of present processes. Some individuals believe that as a nation's technology progresses, its traditional skills and ways of life fade. Therefore, there is no justification for their continued existence. I strongly disagree with this assertion, and my preference will be explained further.

To embark with, in our technological environment, ancient skills and practices nevertheless maintain a special place. Moreover, despite the fact that technology has replaced many things, traditional abilities cannot be replaced. Using Patan city as an example, a study revealed that the city is renowned for its traditional textiles, which, despite attempts at mechanical production, cannot replace the skill of human hands. Therefore, not everything can be replaced by technology.

Furthermore, old methods and rituals constantly retain their origins. In addition, it presents significance to the next generation for the benefit of their lives. If the present generation obtains an understanding of historic practices, they will be able to adopt them to improve living and also learn to respect our traditions. Therefore, to preserve our traditions, it is vital to share these abilities with the world.

However, I would not disregard that technology is always advancing and every approach and employment sector is evolving. Since technology is at its pinnacle, it has made all labour far simpler than in the past. Additionally, individuals are spending less on conventional skills and more on technology. Thus, over a period of time, no one may be able to block old practices and abilities.

To conclude, despite the advancement of technology, it is more vital to retain our traditional abilities, since this preserves the roots connected to their origin.

Sample 10:

Nowadays, traditional skills and ways are almost getting lost. Some people think that if a country develops its technology, then traditional abilities and methods will be lost, and there is no point in keeping those alive. However, I partially agree with this opinion, and my preference will be addressed further.

To begin with, technology perpetually distances us from culture and tradition. As technology advances, individuals devote less attention to cultural pursuits and remain perpetually preoccupied with contemporary life. For instance, according to a report, the majority of youngsters are unaware of their traditional attire since they wore only western clothing. Therefore, we must safeguard the traditions against technology in order to preserve them.

Additionally, traditional skills and practices are crucial to our nations because they reflect them and carry unique significance. If a country promotes its culture, it will entice individuals from other nations to learn more about it; as a consequence, it will aid in connecting and socialising with those of diverse cultures. Thus, traditional skills and practises not only serve to symbolise the nation, but also to unite its people.

However, technology is also highly useful since it provides immediate response and alleviation in the battle against any sickness, while older methods need time to produce results. As medical technology has advanced, individuals have begun to favour it over traditional practices. Therefore, technology is necessary for quick outcomes.

To conclude, although technology benefits us by giving instant results, traditional skills and methods are more essential to know our culture better, and also to socialise more.

Sample 11:

Nowadays, technology and cultural traditions are perennially controversial issues of conversation. Some individuals believe that old methods and abilities are vanishing owing to technological innovation. Moreover, protecting them is futile. I mostly agree with the viewpoint, and my preferences will be explained further.

To begin with, technology is at its pinnacle in every industry today. As a result of the advancement of technology, individuals choose to use it over conventional talents. Moreover, technology greatly simplifies all jobs. For instance, there are lots of sewing machines that have been developed; while, in earlier times, people were using hands to sew, which was time consuming and tough work. Thus, technology makes each task simpler and quicker.

In addition, technology has improved to the point that individuals may now post their professional profiles on internet platforms and get better employment. Additionally, it might enable them to share their work and network with other experts. Individuals may obtain pleasure and tranquilly as well as prosperity if they share their strengths and skills. Therefore, technology offers several advantages over conventional methods.

However, I would not avoid the fact that traditional talents are very distinctive and useful, since they aid in identifying communities and history, therefore connecting the origins of civilizations. In addition, if individuals lose the identity of their communities, they will lose their own. Therefore, it is essential to preserve old practices and abilities.

In conclusion, despite the fact that traditional skills and traditions assist in defining a community, technology is more vital since it makes labour simpler and more useful.

Sample 12:

Digital advancements are the hallmark of the 21st century. Today, nearly every nation across the globe has felt the impact of this wave of technological innovation and has adapted to this phenomenon in some way or the other. However, this occurrence poses an imminent threat to a modest and conventional way of life. It is widely believed that avoiding this change and safeguarding the old ways is impractical. I am a strong supporter of this notion. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I will elaborate on the topic and justify my views with relevant instances.

It is indeed important to acknowledge the various indigenous trades that are present in every nation. The traditional skills prevalent in a region are an intrinsic part of the local culture. Such abilities and ensuing products, although unique, are expensive and require more time and financial investment. Also, the quality standards of such commodities are inconsistent due to the absence of sophisticated machine-based manufacturing techniques.

Furthermore, the chief benefit enjoyed with the employment of technological facilities is the degree of convenience. The reduction of human effort is the prime goal of digital modernization. Today, an individual can access and fulfil all of their necessities and demands at the tip of their fingertips, owing to the advent of the Internet and its subsequent services. The availability of nearly all kinds of domestic and luxurious commodities online has led to such a measure of comfort that was previously unimaginable. Thus, avoiding such resources and following an archaic lifestyle is illogical in this day and age.

Nevertheless, we must also address the fact that a basic manner of living is less stressful and mentally undemanding. However, the level of inefficiency faced, as a consequence, is detrimental to the survivability of an individual regularly.

Finally, progress is a natural occurrence in human civilization, and we have to adapt to the reforms as and when they happen. Therefore, it is prudent to accept such technological transformations rather than going against the majority.

Sample 13:

The significant predicament with the development of technology influencing the traditional skills and conventional lifestyle is quite a controversial topic and requires a profound argument. At a glance, I disagree with the opinion expressed on the topic as technology doesn’t have enough power to completely eradicate the traditional skills from a community, culture or a country. I shall highlight my perception in the following paragraphs.

In a lot of ways, the history of civilisation is interlinked with the history of technology, keeping in mind the discovery of fire, the invention of the wheel and the latest evolution of the internet. We are constantly moving forward, bringing efficient and better ways of living to the world. Definitely, most of the people would want to preserve such traditions. Technology will always be following in its footsteps, regardless of what people think. The advancements in technology are the sheer requirements of people. Thus, preventing or abolishing technological advancement would not be a possibility. Rather, people should embrace the trends positively. Intriguingly, technology can contribute positively to keeping the traditional skills alive. For instance, the population of certain islands is quite restricted to having a regular schooling system. Instead of compelling families to send children to the mainland, authorities have commenced online education for school children.

When it comes to preserving the traditions and customs, the generation of a country is liable for it. If people are willing to save a tradition, technological advancements, in no way, can destroy it. For instance, people found more benefits in machinery and the latest equipment as they could save tons of time and effort. Hence, they let a few traditions die out to bring technology, such as handmade fabric, ploughing of fields in some areas, and more.

Sure, there are certain technologies that have overtaken traditional skills, such as machinery being used to manufacture some fabric that was earlier handmade. However, it also has to be noted that technology is not backed up enough to eliminate every traditional skill altogether.

Concluding the essay, it can be stated that the evolution of technology is not pointless in any way and we, as people, should keep our traditions alive to support our standard of living.

Sample 14:

The argument against preserving traditional skills and lifestyles in the face of technological advancements is compelling, as it suggests that clinging to outdated practices may hinder progress and limit individuals’ ability to adapt to modern advancements. Firstly, maintaining skills that are no longer relevant in the context of technological evolution seems impractical. For instance, the obsolete knowledge required to repair VHS players is rendered useless with the advent of DVD players, emphasizing the natural progression toward more efficient technologies.

Moreover, the argument contends that an excessively traditional lifestyle can impede societal development. Embracing past customs might discourage innovation and hinder the creation of new, improved ways of living. By adhering strictly to traditional values, individuals may miss out on the opportunities presented by technological advancements, hindering the overall advancement of human civilization. This viewpoint suggests that embracing change and welcoming new technologies can lead to a more dynamic and progressive society.

Additionally, the argument highlights how sticking to traditional ways may confine individuals to their comfort zones, preventing them from exploring beyond conventional viewpoints. This limitation could stifle creativity and impede the development of novel ideas. By encouraging people to embrace new technologies and ways of living, society can foster an environment that promotes innovation and adaptability.

In conclusion, the perspective presented argues that traditional skills and lifestyles become unnecessary when superior alternatives are available through technological advancements. The call to anticipate and embrace new ways of living and skill sets is an active stance that encourages individuals to stay open-minded and receptive to progress.

Sample 15:

There is much discussion surrounding the claim that traditional skills and ways of life will eventually go extinct as a result of technological innovation. While it is true that certain practises may become obsolete due to technological improvements, I think it is crucial to preserve traditional skills and ways of life for the sake of cultural preservation and societal well-being.

Innovative techniques are frequently introduced by technological advancement and replace conventional practises, making them less useful or efficient. For instance, labour-intensive craftsmanship can be replaced by sophisticated machinery and automation, which would lead to a loss of traditional artisanal abilities. Additionally, technological advancements such as worldwide networking and information transmission have hastened cultural homogenization and undermined unique cultural practises and customs.

However, maintaining old ways of life and skills is of enormous cultural and social importance. A community's history, morals, and identity are typically deeply established in its customs. They serve as a bridge across generations, fostering a sense of continuity and belonging. Traditional skills also represent the variety of cultural expressions and artistic styles that add to the wealth and diversity of the human legacy.

Preserving ancient ways of life can also be advantageous economically. Cultural tourism and a desire for traditional handicrafts create opportunities for economic expansion and job creation. The transmission of specific knowledge and competence is ensured by maintaining traditional skills and protecting traditional industries and their cultural and economic value.

Instead of viewing technology and tradition as mutually exclusive, a balanced approach is needed. Harmonious coexistence can be achieved by embracing modern advancements while appreciating and preserving traditional skills and ways of life. This can be done by integrating technology into conventional methods, increasing their effectiveness and sustainability while retaining the essential elements of cultural heritage.

Despite the fact that technological improvements may endanger traditional skills and ways of living, it is crucial to acknowledge the cultural and sociological worth of these practises. Traditionalism fosters cultural identity, variety, and economic development. The continuity of cultural heritage and the well-being of society are guaranteed by the adoption of a balanced strategy that combines technological development with the preservation of traditional skills.

Sample 16:

There is little room for doubt that the last 15 years have seen more development in modern technology than the previous 30 years. I, like many others, believe that people forget to use traditional skills whenever a country develops a new technology, as they think that modern products can be easily handled as well as economical to purchase.

Indeed, there are numerous upsides to using modern technologies. One of the most important is time-saving, meaning that using the latest products on a daily basis assists people to save their precious time. Additionally, modern goods are convenient to use because they require the best effort of a person as well as operate automatically by clicking one button. According to the survey conducted by The Times of India, 70% of industries in the USA use modernized machines for manufacturing clothes, as they believe that using these machines helps them to save a sum amount of money along with efforts. Hence, many countries are moving forward to use the latest goods.

There is no denying the fact that traditional skills have their own benefits. One of the most important ones is that they are handmade. To put it another way, most items are manufactured without using any technology. For instance, Kashmiri shawls are stitched by using hands and traditional equipment. Moreover, people love to buy these shawls because they are very premium as well as warm. Therefore, many foreigners purchase Kashmiri shawls whenever they visit India.

To conclude, it seems to me that modern technology is very convenient and economical to use for those who have recently started their businesses.

Sample 17:

When a nation advances technologically, it inevitably takes a toll on the conventional skill set and lifestyle. In my opinion, traditional competencies and values of life are not important to be maintained as technology changes society in a transient manner and solves problems for the people who live in it.

To commence with, there is no rationale for preserving traditional skills that have no practical need for a better lifestyle. Powerful technology makes these skills useless as the proliferation of cutting-edge technologies supersedes the old ones each day as time goes by. In fact, technological changes determine the conditions under which we live. Let’s clarify this with an example. DVDs players are obsolete VHS players, and the skills required to mend VHS players are no longer useful. When the technology has offered even more powerful storage solutions, keeping the backdated ones is just pointless.

Likewise, maintaining a rigorously conventional lifestyle can limit the progress of human civilization. That is to say that the traditional way of life promotes one to remain the same, retaining the same custom, which in turn may dissuade men from inventing new ways of life to make it easier and superior. It keeps people trying to live in the past; thereby they distance themselves from the blessings stemming from technological development. On top of that, the traditional lifestyle confines people in their comfort zone. To put it another way, they cannot push themselves to think outside the box with traditional views.

It would be reasonable enough to draw a conclusion that traditional skills and lifestyle often make no sense at all when there are better alternatives. Therefore, we should be looking forward to embracing the new manners of life and new skill set.

Sample 18:

Conventional skill sets and lifestyles in society are fading away with the advancement of technology. Many believe that the need to maintain a traditional set of skills and ideas is worthless. Such a view is, however, seriously mistaken. This is because traditional skill sets and lifestyles can bring considerable benefits to the environment and the community as well.

Traditional competencies have been forged over hundreds of years of human experience and they are crucial to the environment. These skills were devised with empirical observations about its inhabitants and the ecosystem as a whole. The convention on biological diversity, for example, finds that many indigenous communities have been using biodiversity and cultivating it in a sustainable manner for hundreds of years. Thus, in times like this environmental chaos, traditional skills are of profound importance more than ever.

Similarly, the traditional lifestyle is just as noteworthy as common skills. By maintaining it, people can build a healthy community. In a traditional value system, collectivism takes the centre stage at every level of life. Individuals determine themselves as members of groups and place the priorities of their collective priorities ahead of their personal preferences. In short, individuals aim to satisfy others’ requirements rather than their own demands. On the contrary, today’s individualistic society pays attention to the needs of the individuals over the needs of the group as a whole, which in turn very often provokes bitter conflicts and widens the gaps between the poor and rich.

In fine, traditional skills and ways of life are not only good for the environment but equally are important for the welfare of our society. We should keep alive traditional skills and lifestyles because these can resurrect a healthy environment and a harmonious society for all.

Sample 19:

There is no doubt that with the advancement of technology, many traditional skills and ways of life are becoming obsolete. However, I strongly disagree with the opinion that it is pointless to try and keep them alive. In my view, it is essential to preserve traditional skills and ways of life because they are an integral part of a country’s culture and heritage.

Firstly, traditional skills and ways of life provide a connection to a country’s past and identity. They give us an insight into how our ancestors lived and worked, and how they contributed to the country’s growth and development. By preserving these skills and ways of life, we can maintain a link to our history and heritage and pass it on to future generations.

Secondly, traditional skills and ways of life can be a valuable source of knowledge and inspiration for modern technology. Many of these skills have been refined over centuries and can offer unique perspectives and solutions to contemporary problems. For instance, traditional methods of agriculture or handicrafts can provide insights into sustainable and eco-friendly practices that can benefit modern industries.

Moreover, preserving traditional skills and ways of life can help to promote cultural diversity and maintain a sense of community identity. These practices often reflect the customs, values, and beliefs of a particular community, and their preservation can help to promote social cohesion and understanding.

In conclusion, it is crucial to recognize the value of traditional skills and ways of life and work towards their preservation. They provide a connection to our past, offer valuable insights into modern-day problems, and promote cultural diversity and social cohesion. It is not purposeless to try and keep them alive, and we should do our best to ensure that they are not lost in the march of technological progress.

Sample 1:

Many people argue that an increase in fuel prices will solve the problem of the environment. While this idea could help reduce the number of harmful fumes, I maintain that a global awareness campaign is the most feasible option.

On the one hand this policy might help cut down the emissions from private vehicles which pollute the air in big cities. Indeed, as the cost per kilometer increases, people would have to consider reducing the distance and the frequency at which they travel on the roads. If there is a need to travel, commuters might also turn to more cost-effective and greener means of transportation such as buses or electric bikes. In both of these cases, the total amount of noxious fumes that cause air pollution is limited.

However, an increase in fuel prices can only solve a limited part of the complex environmental issues. In fact, causes of pollution are diverse, involving the use of plastic bags in shopping or chemicals in both agriculture and industry which contaminate both water and land. Therefore, the most effective solution would be running a world-wide campaign that raises the consumer awareness about the environmental cost of their shopping habits and presses companies to reduce the consumption of noxious chemicals and resolve to greener cultivating and manufacturing methods.

In conclusion, while increasing fuel costs can partly solve the environmental problems by discouraging private vehicle usage, the ideal solution would be making the public and enterprises aware of these issues. I am also convinced that once more resolute actions are taken, humans can reverse the effect of climate change and environmental problems.

Sample 2:

The overconsumption of fossil fuels has become a major topic of concern recently. Some people suggest that increasing the fuel price can be the solution to cope with environmental issues. Personally, I believe that other measures should also be given equal consideration.

Firstly, increasing fuel expenses cannot minimise the global dependence on fuel. It should be first noted that even when the price of fuel increases significantly, people still cannot cut down the tremendous demand for petrol at once. For example, in daily life, people still need to use their cars despite the fluctuation in the petrol price. Another clear reason is that petrol is also intended for other applications in manufacturing industries and agricultural purposes. If the price of fuel increases, the national economy could suffer many unfavourable consequences.

When it comes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, some measures should be taken to mitigate the problems of overconsuming fuel. The most practical measure at the moment is to reduce the demand for resources in daily activities like travelling or production. This can be done by encouraging people to turn to mass-producing energy-efficient products like hybrid cars or implementing new saving energy technology in manufacturing. Besides, the most sustainable solution is to lower the reliance on fuel by taking advantage of alternative resources. Wind and tidal power in the Netherlands, nuclear power in Japan, and solar power in the United States have all proven their efficiency in energy in energy production. These could be employed in other parts of the world to minimise global dependence on fossil fuels.

All existing data above shows that only increases the fuel price will not reduce the global warming effects. Some strong alternative measures need to be implemented to tackle this situation.

Sample 3:

The notion that raising the cost of fuel for transportation can alleviate environmental issues has been gaining traction. From my point of view, while this solution can help tackle environmental problems to a degree, creating an incentive for individuals and enterprises to take action against these problems would be a more effective approach.

On the one hand, an increase in the cost of fuel may prove effective in decreasing the traffic volume, thus reducing harmful emissions that can affect the environment. First, this policy would raise people’s awareness of the frequency and length of their travels. Due to the rise in expenses, people would have to cut down on unnecessary trips. Moreover, as fuel prices soar, more sustainable mobility choices that rely less on carbon-intensive fuels, namely buses that run on biofuel, will witness a surge in demand. To illustrate, in America, since 2010, hybrid vehicles and smaller transports have had a growing market as a consequence of rising fuel prices.

On the other hand, increasing fuel costs cannot tackle all environmental issues. As a matter of fact, car emissions are not the sole cause, but emissions from livestock farming and other industries are also significant contributors to pollution. To illustrate, what is surprising is that livestock accounts for 64 percent of total methane emission - a destructive gas for the ozone layer. Hence, providing individuals and businesses with an incentive to protect the environment would be more effective. For example, the government can apply a lower tax on companies which leave less impact on their surroundings. In this way, enterprises will proactively find ways to reduce their carbon footprint.

All in all, increasing fuel prices can help solve environmental problems to a degree. However, the most effective solution would be to provide a stimulus for society to intentionally reduce damaging impacts to our habitat.

Sample 4:

It has been argued that raising the price of petrol for cars and other means of transport is the most effective way to address international environmental issues. In my opinion, although this policy would ostensibly help reduce emissions, I believe it is far from being the best solution and environmental problems would be tackled more effectively if governments invest more in renewable sources of energy.

On the one hand, raising taxes on fuel may help in reducing air pollution and the carbon footprint of each individual. It is common knowledge that cars and other vehicles running on fossil fuels release a large amount of exhaust fumes into the atmosphere. This not only contributes to global warming but also exacerbates existing air pollution in many parts of the world, including rapidly industrializing nations such as China, where the air quality is so poor that citizens there have particularly high risk of respiratory diseases. If the price of fuel increased, people would be reluctant to use cars, which translates into a reduction in exhaust emissions. Therefore, increasing the cost of petrol may be considered an appropriate measure to tackle extreme, short-term environmental problems.

However, I believe increasing fuel costs would be somewhat counterproductive and a focus on renewables would be best. When the price of petrol increased dramatically, this would engender resentment among those who rely on fossil fuels and simply cannot switch to other sources of energy at once. Electric vehicles are the best substitutes; however, for the most part, these vehicles are still prohibitively expensive to be a mainstream replacement for cars that run on petrol. Therefore, concentrating on developing renewable sources of energy would be superior as these sources are less finite and pollution-free. Countries all over the world should invest more in wind farms and solar panels to make renewables more available to average residents. In this way, the dependence on fossil fuels will be reduced without creating classist system that punishes the less affluent.

In conclusion, although increasing fuel costs may help reduce emissions, I believe this policy would do more harm than good and giving priority to renewable energy is preferable. It is of paramount importance that all countries commit to environmental sustainability.

Sample 5:

Nowadays, some individuals believe that the optimal remedy to environmental issues is to raise the cost of fuel for several vehicles. Personally, I do not think this is the best solution and will offer my opinion in the following essay.

Proponents of such an idea would argue that a rise in the petrol price can bring many benefits, among which the improved quality of air seems to be the most significant. Specifically, if the increased cost of fuel came into effect, possibly more and more people could be discouraged from driving their private cars and might make use of the public transport system instead. Consequently, the emission of noxious exhaust from personal vehicles can be tremendously reduced, which could largely contribute to a greener and fresher atmosphere, especially in heavily industrialized urban areas where the quality of air is often considerably low.

However, I believe that such a proposition would not be the best way to solve environmental problems. First, these issues normally stem from diverse causes, some of which may be the abuse of chemicals in agriculture and industry or the inappropriate disposal and treatment of waste. Undoubtedly, an increase in petrol prices alone cannot address these aspects, which would continue doing harm to the environment. Second, as vehicles have long played a pivotal role in the transportation of people, goods or services, a rise in fuel costs could meet with strong disapproval among citizens. This is because not only would there be an additional financial burden placed on them, but their normal daily movement could also be altered due to it.

To recapitulate briefly, despite the assumption that the increased cost of fuel is the best way to tackle environmental problems, I still disagree with it for the reasons mentioned above.

Sample 6:

Troubling environmental problems have required nations and individuals to come up with definitive solutions. Among them, increasing the cost of fuel has been touted as decisive, but this proposal has also divided people over its effectiveness. While there are reasons to support it, a rise in fuel price, in my opinion, is unlikely to be the most superior redress to humanity’s environmental woes.

Some might argue that making fuel cost more would meaningfully impact the environment. Firstly, raising the cost of fuel is believed to reduce carbon footprint through affecting the demand. If their means of powering up private vehicles become less affordable, people will have to resort to transportation alternatives which produce lower amounts of pollutants. The government, furthermore, can levy a tax on purchases of fuel in order to fund cleanup or conservation efforts. As done in many countries, this would ensure that the general population’s demand for energy can fund the restoration of pollution damage caused by fuel emissions. Essentially, making fuel more expensive provides a two-pronged approach to solving environmental issues.

Such a course of action is far from being optimal, however. This is because it can hinder economic activity and stymie development. When fuel becomes more expensive, transportation will follow, and businesses bear the brunt of this impact, which causes them to raise the price of goods and services. Undoubtedly, this is a catalyst for inflation and discontentment among the population. Meanwhile, there exist measures more efficacious than merely making fuel cost more, such as providing public grants and investing in initiatives and companies which produce environmental solutions. The power of technology and talented specialists, combined, can deliver clear-cut and decisive answers to the many issues plaguing the environment, without indiscriminately impacting the economy as previously described.

In conclusion, although increasing the cost of fuel is effective in certain respects, I wholeheartedly dispute the belief that it is the most superior remedy for environmental problems. Hopefully, better alternatives can be implemented to preserve the Earth for the sake of future generations.

Sample 7:

The environment is facing many problems, and most of them are created largely by human actions. To protect the environment, some people suggest increasing the fuel price as the most effective solution as they think that fuel price would reduce private car ownership and check uncontrolled industrialisation. In this essay, I will disagree with this opinion by discussing that global environmental problems are multifaceted and increasing fuel prices is not the best possible solution.

To begin with, increasing the price of fuel would not deter the rich and upper-middle class to drive their own cars but increase the price of necessary commodities making life for the poor and lower-middle class even more difficult. It is evident that people who earn a large sum of money, do not care even a hundred per cent fuel price increase decision as they can afford that without denting their pockets. But a mere 20% fuel price increase would make life difficult for mass people as the price of daily items and essential services would increase proportionately. Similarly, when industries have to purchase fuel at an elevated price, they inflate the price of their products thus profiting even more. Therefore, a high fuel price is not a viable solution to address environmental issues.

Moreover, only fossil fuel is not the culprit for environmental degradation, and it is a multifaceted issue. Logging of woods, uncontrolled urbanisation, chemical wastage, water and noise pollution and our cozy lifestyle and consumerism habits are all responsible for environmental concerns. And all these issues need proper policy implementation rather than hiking the price of fuel. For instance, to reduce deforestation, water and noise pollution, we need proper policy and their implementation not a hike in fuel prices. 

Therefore, increasing the fuel price may be a way to control environmental problems to a limited extent, but it could never be the best solution. We need to include many integrated policies and diverse methods to save our environment.

Sample 8:

The world is facing severe environmental challenges, including climate change, pollution, and resource depletion. Many solutions have been proposed, one of which suggests increasing the price of fuel as a means to address these issues most effectively. This essay will argue that while it may be effective in some aspects, it should not be viewed as a standalone solution to the complex environmental problems of the modern world.

Higher fuel prices could incentivise individuals and industries to adopt more sustainable practices and reduce carbon emissions to some extent. For instance, consumers might opt for fuel-efficient vehicles, while companies may invest in alternative energy sources to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels. This shift towards greener options could contribute to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, helping combat climate change. But it could never be the best solution because it does not deal with other environmental problems like deforestation, plastic pollution, and water and noise pollution to name a few.

Moreover, increasing fuel prices could also have adverse effects on the economy and society, particularly for low-income individuals. Higher fuel costs might lead to an increase in the price of goods and services, affecting the purchasing power of vulnerable populations. Additionally, industries heavily reliant on fuel, such as transportation and manufacturing, may face operational challenges, leading to potential job losses and economic downturns.

While increasing fuel prices may yield some environmental benefits, a more comprehensive approach is necessary to address the world's environmental problems effectively. Governments and policymakers should consider a range of strategies, such as investing in renewable energy, promoting sustainable transportation, implementing stricter environmental regulations, and supporting green technologies for instance to combat environmental issues.

In conclusion, while increasing the price of fuel could have some positive effects on reducing carbon emissions, it is not the sole solution to the world's environmental problems. It is essential to adopt a multi-faceted approach that combines various strategies to tackle issues like climate change, pollution, and resource depletion effectively.

Sample 9:

Raising fuel prices is believed to be the best solution to the planet’s environmental problem. Although this measure may reduce the number of toxic fumes that are released into the atmosphere to some extent, I believe there are several more effective alternatives to tackle environmental issues.

On the one hand, such a policy may help to lower emissions from certain modes of transport. As the price of fuel increases, commuters may resort to using public transport instead of using their own vehicles in order to save money. Moreover, drivers who are unwilling to spend more money on petrol will be encouraged to use vehicles that run on renewable and environmentally-friendly energy sources as an alternative, such as electric cars and bicycles. As a consequence, the number of privately-owned vehicles travelling on public roads would be significantly reduced, which in turn would significantly reduce the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere each year. This would effectively enhance the air quality.

However, as environmental issues stem from many causes, there are several more suitable ways to address these problems. People’s lack of awareness and knowledge about such problems is one of the primary underlying issues that results in pollution. Therefore, the government must educate the public about the current state of their environment and negative lifestyles in order to reduce the long-term impacts of their ignorance. Additionally, water pollution is a severe issue in many developing countries these days and is often found downstream from industrial zones where factories discharge toxic waste without proper treatment. Such an issue requires governments to implement stricter regulations to minimize the negative health impacts and help sustain the economy.

In conclusion, since each problem requires a unique solution, it is justifiable to say that increasing the price of fuel is not the single best resolution for environmental issues.

Sample 10:

It is asserted that the cost of fossil fuels should be increased in order to address environmental challenges. This essay will examine why this is a strong belief and share my opinion on the matter.

Firstly, many people think that the excessive use of crude oil is one of the root causes of the environmental issues our planet is facing and the only way to prevent this is to make the use of fossil fuels more expensive. Moreover, tons of carbon dioxide are released daily by vehicles and factories to the ozone layer, which has been depleted over time. Cloudburst is one of the major natural disasters in Uttarakhand caused by global warming and can be considered an alarm of disaster caused by nature.

The primary cause of global warming is petroleum. However, it is not possible to cope with the issue just by raising the amount of refilling the vehicles that run on fuel. Fuel is a blessing to modern society. People need it to generate power to maintain the standard of well-being. To fulfil their needs, they will buy at any cost, no matter how expensive it is. For example, investing in renewable energy sources to reduce their costs would be a more sensible solution. So that people could have cleaner and cheaper options of energy and fossil fuel would have a better substitute.

To sum up, I counter that making fossil fuels more exorbitant is the right approach to prevent earth’s environmental issues. Whereas affordable alternatives to clean energy sources should be developed.

Sample 11:

Nature can exist without humans, but humans cannot live without nature. However, there are a rising number of environmental issues that are faced by mankind. Some individuals believe that increasing the price of fuel is by far the most appropriate method of tackling this issue. I disagree with this statement because I feel that environmental education and lowering fuel usage are the most viable approaches to solving the environmental problem's primary cause.

Initially, environmental challenges are the negative results of human actions. Included in these were pollution, global warming, and ozone layer depletion. Hence, the benefit of environmental education is that it assists individuals in comprehending how their decisions and activities affect the environment. Spain with the highest environmental performance and air quality in the world, based on their European scoring system because of the National Environmental Education of Spain, which established the curriculum and developed an environmentally friendly program to teach their primary students the fundamental knowledge and skills necessary to address complex environmental issues, which can take action to keep our environment healthy and sustainable for the future.

Using less fossil fuel is a method of reducing air pollution. Humans should prefer walking or bicycle instead of vehicles as it produces nitrogen dioxide which leads to physical health issues. This also results in the country's Emissions of carbon dioxide into the environment having decreased significantly, leading to improved physical and mental health for the nation.

To conclude, the most effective way to address the increase in air pollution is for individuals to adopt a less fuel-intensive lifestyle and be knowledgeable about how global impacts touch their lives.

Sample 12:

There is indeed a worldwide increase in environmental decline and disturbances to the natural environment. Increasing fuel prices is the most effective way to mitigate this issue. However, I disagree vehemently that it is the most effective strategy for addressing this issue.

First, increasing the cost of petrol will not instantly solve the widespread problem that already exists globally. This is due to the fact that the vehicles and machinery producing garbage remain static. This will merely make it tougher for the majority to acquire finances for fuel, whereas the wealthy will have no trouble obtaining fuel. In addition, this strategy would have a substantial impact on the productivity and revenue of enterprises that require fuel to run. For instance, transportation businesses may be forced to increase their prices, which some clients may not be able to afford. Thus, the firm's services will be diminished, resulting in low profits. This can be bad for the economy overall.

It might be claimed that byproducts from car vehicle emissions released into the environment contribute to air pollution and that this can be reduced by indirectly reducing car use through fuel rising prices. However, it is essential to emphasize that limiting automobile use would not alter the baseline environment. Additionally, improved garbage disposal procedures will be adequate.

In summation, I strongly disagree with the statement that hiking gas prices will control the current environmental problems. This will only harm firm sales and national economic progress. In addition, we should identify further effective solutions to these issues.

Sample 13:

Challenging environmental issues have compelled nations and individuals to devise conclusive solutions. Among these, increasing fuel costs has been advocated as definitive, but this proposition has also stirred debate regarding its efficacy. While there are arguments in its favor, escalating fuel prices, in my view, are not the optimal solution to the world's environmental challenges.

Some may contend that augmenting fuel costs would have a significant impact on the environment. Initially, increasing fuel prices is expected to diminish the carbon footprint by affecting demand. If the cost of fueling private vehicles becomes less affordable, individuals will need to turn to transportation alternatives with lower emissions. Additionally, governments can impose taxes on fuel purchases to finance clean-up or conservation endeavors. As practiced in numerous countries, this would ensure that the public's energy demand can support the restoration of pollution caused by fuel emissions. Essentially, increasing fuel costs offers a dual strategy to addressing environmental issues.

However, such a course of action is far from ideal. This is because it can impede economic activity and hinder progress. When fuel becomes more expensive, transportation costs will rise, and businesses will shoulder the burden of this impact, leading them to increase the prices of goods and services. Undoubtedly, this serves as a catalyst for inflation and discontent among the populace. Meanwhile, there are more effective measures than simply raising fuel costs, such as providing public subsidies and investing in programs and companies that offer environmental solutions. The combination of technology and skilled experts can provide precise and decisive solutions to the numerous challenges afflicting the environment, without unfairly impacting the economy as previously discussed.

In conclusion, while increasing fuel costs may be effective in certain aspects, I vehemently challenge the notion that it is the most superior panacea for environmental problems. Hopefully, superior alternatives can be implemented to preserve the Earth for future generations.

Sample 14:

Raising the price of car fuel is believed by some people to be an excellent method to solve the growing number of environmental issues. However, I strongly disagree with this idea, as doing so would make life difficult for lower-income households. While making fuel more expensive wouldn't change the habits of wealthy families, switching to fossil fuel alternatives could prove to be much more beneficial for the environment.

The most compelling reason against raising the cost of fuel is that the upper classes of society will hardly be affected by rising fuel costs, as this only makes up a minor proportion of their expenditure. They will continue to use their personal vehicles as they wish without a thought for the environment or the higher fuel prices, even if their country has state-of-the-art public transportation.

Those who will feel the crunch of this decision are the middle-class and lower-income households, since travelling is a major part of most people's routine, be it to work, school or shopping. Driving is almost unavoidable in many instances; therefore, raising the price of petrol would only serve to widen the gap between the rich and poor, and serve as an inadvertent form of discrimination.

Another reason why increasing the cost of fuel is far from the best way to deal with environmental pollution is that now there are much more viable alternatives. Due to the rapid advances in technology, scientists and engineers have been able to develop several alternatives to fossil fuel, such as cars powered by electricity or naturally produced biofuel. The move to adopt clean energy sources instead of fossil fuels is a much more promising alternative compared to simply making fuel more expensive.

In conclusion, I believe that governments of the world should invest more time and money in finding alternatives to fossil fuels that are more environmentally friendly, rather than simply raising the cost of petrol.

Sample 15:

The idea of increasing fuel prices for cars and other vehicles as a means to address environmental problems has gained traction among many individuals. In this essay, I will present my opinion on this matter, considering both the potential benefits and drawbacks of such a strategy.

Those in support of raising fuel prices argue that it can serve as a deterrent for excessive car usage and promote more sustainable transportation alternatives. By making fuel more expensive, individuals may be incentivized to reduce their reliance on cars, leading to a decrease in harmful emissions and pollution. Furthermore, the additional revenue generated from increased fuel costs can be allocated towards environmental initiatives and the development of greener transportation infrastructure.

However, there are valid concerns regarding the potential negative impacts of higher fuel prices. One major consideration is the burden it may impose on lower-income individuals and families who heavily rely on private vehicles for their daily commute. This could lead to financial strain and limited access to essential services. Instead of solely relying on increased fuel costs, governments should focus on a comprehensive approach that encompasses various strategies. This could involve investing in public transportation, encouraging the adoption of electric and hybrid vehicles, and implementing stricter emissions standards for automobiles.

In my view, while increasing fuel prices may be a viable option to mitigate environmental problems, it should not be the sole solution. Governments should adopt a multifaceted approach that combines measures such as promoting sustainable transportation alternatives, investing in public transit systems, and incentivizing the use of eco-friendly vehicles. By implementing a comprehensive strategy, we can effectively address environmental challenges while ensuring accessibility and affordability for all members of society.

Sample 16:

Fuel consumption has been established as one of the key contributors to rising environmental pollution. Because of this, some people argue that raising energy prices would be an effective way to protect the environment. In this essay, I am going to argue that such a policy is futile because it does not address the underlying causes of pollution, and other measures are needed.

Advocates of increasing fuel costs may argue that in doing so governments may discourage citizens from using personal vehicles, thereby reducing fuel consumption and making the environment cleaner. Consumers, especially in developing countries, are generally price-conscious, and thus the exorbitant fuel prices may gear them towards cheaper and more eco-friendly modes of transport like walking or mass transit. However, such reasoning is flawed, because car exhausts are only one of the many causes of pollution. Factories' discharge of effluents contaminates water sources, and deforestation is the main culprit behind land degradation. Adjusting energy prices would have little or no impact on these phenomena, and therefore the view that higher costs of fuel can effectively solve global environmental problems should be rejected.

Instead of intervening in the energy market, governments should adopt more viable solutions to curb environmental pollution. First of all, stricter punishments must be administered to individuals and companies who do harm to the environment. Prison sentences may be given to people participating in illegal logging, and factories must be fined for releasing excessive toxic gases into the atmosphere. These steps ought to be carried out in tandem with educating the public about the poor state of the environment. Once people are conscious of the detrimental impacts that they have on the air quality or the water sources, they would be galvanized into action and start to actively protect the environment.

In conclusion, I would contend that a scheme to raise fuel costs may not bring about the desired effect, and therefore other steps to mitigate environmental issues should be considered.

Sample 17:

In my view, I strongly agree that increasing the cost of fuel for vehicles is an effective strategy to tackle environmental issues, particularly climate change. This approach can lead to significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and encourage the adoption of more sustainable transportation alternatives.

Raising the cost of fuel serves as a deterrent to excessive car usage and encourages individuals to consider alternative modes of transportation, such as public transit, cycling, or carpooling. In European countries where fuel prices are high due to heavy taxation, people are more inclined to use public transport or adopt energy-efficient vehicles. As a result, these nations have lower carbon emissions per capita and are making notable progress in curbing climate change.

Furthermore, higher fuel prices can stimulate innovation in the automotive industry. As consumers demand more fuel-efficient vehicles, manufacturers are pushed to develop hybrid and electric cars, which are less harmful to the environment. The success of electric car companies like Tesla is a testament to the market’s responsiveness to changes in fuel prices.

However, some argue that such measures disproportionately affect low-income individuals who heavily rely on personal vehicles. While this concern is valid, governments can counterbalance this by investing in affordable public transportation options and providing incentives for eco-friendly vehicles.

In conclusion, raising the cost of fuel for vehicles is a practical and effective strategy to address environmental challenges, particularly in mitigating climate change. By encouraging sustainable transportation choices and fostering innovation, we can move closer to a more environmentally friendly future.

Sample 18:

The proposition that escalating fuel prices is the optimal solution to the world’s environmental problems is a subject of considerable debate. While it is undeniable that this approach can have some merits, I firmly disagree that it is the best solution. 

Increasing the price of fuel is a measure with significant implications for various segments of society, particularly the economically disadvantaged. In developing countries like India, where a large portion of the population depends on fuel for their daily livelihood, such a policy change would result in higher living costs and potentially exacerbate social inequality. Furthermore, the assumption that higher fuel prices would effectively deter its usage and subsequently reduce pollution may not hold true. The demand for fuel tends to be relatively inelastic, meaning people will continue to rely on it even with price increases, primarily due to the lack of viable alternatives. Insufficiently developed public transportation systems in many regions further compound this issue, as they are unable to adequately replace personal vehicle usage. While increasing fuel prices might lead to some reduction in usage, the overall impact on pollution levels is unlikely to be substantial.

Moreover, increasing fuel prices may inadvertently encourage illegal activities such as smuggling and black-market sales of fuel, leading to other problems such as the loss of government revenue and increased crime rates. Additionally, such measures can potentially stifle economic growth. Industries heavily reliant on fuel, such as manufacturing and transportation, could witness significant cost increases, resulting in reduced profits, layoffs, and even business closures. Thus, fuel price hikes could prove detrimental to the nation’s growth, highlighting the need for careful consideration of the broader impacts of such measures.

To conclude, while increasing fuel prices can be one of the strategies to combat environmental issues, it certainly is not the best solution due to its potential to increase economic inequality and its limited effectiveness in reducing pollution. Therefore, an approach that includes promoting renewable energy sources, improving energy efficiency, and investing in robust public transportation systems could be a more effective strategy to address these environmental challenges.

Sample 19:

Some feel that the optimal solution to the current environmental crisis is to raise fuel costs for various private vehicles. In my opinion, though this would have a tangible impact, a more holistic approach is advisable.

On the one hand, increasing the price of fuel would have a clearly identifiable impact. In both developing and developed countries, private vehicles are becoming more common. More expensive fuel costs would discourage individuals from taking long trips and encourage them to seek alternative modes of transport such as walking, riding a bicycle, sharing transportation, and using public transportation. The average family that struggles to pay their bills every month might then decide to stay home rather than take a short trip on weekends if the cost of travel outweighs the potential enjoyment. Governments would be able to clearly chart the effects produced by these taxes and adjust them accordingly.

On the other hand, a wide variety of measures that do not target less affluent segments of society would have a greater effect. A single remedy is unlikely to produce the desired result as the majority of middle- and upper-class citizens would not be deterred by minor taxes. Instead, governments should consider all the relevant environment issues ranging from deforestation and single-use plastics to fossil fuel consumption in industry and the methane released in factory farming. To truly and sustainably counter these issues, governments will need to employ a variety of tactics that will likely include not only taxes but also regulations and various educational initiatives. The tackling of a single cause, such as the fuel used in private vehicles, will have marginal impact at best.

In conclusion, despite tangible results that a tax might engender, governments should opt for a more comprehensive environmental policy. This is a pressing issue and requires a nuanced, long-term approach.

Sample 20:

It has been recommended that out of many solutions, the best solution is to hike the prices of petrol and diesel to ameliorate environmental hazards. I thoroughly agree with the statement because fewer vehicles will run on the road and demand for other means of transport will rise such as cycles or e-rickshaws.

First off, escalating the prices of fuel will make the masses use their types of machinery less. Resultantly, there will be less pollution. To elaborate it, the paradigm shift makes people use their individual vehicles, and the emission of toxic gases from these vehicles deteriorate the air quality, and the environment gets polluted. This contaminated ambience is not suitable for dwellers of any city or town. Therefore, if the prices increase, people will not run their vehicles. They will not enhance their financial burden, such as the money they have saved for eating outside, paying for gym facilities, and throwing parties. They will need to cut their expenses to refuel their cars or any vehicle. So, it is good to raise the prices of conventional fuel.

In addition, increasing fuel prices will assist in using other vehicles, which have no carcinogenic effect on the environment. In other words, people will use bicycles or e-rickshaws. These two modes will be conducive to reducing the financial burden of individuals and keeping them as fit as a fiddle. These models do not create pollution, and people fall less victim to many ailments. Earlier, a cyclist was considered a destitute one over a car owner. As of now, the scenario has changed. Currently, people are awarded and appreciated for becoming environmentalists. Riding a cycle or using an electronic rickshaw has no carbon emission and is safer to use. Consequently, the surroundings will not become unhealthy, and masses will be hale and hearty.

To conclude, considering the above analysis, it is ostensible that rising fuel prices will reduce the number of vehicles on the road and the need to use environmentally-friendly vehicles will increase. It will be helpful for the atmosphere and people.

Sample 1:

There is much discussion nowadays as to whether or not the relationship between family members is as close as before. Diverse contributing factors can be identified. In the following, I would like to present my point of view.

Great changes have taken place in family life along with the development of society. One of them is that the once-extended family tends to become smaller and smaller. Many children have to leave their parents at an early age to study or work elsewhere. As time passes, children become emotionally estranged from their parents.

Compared with the past, social competition is becoming increasingly fierce. People are urged to concentrate their efforts on their work so that they can achieve success or at least a good standard of living. As a result, they can’t afford to spend their leisure hours with their families. The importance of bonds of kinship is gradually fading from their minds.

In addition, the availability of various kinds of recreational facilities also diverts people from enjoying chats with the members of their families. Their free time is mostly occupied by watching TV, surfing the Internet or playing video games. They come to lose interest in communicating with the other members of their families. In view of such alienation within families, urgent steps must be taken, in my opinion. For members of families who live away from one another, regular contact on the phone can bring them the care that they need. Family reunions on holidays or other important occasions can make a difference as well. For those living together, it is a good idea to take some time off work or recreation periods to spend more time with each other.

In the final analysis, a close family relationship can surely be maintained as long as we realise the significant role it plays in our lives, and we attach importance to it.

Sample 2:

In the past, people mostly preferred to stay in extended families. Today, it is observed that many individuals have their own nuclear families. In this essay, we will discuss how professional commitments forced people to opt for this kind of families. To tackle this, an organisation’s role will be analysed.

To begin with, individuals focus on their career development to a greater extent. A good illustration of this is the group of professionals who spend most of their time in their companies. As a result, they do not have much time for themselves and hence, prefer staying in small families with less contact with other members. Thus, it is obvious that they are not much involved with other family members leading to the lack of closeness with them.

To overcome this, companies can play a crucial role. The first step which a firm can take is to provide the work from home access to the employees. By doing this, they will allow their staff to spend more time with their families. The other steps which can be taken include declaring holidays on all festivals and organising family day in a company. This will allow them to spend more periods with their families and hence, can help them to recuperate their relationships.

From the above, it is clear that hectic work schedule act as a major hindrance for creating close bonds with family. Therefore, the companies should allow remote work, increase holidays and announce family days at workplaces for enforcing individuals to concentrate towards their relationships.

Sample 3:

Most people favoured to live with their extended families in the past. Many people now choose to have their own nuclear families. This essay will discuss how work obligations compelled people to choose these families. We will examine the role of an organization in order to address this.

First, people devote more of their attention to developing their careers. An excellent example of this is the professional group that works in their companies for the majority of their workdays. They prefer living in small families with limited interaction with other family members because they have less time for themselves as a result. As a result, it is clear that their lack of involvement with other family members contributes to their distance from them.

Companies can play a critical role in overcoming this. Enabling employees to work from home is the first action a company can take. They will enable their employees to spend more time with their families by taking this action. Taking other actions involves planning a family day at work and declaring holidays for all festivals. They will be able to spend more time with their families as a result, which may aid in the healing of their relationships.

As we can see from the preceding discussion, a demanding work schedule significantly interferes with the development of strong family ties. Consequently, in order to force people to focus on their relationships, businesses ought to permit remote work, extend holidays, and declare family days at work.

Sample 4:

It is a widely acknowledged fact that families are not as close as they used to be. Parents and their kids hardly communicate with each other in most families. Young people may talk to their mom three times a day, but they talk to their friends all day long. Mom is the least of their contacts. In this essay, I will explore the possible reasons and solutions to this problem.

There are several reasons for this tendency. First of all, crowded modern life makes being alone a luxury enjoyment. When working under pressure every day, people want to be alone in their scarce spare time, they are sick of discussions and arguments more and more. Moreover, nowadays there are more choices in entertainment and amusement, which can be enjoyed on one’s own, which makes conversation unnecessary at home. Thirdly, the generation gap also contributes to this trend.

How can family members create a better common topic at home? First of all, improving communication skills is one of the solutions. We should be supportive, but not over-bearing: incisive, but not judgmental towards our family members. Parents should try to talk the same talk with their children. Most importantly, people in the same family should always temper their criticism. Parents should not offer too much-unsolicited advice to adult children. A parent’s voice, even when whispered, is louder than anyone else’s voice in their children’s ears.

Home is a place where we can rest, and a close family relationship can surely be maintained as long as we realize the significant role it plays in our daily life.

Sample 5:

Gone are the days when families used to stay close. Four main causes have primarily contributed to the phenomenon of family detachment. I, however, personally believe that a few factors still can strengthen family ties.

Estrangement depends on several factors, like different expectations, mismatch in values, emotional abuse and urban lifestyle. Financial factors coupled with other factors, for example, education, also fuel it up. In simple words, highly educated family members with financial independence are not dependent on each other, thereby they are likely to live separately. Research has shown that highly educated adults are associated with higher rates of family breakdown.

Besides, a mismatch in values is another prominent reason. If a father has a deeply entrenched belief in male superiority and the daughter violates that, the father views it as offensive. And, how one can forget about extramarital affairs as many women in the USA, for instance, often mention it as the reason for their estrangement from their husbands. Finally, with the emergence of urban lifestyles, people no longer have joint families. This has made their bond with close family members like grandparents, uncles and aunts very distant.

However, some factors can foster closeness – priority, expert opinion, regular interactions and forgiveness, for instance. The first factor that can promote closeness is giving children priority. That is to say that parents ought to spend sufficient time with their children. When children see their parents sacrificing for them, they will possibly never leave their parents in old homes. The next factor that can ameliorate relationships is expert opinion. People should seek help from psychologists who can advise them on how to avoid pitfalls in a relationship. Finally, regular interaction and forgiveness can flourish closeness to a great extent.

To conclude, a family’s chance to drift apart is high in modern days. Several factors such as independence, mismatch in values, and extramarital affairs, need to be considered when the family gets broken. However, priority, expert opinion and forgiveness are the key to reconciliation.

Sample 6:

The family was the kernel of people’s lives, and a strong family bond was a common phenomenon in the past. But sadly, we have shifted to a more self-centred urban lifestyle where we are busy outside. We think little about our kinship and interact less with our relatives, which has unfixed our bonds to a great extent. A few useful measures can, however, still improve it.

To begin with, a growing percentage of the population now lives in cities and many of them work hard to make ends meet. Others are busy making their fortune. Both of these groups have become selfish enough to sail away from their family and live on their own. They have little time to think about their family members either because they can’t or they won’t! For instance, the number of joint families in suburban and rural areas was quite high but with a city-centric lifestyle, we do not take our grandparents, uncles or aunts to live with us, and even leave our parents after we get a job and thus the nuclear family has become the norm in the modern era. Devastatingly enough, people do not have time for their own children and when those children grow up, they feel little connection to their families. This is an atrocious circle that floats us away from our family relationship.

Perhaps the best way to strengthen our family bonds is to get back to a traditional lifestyle away from cities. But since it is not practically possible, we should still prioritise our family over everything else. We can interact more often with our close relatives, spend quality time with our family members, sacrifice our luxury for them, be loyal to them and teach them how to value the importance of family. Perhaps then we would have a much stronger family connection. Research indicates that the divorce rate is high in cities among busy executives who prioritise their careers over their families. We still have time to build a career for the family, not the other way around.

In conclusion, a family is perhaps the single most important thing in this world, and we should take every possible initiative to keep it intact and strong before it is too late for us.

Sample 7:

In recent times, there has been a transformation in the way families used to be formed in the past, and families, the most fundamental constituency in society, are no longer as closely bonded as they used to be in our ancestor’s time. This essay will discuss the reasons for this change and suggest ways in which families can be brought closer together.

One of the primary reasons for the breakdown in family relationships is the advent of modern technology. With smartphones, social media platforms, and video games, individuals spend more time in isolation with their gadgets than in the company of their family members. In addition, long working hours, commuting times, and social commitments take up much of the time that would have been spent interacting with family members.

Another reason for the lack of closeness in families is the fact that people today are more career-driven and independent. With more job opportunities and better educational prospects, people are no longer tied to their hometowns and often relocate to different cities or countries, leading to a lack of proximity and interaction with extended family members.

To bring families closer together, a conscious effort needs to be made by all members. This can be achieved through regular communication, setting aside time for family activities, and celebrating family traditions and occasions. For instance, a family can plan a regular game or movie night, take annual vacations together, or gather to celebrate birthdays and festivals.

In conclusion, the breakdown of family relationships is a multifaceted issue that has emerged due to the advent of modern technology and changing social dynamics. However, by making a conscious effort to spend quality time together, participate in joint activities, and cherish family traditions, families can be brought closer together.

Sample 8:

The perceived decline in the closeness of families is a widely acknowledged phenomenon. The objective of this essay is to examine the impact of societal changes and technological progress on the decline of family closeness, as well as the potential of promoting open communication and quality time to enhance familial ties.

Firstly, changing lifestyles and societal norms have led to increased time pressures and individual pursuits. To brief, amidst the rapid pace of contemporary life, families frequently encounter the challenge of balancing numerous obligations and engagements, leaving little room for collective pursuits and substantial exchanges, ultimately leading to the gradual deterioration of familial ties and a diminished scope for cherished moments spent together. Additionally, the prevalence of technology has resulted in a decline in meaningful personal interactions. Overdependence on digital gadgets and social platforms can impede authentic familial bonds by disregarding the significance of in-person connections and emotional attachments.

However, prioritizing open and meaningful communication within the family is crucial. Promoting regular conversations where family members actively listen to one another and express their thoughts and emotions can strengthen understanding and empathy. Moreover, allocating dedicated quality time for shared activities is essential. Encouraging engagement in activities that promote bonding and creating lasting memories, including family outings, cooking together, or family vacations, can bring families closer together, reinforcing emotional bonds and a sense of togetherness.

In conclusion, the decrease in familial bonds stems from contemporary life's rapid pace and ubiquity of technological advents; nevertheless, by stimulating meaningful dialogues and assigning specific time for group activities among family members, the stated challenges can be mitigated.

Sample 9:

There has been a trend over recent decades for families to become less close than they were in the past and this situation is largely accepted in society. This essay will discuss the reasons for this and examine the benefits and drawbacks of this development.

One of the first reasons for a decline in the closeness of families is connected to the busy lifestyles that we now lead. Most people have to work longer hours and often both parents work, so they simply do not have as much time to spend with each other as they did in the past. Another factor is the materialistic and consumer-driven culture we now live in, which has led to less value being placed on family relationships. Modern technology also means that people are more interested in their online life than interacting with their family in their free time.

It could be argued that this has benefits. If people are not so close with their family, they are free to pursue their own dreams and aspirations, and to focus on improving their own lifestyle. However, I believe that there are far more negative outcomes. The most important factors leading to a fulfilled and happy life are emotional security and comfort. Without these we are in danger of feeling lost. It is a difficult world we live in, and we need the support of people close to us to cope with modern life. We are seeing a rise in mental health problems in many countries, and this may well be a factor in this.

To conclude, busy modern lifestyles, changing cultural values and modern technology are causing families to become less close. We should try to halt this trend as it has more negative than positive outcomes.

Sample 10:

Today’s family life has changed a lot. Many parents are divorced, and a lot of mothers and fathers have jobs far away from home. As a result, children are often alone and lonely. But what are the reasons for this happening?

First of all, I think that modern technology is one of the main reasons for this problem. Many parents work in their nearest cities from their home. They work with the computer in big offices and came home late at night. However, they have no time to look after their children.

In the past, families used to work as a family. Every member worked hard and helped the family to survive, for example, farmers. Furthermore, the education used to be controlled by the parents, not like today’s day-schools with teachers and professors. On the other hand, there must be a solution to bring separated families together. at my point of view, families should spend their free time together. I am thinking about weekends or the time after work. children need their parents even when they are older. to give a reasonable example: I often go out with my parents, mostly for a dinner. Then my brother and I speak about our future plans or something else. An intensive conversation is a possible solution. A similar way is to divide your job into half-part worktimes and spend your free time leftover with your loved persons. A point against this statement is to have financial problems.

In conclusion, I wish that every family is as close as possible with each other if they like that.

Sample 1:

There is no doubt that food is an essential part of living for human lives and the most fundamental need of preparing food is to fulfill a basic human need: hunger. Undoubtedly, with the latest inventions in the market, preparing food has become much easier compared to the old days. In regard to this fact, I am of the opinion that people spend less time preparing food and can utilize this time in other professional tasks.

To begin with, people’s lifestyles have changed drastically over the last few decades. It is justifiable evidence that people spend most of their time working to have a better life. Such people prefer to buy ready-made food or use processed food to feed themselves. Cooking processed food is not an arduous task and is less time-consuming. It is a significant improvement in saving time and using it more productively. For instance, companies like Safa Meat have different versions of processed meat readily available which are easy to prepare and can be consumed in minutes. Apart from ready-made food, the availability of modern cooking tools like rice cookers, air-fryers etc., has made cooking easier. They consume less time and help in preparing healthy food as per your choice. In addition, companies make a huge profit on a year-by-year basis, which supports the claim that processed food is a sustenance hit among individuals.

On the other hand, there are some downsides to easily cooked food. These foods not only cause health problems but also make people obese. Consequently, people with busy life schedules do not maintain a healthy diet and easily become addicted to these items, only to discover their harmful effects at a later date.

In conclusion, the advancement of technology has led to easy preparation of foods and eliminated many problems faced in traditional methods of cooking. However, there are certain fast food items people should stay away from to prevent possible health problems.

Sample 2:

With the advantages of technology, the human has shifted to a lifestyle in which individual requirement for delicious food has emerged not just to fulfil the hunger. They want to enjoy a diverse range of foods with varying tastes and for that have invented many new and complex recipes. They want to do it easily and swiftly with the help of modern tools and technology. Has this really improved our lifestyle or has done more harms? Let us examine this in the following essay.

People want to enjoy a diverse type of food – prepare them at home or eat at expensive restaurants. People want to try new cuisines both at home and at restaurants and they want to be served promptly. This is where the modern equipment takes part in, and food preparation nowadays is easier and faster and this has definitely enhanced our lifestyle as it allows us to enjoy food, not just satisfy our tummy.

Moreover, modern tools like the rice cooker, microwave oven, slicer, mixer, electric heater and so on make the cooking process quick and convenient. This saves a great deal of time, unlike the past when someone had to be busy all day preparing meals for the family. People now have more time for recreation, hobbies and for the family. For students, busy corporates, businessmen and researchers, this improvement remarkably enhances their lifestyle.

On the downside, the advancements in food preparation methods have led to the growth of fast-food industries and their restaurants pop up everywhere, like mushrooms after the rain. This might seem convenient for those who do not have time to prepare food at home, but the health hazards are even greater. The obesity rate is skyrocketing in western countries and more people, these days, are suffering from health-related issues.

In conclusion, the latest technology has undeniably improved the quality of individuals’ living standard but not without a cost. To make the best of this development we have to avoid junk food but prepare more nutritious food at home.

Sample 3:

Food is one of the fundamental needs of human lives, and from the ancient period till this ultra-modern tech-time people have invented different ways to prepare and customise foods. The improvement has definitely enhanced our lifestyle as we have more time to do more productive things.

To begin with, the customs and ways people prepare foods and present to others vary depending on the race, culture and country. But the most fundamental need of preparing foods is to fulfil the very basic human need- hunger. Preparing foods was very cumbersome in the past but with the advancement of human knowledge and technology, men have created many devices and made many new ways of easily making foods. The number of restaurants and fast-food shops are ever increasing and that has omitted the need to prepare the food at all. The advanced technology like rice cookers, meal cookers and easy availability of ingredients nowadays help people to prepare food in no time and that has improved the way of people’s lifestyle. People now spend less time preparing food and can utilise this time in other tasks like professional tasks, reading, entertainment and spending time with family and friends. Thus, people get more productive and social because of the increased time they have.

Quick food has become very popular, which omits the needs of cooking and professionals, students and businessperson are having those foods during their lunchtime. This is a significant improvement in saving time and using it more productively. Though fast foods have some health issues, the ever-increasing popularity of it shows the need to have more time in our busy life and saving this time from the allotted time from cooking. The cooking machines help the housewives to prepare the foods easily and they do not have to spend time in a hot kitchen to prepare food. This is a leap towards a modern life where foods can be prepared virtually anywhere and in few minutes.

In summary, the improved way of cooking helps people nowadays to save time and cook in a more convenient place. This helps them to spend time on more important things and lead a life without much hassle.

Sample 4:

Most of the food items that were hard to prepare and restricted to experienced chefs are now easily available off the shelf or are made easy to prepare with modern recipes. But like any other thing, this also has its advantages and disadvantages.

Firstly, most of these foods are high in saturated fats and eventually lead to obesity. They cannot become substitutes for our staple diet that is still not so easy to prepare due to nature of its cooking methods. For example, for most of the Indians, the staple diet includes a combination of Indian bread, pulses and curries. It is not possible to make it much easier even using modern equipment or methods. Secondly, most of the easy to prepare food items either have a very little shelf life or they need to be kept frozen (or both). Thus, they cannot match the nutrition of freshly prepared traditional home food.

Having said that, these easy to prepare food items are a boon to students or other people, who stay away from home. They are definitely better than eating in restaurants or street food. Although not as good as home food, they definitely purpose the purpose to get “home-like” food. Also, most of these food items come with handy instructions and pre-mixed ingredients. With simple instructions, anybody can cook most of the recipes now. This has made life easier for many across the globe.

With the advent of easy availability of raw ingredients, it has not become much easier to cook recipes at home that was previously possible to cherish only in high-end restaurants. For instance, the Italian pasta, which requires many types of sauces, is now easy to prepare at home and all these sauces are now just a call away from a local grocery shop.

In conclusion, this is a much welcomed and positive change, and it has definitely improved our lives.

Sample 5:

Over the past decade, the food industry has experienced tremendous growth and improvements. This, together with technological advancements, has made it much easier to prepare food and cook at home.

Ready-made meals, which are bought frozen or canned from the shops, are the great lifesaver for those who work since all that is needed is to defrost or open the can and enjoy. Although this is a method of preserving all the goods, the freshly prepared food is definitely better for health. Many of the vitamins and minerals may be lost during the freezing or canning process.

Technology, on the other hand, has speeded up the food preparation process. Kitchen aid tools such as electric choppers and grinders reduce the entire workload, and the food can be prepared in the blink of an eye. Not only it requires less effort compared to the past, but it also saves time, which can be put to other tasks.

The other technological advancement that has helped with food preparation is microwave ovens. This device benefits from short waves that can penetrate food easily and thus cook or warm the food very quickly. In spite of being a huge advancement and time and energy efficient, long-term studies and scientific evidence are not supporting the use of such devices, and they are being blamed for at least minor risks if used on a long-term daily basis.

In conclusion, the process of food preparation has become much easier nowadays and this has had both positive and negative effects on our lives. Every individual should consider wisely how to prepare their food to ensure good health.

Sample 6:

Food is one of the fundamental needs of the people. People are slowly increasing passion towards the taste of the food and some people are becoming crazy about the food. These people always require different tastes and invent new and easy methods to prepare food. These new inventions always change the lifestyle and let us discuss how it made the difference in our life.

Old is gold always. Certain people do not want to miss the raw taste and use the new machinery like mixers or grinders. They want to prepare in old style without machinery and grasp the complete taste of food. Still, my grandfather never uses machinery and enjoys the raw taste.

There is always another side of the coin. Nowadays, people are becoming busy and don’t have time to spend much for cooking food. So, they started inventing new methods which made cooking easy. People invented new types of machinery like gas stoves, induction stoves, cookers, mixers and so on. All these inventions changed people’s lifestyle. It saved people’s time and people started investing time in other activities. And these new inventions also produced good taste and different varieties and caused a dramatic change in lifestyle. I always use all possible machinery to prepare tasty food for my family. And especially in restaurants, chefs use the latest technology to prepare tasty food, and this has changed the lifestyle too. Nowadays people can get food with whatever calories they want in their daily life

In conclusion, I prefer to prepare tasty food in easy methods using the latest machinery.

Sample 7:

Compared with people in the past, we concern far less on the preparation of food today, thanks to the development of agriculture and scientific technology. A fair amount of beneficial influence is occurring to us consequently.

The first to be benefited are travellers. It has been much probable for one to carry out the plan of a trip or expedition to remote areas. As a matter of fact, diverse types of food are designed for outdoor trips, for example, compressed biscuit. Without worrying about starving, a man can push it to the limit wherever he would like to go - Mount Everest or the South Pole.

For most common people, it has been realistic to put their energy mainly on other aspects, work or interest, rather than what to have for meals. Some prefer working all the time in order to earn as much money as they can. Others develop their interests or hobbies like sports, musical instruments, or photographing. Whatever people choose to spend time on, they feel their lives are satisfying and fulfilling.

Attitude toward life matures as well. Humans are no longer bothered with the preparation of food. Our focus now is to improve the standard of life: how to make things more effective? Thus, numerous significant achievements have taken place recently in every subject. Sciences and technologies, arts and humanities are swiftly striding forward and still accelerating. Therefore, without concerning about food preparation, the pattern of human evolvement changes fundamentally.

To conclude, the benefits to both individuals and the whole human race are clearly demonstrated. And I believe that food preparation will account for even less in our lives in the future.

Sample 8:

Advancement in technology, such as microwave ovens and rice cookers, has provided efficient options for cooking food. This has reduced the overall time required for cookery. Thus, it is believed that this has enhanced the lifestyle of the human being to a greater extent. In this essay, we will analyse how these methods allow people to spend their spare time practising their hobbies and provide healthy food options for young people.

To begin with, availability of new methodologies has minimised the cooking period making it possible for them to utilise this span for enjoying the skills of their interest. For instance, using rice cooker usually takes half the time when compared to the conventional gas cooking. This example clearly shows that the individuals who prefer this cooker will manage to get some extra idle time for them. Thus, it is obvious that this moment can be efficiently used for improving their expertise as well as for the relaxing purpose.

In addition, students can cook food for themselves with the aid of these advance innovations and hence, they can feed on the healthy home-made food. A good illustration for this is the utilisation of microwave by the bachelors who have to stay away from the family for study or work purposes. Usage of this microwave enables them to cook food quickly since very few steps are involved in microwave cooking and thereby, they do not need to depend on restaurants for food. As a consequence, the health condition of these young people is maintained since they will intake less amount of artificial food.

From the above examples, the benefits of easy methodologies for preparation of the culinary are difficult to debunk. It is thus hoped that more development will take place in regard to cooking which will ease the life of the masses in the foreseeable future.

Sample 9:

Unlike earlier times, cooking as a process has become compact and facile today.  Now the question is, has this affected our lifestyle? Or is it unbiased? Gone are those days when mother used to spend hours in a hot kitchen for cooking nutritious food for her family members. Fast food being the buzzword of today, all find little or no time to cook for themselves and their family. As a result, processed or easy to cook foods flood the market these days. However, this has brought some dramatic changes to the quality of our lifestyles, though with a few health concerns as discussed below.

In this era of globalisation, where work and time dictate your day, seldom does one find time to cook a full course lunch or dinner. Since both parents work urban world witness more and more children thriving on fast foods like burger, sandwich etc. It is natural that parents are not getting enough time to cook more ethnic food for them; instead, they work more to earn more, thus improving their lifestyle. People find more time to spend with family than before. An exemplification would be that of a busy office lady late from work, prepares an easy-to-cook meal for dinner and prefers to spend time from the kitchen with children. The improvement in the system would be a stronger family bonding! Likewise, a student finds these easy foods a real boon during their hostel days when both time and skill to cook are scanty.

Travellers are another category who admire easy-to-prepare meals, like cooking during a picnic or a business tour would be cumbersome. This also facilitates more family picnics and outings together. A quick breakfast like an egg sandwich would be the best buy for a student on that given exam day! So would be it for a working mother on an office meeting day! So, it is a matter of fact, that the new trend in food preparation has had an impact on our lifestyle. It has helped us to improve our quality of life.

Now turning on the coin, do these fast foods or easy to cook meals pose a health threat? Many studies show a steep climb in the number of cancerous patients in the United States in recent years. One main factor considered responsible for this is frozen and fast foods. The burgers and sandwiches come with a hand full of issues that can harm your health. A majority of fast food is prepared in oil with saturated fats that can cause problems to your body systemic circulation. Consumed on a daily basis, it can lead you to cardiac problems even.

To conclude I would say that though it comes with a few health concerns, the easy-to-cook trend has definitely improvised our quality of life. Now much depends on our conscience to use fast foods only when it is an absolute necessity - for example on a busy day at the office!

Sample 10:

Thanks to advancements in terms of cookery and food preservation, many people have easy access to food now. It is an irrefutable fact that kitchen appliances have become more sophisticated, and they would ease the cooking process. In this essay, I attempt to give some reasons why these considerable changes enhance individual’s lifestyle.

Over the past decades, prepared food has become a major intake in our diet. It unbelievably has become popular among people, especially the youth. However, some have a controversial perception of it. Fast foods would help people to save their time in cooking. Therefore, people tend to dedicate their time to their occupational assignments. In fact, it could help employees to have more spare time to acquire professional skills rather than just merely waste their precious time cooking.

Another crucial aspect of advanced technology to provide a faster way to make food is that families have more time for recreational activities. For instance, if parents allocate a significant amount of their time to upbringing the children, it can make a valuable impact on the children’s personalities. It is invariably thought that children’s need to have sufficient food is important, but the most substantial matter is that they must be reassured that their parent’ affection is true. Thus, spending the massive amount of time for bringing up the children would justify this notion.

Finally, I must assert that, despite some debatable arguments against advanced cookery, it has altered our lifestyle in a good way. In my opinion, critics of prepared food unfairly exaggerate the drawbacks of this practice. It is important to be neutral about this and weigh up the benefits and boons of fast food in an unbiased way.

Sample 11:

Food has always been a priority for the human species, and they have continually invented ways to produce more food, more recipes, preserve them and make them delicious and healthy. The development of technology has brought advantages, improving the way we live in general, and the way we prepare our meals. So that it has brought more efficiency to our life.

Food is the primary need for any species from the smallest (micro-species) to the tallest, strongest and the most intelligent – the human. It is completely incomparable the ways we used to prepare food centuries ago with that of the modern era. For example, the human race was denominated by nomads, moving from places to places in search of food, while men had to hunt animals for meat. All of these are no longer applicable in the modern society. However, if we compare food preparation and preservation with that of a few decades earlier, we are few miles ahead of them.

Our need to invest less time in cooking and more time for professional and family needs has been possible because we have modern devices like the burner, microwave oven, rice cooker, pressure cooker, electric heater, refrigerator and so on. With the help of the internet, anyone these days can be a cook and prepare meals native to other countries. The advancement of technology has brought a huge range of devices and many of them have eliminated the need for a long and complex process to prepare food or drinks. For instance, a coffee maker enables anyone to enjoy a cup of coffee any time he wishes. With those appliances, we have more time to relieve our daily stress, meet friends, do exercises or works, concentrate on our hobbies and so on. We must thank the technology for a richer and easier life.

Some disadvantages of this trend are pointed out by a group of people and those demerits should not be overlooked. Modern devices have negative environmental impacts and health hazards to an extent.

To conclude, taking references from history, the way our century-old ancestors lived in the past, our life transformed greatly due to the advancement of technology, especially in the food-making process. The human species has now more time to dedicate to useful activities.

Sample 12:

In recent years, food preparation has become easier due to technological advancements, making it possible to prepare meals in less time than before. Some people believe that this change has improved the way people live. However, in my opinion, this change has not necessarily had a positive impact on the way people live.

The negative impact of this change is far greater than we might think. The increased convenience of food preparation has led to a greater reliance on fast food and processed meals. This has resulted in an increase in health problems, such as obesity and heart disease. We opt for processed food and use modern devices and cooking appliances to prepare our food. As a result, the food we eat contains little nutritional value and more ingredients that are harmful to us.

Additionally, the lack of time spent preparing food can lead to a decline in cooking skills, making it difficult for people to prepare healthy meals from scratch. For instance, many working professionals in modern cities do not know how to prepare a healthy homemade meal, and as a result, eat fast food even when they have time to cook and eat at home. This is a serious decline in our lifestyle and food choices.

In conclusion, while the ease of food preparation may have some benefits, it has also led to a greater reliance on unhealthy, processed foods. Therefore, it is important to incorporate healthier meals into our diets. Modern cooking appliances and technology may have saved us some time but at the cost of our health and well-being.

Sample 13:

In recent years, food preparation has become much easier and more convenient due to the development of technology and innovation. The use of pre-packaged meals, microwave ovens, and food delivery services, for example, has drastically changed the way people prepare and consume food. In this essay, I will argue that this change has improved the way people live.

Firstly, easier food preparation has enabled people to save time and effort. With busy lifestyles, many people struggle to find time to cook and prepare healthy meals. Pre-packaged meals, microwave ovens and food delivery services provide a quick and easy solution, which allows people to spend more time on other important tasks, such as work or family. This saves time and effort, reduces stress, and enhances productivity.

Secondly, easier food preparation has led to greater access to healthier food options. With the rise of meal kit delivery services and online grocery shopping, people can easily access fresh and healthy ingredients that they might not have been able to find before. This change has encouraged people to eat healthier and make more informed food choices, leading to better health outcomes. For instance, someone with the help of technology can order fresh vegetables, meat and fruits and then get help from the internet to prepare a healthy menu. This was unimaginable in the past.

In conclusion, the ease and convenience of modern food preparation have improved people’s lives by saving time and effort, promoting healthier food options, and reducing stress. While there may be some drawbacks, I believe that the advantages of easier food preparation will continue to benefit individuals and society as a whole.

Sample 14:

The advancements in technology have indeed made food preparation easier, and I firmly believe that this has significantly improved the way people live. 

Firstly, the ease of food preparation has saved a considerable amount of time for individuals. In the past, preparing a meal used to be a time-consuming process, including steps like gathering ingredients, preparing them and cooking. However, with the introduction of ready-to-cook meals, microwaves and other modern kitchen appliances, the time required to prepare meals is reduced. This saved time can be utilized for other productive activities, such as pursuing hobbies, spending time with family, or focusing on personal development. 

Secondly, the use of food preparation has also contributed to a more diverse diet. With the availability of various cooking methods and recipes online, individuals can easily try out different cuisines from around the world. This not only adds variety to the diet but allows individuals to enjoy a wide range of flavours and nutrients. 

Lastly, the ease of food preparation has made it possible for individuals to maintain a healthier lifestyle. With the availability of various healthy food options and easy-to-follow healthy recipes, individuals are more likely to cook at home rather than rely on fast food or processed food. This has a positive impact on their health and well-being. 

In conclusion, the ease of food preparation brought by modern technology has indeed improved the way people live by saving time, promoting dietary diversity and encouraging a healthier lifestyle. Therefore, I agree that this change is beneficial. 

Sample 15:

Humankind has undergone many changes in eating habits from the period when he hunted for himself to the era when he has become dependent on processed food. Obviously, it has become easier to prepare nowadays. However, whether or not this change has improved people’s lives is controversial.

To begin with, preparation for food, now, is much easier than ever before. With the development of technology, there are more and more equipment which helps people cook a meal easily such as stoves, microwaves cooking, refrigerators. For my country for an example, rice is a dish which cannot be absent in our daily meals, and with electronic cookers, it is so easy to prepare that a little child can do it. All things he needs to do is put rice and water into the cooker and press a button, then it takes only about fifteen minutes to have a dish. Furthermore, there are more and more processed food or cooked food, and with those foods, to prepare a meal is becoming not only easier, but also faster. Taking my favourite dish for an example, it is called nuddle, and it is really simple to prepare: put it into a bowl then pour boiled water into and wait about five minutes I can have a meal.

This change, in fact, makes the life of busy people more convenient. Instead of spending hours preparing in the past, now, people can have a meal by themselves just in a short time with some special equipment and precooked foods. People can use the fridge to save time for going to stores to buy food. In the past, they have to buy food every day because they could not store food in their home for long time; however, now they can buy food enough for a week without worrying whether food is going to spoilt with a fridge. It means that people have more time for working, relaxing or studying.

However, personally, I do not think that this change has improved our lives. In fact, this convenience can cause some health problems and one of the outstanding ones is the increase in the number of overweight people recently. People have eaten so much fast foods for precooked foods which contain so much sugar, and fatty nutrients.

In conclusion, the change in the way people prepare food makes our lives more convenient, especially for busy people. However, it does not mean that this change has improve living standard of humankind.

Sample 16:

These days, new modern kitchen appliances have made cooking food a lot easier than the past. This has improved the lifestyle of people for good because it saves them a lot of time and allows both spouses to be employed.

Firstly, preparing meals is one of the most time-consuming household chores. In the past, housewives used to expend hours to prepare all the meals of the day, however, these days, they are being assisted by the modern technology available in the kitchen. For example, a few years back, on average one meal like dinner used to take 1-2 hours, whereas this can be prepared within 30-45 minutes with the aid of the latest kitchen appliances as we just have to set some settings on the machine.

Secondly, this phenomenon also allowing both men and women to be employed. Earlier, females, especially in countries like India, had to perform distinct household tasks, such as cooking meals, doing dishes and washing clothes, but these days there are machines to do these routine chores. Therefore, women can also participate in the workforce of the nation apart from just taking care of household chores. For instance, both my uncle and aunt work as they have some wonderful appliances to do cooking as well as other chores.

In conclusion, modern technology has made cooking a lot easier and quicker. I believe that this has helped people in improving the way they live because it saves time and efforts and allows both spouses to do a job.

Sample 17:

As an old adage goes: “You are what you eat”, there are few things that could be more important than food. Consequently, we spend a great deal of time and energy on planning and making our meals. The fact that food preparation has become easier is, in my opinion, a great improvement in that it frees up time that can be spent doing other things. However, this is not the only advantage of recent advancements in the cooking department.

Before the development of ready-made foods, electric stoves and microwaves, cooking was a full-time job that was usually carried out by women, who then did not have time to do many other things, including pursuit of a career outside the home. The fact that food has become easier, and thereby faster, to prepare has therefore had a huge impact on women and on their options in life. One could even go so far as to say that it has had a direct impact on the emancipation of women and thus has improved their lives considerably.

In addition to the freed-up time, there are other advantages of easier food preparation. Having better implements for cooking at our disposition, we are more likely to be creative at the stove and try out new dishes and cuisines. For example, having a food processor in the house allows me to make things like smoothies, pestos and soups that would be hard work to make by hand. As a result, there is more variety on the menu, and there is the added satisfaction of creating interesting dishes that were previously unavailable.

To sum up, it is easy to see how advancements in the kitchen department have greatly improved the lives we lead. Not only have the developments freed women from the stove, but they have also made cooking more fun and interesting, bringing new options to the table.

Sample 18:

The contemporary epoch has witnessed a noteworthy evolution in the method of preparing food, profoundly impacting the people’s lifestyle. This shift in culinary convenience has undeniably brought about substantial enhancements in the standard of living of a significant section of the society. In our opinion, although it has some positive influence on the lives of people, there are also downsides to it. Both these aspects will be addressed in the subsequent paragraphs.

The primary reason is the increased accessibility of readily available food. In other words, ease of preparing meals has conserved valuable time and energy of individuals, permitting them to allocate these resources to other crucial aspects of their lives, such as their professional careers, academic prospects, or the opportunity to spend quality time with their loved ones. Resultantly, this level of convenience has also alleviated the pressure in regard to daily cooking routines, making life more manageable.

In addition, the presence of a wide range of nutritious and easily consumable food alternatives which can be utilised during cooking has had proven to be fruitful for individuals’ dietary choices. To explain, this has empowered people by escalating their control over the proportion of food they consume and the nutrients they intake, thus promoting the adoption of healthier eating habits. As a consequence, overall physical health and well-being can be improved.

Conversely, it is essential to acknowledge that the demerits of convenience of easily prepared foods should be considered. These encompass the risk of excessive reliance on processed and unhealthy eating options like frozen food, which can negatively affect health and pave its way to several ailments.

In conclusion, although the ease of preparing food has benefited the public, it also has a negative aspect associated with it. Therefore, striking a balance between convenience and a nutritious diet is vital in order to fully benefit from this transformation.

Sample 19:

Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. With this change, people can have a better dinner with fewer efforts and can have more time for other activities. This is why, in my point of view, the change has improved the way people live.  

First of all, people have saved their efforts from cooking. In the past, people have to prepare all the material for cooking themselves, which always occupied too much time. Now, it has changed. People can buy half-done food from the supermarket, which has simplified the cooking process. What they need to do is to finish the rest of the food preparation. Also, more and more convenient cookers have occurred. These cookers have helped to save cooking time greatly. People do not have to wait for as a long time as before cooking. In this case, the easier food preparation has improved the way people live.  

Another reason that this change has improved the way people live is that people can have more time to enjoy other activities. Since people do not have to put as much time as before, they can plan more other activities. For example, they may do more exercise to build their body, or they can spend more time on their hobbies. In another words, people can spend more time on other beneficial things. Therefore, with easier food preparation, the way people lived has been improved.  

In conclusion, this change has improved the way people live because it has made it easier for people to have a wonderful dinner at home and people can spend more time on their interests.