Câu hỏi:
05/01/2025 140Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
The environment has become a major concern over the last couple of decades, resulting in several debates on who should be responsible for ensuring its sustenance for our future generations. In this essay, we will discuss the point of views for establishing where the responsibility for the protection of the environment lies.
There is a strong argument that individually we cannot contribute materially to the cause of preserving our environment because it encompasses several areas where individual efforts become futile. Some examples are factories that are emitting hazardous gases in our air or dumping dangerous materials in our rivers. If we want to take this up as an individual, we cannot be expected to be able to prevent this from happening. One could argue that if each shareholder puts pressure on the companies that they own this could lead to building up of pressure for being more responsible, this, unfortunately, is not workable because usually the companies are mostly owned by funds that are managed by professionals, seeking profit and environment is very low on their priority list.
The above leads us to deduct that if this movement of preserving our environment is a collaborative effort by the government and general public, we stand a better chance of being successful. The government should provide the legal infrastructure to control the natural instinct of profiteering of all investment institutions; with this, the individual efforts could start making the difference. Continuing the above example if an individual member of the society notices that same happening in his or her surroundings, he or she can call on an implementation agency that would tackle the factory emitting hazardous gases and dumping dangerous materials. Examples of these implementation agencies include Environment control desk in the city office, environmental inspectors who randomly visit such factories and are empowered under the law to impose a fine or completely seal the production facility found in violation of the rules.
The responsibility surely seems to be tilting towards the actions of individuals supported through government agencies and legislative framework, thus, in my opinion, the combined efforts of the government and public would be more effective. This should not, however, be interpreted as being absolved from keeping our environment clean and we can through cans and other non-degradable materials on the beach.
Sample 2:
In the contemporary world, the concern for the degrading environment is at its peak. Some people believe it is difficult for an individual to make a difference, while others feel it cannot be solved without authorities intervening in the matter. This essay will discuss both sides in-depth and will also state why I strongly agree that the government has an indispensable role in such matters.
To begin, many believe the task of saving mother nature is tedious for a single person. But if we introduce minor alterations to our day-to-day activities, we could probably eradicate the detrimental causes to our environment. For instance, we can always bring along a recycling bag while shopping so that usage of the plastic bag would decrease. These will definitely help in minimising the air pollution caused by burning plastic bags. Thus, such actions from an individual could lead to a healthy environment.
In contrast, to individual actions, governments also play a vital role in providing checks to many such activities disrupting our ecosystem. Governments can impose stringent rules to be followed by its people. For example, the usage of plastic bags should be completely banned in the country, and this can only be forced by authorities. These regulations require judiciary powers to implement which reside with the respective officials. For this reason, the government plays the cardinal part in a process of abolishing effects causing damage to nature.
To conclude, environmental degradation is increasing at an enormous rate. These problems should be tackled with the collaboration of an individual along with governments. Would it be ungreat? I firmly acknowledge the governments have a prominent role in resolving these issues.
Sample 3:
In today’s modern world, we are constantly confronted with the issue of environmental problems which are becoming more severe nowadays in the newspaper. Some people are of the opinion that individuals can hardly make a change to environmental problems, while some believe that governments can help in solving environmental issues. I strongly agree that governments do play an indispensable role in tackling these problems.
Some people think that environmental problems are not an easy task for individuals to deal with, but in fact, we can actually take up some good habits which could prove useful in dealing with environmental problems. For example, we can always bring along recyclable bags with us so that we can cut down the usage of plastic bags. It can be clearly seen that individuals can actually contribute to helping reduce environmental issues as fewer plastic bags being used means less air pollution which is caused by the burning of plastic bags in the rubbish dump sites.
It is certainly true that environmental problems cannot be solved without the help of governments. To begin, governments have more power than individuals in coping the environmental problems. They can, for instance, set up laws that ban the emission of wastes from factory directly into the air and watercourses. As a consequence, less air pollution and water pollution guarantee the good health of citizens. By doing this, citizens will be healthier, and they can now live in a pollution-free country.
In conclusion, environmental problems should be tackled immediately with the cooperation of individuals and governments. I believe that the environmental problems will be solved one day, and our country will continue to prosper and flourish in the years to come.
Sample 4:
Pollution has become a major concern in society all over the world. In society, not only an individual but also groups of people live. In society, it is everyone’s responsibility to protect the environment. Environmental problems caused by pollution, for example, fuel gases, cutting of trees, gases released by factories. The government should take responsibility to reduce pollution in order to protect the environment.
Every individual who is living in society should take responsibility to participate in protecting the environment. Firstly, people should grow trees in their houses, premises and colonies. By growing trees there are huge advantages, for example, most of the polluted gases are taken over by trees and they release the oxygen. Everyone should not throw waste on the roads, maintain a healthy environment by using the dustbins.
At the same time, if we consider the government’s role: the government have authority to protect the environment. By planting the trees all over the places, for example, all government places, besides the roads, schools, and parks etc., what I know this type of programme called a clean and green environment. Thus, the pollution can be controlled. Cleanliness is very important to maintain a healthy environment, hence government should emphasise the cleaners to clean the area thoroughly. Should place the dustbin every street and educate the individuals by advertisements. Inspect the houses every month to check how the individuals maintain their houses so that the individuals reflect themselves and self-correct themselves. Conduct environmental talks in the school, that individual learns everything from childhood onwards in the school.
I believe that it is every individual’s responsibility to solve the environmental problems, however, impossible for only one individual in the society. So the government should take actions to solve the environmental problems but encourage every individual to takes part in all those activities.
Sample 5:
Environmental problems have dramatically increased over the last few years. A rapid increase in population and other problems such as pollution, deforestation, global warming etc. have further exacerbated the situation. Some people argue that these problems are too large to be addressed by an individual being. I believe that it is a mutual responsibility of both individuals and countries to take pragmatic measures for its solution.
Overpopulation is one of the pivotal reasons that have detrimental effects on the environment. Increase in population demand more food resources, living space and other basic amenities of life. For instance, for the sake of accommodation many natural parks and forests have been wiped out to fulfil the need for living space. This has led to severe consequences that could damage both the people and the environment.
Individual efforts can contribute a lot to address the pressing environmental problems. Steps taken at an individual level can be an effective solution for the world. For instance, if the government of a country takes initiatives to reduce the rubbish produced daily, can’t do much. However, if the citizens take effort from their personal level, rubbish production could be controlled tremendously. Similarly, if the administration of a country starts planting trees, the effort would not go further without the collaboration of the individuals.
Pollution is also a great menace to the environment. It is not only the reason of environmental problems but also has a dire effect on people. Factories operating within cities emit dangerous smoke and other harmful toxins, which are enormously affecting people health and making them more susceptible to diseases. Furthermore, pollution also contributes to global warming. There has been a drastic increase in temperature around the globe, which in turn, melts glaciers across the world. These are no longer national issues, and all the governments of the world should work together to address this pressing problem. That is why prudent decisions are required from the government level and the ordinary citizens should be encouraged and participate in every way possible to make the world a better place to live in.
To sum up, I would like to say that environmental problems should be addressed on a large scale. Everyone has to contribute in order to mitigate its vulnerable effects on the world. Even a little effort by an individual can make a huge difference.
Sample 6:
Along with the rapid social development, severe environmental issues have become a public concern, with an urgent demand for effective measures. Some people suppose that individuals can hardly make a huge difference to the seemingly overwhelming environmental problems, while from my perspective, small though individuals’ efforts and contributions are, they play an indispensable role in addressing environmental issues.
Admittedly, there are good grounds to argue that environmental issues need to be tackled on a macro-level, where efforts from every individual seem to be too small for solving large-scale problems. Since fundamentally addressing environmental issues calls for collaborative efforts from different parties, only governments and large enterprises can make use of abundant national budget and advanced technologies to take on the responsibility. Taking the climate change as an example, the effective solutions, whether it be setting stricter standards on carbon emissions or promoting greener alternatives to alleviate problems, go beyond the individual power.
However, efforts from every resident in the ecosystem should not be ignored. For one thing, the daily behavior of general public exerts impacts on the environment directly, which means only when individuals change their lifestyles can the environmental issues be ameliorated. For instance, once every person gives up the convenience of private vehicles, the problems of energy crisis and subsequent air pollution will be significantly alleviated. In the long run, accumulated individual contributions can be a huge integrated force to preserve the ecosystem. For another, any policy will be implemented in vain without the execution power of every single individual. A good example can be found in the regulation of waste collection system, where although authorities encourage the citizens to recycle garbage, the environment can hardly be improved without everyone’s participation.
In conclusion, the involvement of individuals should be identified as an indispensable part in dealing with environmental issues.
Sample 7:
Constant coverage in the media of the worsening state of the planet's ecosystems is a sad reality of modern life. Some believe that governments are the only ones capable of addressing environmental concerns, while others argue that private citizens can make a difference. It is my firm belief that governments must play a central role in finding solutions to these issues.
While it's true that solving environmental issues requires a collective effort, every one of us can make strides in the right direction by adopting a few simple routines. To reduce our reliance on single-use plastic bags, we can, for instance, always bring along recycle bags. As fewer plastic bags are used, less air pollution is produced as a result of the burning of plastic bags at garbage dumps, making it evident that individuals may truly assist in lessening environmental difficulties.
It is undeniable that governmental involvement is necessary to find lasting solutions to environmental concerns. Initially, governments are better equipped to deal with environmental issues than individuals are. For instance, they can pass legislation prohibiting the release of industrial waste into the atmosphere and water supplies. A reduction in air and water pollution is a result of ensuring the public's health. As a result, the country's populace will enjoy better health and less pollution.
Finally, with the help of both individuals and governments, environmental issues can and should be resolved as soon as possible. I have faith that environmental issues will be resolved and that the United States will be prosperous and strong for many years to come.
Sample 8:
The new era is the most environmentally conscious in human history. Some argue that it's tough for one person to make a difference, while others insist that the problem requires intervention from higher-ups. In this essay, I'll examine both arguments and explain why I think the government should play an essential role in regulating industries like this one.
Firstly, there is the widespread misconception that restoring Mother Nature can't be done by a single individual. However, if we made some simple adjustments to our daily routines, the negative effects on the environment could be eliminated. For instance, we may always bring a recycle bag with us when we go shopping to cut down on the number of plastic bags we use. These will unquestionably help reduce the amount of pollution released into the atmosphere when plastic bags are burned. Therefore, such an individual's efforts may contribute to a more wholesome ecosystem.
However, governments play an equally important role in establishing checks on many of these activities that threaten our ecosystem. Governments have the power to regulate their citizens quite strictly. Plastic bag use, for instance, should be outlawed nationwide, and this can only be mandated by the government. The authority to enforce these rules is in the hands of the officials who made them. Because of this, government plays a pivotal role in efforts to eliminate causes of environmental degradation.
All in all, the rate of environmental degradation is skyrocketing. Both individuals and governments are needed to solve these issues. I agree wholeheartedly that governments should play a pivotal role in finding answers to these problems.
Sample 9:
In the last few decades, environmental protection has emerged at the forefront of public consciousness, sparking heated discussions concerning who is ultimately accountable for the environment's long-term sustainability and the welfare of succeeding generations.
One may raise the argument that conserving the ecosystem as a whole is so complex that no single person could make a meaningful difference on their own. Factories that release poisonous fumes into the atmosphere or dump toxic waste into waterways are now only good instances. It could be asserted that if all shareholders put pressure on the companies they own, this would create a snowball effect that would force the companies to become more responsible. However, this is unlikely to happen because most companies are owned by competently managed funds, for which profit comes before the ecosphere.
From the foregoing, we may infer that the best chance we have of succeeding in our attempts to safeguard the environment is if the government and the people work together on the issue. If a member of society observes the aforementioned phenomenon in his or her immediate vicinity, he or she can contact an implementing agency to deal with the production plant that is releasing harmful fumes and dumping harmful materials. These implementing bodies can be anything from the environment control desk at the city hall to environmental inspectors who are entitled to randomly inspect such factories and levy fines or even shut down the entire production facility if they find evidence of rule-breaking.
Since the obligation of accountability appears to be shifting toward private actors who receive institutional and regulatory backing from the state, I believe that joint public-state initiatives would be more beneficial. However, this is no excuse for littering the beach with non-biodegradable objects or otherwise damaging nature.
Sample 10:
It has been argued that solving environmental hazards is not a cup of tea for individuals alone, while others consider that solving this issue without the help of individuals is a herculean task for any government, so mass involvement is essential. In my perspective, the collective efforts of the government and ordinary people can sort out this predicament.
First off, those who opine that mitigating environmental issues is tough for human beings because they do not take a proactive approach. To elaborate, they burn plastic despite the fact that it has carcinogenic effects on nature. They do not stop doing activities which have a direct impact on their physical surroundings. They take action only when they find no alternatives for it or the situation is out of control for them. To exemplify it, many times it has been told the people to recycle plastic bottles or other unwanted items. They consider it a difficult task to separate usable items and useless items. Their laziness exacerbates the situation, and they contribute to making their planet polluted.
On the other hand, detractors consider that this obstacle can be tackled with the collective efforts of the regime and the masses. Many a time, it has been noticed that government makes an appeal to people to say no to using plastic and using fewer fossil fuels. However, this appeal has sometimes no effect on the common people. This is the consequence of poor coordination between the policymakers and the public.
For instance, if there is a ban on hunting, then individuals must not do it. They must hold that birds or animals are conducive to saving the environment. Using fewer vehicles and sharing car-pooling is another benefit to reducing environmental pollution such as noise pollution. Therefore, if people consider it their responsibility; then, they can make a bigger difference, and their habitat will be a better place to live in.
To conclude, thus, it is apparent that individuals solely cannot solve this environmental problem; instead, it can be sorted out with the collaborative efforts of government and multitude. Policymakers must take stringent actions against the guilty, who spoil the environment and simultaneously persons must make it ensure to recycle and reuse to make their physical surroundings neat and clean.
Sample 11:
In recent years, it has been considered by some that citizens are unable to tackle environmental issues due to their adverse effects. Meanwhile, others think that each individual should be responsible for addressing this problem. This essay will examine both views and argue why the latter is far more compelling.
On the one hand, it is discernible that inhabitants are unable to solve environmental concerns. To begin with, it can be observed that environmental problems not only include erosion or air pollution but also global warming and climate change, so cooperation between the government, enterprises, and citizens is essential. This is mainly because only the authorities can guide and motivate their citizens to carry out potential solutions, minimizing the frequency of environmental issues. As an illustration, the government can implement regulations and laws to encourage their residents and companies to modify harmful behaviors such as littering and excessive emissions. Consequently, citizens could become more responsible in conservation.
Notwithstanding the argument above, residents contend that their role in conservation is negligible due to the considerable impact of environmental issues. They, however, fail to recognize that their small contributions can also address these challenges. Alternatively, their involvement in public area clean-ups and the utilization of renewable energy could dramatically affect environmental problems. As a result, daily, the quality of the environment could significantly improve.
In conclusion, despite the fact that only authorities can incentivize individuals to take action in protecting the environment, individuals must acknowledge their role in conservation. It is recommended that individuals and the government should work together for the mitigation of environmental issues.
Sample 12:
Are environmental problems so big that individuals cannot make any contributions to resolving them? The answer is absolutely “No”. Instead, the issues cannot be addressed without individuals’ joint efforts.
Admittedly, it is justifiable for some to advocate that individuals can do little, since solving environmental problems, as a global issue, requires nations, organisations, companies, and individuals to get involved. Compared with average people, who can merely persuade others to follow the rules and norms, the governing authority possesses the legislative power to enact strict laws, issue corresponding policies, and effectively enforce them in order to safeguard the environment. For example, heavy fines can deter both institutions and individuals from behaving properly. In comparison, individuals are not empowered to require others to do so. However, what average people do cannot be ignored.
As a matter of fact, only when average citizens take certain actions will the effects brought by laws and rules be maximised. To illustrate, even though heavy fines can serve as a deterrent, people may comply with the minimum environmental requirements set out by law owing to either the absence of a sense of responsibility as being qualified planet-mates or the failure to compromise with their convenient lives which are partly based on the sacrifice of natural resources. In this case, the aforementioned laws and rules cannot be as effectual as expected. For example, charging vehicle taxes may reduce the usage of private cars to some extent, while big differences can be made if the owners leave their cars in the garage voluntarily.
In a nutshell, though the government has greater capability in coping with environmental problems by enacting relevant laws and rules, they are not as effective as expected without endeavours of individual citizens.
Sample 13:
Environmental issues have sparked off an intense debate on whether individuals or the government can solve the grave problems. Many opine that these problems are enormous for individuals to tackle, yet others opine that governments cannot curb this environmental chaos without individuals’ efforts. In this case, I put forward the notion that a holistic approach is needed so as to fight environmental damage.
Environmental issues cannot be solved by individuals alone because the overwhelming number of environmental hazards we face, including greenhouse effects, mass extinction of species, water pollution, soil erosion, global warming and others, are the consequences of the global revolution of industrialization and our greedy behaviours for a luxurious lifestyle. Therefore, handling environmental issues is far beyond the scope of individual effort. To curb it, we need strict laws in place and massive budgets which are out of the scope of individuals.
On the contrary, the government alone cannot solve the planet’s biggest issue. In simple words, individuals should avoid cars whenever possible, use energy-efficient home appliances, reduce the use of plastics and plant trees. Only then the governments will be able to harness the catastrophic effect of environmental damage.
However, in my opinion, environmental problems have multifarious dimensions and can be addressed by adopting holistically all kinds of stakeholders such as governments, individuals, international communities, civil societies and activists. This is because the problem is actually a global phenomenon and without collaborative efforts, there is no effective solution to it.
In conclusion, individuals or the government alone cannot combat the environmental crisis as it is an international issue. Therefore, mass people, governments and international organizations have their own roles to play in order to grapple with environmental issues.
Sample 14:
Environmental issues have become a crucial problem for the world in recent years, and there are varying opinions on the responsibility of individuals and governments to address these problems. Some individuals hold the belief that environmental problems are too vast and complex for individuals to solve alone, while others assert that governments alone cannot tackle these problems without the active involvement of individuals. In this essay, both views will be examined. In my opinion, however, both parties need to take measures to address this issue.
On one hand, those who believe that environmental issues are too critical for individuals to address alone argue that the scale of the problem requires a collective effort, beyond the capacity of individuals. For instance, issues such as air pollution and climate change cannot be resolved by individuals alone, as they require large-scale changes in industrial practices and transportation policies. Moreover, individuals may not have the necessary knowledge or resources to address environmental problems effectively.
On the other hand, some people think that governments alone cannot solve environmental issues without the cooperation of individuals. They opine that the government’s efforts will be fruitless if individuals do not take any action to protect the environment. For instance, governments can only do so much to control carbon emissions, but individuals must also take measures such as reducing energy consumption, using public transportation, and adopting eco-friendly lifestyles.
In my view, both individuals and governments have a responsibility to tackle environmental problems. Individuals must take action to minimize their carbon footprint by adopting sustainable lifestyles and reducing their consumption of non-renewable resources. Simultaneously, governments must also take necessary actions such as enacting strict environmental regulations and supporting green technology. It is only when individuals and governments work together that the environment can be protected, and the consequences of environmental issues can be minimized.
In conclusion, environmental issues are a serious concern that requires the joint efforts of both individuals and governments to be resolved. It is through collective efforts that we can protect the environment and secure a sustainable future.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The issue of addressing the global challenge of feeding a rapidly expanding population has spurred discussions about potential solutions, including the adoption of Genetically Modified (GM) foods. While some proponents argue that GM foods present a viable answer to this problem, I fundamentally disagree. The potential risks associated with GM foods and the availability of alternative sustainable approaches make me skeptical about their efficacy as a long-term solution.
To begin with, Genetically Modified foods often involve the manipulation of organisms' genetic makeup to enhance desirable traits, such as increased crop yield or resistance to pests. While this may seem promising in theory, the unintended consequences of genetic modification could pose significant risks to human health and the environment. For instance, allergens or toxins could be inadvertently introduced into GM crops, leading to adverse effects on consumers. The release of genetically modified organisms into the environment could also disrupt natural ecosystems and harm biodiversity.
Additionally, the push for GM foods detracts attention and resources from more sustainable and holistic agricultural practices that have the potential to address food security challenges without compromising safety. Agroecological approaches, such as crop rotation, agroforestry, and integrated pest management, offer environmentally friendly alternatives to intensive monocultures and chemical-based farming. These methods promote soil health, water conservation, and biodiversity, all of which are crucial for ensuring the long-term sustainability of food production.
In conclusion, while the growing global population necessitates innovative solutions for food security, I am opposed to the idea that GM foods offer a viable remedy. The potential risks to human health and the environment, coupled with the availability of more sustainable agricultural practices, make me doubtful about the long-term efficacy of genetically modified foods. Instead of relying solely on GM foods, it is imperative to explore diverse and sustainable approaches that prioritize both human well-being and the planet's health.
Sample 2:
To tackle food shortages, many scientists recommend genetically modified (GM) food as a solution. Despite some concerns regarding this solution, I strongly believe that this is the future for food security.
The first benefit that GM foods offer is that it has significantly higher yield compared to traditional crops. GM foods have their genes altered to reproduce their cells quicker, leading to faster crop productions. Also, GM foods are capable of withstanding harsh environments, such as during winters and dry summers. Another benefit of consuming more GM foods is that they require fewer pesticides, contrary to popular belief. Because scientists design GM foods to be resistant to common pests, farmers do not need to spray pesticides as regularly as they would growing traditional crops.
However, despite these benefits, there are some concerns that researchers should revisit before populating GM foods. The first concern is the impact GM crops have on the ecosystem. Because these crops are known to be resistant to pests, it could lead to the eradication of pest species. As a result, this can disrupt the ecosystem’s balance. The second concern is that, due to GM crops’ high efficiency and rapid growth, they can easily become an invasive species with unhealthy farming practices. This problem, aside from damaging the ecosystem, also has adverse effects on the economy. For example, if one plot destined to grow a certain plant gets invaded by another species, farmers will experience a loss of income.
In conclusion, although admittedly, there are some legitimate concerns for GM foods, I still strongly agree that GM crops are the most feasible solution to the global food shortage.
Sample 3:
Feeding the ever-growing world population is undoubtedly a significant challenge that needs to be addressed. Some individuals argue that genetically modified (GM) foods could provide a viable solution to this problem. In my opinion, while GM foods may offer certain benefits, they also come with potential risks and drawbacks that need to be carefully considered.
Proponents of GM foods argue that they can help increase crop yields, improve nutritional content, and enhance resistance to pests and diseases. This, they claim, would enable farmers to produce more food on less land, ultimately helping to feed a larger population. Additionally, GM foods have the potential to withstand harsh environmental conditions, such as drought or extreme temperatures, making them more resilient and reliable sources of food.
However, it is important to acknowledge the concerns surrounding GM foods. Critics argue that the long-term health and environmental impacts of consuming and cultivating GM crops are not yet fully understood. There are also ethical considerations, such as the potential for corporate control over the food supply and the loss of biodiversity. Furthermore, the introduction of GM crops into natural ecosystems could have unforeseen consequences, disrupting delicate ecological balances.
In conclusion, while GM foods may offer some potential benefits in addressing the challenge of feeding a growing world population, the risks and uncertainties associated with their widespread adoption cannot be ignored. It is crucial to conduct thorough research and risk assessments to ensure that the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks. Ultimately, a balanced approach that takes into account the needs of both current and future generations is necessary to tackle this pressing issue.
Sample 4:
Whether GM foods are the ultimate answer to address the need to feed the ever-growing global population has been a topic of fierce argument recently among intellectuals across the world. However, I fully agree with the statement that such foods are an effective remedy to worldwide food scarcity.
One obvious advantage of GM foods is better production in lesser time which will ensure food for more people that too utilizing a few resources. In addition, these foods and their cultivation are a lot more environmentally-friendly than normal foods because the former are highly resilient to diseases, pests and insects which reduces the need to use harmful herbicides, pesticides, insecticides and so on. This also ensures that people get pure fruits and grains, for example, free from chemicals.
Better texture, varied flavors and improved nutritional values are some other qualities which make genetically modified foods a viable solution to shortage of food. When such high-quality foods are made available at cheaper prices, it will sure save governments and individuals substantial sums of money, not to mention the obvious health benefits for people. Further, longer shelf-life makes bioengineered foods easier to transport to distant places and store them. Last but not least, their potentially non-allergenic nature makes them Manna from heaven for the hungry millions.
In short, GM foods are the need of the hour. Therefore, the authorities across the world need to spring to action to mass-produce genetically-engineered foods and make them available to people thereby saving hundreds of thousands of lives from malnutrition and starvation.
Sample 5:
As the population is increasing at a fast rate across the world, a shortage of food is becoming a perplexing problem. Some individuals suggest that this can be addressed by genetically modified foods. In my opinion, I totally disagree with the statement since engineering genetic foods have a high risk of potential problems and negative environmental impacts.
The main issue of genetic modification organism is a risk of potential problems after having the food for a long-term. This is because scientists or nutritionists are not sure about the long-term effects and safety as it is a relatively new practice. For example, food allergic reactions have risen in the last decade such as nuts or dairy products, which resulted from consuming GM foods. In addition, there are also a large number of people who hold concerns about the potential risks to human health affected by GM crops such as inducing mutations in human genes. Therefore, numerous people have an inclination toward eating organic food rather than GM foods.
Another thing to consider is that the agricultural method of GMOs brings harmful effects on the environment and ecosystem. Firstly, the changes in the agricultural practice affect on the farming and where weeds or other harmful factors become stronger. This results in overuse of the toxic sprays such as pesticides and herbicides. Secondly, the new cultivation method is harmful for non-GMO crops and also insects or animals, which can lead to loss of biodiversity. To illustrate this, bees play an important role in the pollination of various food crops, but they are vulnerable from the sprays.
In conclusion, I am strongly opposed to the opinion that genetically modified foods can deal with
a shortage of food due to the world demographic growth. This is for the reason that it has potential problems affecting people’s health and it has negative effects on environmental impacts and biodiversity.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
It is true that acquiring new language skills is by no means an easy task. Language learners might encounter several challenges such as unfamiliar accents or grammar structures in the learning process of a foreign language. However, in my opinion, such difficulties can be tackled by a well-rounded education system.
When it comes to languages, it is undeniably crucial to get used to a native accent and intonation for effective communication. However, picking up an accurate accent can be enormously difficult, especially for adult learners because of their lack of language learning ability. If a language learner has an unrecognisable accent and intonation, they would not be understood by native speakers. On top of that, each language has different grammar and typical grammatical sequencing of words. For example, Korean sentences always end with verbs whilst English does not, which means that a Korean English-learner should consider about the correct order of
words.
Despite the aforementioned difficulties, I strongly believe that everyone can master a foreign language when a couple of feasible steps are taken. Firstly, it is more important than anything to start learning a new language at a young age. By incorporating foreign language programmes in the primary school curriculum, children can easily be exposed to languages of the world and eventually acquire language skills without difficulties. Secondly, the government can financially subsidise schools to run student exchange programmes that help adolescents to get experiences abroad and make friends overseas while improving their foreign language in a delightful way.
In conclusion, I believe that individuals can have difficulties in learning a new language because of different accents and unfamiliar grammar, however, these problems can be overcome by a good quality of education system subsidised by governments.
Sample 2:
It is argued that to become competent in another nation’s language is a quite difficult job. This essay will suggest that finding a partner for practice is the main difficulty that people face and the best way to overcome this is by joining a group of people who are learning a particular language.
The primary problem that people have to tackle while they start learning a foreign language is a lack of practice. This is because there are very few people around their vicinity who have a keen interest in becoming proficient in another language. Without practice, they will not have enough command on the language which they are learning. For example, a recent survey by Cambridge University found that 55% of people admitted that they were not able to practice a newly learned language because they did not find anyone to practice with.
The best solution to this problem is to join a group where people are already practising the same language which they intend to learn. The members of the group share their experiences of how they are able to master a new language and the group discussions in a community enable them to have enough practice. This will make people fluent in the language. To illustrate, I was struggling a lot in learning English and my friend suggested me to join a local English learners group which I did. After a few weeks, I saw a drastic improvement in my language ability.
In conclusion, the main issue that people face while mastering a foreign language is a lack of sessions for practice. The best way to solve this is on joining a group of language learning enthusiasts.
Sample 3:
Learning a new language is indeed a herculean task for many, especially when it comes to adults. This essay will explore the factors which make learning a new language challenging and will also suggest some potent solutions to deal with the same.
To begin with, grown-ups particularly find it difficult to learn foreign vernaculars because as they grow, their brains lose that flexibility to adapt to any language and become hard-wired to specific languages that they speak or know since childhood. Moreover, the level of intelligence in an individual also matters as some people are blessed with superior cognition and hence are better equipped for learning an alien language. Also learning coherence and cohesion is the hardest part as one can learn vocabulary and rules of a language but putting them in order to make a grammatically correct sentence comes with a lot of struggle and practice. People also tend to apply their native tongue’s grammar and characteristics to make sense of an identically structured foreign language. Research conducted by Mark Pagel, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Reading in the U.S.A. states that the brain affects one’s thoughts and perceptions and it alters the way one thinks, hence our mother tongue tends to dominate our neural system which makes adhering to other languages an ambitious task.
To cope with this, firstly, although people may feel silly when they make mistakes while learning and practising a language, they must not feel bad about it or pretend to be perfect as everyone learns by making mistakes. An excellent approach is to uptake some other activity or skill and take instructions in the language to be learnt. For instance, in California ‘apprentice’ programmes are run in which apprentices pair up with the speakers of native American tongue to learn a traditional skill such as basket weaving, with instructions exclusively in the native language. After a certain time, learners become well-versed with that language. Furthermore, aspirants must also naturally try to get used to listening and understanding the language by watching foreign movies with descriptions in the form of subtitles in a known language through applications like Netflix as by doing so they come across various slangs, range of vocabulary and grammatical structures of sentences. It is an interesting way to grasp a language.
In summary, one needs to be motivated enough to get used to and memorize foreign languages. The advent of social media has eased this process as folks can converse with the native speakers and gain a lot of knowledge by making friends with them. Travelling overseas can also be of great help for becoming familiar with the international language.
Sample 4:
It is believed by many people that learning a different language is not easy. There are numerous factors that increase the difficulty of acquiring a foreign language, and this essay will discuss a couple of them and present some effective ways to learn a new language.
To begin with, a number of things can make learning another language difficult, and the primary ones are a lack of cultural knowledge and personality. With regard to the former, as its speakers’ culture and lifestyle are all inextricably bound up in one language, it is not possible to master it without an understanding of its culture. A good example of this can be seen in the case that many English speakers make a mistake with having conversation in Korean, where a variety of respective expressions are developed. Those who do not use respective words to the elderly, are sometimes considered to be very rude. As for personality, those with an outgoing character are usually likely to communicate more fluently than introvert people. As they put more emphasis on fluency than accuracy, which results in getting more chances to practice the language, consequently leading to a faster learning.
To combat this trouble, two solutions can be suggested to improve proficiency of a foreign language. Above all, one’s target language’s culture should be assimilated. This is because language can be acquired better through understanding its speakers’ way of thought, custom and even history, not to mention its linguistic properties. This can be easily achieved through books, movies, and internet blogs. On top of that, it is necessary to lessen worries about making mistakes. For this, not only are individual efforts inevitable, but also language instructors ought to create a relaxing learning atmosphere, so that learners can practice regardless of mistakes. All these can have a long-lasting effect on improving one’s language ability.
To conclude, a lack of cultural background knowledge and personal learning style are mainly responsible for the difficulty in learning a foreign language. Along with individual learners’ understanding of the target culture, language tutors’ efforts for comfortable learning atmosphere can be effectively implemented to overcome the problem.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Bài tập chức năng giao tiếp (Có đáp án)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
15000 bài tập tách từ đề thi thử môn Tiếng Anh có đáp án (Phần 1)
Bộ câu hỏi: Thì và sự phối thì (Phần 2) (Có đáp án)
Trắc nghiệm Tiếng anh 12 Tìm từ được gạch chân phát âm khác - Mức độ nhận biết có đáp án
500 bài Đọc hiểu ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 21)
Hãy Đăng nhập hoặc Tạo tài khoản để gửi bình luận