2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án (Phần 15)

Sample 1:

Technology is an integral part of everybody’s lives, and it clearly assists us in adapting to consistent developments. I disagree with the perception that traditional skills should disappear with the technological development in a nation. There are two major reasons that I shall discuss in the forthcoming paragraphs.

On the one hand, traditional skills are considered the heritage that we have taken over from our ancestors. Thus, it is our responsibility to preserve them and pass them on to the next generation. The technological development is an enormous benefit for traditional skills. With the help of technology, we can enhance our skills and introduce innovations by combining technology and traditional skills. For example, handmade painting is a traditional skill. With the help of technology-induced Photoshop, people can give it a unique, more appropriate touch. The combination between photoshop and handmade painting could be a considerable innovation. People cannot just create wonders but earn massively as well.

On the other hand, though the technology is developing at a sharp rate, the traditional skill used products still have a high position in the market. For instance, Indian traditional products, including handcrafted decor items, are still being sold at a global level. There are thousands of artisans earning their bread and butter by selling these handmade items to foreign tourists and established companies. It proves that traditional products still have higher demands in the market.

While the traditions that are not being used by a lot of people won’t make a difference if extinct, on a larger scale, improvements in these traditions can always be beneficial.

To sum it up, traditional skills are alive, even though the technology is increasing dramatically. It has a special place in everyone’s lives. Also, the popularity of traditional skills can enhance if the combination with technology is tried and tested at a larger scale.

Sample 2:

Old traditional skills and lifestyles are dying due to technological advances. It is a contentious issue. Many individuals believe that it is pointless to put too much effort into saving it. In my opinion, I don’t agree that it’s pointless saving the traditional skills and techniques. In the following paragraphs, I shall explain my point of view and provide supporting reasons.

Many traditions and talents throughout the world are being abandoned and replaced by machines in this new technological era. One of the most prominent instances of this phenomenon is the worldwide decline in hand-made fabrics. Today, factories create millions of machine-printed fabrics, which have replaced hand-knitted fabrics. The production costs are reduced, and designs appeal to the majority of buyers throughout the world, due to which many artists have lost their jobs. Local marketplaces are dwindling in popularity and people are suffering.

Besides that, life is becoming computerized, forcing ancient practices to become obsolete. Conventional skills provide innovative ideas for the development of modern technologies. Our predecessors’ invisible thread of old traditional skills and practices connect us with them. It helps us learn how things are created better to understand our culture, community, and nationality. These talents and skills help define and communicate a group’s beliefs and abilities, as well as how they interact with their environment.

However, technology has indeed made the life of people simpler. Almost everything nowadays is done with contemporary technology, which makes physical labour easier. Yet, one cannot overlook the wealth of knowledge that individuals gain from traditional skills and techniques.

Overall, traditional skills and practices are undeniably dwindling. One must acknowledge that traditional skills and techniques are a means of tying people together and educating them about their culture, society, country, and many other topics.

Sample 3:

Digital advancements are the hallmark of the 21st century. Today, nearly every nation across the globe has felt the impact of this wave of technological innovation and has adapted to this phenomenon in some way or the other. However, this occurrence poses an imminent threat to a modest and conventional way of life. It is widely believed that avoiding this change and safeguarding the old ways is impractical. I am a strong supporter of this notion. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I will elaborate on the topic and justify my views with relevant instances.

It is indeed important to acknowledge the various indigenous trades that are present in every nation. The traditional skills prevalent in a region are an intrinsic part of the local culture. Such abilities and ensuing products, although unique, are expensive and require more time and financial investment. Also, the quality standards of such commodities are inconsistent due to the absence of sophisticated machine-based manufacturing techniques.

Furthermore, the chief benefit enjoyed with the employment of technological facilities is the degree of convenience. The reduction of human effort is the prime goal of digital modernization. Today, an individual can access and fulfil all of their necessities and demands at the tip of their fingertips, owing to the advent of the Internet and its subsequent services. The availability of nearly all kinds of domestic and luxurious commodities online has led to such a measure of comfort that was previously unimaginable. Thus, avoiding such resources and following an archaic lifestyle is illogical in this day and age.

Nevertheless, we must also address the fact that a basic manner of living is less stressful and mentally undemanding. However, the level of inefficiency faced, as a consequence, is detrimental to the survivability of an individual regularly.

Finally, progress is a natural occurrence in human civilization, and we have to adapt to the reforms as and when they happen. Therefore, it is prudent to accept such technological transformations rather than going against the majority.

Sample 4:

The significant predicament with the development of technology influencing the traditional skills and conventional lifestyle is quite a controversial topic and requires a profound argument. At a glance, I disagree with the opinion expressed on the topic as technology doesn’t have enough power to completely eradicate the traditional skills from a community, culture or a country. I shall highlight my perception in the following paragraphs.

In a lot of ways, the history of civilisation is interlinked with the history of technology, keeping in mind the discovery of fire, the invention of the wheel and the latest evolution of the internet. We are constantly moving forward, bringing efficient and better ways of living to the world. Definitely, most of the people would want to preserve such traditions. Technology will always be following its footsteps, regardless of what people think. The advancements in technology are the sheer requirements of people. Thus, preventing or abolishing the technological advancement would not be a possibility. Rather, people should embrace the trends positively. Intriguingly, technology can contribute positively to keeping the traditional skills alive. For instance, the population of certain islands is quite restricted to have a regular schooling system. Instead of compelling families to send children to the mainland, authorities have commenced online education for school children.

When it comes to preserving the traditions and customs, the generation of a country is liable for it. If people are willing to save a tradition, technological advancements, in no way, can destroy it. For instance, people found more benefits in machinery and the latest equipment as they could save tons of time and effort. Hence, they let a few traditions die out to bring technology, such as handmade fabric, ploughing of fields in some areas, and more.

Sure, there are certain technologies that have overtaken traditional skills, such as machinery being used to manufacture some fabric that was earlier handmade. However, it also has to be noted that technology is not backed up enough to eliminate every traditional skill altogether.

Concluding the essay, it can be stated that the evolution of technology is not pointless in any way and we, as people, should keep our traditions alive to support our standard of living.

Sample 5:

The issue ‘with the development of the technology traditional skills and the conventional lifestyle die’ is a controversial one and needs deeper argument before supporting or opposing the issue. Overall, I disagree with the opinion expressed; I would like to begin by pointing out that ‘traditional skills and ways of life’ are not totally vanished from one country, culture or community because of the introduction of technology.

In many ways, the history of civilisation is the history of technology: from the discovery of fire to the invention of the wheel to the development of the Internet we have been moving on from previous ways of doing things. Some technologies, such as weapons of mass destruction, are of negative impact. Others, such as medical advances, positively help people to live better or longer, and so very much help traditional ways of life. Surely, few people would seek to preserve such traditions as living in caves. Technology will always follow its own footsteps no matter what we, some people think about it. Technology advances because we need it. So, there is no way to prevent the advancement of the technology, but we should embrace it positively. The generation of a country is responsible for preserving their own custom and tradition and if people feel eager to save a tradition, then there is no way technological advancement will destroy it. There are many cases where technology replaces human labour to create certain things, for example, handmade sari, which is still popular in many countries. Technology, in this case, has not destroyed the old tradition but has introduced a faster and less expensive ways to create the same thing.            

Interestingly, technology can positively contribute to the keeping alive of traditional skills and ways of life. For example, the populations of some islands are too small to have normal schools. Rather than breaking up families by sending children to the mainland, education authorities have been able to use the Internet to deliver schooling online. In addition, the Internet, and modern refrigeration techniques are being used to keep alive the traditional skills of producing salmon; it can now be ordered from, and delivered to, anywhere in the world.

In conclusion, without suggesting that all technology is necessarily good, I think it is by no means ‘pointless’, in any way, to try to keep traditions alive with technology. We should not ignore technology because it can be our friend and support our way of life.

Sample 6:

The technological revolution affects all countries around the world in many ways significantly. It seems that the traditional skills and the ways life used to be present have disappeared. This essay will discuss how the technology has led to this case and whether it is worth attempting to save people's traditional life or not.

To begin with, there are various reasons why traditional skills no longer exist as it was many years ago. One major reason is the development of technology. For illustrations, modern technology has been used for many tasks such as agriculture, industries, and the machines have replaced people’s manual tasks in most cases. Moreover, the internet alters the way of communication dramatically; instead of visiting family these days, for example, people speak with each other over the phone or chat using social media like Facebook or Twitter. Perhaps, that is why the traditional skills are expiring with the demand if time and modernization.

Let's move to another point in the statement: some people argue that the traditional experience shouldn't be saved. The principal reason for their opinion is that global advertising encourages everyone to buy the same products. For instance, people wear similar clothes, rather than traditional costumes, and eat from the same types of restaurants such as KFC and Mac Donald and their branches are present all over the world. This shows that it does not make sense to keep the traditional skills alive.

To conclude, this essay has looked at the possible reasons of die out of traditional life, such as the revolution in technology and popularity of the internet, and also the reason why it is aimless to keep them alive.

Sample 7:

Whether the technology and its influences kill the traditional way of life and whether should we try to preserve the tradition is a controversial issue and required an in-depth argument before deciding. In my opinion, the technology definitely traditional skills, expertise and way of life change and the change might be slow for many societies, but it is a sure thing. About the later part of the argument: ‘whether it is pointless to try to preserve those’ is something I opine that that should not be imposed on people. Who want to maintain the traditional way of living rather than embracing the technology should be given the option.

The history suggests us that the new invention and technology have greatly changed the way people live and mostly these changes help them to choose for better alternatives. People who used to cultivate lands with the plough and cow in many years before and that was a kind of skill that became obsolete with the invention of the motorized irrigation system. People might have lost the skill they had but the technology helped them to produce more crops than ever before. With the invention of the cell phone, the internet, television, refrigerator people have definitely adopted a different lifestyle than they had many years ago and those changes, in my opinion, are important to ensure a better life. We would not blame the medical science for killing the traditional unscientific treatment and would widely accept it. In most of the cases, people used to do things manually and with the widespread of technology they have started relying on technology than their own skill and that has caused the loss of traditional skill. But we have to bear in mind that many technologies have been replaced by newer ones and people always try to take the easy and better alternatives.

About the importance of conserving the traditional skill and way of life, I would say when technology offers us a better alternative, we should cordially accept that, but we should also respect the people who among us maintain the old way of life. Technology would knowingly and unknowingly influence our life, but we should not make it a must for everybody.

Sample 8:

Technology is an important thing in people’s life, and it clearly helps us to adapt with the period of development. I disagree with an opinion that, when technology develops in a country, the traditional skills disappear. There are two reasons that I will describe related to this case, which is traditional skills can combine with technology and traditional skills still have a great position in order to technological development.

On the one hand, traditional skill is the heritage from our ancestor. So, we have responsibilities to take care for it. The development of technology is huge advantages for ‘traditional skills’. Using the technology, we can improve these skills and while trying to introduce new innovations to combine technology and traditional skills. For instance, ‘hand art painting’ is one of the traditional skills, people can make a new creation by using technology touching use ‘Photoshop’. The combination between hand art painting and Photoshop software will be a great innovation. People can create great works and earn a lot by doing this.

On another hand, although the technology is developing sharply, the traditional skill used products are still having a high position in the marketing field. For example, Indonesian traditional stuff namely ‘Songket’ is still creating great improvement in the sale. In my hometown, an industrial Songket factory, in the end of 2014, received order 2000 to 3000 pieces ‘songket’ stuff from some country including USA, Italy, Japan and Vietnam. It proofs that traditional products still stand up till now.

To sum up, traditional skills are still alive though the technology is increased dramatically. It still has a special place in people’s life. Also, traditional skills’ popularity will increase if people try to combine both traditional skills and technology.

Sample 9:

Increasingly technological developments are aggressively pushing traditional lifestyle and skills out of the picture. Some believe that this diminishing process is too extraordinary to stop or reverse. However, I believe that valuable traditions will be preserved in particular ways by providing alternative ways of living and being inspirations for modern technology developments.

First of all, traditional lifestyle and skills are gradually becoming popular recently, particularly among young people who live in a busy urban area, by offering alternative ways of life. For instance, a cosy country style Thai restaurant where traditional cooking herbs and vegetables are freshly harvested from its own backyard garden, and spices are 100% homemade with traditional spicy preserving skills, has drawn much attention and popularity from people who are bored of mass-produced food and the highly industrialised environment. Such traditional skills and way of life would continue to have their place in this modern era.

Furthermore, conventional skills can be a great source of inspirations for modern technologies development. Evidence have shown that engineers and designers of modern times are still constantly inspired by the traditional skills. For example, sparked by a traditional bamboo braiding skills from a rural Asian area, a world widely famous furniture designer, working with equally talented engineers, invented production lines to manufacture designed modern furniture that however has that particular traditional braid style touch. Such inspiration has boosted the business, therefore, in turn, would result in more money allocated for preserving those valuable skills for further development.

To conclude, although it is hard to stop most of our traditional skills and ways of life vanishing from this modern world, some traditional skills and lifestyle would not just survive, but also thrive by proving alternative ways of living and being innovative for modern technology.

Sample 10:

Nowadays, technological advancement and their rapid and wide applications are having a significant impact on a nation's traditional skills and ways of life. Some argue that such impact is so extraordinary that it would make conventional skills and lifestyles obsolete. However, I believe they would continue to thrive by providing alternatives to modern ways of life, and innovative ideas for modern technologies.

First of all, traditional skills and ways of life are becoming an alternative solution to the problems caused by "mainstreamed" ways of life which are greatly influenced by modern technologies. For instance, a cozy restaurant where traditional, home-brewed beer is served, offers another experience to people who are bored with branded beers that have the same flavour and come out of mass production with new technologies. It is in such a venue where traditional skills are preserved, people become relaxed and educated. Providing diversity and thus enriching modern ways of life, such traditional skills and ways of life would continue to have their place.

Furthermore, conventional skills provide innovative ideas to the development of modern technologies. For example, sparkled by how the word "Love" is traditionally knitted into a sweater by some ethnic minority women in some parts of Asia, some business managers from textile industry have developed some production lines by applying the traditional skills to Computer-Aided Designs (CAD). The products have boosted the companies' sales which in turn have increased their investment in preserving traditional skills for further developing their technologies.
To conclude, traditional skills and lifestyles are increasingly becoming a useful alternative to the homogeneity brought by global applications of modern technologies. However, the evolution of technologies is a selection process, whereby some would become obsolete, but there is no doubt that some would thrive when their roles are appreciated.

Sample 11:

During the last century, science and technology have expanded to a great extent. As a nation focuses more on technology, it is true that the conventional skills and previous lifestyle vanishes. I strongly agree that there is no point in retaining them. This can be proven by analysing how technology can save a lot of time as well as be accurate enough.

It is apparent that the latest machines can do a lot of work with minimal time. For instance, in a construction industry, a crane can lift a block of heavy materials within a fraction of a minute. By using the traditional skills, it will take at least a day to uplift bulky items to the top of a building. Thus, it is obvious that it makes no sense on focusing on previous skills and ways. Similarly, when automated machines can sew more than thousands of clothes, there is no point to involve manual labour to produce only hundred per day!

It is a fact that almost all industries prefer computers for account related tasks as they are very much accurate and faster. For example, consider a bank which has to calculate the turnover for its past decade. By using a software, it would be possible to get the exact value. Even though there are a lot of algorithms used by old generation, it is not guaranteed that the calculation will be so precise and faster. Hence it is clear that there is not much benefit in focusing on traditional expertise.

By analysing how science has helped in getting the work done faster with precise results, it is very clear that there is not much advantage in retaining old skills and lifestyle. It is considered that the community will create this awareness among the masses.

Sample 12:

Many people think that traditional cultures will vanish due to the rapid development of new technology. Therefore, it is useless to spend some time for preserving the traditional ways of life. To a certain point, I would agree that modern technology has brought some benefits to our life. But I disagree if we should abandon all the old-fashioned cultures, as I believe that some traditional ways are still beneficial for us.

It is a fact that many traditional ways have disappeared due to the existence of new technology. Many people have abandoned their traditional ways and equipment, as they become more productive with the modern tools. For example, instead of using carts and manpower, many farmers in develop countries are using tractors and bulldozers to cultivate their plants these days. By using these machines, it saves a lot of times, money and energy. Therefore, many people prefer to use modern technology than to maintain the traditional ways.

Despite the benefits of modern technology, some traditional ways of life are still important and valid for our lives nowadays. One of the examples is that people in the past are concerned about honesty and integrity. In the olden days, people did business based on trust and respect, as they had no contracts and due to the lack of paper resources. In the modern world, legalised agreement become an essential part of a business deal due to some parties might do any illegal and inappropriate act. These kinds of traditional cultures should be preserved and carry forward to the future generation.

In conclusion, to a certain extent, I would agree that some traditional cultures should be abandoned and replace with technology and modern ways. But some of the traditional ways are still valid and applicable to the modern world, and it is necessary to maintain and preserve them.

Sample 13:

In recent times, technology has played a pivotal role in the transformation of present processes. Some individuals believe that as a nation's technology progresses, its traditional skills and ways of life fade. Therefore, there is no justification for their continued existence. I strongly disagree with this assertion, and my preference will be explained further.

To embark with, in our technological environment, ancient skills and practices nevertheless maintain a special place. Moreover, despite the fact that technology has replaced many things, traditional abilities cannot be replaced. Using Patan city as an example, a study revealed that the city is renowned for its traditional textiles, which, despite attempts at mechanical production, cannot replace the skill of human hands. Therefore, not everything can be replaced by technology.

Furthermore, old methods and rituals constantly retain their origins. In addition, it presents significance to the next generation for the benefit of their lives. If the present generation obtains an understanding of historic practices, they will be able to adopt them to improve living and also learn to respect our traditions. Therefore, to preserve our traditions, it is vital to share these abilities with the world.

However, I would not disregard that technology is always advancing and every approach and employment sector is evolving. Since technology is at its pinnacle, it has made all labour far simpler than in the past. Additionally, individuals are spending less on conventional skills and more on technology. Thus, over a period of time, no one may be able to block old practices and abilities.

To conclude, despite the advancement of technology, it is more vital to retain our traditional abilities, since this preserves the roots connected to their origin.

Sample 14:

Nowadays, traditional skills and ways are almost getting lost. Some people think that if a country develops its technology, then traditional abilities and methods will be lost, and there is no point in keeping those alive. However, I partially agree with this opinion, and my preference will be addressed further.

To begin with, technology perpetually distances us from culture and tradition. As technology advances, individuals devote less attention to cultural pursuits and remain perpetually preoccupied with contemporary life. For instance, according to a report, the majority of youngsters are unaware of their traditional attire since they wore only western clothing. Therefore, we must safeguard the traditions against technology in order to preserve them.

Additionally, traditional skills and practices are crucial to our nations because they reflect them and carry unique significance. If a country promotes its culture, it will entice individuals from other nations to learn more about it; as a consequence, it will aid in connecting and socialising with those of diverse cultures. Thus, traditional skills and practises not only serve to symbolise the nation, but also to unite its people.

However, technology is also highly useful since it provides immediate response and alleviation in the battle against any sickness, while older methods need time to produce results. As medical technology has advanced, individuals have begun to favour it above traditional practices. Therefore, technology is necessary for quick outcomes.

To conclude, although technology benefits us by giving instant results, traditional skills and methods are more essential to know our culture better, and also to socialise more.

Sample 15:

Nowadays, technology and cultural traditions are perennially controversial issues of conversation. Some individuals believe that old methods and abilities are vanishing owing to technological innovation. Moreover, protecting them is futile. I mostly agree with the viewpoint, and my preferences will be explained further.

To begin with, technology is at its pinnacle in every industry today. As a result of the advancement of technology, individuals choose to use it over conventional talents. Moreover, technology greatly simplifies all jobs. For instance, there are lots of sewing machines that have been developed; while, in earlier times, people were using hands to sew, which was time consuming and tough work. Thus, technology makes each task simpler and quicker.

In addition, technology has improved to the point that individuals may now post their professional profiles on internet platforms and get better employment. Additionally, it might enable them to share their work and network with other experts. Individuals may obtain pleasure and tranquilly as well as prosperity if they share their strengths and skills. Therefore, technology offers several advantages over conventional methods.

However, I would not avoid the fact that traditional talents are very distinctive and useful, since they aid in identifying communities and history, therefore connecting the origins of civilizations. In addition, if individuals lose the identity of their communities, they will lose their own. Therefore, it is essential to preserve old practices and abilities.

In conclusion, despite the fact that traditional skills and traditions assist to define a community, technology is more vital since it makes labour simpler and more useful.

Sample 16:

When a nation advances technologically, it inevitably takes a toll on the conventional skill set and lifestyle. In my opinion, traditional competencies and values of life are not important to be maintained as technology changes society in a transient manner and solves problems for the people who live in it.

To commence with, there is no rationale for preserving traditional skills that have no practical need for a better lifestyle. Powerful technology makes these skills useless as the proliferation of cutting-edge technologies supersedes the old ones each day as time goes by. In fact, technological changes determine the conditions under which we live. Let’s clarify this with an example. DVDs players are obsolete VHS players, and the skills required to mend VHS players are no longer useful. When the technology has offered even more powerful storage solutions, keeping the backdated ones is just pointless.

Likewise, maintaining a rigorously conventional lifestyle can limit the progress of human civilization. That is to say that the traditional way of life promotes one to remain the same, retaining the same custom, which in turn may dissuade men from inventing new ways of life to make it easier and superior. It keeps people trying to live in the past; thereby they distance themselves from the blessings stemmed from technological development. On top of that, the traditional lifestyle confines people in their comfort zone. To put it another way, they cannot push themselves to think outside the box with traditional views.

It would be reasonable enough to draw a conclusion that traditional skills and lifestyle often make no sense at all when there are better alternatives. Therefore, we should be looking forward to embracing the new manners of life and new skill set.

Sample 17:

Conventional skill sets and lifestyles in society are fading away with the advancement of technology. Many believe that the need to maintain a traditional set of skills and ideas is worthless. Such a view, is, however, seriously mistaken. This is because traditional skill sets and lifestyles can bring considerable benefits to the environment and the community as well.

Traditional competencies have been forged over hundreds of years of human experience and they are crucial to the environment. These skills were devised with empirical observations about its inhabitants and the ecosystem as a whole. The convention on biological diversity, for example, finds that many indigenous communities have been using biodiversity and cultivating it in a sustainable manner for hundreds of years. Thus, in times like this environmental chaos, traditional skills are of profound importance more than ever.

Similarly, the traditional lifestyle is just as noteworthy as common skills. By maintaining it, people can build a healthy community. In a traditional value system, collectivism takes the centre stage at every level of life. Individuals determine themselves as members of groups and place the priorities of their collective priorities ahead of their personal preferences. In short, individuals aim to satisfy others’ requirements rather than their own demands. On the contrary, today’s individualistic society pays attention to the needs of the individuals over the needs of the group as a whole, which in turn very often provokes bitter conflicts and widens the gaps between the poor and rich.

In fine, traditional skills and ways of life are not only good for the environment but equally are important for the welfare of our society. We should keep alive traditional skills and lifestyles because these can resurrect a healthy environment and a harmonious society for all.

Sample 18:

There is no doubt that with the advancement of technology, many traditional skills and ways of life are becoming obsolete. However, I strongly disagree with the opinion that it is pointless to try and keep them alive. In my view, it is essential to preserve traditional skills and ways of life because they are an integral part of a country’s culture and heritage.

Firstly, traditional skills and ways of life provide a connection to a country’s past and identity. They give us an insight into how our ancestors lived and worked, and how they contributed to the country’s growth and development. By preserving these skills and ways of life, we can maintain a link to our history and heritage and pass it on to future generations.

Secondly, traditional skills and ways of life can be a valuable source of knowledge and inspiration for modern technology. Many of these skills have been refined over centuries and can offer unique perspectives and solutions to contemporary problems. For instance, traditional methods of agriculture or handicrafts can provide insights into sustainable and eco-friendly practices that can benefit modern industries.

Moreover, preserving traditional skills and ways of life can help to promote cultural diversity and maintain a sense of community identity. These practices often reflect the customs, values, and beliefs of a particular community, and their preservation can help to promote social cohesion and understanding.

In conclusion, it is crucial to recognize the value of traditional skills and ways of life and work towards their preservation. They provide a connection to our past, offer valuable insights into modern-day problems, and promote cultural diversity and social cohesion. It is not purposeless to try and keep them alive, and we should do our best to ensure that they are not lost in the march of technological progress.

Sample 19:

Technology flourishes with leaps and bounds, and this development inevitably takes a toll on traditional values. This essay thinks traditional ideals are bound to vanish in this technological world.

To begin with, there are many reasons why there is no existence in this modern world of these conventional values. First of all, everyone is helped with the mobile phone to stay connected to their family and friends in this fast-paced world. In ancient times, however, people used to send letters and stand for the maturity of one call in the long queues on S.T.D and I.S.D. This development in communication modes has shown that traditional skills are useless for nothing.

Second, the fashion world has been changed by technology. Earlier people used to knit, stitch, and design manually, but now computers have made each task more accessible and more comfortable. To substantiate my opinion, many of the students in fashion design were seen portraying model pictures themselves to test the compatibility of colors, but this work is currently being performed in seconds on much-advanced software. Besides that, owing to the advent of refrigerators, hardly anyone is seen buying pitchers for cold water.

In conclusion, the evolution of new technology is an iterative process, so with these latest trends, the time-consuming traditional methods will not be able to keep pace. Therefore, the time to preserve them is useless and wasteful.

Sample 20:

The swift technological advancement within a nation can inevitably result in the demise of traditional skills and lifestyles, rendering efforts to preserve them futile. I completely disaccord with the notion as safeguarding them is essential to uphold cultural diversity, preserving historical heritage, and pass on invaluable wisdom to future generations.

Firstly, traditional skills, crafts, and indigenous practices epitomize the singular cultural legacy of a society. Preserving these skills is crucial as they embody a community's knowledge, values, and identity, reflecting their exceptional history and customs; allowing them to vanish diminishes cultural diversity and erodes societal vibrancy. Additionally, conventional ways of life play a crucial role in fostering a sense of belonging, maintaining continuity, and cultivating collective identity, effectively connecting individuals to their roots and promoting cultural appreciation while facilitating meaningful intergenerational exchange and robust social cohesion. Passed- down festivals, rituals, and craftsmanship, for instance, preserve cultural traditions and ensure their continuity.

Furthermore, these skills embody deep knowledge about local ecosystems, natural resources, and sustainable practices. For example, traditional farming methods promote organic agriculture, respecting ecological balance, and minimizing harm to the environment. Safeguarding these skills enable communities to maintain sustainable livelihoods, protect natural resources, and promote long-term environmental stewardship. Moreover, they can provide opportunities for cultural tourism, artisanal craftsmanship, and niche markets. Reviving and promoting these skills can enrich local economic development, create employment opportunities, and empower sustainable livelihoods rooted in cultural heritage.

In conclusion, protecting traditional skills and ways of life is far from fatuous, as it enriches cultural diversity, community well- being, and sustainable practices, while also fostering the development of the country's local economy.

Sample 21:

There is much discussion surrounding the claim that traditional skills and ways of life will eventually go extinct as a result of technological innovation. While it is true that certain practises may become obsolete due to technological improvements, I think it is crucial to preserve traditional skills and ways of life for the sake of cultural preservation and societal well-being.

Innovative techniques are frequently introduced by technological advancement and replace conventional practises, making them less useful or efficient. For instance, labour-intensive craftsmanship can be replaced by sophisticated machinery and automation, which would lead to a loss of traditional artisanal abilities. Additionally, technological advancements such as worldwide networking and information transmission have hastened cultural homogenization and undermined unique cultural practises and customs.

However, maintaining old ways of life and skills is of enormous cultural and social importance. A community's history, morals, and identity are typically deeply established in its customs. They serve as a bridge across generations, fostering a sense of continuity and belonging. Traditional skills also represent the variety of cultural expressions and artistic styles that add to the wealth and diversity of the human legacy.

Preserving ancient ways of life can also be advantageous economically. Cultural tourism and a desire for traditional handicrafts create opportunities for economic expansion and job creation. The transmission of specific knowledge and competence is ensured by maintaining traditional skills and protecting traditional industries and their cultural and economic value.

Instead of viewing technology and tradition as mutually exclusive, a balanced approach is needed. Harmonious coexistence can be achieved by embracing modern advancements while appreciating and preserving traditional skills and ways of life. This can be done by integrating technology into conventional methods, increasing their effectiveness and sustainability while retaining the essential elements of cultural heritage.

In conclusion, despite the fact that technological improvements may endanger traditional skills and ways of living, it is crucial to acknowledge the cultural and sociological worth of these practises. Traditionalism fosters cultural identity, variety, and economic development. The continuity of cultural heritage and the well-being of society are guaranteed by the adoption of a balanced strategy that combines technological development with the preservation of traditional skills.

Sample 1:

It is an undeniable fact that despite the prevalent use of preservatives and chemicals in processed foods, a significant number of individuals still gravitate towards these convenient options. The crux of this preference lies in the ease and time-efficiency provided by ready-made meals. However, this trend raises concerns about long-term health impacts. This essay will explore the underlying reasons for the preference for processed foods and propose strategies to encourage the consumption of home-cooked meals.

Firstly, the primary appeal of processed foods can be attributed to their convenience. In today’s fast-paced world, many people find themselves pressed for time, making the quick and effortless nature of ready-made meals highly attractive. For instance, a working parent might opt for frozen dinners to manage time more effectively, prioritizing job demands and family care. Moreover, processed foods often come with an enhanced taste profile, achieved through various additives, making them more palatable to those accustomed to intense flavors.

However, the ease of access to and the palatability of processed foods come at a cost, often compromising nutritional value and leading to health issues such as obesity and heart disease. Encouraging a shift towards home-cooked meals requires addressing these root causes. One effective approach is education. By increasing awareness about the health benefits of home-cooked meals and the potential dangers of preservatives and additives, individuals may be more inclined to invest time in cooking at home. Additionally, culinary education programs could demystify the process of cooking, showing that healthy meals can also be prepared quickly and easily. For example, quick cooking classes and online tutorials can provide busy individuals with fast, healthy recipes that can be integrated into their hectic schedules.

In conclusion, while the convenience and taste of processed foods are appealing, the health benefits of home-cooked meals are undeniable. By enhancing public knowledge about nutrition and simplifying the cooking process through educational initiatives, society can foster a healthier lifestyle.

Sample 2:

Despite awareness of the preservatives and chemicals prevalent in processed foods and ready-made meals, many individuals persistently opt for such convenience. This phenomenon can be attributed to factors like time constraints and the appeal of fast food, while strategies to promote home-cooked meals include enhancing culinary education and incentivizing healthier options.

Firstly, the primary allure of processed foods lies in their convenience, crucial for those with hectic schedules. Modern lifestyles often leave minimal time for cooking, compelling many to choose quick, readily available meals despite potential health drawbacks. Additionally, the consistent taste and extensive marketing of processed foods create a comforting familiarity and desirability that home cooking sometimes lacks. For instance, global chains such as McDonald's offer a uniform taste and experience that many find reassuring and enjoyable compared to the unpredictability of homemade dishes. Moreover, processed foods are often perceived as more affordable and accessible than fresh ingredients, further drawing consumers who may have limited budget or access to supermarkets with fresh produce.

Conversely, promoting home-cooked meals requires multifaceted approaches. Education plays a pivotal role; by integrating cooking classes and nutritional education into school curriculums, individuals can learn from an early age the benefits of preparing meals at home, which are often healthier and more economical. Moreover, government incentives could also prove beneficial. For example, subsidies for organic produce or tax reductions for small local farmers can lower the prices of healthier options, making them more accessible and enticing to the general public. Additionally, public campaigns celebrating the cultural and familial aspects of cooking might shift perceptions and valorize the personal touch in home-prepared meals.

In conclusion, while the convenience and familiarity of processed foods hold significant appeal, promoting home-cooked meals through educational initiatives and economic incentives could cultivate a shift towards healthier eating habits. By addressing both the practical and emotional facets of food choices, society can encourage more nutritious and rewarding dietary habits.

Sample 3:

The consumption of processed foods and ready-made meals containing preservatives and chemicals is a prevalent practice, even though people are aware of the potential health risks associated with such foods. This essay will explore the reasons behind this preference and suggest measures to encourage individuals to opt for more home-cooked meals. 

One reason why people gravitate towards processed foods is convenience. In today's fast-paced lifestyle, individuals often face time constraints and demanding schedules, leaving little time for meal preparation. Ready-made meals provide a quick and effortless solution, requiring minimal time and effort in the kitchen. For instance, individuals with busy work schedules or caregivers balancing multiple responsibilities may find it easier to rely on processed foods for convenience.

Furthermore, the extensive marketing and advertising campaigns by the food industry heavily influence consumer choices. These companies invest significant resources in promoting processed foods, employing persuasive techniques to create a desire for their products. Clever packaging, enticing visuals, and misleading health claims can sway consumer preferences towards those food items.

To encourage people to choose more home-cooked meals, raising awareness about the health consequences of consuming processed foods is crucial. Educating individuals about the potential adverse effects of preservatives and chemicals in these foods can help them make informed decisions about their dietary choices. Public health campaigns, informative articles, and educational programs can play a significant role in disseminating this knowledge and promoting healthier alternatives. Moreover, providing support and resources for home cooking can make it more accessible and appealing. Cooking classes, workshops, and online tutorials can equip individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge to prepare nutritious meals at home.

In conlcusion, while the convenience and marketing strategies surrounding processed foods contribute to their popularity, promoting awareness, education, and support for home cooking can help shift dietary preferences towards healthier options. By raising awareness about the health risks associated with processed foods and providing resources for home cooking, individuals can make more informed choices that prioritize their long-term well-being.

Sample 1:

As urban centers experience growth and expansion, the environment within these cities is facing significant deterioration. The increased pollution, depletion of natural resources, and loss of green spaces are pressing concerns that need to be addressed. Tackling this issue requires joint efforts from both the government and individuals to ensure a sustainable and healthy urban environment.

The government plays a vital role in mitigating environmental deterioration. By implementing stricter regulations and policies, they can control emissions and pollution. Enforcing emissions standards and pollution control measures for industries and vehicles can significantly reduce air and water pollution. Additionally, promoting sustainable urban planning and development practices can minimize the impact on the environment. This includes incorporating green spaces, preserving natural habitats, and encouraging the use of renewable energy sources.

Investing in public transportation and infrastructure is another crucial step for the government. Enhancing public transportation networks and providing efficient alternatives to private vehicles can reduce congestion and carbon emissions. Building green infrastructure, such as eco-friendly buildings and renewable energy systems, can help mitigate the environmental impact of urban growth.

However, individuals also have a responsibility to address the issue. Adopting sustainable practices in daily life is key. Conserving energy and water resources, practicing waste reduction and recycling, and choosing eco-friendly products can significantly contribute to environmental preservation. Furthermore, individuals can engage in community initiatives and raise awareness about the importance of environmental conservation. Participating in community clean-up programs, educating others, and advocating for sustainable practices can create a positive ripple effect within the community.

Collaboration between the government and individuals is crucial for effective solutions. Developing partnerships and offering incentives can encourage businesses and organizations to implement sustainable practices. Tax incentives or subsidies for eco- friendly initiatives can motivate individuals and businesses to make environmentally conscious choices. Fostering community engagement and participation in decision-making processes ensures that the concerns and ideas of citizens are taken into account.

In conclusion, the deterioration of the environment in growing urban centers requires a combined effort from both the government and individuals. The government should implement stricter regulations, invest in sustainable infrastructure, and provide incentives for eco-friendly practices. Individuals should adopt sustainable habits, participate in community initiatives, and promote awareness. Through collaboration, we can create healthier and more sustainable urban environments for present and future generations.

Sample 1:

While “burning the midnight oil” for your final exam, you may find yourself nervously shaking and on the verge of exploding. On this fatal date, many of your future hopes can be crushed. Too much strain is put on a single, taking approximately an hour, assessment. This practice has been taken for granted for many years, and only recently, some voices are calling it old – fashioned.

The testing system has one distinctive feature that enhances the process of education. It is universal and standardized while at the same time, it does not take into account the individual. Therefore, teachers are relieved from the burden of designing a personal exam paper. However, some scientists argue that each student possesses unique qualities (creativity, imagination, logical thinking) and unified, strict methods of assessment cannot bring them on the surface.

Nowadays, ambitious parents push their kids to be more obsessed with marks. There are many cases of people encouraging their children to calculate perplexing equations or studying French. All this at the expense of playing outside, socializing and just being a kid. The reason is obvious – the better the under-aged perform, the higher prospects for “hot” schools.

Another aspect of the stressful practice in modern examinations is that it shows only the momentary situation. Even though you may have problems with one part of the textbook, the outcome depends on pure chance. A good step in reversing the process is the ¾ test throughout the semester, implemented nu universities.

On balance, the outdated approach to assessment should be reached and adapted to fit in the modern situation. More constructiveness and reducing anxiety are vital if society wants to keep people willing to learn and not just to achieve high marks.

Sample 2:

The education is the key of future; it is the only way to encourage people to improve their life and environment. Actually, in nowadays testing people, especially students, is the common way to evaluate learning process and teachers tend to pay a lot of attention on students score as it was the only measure to check the knowledge. It is developing high level of pressure on young learners.

The school has a lot of objectives, but the mean one is to prepare people for the life. In fact, life is sometime very stressful and hard, and it is necessary to have the ability to control difficulties and having success in hard time as well. Then it is possible that the high pressure exerts on children and students about testing is a way to help them to be strong and to learn face future stressful situation.

On the other hand, to force students to learn some specific things in specific time could discourage the creative and become students in knowledge’s consumers conversely to look for develop skills or discover personal abilities. In my opinion, pressing students having good score, you are achieving that them memorize a lot of information, but no necessary to learn or understanding it.

Furthermore, experts have found around the world that open learning process make more intelligent and creative students, because to be relaxed and feeling comfortable is easy to learn and discover new things; so this way to teach is better to develop skills and improve difficulties.

In the final analysis, in my view, even to learn to control stress and pressure is important and necessary, if the goal is developing skills and encourage the intelligence, it is necessary to decrease of pressure about testing and promote creative process.

Sample 3:

Exams and tests have always been discussable things. Is it better to do they or not? As always, it depends. I believe that examinations are necessary, but frequency of doing them should be rethink carefully.

First of all, too many exams in primary schools exert high pressure on kids. It can cause problems which can be seen later, like a depression or low self-esteem. Being compared all the time with peers is not a pleasure. Feeling of constant rivalry is really horrible.

But are all children equal? I do not think so. Alter each year (or at least once after primary school) children should be assessed. And here tests or another form of examinations should take place. I remember my tests at the end of primary school, and they were not pleasant. But thanks to them, we knew where we should go: to technical or vocational secondary schools, somewhere else or nowhere.

I have heard that nowadays teachers have to prepare minimum one test per month in primary and secondary schools. This trend to test children and students every month causes that teachers concentrate rather on preparing and making tests and not teaching students how to think or gain knowledge useful for their future work.

On the other hand, if students know there is an ongoing exam, they study harder. No gain, no pain.

For these reasons I strongly believe that examining learners is integral part of teaching process. Tests are important, but it would be great to let children and students live and not only learn.

Sample 4:

With a common view to judging the students’ quality, nations have different ways to approach the issues. However, in some countries, examinations deem to be emphasized heavily, leading to limitation for teachers and exceeding pressure on young pupils.

With regards to teachers, this method plays a considerable role in their work. People can hardly find out a better assessment than through testing and examining students which gives a frank and objective results. Not only do grades indicate how much the students’ effort is but they also help teachers with categorize them in comparison with other students. Nonetheless, examinations bring the teachers high pressure including building the tests and marking them. For instance, in most Vietnamese schools, each class has lots of students, meaning that teachers have the equal number of tests to rank. That is the problem of heavier workload along with higher pressure. Nevertheless, teachers are not the only patient of too much emphasis on testing.

Students, particularly the the young ones, are worse affected by enormous quantity of test during school time. No sooner do children start attending primary schools than they have to struggle against the enemy named tests. Crammed with many a subject and different types of examination, it is not overstated that studying turns out to be a burden for kids to bear that may result in kids’ depress and health deterioration. Despite the counter – productive effect, evaluation apparently still contributes to the students’ life and career. The grades expose their great endeavor at school and shall be a recognition of a hard – working process.

All in all, important role of tests and examinations is undeniable in education systems. However, governments and schools should take advantage of the method of an appropriate level to balance its pros and cons.

Sample 5:

For many people interested in studying abroad, one of the first problems they face is obtaining a visa to enter the country and, in many situations, the procedure is time-consuming and frustrating. As a result, there is a clear case for making visa applications less stringent. However, there is also a potential for abuse if the system was made more lenient, and both of these opinions need to be considered.

In support of simplifying the visa-application procedure, it must be remembered that obtaining a visa is one of the first steps towards studying in a foreign country. If this process is difficult then it reflects poorly on the country the student is intending to go to. Moreover, once in the country, students often find it less problematic to use the services of an immigration agent, to whom they surrender their passports and pay sometimes phenomenal sums of money. In the same way, this again reflects poorly on the host country.

Yet there is a point of view that suggests visa regulations should remain as they are, or even become stricter. It is inevitable that once a developed country opens its door to students, there will be some who exploit the opportunity without any intention of fulfilling the study requirements of their visa.

To conclude, perhaps the best solution would be to allow the schools, colleges and universities that attract international students to have greater control over those students that do arrive in a country. This would allow the institutions themselves to police the students while being overseen by the Immigration Service itself.

Sample 6:

Nowadays testing has an extremely prominent place in education. The preparation required for examinations places limits on teachers as well as considerable amounts of stress on students. While some testing may be necessary to gain a better understanding of what a child has learned, I completely agree that excessive testing is too restricting for teachers. Furthermore, it can actually inhibit students’ learning and potentially be damaging over the long term.

Firstly, with the heavy emphasis placed on exams, teachers must teach only to the test. The result of this is that teachers cannot take the time to answer students’ questions about the content. This is because there is only time to teach what is going to be in the exam. This squashes children’s natural interest in subjects.

Another point to consider is that studies have shown that any student, regardless of age or subject, needs time to consolidate learning before being tested. A student who is tested too soon may get a low mark which is actually not representative of this student’s learning. Continual testing, therefore, does not take in account students’ natural developmental stages.

Finally, the amount of stress placed on students to pass all these exams is not healthy. The continual cycle of preparing for a test and taking a test can exhaust and burn out even the most motivated student. This is particularly dangerous when pupils are still young. It also removes the natural joy that comes from learning for both teachers and students when exams are constantly looming over their heads.

In conclusion, although a certain amount of testing will always be required at schools, I firmly believe that the current emphasis placed on tests is unnecessary and could have longterm negative effects on students.

Sample 7:

Nowadays, the education system is more focused on preparing and conducting tests regularly. But education is learning the factual life reality on the ground level. By putting more emphasis on tests, the student won’t try to understand the subject concept but on the contrary, he/she will just try to remember the text and pass the test. By doing this the student has not gained any knowledge. I completely agree that too much emphasis is placed on testing these days and I will share some of the valid reasons and a better solution to overcome this default system error.

Firstly, teachers are the most important factor in the entire educational system. But the institutions want their teachers to complete the prescribed curriculum and conduct tests regularly. So eventually, the teacher will be more focused on finishing the syllabus and preparing for tests. Now the student will never get to clear their subject-related doubts and will not get any individual attention from the teacher. This will result in students failing in the exam due to syllabus overload and not being able to clear all the queries.

Furthermore, this practice by the educational institution demotivates the students who are willing to learn the subject concepts. Then the student will start to live in a depressed state and convince themselves that education is all about remembering the text and passing the tests. Sometimes, students who couldn’t bear this syllabus burden tend to take extended decisions.

To conclude, the best possible way is to regulate the curriculum structure by limiting the syllabus so that students can understand and prepare for the tests. Even teachers will get time to interact with the student regarding the subject concept and provide them a better education. Stress and depression will never ripe fruitful results. So, the government authorities must realize the seriousness of the issue and take appropriate educational guideline solutions.

Sample 8:

Nowadays, due to the present lopsided educational system, it has become more important to pass the tests than learning the actual subject concepts. Eventually, this results in stress and depression among the students and even the teaching faculties. I agree that too much emphasis is placed on testing which has limited the educator teaching boundaries and also puts more stress and subject burden on students.

Firstly, the educational institutions have made up a predefined curriculum format by which the teacher and student must abide by. Now the teachers are overloaded with tasks to complete the syllabus and prepare the tests by conducting them frequently. So, the mentors will not have time to pay individual attention to the students and resolve their doubts related to subject concepts. Secondly, on the other hand, the students who are given an overload of the syllabus to study and pass the test tend to face stress and depression.

Furthermore, real education is lost as the student tends to believe that education is all about remembering the text and passing the exam. Even though project-based learning methods can be followed but due to overpopulation, assigning a teacher-student ratio will be a challenging task. The education system must not be subject to exams and tests alone. This methodology will not produce experts in any field. I believe that tests and exams are merely filtration processes without identifying the best quality.

To conclude, with the student’s population size and the teacher’s availability. Exams and tests are possible methods of evaluation. But too much emphasis placed on tests is unacceptable because it leads to stress and depression among the students and even the teachers. The best possible solution would be to formulate the syllabus burden and the frequency of conducting tests. The governing educational body must implement guidelines for both the private and govt sectors regarding the curriculum structure and number of tests to be conducted per year.

Sample 9:

Nowadays, the school system is overly focused on exams. As a result, students are stressed, and teachers are unable to adapt courses to meet the needs of individuals. This essay will argue not only that this limitation on teachers is unnecessary, but also explain that there are superior methods of assessment which avoid causing undue stress to learners.

First of all, just because sitting exams is the oldest known method of assessing students, it does not necessarily follow that it is the best. More and more educational institutions are experimenting with project based learning and continuous assessment. Take Finland, where these methods have been the norm in primary school for the past decade. So far, the results are looking promising – pupils report much lower anxiety levels, and parents and teachers are confident children are assimilating the knowledge and skills necessary to prepare them for their future.

A further advantage of this system is its ability to allow educators to adapt their programs for children with varying needs. Gifted young minds no longer have to go at the same pace as the average student, instead they are given personal projects and goals and continual feedback, allowing them to flourish. By the same token, children with learning difficulties are given the special attention they need and are no longer put under pressure to keep up with the rest of the class.

In conclusion, there are far superior options to the current practice of inflicting regular tests on students. These alternatives not only reduce stress-levels in schools, but also allow teachers to better adapt their courses to fit the wide range of needs of individual students.

Sample 10:

With excessive focusing about test in recent day, it causes teachers and students a unessential burden. I agree with this view and the reasons including self-esteem and relative deprivation will be further elaborated in this essay.

There are two main reasons why I agree with the above suggestion, first being the self-esteem. It is believed that people might feel depressed when they are received low grade in the test. To be more specific, a way of assesment to separate class and position bring about people the depression and loss of the confidence because they would compare with their peers and friends their score. People who have low grade in the test feel frustration. Accordingly, their confidence would be fallen down, and they would not adapt education system. This, as a result, would leads decline of self-esteem.

Relative deprivation is also a key reason to affect students and teachers. This is because most people incline to stand hight position in society, school and group which they belong in. To elaborate, most people, in fact, might consider that the high grade represent the high position in the group. Thus, people who have a lower score than others would feel severe stress and underperform their potential because of fear about evaluation. Also, some people could do the deviation since they experience the indifference and comparison with students who are in upper class and position. Such tendency triggers the society adverse effects like a increase in the rate of crime.

In conclusion, all that said, I agree that a excessive concern about the exam brings about the detrimental impact to individual and society in terms of self-esteem and relative deviation.

Sample 11:

Considerable importance is attached to examinations today. In many schools and academic institutions throughout the world there has been a shift from formal examinations and tests to assessment based on home assignments and tutorial or class presentations. This change has been welcomed by many educationalists who view formal exams and testing as an unreliable and inadequate means of evaluating a student's achievements. On the other hand, supporters of regular formal testing claim that important life skills such as discipline, the ability to stay focused under pressure and time management can be exercised only under exam conditions.

In my opinion, their role needs to be re-examined if they are to continue to play a part in the educational system. One valid argument against regular and excessive testing is that it distracts teachers from his or her primary task: teaching. Nowadays, teachers are being held more and more accountable for the academic fortunes of their students and this often results in a preoccupation with strategies for passing exams rather than with learning itself. Furthermore, examinations measure relatively superficial knowledge or learning which totally defeats the purpose of examinations. A person with low grades may turn out to be a successful person while a good grader may end up unsuccessful in life. In addition, some students do not score well even if they know the material, poor reading skills can handicap a student, questions on examination might not test progress as well as they could. Lastly, they have a poor predictive quality because they only judge a student's ability under set conditions and limited time. Many times, a student who is otherwise good may get anxious or confused under strict exam conditions and may not perform up to the mark.

Contrary to what some people think, proponents of regular, formal testing maintain that the need for regular monitoring of a student's progress justifies frequent testing since this enables teachers to provide continual feedback to their students who acknowledge their shortcomings and work on them. Moreover, there are those who argue that a heavy emphasis on testing places unnecessary pressure on young students. They claim that rather than abolish or scale down testing teachers can assist students how to minimise stress and encourage them to take formal assessment in their stride. Another advantage is that exams promote competition among students. They work harder to improve their knowledge and skills. In this way they learn more and improve their learning strategies to achieve better results.

I cannot fully agree with the ideas. Firstly, the issue of tracking student growth is important, but teachers can measure progress using alternative ways such as presentations, group work and projects. It is also true that testing has the additional benefit of generating a spirit of healthy competition since most young people relish the opportunity to measure their achievements against those of their peers and the prospect of a formal exam can often spur students on to greater effort and commitment. However, the necessity to marshal ideas under pressure, to write fluently within time restrictions, to recall information and to think about your counterparts who can excel you in the exam will only intensify pressure and students may experience even higher levels of anxiety. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to help students overcome fears because different people experience different levels of anxiety and cannot control how their bodies respond to a perceived threat.

In conclusion, while examinations and tests should never become an end in themselves or a substitute for genuine teaching and learning, they do demand mental skills which play an important part in a student's intellectual development and provide teachers with valuable data on the progress of their students. Nevertheless, I tend to believe that the number of exams and tests should be decreased and limited to reduce pressure and stress on both teachers and students.

Sample 12:

The training is the important thing of destiny; it's miles the handiest manner to inspire human beings to enhance their lifestyles and environment. Actually, in in recent times checking out human beings, eparticularly college students is the not unusualplace manner to assess getting to know technique and instructors have a tendency to pay loads of interest on college students rating because it turned into the handiest degree to test the knowledge. It is growing excessive degree of stress on younger learners.

The faculty has loads of objectives, however the imply one is to put together human beings for the lifestyles. In fact, lifestyles are someday very disturbing and tough, and it's miles vital to have the capacity to govern problems and having achievement in tough time as well. Then it's miles viable that the excessive stress exerts on youngsters and college students approximately checking out is a manner to assist them to be sturdy and to examine face destiny disturbing situation.

On the alternative hand, to pressure college students to examine a few unique matters in unique time may want to discourage the innovative and come to be college students in knowledge’s clients conversely to search for increase capabilities or find out non-public abilities. In my opinion, urgent college students having accurate rating, you're reaching that them memorize loads of information, however no vital to examine or knowledge it.

Furthermore, specialists have located round the sector that open getting to know technique make greater clever and innovative college students, due to the fact to be comfortable and feeling cushty is straightforward to examine and find out new matters; so this manner to train is higher to increase capabilities and enhance problems.

In the very last analysis, in my view, even to discover ways to manage pressure and stress is essential and vital, if the intention is growing capabilities and inspire the intelligence, it's miles vital to lower of stress approximately checking out and sell innovative technique.

Sample 1:

The debate on whether people who have original ideas are of much greater value to society encompasses diverse viewpoints, revealing its advantages and drawbacks. This essay critically assesses these perspectives.

There are myriad arguments in favour of my stance. Recent research not only outlines the significance of studies as well as people, but also points out the importance of education and coping with vicissitudes. Besides, it provides a brief overview of expanding cultural understanding, followed by enhancing global perspectives. Examples of this can be seen all over the world, especially in affluent nations. Further, the implications of technological advancements on these views are significant, justifying widespread support for the idea that people who have original ideas are of much greater value to society.

However, there are some arguments against the aforementioned view. Besides, its impact is far-reaching indeed as its influence extends to various facets of society, shaping not only individual experiences but also impacting the academic research landscape. Therefore, it is apparent why many are against the notion that people who have original ideas are of much greater value to society.

In conclusion, while the viewpoint that people who have original ideas are of much greater value to society presents a complex array of advantages and disadvantages, my analysis leads me to firmly support the notion that its benefits substantially outweigh the drawbacks.

Sample 2:

I certainly agree that people who come up with new ideas; in other words, those who 'invent' or 'discover' things are terribly important to society as a whole. However, I also think there is a role in society for good imitators.

No one would deny that key individuals must be thanked for providing us with certain facilities that we use every day. Where, would we be, for example, without basic items such as the washing machine, the television and, more recently, the computer? These items are now used so regularly that we tend to take them for granted.

In fact, the society we live in today has become increasingly consumer-oriented, and while it may be possible to constantly update and improve consumer goods, not everyone where I live can afford the prices of these innovations. Furthermore, not everyone lives in an area that has accessibility to the latest models on the market. For this reason, there is a value to be placed on being able to provide good copies of expensive items.

Having said that, certain innovations have a more serious impact on our lives than consumer goods and cannot easily be replicated. Vital medicines like penicillin and vaccines against dangerous diseases also exist because people made continual efforts to develop them. Scientific ideas such as these enable us to live longer and escape illness.

Sample 3:

Nowadays, there are various types of people in every civilisation. As a result, some of them are intelligent enough to come up with a groundbreaking idea, while others work very hard to make these ideas a reality. In general, this article will explain this problem utilising instances and supporting evidence.

First of all, the foundation of any potential creation is a concept. Additionally, this idea is crucial because not everyone is endowed with the creativity and aptitude to think of it. For instance, Da Vinci created a beautiful plane layout. However, it took countless centuries for this plan to become a reality. 

Dreamers with innovative and distinctive ideas are also the force behind progress. They develop a notion, and others can use it in their daily lives because they created it. Because of this, civilisation will gain from it. For instance, the first design of a submarine was created in the 17th century by a self-taught designer from a Russian town, and now scientists utilise it to research deep oceanic zones.

However, it has been argued that without adequate implementation, an idea is only a wish. In other words, individuals were only able to make these goals come true after making a great deal of attempts and exerting a great deal of work. As a result, even when people duplicated a theory, they fixed many issues by enhancing its weaknesses. As a result, these individuals are far more valuable to society and an important force in progress.

In conclusion, our society needs both types of individuals; some develop an idea, while others make it a reality. Overall, I concur that it is more helpful for society if people duplicate someone else’s idea but better realize it.

Sample 4:

In today’s rapidly changing world, the ability to generate original ideas has become increasingly important. While it is true that there is value in the dissemination of existing knowledge, I firmly believe that individuals who come up with original ideas contribute far more to the progress and development of society.

First and foremost, original ideas have the potential to revolutionize the way we live and work. Innovations such as the internet, smartphones, and renewable energy sources have all stemmed from original ideas. These groundbreaking inventions have not only improved our quality of life but have also created new industries and job opportunities. In contrast, individuals who simply copy existing ideas do not contribute to the advancement of society in the same way.

Furthermore, original ideas often spark further creativity and innovation. When a new concept or invention is introduced, it can inspire others to build upon it, leading to a ripple effect of progress. This collaborative and iterative process is essential for driving society forward and addressing complex challenges.

Additionally, individuals who generate original ideas are often at the forefront of change. They challenge the status quo and push boundaries, leading to paradigm shifts and breakthroughs in various fields. In contrast, those who merely copy others are unlikely to drive significant change or make substantial contributions to society.

In conclusion, while there is value in the dissemination of existing knowledge, I strongly believe that individuals who have original ideas provide much greater value to society. Their ability to innovate, inspire creativity, and drive change is crucial for the progress and development of our world.

Sample 5:

People are born with different abilities and talents. Some being unique and some are common to all. Sometimes those with unique talents come up with ideas that are completely new, creative and astonishing. However, there lingers this question “Are they greater than us?”.

In my honest opinion, every single human being should be treated and valued the same. No single person is greater than another. From the start of the human race to the present, no society was made by one man. It has always been a combined and a collective effort of everyone.

Sir Isaac Newton, the great physicist was someone who revolutionised the field of physics. Every single individual respects and acknowledges him for his achievements and contribution to the human race. But does that mean only people of his stature are needed in the society? I say NO. Ideas of Newton have been taken by other individuals to come up with wonders that even Newton could not have imagined of. The Space Shuttles, Aircraft, Architectures, Construction, Sports are all based on ideas of another person. The computer was a machine that was created by an individual. However, this idea was copied by others to build things which are even greater. From simple electronics like calculators to marvels such as supercomputers, Artificial Intelligence, Robots.  

As a conclusion, like Ying and Yang, a society co-exists with the talents and ideas of all people combined. No individual is of much greater value than another. The day society starts considering that people with original ideas are of much greater value, will be the downfall of that society.

Sample 6:

It is believed that people who have genuine ideas bring more benefits to the communities rather than those who duplicate the thought of other people. To a certain extent, I would agree that having pure and original ideas have a higher value than to copy the works of other people. But from the copying activities, other people have developed the work to become more effective and useful.

On the one hand, it is true that the public should respect those who have genuine and original ideas. These people have sacrificed and spent a lot of their time for thinking, studying and doing some research, in order to get new ideas or inventions. And many of the results bring a lot of benefits for the humankind. One of the examples would be Thomas Alva Edison, who had spent most of his time in experimenting so many things. He had tried for almost 1000 times before he invented the bulb light. Therefore, it is believed that people should appreciate their hard work, the eagerness and the sacrifice these people had been through, in order to get the innovative ideas.

On the other hand, there are groups of people who copy ideas from other people. Although some people might disrespect this kind of act, but certain people have developed the ideas into something greater than the original ones. For example, it is undeniable that during the 1950's, Japanese car producers were copying the designs of the American and Europeans car manufacturers. But instead of copying the ideas, the Japanese conducted some extensive development programs. As a result, the Japanese could make a more efficient car than the European and American, such as the Toyota Prius which used the hybrid technology.

In conclusion, I would agree that some innovative and creative thinkers and inverters should be fully appreciated for their original concepts, as they bring so many positive aspects to the society. But sometimes the copying activities could not be judged as a negative thing since there are other people who could copy the ideas and then developed it well.

Sample 7:

In the history of humankind, people have been attempting to facilitate numerous leaps and bounds in their life by sharing their idea to each other. In this regard, societies highly appreciate those who provide their original opinions while those who emulate others idea considered less valuable. From my point of view, this is open to debate.

The first justification that supports those copying other instructions is that they realised any pros and cons of the dilemma that might occur, and the outcome is almost obvious for all. In addition, it is noteworthy that people prefer to put forward those opinions which have tested several times. Taking teachers as an example, they have an inclination to mimic the skills that precedence ones applied in the educational system to transfer knowledge to students, so it is unfair if we underestimate their efforts.

Despite those points mentioned above in favour of emulators, an overt advantage of having creative people in a society is novel solutions for some problems which will appear. An innovative person is admirable in each country due to the fact that he/she has a power of thinking quickly and making an appropriate decision. Furthermore, these people are considered as intelligent and bear dynamism either in the work ambience and their family. Therefore, on the ground of these positive elements, they are much more admirable.

To summarise, although emulating others idea is considered boring and under value, we should not overlook the side of the fact that it has several valuable experiences behind itself. However, I believe that innovative people are much more worthwhile.

Sample 8:

Society respects both types of people because inventing itself does not add value to the mankind but implementing and improvising on original ideas are equally important. At the same time, innovators should be credited as they are the ones that triggered minds of others.

It is good to copy ideas of others if someone adding value to original thought. For example, Right brothers invented flying machines couple of generations ago. Several engineers, scientists and researchers improved this idea and made flying safer and accessible to wide range of people. Had this not happened, today we had to travel for months to reach from one corner of the globe to other. If we consider examples of healthcare, lots of improvements have been done over the past ages to original ideas to save lives of people effectively and efficiently. We can find this pattern not only in these industries but in almost all luxuries and comforts we have today. Original ideas laid the foundation for modern innovations of today. So, society respects both categories of people.

On the contrary, original ideas should be credited because without their ideas, things would not have been how they are today. For instance, telecommunications industry developed rapidly in last decade. Without the invention of smartphones today, communications would have been dulled and difficult. In this ever-improving world, new ideas will be developed by organisations and individuals and well recognised by the society. There have been awards and prizes like Nobel Prize that are globally recognised and helped to reach ideas masses and impact day-to-day lives of people throughout our world.

To summarise, societies have been recognising both original innovators and the ones who improved original ideas. Without continued efforts of both, lifestyle stagnates.

Sample 9:

"An idea can change your life", this famous advertisement tagline points towards a debatable topic, whether an original idea is more important to the society or a copy of the idea.

In the world, if the product has a monopoly, then it might be difficult for mass to enjoy the advantages of it. In such cases, a competition could help to keep the prices grounded. For example, Apple had launched an iPad to enjoy music which was very expensive due to its unique features. However, when the other companies launched similar products and that could be one of the reasons for the reduction of the pad prices.

The original is always considered as a masterpiece and the copied versions are called extensions of it. That is why ‘Taj Mahal’ is one of the Seven Wonders of the World and ‘Bibi Ka Makbara’ which is a copy of it is known by local people only. Nevertheless, few ideas have to be original only and should not be experimented extensively for the safety of the planet. For instance, when scientists found nuclear power, they might have thought about its positive sides like cheaper energy. However, during the copy of this idea, some destructive mindset people might have changed it completely and developed nuclear weapons. Another example could be a sword. Our ancestors invented it to kill animals and feed the families. Unfortunately, over a period of time, its real use was forgotten and humans started using it to kill other humans in the wars.

I believe the original idea whose intention is to make human life better should not be copied by those people whose intention is just to make money even if it is in the price of human life.

Sample 10:

The world is shaped by the ideas of few people who played the role of pioneer in the society. Their ideas contributed greatly to the enhancement of social, economic and political conditions across the globe. It is agreed that such people who contribute to the world with their thoughts are valuable legends of the society. This apparent when we see how such ideas help in social reforms and technological innovations.

The society is continuously improving and aligning to the needs of new generations. Sometimes, this requires a social reformation idea of some great people who have an extraordinary vision for the future of the society and nations. Leaders like Margret Thatcher, Nelson Mandela and Abraham Lincoln had such an extraordinary vision to change the society. For example, the idea of non-violence agitation of a single person helped India to achieve independence in 1947. Even though the real power of such ideas is manifested when the mass follow it, it is the original thoughts that bring in the change in society.

Technological innovations often changed the way we live in this world by bringing in more efficiency and comfort. Such innovations are great ideas of fewer people and later copied by the rest of the world. For instance, Wright brothers, who invented the first airplane; Thomas Edison, who invented the electricity, have moved the world to the next level. The whole humanity is benefited from such people's idea and their contributions to the society are exponential compared to those who use these ideas.

In conclusion, it is a known fact that an idea can change the world, and the people who innovate such an idea are invaluable to the society. Nevertheless, the people who copy their ideas and concepts indeed help the society to realise their benefits and thus contribute to the society as well.

Sample 1:

When thinking about solutions to homelessness, many turn to providing houses for those who are too poor to afford one. I agree that this is a good solution, but the government should consider other problems arising as well.

Providing homes for the homeless has many benefits to both those poor individuals and society. One of which is a reduction of crimes and an increase in social stability. Poor people usually resort to committing crimes, such as thefts, robberies, sexual assault, or minor social indecencies like being fake beggars or flashing oneself. Providing housing will help them stay more stable and find themselves a job, which lessens actions like the aforementioned. Moreover, homeless people are also vulnerable to harsh weather conditions. For example, recently, among hundreds of deaths in Canada due to heatwaves, the majority of them are homeless people.  

However, because charity is often a double-edged sword, the government should consider the following potential problems before investing in homes for the poor. Firstly, this solution does not guarantee to be successful in helping the homeless. Many have become accustomed to the begging life for so long that they are now incapable of feeling inclined to work, especially when they know they can beg for money and food. For example, many still act like they are disabled to ask for charity when they can work. Another problem is that this investment in charity housing will take a toll on taxpayers. Building houses is expensive and takes a great deal of time to finish, which means the government will delay other social development, like providing better healthcare, improving infrastructure, or investing in education.

In conclusion, I agree that providing housing for people who cannot afford one due to poverty is a good solution. However, the government should take into account potential problems from this solution.

Sample 2:

Many reformers are of the opinion that it is the responsibility of governments to provide public housing for members of the public too poor to afford their own homes. In my opinion, although there are some situations when this might be necessary, it is better to allow people the opportunity to pull themselves out of poverty.

Those who support government assistance in housing programs point out the institutional shackles that keep people in poverty. In the United States, there is a long, painful history concerning African Americans that began with slavery, discrimination and still shows its impact in various more muted forms of racism. These people have few chances to escape poverty and own their own homes because they have difficulty getting a good education and then a job. If governments provide them with housing, that frees up their money to go to the education of their children and can break the long chain of poverty that has blighted their path in America.

Although the above-mentioned argument has its merits, in my opinion people who help themselves are more likely to be able to maintain their success. Charity is a notoriously double-edged sword because it fosters dependence. Someone who is in poverty who works hard and finds and escape and manages to own a home will develop reserves of willpower and determination that will serve them their entire life. Their self-respect will also help them in their work and encourage them to hold onto their house, regardless of obstacles. If the government simply gifts this person a house, they will be much less inclined to take care of it and will not develop any of the qualities that will spell out their success in life more generally.

In conclusion, people who are more self-reliant are more likely to be successful and hold onto their homes. The role of government ought to be more subtle and include educational reforms aimed at opening up opportunities that individuals can themselves seize.

Sample 3:

It is true that having a safe and stable home is a reasonable and real need for all individuals. I completely agree with the proposal that the government is responsible for ensuring a place to live for poor residents.

Individuals and families without stable accommodation can find it a struggle to access essential public services such as education and healthcare. For example, in certain cities, having no permanent homes can mean children may not be allowed to attend affordable public schools and adults may face difficulties in registering with state-funded hospitals. In addition, a stable and comfortable living environment is closely linked to mental and emotional well-being. It is obvious that having a place to call home provides a sense of security, peace and belonging, generally enhancing our happiness and fulfilment. Therefore, having a safe place to live is a fundamental need.

However, not all people are fortunate enough to afford their own house. Some suffer from abusive home environments, unemployment, a significant rise in costs of living which are beyond their means, driving them onto the streets. Since the government bears responsibility for ensuring the well-being of each individual, it is legitimate for them to provide safe and stable accommodation to the disadvantaged. Governmental departments should work closely with local authorities to develop unused land, renovate run-down, abandoned buildings or inner-city slums, and provide housing benefits to people without homes. Despite the initial enormous investment, these schemes are likely to be beneficial as they lay the foundation for a sustainable growth of a every individual.

In conclusion, stable accommodation is an essential need for the well-being of every individual. In spite of significant financial resources required at first, I reckon that governments must make every effort to satisfy this need, especially for the impoverished population.

Sample 4:

Many reformers argue that governments have a huge responsibility to provide public housing to citizens who are too poor to be able to afford to buy their own. In my opinion, although there are some situations where it may be necessary, it is better to give everyone a chance to get out of poverty.

Advocates of government support in housing programs point to institutional inadequacies that keep people in constant poverty. In the United States, there is a long and traumatic history involving African Americans, beginning with slavery, discrimination and still showing its impact in many other forms of racism. together. These people have little chance of escaping poverty and owning their own home because it is difficult for them to get a good education and then a job. If the government provides them with housing, it will give them better conditions to work and send their children to school. That could break the long chain of poverty that has ravaged their way in America.

While the argument above has its merits, in my opinion people who help themselves are more likely to remain successful. Charity is a notorious double-edged sword because it promotes dependence. People from poor backgrounds who work hard to own a home develop the will and determination to serve them throughout their lives. Their self-esteem will also help them in their work and encourage them to hold on to their home, despite obstacles. If the government just gave this person a home, they would be less inclined to take care of it and would not develop any of the qualities that would mark success in their life in general.

In conclusion, people with more self-control were more likely to succeed and keep their homes. The role of government should be more subtle and include educational reforms that open up opportunities that individuals themselves can seize.

Sample 5:

A house is a basic need for every person, and everyone deserves to own one regardless of economic status. Some people believe that the government must provide houses to less privileged individuals for free and I agree with that but with conditions.

To begin with, having a shelter to live in is a basic need and a right of every person in a country despite their social status. People who belong below the poverty line should be given assistance by the government in acquiring at least a small house to live in yet a decent one. As it is the government's responsibility to improve the morale of its people, giving those underprivileged citizens a place to live for free is the right thing to do. By doing this, homelessness can be avoided and the common crimes brought by homeless people cannot take place, as well.

However, the government must clearly lay down conditions for the beneficiaries of free houses before providing them so that they will not take advantage of the system. First, the government must create a regulation that beneficiaries of free housing are not allowed to sell the house given to them in any way. Second, they cannot request another house from the government in case the house granted to them becomes unlivable due to negligence. In this way, they will give value to what is given to them and take good care of it. Besides, this is one good way to maintain orderliness in different places in a country which some other countries with a considerable number of homeless people fail to achieve.

In conclusion, underprivileged people deserve a comfortable house to live in and it is the government's responsibility to help them and setting conditions is necessary to avoid exploitation of the government's free housing program.

Sample 6:

Certainly, the question of whether the state should offer complimentary housing to its financially strained citizens is a subject of continual debate. Given the fundamental nature of shelter, the perspectives on this issue are manifold and merit nuanced consideration.

On one hand, the argument for universal free housing rests on the idea of social welfare. If the government were to allocate resources for this purpose, the homelessness rates in cities like Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City would undoubtedly plummet. These actions would not only fulfill the social contract between the citizens and the state but also indirectly boost public health and safety. However, the counterpoint here is the economic strain such a policy would place on the national budget. Sufficient quality housing requires significant capital, something that could jeopardize other critical sectors such as healthcare or education.

However, I believe that free housing, although noble in its intention, is not the most efficient approach to solving the housing crisis in Vietnam. Investment in affordable housing schemes and subsidies offers a more sustainable model. By implementing a sliding scale based on income, more people could secure adequate housing without draining public coffers. This would also encourage personal responsibility, ensuring that citizens do not become overly dependent on state-sponsored programs. It should be noted that this viewpoint is not devoid of empathy, but rather it encompasses a more realistic long-term vision for The Vietnamese society.

In conclusion, while the provision of free housing holds emotional and ethical appeal, it may not be the most judicious course of action from a governance standpoint. It seems more practical for the authorities to foster affordable housing, allowing citizens to acquire homes within their financial means. This strikes a balanced compromise between social welfare and economic viability, preserving the nation’s resources for the multitude of other challenges it must confront.

Sample 7:

Government-funded housing for low-income groups is a debated topic. Some experts claim that it falls within the scope of the welfare state. However, I disagree with this approach for several reasons.

Firstly, governments have limited resources, and providing free housing for all who cannot afford it is not sustainable. Other pressing issues, such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure, need to be addressed. Instead of providing free housing, authorities should focus on creating more job opportunities and increasing the minimum wage, enabling people to purchase their own homes.

Furthermore, waiving accommodation fees can reduce occupants' motivation and increase laziness. With no rent to pay, there is no incentive to work hard and improve their economic situation. This can lead to a decline in productivity and economic growth. In addition, it may also result in an increase in demand for public services, such as healthcare and education, which in turn puts a strain on the government's resources.

In addition, this policy can create a sense of entitlement that may lead to a negative impact on the community. With free housing, people may start to believe that they have a right to it and become dependent on their city council for support. This dependency can lead to reduced motivation to work and contribute to the community, further increasing the number of people relying on government support.

In conclusion, while housing is a basic need, I believe that it should not be provided for free to everyone who cannot afford it. Instead, the government should focus on creating more job opportunities and increasing the minimum wage to enable lower-income groups to purchase their own homes.

Sample 8:

The rise in property prices in recent years has led to a significant increase in homelessness, prompting discussions around providing free accommodation to disadvantaged groups. As this approach may seem like an impractical solution to housing insecurity, I am firmly opposed to this idea.

One of my main reasons for disbelief is related to the impracticality of the policy itself in terms of management and execution. Providing free housing would require a significant budget, including costs associated with land acquisition, construction, maintenance, and ongoing operational expenses. This would pose a substantial financial burden for the government and eventually lead to a national budget deficit. In this case, the government may resort to unsustainable funding programs, such as imposing heavy taxes on people, triggering frustration and anger among the public. Moreover, creating a system of free housing would present many complex administrative challenges for the government, including the development of complex eligibility criteria and the establishment of fair allocation mechanisms, which also requires a large financial resource.

The second idea that supports my argument is that this counterproductive proposal might have negative impacts on a country’s economy and society. It is important that everyone takes responsibility for affording his or her own housing by working hard and saving up. Providing free accommodation for people might not encourage recipients to take necessary steps towards becoming financially independent, instead, it may foster a sense of entitlement, leading to a reliance on others for basic needs. More seriously, on a large scale, this could potentially lead to a societal trend where individuals become overly reliant on government-provided housing, ultimately resulting in enormous financial pressure on the government and even budget dificit problems. If this proposal were implemented, it could discourage private investment in housing, impede initiatives, and hinder market competition, which might eventually disrupt the housing market – a vital sector of any country’s economy.

In conclusion, I disagree strongly with the idea that the government should provide free housing to disadvantaged groups who cannot afford it, due to the infeasibility and negative effects on the economy and society. Instead, the government should concentrate on providing job opportunities for people and developing sustainable and affordable housing initiatives for citizens.

Sample 9:

In my opinion, governments should play a significant role in providing housing for those who cannot afford it, though I believe this support should be carefully implemented and not necessarily entirely free.

Firstly, housing is a basic human need, essential for physical and mental well-being. When individuals lack stable housing, it can lead to a cascade of other social problems, including poor health, difficulty maintaining employment, and challenges in education. By ensuring that all citizens have access to adequate housing, governments can prevent these issues and create a more stable society overall.

Moreover, government intervention in housing can help to reduce inequality and promote social mobility. In many cities, rising property prices have made it increasingly difficult for low-income individuals to find affordable housing, exacerbating social divides. Government-provided housing can help to bridge this gap, giving disadvantaged individuals a foundation from which to improve their circumstances.

However, it’s crucial to implement such programs thoughtfully. Rather than providing entirely free housing, which could potentially discourage self-reliance, governments could offer subsidized housing or rent assistance programs. This approach would still make housing accessible while encouraging individuals to contribute what they can.

Additionally, government housing initiatives should be part of a broader strategy to address poverty and homelessness. This could include job training programs, mental health support, and addiction treatment services. By tackling the root causes of housing insecurity, governments can create more sustainable solutions.

In conclusion, while I strongly support government intervention in providing affordable housing, I believe this should be done in a way that balances assistance with personal responsibility. By implementing well-designed housing programs as part of a comprehensive approach to social welfare, governments can significantly improve the lives of their most vulnerable citizens and strengthen society as a whole.

Sample 10:

Housing, undeniably, stands as a fundamental need for all human beings. The notion of governments providing free accommodations for those financially incapable sparks significant debates. While I partially agree with the proposition due to its potential socio-economic benefits, concerns about its feasibility and unintended repercussions are equally valid.

Firstly, offering free housing can serve as a potent tool in alleviating poverty. By securing shelter for the less privileged, governments can ensure a basic standard of living, fostering societal harmony and security. A person with a roof over their head can focus better on other aspects of life, such as education or employment.

Additionally, by meeting the housing needs, governments can motivate individuals to actively participate in the workforce. When the burden of housing expenses is lifted, people may pursue career opportunities more aggressively, leading to economic progress and decreased reliance on other social services.

However, the counter-arguments hold their merit. For starters, budgetary constraints play a pivotal role. Governments often grapple with allocating funds across various sectors, from healthcare and education to infrastructure and defense. Dedicating vast resources to provide free housing might sideline other pressing matters.

Furthermore, free housing might inadvertently create a culture of dependency or entitlement. When individuals receive substantial benefits without any counter-responsibility, it might dampen the incentive for personal growth and economic contribution.

In conclusion, while the concept of free housing paints a compassionate picture and boasts potential socio-economic advantages, the challenges associated with its implementation cannot be ignored. It is crucial for policymakers to find a balanced approach that upholds societal welfare without compromising on other aspects of national development.

Sample 11:

Housing is a fundamental human need, and the question of whether governments should provide it for those who cannot afford it is a complex and contentious issue. While I acknowledge the arguments against such a policy, I strongly believe that governments should indeed provide housing assistance to those in need, albeit with certain conditions and limitations.

Firstly, providing housing for the less fortunate is a moral imperative for any compassionate society. Homelessness not only causes immense suffering for individuals but also leads to a host of societal problems, including increased crime rates, public health issues, and economic inefficiency. By ensuring that all citizens have access to basic shelter, governments can significantly improve overall social welfare and stability.

Moreover, government-provided housing can serve as a steppingstone for people to improve their situations. With a stable living environment, individuals are better positioned to seek employment, pursue education, and contribute positively to society. This, in turn, can lead to reduced dependency on government assistance in the long run, making it a sound investment for the future.

However, it is crucial to implement such programs carefully to avoid potential pitfalls. For instance, the quality and location of government-provided housing should be carefully considered to prevent the creation of isolated, low-income ghettos. Additionally, these programs should include incentives for recipients to work towards financial independence, such as time limits on assistance or requirements for job training and education.

Critics may argue that providing free housing is an unsustainable burden on taxpayers and may discourage personal responsibility. While these concerns are valid, I believe they can be addressed through thoughtful policy design. For example, housing assistance could be structured as a temporary measure with clear pathways to independence, rather than an indefinite entitlement.

In conclusion, while the implementation of government-provided housing requires careful consideration and planning, I firmly believe that the benefits to both individuals and society as a whole outweigh the potential drawbacks. By providing this basic necessity, governments can create a more equitable, stable, and prosperous society for all citizens.

Sample 12:

It has been argued whether the municipality should introduce a public housing scheme in order to assist deprived families. In this essay, I will outline my arguments that disadvantaged households should be supplied with government accommodations.

Those opposing the provision of complimentary residences believe that this would exert financial constraints on the public funds. By offering free dwellings to poor families, colossal sums of government money would be largely invested in the construction and operational costs. Consequently, such heavy reliance on public money would increase the likelihood of placing more financial burdens on the community in the form of taxes, and thus this may cause social unrest.

Nevertheless, there are several compelling arguments that the officials need to supply subsidised housing to those unable to afford, with the enhancement of public health being the driving force. This is because some life-threatening diseases, such as tuberculosis, malaria or diarrhea are commonly found in substandard living conditions with water leaks, poor ventilation, or pest infestation. Therefore, with granted state-owned accommodations that are adequately constructed, underprivileged dwellers are likely to reduce the chances of catching these adverse health risks. Another reason for the authorities to offer dwellings to low-income earners is that poverty can be mitigated. Since the deprived population are housed without payment, their relentless worries about daily necessities could be partially relieved, allowing them to save considerable household expenditures.

In conclusion, although the introduction of complimentary housing can place pressure on state funds and result in the remaining community adhering to higher tax rates, I feel that the government should make residences available to disadvantaged families as this is a viable solution to public healthcare and poverty.

Sample 13:

While many people have abundant luxuries, others suffer from unimaginable poverty and lack the basic human needs like food and shelter. Home is one of the five most fundamental needs for every human and government of a country should try in every way possible to make sure that there is no homeless in the country.

From the very ancient time till today, people’s need for a safe place to live in is considered to be a very fundamental need. This is how the concept of home has emerged, and only homeless people can understand the sufferings of not having a shelter. Poor people who cannot manage a decent meal every day often live under the open sky. This is inhuman and the government of a country has a natural obligation to ensure the living places for people. When a government has the responsibility to ensure economic development, infrastructure development, education, roads and highway, protecting people from criminals why providing such a basic need like home for homeless people is in a debate? A huge amount of money spent on researches every year and what good those research could bring to the citizens of a country when there are large numbers of people who are living without any shelter?

Natural calamities like flood, tsunami and earthquake make many people homeless and the national and international supports then should always keep the shelter in priority for such victims. War is still a curse in the world we live in and because of that a great number of people are forced to leave their houses and become homeless. Should not rich nations, the government of the country and capable individuals raise their helping hands to ensure the shelter of homeless people? The answer is always yes. That’s what makes us human. When we live in a luxurious building, many others are sleeping beside the pavement. Should not a government be considered a failure when they would spend millions of dollars for space research while there would be thousands of people homeless in the country?

Homeless people would unsurprisingly get involved in crimes and the society would face more trouble controlling them. So from this perspective, a government should focus on ensuring homes for every family. In fact, the loan, mortgage and subsidiary system we notice in many developed countries like the UK and the USA are aimed to help people to have their own home.   

To conclude, a living place is one of the most basic needs of every human being and the government of a country should always take initiatives to make sure that there are no homeless people in the country. 

Sample 14:

It's the fact that people need to eat, live in a house, and wear clothes to survive. Since everyone cannot afford to buy a home, some people believe that the government should provide housing for those in need. However, I believe that unless a proper location system is prepared, such plans would cause economic inflation. I will explain the reason and provide justification in this essay.

People have more money to spend on other things if everyone owns a house. They will, for example, arrange for international trips and buy new clothes to increase their disposable income. Even though people will put money into something, they will spend a lot more on expensive things. In fact, people will switch products more frequently than they normally do. Evidently, increased spending would result in economic inflation. However, housing costs will have a significant impact. A lot of money is put into building homes and renting them out to others. Many of these investors will be impacted by the strategy to provide free housing because home prices will reach their lowest point. Since everyone has a home, no one will spend money on building a new one unless they absolutely have to. For instance, a recent program implemented by the Indian government to provide homes at a subsidized rate has resulted in a significant drop in home prices. Because of these government actions, people won't put their hard-earned money into the housing sector.

I also believe that people will start taking advantage of this scheme. They will find loopholes to loot the government. This will result in the needy or homeless people not getting home. They will have to stay on the streets.

In conclusion, the plan to provide free housing to everyone who cannot afford it is having a significant impact on the economy and its structure. It shouldn't be done unless the market has a lot of income inequality.

Sample 15:

The price of a home is rising at an alarming rate right now. Because apartments are a basic need for people, the government should provide free housing to everyone who can't pay for it. In this essay, I will state reasons that the authorities should provide homeless people with free lodging.

First and foremost, the country's citizens pay taxes to the government. Officials are tasked with taking care of the nation's citizens and ensuring that no one is left homeless. They ought to construct brand-new buildings to accommodate those who are unable to purchase such pricey properties. For instance, according to a survey report that was submitted to the India Times, the new government in Hyderabad has built several high-rise buildings in various locations for people whose annual income is below 50,000 rupees. The regime has the potential to be a valuable resource for the general public in need of such housing in this way.

On the other hand, regardless of caste or religion, men and women vote for the nation's leaders in the hope that they will improve their lives and provide them with better employment opportunities and living conditions. A lot of people who live in poverty hope that the ruling judiciary will help them and their children. For example, they hope that the ministry of the republic will provide them with a spacious apartment and free education. For instance, a report that was submitted by a Chinese newspaper, states that as part of a family scheme, the Chinese ruling party has given 80 3 bhk flats to the poor. To make the world a better place for all underprivileged communities, other kingdoms should follow China's lead and implement this law.

In conclusion, this essay argued that low-income tribes who are unable to afford these contemporary, opulent residences should be provided with personal housing. Underpaid individuals who require a suitable residence ought to receive housing boards from land executives, in my opinion.

Sample 16:

Every human being has three basic needs: food, shelter and clothes. Although all must be fulfilled, predominant is providing accommodation to needy people that catches more attention. So, I completely agree that the regime should provide free housing for destitute people as they are a citizen of a country and incapable of purchasing a home and another point is to solve the problem of homelessness.

First off, it is a very pity for a country to develop or develop if its people live on footpaths and roads. So, here it is the government’s responsibility to provide homes to helpless people who are downtrodden because they have no jobs, and they earn their bread and butter by begging and doing labour work on daily wages. How can they purchase a home? Besides, sometimes if they sleep hungry and having their own home remains a dream for them, so in that case, it is the first responsibility of the government to provide residential places to these people. For example, it has been telecast many times in Asian countries that poverty can be seen in slum areas, and the situation becomes worse when motorists kill them due to living in an unsafe place.

Moreover, as people of any nation contribute to escalating a nation’s economy, the masses pay tax on time, so I think there is no extra burden on the government to provide free housing to needy people. Government can help them by creating jobs according to the abilities and provide them with loan facility. So that needy people can pay the amount smoothly. With taxpayers’ help and providing a loan scheme, this underprivileged section can be helped, and they can live with pride at the own home. For instance, there many schemes such as Apna Ghar, and miserable people can also avail themselves the opportunity with the Government’s help.

Furthermore, countries are known by their people. If people’s living standard is healthy, then the country makes advances and its reputation all over the world is also enhanced. So, the government of any country must have some privileges to these people.

To conclude, in my perspective, the government should provide free houses to people who live below the poverty line. To reduce the government’s financial burden, help can be provided in loans that the masses can repay at low instalments. This will curb the problem of homelessness, and people can live with a sense of pride in their homes.

Sample 1:

It is a fact that many employees insist their employees to work from home these days and this is due to the fact that advancement in technology has made is possible for many employees, especially related to IT and communication sectors, to work from anyplace. The work culture has been drastically changed from last decades. People can work from any avenue and at any time. Let’s discuss the effects on this trend in detail.

Firstly, the advancement of technology has made it possible for most of the people to work from different parts of the globe. An unavoidable fact is that the percentage of people working from home has been drastically increased in recent days. These factors affect positively for collaborating the resources all the time. Moreover, the efforts of work will not be diversified due to lack of resource availability. The most important feature of advancement in technology is collaboration, this is seen as one way of collaboration the resources.

In addition to the above fact, the people can easily attend meetings and respond to the calls or assist team members, if any major issue is encountered in the system. Most likely, people tend to work more productively without the intervention of human or environmental barriers. In fact, the workload can be planned properly and can report to the respective teams for the deliverable. Nowadays people cannot relax as the fact they work from home, it can trace easily by many advanced tools which track the status of people's availability. The most observed fact is that many women can utilise their talent and skill in workplaces as the work from home allows them to work in a company.

Perhaps the negative aspects of the above work culture should also be considered. There is a famous saying "for every action there will be an equal and opposite reaction". All the above facts are only applicable if the employee works and utilises the timely effort in a reasonable way. People working from home could easily divert their concentration on other things. Most often individual can involve in implementing own or personal stuff than official work. The deliverable can affect if an individual is non-responsive. Some technical issues can encounter like networking, connectivity to the workstation and the slow responsiveness.

In conclusion, the work culture has been scaled to the flexibility of each individual, if the facility is utilised in a correct way, the outcome will be more effective to individual and to the organisation. Perhaps if there is any deviation then the productivity will be lowered. It depends on the fact of each individual's ethics and the responsibility. This culture is useful in various ways, the percentage of working people has increased, and many women genders are able to contribute to the society.

Sample 2:

As the development of technology, working from home is not uncommon phenomenon nowadays. It is a trend of future working mode with both positive and negative effects.

From the positive perspective, it does benefit to the work-life balance. For example, employees do not have to spend their time on shuttling between their office and home. The saved time can be spent on their work or taking care of their families. Therefore, the pressure of their work and personal life can be alleviated to a certain extent. Another advantage is the flexible working hour which is conducive to staff's efficiency. It is more reasonable to arrange different kinds of work on different time section. Furthermore, conducting meetings with the customer from different time zone has become more realistic by this practice.

Form the negative perspective, the staff management is a big challenge to many companies. As staff remote to work from home, their managers cannot monitor what they are doing during the working hours. It would cause the lack of effective control and management to their staff. It would greatly impact on the normal run of a company, and it is a great waste of human resource which is the last result employers would like to see. However, this concern can be address by utilising some technology or measures. For instance, the company can install the monitoring software in their staff's laptop to oversee working situations, such as, what software they use and which websites they are browsing during working hours. Furthermore, the strict management measure is a key too. Managers should conduct an effective communication with their staff and estimate the appropriate volume of work for the staff so as to ensure they are reasonably occupied by their work.

To sum up, working from home is good for work-life balance and the work efficiency. Nevertheless, it is necessary for employers to take effective measures to ensure employees to be under a good management, such as, installing monitoring software and assigning the reasonable volume of work to their staff.

Sample 3:

In today’s modern world, the computer technology is being developed at a fast pace which opens up an avenue for people to work at their own homes and communicate with employers and other employees via video conferences. Thus, it is important for us to establish the possible impacts on the employees who work at home.

There are several advantages of working at home instead of working in an office. To begin, the employees will have more flexible times to decide when to start working. For example, they can choose their working time which starts from 9.30am to 6pm, or they can also choose to extend their working time with some breaks in between. In fact, it should be made more common by providing people around the globe for working at home as the employees do not need to commute to work every day which normally takes a long time to reach their workplace from their home. The time they spend on commuting is more valuable if the employees can use it on working. Undoubtedly, it will not cause any harm to the company but help to increase the work efficiency.

The next benefit of it is that housewives can get an opportunity to work even though they have to stay at home all day long. Most women tend to sacrifice to quit their current job after they get married as they believe that they need to stay at home to manage all the households well in order to be a responsible housewife. Thus, it is apparent that if most of the company provide jobs to work at home, the housewives will be able to continue to contribute to the society and earn more money to support their family financially. According to the statistic of a recent research conducted in Malaysia, it has shown that more than half of the married women wish to work at home owing to the fact that they can take care of their children and work simultaneously. Therefore, it has clearly shown that working at home provide the housewives with an opportunity to contribute to the society.

Nevertheless, there is always another side of a coin. It is believed that working at home rather than in the workplace will eventually weaken the ability of an employee to socialise. If the employees were to work at home, they will probably have not much time to interact with others as they focus solely on their works. Even though some people might say that they utilise the convenience of the internet to socialise with others through the social media like Facebook and Twitter, it is proven, however, proven that the way people socialise online is totally different from interacting face-to-face. As a result, it may cause the people these days who work at home without interacting with others face-to-face to develop relationship crisis as they are not equipped with the crucial interpersonal skills.

In conclusion, there are both positive and negative impacts of working at home on the employees it is, however, believed that every employee can contribute endlessly to our nation regardless of where they work and our nation will continue to prosper and flourish in the years to come.
Sample 4:

Nowadays, thanks to development in the cyber-space, some people are able to do their job from home. This method can be useful in some aspects. I think they can save not only their money, but they can raise their safety and improve their family relationships too.

Obviously, these types of careers are far economical than working in the office. Paying for public transportation tickets or private vehicle gas, people have to spend several hundreds of dollars each month to commute between their home and workplace; however, those working from home do not spend this money and can save it. For example, my brother, who works for a mobile company in Australia, has to pay almost $300 per month to travel from his apartment to his workplace located in downtown, while he would not pay it when his employer permitted him to work from home, and he would save over $3500 annually.

Another reason is that this method is far safer than the working in the office. Had not many electronic engineers had to travel between their home and the company they are working, they would not have been injured or even died because of road accidents. Many of them have to use their private car to reach their destination, and unfortunately, because of sudden car accidents, their lives have been jeopardised.

Lastly, this method can improve family relationships. Clearly, this group of employees usually stay longer hours a day in their house and are definitely a longer time in contact with their spouse or children than the ones working in the outside home. In this way, a friend of mine who his office is a room inside of his house can have closer communication with his children because he can monitor his children's activities, including their study or playing, and he is more familiar with his wife's personality than a similar personnel who have to work more than eight hours a day in his workplace.

In conclusion, those working from home can gain more advantages than the ones working from the office. I believe that the former usually spend less money for their transportation, are harmed less by car accidents and have more mutual relations with their family members. It is a perfect plan if governments popularise this type of jobs fundamentally.

Sample 5:

Technology is an inevitable part in our life, expecially, in the current scenario. One cannot think of a situation where technology is absent. As a matter of fact, technology is that ‘moral fabric’ which binds the humans together.

Due to the technological advancement/development, there have been instances where the human race has benefitted and also has been at the receiving end. One of the technologies which have cut across all the ages of mankind is the Computer Technology. The concept of ‘work from home’, ‘flexible timing’ is nothing but the by-products of this ever changing, revolutionary but useful technology. ‘Work from home’ and ‘Flexible timings’ situations provide the people (read employees) to balance their office as well as personal work. Furthermore, with the help of computer technology, the employees are also able to be in constant touch with their office, from the comfort of their homes.

This not only increases the productivity of the employees but also enhances their belongingness and commitment towards their organisation. However, due to computer technology, the employees are approachable throughout the day and sometimes even during odd hours. This may, though not quite often, lead to the breach of privacy, which ultimately results in low productivity by the employee. However, much depends on the environment and mental attitude of the employee. As the same boiling water which hardens the egg also softens the potato, similarly, there are different effects of this computer technology on different employees. A recent case, which was published in the last week edition of a well-known newspaper, had been an eye-opener for working professionals who, though, work from home but stay in touch with their employer due to this computer technology.

Due to the work pressure of year closing an employee, who used to work from home over his laptop, of XUA Company didn’t have ample rest for a week. As a result of this, the employee had to pay for his life due to the accident which occurred while driving his family for a late-night movie.

Sample 6:

Nowadays, there are more people who work from home and get connected to their workplace using the internet technology. The trend brings benefits for both employees and employers, and the following essay will discuss it in detail.

It is a fact that with the existence of internet technology and portable computer, employees could get connected to their office's server and can do their tasks.  As they have connected to their company's network, they could read and reply some emails or enter the office's working program. Besides that, they could communicate with their colleagues using chatting facilities such as Skype or instant messenger; therefore, they are updated with the latest information in the office.  

It is obvious that this advance technology brings mutual benefits for both workers and companies. The advantage for employees is that, when they could not go to the workplace due to some unexpected events, they could still be productive by working from their home. From the employer's point of view, the existence of this technology has been positively affected to their cost. Many companies hire employees to work from their home, as it reduces the space rental fee and saves the electricity cost as well. Besides that, these companies do not have to provide transportation allowance as well for their employees.

In conclusion, it is true the trend of people working from home using online technology is increasing these days. They could connect to their office's network and do their tasks from home. This development brings advantages for both the worker and the company as it reduces the idle time of the worker and save the company's expenses.

Sample 7:

As the use of the internet is becoming relevant and faster these days, many companies have sorted to let their employees work at home and stay in communication with their office. This set-up has huge positive effects on the employers and employees as it saves a lot of time and money in the long run. This practice is becoming popular in many modern companies which are using computers to run their projects.

Working at home can save time as the employees do not need to travel long hours just to get to the office. This is a big advantage, especially if the company is far from home or if the company is based overseas. For example, people working in construction, medical transcriptionists, language tutorials and call centres can just submit their works through different internet-based sites such as Dropbox, Hightail, Yousendit and etc. As a result, a great amount of time is saved in the process.

On the other hand, working offshores can also save money since companies do not have to rent big offices and they can minimise the use of electricity, water and other important resources in running a business. They just need to invest in high-tech servers which in the end will be a great asset. These servers can also be accessed remotely by IT managers anytime that they want.

As a conclusion, computer technology has a great importance and has big effects to save time and money if companies know how to take advantage of it. By offering offshore works, companies and employees can now work hand in hand for having a productive environment while having close communications, and at the same time will add to company’s growth and success to this computer era.

Sample 8:

Thanks for technological advancements - Information Technology and modern electronic gadgets facilitate to perform several jobs at home settings. These advancements immensely help to the employees in various ways. The life changing concept 'work at home' gives various economic and personal allowances to workers and assist them to makes their life a festival.

Firstly, work from home tremendously reduces the transportation cost of employees to and from the office settings. To be more precise, travelling expenses, that is a big burden for many employees, can be significantly reduced by online work. Besides, this money can be mobilised to some other purposes which make the life a cake walk. Recent statistical department's survey reveals that the people work from home settings can be saved extra 35% from their salary by avoiding transportation expenses.

Secondly, employed parents get ample times to look after their children at home. In another word, the upbringing of the children, which is always considered as a tough nut to crack, is easing by this new work culture. In addition, employees get plenty of times to spend with their children which is necessary for children's overall development. Recent WHO report indicates that the parents work from home are more successful to fulfil their children's needs than parents work at office settings.

To sum-up, work from home concept and trend positively affect all class of workers in many ways. They get not only financial benefits but also get a good amount of time with their family. These new work-cultures is really a boon for many people especially for employed parents in several ways.

Sample 9:

Modern technology has greatly facilitated human life. Many professionals and students prefer working or studying from home these days using affordable and user-friendly modern electronic devices. This tendency, in my opinion, offers more benefits than disadvantages, thus it is a development that is good.

There are numerous justifications for my position. The most significant one is that it is more practical to use for both categories, whether they are employees or students. Not only can they avoid wasting time getting to work or school and use it more productively for their work or studies, but they can also focus more intently on their work because they are not worn out by the commute. People who study or work from home, for instance, typically produce more fruitful outcomes than those who commute daily to work or school. Additionally, working from home gives students or employees more flexibility, which is another factor that contributes to the beneficial development of this genre. People who work or study from home have the chance to spend time with their families while either earning money or discovering something new, which is a necessity in today’s workaholic culture. 

Despite the aforementioned arguments, working or studying from home has drawbacks. People lose the chance to engage with others in society and become less social as a result of spending most of their time at home. As a result, they are poor communicators and find it challenging to express their opinions in an open manner in front of others. For instance, those who prefer to live at home for job and school purposes are reported to have less speaking confidence than those who attend college or work in a company.

In conclusion, working or studying from home offers people a number of advantages like convenience and flexibility with only a few drawbacks. As a result, the benefits of the current trend outweigh its negatives.

Sample 1:

Social networking sites, for instance Facebook, are thought by some to have had a detrimental effect on individual people as well as society and local communities. However, while I believe that such sites are mainly beneficial to the individual, I agree that they have had a damaging effect on local communities.

With regards to individuals, the impact that online social media has had on each individual person has clear advantages. Firstly, people from different countries are brought together through such sites as Facebook whereas before the development of technology and social networking sites, people rarely had the chance to meet or communicate with anyone outside of their immediate circle or community. Secondly, Facebook also has social groups which offer individuals a chance to meet and participate in discussions with people who share common interests.

On the other hand, the effect that Facebook and other social networking sites have had on societies and local communities can only be seen as negative. Rather than individual people taking part in their local community, they are instead choosing to take more interest in people online. Consequently, the people within local communities are no longer forming close or supportive relationships. Furthermore, society as a whole is becoming increasingly disjointed and fragmented as people spend more time online with people they have never met face to face and who they are unlikely to ever meet in the future.

To conclude, although social networking sites have brought individuals closer together, they have not had the same effect on society or local communities. Local communities should do more to try and involve local people in local activities in order to promote the future of community life.

Sample 2:

The usage of social networking websites and applications like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok etc. has dramatically increased recently with the advancement of technology. Although it has some detrimental effects on society, its positive side has transformed the world. I believe this technology has a significant contribution in bringing people closer around the globe and also acts as a source of cheap and efficient means for communication and staying connected.

It is true that with the increasing use of social networking websites, some people have become disjointed and fragmented. Youngsters are more receptive to this change as they like to spend most of their time on these sites. This has led to many negative consequences on their physical and psychological health. Moreover, families are greatly affected by this, and their social bonding is no more present in contemporary days.

Nevertheless, social networking sites play a pivotal role in mitigating the communication gap not only in the immediate social circle but also with friends and families in remote areas. Furthermore, many social groups exist on such sites which help people find persons of the same interests and attitudes without confiding them to only geographical boundaries. It has recently been seen that many injustices and social issues were shared on social networking sites, and that made an overall huge impact. That has brought justice to the victims in several instances. Moreover, social networking sites are a common ground for mass people to share their updates, views and other details. Thus, this has created a world without any boundaries.

To conclude, I would like to say that people have become more social and interactive through the use of social networking sites. It gives people a sense of freedom to talk around the world without worrying about the huge cost. It is expected that we would try to mitigate its negative sides and reap the maximum benefits of staying connected.

Sample 3:

The increasing popularity of social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter has sparked a heated debate on whether these platforms have had a positive or negative impact on individuals and society. While these sites have made communication cheaper and more accessible, I firmly believe that their negative effects on society and the community are enormous.

On the one hand, social networking websites have enabled people to communicate and stay connected with others online. These platforms offer an efficient way for individuals to share information, ideas, and experiences with a wide audience. For example, social media platforms have played a vital role in some countries to fight government corruption, as protesters used Twitter and Facebook to coordinate their activities and share their messages with the world.

On the other hand, social networking sites have a huge negative impact on society and the community. First, they promote a culture of superficiality and narcissism, where people are more concerned about their online image and popularity than their real-life relationships and experiences. As a result, many individuals become addicted to social media, spending countless hours scrolling through their feeds and neglecting their responsibilities and duties. Second, social media platforms have become a breeding ground for fake news, hate speech, and cyberbullying, which have a devastating impact on society and democracy. For instance, the spread of fake news and misinformation on Facebook has been blamed for influencing the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential Election.

In conclusion, while social networking sites have made communication cheaper and more accessible, their negative effects on society and the community are enormous. It is essential that we recognize and address these issues to create a more healthy, productive, and democratic society.

Sample 4:

A large group of people believe that social networking websites and apps like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram have largely a detrimental impact on individuals, society, and local communities. While I believe that these sites have some benefits for individuals, I agree that they have mostly negative impacts on local communities or societies as a whole. This essay explains my position.

Social media has brought people from different countries together and enabled them to connect and communicate in an unprecedented way. Facebook's social groups offer individuals the opportunity to interact with like-minded people and participate in discussions on topics of interest while other apps allow them to chat or talk with others without spending extra money. These are clear advantages that online social media has brought to individuals.

However, the effect of Facebook, Twitter and other social networking sites on societies and local communities is highly negative. Due to their influence, people are choosing to engage more online instead of participating in their local communities. As a result, local communities are no longer forming the strong, corroborating relationships that we used to have in the past. Society, as a whole, is becoming increasingly fragmented and disconnected as people spend more time online with people they have never met and are unlikely to meet in the future.

To conclude, while social networking sites have brought individuals closer together, they have not had the same effect on society or local communities. Local communities should take steps to involve their members in local activities to promote the future of community life. Social media can continue to bring individuals together, but it is important to recognize its limitations when it comes to strengthening local communities.

Sample 5:

With the development of new technologies, the popularity of social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, etc., has skyrocketed. Despite its many negative effects on society, its potential benefits should not be overlooked. I firmly bolster with the former viewpoint my preference and other side is justified further. 

To begin with, social networking sites play a crucial role in bridging the gap in communication between people, both locally and with far-flung loved ones. In addition, these platforms typically host numerous social groups that enable users to locate others who share their interests and worldview regardless of physical proximity. In recent years, we've witnessed how sharing stories of injustice and social issues on social media has had a significant impact on authority and resulted in victims receiving justice. Internet social networks have become a widespread medium for people to disseminate and discuss news, ideas, and other information.

However, as social networking sites have become more commonplace, it has been observed that people have become disjointed and fragmented. The younger generation is more open to this shift, and they prefer to devote the majority of their time to these platforms. Their mental and physical health have suffered as a direct result of this. Furthermore, this has a significant impact on families, whose once-robust social bonds have all but vanished in the modern era. Individuals are becoming reliant on these platforms, leading to a decline in their interpersonal skills.

In a nutshell, the use of social networking sites has made people more sociable and interactive. The huge cost previously incurred for international calls is eliminated, giving people the confidence to talk to anyone, anywhere in the world. However, as a result of their hectic schedules, most people prefer electronic communication to face-to-face encounters, which increases the distance between them.

Sample 6:

There are those who believe that social media is bad for people and society as a whole. Since people are vulnerable to developing an unhealthy addiction and social media can lead to schisms in society, I wholeheartedly agree with this viewpoint.

The most noticeable impact of social media is on users' psychological well-being. The small doses of dopamine that come from scrolling through one's feed, feeling outraged at posts, receiving likes, and making positive or negative comments have become addictive for the vast majority of social media users. While there are many ways to find fulfilment, none of them are as healthy as actually accomplishing something worthwhile in the real world. Some people would rather hide away in a virtual world where the risks are much lower, and the interactions are always one-sided.

On top of that, the negative effects of social media are widely recognised. Facebook is full of isolated communities that foster antisocial behaviour. Conspiracy theories, for instance, are a common subject of online discussion and speculation. Isolation from the rest of society is a gradual process that can manifest itself in real-world events like the January 6 insurrection and the Occupy Wall Street movement. These events have the appearance of protests, but the ideas being advocated are usually too radical to result in reform that can be defended or implemented pragmatically.

To recapitulate, for the average person and for society as a whole, social media has far more negative effects than positive ones. Governments' aversion to regulation means that users should stop bothering with these services.

Sample 7:

There are countless ways in which humankind benefits from the progress of technology. Some people believe it leads to a surge in anarchy in society. However, a few others are of the viewpoint that it gives people a global stage on which to be seen. In this respect, I concur with the claim that technological advances in social media provide numerous advantages for young people.

It's undeniable that the advancements in technology provide us with a wide stage on which to perform. A person can expand their business and network by connecting with people all over the world. For instance, people today use these platforms to set up shop online, where they can describe their wares, receive orders for them, and collect payment, all without ever having to physically interact with a single customer.in addition to this, in the modern era, people can always find the most recent news on these sites. During the recent covid-19 pandemic, for example, people were able to access information from a variety of sources, including those on the other side of the world, in a matter of seconds. 

However, there are those who worry about the potential downsides to people's personal and social lives brought on by this progress. To cite just one example, people become "mouse potatoes," causing children to lose focus on their schoolwork and causing adults to waste a lot of time. Furthermore, as people spend more time on these sites, they become more introverted and, paradoxically, more mature in their thinking, as obscene content is readily available even to those with immature minds.

To sum up, there are those who believe that these sites are harmful to individuals and communities. However, I'm inclined to argue that many advantages exist. We need to regulate these platforms more strictly.

Sample 8:

Experts are of the viewpoint that Facebook and other social media websites have far-reaching, negative effects on both individuals and communities. I completely bolster such a viewpoint. My preference and the other side are justified in the ensuing paragraphs.

The first and foremost reason for my inclination is that the primary reason I feel this way is that many young people today would rather spend their time on Facebook or another international social networking site than out in their neighbourhoods making friends and acquaintances. In addition to this, people are spending more time online with people they have never met in person and are unlikely to meet in the future, further fracturing and destabilising society as a whole.

On the other hand, there is no denying the positive effects that online media has had on people personally. First, thanks to the rise of social networking sites like Facebook, people from all over the world can connect with one another in a way that was previously impossible. Facebook's social groups also provide users with an opportunity to connect with and learn from others who share similar interests.for instance, if parents send their children to study abroad can see their children through whatsapp video calls, facetime and google meets. As a result of such social networking sites one can connect to their closed ones anywhere in the entire world.

To conclude, while social networking sites have undoubtedly brought people closer together, they have not had the same effect on larger institutions or neighbourhoods. Communities can do more to foster future community life by encouraging residents to participate in local activities.

Sample 9:

The advent of social networking sites, mainly Facebook and Instagram, in the early decades of the 21st century have transformed the ways that people interact with their friends and community. I am in complete agreement that they have had a negative overall impact on both individuals and society.

Social networking sites hurt individuals by replacing more active forms of enjoyment with transitory, unhealthy self-esteem boosts. In the past, people were more likely to take up an active hobby such as painting, playing a sport or learning a musical instrument. Over time those hobbies increase self-esteem, provide hours of enjoyment, and can be seen as active and healthy to varying degrees. Facebook and Instagram replace not only the time spent on worthwhile hobbies, but users also get stuck in a feedback loop which gives them temporary bursts of dopamine in place of longer lasting feelings of accomplishment.

Just as social media has undoubtedly hurt individuals, it has also taken its toll on society. It is a common refrain to hear older people complaining about how generations today narcissists are, glued to their phones. There is an element of truth in this. Social networking sites, coupled with smartphones, allow people to withdraw and be anonymous in public places. Over time people will come to feel they have less in common with their fellow man and society will become fragmented and more insular with deeply complex political, individual and social consequences.

In conclusion, the rise of social networking platforms has hurt individuals and society greatly. In order to combat this, governments and parents should at least better regulate their availability to children and young teens.

Sample 10:

Facebook, Linkedin, Twitter, and Instagram have become an indispensable part of our lives. Technology has made great strides, and social networking sites are a critical factor in bringing people together. However, some people are of the opinion that it has an inimical effect on society. But I firmly believe that these are apprehensive arguments from people who resist change. We need to learn to adapt ourselves to technological evolution. In the following paragraphs, I shall put forth the ideas on how social networking sites help society.

The world stays connected through Facebook. For example, person A living in a remote corner of the world will still be able to remain in touch with his friends and family via Facebook. It eliminates feelings of isolation. Apart from family and friends, it helps a person find people who suit his/her interests and widen their circle. Once a news is posted, it spreads like wildfire, and millions of people read it. Many crimes and injustice meted out to people had been brought to the forefront and debated. In most cases, these discussions had enabled the affected to win. 

Linkedin is the one-stop solution to the unemployed lot. There are millions of job postings in almost every department, which enables a person to find a suitable job. Also, it has helped people who have lost jobs midway through their career path to recover. It has helped many people find jobs during recession times. It not only builds professional contacts but also increases employability by enabling features like recommendations. By staying connected with the industry, a person gets to know about vacancies immediately. 

Considering the interaction level that people have gained, social networking sites are definitely a boon, albeit the argument that they have robbed the quality time people spend with their families.

In summary, social networking sites help people win contacts and stay connected, which are very important for today’s world. Every individual must consciously avoid misusing it, which will help the community to utilise the potential of these social networking sites to the fullest extent. 

Sample 11:

Some people argue that facebook, a platform of social networking sites possesses a significantly negative effect to individuals and society. I strongly agree with this statement because it affects social cohesion and wasting time.

The major drawback of using facebook leads people to ignore their surroundings. This phenomenon makes people being individualist because users tend to only focus on their activity such chatting making them indifferently to individuals and society around. It brings also people to be lazy in which they will not be easy to leave this activity, this automatically reduces their revenue. Poverty forces them to do unwanted things that disturb the convenience of neighbor. In stark contrast, this device of social media brings also a tremendous benefit. It opens the opportunity for people to communicate with others in separated distances. In a result, although the facebook can connect each other separate distance throughout its its facility such video call. This does not bring positive impact to individuals and society because people will be no care together and lazy.

Furthermore, spending much time to utilize facebook has negative impact to individuals and society. As such, people should be able to maximise their time to study or to work. Irwandi Yusuf, a governor in Aceh, uses facebook a lot of time, for example. Administration will deteriorate if he wastes long hours to use facebook. Albeit it can make user feeling happy, but it will impact negatively to individual and society because people can not work maximum and the trust level of society to governments will worsen.

In conclusion, using facebook or social media gives a large negative effet on individual and society. In my opinion, it is true that impact of using facebook regards with social problem and also waste time.

Sample 12:

Due to recent technological advancements, the usage of social networking sites like Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Google, etc., has rapidly expanded. Though it has several negative repercussions on society, one cannot ignore its advantages.

By sharing their information and updates, social networking sites play a crucial role in bridging the communication gap between the immediate social circle and distant relatives and friends. Social networking services offer a quick and effective way for people to engage with one another. Additionally, many social groups on these websites enable users to find individuals who share their interests and outlooks without being restricted by geographical bounds. Recently, for instance, it has been observed that numerous social concerns and injustices were reported on social media platforms. This significantly impacted power and resulted in the victims’ receiving justice. The majority of people frequently exchange their updates, opinions, and other details on social networking sites. As a result, a world without borders has been created.

On the other hand, since social networking websites have proliferated in communities and cultures, people have frequently become divided and detached. Children more open to this transition would adore spending most of their time on these websites. Their bodily and mental health have suffered severe repercussions as a result. People are becoming increasingly dependent on these websites, making them less social. Deception and propaganda in dating have brought many societal and personal problems.

In conclusion, social networking websites have made people more participatory and social. People feel freer to communicate internationally without worrying about the significant costs required earlier. Due to their busy schedules, most people opt to communicate with others via technology rather than in person, which furthers the gap in their relationships.

Sample 13:

Today, in a fast-paced, modern world, human contact seems more immediate and real due to significant advancements in technology. Numerous social sites are becoming popular among youngsters. However, these sites such as Facebook and Instagram have significant adverse effects on both societies and people. I agree with assertion because these sites are not only responsible for spreading false information of people but also developing an isolated community.

To begin with, unlike in the past time, these days society isolation seems a popular site because now individuals spend most of their time on social sites. People, especially youngsters, are more likely to spend leisure time on Facebook, twitter than spending it with neighbors and friends. This tendency indeed leads to social isolation, which is not helpful to develop trust and cooperation. For example, a survey reveals that large proportion of people in the UK are utilizing more time on social sites by chatting other people than spending time with local people and this is affecting their relationship among society remarkably. Therefore, social sites have a negative impact on society.

Furthermore, teenagers are too immature to use social sites, and they can be easily targeted by anti-social ailments. These offenders use children as a tool to steal the secret information of their parents, which results in the financial loss of individuals. Moreover, these sites are supposed to spread misguided details, which is sometimes responsible for conflicts. It is generally said that the information which is being forwarded enormously on networking sites is not precise. So, this can affect the personal choice to a large extent because sometimes this bias information is related to a celebrity or famous person.

To sum up, although social sites have numerous benefits such as making new friends from other places and instant connectivity, the adverse effects on society and individuals cannot be denied. I personally believe that social sites are not only becoming a platform for spreading false information but also sometimes responsible for confiding individual’s secret financial information. Therefore, these networking sites seem to have more negative effects than positive.

Sample 14:

In this modern era, social media has a vital role in our day-to-day life, and it is argued that these sites have adverse effects on individuals and society. I strongly agree with the above thought that social websites have detrimental consequences among locals and individuals.

First and foremost, social websites have hurt relationships a lot, those who are spending huge time in front of computers and mobiles for chatting, they lost their relationships and the contact with the people around them. Hence, they dont have enough time to meet their friends and relatives. As a result, bonding relationships will dropdown. For instance, in the earlier. People get time to meet their relatives and friends weekly to share their joy and sorrow. Eat together and enjoy/nowadays most of the people do not know their relatives and friends. Consequently, there are no close relationships with each other.

In addition, depression, loss of sleep are another reason for overusing social websites. These can notice among youngsters. They spend most of their valuable time in front of computer and mobile. Similarly, they lose their education, and this will lead them into failure, based on students, they can’t score good results on their examination. As a result, the social network leads to negative effects on individuals and society.

To sum up, although Facebook and other social networks have beneficial to some extent. But I strongly agree with the argument that these sites have more negative impacts on people and the community. I hope they will realize and use these sites wisely.

Sample 15:

In the modern era, the world has encountered numerous growths of social networking sites users. One part of the society believes that it will have a positive impact, whereas others believe that it might be turned into detrimental effects on society. In my perception, I think that, although there are many disadvantages associated with it, yet its advantages cannot be neglected, which I shall discuss in the forthcoming paragraph.

Firstly, on the brighter side, with the advent of Facebook, it is possible for people to have remained in contact with each other. Moreover, it is possible to find any old friends via this application through its search option. For example, after Facebook account, now I have searched many of my old school friend who had an account on Facebook, and today we are in touch at every moment. Furthermore, one another imperial benefit is that any information can be quickly disseminated through facebook to every corner of the world within the fraction of seconds. As per the recent survey, many families whose kids were missing, have again received them via facebook application.

On the contrary, facebook encourages to the virtual world. Today’s youngsters not only spending tons of hours on Facebook but also, they are becoming the victim of addiction. Another potential danger drawback is it renders the age-old tradition redundant. To illustrate people, nowadays wish friend or peers on through facebook instead of personal face to face wish.

In recapitulation, in my view, while there is an abundance of benefits connected with the use of facebooks socially, there is a dark side of it. It absolutely depends upon the user; in what way one utilizes this application.

Sample 16:

Nowadays, social networking websites like Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, and Instagram have become an essential part of our life because of this; many people are getting closer to these websites. I strongly agree with this statement.

First and foremost, today’s social networking sites have started hurting relationships, in present time, people spend a lot of time on online, and they do not have any time to visit their friends and relatives so today, the relationship has not perfect. For instance, in these days, most of the people do not even know many of their relatives, and they are waste of the more time in the front of the computer and mobile phone for chatting with their friends and sometimes they any type of things posting on Facebook. So, they do not any work of house and it can be clearly seen that many children of the today’s spent a lot of time on this websites, but they do not know, if they spent more time on this websites then they can face many problems like the effect on the brain and eyes side becomes overwhelming.

In conclusion, although, many websites are beneficial for everyone according to me people should use these websites in limited time then which they can avoid the loss of these websites.
Sample 17:

Social networking platforms take up a considerable part of our lives, and we depend solely on these sites to connect with family and friends nearby. On the other hand, the negative impact of it on both individuals and society is increasingly worrying. This essay will discuss why these platforms lead to negative and catastrophic situations.

To begin with, social stigma is inevitable. Many young people, the majority of whom are encountering problems such as mental illness, racism, and physical deformities, turn to these platforms to post their problems, seeking solace and advice from both friends and strangers, leading to the wrong, harmful direction and ridiculing, which pushes them to have low self-esteem that may lead to suicide or unnecessary mass shootings. For instance, in the year 2020, a Colorado University student who had for six months been ridiculed by friends and strangers on Facebook for posts about not finding a purpose of living after his father rejected him and left their mother suffering resulted in suicide a few days before his graduation from elementary school.

Secondly, negative individual characteristics can be observed. A lot of peer pressure is ever-present on social media platforms, especially with teenagers seeking attention while using it to expose themselves to and understand the outside world. This leads them to drug cartel traps and sex trafficking rings. For example, in a study done in Malaysia, 60% of young people aged between 9-16 years disappear to sex trafficking rings every year, and the majority are BEA members. This group recruits young individuals primarily through a WhatsApp group called MEET YOU.

On the other hand, social networking as a business is rewarding. Many people use such platforms to post content such as videos and live streams to advertise their businesses, educate the masses or entertain viewers. In addition, jobless individuals can earn from such sites as youtube due to the majority of subscribed viewers. A good example is Chef Raphael’s youtube channel, which has over 4.5 million viewers and earns him a minimum of Ksh.2,000 daily, making him one of the most renowned and successful chefs in Kenya.

All in all, governments need to educate people on the negative impact of these social sites while at the same time putting barriers that mitigate the usage of these sites as much as they are essential to us. It is also the responsibility of family members/parents to keep contact and a watchfully eye on their kin/children to identify any possible behaviours that may lead their children/relatives to seek solace from the wrong people.