Some think that people should not change their jobs while others think they should because it brings advantages for themselves, company, and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
Apart from people who long for a stable and long-term job, many want to experience different occupations as they assume it is beneficial to themselves, company and society. Personally, while both have their own merits, I believe it is better to have a job change for reasons including self-enhancement.
On the one hand, committing to one job can ensure financial stability for employees. As people work at one place for a long time, they will have a stable income and other benefits such as health or social insurance, plus promotions considering their contributions. These rewards and policies are usually applied to full-time employees or those who have worked for over a year. Applicants frequently job-hopping stand a lower chance of getting accepted into a new workplace and are more likely to face unemployment in the future. Most employers would reconsider hiring candidates with a background of switching jobs regularly as this behaviour is often associated with the stereotypical image of an unreliable and easily dissatisfied worker.
On the other hand, changing jobs once in a while can help people, especially the young, have the opportunity to develop a broader knowledge base and learn new skills. Many are put under new challenges such as fitting in or learning new procedures when working in a new environment, significantly enhancing their communication and problem-solving skills. Moreover, job hoppers can achieve career advancement without spending years for promotions, but they are often required to adapt more quickly and showcase their ability. Their efforts to outperform can potentially create better business outputs and build a skilled workforce for a country's competitive economy.
In conclusion, while working at one place can offer employees a more stable income and career prospects, switching jobs can boost their skills and benefit the company they work for and the country's economy. However, I believe that it is better to have a job change occasionally to foster personal growth from new challenges.
Sample 2:
People have opposing opinions about whether we should frequently change our jobs. In this essay, I will analyse both sides of the argument before arriving at my conclusion.
There are certain reasons why people think that it is a good idea for employees to change their jobs. The most important reason is that this is believed to help employees to have a diverse range of knowledge and experience. When they take up employment in a different company in the same industry, or a company in another industry, they have the chance to learn new knowledge and skills. For example, a lawyer working in a law firm can learn a lot by starting work in the legal department of a manufacturing company; this is because the nature of the work at the two companies is different. The diverse skill set that a person who frequently changes his/her job has allows this person to perform better at work and be entitled to a higher salary and better job-related benefits.
However, I do not think that we should change our jobs frequently. First, I believe that having specialised and solid knowledge and skills in an industry is more valued than having a diverse range of knowledge. Tasks at work are best performed by employees who have done the same tasks for years and know how to perform them the most productively. For example, a doctor who masters a certain field of medicine is more valued by patients than the one that knows a lot of fields but does not specialise in any field. Another argument against frequently changing jobs is that when we change our occupation, we have to learn how to adapt to a new working environment. This is a time-consuming and sometimes stressful task.
In conclusion, although there are certain reasons why people advocate changing jobs frequently, I support the argument that we should stay in the same job for as long as we can.
Sample 3:
The topic of changing jobs can be a sensitive topic, with some believing that doing so equips workers with a more expansive skill set and allows companies to save on training costs. I, however, contend that it is more disadvantageous to change jobs since it can hinder an individual’s career and companies may continually struggle to hire new employees.
A key benefit of workers changing jobs regularly is that they can be equipped with a more diverse skill set. As different jobs utilize different knowledge bases, employees may be able to acquire a wide-ranging variety of professional skills. Therefore, in the future when a new job is offered to them, employees will be better prepared for the work entailed at any given position. For companies, when their employees switch occupations, they can save time and money on training. Firms can do this by hiring someone with equal or more experience than the previous person in the same field. Therefore, the quality of the products or services being offered by these firms will remain consistent.
However, switching jobs can hinder a worker’s career as companies may be reluctant to hire such individuals. Employers understandably may hold a prejudice against those who frequently alternate between occupations as they think a so-called ‘job hopper’ will not be able to contribute to their company long-term and thus it would be counterproductive to commit resources to them. When it comes to how companies themselves can be negatively affected by job hopping, they may continually struggle when finding new employees who can meet their requirements. This is evident with how international accounting firms have a higher-than-average turnover rate at the junior level, meaning that they are in a near-endless cycle of hiring new people.
In conclusion, while changing jobs can help workers acquire vital skills and companies save time and money for training, I would assert that the drawbacks are much more substantial, as it can impede one’s career and companies can suffer from potentially high turnover rates.
Sample 4:
In this modern era, switching jobs now and then is no longer something unfamiliar, especially to the millennials. This present-time tendency has posed a debate of whether job-hopping or life-long employment would be more beneficial for the employees, the employers, or the public. This essay will look at both standpoints and suggest its favor for the long-term employment of one workplace.
It is understandable why someone advocates job changing. The first reason is that switching to a different job keeps employees busy and helps them develop valuable professional skills. When a person starts a new job, he is kicked out of his comfort zone and forced to learn new systems, new routines, new names, and new people’s skills. A staff who has flexibility and willingness to enter the unknown will be an asset to companies that require a mobile and malleable workforce. Moreover, it is difficult to significantly increase the annual salary while staying at the same company because a wage raise is usually calculated as a percentage of the base salary. Therefore, employees often switch between jobs to enjoy such financial gain.
However, there are more sound reasons to believe that aiming to stay at the same job career-long seems to be a more holistic solution. Firstly, while I acknowledge a major downside of a one-workplace career is stagnation, this issue can be solved by training programs offered either internally or externally. This means remaining at the same job can still secure one’s professional development. Secondly, a company may operate more sustainably if it can keep the turnover rate minimal. This comes down to the fact that a firm appears to suffer from significant financial loss if their staff leave too often, as they would have to pay more for recruiting and training processes. Also, failing to maintain loyal personnel would affect its reputation, leading to more difficulty in attracting talented workers and maintaining a strong workforce, which is a key factor for the healthy development of an organization.
To conclude, it is persuasive that encouraging people to stay at the same job would have more gains than losses at all levels rather than doing the other way around. Nonetheless, an employee should feel free to consider a shift in occupation if it is more suitable for their situation.
Sample 5:
Whether employees should jump from one job to another, or they should work at the same position throughout their career has been a controversial topic. In my opinion, while changing jobs can be beneficial to a certain extent, being in a similar position is more advantageous to both the individual and the employer.
On the one hand, career changes can benefit employees in many ways. First, job hoppers can hone diverse skills and possess an expansive knowledge spanning across different fields. As each position requires unique abilities, when switching jobs, employees can master a new skill, which can be of importance to positions that entails cross-department communication and cooperation. Moreover, individuals who change jobs often will be less likely to become jobless, as their diverse skill set can be applied in any post. For instance, during the Covid-19 pandemic, people who had additional knowledge in a field different from their job can find new positions once personnel reduction took place.
On the other hand, advocates of working constantly in one post have firm grounds to argue that this trend has numerous positive effects. Concerning individuals, being loyal to a position means that their incentives are high, including seniority bonuses as well as labor insurance. Whereas job hoppers can never expect this as their short-term work will always put their benefits at a new employee level. As for companies, having faithful employees can help them cut training costs and avoid problems that can arise from newcomers. When a new member joins the team, the company has to pay for their lack of efficiency and experience. This is not the case of longtime employees, whose incentives are only tools to motivate them to achieve greater success, not a retribution on the company for their senior employees’ mistakes.
In conclusion, while it is fair to argue that jumping between jobs can help individuals broaden their skill set, working in one position constantly can have numerous positive effects on both the employees and the employers.
Sample 6:
Several people believe that they should work for the same company for the remainder of their lives, while others believe that their jobs should be varied. This paper would examine both viewpoints and explain why the latter is, in my opinion, more favourable.
On the one hand, individuals who believe that staying at the same job makes it simpler to work argue that it is more convenient. In other words, if someone has worked for an organisation for a long time, he or she will be at ease performing any task because everyone knows who they are. For example, a member of my extended family has worked for a financial organisation for over a quarter of a century because he enjoys and is content working there. As a result, many people, particularly the elderly, are hesitant to change careers since they are perfectly satisfied with their current position.
Opponents of this viewpoint believe that a person should be able to change jobs at any time, which means that he or she should be able to transfer to different faculties based on their preferences. Furthermore, job variety not only makes a person happy, but it also allows them to get new experiences and expand their capabilities. For example, according to recent research, the majority of employees are quitting their jobs in order to advance in their careers. As a result, nowadays, young people choose to change jobs in order to further their careers and accumulate wealth.
In conclusion, it is apparent that staying in the same career is joyful for those who oppose change; nevertheless, those who change their profession on a regular basis have a high chance of advancement. As a result, I fully believe that a person should bring variety to their future career path.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The issue of addressing the global challenge of feeding a rapidly expanding population has spurred discussions about potential solutions, including the adoption of Genetically Modified (GM) foods. While some proponents argue that GM foods present a viable answer to this problem, I fundamentally disagree. The potential risks associated with GM foods and the availability of alternative sustainable approaches make me skeptical about their efficacy as a long-term solution.
To begin with, Genetically Modified foods often involve the manipulation of organisms' genetic makeup to enhance desirable traits, such as increased crop yield or resistance to pests. While this may seem promising in theory, the unintended consequences of genetic modification could pose significant risks to human health and the environment. For instance, allergens or toxins could be inadvertently introduced into GM crops, leading to adverse effects on consumers. The release of genetically modified organisms into the environment could also disrupt natural ecosystems and harm biodiversity.
Additionally, the push for GM foods detracts attention and resources from more sustainable and holistic agricultural practices that have the potential to address food security challenges without compromising safety. Agroecological approaches, such as crop rotation, agroforestry, and integrated pest management, offer environmentally friendly alternatives to intensive monocultures and chemical-based farming. These methods promote soil health, water conservation, and biodiversity, all of which are crucial for ensuring the long-term sustainability of food production.
In conclusion, while the growing global population necessitates innovative solutions for food security, I am opposed to the idea that GM foods offer a viable remedy. The potential risks to human health and the environment, coupled with the availability of more sustainable agricultural practices, make me doubtful about the long-term efficacy of genetically modified foods. Instead of relying solely on GM foods, it is imperative to explore diverse and sustainable approaches that prioritize both human well-being and the planet's health.
Sample 2:
To tackle food shortages, many scientists recommend genetically modified (GM) food as a solution. Despite some concerns regarding this solution, I strongly believe that this is the future for food security.
The first benefit that GM foods offer is that it has significantly higher yield compared to traditional crops. GM foods have their genes altered to reproduce their cells quicker, leading to faster crop productions. Also, GM foods are capable of withstanding harsh environments, such as during winters and dry summers. Another benefit of consuming more GM foods is that they require fewer pesticides, contrary to popular belief. Because scientists design GM foods to be resistant to common pests, farmers do not need to spray pesticides as regularly as they would growing traditional crops.
However, despite these benefits, there are some concerns that researchers should revisit before populating GM foods. The first concern is the impact GM crops have on the ecosystem. Because these crops are known to be resistant to pests, it could lead to the eradication of pest species. As a result, this can disrupt the ecosystem’s balance. The second concern is that, due to GM crops’ high efficiency and rapid growth, they can easily become an invasive species with unhealthy farming practices. This problem, aside from damaging the ecosystem, also has adverse effects on the economy. For example, if one plot destined to grow a certain plant gets invaded by another species, farmers will experience a loss of income.
In conclusion, although admittedly, there are some legitimate concerns for GM foods, I still strongly agree that GM crops are the most feasible solution to the global food shortage.
Sample 3:
Feeding the ever-growing world population is undoubtedly a significant challenge that needs to be addressed. Some individuals argue that genetically modified (GM) foods could provide a viable solution to this problem. In my opinion, while GM foods may offer certain benefits, they also come with potential risks and drawbacks that need to be carefully considered.
Proponents of GM foods argue that they can help increase crop yields, improve nutritional content, and enhance resistance to pests and diseases. This, they claim, would enable farmers to produce more food on less land, ultimately helping to feed a larger population. Additionally, GM foods have the potential to withstand harsh environmental conditions, such as drought or extreme temperatures, making them more resilient and reliable sources of food.
However, it is important to acknowledge the concerns surrounding GM foods. Critics argue that the long-term health and environmental impacts of consuming and cultivating GM crops are not yet fully understood. There are also ethical considerations, such as the potential for corporate control over the food supply and the loss of biodiversity. Furthermore, the introduction of GM crops into natural ecosystems could have unforeseen consequences, disrupting delicate ecological balances.
In conclusion, while GM foods may offer some potential benefits in addressing the challenge of feeding a growing world population, the risks and uncertainties associated with their widespread adoption cannot be ignored. It is crucial to conduct thorough research and risk assessments to ensure that the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks. Ultimately, a balanced approach that takes into account the needs of both current and future generations is necessary to tackle this pressing issue.
Sample 4:
Whether GM foods are the ultimate answer to address the need to feed the ever-growing global population has been a topic of fierce argument recently among intellectuals across the world. However, I fully agree with the statement that such foods are an effective remedy to worldwide food scarcity.
One obvious advantage of GM foods is better production in lesser time which will ensure food for more people that too utilizing a few resources. In addition, these foods and their cultivation are a lot more environmentally-friendly than normal foods because the former are highly resilient to diseases, pests and insects which reduces the need to use harmful herbicides, pesticides, insecticides and so on. This also ensures that people get pure fruits and grains, for example, free from chemicals.
Better texture, varied flavors and improved nutritional values are some other qualities which make genetically modified foods a viable solution to shortage of food. When such high-quality foods are made available at cheaper prices, it will sure save governments and individuals substantial sums of money, not to mention the obvious health benefits for people. Further, longer shelf-life makes bioengineered foods easier to transport to distant places and store them. Last but not least, their potentially non-allergenic nature makes them Manna from heaven for the hungry millions.
In short, GM foods are the need of the hour. Therefore, the authorities across the world need to spring to action to mass-produce genetically-engineered foods and make them available to people thereby saving hundreds of thousands of lives from malnutrition and starvation.
Sample 5:
As the population is increasing at a fast rate across the world, a shortage of food is becoming a perplexing problem. Some individuals suggest that this can be addressed by genetically modified foods. In my opinion, I totally disagree with the statement since engineering genetic foods have a high risk of potential problems and negative environmental impacts.
The main issue of genetic modification organism is a risk of potential problems after having the food for a long-term. This is because scientists or nutritionists are not sure about the long-term effects and safety as it is a relatively new practice. For example, food allergic reactions have risen in the last decade such as nuts or dairy products, which resulted from consuming GM foods. In addition, there are also a large number of people who hold concerns about the potential risks to human health affected by GM crops such as inducing mutations in human genes. Therefore, numerous people have an inclination toward eating organic food rather than GM foods.
Another thing to consider is that the agricultural method of GMOs brings harmful effects on the environment and ecosystem. Firstly, the changes in the agricultural practice affect on the farming and where weeds or other harmful factors become stronger. This results in overuse of the toxic sprays such as pesticides and herbicides. Secondly, the new cultivation method is harmful for non-GMO crops and also insects or animals, which can lead to loss of biodiversity. To illustrate this, bees play an important role in the pollination of various food crops, but they are vulnerable from the sprays.
In conclusion, I am strongly opposed to the opinion that genetically modified foods can deal with
a shortage of food due to the world demographic growth. This is for the reason that it has potential problems affecting people’s health and it has negative effects on environmental impacts and biodiversity.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
There is a great number of people travelling and visiting other nations, these days. This can be caused by several reasons and personally, it is a positive development.
To begin with, there are two contributing factors behind people’s motivation to travel. First, many of them may want to learn more about unfamiliar cultures as during their trip, they are allowed to get exposed to local people and observe cultural differences here. This gives them a chance to make a comparison of cultural traits in different nations, which helps them enrich their knowledge and have a more profound understanding of the world. Second, a number of people decide to go on a trip to another nation so that they can visit their relatives or family members who live overseas. Video calls or photos only help them see each other’s faces without hugging or holding hands, and therefore, they desire to travel abroad so as to meet their beloved ones in the flesh.
I believe the prevalence of cross-border trips brings about great positive effects on society. With many travellers coming to a country, the demand for housing and food here will likely grow, so local people can earn a great amount of money through providing shelters and selling their traditional cuisines. For instance, Thailand is a country that welcomes millions of travellers from around the world annually, thanks to which the tourism industry here can flourish. Thousands of jobs have also been created, such as workers in travel agencies, taxi drivers or tour guides, to serve the great number of international tourists. Therefore, many Thai residents working in this industry have escaped poverty, avoided unemployment and enjoyed a better life quality.
In conclusion, people these days travel across the border in order to acquire new knowledge and see one another. In my opinion, this development is positive due to its various social benefits.
Sample 2:
More and more people today are choosing to travel internationally. This positive development is mainly because of a rise in middle-class income coupled with advances in aviation.
People today can afford to travel as it has become more convenient. The last half century has seen wages in both developed and developing companies climb with the concomitant expansion of the global middle class. Workers have the disposable income to travel that they lacked in the past. This has been complemented with safer airplanes, so individuals are not afraid to fly. Airfares have also become cheaper as companies like Boeing produce more efficient planes, competition intensifies between competing airlines, and the supply more than meets demand for flights. These factors combined have spawned a golden age of international travel.
Looking at the opportunity in perspective, it is hard to see the advent of international travel as anything less than one of mankind’s greatest achievements. For the entirety of human history, most people lived and died near to where they were born. Anyone who wanted to travel to another country had to possess enormous wealth, time, and courage. Today, the average employee can save up and travel to see the wonders of the Renaissance in Southern Europe, the vast monuments to history and modernity in China, or explore any other corner of Earth that has piqued their interest. This is an unprecedented opportunity unavailable to past generations.
In conclusion, international travel is a byproduct of the modern age, and we should all be grateful for its possibility. There are clear environmental drawbacks but those should not blind people to its benefits taken as a whole.
Sample 3:
In recent years, there has been a surge in the number of individuals traveling to foreign countries. This trend is fueled by various reasons, all of which contribute to a wide range of positive developments. In this essay, I will explore why numerous people choose to explore novel locations and argue that this trend has an overall positive impact on individuals and society.
One of the primary factors driving the escalating number of international travelers is globalization. As the world becomes more interconnected, people grow increasingly interested in different cultures, traditions, and ways of life. Consequently, traveling to other nations assists them in cultivating cross-cultural comprehension and insights. Moreover, this trend offers significant educational advantages as learners can pursue academic knowledge in developed countries with high-quality educational systems. This allows them not only to acquire academic knowledge but also to gain valuable skills such as problem-solving and effective communication. For instance, students studying abroad will be well-prepared with essential competencies for a lucrative career.
I firmly believe that the growth of international tourism positively impacts the domestic economy of host countries. The influx of foreign tourists and their spending on local services provide a lucrative stream of revenue that can significantly improve the lives of people in these nations. Additionally, tourists benefit from cultural exchanges and eye-opening experiences during their visits. Furthermore, the profits generated from these activities can be utilized by local governments to upgrade infrastructure such as accommodations or roads. For example, Ha Giang province allocates 35% of its tourism revenue annually to construct new buildings and maintain local heritages.
In conclusion, the rise in the number of international visitors can be attributed to globalization and the pursuit of educational opportunities. In my opinion, this trend will continue to yield positive outcomes for individuals and societies by fostering cross-cultural understanding and contributing to economic growth.
Sample 4:
In recent years, there has been a significant surge in the number of people traveling abroad for leisure and various other purposes. This essay will explore the factors driving this growing trend and propose that the benefits of international tourism outweigh its potential drawbacks.
Overseas destinations have become increasingly popular vacation spots in recent years, primarily due to two factors. The first is the reduction in travel costs and increased accessibility, making international trips more affordable and convenient for a larger population than ever before. The emergence of budget airlines and early booking discounts have made airfare more affordable, enabling vacationers to plan ahead and save money. The second driving factor is the explosive growth of social media, which has broadened people's access to information about diverse cultures and remote locations, inspiring them to seek new experiences. Tourist review videos can easily go viral on popular platforms such as TikTok and YouTube, motivating millions of viewers to step beyond their comfort zones and consider embarking on their own enlightening adventures.
This trend of increased international tourism is positive for several compelling reasons. Firstly, overseas tourism can significantly impact the economy of host countries. Holidaymakers typically spend money on a range of goods and services, such as accommodation, food, transportation, and souvenirs, which can stimulate job creation and economic growth. This, in turn, can lead to improved infrastructure and enhanced living standards for the local population. Secondly, travelling globally promotes cultural exchange and understanding among people from diverse geographical backgrounds. By visiting foreign countries, visitors can learn about new cultures, customs, and traditions, broadening their perspectives and fostering mutual respect. This cultural exchange can help dismantle stereotypes and prejudices, leading to a more tolerant and inclusive global society.
In conclusion, the trend of global travel, driven by affordable travel costs, increased accessibility, and the growth of social media, is a predominantly positive development, offering numerous benefits for both tourists and host countries.
Sample 5:
More people today find themselves interested in travelling to foreign nations. I believe that this phenomenon is a result of increased access to information on social media, and yet is fundamentally adverse to the local cultures that experience mass tourism.
Firstly, I believe that social media has allowed people to catch a glimpse of foreign locales, which in turn entices them to visit destinations that they otherwise would not have before. When people see travel adverts through online platforms, they are compelled to explore it themselves and showcase their experience on social media. This is why many people on the internet today have been able to create a career out of travelling and posting pictures on the internet alone: there is a huge market for the advertisements of travel destinations on apps such as Instagram and Facebook today.
However, increased travel to tourist destinations has inadvertently internationalized them over time as governments and urban planners aim to make the stay of rich foreign tourists more comfortable and luxurious. Gradually, little by little of what makes the place special is replaced by a generic, commercialized shell. This creates a situation in places such as Angkor Wat in Cambodia, where the serenity of the temples is destroyed by the overwhelming number of tourists.
Overall, I believe that the rise of the internet and social media in particular has contributed to the proliferation of global travel. Nevertheless, tourism has thrived at the expense of the destinations' local cultures. On the whole, I therefore argue that this development has been an unwanted one for most local populations.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo