Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 452 Lưu

Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Some consider plants and animals extinction to be the modern era’s main environmental problem, while others argue that “survival of the fittest” is the primary reason many weaker species have become extinct and climate change is the more pressing matter. This essay will explore why stopping pollution should take priority to saving dying species.

There have been many attempts to preserve endangered species in zoos as well as laboratories. It is estimated that there are currently more than a thousand active revitalization and protection programs for plants and animals throughout the world, such as the Chinese panda breeding initiative, the white rhino security personnels in Africa or the genetic modification to revive dead plants in America. But regardless of the effort, biodiversity still dwindles due to negative changes in the worldwide biosphere.

Therefore, it is clear that pollution is the more important problem that needs to be addressed. Industrial exhaust, oil spills and deforestation are major factors that contribute to the extinction of various animals. If these effects are halted or reversed, nature will recover, affording plant and animal species greater survivability. One example of this was during the Coronavirus outbreak in 2020: a large number of factories worldwide were closed for quarantine which significantly reduced pollution, resulting in improved environment in the oceans as well as forests.

In conclusion, stopping pollution should take precedence over the effort to protect dying wildlife. When pollutants are removed, plants and animals will be able to thrive in habitable areas thus preventing extinction.

Sample 2:

As the industrialization over the world has been intensified, it has caused a variety of environmental problems. Some people deem that among these problems, the extinction of some creatures is the most serious issue, however others contend that people have to handle other problems first more than the extinction problem. This essay will articulate both arguments and suggest my own opinion.

First of all, as for people who consider that the disappearance of animals and plants is the most serious problem, they think that humans are responsible for the loss of creatures in the wild. The plants and animals have been extinct because of humans’ greed for development. They tend to regard the diversity of plants and animals as high priority of environmental policies. Without people’s intervention, the wild animals or plants could have more diverse species than now. 

However, others think that there are more serious environmental problems which are directly connected to humans’ life. For example, due to global warming the sea level is rising rapidly every year. Because of this phenomenon a country like Maldives is facing the loss of its nation. The width of the land in the country is getting reduced. People in the Maldives had no choice but to leave their hometown and they have to adapt to new environments. Therefore, they insist that the government should care about the humans’ lives first, not those of other plants or animals.

In my opinion, I support the idea that people should preserve the diversity of animals and plants. However, the problem related to humans’ life should be solved at first. It seems that people are able to deal with these issues at the same time. While people try to make an effort to prevent wild animals and plants from being extinct, others could focus on solving problems which are associated with people’s life. 

Sample 3:

Ecosystem is balanced based on the interdependency of all the living organisms on the earth. In early man time period, humans were not at the top of the food chain and that is when there used to be a balance in the ecosystem. But from the time when humans invented new ways or tools for their survival that is when the human started hunting enormously disturbing the ecosystem. This led to extinction of few species of both plants and animals rapidly. Extinction of such species is definitely a bane.

There are certain other important environmental issues like air pollution, plastic disposals, water pollution as well which should be considered and taken care too. But one should realize that controlling pollution will have a positive impact on minimizing the loss of particular species as well. For example, if we prevent the water pollution, there will be no marine animals that are affected due to waste that we dispose into water.

Greediness of humans is the root cause for all of these problems and the human activities are inter linked with both pollution and extinction of species. For example, birds help farmers by eating the insects that destroy the farm and increased internet signals bandwidth is affecting the life span of birds. Due to this, there is an increase in the usage of pesticides there by degrading the soil fertility. This example clearly states the cause for extinction of bird species and also the indirect cause of soil pollution.

Not only designing but also implementing certain rules or restrictions around each and every human activity should help in minimizing this kind of impact on the environmental issues.

Sample 4:

While many believe that the extinction of certain species is the greatest threat to our environment, others feel that there are more pressing environmental issues. This essay discusses both perspectives and why I believe that there are more critical issues than the loss of species.

There are two main reasons why people might believe that the extinction of certain plants and animals is the most serious issue. The first of these concerns the way that plants and species are interrelated and how the loss of one species can lead to the loss of other species. For instance, if coral dies many of the fish and marine life that feed off it also die. Moreover, many people note the importance of the biodiversity of the planet and point out that when a species dies this is reduced. This biodiversity is important because we are constantly finding that certain species have important applications such as in the field of medicine.

However, others consider that there are more serious environmental issues. One of the reasons is that the extinction of a species can be considered a part of nature. For instance, we know that the dinosaurs died out due to naturally changing weather patterns, and life of our planet still continues. In addition, man-made problems are emerging such as Global warming that are so serious they have the potential to wipe out all life on our planet. If the earth continues to experience rising temperatures it will start to become uninhabitable even for humans.

In conclusion, in my opinion both sides of this argument have their merits. However, it seems that man-made global warming is the most serious problem because it ultimately threatens to not only destroy certain species but also destroy all life on our planet including humans. Moreover, it seems that we are not taking enough steps to mitigate this catastrophic problem.

Sample 5:

Some contend that the greatest environmental issue facing humanity today is the extinction of specific plant and animal species, while others assert that other environmental issues are of greater significance. I concur with the earlier point of view because certain animal and plant species are essential to maintaining the equilibrium of the ecosystem.

On the one hand, we are already experiencing the effects of climate change. Natural disasters like wildfires and storms are growing more common and dangerous as a result of rising global temperatures. They even steal a lot of lives in addition to destroying our infrastructure and houses. But since there isn’t enough scientific evidence to support a causal link between global warming and natural disasters, I don’t believe it to be the most pressing environmental issue of our time.

Conversely, an unbalanced environment will arise from the extinction of specific animal and plant species. For instance, if the lion - the main predator - went extinct, the animals it preyed on - deer and giraffes, for example - would procreate profusely. This could seriously upset the ecosystems’ delicate balance on Earth because they have the potential to spread disease and destroy forests. I believe that saving some plant and animal species from going extinct should be our top priority because we depend on a healthy ecosystem to give us essential resources like freshwater, clean air, and medicine.

Finally, I believe that protecting some plant and animal species is more important than others because the loss of these species will upset the ecosystem’s delicate balance, even though climate change may have already begun to affect our lives.

Sample 6:

Both views have merit. The loss of biodiversity is a serious environmental problem because it can disrupt ecosystems and reduce the ability of the Earth to sustain human life. For example, the loss of pollinators such as bees could have a significant impact on global food production.

Besides, there are other pressing environmental problems, such as climate change, air and water pollution, and deforestation. These issues also have the potential to severely impact human well-being and the health of the planet. Climate change, for example, is one of the biggest threats to biodiversity and ecosystems. Warmer temperatures and changing precipitation patterns can cause the extinction of species, degrade habitats and alter the timing of seasonal events such as flowering and migration. To add to the mix, air and water pollution can harm both human health and biodiversity, while deforestation can lead to the loss of biodiversity, as well as contribute to climate change.

Addressing the loss of biodiversity and the other environmental problems should be a priority. This is essential to achieving sustainable development and to maintaining the ecological systems that support human well-being. This means that conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity must be integrated into all sectors. It is also important to recognize that all these issues are all interdependent. By protecting biodiversity, we can also help to mitigate the effects of climate change, improve air and water quality, and preserve the planet's natural resources.

In summary, addressing the loss of biodiversity is crucial in order to maintain the ecological systems that support human well-being. A holistic approach is needed to solve these issues.

Sample 7:

The loss of natural habitats, in part due to intensive agriculture and industrial-scale mining in some parts of the world, as well as urbanisation, has put the survival of many species of plants and animals under threat. While this is certainly a major concern, is this the most pressing environmental problem that we should deal with?

I certainly feel that humanity has a moral obligation to safeguard the survival of different species of fauna and flora. The loss of any species is permanent and means that future generations will not be able to appreciate the wonders of a diverse natural world. For example, the tragic extinction of the dodo is something which we still lament even today.

Moreover, it can affect us detrimentally too. Many herbal remedies are derived from plants, and so the destruction of rainforests could easily have a negative effect on the production of medicinal drugs. In addition, we are part of a natural food chain, so the loss of animals, such as fish, means we will have less food in the future.

Ultimately though, there is a far wider problem that needs to be addressed: global warming. As a result of emissions of greenhouse gases, such as CO2 and methane, global temperatures are rising, and we risk seeing runaway heating. This will lead to a number of problems, including flooding, extreme weather and drought, but also the extinction of species. Indeed, polar bears are already struggling to survive because of the loss of polar ice caps due to rising temperatures.

In other words, working to safeguard the survival of the natural world without tackling global warming would be entirely ineffective, so it’s not really a case of which one is more important: all environmental issues are ultimately interconnected, and so we need to take a holistic approach to the issue.

Sample 8:

The contemporary debate on environmental crises often oscillates between the loss of biodiversity and broader ecological challenges. While some advocate for the prioritization of endangered species, arguing their extinction could unravel ecosystems, others believe issues like climate change and pollution warrant more immediate attention. This essay contends that while the preservation of flora and fauna is vital, addressing broader environmental threats is paramount for our survival.

The argument for prioritizing species preservation is compelling, given the intricate interdependencies within ecosystems. The extinction of a single species can trigger a domino effect, leading to further loss and destabilizing ecosystems that humans rely on for services such as pollination, water purification, and carbon sequestration. For instance, the decline of bee populations has sounded alarms globally, underscoring their role in the pollination of crops essential for human consumption. This perspective underscores a holistic view of conservation, emphasizing the interconnectedness of life and the unintended consequences of species loss.

Conversely, the argument for addressing broader environmental threats is underpinned by the urgency of issues like global warming and pollution, which pose immediate and catastrophic risks to all life forms. Climate change, driven by human activities such as deforestation and fossil fuel combustion, exacerbates natural disasters, threatens food security, and induces habitat loss at an unprecedented scale. Pollution, be it air, water, or soil, has far-reaching impacts on human health and the environment. The rapid industrialization and plastic waste accumulation offer stark evidence of how these broader issues can exacerbate the biodiversity crisis, suggesting a need for an integrated approach to environmental conservation.

In conclusion, safeguarding endangered species is vital, yet the immediate threats of climate change and pollution require urgent global action. An integrated approach is crucial, blending species preservation with broader environmental sustainability efforts. Tackling the root causes of environmental degradation will protect biodiversity and secure a sustainable future for all.

Sample 9:

The contemporary environmental discourse oscillates between the conservation of species and addressing broader ecological issues. While the former emphasizes the critical role of specific flora and fauna in ecosystem stability, the latter advocates for a wider lens, focusing on climate change and pollution as paramount concerns. This essay argues that, although species conservation is essential, the overarching environmental challenges of our era, particularly climate change, necessitate immediate and comprehensive action.

The protection of specific species is undeniably significant, serving as the keystone for biodiversity and ecosystem health. The disappearance of a single species, such as the polar bear, often symbolizes larger environmental shifts, particularly those induced by climate change. These species act not only as indicators of ecosystem health but also as catalysts for conservation efforts, drawing public and scientific attention to the broader implications of their decline. For example, the conservation of sea turtles through protected nesting beaches has broader ecological benefits, preserving coastal ecosystems that protect against storms and support diverse marine life.

However, the urgency of climate change and its capacity to alter global ecosystems arguably overshadows the issue of species loss. The rapid increase in global temperatures, accelerated by human activities like deforestation and carbon emissions, threatens not just individual species but the very fabric of life. The recent wildfires in Australia and the Amazon rainforest offer a grim reminder of climate change's devastating impact, highlighting the need for a global strategy that transcends individual species conservation. Addressing climate change encompasses a myriad of environmental protections, from reducing emissions to fostering sustainable land use, which, in turn, benefits countless species.

In conclusion, while the fight to save individual species is noble and necessary, it is the broader challenge of climate change that poses the greatest threat to our planet's future. An integrated approach that addresses the root causes of environmental degradation while also considering species conservation is crucial. By focusing on the bigger picture, we can ensure a habitable planet not only for specific species but for all forms of life.

Sample 10:

It is argued by many that extinction of any particular plant or animal is the major environmental concern, while other groups, including myself, believe that there are some more serious environmental issues, such as global warming and water pollution, that we should address first.

Losing particular kinds of flora and fauna is an obvious environmental problem because it can distort the ecological balance, which is all about the natural coexistence between living organisms such as human being, plants, and animals as well as their environment. When the natural balance breaks down due to the ecological destruction, some plants can grow excessively fast, reducing the available space for the others. Similarly, some animal species can overpower the minor ones and turn to be predators, which eventually leads to further extinction of the endangered ones. For instance, illegal ivory traders have killed six thousand elephants in African National Safari Park over the last 20 years, reducing the size of the elephant groups significantly smaller and weaker in team strength, which is making it easier for the predators like lions to attack and kill the remainder elephants.

On the other hand, there are more important environmental problems, such air and water pollution, which can permanently harm both our planet and our health. In fact, the significant quantity of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere as a result of burning fossil fuels for energy creates the greenhouse effect, which in turn triggers global warming, the melting of glaciers, and ultimately an increase in sea levels. Furthermore, the small particles expelled in the air by motor vehicles which use oil derivatives as fuel, can seriously damage our lungs when they are inhaled. Also, drastic water pollution is another major concern; contaminants from illegally dumped chemicals in landfills can pollute aquifers, rivers, and lakes. As a result, certain fish can consume tiny plastic pieces from plastic bags or bottles, which might then be eaten by humans, posing a serious health risk.

To sum up, although human has to encounter a myriad of environmental issues, loss of any specific group of plant or animal should not be considered as the worst one, while comparing to the global temperature spike and the severe air-water pollution.

Sample 11:

It is obvious that the planet is in great danger, but people disagree over whether the main problem is the loss of certain species or other issues such as climate change. This essay will discuss both views and conclude that they are both interrelated, and that there is no one problem that is the worst.

Around the world, species of animals and plants are dying at a shocking rate. Forests are being cut down to make way for giant cattle farms, while endangered animals are being poached so that their body parts can be sent to China to make fake medicines. This is a devastating trend not just because these animals don’t deserve to die, but because biodiversity is tremendously important to the planet. When sharks are killed, for example, it is not just the sharks that die. The whole underwater ecosystem faces collapse, which can be catastrophic for the world.

Other problems exist aside from just the loss of species. Major environmental issues today include climate change. This is caused by many factors such as air pollution and the loss of forests and coral reefs, and it has massive potential ramifications, such as sea level rises and desertification. Ultimately, this could lead to the extinction of humanity and the destruction of our world. However, to say that it is worse than the extinction of certain species overlooks the fact that they are related. When we kill certain plants and animals, we are contributing to climate change indirectly, and all of these environmental tragedies bring the world closer to complete destruction.

In conclusion, there are many ways in which humans are wreaking havoc on the planet, but it is hard to say that one is worse than another because they all add up to the same result.

Sample 12:

Many opine that critically endangered species of flora and fauna is the most pressing environmental problem of today, yet others believe that issues like waste disposal, air pollution, temperature rise, and plastic pollution are more crucial. In the case, I think that climate change is the most disastrous environmental hurdle to overcome.

Many plants and animals have become nearly extinct because they have lost their habitat considerably. For instance, a rise in temperatures of the Arctic causes the sea ice to melt, which in turn destroys the habitat of polar bears. Besides, human activities like deforestation, hunting and poaching, also cause the extinction of many already endangered species. Therefore, we should protect wildlife habitats by decreasing greenhouse gas emission and creating natural reserves. But that’s not the worst form of environmental degradation in recent years.

In my opinion, global warming has the most drastic effect on the environment because of its terrible effects. Bit by bit, the temperature of our globe increases, which results in a severe change in the climate. A good chunk of research involving global warming shows that the incremental rise in temperature, particularly pertaining to ocean, has increased the frequency and intensity of earthquake, volcanic eruption, typhoon, tornado, hurricane, tsunami, blizzard, to mention but a few. There are myriad examples of these natural calamities from the last two decades, but the earthquake unleashed a savage tsunami affecting Japan in 2011 is a particularly remarkable example. If the climate keeps changing at this rate, a large portion of the world will become unhabitable both for human and other species.

To recapitulate, while many people claim that imperilled species have taken the centre stage in the environmental problems, all things considered, it seems reasonable to assume that global warming or climate change is the thorniest problem due to its frequency and destructive power.

Sample 13:

Many are of the opinion that the risks for endangered plants and wildlife are the most severe consequences of our worsening environment while others would argue that other problems are more pressing. While I consider the impact of recurring natural disasters to be important, in my opinion the loss of wildlife is the most serious threat to the environment.

The rise in recent catastrophic natural disasters has been strongly linked to climate change. Many scientists have made the case that incremental rises in temperature, specifically involving the oceans, has increased the frequency and potency of hurricanes, tsunamis, and blizzards. There are countless instances of these from the last two decades but the tsunami affecting mainly Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand in 2004 is a particularly striking example. This was the largest natural disaster this century and resulted in thousands of deaths, injuries and billions of dollars in damages, the effects of which set these developing nations back economically for years. People lost their lives, homes, and livelihood in many cases.

The main reason that many people including myself are so focused on plant and animal life is because of the rising number of endangered animals in recent decades. One of the most well-known examples of this is the often-cited case of polar bears. Polar bears live mainly in the Arctic and recent melting of the polar ice caps has resulted in reduced ice for polar bears to hunt on. Polar bears have become an endangered species, and it is often forecast that by 2100 they will be entirely extinct in the wild. Their extinction will likely have a domino effect on the fragile ecosystems of the arctic and other endangered animals like seals and narwhales. This is just one example of the impact of global warming on animals and plants of our planet. Extinction is irreversible and there is no more lasting impression we can leave than to deplete the world entirely of a species.

In my opinion, the loss of ecological diversity trumps any other environmental concerns. In order to remedy this problem governments and individuals need to take serious steps to not only invest more in conservation efforts for endangered animals but also work towards long term reforms related to fossil fuels, carbon emissions and the other apparent catalysts for climate change.

Sample 14:

There is no doubt that environmental issues are becoming more pressing and that we need to take action to address them. Some people believe that the loss of particular species of plants and animals is the most important environmental problem of our time. Others argue that there are more pressing concerns. In my opinion, the loss of species is indeed a critical issue, and one that we must prioritize if we are to preserve our planet's biodiversity.

On the one hand, those who argue that the loss of species is not the most important environmental problem might point to issues such as climate change or pollution. They might argue that these are more pressing concerns because they have a more immediate impact on human beings. For example, pollution can lead to health problems, and climate change can result in natural disasters that threaten human lives. However, while these issues are undoubtedly important, they are also interconnected with the loss of species. For instance, climate changes can lead to habitat loss, which can in turn lead to the extinction of particular species.

On the contrary, those who opine that the loss of species is the most important environmental issue express that it has far-reaching consequences that are not always immediately apparent. Biodiversity plays an important role in maintaining healthy ecosystems, and the loss of a single species can have a ripple effect throughout an entire ecosystem. For example, the extinction of bees can have serious consequences for agriculture, as bees play a vital role in pollinating crops. The loss of particular species can also have implications for human health, as many drugs and treatments are derived from natural sources.

In conclusion, while there are certainly other pressing environmental concerns, I believe that the loss of specific species is a critical issue that we must prioritize if we are to preserve our planet's biodiversity. The loss of species has far-reaching implications for human well-being and the health of ecosystems, and we must take action to address it before it is too late.

Sample 15:

The issue of environmental problems has become a pressing concern in modern times. While some argue that the loss of some particular species of plants and animals is the main environmental problem, others contend that there are more critical issues that demand immediate attention and action. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present arguments for why the loss of biodiversity might not be the central environmental problem of our time.

Those who think that loss of certain animals and plants are the main environmental crisis in modern times argue that the process can disrupt the ecological balance, leading to negative cascading effects on the entire ecosystem. Coral reefs, often referred to as the "rainforests of the sea," are home to an incredible diversity of marine life. The decline of certain coral species due to factors like ocean warming and acidification not only affects the corals themselves but also endangers the countless species that rely on these ecosystems for food and shelter. Thus, it starts a chain reaction that puts the whole world in danger.

On the contrary, others who are against this notion say that the primary environmental problem lies in the presence of other pressing issues, such as climate change and pollution. The consequences of global warming, including extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and disruptions to ecosystems, affect all living beings, not just specific plant or animal species. For example, the emission of greenhouse gases from industrial activities and deforestation has led to a rise in global temperatures, resulting in the melting of polar ice caps and threatening the survival of numerous species. Additionally, air and water pollution from various sources have detrimental effects on entire ecosystems, endangering the health and well-being of both humans and wildlife.

In conclusion, although the loss of particular species of plants and animals is an important environmental concern, it is crucial to recognise that there are other pressing issues, such as climate change and pollution, that demand urgent attention. By addressing environmental challenges effectively, we can ensure a sustainable and healthy planet for all living creatures.

Sample 16:

Many people think that the loss of particular plants and animal species is the main environmental problem that humans are facing nowadays, while others believe that some other environmental issues are more alarming. I agree with the latter view and will analyse both views in the following essay.

On the one hand, the loss of animal and plant species is considered the main environmental problem because of its impact on our planet's biodiversity. Around the world, trees are being cut down for industrial and agriculture purposes. As a result, there will not be enough trees to produce oxygen for humans and prevent soil erosion. Meanwhile, endangered animals are being poached to serve people's needs, hence negatively affecting the whole ecosystem. For example, when sharks are killed for their fins, many types of aquatic species no longer have their natural predators to control their population. Consequently, the disappearance of predators disrupts the natural food chain and then leads to unbalanced underwater ecosystems.  

On the other hand, there are more urgent environmental issues than the loss of plant and animal species. Those problems, which include pollution and climate change, are the main factors that cause the loss of biodiversity and put the natural habitat on the brink of destruction. Water and soil pollution caused by industrial and agricultural activities are poisoning a large number of species of marine and land animals, which means that human health is also negatively affected as those animals are humans' important food source. Moreover, changing weather patterns caused by climate change leads to more frequent occurrences of natural disasters such as droughts, floods and wildfires.

In conclusion, it is true that the loss of particular plants and animals should be paid great attention to, but other environmental issues should also be taken into consideration. I think we should put a great deal of effort into tackling all of those problems rather than only focusing on the animals and plants’ extinction.

Sample 17:

Some people argue that the extinction of certain plant and animal species is the biggest environmental issue that we confront today, while others claim that there are other environmental problems that are more important. I agree with the former viewpoint because some plant and animal species play a key role in keeping the ecosystem in balance.

On the one hand, climate change has already started affecting our lives. With rising global temperatures, natural disasters, such as wildfires and storms, are becoming more frequent and dangerous. They tear down our homes and infrastructure and even take many lives. However, I think global warming is not the most serious environmental challenge we face today since its causal relationship with natural disasters is not fully backed up by science.

On the other hand, the loss of particular animal and plant species will result in an imbalanced ecosystem. For example, if the primary predator, the lion, ceased to exist, the species it used to prey on, such as deer and giraffes, would reproduce in large numbers. This could really alter the balance of Earth's ecosystems because they could destroy forests and also carry disease. Since we depend on a well-balanced ecosystem to provide us with crucial resources such as clean air, freshwater, and medicine, I think protecting certain species of plants and animals from becoming extinct should take the highest priority.

In conclusion, even though climate change might have started impacting our lives already, I think protecting certain plant and animal species is more urgent because their extinction will upset the balance of the ecosystem.

Sample 18:

Environmental issues used to be a quiet backwater a few decades ago. However, these days it has become a widely discussed topic. While many consider depletion of flora and fauna the major affair that humanity is confronting, it is also suggested that other environmentally-related problems are precedent. This essay would elucidate both sentiments and put forward my point of view.

On the one hand, it is justifiable why the disappearance of certain species is emphasized. The key rationale is that there is a correlation between the situation with biodiversity loss. The existence of a species determines others' survival, with its roles as nutrients or population controlling factors. Accordingly, when it comes to biological imbalance, it could have a range of implications for our livelihood, food and health. To give just one example, the number of whales is declining, and scientists have suggested that this could lead to the collapse of fish stocks in oceans around the world. If this is indeed the case, it would be a disaster for hundreds of millions of people who rely upon seafood for sustenance, medicines and income.

On the other hand, some people opine that many other problems are at a more alarming level. Resulting from the impacts of human activities, environmental pollution is now the worldwide focus of concern. Poor air quality, heavily contaminated water and further aspects have been reported globally, which are the culprits of a wide range of medical problems such as poisoning and respiratory diseases. This is compounded by the fact that global warming caused by unrestrained emissions is fuelling the strikes of extreme natural disasters like floods or droughts. Those would then translate into pressure on humans, with the destruction of infrastructure and the disruption of production activities.

In conclusion, public opinions have been of late divided over whether the downswing in specific living forms or other environmental phenomena are of greater importance. From my perspective, two mentalities are both sensible and no parties should be given precedence.

Sample 19:

Environmental issues have ubiquitously taken place in human life which have become an urgent concern of national leaders and the whole community. Many people assume that the recent extinction of various fauna and flora is the most threatening problem to our ecosystem. Personally speaking, there are more important issues in the industrial civilization that need to be solved such as air pollution, disaster devastation, the most catastrophic is climate change. This essay will discuss both opinions precisely with a variety of compelling evidence.

To begin with, there are two reasons put forward to explain why people agree with the first statement. Particularly, fauna and flora are interrelated to their environment. For instance, the living of most wild animals acts on the food chain. It leads to a repercussion that the loss of one spice can affect the other spices. Furthermore, biodiversity also is taken advantage of the majority of human activities such as medication, chemical industry, ecology, which is vulnerable when the main resources decline or even in case of extinction. The second reason is that plants and animals play a pivotal role in food resources and agriculture productivity as well, especially in developing countries. Hence, the loss of spices will expand the high risk of food insecurity and negatively impact people who live under poverty.

However, nobody can deny the fact that there are more severe environmental issues besides. I highly support the idea that climate change is the most serious problem which has been at an alarming rate now. The adverse circumstance is man-made and has the potential to wipe out all life on the Earth with a great deal with indications such as the sea level increase, natural disasters, ozone depletion. They are determined to be the most compelling evidence that no longer do people continually ignore. The Earth will be uninhabitable for humans if we do not suggest a scientific solution to this emergency.

In conclusion, I must say that both statements have their right toward the total which carries out different aspects of the argument. But I believe that climate change is more serious because eventually, its catastrophic consequences not only devastate faunas and floras but also destroy the whole life on the Earth.

Sample 20:

In today's world, environmental problems are of paramount importance. There are those who say extinction is the most pressing environmental issue of our day, while others point to other problems. In this post, I'll discuss both sides of the debate, contrasting the impact of extinction with that of other environmental issues.

On one side of the argument, proponents claim that extinction is the most pressing environmental issue since it threatens the survival of entire species. They show the complex biological relationships found in nature and underline the value of biodiversity for its own sake. The extinction of even a single species can have far-reaching effects due to the crucial role that species play in maintaining ecosystems. Furthermore, they claim that the loss of biodiversity endangers future scientific and medical discoveries because many resources and solutions lie within the genetic variety of different species.

There are, however, many who argue for a broader lens, pointing out that other, more pressing environmental issues also need our immediate attention. Climate change, pollution, deforestation, and the exhaustion of natural resources, they say, have far-reaching and immediate effects on the environment and human well-being. Many species may not make it because of these issues, which threaten entire ecosystems. In addition, they argue that solving these broader issues will indirectly reduce species loss by protecting habitats and improving environmental conditions.

Overall, people have different views on whether extinction or other environmental issues are the most important problems we face today. Climate change, pollution, and resource depletion are all interconnected, and while the extinction of species brings attention to the importance of biodiversity and its intrinsic value, they also threaten the planet's ability to recover. It is crucial that we strike a balance between these issues if we are to successfully address the environmental disaster we now face. We can work towards a future that is sustainable and protects the complex web of life on Earth if we tackle both the localised extinction of species and the global environmental concerns that threaten them.

Sample 21:

There are different opinions on which of today's environmental problems is the most pressing. One school of thought believes that the most serious concern is severely endangered species of flora and animals. In contrast, others believe that concerns such as rubbish disposal, air pollution, global warming, and plastic pollution are much more severe. I, like many others, believe that the most perilous environmental hurdle we face is a rising climate.

On the one hand, deforestation, animal abuse, and poaching have put all the natural creatures living in the jungles in danger of extinction. Additionally, plastic that is tossed into the ocean hurts marine life. Living species on the seafloor are not the only ones impacted. If all this continues a little longer, many species of flora and fauna may cease to exist. There is no denying the fact that the disappearance of individual species will lead to an unstable environment. For instance, if the lion stopped existing, the animals it used to feed on, such as deer and buffaloes, would proliferate. This might seriously affect Earth's ecosystem since they may destroy forests.

On the other hand, many believe that other environmental issues must be taken into greater consideration. One of the difficulties that humans have faced in recent years is global warming. Apart from animal extinction, the causes of global warming are often linked to climate change, the rising of sea levels, and the melting of ice from the poles. There is a significant amount of evidence indicating that global warming increases the frequency of many natural disasters, such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, typhoons, tornadoes, hurricanes, tsunamis, blizzards, etc.

To summarize, if the issue of environmental degradation is not addressed urgently, humans, like other animals, will become endangered species in the not-too-distant future.

Sample 22:

Our planet is perilously close to collapsing as a result of a litany of environmental problems. Opinions differ on which of the many issues should be the primary focus of attention. Some feel that our first concern should be the extinction of certain species of flora and animals, while others believe that other environmental concerns should take precedence. Nonetheless, I believe that no one issue can be deemed primary.

There are an endless number of environmental conflicts happening all over the world, and although the extinction of plants and animals is one of them, it is by no means the only one that exists. Global warming, ozone depletion, pollution, ocean acidification, and deforestation are among the most serious issues facing the world today. Due to the fact that they are at the root of many species' extinction, these issues are of special importance. Instead of concentrating on the immediate result, we should concentrate on the fundamental source of the issue. This would allow us to save the planet far more swiftly and efficiently.

The extinction of plant life on the earth's surface is closely linked to the severe climatic changes induced by global warming, which are occurring at an alarming rate. In a similar vein, the extinction of some animal species is a consequence of the loss of their natural habitats caused by deforestation.

To conclude, although the extinction of certain plant and animal species is an environmental concern that contributes to biodiversity loss, I am convinced that this is mainly a result of other significant environmental problems. We should attempt to address the underlying cause and prioritise other problems that have contributed to our current predicament.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

In recent years, there have been a number of everyday problems that people in big cities have to cope with. This essay will discuss two major problems, pollution and information overload, which I believe should lead governments to encourage people to move to regional areas.

These days, increased levels of pollution have been a great cause for concern among residents of big cities. Due to high volumes of traffic, large quantities of pollutants are being released into the atmosphere, causing the degradation of air quality, which is said to be a significant contributor to various types of respiratory disease, such as lung cancer. Additionally, people in big cities are being bombarded with too much information from the media, including TV, social media, and advertising, with a large proportion of this information being fake or exaggerated. This can lead to confusion or, in some cases, social anarchy.

In my opinion, governments should do what they can to encourage city residents to move to regional areas. Firstly, it will reduce the number of vehicles in cities, which will definitely reduce the levels of air pollution, which is hazardous to the health of citizens. Furthermore, fewer people living in big cities will relieve the pressure on the housing supply, where many people are forced to live in small, uncomfortable spaces. Studies have shown that people’s living spaces have a direct impact on their mental health and how they perform at work.

In conclusion, severe air pollution and a bombardment of information are among the most serious problems facing city residents nowadays, and personally, I feel that authorities should encourage people to relocate to other areas to live.

Sample 2:

It is true that nowadays city residents have to encounter a large number of problems, especially those concerning environmental and social factors. However, encouraging people to migrate to smaller provincial towns, in my opinion, is not a viable solution to these problems.

As living in a metropolis, people are confronted with high level of air pollution, which is caused mainly by the exhaust fumes released into the atmosphere from petrol-driven vehicles. The more populated the city is, the higher the demand for traveling becomes, and as a result, the higher the level of air pollution will be. Living in this environment for a long time is supposed to be detrimental to human’s health as polluted air is the main contributor to respiratory diseases. Another problem involves social aspects such as the issue of unemployment. As many people moving to big cities do not have any skills or qualifications, they are unlikely to find a job. This higher unemployment rate can give rise to the increased criminal activities threatening inhabitants’ life.

Since dwelling in urban centers can have negative impacts, some governments tend to encourage the citizens to relocate to smaller regional towns, but I do not think this will be effective. The first reason for my belief is that this policy cannot guarantee a reduction in air pollution because people still have to commute to their workplace, which is usually located in city center. Indeed, living far away from cities means that people even have to travel a much longer distance to work, which, in fact, can increase the amount of exhaust emissions. The second reason is that finding jobs in the countryside is certainly not easier than in urban areas. Job opportunities in these places are much lower and people usually have to do low-paid jobs if they work in smaller and less developed towns.

In conclusion, it is obvious that living in big cities can create a number of problems, but encouraging people to migrate to suburban areas is, in my opinion, totally not a viable measure at least when it comes to addressing the problems concerning pollution and unemployment.

Sample 3:

It is true that people in major cities are confronting a number of problems in their routine life. This essay will discuss some of these problems and explain the writer’s view that citizens should be encouraged to relocate to the countryside or regional towns.

The urban population is grappling against two main problems out of many. The first issue is the lower quality of life due to the increasingly heavier burden on the existing urban infrastructure. This is because rural immigrants in pursuit of employment opportunities keep inundating the downtown areas of most major cities. For example, most schools and hospitals located in XYZ city are frequently overloaded, making these services inaccessible to the majority of people of lower classes. The second issue is the traffic jam due to the burgeoning car ownership. Arguably, cars take up more space than a motorbike while its capacity to accommodate passengers is far inferior to that of a bus. This weakness results in bumper-to-bumper traffic, particularly in downtown areas where many drivers have to inch along to get away from the terrible traffic.

I think government should encourage citizens to move away from major cities. This is due to the fact that this would relieve the current pressure on the infrastructure. Fewer people would need public services such as hospitals or schools and the roads would be more spacious, ensuring a smooth traffic flow with its resultant fewer accidents for city dwellers. In addition, the resources in the countryside or other less developed regions would be better exploited as there might be available workforce there. For instance, there would be more laborers during harvesting time in the countryside, or skilled or knowledgeable people would help with the construction work in smaller regions, spurring the growth of the local area as well as the nation as a whole.

In conclusion, there are many problems that people in cities are facing, and it is advisable that government encourage the residents to consider relocation to smaller regional areas with a view to solving these issues.

Sample 4:

It is true that nowadays people are shifting to larger cities. There are several negative consequences of this moot issue, and to cope with the current problems, the authorities should encourage individuals to move to smaller cities or even to the countryside.

To begin with, an enormous number of people create problems. One negative consequence is that the urban population would go on increasing and cause housing problems. This leads to the creation of underdeveloped slum areas, where underprivileged individuals must live in poor living conditions like lacking medical care or even drinking water. Another issue is the traffic jam due to the burgeoning car ownership. Arguably, cars take up more space than a motorbike while its capacity to accommodate passengers is far inferior to that of a bus. This weakness results in bumper-to-bumper traffic particularly in downtown areas where many drivers have to inch along to get away from the terrible traffic.

Governments should take steps to move a certain number of city dwellers to less populated areas. The main reason is that shifting people to towns or even the countryside helps to decrease the unemployment rate. This is because as more and more people apply for the same position within a company, it may intensify the competition among employees, making it significantly more difficult to be chosen. Towns, however, due to industrialization, are now able to provide different jobs for engineers or officers in new factories. Therefore, by encouraging job seekers to move to these newly developed areas, the government can lower the number of unemployed individuals in cities.

In conclusion, an increasing number of people living in cities certainly creates housing problems and traffic congestion, and governments should encourage its citizens to migrate to towns.

Sample 5:

More and more people live in cities today than at any point in the past and this trend will likely continue in the future. This has resulted in many problems including extreme overcrowding and governments should take measures to make living outside cities more attractive.

There are a wide range of drawbacks associated with the rise of modern cities but one of the most obvious issues is related to population density. The large number of people crammed into a relatively small area has caused expensive housing, increased traffic and severe pollution. For example, apartment prices in mega-cities like Tokyo and New York have soared to the point where only the wealthiest inhabitants can afford decent living standards. Regardless of financial status, all city dwellers have to deal with more and more traffic jams as the population increases while the area of cities remains fixed. Finally, all these people living and travelling in one place puts a tremendous strain on the environment and some cities, like Beijing in China, have become dangerously polluted.

In my opinion, governments have a duty to encourage citizens to move to more rural areas. If cities continue to expand unabated then the above problems will only get worse. We might one day find ourselves living in densely packed, heavily polluted cities that resemble scenes from a dystopian science fiction film. In order to prevent this from happening, the government can give tax breaks to companies that choose to locate offices and production facilities outside the city. This will provide more jobs for people who are willing to live in the countryside.

In conclusion, the concerns related to overcrowding in cities can and should be somewhat countered by governments incentivising living in rural areas. If this is done then we may still face problems related to cities in the future, but at least they will not be as serious.

Sample 6:

Residing in metropolitan cities has been stimulating some crucial issues in daily activities. Congestion and air pollution are problems related to living in big cities. Thus, these issues have to be tackled by governments through plausible actions such as enhancing numerous public transportations and controlling the price of basic needs instead of encouraging societies to relocate to smaller regional towns.

Societies face many issues in metropolitan cities as traffic jams and quality of air pollution. In big cities, some roads are dominated by private cars, then the number of people using these private cars is higher than in other cities. As a result, there is a phenomenon like congestion in the road that can occur with long duration. Mostly, people who are workers have to go to office and back home regularly using private cars. This situation has a bad impact on utilizing time because they spend more time just on the road and have a chance of becoming late to go to office. Another problem that has influenced widely on people is reducing air quality. When individuals live in larger cities is a risk to the respiratory system, an individual usually takes breath frequently which contains more emissions produced by private cars. Thus, individuals are able to get some diseases such as asthma.

What authorities should do is to deliver better public transportation. These facilities have to consider integration on reaching some ways, an efficiency of time and cost of transportation. If the government ponders this solution, individuals will use this type of transportation. For instance, after the government applied an integration of public transportation in Bandung, societies directly used public transportation. Therefore, the number of private cars has dropped.

To sum up, congestion and quality of air quality are common issues in metropolitan cities. Considering encouraging relocation to smaller cities is not the best solution, but governments can tackle some problems regarding living in metropolitan cities through improving of public transportation.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

In today's digital age, the prevalence of online shopping has soared, with more and more individuals opting for the convenience and accessibility it offers. This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of online shopping for both consumers and businesses.

Online shopping provides numerous advantages for buyers. For individuals, the convenience of shopping from the comfort of their homes, at any time, and from any location is a major draw. This accessibility allows busy professionals and individuals with mobility constraints to easily access a wide array of products and services. Furthermore, online platforms often provide comprehensive product information and customer reviews, enabling consumers to make well-informed purchasing decisions. For instance, a working parent with a hectic schedule can conveniently shop for groceries, clothing, or electronic gadgets online, saving valuable time that would otherwise be spent navigating through physical stores.

Businesses also benefit significantly from the online marketplace. Setting up an e-commerce platform requires lower initial investments compared to establishing physical stores. This cost-effectiveness allows small and medium-sized enterprises to compete with larger corporations on a global scale. Moreover, online platforms enable companies to reach a broader customer base, transcending geographical boundaries and creating new opportunities for growth and expansion.

While online shopping offers numerous advantages, it also presents certain challenges for both consumers and businesses. One prominent concern is cybersecurity. With the rising incidence of online fraud and data breaches, consumers may feel apprehensive about sharing personal and financial information online, which can hamper their willingness to engage in e-commerce.

Moreover, the surge in online shopping has raised concerns about the viability of traditional brick-and-mortar stores. The shift towards online retail has led to decreased foot traffic in physical stores, resulting in reduced revenue and job losses in the retail sector. Additionally, e-commerce giants may dominate the online marketplace, making it challenging for smaller businesses to compete and survive.

The increasing popularity of online shopping signifies its benefits for individuals and businesses alike, offering convenience and broader market reach. However, cybersecurity concerns and the impact on traditional retail should not be overlooked. It is important to ensure a secure and sustainable future for both e-commerce consumers and businesses.

Sample 2:

Online shopping has become increasingly popular in recent years, with more and more people choosing to purchase their needs and wants through digital platforms. This shift in consumer behavior has brought about numerous advantages for both individuals and companies, but it also presents certain disadvantages that need to be considered.

One of the primary advantages of online shopping is the convenience it offers. Individuals can browse and buy products anytime and anywhere, without the need to travel to physical stores. This not only saves time but also eliminates travel expenses. Moreover, online shopping provides access to a wide range of products. Consumers can explore a vast variety and selection that may not be available in their local stores. Additionally, online shopping allows individuals to explore international markets and purchase products from around the world.

For companies, online shopping opens up new possibilities for business growth. It provides a global reach and allows companies to expand their customer base beyond geographical boundaries. Furthermore, operating an online store can significantly reduce operational costs compared to maintaining physical stores. Companies can save on expenses such as rent, utilities, and staff. Additionally, online platforms enable businesses to collect and analyze valuable customer data, which can help them make informed decisions and tailor their marketing strategies.

However, there are certain disadvantages associated with online shopping. One of the main drawbacks is the inability to physically examine products before purchasing. This could lead to potential dissatisfaction if the actual item received does not match the expectations based on online descriptions and images. Additionally, assessing the quality and authenticity of products can be challenging without a physical inspection.

Another concern is the security risks and privacy issues associated with online shopping. Online scams and fraudulent activities are prevalent, and individuals need to be cautious while providing their personal and financial information. Data breaches and identity theft pose significant risks in the digital landscape.

For companies, online shopping comes with intense competition and difficulty in building brand loyalty. With numerous options available to consumers, businesses need to stand out and continuously engage with their customer base. Furthermore, logistics and customer service can be challenging to manage efficiently in the online space.

In conclusion, online shopping offers significant advantages in terms of convenience, access to a wide range of products, and cost savings. Companies benefit from global reach and reduced operational costs. However, the inability to physically examine products and security risks are notable disadvantages. To make the most of online shopping, individuals should exercise caution and research before making purchases, while companies need to focus on building customer trust and providing excellent online experiences. Ultimately, informed decision-making and careful consideration of the advantages and disadvantages are essential in the realm of online shopping.

Sample 3:

Online shopping has revolutionized the way we shop. Consequently, more and more people these days prefer purchasing products online over the traditional method of going to stores. This trend, however, exerts both positive and negative impacts on individuals and businesses as well.

The burgeoning popularity of online shopping can be attributed to several decisive advantages. First of all, the most distinctive benefit is convenience. To illustrate, people can buy products from the comfort of their workplace, own home or virtually anywhere without the pressure of a salesperson. Besides being able to purchase from the comfort of their homes or workstation, customers can also save money. With ever-growing fuel prices, shopping online saves them the cost of driving to and from the shop. They can also save time by avoiding getting stuck in gridlocked traffic. As for online business owners, the startup cost is lower compared to physical retail stores. And let’s not forget, the shop owners do not have to hire staff to work and run the shop, thus saving a substantial amount of expenditure. Apart from this, online business owners can easily sell their products to customers worldwide.

Despite some distinctive benefits, shopping online suffers from some obvious drawbacks. Fraud is the biggest downside of online trading. Put simply, there is a constant risk of fraud: debit or credit card scams, identity theft, hacking, phishing, and counterfeit goods to mention but a few. Likewise, cut-throat competition is making life tougher for business owners. Online trading is global and any customer from any part of the globe can purchase from any seller of their preference. That is to say, the competition with online business is not merely engaging customers, rather staying ahead of other sellers.

In conclusion, while e-commerce reaps distinct advantages, it also confers some obvious disadvantages. As a consumer or business owner, people should know about the downsides of it before switching to e-commerce.

Sample 4:

In recent years, the rate of in-store shopping has plunged due to vast opportunities for buying different products including daily necessaries from hundreds of online stores. This essay will try to demonstrate chances such as convenience and product availability as the reasons behind the popularity of e-shopping whereas it will focus on swindling and isolation as the pitfalls of this issue.

Initially, the prime reason behind the popularity of e-shopping is convenience which can be easily understood from the thousands of virtual shops all over the world. To illustrate, people nowadays are busier than ever because of the fast pace of the world, and they want to save as much time as they can for relaxation. Virtual shopping gives this magnificent prospect of time-saving and so people enjoy taking it. Besides, superstores sometimes run out of products in the precise moment when people need them which online shops rarely have this crisis. For instance, I needed a flat screen monitor a few months ago but my local store had it out of stock. When I peeped into some online stores I found it easily on eBay.

Meanwhile, though shopping on the internet looks very promising, it is not without its setbacks. Many people, mostly the newcomers, regularly complain of getting tricked on virtual shopping and the rate of complaints is increasing at a faster rate. To explain, one of my friends has recently got swindled when he paid in advance for a smartwatch. Additionally, people often become isolated in their rooms through e-shopping which can affect their feelings and behaviour. As an example, a friend of mine started shopping online a couple of years ago even though the nearest superstore was only 500 metres away. His neighbours, nowadays, describe him as an ill-mannered and antisocial person which, needless to say, is the result of being home and becoming isolated from the outer world.

In brief, virtual shoppers obtain greater benefits if compared to in-store shoppers. Converting such shopping to a stress-free experience, it is turning out to be progressively more convenient. However, as clients may sometimes get deceived and become cut off from the social world, concerned authorities should look into the matter cautiously.

Sample 5:

More and more people are purchasing products online instead of visiting brick and mortar stores nowadays. Doing online shopping brings numerous benefits to both individuals and companies. I believe the advantages of using e-commerce platforms outweigh the disadvantages.

Shopping online has the following two advantages. Firstly, people can save time and money by buying goods online. It can take a substantial amount of time for some people to get to a store. Not everyone lives or works near the city center where the high street is located. Also, the price of the cost is usually cheaper on e-commerce platforms than in stores. Secondly, people with disabilities, the elderly, and parents with young children can benefit from online shopping as it allows them to receive the products at home. Such people might find it difficult to shop at stores because some have limitations in their mobility due to their circumstances.

However, doing online shopping has the following two disadvantages. Firstly, the packaging required for online shopping creates quite a lot of waste that cannot be reused or recycled. Therefore, it can create detrimental effects to our precious environment. Secondly, you need to predict what you will need in advance, since it still takes some time to receive the product from when you order it online, even though delivery times are constantly decreasing.

In conclusion, the merits of online shopping far outweigh its disadvantages, and thus, it is expected to continue booming and grow in popularity, as more and more people are turning from shopping in-stores to online shopping due to its convenience and price competitiveness.

Sample 6:

Online shopping is becoming increasingly popular nowadays, and more and more people prefer to buy online instead of going to stores. However, this trend has both pros and cons for individuals and companies.

The burgeoning popularity of shopping online can be attributed to numerous decisive benefits. Firstly, the most distinctive advantage is convenience. For example, people can buy products from the comfort of their workplace, own home, or virtually anywhere without the pressure of a salesperson. Besides purchasing from the comfort of their homes or workstation, customers can also save money. With ever-growing fuel prices, shopping online saves them the cost of driving to and from the shop. They can also save time by eluding getting stuck in gridlocked traffic than physical retail stores for online business owners. Furthermore, the shop owners don’t have to hire staff to work and run the shop, therefore, saving a substantial expenditure. Apart from this, online business owners can sell their products to customers without being curbed by geographical distances.

On the flip side, there are security concerns associated with online shopping. To begin with, individuals may suffer from financial loss because computer viruses and hackers constantly tap into online companies and steal customer identities and financial information. Likewise, the lack of support can complicate the exchange or refund process. For example, if a customer finds that the purchased goods are faulty, it may take several days to rectify the issue. In addition, online shoppers have to deal with complaints from customers due to defective goods. And this can affect the credibility of the online stores and eventually influence their business.

In conclusion, although shopping online has made one’s life easy and helped vendors eliminate global boundaries, it has equal cons that cannot be overlooked in this digital era.

Sample 7:

In today’s digital age, the trend of purchasing goods and services online has become increasingly popular. This shift towards online shopping has both advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies.

For individuals, the primary advantage of shopping online is convenience. With just a few clicks, they can browse through a wide range of products, compare prices, and make purchases without leaving the comfort of their homes. This not only saves time and effort but also provides access to a variety of products that may not be available locally. Additionally, online shopping often offers better deals and discounts, allowing individuals to save money on their purchases.

On the other hand, there are also disadvantages for individuals when it comes to online shopping. One of the main concerns is the risk of fraud and identity theft. Providing personal and financial information online can make individuals vulnerable to cybercrime. Furthermore, the inability to physically inspect products before purchase can lead to dissatisfaction with the quality or fit of the item.

For companies, the advantages of online shopping include the ability to reach a wider audience and reduce overhead costs. By having an online presence, companies can target customers beyond their local market and expand their customer base. Additionally, operating an online store eliminates the need for physical storefronts, reducing expenses related to rent, utilities, and staffing.

However, companies also face challenges when it comes to online shopping. One of the main disadvantages is the intense competition in the online marketplace. With countless businesses vying for attention, companies must invest in marketing and advertising to stand out. Additionally, the logistics of shipping and handling returns can be complex and costly for companies.

In conclusion, while online shopping offers convenience and cost-saving opportunities for both individuals and companies, it also presents risks and challenges. It is essential for both parties to weigh the pros and cons before engaging in online transactions.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP