Câu hỏi:
05/01/2025 151Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
The debate on whether teenagers should focus on all subjects equally or concentrate only on subjects they find interesting has been ongoing for years. This essay will discuss both views and explain my opinion.
Proponents of the idea that teenagers should study all subjects equally argue that this approach provides students with a well-rounded education. By exploring a diverse range of subjects, students gain a broad knowledge base, develop critical thinking skills, and enhance their problem-solving abilities. Moreover, focusing on all subjects equally can help students develop essential life skills. For example, studying mathematics can improve logical thinking and decision-making, while studying literature can foster empathy and creativity. By exploring a wide range of subjects, students can cultivate a range of skills that will serve them well throughout their lives.
On the other hand, supporters of the idea that students should concentrate on subjects they find interesting argue that this approach fosters a passion for learning and increases motivation. When students are genuinely interested in a subject, they are more likely to engage deeply with the material, leading to improved understanding and retention. Furthermore, focusing on subjects of interest may lead to higher academic performance and better career prospects. By dedicating time and effort to subjects they are passionate about, students can excel in those areas, improving their chances of securing scholarships, admission to prestigious universities, or employment in their chosen field.
In conclusion, there are valid arguments for both sides of the debate. In my opinion, teenagers should be encouraged to explore a diverse range of subjects to develop a broad knowledge base and essential life skills. Although delving deeper into subjects that genuinely interest them has its benefits, a well-rounded education will produce well-rounded individuals, people whom society desperately needs right now.
Sample 2:
Opinions differ as to whether teenagers should pay equal attention to all subjects or only focus on the ones in which they are interested. Personally, I believe it is important to strike a balance between the two views.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why teenagers should focus on all subjects equally. First, all subjects have some value and can contribute to a well-rounded education. Science subjects like maths or physics strengthen students’ logical thinking abilities and teach them about the mechanisms of the world, while art subjects such as literature and music enhance their creativity and language skills and foster their emotions. All these aspects are crucial to any person’s adult life. Second, teenagers are still young and may not know what they are interested in yet, so it is important to expose them to different subjects.
On the other hand, teenagers can also reap several benefits when solely concentrating on subjects they find interesting. The first one is that teenagers are more likely to be motivated to learn if they are interested in the subject matter. This can help them develop a deeper understanding and expertise in whatever subjects they focus on. In addition, focusing on what is most interesting to the individual is more efficient, as everyone’s time and energy are limited. If teenagers have to split up their time between too many subjects, including those they may not like, they may not have enough resources to perform well and achieve their desired results.
In conclusion, it is important to make sure that teenagers are exposed to a variety of subjects, and that they have a basic understanding of important topics that may not be immediately interesting to them. However, they should also be encouraged to pursue their interests and passions, which can lead to better academic performance and a more positive attitude towards learning.
Sample 3:
Some individuals suggest that teenagers should give equal attention to all subjects, while others argue that they should prioritize the subjects that they find most engaging. While there are advantages to both views, I believe that teenagers should focus on all subjects equally.
On the one hand, allowing students to decide what they want to learn shows respect for individual freedom and therefore leads to greater engagement and understanding of the subject. When a topic piques their interest, teenagers are more likely to engage with the material and achieve a deeper grasp as well as better academic performance. For instance, a student with a strong interest in literature is inclined to read more books, analyze them in detail, and perhaps even compose essays on the topics they raise. Such interest and enthusiasm can blossom into a lifelong passion for learning, which will undoubtedly bring about far-reaching advantages in a person’s life.
While it is essential for young people to be permitted to pursue their interests, it is also necessary for them to receive a well-rounded education. Studying multiple courses can help students identify their strengths and weaknesses, enabling them to pursue future education and career prospects that match their interests and abilities. For instance, a student who succeeds in math and physics could develop a passion for engineering or technology, whereas a student who excels in languages and social sciences might discover a calling in law or public service. Additionally, a well-rounded education may assist young people develop a broader perspective on the world, leading to better empathy and understanding for various perspectives. This is particularly essential in today’s globalized society, where cross-cultural communication and cooperation are becoming increasingly critical.
In conclusion, although there are reasonable arguments on both sides of the debate, I believe that young people should devote equal time to all subjects.
Sample 4:
These days, many people are divided over the breadth of subjects that students should focus on at school. While some believe that only a few ones relevant to the learner’s interest deserve attention, others support showing equal diligence across as many subjects as possible. In this debate, I favor a less extensive approach, as it is going to result in the best learning outcome.
The reasons for a student to pay equal attention to all disciplines at school vary. Firstly, by adopting such a method, the learner may be able to develop a full spectrum of knowledge. This becomes a tremendous asset in some sectors, such as finance, where professionals may need to exert their management and mathematical abilities, among many. A universal focus, furthermore, has been utilized in past societies to educate the elite stratum. Throughout history, young aristocrats had to learn philosophy, history, arts, mathematics, and equestrianism, for instance, to become proper members of the ruling class. This extensive approach, albeit old-fashioned, was proven to produce generations of rulers who watched over their clans and nations alike.
However, letting students choose what few subjects to focus on seems more sensible. Such a learning method helps to make studying less mentally taxing for schoolgoers, no matter the age. With the extensive approach, students may be subject to burnout, whereas more perceptive ones are bound to feel discouraged. When they go with the knowledge that intrigues them, instead of attempting to cover everything, studying would likely remain joyful and stimulating. Additionally, a limited focus like this would enable students to quickly develop their expertise. The fact that doctors and professors would usually specialize in a definite area of academic research clearly proves this assertion.
The aforementioned points lead me to believe in the value of focusing solely on subjects that the academic learner finds engaging. Adopting such a learning strategy is likely to keep studying refreshing while staving off boredom, and hence, students would be able to accomplish the most out of learning.
Sample 5:
In the education system, there are two opposing views regarding the focus of teenagers on subjects they study. Some people believe that teenagers should strike a balance between academic subjects while others argue that they should spend more time on those they find interesting. In this essay, I will explore the topic from both perspectives and then express my own opinion on this matter.
On the one hand, it is my contention that high school kids should put equal effort into all subjects. The rationale behind this belief is that having a broad knowledge base is important for teenagers, as it helps them to understand the world around them. In fact, the curriculum for secondary education is structured mostly around the fundamentals of core areas of knowledge and hence focusing on only a few ones may limit teenagers’ perception of the natural and social world, as well as prevent them from developing a well-rounded education. To illustrate this point, imagine teachers letting a school kid off the bulk of math knowledge just because he takes no interest in that field. The implications of this for his later life would be wider when it comes to tasks that need basic calculations like paying taxes or sorting out his personal financial matters.
On the other hand, some people argue that teenagers should concentrate on only those subjects in which they find pleasure. One argument is that teenagers are more likely to succeed in their studies if they are passionate about what they are learning. For instance, if a child is spotted with an innate sense of music, then in order for it to be nurtured, he must be allowed to devote himself to it. Meanwhile, it is believed that when students are forced to study subjects that they do not enjoy, they are less likely to engage with the material and more likely to become disinterested in their studies, leading to ineffective knowledge acquisition.
In conclusion, the debate over whether teenagers should focus on all subjects equally or only those that they find interesting is a complex one. While there are valid arguments on both sides, I still believe that students should be encouraged to study a wide range of subjects in order for them to be well-equipped for their later life.
Sample 6:
Some assert that adolescents should prioritise all disciplines equally, while others state that they should focus on subjects they are interested in and excel at. This essay will elaborate on both perspectives and the reasons why I lean towards the former.
On the one hand, paying attention to their favourite subjects can be beneficial to students to some extent. The first reason is that it can develop a passion for learning. More specifically, they are motivated to explore in-depth knowledge about the subject in lieu of being unsatisfied if they are forced to learn something they are not keen on. A student who struggles with maths might become frustrated when attempting the assigned homework, and therefore approach other disciplines with a negative mindset, reducing their potential and outcomes in all parts of the curriculum. Therefore, enabling students to study with their favourite disciples can act as a motive for them to reach their full potential and achieve better learning outcomes. Furthermore, this practice potentially helps adolescents identify their career interests. This is because they are more likely to realise their aptitude for certain areas of expertise, encouraging them to pursue a job related to their favourite subject in the future.
On the other hand, opponents consider devoting equal focus to all subjects is wiser due to several reasons. Chief of these is that this approach provides a well-rounded education. By learning a variety of subjects, teenagers can develop a broad knowledge base and a range of skills, facilitating comprehensive development. To illustrate, logical thinking acquired during maths lessons and critical thinking fostered by literature are prerequisites to fostering nuanced problem-solving skills, allowing them to better tackle real-life difficulties they encounter. Another appealing justification is that studying different subjects can help students identify their strengths and weaknesses. Thus, they can develop critical thinking skills, promote their advantages and improve on their disadvantages to become better versions of themselves.
In conclusion, although both viewpoints are justifiable, I contend that it is more crucial to place emphasis on all subjects for comprehensive education and self-improvement. It is advisable that teenagers should plan to allocate their time to different disciplines equally to become knowledgeable, well-rounded individuals.
Sample 7:
The debate over the most effective educational focus for teenagers is a complex and nuanced issue. On one side, some argue for a specialized approach, encouraging students to concentrate on subjects that spark their interest. On the other, there is a call for a broad-based curriculum, advocating for equal attention across all subjects. This essay aims to explore both perspectives, ultimately arguing in favor of a comprehensive educational strategy that equips students for a rapidly evolving world.
Proponents of focusing on interesting subjects argue that motivation is a key factor in educational success. When teenagers are allowed to concentrate on areas, they find fascinating, their intrinsic motivation skyrockets, leading to better engagement and a deeper understanding of the subject matter. This approach not only makes learning more enjoyable but also fosters a sense of competence and confidence in students, as they are more likely to excel in areas, they are passionate about.
However, the argument for a well-rounded education is compelling for several reasons. Firstly, a broad curriculum fosters a well-rounded knowledge base, which is essential for critical thinking and adaptability. In an era marked by rapid technological advancements and shifting job markets, these skills are invaluable. Students exposed to a wide range of subjects are better prepared to connect disparate ideas, think creatively, and adapt to new challenges. This holistic approach also ensures that students develop foundational skills in key areas such as mathematics, science, and language arts, which are crucial for a wide range of careers. The superiority of a comprehensive educational model lies in its ability to prepare students for the realities of a fast-paced and unpredictable world. By balancing depth with breadth, students not only gain expertise in areas of personal interest but also acquire a broad perspective and versatile skill set. This preparation is indispensable, as it enables individuals to navigate complex problems, embrace lifelong learning, and adapt to various career paths over their lifetime.
In conclusion, while specializing in subjects of interest has its merits, the benefits of a well-rounded education cannot be overstated. Focusing on all subjects equally equips teenagers with the critical thinking skills, adaptability, and versatile abilities necessary for success in today's diverse and ever-changing landscape. Therefore, a balanced approach to education, one that fosters depth of knowledge in areas of interest while ensuring a broad-based educational foundation, is crucial for personal and professional growth.
Sample 8:
While some individuals believe that studying all subjects is necessary for a well-rounded education, others argue that it is more beneficial to concentrate on the areas in which children excel. In my opinion, both perspectives are valid since learning all subjects can aid students in obtaining a diverse set of skills, while concentrating on a single subject can facilitate deeper comprehension and analytical abilities.
On the one hand, studying all subjects can help students develop a broad range of skills, such as time management, problem-solving, and communication. Exposure to various subjects can broaden their perspectives and help them appreciate the value of different disciplines. Moreover, in many educational systems, a wide range of subjects is required to progress to higher levels of education. Studying them all can improve a student's chances of success in exams and future academic pursuits. Therefore, proponents of studying all subjects argue that it can lead to well-rounded individuals with diverse skill sets and a better understanding of the world.
On the other hand, some argue that studying all subjects can be overwhelming and lead to a lack of depth in learning. Students may need more time to fully understand and engage with each subject, resulting in surface-level knowledge. In contrast, children can delve deeper into the subject matter by focusing on their strengths and interests, leading to a more profound understanding and critical analysis. Furthermore, this approach can help children build confidence in their abilities and feel more motivated to learn. However, critics of this approach argue that children may miss out on important subjects essential for their future academic and career paths.
In conclusion, while children must have a well-rounded education, it is equally important to let them focus on their interests and strengths.
Sample 9:
In contemporary education systems, there is an ongoing debate about whether teenagers should evenly distribute their attention across all subjects or concentrate solely on those they find most engaging and excel in. Both perspectives have their merits, but I personally lean towards the latter for the reasons below.
On the one hand, supporters of a balanced education contend that it equips teenagers with a versatile skill set crucial for their future endeavors. Proficiency in, for instance, both analytical thinking from science subjects and communication skills from literature would be more beneficial for students to cope with the multifaceted challenges of the modern world, compared to those only adept at either area. Moreover, a well-rounded education could allow teenagers to explore their potential and discover latent talents via exposure to a variety of subjects. As proof, many Vietnamese secondary school students, although initially disinterested in arts, have discovered a passion for it later on through exposure to a balanced curriculum, leading them to pursue a career in a creative field.
On the other hand, proponents of specialization argue that teenagers should be allowed to concentrate on subjects they find most captivating in order to maximize individual potential and productivity. This is because when students are passionate about a particular subject, they are more likely to invest time and effort into mastering it. Specialization can also cultivate expertise, which is increasingly valued in the professional world, leading to greater career opportunities for these individuals. For example, teenagers with a strong inclination towards computer science may benefit significantly from focusing on coding and programming languages. This in-depth knowledge, in turn, can enable them to have lucrative career paths in technology-related fields.
In summary, while a balanced education equips students with a versatile skill set and encourages exploration, I believe that specialization is a finer approach as it would allow students to cultivate their expertise, potentially resulting in greater career opportunities.
Sample 10:
Our education system has evolved in the past few years. Teenagers go to schools to gain knowledge on a variety of subjects. This idea is controversial, and people opine differently. Some people say that students should have the freedom to study the subjects of their choice, whereas others say that equal attention to all the subjects is beneficial. In my opinion, teenagers should learn all the subjects and gain knowledge about each and every discipline in their curriculum.
On one hand, high school curriculum is tailored to teach important subjects such as mathematics, science, English, history, and geography. These act as a foundation for future career applications. Not only are they designed to provide knowledge, but also allow the students to select the subjects that they might wish to take up for higher studies and career opportunities. Moreover, teenagers are not capable enough to make the best decision pertaining to one particular subject that they would want to study in the foreseeable future.
On the other hand, if a student wishes to be selective, it might be beneficial as well. This would let him ensure undivided focus on his choice of subjects and help him build a sound foundation during the formative years. This would provide students with more time and resources to spend on comparatively lesser and more interesting subjects, leading to better results.
According to me, the option of studying all the subjects enables the students to keep their options open and possibly widen their range of interests. To conclude, I would say that it is best for them to study all the subjects and figure out a particular stream or subject at a later stage in life, preferably during higher studies.
Sample 11:
People are divided on the issue of the subjects which teenagers should be required to study. Some believe that these young school goers should be made to study all subjects, whereas others say that they should be given the choice of studying subjects of their interest. This essay shall analyse both perspectives. l, personally side with the former view. I believe that in today's competitive world, a broad knowledge is needed to succeed in any field.
There are many reasons why some people hold the opinion that students should not have to study all the subjects and should be allowed to choose the subjects they want to study. They opine that in this case the students will probably be more enthusiastic about their study. ln addition, if students are forced to study all subjects, they can easily lose interest in education. What is more, if all subjects are compulsory for studying, students will not have enough time to learn all of them properly; therefore, they will be constantly under a lot of pressure.
However, I believe all subjects are of great importance and for the holistic development of the students they need to study all subjects equally at school level. Later on, during admission to colleges, students can select the subjects of their choice and can explore them further. At that age they are mature enough to decide their subjects for themselves. At school level the student may not know what his real interests are.
Furthermore, nowadays, the job market is very demanding and the recruiters select students who are skilled in various fields. Having the basic knowledge of varied subjects during school time definitely widens the horizons for the students. To add to it, it is a well-known fact that most subjects are related to each other in some way or the other. For example, a basic knowledge of mathematics is needed to excel in computer languages. Finally, I believe that it is up to the teachers to develop the interest of the students in any subject. For instance, during my school days, my history teacher was so good that a boring subject like history was the favourite subject of the whole class.
To sum up, it can be said that students should learn all subjects at school level, as they are not mature enough to know their real interests at school level and a broad knowledge is also needed for their holistic development.
Sample 12:
Education plays an inextricable role in deciding what kind of person we become and which career we choose and therefore finding the optimal curriculum has been a perennial debate. Some believe that schools should focus on subjects that can arouse students’ interest, while others assert that adolescents should be exposed to all disciplines evenly. From my perspective, whilst the former approach is highly suitable for talented students, the latter is more appropriate for average ones.
On the one hand, young talents in athletic or artistic fields and gifted students who excel academically should be allowed to concentrate more on subjects that pique their interest. The rationale is that they would be more motivated, engaged, and invested, leading to mastery of their favorite fields. Such talents should also be given permission to study at their own pace due to their faster progress, and since teachers can tailor the curriculum to meet students’ needs, they tend to challenge themselves with trickier tasks in order to achieve their full potential. Vietnam provides an example of this approach, as the country supports elite athletes, artists, and top scholars in prioritizing their preferred subjects during their teenage years.
Most ordinary students, on the other hand, should be exposed to all disciplines equally, thereby enabling them to gain a comprehensive understanding of the world. By combining this approach with appropriate career guidance, students can gain a better understanding of their strengths and weaknesses, which can lead to greater self-confidence and improved decision-making when it comes to career choices. Another compelling point is that these students can develop transferable skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication by understanding how different disciplines interact with each other. These qualities can make them highly employable as all of which cannot be fully recreated by AI or technological advancement.
In conclusion, I am convinced that students who are endowed with aptitudes for sports or arts and those who are academically inclined should put more effort on their strong suits, while a balanced education is more suitable for most average ones.
Sample 13:
The debate over whether teenagers ought to allocate equal attention to all academic subjects or solely focus on those they find intriguing and excel in is a contentious one. This essay will explore both perspectives, ultimately endorsing the latter viewpoint, which emphasizes specialized focus based on individual interests and strengths.
Advocates of a balanced educational approach argue that an equal focus on all subjects is essential for the comprehensive development of young minds. This perspective emphasizes that a broad curriculum exposes students to a diverse array of knowledge, fostering well-rounded individuals. It cultivates a versatile skill set, enabling students to tackle various challenges and adapt to changing circumstances in the future. For instance, excelling in both humanities and sciences ensures that a student develops both analytical and creative thinking abilities. This approach also prevents premature specialization, allowing teenagers to discover and explore their interests thoroughly before making pivotal career decisions.
Conversely, many, including myself, believe that teenagers should prioritize subjects that captivate their interest and align with their innate abilities. Focusing on areas of strength and passion not only boosts academic performance due to heightened engagement and motivation but also fosters deeper learning and expertise. Specialization can lead to early professional development, providing students with a head start in their future careers. A student passionate about mathematics, for instance, would benefit more from intensifying their focus in this area, potentially leading to innovations or advanced studies in mathematical fields. This tailored approach respects individual differences in interests and aptitudes, promoting personal and academic fulfillment.
In conclusion, while evenly distributing academic efforts across all disciplines can create well-rounded individuals, concentrating on subjects that align with one's interests and strengths offers profound benefits in deep learning and personal satisfaction. The latter approach, which I advocate, respects individual uniqueness and can lead to significant achievements and fulfillment in students' chosen areas.
Sample 14:
Education plays a vital role in each and every person’s life because it opens the doors of employment in the future. A camp of society thinks that adolescents ought to learn all the subjects of the school curriculum whereas another segment of people believes that teenagers should concentrate on these subjects in which they are interested. According to my point of view, learning all school subject is a better aspect for adolescents to choose their specification in their future. There are various reasons for it. I will elaborate on some causes in the following paragraphs of this essay.
On the one side, according to some human beings, a teenager ought to focus on all subjects because the whole curriculum is crucial for students. Firstly, a learner can acquire fundamental knowledge and information about basic principles by reading all subjects. As a result of it, they could become able to apply it in their future as well as knowledge is a cornerstone for trainees to achieve a peak of glory. Secondly, reading all subjects helps juniors to enrich their knowledge and cultivate personal interests. By this, they acquire the creativity of mind which makes them select a suitable profession during their future time.
On the other side, a group of humans tends to believe that it is more beneficial to learn one subject according to his/her interest. Because this aspect brings more benefits to a pupil. When a student gives full attention to only one subject, the learner can get high proficiency in their fields in the future and live a better life. Moreover, concentrating on one captivating subject enhances student’s efficiency of learning. Due to it, an individual’s stress of picking a profession has become lightened.
In my own opinion, learning all curriculum subjects makes a good way for a human being to select a specification by getting knowledge about all subjects. Through this, they can gain multi-disciplinary information. So, the overall cognitive skills develop in a student.
To conclude, concentrating on all school subjects instead of one specific subject offers us a variety of options for taking a profession in the future. By this, a learner gains more and more knowledge to become multi-tasking. I believe reading all subjects makes a human being interdependent and skillful.
Sample 15:
The topic of whether adolescent students should dedicate attention to courses that attract them, or allocate a balanced effort into every subject, has sparked controversy. This essay will elaborate on both viewpoints and provide the reasons for my advocacy for the latter.
Proponents of the sole commitment to preferred subjects assert that this strategy assists in acquiring deep knowledge and wellbeing for teenagers. To begin with, it helps students accelerate in excelling in their chosen field. By allocating extensive time and effort on favored subjects, teenagers can grasp a more comprehensive understanding. This provides them with a firmer foundation of expertise compared to their peers in future professional endeavors. Additionally, without the necessity of full attention to all courses, pupils can distribute more time for leisure activities, which can positively impact their mental and physical health. For instance, those who adopt this approach are required to only perform adequately in the remaining subjects, allowing them to invest more time in sports or other hobbies.
Nonetheless, others believe that providing effort equally to all subjects can optimize youngsters’ career prospects as well as personal growth. Specifically, this practice broadens the range of prospective opportunities available to students. This is because distributing focus on all subjects assists them with fundamental understanding of different domains. Consequently, in their future professional life, they have the capabilities to apply for different lines of work that they had not previously considered. Furthermore, similar distribution across all subjects equips juveniles with various life skills. To illustrate, math facilitates critical thinking ability, while literature improves communication skills.
In conclusion, while the concentration on only interested subjects provides positive effects including in-depth knowledge towards the matter and enhanced health, I would argue that distributing focus evenly between all courses provides greater benefits since it helps students become more versatile in their career lives and facilitates the development of diverse skills.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Travelling abroad is becoming more affordable than ever before, and many nations are implementing new approaches to attract more tourists. Although there are still drawbacks of international travel, I think its values are more significant.
On the one hand, the downsides of welcoming foreign visitors are varied. First, the local environment can be adversely affected due to facility and infrastructural development. For example, in Vietnam, many tourism companies are permitted to chop down a great area of forests to construct modern commodities such as hotels and golf courses, exerting dire consequences on natural habitats. As for the countries that play host to international tourists, the rise in costs of living may lay much pressure on local people and be a detriment to domestic travel. This is because the growth in the number of tourists from abroad would encourage the costs of hotel rooms and other services to increase. People in the neighborhood and domestic visitors would suffer in comparison.
On the other hand, I suppose the benefits of international travel would eclipse those analyzed disadvantages. First, the regional economy can enormously benefit from the burgeoning tourism industry as more occupations will be created to accommodate the needs of tourists. Local people can have more job opportunities in hotels or restaurants and therefore earn more money to improve their living standards. Second, the increased number of foreign people coming to visit another country would evidently enhance tourism industries, contributing greatly to the wealth of that country. If tourists enjoy their trips, they will recommend the destination to their friends or perhaps they will come back in the future.
In conclusion, it appears to me that the merits of international tourism are more notable than its drawbacks.
Sample 2:
In the modern era, international travel has become increasingly accessible and affordable, with many countries opening their doors to welcome tourists from around the world. While this trend brings both benefits and drawbacks to the tourism industry, I firmly believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
On the positive side, the tourism sector plays a pivotal role in boosting the economies of host countries. With an influx of tourists, there is a surge in demand for various services, such as accommodations, transportation, and restaurants, leading to job creation for the local population. Furthermore, the growth of tourism also stimulates other related industries, generating additional income and opportunities for the nation. Moreover, international travel offers an unparalleled opportunity for cultural exchange. Tourists have the chance to immerse themselves in diverse cultures, experience different traditions, and broaden their perspectives, fostering mutual understanding and global harmony. Additionally, tourism serves as a means of relaxation and rejuvenation for travelers. This respite from daily routines can be highly beneficial to mental well-being, allowing individuals to return to their responsibilities with renewed energy and motivation.
However, it is essential to acknowledge the potential downsides of the booming tourism industry. One significant concern is its impact on the environment. As tourist numbers increase, so does the strain on natural resources and ecosystems. Overdevelopment and unsustainable practices may lead to habitat destruction, pollution, and the endangerment of local flora and fauna. Another drawback of international travel is the potential for an increase in criminal activities. Tourists, often carrying money and valuable possessions, can become targets for theft and scams in unfamiliar surroundings.
In conclusion, while international travel has its downsides, the advantages it brings to the economy, cultural exchange, and personal well-being outweigh the disadvantages. Governments and stakeholders in the tourism industry must collaborate to strike a balance between growth and sustainability, fostering a responsible and enjoyable travel experience for all. By addressing the challenges and harnessing the benefits, we can ensure that international travel continues to enrich our lives and strengthen global connections.
Sample 3:
Going on foreign holidays has become increasingly affordable these days, prompting some countries to seize the opportunity and embrace the rise of tourism. Although this trend may present certain challenges, I believe the benefits far outweigh them.
Admittedly, overtourism may disrupt the lives of locals, due to increased traffic and overcrowded venues prioritizing big spenders from abroad. A sudden or prolonged influx of foreign tourists can result in traffic congestion and a rise in the cost of living, as has been observed in certain famed cities like Paris or Venice. In addition, increased demand can stress transportation systems and waste management facilities, causing their eventual deterioration. However, such complications can be mitigated by substantial revenues gained from tourism-adjacent sectors. Development in this industry creates job opportunities and higher incomes, helping locals afford their living expenses. The additional government tax revenue can also be spent on improving public facilities and enhancing residents’ quality of life.
Beyond that, the merits of welcoming international tourists can also be observed from a cultural standpoint. One of them is that direct contact between people from various cultures can foster mutual understanding and appreciation for different ways of life. Deeper insight into the history and traditions of their destinations improves tourists’ social awareness and potentially alleviates any existing prejudices. Tourism can also contribute to the preservation of cultural heritage thanks to earnings from entrance fees and related services. One prime example is Hoi An Ancient Town in Vietnam, where restoration projects have been directly funded by tourism, maintaining the authenticity and architectural integrity of the centuries-old buildings within.
In conclusion, I contend that the potential adverse implications of increased international visitors can be compensated for by the additional income they bring. Moreover, international tourism is advantageous overall because it facilitates cultural exchange and the conservation of historical sites.
Sample 4:
More inexpensive methods of travelling internationally have allowed countries to open their borders to international tourists, which has led to intense debate about the merits and failings of this trend. Personally, I believe that increased global tourism has done more harm than good, for it has improved economies at the cost of cultures’ individuality.
On the one hand, one could argue that tourism brings in significant revenue and can thus aid economic development. Tourists when visiting other countries spend a huge amount of money on hotels, food, and shopping, thereby funding small businesses and supporting jobs. For example, the hospitality sector, particularly in locales such as the Mediterranean, brings in millions of euros a year. Tourism here serves as a vital source of revenue and could be viewed to be hugely beneficial for job creations and public services in these areas.
On the other hand, mass travel may often erode the very culture it seeks to showcase to the world. This is because the tourism companies who enter a new market might start building hotels and other services that end up pushing smaller, local businesses out of the said market, until very little of the “authentic experience” remains. For instance, many cities in Southeast Asia, such as Sapa and Phuket, could be said to have lost their uniqueness and instead have become replicas of other tourist towns. Over time, these cities are likely to lose their charm and perhaps also their visitors.
Overall, I argue that the economic effects of tourism do not outweigh the loss of culture, and as such, I believe that increased international tourism has been on the whole undesirable.
Sample 5:
Many countries encourage the development of international tourism because of its advantages. I think that international tourism has both pros and cons.
International tourism brings economic and cultural benefits to the host country. Firstly, international tourism has become the backbone of many economies in the world. For example, tourism provides job opportunities for local people to work in restaurants or hotels. Otherwise, many local residents converted their homes to hostels so that the tourists could stay as paying guests. Secondly, the development of tourism can promote the local culture to the rest of the world. Foreign travellers might learn about the uniqueness of the local culture and share their cultural experiences once they return home, arousing curiosity about the country among their families and friends.
However, international tourism can be associated with environmental damage and the loss of the local culture. In many countries, tourists have been prohibited from visiting particular places such as mountains or islands as the natural environment is seriously threatened by too many visitors. Tourists often litter the place by throwing plastic products, and the construction of tourism infrastructure also polluted the surroundings. Moreover, local culture may be lost when historical sites can be replaced by modern buildings such as hotels, or traditional jobs, for example farming, are dying out as local people are forced to work in the tourism industry for higher pay.
In conclusion, the environmental and cultural disadvantages of international tourism should be recognised. Provided that governments promote tourism in a more sustainable way such as ecotourism or cultural tourism, I think that the advantages are stronger.
Sample 6:
In an age where international travel is more affordable and countries are welcoming an ever-growing number of tourists, it is pivotal to assess whether the benefits of this increased tourism surpass its drawbacks, especially considering the context of Vietnam.
Proponents of tourism argue that it brings significant economic benefits, a standpoint that holds considerable merit. In Vietnam, for example, the influx of tourists has been a major economic driver, creating jobs and stimulating local businesses. Towns like Hoi An have transformed economically, with local crafts and culinary experiences being marketed to visitors. However, this economic upturn is often accompanied by a rise in living costs and over-commercialization, which can erode the local culture and quality of life. Were it not for these considerations, one might easily conclude that the economic advantages of tourism are unequivocally positive.
On the contrary, I am inclined to believe that the downsides of increased tourism are more impactful. While tourism does indeed contribute to the economy, it also often leads to environmental degradation. Vietnam’s coastal regions, such as Ha Long Bay, have witnessed environmental strain due to the surge in visitors. If measures were implemented to regulate tourism and minimize its environmental impact, one might argue that its benefits could be maximized. However, as it stands, the environmental cost of increased tourism often overshadows its economic gains.
In conclusion, although increased tourism undoubtedly boosts the economy and creates job opportunities, these benefits do not entirely outweigh the negative environmental impacts. For countries like Vietnam, it is imperative to find a balance between welcoming tourists and preserving natural and cultural heritage. Only by achieving this equilibrium can the true potential of tourism be realized without compromising the country’s ecological and cultural integrity.
Sample 7:
Nowadays, the tourism industry has become a rather lucrative business in many countries that have marvelous natural scenery and cultural heritage. However, whether the pros outweigh the cons remains a controversial topic among many people. I agree with the view that despite the several disadvantages, it definitely plays a significant role in the economic development around the world.
Firstly, it is obvious that as a smokeless industry, tourism can attract a sheer volume of tourists from other places, and then boost the local consumptions like hotels, restaurants, air industry, as well as creating numerous job opportunities. The Australian government, for example, can earn a large proportion of income from its travelling resources with its spectacular scenery along the seacoast each year. Therefore, many countries now are eagerly disseminating their own unique attractions.
Moreover, tourism income may help conserve the natural landscape, wildlife, and cultural heritage. This is mainly because preserving the food, fashion, festivals, and scenery needs a great number of funds. If there is no such huge financial support, the scenic spot will lack maintenance and disrupted and thus they will be fade away sooner or later.
That is not to say that the tourism industry is flawless. Chances are that local living conditions and lifestyle are disturbed, and the environment is degraded due to the fact that floods of travellers pour into the once serene places and bring in rubbish and noise. But like other industries, the governments should legislate to avoid these problems.
In sum, many cities and countries now heavily rely on this indispensable industry; meanwhile, though the pros clearly outweigh the cons, the consequences should be handled by efforts. Only by doing so can we ensure that tourism would be developing in a healthy way.
Sample 8:
The global travel industry has witnessed massive growth in the recent decade, attributable to the rise of the low-cost carrier business model. As a result, nations around the world are embracing international tourism as an essential source of economic growth. I believe the advantages of welcoming foreign tourists far outweigh the corresponding disadvantages as long as certain risks are adequately controlled.
Tourism has long been the lifeblood of many economies around the world as well as a tool to carry out international politics. The money that foreign travelers bring to another country creates vital short-term and long-term impacts. In the short term, the expenses paid by tourists go directly to the local populace, improving their livelihood. Thailand probably serves as the best example as many coastal cities such as Pattaya or Phuket have become heaven for people who want to make a good living. In the long-term, private companies, sensing income opportunities, will heavily invest funds into the country, region, or city. These funds will further boost the wealth of the nation. Besides, tourism also plays an integral part in maintaining a balance in global politics by making countries closer and friendlier to each other. The relationship between Vietnam and Korea clearly illustrates how two countries can move from foes to friends by promoting each other’s tourism industry.
Nothing comes without some drawbacks. The growth in international travel has brought up many concerns regarding environmental damages, health issues, and criminal activities. The influx of people to a new destination often creates monumental challenges in waste management. In 2018, the situation was so dire that the government of the Philippines had to shut down Boracay, a hugely attractive traveling destination, for six months to clean out the trash. Airborne diseases, such as SARS or MERS, also spread faster due to tourism. It is also notable that crime rates have risen sharply in popular holiday spots. However, all of the stated problems can be well handled if governments and nations around the world can cooperate efficiently to promote positive tourism practices. For example, the Southeast Asian countries have created a shared database of people with health risks to track contagious disease movements around the region.
In conclusion, increased tourism will bring about great positive benefits despite certain containable shortcomings. It is expected that countries and companies around the world will further direct their efforts to promote the travel industry.
Sample 9:
As international travel becomes cheaper, more and more people travel, and more countries open their doors to increasing numbers of tourists. Some people are of the opinion that international travel does more harm than good whilst others are in favor of the opposite view. From my viewpoint, I prefer the latter opinion for the following reasons.
First and foremost, it is an undeniable fact that international travel goes hand in hand with economic growth since it not only creates millions of jobs but also elevates the tourist industry as well. The most prime example is most countries that have outstanding tourist attractions often has their economic status increased 10% in a few years in comparison with countries that don’t have ones since international travel brings about huge gross profit for travel agencies. Moreover, international travel recruits a huge number of employees every year and often ensures a high income which results in a decrease in the unemployment rate. In other words, international travel has a great contribution to economic growth in various aspects. Another reason why I advocate international tourism is that travelers can take advantage of it by acknowledging not only diverse cultures but potential business contracts as well. As a matter of fact, tourists have inevitably witnessed and later obtained general knowledge from history to customs by experiencing cultural cross in their visits. For example, in Japan, thumbing up stands for excellent performance whilst in Indonesia, it doesn’t. Moreover, international travel also aids businessmen to reach their full potentials. For instance, an adequate fishing trade circulation may catch the eye of a French businessman who is looking for one on his vacation in Japan. Therefore, it seems reasonable that travelers benefit a lot from international travel.
Some of my opponents claim that international travel has its shortcomings since it may have a negative influence not only on the environment but on society as well. This has some merits on the surface; however, it should be borne in mind that the government has taken strict international travel regulations into practice recently which leads to the fact that rarely can international tourists either violate the law or commit social vices. As a result, international travel has its advantages that outweigh its disadvantages.
In conclusion, international travel stimulates economic development and benefits travelers in various ways. Therefore, the economy and travel experience cannot be upgraded unless international travel is encouraged to become a trend in the future.
Sample 10:
It is irrefutable that international tourism has taken on mammoth dimensions. In fact, it has become the backbone of many economies of the world. This situation has both pros and cons. In my opinion, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
International tourism can have many benefits for individuals. The most important benefit is that tourism provides regular employment for many local people who might otherwise be unemployed. They can find work in restaurants or hotels, or with tourist agencies as guides or drivers, for example, and earn regular wages. This, in turn, means that they may be able to save money and improve their standard of living. The second reason is that tourists spend money in the country, and this allows local businesses such as restaurants, bars and taxi companies to flourish. In turn, other businesses, food suppliers or petrol stations, for instance, maybe established in order to provide services to support the companies which cater for tourists. In other words, the whole economy of the region develops.
A third reason is that in order for tourists to be able to visit remote areas, roads, airports and hotels have to be built and local people also benefit by being able to use these new facilities. Furthermore, when communications improve, it becomes possible for other industries to move into the area, bringing with them more employment opportunities and increased prosperity. A final reason why I am in favor of tourism is that visitors from outside bring fresh ideas and different ways of doing things to the local community. Consequently, local people may learn from tourists. Likewise, visitors learn about the local people and culture and return home with a deeper understanding of the host country.
On the other hand, there are some problems associated with international tourism. Firstly, there is the increasing crime rate. Some locals see tourists as easy prey because, not only are they in unfamiliar territory and therefore less able to take care of themselves, but also, they carry visible items of wealth, such as cameras and jewelry which can be disposed of quickly for a profit. Another major problem is health. With greater mobility comes the greater danger of spreading contagious diseases around the world. Also to be considered is the natural environment, which can be seriously threatened by too many visitors. Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, for example, is in danger of being destroyed by tourists and there are plans to restrict visitors to some of the more delicate coral reefs.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that international tourism has both advantages and disadvantages. However, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
Sample 11:
International travel has become more accessible, and numerous countries are actively encouraging an increasing number of tourists. Despite certain drawbacks associated with this trend, I maintain that the advantages of enhanced tourism significantly overshadow the negatives.
On the one hand, there are undeniable challenges stemming from the surge in international tourism. Primarily, the local environment may be adversely affected by the expansion of facilities and infrastructure needed to accommodate the growing number of visitors. For instance, in Vietnam, several tourism companies have been authorized to clear vast areas of forestland to build modern amenities such as hotels and golf courses, leading to harmful consequences for natural habitats. Additionally, in host countries, an increased cost of living may burden local residents and negatively impact domestic tourism. This is because a rise in international tourists can result in inflated prices for accommodations and other services, potentially causing financial strain for local communities and domestic travelers.
On the other hand, the merits of international tourism are substantial and, in my opinion, far exceed the aforementioned challenges. Firstly, the local economy can experience significant growth through a flourishing tourism industry, as more employment opportunities emerge to cater to the needs of tourists. Local residents can secure jobs in hotels, restaurants, and other tourist-related businesses, allowing them to boost their income and improve their living standards. Secondly, a growing influx of foreign visitors can considerably strengthen the host country’s tourism sector, contributing substantially to its economic growth. Satisfied tourists are likely to recommend the destination to their acquaintances or even plan return visits, further advancing the country’s tourism industry.
In conclusion, the positive aspects of international tourism appear to be more substantial than its disadvantages. The economic growth and employment opportunities that arise from increased tourism largely counteract the environmental and financial concerns it raises.
Sample 12:
In recent years, international tourism has experienced a surge in popularity, fueled by the decreasing cost of transportation and the ever-growing accessibility of diverse tourist destinations. Countries increasingly opening their doors to tourists has sparked off a debate whether the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages. While increased tourism offers numerous benefits, it also poses challenges that necessitate careful consideration.
On the positive side, increased tourism has brought undeniable advantages. Countries welcoming more tourists witness a boost in their local economies through spending on accommodation, dining, transportation and various recreational activities. This influx of revenues not only supports the tourism industry but also has a profound effect on other sectors, thus fostering job creation and economic development. Furthermore, exposure to different cultures and traditions deepens cross-cultural understanding, breaking down stereotypes and promoting global harmony. The interchange of ideas and perspectives between tourists and locals can contribute to the enrichment of both parties, creating a more interconnected and empathetic world.
However, it is crucial to acknowledge the downsides of the tourist boom and one of the most significant concerns is the environmental impact. Increased footfall in popular tourist destinations often leads to ecological degradation, exerting stress on delicate ecosystems and contributing to climate change. Overcrowding can lead to pollution, habitat destruction and strain on essential resources and therefore pose a threat to the attractions that draw tourists in the first place. Additionally, the influx of tourists can strain local infrastructure and resources, leading to issues such as traffic congestion, waste management challenges and growing demand for energy.
In conclusion, the merits and demerits of booming tourism are multifaceted and require balanced evaluation. While there are indisputable economic benefits and cultural exchange fostered by tourism, the environmental drawbacks must not be ignored.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Some people argue that playing team sports provides people with more benefits as opposed to participating in individual sports. Personally, I believe that both types of sports can provide a range of benefits to people, and it depends on what benefits each individual wishes to achieve as to which sport they should choose to play.
On the one hand, team sports, such as football and basketball, provide a number of benefits to those who play. For example, team sports give players the opportunity to develop interpersonal skills, like teamwork and communication skills, which will not only help people in their day-to-day social interactions but also benefit them in their workplace. In addition, team sports also offer players the chance to develop a sense of unity, friendship, and sportsmanship between teammates, which can really add value to people’s lives by making them feel a part of something.
On the other hand, individual sports, like tennis and swimming, also have their merits. When someone plays an individual sport, it usually gives them more opportunities to enhance their personal skills, such as being able to manage emotions, cope with stress, and build confidence and self-esteem. When people are playing an individual sport, they usually have no one else to rely on for support during the game or match, and therefore, individuals will need to develop a strong mindset to be able to deal with and overcome any setbacks they may face. Individual sports also provide better opportunities for people to challenge themselves by setting goals and achieving personal bests.
Overall, I feel that all sports offer great benefits for people’s mental and physical health, and that people should choose whatever sport they are most interested in playing.
Sample 2:
Sports play an important role in physical and mental well-being. However, there is a debate about which type of sport is more beneficial: team sports such as football or individual sports like tennis and swimming. In my opinion, both team and individual sports have their advantages and should be encouraged.
On the one hand, team sports like football have many benefits. They teach important values such as teamwork, communication, and leadership, and can help individuals develop social skills and build relationships. Furthermore, playing in a team can provide motivation and accountability, as individuals feel responsible for their teammates' success. In basketball, teamwork is essential. Players must communicate effectively and work together to pass the ball, set screens, and create scoring opportunities. This requires trust, cooperation, and a willingness to put the team's success ahead of individual goals.
On the other hand, individual sports like tennis and swimming can also have significant benefits. They offer a sense of independence and self-reliance and can help individuals develop focus, discipline, and resilience. Furthermore, they offer the opportunity for personal achievement and competition, which can be very motivating for some individuals. For instance, swimming requires a high level of physical endurance and mental focus, making it an ideal sport for individuals looking to develop discipline, resilience, and self-reliance. Swimming can also offer a sense of freedom and independence, which can be particularly appealing for individuals who prefer to work alone and enjoy the solitude of being in the water.
In conclusion, both team and individual sports have their benefits and should be encouraged. Individuals should choose a sport that aligns with their personality, preferences, and goals, and prioritize physical activity for overall health and well-being.
Sample 3:
It is argued that people will gain more benefits when engaging in team sports such as football. Other people, however, believe that it is better to participate in individual sports like golf or tennis. I personally agree with the first group.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some people think that taking part in individual sports has more advantages. Firstly, people who choose to play solo sports such as swimming or tennis have the opportunity to develop independence. This can be explained by the fact that those who play these sports have no one to help them during the game, so they are forced to develop independent thinking and make their own decisions. Those who take part in team sports, by contrast, often receive support from their team members, which could discourage them from developing these skills. Another reason is that players in solo sports know that their success depends mostly on their effort, determination and concentration. Therefore, these people always make every possible effort to achieve their goals.
On the other hand, I would argue that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams such as basketball or football. This is because these sports teach their players valuable life lessons that they could not learn from individual sports. Take football as an example. Those who play this game are taught to work effectively in a team environment and even sacrifice themselves for the sake of their team. Team sports also teach people about leadership, which is one of the most important skills in today’s world.
In conclusion, although some people say that we should choose to play solo sports such as golf or tennis, I believe that team sports like football bring far more benefits.
Sample 4:
While some say that participating in team sports is advantageous, others think that players will reap more benefits from individual sports. In my opinion, I support the idea that team sports can support a person’s development better.
First of all, team sports are beneficial as they can help foster various desirable qualities in a person. A great team player is oftentimes also a supportive and cooperative friend, and a visionary who is capable of utilizing team members’ strengths when and where appropriate. A case in point is doubles badminton. To win a match, both players must understand how each other plays. Only in that case can both athletes find a suitable arrangement within a match. Next, both have to place their trust in the other person’s ability to cover the arena. Moreover, team sports can help build great camaraderie, especially for working adults who do not have time to mingle.
Nevertheless, individual sports are quite advantageous in some cases. It allows the players to learn more about themselves and focus on improving their ability alone. By having to fully bear the weight of any loss or take credit for any success, the player will grow to be a responsible, self-reliant, and confident person. Take chess for example, in most cases, chess is an individual sport as this game requires complete trust in one’s ability, speed, and the ability to foresight. All of which are difficult to achieve in team sports where many minds are involved in the decision-making process.
Overall, even though individual sports offer some positives to a certain extent, I completely agree with the idea that team sports is more beneficial to people since it can help them develop valuable attributes.
Sample 5:
People have different views about which type of sports is better for them to participate in. While there are certain benefits of playing team sports, I would argue that taking part in individual sports is a better option.
On the one hand, team sports are advantageous to some extent. Firstly, playing team sports requires participants to cooperate with other teammates, which can help them to improve their teamwork skills. For example, in a football match, players in a team have to work together to put the ball into the opponent’s net. This is similar to the process in which employees are required to handle tasks together in order to achieve the company’s objectives. Secondly, playing sports in teams is also a great chance to meet new people and make new friends. As a result, people can build up their network, which is highly beneficial to their career.
On the other hand, I believe it is better for people to play sports individually. The first reason is that this allows people to foster their independence instead of depending on others. For instance, when a player wants to win a match of tennis, he has to try his hardest as there is no one else to rely on. Therefore, individuals would learn how to overcome bigger obstacles in life by themselves. Additionally, as people play sports alone, it is easier for them to maintain a regular training schedule. If they play sports with a number of other players, it will be difficult to organise weekly sessions that everyone can find the time to attend.
In conclusion, while team sports bring about undeniable benefits, I believe people should devote more of their spare time to playing individual sports.
Sample 6:
There are those who opine that participating in sporting activities played in teams is more crucial to people. Others, however, disagree, insisting that sports requiring individual efforts play a more vital role. In this essay, both ideas will be analysed before the presentation of my perspective, which is that people’s involvement in both types is more advisable.
It is justified for some to favour the greater importance of team sports to people. The major reason is that their cooperation skills can be better sharpened. To defeat the opponent in a football match, for instance, members of a group have to employ collective power to score a goal, during which time they gradually learn how to work together with others. Additionally, people are likely to build a wider network of contacts. If joining team sports, school and tertiary pupils may know more about other students while adults can meet participants from diverse work backgrounds.
On the other hand, it is also true that people benefit more from individual sports. To begin with, these activities can cultivate people’s perseverance in a more effective manner. If a tennis player feels exhausted in a match, what drives them to continue is a determined will; this is the moment when their willpower is exercised. Moreover, people are able to enjoy a deeper happiness when achieving triumph. It can be explained easily by the fact that the only winner will not share the rapturous applause from audiences inside and outside the stadium.
In conclusion, I believe that both sides of the argument are reasonable. On balance, it is my firm opinion that not only should people take part in team sports but also individual ones. After all, while team sports encourage the development of people’s ability to collaborate with others and create opportunities for them to make more friends, people can also possess dogged perseverance and feel greater joy in winning competitions.
Sample 7:
There are those who opine that it is more advantageous to play team sports, like football, while others argue that sports with individual players, like tennis or swimming, are better choices. This essay discusses both sides of the argument and why I believe that playing non-team sports can bring more benefits.
There are understandable reasons why some feel that team sports are more advantageous. First of all, people playing this kind of sport can learn how to cooperate with others to achieve mutual goals. For example, scoring a goal in a football match requires players in different positions to collaborate closely with each other. In addition, if people in a company play team sports regularly with each other, it will improve their bonding, thereby boosting their work performance. Furthermore, people engaging in team sports are likely to have a better social life. It is obvious that enjoying a favorite activity with those sharing the same interests is a base point for a close relationship.
On the other hand, others believe that playing non-team sports is better. The first reason is that this kind of sport can help people to improve their mental toughness. This can be explained by the fact that the players understand their success entirely depends on their own efforts, so they force themselves to be more self-disciplined such as setting personal goals, managing stress and practicing consistently. In addition, being mentally strong can help people to overcome difficulties and challenges to achieve goals in life. Another reason is that it is more convenient for people to play individual sports. For example, people can go to the swimming pool whenever they want, and if they want to play tennis, they just have to find one person unlike soccer when they have to find two teams.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that both sides of the argument have their positive points. However, I am inclined to believe that team sports are more beneficial because having collaboration skills and a better social life outweigh the benefits of having mental strength and greater convenience.
Sample 8:
Some claim that team sports such as football are more beneficial to players. Meanwhile, others hold a belief that sports that are played individually have superior advantages. In my opinion, both types of sports bring equal advantages.
On the one hand, by participating in team sport, we learn to collaborate with others. In sport fields, individual ambition takes second place to team objective. Every team member is working towards a common goal. To achieve this goal, cooperation and coordination are of the essence. Members must work as a team and achieve the maximum synergy even if that means someone has to make certain sacrifices. For instance, a cyclist may take the leading position for half of the game and then drop out so as to ensure the victory of his teammate. Or another case in point is that in football, a player may have to sacrifice the opportunity to score a goal to pass the ball to his team player if the chance of a goal being scored is higher with his teammate.
On the other hand, solo sports can bring players a number of benefits, one of which is the cultivation and maximization of personal capacities. To be precise, when without the assistance of others, one has to exert himself to the utmost to come up with solutions to win, and this challenges his own limits. For example, in tennis, a player has to strategize his ball serves, predict where the ball falls and be agile in his movement, and he has to multi-task all these on his own. Besides, when doing sports individually, people are liberated from the constraint of rigidly following a previously agreed plan, thereby having the freedom to experiment with new ways of playing. Therefore, such players often have a high sense of satisfaction.
In conclusion, each type of sport has its merits in cultivating players’ personality development. It should depend on each player as to what sports they should do.
Sample 9:
Some people argue that playing team sports like football provides people with more benefits as opposed to participating in individual sports such as tennis or swimming. Personally, I believe that both types of sports can provide a range of benefits to people but, by participating in team sports one can learn useful skills which are only possible with group activities.
On the one hand, team sports such as football and basketball offer a variety of advantages to those who participate. Team sports, for example, provide players with the opportunity to develop interpersonal skills such as teamwork and communication skills, which will benefit them not only in their daily social interactions but also in their workplace. Furthermore, team sports allow players to develop a sense of unity, friendship, and sportsmanship among teammates, which can significantly improve people’s lives by making them feel a part of something.
On the other hand, individual sports provide more opportunities for people to improve their personal skills, such as emotion management, stress management, and confidence and self-esteem building. Individuals who participate in an individual sport like swimming, usually have no one else to rely on for support during the game or match, so they must develop a strong mindset to deal with and overcome any setbacks they may face. Individual sports also give people more opportunities to push themselves by setting goals and achieving personal bests.
Overall, I feel that all group sports offer great benefits for people’s mental and physical health, and that people should choose playing team sports and must also be involved in single games in order to achieve balance.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Bài tập chức năng giao tiếp (Có đáp án)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
15000 bài tập tách từ đề thi thử môn Tiếng Anh có đáp án (Phần 1)
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
Bộ câu hỏi: Thì và sự phối thì (Phần 2) (Có đáp án)
Trắc nghiệm Tiếng anh 12 Tìm từ được gạch chân phát âm khác - Mức độ nhận biết có đáp án
Bộ câu hỏi: Cấp so sánh (có đáp án)
Hãy Đăng nhập hoặc Tạo tài khoản để gửi bình luận