2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án (Phần 13)

Sample 1:

In today's world, the ability to create films is no longer monopolized by large corporations, thanks to the accessibility afforded by digital technology. While some argue that this shift may have adverse effects, I firmly believe it should be viewed as a positive development.

Admittedly, there are significant drawbacks to the democratization of film production, the most prominent being a potential decline in product quality. When anyone can produce films, there is a lack of stringent selection or screening processes seen with professional companies. This can result in the proliferation of low-quality films, lacking in timeliness or professionalism, ultimately disappointing audiences and tarnishing the industry's reputation. Additionally, independent film production can lead to copyright and intellectual property management issues. Without oversight from large production companies, managing these aspects becomes challenging, potentially resulting in copyright infringement, legal disputes, or ethical violations, eroding trust within the industry.

However, despite these drawbacks, the benefits outweigh the concerns. Firstly, it brings diversity and unique creativity to the film industry. With individuals and independent groups contributing, each brings a distinct perspective, fostering a range of works that reflect society's multidimensionality. This diversity enriches audiences' experiences, broadening their understanding of the world. Secondly, the widespread use of digital technology in film production provides equal opportunities and wide access for everyone. Removing financial and technical barriers allows individuals and groups with limited resources to express themselves and share their stories, fostering development and creativity in the industry.

In conclusion, while challenges such as quality concerns and copyright issues exist, the democratization of film production should be celebrated for fostering creativity and providing equal opportunities and access for all.

Sample 2:

Thanks to the advancement of digital technology, it is now possible for almost anyone to make a film. Personally, I think this is a positive development, and will discuss the issue in the following essay.

Firstly, with the advancement of personal electronic devices, such as smartphones, computers, and digital cameras, making films is now reasonably simple for many people. This advancement has therefore allowed film-making to become a hobby and creative outlet for many people around the world. There are even many apps available these days that allow people to shoot and edit short films on their smartphones, and then upload the content to social media and other platforms for people to see. Secondly, producing films is not only a hobby for some people, but also a passion and a career goal. Now, with such technology available, even those who do not have the opportunity to formally study filmography at university, or those with a natural talent for film-making are able to follow their dreams.

Besides being beneficial for those seeking creative expression, this development is also positive in other ways. In the past couple of decades, Hollywood movies have become repetitive and boring for many people, and thanks to the development of technology, many creative directors and film-makers who may not have been able to produce their films or release them to the mainstream public are now able to thanks to the internet and digital technology. This has allowed for a greater diversity of films and videos for people to see. And finally, technology has now allowed people to create documentaries about important issues in society and publish them online to inform people about pressing issues, such as the environment. In the past, what films and documentaries people were able to see was limited to what was produced by large film producing companies, whose main concerns were making profits.

In conclusion, although there may be some minor drawbacks of this development, they are far outweighed by the benefits that it brings.

Sample 3:

Small firms are gradually being recognized for the films they produce as technological advancement becomes more significant. In my opinion, this development could have both positive and negative consequences in equal measure.

On the one hand, the ease with which films can be created these days brings certain benefits to both the film industry and society. First, since an increasing number of filmmakers are able to make movies with the help of digital technology, it brings more diversity and novelty to the movie market. A level playing field, hence, would be created to provide either small filmmakers or movie tycoons with equal opportunities. In fact, more and more Oscars and Cannes have been awarded to a myriad of low-budget producers. Second, the rise in film production creates more jobs, reducing unemployment. For example, the proliferation of film production requires an abundance of actors, actresses and film technicians.

On the other hand, audiences might be burdened with some drawbacks of this digital development, specifically the content and quality of the movies. Unlike cellulose films, films which are recorded on computers and distributed through the Internet seem hard to censor. Viewers, consequently, may be bombarded with a wide range of low-quality movies. Moreover, with the ease of producing films, there is a higher chance of movies containing offensive scenes, thereby accidentally causing certain groups of people to become victims of social criticism. The LGBTQ+ community is transformed into antagonists in some Indian Bollywood productions.

In conclusion, as digital equipment is widely accessible, I believe there will be a variety of equal opportunities for small and big film producers, and the unemployment rate in a country would decrease. However, the ever-rising offensive content and the downturn in movie quality are considered as two main problems arising from the development.

Sample 4:

Due to the progress in digital technology, nearly everyone can now engage in filmmaking. In my opinion, this constitutes a favorable advancement, which I will elaborate on in the subsequent essay.

Firstly, with the advancement of personal electronic devices, such as smartphones, computers, and digital cameras, making films is now reasonably simple for many people. This advancement has therefore allowed film-making to become a hobby and creative outlet for many people around the world. There are even many apps available these days that allow people to shoot and edit short films on their smartphones, and then upload the content to social media and other platforms for people to see. Secondly, producing films is not only a hobby for some people, but also a passion and a career goal. Now, with such technology available, even those who do not have the opportunity to formally study filmography at university, or those with a natural talent for film-making are able to follow their dreams.

Furthermore, apart from benefiting those in search of artistic expression, this progression also yields positive outcomes in various aspects. Over the past few decades, Hollywood productions have grown repetitive and monotonous to many viewers. However, thanks to technological advancements, numerous creative directors and filmmakers who might have previously struggled to produce or distribute their works to a wider audience can now do so through the internet and digital platforms. Consequently, there is now a wider array of films and videos available for consumption. Moreover, technology enables individuals to create documentaries addressing crucial societal issues and share them online, thereby raising awareness on pressing matters such as environmental concerns. Previously, access to films and documentaries was largely restricted to productions by major studios primarily driven by profit motives.

To summarize, while there may exist minor drawbacks associated with this trend, its benefits far outweigh them.

Sample 5:

It is an inevitable and irreversible trend, nowadays, the movie industry has brought large impact on societies across the globe. It is observed that not only giant enterprises are making movies today but also anyone who can access digital technology can make motion pictures. It could be regarded as a progressive approach; the reasons for which are the advent of technology and quality production at an affordable cost.

The foremost aspect to be considered in this context is that a wide range of talented artistes can make spectacular movies. To elaborate, with the advent of modern technologies people can utilize varieties of gadgets and software applications to make movies, even if they are not well- equipped with modern high-cost gadgets. Talented film aspirants have been making short films by the use of simple low-cost gadgets. This is an ideal example in this regard. The contributions, as a consequence, to the film industry around the world are likely to be increased by the use of digital technology by unreputed talented artistes and artists.

Another notable factor is that the quality and standard of films that are made with the help of modern digital technology is unparallel compared to the films which are produced from traditional way and technology. To make it clear, people are adaptive with respect to the changing paradigm shift, and they would always like to watch modern film making rather than the traditional way of making movies. To cite an example, films that are made with the help of digital technology have collected huge amounts of money since such blockbusters are widely accepted by the audience around the world. Films that are made, as such, with the help of digital technology have excellent standards and are widely accepted.

Overall, having analysed the positive aspects of trend, it appears to me, in all likelihood, that not a huge number of talented artists can make films but also the standard of films production can be improved by using digital technology in movie production. Had digital technology become more popular, it would have produced an inexplicable revolution in the entertainment industry.

Sample 6:

The democratisation of film has led to greater opportunity as well as fears as to the future of filmmaking. In my opinion, this is a largely positive development as it opens up the medium for a more diverse range of socieconomic voices.

The main reason that film purists resist the digital revolution is it brings down the quality of films. A good example of this is when digital film first burst onto the scene and started to replace film around the turn of the century. The initial complaints from viewers were that the film looks better and digitally shot movies have a cheap aesthetic akin to a soap opera. As digital film has proliferated beyond studios looking to cut costs, it has exponentially increased the number of films made by amateurs. This naturally leads to movies with bad acting, clumsily written dialogue and poor overall production values.

Despite the admitted cons listed above, digital film has given a voice to less wealthy filmmakers who tend to be of a different class and ethnicity. There are countless examples of students who film digitally, post their video on YouTube and become internet sensations. Many of these new perspectives are outside of the predominantly white, male, heterosexual homogenity of Hollywood. It is increasingly possible for LGBT themes to surface in these shorts and for ethnic minorities around the world to break through. The most striking evidence is simply comparing the major movies made 50 years ago with the diverse range of cinema on offer today.

In conclusion, although there are drawbacks in terms of quality those are mitigated by novel themes from underrepresented demographics. Studios should pay heed and relax their control over an ever-promising industry.

Sample 7:

Unlike many years ago when cinematography was exclusive to large companies, films made by individuals using their own devices have enjoyed increasing popularity in recent years. I am of the opinion that this is more likely to have positive consequences.

The fact that filmmaking is increasingly more accessible has helped add variety to cinematography. Movies made by big companies, on the one hand, are restricted to a handful of themes and backgrounds, several of which are even heavily censored. On the other hand, films made by potential filmmakers, albeit amateur, transcend barriers of ethnicities and backgrounds. Around 400-500 movies are made by Hollywood every year, many of which are Americentric and revolve around superheroes, romance, thrillers and comedies. Meanwhile, with a phone sitting in our pockets and film editing applications at our disposal, that number can add up to millions, with more themes covered and a great array of settings shown.

Additionally, easy access to filming technology helps discover hidden talented people. Thanks to video-sharing platforms such as YouTube or Facebook, several unknown people have attained resounding success just by one or two short films. In Vietnam, for example, a lot of amateur movie-making teams have become overnight sensations by posting short comedies and web dramas onto their sites. Although those films are low-budget, they are well–received by the general public, and many aspiring actors, actresses, and directors are discovered and eventually shot to fame. The Sundance Film Festival, once a low-profile venue for small-budget creators, has become a media extravaganza for new talents now that more and more independent movie creators are able to make films using their own devices.

Inconclusion, my firm conviction is that the widespread popularity of amateur films thanks to the advent of technology is a welcome trend, for it adds spices to the film industry and promotes aspiring individuals wishing to pursue professional film careers.

Sample 8:

The contemporary era is an era of modernization. In the past, due to the lack of technological progress, only large production companies could make films. However, this is no longer the case in the modern world. Small business firms or even individuals can also produce films. In my opinion, this is a positive development both for the country and for the trainees. Therefore, I will explain the positive effects of this modern phenomenon in the following essay.

To commence with, the expansion encourages the creation of new companies. To be more specific, more talented teenagers are willing to start their own field, thus avoiding the elite leaving the countries and hence boosting the national economy as a thriving film industry can boost a country's position in the international market. Moreover, the film is an indicator of public morality. If film production becomes active, the social morale of the nation will improve. For example, the popularity of Hollywood film companies not only better entertains locals in America, but also encourages foreign immigration.

Furthermore, the growth in the number of small film studios is expected to reduce the unemployment rate in the country. For example, unemployed people can start a film directing business if they are interested in acting. In addition, it gives more opportunities for young actors and actresses to express themselves on the screen. On the other hand, cinema is seen as an art form and entertainment. With the positive development of the film industry, the culture and traditions will be strengthened and thus provide the best national rating in the world.

To conclude, the evolution of the film industry could nurture more elites and young talented teenagers to participate in captivating films, which could then reduce unemployment and boost social morality and the nation's economic market. Therefore, this new trend is increasingly recommended as a positive achievement.

Sample 1:

The idea of investing government funds in placing more works of art in towns and cities to enhance their appeal is a topic that prompts varying opinions. While there are merits to this proposal, I still strongly disagree with this suggestion.

Advocates of this notion argue that art installations in public spaces can significantly contribute to the aesthetics and cultural richness of towns and cities. They may well argue that such initiatives can create visually pleasing environments, possibly fostering a sense of community and attracting tourists. Furthermore, public art can serve asc, heritage, and values, promoting a sense of pride among residents. This can be seen in Vietnam where several sculptures of heroes and historical figures are displayed in squares or roundabouts so that their citizens can remember the contributions made by those people.

Nevertheless, I am firmly against this policy for reasons related to the deterioration of artworks and the presence of more pressing issues. Regarding the former, exposure to harsh weather elements like rain, snow, and sunlight can cause fading, corrosion, or other forms of damage to the artworks, thereby reducing its aesthetic appeal. This issue may be exacerbated due to acts of vandalism or graffiti on these installations which can significantly diminish the visual appeal and overall impact of art pieces. Another argument is that there are more pressing issues that demand government attention and financial resources. Focusing on art installations might be seen as a luxury expenditure rather than addressing the immediate needs of the population.

In conclusion, while the idea of enhancing towns and cities with more art installations might seem appealing at first glance, it may not be the most prudent way for governments to allocate limited resources.

Sample 2:

The proposal to utilize government funds for the incorporation of artworks such as paintings and statues in urban areas, with the aim of augmenting their allure, has gained support in recent years. While I recognize the underlying rationale of this perspective, I argue that other facets of urban development should take precedence over enhancing the attractiveness of these areas.

Indeed, there are valid reasons to advocate for government-sponsored art in cities. Artistic installations in public spaces can dramatically transform the aesthetic and cultural landscape of an area. They serve as symbols of cultural identity, reflecting the history and values of the community. Art in public spaces also provides accessibility to cultural experiences for a broader demographic, breaking down the barriers of traditional art galleries and museums. Cities like Barcelona, adorned with Gaudí's architectural masterpieces, exemplify how art can become a cornerstone of urban identity and appeal, drawing tourists and locals alike.

However, the appeal of urban areas relies on more than just aesthetic enhancements. Crucial aspects like infrastructure, green spaces, and public services play a pivotal role in making cities livable and attractive. Efficient public transportation systems, well-maintained parks, and quality public services are fundamental to the daily lives of residents and can significantly impact a city's appeal. For instance, the attractiveness of cities like Vienna and Copenhagen is not just thanks to their artistic heritage but also their emphasis on high-quality public services and sustainable urban planning. Therefore, while art can enrich urban spaces, the allocation of government funds should prioritize these essential elements that directly impact the quality of life and functionality of a city.

To conclude, although the integration of art in urban spaces has its merits, I maintain that government funding should be more strategically directed towards improving fundamental urban infrastructure and services. These elements are crucial in enhancing the overall attractiveness and livability of towns and cities, far beyond the aesthetic contributions of art alone.

Sample 3:

Some people suggest that in order to improve the quality of life in cities, more state budget should be spent erecting monuments and providing paintings. However, in my opinion, this does not seem to be a practical idea.

First and foremost, the construction of monuments and statues occupies not only significant financial resources but also large quantities of land. Paintings, while perhaps not taking up much space, demand frequent preservation from deterioration due to natural damage. Offering more works of art is an interesting idea to help promote the living space inside cities, but not at any cost, especially when urban land funds are becoming increasingly scarce. Meanwhile, to enrich the cultural and spiritual life of a city, there are other feasible and more long-term measures, including developing sport centers, museums, libraries, and bookstores.

Moreover, the government is also presented with other priorities, such as infrastructural, medical, and environmental issues, to name but a few. Building, maintaining, and upgrading traffic infrastructure, for instance, requires substantial allocation. The need for advanced medical centers is also enormous, particularly in the context of post-COVID health decline across the community. Formulating and implementing environmental policies is yet another urgent task, given the accelerating threat of climate change. All of these are among the pressing issues to be addressed if life quality in cities is to be enhanced.

In conclusion, although many people emphasize the need to supplement city life with more pieces of art such as statues and paintings, I rather doubt the practicality of this notion, considering, first, the resources it would require and, second, other priorities.

Sample 4:

In contemporary urban planning discussions, the idea of governments investing in public art to enhance the appeal of towns and cities is a topic of ongoing debate. While some argue that this strategy can contribute to more attractive and culturally rich urban spaces, I disagree with it for several reasons below.

On the one hand, proponents argue that public art installations can transform mundane urban environments into vibrant and aesthetically pleasing spaces, thereby attracting tourists and residents alike. For instance, cities like Barcelona and Paris have successfully integrated public art into their urban landscapes, creating open-air galleries that not only attract tourists but also provide locals with a sense of pride and cultural identity. By showcasing local artists' work or representing the city's history through sculptures, towns and cities can cultivate a unique character that resonates with both residents and visitors.

However, I argue that allocating public funds to art installations might not necessarily address the urgent needs of a community. Specifically, many towns and cities grapple with critical issues such as poor infrastructure, insufficient healthcare facilities, and limited educational resources. This makes prioritizing the creation of public art undesirable since these crucial aspects form the backbone of community development and directly impact residents’ well-being. Additionally, the subjective nature of art could make it challenging to ensure widespread public appreciation and engagement. In other words, different individuals might have diverse tastes and preferences when it comes to artistic expressions, potentially leading to a lack of consensus within the community or even a public backlash.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that governments should not invest substantially in erecting works of art in metropolitan areas as the subjective nature of art might not ensure widespread public appreciation while more pressing social concerns deserve further funding.

Sample 5:

Today, there is an ongoing discussion about whether the government should invest in art and statues supposedly to improve the quality of life in cities. In my opinion, investment in art and culture is essential to a functioning society.

It has been said that a problem with funding art paintings and statues is that it takes away money from more essential infrastructure projects. It might be argued that issues like poverty and pollution are much more urgent and affect the economy in a more profound way. For example, great wealth inequality as well as poor air quality could lead to greater crime and worsening mental health issues for those in the lower social strata. Hence, instead of focusing on art and culture, some may suggest that the money be used for creating more opportunities for disadvantaged people.

On the other hand, I argue that an appreciation for art and culture, reflected in things such as paintings and statues, is essential for a cohesive society. While bread and butter gives individuals a means to survival, art and culture could be said to provide people with meaning that extends beyond mere subsistence. Societies where people only work and are unaware of the history and culture reflected in cultural artefacts, I argue, would have no means of expressing a collective identity. Since humans can only see ourselves within a larger context, be it historically or culturally, investment in these areas is necessarily essential to well-being.

Overall, therefore, I believe that while there are economic arguments against funding art projects and statues, I believe that they give people meaning and as such are essential to a healthy society; it is thus vital that governments continue to protect these artifacts.

Sample 6:

Some feel governments should invest more in public art in cities to boost the quality of life. Personally, I am in disagreement with this idea because it has little actual importance for the average citizen.

On the one hand, public art beautifies a city. A city stripped of all art gives off the dreary appearance of being purely for utilitarian value and the daily rigour of work. In contrast, cities that have invested heavily in public art, such as New York City, offer their residents a beautiful and inspiring home. A child who sees sculptures and murals walking home will feel the city is a nicer place to live and workers passing by works of art will have some emotional relief from the demands of the day. This not only builds up the character of urban areas for local inhabitants and instills a sense of pride, but also attracts tourists and professional artists to the city, both of which contribute to a vibrant city.

Nonetheless, public art has little quantifiable positive value. Most city-dwellers are too engrossed in their hectic schedules to notice public art. This art, therefore, means nothing to most locals, while also diverting an outsized share of a city’s budget. There are other more vital areas requiring development such as high-end infrastructure, well-rounded healthcare systems, and modern recreational facilities. Moreover, the public space used to house these works of art cannot be used for practical purposes including critical public facilities like restrooms, bus stops or parks. Those who rely on these other facilities will have more trouble finding them and their quality of life may be somewhat impacted by a preference for art.

Despite the aesthetic value of public art, government bodies should focus more on urban issues that truly matter to their constituents. There must be a degree of balance, but it should always tip more towards pragmatic concerns.

Sample 7:

It is often argued that government funding should be allocated to artworks in public spaces. While this argument seems relatively reasoned in aesthetic and social terms, I assert that this money would be more beneficially invested elsewhere.

Proponents of the given notion may rationalize that large-scale sculptures or statues can serve as decorations or even landmarks, enhancing the overall appeal of their cities or towns. As a result, they can create hotspots attracting both locals and visitors, fostering social interactions and a sense of community in the whole area. Such art pieces, nonetheless, may not accomplish these intended objectives, possibly attributable to their subjective nature. The public may not express advocacy, but even opposition, towards abstract murals or installations that challenge societal norms, making expenditures in art unnecessary and wasteful.

Under this line of reasoning, I contend that the state budget should be spent on areas more essential than art. Healthcare would be one of them because, despite its pivotal role in citizens' well-being, it may be underfunded. If received more proper funding, hospitals would mitigate overload while constructing more modern facilities and equipping sufficient medical devices, thereby contributing to better public health. Education is another area more worth the investment than public art. A large number of children, especially those in rural or mountainous areas, lack proper schooling, consequently perpetuating poverty and hindering economic growth. Hence, what the authorities should be doing to alleviate such issues is allocating sufficient resources to ensure equitable access to education for all individuals.

In conclusion, while public art potentially brings a few minor virtues to societies, I would argue that the national budget should instead be directed to more vital services including healthcare and education, facilitating a more comprehensive social development.

Sample 8:

Investing public funds in the placement of more works of art, such as paintings and statues, in towns and cities is a topic that sparks debate. While some argue that this enhances the aesthetic appeal and cultural vibrancy of urban areas, I am inclined to disagree with this proposition to a certain extent.

On one hand, supporters of government spending on public art argue that it transforms cities into visually appealing and culturally rich environments. Art has the power to stimulate creativity, spark discussions, and foster a sense of community identity. For instance, cities like Barcelona, known for its public art installations by artists like Antoni Gaudí, have become global tourist attractions. The presence of such artworks can contribute to a city's unique character and attract visitors.

However, it is essential to consider the opportunity cost of allocating public funds to art projects. Towns and cities often face pressing issues such as inadequate infrastructure, education, and healthcare. Channeling funds into art installations might be perceived as a luxury when basic needs are unmet. For example, a city struggling with traffic congestion or a shortage of affordable housing might be better served by prioritizing infrastructure projects over aesthetic enhancements.

In conclusion, while the inclusion of art in urban spaces can undoubtedly contribute to cultural enrichment and tourism, governments must strike a balance. Allocating substantial funds to public art should be approached cautiously, considering the prioritization of pressing needs that directly impact the well-being of the residents. Achieving a harmonious blend of aesthetics and functionality should be the ultimate goal in enhancing the overall appeal of towns and cities.

Sample 9:

The debate on government spending in urban areas often centers around whether to prioritize artistic projects or essential infrastructure. This essay will explore the merits of investing in art to enhance city life against the imperative need for practical urban development, aiming to find a balanced approach to government expenditure.

Proponents of this perspective argue that art infuses cities with cultural vibrancy, thereby elevating the quality of life for residents. For instance, in Hanoi, the installation of murals depicting traditional Vietnamese stories has transformed mundane walls into sources of national pride and tourist attraction. These artistic endeavors not only beautify urban landscapes but also foster a sense of community and historical continuity. However, while the aesthetic and cultural merits of art are undeniable, the question of its prioritization over more pressing urban needs remains contentious.

However, I believe that the government's primary focus should be on addressing more immediate urban issues. Infrastructure improvements, for example, are critical in cities like Ho Chi Minh City, where frequent traffic congestion and inadequate public transportation systems pose daily challenges for millions. Investing in better roads, public transport, and urban planning would not only enhance the functional efficiency of cities but also contribute to the well-being of its inhabitants in a more tangible manner than art installations.

In conclusion, while the incorporation of art in urban spaces can undoubtedly enrich the cultural tapestry of a city, it is imperative that such aesthetic considerations do not overshadow the essential infrastructural developments that directly impact the daily lives of city dwellers. A balanced approach, prioritizing functional necessities while also celebrating artistic expression, would be a more prudent course of action for government spending.

Sample 10:

It is believed by some that governments should allocate funds to install more works of art, such as paintings and statues, in towns and cities to enhance their attractiveness. Although there are certain arguments against this viewpoint, I believe that such an initiative should be put into practice. 

On the one hand, opponents argue that more practical and immediate needs, such as infrastructure, education, and healthcare should receive greater allocation of the national budget, which is often limited in most countries around the world.

Obviously, these areas are vital for a country to function well and have a direct impact on the well-being and livelihood of citizens, whereas art may be considered as a kind of luxury that serves the sole purpose of enhancing the aesthetic appeal of a city. 

However, the economic benefits that public art brings to a country should not be downplayed. Sculptures or statues can turn towns and cities into vibrant and culturally rich spaces, and such aesthetically pleasing cities are more likely to not only boost tourist activities but also attract businesses and investors, thus contributing to the development of the local economy and generating more employment opportunities.

In this way, the indirect economic advantages of public art can offset its initial costs and contribute to the overall prosperity of citizens’ lives.  

Moreover, public art functions as a vehicle for expressing and enriching culture. When governments integrate a variety of artistic expressions into public spaces, they actively contribute to shaping the cultural identity of a community. This exposure to a range of art forms serves as an educational and inspirational experience for residents, nurturing feelings of pride and fostering an appreciation for cultural diversity.

In conclusion, while there are reasonable concerns related to the allocation of limited resources, the benefits of public art in enhancing the cultural and economic fabric of a community are adequate compensation for the initial costs involved in setting up art projects in cities and towns. 

Sample 11:

It has long been a debatable issue whether governments should spend on the beautification of towns and cities through works of art, like statues and paintings. I agree with the given statement and in the following essay I will put forth my views in support of my argument.

Art has always been an inseparable part of our lives as it helps us express ourselves and instills happy feelings in us. Putting up statues or sculptures in open areas gives an opportunity to people to enjoy it and acts as a distraction from the monotony of everyday activities. Research has proved that appreciating art helps people relieve stress. In addition, during tough times, people need some form of art to release tension. It could be through music, dance, painting, etc. Having sculptures, statues or murals in public places gives an access to people from all strata of society to enjoy art and refresh their mind.

Moreover, installing statues in public places is not only a way to commemorate a famous historical figure, but also is an interesting way for children to learn about the history or the accomplishments of that person. India has a rich culture and history and in most of the towns and cities there are statues of famous persons or those depicting historical events. For example, in my hometown, there is a statue of Dr. B.R Ambedkar. Everyone who passes by that statue reads about him and the children are fascinated by it and know all about Dr. Ambedkar.

Another added advantage is that statues become a tourist attraction and people like to visit places which have a rich history, art and culture. This helps the local business and thus, helps make the economy of the place better. For example, the Rock Garden in Chandigarh has modern sculptures made of trash, which attracts a lot of tourists from all over the world.

No doubt, the government should focus more on other more important issues, like poverty, unemployment, illiteracy, etc. However, art should also not take a backseat and should be focused on to make the cities and the country more beautiful and attractive, for the residents and for those who visit.

In conclusion, I would reiterate that art cannot be separated from our lives and importance should be given to making a place more appealing, by installing works of art, like sculptures, statues and paintings in public places.

Sample 1:

Today, it is often argued that elaborate descriptions of criminal activities on printed newspapers and social media should be limited because of their numerous adverse effects. Personally, I disagree with this notion and will offer my opinion in the following essay.

Granted, there are several drawbacks of displaying detailed criminal information in the media. Firstly, the descriptions of brutal and serious offences could promote a strong sense of insecurity and anxiety among the general public in society. Consequently, many people may feel disinclined to socialize with others around or help strangers in need, especially those they think are potentially suspicious, which may render the community less close-knit and more cold-hearted. Secondly, elaborate criminal descriptions could adversely affect offenders to a great extent even after successful rehabilitation programs. This is because the human mind is capable of remembering detailed information of criminal acts people abhor, which possibly prompts them to still harshly discriminate against ex-offenders.

Nevertheless, I would argue that elaborately provided criminal descriptions are of huge benefit to the tightening of social security. On being publicly shown to the masses, these depictions can inform citizens of meticulous or intricate forms of illegal acts. Therefore, people will be encouraged to take more precautions or equip themselves with necessary tools to avoid such undesirable situations. For instance, thanks to the detailed reports of widespread crimes over the past few years, some Vietnamese households have already begun to install surveillance cameras and alarm bells which can timely alert these families to cases of thefts. Without these careful criminal descriptions, they might have been unable to take such appropriate measures to prevent serious offences.

In conclusion, despite the view that restrictions on showing detailed criminal descriptions in the media should be imposed, it is my firm conviction that this type of information would prove valuable to social security in the long term.

Sample 2:

There is a school of thought that believes the media content involving meticulous description of crime could have negative impacts and so it should be limited. From my point of view. I agree that this type of content has more drawbacks than advantages to general viewers.

There are some valid reasons why some accept the presence of criminal content in the media. One proposition is that this type of information could be educational regarding one's security and safety. News concerning crimes or true crime documentaries could educate everyone about criminals' minds and the typical ways a crime is committed, which could help people to be more alert if they ever encounter such dangerous situations. However. these kinds of information could be delivered via a more standardized and textual way rather than gruesome images which could possibly be traumatizing to some.

I would opine that media censorship on meticulous criminal accounts is necessary for the well-being and security of society. Detailed descriptions of unlawful conduct via mass media could unintentionally encourage law-breaking by giving demonstrations or instructions to potential law offenders on how to commit a crime. In many mass shooting cases in the U.S., it is common that the suspects have high exposure to uncensored violent and criminal content. Another justification is this type of information may be triggering to the public. Fear and anxiety could easily be spread within the society when citizens may consider their community unsafe as too many cruel acts are reported.

All things considered, while some kind of criminal content is essential for educational purposes, a meticulous description of law-breaking acts could pose potential hazards to our safety. Thus, it is reasonable that this type of content should be subject to censorship and be closely regulated.

Sample 3:

The advent of diverse multimedia platforms has facilitated the widespread dissemination of detailed information about crimes, including graphic depictions and images, which are readily available to audiences. However, this trend has ignited debates regarding the potential hazards of such content, leading to calls for restrictions. I firmly concur that the drawbacks of this type of content outweigh the benefits.

Access to comprehensive portrayals of crime can indeed offer valuable insights into criminal behaviour and spur individuals to take preventive measures. For example, revealing a serial killer's modus operandi could assist law enforcement in suspect identification and prevention of further incidents, while also enabling the public to adopt protective measures. However, it's crucial to consider the potential psychological ramifications for the public. Instead of graphic depictions, standardised and written methods may serve as a more effective and less distressing approach for raising awareness.

There are, however, profound drawbacks associated with the dissemination of graphic crime content that cannot be overlooked. One of the primary concerns is the potential to induce unnecessary fear and anxiety among the audience. Graphic details of crimes, when widely circulated, can lead to a sense of panic and apprehension in communities, regardless of the low probability of similar crimes occurring in their vicinity. This can result in increased stress levels, decreased sense of safety, and harmful vigilantism. Furthermore, the sensationalisation or over-representation of certain crimes in media can reinforce negative stereotypes about specific groups of people, such as racial or ethnic minorities. This can lead to serious repercussions for these groups, including increased discrimination, harassment, and even violence. For instance, media coverage that disproportionately emphasises the race or ethnicity of a criminal can fuel prejudice and discrimination against members of that group.

In conclusion, while it is critical for the public to stay informed about crime trends and safety measures, the distribution of detailed crime information should be handled responsibly. It should consider potential psychological impacts on viewers and avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes. In this way, we can balance the need for public safety information with the need to maintain societal harmony and individual psychological well-being.

Sample 4:

The detailed depiction of criminal activities in newspapers and on television has sparked a debate regarding its potential negative influences. I totally agree that such information should be restricted in the media due to its detrimental effects on viewers, particularly vulnerable youths, and the way it aids potential criminals.

One major reason to support the restriction of detailed criminal descriptions is that they can encourage viewers, especially impressionable youngsters, to violate the law. Teenagers, driven by curiosity and the desire to make an impression, might replicate crimes they see detailed in the media. Their vulnerable mentality and lack of experience make them susceptible to such influences. For example, in 2017, a 13-year-old boy in Ohio was arrested for attempting to create a homemade bomb after following a detailed tutorial he found online. This incident underscores how exposure to explicit crime-related content can lead to juvenile delinquency, which can become rampant if left unchecked.

Another reason is that detailed descriptions of crimes can serve as a manual for would-be criminals, complicating efforts by law enforcement to combat crime efficiently. Although the intention behind crime reporting is often to warn the public and educate them on avoiding similar situations, it can have the opposite effect. For instance, during the late 1970s, the "Son of Sam" murders in New York City received extensive media coverage. The detailed accounts of David Berkowitz's crimes potentially inspired copycat killings and hindered the police's ability to gather information and apprehend him quickly. This example highlights the unintended consequences of detailed crime reporting, which can inadvertently assist criminals in honing their methods.

In conclusion, the restriction of detailed criminal descriptions in the media is necessary to prevent the encouragement of illegal activities among young viewers and to hinder the education of potential criminals.

Sample 5:

The increased degree of freedom in media reports has allowed exposure of crime cases to come forth in a detailed manner, which certainly arouses a great deal of concern. In light of this, some people believe there should be restrictions on such information. From my perspective, I agree that censorship should be imposed on the descriptions of crime.

There are several reasons why the focus of newspapers and television on high-profile crimes should be more carefully regulated. The group most affected by the news media's coverage of violence and victimization is crime victims. This is because media coverage that is sometimes viewed as insensitive, voyeuristic, and uncaring can largely violate victims' privacy and inflict their emotional and psychological suffering. Not only that, but the general public also seldom benefits from this exposure to crime details. In fact, these descriptions can not only cause discomfort but also arouse apprehension about the impacts on young people. Besides, it is likely that potential offenders would be instigated and incited to commit crimes, since they might regard detailed media coverage as a form of guidance.

It is undeniable that the coverage of crime cases can be helpful and, in some cases, even healing.

Some would also suggest that the media have the obligation to keep the public well informed about trends in crime. Indeed, the media play a significant role in public safety by keeping citizens

apprised of essential information on criminal affairs, such as new patterns of fraud, ways to assist

victims and measures to prevent crime. However, the extent to which the media can cover about

these cases should be censored carefully by avoiding excessively detailed descriptions, so that they can accurately cover crime stories with the least amount of trauma to the victim and negative

repercussions on the public.

In conclusion, although newspapers and television need to raise the public awareness of key information on crime cases, I contend that restrictions should be imposed on excessive descriptions of details, in order to mitigate the detrimental consequences.

Sample 6:

It is argued that reporting crimes in detail in printed newspapers and on television is detrimental; therefore, it should be limited. I completely agree with this notion since it gives rise to criminal acts and people’s anxiety.

The first reason for my view that crimes should not be reported meticulously is because it encourages viewers to violate the laws. More specifically, numerous teenagers tend to follow or replicate infractions presented with detailed procedures, methods and tools mainly because they have great curiosity, or they want to make a grand impression by proving that they can be better than the person who committed the original crime. For instance, Shinochiro Azima, a 14-year-old student in Japan killed two students in 1997 by cutting off their heads after watching a documentary about an American criminal, the Zodiac Killer, who performed the same acts. As he was being interrogated, he admitted that he imitated this horrible act since he wanted to impress other people. Consequently, this may pose a threat to social stability due to growing crime rates.

Another justification for why I oppose the detailed presentation of crimes via the mass media is that members of the public’s anxiety can be triggered. This is because they may consider their community unsafe and then hesitate to connect with others as too many cruel acts are reported in the media. They would likely feel afraid of being a victim of a potential crime and constantly experience a sense of insecurity. As a result, it could lead to a loose-knit community where people are not willing to support those in need.

In conclusion, I strongly oppose the idea of presenting detailed crime reports in newspapers and television because it provokes more individuals to be driven to crime and arouses people’s apprehension. It is advisable that the details of the crimes should be completely banned to minimise its adverse impacts on viewers.

Sample 7:

The restriction of legal violation scenes shown via media channels should be introduced by the related authorities due to their detrimental impacts. From my perspective, I would express my strong opposition to that suggestion as broadcasting criminal cases through multimedia sites is beneficial in terms of educating citizens and exercising caution in dealing with serious offenses.

On the one hand, the detailed description of crimes in newspapers and on TV would be disadvantageous due to the possibility that people would commit the same criminal acts and display anxiety toward the unsafe society. Regarding the former drawback, showing the wrongdoings of criminals publicly on media networks provides individuals with a clear understanding of how the infringement was conducted, from which they may learn and follow. As a consequence, there are high chances that those people, especially youngsters, would become potential offenders in the future. Not to mention that by televising a myriad of violation occurrences, mental health problems would experience a drastic increase since citizens are prone to develop anxiety toward an unsecured society.

On the other hand, broadcasting more crime scenes on social media websites can be considered a means of education and caution for people. Chief among these is that broadcasting more violations of crimes in combination with their severe punishment plays a pivotal role in eradicating the intention of future offenders. Therefore, the increasing rate of the number of to-be-culprits would be significantly reduced. In addition, by exemplifying in detail the procedure of a breach, individuals would be more well-aware of the feasibility of a criminal case. Thus, they would have a tendency to prepare for approaches to avoid being victims of wrongdoings.

In conclusion, although the display of criminal scenes should be limited due to their potential impact on increasing lawbreakers' and citizens' concerns, I am of the opinion that cases of violation of law should be shown on different media sites to educate and inform people about the risk of those offenses.

Sample 8:

Some people argue that detailed criminal descriptions in newspapers and on TV have negative impacts and should be restricted. In my opinion, restricting the media from reporting on crime in detail is not the solution, and may actually have negative consequences.

Firstly, the media has a responsibility to report on events accurately and objectively, and this includes crimes. Restricting information on criminal activity may lead to misinformation, censorship, and a lack of transparency in the justice system. The media can also play an important role in holding law enforcement agencies accountable by reporting on cases that may have been mishandled or neglected. For example, some countries have implemented regulations that limit the amount of information surrounding criminal cases, including the names and photographs of suspects and victims. As a result, the public has been left with little information about ongoing criminal cases, leading to confusion and rumors about what is happening.

Secondly, the public has a right to be informed about criminal activity in their community. Access to accurate and detailed information can help citizens take necessary precautions to protect themselves and their property. It can also encourage public awareness and involvement in crime prevention efforts. For instance, in a neighborhood with a high incidence of burglaries, law enforcement may provide residents with information on how to secure their homes and property, as well as signs to look out for that may indicate suspicious activity.

In conclusion, while some may argue that detailed criminal descriptions in the media have negative impacts, I believe that the benefits of accurate and transparent reporting on crime far outweigh any potential negative consequences.

Sample 9:

Whenever we turn on TV or read a newspaper, more often than not we can read a lengthy description of atrocious crime, which has become a so-called feature of modern media. I, as one of the common readers, advocate the proposal that such reports should be strictly controlled, if not abolished.

Alarmingly, those criminal descriptions wield adverse influence on the audience, especially fragile youngsters. Due to vulnerable mentality and lack of ample experience, upon contacting violent programmes, those kids are tempted to follow suit, thus breaking the law and such juvenile delinquencies are too often to be ignored. If this trend is out of control, then more teenagers will fall victim to those evil reports.

Moreover, numerous would-be criminals can learn skills of committing crimes from similar cases, also the police find it more formidable to crack down on crimes efficiently. Although the original purpose of crime description is to warn people against offenses and teach them valuable lessons, the fact is that there, indeed, exists a discrepancy between what is desired and what is achieved. The latest research reveals that some habitual lawbreakers have access to criminal skills and even the police's detective methods from TV programmes and newspaper stories about crimes. By contrast, if we restrict strictly the programmes of tackling criminal cases, the ways employed by the police to combat crimes win be kept as the top secret, and it is out of the question to be disclosed to the public, especially those potential offenders.

Granted, criminal content, which is not a usual experience for common, can enhance. the TV rating substantially. Satisfying people's curiosity and adding varieties to choices, those programmes can always attract a larger audience. As for me, however, the overwhelming detriments have overshadowed whatever benefits.

Overall, no matter what excuse media can find for detailed criminal description, there should be a strict regulation to limit such broadcasting. Government and relevant organisations should co-operate fully, guaranteeing healthier circumstances.

Sample 1:

As the younger generations struggle to apply for jobs, they begin to wonder if holding interviews is the best way to assess candidates. I moderately agree that in some cases, interviews are not the best method.

There are many reasons why people are skeptical about using interviews to examine candidates’ qualities. Firstly, an interview does not fully reflect candidates’ abilities, especially for candidates applying to technical positions in the IT and engineering industries. For these positions, the best way to assess their abilities is through tests, such as programming tests, case studies, or teamwork sessions with other candidates. Secondly, it is hard to evaluate candidates through interviews because they can lie. Many people admitted to having lied at least once, especially when asked about their past experiences or projects. For example, many told recruiters that they significantly contributed to projects that they hardly participated in.

However, I still think that recruiters should combine interviews with other evaluations because they are still efficient. The first advantage is that the interview gives both employers and applicants a chance to see if applicants are suitable for the company’s culture. For example, employers can observe candidates’ manners, dress codes, or attitudes, whereas candidates can see how other workers are treated. Another advantage of interviews is that they are quick and easy to conduct. Most employers will spend only 30 minutes interviewing candidates before usually giving a tour around the workplace. This is also the most direct way to communicate with applicants because both parties can discuss sensitive topics that otherwise would be inappropriate to touch on, such as salary, benefits, or workplace culture.

In conclusion, I agree that for technology companies, using only interviews as an assessment during their hiring process is not sufficient. However, recruiters should not eliminate or replace interviews.

Sample 1:

Many parts of the world have adopted laws to curb the working hours of workers. This essay will expound on why safeguarding workers’ health is the primary aim of introducing the Working Hours Limit Act, and I contend that this is a negative development because it endangers the economy by challenging small companies operating in a competitive market.

The primary reason for limiting the working hours of employees is that it safeguards the physical and mental health of an employee.  Excessive hours of work can cause work pressure, and therefore it can lead to stress as well as physical and mental fatigue, which is likely to develop various health issues. By limiting maximum working hours, nations ensure that workers have adequate time to relax and unwind, thus promoting overall well-being. A case in point is Australia's Fair Work Act 2009. The act has enforced standards by setting provisions for maximum working hours, ensuring that employees are not subjected to long working hours that could drive them to exhaustion.

However, tight restrictions on working hours can pose a real threat to business and the economy. To commence with, businesses that require non-stop operations, for instance, transportation, healthcare, or emergency services, can face enormous challenges in providing emergency services if working hours are severely limited. Besides, industries operating in a fiercely competitive environment, it is inevitable that some companies will go out of business, resulting in an adverse impact on the economy. By way of illustration, consider a small business trying to establish itself in a cut-throat world of business may face challenges if its founders cannot dedicate adequate time to business due to the severe working hour restrictions of employees.

To conclude, although limiting working hours promotes employees’ health, I think this is a negative development because it could adversely affect the business and the economy.

Sample 2:

In response to the evolving dynamics of the modern workforce, several countries have implemented laws aimed at restricting working hours for employees. This essay will explore the reasons behind the introduction of such legislation and opine that it constitutes a positive development.

The primary motivation behind the implementation of laws limiting working hours is to safeguard the well-being and health of employees. Prolonged and excessive working hours can lead to physical and mental exhaustion, increasing the risk of stress-related illnesses, burnout, and decreased productivity. By establishing legal limits on working hours, governments seek to promote a healthier work-life balance and protect workers from exploitation by employers who may demand excessive overtime without adequate compensation. In Japan, the government introduced the "Premium Friday" initiative, encouraging companies to allow employees to leave work early on the last Friday of every month. This aimed to address overwork issues, promoting better work-life balance and reducing stress-related health issues.

I believe it is a positive development as limiting working hours can have broader societal benefits, including reducing unemployment rates and stimulating economic growth. By enforcing regulations that cap working hours, governments create opportunities for more individuals to enter the labour market, thereby spreading employment opportunities across a larger segment of the population. Additionally, shorter working hours can lead to increased spending on leisure activities, contributing to the growth of industries such as tourism, entertainment, and hospitality. As employees have more free time due to shorter working hours, they may choose to spend their leisure time travelling to new destinations, dining out at restaurants, or attending concerts and events, stimulating the tourism, entertainment, and hospitality sectors.

In conclusion, the introduction of laws to limit working hours for employees is a positive development that prioritises the well-being of workers and promotes a healthier work-life balance. By ensuring that individuals have sufficient time for rest, leisure, and personal pursuits, such legislation contributes to overall societal welfare and economic prosperity.

Sample 3:

There has been a drastic increase in working hours in many countries and employees have been pushed to work harder and longer without any additional incentives than their wages. Therefore, many countries have passed new laws to control and legitimate working hours. I believe that it will send a positive message to workers, lifting their morale and dedication towards work and should be considered a positive development.

There are numerous examples, all around the world, where companies are making their employees work longer than normal duty hours. This has led to severe problems including employees feeling immense pressure from their employers to meet targets and deadlines. This is one of the pivotal reasons that employees are more susceptible to illness and stress. Therefore, some legislation is required to curb that, and those new laws that restrict working hours are aimed at achieving exactly that. 

Overall, it is a positive development, and those laws have already proved that they are immensely beneficial. Newly introduced rules have substantial impacts on workers' performance and health. These employees have become more responsible and productive. The quality of the work has also increased after applying these rules. In addition to this, people's health conditions have significantly improved. Now they have more time to spend with their family which helped them tremendously mitigate their stress and tensions.

To conclude, I believe that longer working hours have detrimental effects on employees' physical and psychological health and social life. New laws that limit working hours will bring several changes in their lifestyle that would lead them towards a better and more successful professional and social life.

Sample 4:

In response to increasing concerns about worker well-being, several countries have introduced laws to limit working hours for employees. These regulations aim to address a multitude of issues related to health, productivity, and quality of life. In my opinion, these laws are a positive development that significantly benefits both employees and society as a whole.

The primary motivation behind implementing laws to limit working hours is to safeguard employees' health and well-being. Extensive research has shown that prolonged working hours can lead to severe physical and mental health problems, such as chronic stress, burnout, cardiovascular diseases, and depression. For instance, a study conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) revealed that working more than 55 hours per week is associated with a higher risk of stroke and heart disease. By enforcing legal limits on working hours, governments aim to promote a healthier work-life balance, reducing the incidence of such health issues and improving overall productivity. Furthermore, these laws are designed to protect workers from exploitation. In many industries, particularly those with lower wage levels, employers may demand excessive overtime without fair compensation, leading to worker fatigue and dissatisfaction. By capping working hours, these laws ensure that employees are not overburdened and that they receive adequate rest, thereby fostering a more motivated and efficient workforce.

From an economic perspective, limiting working hours can have positive ripple effects on society. Shorter working hours can lead to increased spending on leisure activities, which stimulates sectors such as tourism, entertainment, and hospitality. Additionally, employees with more free time are likely to engage in further education or skills development, ultimately contributing to a more skilled and versatile workforce. For instance, in countries like Germany, where strict working hour regulations are in place, there is a noticeable correlation between regulated work hours and high productivity levels, as well as economic growth.

In conclusion, the introduction of laws to limit working hours is a positive development that addresses critical issues related to health, worker exploitation, and economic growth. By ensuring that employees have a balanced work-life dynamic, these laws contribute to a healthier, more motivated, and more productive society.

Sample 5:

In many countries, it is common for the state to constrain the number of hours a person can work within any given day. In my opinion, this law is designed to discourage exploitation and is decidedly positive overall.

The main reason the average workday is limited by law is that otherwise companies could take advantage of their employees. The evidence for this comes from past centuries before such laws were passed. Around the beginning of the industrial revolution, it was a common practice in European countries for individuals to work 12 to 16 hours a day. If an employee protested, then they might be fired or even physically harmed. Today, there are very few countries where corporations have the ability to make inhumane physical and mental demands on employees.

Limiting a person’s working laws is beneficial to society as it ensures workers have time for themselves. In countries where these laws do not exist or are poorly defined, there may still be instances of child labor or long working days. For example, in several East Asian countries, factory workers must live and work at their jobs with little opportunity for an outside life. In contrast, in countries with strict labor laws, a person possesses more time for family, hobbies, and friends. Free time is one way of guaranteeing a better quality of life and overall satisfaction, benefits which can have ramifications for society as a whole.

In conclusion, laws related to working conditions protect workers and for that reason are positive. It is also essential that countries enforce the laws they have passed.

Sample 6:

An increasing number of nations have enacted laws to protect average working hours. In my opinion, these laws are meant to limit exploitive practices, and they are advantageous if enforced well.

Lawmakers typically argue these reforms defend employees. Before labor laws existed, it was common for corporations to require long working days under extreme conditions. Modern stipulations that limit working hours are responding to these deeply rooted historic concerns. For example, in many developing nations, the labor laws are often not strict, leading to so-called ‘sweatshops’ where employees work long hours in dangerous environments for little pay. This mistreatment has been exposed in the media and now citizens demand better treatment. The laws therefore establish basic guidelines to prevent employees from working excessive hours.

On the whole, these laws are positive as long as they are nuanced and enforced consistently. There are many countries where such laws have been passed but in practice they are not followed, and workers have little recourse to report infractions. These laws must be strictly monitored, including preventing employers from firing employees who make complaints. Moreover, there are possible exceptions. A factory worker, for example, should never be required to work too many hours as they are likely to earn a low wage and put their health at risk. However, many white-collar workers, such as those at a start-up, may desire to work 90+ hour workweeks due to an overriding passion for a project. The law must discriminate between these dissimilar cases.

In conclusion, labor laws related to maximum working hours are meant to safeguard workers’ rights and are positive generally depending on their execution. It is important that governments propose laws they believe are enforceable and beneficial for the whole of society.

Sample 7:

Legislations restricting working hours for employees have been passed by many governments. The directive is believed to be for the benefits of relevant parties; however, I would argue that the negative effects could certainly overshadow its advantages.

To begin with, the compulsory limit which establishes a ceiling for working time can reduce work pressure on employees and prevent them from being forced to work overtime by businesses. Recent surveys show that the vast majority of respondents prefer to work fewer hours because it means they feel less exhausted, are able to spend more time with family, and focus on themselves. In addition, the possibility of increasing work efficiency also provides a basis for regulating hours of employment. As the regulation was proven to facilitate a relaxed work atmosphere, employees are more motivated and show more enthusiasm at work. This can contribute to the development of the company.

Although the proposed legislation has the potential to achieve the above impacts, the problems encountered may still outweigh them. The first issue is the costs that companies have to bear to ensure business progress in case the daily goals have not been met. The expense includes hiring more part-time employees to make up for non- labor inputs. Secondly, when workers have the same number of working hours, the number of people participating in road traffic during rush hours will increase. For example, since Mexico applied the 48- hour workweek policy, the number of vehicles on the street after work shifts has doubled, and traffic congestion has become worsened tremendously.

In conclusion, while there are some obvious merits to the hour restrictions including lessening stress and boosting productivity, it seems to me that the limitation has caused us more issues due to the national scale of its impact.

Sample 8:

Recently, some countries have brought in laws to limit working hours. I think this decision comes from wanting to protect employees’ health and rights, and it is a beneficial one in many ways.

Firstly, from my understanding, I think this development stems from wanting to improve workers’ health, especially if they’re working in an office environment. Many office workers suffer from health problems such as back and neck pains, migraines, and sleep deprivation. Overworking seems to be the common cause of these problems. By restricting working hours, employees have more time to rest, thus improving their health. Another reason why I think countries introduce this law is to protect employees from being abused by employers. For example, it is common nowadays that marketing agency employees are expected to not leave until meeting their deadlines, which means they work overtime without getting paid.

Regardless of the reason, I think that this is something to be encouraged. Firstly, limiting working hours will help improve employees’ moods as they do not have to overwork anymore. As a result, the relationship between corporations and employees improves, leading to a warmer cooperative attitude. Secondly, although it may come as a surprise, there have been studies showing that productivity is boosted by limiting working hours. These studies point out that working shorter shifts will help employees stay more focused as it does not take as much a toll on workers’ physical and mental health, hence improving productivity for the whole workplace. This is especially true for factory workers, as repetitive motions can cause drowsiness, so limiting working hours keeps their minds sharper.

In conclusion, I understand that countries introduced this law to limit working hours to protect employees’ rights and health. I think this is a beneficial development that needs to be encouraged in many more countries.

Sample 9:

Rules and regulations are made to maintain law and order. Some countries have introduced guidelines to reduce working hours for personnel. I consider reducing their stress and maintaining work life balance.

At the outset, the paradigm shift has made people ambitious and in order to earn a lot, individuals sacrifice their leisure time that they usually like to spend with their family. Thus, they escalate their stress and do overwork and reduce their productivity. Therefore, to relieve their stress, the need of curtailing the working hours is felt. Besides, it becomes a herculean task for them to maintain work life balance. They do not remain cheerful, instead they become accustomed to taking pills in order to have a sound sleep. In this way, their efficiency gets decreased, and this is a great threat to the economy of a company and to make them agile and fertile, setting a limit on working hours is necessary. For instance, it could be seen in developed nations as well as developing ones that individuals do work on vacations and lead a miserable life. They remain perplexed and gradually the knot of relationships gets loose and broken relationships make them depressed and they start to shrink the work and loose their efficiency. So, it is dispensable to let them free early.

Furthermore, it is a negative development because people become money minded, and they do not remain outgoing and valuing relationship is no longer needed for them. So, this kind of trend has adverse effects on the lives of job holders. What’s more, if a company is progressing by leaps and bounds, the whole credit goes to its staff. However, if staff is not optimist and shrinks the work then company is unable to make profit and ultimately, country will not progress owing to incapability of entrepreneurs to pay tax on time.

In conclusion, thus it is mandatory to diminish the working hours for the well-being of its employees as well as for the advancement of a company. Satisfying the needs of personnel is the first goal of a company and if they were showing remarkable performances in a specific period of time, then introduction of rules is commendable task of the governments.

Sample 10:

Nowadays, employees have been pushed to endeavour harder and longer in some developing countries. Hence, several countries have enacted laws to restrict working hours. There are numerous motives why the law is needed, which I will discuss in this essay. I believe that restricting the number of hours worked is a positive development for everyone.

One evident reason to present a law to limit working hours is to reduce the companies which set their labourers to work longer than normal duty hours. For instance, the employees obtain jobs over time to elevate their production by spending the same expenditure. However, workers are feeling immense pressure to meet targets and deadlines. Furthermore, another one of the pivotal reasons that employees are more susceptible to illness is primarily their unhealthy lifestyle. In particular, employees who do not have sufficient time to relax or sleep, which can put them at risk of suffering sanity problems, and it leads to spending more money on medical treatments.

There are also benefits to enforcing rules which have substantial impacts on workers’ performance and health. Employees are able to perform the job carefully, which helps prevent potential hazards affecting their safety and that of their surroundings. An illustration, if the employees are responsible to handle hazardous chemicals, it can be deadly if they cannot dispose of it according to the steps or procedures in the guidelines. In addition, people who cut their performance hours will have significantly improved their health conditions. For example, they have more time to stay with their families which helps them tremendously mitigate their stress.

To sum up, excessive works have detrimental effects on the workers’ physical and psychological health. Limiting work hours will bring several changes in their lifestyle that would lead them towards a better and successful life.

Sample 11:

In many countries, governments have enacted restrictions on working hours for jobholders. This essay will discuss the possible reasons why these acts came into force and suggest that this is a positive development because it reaps various benefits.

To commence with, prolonged working hours have been on the rise for many years, resulting in a growing number of employees developing health issues related to work pressure. It is also associated with the mental and social well-being of employees. Every year, long working hours lead to many early deaths from cardiac arrests and ischemic heart disease. For example, in an international study of the loss of life and health associated with working long hours, ILO and WHO joint estimate reveals that around half a million people, in 2017, died from stroke as a result of having worked at least 52 hours a week. The COVID-19 pandemic had also worsened the situation. A case in point is a study of 4.2 million employees from Latin America, Australia, and Europe in 2019, which shed light on the fact that the average working hours had risen by 52.4 minutes. Therefore, there is a justification for states to introduce laws to prohibit long working hours.

Defined working hours laws are a positive development as they prove advantageous to employees and employers. In simple words, reducing working hours helps employees devote their spare time to their family and friends, thereby establishing a healthy personal and professional life. It also enhances their performance and job loyalty which benefits employers. Apart from that, it reduces unemployment. When employees work for limited hours, the necessity of increasing employees to make up for the fewer working hours emerges, which brings down unemployment. It is, therefore, evident that legal maximum working hours is a positive development.

To recapitulate, severe health, social and psychological issues caused by indecent working hours have provoked the authority to adopt laws to limit working hours. It is a positive development as these laws confer various advantages to workers as well as employers.

Sample 12:

There are countries in the world such as the USA, Canada, Australia and many more where a person cannot work for more than 40 hours a week. In my opinion, it is a positive development. In the following paragraphs, I shall discuss why this law was introduced and my arguments to support my views.

This law was mainly introduced to protect the economic rights of the workers and prevent exploitation. It is seen that in places where there is no such law, employees are exploited and instead of normally working from 9 am to 5 pm, they are made to sit in offices from 9 am to 9 pm at no extra pay. Many other benefits of this law such as improvement in the physical and mental health of the employees and better family relations automatically followed.

This law is beneficial because, in this fast-moving world of today, people have become workaholics. In order to satisfy their material desires, they forget to draw a line between work and family. If working hours are fixed, then they have enough time for their family life and leisure. Secondly, overworking leads to stress and can lead to nervous breakdown in extreme cases. People also find time for their regular exercise if working hours are fixed.

Furthermore, having a limit on working hours also helps solve the problem of unemployment. A larger number of people working for a fixed number of hours is better than a lesser number of people working more hours. What is more, it has been proved by researchers that having a limit on the working hours increases the output and productivity of employees. This could be a win-win situation for both the employer and the employee. Finally, it can be said that the chances of exploitation of employees are much less if there is a limit on the working hours.

Some people oppose this law by saying that it is an infringement of rights. They say that if a person has the ability to work more, he should be allowed to work. Sometimes a person may need more money for his personal needs, so it is unfair not to let him work more. Nonetheless, it has been seen that in countries where such laws are there, people have a better life, better working conditions, lesser degree of unemployment and better productivity of employees.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that this law was imposed for the benefit of employees and employers, and it has many advantages.

Sample 13:

Free time allows the person to step back from stress not only physically but mentally as well. Nowadays, few nations are inclining towards reducing employees’ job hours. I will discuss why this law has been established alongside the development it has brought in people’s life.

Commencing with the myriad reasons why this law has been launched. First and foremost, it has established work-life balance in people’s lives. In recent times, the majority of individuals juggle for maintaining equilibrium between home and professional life. For instance, In New Zeeland, Guardian company has adopted for four days work week and found that 78% of their employee strength is able to maintain uniformity in their work and personal life. Thus, it helps people to maintain peace between both worlds. Moreover, it boosts mental happiness among personnel as they will be able to spend additional time with their loved ones and nurture family values. Therefore, it ameliorates family bonds and reduces health issues as people will be content and stress-free.

In my opinion, it is a positive development. Primarily, it has proliferated employee’s productivity level as employees are pleased mentally so they are able to finish tasks with a clear mind. Apart from this, this approach is environmentally-friendly. Multitudes who will travel to the office will be less for a day, resulting in decreased carbon dioxide emission. Also, plastic wastage will be little for a day. Therefore, this perspective is eco-friendly.

In conclusion, curbing working hours has ample merits. However, some service base companies cannot proceed with this technique, but they should try to look for alternatives to achieve contentment among workforces.

Sample 1:

With the advancement of technology, more people are opening accounts for social media and online banking purposes. This has led to the question of whether it is beneficial to put personal information online. I think that, despite the convenience it brings, people should not put their personal information online.

On the one hand, I can understand why people would put their personal information online. Firstly, it makes signing up for accounts much more convenient for users. For example, in the past, to open up a stock account, people would have to go to a stock company and complete lots of paperwork. By providing personal information online, people save time doing these registrations. Another benefit is that this makes signing in to these accounts easier for users. Instead of choosing security questions and remembering the answer for them like in the past, nowadays, users only need to provide their phone number or email address to get verified. This feature is useful when someone is trying to sign in to a bank account during an emergency.

On the other hand, there are multiple problems with readily providing one’s personal information online. The first one is that, by doing so, the user will become a target for not just material but also identity thefts. Social media accounts are prone to be hacked. Once the thief acquires the person’s address, they can easily break into that person's house, especially with other information already posted on social media, like vacation plans. Even worse, they can impersonate the user to claim insurance. On a less serious note, when users give out their information to the social media company or the bank, there is still a slight chance that these companies will sell it to telesales people. There have been reports that some social media platforms, such as Tiktok, collect and sell user's personal information.

In conclusion, although providing personal information makes registration convenient for people, it has to be done carefully since currently, it still does more harm than good.

Sample 2:

In today’s digital era, an increasing number of people share their private details online, such as home addresses and contact numbers, for a variety of reasons including registration on social platforms and internet banking. In my opinion, despite presenting certain drawbacks, this trend is predominantly a positive evolution in our increasingly digital society.

The primary concern with this trend is the heightened risk of privacy breaches and identity theft. As personal information becomes increasingly accessible online, it creates opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit such data. A notable example is the 2016 incident in Vietnam, where the personal information of 50 million Vietnamese citizens was allegedly leaked online, including sensitive details like names, addresses, and identity card numbers. This breach not only highlighted the vulnerabilities associated with online data sharing but also emphasized the urgent need for stronger cybersecurity measures and more cautious online behavior, linking directly to the critical importance of protecting personal data in the digital age.

On the flip side, the digitization of personal information offers more considerable benefits. One of these is the enhanced convenience of everyday transactions and communications. For instance, the rise of online banking in Vietnam, with platforms such as Vietcombank and Techcombank, has transformed how Vietnamese individuals manage their finances, enabling instant transfers and bill payments without visiting a bank branch. Additionally, social networking sites, such as Zalo and Facebook, have overcome geographical barriers, allowing people to maintain and develop relationships irrespective of their physical location. These benefits not only simplify logistical aspects of life but also enrich social interactions, illustrating the positive aspects of sharing personal information online.

In conclusion, while sharing personal details online carries certain risks, particularly highlighted by the Vietnamese example of data breaches, I am convinced that the overall impact of this trend is overwhelmingly positive. It represents a significant leap towards making daily routines more efficient and enhancing social connections, encapsulating the essence of this digital evolution as a beneficial step in leveraging technology to improve our lives.

Sample 3:

Nowadays, it is becoming increasingly common for people to provide their personal details online. Although this practice might facilitate a better user experience, I believe the trend is negative as people will likely be vulnerable to cyber-crimes.

On the one hand, updating personal information online facilitates a superior experience for online shoppers. By associating personal details with exclusive accounts, consumers can make more convenient online purchases. This is clearly exemplified when people shop on e-commerce platforms such as Amazon or Facebook. Because their identity information has already been synchronized with their sign-in accounts during an initial by the first registration, customers can skip the time-consuming data entry and transfer immediately to the final step of making a transaction. Thus, the buying process is expedited, fostering an overall convenient customer experience.

On the other hand, posting personal data on the Internet makes users potentially susceptible to criminal activities. The private information shared online including one’s names, addresses or social security numbers can be exploited for illicit purposes such as financial fraud. For instance, a hacker known as “Hieu PC’ in Vietnam ran one of the Internet’s most profitable and popular services for selling stolen identity records. He utilized his social engineering degree to exploit a wealth of vulnerable consumer data, stealing thousands a sheer volume of social security numbers and reselling them on an anonymous broker’s online platform. This led to a large number of retired workers in the United States losing million-dollar pensions to a sophisticated online hacking scheme.

In conclusion, in spite of some relatively minor conveniences, registering personal details online is a negative development considering the risk of online fraud. In my opinion, governments should establish additional privacy regulations for online shopping firms so as to mitigate security risks and better secure personal identity information.

Sample 4:

It has become common for people to put their personal data online for communicational and financial purposes. In my opinion, the benefits offered by this trend could hardly justify the potential drawbacks.

Admittedly, the trend in question presents certain benefits, chiefly in terms of businesses and services. First, from a consumer’s standpoint, having their personal information registered on social networking and digital banking platforms allows an increased exposure to various service offerings. This is because advanced data technologies enable consumers’ needs to be quickly identified based on their personal input. Thus, a list of potentially suitable service providers can be derived therefrom. Second, from a business’ perspective, a database of consumers’ information may help businesses gain insight into the market situation and make better decisions for their operations. For example, banks often analyse trends in consumer shopping behaviour, thereby devising more targeted marketing schemes which can yield higher sales rates.

However, users may very well find themselves in serious predicaments from putting personal information online. The consequences that may arise from a breach of cyber security can be catastrophic. As has often been the case on social networking sites, unaware users can fall prey to hackers by clicking on links that compromise their security settings. As such, users’ personal data may be extracted and used against their will, for blackmail, property fraud or misinformation. Moreover, there are chances that greedy businesses will commoditize users’ data and sell them to other corporations and industries for a profit. With their personal information in the wrong hands, users may have their needs, tastes and thoughts manipulated by dubious organizations.

In conclusion, despite its conveniences, the practice of putting personal information online proves to be more of a negative trend. The problems resulting from this practice can be more complicated and far-reaching than expected, especially in today’s digital age.

Sample 5:

Today, one of the most common occurrences in the digital world is the availability of personal information online, with people providing their details for daily activities such as social networking or banking. Despite some positivity associated with it, I believe this development is largely negative.

The increased presence of personal information online has produced some benefits. Thanks to this development, it has become easier for people to connect with each other, or in some cases, reconnect. An adult, for example, can find somebody he went to high school with by searching for their name on a popular social media platform. Then, they can catch up with one another and stay in touch after a long period of no contact. Meanwhile, in certain services, it is possible to provide higher degrees of convenience by having more personal information available online. When users have verified their own accounts using private details, banks and e-commerce sites can quickly facilitate transactions, enhancing customer satisfaction and generating profit faster. Indeed, the advantages to having personal information present digitally should not be disputed.

However, the negative implications associated with this tendency are potentially severe. For one, it puts people at risk of having their information abused. This can lead to a sense of insecurity, as there have been individual cases of private details being leaked to malicious parties, who proceed to use the victim’s identity for fraudulent schemes. Another privacy-related concern has to do with the vague possibility of withdrawing personal details from online platforms. Once private information is submitted, there is little guarantee aside from the holder’s word that it can be wiped from the digital world should the user request it. As a consequence, people’s digital presence may end up inseparable from their real lives, providing a way to track their activities and erode their privacy.

Given these points, I believe that many people putting up their private details online is detrimental. It is therefore necessary to be cognizant of the risks associated with this decision, and even more so to take steps to protect oneself.

Sample 6:

The advent of the internet has caused a paradigm shift in how people share about themselves. Many voluntarily put online personal details for networking purposes or financial reasons. This essay will explain how the trend can be more harmful than it is helpful.

The personal choice to post about one's information can make it easier for people to connect with one another; however, it can lead to some privacy threats. On social networking sites, it is more than easy for users to update on which school they go to, where they are working at or who they are hanging out with. Such data feeds to the algorithm which can push people who share common interests to interact with each other, thus expanding their social circle and strengthening the community. Nonetheless, if one is not aware of what they are posting online and accidentally reveals sensitive information, they could fall prey to predators. It is, unfortunately, getting increasingly prevalent to find stalkers lurking in the virtual world, collecting data on their susceptible victims. There is also an increase in the number of blackmailing activities due to lack of digital intelligence.

With data exchange, financial activities would be tremendously more convenient but also awfully more high-risk. By using online banking services, an average person could save a significant amount of time waiting in lines and filling out forms. Additionally, storing passwords along with other data on the clouds can be handy to those who have multiple accounts but a limited remembrance. In spite of that, the detrimental effects are worth being taken into consideration. Identity theft thrives on data leak incidents, where cybercriminals have access to people's identification or bank account. Ransomware poses another threat to unsuspecting users who, for example, provide their information to fraudulent websites identical to legit ones.

To sum up, people who overshare on the web run a high chance of getting themselves in trouble. This is why it is imperative to raise the public awareness on data security and enhance protection software as well as intrusion detection.

Sample 7:

Recent years have witnessed substantial advances in technology with the invention of the Internet as an epitome. An increasing number of Internet users have agreed to provide their personal information to online websites for different daily purposes. Despite the potential risks this tendency may pose, I still opine that the positive aspects are more considerable.

Invasion of privacy and cyberbullying, on the one hand, are deemed the two most major concerns when it comes to the digital age. For instance, one can be easily and constantly bothered by unwanted calls offering different goods and services since his telephone number is publicized, which not only disturbs the recipient’s daily activities but also causes unnecessary irritation, affecting work productivity. There are many other situations in which the credit card information of users has been illegally stolen, resulting in a huge amount of money loss. Another case in point is that many people, especially celebrities, can easily be bullied or harassed by hurtful or threatening comments and messages posted by anti-fans. If their home or company addresses can be found online with just a few clicks away, those people will even have to suffer from batteries in real life.

Be that as it may, the fact that the availability of information online helps facilitate various life aspects should not be ignored. First, daily activities can be carried out with more convenience. A typical example worth mentioning is the delivery service. It can be said that never have people been able to do shopping with such ease. Every purchasing activity can take place online, and buyers only have to provide their mobile number as well as address in order to get their items delivered at door. Governments have also been making use of information public on social media sites to spot and track reactionaries or dangerous criminals so that the safety of society can be ensured. Another example is that during the Covid-19 pandemic, those who evaded the quarantine protocol were all caught by authorities because they often updated their activities on Facebook.

In conclusion, although a person may be bothered or bullied by sharing their personal details online, this trend still benefits each individual and the general public to a great extent as long as the Internet and media literacy are popularized.

Sample 8:

In the contemporary digital era, the proliferation of virtual platforms has led to an increasing trend of individuals sharing personal information online for various purposes. While some people raise concerns about its potential privacy and security breaches, I believe that such an inclination substantially heightens user experience and convenience, making it a positive development.

It is undeniable that the widespread dissemination of personal information might pose significant threats to public privacy and security. Examples of data breaches and identity theft have become alarmingly common, with cybercriminals exploiting defects in online systems to gain illegal access to one’s private information such as bank account passwords. Furthermore, some technology giants are known for violating privacy rights through mass collection of user data to their own advantage. Serving as a prime example, Uber was once accused of secretly tracking the movements of its users, even after their rides, to monitor their locations in real-time without prior consent.

Although the privacy and security risks associated with sharing personal information online are apparent, I argue that these are outweighed by its significant advantages. One of them is the use of location-based services, which enhance user experience by offering relevant and timely content, such as nearby restaurants, shops, or events, that meets individual preferences and needs. Another benefit of sharing personal information online relates to personalized experiences and targeted services. Specifically, many E-commerce websites and digital marketing platforms utilize user data to deliver customized suggestions, advertisements, and promotions, all of which help enhance customer satisfaction and engagement.

In conclusion, while the sharing of personal information online carries potential risks to one’s privacy and security, it is my firm conviction that its huge contributions to user experience and satisfaction make it a positive development in current life.

Sample 9:

In the digital age, the increasing popularity of online platforms has facilitated the seamless integration of personal information into daily activities. While some argue that this trend can bring about a sense of convenience, I strongly believe that it poses more significant risks to privacy and security.

On the one hand, the trend towards sharing personal information online offers unparalleled convenience. When submitting addresses, credit card numbers, and other essential information, shoppers can easily purchase goods and services as well as conduct financial transactions at the comfort of their home. By uploading stories and pictures to Facebook or similar social platforms, individuals can interact with friends and family regardless of geographical barriers. This level of accessibility enhances efficiency and productivity, enabling people to manage their lives with unprecedented ease.

Despite this, there are greater concerns about the potential risks associated with online information sharing. The digital landscape is rife with threats such as hacking, identity theft, and data breaches, which can have devastating consequences for individuals and organizations alike. This issue is further exacerbated by the fact that submitting and saving personal data online leaves individuals vulnerable to surveillance and exploitation by both malicious actors and corporate entities. This erosion of privacy undermines trust in online systems, thereby potentially deterring users from fully engaging with digital technologies.

In conclusion, although the trend of sharing personal information online for routine activities can provide users with convenient experiences, it also exposes individuals to major risks to privacy and security. As such, I take the view that this development is more detrimental.

Sample 10:

In today's digital era, the norm of depositing personal and private details online for banking, shopping, and socializing has become ubiquitous. This essay delves into the ramifications of this phenomenon, particularly in Vietnam, and argues for its overall positive impact despite notable concerns.

The convenience of online transactions and social interactions cannot be overstated. In Vietnam, e-commerce giants like Shopee and Lazada have revolutionized consumer behavior, enabling effortless purchasing and financial transactions from anywhere. This digital accessibility is a testament to technological progress, boosting economic efficiency and fostering social connections. It offers unprecedented convenience, allowing for real-time interactions and transactions that were previously unimaginable. The ability to manage finances, shop, and socialize online has become indispensable, especially in the fast-paced, modern world where time is a precious commodity.

However, the advantages of this digital integration are not without their pitfalls. Privacy and data security emerge as significant concerns, with the risk of personal information being compromised. Despite these valid worries, the positive strides towards a more connected and efficient society are tangible. Particularly in Vietnam, the digital economy's rapid expansion is a clear indicator of the benefits. Online platforms provide vital services, reaching even the most remote areas and offering them access to broader markets and opportunities. The key lies in balancing these benefits with rigorous cybersecurity measures to mitigate risks.

In conclusion, while concerns about privacy and data security are legitimate, the advantages of sharing personal information online - enhancing convenience, economic growth, and societal connectivity - significantly outweigh the potential drawbacks. With strict cybersecurity protocols in place, the digital age's promise can be fully realized, marking a positive development in our increasingly online lives.

Sample 11:

In the contemporary digital age, with the Internet becoming an omnipresent element of daily life, a significant portion of people’s private information is shared online. This development, despite bringing about certain benefits, is an undesirable one, given its serious impacts on individuals’ privacy, finance and psychological well-being.

On the one hand, the advantages of the digitization of personal details are evident. Firstly, sharing personal information on social networks enables individuals to socialize and maintain connections with friends, family, and acquaintances. Social media platforms offer a platform for users to post updates, photos, and participate in discussions, nurturing virtual connections that may be challenging to establish through conventional methods. From a financial perspective, online disclosure of personal information enables individuals to effortlessly have access to a range of online services. For instance, online banking has become more convenient, allowing users to handle their finances, carry out transactions, and keep track of accounts from the comfort of their own homes.

On the other hand, these positive aspects pale in comparison with the more significant drawbacks that these online users have to encounter. One of the most pressing concerns is the loss of privacy, as individuals who publicly disclose sensitive details such as addresses and telephone numbers could become vulnerable to cybersecurity issues. There have been numerous reports in which cybercriminals may take advantage of personal information they have stolen for malicious purposes, which potentially leads to tarnished personal reputation and emotional distress for those concerned. Furthermore, the trend of sharing information on online platforms has become the breeding ground for the rise in identity theft. Online criminals, who may use stolen information to impersonate individuals and gain unauthorized access to one’s bank account, have provoked widespread concerns related to huge financial losses.

In conclusion, while sharing of private information could be beneficial to a certain extent, I am of the opinion that these benefits are outstripped by the drawbacks, as the convenience for social and financial activities is not an adequate compensation for the repercussions on privacy and financial security.

Sample 12:

The digitalized era has revolutionized humans' exchange of information. Personal identifying information such as banking information or phone numbers is made available on the Internet to ease the process of daily tasks. This essay will explain why this trend encompasses both positive attributes and inherent drawbacks.

To commence with, it is argued that the integration of personal information into online platforms can lead to greater efficiency and convenience. In the realm of e-commerce, for instance, many businesses take advantage of the Internet to automate their selling process. Customers can follow the shopping procedures provided by retailers on their platforms, from product research to making purchases without the need to communicate directly. This can save sellers a significant amount of time dealing with thousands of repetitive interactions daily, which can affect their productivity and ultimately profit. Similarly, when it comes to making transactions or opening up new accounts, banks can help minimize the number of steps that users have to go through by getting access to the verified information provided by them before that, providing a seamless and satisfactory customer experience.

Despite the benefits, public disclosure of sensitive data carries a high risk of identity theft. There have been numerous cases where cybercriminals utilize such clues to gain non-consensual access to users' bank accounts to commit financial fraud. Evidence for this can be witnessed in the phenomenon of stolen identity records in Vietnam in recent years, where scammers have managed to make unauthorized purchases or engage in illegal gambling under the victims' names. Another danger associated with data breach is the invasion of privacy. In many circumstances, hackers of social media accounts may blackmail their victims by threatening to publish confidential or private facts on public platforms, ultimately leading to defamation of character.

In conclusion, the debate on whether disclosing personal information online offers more opportunities or challenges is multifaceted with valid arguments from both sides. While it engenders efficiency and convenience, it can result in exploitation of users' data and make them become victims to identity theft and invasion of privacy.

Sample 13:

The advent of a digital society has led to greater vulnerability in terms of the personal information stored online. In my opinion, these associated dangers are significant but do not outweigh the benefits of a more convenient user experience.

Concerned policymakers often argue that sensitive information registered online fosters widespread fraud. The majority of individuals store some degree of information online whether it is as simple as their address and phone number or more important data such as social security numbers or banking details. Naturally, this information can be stolen. The variety of methods used to steal information, including phishing emails and actual hacking of websites, pose challenges for law enforcement and can lead to crimes such as identity theft. These novel vulnerabilities that all consumers must become aware of are likely to remain a permanent fixture of online life.

Nonetheless, the above instances are rare and storing information online allows for greater ease of access. The best evidence for this is that the vast majority of individuals have decided to store personal information online despite growing cognizance of the risks. For example, it is an afterthought to log in to a website, accept the cookies and store a username, and password. The next time the user logs in, the process only takes seconds and this small saving in terms of effort and time is justifiably meaningful in the aggregate. Moreover, in the case of online market trading platforms and banking websites, consumers are willing to divulge more confidential information to enjoy the conveniences of conducting transactions faster.

In conclusion, the tradeoffs associated with storing important data online do not make it a negative on the whole. Consumers, corporations, and governments must take steps to ensure safety, while being mindful that saving time and effort are two of the more fundamental human priorities.

Sample 14:

The number of netizens uploading their personal details for various daily activities has been on the rise recently. I believe this trend is largely positive given the convenience and improved service experience it offers despite the risk of scams.

The foremost rationale for why I support people keeping private information online for daily purposes is the enhanced comfort. Many web browsers have enabled auto-fills that can automatically complete forms by using users’ previously loaded details, eliminating the hassle of repeatedly entering meticulous data such as credit card numbers. Furthermore, this also streamlines the process of online transactions encompassing goods purchases and hotel bookings, contributing to a greater sense of satisfaction.

Another reason for my approval of storing personal details online for everyday activities lies in the better quality of services that people receive. In reality, service providers have developed sophisticated tools that capitalise on users’ actions to customise their experience. For instance, Google Maps can produce more personalised suggestions of restaurants and cafes if users are willing to provide their home location and places of interest.

However, I acknowledge the possibility of personal details being taken advantage of by cyber criminals. It has been reported that a number of hackers have manipulated loopholes in websites’ security systems to steal their users’ details, which include banking passwords and social welfare codes. These hackers then utilised the data to steal money from the victims’ bank accounts or blackmail them. If such personal data were kept off the Internet, these instances might have been less likely.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that keeping personal details online for everyday use is mostly advantageous as individuals can benefit from heightened convenience and service quality even though the data might be vulnerable to cybercrime. That is why governments should take more resolute actions such as providing greater security support for tech companies to create a safer virtual environment.

Sample 1:

It is believed that these days, thanks to various advances and breakthroughs in science and technology, we no longer need to use products from animals, such as food, clothing items or even medicine. I completely agree with this idea.

Many studies show that a plant-based diet not only provides sufficient nutrients for our body to function normally, but also helps us prevent various potential health issues such as diabetes, high blood pressure or heart attacks. My grandfather is a good case in point. He has been a vegetarian for over 60 years, and he is still in good health at the age of 80. In terms of clothing, I strongly believe that it is not necessary to sacrifice an animal’s life for a jacket or a dress. These days, artificial fur and high-quality synthesised fabric are being used to replace animals’ fur or other body parts.

Animal testing has played an essential role in the medical field. In recent years, however, with the development of technology, we can replace animal experimentations with sophisticated computer programs that could provide more accurate results. For instance, computer-based testing has been used to test the safety of new drugs or cancer treatments and has proved effective. It is, therefore, no longer necessary to use animals for new medicine testing or treatments.

In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that products made by killing animals such as food, clothing or medicine are no longer necessities due to the fact that they can be replaced by vegetarian food, artificial clothing materials or computer simulations.

Sample 2:

The argument over the use of animals to provide food, medicine, and clothing has been ongoing for years. Some people consider the killing of animals to produce food and other products to be unnecessary. In my view, I agree with this idea and will discuss several compelling reasons in this essay.

These days, we are faced with many public health challenges regarding poor health conditions, including cancer and heart disease, caused by excessive consumption of meat on a regular and long-term basis. Experts are calling for a change in human diets so that people can enjoy better health. Fortunately, many alternative meat products are available on the market. In fact, vegetarian diets are being favored by a growing number of people and can provide the same amount of nutrients for consumers. In particular, mushrooms and tofu contain high levels of protein, a kind of nutrient presumably only found in meat, and can therefore be used as a substitute.

Furthermore, medical experiments on animals and medicines manufactured from animals’ body parts received little endorsement in the past. Nowadays, herbs and many other types of plant-based medicines, such as ginseng, can cure many diseases, prolong human life expectancy, and aid medical practitioners in the treatment of many illnesses. More seriously, thousands of wild animals, such as tigers and minks, are killed each year, with their fur taken to produce coats and accessories for the fashion industry. There are now similar products made from plants and artificial materials that can fulfill our needs. Animals do not have to suffer for our needs anymore.

In conclusion, I think that our needs and desires do not justify the suffering of animals and animal products are no longer necessary. We can choose a different source of nourishment, medicine and clothing without any toll on wild animals.

Sample 3:

The use of animals for the provision of food, medicine and clothing has been extant for several years. However, the cruel treatment of animals and their slaughter for the purpose of human consumption has evoked the sympathy of numerous people, leading them to declare it an unnecessary practice. I agree with this viewpoint and will elaborate on this in the forthcoming paragraphs.

Firstly, it is needlessly cruel and unjust to the helpless animals to butcher them in order to fulfil our needs. Secondly, excessive consumption of meat on a regular basis can pose risks to our health. As a result, medical professionals are calling for a modification in human diets so that people can experience better health conditions. There has been widespread popularity of plant-based foods and meat substitutes are also widely available. Many people are turning to vegetarianism and veganism to help modify their diets and lifestyles, with them obtaining their protein requirements from a plant-based diet.

Furthermore, research has shown that reducing meat consumption is more conducive to the environment. Additionally, there have been reports of those involved in animal husbandry often using noxious chemical agents and medicines such as antibiotics to boost the growth and meat quality of their animals which further endangers the health of those consuming meat. As for clothing and medicine, ersatz options have been developed thanks to scientific advancement, which renders the extermination of animals futile. Lastly, alternative methods have also been developed for drug and cosmetic testing, which also makes the use of animals in such fields unnecessary.

However, arguments can be made for continuing the use of animal products. It provides a livelihood for several people and stopping animal husbandry would leave such people unemployed. Some people also require animal protein in their diet for health reasons and depriving such people would cause problems.

Thus, in conclusion, it can be said that while there may be a few reasons for utilising animal products, for the most part, their use should be discontinued as it is inhumane, and the gratification of human needs cannot be sufficient for causing such suffering to animals.

Sample 4:

The exploitation of animals has been an unavoidable aspect of human life for most of our history. We have raised and hunted animals for food, used their fur and skin for protection from the elements, and even used their body parts for their supposed medicinal benefits. However, as society advances, we need to consider our effect on other living things, and it seems that we should try to limit or even eliminate our reliance on animal products.

Like all living things, humans need a source of food and protection from the surrounding environment. When we lived as hunter-gatherers and in early agricultural societies, animals were an essential part of our survival, providing us with protein and keeping us warm. Conversely, in a modern context there is minimal need for this. We can get adequate nutrition from vegetarian sources and food scientists are developing lab-grown meat that will soon be indistinguishable from real meat. When we add in the suffering that animals experience in factory farms or in battery cages and the devastating environmental effects of intensive farming, it seems extremely difficult to justify using animals for meat and clothing.

The other major use of animals has been in medicine. Before the advent of modern medical science, people relied on traditional doctors who often used various animal parts to allegedly cure different maladies. Nevertheless, we now live in a brighter world where we not only have better alternatives, but we can demonstrate that these traditional animal-derived treatments are absolutely ineffective. Users and promoters of these types of medicine highlight the worst aspects of human nature as their stubbornness and selfishness leads to the extinction of many of the most majestic animals that have ever walked the earth.

Broadly speaking, in a historical context, the use of animals as food, clothing, and medicine seems understandable. However, in a supposedly enlightened modern society such practices highlight that many of us still think and act like we are nothing more than hairless apes.

Sample 5:

In contemporary society, it is argued that there is no necessity to use animals to make food, clothes and medicines. Personally, I totally disagree with this idea because of people’s eating habits, the assistance to people in cold areas and animals’ contribution to the medicine field.

The main reason why I do not believe that it is not necessary for people to consume animal products is that people have formed the habit of eating meat for a long time, which they find it difficult to get rid of. More specifically, human beings in ancient times started to hunt animals to feed themselves, and in modern society, they still regard meat as the main course on the dinner table. Thus, they are not likely to abandon this habit developed for centuries. Meanwhile, meat food contains some nutrients that fruits and vegetables cannot replace. If people do not absorb such elements, their health may be negatively affected.

Another reason is that clothing made of animal fur is of great importance to people dwelling in severely cold areas to withstand the cold. Although it seems that modern technology can make cold-protective coats without using animals, they may not be comfortable to wear because of the lack of good air-permeability. Fur clothes, however, are not the case.

The third reason is that scientists need to develop new medicines by conducting animal experiments. Compared with the money spent carrying out scientific research on human beings, the cost of utilising animals is much lower. Meanwhile, some animals are the key ingredients for some particular medicines, and no other artificial products can be a substitute.

In conclusion, I completely disapprove of the viewpoint that it is not essential to take advantage of animals to produce food, manufacture clothes and make drugs. This is because if animals were not used, people would not eat and wear comfortably and benefit from new medicines.

Sample 6:

Trying to live without exploiting animals for food, clothing or medicine can certainly be done nowadays, and people in the modern world seem to agree that it is not 100 percent justified to eat meat, clothe in leather, or use animals as medical research subjects. Therefore, I agree with the given statement that we can do without animal products.

To begin with, a vegetarian diet has proven to be a healthy choice. The earlier beliefs that vegetarian diet is deficient in proteins and other micronutrients, such as vitamins and proteins, have been challenged successfully. On top of that, a vegetarian diet, which is rich in fiber, prevents cancer of the colon, which is the most prevalent cancer in the West, where people mostly eat non-vegetarian food. Even the vegans, the very strict vegetarians who don’t even use animal products such as milk and eggs, have not been seen to be suffering from any malnutrition. So, we can safely spare the animals from becoming our source of such nutrition.

Talking about clothes, today pure leather shoes and garments can be easily replaced by faux leather, which is just like pure leather and only a true connoisseur can tell the difference. Such products have the added advantage of being easier on the pocket, as their initial cost is also less

and the maintenance cost is also lesser than that of pure leather products. So, even for clothing, animals can be left alone.

It is true that animals have been used for experimenting new drugs and are also the source of many medicines, but for that too today we have computer-simulated experiments, which give better results than those done on animals. Therefore, animals are not needed anymore in this field also. It is beyond argument that for this Earth to go the distance we must respect nature and its elements. We mustn’t abuse or exploit the animal kingdom because preserving those results in long term and ultimate good for mankind.

To sum up, it can be reiterated that it is definitely possible to lead a good life without depending on animal products, and so we have no right to exploit them.

Sample 7:

Animals play vital roles in the lives of humans. They help fulfill three of the most basic human needs - food, clothing and medicines, but questions about the necessity of animal products arise among several different consumer groups. Personally, I believe in the philosophy in which animals are entitled to the possession of their own existence and that their most basic interests - such as the need to avoid suffering - should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings.

There are various attractive plant-based options that can substitute for products of animal origin, which could help to encourage more people to reduce consumption of these commodities. People could facilitate a variety of possible routes to developing high-quality alternatives to animal-based foods. For example, we could now produce multiple types of cultured meat, which can replace conventional meat as good sources of nutrients for humans, and we could also invest in synthetic biology for the yeast-based production of ingredients originally from animals, such as egg white and milk. At the same time, with the increased use of synthetic fibers, the use of animal sources of clothing has significantly decreased. Still, medicine is one such area of potential complication for those of us attempting to live as plant-based as possible, because the overwhelming majority of medication contains ingredients or excipients that are not vegan friendly.

In my opinion, we should address the ethical questions about our treatment of animals because they form part of the larger picture of the way society treats all living things. I believe that animals do have feelings, and that unnecessary cruelty toward them is morally wrong. Therefore, animals should no longer be viewed as property or used as food, clothing, research subjects, entertainment, or beasts of burden, for the custom of tormenting and killing of beasts will, by degrees, harden people’s minds even towards men. All in all, consumers’ growing ethical sensitivity about the products that we use could ultimately make our society less impious and more civilized.

In conclusion, I believe that there are various alternatives to animal products, and we should forgo the ruthless exploitation of animals because of ethical reasons. In my opinion, the transition from animal-based to plant-based food, medicines, and clothing production would benefit our civilization.

Sample 8:

With the advance of technology, a colossal number of animal products can be replaced by artificial or synthetic elements in the modern society. As a result, many people claim that there is no longer necessary to consume animals to produce any food, clothing, and medicines. But I personally believe such an opinion is invalid.

Under no circumstance can the animal products be replaced. First of all, the human body cannot depart from meat, since our muscles are built by absorbing the protein coming from meat. And a huge number of necessary nutritions which are crucial to maintain our whole physical system also come animal food products. Thus, without meat, there would be negative effects on our health. In addition, abandoning all the animal products will definitely curb the augment of the economy. More specifically, ifthe market does not consume the animal products anymore, animal husbandry would be totally destroyed, generating the unemployment of hundreds of thousands of farmers, then relatively, social instability would appear, and the economy would collapse. Clearly, it is irrational to forbid animal products.

However, some people argue that human beings have the obligation to stop using any animal products as technology has way developed than before so that the substitution of animal products can be easily found. Unfortunately, such advocates fail to recognize the reality that many animal products, especially some medicines, cannot be replaced. Furthermore, these people do not distinguish the concept between animal preservation and animal products consumption. In other words, abandoning animal products is not the best way to protect the animal.

In conclusion, it is to early to abandon all the animal products, regardless of the valid alternatives resulting from the advance of the technology. And accordingly, the averages should understand that rejecting any animal products does not stand for animal protection.

Sample 1:

Opinions are divided on whether the standard of living has become higher compared to the previous centuries. Despite the higher living costs, I agree that life is now better for people in most parts of the world as they receive better healthcare and education.

The last century is a period of progress regarding improvements in people's health. A century ago, many illnesses such as smallpox, malaria or money pox were deemed life-threatening. This is mostly because of the poor prevention of diseases, the limitations in medical research and treatment at that time. However, this is not the case for most people today, as new vaccines, antibiotics and other effective cures have been developed, which shields humans from many viruses and have greatly enhanced our immune system. Although the cost for these can add up and be higher than in the past, the truth is that the lives of billions of people have been saved.

The general population in this century also reap benefits from a finer education. There are more schools and universities now than a hundred years ago, including online-based ones, meaning that more children can now gain access to education with fewer financial and geographical constraints. The increasing education standards are also what makes life better in the 21st century. as innovative pedagogical methods used in both teaching and learning are being constantly tested and applied. This facilitates the knowledge and skills students possess and results in a more skilled and adaptable workforce that serves as a basis for a nation's economic prosperity. A stronger and more sustainable economy is, finally, one of the key indicators of a superior quality of life compared to the past.

In conclusion, people's wellbeing today has improved significantly due to medical advances in the last century regardless of being more costly. People around the world are also being provided with better education, which yields long-term economic benefits.

Sample 2:

It is sometimes asserted that modern citizens are experiencing elevated living standards compared with those in the past. I largely agree with this assertion considering the improvements in general economic and physical well-being even though mental health remains a concern in today’s society.

The foremost rationale for why I believe the quality of life has been improved lies in people’s enhanced physical health. This can be attributed to an increasing number of medical treatments capable of effectively curing many of the existing health problems which were not curable centuries ago. More importantly, recent research in nutrition and disease prevention has empowered people to proactively design their diets and daily regimen of exercise to ensure a healthier lifestyle.

Another aspect that I consider contributes to an increased quality of life in this century is the increased financial stability. This can be seen in the case of most Vietnamese people who have seen their income increased. Since the 2000s, the proportion of those who have middle to high income has grown remarkably as a result of economic reforms and technical advancements in this country. A growing number of people now are able to afford not only modern home appliances but also luxuries such as spa treatments or overseas travel to enrich their life experiences.

Nevertheless, I concede that a certain number of individuals might be suffering from a heightened level of stress which undermines their quality of life. Recent reports have highlighted the escalating trend of pressure in some countries, notably Japan. Many Japanese have to contend with the soaring cost of living, fierce competitiveness in the job market and other social pressure, which has reportedly led to depression and mental breakdowns being on the rise.

In conclusion, I mostly align with the observation that the overall quality of life has been enhanced in the current century due to the augmentation of people’s physical health and income despite the documented decrease in their mental well-being. That is why governments should invest more in initiatives that fundamentally address mental health problems to leverage their citizens’ level of happiness.

Sample 3:

It is undeniable that people living in the 21st century enjoy a markedly superior quality of life compared to their counterparts in previous centuries. From advancements in healthcare and technology to expanded personal freedoms and economic opportunities, the modern era has ushered in an unprecedented era of human progress and well-being.

One of the most significant factors contributing to the enhanced quality of life in the 21st century is the dramatic improvements in healthcare and life expectancy. Thanks to groundbreaking medical discoveries, widespread access to vaccines, and better sanitation, people today are far less vulnerable to debilitating and often fatal diseases that were commonplace in earlier eras. The average lifespan has increased over the decades in many parts of the world, allowing individuals to live fuller, more productive lives. Additionally, modern medicine has greatly reduced the suffering caused by chronic conditions, physical disabilities, and injuries that would have been a death sentence just a century ago. A prime example of this is that rabies, which used to be considered fatal in the past, can now be cured at an early stage.

Moreover, the modern era has also seen a remarkable expansion of economic opportunities and material comforts. The middle class has grown substantially, providing more people access to education, technology, consumer goods, and leisure activities that were the exclusive domain of the elite in centuries past. This has empowered individuals to enjoy a higher standard of living and cultivate richer, more fulfilling lives. Furthermore, women today have greater access to higher education than ever before, opening up a world of opportunities for them to chart their own course in life. Whether they choose to pursue a fulfilling career or dedicate themselves to the important role of nurturing a family, modern women enjoy the freedom to make that decision for themselves

In conclusion, considering the undeniable progress in healthcare, women freedom and economic prosperity, the overall quality of life in the present far surpasses that of previous eras.

Sample 4:

There are those who hold the opinion that individuals in the 21st century enjoy a superior quality of life compared to those living in earlier centuries. I am in complete agreement with this view, as I believe the unparalleled advancements in technology and social welfare have significantly elevated our way of living.

The first reason for this enhanced quality of life is the unprecedented progress in healthcare. Modern medical innovations have not only increased life expectancy but also improved the quality of life through effective treatments and preventive care. For example, advancements in medical imaging and minimally invasive surgery have made complex procedures safer and more accessible, drastically reducing recovery times and improving outcomes. These medical breakthroughs, unavailable in previous centuries, have provided us with a level of health and well-being that was previously unimaginable.

Moreover, the digital revolution has fundamentally transformed our daily lives, marking a significant improvement over the past centuries. The internet and smartphones have democratized access to information, connecting people across the globe and empowering them with knowledge and resources. This has led to an informed and engaged society of people, capable of making better decisions for their personal and professional lives. The convenience and efficiency brought about by these technological tools, such as online banking, e-commerce, and telecommuting, have significantly improved our standard of living, making everyday tasks more manageable and less time-consuming.

To conclude, the 21st century offers a superior quality of life, primarily thanks to groundbreaking advancements in healthcare and the transformative impact of digital technology. These developments have not only prolonged our life spans but have also enriched our daily experiences, making modern life more convenient, connected, and comfortable than ever before.

Sample 5:

Some people hold the belief that people in present-day society experience enhanced living standards in comparison with those in earlier times. In this essay, however, I will challenge this school of thought.

Granted, modern people are superior to those in the past in terms of financial status. What used to be scarce such as education has become increasingly prevalent, which leads to a myriad of employment prospects and thereby higher incomes as opposed to those living in the past mostly sticking to manual jobs. Nonetheless, such growth in the job market is not permanent given recent financial downturns, particularly the economic recession of 2008. For instance, the IT industry, which used to provide numerous career prospects for people with handsome salaries, now faces a mass layoff due to market volatility, posing a threat to the stability of many people’s lives.

Another argument in favor of modern life is that people nowadays enjoy greater comforts with the development of numerous amenities and facilities for commercial and recreational purposes. The expansion of such facilities, nevertheless, comes at the expense of nature and ultimately human wellness. This can be illustrated by how thriving tourism alters and more worryingly, destroys natural landscapes. In Vietnam, green forests and vast areas along the coast have been cleared so as to build luxury resorts and retreats catering to tourists. These activities are the main culprits in the crisis of climate change, taking a toll on humans themselves

From my perspective, in the modern era, ones would be inferior to those living in previous times regarding the mental sphere. This is because modern people are inclined to dedicate their lives to work, which deprives them of quality time with their loved ones including families and friends, and other essential values in life such as their peace of mind. This devotion is widely regarded as the primary factor of the majority of burnout cases in modern society while people in the past tended to have greater work-life balance. The hectic life coupled with the proliferation of social media tends to place significant pressure on individuals and render modern life more complicated. Indeed, in the past, people mostly cared about how to sustain a living or how to protect their families. Meanwhile, people in the 21st century have to work excessively yet still fall victim to negative peer pressure or low self-esteem as they are exposed to an “amazing” life that other people try to depict on social media.

In conclusion, I disagree with the notion that today’s people have a better quality of life compared to those living in previous decades as people of different times have distinctive challenges that might not be shared by others.

Sample 6:

It is an undeniable fact that the world has been advancing rapidly since the beginning of this century. While some argue that the former times were better, others insist that people enjoy a rather convenient lifestyle today. In my opinion, I believe that due to the evolution of technology, there has been a strong enhancement in the well-being of humans.

Firstly, having access to comprehensive healthcare systems has significantly played a key role in boosting the lifespan of humans. The revolutionary developments in the medical sciences have drastically improved health assistance in the current society. For instance, there have been several epidemics throughout history and the fatality rate for diseases such as cholera, plague, measles, and polio have been quite high. In contrast, due to the advancements in medical sciences, these diseases have been nearly eradicated from the planet. While new diseases such as COVID-19 or Monkeypox emerge occasionally, we are better prepared to tackle them efficiently with suitable scientific cures.

Secondly, the tools, gadgets and engineering available in the present is pushing the boundaries of technological breakthroughs. High-speed transportation, gadgets, devices and machines collectively contribute to the quality and convenience of life. For example, decades ago travelling from Japan to Africa would have been a challenging, weeks-long travel, in comparison to a comfortable flight which covers the same distance in just a few hours. Apart from devices and travel, the invention of the internet has truly changed the world in terms of information sharing, connectivity, communication and data access. Such scientific evolvement has resulted in unimaginable and heightened lifestyle benefits.

To conclude, it is undoubtedly true that the present-day standard of living is substantially better than the olden days. In my opinion, the progression in healthcare, engineering and communication has surpassed the previous days and has enhanced the overall life quality in the 21st century.

Sample 7:

Nowadays, people’s quality of life has tremendously improved compared to the previous centuries. The essential factors for this change are advancements in technology, improved infrastructure and various initiatives taken by the government to bring up citizens’ living standards. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this statement.

Admittedly, the upgraded infrastructure helps people lead a quality living. Better transportation facilities, which were enhanced through technological advancements, have reduced travelling time to a great extent and improved the connectivity between various destinations. Such conveniences were not benefited by the people who lived some decades ago. For example, in the past, people spent months on sea voyages to commute to another country, but now it takes only a few hours to reach any corner of the world thanks to the high frequency of air flights. In addition, the condition of the food is being constantly monitored by the government in order to cater better quality food to every citizen. Still, some argue that the food consumed by our ancestors was more nutritious than now.

Furthermore, the development in medical services aided people to live longer, and various threatening diseases can be easily identified and cured as a consequence of advanced technological methods and innovative devices. For instance, the fatality rate of infectious viral infections such as measles and polio was significantly higher in the previous century, however, nowadays, these are entirely eradicated from the planet. While newer diseases continue to emerge from time to time, modern medicine can cure many of them, improving humankind’s quality of life.

In conclusion, humans in the modern era are experiencing a superior aspect of life to the ones who lived in previous centuries. Undoubtedly, as technology grows, there have been constant developments in every field to make living more manageable and more pleasant for everyone.

Sample 8:

Undoubtedly, the living standard of people changed with the advancement of technology. Although it has some grave repercussions for health; however, in the high-tech era, the community has improved the quality of life than in the ancient world. I agree with this notion, and I will elucidate my views in the forthcoming paragraphs.

To commence with, there are enormous amenities for the masses in the modern world, but the predominant ones are the Internet and education. To elaborate, institutions and businesses are using computers to get daily experience, making work very manageable. Furthermore, society is also informed due to smartphones because the Internet is available. Apart from it, the education sector has improved since students are used to it and do not need to wait for teachers if they confront difficulties. They access knowledge from Google and other apps. For instance, yale university observed that 70% of learners are ahead of primitive time. Hence, it might lead to more independent lifestyles and education in the world.

To strengthen the further views, in the past, people lacked knowledge regarding the Internet, and growth was stagnant. To eclipse it, ancient mortals wrote letters to relatives. They waited a long time for an answer which affected communications as much as possible as there were fewer opportunities to achieve their ambitions at the proper time. To cite an example, research done by Kenyatta university shows that 20% of people in 1000 are not able to use phones and the Internet. Therefore, at that time, limited facilities to get awareness. In addition, a few traditions are still helpful now, which cannot be neglected by technology.

To conclude, although technology is fast growing which leads to a better life and facilitates, people have no option due to the fast pace of life but to agree and learn about it very fast.

Sample 9:

The assertion that the quality of life in the 21st century surpasses that of previous centuries is widely discussed. This essay will analyze both the advancements that contribute to a higher quality of life today and the challenges that might argue against this view.

Advocates of the modern era's superior quality of life point to technological innovations and medical advancements as pivotal factors. In Vietnam, access to modern healthcare and technology has dramatically increased life expectancy and reduced infant mortality rates. A typical example can be observed in the widespread use of telemedicine, which allows rural populations to consult with specialists in urban centers, thereby receiving expert care that was previously inaccessible. If these technologies were not developed, many living in remote areas would suffer from lack of proper medical care. However, this reliance on technology also leads to lifestyle diseases linked to sedentary behavior, suggesting that these advancements are not without their drawbacks.

However, I believe that while technological and medical advancements have undeniably enhanced certain aspects of life, they do not universally translate to a better quality of life for all. The rapid pace of modern life, coupled with the stress of economic and social pressures, can detract significantly from mental and emotional well-being. In Vietnam, the rise in reported cases of anxiety and depression, especially among young professionals, highlights a critical downside of 21st-century lifestyles. This contrasts sharply with past centuries, where although life was harder in material terms, social bonds and community support were stronger and life rhythms were arguably more in harmony with human needs.

In conclusion, while the 21st century has seen remarkable advancements that enhance physical well-being and provide conveniences previously unimaginable, it also presents new challenges that can impede overall quality of life. Thus, it is essential to strike a balance that allows us to benefit from modern innovations while mitigating their less desirable impacts on our lives.

Sample 10:

There is a prevailing notion that contemporary global citizens are enjoying greater living standards than their forebears. Personally, I totally concur with this statement and will offer my opinion in the following essay.

On the one hand, there are several rationales behind a common belief that the modern quality of life has either remained the same or, to some extent, diminished. Firstly, the rapid industrialization and technological progress of the 21st century have given rise to many environmental challenges such as pollution and climate change. The adverse impacts of these on public health are evident in increasing cases of chronic respiratory diseases or extreme weather events like storms and floods. Secondly, the fast-paced and demanding nature of modern life has seemingly made mental health problems more common than ever. Issues like anxiety and depression are becoming alarmingly prevalent, especially among youth, suggesting that the heightened quality of life may not be universally experienced.

On the other hand, I contend that the general population has reaped numerous benefits in terms of improved healthcare and education, leading to an overall enhanced quality of life. Regarding healthcare, previously terminal illnesses, such as tuberculosis or plague, are no longer significant threats to society thanks to extensive research and breakthroughs in medicine. This has largely contributed to longer life expectancy and enhanced overall well-being among the public. Turning to education, the advent of the Internet and other technological advancements has facilitated and diversified the learning experiences of many individuals. This means that apart from formal education at school, learners can access abundant online resources with minimal financial and geographical constraints, which helps further promote their personal development and intellectual growth.

In summary, despite the environmental concerns and mental health issues associated with modern life, it is my firm conviction that significant improvements in medical care and education have contributed to a generally higher standard of living in the 21st century.

Sample 11:

Many believe that modern society offers individuals an improved standard of living than in past centuries. I mostly agree with this opinion as people have witnessed unprecedented advancements in the realms of medicine and education; however, I acknowledge that there remains a concurrent rise in stress levels.

One valid argument for my agreement is the tremendous progress in medical science. Many breakthroughs in healthcare research have enhanced treatment modalities and increased the probability of correct diagnoses, while the invention of vaccinations and other treatments have made previously incurable diseases manageable or preventable. For example, safe techniques for kidney or heart transplantation have helped patients to prolong their lives.

To add further credence to my belief is the educational sector has also undergone remarkable improvements. Governments from around the world strive to provide universal education for their citizens alongside the advent of online platforms that enable learners to access unlimited learning resources. As citizens become more intellectually educated, they will have more chances to seek a decent job which can contribute to increased living quality.

Nonetheless, I concede that people living in today's world also face many forms of stressors. The fast-paced nature of modern life, coupled with heightened societal expectations and family pressures can negatively affect their mental well-being. For instance, stressful economic elements necessitate longer working hours or multiple occupations to cover their expensive living costs, leaving adults less time to relax or spend with loved ones. This results in an increase in cases of mental illness or even suicide in some extreme circumstances.

In conclusion, while I largely contend that the 21st century has allowed people to enjoy improved healthcare and educational opportunities, contributing significantly to the enhancement of quality of life for many, I admit that the rapid societal shift has rendered them a more stressful existence. Where possible, people should balance between caring about their mental health and fulfilling their personal goals to lead a healthier life.

Sample 12:

It is an undeniable fact that the world has been advancing rapidly since the beginning of this century. Therefore, many people opine that today our living standards are much better than those of our ancestors. This essay concurs with this statement as it has manifold reasons to substantiate it.

To embark on, people were more susceptible to different kinds of diseases in those days and casualties were high. The revolutionary development of medical science contributed to averting such threats to a great extent. For example, the fatality rate of infectious viral diseases such as measles and polio were significantly higher in the previous century; however, nowadays these are completely eradicated from the planet. While newer diseases continue to emerge from time to time, modern medicine is able to cure many of them.

In addition, the transportation facilities available these days are more versatile. They have reduced the travelling time to a great extent as well as improved the connectivity between various destinations. Likewise, home appliances have made cooking and cleaning easier. Apart from that, the role of recent communication channels remarkably contributed to making our life more comfortable. The internet, which enables us to send and receive a huge amount of data within seconds, can be considered as the finest example of the power of technology. Thus, obviously, our lives are easier and more comfortable today than in the past.

In short, the people who live in the present century are enjoying the benefits of better services in the health, transport and communication sectors. Therefore, I believe, we enjoy a better quality of life than our ancestors.

Sample 13:

Some people think that people living in the twenty-first century enjoy a better quality of life than people living in earlier centuries. I completely agree with this viewpoint since I believe that scientific and technological developments have a big influence on how people live.

First of all, thanks to advancements in medical facilities and the growing number of highly qualified healthcare experts, healthcare is now more advanced and available to a wider range of people than it was in previous centuries. For instance, people living in Vietnam's mountainous regions no longer have to travel millions of kilometers to large cities in order to receive healthcare treatment because they can now access qualified medical professionals in neighboring hospitals that have readily available medical equipment for checkups. Even highly competent physicians from large hospitals might support the challenging situations by using online calls to consult and advise the less experienced physicians in the area. 

Additionally, our ability to network and connect to each other has become richer and more convenient owing to digital technology, which is another reason why residents of the twenty-first century have a higher standard of living. In contrast to earlier eras when communication options were limited to texting and phone conversations, modern people can now connect and contact their family and friends via a variety of platforms, including online social networks and zoom calls, much more easily, quickly, and affordably, all thanks to their smartphones. 

In conclusion, I truly believe that because of developments in digital technology and healthcare, the 21st century offers a greater quality of life. Our lives have been extended by these improvements, which also enhanced our everyday experiences and made living in the modern day more comfortable, easy, and connected than ever before. 

Sample 14:

People believe that we live a better life than the people who lived in the previous century. I completely agree with the fact that we lead a better life. I will justify my opinion with examples and scenarios in this essay.

The first and the foremost thing that comes to my mind is technology. We are surrounded by technology. Our life revolves around it. We work on laptops, tablets and computers which were not available in the last century. We use mobiles to connect to our friends and family. Earlier there was no such option. People used to travel and write letters. We can connect with anyone worldwide through social media websites. I believe that technology has made our lives easier. We use the washing machine to clean clothes. It does not require physical effort which people did previously. Cooking has become easier, storing food is now just a door away. These facilities were not available to make life easier in the previous century.

Second is the medical advancement that we have gained. The world can cope up with threats and treat patients. Now there are so many treatments for people which were not available earlier. They used to fall sick and left to expire. Every village and city now has hospitals. Right treatment at the right time saves many lives nowadays.

We have also excelled in terms of transportation. Traveling now from one country to another is just a flight away. People in the previous century did not have the facilities. Now we have trains and buses traveling all over the country.

In conclusion, I believe that the 21st century has a better standard of living. We can easily cure people, travel to our dear ones and lead an easier life.

Sample 15:

With the advancement of science and technology, our life has become easier and much more comfortable. These facilities were not available to the people who lived in the previous century. Hence, I do believe that people living in the 21st century generally have a better quality of life than people who lived in the previous century. In this essay, I will discuss a few reasons justifying the statement.

If we take a look around us, we can see a world full of technology and advancement. We can see cars, bikes, TV, laptops, fridge, washing machine, flats, apartments, hospitals, flyovers and what not. All these symbolize a better standard of living. Let us consider the advancement in the field of building. There are thousands of apartments that are growing vertically. This is making more space for people with luxurious views. The roads are better constructed, and flyovers have been built to ease traffic congestion, facilitating quicker commutes home from work. These flats and apartments have facilities like Air conditioner, automated lighting system, cooking oven, fridge, swimming pool, play area etc. One does not even need to travel to avail these facilities. Previously all these were not available. People used to stay without these facilities. Not only that, but we have also had a great advancement in the field of technology. Technical giants like Apple, Microsoft, and Google have affected our lives for the last 30 years. They have everything that we need. We can stay at home and look up places in America or Australia. Technology has developed 3D, 4D and 7D movies. Previously it was played on projectors and was black and white. Now we have Virtual reality which is a miracle of technology.

I believe that technology and advancement in all other fields have made our life easier and better. So, we are definitely leading a better quality of life than the people of the previous century.