Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Sample 1:

Travelling abroad is becoming more affordable than ever before, and many nations are implementing new approaches to attract more tourists. Although there are still drawbacks of international travel, I think its values are more significant.

On the one hand, the downsides of welcoming foreign visitors are varied. First, the local environment can be adversely affected due to facility and infrastructural development. For example, in Vietnam, many tourism companies are permitted to chop down a great area of forests to construct modern commodities such as hotels and golf courses, exerting dire consequences on natural habitats. As for the countries that play host to international tourists, the rise in costs of living may lay much pressure on local people and be a detriment to domestic travel. This is because the growth in the number of tourists from abroad would encourage the costs of hotel rooms and other services to increase. People in the neighborhood and domestic visitors would suffer in comparison.

On the other hand, I suppose the benefits of international travel would eclipse those analyzed disadvantages. First, the regional economy can enormously benefit from the burgeoning tourism industry as more occupations will be created to accommodate the needs of tourists. Local people can have more job opportunities in hotels or restaurants and therefore earn more money to improve their living standards. Second, the increased number of foreign people coming to visit another country would evidently enhance tourism industries, contributing greatly to the wealth of that country. If tourists enjoy their trips, they will recommend the destination to their friends or perhaps they will come back in the future.

In conclusion, it appears to me that the merits of international tourism are more notable than its drawbacks.

Sample 2:

In the modern era, international travel has become increasingly accessible and affordable, with many countries opening their doors to welcome tourists from around the world. While this trend brings both benefits and drawbacks to the tourism industry, I firmly believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

On the positive side, the tourism sector plays a pivotal role in boosting the economies of host countries. With an influx of tourists, there is a surge in demand for various services, such as accommodations, transportation, and restaurants, leading to job creation for the local population. Furthermore, the growth of tourism also stimulates other related industries, generating additional income and opportunities for the nation. Moreover, international travel offers an unparalleled opportunity for cultural exchange. Tourists have the chance to immerse themselves in diverse cultures, experience different traditions, and broaden their perspectives, fostering mutual understanding and global harmony. Additionally, tourism serves as a means of relaxation and rejuvenation for travelers. This respite from daily routines can be highly beneficial to mental well-being, allowing individuals to return to their responsibilities with renewed energy and motivation.

However, it is essential to acknowledge the potential downsides of the booming tourism industry. One significant concern is its impact on the environment. As tourist numbers increase, so does the strain on natural resources and ecosystems. Overdevelopment and unsustainable practices may lead to habitat destruction, pollution, and the endangerment of local flora and fauna. Another drawback of international travel is the potential for an increase in criminal activities. Tourists, often carrying money and valuable possessions, can become targets for theft and scams in unfamiliar surroundings.

In conclusion, while international travel has its downsides, the advantages it brings to the economy, cultural exchange, and personal well-being outweigh the disadvantages. Governments and stakeholders in the tourism industry must collaborate to strike a balance between growth and sustainability, fostering a responsible and enjoyable travel experience for all. By addressing the challenges and harnessing the benefits, we can ensure that international travel continues to enrich our lives and strengthen global connections.

Sample 3:

Going on foreign holidays has become increasingly affordable these days, prompting some countries to seize the opportunity and embrace the rise of tourism. Although this trend may present certain challenges, I believe the benefits far outweigh them.

Admittedly, overtourism may disrupt the lives of locals, due to increased traffic and overcrowded venues prioritizing big spenders from abroad. A sudden or prolonged influx of foreign tourists can result in traffic congestion and a rise in the cost of living, as has been observed in certain famed cities like Paris or Venice. In addition, increased demand can stress transportation systems and waste management facilities, causing their eventual deterioration. However, such complications can be mitigated by substantial revenues gained from tourism-adjacent sectors. Development in this industry creates job opportunities and higher incomes, helping locals afford their living expenses. The additional government tax revenue can also be spent on improving public facilities and enhancing residents’ quality of life.

Beyond that, the merits of welcoming international tourists can also be observed from a cultural standpoint. One of them is that direct contact between people from various cultures can foster mutual understanding and appreciation for different ways of life. Deeper insight into the history and traditions of their destinations improves tourists’ social awareness and potentially alleviates any existing prejudices. Tourism can also contribute to the preservation of cultural heritage thanks to earnings from entrance fees and related services. One prime example is Hoi An Ancient Town in Vietnam, where restoration projects have been directly funded by tourism, maintaining the authenticity and architectural integrity of the centuries-old buildings within.

In conclusion, I contend that the potential adverse implications of increased international visitors can be compensated for by the additional income they bring. Moreover, international tourism is advantageous overall because it facilitates cultural exchange and the conservation of historical sites.

Sample 4:

More inexpensive methods of travelling internationally have allowed countries to open their borders to international tourists, which has led to intense debate about the merits and failings of this trend. Personally, I believe that increased global tourism has done more harm than good, for it has improved economies at the cost of cultures’ individuality.

On the one hand, one could argue that tourism brings in significant revenue and can thus aid economic development. Tourists when visiting other countries spend a huge amount of money on hotels, food, and shopping, thereby funding small businesses and supporting jobs. For example, the hospitality sector, particularly in locales such as the Mediterranean, brings in millions of euros a year. Tourism here serves as a vital source of revenue and could be viewed to be hugely beneficial for job creations and public services in these areas.

On the other hand, mass travel may often erode the very culture it seeks to showcase to the world. This is because the tourism companies who enter a new market might start building hotels and other services that end up pushing smaller, local businesses out of the said market, until very little of the “authentic experience” remains. For instance, many cities in Southeast Asia, such as Sapa and Phuket, could be said to have lost their uniqueness and instead have become replicas of other tourist towns. Over time, these cities are likely to lose their charm and perhaps also their visitors.

Overall, I argue that the economic effects of tourism do not outweigh the loss of culture, and as such, I believe that increased international tourism has been on the whole undesirable.

Sample 5:

Many countries encourage the development of international tourism because of its advantages. I think that international tourism has both pros and cons.

International tourism brings economic and cultural benefits to the host country. Firstly, international tourism has become the backbone of many economies in the world. For example, tourism provides job opportunities for local people to work in restaurants or hotels. Otherwise, many local residents converted their homes to hostels so that the tourists could stay as paying guests. Secondly, the development of tourism can promote the local culture to the rest of the world. Foreign travellers might learn about the uniqueness of the local culture and share their cultural experiences once they return home, arousing curiosity about the country among their families and friends.

However, international tourism can be associated with environmental damage and the loss of the local culture. In many countries, tourists have been prohibited from visiting particular places such as mountains or islands as the natural environment is seriously threatened by too many visitors. Tourists often litter the place by throwing plastic products, and the construction of tourism infrastructure also polluted the surroundings. Moreover, local culture may be lost when historical sites can be replaced by modern buildings such as hotels, or traditional jobs, for example farming, are dying out as local people are forced to work in the tourism industry for higher pay.

In conclusion, the environmental and cultural disadvantages of international tourism should be recognised. Provided that governments promote tourism in a more sustainable way such as ecotourism or cultural tourism, I think that the advantages are stronger.

Sample 6:

In an age where international travel is more affordable and countries are welcoming an ever-growing number of tourists, it is pivotal to assess whether the benefits of this increased tourism surpass its drawbacks, especially considering the context of Vietnam.

Proponents of tourism argue that it brings significant economic benefits, a standpoint that holds considerable merit. In Vietnam, for example, the influx of tourists has been a major economic driver, creating jobs and stimulating local businesses. Towns like Hoi An have transformed economically, with local crafts and culinary experiences being marketed to visitors. However, this economic upturn is often accompanied by a rise in living costs and over-commercialization, which can erode the local culture and quality of life. Were it not for these considerations, one might easily conclude that the economic advantages of tourism are unequivocally positive.

On the contrary, I am inclined to believe that the downsides of increased tourism are more impactful. While tourism does indeed contribute to the economy, it also often leads to environmental degradation. Vietnam’s coastal regions, such as Ha Long Bay, have witnessed environmental strain due to the surge in visitors. If measures were implemented to regulate tourism and minimize its environmental impact, one might argue that its benefits could be maximized. However, as it stands, the environmental cost of increased tourism often overshadows its economic gains.

In conclusion, although increased tourism undoubtedly boosts the economy and creates job opportunities, these benefits do not entirely outweigh the negative environmental impacts. For countries like Vietnam, it is imperative to find a balance between welcoming tourists and preserving natural and cultural heritage. Only by achieving this equilibrium can the true potential of tourism be realized without compromising the country’s ecological and cultural integrity.

Sample 7:

Nowadays, the tourism industry has become a rather lucrative business in many countries that have marvelous natural scenery and cultural heritage. However, whether the pros outweigh the cons remains a controversial topic among many people. I agree with the view that despite the several disadvantages, it definitely plays a significant role in the economic development around the world.

Firstly, it is obvious that as a smokeless industry, tourism can attract a sheer volume of tourists from other places, and then boost the local consumptions like hotels, restaurants, air industry, as well as creating numerous job opportunities. The Australian government, for example, can earn a large proportion of income from its travelling resources with its spectacular scenery along the seacoast each year. Therefore, many countries now are eagerly disseminating their own unique attractions.

Moreover, tourism income may help conserve the natural landscape, wildlife, and cultural heritage. This is mainly because preserving the food, fashion, festivals, and scenery needs a great number of funds. If there is no such huge financial support, the scenic spot will lack maintenance and disrupted and thus they will be fade away sooner or later.

That is not to say that the tourism industry is flawless. Chances are that local living conditions and lifestyle are disturbed, and the environment is degraded due to the fact that floods of travellers pour into the once serene places and bring in rubbish and noise. But like other industries, the governments should legislate to avoid these problems.

In sum, many cities and countries now heavily rely on this indispensable industry; meanwhile, though the pros clearly outweigh the cons, the consequences should be handled by efforts. Only by doing so can we ensure that tourism would be developing in a healthy way.

Sample 8:

The global travel industry has witnessed massive growth in the recent decade, attributable to the rise of the low-cost carrier business model. As a result, nations around the world are embracing international tourism as an essential source of economic growth. I believe the advantages of welcoming foreign tourists far outweigh the corresponding disadvantages as long as certain risks are adequately controlled.

Tourism has long been the lifeblood of many economies around the world as well as a tool to carry out international politics. The money that foreign travelers bring to another country creates vital short-term and long-term impacts. In the short term, the expenses paid by tourists go directly to the local populace, improving their livelihood. Thailand probably serves as the best example as many coastal cities such as Pattaya or Phuket have become heaven for people who want to make a good living. In the long-term, private companies, sensing income opportunities, will heavily invest funds into the country, region, or city. These funds will further boost the wealth of the nation. Besides, tourism also plays an integral part in maintaining a balance in global politics by making countries closer and friendlier to each other. The relationship between Vietnam and Korea clearly illustrates how two countries can move from foes to friends by promoting each other’s tourism industry.

Nothing comes without some drawbacks. The growth in international travel has brought up many concerns regarding environmental damages, health issues, and criminal activities. The influx of people to a new destination often creates monumental challenges in waste management. In 2018, the situation was so dire that the government of the Philippines had to shut down Boracay, a hugely attractive traveling destination, for six months to clean out the trash. Airborne diseases, such as SARS or MERS, also spread faster due to tourism. It is also notable that crime rates have risen sharply in popular holiday spots. However, all of the stated problems can be well handled if governments and nations around the world can cooperate efficiently to promote positive tourism practices. For example, the Southeast Asian countries have created a shared database of people with health risks to track contagious disease movements around the region.

In conclusion, increased tourism will bring about great positive benefits despite certain containable shortcomings. It is expected that countries and companies around the world will further direct their efforts to promote the travel industry.

Sample 9:

As international travel becomes cheaper, more and more people travel, and more countries open their doors to increasing numbers of tourists. Some people are of the opinion that international travel does more harm than good whilst others are in favor of the opposite view. From my viewpoint, I prefer the latter opinion for the following reasons.

First and foremost, it is an undeniable fact that international travel goes hand in hand with economic growth since it not only creates millions of jobs but also elevates the tourist industry as well. The most prime example is most countries that have outstanding tourist attractions often has their economic status increased 10% in a few years in comparison with countries that don’t have ones since international travel brings about huge gross profit for travel agencies. Moreover, international travel recruits a huge number of employees every year and often ensures a high income which results in a decrease in the unemployment rate. In other words, international travel has a great contribution to economic growth in various aspects. Another reason why I advocate international tourism is that travelers can take advantage of it by acknowledging not only diverse cultures but potential business contracts as well. As a matter of fact, tourists have inevitably witnessed and later obtained general knowledge from history to customs by experiencing cultural cross in their visits. For example, in Japan, thumbing up stands for excellent performance whilst in Indonesia, it doesn’t. Moreover, international travel also aids businessmen to reach their full potentials. For instance, an adequate fishing trade circulation may catch the eye of a French businessman who is looking for one on his vacation in Japan. Therefore, it seems reasonable that travelers benefit a lot from international travel.

Some of my opponents claim that international travel has its shortcomings since it may have a negative influence not only on the environment but on society as well. This has some merits on the surface; however, it should be borne in mind that the government has taken strict international travel regulations into practice recently which leads to the fact that rarely can international tourists either violate the law or commit social vices. As a result, international travel has its advantages that outweigh its disadvantages.

In conclusion, international travel stimulates economic development and benefits travelers in various ways. Therefore, the economy and travel experience cannot be upgraded unless international travel is encouraged to become a trend in the future.

Sample 10:

It is irrefutable that international tourism has taken on mammoth dimensions. In fact, it has become the backbone of many economies of the world. This situation has both pros and cons. In my opinion, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

International tourism can have many benefits for individuals. The most important benefit is that tourism provides regular employment for many local people who might otherwise be unemployed. They can find work in restaurants or hotels, or with tourist agencies as guides or drivers, for example, and earn regular wages. This, in turn, means that they may be able to save money and improve their standard of living. The second reason is that tourists spend money in the country, and this allows local businesses such as restaurants, bars and taxi companies to flourish. In turn, other businesses, food suppliers or petrol stations, for instance, maybe established in order to provide services to support the companies which cater for tourists. In other words, the whole economy of the region develops.

A third reason is that in order for tourists to be able to visit remote areas, roads, airports and hotels have to be built and local people also benefit by being able to use these new facilities. Furthermore, when communications improve, it becomes possible for other industries to move into the area, bringing with them more employment opportunities and increased prosperity. A final reason why I am in favor of tourism is that visitors from outside bring fresh ideas and different ways of doing things to the local community. Consequently, local people may learn from tourists. Likewise, visitors learn about the local people and culture and return home with a deeper understanding of the host country.

On the other hand, there are some problems associated with international tourism. Firstly, there is the increasing crime rate. Some locals see tourists as easy prey because, not only are they in unfamiliar territory and therefore less able to take care of themselves, but also, they carry visible items of wealth, such as cameras and jewelry which can be disposed of quickly for a profit. Another major problem is health. With greater mobility comes the greater danger of spreading contagious diseases around the world. Also to be considered is the natural environment, which can be seriously threatened by too many visitors. Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, for example, is in danger of being destroyed by tourists and there are plans to restrict visitors to some of the more delicate coral reefs.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that international tourism has both advantages and disadvantages. However, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

Sample 11:

International travel has become more accessible, and numerous countries are actively encouraging an increasing number of tourists. Despite certain drawbacks associated with this trend, I maintain that the advantages of enhanced tourism significantly overshadow the negatives.

On the one hand, there are undeniable challenges stemming from the surge in international tourism. Primarily, the local environment may be adversely affected by the expansion of facilities and infrastructure needed to accommodate the growing number of visitors. For instance, in Vietnam, several tourism companies have been authorized to clear vast areas of forestland to build modern amenities such as hotels and golf courses, leading to harmful consequences for natural habitats. Additionally, in host countries, an increased cost of living may burden local residents and negatively impact domestic tourism. This is because a rise in international tourists can result in inflated prices for accommodations and other services, potentially causing financial strain for local communities and domestic travelers.

On the other hand, the merits of international tourism are substantial and, in my opinion, far exceed the aforementioned challenges. Firstly, the local economy can experience significant growth through a flourishing tourism industry, as more employment opportunities emerge to cater to the needs of tourists. Local residents can secure jobs in hotels, restaurants, and other tourist-related businesses, allowing them to boost their income and improve their living standards. Secondly, a growing influx of foreign visitors can considerably strengthen the host country’s tourism sector, contributing substantially to its economic growth. Satisfied tourists are likely to recommend the destination to their acquaintances or even plan return visits, further advancing the country’s tourism industry.

In conclusion, the positive aspects of international tourism appear to be more substantial than its disadvantages. The economic growth and employment opportunities that arise from increased tourism largely counteract the environmental and financial concerns it raises.

Sample 12:

In recent years, international tourism has experienced a surge in popularity, fueled by the decreasing cost of transportation and the ever-growing accessibility of diverse tourist destinations. Countries increasingly opening their doors to tourists has sparked off a debate whether the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages. While increased tourism offers numerous benefits, it also poses challenges that necessitate careful consideration.

On the positive side, increased tourism has brought undeniable advantages. Countries welcoming more tourists witness a boost in their local economies through spending on accommodation, dining, transportation and various recreational activities. This influx of revenues not only supports the tourism industry but also has a profound effect on other sectors, thus fostering job creation and economic development. Furthermore, exposure to different cultures and traditions deepens cross-cultural understanding, breaking down stereotypes and promoting global harmony. The interchange of ideas and perspectives between tourists and locals can contribute to the enrichment of both parties, creating a more interconnected and empathetic world.

However, it is crucial to acknowledge the downsides of the tourist boom and one of the most significant concerns is the environmental impact. Increased footfall in popular tourist destinations often leads to ecological degradation, exerting stress on delicate ecosystems and contributing to climate change. Overcrowding can lead to pollution, habitat destruction and strain on essential resources and therefore pose a threat to the attractions that draw tourists in the first place. Additionally, the influx of tourists can strain local infrastructure and resources, leading to issues such as traffic congestion, waste management challenges and growing demand for energy.

In conclusion, the merits and demerits of booming tourism are multifaceted and require balanced evaluation. While there are indisputable economic benefits and cultural exchange fostered by tourism, the environmental drawbacks must not be ignored.

Sample 1:

The future of life on Earth is a topic of much concern with many challenges that will make it increasingly difficult to sustain life on our planet. Some people believe that more money should be spent on researching other planets to live on, such as Mars. In my opinion, this is not a realistic or viable solution to the environmental challenges we face on Earth.

Firstly, investing large sums of money into space exploration and colonization of other planets, such as Mars, is a questionable use of resources. At present, we still lack the necessary technology and knowledge to make such a mission a reality. Even if we were to develop the necessary technology, it would require vast amounts of resources and time to build and maintain such colonies. Given the current state of our planet, we should prioritize investing resources into finding solutions to environmental issues and reducing our carbon footprint to help mitigate the effects of climate change.

Furthermore, investing in space exploration may divert resources from more pressing issues, such as poverty reduction, healthcare, and education. By focusing on space exploration, we risk neglecting critical issues that are closer to home and impact the lives of millions of people on a daily basis. For instance, many countries have been facing a growing wealth gap, with millions of people living in poverty and struggling to access basic necessities such as food, shelter, and healthcare. By allocating a significant portion of the budget to space exploration, we are neglecting these issues and failing to provide for the most vulnerable members of society.

In conclusion, while the idea of researching other planets as an alternative to Earth may seem appealing, it is not a practical or responsible use of resources. We should instead focus on finding solutions to the problems we face on Earth, such as climate change and poverty, and work towards a sustainable future.

Sample 2:

It is true that if present trends continue, it will become increasingly difficult to sustain human life on Earth. While I agree that it is vital to tackle this problem, I believe that expenditure on research for new planets to colonise should be given a low priority, and resources must be used to find other, more practical solutions.

There are two major reasons why life on Earth is becoming more and more unsustainable. One obvious problem is the uncontrolled consumption of natural resources, which are being depleted as a result. For instance, the extraction of fossil fuels, such as coal, gas and oil to satisfy growing energy demands has serious environmental impacts, and these resources will eventually run out. Another concern is the rising level of pollution worldwide, of the land, the oceans and the air that we breathe. In India, for example, thousands of tons of industrial rubbish have been released illegally into rivers, killing aquatic life and contaminating drinking water.

However, I would argue that the search for a new planet on which humans could survive is a waste of valuable resources. Firstly, a vast amount of funding would be required to finance such space exploration, with no guarantee of success. This money is needed now to improve health services globally and to provide better education for all. Secondly, financial resources should be used to develop advanced technologies that would be more environmentally friendly and provide renewable energy. In the field of transport, to take a simple example, vehicles can now be converted to run on hydrogen or even waste cooking oil – as McDonald’s have done with their trucks.

In conclusion, I consider that the search for new planets on which to settle is a waste of time and resources, and efforts should be concentrated on living more sustainably here on Earth.

Sample 3:

Advances in technology make the prospect of finding the second Earth potentially viable. While I agree that terrestrial life has become increasingly difficult, I do not believe that we should invest money in finding a new planet to live on.

On the one hand, there is no doubt that life is not as easy as it was in the past. The main problem is the growing level of environmental pollution that adversely affects humankind in all parts of the world. The rising consumption of natural resources such as gas, oil and coal has resulted in an enormous amount of carbon emissions being released into the atmosphere, which impairs the air quality and accelerates climate change. The consequences of this are grave. People in many big cities are suffering respiratory diseases; more land is being shrunk due to the rise of sea levels; and there are frequent heat waves in tropical countries. Apparently, human life is now put in danger.

On the other hand, I would contend that spending money on finding another home for all creatures on the Earth is not an effective measure. There is little hope of seeking a planet that has favorable conditions for life while the expenditure can be extremely huge. In contrast, a much better solution would be that we should invest in environmental projects and encourage people to lead a more environmentally friendly lifestyle. For example, green energy should be harnessed and made more available to replace our dependence on fossil fuels, and individuals ought to opt for public transport rather than driving their vehicles. Such actions can cut exhaust emissions and slow down the effects of global warming, making the earth a more desirable place for us all.

In conclusion, although global warming is a global malady, it seems ludicrous to suggest that people should find another planet to settle down on.

Sample 4:

It is sometimes asserted that more investment should be allocated to space programs dedicated to researching new habitats for humankind given the possibility of Earth becoming increasingly unlivable. I largely agree with this assertion considering the need for another habitable planet and the possibility of scientific breakthroughs resulting from space projects despite the urge to address immediate issues.

The foremost rationale for my approval of increasing resources for exploring other planets lies in the conditions on Earth becoming more uninhabitable. This might stem from a number of factors such as climate change and natural resource depletion. While shifts in climate possibly lead to catastrophic storms, floods and heat waves, the scarcity of resources including oil and coal might result in the collapse of industrial production. These scenarios underscore the necessity to migrate to another habitable planet to protect humans from extinction.

Another reason as for why I support additional investment in projects researching other planets is the scientific advancements they offer. Specifically, these technical improvements can not only benefit these projects but also elevate people’s standards of living. For instance, the program “Occupying Mars”, which aims to send humans to Mars, has successfully developed novel satellite communication technologies that are being employed to provide internet connection to remote areas, contributing to socio–economic development in these regions.

Nevertheless, I acknowledge the demand to solve the pressing problems of modern society. These issues are diverse, ranging from national conflicts and a booming population to insufficient social welfare. If adequate resources were given to address these fundamental issues, the living conditions for people on Earth could be greatly improved, lessening the need to explore distant planets for an alternative habitat.

In conclusion, I mostly support the idea of investing more in the search for a new livable planet given the future hostile environment of Earth and the technological benefits it provides even though there are urgent issues that need addressing. It is predicted that governments of wealthy nations should allocate greater funds to encourage the execution of ambitious space expeditions, while those of struggling nations should just continue to focus on providing basic welfare to their populations.

Sample 5:

Many people believe more financial resources should be allocated to universe studies in order to discover a new habitable environment for humans due to the increasingly harsh living conditions on the Earth. In my opinion, this idea is completely justifiable.

The population explosion is the first urgent matter urging results from space studies which currently are in need of more money to afford facilities and modern machinery. The world is facing the threat from the lack of land and accommodation for the ever-increasing rate of birth. Especially in densely populated cities like Hanoi, it is a common picture of people struggling to find an apartment. This forces humans to resort to alternatives of changing living places to other planets. Such an idea would not be actualized without enough money, emphasizing the demand for sponsorships.

Another thing which justifies the budget spent on discovering a new suitable home for human beings is the depletion of natural resources, such as fuel and water. Unfortunately, fossil fuel and water reservoir are being over-exploited for short-term benefits. In the long term, the essential elements for life sustainability will be used up, and human life will be put at stake since there is no fuel to maintain production or transportation. Therefore, if there is even a fragile hope to discover a new environment, people should value the opportunity and invest money in researches on space to ensure the survival of the human race.

In conclusion, I strongly suppose that financial investments on discovering another planet as a new home replacing the Earth are reasonable.

Sample 6:

Some people believe that it is only a matter of time until living conditions on Earth become completely uninhabitable. In light of this, more capital should be allocated to research on discovering alternative planets to populate, such as Mars. From a personal standpoint, any monetary resource allocated to outer space expeditions is a complete waste and, as a matter of fact, can be better spent in ameliorating Earth’s environment itself.

On the one hand, cosmic exploration does not guarantee any positive outcomes on finding a new proper home for human life. The first reason is that astronomers worldwide have attempted to inspect neighboring planets and solar systems and have so far found no planets that have even a slight livable condition for human residence. In addition, the universe is extraordinarily vast and would take tens of billions of years to travel at even light speed, which itself is, in the foreseeable future, far beyond human capabilities. Thus, even when a new plausible alternative to Earth is found, migrating mankind there would take eons and likely be prohibitively expensive.

On the other hand, improving Earth’s environmental standards is an appropriate and effective usage of funds. Firstly, unlike the field of space travel, natural world preservation and protection have yielded tangible and sometimes promising results. For example, just recently the news has reported the invention of bacteria that converts plastic to biofuel, or per-kilowatt solar power cost has been, for the first time, feasible for the average household as a supplement to the national grid. Therefore, it would be more plausible to continue investing in a field that has been proven to work. Secondly, for environmental research that has come to fruition, massive amounts of funds are required to implement and maintain it. For example, Singapore has successfully implemented a very costly, but effective and comprehensive, sewer & waste treatment system, which has contributed greatly to the country’s pollution-free status. If other countries are willing to pay such high prices, this will no doubt pay off in the long term with a cleaner Earth.

All in all, if there was a monetary investment to be made, it would be made into preserving Earth’s sustainability instead of space expeditions.

Sample 7:

As interest around interplanetary travel starts to pique, many are proposing the idea that money be poured into studying other planets. In my opinion, despite this being a worthwhile endeavour, it should not be done at the expense of people on Earth as well as their habitats.  

One side of the argument is that space is the final frontier for human exploration, and it can provide intellectual satisfaction for individuals. I argue that one of humanity’s most basic drives is the want to be able to explore new phenomena. Human conceptual and linguistic capabilities point to a high level of inquisitiveness and self-expression, and as such, space travel could be a potential avenue for expressing these drives. This is why, for instance, despite it not necessarily being profitable, organisations such as NASA continue to spend billions of dollars a year in helping to develop space travel. Thus, if we are able to reduce costs enough for people to live on Mars, this will allow a new generation of humans to learn more about the universe and our place within it.

On the other hand, it could be said that space exploration should not be at the cost of the Earth’s health. Instead of spending money on travelling to other planets that could harbour life, I argue that it is much more important to protect the planet we are sure to contain life, that of our own. Thus, resources that are used for space travel could instead be redirected to things such as poverty alleviation programs.

Ultimately, despite the extraordinary benefits space travel might bring about, I find taking care of the planet on which we are living and promoting its sustainable development a better option.

Sample 8:

The existence of our own planet is becoming increasingly difficult as a result of escalating instability in the environment and culture. A group of people proposes that more research money be expanded so that people can end up living on other planets. I disagree with this viewpoint, and hence the article will demonstrate why more funds should be used for the betterment of the Earth rather than investing in space research.

Many individuals believe that the planet will become unfit for human habitation in the near future due to a large number of social crimes occurring in society as well as the numerous forms of pollution occurring in the environment. It is regrettable that most governments and concerned authorities fail to properly control these man-made disasters, which have a negative impact on the entire human species as the population grows.

Regardless of the few serious challenges that the globe faces, the notion that the earth would no longer be appropriate for human habitation is totally absurd. The rationale for this idea is that all of society's errors and harmful pollutants are caused by males. The social and environmental distresses may undoubtedly be abolished or reduced to a major level if all governments impose rigorous law and order on their people and place a great emphasis on public knowledge in order to prevent the world from further deterioration. To demonstrate, the current global pandemic Covid 19 outbreak is causing people to stay at home, and as a result, all countries are observing a significant decrease in overall pollution; also, very few crimes are occurring due to people's restricted lifestyle. As a result, humans still have the ability to protect and repair the earth through their actions.

To summarise, it is evident that men are constantly endangering their living planet by inappropriate and hazardous behavior. However, rather than investing more money in exploring the viability of life on other planets, we should direct that money toward reducing the existing problems in society and the environment, so protecting the total population of all creatures.

Sample 9:

Some people feel that because humanity will become too vulnerable on Earth, people/governments should invest more money in space exploration in order to find a new home. This is entirely my opinion. Not surprisingly, there has been a significant increase in population in recent years. Staying alive on Earth will become increasingly difficult in the next decades. Some argue that large sums of money should be spent on investigating other worlds where humans could reside, specifically Mars. I somewhat agree with this viewpoint, and several of the framework's fundamental points are outside the scope of the following paragraphs.

On the one hand, it is evident that the Earth no longer has the capacity to support human life. For starters, environmental degradation is accelerating, resulting in natural resource loss. One stark example is the increasing severity and insurmountability of the lack/shortage/scarcity of clean water, particularly in developing countries. Furthermore, combating the greenhouse effect, which has resulted in not only climate change but also habitat destruction, is becoming more difficult and expensive than ever. This is due in part to our dependency on fossil fuels: the more we use them, the worse the pollution becomes.

Space exploration, on the other hand, has played a critical role in transforming humanity's society. One reason is that it is unraveling the secrets of the cosmos while simultaneously providing humans with information about planet Earth. For example, information gathered from space, robes assisted people in explaining the beginning of the Earth. Another reason is that space exploration has given rise to a plethora of cutting-edge technologies. One of these is satellite technology, which gave rise to satellite television and GPS gadgets. Apparently, study into other worlds has resulted in a plethora of spin-offs for resolving problems on Earth.

To summarise, I believe that space exploration is critical and deserving of further development because our planet is becoming too unsafe for humans to live on.

Sample 10:

Some argue that life on Earth is becoming increasingly difficult. As a result, we must look for another planet on which to live. Although I believe that living on Earth will be difficult in the future, I believe that searching for a new planet is unnecessary.

On the one hand, there are primarily two reasons why Earth's life will be unsustainable. One evident issue is the rising level of pollution in the land and ocean, which results in a disproportionate number of people living in these places. For example, if the ocean is polluted, there will be no fish to catch. As a result, fishermen and those who live near the beach will be forced to relocate. Overconsumption of natural resources is another factor. When fossil fuels like oil and coal are used to supply the world's energy needs, they will soon be depleted. Unfortunately, it takes a long time for these resources to regenerate.

However, I believe that discovering a new planet is a waste of money. We must consider a number of pressing issues that have a direct impact on people's lives. One of these is to enhance agricultural technology and, as a result, lessen the risk of hunger. Furthermore, there is still time to save the planet by replacing fossil fuels with environmentally benign and renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power, which will slow the rate of global warming. Take the Rex Hotel as an example; they are now using trucks that are powered by corn oil to reduce pollutants.

In conclusion, while it is becoming increasingly difficult to live on Earth, I continue to believe that there are other solutions to this problem other than searching for another planet to live on.

Sample 11:

As the environmental issues of the Earth are growing more serious, people have started to believe that we should invest more money into the research of other habitable planets. However, in my opinion, such expenditure is nowhere close to being sensible.

Despite sounding promising, the plan of migrating to another planet has numerous risks. In this boundless universe, looking for another Earth would be almost impossible. If in one in a million chance we do find a new home, how will we transport the entire human race and rebuild the society? To make this theoretically possible, we would need spaceships capable of transporting 7.7 billion people, houses and facilities would need to be rebuilt, not to mention the extreme amount of energy needed to launch the spaceships. Also, the fund for this comes from the citizens whose lives are being risked. If the plan were to fail, that would mean we spent time, money and effort just to kill ourselves. By the time things start to go wrong, it will already be too late to turn back.

Instead of risking our lives, we should focus more on saving our planet. With the same amount of money, we can restore the Earth’s habitable nature. We can organize projects and campaigns that increase environmental awareness and produce more environmentally friendly products. Many people say that it is already too late to save the Earth but that is such an irresponsible thing to say. In the past few millennia, this planet has been slowly destroyed by none other than humans themselves. After everything we have done, it is unacceptable to just abandon the Earth.

As previously mentioned, spending money on researching for another planet to live on is not the smartest move. The Earth is our one and only home. Therefore, the only way to sustain human life is to protect this planet.

Sample 12:

It is true that there are several discussions about whether authorities in many countries should invest more money in finding other new places for creatures to survive because of the rising difficulties of living on the Earth. While I agree that the Earth is not as favourable as it was in the past, I also believe that the expenditure on space research too much is a waste of time and money as well.

On the one hand, there are two major reasons why I suppose that it is becoming impossible for ordinary people to settle down on the Earth. The first reason is that natural resources are put in danger due to the uncontrolled consumption of people. To generate electricity, for example, the growing amount of oil, gas and coal used to meet humans demand on a daily basis, which has serious impacts on the environment. The second reason is that a great number of countries have witnessed environmental pollutions which affected adversely to humankind. In many factories in Vietnam, there has been thousands of tons of industrial rubbish released illegally into rivers nearby.

On the other hand, I believe that governments should not be encouraged to spend more money on seeking a new planet to survive in the future. Firstly, the expenses of researching the space industry might account for a huge amount of money in the national budgets. It would be more effective if the authorities should use them to invest on many other key fields such as education, health and especially transportation, which raise the living standard of the citizens. Furthermore, the development of advanced technology would be a much better solution to improve the survival of humankind on the Earth. Politicians should run more campaigns to encourage people to use green energy sources instead of natural resources.

In conclusion, despite the fact that there have been numerous problems living on the Earth, I also believe that it is not necessary for governments to spend more expenses on seeking other new planets for humans to survive in the future.

Sample 13:

We all have at least once in our lives contemplated living on some other planet. Be it Mars, Venus, Mercury, and so on. To provide food to our intellectual thoughts, let us first study the requirements to live on another planet like air, water, sunlight, and so on. Other than requiring things we must understand the atmosphere of other planets in the solar system. Mars is remote from the sun and also, it’s less bulky than earth. So, the conclusion is that we can survive on Mars but with limited capacity. Mercury is not bulky and most close to the sun. So, it is impossible to live on mercury. Venus is bulkier than mercury and also remote from the sun. So, we can think about it, if there is a possibility of living. The second thing is that apart from it, we also have to know about the temperature according to the different planets. Some planets have a higher temperature due to the less distance from the sun and on these planets, it is impossible to live. This is because the human body cannot survive in the high temperature. Now, if we come to Mars then it is a better option for human habitation than any other planet. One of the reasons behind habitation on Mars is that recently scientists have proved that Mars has water and air which are required to live as humans. Since Mars is the closest to the earth yet 35 million miles away and I think it is the best alternative to support human life. Basically, the journey from earth to mars is about four to six months long but it is very difficult to survive without proper and strict training. Apart from human lives, plants and animals cannot survive the conditions on Mars due to some genuine aspects. Another challenge is the gravity on Mars because it has only 38 % gravity compared to the earth. And due to less gravity, there are many health problems that occur like muscle loss and bone demineralization. Other problems like Solar radiation, Ozone degradation, dust storms, and toxicness are also important to live on the other planets.

Sample 14:

Earth is in the perfect position from the sun and due to it, we get the water in the liquid state. Because if it's too close to the sun then we can’t get the water in a liquid state due to warmness and on the other side if it's further from the sun then also we can’t get the water in the liquid state due to coldness. So, the main challenge is that we have to find the true copy of the earth to live on it.

According to the scientist, there are many planets where suitable conditions are available to habitat the humans, and also there will be many moons on them. In recent times, Elon Musk and NASA both are focused on Mars as the alternative to the earth. NASA said that going to the moon takes only three days but going to Mars takes seven to nine months. In this journey, there are many problems that occur like weightlessness, cosmic radiation, and all. And Mars is colder than the earth so on it, we have to maintain the temperature to survive the seven to nine months.

Apart from it, the biggest difficulty is the money because we don’t have much money to spend on accommodation for the humans living on the other planets. If we think about Pluto, then it has minimal solar radiation than any other, but the problem is that it is furthest from the sun and due to this it is the very coldest planet, and human lives cannot survive in this much low temperature. If we guess that we can overcome these problems, then also the biggest issue is that human lives cannot survive without food, and it is impossible to grow food on the surface of any other planet due to some abstract conditions.

So, according to me, it’s not a single issue but there are very many problems during the journey to another planet and we have to understand both sides of the subject and then we can decide something. So, till now Mars is the best alternative to Earth.

Sample 15:

Many people are of the view that life on earth is becoming difficult, and the future does not hold much for people living on earth. Accordingly, money and resources at higher levels need to be spent to find ways to settle on other planets like on Mars. While it may be considered effective to find whether life on Mars would be possible, spending too much money on it does not seem like a better idea. First of all, people living on earth are finding it difficult to see a future because of the problems created by humans. This includes the massive and excessive use of natural resources resulting in depletion. Further, pollution of different kinds including land, water, and air is increasing with time because of human activities. Spending large sums of money and resources in order to find life and settle on another planet like Mars is not a great idea. This would imply that humans settling on another planet might even deplete the conditions of that planet as well. Moreover, spending money for finding ways for human settlement without guarantee of success, is just a waste of money. Another important point to consider is that the existing systems on earth in healthcare, education, etc. yet needs to be developed. The countries across the world are faced with immense financial issues and lack of proper infrastructure. Financial resources need to be spent in order to develop the existing living conditions rather than on another planet like Mars. More sustainable ways of living with the use of solar power, technological advancements can be used for enhancing the quality of life on earth. Hence, while it might seem to be quite an exploration for finding human settlement on Mars, it is essential for the development of people on earth.

Sample 16:

In the technologically driven world, individuals were believed that, rather than leading an appalling life on planet Earth, it is better to invest in livelihood research on other planets such as Mars. Is it always the case? I vehemently disagree with the statement because studies show that there was a dire situation to live on these planets.

Initially, it is totally true that we are living in an age which starving with leading issues. Primarily after this pandemic situation, people are totally distracted with their life. Many of them lost their lives, a few of them lost their savings, and others lost their employment. In totality, people are facing a drastic situation that was not faced earlier in their life. Researchers may invent remedies in the form of vaccination till an absolute adequate solution is not available. Apart from this, inflation, economic crisis and other natural disasters are also rigorous problems for individuals. Last but not least, our natural resources are limited, and there was no immediate alternative for the same.

On the other hand, spending money for research studies for another planet is a Himalayan task. Only humongous investors or materialists can afford its cost. Still, scientists were on the track of confusion that is humans are able to live in outer space. For surviving on other planets, we required advantageous facilities which are error-free. In addition, we required a mammoth investment for infrastructure, automotive, and health care. Still, there is no security for humans to survive on other planets.

In my opinion, humans should find a practical solution to overcome these situations. Government officials should take initiatives for human welfare.

Sample 17:

Numerous individuals advocate for increased allocation of financial resources towards space exploration to seek out a new livable habitat for humanity, given the increasingly adverse conditions on Earth. In my view, this proposition holds merit.

The issue of overpopulation is the primary concern prompting the necessity for advancements in space exploration, which presently require additional funding for facilities and modern equipment. The global challenge arises from the shortage of land and housing to accommodate the continuously growing birth rate. Particularly in densely populated urban areas like Hanoi, the struggle to secure housing is a common sight. This compels humanity to consider relocating to other planets. However, such a prospect cannot materialize without sufficient financial backing, highlighting the crucial need for sponsorships.

Another factor justifying the expenditure on seeking a new habitable environment for humans is the depletion of natural resources, including fuel and water. Unfortunately, fossil fuels and water reserves are being excessively exploited for short-term gains. In the long run, these vital resources essential for sustaining life will be depleted, jeopardizing human existence as there will be insufficient fuel for maintaining production or transportation. Hence, if there is even a faint hope of discovering a new habitable world, it is imperative to seize the opportunity and allocate funds towards space research to ensure the continuation of the human race.

To conclude, I firmly believe that investing financially in the quest for an alternative planet as a new habitat to replace Earth is justifiable.

Sample 18:

The existence of our own planet is becoming challenging day by day due to the increasing disorder in the environment and society. For this, a group of individuals suggest that more funding should be given to research so that people can live on other planets. I do not agree with this opinion, and therefore the essay will argue why more funds should be used to improve the Earth, instead of spending them on space exploration.

Many people believe that in the near future the world will become uninhabitable due to the large number of social crimes occurring in society, as well as various forms of pollution occurring in the environment. Unfortunately, most governments and relevant authorities are not able to effectively control these man-made disasters with population growth, which, in turn, adversely affect the entire human race. For example, a study conducted by researchers at Harvard University scholars in late 2018 shows that 44% of Chicago residents feel unsafe to leave their home every day for work due to environmental and social damage. As a result, a significant number of developed countries are working on other planets such as Mars to make them habitable in case the Earth cannot meet their needs. In this regard, some governments allocate a larger budget for space research, rather than spending it on human needs.

Despite several major obstacles the world is facing, the idea that the Earth will no longer be habitable for our lives is downright ridiculous. The reason for this belief is that all the unhappiness in society and the deadly pollution that occurs are created by men. Social and environmental disasters can certainly be eliminated or reduced to a significant level if all governments establish strict law and order for their people and emphasize a strong public consciousness to save the planet from further decay. For instance, the recent global outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic is forcing people to stay at home, and as a result, there has been a significant reduction in overall pollution in all countries; also, very few crimes occur because of people's controlled lifestyle. So, people still have the power to protect and heal the earth by their own deeds.

To conclude, it cannot be denied that humans are constantly harming their living planet with their unintelligent and reckless behavior. However, instead of spending more money on research into the possibility of life on other planets, we should use that money to alleviate existing problems in society and the environment and thus save the entire population of all beings.