Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 477 Lưu

Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless or unemployed. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Some argued that the government should not prioritize funding foreign aid over solving the financial difficulties of their socially underprivileged groups. With a whole host of problems arising from the burgeoning debt and overpopulation, I agree that the government should focus on tackling its own challenges first.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why the state budget should be used to ensure the well-being of each individual in the country. First, it is difficult to help others when your problems have not been resolved. The post-pandemic period has seen an astronomical increase in the unemployment rate and debt. Instead of donating money to poorer countries, the authorities should use the government budget to improve free social services such as healthcare, education and shelters for unfortunate individuals. Second, as underprivileged citizens are ensured the bare minimum living standards, they are motivated to find jobs to reach financial stability which would indirectly lead to economic growth. Last but not least, offering financial assistance to poor neighbours can be seen as a political manipulation strategy because the recipient has to obey the regulations set by the donor. For example, China helped Sri Lanka build a port paid entirely by the Chinese loan. However, the South Asia country failed to pay the debt, so they had to lease the port to China for 99 years.

On the other hand, donating money to underdeveloped countries does strengthen international relations and creates a strong bond between nations. This would lower the tax barriers which help domestic companies to penetrate new markets easily.

In conclusion, there are benefits for the government while funding international aid. Nonetheless, fully addressing problems in one’s country is more important than reaching out to help others.

Sample 2:

Some people believe that governments should not be contributing foreign aid while they have their own underprivileged citizens, such as those who are homeless or jobless. Personally, I completely disagree with this point of view.

There are several reasons why some people might believe that the government should prioritise their own citizens over helping other nations. Firstly, not all countries have a generous enough budget to invest in international aid, so they should prioritise the welfare of their own citizens. It is possible to find impoverished people in even the most developed countries, and it would take a large sum of money to help them all climb their way out of poverty. Moreover, resources for international aid can be allocated to help a country promote its own economic growth instead. For example, many factories could be built across the country, thus creating more job opportunities and facilitating revenue growth.  

Although I can understand the above arguments, I still think that it is necessary for governments to provide foreign assistance. In some countries, people are facing problems which can easily be solved with the help of other countries. For instance, just a few packets of rice can save many people from dying of starvation. Furthermore, countries can dramatically improve international relations through international aid, leading to greater cooperation between nations. Also, spending money on such a program can help address global issues that will affect all nations, such as climate change and migration, because people are less likely to move abroad or destroy forests to make way for agriculture when their living standards are improved.

In conclusion, I believe that countries should help each other for humanitarian purposes as well as their own development.

Sample 3:

It is argued that the state budget should not be allocated towards international support since underprivileged people such as the homeless and unemployed in the country need to be financially aided. I totally disagree with this notion as foreign aid enhances solidarity among nations and symbolizes human decency.

To begin with, I consider the government should provide overseas fiscal aid since it strengthens the unity of different nations around the globe. More specifically, a country which receives monetary assistance from others in times of difficulty would likely recognize this goodwill gesture and reciprocate their favour, fostering cross-border friendship. For instance, due to the financial support of the Russian government for Vietnam in the Vietnam War, these two nations have intensified their friendly relations. As a result, they have become strategic partners in terms of the global economy, leading to favourable trade concessions from which the donating country would financially benefit in another way.

Furthermore, financial support across the globe should be encouraged since it promotes humanity. To be more specific, politicians in wealthy countries can display their nation’s care and empathy for people in less economically developed ones by offering them financial support, enabling them to sustain their lives and solve urgent problems. To illustrate, during the Covid 19 pandemic, the US government financially supported Vietnam in the form of providing free Moderna vaccines for Vietnamese citizens as they faced a great health threat, saving thousands of people and being praised for their benevolence. Therefore, sharing and empathising could be highly valued, promoting a world rich in kindness.

In conclusion, I firmly maintain that foreign aid can intensify the bonds among nations and engender human empathy. It is advisable that the state should develop the nation to be able to financially offer support globally.

Sample 4:

Certain individuals are of the opinion that the governmental allocation of financial resources should be distributed to other impoverished countries while others suppose that it is of paramount importance to focus on curbing their domestic issues. From my perspective, I am in consummate agreement with the proposal of determining national priority on internal problems.

On the one hand, it is understandable that crossborder support is a symbol of humanity. Geographically, people are divided into different ethnicities but by nature, humanity is the core connected feature among individuals. Thus, it goes without saying that supporting other countries through the provision of financial or social assistance is a logical and praiseworthy action. Not to mention that helping other nations to deal with financial crises would eliminate the chances of illegal migration which is detrimental to surrounding developed regions.

However, I opine that concentrating on addressing domestic issues such as homelessness or unemployment should be of the utmost urgency of any country. To begin with, the financial fund from the government is regarded as a crucial means to reserve and maintain welfare schemes as well as social security. The smooth flow of how society works would create a favorable environment for job opportunities which accordingly increases the economic growth rate. Furthermore, employment chances, as a result, generate more personal budgets which people can use to afford decent shelters, decreasing the homelessness rate.

In conclusion, although transnational support should be executed as a gesture of humanity, I still believe that any government should put the goal of tackling internal issues in a country to be the top priority.

Sample 5:

International assistance is a voluntarily given resource transfer from one nation to another. I firmly think that every country should support other nations who are desperately trying to rebuild their economies. Certainly, both developing and wealthy nations must assist disadvantaged individuals residing in developing nations.

My first argument is that there won't be any humanitarian help if unemployment and homelessness are used as grounds for denial of aid. Homelessness and unemployment are problems in even the most affluent nations, such as the United States and the United Kingdom.

The world's underprivileged will have no one to turn to if such nations stop providing help. For instance, records from 2013 show that more than 6% of Americans were unemployed, although the US helped out with $30 billion. Even developing countries like India have budgeted a percentage of their annual spending for international assistance. The bigger picture is what matters most. Other nations must be lifted up in order for one nation to advance.

Second, the majority of aid has indirect advantages for the giving country, such as enabling resource extraction or opening up new economic opportunities for the receiving nation. Multinational businesses (MNCs), for instance, who have opened offices in India as a consequence of foreign aid, surely employ many young people, but they pay them significantly less than what they must pay their own country's workers. India is a significant commercial market due to its expanding population, and many foreign companies have established retail outlets there. Giving and receiving countries both benefit from assistance, therefore it is a win-win situation.

In addition, every country should offer its assistance in the case of an emergency or a natural disaster like an earthquake or a tsunami. Aid does not always take the form of money; it can also be provided in the form of goods that the afflicted people need or by the donation of unpaid labour. Such help needs to be given, even if there are problems within the nation. Additionally, this improves international relations.

In conclusion, I think that all nations should contribute by giving aid internationally, even if they are struggling with unemployment and homelessness.

Sample 6:

The ever-growing population across many countries in the world has brought along with it many problems such as poverty, illiteracy and massive layoffs. To tackle these problems, many governments have allocated a large number of resources. Given that all countries have their own problems to address, I agree with the argument that their priority should be given to their own disadvantaged people.

There are many reasons for which I believe governments ought to attach more importance to their own people. To begin with, should those governments spend financial resources on international aids, they would sooner or later suffer from scarce funds considering the fact that many of them have already been in debt. Under such a circumstance, it indeed makes more sense to reserve the money for the development and maintenance of their own social security measures such as health services for the sick and shelters for homeless people. Also, focusing on their own people contributes to the improvement of “post-donation” experience of taxpayers. After all, the government collects budgets from average taxpayers, and the latter are usually more sensitive to the needy people from the same community.

On the other hand, however, I would have to admit that donation to the poorer nations somehow plays a significant role in the process of achieving human decency and humanity. Without the aids from other countries, people living in impoverished regions may find it rather difficult to have their most fundamental survival needs satisfied. Stopping offering financial assistance to those people and meanwhile enjoying domestic prosperity, to some extent, is equivalent to indirectly depriving their last chance to survive, can lead to ethical challenges to the entire human society.

In summary, despite the significance of relief aids to foreign countries, I still believe that the government should help their own disadvantaged residents first. After all, it is impossible for a single country to eliminate poverty and unemployment altogether.

Sample 7:

Evolution of globalization makes the connection between countries stronger. Nowadays, every country is finding useful resources for their economic growth. The government of these countries uses these resources to earn money in order to progress and to provide international aid to those countries who are in need. However, some people offend such actions of their nation’s government. I disagree with this statement and will provide credible reasons to prove it.

Firstly, I believe that providing international aid will help the country itself because this can strengthen their relationship among other nations and will open a door to many opportunities. For instance, when the richest country provides health and education facilities to the poor country, this will enable them to recruit more staff to work in that country, which will solve their problem of unemployment. Moreover, working in these areas might improve the resources of the poor nation which will further open more scopes in these sectors. Also, setting up industries in various nations will turn out to be the two-way profit. Like, telecommunication industries benefit both giver and recipient nations. 

Secondly, providing assistance on natural calamities occurrences like earthquake, floods etc.  are what we call humanity. Every country should have the separate foreign aid account for the sake of humanity. This can help the suffered nation to recover fast. When the developed countries give aid and abet to underdeveloped nations, in return they get some share to use their resources. For example, USA, holding shares in oil companies of the Middle East nations. 

In the end, I think it would be appropriate to say that the international subsidy will be useful in eradicating poverty, unemployment, and homelessness in their own home rather than creating it.

Sample 8:

It is a big concern for many people that it is not a compulsory responsibility of their government to provide international aid to other countries owing to the fact that they have some obstacles in their home country. In my opinion, I would like to stay in the middle of this debate.

Firstly, one important aspect of a government is to invest money in their own country instead of giving wealth to other countries. In fact, it is true that when the unemployment rate is high in a country and people of this country need better economic structure, they would not support that their governments supply aid and money to other poor countries. Naturally, they would expect their own problems to be sorted out first. For instance, if any government invests money in the constructions of many new organisations like factories and health departments in their homeland, there will be more chances of development of country and high opportunities to control on unemployment.

Another important thing for any country’s government is to provide homes and some other facilities for homeless people rather than lending money to other countries because in this way the economy would be better than before in that country. If any government has extra money, firstly they should focus on compulsory needs of their own country after that it can be provided as the international aid to other countries.

However, we live in a single globe and when people in some parts of the world are starving, many others have opulent resources. Sharing among nations can ensure a better world. The economic structure of the present world would never allow a country to ensure 100% employment and houses for people to live in. There will always be homeless people and jobless youth even in developed countries. So considering these, a rich nation should always help the poor nations in need. Don’t we help people with our resources and money when we still have a scarcity of these? Similarly, a comparatively rich country should always raise the helping hand to the poor nations. The sharing of wealth will eliminate more pressing problems in poor nations and thus in return they would also help in other ways. For example, rich countries like the USA invest in research facilities in many Asian countries and in return they can have meritorious scientists living and working for them and better business understanding.

In conclusion, the government of a country should first fulfil the necessity of its own citizens. To a certain extent, they should share their extra wealth with poor countries as the international aid that can be helpful for both of the countries.

Sample 9:

No country around the world is self-reliant. It is said that if a country has unemployment and poverty, it should not help other countries. I completely disagree with this viewpoint because aiding other nations can help the government to redress problems that have prevailed in their own country.

Giving monetary help to a country that is in distress can in turn reduce the problem of unemployment in one's own country. Every government has a limited capacity to create jobs every year. If they spend the whole revenue on generating employment, it can compromise other developments. But when the state provides money to other nations, it develops a good relationship between countries. Such harmonious relations culminate in signing trade agreements, memorandum of understandings, and opening bilateral business opportunities. By working together, all governments can eliminate their country-specific issues. For instance, in 2011, Japan was ravaged by tsunamis and lost the property of billions of dollars. Despite having millions of unemployed youths in the country, the Indian government gave ten million dollars to Japan. Because of this humanitarian assistance, in the year 2018, Japan started the project of bullet trains in India and created thousands of jobs. Thus, giving aid to other countries is beneficial for donner countries.

Similarly, it can also assist a country to come out of poverty if it helps other nations. All countries have a finite number of resources. Some countries do not have many resources that could generate enough goods and services to sustain their economy; people of such countries have to work hard, but they receive less income. In this situation, a cordial relationship with the governments of other countries can help a state to send its people to these countries for work. From where, people can earn more money and send remittance. Consequently, help to alleviate poverty in the home country.

To conclude, every country lacks in one or another way. By helping other countries, a state can redress their problems, which cannot be reduced by themselves. Therefore, I disagree with the viewpoint and believe that the state should help other nations.

Sample 10:

International aid is the transfer of goods or services from a country or international organization to benefit another country. Support can be economical or humanitarian. Some think that their government should not spend on international aid because there are underprivileged people in their own country. I completely agree with this idea. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall explain why countries should give priority to their internal problems.

Firstly, a developed country should examine its debt ceiling before volunteering to help other countries. The US is a classic example. According to a survey, the US national debt was about $26 trillion in June 2020. It has increased to almost 800% of what it was in 1989. This would bring down the value of the dollar and impact negatively on the economy and international investments. Eventually, it would aggravate the unemployment problem within the country. So, it is high time that the nation concentrated on reducing its debts rather than contributing to international aid. If these countries continue to fund other nations, it will cause serious social unrest within their country.

There is no evidence that the countries receiving foreign aid are progressing economically. Also, according to a survey, foreign aid consumes a considerable amount in the budget which can be used for the nation’s welfare. Furthermore, the countries receiving support are not committed to remaining loyal to the donor country in times of crisis and may not yield to the donor’s interests. Donor countries also need to be wary of the fact that they contribute only their share and don’t overdo the aid.

Despite the fact that developed countries should be merciful on third world countries, I feel that intra-governmental development should gain priority over helping others.

In conclusion, though it is deemed merciless to stop funding the underdeveloped countries, it should be noted that solving the intragovernmental problems in a developed country is of more importance. Only a self-sustained country will be able to donate generously to other countries.

Sample 11:

The foreign aid budget is at the forefront of national debates and is driving political discourse. Many argue that governments ought not to extend aid to other countries if there are underprivileged, destitute, and homeless people within their own borders. In this case, this essay partly agrees with the stand.

The opponents of granting foreign aid insist that charity always begins at home. For them, it is unacceptable that the governments spend money on alleviating poverty abroad while unemployment, homelessness, and poverty exist in their own territories. Apart from that, a growing number of empirical evidence shows that a substantial amount, as much as one-seventh of overseas aid, is captured by the ruling elite in recipient nations, either spent on luxury goods and real estate or diverted into tax heavens. So, I believe that governments should place the welfare of their own citizens ahead of others.

Having said that, giving overseas aid reaps considerable benefits. In the first case, when a nation helps develop emerging markets, and that investment allows it to earn the financial rewards of close trading ties with recipient nations. Aside from reaping commercial advantages, a country increases its soft power by spending on international aid, does not only enhance global security but also helps the country attain its policy goals, such as combating climate change, abroad. According to Joe Cerrell of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, for example, this means that aid is “an investment in our shared security and prosperity”. Therefore, granting aid to other countries is not purely selfless.

In the light of the above discussion, it seems reasonable to conclude that governments should find an ideal balance between these conflicting interests. I would end by quoting Francis Bacon “Charity begins at home but should not end there”.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Travelling abroad is becoming more affordable than ever before, and many nations are implementing new approaches to attract more tourists. Although there are still drawbacks of international travel, I think its values are more significant.

On the one hand, the downsides of welcoming foreign visitors are varied. First, the local environment can be adversely affected due to facility and infrastructural development. For example, in Vietnam, many tourism companies are permitted to chop down a great area of forests to construct modern commodities such as hotels and golf courses, exerting dire consequences on natural habitats. As for the countries that play host to international tourists, the rise in costs of living may lay much pressure on local people and be a detriment to domestic travel. This is because the growth in the number of tourists from abroad would encourage the costs of hotel rooms and other services to increase. People in the neighborhood and domestic visitors would suffer in comparison.

On the other hand, I suppose the benefits of international travel would eclipse those analyzed disadvantages. First, the regional economy can enormously benefit from the burgeoning tourism industry as more occupations will be created to accommodate the needs of tourists. Local people can have more job opportunities in hotels or restaurants and therefore earn more money to improve their living standards. Second, the increased number of foreign people coming to visit another country would evidently enhance tourism industries, contributing greatly to the wealth of that country. If tourists enjoy their trips, they will recommend the destination to their friends or perhaps they will come back in the future.

In conclusion, it appears to me that the merits of international tourism are more notable than its drawbacks.

Sample 2:

In the modern era, international travel has become increasingly accessible and affordable, with many countries opening their doors to welcome tourists from around the world. While this trend brings both benefits and drawbacks to the tourism industry, I firmly believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

On the positive side, the tourism sector plays a pivotal role in boosting the economies of host countries. With an influx of tourists, there is a surge in demand for various services, such as accommodations, transportation, and restaurants, leading to job creation for the local population. Furthermore, the growth of tourism also stimulates other related industries, generating additional income and opportunities for the nation. Moreover, international travel offers an unparalleled opportunity for cultural exchange. Tourists have the chance to immerse themselves in diverse cultures, experience different traditions, and broaden their perspectives, fostering mutual understanding and global harmony. Additionally, tourism serves as a means of relaxation and rejuvenation for travelers. This respite from daily routines can be highly beneficial to mental well-being, allowing individuals to return to their responsibilities with renewed energy and motivation.

However, it is essential to acknowledge the potential downsides of the booming tourism industry. One significant concern is its impact on the environment. As tourist numbers increase, so does the strain on natural resources and ecosystems. Overdevelopment and unsustainable practices may lead to habitat destruction, pollution, and the endangerment of local flora and fauna. Another drawback of international travel is the potential for an increase in criminal activities. Tourists, often carrying money and valuable possessions, can become targets for theft and scams in unfamiliar surroundings.

In conclusion, while international travel has its downsides, the advantages it brings to the economy, cultural exchange, and personal well-being outweigh the disadvantages. Governments and stakeholders in the tourism industry must collaborate to strike a balance between growth and sustainability, fostering a responsible and enjoyable travel experience for all. By addressing the challenges and harnessing the benefits, we can ensure that international travel continues to enrich our lives and strengthen global connections.

Sample 3:

Going on foreign holidays has become increasingly affordable these days, prompting some countries to seize the opportunity and embrace the rise of tourism. Although this trend may present certain challenges, I believe the benefits far outweigh them.

Admittedly, overtourism may disrupt the lives of locals, due to increased traffic and overcrowded venues prioritizing big spenders from abroad. A sudden or prolonged influx of foreign tourists can result in traffic congestion and a rise in the cost of living, as has been observed in certain famed cities like Paris or Venice. In addition, increased demand can stress transportation systems and waste management facilities, causing their eventual deterioration. However, such complications can be mitigated by substantial revenues gained from tourism-adjacent sectors. Development in this industry creates job opportunities and higher incomes, helping locals afford their living expenses. The additional government tax revenue can also be spent on improving public facilities and enhancing residents’ quality of life.

Beyond that, the merits of welcoming international tourists can also be observed from a cultural standpoint. One of them is that direct contact between people from various cultures can foster mutual understanding and appreciation for different ways of life. Deeper insight into the history and traditions of their destinations improves tourists’ social awareness and potentially alleviates any existing prejudices. Tourism can also contribute to the preservation of cultural heritage thanks to earnings from entrance fees and related services. One prime example is Hoi An Ancient Town in Vietnam, where restoration projects have been directly funded by tourism, maintaining the authenticity and architectural integrity of the centuries-old buildings within.

In conclusion, I contend that the potential adverse implications of increased international visitors can be compensated for by the additional income they bring. Moreover, international tourism is advantageous overall because it facilitates cultural exchange and the conservation of historical sites.

Sample 4:

More inexpensive methods of travelling internationally have allowed countries to open their borders to international tourists, which has led to intense debate about the merits and failings of this trend. Personally, I believe that increased global tourism has done more harm than good, for it has improved economies at the cost of cultures’ individuality.

On the one hand, one could argue that tourism brings in significant revenue and can thus aid economic development. Tourists when visiting other countries spend a huge amount of money on hotels, food, and shopping, thereby funding small businesses and supporting jobs. For example, the hospitality sector, particularly in locales such as the Mediterranean, brings in millions of euros a year. Tourism here serves as a vital source of revenue and could be viewed to be hugely beneficial for job creations and public services in these areas.

On the other hand, mass travel may often erode the very culture it seeks to showcase to the world. This is because the tourism companies who enter a new market might start building hotels and other services that end up pushing smaller, local businesses out of the said market, until very little of the “authentic experience” remains. For instance, many cities in Southeast Asia, such as Sapa and Phuket, could be said to have lost their uniqueness and instead have become replicas of other tourist towns. Over time, these cities are likely to lose their charm and perhaps also their visitors.

Overall, I argue that the economic effects of tourism do not outweigh the loss of culture, and as such, I believe that increased international tourism has been on the whole undesirable.

Sample 5:

Many countries encourage the development of international tourism because of its advantages. I think that international tourism has both pros and cons.

International tourism brings economic and cultural benefits to the host country. Firstly, international tourism has become the backbone of many economies in the world. For example, tourism provides job opportunities for local people to work in restaurants or hotels. Otherwise, many local residents converted their homes to hostels so that the tourists could stay as paying guests. Secondly, the development of tourism can promote the local culture to the rest of the world. Foreign travellers might learn about the uniqueness of the local culture and share their cultural experiences once they return home, arousing curiosity about the country among their families and friends.

However, international tourism can be associated with environmental damage and the loss of the local culture. In many countries, tourists have been prohibited from visiting particular places such as mountains or islands as the natural environment is seriously threatened by too many visitors. Tourists often litter the place by throwing plastic products, and the construction of tourism infrastructure also polluted the surroundings. Moreover, local culture may be lost when historical sites can be replaced by modern buildings such as hotels, or traditional jobs, for example farming, are dying out as local people are forced to work in the tourism industry for higher pay.

In conclusion, the environmental and cultural disadvantages of international tourism should be recognised. Provided that governments promote tourism in a more sustainable way such as ecotourism or cultural tourism, I think that the advantages are stronger.

Sample 6:

In an age where international travel is more affordable and countries are welcoming an ever-growing number of tourists, it is pivotal to assess whether the benefits of this increased tourism surpass its drawbacks, especially considering the context of Vietnam.

Proponents of tourism argue that it brings significant economic benefits, a standpoint that holds considerable merit. In Vietnam, for example, the influx of tourists has been a major economic driver, creating jobs and stimulating local businesses. Towns like Hoi An have transformed economically, with local crafts and culinary experiences being marketed to visitors. However, this economic upturn is often accompanied by a rise in living costs and over-commercialization, which can erode the local culture and quality of life. Were it not for these considerations, one might easily conclude that the economic advantages of tourism are unequivocally positive.

On the contrary, I am inclined to believe that the downsides of increased tourism are more impactful. While tourism does indeed contribute to the economy, it also often leads to environmental degradation. Vietnam’s coastal regions, such as Ha Long Bay, have witnessed environmental strain due to the surge in visitors. If measures were implemented to regulate tourism and minimize its environmental impact, one might argue that its benefits could be maximized. However, as it stands, the environmental cost of increased tourism often overshadows its economic gains.

In conclusion, although increased tourism undoubtedly boosts the economy and creates job opportunities, these benefits do not entirely outweigh the negative environmental impacts. For countries like Vietnam, it is imperative to find a balance between welcoming tourists and preserving natural and cultural heritage. Only by achieving this equilibrium can the true potential of tourism be realized without compromising the country’s ecological and cultural integrity.

Sample 7:

Nowadays, the tourism industry has become a rather lucrative business in many countries that have marvelous natural scenery and cultural heritage. However, whether the pros outweigh the cons remains a controversial topic among many people. I agree with the view that despite the several disadvantages, it definitely plays a significant role in the economic development around the world.

Firstly, it is obvious that as a smokeless industry, tourism can attract a sheer volume of tourists from other places, and then boost the local consumptions like hotels, restaurants, air industry, as well as creating numerous job opportunities. The Australian government, for example, can earn a large proportion of income from its travelling resources with its spectacular scenery along the seacoast each year. Therefore, many countries now are eagerly disseminating their own unique attractions.

Moreover, tourism income may help conserve the natural landscape, wildlife, and cultural heritage. This is mainly because preserving the food, fashion, festivals, and scenery needs a great number of funds. If there is no such huge financial support, the scenic spot will lack maintenance and disrupted and thus they will be fade away sooner or later.

That is not to say that the tourism industry is flawless. Chances are that local living conditions and lifestyle are disturbed, and the environment is degraded due to the fact that floods of travellers pour into the once serene places and bring in rubbish and noise. But like other industries, the governments should legislate to avoid these problems.

In sum, many cities and countries now heavily rely on this indispensable industry; meanwhile, though the pros clearly outweigh the cons, the consequences should be handled by efforts. Only by doing so can we ensure that tourism would be developing in a healthy way.

Sample 8:

The global travel industry has witnessed massive growth in the recent decade, attributable to the rise of the low-cost carrier business model. As a result, nations around the world are embracing international tourism as an essential source of economic growth. I believe the advantages of welcoming foreign tourists far outweigh the corresponding disadvantages as long as certain risks are adequately controlled.

Tourism has long been the lifeblood of many economies around the world as well as a tool to carry out international politics. The money that foreign travelers bring to another country creates vital short-term and long-term impacts. In the short term, the expenses paid by tourists go directly to the local populace, improving their livelihood. Thailand probably serves as the best example as many coastal cities such as Pattaya or Phuket have become heaven for people who want to make a good living. In the long-term, private companies, sensing income opportunities, will heavily invest funds into the country, region, or city. These funds will further boost the wealth of the nation. Besides, tourism also plays an integral part in maintaining a balance in global politics by making countries closer and friendlier to each other. The relationship between Vietnam and Korea clearly illustrates how two countries can move from foes to friends by promoting each other’s tourism industry.

Nothing comes without some drawbacks. The growth in international travel has brought up many concerns regarding environmental damages, health issues, and criminal activities. The influx of people to a new destination often creates monumental challenges in waste management. In 2018, the situation was so dire that the government of the Philippines had to shut down Boracay, a hugely attractive traveling destination, for six months to clean out the trash. Airborne diseases, such as SARS or MERS, also spread faster due to tourism. It is also notable that crime rates have risen sharply in popular holiday spots. However, all of the stated problems can be well handled if governments and nations around the world can cooperate efficiently to promote positive tourism practices. For example, the Southeast Asian countries have created a shared database of people with health risks to track contagious disease movements around the region.

In conclusion, increased tourism will bring about great positive benefits despite certain containable shortcomings. It is expected that countries and companies around the world will further direct their efforts to promote the travel industry.

Sample 9:

As international travel becomes cheaper, more and more people travel, and more countries open their doors to increasing numbers of tourists. Some people are of the opinion that international travel does more harm than good whilst others are in favor of the opposite view. From my viewpoint, I prefer the latter opinion for the following reasons.

First and foremost, it is an undeniable fact that international travel goes hand in hand with economic growth since it not only creates millions of jobs but also elevates the tourist industry as well. The most prime example is most countries that have outstanding tourist attractions often has their economic status increased 10% in a few years in comparison with countries that don’t have ones since international travel brings about huge gross profit for travel agencies. Moreover, international travel recruits a huge number of employees every year and often ensures a high income which results in a decrease in the unemployment rate. In other words, international travel has a great contribution to economic growth in various aspects. Another reason why I advocate international tourism is that travelers can take advantage of it by acknowledging not only diverse cultures but potential business contracts as well. As a matter of fact, tourists have inevitably witnessed and later obtained general knowledge from history to customs by experiencing cultural cross in their visits. For example, in Japan, thumbing up stands for excellent performance whilst in Indonesia, it doesn’t. Moreover, international travel also aids businessmen to reach their full potentials. For instance, an adequate fishing trade circulation may catch the eye of a French businessman who is looking for one on his vacation in Japan. Therefore, it seems reasonable that travelers benefit a lot from international travel.

Some of my opponents claim that international travel has its shortcomings since it may have a negative influence not only on the environment but on society as well. This has some merits on the surface; however, it should be borne in mind that the government has taken strict international travel regulations into practice recently which leads to the fact that rarely can international tourists either violate the law or commit social vices. As a result, international travel has its advantages that outweigh its disadvantages.

In conclusion, international travel stimulates economic development and benefits travelers in various ways. Therefore, the economy and travel experience cannot be upgraded unless international travel is encouraged to become a trend in the future.

Sample 10:

It is irrefutable that international tourism has taken on mammoth dimensions. In fact, it has become the backbone of many economies of the world. This situation has both pros and cons. In my opinion, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

International tourism can have many benefits for individuals. The most important benefit is that tourism provides regular employment for many local people who might otherwise be unemployed. They can find work in restaurants or hotels, or with tourist agencies as guides or drivers, for example, and earn regular wages. This, in turn, means that they may be able to save money and improve their standard of living. The second reason is that tourists spend money in the country, and this allows local businesses such as restaurants, bars and taxi companies to flourish. In turn, other businesses, food suppliers or petrol stations, for instance, maybe established in order to provide services to support the companies which cater for tourists. In other words, the whole economy of the region develops.

A third reason is that in order for tourists to be able to visit remote areas, roads, airports and hotels have to be built and local people also benefit by being able to use these new facilities. Furthermore, when communications improve, it becomes possible for other industries to move into the area, bringing with them more employment opportunities and increased prosperity. A final reason why I am in favor of tourism is that visitors from outside bring fresh ideas and different ways of doing things to the local community. Consequently, local people may learn from tourists. Likewise, visitors learn about the local people and culture and return home with a deeper understanding of the host country.

On the other hand, there are some problems associated with international tourism. Firstly, there is the increasing crime rate. Some locals see tourists as easy prey because, not only are they in unfamiliar territory and therefore less able to take care of themselves, but also, they carry visible items of wealth, such as cameras and jewelry which can be disposed of quickly for a profit. Another major problem is health. With greater mobility comes the greater danger of spreading contagious diseases around the world. Also to be considered is the natural environment, which can be seriously threatened by too many visitors. Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, for example, is in danger of being destroyed by tourists and there are plans to restrict visitors to some of the more delicate coral reefs.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that international tourism has both advantages and disadvantages. However, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

Sample 11:

International travel has become more accessible, and numerous countries are actively encouraging an increasing number of tourists. Despite certain drawbacks associated with this trend, I maintain that the advantages of enhanced tourism significantly overshadow the negatives.

On the one hand, there are undeniable challenges stemming from the surge in international tourism. Primarily, the local environment may be adversely affected by the expansion of facilities and infrastructure needed to accommodate the growing number of visitors. For instance, in Vietnam, several tourism companies have been authorized to clear vast areas of forestland to build modern amenities such as hotels and golf courses, leading to harmful consequences for natural habitats. Additionally, in host countries, an increased cost of living may burden local residents and negatively impact domestic tourism. This is because a rise in international tourists can result in inflated prices for accommodations and other services, potentially causing financial strain for local communities and domestic travelers.

On the other hand, the merits of international tourism are substantial and, in my opinion, far exceed the aforementioned challenges. Firstly, the local economy can experience significant growth through a flourishing tourism industry, as more employment opportunities emerge to cater to the needs of tourists. Local residents can secure jobs in hotels, restaurants, and other tourist-related businesses, allowing them to boost their income and improve their living standards. Secondly, a growing influx of foreign visitors can considerably strengthen the host country’s tourism sector, contributing substantially to its economic growth. Satisfied tourists are likely to recommend the destination to their acquaintances or even plan return visits, further advancing the country’s tourism industry.

In conclusion, the positive aspects of international tourism appear to be more substantial than its disadvantages. The economic growth and employment opportunities that arise from increased tourism largely counteract the environmental and financial concerns it raises.

Sample 12:

In recent years, international tourism has experienced a surge in popularity, fueled by the decreasing cost of transportation and the ever-growing accessibility of diverse tourist destinations. Countries increasingly opening their doors to tourists has sparked off a debate whether the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages. While increased tourism offers numerous benefits, it also poses challenges that necessitate careful consideration.

On the positive side, increased tourism has brought undeniable advantages. Countries welcoming more tourists witness a boost in their local economies through spending on accommodation, dining, transportation and various recreational activities. This influx of revenues not only supports the tourism industry but also has a profound effect on other sectors, thus fostering job creation and economic development. Furthermore, exposure to different cultures and traditions deepens cross-cultural understanding, breaking down stereotypes and promoting global harmony. The interchange of ideas and perspectives between tourists and locals can contribute to the enrichment of both parties, creating a more interconnected and empathetic world.

However, it is crucial to acknowledge the downsides of the tourist boom and one of the most significant concerns is the environmental impact. Increased footfall in popular tourist destinations often leads to ecological degradation, exerting stress on delicate ecosystems and contributing to climate change. Overcrowding can lead to pollution, habitat destruction and strain on essential resources and therefore pose a threat to the attractions that draw tourists in the first place. Additionally, the influx of tourists can strain local infrastructure and resources, leading to issues such as traffic congestion, waste management challenges and growing demand for energy.

In conclusion, the merits and demerits of booming tourism are multifaceted and require balanced evaluation. While there are indisputable economic benefits and cultural exchange fostered by tourism, the environmental drawbacks must not be ignored.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

International tourism has undeniably provided substantial benefits to many destinations worldwide. However, alongside these benefits, there are significant concerns regarding its impact on local communities and the environment. While tourism drives economic growth and cultural exchange, its disadvantages, particularly in terms of environmental degradation and cultural erosion, often outweigh these advantages.

One of the primary advantages of international tourism is its contribution to the economy. Tourism generates revenue, creates jobs, and stimulates local businesses. For instance, countries like Thailand and Spain rely heavily on tourism as a vital part of their economies, providing employment opportunities and boosting infrastructure development. Moreover, tourism fosters cultural exchange, allowing for greater understanding and appreciation of diverse cultures. Visitors often gain insights into local traditions and lifestyles, promoting global harmony.

However, the disadvantages of international tourism are increasingly concerning. Environmental degradation is one of the most significant issues. Popular tourist destinations often suffer from pollution, deforestation, and depletion of natural resources. For example, the Great Barrier Reef in Australia has experienced significant damage due to over-tourism, affecting marine life and coral health. Additionally, mass tourism can lead to the erosion of local cultures. Traditional customs and lifestyles may be commercialised or lost altogether as destinations cater to the preferences of international visitors. Venice, for instance, has seen a decline in its traditional way of life due to the overwhelming influx of tourists, leading to the displacement of local residents. In my opinion, while international tourism brings economic and cultural benefits, the negative impacts on the environment and local communities are more pressing. Governments and the tourism industry must implement sustainable practices to mitigate these adverse effects.

In conclusion, although international tourism offers considerable economic and cultural advantages, the detrimental effects on the environment and local societies outweigh these benefits. A sustainable approach to tourism is essential to ensure that the positive aspects can be enjoyed without compromising the well-being of destinations and their inhabitants.

Sample 2:

Global tourism reaps numerous advantages to many parts of the world while causing concern about its adverse effects on local residents and the atmosphere. This essay argues that despite the disadvantages - disruption of the local community and environmental impact, I believe that the advantages are far more significant as international tourism promotes local economy and global peace.

Some express grave concerns about the drawbacks of international tourism as it disrupts the local communities and causes environmental degradation. With the rise of tourism, local inhabitants may face challenges such as strain on infrastructure, overcrowding, and changes in the economy to name but a few. For example, overcrowded destinations may increase demands for electricity, leading to frequent load shedding or power shortages. Similarly, the influx of tourists can exert a negative impact on the environment. This includes habitat destruction, land encroachment, increased waste generation, and pollution. Take the Hawaiian Islands for instance. The popular destination suffers from overtourism which leads to damage to coral reefs from snorkelling or scuba diving.

On the contrary, many believe that international tourism is a real boon to the local community. Global tourism can stimulate an exponential increase in the local economy by generating employment opportunities and revenue. It can enhance the development of infrastructure, business, and service. For example, popular tourist attractions quite often are bombarded with visitors who spend money on meals, accommodations, and souvenirs, thus contributing to the local economy. Likewise, international tourism also contributes to global peace by promoting cultural exchange, mutual understanding, and an interdependent economy. For instance, countries with huge tourism prospects are eager to maintain peaceful relations to ensure tourist flow and economic benefits. For these reasons, I contend that the benefits of global tourism reap eclipse its drawbacks. 

To conclude, the downsides of international tourism are the disruption of local communities and environmental impacts. However, I feel that economic benefits and global peace are more significant advantages.

Sample 3:

People have varying views about the effects of international tourism on the economy and environment. While I accept that international tourism has some positive impacts on our lives and economy, I believe that it has more negative impacts compared to positive ones.

On the one hand, international tourism has some advantages. Firstly, tourism is a popular leisure activity for millions of people all over the world. Tourists can relax and have fun by sightseeing in a new place. This activity broadens their horizons and opens their minds by exposing them to different cultures and customs. Secondly, from an economic perspective, the tourism industry plays a vital role in many countries. People may rely on tourism for their income. Also, the tourism industry creates many job opportunities in services like hotels and restaurants. As a result, international tourism improves the standard of living in some local areas.

On the other hand, from an environmental perspective, tourism may affect the environment negatively in three ways. Firstly, the excessive building needed by the tourism industry could destroy natural habitats and even may result in the extinction of many animals and plants. Secondly, international tourism causes more pollution and waste. Finally, the tourism industry puts more pressure on natural resources like oil and water and this may lead to the shortage of some basic human needs. From a cultural perspective, tourism may affect local cultures negatively. Traditional jobs and skills like farming and fishing may die out because tourism forces people to work in their services. So, this may lead to the loss of many cultural features and values. Therefore, I believe that international tourism has more negative impacts on the environment and local cultures.

In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of international tourism on the environment and culture are more significant than the possible benefits in personal and economic sectors. Governments should impose laws to protect the environment and local cultures.

Sample 4:

It is a fact that international tourism has already become a popular and huge industry these days, and many places have reaped the benefits of it. However, some people opine that the activity hurts the local communities. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of international tourism and opine that it has more benefits than drawbacks.

On the one hand, some people think that international tourism activities bring some disadvantages to the local area. They are afraid that the local environment will deteriorate as more and more people visit there. For example, Mount Everest is one of the top destinations for international travellers, but it is reported that the amount of garbage that tourists produce has increased rapidly in the past few years. Consequently, it might have a catastrophic effect on the local environment there. Another reason for this concern is that tourists will bring some negative cultures to the local people. For instance, some Western people like to drink alcoholic beverages, and elders of the local societies are afraid that the local people would also be interested in drinking those liquors.

On the other hand, many people believe that travelling abroad for leisure activities would bring a lot of benefits for the destination places. Firstly, it creates a lot of job opportunities for the local people as some of them could become tour guides or run small businesses. Secondly, when foreign travellers come to a country, they will spend their money on various activities. It means that they will also bring revenue to the local government in the form of tax. As a result, the government would have enough budgets for maintaining the public facilities around the places and the local environment as well. Lastly, it also attracts investors in building resorts and hotels in the surrounding areas. The development of these places will absorb many employments not only from the local area but from other cities and countries as well.

In conclusion, despite its negative effects, I personally believe that global tourism industries would bring more benefits to the local inhabitants and communities. It boosts the economic condition of the country and creates job opportunities for the local people. As for the negative effects, it really depends on how the government would make clear regulations and implement them.

Sample 5:

People have different views about the effect of international tourism. While I accept that international tourism has some positive impacts on our lives, I believe that it has more negative impacts compared to positive ones.

On the one hand, international tourism has many advantages. First, from my perspective, travel is a very common pastime. By exploring a new location, travelers can unwind and enjoy themselves. Additionally, traveling stimulates their minds and broadens their horizons by exposing them to various countries and traditions. Second, from an economic standpoint, the tourism industry is crucial to the development of many nations. Tourism is one of the major sources of income for some people. Additionally, the tourism sector generates numerous job openings in industries like hotels and restaurants. International travel consequently raises the standard of living in some local communities.

On the other hand, I believe that international tourism has more negative impacts on the environment and local cultures. First, from an environmental standpoint, there are three ways that tourism could harm the ecosystem. First, the tourism industry's demand for excessive construction might ruin natural habitats and potentially cause the extinction of several species and plants. Additionally, waste and pollution are increased by international tourists. Finally, the tourism industry demanding constantly natural resources like water and energy could result in a shortage of some basic human needs. Second, from a cultural standpoint, tourism could have a negative impact on local cultures. Farming and fishing may become obsolete as a result of people being forced to work in tourism-related industries, which could lead to the loss of many cultural traits and values.

In conclusion, in my opinion, the potential dangers of international tourism on the environment and culture are far more significant than the benefits on personal and economic sectors. Governments should impose laws to protect the environment and local cultures.

Sample 6:

The travel industry has experienced a major boom over recent decades, which has helped some economically weaker nations to improve their failing economies. While questions have been raised regarding the negative impacts that accompany the growth in the travel sector, these definitely do not outweigh the associated benefits.

On the one hand, the rising influx of holidaymakers is associated with increased incidences of crimes and antisocial activities like drugs, human trafficking and gambling, which affect the values of the indigenous society. The local population is also affected by the growth in property prices. Environmentalists are also concerned regarding environmental remodelling that is associated with increased tourist activities in natural reserves. In this context, it is worth mentioning that, by enforcing strict law and order and implementing strict legislation, governments can control most of these negative impacts of tourism.

On the other hand, the economic boost that accompanies a successful travel industry is quite well recognised. Thailand is a good example of the benefits of tourism as the Thai economy revolves around tourism and the country had been able to uplift its socio-economic status through its flourishing hospitality sector. Egypt is another nation that is heavily dependent on its hospitality sector. The growth in the number of incoming tourists leads to innumerable prospects in terms of local entrepreneurship and employment. This is also associated with international investment and infrastructure development. The national authorities, in order to ensure the safety of the international visitors, provide better law and order enforcement, improved transportation and healthcare facilities, which in turn benefit the local population.

In conclusion, it can be said that, even though growth in the travel industry has accompanying negative social and environmental impacts, these do not outweigh the contributions made by this sector towards social development. However, to be successful, the government must make sure that tourism development is regulated and eco-friendly and only then can it really benefit the local community.

Sample 7:

Around the world, tourism industry is proving beneficial for different places by not only generating good revenue but also creating employment opportunities. However, there are some possible drawbacks of international tourism as it has negative effects on local inhabitants and the environment. Nonetheless, I firmly believe that if both pros and cons are considered the merits of tourism surpass the demerits.

On the one hand, international tourism is advantageous in many ways. Firstly, it contributes towards revenue generation for the country. In addition, it plays a significant role in creating employment prospects for local people. For instance, a country like Dubai has an oil industry for generating income but apart from that there is no other source of income generation. However, a large number of tourists visit Dubai, thanks to Dubai's world class tourist attractions. Secondly, to accommodate international tourists many local people do jobs in different companies which facilitates the tourists. Hence, the local people and the government in the tourist places are benefited by the tourism.

On the other hand, despite the many advantages of international tourism, there are some disadvantages too. It affects local inhabitants as well as the environment because to make the place more alluring to tourists the natural surroundings are modified, which eventually damages nature. Moreover, it also destroys the habitat of local animals. As many people are dependent on the tourism business, there are times when tourists are not visiting, and the local people find difficulty in earning money to live then.

In conclusion, international tourism has its positive and negative impact but the merits like more income and employment overshadow the demerits.

Sample 8:

There is no doubt that international tourists have brought a lot of positive impact to many countries. However, these benefits also come with many negative issues. Personally, I feel that international tourism has resulted more advantages than disadvantages to the affected nations in general. In this essay, I will examine both the benefits and their related cost and support my opinion accordingly.

First of all, many people argue that many local inhabitants have been sacrificed in order to make way for the development of tourist attractions. For example, trees were cut down so that hotels can be constructed; old heritage sites were demolished and replaced by new shopping malls; local residences, especially the aboriginals, have to be relocated so that their land can be used for new airports. However, people tend to ignore the economic and social benefits brought upon by these developments. For example, the number of jobs created by the constructions of hotels and shopping malls could stimulate the economic growth of a nation and benefit the both the people and the nation as a whole.   

Secondly, many people also claimed that the influx of foreign tourists will increase social problems such as crime rates immoral activities.  For example, they claimed that tourists usually like to visit pubs and clubs in the evening and that will lead to a higher rate of alcohol-related problems such as noise pollution, vandalism and prostitution. However, I believe that the millions of foreign dollars brought in by these tourists could actually decrease the problems if the money is put into proper used by the government. For example, the tax collected from the entertainment outlet could be used to help combat crime and actually make the country a safer place.

In conclusion, I believe that if we look at the overall picture of international tourism when doing the cost-benefit analysis, we will see that there are more advantages than disadvantages.  

Sample 9:

Experts all across the world have argued about whether the upsides of travelling the world are worth the potential drawbacks. As it's a major source of income for many countries, I believe the downsides could not exceed the benefits. This essay will address the advantages and disadvantages, along with supporting evidence for each position.

One positive aspect is that foreign tourism contributes to national economies. Recent UN reforms, for instance, reveal that the tourism industry provided 10-15% of PIB for 32 European, African, and American nations in the last five years. People's social lives and economies grew as a result. In addition, many of the world's superpowers are investing in the development of natural tourist attractions.

On the other hand, the tourism industry contributes to an increase in pedestrian traffic. Because it is so simple to connect individuals from different parts of the world. A large number of tourists are deceiving the natives of the area that they are visiting, by promising them jobs and an improved quality of life. For instance, a recent analysis conducted by UNICEF revealed that one in ten commuters all over the world are involved in the trafficking of children. Because of this, the residents of the community regarded travellers as being dishonest. In addition to this, it is the primary reason why criminal records are kept by law enforcement agencies worldwide.

In conclusion, despite the drawbacks, international tourism is one of the reasons to improve the economy of the nation. As a result, I continue to hold the belief that the advantages exceed the disadvantages. In the interest of their own economies, I would suggest that global authorities increase the number of tourism amenities available.

Sample 10:

It is undeniable that international tourism has grown into a massive industry. However, there are many who are concerned about the potential adverse effects on the neighboring communities. The following essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of international tourism. Yet, in my opinion, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

On the one hand, there are many positive aspects of foreign tourism. First and foremost, it aids in raising the total tax revenue collected by the government. Also, it is crucial in the development of local economic conditions by providing local residents with new job opportunities. As an example, Dubai, which has no other significant industries, may rely on its oil business as its primary source of income. Due to Dubai's reputation as a global tourist hotspot, an extraordinary number of people travel there annually. The second is the large number of locals engaged by a wide range of companies to cater to foreign tourists. So, the tourism business is good for the host communities and governments as well as the tourists who visit them.

Despite these benefits, international travel also has its drawbacks. Those who live there feel the effects. The environment also suffers because of the changes to the natural environment in an effort to make it more appealing to tourists. Moreover, it destroys local animal habitats. As so many people rely on tourism for their income, when there aren't any tourists around, locals will have tough times.

In conclusion, international tourism has both positive and negative consequences, but the benefits, including an increase in revenue and prospects for employment, outweigh the drawbacks.

Sample 11:

While international tourism has many positive effects, others worry about the toll it may take on native species and ecosystems in some popular vacation spots. The following are some of the reasons why I believe that the benefits of travelling the world much outweigh the negatives.

In the first place, a city's economy benefits greatly from the promotion of foreign tourism because of the large number of jobs it creates. In addition, it helps a country's government by bringing in plenty of cash through forex programmes, which the government may use towards urban improvement. Aside from this, local government and residents work together to preserve a region's natural environment so that tourists from all over the world can come and admire it. In some nations, for instance, tourism is the only industry, hence the government has instituted policies aimed at protecting the environment to encourage its growth.

Yet, as more and more tourists come to a region, locals become exposed to and often strive to adopt aspects of those visitors' cultures. In addition, several hotels, highways, and retail establishments need to be built, resulting in destroying of many trees. For instance, the advent of tourism in several developing countries resulted in the government's need to build hotels and resorts in the region.

In sum, there are some negative effects of foreign tourism, such as deforestation and cultural loss; however, the positive effects far outweigh the negative ones, as the economy improves, and the government takes environmental protection seriously.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP