Some people believe that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress, but they should be concerned about the quality at work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
There is an opinion that employers should not overly concern themselves with what their employees wear, as their quality of work should be the primary focus. I wholeheartedly agree with this viewpoint, and this essay will elaborate on my reasons.
The major consideration for employers should indeed be the quality of their employees' work. When employers prioritize work performance over dress code, they create an environment where employees can focus on their tasks without unnecessary distractions. For example, in the tech industry, companies like Apple have adopted a more relaxed dress code, allowing employees to wear casual attire. This approach has contributed to a culture of innovation, where employees feel comfortable and empowered to generate groundbreaking ideas. By emphasizing work quality over attire, companies like Apple have demonstrated that allowing employees to dress comfortably can lead to enhanced creativity and productivity.
Furthermore, an excessive focus on dress codes can negatively impact inclusivity and diversity within the workplace. When employers impose strict dress codes, they may inadvertently exclude employees from various cultural backgrounds who have unique clothing preferences or requirements. For example, in multinational corporations with employees from diverse cultures, mandating a Western dress code might alienate those who prefer traditional attire. Embracing a more flexible dress code policy fosters an inclusive environment where employees from different cultural backgrounds feel respected and valued, contributing to a more harmonious and diverse workplace.
In conclusion, employers should place their main focus on the quality of their employees' work rather than micromanaging their attire. As exemplified by companies like Apple and multinational corporations, this approach not only enhances work performance but also fosters an inclusive and diverse working environment.
Sample 2:
It is sometimes asserted that the management should not regulate their subordinates’ attire and instead place emphasis on the importance of work performance. I largely agree with this assertion given the fact that additional regulations cause greater work stress and damage companies’ competitive advantages; however complete freedom might be detrimental to the office environment.
The first rationale for my disagreement to the involvement of managers in the office dress code is the extra stress it imposes on employees. Specifically, they might interpret these policies as an invasion of their privacy and excessive supervision by bosses, further burdening their work. Conversely, if employers solely attend to work performance, employees can have a greater sense of freedom and autonomy and therefore exhibit innovation and commitment which drive their company’s success.
Another argument for why I oppose managers dictating workplace attire is the significant resources required for implementing and enforcing such regulations. Instead of lavishing valuable time and money on addressing employees’ appearances, managers can allocate these sources to more crucial factors, which more directly improve their company’s competitiveness, such as talent retention and product research.
However, I acknowledge that granting employees complete freedom in their office attire choices could potentially harm the professional work environment. For instance, some may opt for casual attire like jeans or flip-flops, which could convey a lack of seriousness towards work and respect for their colleagues. If this practice becomes ingrained in the workplace culture, it could negatively impact the company’s image of professionalism and dedication.
In conclusion, I am mostly in agreement with the proposition of those in management positions not dictating employees’ dress codes due to the stress it can generate at work and its potential to harm the company’s competitiveness although employees might dress inappropriately if there is no regulation. That is why managers and HRs should develop a comprehensive plan to foster a culture of respect and unity among employees, ensuring that even in the absence of strict regulations, workers maintain appropriate attire standards.
Sample 3:
The way employees dress in the workplace has divided people over whether companies should be concerned with their staff’s choice of clothing. While some believe that how they dress is none of their employer’s business, as work performance should take precedence, I am inclined to disagree with them.
It is understandable that companies ought not to govern their employees' clothing. After all, productivity should be the primary focus of any firm, and personal matters should be left to the employee’s discretion. Being uptight about the staff members’ clothes may create unnecessary friction and drive down company morale; in turn, this will be detrimental to employee performance. Another argument, meanwhile, supports employees’ freedom to choose their clothing, as long as they stay appropriate. As opposed to enforcing rigid dress codes, this can help to create a more leisurely and comfortable workplace. Therefore, workers would have a relaxed environment to perform, leading to increased quality of their output.
Nevertheless, firms should be conscious of how their employees dress. This is because in certain sectors, particularly where publicity or presentation in front of clients is a significant element, clothes reflect the organization’s reputability. If employees look professional in their clothing, a positive impression can be created on customers and stakeholders. That is why investment banking firms, for instance, usually have strict dress codes, with heavy emphasis on formality and established styles. Inversely, should workers dress themselves sloppily, potential clients and members of the public might develop a negative perception of the business. The fashion industry can be notorious for this, since employees simply cannot afford to be seen in the public as slovenly or too casual. It would seem from these points that workers’ clothing is a contributing element to an enterprise’s reputation; hence, concerns about it can be justified.
In conclusion, I disagree that companies should not be interested in the way their staff dress. It is recommended that they become aware of the possible impact employees' clothing choices can have and ensure that workers are dressed professionally.
Sample 4:
In modern society, many companies attach great importance to how employees dress at work, while others consider that work efficiency is far more important than employees’ appearance. In my opinion, the smart dressing style of workers plays a crucial role, but the quality of work should be prioritized.
People who favour the importance of dressing argue that dressing well can bring many benefits to the company and individual. First of all, appropriate workplace clothing can demonstrate a high level of professionalism, which is best illustrated by bank employees wearing formal attire and salespeople wearing business suits. In addition, an exquisite outlook creates a positive attitude which aids employees in building social networks and developing businesses. A recent survey in China reveals that wearing a formal suit will impress potential clients that you are working at a trustworthy company, whereas casual outfits typically wind up with an opposite effect.
However, the success and reputation of enterprises mainly depend on the quality of work. Firstly, product quality is a necessary factor to ensure customer satisfaction. Therefore, the high requirements for quality work generate higher profits and enhance market competitiveness. What is more, the dress code for employees is dropping with technology innovation and job diversification. In the workplace where projects and tasks are done online, employees only focus on their capacity and productivity instead of outward look. Companies like Apple and Google, for example, are so tolerant of dress code that employees feel free to excel in their work.
In conclusion, if an enterprise demands for long-term and sustainable development, the quality of work always comes first. While employees need to be cautious about the way they dress to work, it is the quality of work that they should value most.
Sample 5:
In contemporary professional settings, there is a popular notion that employers should put a greater emphasis on the work productivity of subordinates rather than their attire. Personally, I disagree with this viewpoint and will offer my opinion in the following essay.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why many individuals prefer the absence of dress codes at the workplace. Firstly, such restrictions on clothing seem to bear little relation to the overall growth and success of a company, which would be better indicated by workers’ actual job performances and contributions. Another argument against dress codes is that they are sometimes perceived to suppress individuality and self-expression. This lack of personal freedom could then give rise to decreased morale and job satisfaction among employees, potentially diminishing their productivity and delaying the general work progress.
On the other hand, I firmly believe that formal dress codes can have positive impacts on both the public image of an organization and the spirit of its employees. Regarding the former, an employee’s attire would reflect the professionalism and credibility of an entire company, a crucial factor in terms of customer dealings and interactions. To illustrate, a formally and politely dressed workforce is more likely to project a polished and credible image to clients or partners, facilitating business cooperation or negotiation processes. As for the latter, the introduction of dress codes could ensure that all employees are uniform in their appearance, thus fostering a strong sense of belonging and equality among the labor force. Such cohesion is particularly conducive to today’s team-oriented work environments.
To recapitulate briefly, despite the belief that employers should primarily focus on the overall work quality instead of their subordinates’ clothing, it is still my firm conviction that for optimal business operation and development, both aspects should be sufficiently addressed.
Sample 6:
The importance of how employees dress at workplaces has already been recognised and accepted. Although I agree that the relaxation of the dress code at work is not a matter in measuring their performance, I think that in some areas, a strict dress code is essential.
In some companies, employees are allowed to dress in their own way. For example, many of my colleagues were promoted because they often care more about their performance improvement than the dress code at the workplace. In fact, they often dress casually as they explained that they feel more comfortable when doing their work. Also, there are similar examples at famous technology companies such as Google and Facebook where employers encourage relaxed dress code to create a fun, satisfied and creative environment.
In most cases, employers need to pay more attention to the way their staff dress for some reasons. Firstly, dressing formally promotes a professional working atmosphere and helps employees do their job better. To take the banking sector as an example, a uniform or a smart suit can convey an image of trustworthiness to ensure that customers feel confident that their money is in safe hands, thereby using the services of the bank. In this case, casual clothes can give a very bad first impression of the company. Secondly, wearing a uniform is a mandatory issue in some jobs like firefighters or doctors as such uniforms are sophisticatedly designed to allow people who wear them to work under hazardous or special working conditions.
To conclude, an employee’s ability to perform well in their job has to be the highest priority in any profession. Whether the dress code should be relaxed or strict should depend on the working environment and work culture of the workplace.
Sample 7:
Some argue that employers should not focus on the attire of their employees, as it is the caliber of their work that truly matters. This essay will delve into this discourse, exploring the merits of each perspective and ultimately presenting a balanced view on the matter.
It is imperative to recognize that an employee’s competence and productivity should be the paramount concerns for any discerning employer. In today’s dynamic and fiercely competitive work environment, the value an employee brings through their profound skills and expertise far outweighs the significance of their attire. For instance, in creative industries such as graphic design or content creation, what holds utmost importance is the quality of the output rather than conforming to stringent formal dress codes. Furthermore, a workplace that wholeheartedly embraces individual expression fosters a more vibrant and diverse environment. Granting employees the latitude to dress comfortably and express their unique style can lead to elevated job satisfaction and a profound sense of belonging. This, in turn, engenders an atmosphere of heightened creativity and innovation within the team.
However, it is essential to acknowledge that in certain client-facing roles or industries with a high emphasis on professionalism, a specific level of dress code is imperative. In fields as esteemed as law, finance, or executive leadership, the image of the company is intricately linked with client trust, rendering adherence to a formal dress code a matter of necessity. This professional image not only instills confidence in clients but also mirrors the organization’s unwavering commitment to excellence. Moreover, in industries where safety stands as a priority, such as construction or manufacturing, enforcing specific dress codes transcends mere preference; it becomes a vital necessity. Protective gear, encompassing helmets, goggles, and specialized attire, stands as an indispensable aspect in ensuring the well-being of employees and averting potential accidents or injuries.
In conclusion, while the emphasis on an employee’s competence and productivity stands as of paramount importance, it is equally crucial to strike a judicious balance between professionalism and individual expression. In certain client-facing roles or positions where clothing styles significantly impact safety, I ardently advocate for the imposition of a stringent dress code.
Sample 8:
In the contemporary professional realm, it is often argued whether an employee's attire should be of concern to employers, or if productivity should be the primary focus. In this essay, I will discuss these viewpoints before outlining my argument that, while work quality is crucial, attire also plays an important role and should not be disregarded.
There is no denying that work efficiency needs to be the focal point of employers as this is the major driver of recruitment. It is widely understood that being well-dressed is rarely a requirement in job descriptions, but first-hand experience, transferable skills and specialised knowledge are what recruiters demand from their applicants. Therefore, the quality with which tasks are accomplished and their potential to increase revenues for the company are determining factors in accessing an employee's value.
Nevertheless, it is imperative to acknowledge the salience of professional attire as it can enhance the perception of a company's professionalism. This is particularly evident in business meetings. While exhibiting outstanding presentation skills or excellent job-related knowledge, an employee dressed in jeans, T-shirts and flip flops could detract from their partner's impression and trust. In the worst-case scenario, a casual or untidy appearance from a minor group of workers could tarnish the image of the entire organisation. This could lead others to regard the company as disorganised and insufficiently professional, thereby increasing the likelihood of business venture failure.
In conclusion, how efficiently an individual works is undoubtedly more significant than what they wear as this is an indicator of their value. However, I feel that a neat and professional look is worth considering because of its potential influence on promoting the reliability and professionalism of a business.
Sample 9:
In today's dynamic workplace, the notion that attire is irrelevant and that an employee's merit should solely be gauged by their performance has gained traction. While this perspective holds merit, I argue that professional attire remains an essential aspect of corporate culture.
One valid viewpoint suggests that an employee's work quality should be the primary concern for employers, and the way someone dresses should be immaterial. This line of reasoning gains strength when considering roles such as software development or research, where an employee's attire has little to no bearing on performance. For instance, in the burgeoning tech industry of Vietnam, professionals often adopt a casual dress code while excelling in coding and problem-solving skills. However, the absence of a dress code can be detrimental in certain contexts. Take customer-facing roles in the banking sector, for example; if employees dressed too casually, it could potentially undermine the institution's reputation for professionalism and trustworthiness.
However, I believe that the importance of attire should not be overlooked, particularly in professions where presentation and first impressions hold significant weight. In Vietnam's growing hospitality industry, for instance, a hotel staff's impeccable appearance directly correlates with the establishment's perceived quality. Should a hotel in the heart of Ho Chi Minh City employ staff who appear unkempt, the repercussions would not merely be internal but would also tarnish the hotel's public image. While the quality of service is indispensable, the visual presentation serves as the initial touchpoint for customer interaction, which is equally valuable.
In conclusion, while the quality of work should undeniably be a focal point for employers, the role of appropriate dress code cannot be entirely dismissed. A nuanced approach that takes into account the specifics of the industry and job function is, therefore, essential for striking the right balance between appearance and performance.
Sample 10:
It is believed that in a workplace, it is unnecessary for employers to care about their employees’ attire, but instead job performance should be the sole focus. Although it is true that the quality at work is of great importance, managers should set clear guidelines regarding uniforms for their workers.
Granted, one might argue that overly strict or rigid dress codes can impose restraints on employees’ individuality and self-expression. When there is an alignment between how employees dress and their sense of comfort and personal styles, this could offer them a sense of satisfaction, which would raise their morale and lead to the resultant increased productivity.
However, this line of reasoning may not be sound as it fails to factor in the fact that not all employees can afford expensive or the latest clothings and their standard of living differ from family to family; therefore, it is probable that there might be a discrimination between workers regarding how wealthy they are by flaunting their clothes, potentially instilling shyness and jealously into some employees.
Moreover, too many different clothing styles in the same working environment can make it difficult for everyone to bond and cooperate with each other, whereas uniforms put everyone, regardless of their ranks in an enterprise, at the same level, which would help make the management less intimidating and more approachable and can build a sense of unity and cohesion which can otherwise be difficult to achieve.
Advocates of allowing employees the freedom of choice in terms of the way to present themselves at work also justify their position by pointing out that job performance and skills should be the primary criteria for evaluating employees and contributing to the overall success of a business, while clothing has nothing to do with these.
Though reasonable this argument seems to be, more often than not, clothes can in fact exert a direct impact on the image and reputation of an organization. For instance, in positions where employees have to frequently interact with clients such as in education and retail, attire of teachers and sales associates can shape the way the company is perceived by clients, and thus can help establish a sense of trust and rapport.
Furthermore, implementing work uniforms is one of the most cost-effective ways to enhance a company’s branding, and set it apart from its competitors by means of delicately incorporating its brand’s colors, patterns and logos into the uniforms.
In conclusion, while it is understandable why managers should prioritize their employee’s quality of work rather than worry about how they dress, I am of the opinion that dress codes should be made obligatory in an organization.
Sample 11:
Professional clothes and dressing sense at work has persistently been a subject of dispute among people. Some people consider that the organizations’ administrators and the higher management should not be bothered about how the employees dress. I disagree with this notion and realize the essence of business attire at work. In the following paragraph, I shall further my opinions on this viewpoint.
The very essence of having business attire and the fundamental emergence of professional dressing is to invoke a sense of uniformity and constancy among all. The incidents of people forming opinions and at times getting engrossed in chatting about one’s choice of outfit is rife and has been time and again seen denigrating one and making them rate low on self-esteem. This causes mental fatigue in an individual trying to match up with a standardized dressing norm. Moreover, in this process, it has been seen as to how the efficacy of an individual extenuates upon thinking about such insignificant and paltry issues. In addition to that, it revitalizes the sense of belonging among colleagues and employees.
An employee is the face of an organization, and how people look upon them reflects organizational standards in the minds of people. Especially, in business meetings, wearing clothes based on comfort might render a sense of discomfort and trigger an ambience of informality among the employees and the clients as well. Even in business models based on business-toclient modelling, formal wear and having a dressing code is quintessential to the reputation of an organization. Therefore, even from the putative aspect, it is all the more cardinal to have a formal uniform for the employees.
Though some might argue that having a typical dress could at times be quite daunting to put up with, in the long run, this creates a professional work environment without dragging trivial issues like choosing what to wear or if this dress is being repeated or not, in the mainstream.
Conclusively we may say that having a dressing sense is mandatory for an efficient work environment and having a conducive work environment is all that should be a numero uno priority.
Sample 12:
Many are of the belief that corporations should prioritize quality work over appropriate workplace attire. In my opinion, there are limits to this sentiment; however, it is largely justified as other areas are more crucial to success.
Those in favor of a strict dress code argue that it fosters professionalism. Appearance is important not only for clients and customers but also workers themselves. An employee who dresses well for work is similar to an actor preparing for a performance. The appearance of professionalism is likely to engender the same level of diligence to their work. This becomes part of a cycle as customers notice the attention to detail and workers become aware they are essentially performing. The best illustration of this is professions that require uniforms, such as doctors and police officers, and thus fully embody their public role.
However, the quality of the work itself is paramount. In recent years, corporations have relaxed dress codes in recognition of this fact. For example, many technology companies in Silicon Valley including Facebook and Google are famous for a more casual approach to attire. This policy begins with the CEOs and executives who eschew traditional suits for jeans, normal shirts, and comfortable shoes. This signals that the success of a company depends more on the output of their work. An employee at such a company who dresses well but cannot code or contribute meaningfully to a high-achieving team is in fact a hindrance to success. The focus on inner qualities and capabilities is reflective of a broader social shift that places less value on factors extrinsic to true achievement.
In conclusion, the minor benefits of dress codes for professionalism are outweighed by the recognition of the importance of real work. Companies should therefore strive to uphold values with tangible impact.
Sample 13:
Opinions vary regarding whether employers should focus on the working performance of their employees rather than on how they dress. Although a professional appearance can be important to a certain extent, I firmly believe that allowing employees to have some freedom in their clothing choices can have a ripple effect on their work performance.
One perspective claims that an established dress code is essential for portraying a professional image and fostering a conducive work environment. When employees are dressed in appropriate and tidy attire, it reflects positively on the company's reputation. Clients and customers are more likely to have confidence in a well-presented workforce, which can ultimately lead to increased business opportunities. However, I believe that establishing a more formal dress code is only necessary in a few cases. For client-facing roles, adhering to this policy is undoubtedly essential, whereas in a large number of situations and fields, it would not yield the same benefits.
Conversely, I completely support a more lenient approach to employee attire since focusing on the quality of work should supersede concerns about appearance. When individuals feel at ease and confident in what they wear, they are more likely to be content and motivated in their work environment. This positive mindset can lead to an increase in creative thinking and problem-solving abilities, which in turn can enhance overall productivity. Furthermore, in today's rapidly evolving work landscape, especially in tech-driven industries, a strict dress code may be perceived as outdated and hinder recruitment efforts, particularly among younger, innovative professionals who value a relaxed work environment.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments in favor of maintaining a formal dress code to project professionalism and enhance the company's image, I firmly believe that a more flexible approach to employee attire is conducive to productivity and overall job satisfaction.
Sample 14:
In today's diverse workplace landscape, the question of whether employers should focus on their employees' dress code or prioritize the quality of their work is a subject of much debate. Some argue that dress codes are inconsequential, while work quality should be the sole focus. I agree with this perspective, believing that while business attire is essential, it should not overshadow the significance of work quality.
Firstly, an employee's proficiency and productivity are pivotal to the success of any organization. Employers must invest in cultivating a skilled workforce and nurturing an environment that promotes excellence. Prioritizing work quality ensures that tasks are completed efficiently, deadlines are met, and the company's objectives are achieved. When the workforce is focused on delivering high-quality results, the organization thrives and maintains its competitive edge in the market.
Secondly, an employee's attire can influence their confidence and motivation. While dress codes can create a sense of uniformity and professionalism, enforcing strict rules can lead to discomfort and hinder creativity. Allowing employees to dress in a manner that makes them comfortable, within the bounds of decency, can enhance their confidence, leading to improved job satisfaction and, consequently, higher productivity.
However, it is crucial to strike a balance. Employers can encourage a professional dress code while emphasizing the importance of work quality. By fostering a supportive and inclusive environment, companies can harness the strengths of a diverse workforce. Employees should be judged based on their skills, knowledge, and accomplishments rather than their appearance.
In conclusion, while a professional appearance has its merits, it should not overshadow the paramount importance of work quality. Striking a balance between professionalism and individual comfort can create a workplace environment where employees are motivated, confident, and committed to delivering high-quality results. This delicate equilibrium fosters a culture of excellence, ensuring the long-term success of any organization.
Sample 15:
Many consider that companies should focus on the working performance of their staff, rather than their apparel styles. I mostly agree with this viewpoint as applying rigorous attire rules may raise work efficiency and cultural respect; however, a regulation on dress code is necessary in several professions.
The first reason for my agreement is that promoting a comfortable and flexible dress code can enhance employee morale and productivity. When employees are allowed to dress in a way that reflects their personal styles and comfort, they are likely to feel more relaxed and confident, which can translate into higher job satisfaction, hence a better performance. In contrast, restricting the way employees dress may occasionally cause conflicts with their personal preference, which potentially results in discomfort, eventually affecting working productivity.
Another justification for my advocacy is that a freestyle appearance policy fosters cultural identities. Specifically, allowing employees to dress according to their traditional attire establishes and encourages recognition and respect toward cultural diversity within the workplace, creating a harmonious environment. However, imposing strict dress regulations may suppress cultural identity, leading to feelings of cultural erasure or alienation among employees and may result in poor quality output.
Granted, appropriate dress code should be considered depending on the nature of the jobs in some cases. In certain industries, such as manufacturing or healthcare, strict uniforms might benefit the health and safety of employees. For instance, workers in construction sites must wear safety equipment such as goggles or helmets to avoid potential accidents. In this aspect, prioritizing dressing rules minimizes risks and enhances staff's overall well-being, which can have a direct impact on productivity and work quality.
In conclusion, although paying attention to employee's dress code is essential in various jobs due to safety issues, I somewhat believe that a flexible regulation on appearance in the workplace improves job satisfaction and cultural identity respect, which contributes to higher productivity for companies.
Sample 16:
It is argued that in workplaces, employers need not concern themselves with their employees' attire; rather, job performance should be the primary focus. While workplace performance is undoubtedly important, managers should establish clear uniform guidelines for their staff.
Admittedly, one could argue that excessively strict dress codes may constrain employees' individuality and self-expression. When employees align their clothing choices with their comfort and personal styles, it can enhance their satisfaction, boosting morale and productivity as a result.
However, this argument may overlook the fact that not all employees can afford expensive or trendy attire, and their socioeconomic backgrounds vary. Consequently, there may be disparities among employees regarding their perceived wealth based on their clothing, potentially leading to feelings of insecurity and jealousy among some.
Furthermore, a multitude of diverse clothing styles in the same workplace can hinder cohesion and collaboration among employees. Uniforms, on the other hand, place everyone on an equal footing regardless of their position within the company, making management less intimidating and more approachable. This fosters unity and cooperation that can otherwise be challenging to achieve.
Supporters of granting employees the freedom to choose how they present themselves at work also argue that job performance and skills should be the primary factors for evaluating employees and contributing to a business's overall success, while clothing should not play a role in this process.
While this argument may seem logical, the reality is that clothing often directly impacts an organization's image and reputation. For example, in roles where employees frequently interact with clients, such as in education and retail, the attire of teachers and sales associates can influence how clients perceive the company, contributing to the establishment of trust and rapport.
Moreover, implementing uniforms at work is one of the most cost-effective ways to enhance a company's branding and differentiate it from competitors by incorporating the brand's colors, patterns, and logos into the uniforms.
In conclusion, while it's understandable why managers prioritize employee work quality over attire concerns, I believe dress codes should be mandatory in an organization.
Sample 17:
In contemporary workplaces, there is a contentious debate about whether employers should place more emphasis on the dress code or on the quality of work produced by their employees. This essay will shed light on the reasons why the latter approach is more practical.
By prioritizing work quality over dress code, employees are able to dedicate their energy and time more effectively to their tasks, leading to improved work efficiency and productivity. Without the need to spend excessive time and mental effort on selecting and maintaining specific outfits, employees can allocate more cognitive resources to their job responsibilities. This heightened focus on work-related tasks often results in increased productivity levels. For example, renowned tech companies like Google and Facebook have adopted relaxed dress codes, emphasizing employee comfort and creativity. This approach has enhanced innovative work environments and the development of high-quality products. It showcases how giving paramount importance to work quality can contribute to the overall success of a company.
It could be argued that a well-designed dress code can positively impact employee morale by fostering a sense of belonging and identity within the organization. As employees adhere to a common dress code, it nurtures a feeling of unity and professionalism. However, when emphasizing the quality of work over attire, it promotes diversity in the workplace. This is because individuals from various cultural backgrounds or personal preferences may opt for different clothing choices. Besides, when a company places greater significance on work quality, it ensures that employees are assessed based on their skills, qualifications, and contributions rather than their appearance. This practice encourages a vibrant atmosphere, where employees are valued for their unique perspectives and abilities.
In conclusion, while there are some benefits to considering employee attire, giving higher priority to work quality rather than dress codes improves productivity, promotes diversity in the workplace, and recognizes employees for their competence and contributions.
Sample 18:
Traditionally, employers have exercised some control over the way their employees dress. In recent years however, many businesses have been focussing less on employees’ appearance and more on performance. I believe that this is a positive development overall although there are still some sectors in which the way you present yourself is important.
The chief argument in favour of dress codes is that an employee is the public face of a company and that therefore their appearance is important. After all, creating a good impression depends, in part, on the way you are dressed. A case in point is the retail sector. If a customer visits an establishment staffed by slovenly employees, it might give the impression that the business is generally poorly run. In such cases, an employer is entitled to expect their employees to dress a particular way.
However, this is not the case in the majority of jobs. If an employee does not have direct contact with customers or clients, then their appearance is generally less important. When dealing with colleagues, the way you are dressed does not affect the quality of your work and often goes unnoticed. In fact, as more people are working remotely, it is becoming less and less important. As a result, employers should not waste their time trying to impose outdated dress codes but rather encourage workers to be more productive.
In conclusion, it is generally more profitable for companies to focus on how employees perfom, but in some sectors of the economy an employees’ appearance may impact the success of the business.
Sample 19:
Whether employers should be more concerned with their employees’ dressing manner or their work quality has become a heated topic in recent years.
Some people believe that it is beneficial to have a dress code in the workplace, if only for image reasons. Workers may be asked to wear a uniform to communicate a corporate image and ensure that people easily identify them. This is particularly true to a workplace where employees have regular face-to-face contact with customers and clients. For this reason, nowadays an increasing number of workplaces prefer to set up a dress code and subtly promote the visual uniformity. While it is hard to determine how the visual uniformity is related to quality at work, having a dress code in place may help the way a corporation wants to be perceived.
However, some people think that having a strict dress code may actually affect the employees’ quality at work. One of its biggest downsides is that a strict dress code can stifle individuality since workers are not given total freedom to demonstrate their personal styles. Sometimes employees complain that a dress code causes feelings of stress among themselves and consequently leads to lower effectiveness and efficiency at work.
In conclusion, employers should be concerned about the quality at work, but whether a dress code makes sense for a workplace is a question only employers can answer. With quality of work in mind, it is up to every employer to decide whether he should care about the way his employees should dress.
Sample 20:
It is argued that companies should place importance on quality work over appropriate work attire. While proper dress code creates a good impression, this essay would argue that the significance of output that employees produce is enormous and greater than any other aspect because it generates revenue and contributes to corporation morale.
Appropriate workplace attire leaves a good first, and often lasting, impression on the employees. If an employee is in a business where gathering customers are essential, then she needs to give them a first good impression. This is because wearing formal dress sets her team on the right path, telling them that she means business and her company is an organization that they can trust. A casual look just cannot make the same impression. For instance, a growing body of research reveals that a proper dress code is essential to form a firm impression. Thus, formal attire is of profound importance to impress clients.
However, great work quality exceeds all other requirements in its importance. This is because work quality is the generator of revenue. If the quality of work is not the first priority of an organization, it will then certainly decrease recurring revenue streams and put future sustainability at risk. Therefore, employees’ performance is crucial for sustaining a business. Besides, it also builds the company morale. When every employee produces nice output, it can boost the morale of the whole company. This reason is that the company can accomplish its goals when each employee matches their expectations and submits quality work. It is therefore obvious that work quality should be the top priority in any company.
In conclusion, appropriate workplace attire is not as important as quality work. This is because employee output helps sustain a business and also improves the morale of the business. Therefore, a company ought to make quality work the top priority.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Đang tải chế độ Học...
Hot: 1000+ đề thi giữa kì 1 lớp 1-12 đầy đủ các môn (Update 2026) (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
Đăng ký VIP để học và luyện thi không giới hạn
Trọn bộ quyền lợi trên Vietjack, trong một tài khoản.
- Phòng luyện thi cấp tốc: ĐGNL - ĐGTD, Tốt nghiệp THPT, Ôn vào 10, Ôn vào 6, Ôn Giữa kì/Cuối kì
- Hơn 200K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
- Với 3tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
- Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
- Xem hàng ngàn bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
- Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
- Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện
- Đăng ký ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Today technology has changed how people interact with each other. I believe the biggest effects it has had on relationships are that it has reduced in-person interaction and that it has led to the development of online relationships. This has been a positive development because often cyber relationships are more meaningful than in-person relationships.
Technology has reduced face-to-face interaction. For instance, it is not uncommon to see two people sitting at the same table in a restaurant, checking their phones every 30 seconds, and only talking to each other occasionally.
Technology has also given rise to online relationships. Nowadays anyone that has access to the Internet and computers can create a free Facebook or Twitter account and build their social networks on these platforms no matter where on the planet they reside. Take, for example, Chinese teenagers who like collecting insects. On the Internet, they can find and connect with others who share this particular hobby, even if those people live in the Amazon rainforest.
This should be seen as a positive trend because cyberspace relationships can be very meaningful. Today it is very common that those in a person's immediate circle do not support what they pursue. For example, many street artists are looked down on by their family members. Fortunately, Facebook groups give them the power to build their own communities where they can support each other. The inspiration and motivation they obtain there can drive them to work hard to move toward their goals.
In conclusion, technology has reduced in-person interaction and has meanwhile enabled online relationships. This has definitely been a positive trend because online relationships are often more satisfying and meaningful than face-to-face ones.
Sample 2:
Technology is a crucial tool for communication in modern times. It is flourishing in each and every field of communication. Though this invention has changed the way people interact around the world, it has both positive and negative impact on the relationship of people.
To embark on, with regard to the positive development, technological advancement has made communication between organizations more convenient and time-saving. Many companies and organizations use tools like social media, email and forum to influence a larger number of audiences. This also serves as an advanced mode of learning since schools adopt the method of smart classrooms. With the availability of ecommerce, freelance websites, social media marketing, people can easily buy and sell products and services with effortless communication.
On the other hand, the drawbacks of technology on the relationships of people cannot be ignored. Though technology has advanced greatly, it still lacks the emotional touch of communication. It has affected the love and affection people crave with communication. Millennials today are more fascinated by the virtual world, thereby forgetting the practical side of life. Modern modes of communication are making people busy and less productive. Sharing personal information on social media also invades people’s privacy. For example, individuals spending hours on social media interaction interacting with people from around the world and wasting their valuable time. In fact, family vacation which was previously a private affair has now become a public affair.
To sum up, communication technology can be a blessing or a curse depending upon how people make use of it. Even though it is an easy method of interaction, the relationships formed through technological interaction lack trust and emotion. Hence, people should give preference to face-to-face communication.
Sample 3:
It is evident that technology has transformed the ways of communication and influenced relationships in a variety of ways. In my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects of this.
The principal way in which relationships have been affected is that they tend to be at a distance rather than face-to-face. The advent of the internet has made it easy for business owners to communicate across the world, with remote job opportunities one call away. Online educational programs are available for people residing in different countries, and it is no longer a dream to attend live classes from the comfortable environment of a home. Not only this, the social platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube have revolutionized relationships, be it making online friendships with people from other countries or staying in touch with loved ones. Based on this perspective, technology has influenced relationships in a positive way.
However, despite these advances, the quality of interaction has significantly declined in several respects. If people are developing most of their relationships online, this means that they may also have less fact-to-face contact. This kind of contact on a personal level is important for human beings to feel wanted and a part of society. This may be a particular problem for children's social development as they used to be seen playing out on the streets but are now too often indoors. Technology can also mean people are detached from what is going on around them even when they are out, as can be seen by the many people staring into their mobile phones as they travel or walk around.
In conclusion, technology has brought some positive developments in the ways people interact with each other. However, there are also some negative impacts of technology on the types of relationships people make.
Sample 4:
Technology has hardly left any human feeling untouched. Instead, it has played a great role in manipulating and transforming it to a great extent. One of the most highly impacted aspects in this context is human interaction.
Technology has laid its hands on human behavior and has greatly influenced the pattern of human interaction since its introduction. From social media platforms to FaceTime applications, staying in touch has become easier with time. However, it has its downsides as well. With such high-end digital connections, intimate relationships have seen a significant decrease ever since.
These changes result from the freedom of hiding genuine emotions that technology brings. People can now fake caring about someone, express false love, and connect just for the sake of words. This has led to loosened family bonds, false promises between partners, and much more. People do interact with each other, but this interaction is often fake and untrue. Technology's significant impact on human interaction leads to various unwanted consequences. A surge in depression cases, suicides, and unwise decisions have been recorded as a result of such interactions.
Hence, technology has influenced the way people interact both positively and negatively. Undoubtedly, it has helped humans connect from miles away with their loved ones yet has made relations less meaningful and degraded their overall quality.
Sample 5:
Technology has brought vast changes in human behavior since its introduction. Moreover, with its rapid advancement and new changes, it is impacting relationships more rapidly. Interactions have recently been made more accessible due to technology. People can now connect easily and from the ease of their homes. However, it also has its downsides. A detailed study of this significant impact on human relationships due to technology can be understood with various examples.
In recent years, technology has helped humans stay connected at all times. With technology spreading its arms, connections can be made even in the most unexpected and tribal areas of the world. However, this has ultimately transformed human behavior and the way people interact with each other.
A prime example of this change is how people interact since social media's introduction. The introduction of social media platforms has made it easier for people to connect with their loved ones, even at a distance. However, it has entirely transformed how people interact with their close surroundings. This has also led to the expression of fake feelings and false expressions.
Overall, technology has transformed the entire interaction cycle of human beings without letting us realize it. More connections over the internet have paved the way for broken real-life relationships and have ultimately degraded the quality of relationships.
Sample 6:
There has been a change in the different aspects of social relations as affected by technology which we can introduced as more of a post-positively than post-negatively impact.
First, technology has immensely extended the speed and convinience of communication and thus the worth of relationships. For example, a university learner who is learning in another country can use video-calling to speak with the parents daily. An instantaneous means of communication makes it easier to avoid having to wait for a letter to arrive for a day or more as is the norm. Furthermore, social networks allow a person to get acquanted with like-minded strangers with similar interests, career choices, or hobbies, therefore create friendships that last a lifetime.
Despite this perception, this development is fairly beneficial to the masses. Improved communication technology reduces pressure and creates the need for belonging. For instance, when there is negative information, people get to act quickly. Also, positive information is more effective when shared immediately and it helps enhance interpersonal relationships. In addition, this has led to the growth of businesses and the eradication of geographical barriers whereby a company can comfortably and easily transact business with an organization in another country at any given time.
Altogether, it can be highlighted that technology plays a vital role in changing social relations by providing more effective and pleasant means of communication. It has made interpersonal communication better, provided businesses with links and connections as well as made everyone have equal access to information. Thus, it can be concluded that the purpose and use of technology have been mainly beneficial for interactions and relationships for the majority of people.
Sample 7:
It is true that new technologies have had an influence on communication between people. Technology has affected relationships in various ways, and in my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects.
Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, telephones and the Internet allow businesspeople in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. For example, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.
On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between people in different countries was much more difficult when communication was limited to written letters or telegrams. Nowadays, interactions by email, phone or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings, and many of us benefit from these interactions, either in work or social contexts. On the other hand, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result ofisolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these 'virtual' relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships.
In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionized communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.
Sample 8:
There has been a complex alteration in the various aspects of social relations due to technological advancement resulting in more positive impact than negatives.
First of all, the usage of technology has tremendously augmented the speed and ease of interaction making the relations’ depth richer. For example, a university student studying in another country can utilize video-calling to maintain quotidian contact with his or her parents. Real-time messaging banishes the lengthy wait for the letter, which was taken as conventional before. Besides, one is able to interact with strangers with similar interests, jobs, or hobbies, hence fostering friendships that endure a lifetime.
This development is predominantly propitious for the people. Advanced communication technology reduces stress and creates a feeling of belongingness. For instance, the sectional publicity of negative information can be quickly followed by timely responses. And just as to promote the fast exchange of positive messages, cooperation is strengthened between people. In addition, this technological advancement has boosted business development and erased hegemonic constraints and restrictions that enable business organizations to freely and easily connect with global organizations at any time.
Therefore, one is able to deduce that relations in society have been significantly mediated by technology in the manner in which humans interact offering more effective and fulfilling ways. It has made interpersonal communication easier, created business relationships and opportunities, and given equal opportunity for information access. Hence, the major impact of technology is analyzing and interpreting common interaction and relationship profiles that can be deemed more beneficial and helpful for most people.
Sample 9:
The advent and rapid development of technology have fundamentally transformed the dynamics of interpersonal interactions among individuals. This has also transformed the way we form relationships and bond with each other. This essay contends that the evolution of technology has, in fact, catalyzed a positive shift in the types of relationships people form, fostering connectivity and enhancing social engagement.
Technology has diversified the ways individuals establish and maintain relationships. Social media platforms, for instance, have facilitated connections among individuals globally, transcending geographical barriers. Additionally, online dating applications have revolutionized how people meet and form romantic relationships, offering a wide array of choices and opportunities to connect with like-minded individuals. Technology has also gifted us swift and interactive communication with loved ones no matter the distance. For instance, someone living abroad can make video calls and talk to his or her family members whenever they want. This has reduced the communication gap and significantly enhanced our options to contact others in real-time unlike in the past when sending handwritten letters was perhaps the best option to convey messages or contact someone.
This evolution in the types of relationships forged through technology signifies a positive development. Online connectivity allows individuals to maintain contact with friends, family, and acquaintances across vast distances. Moreover, digital platforms enable marginalized groups, such as those with disabilities or introverted personalities, to establish meaningful connections they may struggle to form in traditional social settings. For instance, social networking sites provide platforms for introverted individuals to express themselves and interact comfortably, fostering self-confidence and social skills.
In conclusion, the impact of technology on relationship dynamics has been transformative, offering diverse avenues for connectivity and social interaction. The ability to form connections across distances and the empowerment of individuals who face social barriers underscore the positive aspects of technological advancements. Embracing these changes in relationship dynamics signifies a positive shift towards enhanced connectivity and inclusivity in contemporary society.
Sample 10:
The ubiquitous presence of technology has undoubtedly redefined the landscape of human interaction, altering the very nature of how we build and maintain relationships. While the advancements of the digital age offer a plethora of tools for communication and connection, a closer examination reveals a disturbing trend – the erosion of genuine, meaningful relationships.
With technology, we make friends more often than ever. We also have a variety of tools to connect with others and remain in touch with people we care about. But one undeniable consequence of this technology-driven relationship is the rise of superficial and fleeting interactions online. Social media platforms, while fostering a sense of instant connectivity, often facilitate shallow exchanges and curated self-presentation. In the pursuit of likes and followers, meaningful conversations and authentic connections are often sacrificed, fostering a culture of virtual intimacy that lacks the depth and genuineness of face-to-face interaction.
As a result, of the constant bombardment of digital stimuli can contribute to social anxiety and a fear of missing out, hindering our ability to develop genuine relationships. The pressure to maintain an online presence and curate a perfect digital persona can lead individuals to withdraw from real-world interactions, hindering their ability to connect authentically with others. And this is a disturbing outcome of our digital relationship. Additionally, the ease of virtual communication can discourage individuals from developing the interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence necessary for navigating the complexities of face-to-face interaction. For example, a young adult accustomed to online communication might struggle to hold engaging conversations in person, leading to feelings of awkwardness and missed opportunities for meaningful connections.
In conclusion, while technology undoubtedly offers tools for communication and connection, it is crucial to recognize its limitations and potential pitfalls. By prioritizing face-to-face interaction, fostering genuine conversations, and actively engaging with our communities, we can strive to counteract the negative effects of technology on our relationships and cultivate a more meaningful and fulfilling social life.
Sample 11:
There is no doubt that many things have changed in the last few decades; some changes are for the better and some changes are for the worse. One of the fields which were greatly affected by the advent of technology is the way of interaction and communication.
Without any doubt, technology has changed the way we lead our lives, and these changes have been prominent over the last decade. There are several improvements in life due to the positive effects of technology and there are some negative impacts as well. One area that has dramatically changed is the way we communicate and maintain our relationship nowadays. And in my opinion, technology has positively affected our communication and the way we make relationships and maintain it. Despite some negative effects, most of us enjoy the positive things technology has bought for us. In the past, the ways of interaction were very limited. Unleash your imagination; if you want to speak with your friend, you would have to go directly to his house or send him a message which may take a few days to get a response. I completely believe that technology has a great tangible effect on our communication. Nowadays, it's very easy to interact with your relatives - and even with the government and organisations - either by emails, mobiles, chatting, etc. and I think that this has improved and enhanced the relationships.
We no longer need to visit a relative or friend to get updates. Alternatively, we can let them know our updates instantly. Besides personal communications, official and business communications have become easier. Email campaigns offer a good marketing opportunity for business owners and people can complain about a certain thing using emails without exposing their identity. Not all of the people have the availability of technology, and they still use the old form of communication. People now can deceive others using identity theft and fraud identity. The personal touch of communication like handwritten letters, face-to-face communications were more effective in some cases. Like meeting your friend is still more important than just writing him an email.
We make so many friends via chatting or social networking which would not have been possible without the advancement of technology and its contribution to communication. Cell phones, emails and social networking have enhanced the way of communicating and we can talk to anyone with a minimum cost. It's now not unusual to prepare for a visit and even several visits to your relatives and friends on the same day, while in the past this may have taken several weeks or months.
To conclude, despite all that, I still see some failings in the development of the means of interaction. For instance, the very high cost each person spends every day on communication. Another defect is that many elderly people are not accustomed to this modern technology. But that doesn't have a great effect on the positive role technology has made in the field of interaction between people and I think these defects are very easy to be solved.
Sample 12:
A true relationship between two people requires face to face communication and time to truly get to know each other. Regardless of what humans think, all individuals admire the feeling of being wanted even if it’s a lie. The digital world has created the sense that it is passable to be who anyone wishes to be online. However, I believe that the way people know each other online and the type of relationships they make virtually have changed for the worse.
Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, most are being turned inward, forgetting the true definition of a friend. Human beings have feelings, and they feel broken at times and do not always smile but the Internet only shows one's happy moments keeping one from fully being known. The types of friendships people make these days are quick and short-lasting. In real life friendship, people see each other at one’s best and worst time and remain there for one another. This can never be compared to a social network friendship. One can only get to know someone by spending time together for the reason that the Internet cannot replace shared experience and personal communication. However, due to the Internet, people can make friends anywhere in the world which was quite impossible in the past era. Finding school and college friends and getting in touch with them is an advantage that the Internet offers to us. However, true friendship is not possible if two people do not spend time together, share their common interests, talk a lot and help each other both in good and bad times.
Rightfully, life is meant to be lived and have many physical experiences, bonding with another person’s physical presence. Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, they are spending time online to make friends. This is, in my opinion, a negative aspect of the digital era.
In conclusion, making friends beyond boundaries and getting in touch with childhood friends could be the advantages of the digital era but the way we are becoming dependent on the technology and the way we are pretending to maintain our friendship online have negative consequences on our personal, moral and social aspects.
Sample 13:
It is true that technology in recent years has altered the path that people communicate with each other. There are many ways that technology affects our relationships, and in my opinion, this is a beneficial development.
To begin with, the most obvious transformation in people’s relationships is how they communicate with each other. By this, I mean that the Internet has converted the world into a small village and nowadays people around the world can reach each other easily and rapidly. For example, a friend who lives in the UK can chat and talk with their friends in China using a mobile phone or social network.
Another field in which technology affects our life is the way that people make friends. In other words, it has been observed that these days we can make friends from all nationalities without any effort or travel, and this helps with culture interchange and help people who suffer.
In my thought, this has a positive impact on the community for two reasons. Firstly, human life has become more convenient, this provides people with more opportunity to spend their leisure time with their kin. For instance, with the Internet, we can shop and work from our dwelling house without going outside anymore. Secondly, travel around the globe has become usable and cheap. As a result, people visiting each other and spend a lot of time together hence more connected society emerges.
To conclude, as we have found out there is no easy answer to this question. Nevertheless, technology makes a huge difference in peoples' lives in terms of communication and I believe that this is a positive impact in our society.
Sample 14:
From the last century to the present days, there have been many changes in the way people interact with each other as there have been evolutionary changes in technological fields. One may say this transformation has negative effects on relationships between people or positive effects. I believe that there have been more positive effects than negative ones among the people due to the reasons that in few seconds of time people can contact their dearest ones and technology gives strength to people by making them closer to each other even if they are not.
From the introduction of telecommunication and electronic mail, the lives of people turned out to be easier and communication among people became easier and more convenient. They can contact their families and friends using these advanced services over the countries. Without visiting their homes frequently, they can make money or accomplish their goals. For example, a military man has to serve his country at the borders, and it is uneasy to go home and spend some time with his family and acquaintances thoroughly. However, he can make contact with his family via telephone and other services. With the help of telecommunication and electronic mail, he can keep in touch with his family and buddies. In this way, technology makes people close to each other. This absolutely positive development as we have huge benefits using technology.
With the absence of one's dearest one, he used to be all alone before the introduction of technology. But it is possible to get in touch with his sweetheart. And also, he can send and receive the money within seconds over the thousands of miles using the latest money transfer machines. As a result, he can look over and take care of his family's financial problems and needs without his presence at his home. For instance, my uncle who stays in the United States calls his family and others via ‘Skype’ daily whereas, my dad who used to work in Dubai could not keep in touch with us as at that time the telecommunication had not installed in my village. Thus, that made my father bound to visit us frequently. Consequently, he spent a large amount of money travelling and could not communicate with us as frequently as he wanted to.
In many positive ways, technology has affected the relationships between people, and I would say these are positive developments. Imagine without technology, what would happen to the people and the world. In many ways, we are getting the help of using technology.
Sample 15:
Technological developments in this modern era have transformed the way we socialise. Advancements in communication networks have played a vital role in bringing people closer. In my opinion, there are both pros and cons of this development and this essay will analyse how technology has changed the types of relationships made by people.
In ancient times, people used letters and telegrams to interact with each other. With the advent of modern communication systems like the telephone and the Internet, people can collaborate more effectively. For instance, we can interact through emails rather than letter and businessman can have online meetings through the conference calls.
Another reason is the widespread use of social networks over the internet; for instance, Facebook, where men and women can now make friends online and interact with them through the post, message and online chat. Video conferencing in the form of Skype has improved instructor and student relationship. Online messaging platforms like mIRC have given people the luxury to choose their own discussion-based chat rooms. There are more ways to socialise now than there used to be in the past.
All these advancements in technology come up with their merits and demerits. Letters, memos and telegrams are replaced by emails and text messages. Human resource hiring can be done through online video conferencing which has eliminated the need for physical presence and travelling requirement. We can now mingle more through Facebook, Pinterest, Google+, Instagram and Orkut and so on. Though one can regard these as positive developments, they do have some negative aspects. These developments have isolated people and discouraged real-world interaction. For instance, youth, in particular, prefers to choose to mix up with people online rather than socialising with them in the real world.
To conclude, technology has no doubt revolutionised the way we interact and hang out but has greatly reduced real-world interaction. Though these virtual relations tend to be positive, we should not deny the importance of physical interaction in our lives.
Sample 16:
Everything has two sides, and the effects of technology on people’s relationships are not an exception. We cannot deny how much technology has transformed the individual reaction with others in his family and the surrounding community.
In my opinion, technology has affected and transformed our life aspects and dealing with other people in a good way. Recently, we have had different fast and cheap methods to call our family and friends. Moreover, some technologies are giving us chances to see and talk with them at the same time. In addition, we are informed on a daily basis with the last updates and news about our friends and family, so we can remember birthdays, graduation parties and even marriage anniversaries. Furthermore, these methods make it faster and easier to call and congratulate another individual.
On the other hand, many people believe that technology is affecting individual relationships badly. They opine that, if we did not have these kinds of technology, we would have been visiting each other regularly.
Not only that, but individuals will not be isolated from each other, especially those who are addicted to using social networking platforms. As a matter of fact, people rarely talk to each other face-to-face. In particular, people’s personalities are changing so much, because of addiction to using Facebook. It’s one of the vital reasons to decrease confidence and self-esteem.
As can be seen, even if we have some bad effects of technology and how it changed the way people contact each other, we still have much more effects. We can obtain many easy and cheaper methods to contact each other. In fact, technology has enhanced our life and the way we are contacting each other.
Sample 17:
Today, various brand-new methods of telecommunications have tremendously influenced social behaviour. Although their impacts have benefited human lifestyle, they have had some costs as well. However, before evaluating their advantages and disadvantages, it is better to reveal how these breakthroughs affect the ways people relate to each other.
In the old times, when someone wanted to communicate, there were extremely limited means of doing so. Indeed, he should write a letter or have a face-to-face conversation. Likewise, it was possible to be acquainted with new faces either by meeting them personally or being introduced by family and friends.
On the other hand, substantial technological progress has happened in recent years. For instance, smartphones can be utilised both by direct calls and via different applications. Alternatively, the internet can be used either by offline methods like e-mail or by online protocols like chatting programs. Moreover, social networking is another rich aspect of the internet by which everybody is able to find new friends or search for old, missed ones, and it can be used to interact with current relatives as well. Clearly, not only have modern technologies facilitated human interactions, but they also diversified his relationships.
On the debit side, excessive use of virtual connections might weaken the personal relationship with reality. While it seems that people are aware of each other’s statuses on a daily basis, even up-to-the-minute, they may overlook loved ones’ emotional states due to the negligence of their presence.
All in all, contemplating the pros and cons of these phenomena simultaneously, I should say it depends on the person who utilises these state-of-the-art technologies. If he applies them wisely, their pluses will definitely overshadow their pitfalls. After all, in my viewpoint, humankind can eventually address this issue in favour of his civilisation. Hence, I assume it as a mainly positive development in the long run.
Sample 18:
People used to communicate by meeting each other while it has nowadays totally changed since technological advancement. Some assert that utilising technology in daily communication brings more harm than good things. I personally agree with this view and this essay will look into the reason with some considerations.
The first effect of technology usage is that it reduces the sense of togetherness among people. Since they do interaction via telecommunication such as a mobile phone or the internet, it reduces the personal relationship. People cannot catch moments during interaction because they communicate in unreal situations. Take social media as an example, most teenagers talk to their friend via utilising Facebook, Viber, WhatsApp or others. They tend to interact with each other via sending messages thus they can feel the situation or even communication sense just by reading the messages. By contrast, direct communication tends to develop a sense of belonging among people. They will be more comfortable expressing their feelings thus it is easy to get along together.
In addition, it will deteriorate the human behaviour. By using electronic devices in the daily life of communication, it is hard for them to get involved in a social environment. It will decrease their self-confidence to speak in public because they usually interact through devices rather than through face-to-face communication. Moreover, utilising technology in interaction is not free thus you should they should prepare much budget just for communication.
It is true that technology usages enable people to keep in touch with people who live in different places. However, it is not capable of providing a sense of feeling as well as direct communication.
To sum up, by communicating directly, it will help people keep close to each other and able to talk towards them easily and expressively.
Sample 19:
The 21st century has been a game-changer in all aspects of human life. The same case is with relationships which have also taken on a new dimension with technological advancement. Nowadays, relationships are much more fragile, materialistic, mistrustful and doubtful as compared to previous times. I reckon that overall, this development has been quite negative which will be analysed in our paragraphs to follow.
To start with, nowadays technology has made relationships between humans quite suspicious. People are getting involved in relationships just on social networking websites without even knowing who is actually communicating with them. For instance, there have been many cases in which the person you are in contact with is actually fake and fraud. He is just playing and making a fool of you, and you believe that you are making a friend or falling in love with him. Consequently, when you know the truth, it is just like a bolt from the blue and your feeling is eradicated. This is evident from the argument above the reality that technological relationships can be quite painful sometimes.
Further, in the new era connections between people can be quite fragile and weak as compared to the strength of relationships before the advent of technology. People without practically meeting each other and actually knowing their strengths and weaknesses tend to trust each other too much and when they face the true facts the relationships are affected and, in some cases, broken down. For instance, a survey was conducted by Indian newspaper regarding the success of technology relationships and the result was reconciling with the point that relationships are very poor, and the failure rate was quite high.
To sum up, these technological relationships have altered the connectivity between two people. I firmly believe that drawbacks outweigh much more as compared to the fruits of these new relationships. However, it is recommended that people should be extremely careful and cautious in making any sought of relationships on social networking websites, chatting software etc.
Sample 20:
Technology has been affecting many aspects of human life including the way people interact with one another. Some believe that it has more benefits for people’s connection than drawbacks, while others contradict it. I personally argue with the former opinion, and through this essay, I am going to explain my reasons.
Initially, the first reason that I am going to elaborate is the way technology better enhances communication among people. A large number of communication gadgets has been invented in order to help communication between people, even for those who are separated by spacious distance, getting simpler and quicker. Thus, by giving an easier chance to be connected, this development has been encouraging society’s sense of togetherness. They do not have to visit their colleagues which are in different regions or cities to ask about their condition, for instance, because they could just pick up their phone and call their friends.
Subsequently, the variety of communication technology has been developed even further. The purpose is not only to make it easier but also to achieve a better quality of communication. We can mention video call, voice messenger and social media as the parts of it. The users are not limited by the elder method of phone call anymore. They can communicate more interactively by using video call. Therefore, they can communicate with others in the wider range of connection by using social media such as Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. This situation will globally lead people into a worldwide relationship.
On the other hand, there has been a developing trend that people are becoming more individualistic as the effect of technological development. The decreasing opportunity of direct interaction among them is accused as the root of this problem. However, it depends on us as the users to utilise technology wisely. If we can maintain a balance between communication technology and the conventional way of communication, the problem will certainly disappear.
Eventually, the advantages of using technology as part of our communication types outweigh the disadvantages, as long as we can manage it to be the helper, not the loser.
Sample 21:
It is true that some people have shifted their way to keep in touch with others due to the innovation of technology. The massive use of devices in communication, particularly phones and the internet, can be identified as the main difference compared to the past. People rely on those technologies to connect with families, friends and colleagues. Personally, I reckon that this trend may lead people to have a better relationship due to the effectiveness and low cost of communication.
To begin with, the interaction of individuals is presently not limited in one model. It means that people have many choices to stay connected with others than before. Technology offers some applications such as email, Facebook or Twitter. Those social media serve advantages to enhance and build a relationship with others. For example, in workplaces, employees do not have to meet in a certain place to discuss something. Rather they can use video conference to do a meeting. Therefore, various types of communication tools can help people to choose their preference and purpose in communication.
Furthermore, the usage of technology in communication leads to some positive things. It can be assumed that the easiness and effectiveness which are offered by these devices maximise the quality of people life in term of maintenance the relation of people. In addition, these communication tools allow people to spend less money and time. In other words, individuals do not have to visit someone when they want to talk or know friends’ news. Young people nowadays have friends from different countries and can have more friends. They can share their thoughts and updates instantly, which was quite impossible in the past. Some people might argue that people rely too much on technology and that’s they keep a less personal relationship with others. However, I disagree and want to say that technology has made it possible to connect with a dear one, make new friends and build up relationships in a more convenient way.
In conclusion, people always pick the best and most efficient way of communication, and the widespread use of the internet, mobile phone and other ways of communication have positively impacted our life and the way we make and keep our relationship.
Sample 22:
It is commonly noticed that people surrounding us stay connected with other people via social networking sites or other applications and technology have totally changed the way people used to communicate, make friends and keep their relationship. This paradigm shift happened basically because of the advances in technology and widespread use of such technological applications. Shall we welcome this shift or be wary about the changes? In this essay, I am going to discuss how technology has affected the types of relationships people make and whether it is considered as a positive or negative development.
First and foremost, I think that the development of technology has enhanced the relationships people make and maintain. For instance, when a student studies abroad and stays far away from his or her family and friends, social networking sites and other applications can help the student stay connected with his or her family and friends through Skype, for instance. In my opinion, in this case, this is a positive development to deal with homesickness or maintain our interactions with people we care about. Compared to the past decade, when technology was not so advanced, people had to depend on letters to communicate with each other and that was a time-consuming method, and it incurred higher cost. In contrast, in today’s world, people just have to be on laptops or smartphones and can have direct communication and interaction with family and friends. They can see each other contrary to the past method of interchanging written words. In this way, people can keep a close relationship with family and friends. We can now make friends beyond borders and that enhances our perspective about other nations and customs. Online groups, social platforms and social networking sites bring people together who have common interests and there are many events those people meet and plan for the betterment of society.
In fact, the implication of technology on people’s relationships is a controversial issue. On the one hand, it is a positive development for helping people stay connected with family and friends and making new friends. On the other hand, it can estrange the relationships people make. The argument that it has a negative influence on people’s relationships is based on the scenario that people will avoid face-to-face communication in the long run. Recent research indicates that virtual communication will weaken the communication skill of a person. I still remember a film that I watched had a scene that showed four friends having meals in a restaurant. When they sat together, they did not interact with each other face-to-face but through social applications by sending out the emotions in the social group to show their feelings. This example shows a worrying trend as people enjoy interacting virtually more than face to face due to their reliance on technology. It is important to create awareness to the public that actual communication is more important than virtual interaction to minimise its repercussion.
Overall, as far as I am concerned, the advancement of technology has both positive and negative effects on the kind of relationships people make. We have to be aware that actual interaction is more important to enhance a relationship. We shall connect with family and friends virtually only if we are apart from them.
Sample 23:
Face-to-face communication and enough time to get to know each other well are prerequisites for a real relationship. People all like to feel wanted, even if it’s a false sense, despite what other people may believe. The perception that one can be whoever one wants to be online has been shaped by the digital age. But I think that relationships people form virtually and the way people get to know each other online have changed, mostly negatively.
Most are becoming more inward-focused and have forgotten what it means to be a true friend to those around them, rather than being genuine friends. People are emotional creatures who occasionally feel sad and aren’t always happy, but the Internet only shares positive experiences, preventing people from knowing each other completely. Nowadays, people tend to form fast and transient friendships. In real life friendships, individuals support one another through each other’s highs and lows. This is not at all like friendship on social media. Because the Internet cannot take the place of in-person interactions and shared experiences, getting to know someone requires spending time together.
It is only fitting that life be experienced fully, forming bonds with the physical presence of others. Rather than truly being friends with those in their immediate vicinity, they are utilizing social media to establish connections. I consider this to be a drawback of the digital age.
In conclusion, the digital age may have brought about benefits like reaching out to old friends and forming new ones, but it has also had unfavorable effects on our moral, social, and personal lives due to our growing reliance on technology and the ways we pretend to keep up our online friendships.
Sample 24:
Since communication with others comprises a very essential aspect of our daily life, any alteration in the way we communicate with each other will have a profound effect on our social and professional life. This essay will first discuss how technology has influenced the way we relate with each other presently and will then address the question of whether this influence has been positive or negative.
There are several ways in which the new communication technology has influenced people’s way of interaction with each other. Firstly, social media applications have revolutionized the way we communicate. The reason why many people believe this is that nowadays, you can connect with your family and friends instantly through many social media applications such as the Facebook and twitter applications. It is also possible to say that people are now more encouraged to share their opinions openly via the Internet. One good illustration for this is the substantial number of friends that people who use social media applications have in their contact list.
However, the impact of social media in one’s social life may not always be positive. This is because people are now increasingly abandoning face to face interactions and prefer carrying out their communication behind closed doors. This is causing more people, especially youths, to lose out on many aspects of personal communication. A particularly good example here is a study conducted in the USA showing that more than 75% of high school students are spending more than 50% of their free time on the Internet.
To sum up, modern technological advances in communication have incredibly influenced the way people interact, and although there are many perks associated with the use of recent technology there are also drawbacks that people must take care of.
Sample 25:
In this contemporary era, the means of communication have updated dramatically with the evolution of cutting-edge technologies. In my perspective, I foster that it is a constructive movement, and this treatise will elucidate my stance in the forthcoming paragraphs with credible illustrations.
To start with, the recent improvements in various aspects of technology have revolutionized the entire world such that the public claim that it makes them establish their communication among their peers in a feasible manner. There are many applications which can be downloaded and installed on our electronic gadgets, such as Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, which enable people to exchange messages, photos and videos. The latest breakthrough, instant calling and face-time features for long periods of time with minimal charges incurred, have made humans have a face-to-face interaction virtually. Many organizations are working tirelessly to achieve these updates frequently and are intuitive. For instance, old people who reside in the suburbs are overwhelmed with amusement since they are frequently having a chat with their children who live either in metro cities or in foreign lands. Thus, it creates a remarkable bonding among families who are far away from one another in distant locations.
In a similar fashion, there are multiple websites on the internet which attract youngsters in modern society. They are fascinated by browsing these sites to find new individuals in nearby areas and are meeting up for casual dates to understand each other. Additionally, some are using these to search for pristine friends and are gradually chatting almost every day. This eventually encourages them to identify partners or peers who have similar interests. By sharing their emotions, they feel relaxed and rejuvenated rather than having trepidation or stress. Hence, it plays a significant role in commencing new bonds for the youth.
Taking everything into consideration, the latest innovations in technology have drastically impacted the entire human population to have noteworthy coordination with parents and grandparents and explore new friends. This essay has exposed a plethora of merits and the advantageous impact of technology on the public worldwide.
Sample 26:
In recent years, with the development of information technology and the evolution of the internet, people interact and communicate better and more effectively than in the past. With new technology, people interact via devices where the technology has been converged. Now it is possible to make calls, watch TV, play video games, listen to music and access internet with only one device. Many people believe that technology may improve the type of the relationships people make whereas others do feel that it has negative effects.
It is believed by some people that technology has a positive effect in the way people interact because it is more convenient on daily basis, and the use of new channels to communicate is often free. For example, if you are looking for a job. You do not have to go to the office nor pay stamps to send your CV. You can do this by email by simply clicking on the “submit” button. It is effective because it saves time, and it is simple to apply. Another significant example is the use of social media platforms. It enables people to share experiences and send information instantaneously which can be seen by everyone, so it improves the way people socialise. Moreover, new channels of communication can help maintain good relationships in business between jobseekers and employers as well as with family and friends on a daily basis.
It is argued by others that technology has a negative impact on the type of relationship people make because it can lead to a development of antisocial behaviours. For instance, teenagers who play video games can find themselves in total confusion between the real world and the virtual world. The law is different because in the real world people have to follow rules whereas in the virtual world there are no constraints. It influences the behaviour of people in a negative way. Moreover, it can create a certain form of addiction for some, leading them to become completely isolated and unaware of what is good and right. Also, the use of the internet can spread bad behaviours such as bullying or the promotion of negative images, comments which will have an impact in people’s lives. For example, on Facebook, several teenagers committed suicide after being bullied by their friends. So, the inappropriate use of technology can lead to healthy issues such as addiction or fatal death.
To sum up, the development of technology has changed the type of relationships people make in both a positive and negative fashion. People use new channels in their daily life because it is convenient as well as cheap. However, the use of the internet needs to be carefully monitored and used appropriately to prevent children and vulnerable people from developing addictions, which could lead to harmful or even fatal consequences.
Sample 27:
Today, more than ever, in regard to determining whether or not advances in technology influence the sorts of relationships people make, various views have been set forward. The expansion of modern means of communicating is the continuing debate that causes so much controversy. This matter is evidenced by some experts who believe that they pose a direct threat to social lives and might come at the expense of severe social isolation and a sedentary lifestyle. Others understand the significance of communication and adhere to the concept that these types of relationships are integral pieces of social communication. Consequently, they are regarded as rewarding. Nevertheless, the opinion set forth by the second category is more logical. In the following paragraphs, I will shed light on my attitudes on this matter.
To begin with, previously, communication among people looked bleak. People used to fulfill and make an appointment to observe each other, and according to the simple fact that communities had busy folks, and they seem doomed to possess far-reaching communication.
In the next place, modern means of communicating control people’s attention. They are the fastest and easiest way of togetherness. Individuals are at the mercy of the digital world to get in touch with others in the remotest part of the world, leading to saving their own time and hanging out every second. This issue questions the requirement to have face to face connections.
In this hectic way of life, the truth is that the responsibility of real-time discussions, visualization of each other, information exchange which enables a person to share a variety of information like activities, events, interests, thoughts fall upon these ways of communication. Thanks to tremendous advances in technology.
In summary, all in all, rather than devoting a fantastic deal of time and energy solely concerning face to face interaction, the trend today is toward utilizing modern means of communication to get in touch with other individuals. The pivotal role in these ways of communicating performed in interpersonal communication is hard to dismiss. However, many men and women do not appreciate it.
Sample 28:
In recent years, the innovation of techonology has led to various changes in the way people interact. As a result, this causes some specific effects on people’s relationships which are generally considered as beneficial impacts on the society.
Conspicuously, the improvement in techonological devices such as computers with internet connection and mobile phones affect people’s relations in different aspects. Firstly, it helps to diversify kinds of relationships instead of just several traditional ones in the past. Besides people’s interactions in real life, many connections are beign bult through a virtual life on the internet especially via facebook or online games. Secondly, the convenience of communicating between people is likely to make people’s relationships more sociable and hardly understandable. In fact, many friendships are not based on trust or sincerity but benefits which are generally hard to be perceived in a virtual life.
Although the development of technology somehow makes people’s relationships more complicated, I still believe that people are actually beneficial from this. Thanks to internet availability, gaps between people are shortened in magical ways. For example, no matter how far the distance between two people, they still can talk directly to each other provided with the internet access. What’s more, people have never been able to save as much time and communicating expenses as at the present. Instead of waiting for months to receive a response from a posted letter, it just takes some seconds for the letter to be delivered through email even to many partners at the same time.
In conclusion, taking advantage of technological development to facilitate interaction between people is beneficial not only for building a good relationship but also for doing business.
Sample 29:
Technology is expanding in every field, and connectivity will be no exception. Nonetheless, due to its other pitfalls that cause discussion on its positive and negative effects, this enormous shift in the ways of interaction cannot be regarded as fruitful straight away.
One of the essential advantages of focusing on in terms of positive development is that technology makes connectivity simpler and more convenient. Because of recent events such as Skype, video conferencing, Whatsapp, and social networking sites, such as Facebook, people are hardly a click away from the nears and dears. To a great extent, these advances have made us social. Second, there are enormous opportunities for letters and telephone calls to be sent and for requests to be made. Customers used to be on the S.T.D and I.S.D booth in long queues, but now mobile phones and sophisticated gizmos make it easier for everyone to communicate openly.
On the other hand, certain disadvantages cannot be overlooked as people of today not only spend a long time using computers but also do not want to meet their relatives and friends face-to-face, leading to a fading relationship. One of my school friends, for example, visited me personally on various occasions, such as at festivals and birthdays. Still, nowadays, she sends messages to welcome me and sends salutations to my post. Even most members of the family suffer from asphyxia, which is an unusual illness that flares. For imitating relationships, this is a troubling question.
To recap, despite numerous disadvantages, nobody can afford to tackle this ever-fast digital technology that has to make our lives easier.
Sample 30:
Technological advancements have revolutionized how millions of people interact with each other, and it has gone to a whole new level. With it, how we make relationships has also been affected. The essay will expound on how individuals can now build relationships across the world, and then opine that this is an incredibly positive development.
Unprecedented in human history, modern technology has made it extremely convenient for people to communicate and get in touch with family, relatives, friends or old classmates. Besides, people can communicate instantaneously with someone they have never been acquainted with before and in geography, they have never been to with the help of digital applications like WhatsApp or Viber. They can even find someone on a freelancing platform to have their job done. This is quite different from the conventional relationships we develop by meeting in person; it is, nevertheless, hard to downplay these relationships. Moreover, social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn, provide people with a platform that allows them to live chat and comment on someone else’s matter instantly. Strangely enough, some of them even find their dates online and make friends in a distant country without ever meeting them.
Overall, the phenomenon is a real boon to mankind. The revolution in communication that modern technology brings forth has eroded the traditional notions of national sovereignty. It has blurred the line between national and international boundaries and wielded enormous influence on the values of the national identity so as to transform global citizens; whose ideas, values, ethics, and orientations are no longer moulded by the local culture and environment. Rather global ideals and values are incessantly aired on the web and social media to make a better world. Most importantly, the communication revolution paved the way for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, towards which the globe is rapidly heading.
In conclusion, leading-edge technology has altered our mode of interaction forever, transcending national and cultural barriers so that individuals can frankly chat, talk and can readily keep in touch, and it is a windfall achievement that will transform a new world where things, like culture, sect, and so on, that split people will not exist.
Sample 31:
Technology has revolutionised the way people interact with each other in recent times. However, this has led to a decline in the quality of relationships people make. The impact of technology on relationships is a double-edged sword, and while some may argue that it has been a positive development, I believe that it has had negative effects.
One of the ways that technology has affected relationships is that people are becoming more isolated and less likely to engage in face-to-face interactions. The rise of social media platforms and instant messaging services have made it easier for people to communicate remotely, but it has also led to a decrease in the frequency and quality of in-person interactions. People are now more likely to spend their time on social media rather than meeting up with friends or family members. Moreover, technology has made it easier for people to be dishonest and insincere in their interactions. For instance, people can now hide behind the anonymity of the internet and present a false version of themselves. This has led to a decline in trust and authenticity in relationships.
Another way that technology has affected relationships is that people are now more reliant on their devices than on their relationships. People can now find entertainment and fulfil their social needs through technology, making it less necessary to build and maintain meaningful relationships.
In conclusion, while technology has undoubtedly had many positive effects on society, its impact on relationships has been mostly negative. It has led to a decrease in in-person interactions, a decline in genuineness and trust, and an increased reliance on devices over relationships. It is crucial that people recognize these negative effects and take steps to mitigate them by prioritising in-person interactions and being more sincere and honest in their relationships.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In different parts of the world, traditional foods are becoming less common due to the increasing popularity of international fast food. While some people believe that fast food is a good option, I think that consuming traditional foods is much more beneficial. This essay will demonstrate the author’s point of view.
On the one hand, there are compelling reasons why many people are in favor of fast food. Firstly, it is convenient and time-saving. Instead of having to prepare a meal for hours, people can easily grab a bite at any fast-food restaurant, which is ubiquitous in many megacities. This type of food is also suitable for those with fast-paced lifestyles. In addition, fast food is famous for its delicious taste. This can explain the successful franchises of various fast-food chains all over the world such as McDonald’s, KFC, and so on.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that eating traditional food is more advantageous. One of the most substantial benefits of traditional meals is the nutritional value that they contain. A homemade meal can provide a sufficient amount of protein, fiber, and many other nutrients, which has proved to be effective in maintaining good health. This is because traditional food is usually made from fresh ingredients and without any preservatives. More importantly, I would argue that consuming traditional food rather than fast food is a good way to preserve culture as each flavor has its own uniqueness and is a representation of the national cuisine. By making and eating traditional food, people are contributing to cultural preservation, and thus passing it down to the next generation.
In conclusion, even though fast-food consumption has been an accelerating trend in recent years due to its conveniences, I sincerely believe that the benefits of eating traditional food are more significant.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng ký để học cùng Vietjack. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Bằng việc đăng ký, bạn đồng ý với Điều khoản sử dụng và Chính sách bảo mật của Vietjack.
Nhắn tin Zalo
Hỏi bài tập