2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án (Phần 13)

Sample 1:

In today's world, the ability to create films is no longer monopolized by large corporations, thanks to the accessibility afforded by digital technology. While some argue that this shift may have adverse effects, I firmly believe it should be viewed as a positive development.

Admittedly, there are significant drawbacks to the democratization of film production, the most prominent being a potential decline in product quality. When anyone can produce films, there is a lack of stringent selection or screening processes seen with professional companies. This can result in the proliferation of low-quality films, lacking in timeliness or professionalism, ultimately disappointing audiences and tarnishing the industry's reputation. Additionally, independent film production can lead to copyright and intellectual property management issues. Without oversight from large production companies, managing these aspects becomes challenging, potentially resulting in copyright infringement, legal disputes, or ethical violations, eroding trust within the industry.

However, despite these drawbacks, the benefits outweigh the concerns. Firstly, it brings diversity and unique creativity to the film industry. With individuals and independent groups contributing, each brings a distinct perspective, fostering a range of works that reflect society's multidimensionality. This diversity enriches audiences' experiences, broadening their understanding of the world. Secondly, the widespread use of digital technology in film production provides equal opportunities and wide access for everyone. Removing financial and technical barriers allows individuals and groups with limited resources to express themselves and share their stories, fostering development and creativity in the industry.

In conclusion, while challenges such as quality concerns and copyright issues exist, the democratization of film production should be celebrated for fostering creativity and providing equal opportunities and access for all.

Sample 2:

Thanks to the advancement of digital technology, it is now possible for almost anyone to make a film. Personally, I think this is a positive development, and will discuss the issue in the following essay.

Firstly, with the advancement of personal electronic devices, such as smartphones, computers, and digital cameras, making films is now reasonably simple for many people. This advancement has therefore allowed film-making to become a hobby and creative outlet for many people around the world. There are even many apps available these days that allow people to shoot and edit short films on their smartphones, and then upload the content to social media and other platforms for people to see. Secondly, producing films is not only a hobby for some people, but also a passion and a career goal. Now, with such technology available, even those who do not have the opportunity to formally study filmography at university, or those with a natural talent for film-making are able to follow their dreams.

Besides being beneficial for those seeking creative expression, this development is also positive in other ways. In the past couple of decades, Hollywood movies have become repetitive and boring for many people, and thanks to the development of technology, many creative directors and film-makers who may not have been able to produce their films or release them to the mainstream public are now able to thanks to the internet and digital technology. This has allowed for a greater diversity of films and videos for people to see. And finally, technology has now allowed people to create documentaries about important issues in society and publish them online to inform people about pressing issues, such as the environment. In the past, what films and documentaries people were able to see was limited to what was produced by large film producing companies, whose main concerns were making profits.

In conclusion, although there may be some minor drawbacks of this development, they are far outweighed by the benefits that it brings.

Sample 3:

Small firms are gradually being recognized for the films they produce as technological advancement becomes more significant. In my opinion, this development could have both positive and negative consequences in equal measure.

On the one hand, the ease with which films can be created these days brings certain benefits to both the film industry and society. First, since an increasing number of filmmakers are able to make movies with the help of digital technology, it brings more diversity and novelty to the movie market. A level playing field, hence, would be created to provide either small filmmakers or movie tycoons with equal opportunities. In fact, more and more Oscars and Cannes have been awarded to a myriad of low-budget producers. Second, the rise in film production creates more jobs, reducing unemployment. For example, the proliferation of film production requires an abundance of actors, actresses and film technicians.

On the other hand, audiences might be burdened with some drawbacks of this digital development, specifically the content and quality of the movies. Unlike cellulose films, films which are recorded on computers and distributed through the Internet seem hard to censor. Viewers, consequently, may be bombarded with a wide range of low-quality movies. Moreover, with the ease of producing films, there is a higher chance of movies containing offensive scenes, thereby accidentally causing certain groups of people to become victims of social criticism. The LGBTQ+ community is transformed into antagonists in some Indian Bollywood productions.

In conclusion, as digital equipment is widely accessible, I believe there will be a variety of equal opportunities for small and big film producers, and the unemployment rate in a country would decrease. However, the ever-rising offensive content and the downturn in movie quality are considered as two main problems arising from the development.

Sample 4:

Due to the progress in digital technology, nearly everyone can now engage in filmmaking. In my opinion, this constitutes a favorable advancement, which I will elaborate on in the subsequent essay.

Firstly, with the advancement of personal electronic devices, such as smartphones, computers, and digital cameras, making films is now reasonably simple for many people. This advancement has therefore allowed film-making to become a hobby and creative outlet for many people around the world. There are even many apps available these days that allow people to shoot and edit short films on their smartphones, and then upload the content to social media and other platforms for people to see. Secondly, producing films is not only a hobby for some people, but also a passion and a career goal. Now, with such technology available, even those who do not have the opportunity to formally study filmography at university, or those with a natural talent for film-making are able to follow their dreams.

Furthermore, apart from benefiting those in search of artistic expression, this progression also yields positive outcomes in various aspects. Over the past few decades, Hollywood productions have grown repetitive and monotonous to many viewers. However, thanks to technological advancements, numerous creative directors and filmmakers who might have previously struggled to produce or distribute their works to a wider audience can now do so through the internet and digital platforms. Consequently, there is now a wider array of films and videos available for consumption. Moreover, technology enables individuals to create documentaries addressing crucial societal issues and share them online, thereby raising awareness on pressing matters such as environmental concerns. Previously, access to films and documentaries was largely restricted to productions by major studios primarily driven by profit motives.

To summarize, while there may exist minor drawbacks associated with this trend, its benefits far outweigh them.

Sample 5:

It is an inevitable and irreversible trend, nowadays, the movie industry has brought large impact on societies across the globe. It is observed that not only giant enterprises are making movies today but also anyone who can access digital technology can make motion pictures. It could be regarded as a progressive approach; the reasons for which are the advent of technology and quality production at an affordable cost.

The foremost aspect to be considered in this context is that a wide range of talented artistes can make spectacular movies. To elaborate, with the advent of modern technologies people can utilize varieties of gadgets and software applications to make movies, even if they are not well- equipped with modern high-cost gadgets. Talented film aspirants have been making short films by the use of simple low-cost gadgets. This is an ideal example in this regard. The contributions, as a consequence, to the film industry around the world are likely to be increased by the use of digital technology by unreputed talented artistes and artists.

Another notable factor is that the quality and standard of films that are made with the help of modern digital technology is unparallel compared to the films which are produced from traditional way and technology. To make it clear, people are adaptive with respect to the changing paradigm shift, and they would always like to watch modern film making rather than the traditional way of making movies. To cite an example, films that are made with the help of digital technology have collected huge amounts of money since such blockbusters are widely accepted by the audience around the world. Films that are made, as such, with the help of digital technology have excellent standards and are widely accepted.

Overall, having analysed the positive aspects of trend, it appears to me, in all likelihood, that not a huge number of talented artists can make films but also the standard of films production can be improved by using digital technology in movie production. Had digital technology become more popular, it would have produced an inexplicable revolution in the entertainment industry.

Sample 6:

The democratisation of film has led to greater opportunity as well as fears as to the future of filmmaking. In my opinion, this is a largely positive development as it opens up the medium for a more diverse range of socieconomic voices.

The main reason that film purists resist the digital revolution is it brings down the quality of films. A good example of this is when digital film first burst onto the scene and started to replace film around the turn of the century. The initial complaints from viewers were that the film looks better and digitally shot movies have a cheap aesthetic akin to a soap opera. As digital film has proliferated beyond studios looking to cut costs, it has exponentially increased the number of films made by amateurs. This naturally leads to movies with bad acting, clumsily written dialogue and poor overall production values.

Despite the admitted cons listed above, digital film has given a voice to less wealthy filmmakers who tend to be of a different class and ethnicity. There are countless examples of students who film digitally, post their video on YouTube and become internet sensations. Many of these new perspectives are outside of the predominantly white, male, heterosexual homogenity of Hollywood. It is increasingly possible for LGBT themes to surface in these shorts and for ethnic minorities around the world to break through. The most striking evidence is simply comparing the major movies made 50 years ago with the diverse range of cinema on offer today.

In conclusion, although there are drawbacks in terms of quality those are mitigated by novel themes from underrepresented demographics. Studios should pay heed and relax their control over an ever-promising industry.

Sample 7:

Unlike many years ago when cinematography was exclusive to large companies, films made by individuals using their own devices have enjoyed increasing popularity in recent years. I am of the opinion that this is more likely to have positive consequences.

The fact that filmmaking is increasingly more accessible has helped add variety to cinematography. Movies made by big companies, on the one hand, are restricted to a handful of themes and backgrounds, several of which are even heavily censored. On the other hand, films made by potential filmmakers, albeit amateur, transcend barriers of ethnicities and backgrounds. Around 400-500 movies are made by Hollywood every year, many of which are Americentric and revolve around superheroes, romance, thrillers and comedies. Meanwhile, with a phone sitting in our pockets and film editing applications at our disposal, that number can add up to millions, with more themes covered and a great array of settings shown.

Additionally, easy access to filming technology helps discover hidden talented people. Thanks to video-sharing platforms such as YouTube or Facebook, several unknown people have attained resounding success just by one or two short films. In Vietnam, for example, a lot of amateur movie-making teams have become overnight sensations by posting short comedies and web dramas onto their sites. Although those films are low-budget, they are well–received by the general public, and many aspiring actors, actresses, and directors are discovered and eventually shot to fame. The Sundance Film Festival, once a low-profile venue for small-budget creators, has become a media extravaganza for new talents now that more and more independent movie creators are able to make films using their own devices.

Inconclusion, my firm conviction is that the widespread popularity of amateur films thanks to the advent of technology is a welcome trend, for it adds spices to the film industry and promotes aspiring individuals wishing to pursue professional film careers.

Sample 8:

The contemporary era is an era of modernization. In the past, due to the lack of technological progress, only large production companies could make films. However, this is no longer the case in the modern world. Small business firms or even individuals can also produce films. In my opinion, this is a positive development both for the country and for the trainees. Therefore, I will explain the positive effects of this modern phenomenon in the following essay.

To commence with, the expansion encourages the creation of new companies. To be more specific, more talented teenagers are willing to start their own field, thus avoiding the elite leaving the countries and hence boosting the national economy as a thriving film industry can boost a country's position in the international market. Moreover, the film is an indicator of public morality. If film production becomes active, the social morale of the nation will improve. For example, the popularity of Hollywood film companies not only better entertains locals in America, but also encourages foreign immigration.

Furthermore, the growth in the number of small film studios is expected to reduce the unemployment rate in the country. For example, unemployed people can start a film directing business if they are interested in acting. In addition, it gives more opportunities for young actors and actresses to express themselves on the screen. On the other hand, cinema is seen as an art form and entertainment. With the positive development of the film industry, the culture and traditions will be strengthened and thus provide the best national rating in the world.

To conclude, the evolution of the film industry could nurture more elites and young talented teenagers to participate in captivating films, which could then reduce unemployment and boost social morality and the nation's economic market. Therefore, this new trend is increasingly recommended as a positive achievement.

Sample 1:

The idea of investing government funds in placing more works of art in towns and cities to enhance their appeal is a topic that prompts varying opinions. While there are merits to this proposal, I still strongly disagree with this suggestion.

Advocates of this notion argue that art installations in public spaces can significantly contribute to the aesthetics and cultural richness of towns and cities. They may well argue that such initiatives can create visually pleasing environments, possibly fostering a sense of community and attracting tourists. Furthermore, public art can serve asc, heritage, and values, promoting a sense of pride among residents. This can be seen in Vietnam where several sculptures of heroes and historical figures are displayed in squares or roundabouts so that their citizens can remember the contributions made by those people.

Nevertheless, I am firmly against this policy for reasons related to the deterioration of artworks and the presence of more pressing issues. Regarding the former, exposure to harsh weather elements like rain, snow, and sunlight can cause fading, corrosion, or other forms of damage to the artworks, thereby reducing its aesthetic appeal. This issue may be exacerbated due to acts of vandalism or graffiti on these installations which can significantly diminish the visual appeal and overall impact of art pieces. Another argument is that there are more pressing issues that demand government attention and financial resources. Focusing on art installations might be seen as a luxury expenditure rather than addressing the immediate needs of the population.

In conclusion, while the idea of enhancing towns and cities with more art installations might seem appealing at first glance, it may not be the most prudent way for governments to allocate limited resources.

Sample 2:

The proposal to utilize government funds for the incorporation of artworks such as paintings and statues in urban areas, with the aim of augmenting their allure, has gained support in recent years. While I recognize the underlying rationale of this perspective, I argue that other facets of urban development should take precedence over enhancing the attractiveness of these areas.

Indeed, there are valid reasons to advocate for government-sponsored art in cities. Artistic installations in public spaces can dramatically transform the aesthetic and cultural landscape of an area. They serve as symbols of cultural identity, reflecting the history and values of the community. Art in public spaces also provides accessibility to cultural experiences for a broader demographic, breaking down the barriers of traditional art galleries and museums. Cities like Barcelona, adorned with Gaudí's architectural masterpieces, exemplify how art can become a cornerstone of urban identity and appeal, drawing tourists and locals alike.

However, the appeal of urban areas relies on more than just aesthetic enhancements. Crucial aspects like infrastructure, green spaces, and public services play a pivotal role in making cities livable and attractive. Efficient public transportation systems, well-maintained parks, and quality public services are fundamental to the daily lives of residents and can significantly impact a city's appeal. For instance, the attractiveness of cities like Vienna and Copenhagen is not just thanks to their artistic heritage but also their emphasis on high-quality public services and sustainable urban planning. Therefore, while art can enrich urban spaces, the allocation of government funds should prioritize these essential elements that directly impact the quality of life and functionality of a city.

To conclude, although the integration of art in urban spaces has its merits, I maintain that government funding should be more strategically directed towards improving fundamental urban infrastructure and services. These elements are crucial in enhancing the overall attractiveness and livability of towns and cities, far beyond the aesthetic contributions of art alone.

Sample 3:

Some people suggest that in order to improve the quality of life in cities, more state budget should be spent erecting monuments and providing paintings. However, in my opinion, this does not seem to be a practical idea.

First and foremost, the construction of monuments and statues occupies not only significant financial resources but also large quantities of land. Paintings, while perhaps not taking up much space, demand frequent preservation from deterioration due to natural damage. Offering more works of art is an interesting idea to help promote the living space inside cities, but not at any cost, especially when urban land funds are becoming increasingly scarce. Meanwhile, to enrich the cultural and spiritual life of a city, there are other feasible and more long-term measures, including developing sport centers, museums, libraries, and bookstores.

Moreover, the government is also presented with other priorities, such as infrastructural, medical, and environmental issues, to name but a few. Building, maintaining, and upgrading traffic infrastructure, for instance, requires substantial allocation. The need for advanced medical centers is also enormous, particularly in the context of post-COVID health decline across the community. Formulating and implementing environmental policies is yet another urgent task, given the accelerating threat of climate change. All of these are among the pressing issues to be addressed if life quality in cities is to be enhanced.

In conclusion, although many people emphasize the need to supplement city life with more pieces of art such as statues and paintings, I rather doubt the practicality of this notion, considering, first, the resources it would require and, second, other priorities.

Sample 4:

In contemporary urban planning discussions, the idea of governments investing in public art to enhance the appeal of towns and cities is a topic of ongoing debate. While some argue that this strategy can contribute to more attractive and culturally rich urban spaces, I disagree with it for several reasons below.

On the one hand, proponents argue that public art installations can transform mundane urban environments into vibrant and aesthetically pleasing spaces, thereby attracting tourists and residents alike. For instance, cities like Barcelona and Paris have successfully integrated public art into their urban landscapes, creating open-air galleries that not only attract tourists but also provide locals with a sense of pride and cultural identity. By showcasing local artists' work or representing the city's history through sculptures, towns and cities can cultivate a unique character that resonates with both residents and visitors.

However, I argue that allocating public funds to art installations might not necessarily address the urgent needs of a community. Specifically, many towns and cities grapple with critical issues such as poor infrastructure, insufficient healthcare facilities, and limited educational resources. This makes prioritizing the creation of public art undesirable since these crucial aspects form the backbone of community development and directly impact residents’ well-being. Additionally, the subjective nature of art could make it challenging to ensure widespread public appreciation and engagement. In other words, different individuals might have diverse tastes and preferences when it comes to artistic expressions, potentially leading to a lack of consensus within the community or even a public backlash.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that governments should not invest substantially in erecting works of art in metropolitan areas as the subjective nature of art might not ensure widespread public appreciation while more pressing social concerns deserve further funding.

Sample 5:

Today, there is an ongoing discussion about whether the government should invest in art and statues supposedly to improve the quality of life in cities. In my opinion, investment in art and culture is essential to a functioning society.

It has been said that a problem with funding art paintings and statues is that it takes away money from more essential infrastructure projects. It might be argued that issues like poverty and pollution are much more urgent and affect the economy in a more profound way. For example, great wealth inequality as well as poor air quality could lead to greater crime and worsening mental health issues for those in the lower social strata. Hence, instead of focusing on art and culture, some may suggest that the money be used for creating more opportunities for disadvantaged people.

On the other hand, I argue that an appreciation for art and culture, reflected in things such as paintings and statues, is essential for a cohesive society. While bread and butter gives individuals a means to survival, art and culture could be said to provide people with meaning that extends beyond mere subsistence. Societies where people only work and are unaware of the history and culture reflected in cultural artefacts, I argue, would have no means of expressing a collective identity. Since humans can only see ourselves within a larger context, be it historically or culturally, investment in these areas is necessarily essential to well-being.

Overall, therefore, I believe that while there are economic arguments against funding art projects and statues, I believe that they give people meaning and as such are essential to a healthy society; it is thus vital that governments continue to protect these artifacts.

Sample 6:

Some feel governments should invest more in public art in cities to boost the quality of life. Personally, I am in disagreement with this idea because it has little actual importance for the average citizen.

On the one hand, public art beautifies a city. A city stripped of all art gives off the dreary appearance of being purely for utilitarian value and the daily rigour of work. In contrast, cities that have invested heavily in public art, such as New York City, offer their residents a beautiful and inspiring home. A child who sees sculptures and murals walking home will feel the city is a nicer place to live and workers passing by works of art will have some emotional relief from the demands of the day. This not only builds up the character of urban areas for local inhabitants and instills a sense of pride, but also attracts tourists and professional artists to the city, both of which contribute to a vibrant city.

Nonetheless, public art has little quantifiable positive value. Most city-dwellers are too engrossed in their hectic schedules to notice public art. This art, therefore, means nothing to most locals, while also diverting an outsized share of a city’s budget. There are other more vital areas requiring development such as high-end infrastructure, well-rounded healthcare systems, and modern recreational facilities. Moreover, the public space used to house these works of art cannot be used for practical purposes including critical public facilities like restrooms, bus stops or parks. Those who rely on these other facilities will have more trouble finding them and their quality of life may be somewhat impacted by a preference for art.

Despite the aesthetic value of public art, government bodies should focus more on urban issues that truly matter to their constituents. There must be a degree of balance, but it should always tip more towards pragmatic concerns.

Sample 7:

It is often argued that government funding should be allocated to artworks in public spaces. While this argument seems relatively reasoned in aesthetic and social terms, I assert that this money would be more beneficially invested elsewhere.

Proponents of the given notion may rationalize that large-scale sculptures or statues can serve as decorations or even landmarks, enhancing the overall appeal of their cities or towns. As a result, they can create hotspots attracting both locals and visitors, fostering social interactions and a sense of community in the whole area. Such art pieces, nonetheless, may not accomplish these intended objectives, possibly attributable to their subjective nature. The public may not express advocacy, but even opposition, towards abstract murals or installations that challenge societal norms, making expenditures in art unnecessary and wasteful.

Under this line of reasoning, I contend that the state budget should be spent on areas more essential than art. Healthcare would be one of them because, despite its pivotal role in citizens' well-being, it may be underfunded. If received more proper funding, hospitals would mitigate overload while constructing more modern facilities and equipping sufficient medical devices, thereby contributing to better public health. Education is another area more worth the investment than public art. A large number of children, especially those in rural or mountainous areas, lack proper schooling, consequently perpetuating poverty and hindering economic growth. Hence, what the authorities should be doing to alleviate such issues is allocating sufficient resources to ensure equitable access to education for all individuals.

In conclusion, while public art potentially brings a few minor virtues to societies, I would argue that the national budget should instead be directed to more vital services including healthcare and education, facilitating a more comprehensive social development.

Sample 8:

Investing public funds in the placement of more works of art, such as paintings and statues, in towns and cities is a topic that sparks debate. While some argue that this enhances the aesthetic appeal and cultural vibrancy of urban areas, I am inclined to disagree with this proposition to a certain extent.

On one hand, supporters of government spending on public art argue that it transforms cities into visually appealing and culturally rich environments. Art has the power to stimulate creativity, spark discussions, and foster a sense of community identity. For instance, cities like Barcelona, known for its public art installations by artists like Antoni Gaudí, have become global tourist attractions. The presence of such artworks can contribute to a city's unique character and attract visitors.

However, it is essential to consider the opportunity cost of allocating public funds to art projects. Towns and cities often face pressing issues such as inadequate infrastructure, education, and healthcare. Channeling funds into art installations might be perceived as a luxury when basic needs are unmet. For example, a city struggling with traffic congestion or a shortage of affordable housing might be better served by prioritizing infrastructure projects over aesthetic enhancements.

In conclusion, while the inclusion of art in urban spaces can undoubtedly contribute to cultural enrichment and tourism, governments must strike a balance. Allocating substantial funds to public art should be approached cautiously, considering the prioritization of pressing needs that directly impact the well-being of the residents. Achieving a harmonious blend of aesthetics and functionality should be the ultimate goal in enhancing the overall appeal of towns and cities.

Sample 9:

The debate on government spending in urban areas often centers around whether to prioritize artistic projects or essential infrastructure. This essay will explore the merits of investing in art to enhance city life against the imperative need for practical urban development, aiming to find a balanced approach to government expenditure.

Proponents of this perspective argue that art infuses cities with cultural vibrancy, thereby elevating the quality of life for residents. For instance, in Hanoi, the installation of murals depicting traditional Vietnamese stories has transformed mundane walls into sources of national pride and tourist attraction. These artistic endeavors not only beautify urban landscapes but also foster a sense of community and historical continuity. However, while the aesthetic and cultural merits of art are undeniable, the question of its prioritization over more pressing urban needs remains contentious.

However, I believe that the government's primary focus should be on addressing more immediate urban issues. Infrastructure improvements, for example, are critical in cities like Ho Chi Minh City, where frequent traffic congestion and inadequate public transportation systems pose daily challenges for millions. Investing in better roads, public transport, and urban planning would not only enhance the functional efficiency of cities but also contribute to the well-being of its inhabitants in a more tangible manner than art installations.

In conclusion, while the incorporation of art in urban spaces can undoubtedly enrich the cultural tapestry of a city, it is imperative that such aesthetic considerations do not overshadow the essential infrastructural developments that directly impact the daily lives of city dwellers. A balanced approach, prioritizing functional necessities while also celebrating artistic expression, would be a more prudent course of action for government spending.

Sample 10:

It is believed by some that governments should allocate funds to install more works of art, such as paintings and statues, in towns and cities to enhance their attractiveness. Although there are certain arguments against this viewpoint, I believe that such an initiative should be put into practice. 

On the one hand, opponents argue that more practical and immediate needs, such as infrastructure, education, and healthcare should receive greater allocation of the national budget, which is often limited in most countries around the world.

Obviously, these areas are vital for a country to function well and have a direct impact on the well-being and livelihood of citizens, whereas art may be considered as a kind of luxury that serves the sole purpose of enhancing the aesthetic appeal of a city. 

However, the economic benefits that public art brings to a country should not be downplayed. Sculptures or statues can turn towns and cities into vibrant and culturally rich spaces, and such aesthetically pleasing cities are more likely to not only boost tourist activities but also attract businesses and investors, thus contributing to the development of the local economy and generating more employment opportunities.

In this way, the indirect economic advantages of public art can offset its initial costs and contribute to the overall prosperity of citizens’ lives.  

Moreover, public art functions as a vehicle for expressing and enriching culture. When governments integrate a variety of artistic expressions into public spaces, they actively contribute to shaping the cultural identity of a community. This exposure to a range of art forms serves as an educational and inspirational experience for residents, nurturing feelings of pride and fostering an appreciation for cultural diversity.

In conclusion, while there are reasonable concerns related to the allocation of limited resources, the benefits of public art in enhancing the cultural and economic fabric of a community are adequate compensation for the initial costs involved in setting up art projects in cities and towns. 

Sample 11:

It has long been a debatable issue whether governments should spend on the beautification of towns and cities through works of art, like statues and paintings. I agree with the given statement and in the following essay I will put forth my views in support of my argument.

Art has always been an inseparable part of our lives as it helps us express ourselves and instills happy feelings in us. Putting up statues or sculptures in open areas gives an opportunity to people to enjoy it and acts as a distraction from the monotony of everyday activities. Research has proved that appreciating art helps people relieve stress. In addition, during tough times, people need some form of art to release tension. It could be through music, dance, painting, etc. Having sculptures, statues or murals in public places gives an access to people from all strata of society to enjoy art and refresh their mind.

Moreover, installing statues in public places is not only a way to commemorate a famous historical figure, but also is an interesting way for children to learn about the history or the accomplishments of that person. India has a rich culture and history and in most of the towns and cities there are statues of famous persons or those depicting historical events. For example, in my hometown, there is a statue of Dr. B.R Ambedkar. Everyone who passes by that statue reads about him and the children are fascinated by it and know all about Dr. Ambedkar.

Another added advantage is that statues become a tourist attraction and people like to visit places which have a rich history, art and culture. This helps the local business and thus, helps make the economy of the place better. For example, the Rock Garden in Chandigarh has modern sculptures made of trash, which attracts a lot of tourists from all over the world.

No doubt, the government should focus more on other more important issues, like poverty, unemployment, illiteracy, etc. However, art should also not take a backseat and should be focused on to make the cities and the country more beautiful and attractive, for the residents and for those who visit.

In conclusion, I would reiterate that art cannot be separated from our lives and importance should be given to making a place more appealing, by installing works of art, like sculptures, statues and paintings in public places.

Sample 1:

Today, it is often argued that elaborate descriptions of criminal activities on printed newspapers and social media should be limited because of their numerous adverse effects. Personally, I disagree with this notion and will offer my opinion in the following essay.

Granted, there are several drawbacks of displaying detailed criminal information in the media. Firstly, the descriptions of brutal and serious offences could promote a strong sense of insecurity and anxiety among the general public in society. Consequently, many people may feel disinclined to socialize with others around or help strangers in need, especially those they think are potentially suspicious, which may render the community less close-knit and more cold-hearted. Secondly, elaborate criminal descriptions could adversely affect offenders to a great extent even after successful rehabilitation programs. This is because the human mind is capable of remembering detailed information of criminal acts people abhor, which possibly prompts them to still harshly discriminate against ex-offenders.

Nevertheless, I would argue that elaborately provided criminal descriptions are of huge benefit to the tightening of social security. On being publicly shown to the masses, these depictions can inform citizens of meticulous or intricate forms of illegal acts. Therefore, people will be encouraged to take more precautions or equip themselves with necessary tools to avoid such undesirable situations. For instance, thanks to the detailed reports of widespread crimes over the past few years, some Vietnamese households have already begun to install surveillance cameras and alarm bells which can timely alert these families to cases of thefts. Without these careful criminal descriptions, they might have been unable to take such appropriate measures to prevent serious offences.

In conclusion, despite the view that restrictions on showing detailed criminal descriptions in the media should be imposed, it is my firm conviction that this type of information would prove valuable to social security in the long term.

Sample 2:

There is a school of thought that believes the media content involving meticulous description of crime could have negative impacts and so it should be limited. From my point of view. I agree that this type of content has more drawbacks than advantages to general viewers.

There are some valid reasons why some accept the presence of criminal content in the media. One proposition is that this type of information could be educational regarding one's security and safety. News concerning crimes or true crime documentaries could educate everyone about criminals' minds and the typical ways a crime is committed, which could help people to be more alert if they ever encounter such dangerous situations. However. these kinds of information could be delivered via a more standardized and textual way rather than gruesome images which could possibly be traumatizing to some.

I would opine that media censorship on meticulous criminal accounts is necessary for the well-being and security of society. Detailed descriptions of unlawful conduct via mass media could unintentionally encourage law-breaking by giving demonstrations or instructions to potential law offenders on how to commit a crime. In many mass shooting cases in the U.S., it is common that the suspects have high exposure to uncensored violent and criminal content. Another justification is this type of information may be triggering to the public. Fear and anxiety could easily be spread within the society when citizens may consider their community unsafe as too many cruel acts are reported.

All things considered, while some kind of criminal content is essential for educational purposes, a meticulous description of law-breaking acts could pose potential hazards to our safety. Thus, it is reasonable that this type of content should be subject to censorship and be closely regulated.

Sample 3:

The advent of diverse multimedia platforms has facilitated the widespread dissemination of detailed information about crimes, including graphic depictions and images, which are readily available to audiences. However, this trend has ignited debates regarding the potential hazards of such content, leading to calls for restrictions. I firmly concur that the drawbacks of this type of content outweigh the benefits.

Access to comprehensive portrayals of crime can indeed offer valuable insights into criminal behaviour and spur individuals to take preventive measures. For example, revealing a serial killer's modus operandi could assist law enforcement in suspect identification and prevention of further incidents, while also enabling the public to adopt protective measures. However, it's crucial to consider the potential psychological ramifications for the public. Instead of graphic depictions, standardised and written methods may serve as a more effective and less distressing approach for raising awareness.

There are, however, profound drawbacks associated with the dissemination of graphic crime content that cannot be overlooked. One of the primary concerns is the potential to induce unnecessary fear and anxiety among the audience. Graphic details of crimes, when widely circulated, can lead to a sense of panic and apprehension in communities, regardless of the low probability of similar crimes occurring in their vicinity. This can result in increased stress levels, decreased sense of safety, and harmful vigilantism. Furthermore, the sensationalisation or over-representation of certain crimes in media can reinforce negative stereotypes about specific groups of people, such as racial or ethnic minorities. This can lead to serious repercussions for these groups, including increased discrimination, harassment, and even violence. For instance, media coverage that disproportionately emphasises the race or ethnicity of a criminal can fuel prejudice and discrimination against members of that group.

In conclusion, while it is critical for the public to stay informed about crime trends and safety measures, the distribution of detailed crime information should be handled responsibly. It should consider potential psychological impacts on viewers and avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes. In this way, we can balance the need for public safety information with the need to maintain societal harmony and individual psychological well-being.

Sample 4:

The detailed depiction of criminal activities in newspapers and on television has sparked a debate regarding its potential negative influences. I totally agree that such information should be restricted in the media due to its detrimental effects on viewers, particularly vulnerable youths, and the way it aids potential criminals.

One major reason to support the restriction of detailed criminal descriptions is that they can encourage viewers, especially impressionable youngsters, to violate the law. Teenagers, driven by curiosity and the desire to make an impression, might replicate crimes they see detailed in the media. Their vulnerable mentality and lack of experience make them susceptible to such influences. For example, in 2017, a 13-year-old boy in Ohio was arrested for attempting to create a homemade bomb after following a detailed tutorial he found online. This incident underscores how exposure to explicit crime-related content can lead to juvenile delinquency, which can become rampant if left unchecked.

Another reason is that detailed descriptions of crimes can serve as a manual for would-be criminals, complicating efforts by law enforcement to combat crime efficiently. Although the intention behind crime reporting is often to warn the public and educate them on avoiding similar situations, it can have the opposite effect. For instance, during the late 1970s, the "Son of Sam" murders in New York City received extensive media coverage. The detailed accounts of David Berkowitz's crimes potentially inspired copycat killings and hindered the police's ability to gather information and apprehend him quickly. This example highlights the unintended consequences of detailed crime reporting, which can inadvertently assist criminals in honing their methods.

In conclusion, the restriction of detailed criminal descriptions in the media is necessary to prevent the encouragement of illegal activities among young viewers and to hinder the education of potential criminals.

Sample 5:

The increased degree of freedom in media reports has allowed exposure of crime cases to come forth in a detailed manner, which certainly arouses a great deal of concern. In light of this, some people believe there should be restrictions on such information. From my perspective, I agree that censorship should be imposed on the descriptions of crime.

There are several reasons why the focus of newspapers and television on high-profile crimes should be more carefully regulated. The group most affected by the news media's coverage of violence and victimization is crime victims. This is because media coverage that is sometimes viewed as insensitive, voyeuristic, and uncaring can largely violate victims' privacy and inflict their emotional and psychological suffering. Not only that, but the general public also seldom benefits from this exposure to crime details. In fact, these descriptions can not only cause discomfort but also arouse apprehension about the impacts on young people. Besides, it is likely that potential offenders would be instigated and incited to commit crimes, since they might regard detailed media coverage as a form of guidance.

It is undeniable that the coverage of crime cases can be helpful and, in some cases, even healing.

Some would also suggest that the media have the obligation to keep the public well informed about trends in crime. Indeed, the media play a significant role in public safety by keeping citizens

apprised of essential information on criminal affairs, such as new patterns of fraud, ways to assist

victims and measures to prevent crime. However, the extent to which the media can cover about

these cases should be censored carefully by avoiding excessively detailed descriptions, so that they can accurately cover crime stories with the least amount of trauma to the victim and negative

repercussions on the public.

In conclusion, although newspapers and television need to raise the public awareness of key information on crime cases, I contend that restrictions should be imposed on excessive descriptions of details, in order to mitigate the detrimental consequences.

Sample 6:

It is argued that reporting crimes in detail in printed newspapers and on television is detrimental; therefore, it should be limited. I completely agree with this notion since it gives rise to criminal acts and people’s anxiety.

The first reason for my view that crimes should not be reported meticulously is because it encourages viewers to violate the laws. More specifically, numerous teenagers tend to follow or replicate infractions presented with detailed procedures, methods and tools mainly because they have great curiosity, or they want to make a grand impression by proving that they can be better than the person who committed the original crime. For instance, Shinochiro Azima, a 14-year-old student in Japan killed two students in 1997 by cutting off their heads after watching a documentary about an American criminal, the Zodiac Killer, who performed the same acts. As he was being interrogated, he admitted that he imitated this horrible act since he wanted to impress other people. Consequently, this may pose a threat to social stability due to growing crime rates.

Another justification for why I oppose the detailed presentation of crimes via the mass media is that members of the public’s anxiety can be triggered. This is because they may consider their community unsafe and then hesitate to connect with others as too many cruel acts are reported in the media. They would likely feel afraid of being a victim of a potential crime and constantly experience a sense of insecurity. As a result, it could lead to a loose-knit community where people are not willing to support those in need.

In conclusion, I strongly oppose the idea of presenting detailed crime reports in newspapers and television because it provokes more individuals to be driven to crime and arouses people’s apprehension. It is advisable that the details of the crimes should be completely banned to minimise its adverse impacts on viewers.

Sample 7:

The restriction of legal violation scenes shown via media channels should be introduced by the related authorities due to their detrimental impacts. From my perspective, I would express my strong opposition to that suggestion as broadcasting criminal cases through multimedia sites is beneficial in terms of educating citizens and exercising caution in dealing with serious offenses.

On the one hand, the detailed description of crimes in newspapers and on TV would be disadvantageous due to the possibility that people would commit the same criminal acts and display anxiety toward the unsafe society. Regarding the former drawback, showing the wrongdoings of criminals publicly on media networks provides individuals with a clear understanding of how the infringement was conducted, from which they may learn and follow. As a consequence, there are high chances that those people, especially youngsters, would become potential offenders in the future. Not to mention that by televising a myriad of violation occurrences, mental health problems would experience a drastic increase since citizens are prone to develop anxiety toward an unsecured society.

On the other hand, broadcasting more crime scenes on social media websites can be considered a means of education and caution for people. Chief among these is that broadcasting more violations of crimes in combination with their severe punishment plays a pivotal role in eradicating the intention of future offenders. Therefore, the increasing rate of the number of to-be-culprits would be significantly reduced. In addition, by exemplifying in detail the procedure of a breach, individuals would be more well-aware of the feasibility of a criminal case. Thus, they would have a tendency to prepare for approaches to avoid being victims of wrongdoings.

In conclusion, although the display of criminal scenes should be limited due to their potential impact on increasing lawbreakers' and citizens' concerns, I am of the opinion that cases of violation of law should be shown on different media sites to educate and inform people about the risk of those offenses.

Sample 8:

Some people argue that detailed criminal descriptions in newspapers and on TV have negative impacts and should be restricted. In my opinion, restricting the media from reporting on crime in detail is not the solution, and may actually have negative consequences.

Firstly, the media has a responsibility to report on events accurately and objectively, and this includes crimes. Restricting information on criminal activity may lead to misinformation, censorship, and a lack of transparency in the justice system. The media can also play an important role in holding law enforcement agencies accountable by reporting on cases that may have been mishandled or neglected. For example, some countries have implemented regulations that limit the amount of information surrounding criminal cases, including the names and photographs of suspects and victims. As a result, the public has been left with little information about ongoing criminal cases, leading to confusion and rumors about what is happening.

Secondly, the public has a right to be informed about criminal activity in their community. Access to accurate and detailed information can help citizens take necessary precautions to protect themselves and their property. It can also encourage public awareness and involvement in crime prevention efforts. For instance, in a neighborhood with a high incidence of burglaries, law enforcement may provide residents with information on how to secure their homes and property, as well as signs to look out for that may indicate suspicious activity.

In conclusion, while some may argue that detailed criminal descriptions in the media have negative impacts, I believe that the benefits of accurate and transparent reporting on crime far outweigh any potential negative consequences.

Sample 9:

Whenever we turn on TV or read a newspaper, more often than not we can read a lengthy description of atrocious crime, which has become a so-called feature of modern media. I, as one of the common readers, advocate the proposal that such reports should be strictly controlled, if not abolished.

Alarmingly, those criminal descriptions wield adverse influence on the audience, especially fragile youngsters. Due to vulnerable mentality and lack of ample experience, upon contacting violent programmes, those kids are tempted to follow suit, thus breaking the law and such juvenile delinquencies are too often to be ignored. If this trend is out of control, then more teenagers will fall victim to those evil reports.

Moreover, numerous would-be criminals can learn skills of committing crimes from similar cases, also the police find it more formidable to crack down on crimes efficiently. Although the original purpose of crime description is to warn people against offenses and teach them valuable lessons, the fact is that there, indeed, exists a discrepancy between what is desired and what is achieved. The latest research reveals that some habitual lawbreakers have access to criminal skills and even the police's detective methods from TV programmes and newspaper stories about crimes. By contrast, if we restrict strictly the programmes of tackling criminal cases, the ways employed by the police to combat crimes win be kept as the top secret, and it is out of the question to be disclosed to the public, especially those potential offenders.

Granted, criminal content, which is not a usual experience for common, can enhance. the TV rating substantially. Satisfying people's curiosity and adding varieties to choices, those programmes can always attract a larger audience. As for me, however, the overwhelming detriments have overshadowed whatever benefits.

Overall, no matter what excuse media can find for detailed criminal description, there should be a strict regulation to limit such broadcasting. Government and relevant organisations should co-operate fully, guaranteeing healthier circumstances.

Sample 1:

As the younger generations struggle to apply for jobs, they begin to wonder if holding interviews is the best way to assess candidates. I moderately agree that in some cases, interviews are not the best method.

There are many reasons why people are skeptical about using interviews to examine candidates’ qualities. Firstly, an interview does not fully reflect candidates’ abilities, especially for candidates applying to technical positions in the IT and engineering industries. For these positions, the best way to assess their abilities is through tests, such as programming tests, case studies, or teamwork sessions with other candidates. Secondly, it is hard to evaluate candidates through interviews because they can lie. Many people admitted to having lied at least once, especially when asked about their past experiences or projects. For example, many told recruiters that they significantly contributed to projects that they hardly participated in.

However, I still think that recruiters should combine interviews with other evaluations because they are still efficient. The first advantage is that the interview gives both employers and applicants a chance to see if applicants are suitable for the company’s culture. For example, employers can observe candidates’ manners, dress codes, or attitudes, whereas candidates can see how other workers are treated. Another advantage of interviews is that they are quick and easy to conduct. Most employers will spend only 30 minutes interviewing candidates before usually giving a tour around the workplace. This is also the most direct way to communicate with applicants because both parties can discuss sensitive topics that otherwise would be inappropriate to touch on, such as salary, benefits, or workplace culture.

In conclusion, I agree that for technology companies, using only interviews as an assessment during their hiring process is not sufficient. However, recruiters should not eliminate or replace interviews.

Sample 1:

Many parts of the world have adopted laws to curb the working hours of workers. This essay will expound on why safeguarding workers’ health is the primary aim of introducing the Working Hours Limit Act, and I contend that this is a negative development because it endangers the economy by challenging small companies operating in a competitive market.

The primary reason for limiting the working hours of employees is that it safeguards the physical and mental health of an employee.  Excessive hours of work can cause work pressure, and therefore it can lead to stress as well as physical and mental fatigue, which is likely to develop various health issues. By limiting maximum working hours, nations ensure that workers have adequate time to relax and unwind, thus promoting overall well-being. A case in point is Australia's Fair Work Act 2009. The act has enforced standards by setting provisions for maximum working hours, ensuring that employees are not subjected to long working hours that could drive them to exhaustion.

However, tight restrictions on working hours can pose a real threat to business and the economy. To commence with, businesses that require non-stop operations, for instance, transportation, healthcare, or emergency services, can face enormous challenges in providing emergency services if working hours are severely limited. Besides, industries operating in a fiercely competitive environment, it is inevitable that some companies will go out of business, resulting in an adverse impact on the economy. By way of illustration, consider a small business trying to establish itself in a cut-throat world of business may face challenges if its founders cannot dedicate adequate time to business due to the severe working hour restrictions of employees.

To conclude, although limiting working hours promotes employees’ health, I think this is a negative development because it could adversely affect the business and the economy.

Sample 2:

In response to the evolving dynamics of the modern workforce, several countries have implemented laws aimed at restricting working hours for employees. This essay will explore the reasons behind the introduction of such legislation and opine that it constitutes a positive development.

The primary motivation behind the implementation of laws limiting working hours is to safeguard the well-being and health of employees. Prolonged and excessive working hours can lead to physical and mental exhaustion, increasing the risk of stress-related illnesses, burnout, and decreased productivity. By establishing legal limits on working hours, governments seek to promote a healthier work-life balance and protect workers from exploitation by employers who may demand excessive overtime without adequate compensation. In Japan, the government introduced the "Premium Friday" initiative, encouraging companies to allow employees to leave work early on the last Friday of every month. This aimed to address overwork issues, promoting better work-life balance and reducing stress-related health issues.

I believe it is a positive development as limiting working hours can have broader societal benefits, including reducing unemployment rates and stimulating economic growth. By enforcing regulations that cap working hours, governments create opportunities for more individuals to enter the labour market, thereby spreading employment opportunities across a larger segment of the population. Additionally, shorter working hours can lead to increased spending on leisure activities, contributing to the growth of industries such as tourism, entertainment, and hospitality. As employees have more free time due to shorter working hours, they may choose to spend their leisure time travelling to new destinations, dining out at restaurants, or attending concerts and events, stimulating the tourism, entertainment, and hospitality sectors.

In conclusion, the introduction of laws to limit working hours for employees is a positive development that prioritises the well-being of workers and promotes a healthier work-life balance. By ensuring that individuals have sufficient time for rest, leisure, and personal pursuits, such legislation contributes to overall societal welfare and economic prosperity.

Sample 3:

There has been a drastic increase in working hours in many countries and employees have been pushed to work harder and longer without any additional incentives than their wages. Therefore, many countries have passed new laws to control and legitimate working hours. I believe that it will send a positive message to workers, lifting their morale and dedication towards work and should be considered a positive development.

There are numerous examples, all around the world, where companies are making their employees work longer than normal duty hours. This has led to severe problems including employees feeling immense pressure from their employers to meet targets and deadlines. This is one of the pivotal reasons that employees are more susceptible to illness and stress. Therefore, some legislation is required to curb that, and those new laws that restrict working hours are aimed at achieving exactly that. 

Overall, it is a positive development, and those laws have already proved that they are immensely beneficial. Newly introduced rules have substantial impacts on workers' performance and health. These employees have become more responsible and productive. The quality of the work has also increased after applying these rules. In addition to this, people's health conditions have significantly improved. Now they have more time to spend with their family which helped them tremendously mitigate their stress and tensions.

To conclude, I believe that longer working hours have detrimental effects on employees' physical and psychological health and social life. New laws that limit working hours will bring several changes in their lifestyle that would lead them towards a better and more successful professional and social life.

Sample 4:

In response to increasing concerns about worker well-being, several countries have introduced laws to limit working hours for employees. These regulations aim to address a multitude of issues related to health, productivity, and quality of life. In my opinion, these laws are a positive development that significantly benefits both employees and society as a whole.

The primary motivation behind implementing laws to limit working hours is to safeguard employees' health and well-being. Extensive research has shown that prolonged working hours can lead to severe physical and mental health problems, such as chronic stress, burnout, cardiovascular diseases, and depression. For instance, a study conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) revealed that working more than 55 hours per week is associated with a higher risk of stroke and heart disease. By enforcing legal limits on working hours, governments aim to promote a healthier work-life balance, reducing the incidence of such health issues and improving overall productivity. Furthermore, these laws are designed to protect workers from exploitation. In many industries, particularly those with lower wage levels, employers may demand excessive overtime without fair compensation, leading to worker fatigue and dissatisfaction. By capping working hours, these laws ensure that employees are not overburdened and that they receive adequate rest, thereby fostering a more motivated and efficient workforce.

From an economic perspective, limiting working hours can have positive ripple effects on society. Shorter working hours can lead to increased spending on leisure activities, which stimulates sectors such as tourism, entertainment, and hospitality. Additionally, employees with more free time are likely to engage in further education or skills development, ultimately contributing to a more skilled and versatile workforce. For instance, in countries like Germany, where strict working hour regulations are in place, there is a noticeable correlation between regulated work hours and high productivity levels, as well as economic growth.

In conclusion, the introduction of laws to limit working hours is a positive development that addresses critical issues related to health, worker exploitation, and economic growth. By ensuring that employees have a balanced work-life dynamic, these laws contribute to a healthier, more motivated, and more productive society.

Sample 5:

In many countries, it is common for the state to constrain the number of hours a person can work within any given day. In my opinion, this law is designed to discourage exploitation and is decidedly positive overall.

The main reason the average workday is limited by law is that otherwise companies could take advantage of their employees. The evidence for this comes from past centuries before such laws were passed. Around the beginning of the industrial revolution, it was a common practice in European countries for individuals to work 12 to 16 hours a day. If an employee protested, then they might be fired or even physically harmed. Today, there are very few countries where corporations have the ability to make inhumane physical and mental demands on employees.

Limiting a person’s working laws is beneficial to society as it ensures workers have time for themselves. In countries where these laws do not exist or are poorly defined, there may still be instances of child labor or long working days. For example, in several East Asian countries, factory workers must live and work at their jobs with little opportunity for an outside life. In contrast, in countries with strict labor laws, a person possesses more time for family, hobbies, and friends. Free time is one way of guaranteeing a better quality of life and overall satisfaction, benefits which can have ramifications for society as a whole.

In conclusion, laws related to working conditions protect workers and for that reason are positive. It is also essential that countries enforce the laws they have passed.

Sample 6:

An increasing number of nations have enacted laws to protect average working hours. In my opinion, these laws are meant to limit exploitive practices, and they are advantageous if enforced well.

Lawmakers typically argue these reforms defend employees. Before labor laws existed, it was common for corporations to require long working days under extreme conditions. Modern stipulations that limit working hours are responding to these deeply rooted historic concerns. For example, in many developing nations, the labor laws are often not strict, leading to so-called ‘sweatshops’ where employees work long hours in dangerous environments for little pay. This mistreatment has been exposed in the media and now citizens demand better treatment. The laws therefore establish basic guidelines to prevent employees from working excessive hours.

On the whole, these laws are positive as long as they are nuanced and enforced consistently. There are many countries where such laws have been passed but in practice they are not followed, and workers have little recourse to report infractions. These laws must be strictly monitored, including preventing employers from firing employees who make complaints. Moreover, there are possible exceptions. A factory worker, for example, should never be required to work too many hours as they are likely to earn a low wage and put their health at risk. However, many white-collar workers, such as those at a start-up, may desire to work 90+ hour workweeks due to an overriding passion for a project. The law must discriminate between these dissimilar cases.

In conclusion, labor laws related to maximum working hours are meant to safeguard workers’ rights and are positive generally depending on their execution. It is important that governments propose laws they believe are enforceable and beneficial for the whole of society.

Sample 7:

Legislations restricting working hours for employees have been passed by many governments. The directive is believed to be for the benefits of relevant parties; however, I would argue that the negative effects could certainly overshadow its advantages.

To begin with, the compulsory limit which establishes a ceiling for working time can reduce work pressure on employees and prevent them from being forced to work overtime by businesses. Recent surveys show that the vast majority of respondents prefer to work fewer hours because it means they feel less exhausted, are able to spend more time with family, and focus on themselves. In addition, the possibility of increasing work efficiency also provides a basis for regulating hours of employment. As the regulation was proven to facilitate a relaxed work atmosphere, employees are more motivated and show more enthusiasm at work. This can contribute to the development of the company.

Although the proposed legislation has the potential to achieve the above impacts, the problems encountered may still outweigh them. The first issue is the costs that companies have to bear to ensure business progress in case the daily goals have not been met. The expense includes hiring more part-time employees to make up for non- labor inputs. Secondly, when workers have the same number of working hours, the number of people participating in road traffic during rush hours will increase. For example, since Mexico applied the 48- hour workweek policy, the number of vehicles on the street after work shifts has doubled, and traffic congestion has become worsened tremendously.

In conclusion, while there are some obvious merits to the hour restrictions including lessening stress and boosting productivity, it seems to me that the limitation has caused us more issues due to the national scale of its impact.

Sample 8:

Recently, some countries have brought in laws to limit working hours. I think this decision comes from wanting to protect employees’ health and rights, and it is a beneficial one in many ways.

Firstly, from my understanding, I think this development stems from wanting to improve workers’ health, especially if they’re working in an office environment. Many office workers suffer from health problems such as back and neck pains, migraines, and sleep deprivation. Overworking seems to be the common cause of these problems. By restricting working hours, employees have more time to rest, thus improving their health. Another reason why I think countries introduce this law is to protect employees from being abused by employers. For example, it is common nowadays that marketing agency employees are expected to not leave until meeting their deadlines, which means they work overtime without getting paid.

Regardless of the reason, I think that this is something to be encouraged. Firstly, limiting working hours will help improve employees’ moods as they do not have to overwork anymore. As a result, the relationship between corporations and employees improves, leading to a warmer cooperative attitude. Secondly, although it may come as a surprise, there have been studies showing that productivity is boosted by limiting working hours. These studies point out that working shorter shifts will help employees stay more focused as it does not take as much a toll on workers’ physical and mental health, hence improving productivity for the whole workplace. This is especially true for factory workers, as repetitive motions can cause drowsiness, so limiting working hours keeps their minds sharper.

In conclusion, I understand that countries introduced this law to limit working hours to protect employees’ rights and health. I think this is a beneficial development that needs to be encouraged in many more countries.

Sample 9:

Rules and regulations are made to maintain law and order. Some countries have introduced guidelines to reduce working hours for personnel. I consider reducing their stress and maintaining work life balance.

At the outset, the paradigm shift has made people ambitious and in order to earn a lot, individuals sacrifice their leisure time that they usually like to spend with their family. Thus, they escalate their stress and do overwork and reduce their productivity. Therefore, to relieve their stress, the need of curtailing the working hours is felt. Besides, it becomes a herculean task for them to maintain work life balance. They do not remain cheerful, instead they become accustomed to taking pills in order to have a sound sleep. In this way, their efficiency gets decreased, and this is a great threat to the economy of a company and to make them agile and fertile, setting a limit on working hours is necessary. For instance, it could be seen in developed nations as well as developing ones that individuals do work on vacations and lead a miserable life. They remain perplexed and gradually the knot of relationships gets loose and broken relationships make them depressed and they start to shrink the work and loose their efficiency. So, it is dispensable to let them free early.

Furthermore, it is a negative development because people become money minded, and they do not remain outgoing and valuing relationship is no longer needed for them. So, this kind of trend has adverse effects on the lives of job holders. What’s more, if a company is progressing by leaps and bounds, the whole credit goes to its staff. However, if staff is not optimist and shrinks the work then company is unable to make profit and ultimately, country will not progress owing to incapability of entrepreneurs to pay tax on time.

In conclusion, thus it is mandatory to diminish the working hours for the well-being of its employees as well as for the advancement of a company. Satisfying the needs of personnel is the first goal of a company and if they were showing remarkable performances in a specific period of time, then introduction of rules is commendable task of the governments.

Sample 10:

Nowadays, employees have been pushed to endeavour harder and longer in some developing countries. Hence, several countries have enacted laws to restrict working hours. There are numerous motives why the law is needed, which I will discuss in this essay. I believe that restricting the number of hours worked is a positive development for everyone.

One evident reason to present a law to limit working hours is to reduce the companies which set their labourers to work longer than normal duty hours. For instance, the employees obtain jobs over time to elevate their production by spending the same expenditure. However, workers are feeling immense pressure to meet targets and deadlines. Furthermore, another one of the pivotal reasons that employees are more susceptible to illness is primarily their unhealthy lifestyle. In particular, employees who do not have sufficient time to relax or sleep, which can put them at risk of suffering sanity problems, and it leads to spending more money on medical treatments.

There are also benefits to enforcing rules which have substantial impacts on workers’ performance and health. Employees are able to perform the job carefully, which helps prevent potential hazards affecting their safety and that of their surroundings. An illustration, if the employees are responsible to handle hazardous chemicals, it can be deadly if they cannot dispose of it according to the steps or procedures in the guidelines. In addition, people who cut their performance hours will have significantly improved their health conditions. For example, they have more time to stay with their families which helps them tremendously mitigate their stress.

To sum up, excessive works have detrimental effects on the workers’ physical and psychological health. Limiting work hours will bring several changes in their lifestyle that would lead them towards a better and successful life.

Sample 11:

In many countries, governments have enacted restrictions on working hours for jobholders. This essay will discuss the possible reasons why these acts came into force and suggest that this is a positive development because it reaps various benefits.

To commence with, prolonged working hours have been on the rise for many years, resulting in a growing number of employees developing health issues related to work pressure. It is also associated with the mental and social well-being of employees. Every year, long working hours lead to many early deaths from cardiac arrests and ischemic heart disease. For example, in an international study of the loss of life and health associated with working long hours, ILO and WHO joint estimate reveals that around half a million people, in 2017, died from stroke as a result of having worked at least 52 hours a week. The COVID-19 pandemic had also worsened the situation. A case in point is a study of 4.2 million employees from Latin America, Australia, and Europe in 2019, which shed light on the fact that the average working hours had risen by 52.4 minutes. Therefore, there is a justification for states to introduce laws to prohibit long working hours.

Defined working hours laws are a positive development as they prove advantageous to employees and employers. In simple words, reducing working hours helps employees devote their spare time to their family and friends, thereby establishing a healthy personal and professional life. It also enhances their performance and job loyalty which benefits employers. Apart from that, it reduces unemployment. When employees work for limited hours, the necessity of increasing employees to make up for the fewer working hours emerges, which brings down unemployment. It is, therefore, evident that legal maximum working hours is a positive development.

To recapitulate, severe health, social and psychological issues caused by indecent working hours have provoked the authority to adopt laws to limit working hours. It is a positive development as these laws confer various advantages to workers as well as employers.

Sample 12:

There are countries in the world such as the USA, Canada, Australia and many more where a person cannot work for more than 40 hours a week. In my opinion, it is a positive development. In the following paragraphs, I shall discuss why this law was introduced and my arguments to support my views.

This law was mainly introduced to protect the economic rights of the workers and prevent exploitation. It is seen that in places where there is no such law, employees are exploited and instead of normally working from 9 am to 5 pm, they are made to sit in offices from 9 am to 9 pm at no extra pay. Many other benefits of this law such as improvement in the physical and mental health of the employees and better family relations automatically followed.

This law is beneficial because, in this fast-moving world of today, people have become workaholics. In order to satisfy their material desires, they forget to draw a line between work and family. If working hours are fixed, then they have enough time for their family life and leisure. Secondly, overworking leads to stress and can lead to nervous breakdown in extreme cases. People also find time for their regular exercise if working hours are fixed.

Furthermore, having a limit on working hours also helps solve the problem of unemployment. A larger number of people working for a fixed number of hours is better than a lesser number of people working more hours. What is more, it has been proved by researchers that having a limit on the working hours increases the output and productivity of employees. This could be a win-win situation for both the employer and the employee. Finally, it can be said that the chances of exploitation of employees are much less if there is a limit on the working hours.

Some people oppose this law by saying that it is an infringement of rights. They say that if a person has the ability to work more, he should be allowed to work. Sometimes a person may need more money for his personal needs, so it is unfair not to let him work more. Nonetheless, it has been seen that in countries where such laws are there, people have a better life, better working conditions, lesser degree of unemployment and better productivity of employees.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that this law was imposed for the benefit of employees and employers, and it has many advantages.

Sample 13:

Free time allows the person to step back from stress not only physically but mentally as well. Nowadays, few nations are inclining towards reducing employees’ job hours. I will discuss why this law has been established alongside the development it has brought in people’s life.

Commencing with the myriad reasons why this law has been launched. First and foremost, it has established work-life balance in people’s lives. In recent times, the majority of individuals juggle for maintaining equilibrium between home and professional life. For instance, In New Zeeland, Guardian company has adopted for four days work week and found that 78% of their employee strength is able to maintain uniformity in their work and personal life. Thus, it helps people to maintain peace between both worlds. Moreover, it boosts mental happiness among personnel as they will be able to spend additional time with their loved ones and nurture family values. Therefore, it ameliorates family bonds and reduces health issues as people will be content and stress-free.

In my opinion, it is a positive development. Primarily, it has proliferated employee’s productivity level as employees are pleased mentally so they are able to finish tasks with a clear mind. Apart from this, this approach is environmentally-friendly. Multitudes who will travel to the office will be less for a day, resulting in decreased carbon dioxide emission. Also, plastic wastage will be little for a day. Therefore, this perspective is eco-friendly.

In conclusion, curbing working hours has ample merits. However, some service base companies cannot proceed with this technique, but they should try to look for alternatives to achieve contentment among workforces.