It is important for all towns and cities to have large public outdoor places like squares and parks. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Sample 1:

Public outdoor spaces, such as squares and parks, play a crucial role in the development and well-being of urban areas. These communal spaces provide a myriad of benefits that contribute to the overall quality of life for residents. This essay will argue in favor of the importance of having large public outdoor places in towns and cities.

Firstly, public outdoor spaces promote social cohesion by fostering interactions among people from different backgrounds and walks of life. Squares and parks serve as natural gathering points for various events and activities, such as concerts, festivals, and community celebrations. These spaces provide opportunities for residents to connect, share experiences, and develop a sense of belonging to their community. In doing so, they help build stronger and more resilient social networks, which are essential for creating inclusive and harmonious urban environments.

Secondly, public outdoor spaces contribute significantly to the health and well-being of city dwellers. Parks and green spaces offer residents an escape from the hustle and bustle of city life, providing them with areas to relax, unwind, and enjoy nature. Additionally, these spaces encourage physical activity by providing venues for sports, exercise, and leisurely walks. Regular physical activity has been proven to reduce the risk of chronic diseases, improve mental health, and enhance overall well-being. Therefore, the presence of large public outdoor spaces in towns and cities is crucial for promoting a healthy and balanced lifestyle.

In conclusion, the importance of having large public outdoor spaces in towns and cities cannot be overstated, as these spaces foster social cohesion and promote health and well-being. They must be developed and preserved in our modern world.

Sample 2:

The initiative to promote outdoor spaces in metropolitan areas has gained in popularity in recent years. Although these public places might result in a minor uptick in crimes, I personally support such forward-looking policies considering their effect on public health.

On the one hand, minor infractions might be on the rise in public areas. A clear instance of this is the case of Nguyen Hue pedestrian square in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Since its public opening in 2018, the square has attracted millions of visitors who enjoy strolling, gathering with friends and enjoying quality time with family. As visitors are tightly packed in the space and may be distracted by their friends and family, they have become easy targets for criminals such as pickpockets. This is not only a loss for the unfortunate victims but can also damage the image of a safe and hospitable Ho Chi Minh City.

On the other hand, it is clear to me that outdoor spaces are beneficial to physical health. There are many parks, gardens and squares that offer an abundance of freely accessible resources for exercises. For example, those in Hanoi typically provide residents with exercise equipment and fitness activities which often come free of charge. In addition, public spaces are generally filled with plants, fostering a greener atmosphere and offering visitors a refreshing escape from the pollution that they must frequently endure in densely populated cities. Recent policy research into this area has shown that residents in the vicinity of public spaces tend to exercise more regularly, thus enjoying overall better health.

In conclusion, in spite of the threat of petty crimes, I would opine that public spaces should be encouraged in every city and town to promote healthier lifestyles. It is therefore advisable that city planners should allocate at least 20 percent of total development area for green spaces or public areas.

Sample 3:

City planning has always been a major concern for policymakers. With regard to this topic, some people believe that urban areas need to feature large outdoor spaces for the public. In my opinion, I am inclined to agree, despite several arguments that it should not be a priority.

Building public outdoor places might not seem important from certain perspectives. One possible view is that constructing residential areas such as apartment complexes can be a better utilization of urban land. That way, cities could accommodate a larger population and somewhat alleviate concerns related to overcrowding. Meanwhile, others point out that city governments would benefit from having more locations of commerce. The more businesses present in a city, the more commercial revenue exists to be taxed by the government. From this point of view, reserving space for the populace’s leisure would understandably be a waste of money, since that land cannot be monetized. Establishing public outdoor spaces, therefore, might not be easily justified.

However, I believe these kinds of places are essential components of any town or city. They greatly adorn the surrounding landscape, simply by existing as green spaces or showcasing artistic achievements in the form of statues and monuments. New York, for example, would not be the same without its scenic Central Park, an urban park which features both wildlife reservations and man-made landmarks. Furthermore, public outdoor spaces could serve recreational purposes, as people can jog, cycle, and play sports there to relieve the stress caused by modern life. Relating to my aforementioned point about residential areas, even modern designs for apartment complexes would usually include communal spaces such as playgrounds and squares, highlighting the necessity of these spots. Building them, consequently, could be tremendously beneficial for a city.

In my opinion, large public outdoor places are indispensable components of any town, thanks to their ability to improve its value, and in some cases, significance. Planners, therefore, are recommended to prioritize incorporating these spaces in their work.

Sample 4:

In contemporary urban planning, the inclusion of expansive public outdoor spaces, such as squares and parks, is non-negotiable. I firmly agree that every town and city should prioritize the establishment and maintenance of these communal areas. The significance extends beyond mere aesthetics, encompassing the enhancement of residents' well-being, the promotion of community bonds, and the contribution to a sustainable urban environment.

Firstly, large public outdoor spaces serve as vital recreational hubs, providing an essential escape from the frenetic pace of urban life. Parks, in particular, offer a sanctuary for physical activities, contributing to improved mental health and stress reduction. An example is Vancouver's Stanley Park, seamlessly integrated into the city's fabric, offering residents a serene connection with nature within city limits.

Furthermore, public squares and parks play a pivotal role as social catalysts, acting as focal points for cultural events and community gatherings. The transformative impact is evident in New York City's High Line, an urban repurposing success story that has evolved into a vibrant communal space, fostering a sense of unity among diverse residents.

In addition to the social benefits, these spaces contribute significantly to environmental sustainability. They mitigate the urban heat island effect, improve air quality, and provide havens for biodiversity. Singapore stands as a prime example, where green spaces are seamlessly woven into the urban landscape, enhancing the city's environmental resilience.

In conclusion, the creation and maintenance of large public outdoor spaces are indispensable components of urban planning. Beyond the physical and mental health advantages, these spaces cultivate social cohesion and contribute to environmental sustainability. As urban areas expand, prioritizing the integration of such communal areas should be fundamental to sustainable urban development strategies.

Sample 5:

In my perspective, it is crucial for urban development plans to incorporate ample public outdoor spaces such as parks and squares. I wholeheartedly agree with this notion due to the myriad benefits it offers.

To begin with, the primary advantage lies in the enhancement of public health. Parks provide urban dwellers with a retreat from their daily routines, allowing them to immerse themselves in natural surroundings, thereby enhancing their satisfaction and reducing stress levels. Healthcare professionals are also encouraged to prescribe outdoor activities in communal settings as part of treatments for patients grappling with psychological issues. Moreover, parks teeming with diverse flora and fauna serve as delightful playgrounds for children. Rather than succumbing to the allure of video games, youngsters can partake in walks or bike rides in national parks, thereby improving their physical health and fostering a deeper connection with nature.

Furthermore, the environmental benefits of expanding green spaces are undeniable. Thanks to their remarkable capacity to absorb carbon dioxide, public parks adorned with a variety of trees play a crucial role in alleviating urban pollution, consequently reducing the incidence of pollution-related illnesses among residents.

Lastly, the inclusion of public outdoor areas in urban planning contributes to economic advantages, particularly in terms of tourism. A well-thought-out urban development plan not only enhances the allure of cities by making them clean and appealing to tourists but also stimulates local businesses, thereby creating more job opportunities for residents.

In conclusion, the significant merits of incorporating expansive public outdoor areas in urban layouts, spanning public health, environmental preservation, and economic prosperity, underscore the necessity of such measures. It is imperative for national authorities and private enterprises to collaborate in crafting thoughtful urban development plans that prioritize the well-being of residents.

Sample 6:

Urban planning has always been a major concern for policymakers. Regarding this issue, some individuals argue that urban areas should include extensive public outdoor spaces. In my view, I tend to agree, despite arguments suggesting otherwise.

The establishment of public outdoor areas may not appear significant from certain standpoints. One perspective is that constructing residential complexes could better utilize urban land. This approach could accommodate a larger population and somewhat alleviate concerns about overcrowding. Conversely, others argue that city administrations would benefit from additional commercial areas. The more businesses in a city, the more tax revenue the government can collect. Consequently, allocating space for public leisure might be seen as wasteful since it cannot be monetized. Therefore, justifying the creation of public outdoor spaces might not be straightforward.

However, I believe such spaces are essential elements of any urban environment. They greatly enhance the surroundings, either by serving as green spaces or by displaying artistic achievements such as statues and monuments. For instance, New York City's iconic Central Park, featuring both natural reserves and man-made landmarks, contributes significantly to its identity. Moreover, public outdoor areas can serve recreational purposes, providing opportunities for activities like jogging, cycling, and sports, which can help alleviate the stress of modern life. Additionally, even contemporary residential designs often incorporate communal spaces like playgrounds and squares, underscoring the necessity of such areas. Therefore, constructing them could bring considerable benefits to a city.

In my opinion, large public outdoor spaces are indispensable components of any urban area, as they enhance its value and, in some cases, its significance. Hence, planners are advised to prioritize their inclusion in urban development.

Sample 7:

The concept of incorporating open-air communal zones into urban areas has surged in importance recently. Despite the minor increase in criminal activities that these zones could potentially invite, I firmly advocate such progressive schemes owing to the significant benefits they offer for community well-being.

While it is true that minor transgressions might slightly escalate in these communal zones, the example of Nguyen Hue pedestrian square in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, drives home the point. Since its inauguration in 2018, the square has welcomed an impressive number of visitors who find pleasure in leisurely strolls, social interactions, and familial bonding. In such crowded spaces, individuals, engrossed in their activities, often become susceptible to petty criminals. This unfortunate situation not only affects the victims but could also tarnish the reputation of Ho Chi Minh City as a secure and welcoming destination.

However, it remains evident to me that open-air communal zones play a critical role in promoting physical fitness. A multitude of parks, gardens and squares offer an array of resources for physical activity, free of cost. Places such as those in Hanoi equip residents with exercise amenities and conduct fitness activities without imposing any charges. Moreover, these zones, typically abundant in foliage, offer a refreshing respite from the pollution-ridden atmosphere of crowded cities. Recent urban planning research has revealed a positive correlation between the proximity of such spaces and the regularity of exercise among residents, leading to an overall improvement in health.

In conclusion, despite the slight risk of petty crimes, I strongly endorse the establishment of communal zones in every city and town to foster healthier lifestyles. It would be beneficial for urban planners to dedicate at least 25 percent of the total development area to such green or communal spaces.

Sample 8:

There exists an argument that it is important for urban spaces to have noticeable constructions to facilitate the public, and hence heavy investment is needed for the purpose. To an extent, it is essential as I think these would reflect the pride of the city, but other vital needs should not be ignored.

The prime reason why I think an exorbitant sum of money should be spent on such buildings in cities is because of the fact that these buildings would later become the identity and prestige of the city. For example, when a person thinks about Paris, the first picture which comes to his mind is the Eiffel Tower. Another merit I perceive with this investment is that it would change the face of a city. To be clearer, these places would attract a large volume of people from and around, and when this happens, the proximal places would progress economically as a lot of commercial activities take place.

Conversely, one should realize that a city has a variety of necessities which includes better infrastructure, smooth transport, quality educational institutions, high-level health care et cetera. It is therefore clear that a huge sum of money is to be allocated to these areas to balance these financial necessities. The level of contentment among the city-dwellers would be compromised if a considerable proportion of revenue is channeled to erect huge concrete or iron structures. If the city administration is financially sound, I feel they can go ahead with the move, or else this would result in many burning social and economic issues.

In conclusion, it is highly recommended to have hefty investments which are to be kept aside for the construction of outdoor public structures. However, I feel that the authorities should also look into the equilibrium of fund allocation as per the necessities of the city-dwellers, which is vital in the development of a city.

Sample 9:

For the past few decades, urban sprawl has resulted in the conversion of areas into concrete jungles. This has prompted a lobby of urban town planners to propose the establishment of open spaces, in form of squares and parks though there are certain voices of dissent over this.

Creating open spaces would help improve the quality of life of inhabitants of urban locations by much-required relief from the suffocating urban landscape dominated by built-up structures, sprawling complexes, skyscrapers, etc. Public squares with views of open skies, and gardens laden with greenery also, render a relaxing environment and let the inhabitants experience a healthy distraction from hectic mundane and depressing encounters with concrete areas. This can let people forgo the need to leave cities and towns to seek solace and solitude.

Moreover, such locations can provide opportunities for not only socializing but also entertaining to the otherwise overwhelmed by extremely busy and overburdened with obligations, city and town dwellers. Most are bereft of time and money to avail facilities offered by more formal settings of clubs, that charge exorbitant amounts. People can simply go to these locations and meet others at their convenience without needing to pay anything.

However, some critics voice their doubts over such a proposal. They term it as a misuse of land resources in times when urban locations are facing a deep scarcity of usable land. Taking such a step would only cause an unprecedented increment in the prices. Thus, making it harder for many to afford dwelling units or offices. This would only fuel urban spread, as they fear.

In conclusion, even though the issue of creating open has descended into a senseless squabble. I feel that gardens and public squares can help rejuvenate distressed inhabitants, as well as the cityscape. 

Sample 10:

Public places such as parks and common squares are a kind of pleasure-space where the urban people sit and enjoy. I completely agree that more of such spaces should be built in cities.

Towns and cities do not have a lot of the green beauty and open fields found in the countryside. Instead, with growing modernization, the cities are getting filled up with din and dust and smoke, making people feel suffocated in this heavy atmosphere. They wish to enjoy the serenity of rural scenes which are not available in cities and towns, which is why many people build farmhouses and holiday homes away from the city for a weekend of peaceful and green atmosphere. A public park or a playground provides a taste of that to these busy people during their leisure hours. Here they find a wealth of oxygen which is rare in other parts of the town, and families can have exciting picnics together and indulge in recreational activities like playing the frisbee or taking their dog for a run.

A town square is commonly found in the heart of a traditional town used for community gatherings. They may house open markets, music concerts, bakeries and have a beautiful center containing a fountain or a statue. In most countries, automobiles are prohibited in these areas enabling people to walk around and eliminating noise and pollution. People can gather here on weekends and have a fun outing for several hours for minimal costs since it’s freely accessible to all public. Such public squares or civic centers encourage a sense of community and bond the society in harmony.

Due to the aforementioned reasons, it is necessary to build such community places in towns and cities. I feel they are necessary for the health and happiness of the town-dwellers.

Sample 11:

There has been some discussion about the existence and need for parks and squares in towns and cities. While some people believe that these open premises are essential, others insist that these places make the land useless and hence they must be converted to practical purposes. In my opinion, despite the voices against the larger public places, parks and squares provide great value to both the towns and their civilians.

First of all, the open areas have always been considered as the heart of cities, where people get together for meetings and leisure activities. Besides, children and their parents spend quality time at these places after their hectic daily schedules. The increasing pollution in cities is a cause of great concern for the government and the citizens and places like parks and squares often provide relaxation to the old people. Moreover, such places attract tourists as they usually have a history behind their creation. For instance, all European towns are famous for their beautiful gardens and city center squares. Thus, it’s absolutely imperative to conserve them for future generations.

On the other hand, one can’t deny the fact that cities are getting crowded each day and lacking places to build public and commercial centers. New transportation systems are coming to the cities, and they need a large space to build stations and wider lanes. For example, New York was planned nearly two hundred years ago and the roads in the city were small and narrow which were built for carts, not for cars and buses. Later, the New York city authority converted many historical parks and gardens into parking stations and highways. This transformation was publicly criticized by civilians and other town planners. Therefore, destroying parks and other public places for current benefits is not the solution for space constraints in cities.

In conclusion, big public grounds are the need of our future generations. Cities are facing a lot of pressure to develop a substantial infrastructure for the growing population, but this cannot be allowed at the cost of parks and squares. Therefore, it’s completely indispensable to have huge social places in the cities and towns.

Sample 12:

Urban planning undoubtedly has a considerable bearing on the well-being of city dwellers. Because of this, public opinion remains divided over how to effectively design cities and towns in a bid to boost citizens' welfare. It is believed that open green places such as parks and squares should always be present in urban areas and towns. This essay would agree with this thinking as such vast spaces are highly beneficial to both physical and health of the masses.

Constructing many outdoor recreational amenities in towns or cities irrefutably has a positive impact on citizens' health. Obviously, sedentary lifestyles have long been established as the chief culprit of the increasing number of health problems such as obesity or diabetes. In other words, individuals are becoming less physically active; for example: working adults typically sit behind a desk and children tend to hunch over their phones for an enormous amount of time daily, which can be highly detrimental to their health. These low levels of physical activities can be attributed to a dearth of large outdoor spaces where people can play sports or do exercises. Thus, building more vast green spots is of the essence for every city and town as these places could provide much-needed space for people to work out and maintain good levels of fitness.

Health aside, wide public spaces can also improve the psychological well-being of the public. Communal places such as parks or squares are generally deemed the sites where people can relax after grueling working hours as well as build local communities through social conversations and interactions. The absence of such places can take a heavy toll on city dwellers' mental well-being since they may spend more time staying at home or the workplace. Hanoi perfectly epitomizes this situation. Due to a lack of green vast areas, people have fewer chances to go out and socialize with others and in most cases, they are forced to be either in their apartments or offices during the day, which tends to leave them mentally drained. This is a testament to how building large outdoor areas is of fundamental importance for the mental health of the masses in urban areas.

In conclusion, the notion that every town or city needs to have large green spaces is valid as these places could go a long way towards enhancing both the physical and mental welfare of the general public.

Sample 13:

Allocating inner-city lands for public areas is tremendously necessary. In my opinion, I completely agree with this view, considering communal places eminent due to their significant benefits to local residents and the urban area as a whole.

The main reason why parts of big cities need shared spaces lies in their merits on improving public mental well-being. Since city dwellers persistently endure pressure in their daily lives because of the hustle and bustle of metropolises, establishing public parks or pedestrian zones in the vicinity of towns can provide a respite for these individuals. For example, taking a post- work stroll and immersing oneself in the revitalising atmosphere of green spaces can alleviate their worries. Furthermore, the construction of recreational parks, urban plazas, and similar public places promises to encourage frequent casual gatherings among the local people. Not only will this socialisation expand individual social circles but also foster societal cohesion.

Another compelling argument for introducing more open-air facilities in towns is the enhancement of the urban landscape. It is ubiquitous that the majority of metropolitan areas are characterised by a monotonous and industrial look, with skyscrapers and asphalt roads dominating. By incorporating inner-city green spaces, such as local parks and botanical gardens, these concrete jungles can be brought to life, adorned with the natural beauty of colorful flora.

In conclusion, not only can communal areas provide city dwellers with opportunities for socialising and relaxation but also contribute to the enhancement of urban aesthetics. Hence, I wholeheartedly support the notion that shared spaces are fundamental urban amenities.