Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve, while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals take some actions. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sample 1:

The environment has become a major concern over the last couple of decades, resulting in several debates on who should be responsible for ensuring its sustenance for our future generations. In this essay, we will discuss the point of views for establishing where the responsibility for the protection of the environment lies.

There is a strong argument that individually we cannot contribute materially to the cause of preserving our environment because it encompasses several areas where individual efforts become futile. Some examples are factories that are emitting hazardous gases in our air or dumping dangerous materials in our rivers. If we want to take this up as an individual, we cannot be expected to be able to prevent this from happening. One could argue that if each shareholder puts pressure on the companies that they own this could lead to building up of pressure for being more responsible, this, unfortunately, is not workable because usually the companies are mostly owned by funds that are managed by professionals, seeking profit and environment is very low on their priority list.

The above leads us to deduct that if this movement of preserving our environment is a collaborative effort by the government and general public, we stand a better chance of being successful. The government should provide the legal infrastructure to control the natural instinct of profiteering of all investment institutions; with this, the individual efforts could start making the difference. Continuing the above example if an individual member of the society notices that same happening in his or her surroundings, he or she can call on an implementation agency that would tackle the factory emitting hazardous gases and dumping dangerous materials. Examples of these implementation agencies include Environment control desk in the city office, environmental inspectors who randomly visit such factories and are empowered under the law to impose a fine or completely seal the production facility found in violation of the rules.

The responsibility surely seems to be tilting towards the actions of individuals supported through government agencies and legislative framework, thus, in my opinion, the combined efforts of the government and public would be more effective. This should not, however, be interpreted as being absolved from keeping our environment clean and we can through cans and other non-degradable materials on the beach.

Sample 2:

In the contemporary world, the concern for the degrading environment is at its peak. Some people believe it is difficult for an individual to make a difference, while others feel it cannot be solved without authorities intervening in the matter. This essay will discuss both sides in-depth and will also state why I strongly agree that the government has an indispensable role in such matters.

To begin, many believe the task of saving mother nature is tedious for a single person. But if we introduce minor alterations to our day-to-day activities, we could probably eradicate the detrimental causes to our environment. For instance, we can always bring along a recycling bag while shopping so that usage of the plastic bag would decrease. These will definitely help in minimising the air pollution caused by burning plastic bags. Thus, such actions from an individual could lead to a healthy environment.

In contrast, to individual actions, governments also play a vital role in providing checks to many such activities disrupting our ecosystem. Governments can impose stringent rules to be followed by its people. For example, the usage of plastic bags should be completely banned in the country, and this can only be forced by authorities. These regulations require judiciary powers to implement which reside with the respective officials. For this reason, the government plays the cardinal part in a process of abolishing effects causing damage to nature.

To conclude, environmental degradation is increasing at an enormous rate. These problems should be tackled with the collaboration of an individual along with governments. Would it be ungreat? I firmly acknowledge the governments have a prominent role in resolving these issues.

Sample 3:

In today’s modern world, we are constantly confronted with the issue of environmental problems which are becoming more severe nowadays in the newspaper. Some people are of the opinion that individuals can hardly make a change to environmental problems, while some believe that governments can help in solving environmental issues. I strongly agree that governments do play an indispensable role in tackling these problems.

Some people think that environmental problems are not an easy task for individuals to deal with, but in fact, we can actually take up some good habits which could prove useful in dealing with environmental problems. For example, we can always bring along recyclable bags with us so that we can cut down the usage of plastic bags. It can be clearly seen that individuals can actually contribute to helping reduce environmental issues as fewer plastic bags being used means less air pollution which is caused by the burning of plastic bags in the rubbish dump sites.

It is certainly true that environmental problems cannot be solved without the help of governments. To begin, governments have more power than individuals in coping the environmental problems. They can, for instance, set up laws that ban the emission of wastes from factory directly into the air and watercourses. As a consequence, less air pollution and water pollution guarantee the good health of citizens. By doing this, citizens will be healthier, and they can now live in a pollution-free country.

In conclusion, environmental problems should be tackled immediately with the cooperation of individuals and governments. I believe that the environmental problems will be solved one day, and our country will continue to prosper and flourish in the years to come.

Sample 4:

Pollution has become a major concern in society all over the world. In society, not only an individual but also groups of people live. In society, it is everyone’s responsibility to protect the environment. Environmental problems caused by pollution, for example, fuel gases, cutting of trees, gases released by factories. The government should take responsibility to reduce pollution in order to protect the environment.

Every individual who is living in society should take responsibility to participate in protecting the environment. Firstly, people should grow trees in their houses, premises and colonies. By growing trees there are huge advantages, for example, most of the polluted gases are taken over by trees and they release the oxygen. Everyone should not throw waste on the roads, maintain a healthy environment by using the dustbins.

At the same time, if we consider the government’s role: the government have authority to protect the environment. By planting the trees all over the places, for example, all government places, besides the roads, schools, and parks etc., what I know this type of programme called a clean and green environment. Thus, the pollution can be controlled. Cleanliness is very important to maintain a healthy environment, hence government should emphasise the cleaners to clean the area thoroughly. Should place the dustbin every street and educate the individuals by advertisements. Inspect the houses every month to check how the individuals maintain their houses so that the individuals reflect themselves and self-correct themselves. Conduct environmental talks in the school, that individual learns everything from childhood onwards in the school.

I believe that it is every individual’s responsibility to solve the environmental problems, however, impossible for only one individual in the society. So the government should take actions to solve the environmental problems but encourage every individual to takes part in all those activities.

Sample 5:

Environmental problems have dramatically increased over the last few years. A rapid increase in population and other problems such as pollution, deforestation, global warming etc. have further exacerbated the situation. Some people argue that these problems are too large to be addressed by an individual being. I believe that it is a mutual responsibility of both individuals and countries to take pragmatic measures for its solution.

Overpopulation is one of the pivotal reasons that have detrimental effects on the environment. Increase in population demand more food resources, living space and other basic amenities of life. For instance, for the sake of accommodation many natural parks and forests have been wiped out to fulfil the need for living space. This has led to severe consequences that could damage both the people and the environment.

Individual efforts can contribute a lot to address the pressing environmental problems. Steps taken at an individual level can be an effective solution for the world. For instance, if the government of a country takes initiatives to reduce the rubbish produced daily, can’t do much. However, if the citizens take effort from their personal level, rubbish production could be controlled tremendously. Similarly, if the administration of a country starts planting trees, the effort would not go further without the collaboration of the individuals.

Pollution is also a great menace to the environment. It is not only the reason of environmental problems but also has a dire effect on people. Factories operating within cities emit dangerous smoke and other harmful toxins, which are enormously affecting people health and making them more susceptible to diseases. Furthermore, pollution also contributes to global warming. There has been a drastic increase in temperature around the globe, which in turn, melts glaciers across the world. These are no longer national issues, and all the governments of the world should work together to address this pressing problem. That is why prudent decisions are required from the government level and the ordinary citizens should be encouraged and participate in every way possible to make the world a better place to live in.

To sum up, I would like to say that environmental problems should be addressed on a large scale. Everyone has to contribute in order to mitigate its vulnerable effects on the world. Even a little effort by an individual can make a huge difference.

Sample 6:

Along with the rapid social development, severe environmental issues have become a public concern, with an urgent demand for effective measures. Some people suppose that individuals can hardly make a huge difference to the seemingly overwhelming environmental problems, while from my perspective, small though individuals’ efforts and contributions are, they play an indispensable role in addressing environmental issues.

Admittedly, there are good grounds to argue that environmental issues need to be tackled on a macro-level, where efforts from every individual seem to be too small for solving large-scale problems. Since fundamentally addressing environmental issues calls for collaborative efforts from different parties, only governments and large enterprises can make use of abundant national budget and advanced technologies to take on the responsibility. Taking the climate change as an example, the effective solutions, whether it be setting stricter standards on carbon emissions or promoting greener alternatives to alleviate problems, go beyond the individual power.

However, efforts from every resident in the ecosystem should not be ignored. For one thing, the daily behavior of general public exerts impacts on the environment directly, which means only when individuals change their lifestyles can the environmental issues be ameliorated. For instance, once every person gives up the convenience of private vehicles, the problems of energy crisis and subsequent air pollution will be significantly alleviated. In the long run, accumulated individual contributions can be a huge integrated force to preserve the ecosystem. For another, any policy will be implemented in vain without the execution power of every single individual. A good example can be found in the regulation of waste collection system, where although authorities encourage the citizens to recycle garbage, the environment can hardly be improved without everyone’s participation.

In conclusion, the involvement of individuals should be identified as an indispensable part in dealing with environmental issues.

Sample 7:

Constant coverage in the media of the worsening state of the planet's ecosystems is a sad reality of modern life. Some believe that governments are the only ones capable of addressing environmental concerns, while others argue that private citizens can make a difference. It is my firm belief that governments must play a central role in finding solutions to these issues.

While it's true that solving environmental issues requires a collective effort, every one of us can make strides in the right direction by adopting a few simple routines. To reduce our reliance on single-use plastic bags, we can, for instance, always bring along recycle bags. As fewer plastic bags are used, less air pollution is produced as a result of the burning of plastic bags at garbage dumps, making it evident that individuals may truly assist in lessening environmental difficulties.

It is undeniable that governmental involvement is necessary to find lasting solutions to environmental concerns. Initially, governments are better equipped to deal with environmental issues than individuals are. For instance, they can pass legislation prohibiting the release of industrial waste into the atmosphere and water supplies. A reduction in air and water pollution is a result of ensuring the public's health. As a result, the country's populace will enjoy better health and less pollution.

Finally, with the help of both individuals and governments, environmental issues can and should be resolved as soon as possible. I have faith that environmental issues will be resolved and that the United States will be prosperous and strong for many years to come.

Sample 8:

The new era is the most environmentally conscious in human history. Some argue that it's tough for one person to make a difference, while others insist that the problem requires intervention from higher-ups. In this essay, I'll examine both arguments and explain why I think the government should play an essential role in regulating industries like this one.

Firstly, there is the widespread misconception that restoring Mother Nature can't be done by a single individual. However, if we made some simple adjustments to our daily routines, the negative effects on the environment could be eliminated. For instance, we may always bring a recycle bag with us when we go shopping to cut down on the number of plastic bags we use. These will unquestionably help reduce the amount of pollution released into the atmosphere when plastic bags are burned. Therefore, such an individual's efforts may contribute to a more wholesome ecosystem.

However, governments play an equally important role in establishing checks on many of these activities that threaten our ecosystem. Governments have the power to regulate their citizens quite strictly. Plastic bag use, for instance, should be outlawed nationwide, and this can only be mandated by the government. The authority to enforce these rules is in the hands of the officials who made them. Because of this, government plays a pivotal role in efforts to eliminate causes of environmental degradation.

All in all, the rate of environmental degradation is skyrocketing. Both individuals and governments are needed to solve these issues. I agree wholeheartedly that governments should play a pivotal role in finding answers to these problems.

Sample 9:

In the last few decades, environmental protection has emerged at the forefront of public consciousness, sparking heated discussions concerning who is ultimately accountable for the environment's long-term sustainability and the welfare of succeeding generations.

One may raise the argument that conserving the ecosystem as a whole is so complex that no single person could make a meaningful difference on their own. Factories that release poisonous fumes into the atmosphere or dump toxic waste into waterways are now only good instances. It could be asserted that if all shareholders put pressure on the companies they own, this would create a snowball effect that would force the companies to become more responsible. However, this is unlikely to happen because most companies are owned by competently managed funds, for which profit comes before the ecosphere.

From the foregoing, we may infer that the best chance we have of succeeding in our attempts to safeguard the environment is if the government and the people work together on the issue. If a member of society observes the aforementioned phenomenon in his or her immediate vicinity, he or she can contact an implementing agency to deal with the production plant that is releasing harmful fumes and dumping harmful materials. These implementing bodies can be anything from the environment control desk at the city hall to environmental inspectors who are entitled to randomly inspect such factories and levy fines or even shut down the entire production facility if they find evidence of rule-breaking.

Since the obligation of accountability appears to be shifting toward private actors who receive institutional and regulatory backing from the state, I believe that joint public-state initiatives would be more beneficial. However, this is no excuse for littering the beach with non-biodegradable objects or otherwise damaging nature.

Sample 10:

It has been argued that solving environmental hazards is not a cup of tea for individuals alone, while others consider that solving this issue without the help of individuals is a herculean task for any government, so mass involvement is essential. In my perspective, the collective efforts of the government and ordinary people can sort out this predicament.

First off, those who opine that mitigating environmental issues is tough for human beings because they do not take a proactive approach. To elaborate, they burn plastic despite the fact that it has carcinogenic effects on nature. They do not stop doing activities which have a direct impact on their physical surroundings. They take action only when they find no alternatives for it or the situation is out of control for them. To exemplify it, many times it has been told the people to recycle plastic bottles or other unwanted items. They consider it a difficult task to separate usable items and useless items. Their laziness exacerbates the situation, and they contribute to making their planet polluted.

On the other hand, detractors consider that this obstacle can be tackled with the collective efforts of the regime and the masses. Many a time, it has been noticed that government makes an appeal to people to say no to using plastic and using fewer fossil fuels. However, this appeal has sometimes no effect on the common people. This is the consequence of poor coordination between the policymakers and the public.

For instance, if there is a ban on hunting, then individuals must not do it. They must hold that birds or animals are conducive to saving the environment. Using fewer vehicles and sharing car-pooling is another benefit to reducing environmental pollution such as noise pollution. Therefore, if people consider it their responsibility; then, they can make a bigger difference, and their habitat will be a better place to live in.

To conclude, thus, it is apparent that individuals solely cannot solve this environmental problem; instead, it can be sorted out with the collaborative efforts of government and multitude. Policymakers must take stringent actions against the guilty, who spoil the environment and simultaneously persons must make it ensure to recycle and reuse to make their physical surroundings neat and clean.

Sample 11:

In recent years, it has been considered by some that citizens are unable to tackle environmental issues due to their adverse effects. Meanwhile, others think that each individual should be responsible for addressing this problem. This essay will examine both views and argue why the latter is far more compelling.

On the one hand, it is discernible that inhabitants are unable to solve environmental concerns. To begin with, it can be observed that environmental problems not only include erosion or air pollution but also global warming and climate change, so cooperation between the government, enterprises, and citizens is essential. This is mainly because only the authorities can guide and motivate their citizens to carry out potential solutions, minimizing the frequency of environmental issues. As an illustration, the government can implement regulations and laws to encourage their residents and companies to modify harmful behaviors such as littering and excessive emissions. Consequently, citizens could become more responsible in conservation.

Notwithstanding the argument above, residents contend that their role in conservation is negligible due to the considerable impact of environmental issues. They, however, fail to recognize that their small contributions can also address these challenges. Alternatively, their involvement in public area clean-ups and the utilization of renewable energy could dramatically affect environmental problems. As a result, daily, the quality of the environment could significantly improve.

In conclusion, despite the fact that only authorities can incentivize individuals to take action in protecting the environment, individuals must acknowledge their role in conservation. It is recommended that individuals and the government should work together for the mitigation of environmental issues.

Sample 12:

Are environmental problems so big that individuals cannot make any contributions to resolving them? The answer is absolutely “No”. Instead, the issues cannot be addressed without individuals’ joint efforts.

Admittedly, it is justifiable for some to advocate that individuals can do little, since solving environmental problems, as a global issue, requires nations, organisations, companies, and individuals to get involved. Compared with average people, who can merely persuade others to follow the rules and norms, the governing authority possesses the legislative power to enact strict laws, issue corresponding policies, and effectively enforce them in order to safeguard the environment. For example, heavy fines can deter both institutions and individuals from behaving properly. In comparison, individuals are not empowered to require others to do so. However, what average people do cannot be ignored.

As a matter of fact, only when average citizens take certain actions will the effects brought by laws and rules be maximised. To illustrate, even though heavy fines can serve as a deterrent, people may comply with the minimum environmental requirements set out by law owing to either the absence of a sense of responsibility as being qualified planet-mates or the failure to compromise with their convenient lives which are partly based on the sacrifice of natural resources. In this case, the aforementioned laws and rules cannot be as effectual as expected. For example, charging vehicle taxes may reduce the usage of private cars to some extent, while big differences can be made if the owners leave their cars in the garage voluntarily.

In a nutshell, though the government has greater capability in coping with environmental problems by enacting relevant laws and rules, they are not as effective as expected without endeavours of individual citizens.

Sample 13:

Environmental issues have sparked off an intense debate on whether individuals or the government can solve the grave problems. Many opine that these problems are enormous for individuals to tackle, yet others opine that governments cannot curb this environmental chaos without individuals’ efforts. In this case, I put forward the notion that a holistic approach is needed so as to fight environmental damage.

Environmental issues cannot be solved by individuals alone because the overwhelming number of environmental hazards we face, including greenhouse effects, mass extinction of species, water pollution, soil erosion, global warming and others, are the consequences of the global revolution of industrialization and our greedy behaviours for a luxurious lifestyle. Therefore, handling environmental issues is far beyond the scope of individual effort. To curb it, we need strict laws in place and massive budgets which are out of the scope of individuals.

On the contrary, the government alone cannot solve the planet’s biggest issue. In simple words, individuals should avoid cars whenever possible, use energy-efficient home appliances, reduce the use of plastics and plant trees. Only then the governments will be able to harness the catastrophic effect of environmental damage.

However, in my opinion, environmental problems have multifarious dimensions and can be addressed by adopting holistically all kinds of stakeholders such as governments, individuals, international communities, civil societies and activists. This is because the problem is actually a global phenomenon and without collaborative efforts, there is no effective solution to it.

In conclusion, individuals or the government alone cannot combat the environmental crisis as it is an international issue. Therefore, mass people, governments and international organizations have their own roles to play in order to grapple with environmental issues.

Sample 14:

Environmental issues have become a crucial problem for the world in recent years, and there are varying opinions on the responsibility of individuals and governments to address these problems. Some individuals hold the belief that environmental problems are too vast and complex for individuals to solve alone, while others assert that governments alone cannot tackle these problems without the active involvement of individuals. In this essay, both views will be examined. In my opinion, however, both parties need to take measures to address this issue.

On one hand, those who believe that environmental issues are too critical for individuals to address alone argue that the scale of the problem requires a collective effort, beyond the capacity of individuals. For instance, issues such as air pollution and climate change cannot be resolved by individuals alone, as they require large-scale changes in industrial practices and transportation policies. Moreover, individuals may not have the necessary knowledge or resources to address environmental problems effectively.

On the other hand, some people think that governments alone cannot solve environmental issues without the cooperation of individuals. They opine that the government’s efforts will be fruitless if individuals do not take any action to protect the environment. For instance, governments can only do so much to control carbon emissions, but individuals must also take measures such as reducing energy consumption, using public transportation, and adopting eco-friendly lifestyles.

In my view, both individuals and governments have a responsibility to tackle environmental problems. Individuals must take action to minimize their carbon footprint by adopting sustainable lifestyles and reducing their consumption of non-renewable resources. Simultaneously, governments must also take necessary actions such as enacting strict environmental regulations and supporting green technology. It is only when individuals and governments work together that the environment can be protected, and the consequences of environmental issues can be minimized.

In conclusion, environmental issues are a serious concern that requires the joint efforts of both individuals and governments to be resolved. It is through collective efforts that we can protect the environment and secure a sustainable future.