Câu hỏi:

05/01/2025 289

Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships. Do you agree or disagree?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Some hold a view that advanced communication technology is adversely affecting social relationships. I mostly agree with this view since it can bring about greater misunderstandings and a lack of healthy relationships although it can facilitate human interactions.

The first justification for my agreement is that the utilization of technology in communication has given rise to more frequent misunderstandings. More specifically, people may misinterpret what others convey due to the lack of genuine interaction as they converse with each other via online platforms. For instance, with a pleasant tone and mischievous face, people can show that they are joking during face-to-face conversations; however, if they communicate via networking sites such as Facebook in the same way, recipients can misunderstand the same utterance and falsely believe that the sender is angry or sarcastic instead. Therefore, there would arise growing dissatisfaction and outrage among individuals who have a habit of communicating virtually.

Another reason why I agree that social interactions are being negatively impacted by current communication technology is that people can find it harder to establish trustful relationships. This is because there are numerous scammers, criminals and other corrupt individuals who approach people on social media for nefarious purposes, making them potentially suffer from many toxic and troubled online relationships. To illustrate, Twitter users these days tend to raise their vigilance as they acknowledge that cybercriminals who make friends with them in this social platform can disguise themselves as genuine citizens who then go on to steal their personal information for financial fraud. As a result, close-knit friendships are unlikely to be nurtured, potentially narrowing each individual’s circle of relationships.

On the other hand, I concede that breakthroughs in communication technology can also improve interactions between individuals. Most importantly, cutting-edge technology allows people to engage with their connections regardless of time and geographical constraints, thus facilitating the increase of social interactions and therefore enhancing humans’ interpersonal relationships.

In conclusion, I strongly advocate the idea that technological advancements in communication can jeopardize social relationships as more misunderstandings can arise and reliable relationships can be difficult to forge. It is advisable that people should favour face-to-face interactions to eliminate these drawbacks.

Sample 2:

The influence of social media and technological devices on social relationships is a topic that has gained considerable attention. While they are sometimes believed to do damage to interpersonal communication, this, in my opinion, need not always be the case.

One of the most well-known reasons why technology is often blamed for our communication problems is because people become isolated as they use it. It is, in fact, not difficult to see friends who meet up at a café end up attached to their phones, or parents and children spend their evenings on social media rather than interacting with each other. Another limitation can be observed from the conflicts happening online. People have difficulties expressing their emotions and attitudes through texts, causing miscommunications and quarrels. These problems are, however, often caused by people’s abuse of supposedly helpful tools.

Our interaction, on the other hand, is enhanced with the assistance of modern communication technology. Having the ability to connect people from a distance helps students who study in a different town or in a foreign country, for example, to constantly stay in touch with their family. In addition, it also allows people to expand their social circles as they join various online communities. Facebook groups, for instance, enable people of the same interest in a particular field such as art or language acquisition to connect and exchange knowledge.

In conclusion, for any tool ever created by humans, including communication technology, drawbacks are inevitable. However, these communication aids only seem to pose a threat to the quality of interpersonal relationships when we misuse them.

Sample 3:

There is widespread concern that the prevalence of instantaneous communication tools negatively impacts interpersonal bonds. I disagree completely with this viewpoint because of how modern communication facilitates not just long-distance interactions but also global social engagement.

Some worry that individuals may grow more isolated if more convenient modes of communication, such as smartphones and social media, become the norm. They argue that by emphasizing virtual communication over real-world encounters, these technologies risk weakening the foundations of interpersonal bonds. This assertion, however, is vastly inflated. Virtual communication actually strengthens interpersonal bonds rather than weakening them. Most Facebook users, for instance, have face-to-face conversations with friends and coworkers in addition to exchanging messages online. Facebook's additional tools, such as instant messaging and video chatting, do not replace face-to-face communication but rather help us maintain relationships over great distances.

In addition to addressing the issue of distance, as stated above, these technologies also allow us to widen our social networks. Some examples of such communities are online forums like Reddit, which bring together people with a shared interest in the arts, history, video games, or linguistics, and photo-sharing applications like Pinterest, which may bring together a group of individuals with similar tastes in photography. These communities allow for in-depth conversations and debates on a global scale, something that is difficult to do in person. Therefore, advances in communication have not been at the expense of interpersonal connections but rather have strengthened them.

In conclusion, I am confident that the advancements in communication technology have made it possible for people to maintain long-distance connections and participate in the social life on a global scale.

Sample 4:

In recent years, modern communication technology has significantly impacted social relationships. While some argue that these technological advancements have led to a decline in the quality of our connections with others, I believe that there are both negative and positive effects to consider.

On one hand, there is a prevailing concern that modern communication technology has contributed to social isolation. It has created a situation where people increasingly opt for virtual experiences over face-to-face interactions. In the past, friends and family gathered for meals, fostering stronger bonds. Nowadays, individuals may sit together at a table but remain engrossed in their smartphones, creating an emotional distance among them. Additionally, the brevity of digital communication, such as texting and social media, often fails to convey the depth of emotions and can lead to misunderstandings and misinterpretations. Consequently, people might become overly reliant on technology for connection, inadvertently isolating themselves from genuine social experiences.

However, it is essential to acknowledge the positive effects of modern communication technology on social relationships. Most notably, it has facilitated global connectivity by allowing people to stay in touch with loved ones regardless of geographical distances. Through video calls and instant messaging, grandparents can witness their grandchildren's milestones, and friends can maintain their bonds despite living in different countries. Furthermore, online platforms offer opportunities for individuals to meet new people, share common interests, and form new friendships, transcending the limitations of physical proximity.

In conclusion, while modern communication technology can indeed lead to social isolation, it is equally responsible for fostering global connectivity and enabling meaningful interactions. As such, I believe that its overall impact on social relationships is contingent on how individuals choose to use and balance these technologies in their lives.

Sample 5:

In an era where digital communication reigns supreme, concerns are mounting over its potential detrimental impact on social bonds. I contend that while modern communication technologies facilitate unprecedented connectivity, they can indeed strain interpersonal relationships by fostering superficial interactions and diminishing face-to-face engagement. This essay will examine the dilution of genuine social interactions and the erosion of privacy as primary consequences.

The advent of social media and instant messaging has transformed the way we connect, offering the convenience of swift, borderless communication. However, this convenience comes at a cost. Digital platforms, while enabling constant contact, often lead to shallow exchanges that lack the depth and emotional resonance of in-person conversations. Studies have shown that reliance on such mediums can lead to a decrease in the quality of friendships and family relationships, as the nuanced cues of face-to-face interaction—such as body language and tone—are lost. For instance, a message conveying sympathy may seem insincere or misunderstood when not accompanied by the warmth of a human presence, leading to misinterpretations and feelings of isolation among users.

Furthermore, the ubiquity of social networks and the ease of sharing have raised significant privacy concerns, altering the dynamics of trust within relationships. The blurring lines between public and private spheres mean that personal moments, once shared between close friends or family, are now broadcast to a wide audience. This oversharing can lead to discomfort and breaches of trust, as individuals find their lives scrutinized or misused without their consent. The viral nature of online content also means that once shared, information is difficult to retract, leading to potential long-term damage to one’s reputation and relationships.

In conclusion, modern communication technologies, despite their convenience, challenge the depth and privacy of social ties. They risk diluting genuine connections with superficial interactions and privacy breaches, undermining trust and emotional richness. Navigating this digital era demands a balance that cherishes real interpersonal bonds alongside technological ease.

Sample 6:

The pervasive ascent of digital communication has ignited debates on its repercussions for human interaction. I firmly believe that while these technologies enrich our connectivity, they inadvertently erode the fabric of social cohesion. This essay delves into the nuances of how digital platforms may prioritize efficiency over empathy and contribute to a culture of distraction, detracting from the quality of our relationships.

Digital communication, for all its immediacy and breadth, often substitutes the depth of face-to-face interactions with a more cursory form of engagement. The texture of real-life conversations, replete with emotional subtleties and non-verbal cues, is irreplaceable. For instance, the empathy conveyed through a comforting touch, or a shared glance is absent in the digital realm. This shift towards online interactions can dilute the intimacy and understanding that cement human relationships, fostering a sense of isolation amidst a networked world. A study from the University of Michigan suggests that increased social media use correlates with lower measures of emotional well-being, highlighting the paradox of connectedness in the digital age.

Moreover, the relentless influx of notifications and social media updates creates a fragmented attention span, relegating meaningful interactions to the background. This environment of constant distraction not only hampers our ability to engage deeply with others but also undermines the sanctity of present moments. The phenomenon of "phubbing," where individuals ignore their companions in favor of their smartphones, exemplifies how digital interruptions can fray the threads of social rapport, leaving relationships frayed at the edges.

In conclusion, while modern communication technologies expand our connectivity, they risk diminishing the depth of our relationships. It's crucial to balance digital interactions with face-to-face connections, valuing the depth and intimacy they bring. Moving forward, we must ensure technology enhances rather than overshadows the richness of genuine human bonds.

Sample 7:

A widespread belief holds that the advent of modern means of communication has resulted in some detrimental impacts on social connections. I completely agree with the statement, because I believe that the ease and accessibility of instant gratification through technology is driving us towards a lack of genuine human connections, and it is also leading to increased feelings of loneliness and social isolation.

Firstly, people have become too dependent on digital devices to communicate with others, which has led to a reduction in face-to-face interaction which is important for a real connection between individuals. With the ability to send texts, messages, and make calls from anywhere at any time, many people are forgoing traditional means of communication such as meeting in person or even speaking on the phone. This has resulted in a lack of meaningful, in-person relationships and a decrease in empathy and emotional intelligence, as people are not practicing or honing these skills as often as they once did. For example, studies have shown that people who spend more time on their phones and other digital devices tend to report feeling more lonely and less connected to others, despite the seemingly constant stream of communication available to them.

Secondly, social media has contributed to the deterioration of real-life relationships by fostering a false sense of connection. Many people use social media to present a curated, idealized version of their lives, and in doing so, they create a distorted reality that others are able to compare their own lives to. This can lead to feelings of inadequacy, frustration, and even resentment, as people feel like they cannot measure up to the lives they see online. In addition, the impersonal nature of social media communication makes it easier for people to be rude, unkind, and even abusive towards others, as they are not faced with the immediate consequences of their actions. This creates a toxic online environment that can have a damaging impact on people's mental health and well-being.

In conclusion, the constant availability of cutting-edge communication technology has led to a reduction in face-to-face interactions and established a false sense of connection, which is damaging to both individuals and society as a whole. Therefore, I firmly believe that modern communication technology has had a negative impact on social relationships.

Sample 8:

It is argued that technological advancements in the field of communication have adversely affected one's personal and professional relationships. Personally, I strongly disagree with this view.

As new ways of communicating with one another, such as mobile phones and social networks, are introduced, some fear that people might become socially isolated. Their rationale is that these technologies, which promote communication in virtual reality, have marginalized physical interaction and thus may potentially fracture concrete relationships. However, this claim is largely exaggerated. In reality, virtual interaction augments social relationships rather than undermines them. For example, most Facebook users talk to friends and colleagues both through the social network and in person. The extra features that Facebook provides like instant messaging and video calling do not substitute for having a conversation in real life, but merely help us stay connected over long distances.

I am convinced there is further evidence to suggest that innovations in communication exist not to the detriment of social relationships, but rather to their benefit. Not only do they address the question of distance as demonstrated above, but these tools also help us to expand our social circles. For instance, online food forums connect people who share a passion for culinary arts, while photo- sharing applications like Instagram can bring together a group of individuals who have the same taste in fashion. These examples are a testament to how technology establishes communities and promotes interaction among people.

In conclusion, there are sufficient grounds to reject the view that social relationships might be jeopardized by the advent of advanced communication technologies. It is my genuine belief that as technology improves going forward, so will people's social experience.

Sample 9:

The impacts of digital communication on human relationships have long been a topic of controversy. From my perspective, modern means of communication may sabotage one’s relationships with other people.

The most typical example of today’s communication technology is the mobile phone. Originally designed to provide people with instant access to telecommunication, it has become indispensable for most people in modern society. Nowadays, various features such as built-in cameras and interactive games have been added to the mobile phone, making it multifunctional and thus even more popular. However, I believe the omnipresence of mobile phones in particular, or digital communication tools in general, often interferes with the bonding time that people share and thus has a negative influence on interpersonal relationships. There is compelling evidence for my belief. If people use mobile phones for work purposes, business calls may disrupt any real-life conversations they have. This is the case for millions of working people who may have overlooked the importance of having smooth and uninterrupted conversations with other people. They may be unaware that relationships are at risk of eroding when people spend less quality time with each other. Also, if people use mobile phones to play games, the constant urge to complete game missions may disengage them from social gatherings. For example, many teenagers sacrifice real-life socialising time for mobile game playing time. In the long term, this would be likely to cause friends to drift apart.

Some people use mobile phones mainly for virtual social networks, and notifications and messages from these sites may prevent them from having intimate conversations with their loved ones. There are many real examples of couples on the verge of breaking up because one or both partners have grown overly attached to social network applications on mobile phones, and they find it hard to maintain a sense of intimacy.

Although most people use mobile phones for all personal as well as professional reasons and consequently, they need to pay constant attention to their phone, however, potentially isolating those in their company. In this way, mobile phones may dull real-life interactions and affect relationships as a result.

In brief, the constant distraction of modern communication devices such as mobile phones may cause the breakdown of numerous social relationships.

Sample 10:

It is argued by some that state-of-the-art technological improvements in communication pose a dire threat to the relationships amongst people. I agree with this viewpoint for some reasons.

Firstly, social isolation is the first negative consequence. In today’s era, with the invention of the internet as well as smartphones and the emergence of other social networking websites, people are substituting physical relations with electronic ones. It is common to see many youths prefer to make friends online via Facebook or Twitter instead of gathering at the coffee shops for their first meeting.

Secondly, people’s social etiquette is declining due to the lack of social exposure and the informal way of transmitting messages. On online platforms, teenagers tend to make use of emoticons and abbreviations to convey their feelings and emotions, removing the formalities rather than writing full sentences or making gestures or postures to express their actions.

Finally, advanced technology in the field of communication can wreck the nature of friendship. Often virtual friends easily break up and only a minimum degree of reliability and loyalty is expected of them. Some online friends are merely looking for an opportunity to con others out of their pocket. A prime example is when I was persuaded by a close buddy of mine to transfer USD 200 into his account, only later to realize that his Facebook account was a clone one. This has made me more cautious ever since.

In conclusion, I believe that this trend is negatively affecting people’s relations. Given this situation, it is advisable that less use of modern communication equipment be made.

Sample 11:

Digital communication has had an impact on human relationships for a long time but whether the impacts are good or bad is a matter of controversy. To a great extent, I believe that modern ways of communication sometimes affect social relationships.

The greatest mode of digital communication is mobile, which was designed for telecommunication. Presently with the easy access to social in the smartphone, it is beyond any doubt that people’s social relationships are getting poorer. Smartphone users prefer to see things in their built-in cameras, not directly through their eyes. They play mobile games, but they don’t know the playground. They have so many friends on social media, but they may not know their neighbors. They protest against global issues, but the local issues remain unseen. They make friends, breaking the boundaries of countries without even seeing but the people around them are unknown. So, definitely digital communication makes people socially isolated.

If we can use mobile phones for what it is designed to, we may stay more socially connected and it can improve the quality of life as well. Apart from being individuals, we are also a part of society, and we must not forget this. Having face-to-face communication and keeping aside digital communication for a specific duration each day can strengthen our social ties, and it will be very helpful at the time of need.

Digital life and digital communication reduce our scopes of socializing as we avoid social gatherings to be digitally available for some other happening. For example, people are ready to miss a birthday party or a wedding reception nearby for a virtual meeting. But the fact is at the time of emergency, the people outside the town or country will not come for help – the neighbors will.

I strongly believe that people’s social relationships get much damaged due to digital communication and it is not at all a sign of a healthy society.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Travelling abroad is becoming more affordable than ever before, and many nations are implementing new approaches to attract more tourists. Although there are still drawbacks of international travel, I think its values are more significant.

On the one hand, the downsides of welcoming foreign visitors are varied. First, the local environment can be adversely affected due to facility and infrastructural development. For example, in Vietnam, many tourism companies are permitted to chop down a great area of forests to construct modern commodities such as hotels and golf courses, exerting dire consequences on natural habitats. As for the countries that play host to international tourists, the rise in costs of living may lay much pressure on local people and be a detriment to domestic travel. This is because the growth in the number of tourists from abroad would encourage the costs of hotel rooms and other services to increase. People in the neighborhood and domestic visitors would suffer in comparison.

On the other hand, I suppose the benefits of international travel would eclipse those analyzed disadvantages. First, the regional economy can enormously benefit from the burgeoning tourism industry as more occupations will be created to accommodate the needs of tourists. Local people can have more job opportunities in hotels or restaurants and therefore earn more money to improve their living standards. Second, the increased number of foreign people coming to visit another country would evidently enhance tourism industries, contributing greatly to the wealth of that country. If tourists enjoy their trips, they will recommend the destination to their friends or perhaps they will come back in the future.

In conclusion, it appears to me that the merits of international tourism are more notable than its drawbacks.

Sample 2:

In the modern era, international travel has become increasingly accessible and affordable, with many countries opening their doors to welcome tourists from around the world. While this trend brings both benefits and drawbacks to the tourism industry, I firmly believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

On the positive side, the tourism sector plays a pivotal role in boosting the economies of host countries. With an influx of tourists, there is a surge in demand for various services, such as accommodations, transportation, and restaurants, leading to job creation for the local population. Furthermore, the growth of tourism also stimulates other related industries, generating additional income and opportunities for the nation. Moreover, international travel offers an unparalleled opportunity for cultural exchange. Tourists have the chance to immerse themselves in diverse cultures, experience different traditions, and broaden their perspectives, fostering mutual understanding and global harmony. Additionally, tourism serves as a means of relaxation and rejuvenation for travelers. This respite from daily routines can be highly beneficial to mental well-being, allowing individuals to return to their responsibilities with renewed energy and motivation.

However, it is essential to acknowledge the potential downsides of the booming tourism industry. One significant concern is its impact on the environment. As tourist numbers increase, so does the strain on natural resources and ecosystems. Overdevelopment and unsustainable practices may lead to habitat destruction, pollution, and the endangerment of local flora and fauna. Another drawback of international travel is the potential for an increase in criminal activities. Tourists, often carrying money and valuable possessions, can become targets for theft and scams in unfamiliar surroundings.

In conclusion, while international travel has its downsides, the advantages it brings to the economy, cultural exchange, and personal well-being outweigh the disadvantages. Governments and stakeholders in the tourism industry must collaborate to strike a balance between growth and sustainability, fostering a responsible and enjoyable travel experience for all. By addressing the challenges and harnessing the benefits, we can ensure that international travel continues to enrich our lives and strengthen global connections.

Sample 3:

Going on foreign holidays has become increasingly affordable these days, prompting some countries to seize the opportunity and embrace the rise of tourism. Although this trend may present certain challenges, I believe the benefits far outweigh them.

Admittedly, overtourism may disrupt the lives of locals, due to increased traffic and overcrowded venues prioritizing big spenders from abroad. A sudden or prolonged influx of foreign tourists can result in traffic congestion and a rise in the cost of living, as has been observed in certain famed cities like Paris or Venice. In addition, increased demand can stress transportation systems and waste management facilities, causing their eventual deterioration. However, such complications can be mitigated by substantial revenues gained from tourism-adjacent sectors. Development in this industry creates job opportunities and higher incomes, helping locals afford their living expenses. The additional government tax revenue can also be spent on improving public facilities and enhancing residents’ quality of life.

Beyond that, the merits of welcoming international tourists can also be observed from a cultural standpoint. One of them is that direct contact between people from various cultures can foster mutual understanding and appreciation for different ways of life. Deeper insight into the history and traditions of their destinations improves tourists’ social awareness and potentially alleviates any existing prejudices. Tourism can also contribute to the preservation of cultural heritage thanks to earnings from entrance fees and related services. One prime example is Hoi An Ancient Town in Vietnam, where restoration projects have been directly funded by tourism, maintaining the authenticity and architectural integrity of the centuries-old buildings within.

In conclusion, I contend that the potential adverse implications of increased international visitors can be compensated for by the additional income they bring. Moreover, international tourism is advantageous overall because it facilitates cultural exchange and the conservation of historical sites.

Sample 4:

More inexpensive methods of travelling internationally have allowed countries to open their borders to international tourists, which has led to intense debate about the merits and failings of this trend. Personally, I believe that increased global tourism has done more harm than good, for it has improved economies at the cost of cultures’ individuality.

On the one hand, one could argue that tourism brings in significant revenue and can thus aid economic development. Tourists when visiting other countries spend a huge amount of money on hotels, food, and shopping, thereby funding small businesses and supporting jobs. For example, the hospitality sector, particularly in locales such as the Mediterranean, brings in millions of euros a year. Tourism here serves as a vital source of revenue and could be viewed to be hugely beneficial for job creations and public services in these areas.

On the other hand, mass travel may often erode the very culture it seeks to showcase to the world. This is because the tourism companies who enter a new market might start building hotels and other services that end up pushing smaller, local businesses out of the said market, until very little of the “authentic experience” remains. For instance, many cities in Southeast Asia, such as Sapa and Phuket, could be said to have lost their uniqueness and instead have become replicas of other tourist towns. Over time, these cities are likely to lose their charm and perhaps also their visitors.

Overall, I argue that the economic effects of tourism do not outweigh the loss of culture, and as such, I believe that increased international tourism has been on the whole undesirable.

Sample 5:

Many countries encourage the development of international tourism because of its advantages. I think that international tourism has both pros and cons.

International tourism brings economic and cultural benefits to the host country. Firstly, international tourism has become the backbone of many economies in the world. For example, tourism provides job opportunities for local people to work in restaurants or hotels. Otherwise, many local residents converted their homes to hostels so that the tourists could stay as paying guests. Secondly, the development of tourism can promote the local culture to the rest of the world. Foreign travellers might learn about the uniqueness of the local culture and share their cultural experiences once they return home, arousing curiosity about the country among their families and friends.

However, international tourism can be associated with environmental damage and the loss of the local culture. In many countries, tourists have been prohibited from visiting particular places such as mountains or islands as the natural environment is seriously threatened by too many visitors. Tourists often litter the place by throwing plastic products, and the construction of tourism infrastructure also polluted the surroundings. Moreover, local culture may be lost when historical sites can be replaced by modern buildings such as hotels, or traditional jobs, for example farming, are dying out as local people are forced to work in the tourism industry for higher pay.

In conclusion, the environmental and cultural disadvantages of international tourism should be recognised. Provided that governments promote tourism in a more sustainable way such as ecotourism or cultural tourism, I think that the advantages are stronger.

Sample 6:

In an age where international travel is more affordable and countries are welcoming an ever-growing number of tourists, it is pivotal to assess whether the benefits of this increased tourism surpass its drawbacks, especially considering the context of Vietnam.

Proponents of tourism argue that it brings significant economic benefits, a standpoint that holds considerable merit. In Vietnam, for example, the influx of tourists has been a major economic driver, creating jobs and stimulating local businesses. Towns like Hoi An have transformed economically, with local crafts and culinary experiences being marketed to visitors. However, this economic upturn is often accompanied by a rise in living costs and over-commercialization, which can erode the local culture and quality of life. Were it not for these considerations, one might easily conclude that the economic advantages of tourism are unequivocally positive.

On the contrary, I am inclined to believe that the downsides of increased tourism are more impactful. While tourism does indeed contribute to the economy, it also often leads to environmental degradation. Vietnam’s coastal regions, such as Ha Long Bay, have witnessed environmental strain due to the surge in visitors. If measures were implemented to regulate tourism and minimize its environmental impact, one might argue that its benefits could be maximized. However, as it stands, the environmental cost of increased tourism often overshadows its economic gains.

In conclusion, although increased tourism undoubtedly boosts the economy and creates job opportunities, these benefits do not entirely outweigh the negative environmental impacts. For countries like Vietnam, it is imperative to find a balance between welcoming tourists and preserving natural and cultural heritage. Only by achieving this equilibrium can the true potential of tourism be realized without compromising the country’s ecological and cultural integrity.

Sample 7:

Nowadays, the tourism industry has become a rather lucrative business in many countries that have marvelous natural scenery and cultural heritage. However, whether the pros outweigh the cons remains a controversial topic among many people. I agree with the view that despite the several disadvantages, it definitely plays a significant role in the economic development around the world.

Firstly, it is obvious that as a smokeless industry, tourism can attract a sheer volume of tourists from other places, and then boost the local consumptions like hotels, restaurants, air industry, as well as creating numerous job opportunities. The Australian government, for example, can earn a large proportion of income from its travelling resources with its spectacular scenery along the seacoast each year. Therefore, many countries now are eagerly disseminating their own unique attractions.

Moreover, tourism income may help conserve the natural landscape, wildlife, and cultural heritage. This is mainly because preserving the food, fashion, festivals, and scenery needs a great number of funds. If there is no such huge financial support, the scenic spot will lack maintenance and disrupted and thus they will be fade away sooner or later.

That is not to say that the tourism industry is flawless. Chances are that local living conditions and lifestyle are disturbed, and the environment is degraded due to the fact that floods of travellers pour into the once serene places and bring in rubbish and noise. But like other industries, the governments should legislate to avoid these problems.

In sum, many cities and countries now heavily rely on this indispensable industry; meanwhile, though the pros clearly outweigh the cons, the consequences should be handled by efforts. Only by doing so can we ensure that tourism would be developing in a healthy way.

Sample 8:

The global travel industry has witnessed massive growth in the recent decade, attributable to the rise of the low-cost carrier business model. As a result, nations around the world are embracing international tourism as an essential source of economic growth. I believe the advantages of welcoming foreign tourists far outweigh the corresponding disadvantages as long as certain risks are adequately controlled.

Tourism has long been the lifeblood of many economies around the world as well as a tool to carry out international politics. The money that foreign travelers bring to another country creates vital short-term and long-term impacts. In the short term, the expenses paid by tourists go directly to the local populace, improving their livelihood. Thailand probably serves as the best example as many coastal cities such as Pattaya or Phuket have become heaven for people who want to make a good living. In the long-term, private companies, sensing income opportunities, will heavily invest funds into the country, region, or city. These funds will further boost the wealth of the nation. Besides, tourism also plays an integral part in maintaining a balance in global politics by making countries closer and friendlier to each other. The relationship between Vietnam and Korea clearly illustrates how two countries can move from foes to friends by promoting each other’s tourism industry.

Nothing comes without some drawbacks. The growth in international travel has brought up many concerns regarding environmental damages, health issues, and criminal activities. The influx of people to a new destination often creates monumental challenges in waste management. In 2018, the situation was so dire that the government of the Philippines had to shut down Boracay, a hugely attractive traveling destination, for six months to clean out the trash. Airborne diseases, such as SARS or MERS, also spread faster due to tourism. It is also notable that crime rates have risen sharply in popular holiday spots. However, all of the stated problems can be well handled if governments and nations around the world can cooperate efficiently to promote positive tourism practices. For example, the Southeast Asian countries have created a shared database of people with health risks to track contagious disease movements around the region.

In conclusion, increased tourism will bring about great positive benefits despite certain containable shortcomings. It is expected that countries and companies around the world will further direct their efforts to promote the travel industry.

Sample 9:

As international travel becomes cheaper, more and more people travel, and more countries open their doors to increasing numbers of tourists. Some people are of the opinion that international travel does more harm than good whilst others are in favor of the opposite view. From my viewpoint, I prefer the latter opinion for the following reasons.

First and foremost, it is an undeniable fact that international travel goes hand in hand with economic growth since it not only creates millions of jobs but also elevates the tourist industry as well. The most prime example is most countries that have outstanding tourist attractions often has their economic status increased 10% in a few years in comparison with countries that don’t have ones since international travel brings about huge gross profit for travel agencies. Moreover, international travel recruits a huge number of employees every year and often ensures a high income which results in a decrease in the unemployment rate. In other words, international travel has a great contribution to economic growth in various aspects. Another reason why I advocate international tourism is that travelers can take advantage of it by acknowledging not only diverse cultures but potential business contracts as well. As a matter of fact, tourists have inevitably witnessed and later obtained general knowledge from history to customs by experiencing cultural cross in their visits. For example, in Japan, thumbing up stands for excellent performance whilst in Indonesia, it doesn’t. Moreover, international travel also aids businessmen to reach their full potentials. For instance, an adequate fishing trade circulation may catch the eye of a French businessman who is looking for one on his vacation in Japan. Therefore, it seems reasonable that travelers benefit a lot from international travel.

Some of my opponents claim that international travel has its shortcomings since it may have a negative influence not only on the environment but on society as well. This has some merits on the surface; however, it should be borne in mind that the government has taken strict international travel regulations into practice recently which leads to the fact that rarely can international tourists either violate the law or commit social vices. As a result, international travel has its advantages that outweigh its disadvantages.

In conclusion, international travel stimulates economic development and benefits travelers in various ways. Therefore, the economy and travel experience cannot be upgraded unless international travel is encouraged to become a trend in the future.

Sample 10:

It is irrefutable that international tourism has taken on mammoth dimensions. In fact, it has become the backbone of many economies of the world. This situation has both pros and cons. In my opinion, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

International tourism can have many benefits for individuals. The most important benefit is that tourism provides regular employment for many local people who might otherwise be unemployed. They can find work in restaurants or hotels, or with tourist agencies as guides or drivers, for example, and earn regular wages. This, in turn, means that they may be able to save money and improve their standard of living. The second reason is that tourists spend money in the country, and this allows local businesses such as restaurants, bars and taxi companies to flourish. In turn, other businesses, food suppliers or petrol stations, for instance, maybe established in order to provide services to support the companies which cater for tourists. In other words, the whole economy of the region develops.

A third reason is that in order for tourists to be able to visit remote areas, roads, airports and hotels have to be built and local people also benefit by being able to use these new facilities. Furthermore, when communications improve, it becomes possible for other industries to move into the area, bringing with them more employment opportunities and increased prosperity. A final reason why I am in favor of tourism is that visitors from outside bring fresh ideas and different ways of doing things to the local community. Consequently, local people may learn from tourists. Likewise, visitors learn about the local people and culture and return home with a deeper understanding of the host country.

On the other hand, there are some problems associated with international tourism. Firstly, there is the increasing crime rate. Some locals see tourists as easy prey because, not only are they in unfamiliar territory and therefore less able to take care of themselves, but also, they carry visible items of wealth, such as cameras and jewelry which can be disposed of quickly for a profit. Another major problem is health. With greater mobility comes the greater danger of spreading contagious diseases around the world. Also to be considered is the natural environment, which can be seriously threatened by too many visitors. Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, for example, is in danger of being destroyed by tourists and there are plans to restrict visitors to some of the more delicate coral reefs.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that international tourism has both advantages and disadvantages. However, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

Sample 11:

International travel has become more accessible, and numerous countries are actively encouraging an increasing number of tourists. Despite certain drawbacks associated with this trend, I maintain that the advantages of enhanced tourism significantly overshadow the negatives.

On the one hand, there are undeniable challenges stemming from the surge in international tourism. Primarily, the local environment may be adversely affected by the expansion of facilities and infrastructure needed to accommodate the growing number of visitors. For instance, in Vietnam, several tourism companies have been authorized to clear vast areas of forestland to build modern amenities such as hotels and golf courses, leading to harmful consequences for natural habitats. Additionally, in host countries, an increased cost of living may burden local residents and negatively impact domestic tourism. This is because a rise in international tourists can result in inflated prices for accommodations and other services, potentially causing financial strain for local communities and domestic travelers.

On the other hand, the merits of international tourism are substantial and, in my opinion, far exceed the aforementioned challenges. Firstly, the local economy can experience significant growth through a flourishing tourism industry, as more employment opportunities emerge to cater to the needs of tourists. Local residents can secure jobs in hotels, restaurants, and other tourist-related businesses, allowing them to boost their income and improve their living standards. Secondly, a growing influx of foreign visitors can considerably strengthen the host country’s tourism sector, contributing substantially to its economic growth. Satisfied tourists are likely to recommend the destination to their acquaintances or even plan return visits, further advancing the country’s tourism industry.

In conclusion, the positive aspects of international tourism appear to be more substantial than its disadvantages. The economic growth and employment opportunities that arise from increased tourism largely counteract the environmental and financial concerns it raises.

Sample 12:

In recent years, international tourism has experienced a surge in popularity, fueled by the decreasing cost of transportation and the ever-growing accessibility of diverse tourist destinations. Countries increasingly opening their doors to tourists has sparked off a debate whether the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages. While increased tourism offers numerous benefits, it also poses challenges that necessitate careful consideration.

On the positive side, increased tourism has brought undeniable advantages. Countries welcoming more tourists witness a boost in their local economies through spending on accommodation, dining, transportation and various recreational activities. This influx of revenues not only supports the tourism industry but also has a profound effect on other sectors, thus fostering job creation and economic development. Furthermore, exposure to different cultures and traditions deepens cross-cultural understanding, breaking down stereotypes and promoting global harmony. The interchange of ideas and perspectives between tourists and locals can contribute to the enrichment of both parties, creating a more interconnected and empathetic world.

However, it is crucial to acknowledge the downsides of the tourist boom and one of the most significant concerns is the environmental impact. Increased footfall in popular tourist destinations often leads to ecological degradation, exerting stress on delicate ecosystems and contributing to climate change. Overcrowding can lead to pollution, habitat destruction and strain on essential resources and therefore pose a threat to the attractions that draw tourists in the first place. Additionally, the influx of tourists can strain local infrastructure and resources, leading to issues such as traffic congestion, waste management challenges and growing demand for energy.

In conclusion, the merits and demerits of booming tourism are multifaceted and require balanced evaluation. While there are indisputable economic benefits and cultural exchange fostered by tourism, the environmental drawbacks must not be ignored.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some people argue that playing team sports provides people with more benefits as opposed to participating in individual sports. Personally, I believe that both types of sports can provide a range of benefits to people, and it depends on what benefits each individual wishes to achieve as to which sport they should choose to play.

On the one hand, team sports, such as football and basketball, provide a number of benefits to those who play. For example, team sports give players the opportunity to develop interpersonal skills, like teamwork and communication skills, which will not only help people in their day-to-day social interactions but also benefit them in their workplace. In addition, team sports also offer players the chance to develop a sense of unity, friendship, and sportsmanship between teammates, which can really add value to people’s lives by making them feel a part of something.

On the other hand, individual sports, like tennis and swimming, also have their merits. When someone plays an individual sport, it usually gives them more opportunities to enhance their personal skills, such as being able to manage emotions, cope with stress, and build confidence and self-esteem. When people are playing an individual sport, they usually have no one else to rely on for support during the game or match, and therefore, individuals will need to develop a strong mindset to be able to deal with and overcome any setbacks they may face. Individual sports also provide better opportunities for people to challenge themselves by setting goals and achieving personal bests.

Overall, I feel that all sports offer great benefits for people’s mental and physical health, and that people should choose whatever sport they are most interested in playing.

Sample 2:

Sports play an important role in physical and mental well-being. However, there is a debate about which type of sport is more beneficial: team sports such as football or individual sports like tennis and swimming. In my opinion, both team and individual sports have their advantages and should be encouraged.

On the one hand, team sports like football have many benefits. They teach important values such as teamwork, communication, and leadership, and can help individuals develop social skills and build relationships. Furthermore, playing in a team can provide motivation and accountability, as individuals feel responsible for their teammates' success. In basketball, teamwork is essential. Players must communicate effectively and work together to pass the ball, set screens, and create scoring opportunities. This requires trust, cooperation, and a willingness to put the team's success ahead of individual goals.

On the other hand, individual sports like tennis and swimming can also have significant benefits. They offer a sense of independence and self-reliance and can help individuals develop focus, discipline, and resilience. Furthermore, they offer the opportunity for personal achievement and competition, which can be very motivating for some individuals. For instance, swimming requires a high level of physical endurance and mental focus, making it an ideal sport for individuals looking to develop discipline, resilience, and self-reliance. Swimming can also offer a sense of freedom and independence, which can be particularly appealing for individuals who prefer to work alone and enjoy the solitude of being in the water.

In conclusion, both team and individual sports have their benefits and should be encouraged. Individuals should choose a sport that aligns with their personality, preferences, and goals, and prioritize physical activity for overall health and well-being.

Sample 3:

It is argued that people will gain more benefits when engaging in team sports such as football. Other people, however, believe that it is better to participate in individual sports like golf or tennis. I personally agree with the first group.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some people think that taking part in individual sports has more advantages. Firstly, people who choose to play solo sports such as swimming or tennis have the opportunity to develop independence. This can be explained by the fact that those who play these sports have no one to help them during the game, so they are forced to develop independent thinking and make their own decisions. Those who take part in team sports, by contrast, often receive support from their team members, which could discourage them from developing these skills. Another reason is that players in solo sports know that their success depends mostly on their effort, determination and concentration. Therefore, these people always make every possible effort to achieve their goals.

On the other hand, I would argue that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams such as basketball or football. This is because these sports teach their players valuable life lessons that they could not learn from individual sports. Take football as an example. Those who play this game are taught to work effectively in a team environment and even sacrifice themselves for the sake of their team. Team sports also teach people about leadership, which is one of the most important skills in today’s world.

In conclusion, although some people say that we should choose to play solo sports such as golf or tennis, I believe that team sports like football bring far more benefits.

Sample 4:

While some say that participating in team sports is advantageous, others think that players will reap more benefits from individual sports. In my opinion, I support the idea that team sports can support a person’s development better.

First of all, team sports are beneficial as they can help foster various desirable qualities in a person. A great team player is oftentimes also a supportive and cooperative friend, and a visionary who is capable of utilizing team members’ strengths when and where appropriate. A case in point is doubles badminton. To win a match, both players must understand how each other plays. Only in that case can both athletes find a suitable arrangement within a match. Next, both have to place their trust in the other person’s ability to cover the arena. Moreover, team sports can help build great camaraderie, especially for working adults who do not have time to mingle.

Nevertheless, individual sports are quite advantageous in some cases. It allows the players to learn more about themselves and focus on improving their ability alone. By having to fully bear the weight of any loss or take credit for any success, the player will grow to be a responsible, self-reliant, and confident person. Take chess for example, in most cases, chess is an individual sport as this game requires complete trust in one’s ability, speed, and the ability to foresight. All of which are difficult to achieve in team sports where many minds are involved in the decision-making process.

Overall, even though individual sports offer some positives to a certain extent, I completely agree with the idea that team sports is more beneficial to people since it can help them develop valuable attributes.

Sample 5:

People have different views about which type of sports is better for them to participate in. While there are certain benefits of playing team sports, I would argue that taking part in individual sports is a better option.

On the one hand, team sports are advantageous to some extent. Firstly, playing team sports requires participants to cooperate with other teammates, which can help them to improve their teamwork skills. For example, in a football match, players in a team have to work together to put the ball into the opponent’s net. This is similar to the process in which employees are required to handle tasks together in order to achieve the company’s objectives. Secondly, playing sports in teams is also a great chance to meet new people and make new friends. As a result, people can build up their network, which is highly beneficial to their career.

On the other hand, I believe it is better for people to play sports individually. The first reason is that this allows people to foster their independence instead of depending on others. For instance, when a player wants to win a match of tennis, he has to try his hardest as there is no one else to rely on. Therefore, individuals would learn how to overcome bigger obstacles in life by themselves. Additionally, as people play sports alone, it is easier for them to maintain a regular training schedule. If they play sports with a number of other players, it will be difficult to organise weekly sessions that everyone can find the time to attend.

In conclusion, while team sports bring about undeniable benefits, I believe people should devote more of their spare time to playing individual sports.

Sample 6:

There are those who opine that participating in sporting activities played in teams is more crucial to people. Others, however, disagree, insisting that sports requiring individual efforts play a more vital role. In this essay, both ideas will be analysed before the presentation of my perspective, which is that people’s involvement in both types is more advisable.

It is justified for some to favour the greater importance of team sports to people. The major reason is that their cooperation skills can be better sharpened. To defeat the opponent in a football match, for instance, members of a group have to employ collective power to score a goal, during which time they gradually learn how to work together with others. Additionally, people are likely to build a wider network of contacts. If joining team sports, school and tertiary pupils may know more about other students while adults can meet participants from diverse work backgrounds.

On the other hand, it is also true that people benefit more from individual sports. To begin with, these activities can cultivate people’s perseverance in a more effective manner. If a tennis player feels exhausted in a match, what drives them to continue is a determined will; this is the moment when their willpower is exercised. Moreover, people are able to enjoy a deeper happiness when achieving triumph. It can be explained easily by the fact that the only winner will not share the rapturous applause from audiences inside and outside the stadium.

In conclusion, I believe that both sides of the argument are reasonable. On balance, it is my firm opinion that not only should people take part in team sports but also individual ones. After all, while team sports encourage the development of people’s ability to collaborate with others and create opportunities for them to make more friends, people can also possess dogged perseverance and feel greater joy in winning competitions.

Sample 7:

There are those who opine that it is more advantageous to play team sports, like football, while others argue that sports with individual players, like tennis or swimming, are better choices. This essay discusses both sides of the argument and why I believe that playing non-team sports can bring more benefits.

There are understandable reasons why some feel that team sports are more advantageous. First of all, people playing this kind of sport can learn how to cooperate with others to achieve mutual goals. For example, scoring a goal in a football match requires players in different positions to collaborate closely with each other. In addition, if people in a company play team sports regularly with each other, it will improve their bonding, thereby boosting their work performance. Furthermore, people engaging in team sports are likely to have a better social life. It is obvious that enjoying a favorite activity with those sharing the same interests is a base point for a close relationship.

On the other hand, others believe that playing non-team sports is better. The first reason is that this kind of sport can help people to improve their mental toughness. This can be explained by the fact that the players understand their success entirely depends on their own efforts, so they force themselves to be more self-disciplined such as setting personal goals, managing stress and practicing consistently. In addition, being mentally strong can help people to overcome difficulties and challenges to achieve goals in life. Another reason is that it is more convenient for people to play individual sports. For example, people can go to the swimming pool whenever they want, and if they want to play tennis, they just have to find one person unlike soccer when they have to find two teams.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that both sides of the argument have their positive points. However, I am inclined to believe that team sports are more beneficial because having collaboration skills and a better social life outweigh the benefits of having mental strength and greater convenience.

Sample 8:

Some claim that team sports such as football are more beneficial to players. Meanwhile, others hold a belief that sports that are played individually have superior advantages. In my opinion, both types of sports bring equal advantages.

On the one hand, by participating in team sport, we learn to collaborate with others. In sport fields, individual ambition takes second place to team objective. Every team member is working towards a common goal. To achieve this goal, cooperation and coordination are of the essence. Members must work as a team and achieve the maximum synergy even if that means someone has to make certain sacrifices. For instance, a cyclist may take the leading position for half of the game and then drop out so as to ensure the victory of his teammate. Or another case in point is that in football, a player may have to sacrifice the opportunity to score a goal to pass the ball to his team player if the chance of a goal being scored is higher with his teammate.

On the other hand, solo sports can bring players a number of benefits, one of which is the cultivation and maximization of personal capacities. To be precise, when without the assistance of others, one has to exert himself to the utmost to come up with solutions to win, and this challenges his own limits. For example, in tennis, a player has to strategize his ball serves, predict where the ball falls and be agile in his movement, and he has to multi-task all these on his own. Besides, when doing sports individually, people are liberated from the constraint of rigidly following a previously agreed plan, thereby having the freedom to experiment with new ways of playing. Therefore, such players often have a high sense of satisfaction.

In conclusion, each type of sport has its merits in cultivating players’ personality development. It should depend on each player as to what sports they should do.

Sample 9:

Some people argue that playing team sports like football provides people with more benefits as opposed to participating in individual sports such as tennis or swimming. Personally, I believe that both types of sports can provide a range of benefits to people but, by participating in team sports one can learn useful skills which are only possible with group activities.

On the one hand, team sports such as football and basketball offer a variety of advantages to those who participate. Team sports, for example, provide players with the opportunity to develop interpersonal skills such as teamwork and communication skills, which will benefit them not only in their daily social interactions but also in their workplace. Furthermore, team sports allow players to develop a sense of unity, friendship, and sportsmanship among teammates, which can significantly improve people’s lives by making them feel a part of something.

On the other hand, individual sports provide more opportunities for people to improve their personal skills, such as emotion management, stress management, and confidence and self-esteem building. Individuals who participate in an individual sport like swimming, usually have no one else to rely on for support during the game or match, so they must develop a strong mindset to deal with and overcome any setbacks they may face. Individual sports also give people more opportunities to push themselves by setting goals and achieving personal bests.

Overall, I feel that all group sports offer great benefits for people’s mental and physical health, and that people should choose playing team sports and must also be involved in single games in order to achieve balance.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP