Câu hỏi:

05/01/2025 248

Nowadays a large amount of advertising is aimed at children. Some people think this can have negative effects on children and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Xem lời giải

Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!

Bắt đầu thi

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Recently issues have arisen regarding whether or not advertisements targeted at children should be legally allowed. Personally, I view advertisements aimed at children to be unethical, since not only are they still naive, but bombarding them with commercials can cause a rift in the relationship between them and their parents.

Firstly, advertisements should not be aimed at children because they are highly suggestible, and as such cannot yet understand what their best self-interest is ultimately. Because they are incapable of making responsible fiscal decisions, marketing to this demographic means exploiting their inability to make rational choices for financial gain. For example, although children might want to buy LEGO sets advertised on TV, they often get bored of them as soon as they find out what they have bought is not like the advertisements. This exploitation of children’s naivety could be judged to be unethical.

Secondly, marketing to children inevitably leads to them pleading with their caretakers, who have disposable income to spend, which can lead to a deterioration in their relationship. Not buying children's toys could result in resentment in the relationship, for it is reasonable for caretakers whose duty it is to be fiscally responsible to refuse the child’s requests. This situation if repeated enough may in turn lead to negligence and subsequently stunt child development. Psychological studies have shown, for example, that children who have been neglected perform worse in cognitive tasks then those who have not.

In conclusion, I hold that not only are advertisements aimed at children unethical because it exploits their suggestibility, but they can also affect children’s relationships with their parents and damage them psychologically. Therefore, I believe that such practices should be legally disallowed.

Sample 2:

These days, a large amount of advertising is aimed at children and some people feel that it should be banned. While advertising can have several negative impacts on children, I believe it should not be completely banned.

On the one hand, commercials aimed at children can have a detrimental impact, particularly on the relationship between parents and their children. Many children are easily manipulated to want things they see in advertisements, and this may cause conflicts between parents and children if parents deny their children something they want. In addition, advertising targeted at children can have negative effects on their health, as many fast food and junk food companies these days direct their marketing strategies towards children, making their products appear to be healthy and appealing. Unfortunately, most children do not understand the concept of advertising and are easily persuaded to purchase these unhealthy foods, and as a consequence, can be at risk of many serious health issues, such as obesity and diabetes.

On the other hand, I feel that there should not be a ban on advertising aimed at children because advertising is one of the key aspects of a prosperous economy. If bans were to be placed on commercials, many companies would suffer from a decrease in sales and profits, which would eventually affect unemployment rates and the economy. For example, Coca Cola provides thousands of employment opportunities in advertising throughout its branches across different regions around the world. If advertising was banned, a large number of workers, such as marketers, may become unemployed, and as a result, the government will have to provide temporary financial support for those unemployed people.

In conclusion, although advertising aimed at children may have certain negative impacts regarding family relationships and health, imposing a prohibition on it is unreasonable.

Sample 3:

In today's world, child-targeted advertising has grown substantially, sparking debates about its potential negative effects. While some argue that it should be banned altogether, I disagree with the idea of an outright ban and believe that responsible, regulated advertising can coexist with children's well-being.

To begin with, it's crucial to acknowledge the positive aspects of advertising aimed at children. In many cases, advertisements introduce children to a variety of products, including educational toys, books, and programs that can enhance their learning and development. Through these ads, children are exposed to valuable lessons, such as literacy, numeracy, and social skills, in an engaging and entertaining manner. This demonstrates how child-targeted advertising can play a constructive role in children's intellectual and emotional development.

Additionally, advertising can foster children's social development. Advertisements frequently showcase diversity in terms of race, gender, and background, aiding children in comprehending and valuing differences from a young age. They can serve as a catalyst for essential dialogues about inclusivity, tolerance, and diversity within families and educational institutions. For example, a commercial featuring a diverse group of children playing together can prompt discussions about the importance of accepting others regardless of their backgrounds.

However, it's essential to strike a balance and ensure that advertising doesn't harm children's well-being. Excessive exposure to advertisements that promote unhealthy food, sugary drinks, or excessive consumption of material goods can have detrimental effects on children's health and values. Therefore, regulations are necessary to limit the promotion of such products to children.

In conclusion, I believe that banning advertising aimed at children is not the solution. Instead, responsible advertising can offer educational and social benefits. It's essential to create a balanced advertising environment that promotes both learning and the overall welfare of children.

Sample 4:

Many people believe that advertisements targeted at children should be banned as it is negative to children. Although I see the negative impact of those advertisements on children, I believe such a ban is not a good idea.

The first reason to oppose advertisements aimed at children is that advertisements for fast foods and high sugar drinks might never reveal a fact that those products cause child obesity. Therefore, inexperienced children do not know about the harms of their health when consuming those products. Another reason is that many parents have associated advertising with unjustified desires to buy something unnecessary from their children. For example, film heroes or favourite cartoon characters are often used in such attractive advertisements that children are lured and pester their parents to buy products advertised at any cost. In other words, they are misguided to make a purchase.

Of course, I think the best solution is to ban advertisements from children. While this idea might be workable for advertisements on TV, it seems to be impossible to ban online adverts which would be more difficult to define whether they are aimed at children or not. In addition, there are a variety of advertisements that should not be regulated as they are non-commercial and provide educational information such as anti-smoking, courses or books. Moreover, the most effective solution is that both schools and parents need to teach children critical thinking skills so that they are no longer misled by advertising.

In conclusion, children are susceptible to the misleading information from advertisements targeted on them. This problem could be solved with a ban on those adverts, but I am convinced that there are better options.

Sample 5:

Advertisements have been an essential part of our everyday life. A great number of those target children, and some people believe that those should be banned because of the harmful effects these may bring. I completely agree with this statement, for most advertising of this sort has deleterious effects on children’s physical health and their mental development.

Fast food advertising has been known to be implicated in many health problems among children. Food corporations promote their products using glamorous images of perfectly cooked meat, or alluring soda cans consumed by jubilant-looking and perfectly fit child actors. Credulous parents and children, as a result, are subconsciously enticed by those ads and end up buying them for regular consumption which, as a lot of research has pinpointed, is closely associated with many serious health problems such as obesity, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes.

Additionally, early exposure to consumerism may negatively impact on children’s mental development. It is not uncommon to encounter cases of kids throwing tantrums at their parents, asking for new items such as a new doll, an AI robot or a drone advertised on TV. Research has shown that many children who develop such attitudes may either have an inferiority complex or grow up being too demanding and materialistic if their wishes are not answered.

In conclusion, my firm conviction is that advertising aimed at children should be banned, due to its negative influences on children’s physical and mental well-being. As adults, we have the power to end it and let our children grow up free from many of the pressures of consumerism until they’re old enough to make their own decisions.

Sample 6:

In contemporary times, there is a growing concern about the abundance of advertisements targeted at children, with some advocating for a complete prohibition due to potential negative effects. While I acknowledge the drawbacks associated with advertising, I believe it remains a valuable tool that should not be outright prohibited.

Firstly, it is important to recognize the adverse effects that advertising can have on children. Marketing tactics often tend to exaggerate information in ads seen on social media, television, and various platforms. This exaggeration can lead to children expressing a desire for unnecessary purchases, creating conflicts between parents and their children. Moreover, advertising influences children’s eating habits, as the attractive and eye-catching portrayal of fast food and junk food may contribute to overconsumption, leading to health issues such as heart disease and obesity among the younger generation.

However, despite these concerns, I argue that advertising should not be categorically banned due to its inherent benefits. When a business initiates an advertising campaign, it plays a crucial role in promoting products and services, thereby increasing awareness in the market. The key lies in ensuring that advertisements provide specific information about the products, including type, function, promotions, retailer locations, and price. This approach allows customers to make informed decisions, understanding the benefits they will receive when they purchase a particular product.

In conclusion, while I acknowledge that advertising can have negative repercussions for children, creating conflicts and fostering unhealthy lifestyles, I believe an outright prohibition is not the solution. Instead, governments and parents should focus on implementing policies and seeking effective advertising solutions to mitigate the negative influence on the younger generation. By doing so, we can strike a balance that preserves the advantages of advertising while safeguarding the well-being of our children.

Sample 7:

Some people feel that a large proportion of advertising that targets children should be prohibited, due to the negative impacts. I completely agree with this point of view because otherwise children may become unhealthy and have poor relationships with their parents.

Promoting unhealthy foods to children may lead them to develop health problems. Take snack advertisements, for example. They use kids' favorite cartoon characters and special effects to make the products look good. As a result, young children may very likely crave them after watching the advertisements. As they eat more and more snacks, they may become obese and prone to health problems such as diabetes later in life because these foods are generally high in fat, sugar and calories. Since many children do not have the ability to control their cravings, marketing unhealthy foods to them should be banned to prevent them from consuming too many.

In addition, advertising branded products to children can have a negative influence on the parent- child relationship. For example, if children see some cool Nike backpacks in commercials, they may want one and ask their parents to buy it for them. However, their parents may not be doing well financially and thus refuse their request, which would lead to arguments. That is to say, if advertisements for designer goods targeted at children are not banned, they may ask their parents to purchase things that they cannot afford every single day, which could cause constant arguing and eventually bad relationships.

In conclusion, much advertising to children should not be allowed because it is detrimental both to their health and to their relationships with their parents.

Sample 8:

Advertisements are ubiquitous nowadays especially advertising targeting children who are considered vulnerable targets by companies. As a result, many parents are worried about this phenomenon. However, we cannot ban advertisements because they serve a lot of useful purposes as well.

Admittedly, in sensitive areas such as the toy industry, some censorship should be there to limit children’s access to excess advertisements. Because children under a certain age lack abilities to make wise judgments as to what they want. They are attracted by colourful pictures in advertisements and swayed by misleading information. So, they pester their parents to buy those things, and this can upset the budget of many families. Even the advertisements for fast foods are bad for children. Children cannot understand that the slim-trim models advertising McDonald’s burgers hardly ever eat such foods themselves. They are attracted to fast foods, and these are very detrimental to their health.

On the other hand, advertising provides us with information on new products. If it were not for electronic and print advertising, many products would not be bought. In this way, advertising provides an important service to manufacturers and some consumers. Additionally, it fuels the advertising industry, creating jobs for thousands of people. In this respect, it has the backbone of many economies of the world.

Furthermore, advertisements touch on social issues. For example, when Amitabh Bachchan tells people to bring their children for pulse polio immunization, people listen. Then there are ads against female feticides which are very informative. Advertisements also teach a lot about the country from where the ads come. This is because through satellite TV we can see ads from all over the world. When we see a Japanese advert for a lady in a kimono, we come to know about the clothes of Japan.

To put it in a nutshell I pen down saying that regulations must be imposed on advertisers who target children or who make false claims. However, advertisement is indispensable in this highly competitive market and produces many more positive effects than negative ones on society as a whole. So, we should not ban advertisements.

Sample 9:

Ever since the liberalisation of media, advertisements have been its primary source of revenue. Children, who are in their formative years, are more likely to be influenced by advertisements than their elder counterparts, are regularly targeted by the marketers. It is agreed that this has negative effects on children, thus, shall be banned. This will be proven by looking at how these advertisements can ultimately make children defiant and play a part in distracting children from academic activities.

To begin, when children are exposed to advertisements of products that their parents can’t afford to provide for them, children often resort to defying both, their parents, and society. For instance, it is a known fact that most children who go on to become rebels, had been deprived of their wishes for items that they don’t even need, nor can afford, such as elegant toys and expensive mobile phones. This shows that advertisements of certain kinds of products can lead children to develop delinquent tendencies. Hence, promotional material that targets children has more than its fair share of disadvantages.

In addition to this, a large number of the flashy advertisements can subconsciously have a detrimental effect on a child’s academics. For instance, after being barraged by an endless number of advertisements in a short span of time, juveniles can lose their ability to focus on a certain task for an extended period of time. Thus, being exposed to such advertisements can take its toll on a child’s brain. After analysing this, the demerits of advertisements targeting children are manifested.

Following this look at how advertisements aimed at children can, undermine their behaviour, and hinder the achievement of their academic objectives, it is evident that these advertisements have adverse effects on children. Thus, it is hoped that governments should muse upon banning of such advertisements.

Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay

Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:

Xem thêm »

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Câu 1

With a growing world population, one of the most pressing issues is feeding a huge population. Some people think that GM (Genetically Modified) foods offer a viable solution to this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

The issue of addressing the global challenge of feeding a rapidly expanding population has spurred discussions about potential solutions, including the adoption of Genetically Modified (GM) foods. While some proponents argue that GM foods present a viable answer to this problem, I fundamentally disagree. The potential risks associated with GM foods and the availability of alternative sustainable approaches make me skeptical about their efficacy as a long-term solution.

To begin with, Genetically Modified foods often involve the manipulation of organisms' genetic makeup to enhance desirable traits, such as increased crop yield or resistance to pests. While this may seem promising in theory, the unintended consequences of genetic modification could pose significant risks to human health and the environment. For instance, allergens or toxins could be inadvertently introduced into GM crops, leading to adverse effects on consumers. The release of genetically modified organisms into the environment could also disrupt natural ecosystems and harm biodiversity.

Additionally, the push for GM foods detracts attention and resources from more sustainable and holistic agricultural practices that have the potential to address food security challenges without compromising safety. Agroecological approaches, such as crop rotation, agroforestry, and integrated pest management, offer environmentally friendly alternatives to intensive monocultures and chemical-based farming. These methods promote soil health, water conservation, and biodiversity, all of which are crucial for ensuring the long-term sustainability of food production.

In conclusion, while the growing global population necessitates innovative solutions for food security, I am opposed to the idea that GM foods offer a viable remedy. The potential risks to human health and the environment, coupled with the availability of more sustainable agricultural practices, make me doubtful about the long-term efficacy of genetically modified foods. Instead of relying solely on GM foods, it is imperative to explore diverse and sustainable approaches that prioritize both human well-being and the planet's health.

Sample 2:

To tackle food shortages, many scientists recommend genetically modified (GM) food as a solution. Despite some concerns regarding this solution, I strongly believe that this is the future for food security.

The first benefit that GM foods offer is that it has significantly higher yield compared to traditional crops. GM foods have their genes altered to reproduce their cells quicker, leading to faster crop productions. Also, GM foods are capable of withstanding harsh environments, such as during winters and dry summers. Another benefit of consuming more GM foods is that they require fewer pesticides, contrary to popular belief. Because scientists design GM foods to be resistant to common pests, farmers do not need to spray pesticides as regularly as they would growing traditional crops.

However, despite these benefits, there are some concerns that researchers should revisit before populating GM foods. The first concern is the impact GM crops have on the ecosystem. Because these crops are known to be resistant to pests, it could lead to the eradication of pest species. As a result, this can disrupt the ecosystem’s balance. The second concern is that, due to GM crops’ high efficiency and rapid growth, they can easily become an invasive species with unhealthy farming practices. This problem, aside from damaging the ecosystem, also has adverse effects on the economy. For example, if one plot destined to grow a certain plant gets invaded by another species, farmers will experience a loss of income.

In conclusion, although admittedly, there are some legitimate concerns for GM foods, I still strongly agree that GM crops are the most feasible solution to the global food shortage.

Sample 3:

Feeding the ever-growing world population is undoubtedly a significant challenge that needs to be addressed. Some individuals argue that genetically modified (GM) foods could provide a viable solution to this problem. In my opinion, while GM foods may offer certain benefits, they also come with potential risks and drawbacks that need to be carefully considered.

Proponents of GM foods argue that they can help increase crop yields, improve nutritional content, and enhance resistance to pests and diseases. This, they claim, would enable farmers to produce more food on less land, ultimately helping to feed a larger population. Additionally, GM foods have the potential to withstand harsh environmental conditions, such as drought or extreme temperatures, making them more resilient and reliable sources of food.

However, it is important to acknowledge the concerns surrounding GM foods. Critics argue that the long-term health and environmental impacts of consuming and cultivating GM crops are not yet fully understood. There are also ethical considerations, such as the potential for corporate control over the food supply and the loss of biodiversity. Furthermore, the introduction of GM crops into natural ecosystems could have unforeseen consequences, disrupting delicate ecological balances.

In conclusion, while GM foods may offer some potential benefits in addressing the challenge of feeding a growing world population, the risks and uncertainties associated with their widespread adoption cannot be ignored. It is crucial to conduct thorough research and risk assessments to ensure that the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks. Ultimately, a balanced approach that takes into account the needs of both current and future generations is necessary to tackle this pressing issue.

Sample 4:

Whether GM foods are the ultimate answer to address the need to feed the ever-growing global population has been a topic of fierce argument recently among intellectuals across the world. However, I fully agree with the statement that such foods are an effective remedy to worldwide food scarcity.

One obvious advantage of GM foods is better production in lesser time which will ensure food for more people that too utilizing a few resources. In addition, these foods and their cultivation are a lot more environmentally-friendly than normal foods because the former are highly resilient to diseases, pests and insects which reduces the need to use harmful herbicides, pesticides, insecticides and so on. This also ensures that people get pure fruits and grains, for example, free from chemicals.

Better texture, varied flavors and improved nutritional values are some other qualities which make genetically modified foods a viable solution to shortage of food. When such high-quality foods are made available at cheaper prices, it will sure save governments and individuals substantial sums of money, not to mention the obvious health benefits for people. Further, longer shelf-life makes bioengineered foods easier to transport to distant places and store them. Last but not least, their potentially non-allergenic nature makes them Manna from heaven for the hungry millions.

In short, GM foods are the need of the hour. Therefore, the authorities across the world need to spring to action to mass-produce genetically-engineered foods and make them available to people thereby saving hundreds of thousands of lives from malnutrition and starvation.

Sample 5:

As the population is increasing at a fast rate across the world, a shortage of food is becoming a perplexing problem. Some individuals suggest that this can be addressed by genetically modified foods. In my opinion, I totally disagree with the statement since engineering genetic foods have a high risk of potential problems and negative environmental impacts.

The main issue of genetic modification organism is a risk of potential problems after having the food for a long-term. This is because scientists or nutritionists are not sure about the long-term effects and safety as it is a relatively new practice. For example, food allergic reactions have risen in the last decade such as nuts or dairy products, which resulted from consuming GM foods. In addition, there are also a large number of people who hold concerns about the potential risks to human health affected by GM crops such as inducing mutations in human genes. Therefore, numerous people have an inclination toward eating organic food rather than GM foods.

Another thing to consider is that the agricultural method of GMOs brings harmful effects on the environment and ecosystem. Firstly, the changes in the agricultural practice affect on the farming and where weeds or other harmful factors become stronger. This results in overuse of the toxic sprays such as pesticides and herbicides. Secondly, the new cultivation method is harmful for non-GMO crops and also insects or animals, which can lead to loss of biodiversity. To illustrate this, bees play an important role in the pollination of various food crops, but they are vulnerable from the sprays.

In conclusion, I am strongly opposed to the opinion that genetically modified foods can deal with

a shortage of food due to the world demographic growth. This is for the reason that it has potential problems affecting people’s health and it has negative effects on environmental impacts and biodiversity.

Câu 2

Many people are travelling to other countries. Why? Is it a positive or negative development?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

There is a great number of people travelling and visiting other nations, these days. This can be caused by several reasons and personally, it is a positive development.

To begin with, there are two contributing factors behind people’s motivation to travel. First, many of them may want to learn more about unfamiliar cultures as during their trip, they are allowed to get exposed to local people and observe cultural differences here. This gives them a chance to make a comparison of cultural traits in different nations, which helps them enrich their knowledge and have a more profound understanding of the world. Second, a number of people decide to go on a trip to another nation so that they can visit their relatives or family members who live overseas. Video calls or photos only help them see each other’s faces without hugging or holding hands, and therefore, they desire to travel abroad so as to meet their beloved ones in the flesh.

I believe the prevalence of cross-border trips brings about great positive effects on society. With many travellers coming to a country, the demand for housing and food here will likely grow, so local people can earn a great amount of money through providing shelters and selling their traditional cuisines. For instance, Thailand is a country that welcomes millions of travellers from around the world annually, thanks to which the tourism industry here can flourish. Thousands of jobs have also been created, such as workers in travel agencies, taxi drivers or tour guides, to serve the great number of international tourists. Therefore, many Thai residents working in this industry have escaped poverty, avoided unemployment and enjoyed a better life quality.

In conclusion, people these days travel across the border in order to acquire new knowledge and see one another. In my opinion, this development is positive due to its various social benefits.

Sample 2:

More and more people today are choosing to travel internationally. This positive development is mainly because of a rise in middle-class income coupled with advances in aviation.

People today can afford to travel as it has become more convenient. The last half century has seen wages in both developed and developing companies climb with the concomitant expansion of the global middle class. Workers have the disposable income to travel that they lacked in the past. This has been complemented with safer airplanes, so individuals are not afraid to fly. Airfares have also become cheaper as companies like Boeing produce more efficient planes, competition intensifies between competing airlines, and the supply more than meets demand for flights. These factors combined have spawned a golden age of international travel.

Looking at the opportunity in perspective, it is hard to see the advent of international travel as anything less than one of mankind’s greatest achievements. For the entirety of human history, most people lived and died near to where they were born. Anyone who wanted to travel to another country had to possess enormous wealth, time, and courage. Today, the average employee can save up and travel to see the wonders of the Renaissance in Southern Europe, the vast monuments to history and modernity in China, or explore any other corner of Earth that has piqued their interest. This is an unprecedented opportunity unavailable to past generations.

In conclusion, international travel is a byproduct of the modern age, and we should all be grateful for its possibility. There are clear environmental drawbacks but those should not blind people to its benefits taken as a whole.

Sample 3:

In recent years, there has been a surge in the number of individuals traveling to foreign countries. This trend is fueled by various reasons, all of which contribute to a wide range of positive developments. In this essay, I will explore why numerous people choose to explore novel locations and argue that this trend has an overall positive impact on individuals and society.

One of the primary factors driving the escalating number of international travelers is globalization. As the world becomes more interconnected, people grow increasingly interested in different cultures, traditions, and ways of life. Consequently, traveling to other nations assists them in cultivating cross-cultural comprehension and insights. Moreover, this trend offers significant educational advantages as learners can pursue academic knowledge in developed countries with high-quality educational systems. This allows them not only to acquire academic knowledge but also to gain valuable skills such as problem-solving and effective communication. For instance, students studying abroad will be well-prepared with essential competencies for a lucrative career.

I firmly believe that the growth of international tourism positively impacts the domestic economy of host countries. The influx of foreign tourists and their spending on local services provide a lucrative stream of revenue that can significantly improve the lives of people in these nations. Additionally, tourists benefit from cultural exchanges and eye-opening experiences during their visits. Furthermore, the profits generated from these activities can be utilized by local governments to upgrade infrastructure such as accommodations or roads. For example, Ha Giang province allocates 35% of its tourism revenue annually to construct new buildings and maintain local heritages.

In conclusion, the rise in the number of international visitors can be attributed to globalization and the pursuit of educational opportunities. In my opinion, this trend will continue to yield positive outcomes for individuals and societies by fostering cross-cultural understanding and contributing to economic growth.

Sample 4:

In recent years, there has been a significant surge in the number of people traveling abroad for leisure and various other purposes. This essay will explore the factors driving this growing trend and propose that the benefits of international tourism outweigh its potential drawbacks.

Overseas destinations have become increasingly popular vacation spots in recent years, primarily due to two factors. The first is the reduction in travel costs and increased accessibility, making international trips more affordable and convenient for a larger population than ever before. The emergence of budget airlines and early booking discounts have made airfare more affordable, enabling vacationers to plan ahead and save money. The second driving factor is the explosive growth of social media, which has broadened people's access to information about diverse cultures and remote locations, inspiring them to seek new experiences. Tourist review videos can easily go viral on popular platforms such as TikTok and YouTube, motivating millions of viewers to step beyond their comfort zones and consider embarking on their own enlightening adventures.

This trend of increased international tourism is positive for several compelling reasons. Firstly, overseas tourism can significantly impact the economy of host countries. Holidaymakers typically spend money on a range of goods and services, such as accommodation, food, transportation, and souvenirs, which can stimulate job creation and economic growth. This, in turn, can lead to improved infrastructure and enhanced living standards for the local population. Secondly, travelling globally promotes cultural exchange and understanding among people from diverse geographical backgrounds. By visiting foreign countries, visitors can learn about new cultures, customs, and traditions, broadening their perspectives and fostering mutual respect. This cultural exchange can help dismantle stereotypes and prejudices, leading to a more tolerant and inclusive global society.

In conclusion, the trend of global travel, driven by affordable travel costs, increased accessibility, and the growth of social media, is a predominantly positive development, offering numerous benefits for both tourists and host countries.

Sample 5:

More people today find themselves interested in travelling to foreign nations. I believe that this phenomenon is a result of increased access to information on social media, and yet is fundamentally adverse to the local cultures that experience mass tourism.

Firstly, I believe that social media has allowed people to catch a glimpse of foreign locales, which in turn entices them to visit destinations that they otherwise would not have before. When people see travel adverts through online platforms, they are compelled to explore it themselves and showcase their experience on social media. This is why many people on the internet today have been able to create a career out of travelling and posting pictures on the internet alone: there is a huge market for the advertisements of travel destinations on apps such as Instagram and Facebook today.

However, increased travel to tourist destinations has inadvertently internationalized them over time as governments and urban planners aim to make the stay of rich foreign tourists more comfortable and luxurious. Gradually, little by little of what makes the place special is replaced by a generic, commercialized shell. This creates a situation in places such as Angkor Wat in Cambodia, where the serenity of the temples is destroyed by the overwhelming number of tourists.

Overall, I believe that the rise of the internet and social media in particular has contributed to the proliferation of global travel. Nevertheless, tourism has thrived at the expense of the destinations' local cultures. On the whole, I therefore argue that this development has been an unwanted one for most local populations.

Câu 3