2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án (Phần 9)

Sample 1:

During vehicle-free days in some cities, private vehicles, trucks, and motorbikes are prohibited from the city center. Moreover, people are also urged to utilize public transit, such as buses, taxis, and the metro. Personally, the advantages of vehicle-free days are eclipsed by their drawbacks, as this policy can significantly hinder businesses and medical services.

One of the significant advantages of implementing vehicle-free days is the reduction of air pollution caused by vehicles. Carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide are the primary pollutants emitted by vehicles that pose a risk to human health. Reducing the number of vehicles on the road during vehicle-free days significantly reduces air pollution. By breathing cleaner air, people can experience better respiratory health, reduced risk of heart disease, and overall improved quality of life. Furthermore, vehicle-free days also promote public transportation, a more sustainable and efficient mode of transport. Public transportation systems are designed to transport more people with fewer vehicles, reducing road congestion. When more people use public transportation during vehicle-free days, it results in fewer vehicles on the road, leading to less traffic congestion.

However, vehicle-free days also have some disadvantages to consider. Firstly, businesses that rely on transportation, such as delivery services, may suffer during vehicle-free days. They may face difficulty in delivering goods on time, resulting in losses. The reduced accessibility to vehicles could result in a drop in customer satisfaction levels, and delivery services may have to find alternative methods to deliver goods. Secondly, people who rely on private transportation for medical reasons, such as the disabled or elderly, may find it challenging to access necessary medical services. This could have severe consequences for their health, as they may not be able to receive timely medical treatment. Therefore, it is crucial to find alternative transportation arrangements for medical services and address the concerns of businesses that rely on transportation during vehicle-free days.

In conclusion, I believe the disadvantages of vehicle-free days outweigh their benefits since this legislation may greatly impair companies and health services.

Sample 2:

In an effort to reduce traffic congestion, air pollution, and enhance the quality of life, some cities have introduced vehicle-free days, during which private cars, trucks, and motorcycles are prohibited in the city center. These days, people are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses, taxis, and the metro. This essay will argue that the advantages of vehicle-free days outweigh the disadvantages.

Firstly, vehicle-free days contribute significantly to environmental sustainability. The temporary ban on private vehicles leads to a decrease in carbon emissions and air pollution, as fewer cars are operating in the city center. Consequently, air quality improves, which benefits the health of urban residents and reduces the burden on healthcare systems. Additionally, the promotion of public transportation on vehicle-free days encourages people to adopt more environmentally-friendly habits, which can have a long-lasting impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Secondly, vehicle-free days lead to a reduction in traffic congestion in the city center. This alleviation not only minimizes stress for commuters but also allows for more efficient transportation of goods and services. Furthermore, the increased use of public transportation on vehicle-free days may encourage city governments to invest in and improve public transit systems, ultimately making them more attractive to commuters. This shift towards public transportation could lead to a long-term reduction in traffic congestion, benefiting both individuals and businesses.

In conclusion, the advantages of vehicle-free days in cities far outweigh the disadvantages. Vehicle-free days can contribute to environmental sustainability, reduce traffic congestion, and encourage healthier lifestyles. By adopting vehicle-free days, cities can take a significant step towards creating more sustainable, livable, and healthy urban environments for their residents.

Sample 3:

Occasions on which private vehicles are not allowed to be driven within the central city for specific days are encouraged in some metropolitan areas. Therefore, people are stimulated to utilize public transportation. I consider its benefits such as reduced traffic congestion and a decrease in the release of carbon into the atmosphere are slightly more significant although this practice can induce inconvenience to residents.

The first benefit of banning individual means of transportation on certain days is that it can lessen traffic congestion. With fewer cars and motorbikes on the road, traffic jams can be eased and travel time for public transportation can be reduced. For instance, the annual “World Car-Free Day” that takes place on September 22nd each year encourages people to use alternative forms of transportation instead of driving their cars, leading to a significant reduction in traffic density worldwide.

Another advantage is the reduction in carbon emissions. As vehicles are a major source of air pollution, limiting or banning them on certain days can significantly lessen the levels of pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and particulate matter in the air. This can lead to improved air quality and better health outcomes, especially for people with respiratory issues.

However, as private vehicles are prohibited on certain days, it can cause inconvenience for citizens. More specifically, people who live or work in the city center may find it burdensome to have to use public transportation or walk long distances to get to their destination in lieu of utilizing their own cars or motorbikes.

In conclusion, although transport-free days may trigger inconvenience for residents, I consider its advantages including the improvement of traffic congestion and lowering of carbon footprint are far more noteworthy since it has positive impacts on the wider population. It is advisable that individuals should follow this practice to improve air quality and their own health.

Sample 4:

On “vehicle-free days,” when private cars, trucks, and motorcycles are prohibited from entering the city center, residents are urged to use public transportation, such as buses, taxis, and the metro. While there are certain disadvantages to this program, I believe the benefits exceed the drawbacks.

There are certain negative outcomes that could result from this policy. One of the most major disadvantages of car-free days is the inconvenience and disruption they might cause to individuals who rely on private vehicles for transit. For instance, commuters, delivery drivers, and emergency services may struggle to navigate through the city center and reach their destinations on time. Furthermore, businesses located in the city center which rely on vehicle traffic for customers may suffer financially as fewer people visit their establishments on vehicle-free days. As a consequence, this negative impact on businesses may considerably affect employment and economic activity in the city.

Despite these disadvantages, there are far more advantages to having vehicle-free days in the urban core. One crucial benefit is the reduction in air pollution levels. Vehicle emissions are indeed a major source of air pollution in metropolitan areas, leading to a detrimental effect on public health. By restricting vehicles in the city center, the air quality could be substantially improved, resulting in health benefits for both residents and visitors. Additionally, vehicle-free days can help promote sustainable transportation, such as public transit, cycling, and walking. Thus, individuals are inspired to adopt more environmentally friendly commuting habits, which would result in less greenhouse gas emissions and a decrease of reliance on fossil fuels.

In conclusion, while there may be discomfort and interruption to certain individuals and businesses, the health and environmental benefits make vehicle-free days a worthwhile initiative in the long run.

Sample 5:

Some cities now ban private vehicles from entering the city centre on certain days and allow only public transportations. Although this can have certain drawbacks, I believe the benefits are much more significant.

The imposition of vehicle-free days can cause inconvenience to people and affect certain businesses. Many people, especially the disabled or elderly, often rely on private vehicles in their daily travels, so the banning of private vehicles is certainly inconvenient for them. This is also the case in cities where public transport systems are still underdeveloped, as buses, trains, or even taxis in these cities may lack the capacity to serve people’s travel demands. In addition, businesses in city centres may experience reduced sales due to decreased accessibility on vehicle-free days.

However, the advantages that this policy brings far outweigh the disadvantages mentioned above. First, when private vehicles are not allowed in the city centre, the level of carbon emissions and, along with that, air pollution will be reduced. This can benefit people in the long run, as air pollution is a major contributor to respiratory problems and other health issues. Second, with fewer vehicles on the road, traffic congestion is reduced, leading to smoother traffic flow, reduced travel time, and increased safety for pedestrians and cyclists. Thirdly, by promoting public transportation and cycling, vehicle-free days can encourage people to use these modes of transportation more often, reducing their dependence on private vehicles.

In conclusion, though the policy of vehicle-free days in some cities can have unwelcome consequences for some people and businesses, I believe it is a beneficial trend in the long run. This policy can help reduce air pollution and traffic congestion in city centres, as well as encourage more people to use public transport on a daily basis.

Sample 6:

In numerous urban areas worldwide, the concept of vehicle-free days has gained momentum, promoting the restriction of private cars, trucks, and motorcycles within city centres. On these days, citizens are urged to utilize public transportation like buses, taxis, and metros as an alternative. In my opinion, the advantages of this practice far outweigh the drawbacks it may have.

It is undeniable that this approach may present several drawbacks. The inconvenience caused to individuals who heavily rely on private vehicles for their daily commute could lead to dissatisfaction. Moreover, businesses that depend on deliveries or transportation for their operations might face logistical challenges, potentially impacting their productivity. For instance, courier companies tasked with timely deliveries of perishable goods or essential supplies to various city businesses could encounter delays during vehicle-free days, affecting their ability to meet customer demands.

However, this practice brings several benefits. The primary advantage of vehicle-free days lies in mitigating environmental pollution and reducing traffic congestion. By limiting the number of private vehicles traversing the city centre, there is a substantial decline in harmful emissions, contributing to cleaner air and reduced noise pollution. Moreover, this temporary ban can alleviate traffic congestion, providing smoother movement for public transportation, cyclists, and pedestrians, thereby improving overall road safety. Finally and most importantly, it encourages some people to try public transportation or ride a bicycle, which may change their attitude towards solely using private cars.

Based on the discussion, it can be inferred that the advantages of vehicle-free days significantly outweigh the disadvantages. The positive impact on the environment, public health and attitude, and reduced traffic congestion in city centres can lead to sustainable urban development.

In conclusion, while vehicle-free days may pose some minor inconveniences, their overarching benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, changing people's perceptions about using public transport, and reduced traffic congestion make them a worthwhile initiative for cities to adopt.

Sample 7:

The urban landscape pulsates with life but is often choked by the throes of traffic. In response, some cities have embraced the concept of car-free days, temporarily banishing private vehicles from their hearts. While disruptions and inconveniences arise, the environmental and societal benefits paint a compelling picture, suggesting that the advantages of these car-free initiatives outweigh the disadvantages.

Firstly, the most immediate and tangible benefit is a dramatic improvement in air quality. With exhaust fumes abating, car-free days offer city dwellers a taste of pure air, reducing harmful pollutants and allergens. This translates into immediate health benefits, particularly for vulnerable populations like children and the elderly. Studies have shown significant drops in respiratory issues and improved lung function during car-free periods, underscoring the positive impact on public health.

Furthermore, car-free days unlock the potential for vibrant public spaces. Reclaimed streets become pedestrianised playgrounds, buzzing with activity. Street performers entertain, vendors display their wares, and families enjoy picnics and leisurely strolls. This fosters a sense of community and belonging, transforming the city centre from a congested thoroughfare into a place for human interaction and shared experiences. For instance, some European cities saw their car-free day morph into a massive street food festival, drawing in locals and tourists alike, and injecting vitality into the city's core.

However, objections to car-free days often cite disruptions to daily routines and economic concerns. Businesses fear decreased foot traffic, while commuters grapple with navigating alternative transportation. These drawbacks deserve consideration. Businesses can adapt by offering delivery services or hosting special events on car-free days. Commuters can plan ahead, utilizing public transport, cycling, or carpooling.

In conclusion, while car-free days are not without their challenges, the advantages they offer paint a compelling picture. Improved air quality, vibrant public spaces, and a strengthened sense of community stand as weighty benefits, outweighing the inconveniences faced by businesses and commuters.

Sample 8:

In several metropolitan areas, a scheme involving the prohibition of private vehicles in the central district on specific days is being carried out, with the intention to promote the use of mass transit. Personally, I am inclined to the view that the positives of environmental protection and safety of such a trend overshadow the drawback of overwhelmed public transport.

One of the cogent merits of organizing vehicle-free days in urban areas is reduced pollution. The overwhelming number of private cars, trucks and motorcycles on the street is irrefutably one of the foremost contributors to contamination issues of air, noise and visual pollution. The moratorium on the use of personal vehicles, therefore, urges citizens to switch to more environmentally friendly, public substitutes, which is conducive to an enormous decrease in emitted exhaust fumes, light from vehicles, road illumination, as well as traffic-related noise.

An additional benefit of vehicle-banning days is increased safety. Too many vehicles roaming the streets correlate with a higher possibility of traffic issues. As a case in point, commuters stuck in traffic congestion are more prone to speeding and red-light crossing, all of which can induce damaging accidents on those committing the infringement, and possibly the unfortunate travellers around.

However, there are downsides associated with the imposition of this scheme, the main one of which is many countries, in fact, do not possess a full-fledged public transport system. As a result, overloading and inaccessibility issues can happen as an unavoidable consequence when there is a sudden rise in the number of public transport users. This undoubtedly takes a toll on the commuting experiences of many, making them late for work or school.

In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that the benefits of vehicle-restricting days in metropolises, in terms of lessened pollution and enhanced safety, outweigh the downsides such as public transport sometimes being too crowded or inaccessible. I recommend, to overcome this, the authorities, before putting this scheme in operation, need to make special endeavors to reinforce and improve public transport facilities to meet the travel demands of their people.

Sample 9:

Many cities around the world have started introducing vehicle-free days as a first step to banning private cars from the busiest, central city districts. Public transport, such as buses, taxis or the subway, is meant to replace private cars completely on these days. While such prohibition may initially be seen as inconvenience and prompt a negative reaction, it has a potential to improve many aspects of city life.

Undoubtedly, private cars in many cases offer greater convenience compared to public transportation, and busy executives, directors and agents may not welcome the challenges of being forced to use the subway. Some of these high-profile individuals rely on cars for their own security and that of valuable equipment they carry to meetings, as well as the ability to work while en-route to the next appointment. Also, many businesses located in the city centre might struggle if delivery trucks were restricted on certain days; this would cause problems with stock levels at various retail shops and supermarkets.

However, the benefits of car-free days are numerous. Reduced congestion will enable public transport to move faster between stops, and also the air quality will improve significantly. Not driving to the city centre will eliminate the eternal parking problem for many people, saving the anxiety and expense. There will be more room for bicycles and their safety will increase due to roads not being overcrowded, not to mention pedestrians whose security will be boosted by monitoring all cars allowed to enter the city centre.

Another important consideration is a change in mindset that vehicle-free days would bring about. Being able to go through the day without a car can be a liberating experience for city workers. This real-life demonstration would prove that cars aren't always necessary and taking a bus or a tram can be just as convenient and fast. By breaking the habit of reliance on private cars people would become more open and receptive to new ways of moving around.

In conclusion, even though some may view prohibition of private cars negatively, for the reasons of improved transportation, better air quality and increased security it seems necessary to introduce vehicle-free days.

Sample 10:

Traffic and pollution resulting from vehicles have affected people throughout the world. With cities suffering from heavy smog and endless congestion, governments are eager to reduce the large number of automobiles on the road every day, and one way is to set vehicle-free days, which is to ban private cars and suggest citizens to take public transports instead.

The advocates of this policy propose that it contributes to mitigating emissions and alleviating traffic congestion in cities. It sounds like an easy math problem: if there was one day per month when a city was closed to private cars, for example, the amount of greenhouse gas emitted from those vehicles could be reduced by roughly 3.3% in total, and if it was on a weekly basis, the figure would go up to over 10%. Furthermore, it could also eliminate the concerns related to gridlock and parking availability. However, when putting into practice, the policy may not be as effective as it promises, as the canceled trips by private car owners may just be scheduled on another day instead of being replaced by bus journeys, so its contribution to carbon mitigation and traffic congestion may be much smaller than expected.

On the other hand, it is very likely that the vehicle-free days could produce some negative outcomes from a long-term perspective. A predictable challenge is that those who rely on private vehicles for commuting may be dissatisfied when public transportation fails to provide them with equivalent comfort and convenience by being overcrowded, lacking coverage, or charging too much, but a more important issue can be the influence on businesses, which will be less productive as a result of such policy. A typical example can be supermarkets, which sell fresh food on their shelves. Banning trucks and lorries on certain days may mean that they could not ensure sufficient supply or provide delivery service as usual.

In conclusion, while there are theoretical benefits, the vehicle-free days may result in a less active city on those days and hurt the local economy in practice while leaving the existing pollution and traffic problems still unsolved.

Sample 11:

Automobiles on the road have been increasing by the day as the cost of vehicles has decreased and the number of cheap options available in the market has expanded, resulting in an increase in the number of cars owned by individuals. Cities have devised ways to minimise the number of vehicles on the road in order to fight the accompanying issues. On particular days, certain cities have enacted bans on private vehicles, trucks, and motorcycles. There are certain advantages and disadvantages to this, which will be covered throughout the article.

To begin with, the benefits of enacting vehicle restrictions include helping to limit street overpopulation, which improves roadway condition and lowers maintenance costs. It also reduces the amount of smoke in the air, making the environment safer. Furthermore, the ban encourages individuals to use public transportation, allowing people from all walks of life to afford transportation. Furthermore, it is said to be beneficial to one's health because people are encouraged to participate in physical activity. For example, CO2 emissions may be lowered if fewer vehicles were allowed on the road and people had to walk to the nearest bus or metro station.

On the contrary, there is a convenience drawback. Having the freedom to drive your own car gives you more privacy and allows you to be mobile at different times of the day. People whose occupations necessitate regular travel will find that taking public transportation is less efficient than driving their own automobile. For example, a salesperson may be required to travel to several clients, and waiting for public transportation would entail wasting a significant amount of time.

To summarise, the benefits of enforcing the ban outweigh the drawbacks. More flexible legislation, in the form of licences for particular scenarios such as emergency conditions or job requirements, could help to mitigate the negative effects of the disadvantages.

Sample 12:

According to some people, private automobiles should be banned on free-vehicle days and people should use public transportation instead, such as trains and buses. In my opinion, drawbacks such as a country 's recession will be outweighed by benefits such as fewer climate struggles and fuel savings.

The widespread disadvantage of excluding private vehicles may lead to a slump in the economy. If a shipment of items' raw materials failed to arrive on time, a cycle of the company's process could be disrupted, affecting the economy of the country. In the chemical industry, for example, once the machinery is begun, the material must be fed continually until the process is completed. Restart the process as well. It operates at an outrageously high price for whatever reason. This example demonstrates the economic consequences of a boycott against the prohibition of private transportation.

Despite the disadvantages of secession, the general benefits of prohibiting private transportation include less environmental impact and reduced fuel use. Because there would be fewer vehicles on the road, fuel usage will drop dramatically. To some extent, this will help to eliminate dangerous gases in the habitat region. Furthermore, due to the free-vehicle days, the use of petroleum fuels will be significantly lower than usual. I feel that prohibiting private automobiles is not only beneficial to the environment, but also protects the natural ecosystem.

To summarise, the benefits, such as reducing climate change and conserving natural resources, outweigh the downsides, such as slowing economic growth. As a result, I have weighed the advantages and disadvantages, and I am confident that the advantages will outweigh the disadvantages.

Sample 13:

Many cities throughout the world have begun to implement vehicle-free days as a first step toward prohibiting private cars from the city's busiest areas. These days, public transportation such as buses, taxis, and the subway are intended to totally replace private automobiles. While such a prohibition may appear inconvenient at first and elicit a negative reaction, it has the potential to improve city life in different areas.

Private cars are undoubtedly more convenient than public transportation in many circumstances, and busy executives, directors, and agents may not appreciate the inconvenience of being compelled to utilise the subway. Some of these high-profile people rely on cars for their own safety and the safety of the valuable equipment and documents they bring to meetings, as well as the ability to work while driving. Furthermore, many companies in the city centre may have difficulties if delivery trucks are prohibited on particular days; this would result in a shortage of supplies at various retail stores and supermarkets.

The advantages of car-free days, on the other hand, are considerable. Reduced congestion will allow public transportation to move faster between stations while also greatly improving air quality. For many people, not going to the city centre will solve the never-ending parking problem, saving them time and money. Bicycles will have more space, and their safety will improve as roads are not clogged, not to mention pedestrians, whose safety will be enhanced by the monitoring of all cars allowed into the city centre.

Another factor to consider is the shift in thinking that vehicle-free days would entail. For city employees, being able to get around without a car can be a liberating experience. This real-life example would demonstrate that cars aren't always necessary, and that using the bus or tram is just as easy and quick. People would be more open and receptive to alternative modes of transportation if they were less reliant on private automobiles.

To summarise, while some may perceive banning of private cars as a disadvantage, vehicle-free days appear to be important for improved transportation, better air quality, and higher security.

Sample 14:

In various metropolitan areas, residents are advised to utilize public transport on vehicle-restriction days, when the use of citizen-owned automobiles is prohibited in the central area. In my opinion, this regulation contributes more remarkable benefits than the possible drawback it may pose.

The main advantage is that this method enhances the air quality for residents. Private vehicles are a significant source of carbon emissions, which can have a negative impact on public health. As a result, reducing the number of cars on the road lessens the level of air pollution, ultimately providing a cleaner environment and promoting better health outcomes.

Furthermore, limiting private vehicles can also help establish a safer environment for citizens. It can be assumed that fewer automobiles traveling on the roads leads to a reduced possibility of traffic accidents. To illustrate, with the expectation of a lower appearance of motorized vehicles on the streets, pedestrians and cyclists can mobilize more freely and experience a lower risk of injury from collisions with cars.

However, this practice is not without its demerits, one of which is the inconvenience in mobility for citizens. Commuters may have to experience increased travel time to reach their desired destinations because public transport modes are required to stop at stations along the route. For example, according to its specified coverage, a bus must make numerous stops before transporting them to their university. This may cause punctuality issues for passengers.

In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that the advantages of vehicle-free days in improving environmental conditions and providing safer streets prevail over the downsides including traveling challenges for residents. To reduce the travel time of public transport for citizens, the authorities should design more direct routes for the convenience of passengers.

Sample 1:

Nowadays, there has been a significant shift in the way people choose to consume text content and read books, with more and more individuals opting to read e-books instead of printed books. While there are some drawbacks to this trend, I strongly believe that the advantages of e-reading far outweigh the disadvantages.

To begin with, one of the main drawbacks of reading digital books is that it lacks the tactile and sensory experience of reading a physical book. Many people enjoy the feeling of turning pages, the smell of the ink, and the overall aesthetic of a traditional book. Additionally, e-books are often criticized for causing strain on the eyes, especially when reading for prolonged periods. For example, a recent study in Ireland reveals that young children who read digital books more than four hours a day often suffer from eye problems within the next four years.

However, there are also several compelling reasons why e-reading has become increasingly popular and beneficial. Firstly, e-books are often more convenient and accessible than their physical counterparts. They are lightweight, easily transportable, and can be stored on a single device, making it easy to carry a library of books with us wherever we go. Furthermore, e-books often cost less than paper books, making them more affordable for many readers. Additionally, e-books are also more environmentally friendly as they do not require paper, ink, and energy to produce. For instance, with the popularity of digital book reading devices, the requirement for printing and cutting trees has decreased, and as a result, has positively impacted our environment.

In conclusion, while there are some minor disadvantages to e-reading, the advantages of this trend far overshadow them. E-books offer convenience, accessibility, and affordability, making them an increasingly popular choice among readers. Furthermore, they are environmentally friendly, which is a big plus.

Sample 2:

These days, there is a growing trend of individuals preferring to read e-books over traditional printed books. In my opinion, the advantages of e-reading far outweigh the disadvantages primarily because of their easy portability, accessibility and positive impact on the environment.

To begin with, e-books offer a high degree of portability and convenience. With the ability to read on mobile devices, laptops or other hand-held devices, one can easily access books from virtually anywhere. Furthermore, the need to physically carry heavy books is eliminated, thereby making reading a more effortless and streamlined process. Additionally, many publishing companies have begun to shift towards e-book production due to the reduced costs associated with their production, resulting in e-books being more affordable than traditional printed books, particularly for students.

Furthermore, e-books are more easily accessible through online purchases, making them readily available to readers at any time. Additionally, they are more environmentally friendly as they require no paper, ink, or energy to produce.

However, it should be acknowledged that there are some drawbacks to e-reading. Many literary and scientific works are not yet available in e-book format, making them inaccessible to individuals who prefer e-reading. Additionally, it can be difficult to find certain older books in e-book format, as they are often only available in physical libraries. For instance, once I was looking for a research paper published by one of our university teachers and could not find it online. I had to access it in a library.

In conclusion, while there are some disadvantages to e-reading, I believe that the advantages far outweigh them. The growing popularity of e-books is a trend that will continue to gain momentum, offering readers convenient, accessible and affordable reading experience while also saving trees and the environment.

Sample 3:

The digital age has witnessed a significant shift in reading habits, with a growing preference for electronic books over traditional printed materials. In my view, the advantages of this trend far outweigh its drawbacks. The advantages of electronic books (e-books), such as space efficiency, immediate access, and global accessibility, exceed the disadvantages, making them a superior choice over printed books.

One major advantage of e-books is their space efficiency. Unlike printed books, which require substantial physical storage space, e-books can be stored in small, portable devices such as pen drives or CDs. The convenience of carrying hundreds of books in a small pen drive makes e-books an ideal choice for individuals who value portability. For instance, students can have their entire academic library on a single pen drive, eliminating the need for dedicated storage rooms.

Despite the potential for eye strain due to prolonged screen exposure being a significant disadvantage of e-books, advancements in technology, such as vision protection screens for computers, have mitigated this concern. While the prevalence of vision problems attributed to screen time is acknowledged, the overall convenience and accessibility of e-books outweigh this relatively minor issue. Moreover, protective screens provide a viable solution to address eye strain concerns associated with digital reading.

To sum up, the transition from printed books to e-books represents a positive evolution in reading habits. E-books offer a multitude of advantages, from portability and convenience to affordability and environmental friendliness. While some concerns exist regarding eye strain, these can be effectively addressed through simple precautions and technological advancements. The benefits of e-books far outweigh their drawbacks, making them a compelling choice for readers in the modern world.

Sample 4:

In the modern era, reading habits are undergoing a significant transformation, with a growing preference for electronic books (e-books) over traditional printed books. While there are apprehensions about the absence of a physical reading experience and potential eye strain associated with digital reading, the numerous advantages of e-books, such as ease of access, convenience, affordability, and environmental friendliness, make them an appealing and beneficial option. This essay contends that, overall, the benefits of e-reading significantly outweigh its drawbacks.

One of the primary concerns associated with e-reading is the absence of the tactile and sensory experience inherent in physical books. Many enthusiasts cherish the act of turning pages, the distinct aroma of ink, and the overall aesthetic appeal of traditional books. Additionally, critics argue that e-books can contribute to eye strain, particularly during extended reading sessions. For instance, a study conducted in Ireland found a correlation between prolonged digital book consumption, exceeding four hours a day in young children, and subsequent eye problems within a four-year span.

However, the advantages of e-reading are compelling and contribute significantly to its growing popularity. Firstly, e-books offer unparalleled convenience and accessibility. They are lightweight, easily transportable, and can be stored on a single device, allowing readers to carry an entire library wherever they go. Moreover, e-books often come at a lower cost than their printed counterparts, rendering them more economically viable for a broad readership. Beyond financial considerations, the environmental benefits of e-books are noteworthy. By eliminating the need for paper, ink, and energy-intensive production processes, e-books contribute to an eco-friendlier reading experience. The rise of digital book reading devices has led to a decrease in the demand for printed materials, resulting in positive environmental outcomes, such as reduced tree cutting.

To conclude, despite concerns about the sensory aspects and potential eye strain associated with e-reading, the advantages of this trend far outweigh the disadvantages. The convenience, accessibility, and affordability of e-books cater to the evolving needs of readers in the digital age. Furthermore, the environmental friendliness of e-books adds a significant dimension to their appeal. As technology continues to advance, it is foreseeable that the preference for e-reading will persist and redefine the landscape of literary consumption for generations to come.

Sample 5:

An increasing number of readers are switching to e-books in recent years. Although e-books might be injurious to one’s eyesight, and contain unsuitable content for young audiences, these devices are environmentally-friendly and portable, which is positive overall. 

On the one hand, e-books’ readers are generally more prone to eye diseases and disorders. E-books are often read on electronic devices ranging from phones to computer screens that emit blue light, and as a result cause readers’ visions to become poorer after an extended period of exposure. Recent research and surveys indicate that most e-books readers suffer from a broad range of eye conditions including astigmatism and myopia. Some e-books may also have content that is inappropriate for certain ages. Unlike conventional publications, online ones often have less rigorous censorship, thus having a higher chance of containing harmful material for children such as violence or sexuality. Children gaining access to this content might develop violent behaviors and hurt others either through verbal abuse or physical assault.

On the other hand, supporters of e-books argue for their portability. A compact device can store up to hundreds of e-books, which is much more convenient to bring, especially for students and frequent travelers. Many prestigious schools have now implemented the use of iPads and in turn students no longer need to carry bulky books. Furthermore, e-books contribute significantly to environmental protection. E-books completely eliminate the need for deforestation as their content can be written on computers and require neither paper nor printing. For example, the use of e-books drastically reduces logging activities and the exploitation of natural resources, hence becoming the ideal substitution for printed materials.  

In conclusion, despite its potential damaging effects on one’s eyes and children’s behaviors, the benefits related to convenience and safeguarding the environment far outweigh the perceived drawbacks. 

Sample 6:

In the contemporary era, individuals demonstrate a preference for selecting digital books over hardcovers. There is an ongoing debate on whether this trend outweighs its demerits. From my perspective, the advantages of reading e-versions outweigh its disadvantages.

On the one hand, electronic versions of books are considered to have several disadvantages. One major concern is the potential eye strain that may result from reading on screens. E-readers typically utilize technological devices for reading, such as tablets, computers, or mobile phones, which expose the eyes to blue light emitted from the screen. Prolonged exposure to this blue light, especially in the evening or at night, may lead to eye-related issues, including myopia or hyperopia. Additionally, readers worry about the prevalence of piracy websites. With the rapid advancement of the Internet, the prevalence of piracy websites has significantly increased. These websites illegally upload copyrighted books without the authors’ permission, which can reduce legitimate sales as consumers opt for free access to copyrighted material instead of purchasing books through authorized channels.

Despite these drawbacks, I contend that the advantages of e-books are more significant. First, unlike printed books, electronic books provide readers with high portability and accessibility. Carrying bulky printed books requires more effort, and they also take up too much space, while e-readers allow users to easily access their library with a massive number of books regardless of space constraints. Secondly, e-versions are equipped with advanced interactive features not found in traditional books. For example, e-readers offer built-in features like bookmarks, highlighting, or notes, which enhance the reading experience and make it more enjoyable.

In conclusion, despite some of the given counterarguments, I personally still strongly believe that the disadvantages of e-books are minimal compared to their advantages.

Sample 7:

An increasing number of people are using e-books as a reading tool, such as a kindle, instead of traditional paper books. I believe there are significant benefits to using e-books over paper books with only a few minor drawbacks.

E-books have enormous advantages over paper books mainly because of the vast number of books that an e-book device, namely a kindle, can contain. Kindles are able to contain thousands of books which you can categorise and organise on a device that is lighter than a tablet. For people who are travelling or those who want easy access to multiple books, these devices are perfect. Furthermore, e-books can be purchased with the click of a button giving instant access to the book without having to wait for delivery.

On the other hand, there is a downside to choosing an e-book over a paper book. The main issue is that it can be hard to find books on specialist subjects in electronic form. Many specialist and old books are only available as paper books and can only be found in libraries. Another point to consider is that e-books are yet another device which people are glued to and that does have an impact on eyesight and health in general. It has long been known that people spend too much time on their devices and therefore reading a paper book might actually be preferable from time to time.

In conclusion, I think e-books have brought numerous gains to people's lives through accessibility and convenience that truly benefit people's lives, but there are disadvantages that should not be ignored.

Sample 8:

In this day and age, an increasing number of people prefer to read e-books instead of paper books. In my opinion, it would be a positive trend.

Reading e-books can exert many benefits to people's lives. Firstly, it can bring much convenience to people. That is because many books can be saved in one device due to its huge storage capacity, which enables people to carry them outside more easily. Secondly, paper books are made of wood which leads to more serious deforestation around the world. In the meantime, the collection of waste collection is a complicated process, especially in many developing countries where paper waste has caused severe environmental pollution. Accordingly, the popularity of e-books can reverse this situation effectively. Finally, the prices of electronic books are far lower than paper ones, which would motivate people to read more.

Many people, however, still like reading paper books owing to their unique strengths. One merit of paper books is that they are tangible compared to e-books, which means readers can enjoy the reading process through toughing paper and taking notes in books. Besides, people seem to be more concentrated on paper books than reading by staring at the screen for a long time. Nevertheless, owing to the advancement of artificial technology, many e-books have been designed to be more attractive and intriguing, which allows readers to gain more visual images related to the contents of books as well as audio resources. That means reading has become a diversified enjoyment.

To conclude, the traditional way of reading has been challenged by high technology and more people choose to read through electronic devices. From my point of view, it would bring more merits to people's lives.

Sample 1:

Unequal distribution of wealth is one of the common problems faced by developing nations. There is no doubt that the gap present clearly today between the poor and the rich is getting wider by time and is affecting our way of life. This affects the economy causing disparity and hinders the overall economic development of a nation. The government should always strive towards minimizing this gap.

The main problem caused by unequal distribution of wealth is that education has become inaccessible to the poor. Quality education has become very expensive. There are schools and colleges which are very costly and not within the reach of the poor. Due to this, a certain population of people are not able to compete for high paying jobs and it becomes a fundamental disadvantage for them.

Another important issue is the increase in crime rates, as marginalized groups most often do not make enough money to meet their basic needs, they resort to heinous acts like burglary, theft etc.

However, there are some measures that can be taken to tackle inequality. Firstly, the government should develop schemes by building new government schools for children and providing scholarships which will help people from the poor section afford quality education.

Reserving seats for marginalized groups or quota systems can also be one of the solutions. This will give them a fair chance to compete with rich people.

Governing bodies should review their policies in regard to the tax sector and should update them to remove the economic disparities in the country. This will help enable the increase in development of the life standards of the poor and will develop the nation as a whole.

Sample 2:

In today’s materialistic world, economic inequality, also known as the gap between rich and poor, is one of the most prevalent problems. It can be characterized by the aphorism “the rich get richer while the poor get poorer”. Undoubtedly, the wealth gap is expanding over time, affecting the economy, causing inequities, and limiting a country’s overall economic success. As a result, the government and authorities should take the required actions and enact laws to solve these pressing problems. The following essay will discuss the problems and possible solutions for this escalating situation.

To begin with, there are a multitude of problems caused by economic disparity. The inaccessibility of education, increased crime rates, and deteriorating public health are the main concerns caused by the spreading inequality. The high levels of economic inequality are associated with increased crime and poor public health, both of which impose a burden on the economy. It is becoming more difficult for the less privileged to pursue higher education since quality education has become increasingly expensive. As a result, they are denied employment opportunities, ultimately leading to squalor and poverty. Furthermore, the rising crime rate is a significant source of concern, as minorities who lack the financial means to meet their fundamental necessities resort to delinquency.

However, some steps can be taken to address these unsettling concerns, such as the government allocating more resources to overcome the economic divide. Firstly, the government can provide financial help to economically disadvantaged people. Second, governments should ensure that individuals have access to high-quality education and job opportunities. This will surely assist in reducing poverty and enhancing the living standards of financially disadvantaged households. Thirdly, developed countries should make more efforts to reduce poverty worldwide.

To sum up, economic disparity is a major concern for growing countries since it leads to lower levels of education, greater crime rates, and poorer public health. It may be tackled if the government passes legislation and enacts laws. I believe that everyone has an equal right to higher-quality education and a better life. Furthermore, education is the most powerful weapon for overcoming poverty. In this regard, the government and higher regulating bodies should join hands and make joint efforts to bridge economic disparity.

Sample 3:

One of the most widespread issues that developing countries have to deal with is unequal distribution of wealth and there is no denying that this wide gap of wealth that separates the rich and poor today is widening. It has a great impact on our standard of living. Nevertheless, there are numerous factors that led to this predicament as well as potential remedies for it, and each one needs to be carefully considered.

First and foremost, there are plenty of issues brought on by economic inequality. The main issues caused by the increasing inequality are the lack of access to education, the rise in crime, and the decline in public health. Because of the rising cost of education, it is becoming increasingly difficult for those from lower socio-economic backgrounds to pursue post-secondary education. The high rates of economic inequality are costly because they contribute to an increase in crime and a decline in public health. The underprivileged groups are increasingly turning to criminal activity to meet their basic needs.

To address these serious issues, governments must increase their efforts to close the wealth gap. To begin with, governments should make sure that all of their citizens have access to high-quality education. That will undeniably aid in alleviating poverty. Moreover, it's time for developed nations to step up and shoulder a larger share of the burden in the fight to end global poverty. Some African countries have already seen the benefits of these kinds of efforts, which have helped a lot of people improve their standard of living. Those who are struggling financially should have access to government assistance programs.

To sum up, the disparity between the rich and the poor in today's society is drastic. But we can't turn a blind eye to the problems this creates, such as the rise in crime and illiteracy. The government can take steps to narrow the gap by making wise choices.

Sample 4:

It is a fact that the gap between the wealthy and the poor is growing wider in today's society. On the one hand, wealth is expanding, while the poor are falling deeper into debt on a daily basis. However, if the government takes the right action, these issues are not insurmountable.

One of the primary causes of the unequal distribution of wealth is costly education. It's inevitable that costly education results in the poor being unable to afford school. As a result, their future is at stake because of their lack of a good education. Because of their poverty and lack of education, they are more likely to engage in chaos and violence. Another serious concern is the fact that people with low incomes get sick and this is because they are forced to endure extreme poverty and a lack of basic necessities such as adequate nutrition and clean drinking water. This makes them vulnerable to conditions like cancer and gastrointestinal illness.

The problems caused by wealth disparity require immediate action. Solutions could necessarily mean raising taxes on the wealthy. More taxes will help the country's economy but will also have the unintended consequence of reducing people's wealth. However, more aid for the poor class could help alleviate the issue even further. As a result, they will be able to improve their financial situation and enjoy a higher quality of life. For instance, the government should provide free or heavily discounted education and food for all citizens. Consequently, bridging the gap through better benefits for them is essential.

In conclusion, illiteracy is a major contributor to the gap between wealthy and poor nations and closing it will require significant effort on the part of government organizations.

Sample 5:

A number of people today believe that the gap between the wealthy and the rest of society has widened dramatically in recent decades. However, in my opinion, this is mainly due to the fact that not enough resources are being made available to everyone. Deterrent action on the part of the government is the only option. This essay will explore possible explanations for this phenomenon using examples from advanced economies, before turning to potential remedies.

Due to the wealth gap, it has become very costly to get a good education these days. Top-tier universities and colleges can be out of reach for low-income families due to their high tuition rates. This places them at a severe disadvantage in the job market, making it difficult for them to land well-paying positions. The rising crime rate is another critical issue. In order to survive, members of marginalized communities often resort to criminal behaviour such as burglary, theft, and so on.

The government could do a better job of addressing the issue at hand by providing free lectures to the underprivileged. Therefore, these unfortunate people are able to improve their social and employment-related knowledge and skills. As a result, the disadvantaged will have a better chance of finding gainful employment and raising their economic standing, contributing to increased social stability.  Higher levels of education do have a positive effect on reducing violent and property crime.

In conclusion, if the government takes action by enacting laws, it may be possible to address the problem. In my opinion, everyone should have access to better educational opportunities and improved living conditions. And learning is the best defense against economic hardship. There needs to be a concerted effort from the government and higher regulatory bodies to close this gap in economic opportunity.

Sample 6:

As the world progresses, the gap between the two classes of society is widened because the rich become wealthier while the poor are living on the breadline. Such income inequality could lead to several problems, and some suggestions to improve this situation will be analyzed in the following essay.

Wealth concentration within a handful of individuals and institutions might result in two major issues. Firstly, the rich-poor gap could be the breeding ground for social unrest and political instability. The poor might perceive that the rich are the principal force of hindrance to their occupational and service opportunities. This might be the precursor to discontentment, which potentially is the onset of social anarchy. Secondly, as poverty restricts the capacity of the underprivileged to access services and other life-sustaining matters such as education, employment and medicine, they might resort to violence and opt for the life of criminals.

There are several initiatives to reduce economic inequality, including progressive taxation and minimum salary legislation. Higher taxes should be levied on the rich, which could reduce the amount of income inequality in society. On the other hand, governments could use this money to supply free goods and services for those who struggle to make a living. Also of great importance is the increase in the minimum earnings of the poorest workers. Although it cannot be denied that the current system places much importance on individual competence to determine the amount of money one might earn, unskilled workforce who usually are from the lower class should be, still, provided enough to live sufficiently.

In conclusion, chaos and the acceleration of crime rates are the two severe repercussions of the unequal distribution of wealth; and governments could impose heavy taxes on the rich and heighten the minimum amount of salary for the disadvantaged.

Sample 7:

Inappropriate distribution of wealth is a major challenge faced by developing nations globally. The gap between rich and poor is getting wider by time and affecting one’s way of life. This has also impacted the economy of nations causing disparity. Moreover, it has hindered the overall economic aspects of a nation. Thus, there is a necessity for the government to work towards reduction of this potential gap.

The major issue that is faced due to unequal distribution of wealth is lack of educational opportunities for the poor. Provision of quality education for the poor has become very expensive. There are several schools and colleges that are very costly and are out of the reach or capabilities of the poor. This is the major reason behind individuals being unable to compete for high paying jobs, creating a fundamental disadvantage for them.

Another significant concern is the rise in crime rates. Because marginalized people frequently lack the financial means to cover their basic requirements, they turn to horrible activities such as burglary and stealing.

There are, nevertheless, some steps that can be taken to address inequality. To begin, the government should implement schemes that include the construction of new government schools for children and the provision of scholarships to allow people from low-income families to afford quality education.

One alternative could be to set aside seats for underprivileged communities or implement quota systems. This will allow them to compete on an equal footing with the wealthy.

Governments should evaluate and update their tax policy in order to reduce economic inequalities in the country. This will aid in the improvement of the poor's living standards, as well as the development of the country as a whole.

Sample 8:

There is no doubt that the gap present clearly today between the poor and the rich is getting wider by time and is affecting our way of life.

That was only observed in the past in some communities where the wealth of a country was restricted to a few powerful and connected people. They used to own more than eighty percent of the resources and income, while the rest is barely enough for the common people. Nowadays, the difference is significant but not limited to societies’ finest. Society is divided into groups, the rich, the poor and the few managing to enjoy some of the rich’s benefits but struggling to keep this level, they are bouncing between the limits of each of the other groups.

As a result of today's situation, a broadband of the poor is striving to get a fair share of prosperity with no actual hope, the fabric of the society is getting weaker and therefore each group is more colonised to itself forming new habits and customs. Bridging this gap can only be done if equality was achieved in basic needs like education and healthcare. If acceptable ease was managed for the common people in their daily routines like public transportation and business facilities, that would also be helpful. There must be transparent laws to manage the use of wealth and the equality of sharing it and monitor any possible corruption. The sense of equal opportunity has to be delivered and believed by all people.

Briefly, no community can prosper and evolve safely unless the gaps are bridged between people in all aspects giving a fair chance to everyone to live in comfort if they worked reasonably hard to achieve it.

Sample 9:

The amount of income of people is always an important topic in social sciences. The equilibrium of society depends on how this income is shared among the people. Sadly, with the start of the 1950s, the gap between poor and rich has become wider and nowadays this gap has reached its peak point.

The reason for this situation is the structure of the business system we have constructed over the years. This economic model is called ‘Capitalism’. Needless to say, the word Capitalism is the derivative of Capital and obliviously, one who has capital has the chance to improve his business and obtain welfare. On the other hand, poor guys are less likely to build a business because of the absence of capital. One of the ugliest results of this system is that this system makes people simply greedy. The community has started to think true happiness can be reached only with more money. Another problem we face in this system is consumerism, which means to have a good stable mood it is obligatory to consume more and more. In future, if this economic model preserves itself, it can lead to anarchy which may result in disasters and deaths of many innocents.

To improve our lives, to beat this endless unhappiness, we should teach our children the importance of social justice. This problem is not going to be solved in the following several years. In the long run, we should change the way how we understand life. We must alter the roots and dynamics of our community. Nevertheless, we should preserve our hope because human beings had solved much more difficult problems in history. There are a great number of people who are aware of this problem.

A modern social and economic structure should be formed to address this issue. The government policy to help the poor should be more emphasised and education in a country should be free so that poor people can make their children educated. This educational opportunity can play a huge role in mitigating this eminent gap.

In conclusion, the social and economic formation and revolutionary changed in current capitalism is required to eliminate the gap between the poor and rich. More than three-fourths of wealth is owned by only 15% of the total population in the world. This is an unfair distribution and if not addressed carefully would only create chaos in the future.

Sample 10:

It is true that nowadays the difference between the wealthy and the poor is increasing: the wealth is growing, while the poor are going deeper into debt.

We must acknowledge that life for some categories of the population is extremely hard. It does not mean that they are people who have never worked in their life or those with anti-social behaviour like drug or alcohol addiction. I read in "Gold Coast Bulletin" that 700 households in Queensland had been disconnected from electricity in the past 3 months because they had not been able to pay the bills. It is true that it is more complicated for these citizens to survive and adapt, as the cost of living is unreasonably high.

On the other hand, 1% of Earth’s population owns as much money as the rest 99%, which is absolutely unfair. I doubt that all of them have inherited their wealth or have been working hard for decades. The names of the two wealthiest families – the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers are known to everybody. The ways of getting such enormous sums are not always legal, but society prefers to ignore such facts.

Moreover, these people do not only live in multi-million mansions, drive luxurious cars, eat in sophisticated restaurants, but they constantly show off their money, which many people find offensive and irritating. Instead of spending a fortune on useless things, why are they not involved in charity more? If they have billions of dollars and do not know what else to purchase to attract others' attention, why do not share half of their wealth? They will not become poorer, while the lives of less lucky ones can be transformed, and these people can at least get a chance.  The whole society would benefit because of that as the crime level would descend.

Overall, the gap between the rich and the poor is becoming more dramatic, if the governments do not take immediate actions, it is going to grow in future as well.

Sample 11:

The economic differences in society create inequality among people. The differences between rich people and poor people’s income are increasing in recent years. The reason for them can be classified into improper government policies and the individual's talents.

Tax policies introduced by the governments are favourable for the high-net-worth people to evade the tax. For instance, entrepreneurs have different tax slabs that make them avail tax exemptions like, opening an office in a special economy zone can result in good savings and an increase in profit. However, we cannot discount the individual talents in making enormous profits.

Talent is something that can be acquired by experience or inherited from the family. There are several startup companies created by talented individuals who make it to the rich people category in a matter of a few years. In addition, there are few interesting people from the wealthy segment who use their talents to bridge the income gap between the rich and poor.

For example, companies like Microsoft and Google are spending hard-earned money for the betterment of society by investing in child education and infrastructure. If all the organisations and the individuals spend a fraction of their enormous income on the country's infrastructure, education and economic growth, then there are bright chances to fill in the gap of the income difference.

I firmly believe that rich people spending the money on improving the lifestyle of poor people and better government tax policies will increase the chances of closing the income difference between the rich and poor.

Sample 12:

It is true that nowadays rich people are getting even richer and poor people have become poorer, especially in developing countries. This situation has presented a wide variety of problems to the community, and it has negatively affected a country's developments. To tackle these problems, I believe that governments and authorities should take necessary steps and implement laws to improve the living standards of financially poor people.

To begin with, studies have shown that poverty and crimes are correlated owing to the fact that people are committing crimes for earning a living. Furthermore, children of poorer parents are often not able to access higher education even though they may have talents in their studies. As a result, they are not hired for a wealthy job. This means that probably they will live their lives under uncomfortable circumstances and poverty. That will present uncertainty in one country. Moreover, the public health of one country would deteriorate if people in one country are living in extreme poverty.

To tackle these worrying concerns governments should need to do more works to minimising the gap between poorer people and richer people. Firstly, governments should provide financial support for people who are living under uncomfortable financial circumstances. Secondly, governments should ensure the quality of education for all of their citizens. That will definitely help to reduce the poverty as well as increasing the living standards of financially poor families. Finally, developed countries should take more responsibility and efforts to eradicate poverty from the world. These efforts already have been seen in some African countries and that have helped many people to increase their living standards.

To conclude I believe that we as a human everyone has the right to get access to education and quality life. In addition, education is the most useful weapon to fight against poverty. In this sense, governments should ensure the quality of education for all of their citizens. That will certainly help to reduce the gap between richer and poorer people.

Sample 13:

In this day and age, the gap between affluent and destitute is becoming increasingly wider. This surging wave of differences among people leads to some problems, which are elucidated below. However, these are not insurmountable problems if the government takes some suitable measure.

The most significant problem is that the rent of crime will increase because in wretched families both parents should work outdoors and cannot pay enough attention to their children. As a result, these kids will grow up in an improper way and almost all of them are serious dangers for society in the future. In addition, these poor families always think that wealthy families spoil their rights and so they want to revenge with theft or harshness from them.

The next problem in this situation is that illiteracy will be common since the needy cannot afford the cost of education. Therefore, their future becomes blurred as they do not get a quality education. This deprivation (lack of education) causes their tendency to lawlessness and violence to become more common.

As for the problems mentioned above, there are some solutions that can be taken to reduce the problems. Firstly, governments should impose a heavy tax on affluent persons and spend this gain money for improving the destitute lives. Also, governments can prepare the facilities of education, free of charge for poor children.

In conclusion, today it is apparent that the gap between poor and wealthy is dramatic. However, this situation should not be ignored because it creates some serious problems such as a surging rate of crime and illiteracy. The government can reduce this gap with some proper measures by taking prudent decisions.

Sample 14:

It is true that the gap between those who are rich and poor is becoming greater in many parts of the world. While economic inequality can cause several problems, there are solutions that can be adopted to tackle these issues.

To begin with, the increasing gap between rich and poor people might bring about some negative consequences. Firstly, this can lead to great disparities in the level of health care and education services that people can access. For example, while young people who come from wealthy families can afford to study abroad, poorer ones tend to find it harder to approach high quality education. As a result, life seems unfair for individuals who live below the poverty line. Secondly, since impoverished people are getting relatively poorer compared to others in society, it is more difficult for them to cover their basic needs such as needs for food or accommodation. Therefore, they could be more likely to be involved in crimes such as robberies or burglaries, which leads to higher crime rates.

Fortunately, there are some effective solutions to these problems. The first one would be to provide special educational opportunities for people coming from an impoverished background. For instance, universities can offer grants for poor students, which helps these students become competent workers in the future and earn a living. Additionally, the government should apply tax and pension systems which favour poor citizens. To be specific, those who earn more money should be required to pay higher tax than others. This would help minimise economic inequality in society.

In conclusion, while greater disparities between rich and poor people can contribute to several issues, there are some good measures that can be taken to deal with these problems.

Sample 15:

Nowadays, wealth disparity is a common phenomenon, and this issue tends to worsen as the gap between the haves and have-nots is being increasingly widened. In the following essay, the consequences of this problem will be examined, and some measures will be suggested with a view to resolving it.

There are various challenges that wealth inequality can pose to the development of a nation. Firstly, this issue can fuel social unrest and political instability, as the poor may feel indignant with the concentrated material power of the rich, as well as the government’s favoritism towards them. To illustrate, the Poor’s People Campaign, a political demonstration, was held by the American lower classes in 1968 to aggressively call for the authorities' solutions to the lack of basic needs among them. Secondly, most of the disadvantaged do not have sufficient access to quality medical and educational services. Thus, the mortality and unemployment rates among this group have risen considerably in recent years, placing a burden on the economic progress of a country.

Taking the above problems into account, a variety of measures should be taken by the governing bodies to curb the increase in wealth inequality. Most obviously, they can raise the taxes incurred by the upper classes and subsequently invest these huge sums of money in upgrading the public infrastructure, such as public transportation and sewage treatment facilities, which serves the masses. Furthermore, numerous social welfare programs could be introduced to help the people in need with free healthcare assistance, hygienic water and food provision together with access to formal education. If these solutions are extensively and properly applied, the living standards of the underprivileged will likely be significantly improved, contributing to a narrowed gap between them and the wealthy in society.

In conclusion, wealth disparity can lead to several problems in relation to social instability and shortages of basic life needs among the poor. In order to address these issues, the authorities could impose increased taxes on the upper classes’ income and conduct more social welfare programs aimed at the disadvantaged.

Sample 16:

The increasing gap between affluent and destitute people causes a grave issue for the nation’s development these days. This is mainly due to inflation which can be tackled by spreading awareness by the government and reducing the amount of tax from the backward individual.

Commencing with there are a plethora of reasons why poor people are becoming poor. First and foremost, inflation makes it challenging for backward people rather than rich people. This is because it is arduous for poorer people in order to cater for their daily requirements, and due to this, underprivileged masses have become victims of inflation. They spend their whole income to fulfil their needs. Take epitome as an example, which shows the gap between poor and rich people is increasing daily as poorer people expend their whole income daily. As a result, it is a destructive development for the development of mankind.

In order to tackle this problem, the administration should commence an awareness program to decrease the amount of poverty, which can be beneficial not solely for the development of the nation but also fruitful for the holistic development of mankind. Besides this, the authority should eliminate the tax amount from underprivileged people for growth because this individual can preserve it for the future. Also, poorer people become affluent. For instance, lawmakers should reduce the amount of tax on people to reduce the gap between rich and poorer people. Consequently, it is beneficial and brings drastic improvement in individual life.

Having concluded, although it is detrimental for the regime to reduce the tax burden, this constructive approach can easily reduce the gap between poorer and rich people.

Sample 17:

The gap between the wealthy and the destitute is getting wider in recent time as the rich people are getting wealthier while the poor are suffering even more. This essay discusses the problems that might arise due to this ever-widening gap between poor and rich, and solutions that could resolve the poverty problems to a great extent.

The extensive differences in social classes could cause many severe problems for a country. When the elites get richer and the low-income people get poorer, crime, inequality and violence rate increase significantly. This issue could be a threat to the country's sovereignty and stability as there might be widespread protests and riots. One of the examples is the French Revolution that was primarily caused by social and economic discriminations. During the Revolution, the gap between the rich and the poor was extensive, and it had caused the unstoppable riot. The gap is responsible for bringing political instability and dissatisfaction among the mass people. It hinders the progress of the country as well.

The government could take numerous initiatives to resolve the issue and alleviate poverty. Firstly, the authority should make proper regulations in terms of business practice and create more job opportunities. Any monopoly and nepotism in important sectors should not be allowed. Secondly, the government must provide subsidies for low-income people. The fund for these subsidies could be allocated from income tax collected from the rich people and larger organisations. With the subsidies and job opportunities, it is hoped that the poor classes could improve their economic conditions.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that the majority of global resources are controlled by a fraction of the population, and this could become a serious threat to most countries. Creating more jobs and eliminating corruption could be effective measures to address the poverty problems.

Sample 1:

Competition in sport can play an important role in a teenager’s development. However, we must be careful as this can have both positive and negative effects on the child and people disagree about which is the most significant.

Initially, let’s think about the reasons why teenagers benefit from competition in sports. On the one hand, sport is a great way to reduce stress and focus the mind away from lessons. Furthermore, a little competition can help teenagers to focus more and give them a reason to perform better. In addition, when playing in teams, these sports help teenagers learn team-building skills and can improve their physical well-being, which is a really important benefit.

On the other hand, competitive sports can also cause problems for individuals if people feel that when they lose, they fail. This is clearly unsatisfactory and may cause serious issues with confidence. It is certain that this pressure makes sport less fun and means teenagers do not want to take part. Although being part of a team can be enjoyable, some people cannot perform as well as others and they may feel isolated from other team members. This can be a serious concern for teenagers who want to fit in with others around them.

To sum up, there are good arguments on both sides. While competitive sports can play a useful role in developing a teenager, it is important that sports are monitored to ensure individuals do not feel pressured or stressed when playing. It is important that young people understand the value of competition and that even if they fail, they feel that they have achieved something.

Sample 2:

Sports nowadays have become an integral part of the young generation. In this regard, some people believe that it is wiser to take it hand in hand with education while some argue schools are meant only for academic studies. In this essay, both these views will be discussed, and a conclusion will be drawn.

The benefits of including sports in the school curriculum are tremendous. A child spends most of his/her time in his school and the attributes inculcated to him/her at this time shapes his future. Sports make him/her healthy, boost confidence, enhance the spirit to win and develop the quality to work hard in competition. Moreover, only academic studies might prove to be monotonous for a kid, so the sports break will prove to be relaxing and refreshing. Furthermore, not all the students in a class desire to become doctors or engineers, some might aspire to be sports stars as well. In this case, the school learning would be justifiable for all.

On the contrary, some debate that academic learning only needs to be focused in school. In accordance with them, sports act as distractors as a result of which the young ones might fail in their examination. Additionally, they believe kids can play games at home while they are off school or on vacations and schools need to use all their time on teaching subjects that will help them get better jobs in the future. Similarly, in the developing or underdeveloped countries, where there is no scope of games, investment of time and money on them might prove to be worthless.

Finally, I would like to conclude that although there are cons of playing games at schools, their pros dare not be underestimated. Therefore, appropriate sports must be included in a child’s curriculum taking studies simultaneously.

Sample 3:

The debate surrounding the impact of competitive sports on teenagers' education is multifaceted, with arguments for both its beneficial and detrimental effects. This essay posits that while competitive sports offer valuable life lessons and physical benefits, they must be balanced with academic pursuits to ensure a holistic development.

Proponents of competitive sports ardently argue that these activities instill crucial discipline, teamwork, and resilience in teenagers, essential for both personal development and academic success. Engaging in sports demands a significant commitment to consistent training, punctuality, and cooperation with teammates, closely mirroring the skills indispensable for academic achievement. A notable study by the Youth Sports Trust revealed that students engaged in organized sports exhibited superior time management skills, directly correlating with enhanced academic performance. Furthermore, the rigorous physical activity involved in sports significantly promotes mental well-being, effectively reducing stress and anxiety levels, which in turn, bolsters teenagers’ concentration and focus, thus markedly improving their academic pursuits.

Conversely, critics of competitive sports emphasize the potential risks of these activities overshadowing academic responsibilities. They caution that the intense pressure to excel in sports may result in an excessive allocation of time towards training and competitions, consequently diminishing valuable study time. A pertinent example is the observed increase in dropout rates among student-athletes who face the daunting challenge of balancing their sporting and academic commitments. Moreover, the acute focus on achieving victory can engender an atmosphere of unhealthy competitiveness, inducing stress and potentially culminating in burnout. This environment not only negatively impacts students’ educational achievements but also their mental health, thus casting a shadow over the overall benefits of engaging in competitive sports for teenagers.

In conclusion, competitive sports can be a double-edged sword in the context of teenagers' education. While they offer significant advantages in developing essential life skills and promoting physical health, it is crucial to maintain a balance with academic responsibilities. A structured approach that integrates sports and education can provide a framework for nurturing well-rounded individuals, prepared for the challenges of the future.

Sample 4:

The discourse on whether competitive sports positively or negatively influence teenagers' educational journey is ongoing. This essay advocates the notion that, despite potential drawbacks, competitive sports play a pivotal role in fostering essential life skills, which, when balanced with academic pursuits, contribute significantly to a teenager's holistic development.

Firstly, competitive sports serve as a fertile ground for nurturing time management and leadership skills, virtues paramount in the realm of academia. Participation in sports demands rigorous scheduling, which inadvertently teaches students the art of balancing their academic responsibilities with extracurricular activities. An exemplar of this is the initiative by the International Olympic Committee to integrate sports with education, thereby producing athletes who excel both on the field and in their studies. This synergy between sports and education underscores the capacity of sports to enhance cognitive skills, such as strategic thinking and problem-solving, which are transferable to academic success.

However, detractors argue that the emphasis on competitive sports can inadvertently eclipse the importance of academics, potentially leading to an imbalance that might negatively impact academic performance. Critics specifically point to the concerning phenomenon of sports-induced academic negligence, where an overwhelming zeal to excel in sports significantly diverts attention and resources away from essential scholarly duties. Yet, this perspective somewhat hastily overlooks the substantial potential for carefully structured sports programs. These programs, if designed with a keen emphasis on achieving a harmonious equilibrium between sports involvement and academic commitments, can play a pivotal role in mitigating the risks associated with academic neglect. Through such balanced programs, students are encouraged not only to pursue athletic excellence but also to prioritize and excel in their academic endeavors, ensuring a comprehensive development framework.

In conclusion, while the concerns regarding the overshadowing of academics by competitive sports are valid, the incorporation of well-structured sports programs into the educational curriculum can foster a conducive environment for the holistic development of teenagers. By instilling discipline, teamwork, and strategic thinking, competitive sports complement academic pursuits, preparing students for multifaceted success in their future endeavours.

Sample 5:

Competitive sports have been a topic of debate, with some arguing that they have positive effects on teenagers' education while others claim the opposite. In this essay, I will explore both perspectives and provide my own opinion. I believe that participating in competitive sports can be highly beneficial, as it helps build endurance, improve communication skills, and promote physical fitness. However, it is also important to consider potential negative impacts, such as decreased self-esteem, injury, and stress.

Some argue that participating in competitive sports can engender a myriad of complications, including diminished self-esteem and increased susceptibility to injuries. The pressure to outperform others may erode the confidence and motivation of adolescents, potentially leading to a decline in their sense of self-worth. Furthermore, the undue stress and pressure associated with these competitive events may engender detrimental psychological ramifications, potentially giving rise to mental health disorders. Additionally, injuries are an inescapable aspect of engaging in competitive sports, and as a consequence, students may be required to undergo protracted periods of recuperation, thereby disrupting their academic pursuits.

Conversely, the paramount advantage of engaging in competitive sports lies in the opportunity for students to develop resilience and fortitude. In their quest for achievement, individuals must persevere and continuously hone their skills. To vanquish their adversaries, students must surpass the level of dedication exhibited by their competitors. Moreover, collaborating with teammates necessitates effective communication, a fundamental component of triumph in any contest. Competitive sports provide students with an invaluable opportunity to cultivate and refine their communication skills, as well as to enhance their physical prowess, muscular strength, and overall health.

In conclusion, despite potential adverse consequences correlated with competitive sports, such as diminished self-worth, physical injuries, and heightened stress, the overarching implications for adolescents are largely beneficial, fostering enhanced stamina, honing interpersonal communication abilities, and bolstering overall physical well-being.

Sample 6:

Competitive sports, an integral component of the education of teenagers, can elicit spirited debates. Advocates insist they yield significant benefits, while critics highlight potential harm. In my analysis, I'll examine both viewpoints, providing insights on the salubrious and detrimental impacts of competitive sports on adolescent education.

Competitive sports are instrumental in cultivating resilience, a key attribute in the personal development of teenagers. The relentless pursuit of victory necessitates consistent effort, honing the ability to endure challenges. Moreover, success in these sports isn't a solitary endeavour; it demands seamless coordination and communication among team members. This facilitates the development of effective communication skills, a vital competency for success in various life arenas. Furthermore, competitive sports have a positive effect on physical education, providing an avenue for comprehensive conditioning, contributing to overall health and well-being, muscular strength, and cardiovascular fitness.

However, the darker side of competitive sports can't be ignored. An unfavourable performance could precipitate a decline in self-esteem and motivation, creating psychological obstacles in a teenager's personal growth journey. Additionally, the constant pressure to excel might breed unhealthy levels of stress, potentially leading to mental health issues such as anxiety and depression. Physical injuries, an inherent risk in sports, can also disrupt a student's academic life due to extended periods of recovery.

In summary, while competitive sports may catalyze potential pitfalls including diminished self-esteem, physical injuries, and increased stress levels, their overall impact on the education of teenagers is predominantly beneficial. They play a vital role in fostering resilience, nurturing communication skills, and promoting physical health. The holistic development offered by these sports prepares teenagers for the diverse challenges that lie beyond the school environment, equipping them with a robust set of skills for life.

Sample 1:

Opinions diverge on whether governments should invest funds in exploring other planets to secure a new home for humans or concentrate on resolving pressing issues on our own planet. This essay will examine both perspectives and then advocate for the latter argument.

On one side, those supporting government funding for the exploration of the universe may have a compelling argument. They may contend that discovering habitable planets beyond our solar system is crucial for the survival of the human race. Moreover, proponents assert that space exploration can yield various benefits for humanity, including technological advancements, scientific discoveries, and potential economic growth. Additionally, our planet is currently grappling with major challenges such as climate change, overpopulation, and resource depletion, and seeking an alternative habitat is seen as a plausible solution.

However, I am of the opinion that the government should prioritize addressing the problems on Earth before delving into space. Firstly, while space exploration holds the potential for scientific and technological advancements, it is not without risks. The hazards of space travel, such as radiation exposure, equipment malfunctions, and the possibility of accidents, should not be overlooked. Resources earmarked for mitigating these risks could be more effectively allocated to tackling issues on Earth, such as climate change, pollution, and deforestation. Secondly, space exploration demands a significant investment of resources, and the funds allocated could be more judiciously used to address more pressing concerns like poverty, hunger, and disease.

In conclusion, although both perspectives have merits, I firmly believe that the government should focus more on addressing the tangible issues that human populations face. Through strategic investments in education, healthcare, and social welfare programs, we can enhance the quality of life for people on Earth and ensure access to necessities.

Sample 2:

The allocation of government funds has been a topic of ongoing debate. Some argue that resources should be directed towards space exploration and the search for extraterrestrial life, while others believe that addressing terrestrial issues should be the priority. I personally lean towards the latter view, believing that our main focus should be on resolving Earth’s problems.

On the one hand, proponents of space exploration argue that it is essential for the advancement of human knowledge. The potential discovery of life on other planets could revolutionize human understanding of biology and the universe, challenging existing theories of evolution and offering insights into the adaptability of life forms in extreme conditions. Moreover, the technological innovations required for such exploration often have practical applications on our planet. The development of GPS technology serves as a prime example, which was initially designed for space missions but is now used by millions of people around the world for navigation.

On the other hand, critics argue that immediate concerns such as climate change, poverty, and healthcare should be prioritized as they have direct and immediate impacts on human well-being. Redirecting the billions of dollars allocated to Mars missions, for instance, towards renewable energy projects or healthcare infrastructure could yield immense societal benefits, contributing to an improved quality of life globally. Another reason for their objection is the morality of investing substantially in space exploration when many individuals are still enduring hardship. They argue that governments have a responsibility to prioritize the well-being of most citizens over speculative endeavors that might benefit only a small fraction of the population.

In conclusion, while the search for life on other planets can bring about groundbreaking discoveries, I firmly believe that it is more important to focus on solving the problems of our own planet to ensure a sustainable and thriving future.

Sample 3:

Opinions diverge on whether the state should finance the search for extraterrestrial life or alternatively, other pressing global issues are of more considerable concern. This essay will discuss both notions and explain why I believe that the funds are more justifiably utilised to mitigate pressing issues on Earth.

Proponents of investing in the search for outer-space civilisations cite two of its feasible benefits. The foremost one is that this may foster breakthroughs in many scientific realms which are conducive to the development of humankind. For example, the launching of spacecraft for interplanetary exploration can facilitate other practical applications of satellite technologies. Moreover, this activity can serve as a powerful diplomatic tool as many nations around the world can share their insights and manpower to cooperate toward a mutual goal, instilling a sense of shared responsibility and promoting peace.

However, critics argue that there are more thorny issues that necessitate pecuniary resources. First of all, many societal matters, such as starvation, or inadequate healthcare, require a substantial amount of financial investment from governments. Therefore, the diversion of the state budget to the exorbitantly expensive discovery of cosmic life forms may render insufficient funding to mitigate these challenges. Furthermore, several environmental problems, including climate change due to greenhouse gas effects, can threaten the survival of human beings. Consequently, governments should allot money to the research of eco-friendly technologies and renewable sources of energy instead of the investigation of the vague presence of alien territories.

In conclusion, I concede that the merits of delving into the signs of other galactic existence are somewhat promising to the provision of novel knowledge and the unity of humanity toward a collective endeavour of conquering the universe. However, I contend that they are very uncertain and earthly well-being should be prioritised since numerous social and natural issues pose more direct threats to mankind. If possible, only developed nations should spend money on this development while emerging ones should only focus on their immediate needs.

Sample 4:

The search for extraterrestrial life has been a topic of discussion and debate for many years. While some people believe that using taxpayer funds to find life on other planets is essential, others see it as a poor use of public money.

Those who believe in the importance of searching for extraterrestrial life argue that this is an opportunity to answer one of the biggest questions in science and human history: are we alone in the universe? They also believe that such a search will have tremendous scientific and technological benefits, including the development of new instruments, techniques, and methods of exploration that can be used for other purposes. Moreover, the discovery of extraterrestrial life, even if only in the form of microbial organisms, would have a profound impact on our understanding of the universe and the origin of life itself.

That said, I personally hold the view that though such research is important, the money spent on this should be balanced against other important needs and should not come at the expense of other critical programs. There are many pressing issues on our own planet that require funding, such as the major problems of poverty, hunger, disease, and environmental degradation. These are all urgent issues that affect millions of people around the world. We need to be mindful of the limited resources available to us and make sure that they are used in a responsible and effective manner.

In conclusion, the search for extraterrestrial life is an important and fascinating endeavour, but it must be balanced against other critical needs. The investment in this area should be used wisely and effectively, taking into account the benefits and limitations of the research, and should not be to the detriment of other important programs.

Sample 5:

Many people think that the field of astronomy should be invested for the quest for a new homeland. Although I do accept the argument for this idea, I believe that it is a waste of money and solving the problem in our home planet should be the first priority.

The first reason why governments should pour more money into space exploration and research lies in an anticipation that the Earth would not be able to sustain human lives. The problem of over-exploited natural resources and environmental damages are becoming insurmountable to deal with. Therefore, finding a potential backup is not simply an option. Another reason is that secondary uses of technology in space research as spin-offs could be used to solve problems on earth. For example, the satellite technology in space research has been used in data collection and analysis of the climate change.

However, I think space discovery is a waste as space shifts, researching projects or astronauts training fee is extravagant while the success of discovering alternative planets could not be guaranteed despite many years since the first steps of humans on the Moon or after centuries of watching the universe. In contrast, this money should be spent to improve the living environment on Earth. The degradation of the Earth is such a long-term process that we still have time to regenerate our current home. If so, human survival will not be threatened, and regenerating the Earth could be more promising than leaving it.

In conclusion, there are reasons behind the investment in search of living planets, but it seems to be wasted money. I think that the regeneration of the Earth is a better option.

Sample 6:

In the contemporary debate regarding governmental budget allocation, two contrasting perspectives have emerged: one advocating for the exploration of extraterrestrial life, and the other opposing it due to pressing terrestrial concerns. This essay will examine both viewpoints before articulating a reasoned stance.

Proponents of space exploration argue that the search for life beyond Earth could yield groundbreaking discoveries, potentially revolutionizing our understanding of the universe. For instance, in Vietnam, advancements in technology and knowledge gained from such endeavors could spur innovation in various sectors, enhancing the nation's global standing. This viewpoint holds that the potential benefits of discovering extraterrestrial life are monumental, possibly leading to unprecedented scientific breakthroughs. However, this argument overlooks the immediate challenges faced by humanity. The investment in space research, often seen as a long-term gamble, diverts resources from addressing urgent issues such as poverty and climate change.

Contrastingly, I am inclined to believe that governmental funds should prioritize earthly problems. Although the quest for extraterrestrial knowledge is fascinating, the immediate needs of our planet cannot be sidelined. In Vietnam, for instance, allocating funds towards improving infrastructure, healthcare, and education can have a tangible impact on the quality of life. This approach not only addresses the immediate needs of the populace but also lays a strong foundation for future generations. It is imperative that governments focus on sustainable development, ensuring that resources are utilized where they are most needed.

In conclusion, while the exploration of other planets holds the allure of the unknown and the potential for significant scientific advancements, it is crucial to address the myriad challenges that plague our world today. The allocation of funds towards improving living conditions and solving pressing issues on Earth should be the priority. It is only by establishing a strong base on our home planet that we can hope to responsibly explore the mysteries of the universe in the future.

Sample 7:

There has been an ongoing concern about how the government should allocate financial resources to facilitate people’s lives. While some assert that it is imperative for the authorities to use money to implement space exploration in search of new life, others believe this is rather impractical, given the unsolved problems on this planet. In this essay, I will elaborate on both views and present my perspective on this debate.

On one hand, it is reasonable for individuals to advocate for the allocation of governmental resources to search for life on other planets, driven by their concerns about the prospects of perpetual life on Earth. Indeed, the swift advancements in human society have induced countless fatal environmental problems.

For example, industrialization in developed countries has caused air pollution and greenhouse effects, damaging the natural habitat of animal species that play a key role in balancing the environment. If this situation prevails, life on Earth inevitably faces the risk of extinction. Therefore, humans need to find new external habitats, and to implement so, financial support from the government is necessary.

On the other hand, opponents of the aforementioned belief underscore the necessity of governmental support to address the remaining issues on Earth, arguing that there are still viable solutions. They believe that technological improvements nowadays can be harnessed to find sustainable approaches; for instance, channeling resources into renewable energy research and development can mitigate the environmental impact of industrialization and help address climate change. Moreover, advancements in medical research and education can contribute to the improvement of healthcare systems, enhancing the quality of life for millions.

From my perspective, while the quest for interplanetary exploration is undoubtedly valuable, a balanced approach is crucial. Governments should prioritise addressing pressing issues on Earth, allocating resources to improve environmental quality and combat climate change. However, a portion of funding could still be dedicated to scientific exploration, including space missions, as this pursuit may yield valuable insights and technologies that could benefit both Earth and potential future space exploration projects.

In conclusion, both sides of the argument are valid, but I believe a balanced approach from the government is crucial to address issues on Earth and support space missions looking for new life.

Sample 8:

According to some people, the government should not spend money on space exploration. I agree with this view. In my opinion, there are other areas that need public spending. Also, space exploration is not crucial for the development of a country.

Of course, there are some benefits to investing in space research. It helps us to learn more about the universe we are a part of. Also, there is a possibility that some space missions may find life on other planets. We may also be able to find other inhabitable planets. Since population growth is leading to a resource crunch on planet earth, finding another planet that can sustain life is in the larger interest of the whole humanity.

On the other hand, there is no guarantee that we will find another planet that we can colonize. It is a mere possibility, and it may take hundreds or thousands of years before we actually manage to achieve it. Hence, spending public money on such projects is unlikely to offer much in return at the moment. What’s more, there are several other pressing needs on earth that need immediate resolution. For example, millions of people still do not have access to potable water or education. Even today, thousands of people die in war and conflicts almost every day. It is foolish to spend money on space programmes before addressing these issues. Actually, making our planet more livable is much better than finding another planet to live on.

In conclusion, although outer space exploration projects help us to learn more about the universe, these projects are not crucial for the development of a country. Moreover, public money should be spent on more pressing issues like healthcare and education because they directly impact the public.

Sample 9:

Many countries are spending money to find out if there are living conditions in space. While this may be useful to us in the future, some people believe that this is not a priority. They believe that there are more pressing problems on Earth that need the governments’ attention. Although I support the second argument, this essay shall throw light on both.

The main reason for finding life on other planets is to find natural resources that are useful for us to survive, like water. This is being done because the natural resources on Earth are depleting, and the remaining ones are being polluted by humankind. Another motive behind searching for life on other planets is that if the population rises to an uncontrollable extent in the future, we would have the facility to accommodate people on other planets as well. For example, if we are able to successfully build a colony in space where humans can live with similar natural resources like on Earth, we won’t have to worry about the resources being less as compared to the population. Nevertheless, it is important to mention that the problems of natural resources being scarce and population rise are man-made. Therefore, they can be solved.

The amount of money already spent on space research is in billions. However, it has achieved considerably little when we compare the amount of money on space exploration spent and the results that we’ve got. To be specific, we have still not been able to find any other planet in our Solar System that houses the same conditions as Earth does. All the succeeding space projects would require more money, and it would result in increasing the burden on taxpayers. It would be better if this same money can be allocated to solving immediate problems like global warming, world hunger, poverty, illiteracy, or finding cures for deadly diseases. Working towards these problems would at least have a direct effect on the population.

To conclude, while finding life on other planets would be a huge achievement for humankind, the Earth still has problems that first need to be solved. I support the opinion that right now the governments’ main priority should be to find an answer to the current problems that people are facing.

Sample 10:

Every year governments of rich nations spend billions of dollars on exploration of space and extra-terrestrial life. Considering the problems on earth, this expenditure on space programmes has become a highly debatable topic. Some people are in favour of investing time and money in search for life beyond earth. Others, however, feel that this money should be used for improving the quality of life on earth. In my opinion, space research is an investment for our future generations. Definitely, pressing problems like famine, illiteracy, unemployment, poverty and many more deserve attention. Sincere efforts at a national and global level are required to solve them.

It is certainly true that space research is an expensive affair. In my view, the ultimate objective of searching for extra-terrestrial life is to find a new home for humans. If we look at the exploitation of resources like land, water and fossil fuels etc., it is possible that our earth will not be able to sustain the pressure of rising population. Exploring space is therefore paramount for a sustainable future. If we look for life beyond earth, we can come across fascinating discoveries such as planets that can be our future motherland.

Coming to the current issues on earth, the biggest problem is the unfettered growth of global population which has crossed the mark of 7.5 billion. Fulfilling the basic needs such as food, accommodation, and education etc. of their citizens is a herculean task for the governments of underdeveloped and developing countries. Climate change, pollution and terrorism are some other major global problems. Unquestionably, handling these problems is as important as finding life beyond earth.

To sum up, spending money in search for extra-terrestrial life is vital. It should not be viewed as a waste of money.