Some people say that the purpose of education is to prepare individuals to be useful to society. Others say its purpose is to prepare individuals to achieve personal ambitions. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
The purpose of education has long been a topic of debate. Some argue that education should primarily serve the nation by molding students into responsible members of society. Others emphasise the individual's role in education, focusing on personal growth and development.
On one hand, education plays a pivotal role in a country's progress and development. It instills social norms and moral values in the younger generation, ensuring that they adhere to societal rules and become responsible citizens. Moreover, education equips students with essential knowledge and skills necessary for employment and contributing to society. Numerous studies have demonstrated the close relationship between a well-educated workforce and a nation's economic advancement, which explains the significant investments in education made by nations worldwide, whether developed or developing.
On the other hand, education undeniably fosters personal growth, an ideology that prevails in many countries' educational philosophies. Through education, individuals develop their personality and attitudes, acquire vital skills and capabilities for managing their lives, including specific knowledge, interpersonal skills, moral principles, and a broader perspective on the world. The education process helps individuals discover their interests and unlock their potential, enabling them to make informed choices for their personal well-being. In other words, education facilitates the development in physical and mental aspects, making individuals ready for the world.
From my perspective, education serves both these purposes, and most countries strive to strike a balance between them when formulating education policies and regulating educational systems. Education, first and foremost, shapes an individual's character and equips them with essential survival skills in society. At the same time, these well-educated individuals are citizens and contributors to their country, necessitating consideration of the nation's and society's interests. Therefore, I firmly believe that the aim of education is twofold, and neglecting either dimension would be unwise. A holistic approach to education acknowledges the dual role it plays.
Sample 2:
The education system was created to allow individuals to develop into more than the sum of their parents’ knowledge. This in turn allows us all to choose our destiny, and to be useful to society.
Schools are made to develop our minds by providing us with all the knowledge we need. This helps us to achieve our personal goals as well as become better human beings, able to react compassionately in any situation. Even though the system may be inadequate to provide this to every individual, as the range of needs is incredibly diverse and the system has finite resources. Still, we often manage to do quite well for ourselves, achieving much of our potential.
Society of course wants workers that are eager and willing to fulfill the practical needs of a company; every business requires a diverse range of staff with varying educational backgrounds. This is exactly what schools do, the range of subjects at each level ensures not only basic conformity but also diversity in the final choice of subjects in the latter years of schooling. Thus, the pool of school leavers and tertiary graduates each year becomes available to industry and the all-important economy can continue to evolve, making the rich richer and the rest of us managing to get by.
Everyone has personal ambitions and without a good education, we certainly wouldn’t be able to achieve most of them. School certainly gives us the background we need for this, but on a macro scale, we are all cogs in the machine, continually providing essential service to our masters.
Sample 3:
The purpose of education is multifaceted. False dichotomies couching functions of societal institutions, namely education, as mutually exclusive are inane. Pedagogical functions can include educating individuals in both a duty to society and a duty to oneself.
Utilitarian principles are arguably necessary for a cohesive society with the caveat being that they are not authoritarian, absolute mandates. Egalitarianism and altruism are fundamental characteristics of an enlightened individual and should be promoted in educational institutions. Societal members, at least tacitly agree to a social contract in that they are bound by certain societal conventions, thus being morally obligated to contribute or 'be useful' for society. Although who and what determines 'useful for society' is debatable (and rife with obvious inherent contradictions and dangers), a reasonable interpretation should include the pursuit of virtues such as lawful behavior, self-sacrifice, and a sense of responsibility toward 'the other' and toward societal unity.
However, although utilitarian considerations are necessary for a fully functional, congruous society, they are not sufficient and if left unrestrained, are potentially harmful - radical utilitarianism would be counterproductive, if not highly destructive. Therefore, the rights of the individual are also paramount and must be considered. Within the boundaries of tacit social contract obligation, the autonomy of the individual must be balanced with the rights of the group. Hence, educational institutions should also promote the pursuit of individualistic ambitions. It is the responsibility of the individual to mitigate inherent conflict and balance personal with societal needs.
In conclusion, neither radical egalitarianism nor radical individualism are desirable. A duty to society and a duty to oneself are not mutually exclusive but rather are compatible, should be balanced, and educational institutions should reinforce the utility of both.
Sample 4:
When it comes to the purpose of education, opinions are divided as some see its primary role as preparing individuals to be useful to society while others believe it should primarily serve people's personal ambitions. In my view, education should strike a balance between these two objectives, catering to the needs of society as well as the aspirations of the individual.
Those who see education as a tool for societal utility argue that it should produce individuals who can contribute effectively to the economic and social fabric of their communities. This perspective emphasises the importance of equipping students with practical skills and knowledge that align with the demands of the job market. Such an approach is crucial for the economic development and stability of any society, because it ensures a workforce that is both skilled and employable.
However, the importance of education to individual ambitions and personal growth is hard to dismiss. Advocates of this view argue that education should nurture creativity, critical thinking, and personal exploration, allowing individuals to realise their unique potential. This approach not only fosters self-actualisation but also encourages the development of innovators and original thinkers who can contribute uniquely to society.
In conclusion, education should ideally encompass both these perspectives. By providing a balanced curriculum that caters to the practical needs of society while also encouraging individual exploration and creativity, education can produce well-rounded individuals. Their capability of contributing effectively to their communities while pursuing personal fulfillment and growth will likely lead to a more dynamic and prosperous society.
Sample 5:
The nature of education is to humanise human, stated by Paolo Pereira. Some people believe that humanising human means that every person should be beneficial for society on how societies get the advantages from their knowledge and skills. However, others believe that they attend education institutions for having skills and experience as the tools to enter job market easily. This essay aims to discuss both purposes as well as provide several reasons.
People tend to focus on developing their social awareness through education in order to bring society to become a better community. They believe that the ultimate aim of education is that to contribute as well as to implement the knowledge and skills for the prosperity of society. For example, those who have expertise in agriculture science probably educate the farmers how to have a good quality of plants, how to manage the irrigation system well and how to conduct the product sales in the market. Moreover, graduates are believed as the social agents who bridge the society and government in terms of making society-based policy. If there is a controversial policy that harms people, educated persons are probably asked by those people to help them conducting negotiation even against the policy.
On the other hand, some believe that the ultimate aim of having an education is that people tend to get certain skills and experience as the main tools to achieve a good position in the job market. The company might require well-educated workers and put them in a strategic position which brings them to such more prosperous economic life condition. It is undeniable to stop people making education as the way to gain personal purpose because it is their personal right. In addition, the government guarantees every single person to have education for whatever the purpose as long as it is still on the education rules.
I believe that both purposes of people in entering education institution discussed above might be in line together. We can be valuable people for the society while having a job which we allocate some money from our salaries to educate people by providing the fund for those children who need it for school fee. The higher salary we achieve, the more money we can donor.
In short, everyone has their own targets to enter schools, universities or colleges. The most important thing is how to save ourselves by having a permanent job while contributing ours kills for the prosperity of society.
Sample 6:
In current years, the aim of pursuing higher education has been widely a fashionable trend. Some people believe that education lays on the aim of preparing individuals to serve society. While some others assert that education conducts personal goal. Indeed, these issues emerges a fierce debate. As regards this case, I will scrutinise both views along with related examples.
To begin with, the idea that every living individual belongs to the more complex group is a very basic concept which shapes any aspect of human life including education. This further becomes a framework of education nurturing people in the sake of emerging positive impact to the broad communities. In this regard, as a part of society individuals are responsible for contributing their knowledge they have acquired. Subsequently, it is strongly assumed that knowledge without devotion is such a meaningless sense in any variant of ways. It is the sense of devotion which encourage individuals to achieve their education for the sake of benefiting others. Furthermore, the national government urges the schools to enrich the pupils with the sense of nationalism where the citizen has to put public necessity over personal need. A very good example is Indonesian government requires schools to provide nationality subject in elementary and junior high schools.
In contrast, obtaining individual ambition should remain as the purpose of education particularly in the modern age. As it is widely acknowledged that individualism becomes a major trend where people put aside social aspect. Undoubtedly, modern lifestyle propels people to seek their own desire of how their education should be aimed to. Moreover, the belief that people must fulfil their own need plays an essential role in this case. Finally, human rights tell us the freedom of everyone choice in focusing their own passion. For instance, people have legal rights to assert their purpose in acquiring education.
To sum up, I personally think that preparing individuals to devote the society outweighs the other view in the term of education purpose.
Sample 7:
Education plays a pivotal role in shaping individuals and society. While some argue that its main goal is to ensure that individuals make contributions to the betterment of society, others believe it should primarily serve personal goals. I personally believe that literate individuals should not only focus on fulfilling their personal aspirations but also contribute towards societal good.
One school of thought asserts that education should focus on preparing individuals to become responsible and active members of society since it equips them with the knowledge and skills necessary to address societal challenges, thus fostering social cohesion and progress. To illustrate, with an emphasis on holistic learning, a well-educated populace can engage in community service, drive positive change, and contribute to the greater good. A well-rounded education not only imparts academic knowledge but also instills values, ethics, and a sense of social responsibility.
Conversely, some argue that education should primarily empower individuals to achieve their life goals. Education is a means to unlock individual potential and nurture talents and passions. It enables personal growth, self-discovery, and fulfillment of one's dreams. For instance, by catering to personal ambitions, education can lead to happier and more fulfilled lives.
In my opinion, an ideal educational system should strike a balance between both perspectives. A society benefits when its members are fulfilled and content. Education should provide a foundation for contributing to society, while also encouraging personal development and the pursuit of individual goals. Striking this balance ensures that people harness their unique strengths to address societal needs while also leading satisfying lives.
In conclusion, education serves a dual purpose. It prepares individuals to contribute to society and empowers them to pursue personal ambitions. Ultimately, education should enable a harmonious blend of personal growth and societal engagement.
Sample 8:
There is an ongoing debate concerning the primary purpose of education, with some arguing it is to churn out productive societal members while others contend that personal ambition fulfilment should be the focus. My stance is dual-spectral, acknowledging that both elements play a pivotal role in the neurological cultivation of an individual.
Undeniably, societal development is nurtured through the educational system which often prioritizes utility directly linked to social advancement. As our global environment gravitates towards technological advancement, the demand for proficient engineers escalates. Education has exhibited significant prowess in equipping individuals with both theoretical and practical skills that feed into the technological sphere. Moreover, it is through education that a nation's image can receive an international standing, demonstrating the universal importance of an educated society.
Nonetheless, recognizing the personal aspirations of individuals should equally be factored into the essence of education. Often, educational institutions are funded by individual school fees, and it is only fair that learners should acquire knowledge that resonates with their personal visions. To illustrate, in the Korean educational system, students are known to pursue private tuition to regale their academic appointment, a path that only benefits their personal goals. Coherently, individuals' career sustainability plays a critical role in societal development.
In conclusion, while education impacts society positively, it is equally crucial in individuals achieving their life goals.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
- Sổ tay dẫn chứng nghị luận xã hội năm 2025 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay Địa Lí 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay lớp 12 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa, KTPL (chương trình mới) ( 36.000₫ )
- Bộ đề thi tốt nghiệp 2025 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Anh, Sinh, Sử, Địa, KTPL (có đáp án chi tiết) ( 36.000₫ )
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The issue of addressing the global challenge of feeding a rapidly expanding population has spurred discussions about potential solutions, including the adoption of Genetically Modified (GM) foods. While some proponents argue that GM foods present a viable answer to this problem, I fundamentally disagree. The potential risks associated with GM foods and the availability of alternative sustainable approaches make me skeptical about their efficacy as a long-term solution.
To begin with, Genetically Modified foods often involve the manipulation of organisms' genetic makeup to enhance desirable traits, such as increased crop yield or resistance to pests. While this may seem promising in theory, the unintended consequences of genetic modification could pose significant risks to human health and the environment. For instance, allergens or toxins could be inadvertently introduced into GM crops, leading to adverse effects on consumers. The release of genetically modified organisms into the environment could also disrupt natural ecosystems and harm biodiversity.
Additionally, the push for GM foods detracts attention and resources from more sustainable and holistic agricultural practices that have the potential to address food security challenges without compromising safety. Agroecological approaches, such as crop rotation, agroforestry, and integrated pest management, offer environmentally friendly alternatives to intensive monocultures and chemical-based farming. These methods promote soil health, water conservation, and biodiversity, all of which are crucial for ensuring the long-term sustainability of food production.
In conclusion, while the growing global population necessitates innovative solutions for food security, I am opposed to the idea that GM foods offer a viable remedy. The potential risks to human health and the environment, coupled with the availability of more sustainable agricultural practices, make me doubtful about the long-term efficacy of genetically modified foods. Instead of relying solely on GM foods, it is imperative to explore diverse and sustainable approaches that prioritize both human well-being and the planet's health.
Sample 2:
To tackle food shortages, many scientists recommend genetically modified (GM) food as a solution. Despite some concerns regarding this solution, I strongly believe that this is the future for food security.
The first benefit that GM foods offer is that it has significantly higher yield compared to traditional crops. GM foods have their genes altered to reproduce their cells quicker, leading to faster crop productions. Also, GM foods are capable of withstanding harsh environments, such as during winters and dry summers. Another benefit of consuming more GM foods is that they require fewer pesticides, contrary to popular belief. Because scientists design GM foods to be resistant to common pests, farmers do not need to spray pesticides as regularly as they would growing traditional crops.
However, despite these benefits, there are some concerns that researchers should revisit before populating GM foods. The first concern is the impact GM crops have on the ecosystem. Because these crops are known to be resistant to pests, it could lead to the eradication of pest species. As a result, this can disrupt the ecosystem’s balance. The second concern is that, due to GM crops’ high efficiency and rapid growth, they can easily become an invasive species with unhealthy farming practices. This problem, aside from damaging the ecosystem, also has adverse effects on the economy. For example, if one plot destined to grow a certain plant gets invaded by another species, farmers will experience a loss of income.
In conclusion, although admittedly, there are some legitimate concerns for GM foods, I still strongly agree that GM crops are the most feasible solution to the global food shortage.
Sample 3:
Feeding the ever-growing world population is undoubtedly a significant challenge that needs to be addressed. Some individuals argue that genetically modified (GM) foods could provide a viable solution to this problem. In my opinion, while GM foods may offer certain benefits, they also come with potential risks and drawbacks that need to be carefully considered.
Proponents of GM foods argue that they can help increase crop yields, improve nutritional content, and enhance resistance to pests and diseases. This, they claim, would enable farmers to produce more food on less land, ultimately helping to feed a larger population. Additionally, GM foods have the potential to withstand harsh environmental conditions, such as drought or extreme temperatures, making them more resilient and reliable sources of food.
However, it is important to acknowledge the concerns surrounding GM foods. Critics argue that the long-term health and environmental impacts of consuming and cultivating GM crops are not yet fully understood. There are also ethical considerations, such as the potential for corporate control over the food supply and the loss of biodiversity. Furthermore, the introduction of GM crops into natural ecosystems could have unforeseen consequences, disrupting delicate ecological balances.
In conclusion, while GM foods may offer some potential benefits in addressing the challenge of feeding a growing world population, the risks and uncertainties associated with their widespread adoption cannot be ignored. It is crucial to conduct thorough research and risk assessments to ensure that the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks. Ultimately, a balanced approach that takes into account the needs of both current and future generations is necessary to tackle this pressing issue.
Sample 4:
Whether GM foods are the ultimate answer to address the need to feed the ever-growing global population has been a topic of fierce argument recently among intellectuals across the world. However, I fully agree with the statement that such foods are an effective remedy to worldwide food scarcity.
One obvious advantage of GM foods is better production in lesser time which will ensure food for more people that too utilizing a few resources. In addition, these foods and their cultivation are a lot more environmentally-friendly than normal foods because the former are highly resilient to diseases, pests and insects which reduces the need to use harmful herbicides, pesticides, insecticides and so on. This also ensures that people get pure fruits and grains, for example, free from chemicals.
Better texture, varied flavors and improved nutritional values are some other qualities which make genetically modified foods a viable solution to shortage of food. When such high-quality foods are made available at cheaper prices, it will sure save governments and individuals substantial sums of money, not to mention the obvious health benefits for people. Further, longer shelf-life makes bioengineered foods easier to transport to distant places and store them. Last but not least, their potentially non-allergenic nature makes them Manna from heaven for the hungry millions.
In short, GM foods are the need of the hour. Therefore, the authorities across the world need to spring to action to mass-produce genetically-engineered foods and make them available to people thereby saving hundreds of thousands of lives from malnutrition and starvation.
Sample 5:
As the population is increasing at a fast rate across the world, a shortage of food is becoming a perplexing problem. Some individuals suggest that this can be addressed by genetically modified foods. In my opinion, I totally disagree with the statement since engineering genetic foods have a high risk of potential problems and negative environmental impacts.
The main issue of genetic modification organism is a risk of potential problems after having the food for a long-term. This is because scientists or nutritionists are not sure about the long-term effects and safety as it is a relatively new practice. For example, food allergic reactions have risen in the last decade such as nuts or dairy products, which resulted from consuming GM foods. In addition, there are also a large number of people who hold concerns about the potential risks to human health affected by GM crops such as inducing mutations in human genes. Therefore, numerous people have an inclination toward eating organic food rather than GM foods.
Another thing to consider is that the agricultural method of GMOs brings harmful effects on the environment and ecosystem. Firstly, the changes in the agricultural practice affect on the farming and where weeds or other harmful factors become stronger. This results in overuse of the toxic sprays such as pesticides and herbicides. Secondly, the new cultivation method is harmful for non-GMO crops and also insects or animals, which can lead to loss of biodiversity. To illustrate this, bees play an important role in the pollination of various food crops, but they are vulnerable from the sprays.
In conclusion, I am strongly opposed to the opinion that genetically modified foods can deal with
a shortage of food due to the world demographic growth. This is for the reason that it has potential problems affecting people’s health and it has negative effects on environmental impacts and biodiversity.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
There is a great number of people travelling and visiting other nations, these days. This can be caused by several reasons and personally, it is a positive development.
To begin with, there are two contributing factors behind people’s motivation to travel. First, many of them may want to learn more about unfamiliar cultures as during their trip, they are allowed to get exposed to local people and observe cultural differences here. This gives them a chance to make a comparison of cultural traits in different nations, which helps them enrich their knowledge and have a more profound understanding of the world. Second, a number of people decide to go on a trip to another nation so that they can visit their relatives or family members who live overseas. Video calls or photos only help them see each other’s faces without hugging or holding hands, and therefore, they desire to travel abroad so as to meet their beloved ones in the flesh.
I believe the prevalence of cross-border trips brings about great positive effects on society. With many travellers coming to a country, the demand for housing and food here will likely grow, so local people can earn a great amount of money through providing shelters and selling their traditional cuisines. For instance, Thailand is a country that welcomes millions of travellers from around the world annually, thanks to which the tourism industry here can flourish. Thousands of jobs have also been created, such as workers in travel agencies, taxi drivers or tour guides, to serve the great number of international tourists. Therefore, many Thai residents working in this industry have escaped poverty, avoided unemployment and enjoyed a better life quality.
In conclusion, people these days travel across the border in order to acquire new knowledge and see one another. In my opinion, this development is positive due to its various social benefits.
Sample 2:
More and more people today are choosing to travel internationally. This positive development is mainly because of a rise in middle-class income coupled with advances in aviation.
People today can afford to travel as it has become more convenient. The last half century has seen wages in both developed and developing companies climb with the concomitant expansion of the global middle class. Workers have the disposable income to travel that they lacked in the past. This has been complemented with safer airplanes, so individuals are not afraid to fly. Airfares have also become cheaper as companies like Boeing produce more efficient planes, competition intensifies between competing airlines, and the supply more than meets demand for flights. These factors combined have spawned a golden age of international travel.
Looking at the opportunity in perspective, it is hard to see the advent of international travel as anything less than one of mankind’s greatest achievements. For the entirety of human history, most people lived and died near to where they were born. Anyone who wanted to travel to another country had to possess enormous wealth, time, and courage. Today, the average employee can save up and travel to see the wonders of the Renaissance in Southern Europe, the vast monuments to history and modernity in China, or explore any other corner of Earth that has piqued their interest. This is an unprecedented opportunity unavailable to past generations.
In conclusion, international travel is a byproduct of the modern age, and we should all be grateful for its possibility. There are clear environmental drawbacks but those should not blind people to its benefits taken as a whole.
Sample 3:
In recent years, there has been a surge in the number of individuals traveling to foreign countries. This trend is fueled by various reasons, all of which contribute to a wide range of positive developments. In this essay, I will explore why numerous people choose to explore novel locations and argue that this trend has an overall positive impact on individuals and society.
One of the primary factors driving the escalating number of international travelers is globalization. As the world becomes more interconnected, people grow increasingly interested in different cultures, traditions, and ways of life. Consequently, traveling to other nations assists them in cultivating cross-cultural comprehension and insights. Moreover, this trend offers significant educational advantages as learners can pursue academic knowledge in developed countries with high-quality educational systems. This allows them not only to acquire academic knowledge but also to gain valuable skills such as problem-solving and effective communication. For instance, students studying abroad will be well-prepared with essential competencies for a lucrative career.
I firmly believe that the growth of international tourism positively impacts the domestic economy of host countries. The influx of foreign tourists and their spending on local services provide a lucrative stream of revenue that can significantly improve the lives of people in these nations. Additionally, tourists benefit from cultural exchanges and eye-opening experiences during their visits. Furthermore, the profits generated from these activities can be utilized by local governments to upgrade infrastructure such as accommodations or roads. For example, Ha Giang province allocates 35% of its tourism revenue annually to construct new buildings and maintain local heritages.
In conclusion, the rise in the number of international visitors can be attributed to globalization and the pursuit of educational opportunities. In my opinion, this trend will continue to yield positive outcomes for individuals and societies by fostering cross-cultural understanding and contributing to economic growth.
Sample 4:
In recent years, there has been a significant surge in the number of people traveling abroad for leisure and various other purposes. This essay will explore the factors driving this growing trend and propose that the benefits of international tourism outweigh its potential drawbacks.
Overseas destinations have become increasingly popular vacation spots in recent years, primarily due to two factors. The first is the reduction in travel costs and increased accessibility, making international trips more affordable and convenient for a larger population than ever before. The emergence of budget airlines and early booking discounts have made airfare more affordable, enabling vacationers to plan ahead and save money. The second driving factor is the explosive growth of social media, which has broadened people's access to information about diverse cultures and remote locations, inspiring them to seek new experiences. Tourist review videos can easily go viral on popular platforms such as TikTok and YouTube, motivating millions of viewers to step beyond their comfort zones and consider embarking on their own enlightening adventures.
This trend of increased international tourism is positive for several compelling reasons. Firstly, overseas tourism can significantly impact the economy of host countries. Holidaymakers typically spend money on a range of goods and services, such as accommodation, food, transportation, and souvenirs, which can stimulate job creation and economic growth. This, in turn, can lead to improved infrastructure and enhanced living standards for the local population. Secondly, travelling globally promotes cultural exchange and understanding among people from diverse geographical backgrounds. By visiting foreign countries, visitors can learn about new cultures, customs, and traditions, broadening their perspectives and fostering mutual respect. This cultural exchange can help dismantle stereotypes and prejudices, leading to a more tolerant and inclusive global society.
In conclusion, the trend of global travel, driven by affordable travel costs, increased accessibility, and the growth of social media, is a predominantly positive development, offering numerous benefits for both tourists and host countries.
Sample 5:
More people today find themselves interested in travelling to foreign nations. I believe that this phenomenon is a result of increased access to information on social media, and yet is fundamentally adverse to the local cultures that experience mass tourism.
Firstly, I believe that social media has allowed people to catch a glimpse of foreign locales, which in turn entices them to visit destinations that they otherwise would not have before. When people see travel adverts through online platforms, they are compelled to explore it themselves and showcase their experience on social media. This is why many people on the internet today have been able to create a career out of travelling and posting pictures on the internet alone: there is a huge market for the advertisements of travel destinations on apps such as Instagram and Facebook today.
However, increased travel to tourist destinations has inadvertently internationalized them over time as governments and urban planners aim to make the stay of rich foreign tourists more comfortable and luxurious. Gradually, little by little of what makes the place special is replaced by a generic, commercialized shell. This creates a situation in places such as Angkor Wat in Cambodia, where the serenity of the temples is destroyed by the overwhelming number of tourists.
Overall, I believe that the rise of the internet and social media in particular has contributed to the proliferation of global travel. Nevertheless, tourism has thrived at the expense of the destinations' local cultures. On the whole, I therefore argue that this development has been an unwanted one for most local populations.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.