Câu hỏi:
07/01/2025 819
Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
Some people believe that countries should produce their own food for their citizens and reduce the amount of food that is imported. Personally, I totally agree with this point of view.
There are several reasons why a country should produce its own food for its population, one of which is the creation of more jobs. When the demand for domestically produced food grows within a country, there will be more job opportunities available for local people in farming and food processing industries, leading to a reduction in unemployment rates. Secondly, it may be easier to control food quality when it is produced domestically, as authorities can easily monitor farms and food processing plants, in order to maintain safe, hygienic food standards.
Additionally, food imports should be reduced due to a number of reasons. Firstly, putting barriers on importing food can help to boost a country’s economy by eliminating the competition that local companies face with foreign products, allowing them to be more profitable and contribute to the national economy. Furthermore, food importation can have negative environmental impacts due to the large amounts of carbon emissions released from the transportation of products all around the world via planes, trucks, and ships. By reducing food imports, countries can play their part in helping to protect the environment, rather than contributing to environmental issues such as climate change.
In conclusion, I believe that each country should invest in the development of its agricultural industry to provide food for the population itself and import as little as possible.
Sample 2:
There are some who believe that countries should be self-sufficient in terms of their food production. This essay disagrees with such a suggestion, due to the potential benefits that food trade brings to all parties involved. These benefits, including effective allocation of resources, improved political atmosphere, and cultural appreciation, will be analysed below.
Food trade maximizes the effective allocation of resources, as it encourages specialization of production. Due to different resource endowments, each country is effective at producing different food items. If they can import, nations can focus on producing their most efficient goods, then trade excess items with other countries. Otherwise, nations would need to reallocate resources to produce what they are not efficient at, driving up the costs of production and causing their citizens to suffer from inflated food prices. An example of this situation is the Common Agricultural Policy used by the European Union, which subsidizes European farmers’ food production. If the EU had imported food from more efficient foreign farmers, the subsidy money could be used elsewhere or saved, while food prices are still manageable.
In addition, foreign trade creates interdependence between parties involved. As national leaders must take into consideration the impact of political decisions on food trade and commerce, they are less likely to turn to hostile acts that might provoke animosity and lead to war. Thus, this improves the global political atmosphere. Moreover, speaking from consumers’ perspective, food trade brings about more diversity and appreciation for other cultures in terms of their cuisine. An example of this is the popularity of sushi and other Japanese rolls in Western countries, giving rise to the Californian roll – a unique food combination that symbolizes the unique, global world we live in today.
To reiterate, countries should not attempt to produce all food for their entire population, as trade plays an important role in promoting effective resources allocation, global peace, and cultural appreciation.
Sample 3:
The question of whether or not states should be self-sufficient in food production has long been the centre of intense debate, with some believing that countries should produce all foodstuff themselves. Personally, I do not believe states could and should be self-sufficient, since although this can have some positive economic effect e.g. a positive trade balance, it can also bring with it the instability of famines.
Firstly, a country producing its own food has the benefit of reducing the amount it spends on imports, which has a positive effect economically in the long term. This is a huge consideration in nation-states that are still importing more than they are exporting, for money is technically flowing out of the country. This is why countries such as the USA, despite being the most powerful country in the world economically, still rely on a strong agricultural industry in order to keep their trade balance.
On the other hand, food self-production can often lead to famines, for weather conditions can make or break a harvest. In the past, when countries grew their own crops and international trade was far lower, famines were much more frequent as there was more risk involved: a season of bad weather would mean a famine that could last year-round. Importing food from a variety of countries would minimize the risk incurred by fluctuating weather patterns, since risks to crops are more geographically spread out.
Overall, I argue that though there are economic benefits to having a country making its own food, the nature of the modern globalized economy means that in the long run, countries might find it much more beneficial to import their food from overseas.
Sample 4:
Ensuring food adequacy for the entire population has been a major concern for nations throughout the centuries. Some people believe that the government should focus on producing all kinds of food while importing as little as possible to ensure food sufficiency. I firmly believe that producing many kinds of food is an inevitable effort in terms of ensuring the nation’s food security.
Firstly, the more a country relies on imported food, the more food crises it faces. Food import includes transportation costs, taxation and other charges that eventually increase the food price. To tackle this problem, a government should allocate more budgets to improve national production by maximising the collaboration of research centres with farmers. Related university courses and diploma programmes can create more talented individuals who would be involved in domestic food production. Furthermore, by mass production of all kinds of food items, a country can prepare for the rainy days.
Secondly, by focusing on farming, irrigation and planting, a government can decrease unemployment problems. For example, in Indonesia, the farming sector creates the highest percentage of jobs. More than 50 per cent of Indonesians are directly or indirectly depends on the agriculture sector.
Finally, imported food does not have the same quality and freshness as locally produced food and crops. If food is imported from a long distance, the food value degrades and, in some cases, toxic chemicals are used to preserve the imported food. Thus, the local production of foods would ensure better food quality and sound health of citizens.
In conclusion, preventing the food crisis, ensuring better food quality and decreasing unemployment could be achieved if a country becomes self-sufficient in its food production. It is expected that countries would emphasize their domestic food production as it gives many competitive advantages over importing.
Sample 5:
Every country wants to reduce its dependency on imports while maximising its exports including items such as food and crops. However, not all countries have the same geographic location, weather condition, technology and suitable lands to produce each type of crop the citizens need. This is why a country should focus more on its overall economic growth rather than using manpower and budget to become self-reliant on food.
To commence with, soil, weather condition, available lands, technology and demographics of a county determine what crops, vegetables and fruits it can produce. Not all countries have the same geographical features and manpower, and thus, it is obvious that the country needs to import some of the items. In many cases, this is more advantageous than producing or growing crops and then harvesting the grains. For instance, it is impossible for an Arab country to produce all types of foods due to its weather condition. If they focus on growing these food items and engage their manpower to do that, their economic growth would be hindered.
Moreover, a country like Germany and China can focus on manufacturing and industrial innovation while import food from other countries. The ultimate outcome is more beneficial for them. However, this might not be the case for a country that solely depends on the agriculture sector and where a majority of its population is already dependant on it. They can focus on improving their productions, but this model is not suitable for industrial countries.
To conclude, I believe that free trade and globalisation have made the world a global village. And with the speedy transportation system, food import costs have already declined. Since fulfilling the mass people's diverse needs for various kinds of food is not feasible for a country, it should focus on its true potential rather than allocating budget and manpower to become self-dependent on food.
Sample 6:
Ensuring adequate food for the whole population was a significant concern for nations throughout the centuries. Many people believe that the government should concentrate on producing all kinds of food while minding as little as possible to ensure all taxpayers’ buying capacities. I firmly believe that producing many kinds of food is an inevitable effort concerning ensuring the country’s food safety.
Firstly, the greater a country depends on imported food, the greater the food crisis it faces. Food import includes transportation costs, taxation and other fees that eventually increase the food price. To handle this issue, a government should allocate more funds to improve national production by assessing faculty and research lab alliance. Therefore, this idea may produce more gifted people who would participate in domestic food production. Furthermore, by mass production of all types of food items, a nation can prepare for its rainy times.
Secondly, by focusing on farming, planting and irrigation, a government can reduce unemployment problems. Greater than 50 percent of Indonesian are directly or indirectly is dependent on the agriculture industry.
Lastly, imported food does not have the quality and freshness that locally produced one can offer. If food is imported from a long distance, the food worth degrades, and in some cases, toxic chemicals are used to preserve the food. Thus, the local manufacturing of meals would ensure better food quality and solid health of taxpayers.
In summary, preventing the food crisis, ensuring greater food quality, and decreasing unemployment problems could execute if a nation becomes self-explanatory in their food production. Massively producing all sorts of foods is a great effort that the government could pick and take advantage of.
Sample 7:
Every nation wants to decrease its dependence on importing while wishing to increase its export things, and food is not an exception. However, not all nations have identical geographical characteristics, weather conditions and appropriate lands to create every kind of food the taxpayers want. That is why a nation should concentrate more on its general financial expansion than using budget and workforce to turn into self-reliant food, despite a few people’s contradictory views.
To start with, dirt, climate condition, accessible demographics and lands of a county decides what fruits and crops it can create. Not all nations have the exact geographical attribute and workforce, so many things inevitably require importing. Frequently, importing is quite beneficial compared to generating it. For example, an Arab state cannot create all kinds of meals because of its weather illness. Should they concentrate on growing those food items and participating in their human resources to do so, their economic development would diminish.
Furthermore, a nation like Germany and China can concentrate on the industrial and manufacturing invention during import food from different nations. The best result is much more valuable for them. Nevertheless, this may not be the situation for a nation that solely depends upon the agriculture industry, and the vast majority of its inhabitants are already dependant on it. They can concentrate on enhancing its creation, but this version is not appropriate for industrial nations.
Since fulfilling the bulk of people’s varied needs for several types of meals is impossible for a nation, it must concentrate on its true capacity instead of devoting funding and workforce to turn into self-dependent on meals.
Sample 8:
Many people suggest that a country should prioritize self-sufficiency in food production and minimize its reliance on imported food. I am inclined to agree with this perspective. This essay will explore the reasons behind this viewpoint and provide examples to support the argument.
Firstly, achieving self-sufficiency in food production enhances a country’s food security. By relying on domestic production, a nation can ensure a stable and consistent food supply for its population, reducing vulnerability to external factors such as trade disruptions, price fluctuations, or geopolitical tensions. For instance, countries like Japan and South Korea, with limited arable land and a high population density, have prioritized self-sufficiency to safeguard against potential food shortages and maintain a reliable food system.
Moreover, promoting domestic food production stimulates the growth of the agricultural sector and supports rural economies. When a country invests in agricultural infrastructure, technology, and training, it creates employment opportunities and income sources for farmers and agricultural workers. This, in turn, fosters economic development and reduces rural-urban migration. For example, countries like the Netherlands and Denmark have implemented advanced agricultural practices and achieved high levels of self-sufficiency, resulting in thriving rural communities and a strong agricultural sector.
In conclusion, prioritizing self-sufficiency enhances food security, supports rural economies, and promotes environmental sustainability. Countries that have embraced this approach have reaped the benefits of a stable food system, vibrant agricultural sectors, and reduced ecological impact. Therefore, governments should encourage and invest in domestic food production to secure the well-being of their populations and foster sustainable development.
Sample 9:
In recent years the topic of food sovereignty has become a pressing issue for many nations. It is a commonly held belief that countries should prioritise being self-sufficient by producing all the food necessary for their citizens instead of importing it. Although this viewpoint has its merits, I believe that this is not a feasible or beneficial option.
To begin, utilising local food production will enhance a country's national security, as this will prevent international disputes that may occur over pricing and other financial issues related to importing goods, such as taxes and other costs. In addition, local food production will promote sustainable agricultural practices according to a country's regional climates, which will preserve local biodiversity.
However, it must be noted that this method might not be beneficial for all nations, as not every country possesses arable land or a climate that is conducive to cultivating a variety of produce. For example, countries in colder parts of the world would not have access to tropical fruits like mangoes or bananas. Therefore, importing food is vital to provide a variety of food items as well as ensuring that certain items are available even during off seasons or other times of shortage. I also believe that being exposed to food items from other countries can add to our cultural diversity and enrich our culinary experiences.
In conclusion, while it might be beneficial for some nations to strive for food self-sufficiency, for many others this approach is unrealistic and could deprive a large part of the world of the broader benefits of global trade. Therefore, a balanced combination of domestic production and imports would be a more suitable option.
Sample 10:
Most people think a nation should be self-sufficient in growing its crops for its entire population, thereby reducing the goods from overseas to as little as possible. However, I disagree with it for two significant reasons, and in the following few paragraphs, I will explain them.
To begin with, each crop requires an ideal climate and soil for growth; therefore, it is impossible to produce every type of consumption product in one country. For example, apples need cold weather to grow, and therefore, Eastern desert countries like the UAE, Saudi Arabia, etc., will have to import them from other apple-producing countries. There are still many fruits, vegetables, and grains that cannot be grown in deserts. Hence, relying on minimal homegrown crops would not be practical. Therefore, a country must depend on other nations for food commodities.
In addition, if imports are reduced, there would be a price hike for locally produced crops. This is because product quantities available locally would be lower, and subsequently, the price would also soar due to high demand. It would result in no profit for anyone. As a result, most countries import items to stabilize the economy.
In conclusion, it is argued by most people that a country must produce its food for the entire nation. However, I firmly believe that importing is necessary as different crops require various environmental factors to grow, and fewer imports would result in a rise in the cost of commodities.
Sample 11:
Some people argue that countries should depend on domestic rather than imported produce to feed their population. I completely agree with this point of view because if they don't, low-income people might face hunger, and agricultural workers might lose their jobs.
A country's over-reliance on global markets for food can put people on low incomes at risk of starvation. This is because it does not have complete control over the food supplied by these markets. For example, if flooding hits the rice production of Thailand and Vietnam, the two biggest rice exporters to China, its supply would decrease dramatically. The price in turn might increase to the point at which the poor would be unable to afford it. This might lead to hunger since rice is a staple food in China.
In addition, the more food a country imports, the higher the unemployment rate among its farm workers. Countries that mainly rely on domestically grown produce to feed their population usually have a robust agricultural industry. This means there are many jobs available for farm workers: they can be hired to grow crops or raise animals for slaughter. If these countries switched to food imports, there would be large employment losses in farming. Therefore, farmworkers would be struggling to earn an income since it is very unlikely that they have the skills needed to work in another sector.
In conclusion, countries should encourage homegrown production and not just depend on uncertain global markets for food. Otherwise, people with low incomes may suffer hunger and the jobless rates for farmworkers may rise.
Sample 12:
In the contemporary world, the idea that a country must be self-sufficient has gained major attraction. It allows reducing dependency on foreign food imports and ensuring a stable supply of food for their population. However, I disagree with this notion because I believe that in the present global scenario, a country cannot stop imports as it would not only cause loss to the country’s economy but also deprive citizens of dietary diversity.
Complete self-sufficiency is not practically possible or desirable for all nations. Factors such as climatic changes, geographical features, and resource availability can significantly influence a country’s agricultural potential. For example, desert nations like Saudi Arabia have limited arable land, which makes it challenging for them to produce diversified crops domestically. In these cases, food imports are not just a luxury but a necessity. Furthermore, global trade allows various countries to try the food of other countries that cannot be domestically produced in their own countries. For example, tropical fruits like bananas and mangoes are available in colder regions like Canada thanks to international trade.
Additionally, in our interconnected world, trade plays a crucial role not only in economic growth but also in cultural exchange and mutual benefit. Importing food can lead to a more balanced diet, improved health outcomes, and a richer culinary culture. Moreover, food imports can serve as a safety net in times of domestic food shortages due to unforeseen circumstances like natural disasters. This can ensure a steady supply of food and prevent potential crises.
In conclusion, while self-sufficiency is a commendable goal, it is not the most practical or beneficial approach in today’s globalised world. A balance between domestic production and imports can lead to a more resilient and diverse food system. This approach allows countries to enjoy the benefits of self-sufficiency while also taking advantage of the opportunities offered by international trade. It promotes economic stability, cultural exchange, and dietary diversity, contributing to a more secure and prosperous society.
Sample 13:
Many today are increasingly of the opinion that countries should be self-sufficient in their food production and import as little as possible. Though I grant this is unrealistic in certain countries, the economic implications are convincing.
In most countries, imported foods are simply a luxury but this belies those nations where imports ensure survival. Some of these countries include populous Southeast Asian nations, and numerous Middle Eastern and African countries. The reasons range from poorly developed infrastructure, little arable soil, and increased vulnerability to natural disasters. Many Asian countries in particular, import and stockpile basic foods such as rice for potential catastrophes. As agricultural technology develops and allows for crops that require less water, their desperation will lessen but it would be inhumane today to starve citizens in these countries.
The above-mentioned scenarios are exceptions; the majority of countries would be better served through vibrant food cultivation and production industries. The economic impact is twofold. First, these industries employ thousands of agricultural and meat-packing workers. Secondly, these workers then contribute to the local economy by buying goods and services. Replace them with international food conglomerates and suddenly they are funding the GDP of another country. A good counter-example to this would be in South Korea where the vast majority of products are nationally produced and, in fact, were some of the initial, primary sources of income for technology giants like Samsung and LG.
In conclusion, except in extreme cases, countries should import fewer food products to better serve their citizenry economically. There will always be a place for a limited range of imports, but it should not supersede local production.
Sample 14:
People have different views as to whether countries should import less food and, instead, try to produce all of their food locally. In my opinion, countries should continue to import food normally.
On one hand, producing food locally helps support the local economy. Money spent on these domestic products ends up in the hands of local farmers and distributors, keeping the money within a country instead of having it flow to foreign countries. Another benefit is that local food is often fresher and healthier than imported food, which is typically frozen so that it can be transported across the world. Moreover, these transportation costs are passed down to customers, making imported food considerably more expensive than local food. Transporting food across countries also harms the environment, as food miles contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Producing local food, in other words, helps curb climate change.
However, I still believe that countries should continue to import food as they normally do. First, imported food can be safer and of higher quality than local food, and it would be wrong to deny people food safety. Imported food also provides people with a greater variety of options. For example, many types of cheese, meat, and fruit are produced only in foreign countries. Being able to buy these foods results in a happier and more content general population. Additionally, importing food grants people access to food that is out of season in their country. It allows people, for instance, to enjoy mangoes all-year round instead of just during summer when they're in season.
For these reasons, I would argue that countries should continue to import food normally instead of trying to replace it with locally produced food.
Sample 15:
It is suggested that a country should avoid importing food and meet all of its demands with national production. From my perspective, this idea should never be implemented in practice.
The most common argument for food autarky is to maintain food security. Food, unlike other types of goods, is essential for human survival; a mass shortage of food in just a few days will lead to riots. Therefore, ensuring food supply independent from import supply seems reasonable; however, this line of thought is not without a flaw. In reality, a food crisis can be the result of natural disasters; tying the whole country's food demand with domestic supply is actually risky. An example is the North Korea famine during the 90s, which happened due to a series of droughts and the lack of imported food. In practice, a good network of food trade reduces the risk of national famine.
Another reason for not importing food is protectionism, or in other words, restricting imports in order to shield the domestic industry from competition. Protectionists argue that without tariffs on imported goods, many imported products are cheaper than their domestic counterparts. Consumers usually pick the cheaper ones, this causes local firms to be unable to sell their products and lose their revenue, making local workers lose their jobs. However, this argument overlooks the bilateral aspect of international trade. If a country insists on exporting but not importing anything from its foreign partners, every nation will eventually adopt the same strategy. Many workers will lose their jobs if there is no market for their products. Therefore, protectionism does not necessarily prevent unemployment.
In conclusion, it is best practice to let the market dictate the import flow.
Sample 16:
It is believed that nations should grow crops themselves to feed their residents, and imports should be reduced to a large extent. This essay agrees with this statement because this initiative will make food items cheaper and improve the financial status of farmers.
Firstly, the food items grown in the nation will be much more affordable for its citizens. This is because grains produced in the nation do not need to pay the international transportation cost and other international charges. As a result, the price of locally grown food will much lower. For example, in South-east nations, they import much of their wheat and rice from other nations and thus the cost of these food grains is quite higher in these nations as compared to other parts of the world.
Secondly, when governments push their residents to produce more grains for domestic consumption, it is more likely that the income of local farmers will increase. This is because all crops that they grow will be sold in the local food markets either purchased by the government agencies or private companies. This will enable farmers to earn a good amount of money. To illustrate, in India, the government procures grains from farmers at a minimum support price and thus this has enabled farmers to have an assured income for their work and have a decent lifestyle.
In conclusion, domestically grown food products will result in lowering the prices of food items and it will raise the economic status of the farming community.
Sample 17:
It is commonly suggested that food grown by the nations should satisfy the needs of all their citizens and imports must be curbed as much as possible. I completely agree with this point of view as this will help countries to save money and create many opportunities for the residents.
One of the biggest benefits of producing food in-house is that it can financially favor the governments. Becoming self-sufficient in food production and minimizing imports makes the country less dependent on others and at the same it benefits local producers. This will also give the upper hand in trade-related decisions with other nations. Moreover, food grown in the country will have lower base prices as it becomes a regular item in people’s diet. For example, 30 years ago, India was totally dependent on foreign countries for wheat and then wheat prices were high. However, now the country produces enough wheat for its people and prices have fallen by 50%. Thus, domestic production of foods benefits national economies.
Additionally, the idea of growing food to fulfill the country’s demand will create many opportunities for their people to grow. This will create higher employment in this sector and will motivate the researchers to develop new technologies. For instance, the state of Punjab created 30% more jobs for its residents since the time it started to lead the nation in the production of wheat. Furthermore, the state government was able to allocate more resources to the research and development making wheat much more affordable to the people of India.
In conclusion, the idea of growing food that can fulfil the need of the country and curtailing imports is entirely justified. This will not only make the country financially strong but also generate more employment opportunities employment and elevate its technological capacities in the long run.
Sample 18:
There exists an opinion that each country should ensure its food security as per the food demands of its population rather than relying heavily on other countries. I too think the same way, despite some strong exceptions.
The primary reason for my view is because of the fact that many countries across the world face food shortage, though they are capable of being independent in case of meeting the food demands. This might be due to changing the focus of development from the agricultural sector to other sectors like tourism and infrastructure. Admitting the fact that development is needed in all the sectors, I think a country should never deviate its focus from food produce, as it is one of the basic needs of mankind.
In many countries, hectares of agricultural lands are converted to either residential or industrial areas, and they depend heavily on food imports. The most undesirable situation might arise when there occurs a shortage in these imports due to any unforeseen events like natural calamities or war. In such a case, the citizens of the dependent countries might suffer severe food shortage or even famine. In order to avoid such incidences, it is better to produce and store enough food items a country’s population demands.
However, there are countries where extreme climatic conditions are present. For example, it is difficult to meet the food demands of middle east countries, as the area suitable for agriculture is too less, compared to other countries. The situation is similar in the case of countries where frequent floods and droughts occur. The modern technology is not yet fully developed to solve these issues.
In conclusion, even though adverse conditions hamper the food production process in certain countries, I think a country should ensure minimum food imports by promoting cultivation of edible food products, whenever and wherever possible.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Today technology has changed how people interact with each other. I believe the biggest effects it has had on relationships are that it has reduced in-person interaction and that it has led to the development of online relationships. This has been a positive development because often cyber relationships are more meaningful than in-person relationships.
Technology has reduced face-to-face interaction. For instance, it is not uncommon to see two people sitting at the same table in a restaurant, checking their phones every 30 seconds, and only talking to each other occasionally.
Technology has also given rise to online relationships. Nowadays anyone that has access to the Internet and computers can create a free Facebook or Twitter account and build their social networks on these platforms no matter where on the planet they reside. Take, for example, Chinese teenagers who like collecting insects. On the Internet, they can find and connect with others who share this particular hobby, even if those people live in the Amazon rainforest.
This should be seen as a positive trend because cyberspace relationships can be very meaningful. Today it is very common that those in a person's immediate circle do not support what they pursue. For example, many street artists are looked down on by their family members. Fortunately, Facebook groups give them the power to build their own communities where they can support each other. The inspiration and motivation they obtain there can drive them to work hard to move toward their goals.
In conclusion, technology has reduced in-person interaction and has meanwhile enabled online relationships. This has definitely been a positive trend because online relationships are often more satisfying and meaningful than face-to-face ones.
Sample 2:
Technology is a crucial tool for communication in modern times. It is flourishing in each and every field of communication. Though this invention has changed the way people interact around the world, it has both positive and negative impact on the relationship of people.
To embark on, with regard to the positive development, technological advancement has made communication between organizations more convenient and time-saving. Many companies and organizations use tools like social media, email and forum to influence a larger number of audiences. This also serves as an advanced mode of learning since schools adopt the method of smart classrooms. With the availability of ecommerce, freelance websites, social media marketing, people can easily buy and sell products and services with effortless communication.
On the other hand, the drawbacks of technology on the relationships of people cannot be ignored. Though technology has advanced greatly, it still lacks the emotional touch of communication. It has affected the love and affection people crave with communication. Millennials today are more fascinated by the virtual world, thereby forgetting the practical side of life. Modern modes of communication are making people busy and less productive. Sharing personal information on social media also invades people’s privacy. For example, individuals spending hours on social media interaction interacting with people from around the world and wasting their valuable time. In fact, family vacation which was previously a private affair has now become a public affair.
To sum up, communication technology can be a blessing or a curse depending upon how people make use of it. Even though it is an easy method of interaction, the relationships formed through technological interaction lack trust and emotion. Hence, people should give preference to face-to-face communication.
Sample 3:
It is evident that technology has transformed the ways of communication and influenced relationships in a variety of ways. In my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects of this.
The principal way in which relationships have been affected is that they tend to be at a distance rather than face-to-face. The advent of the internet has made it easy for business owners to communicate across the world, with remote job opportunities one call away. Online educational programs are available for people residing in different countries, and it is no longer a dream to attend live classes from the comfortable environment of a home. Not only this, the social platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube have revolutionized relationships, be it making online friendships with people from other countries or staying in touch with loved ones. Based on this perspective, technology has influenced relationships in a positive way.
However, despite these advances, the quality of interaction has significantly declined in several respects. If people are developing most of their relationships online, this means that they may also have less fact-to-face contact. This kind of contact on a personal level is important for human beings to feel wanted and a part of society. This may be a particular problem for children's social development as they used to be seen playing out on the streets but are now too often indoors. Technology can also mean people are detached from what is going on around them even when they are out, as can be seen by the many people staring into their mobile phones as they travel or walk around.
In conclusion, technology has brought some positive developments in the ways people interact with each other. However, there are also some negative impacts of technology on the types of relationships people make.
Sample 4:
Technology has hardly left any human feeling untouched. Instead, it has played a great role in manipulating and transforming it to a great extent. One of the most highly impacted aspects in this context is human interaction.
Technology has laid its hands on human behavior and has greatly influenced the pattern of human interaction since its introduction. From social media platforms to FaceTime applications, staying in touch has become easier with time. However, it has its downsides as well. With such high-end digital connections, intimate relationships have seen a significant decrease ever since.
These changes result from the freedom of hiding genuine emotions that technology brings. People can now fake caring about someone, express false love, and connect just for the sake of words. This has led to loosened family bonds, false promises between partners, and much more. People do interact with each other, but this interaction is often fake and untrue. Technology's significant impact on human interaction leads to various unwanted consequences. A surge in depression cases, suicides, and unwise decisions have been recorded as a result of such interactions.
Hence, technology has influenced the way people interact both positively and negatively. Undoubtedly, it has helped humans connect from miles away with their loved ones yet has made relations less meaningful and degraded their overall quality.
Sample 5:
Technology has brought vast changes in human behavior since its introduction. Moreover, with its rapid advancement and new changes, it is impacting relationships more rapidly. Interactions have recently been made more accessible due to technology. People can now connect easily and from the ease of their homes. However, it also has its downsides. A detailed study of this significant impact on human relationships due to technology can be understood with various examples.
In recent years, technology has helped humans stay connected at all times. With technology spreading its arms, connections can be made even in the most unexpected and tribal areas of the world. However, this has ultimately transformed human behavior and the way people interact with each other.
A prime example of this change is how people interact since social media's introduction. The introduction of social media platforms has made it easier for people to connect with their loved ones, even at a distance. However, it has entirely transformed how people interact with their close surroundings. This has also led to the expression of fake feelings and false expressions.
Overall, technology has transformed the entire interaction cycle of human beings without letting us realize it. More connections over the internet have paved the way for broken real-life relationships and have ultimately degraded the quality of relationships.
Sample 6:
There has been a change in the different aspects of social relations as affected by technology which we can introduced as more of a post-positively than post-negatively impact.
First, technology has immensely extended the speed and convinience of communication and thus the worth of relationships. For example, a university learner who is learning in another country can use video-calling to speak with the parents daily. An instantaneous means of communication makes it easier to avoid having to wait for a letter to arrive for a day or more as is the norm. Furthermore, social networks allow a person to get acquanted with like-minded strangers with similar interests, career choices, or hobbies, therefore create friendships that last a lifetime.
Despite this perception, this development is fairly beneficial to the masses. Improved communication technology reduces pressure and creates the need for belonging. For instance, when there is negative information, people get to act quickly. Also, positive information is more effective when shared immediately and it helps enhance interpersonal relationships. In addition, this has led to the growth of businesses and the eradication of geographical barriers whereby a company can comfortably and easily transact business with an organization in another country at any given time.
Altogether, it can be highlighted that technology plays a vital role in changing social relations by providing more effective and pleasant means of communication. It has made interpersonal communication better, provided businesses with links and connections as well as made everyone have equal access to information. Thus, it can be concluded that the purpose and use of technology have been mainly beneficial for interactions and relationships for the majority of people.
Sample 7:
It is true that new technologies have had an influence on communication between people. Technology has affected relationships in various ways, and in my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects.
Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, telephones and the Internet allow businesspeople in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. For example, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.
On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between people in different countries was much more difficult when communication was limited to written letters or telegrams. Nowadays, interactions by email, phone or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings, and many of us benefit from these interactions, either in work or social contexts. On the other hand, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result ofisolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these 'virtual' relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships.
In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionized communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.
Sample 8:
There has been a complex alteration in the various aspects of social relations due to technological advancement resulting in more positive impact than negatives.
First of all, the usage of technology has tremendously augmented the speed and ease of interaction making the relations’ depth richer. For example, a university student studying in another country can utilize video-calling to maintain quotidian contact with his or her parents. Real-time messaging banishes the lengthy wait for the letter, which was taken as conventional before. Besides, one is able to interact with strangers with similar interests, jobs, or hobbies, hence fostering friendships that endure a lifetime.
This development is predominantly propitious for the people. Advanced communication technology reduces stress and creates a feeling of belongingness. For instance, the sectional publicity of negative information can be quickly followed by timely responses. And just as to promote the fast exchange of positive messages, cooperation is strengthened between people. In addition, this technological advancement has boosted business development and erased hegemonic constraints and restrictions that enable business organizations to freely and easily connect with global organizations at any time.
Therefore, one is able to deduce that relations in society have been significantly mediated by technology in the manner in which humans interact offering more effective and fulfilling ways. It has made interpersonal communication easier, created business relationships and opportunities, and given equal opportunity for information access. Hence, the major impact of technology is analyzing and interpreting common interaction and relationship profiles that can be deemed more beneficial and helpful for most people.
Sample 9:
The advent and rapid development of technology have fundamentally transformed the dynamics of interpersonal interactions among individuals. This has also transformed the way we form relationships and bond with each other. This essay contends that the evolution of technology has, in fact, catalyzed a positive shift in the types of relationships people form, fostering connectivity and enhancing social engagement.
Technology has diversified the ways individuals establish and maintain relationships. Social media platforms, for instance, have facilitated connections among individuals globally, transcending geographical barriers. Additionally, online dating applications have revolutionized how people meet and form romantic relationships, offering a wide array of choices and opportunities to connect with like-minded individuals. Technology has also gifted us swift and interactive communication with loved ones no matter the distance. For instance, someone living abroad can make video calls and talk to his or her family members whenever they want. This has reduced the communication gap and significantly enhanced our options to contact others in real-time unlike in the past when sending handwritten letters was perhaps the best option to convey messages or contact someone.
This evolution in the types of relationships forged through technology signifies a positive development. Online connectivity allows individuals to maintain contact with friends, family, and acquaintances across vast distances. Moreover, digital platforms enable marginalized groups, such as those with disabilities or introverted personalities, to establish meaningful connections they may struggle to form in traditional social settings. For instance, social networking sites provide platforms for introverted individuals to express themselves and interact comfortably, fostering self-confidence and social skills.
In conclusion, the impact of technology on relationship dynamics has been transformative, offering diverse avenues for connectivity and social interaction. The ability to form connections across distances and the empowerment of individuals who face social barriers underscore the positive aspects of technological advancements. Embracing these changes in relationship dynamics signifies a positive shift towards enhanced connectivity and inclusivity in contemporary society.
Sample 10:
The ubiquitous presence of technology has undoubtedly redefined the landscape of human interaction, altering the very nature of how we build and maintain relationships. While the advancements of the digital age offer a plethora of tools for communication and connection, a closer examination reveals a disturbing trend – the erosion of genuine, meaningful relationships.
With technology, we make friends more often than ever. We also have a variety of tools to connect with others and remain in touch with people we care about. But one undeniable consequence of this technology-driven relationship is the rise of superficial and fleeting interactions online. Social media platforms, while fostering a sense of instant connectivity, often facilitate shallow exchanges and curated self-presentation. In the pursuit of likes and followers, meaningful conversations and authentic connections are often sacrificed, fostering a culture of virtual intimacy that lacks the depth and genuineness of face-to-face interaction.
As a result, of the constant bombardment of digital stimuli can contribute to social anxiety and a fear of missing out, hindering our ability to develop genuine relationships. The pressure to maintain an online presence and curate a perfect digital persona can lead individuals to withdraw from real-world interactions, hindering their ability to connect authentically with others. And this is a disturbing outcome of our digital relationship. Additionally, the ease of virtual communication can discourage individuals from developing the interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence necessary for navigating the complexities of face-to-face interaction. For example, a young adult accustomed to online communication might struggle to hold engaging conversations in person, leading to feelings of awkwardness and missed opportunities for meaningful connections.
In conclusion, while technology undoubtedly offers tools for communication and connection, it is crucial to recognize its limitations and potential pitfalls. By prioritizing face-to-face interaction, fostering genuine conversations, and actively engaging with our communities, we can strive to counteract the negative effects of technology on our relationships and cultivate a more meaningful and fulfilling social life.
Sample 11:
There is no doubt that many things have changed in the last few decades; some changes are for the better and some changes are for the worse. One of the fields which were greatly affected by the advent of technology is the way of interaction and communication.
Without any doubt, technology has changed the way we lead our lives, and these changes have been prominent over the last decade. There are several improvements in life due to the positive effects of technology and there are some negative impacts as well. One area that has dramatically changed is the way we communicate and maintain our relationship nowadays. And in my opinion, technology has positively affected our communication and the way we make relationships and maintain it. Despite some negative effects, most of us enjoy the positive things technology has bought for us. In the past, the ways of interaction were very limited. Unleash your imagination; if you want to speak with your friend, you would have to go directly to his house or send him a message which may take a few days to get a response. I completely believe that technology has a great tangible effect on our communication. Nowadays, it's very easy to interact with your relatives - and even with the government and organisations - either by emails, mobiles, chatting, etc. and I think that this has improved and enhanced the relationships.
We no longer need to visit a relative or friend to get updates. Alternatively, we can let them know our updates instantly. Besides personal communications, official and business communications have become easier. Email campaigns offer a good marketing opportunity for business owners and people can complain about a certain thing using emails without exposing their identity. Not all of the people have the availability of technology, and they still use the old form of communication. People now can deceive others using identity theft and fraud identity. The personal touch of communication like handwritten letters, face-to-face communications were more effective in some cases. Like meeting your friend is still more important than just writing him an email.
We make so many friends via chatting or social networking which would not have been possible without the advancement of technology and its contribution to communication. Cell phones, emails and social networking have enhanced the way of communicating and we can talk to anyone with a minimum cost. It's now not unusual to prepare for a visit and even several visits to your relatives and friends on the same day, while in the past this may have taken several weeks or months.
To conclude, despite all that, I still see some failings in the development of the means of interaction. For instance, the very high cost each person spends every day on communication. Another defect is that many elderly people are not accustomed to this modern technology. But that doesn't have a great effect on the positive role technology has made in the field of interaction between people and I think these defects are very easy to be solved.
Sample 12:
A true relationship between two people requires face to face communication and time to truly get to know each other. Regardless of what humans think, all individuals admire the feeling of being wanted even if it’s a lie. The digital world has created the sense that it is passable to be who anyone wishes to be online. However, I believe that the way people know each other online and the type of relationships they make virtually have changed for the worse.
Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, most are being turned inward, forgetting the true definition of a friend. Human beings have feelings, and they feel broken at times and do not always smile but the Internet only shows one's happy moments keeping one from fully being known. The types of friendships people make these days are quick and short-lasting. In real life friendship, people see each other at one’s best and worst time and remain there for one another. This can never be compared to a social network friendship. One can only get to know someone by spending time together for the reason that the Internet cannot replace shared experience and personal communication. However, due to the Internet, people can make friends anywhere in the world which was quite impossible in the past era. Finding school and college friends and getting in touch with them is an advantage that the Internet offers to us. However, true friendship is not possible if two people do not spend time together, share their common interests, talk a lot and help each other both in good and bad times.
Rightfully, life is meant to be lived and have many physical experiences, bonding with another person’s physical presence. Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, they are spending time online to make friends. This is, in my opinion, a negative aspect of the digital era.
In conclusion, making friends beyond boundaries and getting in touch with childhood friends could be the advantages of the digital era but the way we are becoming dependent on the technology and the way we are pretending to maintain our friendship online have negative consequences on our personal, moral and social aspects.
Sample 13:
It is true that technology in recent years has altered the path that people communicate with each other. There are many ways that technology affects our relationships, and in my opinion, this is a beneficial development.
To begin with, the most obvious transformation in people’s relationships is how they communicate with each other. By this, I mean that the Internet has converted the world into a small village and nowadays people around the world can reach each other easily and rapidly. For example, a friend who lives in the UK can chat and talk with their friends in China using a mobile phone or social network.
Another field in which technology affects our life is the way that people make friends. In other words, it has been observed that these days we can make friends from all nationalities without any effort or travel, and this helps with culture interchange and help people who suffer.
In my thought, this has a positive impact on the community for two reasons. Firstly, human life has become more convenient, this provides people with more opportunity to spend their leisure time with their kin. For instance, with the Internet, we can shop and work from our dwelling house without going outside anymore. Secondly, travel around the globe has become usable and cheap. As a result, people visiting each other and spend a lot of time together hence more connected society emerges.
To conclude, as we have found out there is no easy answer to this question. Nevertheless, technology makes a huge difference in peoples' lives in terms of communication and I believe that this is a positive impact in our society.
Sample 14:
From the last century to the present days, there have been many changes in the way people interact with each other as there have been evolutionary changes in technological fields. One may say this transformation has negative effects on relationships between people or positive effects. I believe that there have been more positive effects than negative ones among the people due to the reasons that in few seconds of time people can contact their dearest ones and technology gives strength to people by making them closer to each other even if they are not.
From the introduction of telecommunication and electronic mail, the lives of people turned out to be easier and communication among people became easier and more convenient. They can contact their families and friends using these advanced services over the countries. Without visiting their homes frequently, they can make money or accomplish their goals. For example, a military man has to serve his country at the borders, and it is uneasy to go home and spend some time with his family and acquaintances thoroughly. However, he can make contact with his family via telephone and other services. With the help of telecommunication and electronic mail, he can keep in touch with his family and buddies. In this way, technology makes people close to each other. This absolutely positive development as we have huge benefits using technology.
With the absence of one's dearest one, he used to be all alone before the introduction of technology. But it is possible to get in touch with his sweetheart. And also, he can send and receive the money within seconds over the thousands of miles using the latest money transfer machines. As a result, he can look over and take care of his family's financial problems and needs without his presence at his home. For instance, my uncle who stays in the United States calls his family and others via ‘Skype’ daily whereas, my dad who used to work in Dubai could not keep in touch with us as at that time the telecommunication had not installed in my village. Thus, that made my father bound to visit us frequently. Consequently, he spent a large amount of money travelling and could not communicate with us as frequently as he wanted to.
In many positive ways, technology has affected the relationships between people, and I would say these are positive developments. Imagine without technology, what would happen to the people and the world. In many ways, we are getting the help of using technology.
Sample 15:
Technological developments in this modern era have transformed the way we socialise. Advancements in communication networks have played a vital role in bringing people closer. In my opinion, there are both pros and cons of this development and this essay will analyse how technology has changed the types of relationships made by people.
In ancient times, people used letters and telegrams to interact with each other. With the advent of modern communication systems like the telephone and the Internet, people can collaborate more effectively. For instance, we can interact through emails rather than letter and businessman can have online meetings through the conference calls.
Another reason is the widespread use of social networks over the internet; for instance, Facebook, where men and women can now make friends online and interact with them through the post, message and online chat. Video conferencing in the form of Skype has improved instructor and student relationship. Online messaging platforms like mIRC have given people the luxury to choose their own discussion-based chat rooms. There are more ways to socialise now than there used to be in the past.
All these advancements in technology come up with their merits and demerits. Letters, memos and telegrams are replaced by emails and text messages. Human resource hiring can be done through online video conferencing which has eliminated the need for physical presence and travelling requirement. We can now mingle more through Facebook, Pinterest, Google+, Instagram and Orkut and so on. Though one can regard these as positive developments, they do have some negative aspects. These developments have isolated people and discouraged real-world interaction. For instance, youth, in particular, prefers to choose to mix up with people online rather than socialising with them in the real world.
To conclude, technology has no doubt revolutionised the way we interact and hang out but has greatly reduced real-world interaction. Though these virtual relations tend to be positive, we should not deny the importance of physical interaction in our lives.
Sample 16:
Everything has two sides, and the effects of technology on people’s relationships are not an exception. We cannot deny how much technology has transformed the individual reaction with others in his family and the surrounding community.
In my opinion, technology has affected and transformed our life aspects and dealing with other people in a good way. Recently, we have had different fast and cheap methods to call our family and friends. Moreover, some technologies are giving us chances to see and talk with them at the same time. In addition, we are informed on a daily basis with the last updates and news about our friends and family, so we can remember birthdays, graduation parties and even marriage anniversaries. Furthermore, these methods make it faster and easier to call and congratulate another individual.
On the other hand, many people believe that technology is affecting individual relationships badly. They opine that, if we did not have these kinds of technology, we would have been visiting each other regularly.
Not only that, but individuals will not be isolated from each other, especially those who are addicted to using social networking platforms. As a matter of fact, people rarely talk to each other face-to-face. In particular, people’s personalities are changing so much, because of addiction to using Facebook. It’s one of the vital reasons to decrease confidence and self-esteem.
As can be seen, even if we have some bad effects of technology and how it changed the way people contact each other, we still have much more effects. We can obtain many easy and cheaper methods to contact each other. In fact, technology has enhanced our life and the way we are contacting each other.
Sample 17:
Today, various brand-new methods of telecommunications have tremendously influenced social behaviour. Although their impacts have benefited human lifestyle, they have had some costs as well. However, before evaluating their advantages and disadvantages, it is better to reveal how these breakthroughs affect the ways people relate to each other.
In the old times, when someone wanted to communicate, there were extremely limited means of doing so. Indeed, he should write a letter or have a face-to-face conversation. Likewise, it was possible to be acquainted with new faces either by meeting them personally or being introduced by family and friends.
On the other hand, substantial technological progress has happened in recent years. For instance, smartphones can be utilised both by direct calls and via different applications. Alternatively, the internet can be used either by offline methods like e-mail or by online protocols like chatting programs. Moreover, social networking is another rich aspect of the internet by which everybody is able to find new friends or search for old, missed ones, and it can be used to interact with current relatives as well. Clearly, not only have modern technologies facilitated human interactions, but they also diversified his relationships.
On the debit side, excessive use of virtual connections might weaken the personal relationship with reality. While it seems that people are aware of each other’s statuses on a daily basis, even up-to-the-minute, they may overlook loved ones’ emotional states due to the negligence of their presence.
All in all, contemplating the pros and cons of these phenomena simultaneously, I should say it depends on the person who utilises these state-of-the-art technologies. If he applies them wisely, their pluses will definitely overshadow their pitfalls. After all, in my viewpoint, humankind can eventually address this issue in favour of his civilisation. Hence, I assume it as a mainly positive development in the long run.
Sample 18:
People used to communicate by meeting each other while it has nowadays totally changed since technological advancement. Some assert that utilising technology in daily communication brings more harm than good things. I personally agree with this view and this essay will look into the reason with some considerations.
The first effect of technology usage is that it reduces the sense of togetherness among people. Since they do interaction via telecommunication such as a mobile phone or the internet, it reduces the personal relationship. People cannot catch moments during interaction because they communicate in unreal situations. Take social media as an example, most teenagers talk to their friend via utilising Facebook, Viber, WhatsApp or others. They tend to interact with each other via sending messages thus they can feel the situation or even communication sense just by reading the messages. By contrast, direct communication tends to develop a sense of belonging among people. They will be more comfortable expressing their feelings thus it is easy to get along together.
In addition, it will deteriorate the human behaviour. By using electronic devices in the daily life of communication, it is hard for them to get involved in a social environment. It will decrease their self-confidence to speak in public because they usually interact through devices rather than through face-to-face communication. Moreover, utilising technology in interaction is not free thus you should they should prepare much budget just for communication.
It is true that technology usages enable people to keep in touch with people who live in different places. However, it is not capable of providing a sense of feeling as well as direct communication.
To sum up, by communicating directly, it will help people keep close to each other and able to talk towards them easily and expressively.
Sample 19:
The 21st century has been a game-changer in all aspects of human life. The same case is with relationships which have also taken on a new dimension with technological advancement. Nowadays, relationships are much more fragile, materialistic, mistrustful and doubtful as compared to previous times. I reckon that overall, this development has been quite negative which will be analysed in our paragraphs to follow.
To start with, nowadays technology has made relationships between humans quite suspicious. People are getting involved in relationships just on social networking websites without even knowing who is actually communicating with them. For instance, there have been many cases in which the person you are in contact with is actually fake and fraud. He is just playing and making a fool of you, and you believe that you are making a friend or falling in love with him. Consequently, when you know the truth, it is just like a bolt from the blue and your feeling is eradicated. This is evident from the argument above the reality that technological relationships can be quite painful sometimes.
Further, in the new era connections between people can be quite fragile and weak as compared to the strength of relationships before the advent of technology. People without practically meeting each other and actually knowing their strengths and weaknesses tend to trust each other too much and when they face the true facts the relationships are affected and, in some cases, broken down. For instance, a survey was conducted by Indian newspaper regarding the success of technology relationships and the result was reconciling with the point that relationships are very poor, and the failure rate was quite high.
To sum up, these technological relationships have altered the connectivity between two people. I firmly believe that drawbacks outweigh much more as compared to the fruits of these new relationships. However, it is recommended that people should be extremely careful and cautious in making any sought of relationships on social networking websites, chatting software etc.
Sample 20:
Technology has been affecting many aspects of human life including the way people interact with one another. Some believe that it has more benefits for people’s connection than drawbacks, while others contradict it. I personally argue with the former opinion, and through this essay, I am going to explain my reasons.
Initially, the first reason that I am going to elaborate is the way technology better enhances communication among people. A large number of communication gadgets has been invented in order to help communication between people, even for those who are separated by spacious distance, getting simpler and quicker. Thus, by giving an easier chance to be connected, this development has been encouraging society’s sense of togetherness. They do not have to visit their colleagues which are in different regions or cities to ask about their condition, for instance, because they could just pick up their phone and call their friends.
Subsequently, the variety of communication technology has been developed even further. The purpose is not only to make it easier but also to achieve a better quality of communication. We can mention video call, voice messenger and social media as the parts of it. The users are not limited by the elder method of phone call anymore. They can communicate more interactively by using video call. Therefore, they can communicate with others in the wider range of connection by using social media such as Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. This situation will globally lead people into a worldwide relationship.
On the other hand, there has been a developing trend that people are becoming more individualistic as the effect of technological development. The decreasing opportunity of direct interaction among them is accused as the root of this problem. However, it depends on us as the users to utilise technology wisely. If we can maintain a balance between communication technology and the conventional way of communication, the problem will certainly disappear.
Eventually, the advantages of using technology as part of our communication types outweigh the disadvantages, as long as we can manage it to be the helper, not the loser.
Sample 21:
It is true that some people have shifted their way to keep in touch with others due to the innovation of technology. The massive use of devices in communication, particularly phones and the internet, can be identified as the main difference compared to the past. People rely on those technologies to connect with families, friends and colleagues. Personally, I reckon that this trend may lead people to have a better relationship due to the effectiveness and low cost of communication.
To begin with, the interaction of individuals is presently not limited in one model. It means that people have many choices to stay connected with others than before. Technology offers some applications such as email, Facebook or Twitter. Those social media serve advantages to enhance and build a relationship with others. For example, in workplaces, employees do not have to meet in a certain place to discuss something. Rather they can use video conference to do a meeting. Therefore, various types of communication tools can help people to choose their preference and purpose in communication.
Furthermore, the usage of technology in communication leads to some positive things. It can be assumed that the easiness and effectiveness which are offered by these devices maximise the quality of people life in term of maintenance the relation of people. In addition, these communication tools allow people to spend less money and time. In other words, individuals do not have to visit someone when they want to talk or know friends’ news. Young people nowadays have friends from different countries and can have more friends. They can share their thoughts and updates instantly, which was quite impossible in the past. Some people might argue that people rely too much on technology and that’s they keep a less personal relationship with others. However, I disagree and want to say that technology has made it possible to connect with a dear one, make new friends and build up relationships in a more convenient way.
In conclusion, people always pick the best and most efficient way of communication, and the widespread use of the internet, mobile phone and other ways of communication have positively impacted our life and the way we make and keep our relationship.
Sample 22:
It is commonly noticed that people surrounding us stay connected with other people via social networking sites or other applications and technology have totally changed the way people used to communicate, make friends and keep their relationship. This paradigm shift happened basically because of the advances in technology and widespread use of such technological applications. Shall we welcome this shift or be wary about the changes? In this essay, I am going to discuss how technology has affected the types of relationships people make and whether it is considered as a positive or negative development.
First and foremost, I think that the development of technology has enhanced the relationships people make and maintain. For instance, when a student studies abroad and stays far away from his or her family and friends, social networking sites and other applications can help the student stay connected with his or her family and friends through Skype, for instance. In my opinion, in this case, this is a positive development to deal with homesickness or maintain our interactions with people we care about. Compared to the past decade, when technology was not so advanced, people had to depend on letters to communicate with each other and that was a time-consuming method, and it incurred higher cost. In contrast, in today’s world, people just have to be on laptops or smartphones and can have direct communication and interaction with family and friends. They can see each other contrary to the past method of interchanging written words. In this way, people can keep a close relationship with family and friends. We can now make friends beyond borders and that enhances our perspective about other nations and customs. Online groups, social platforms and social networking sites bring people together who have common interests and there are many events those people meet and plan for the betterment of society.
In fact, the implication of technology on people’s relationships is a controversial issue. On the one hand, it is a positive development for helping people stay connected with family and friends and making new friends. On the other hand, it can estrange the relationships people make. The argument that it has a negative influence on people’s relationships is based on the scenario that people will avoid face-to-face communication in the long run. Recent research indicates that virtual communication will weaken the communication skill of a person. I still remember a film that I watched had a scene that showed four friends having meals in a restaurant. When they sat together, they did not interact with each other face-to-face but through social applications by sending out the emotions in the social group to show their feelings. This example shows a worrying trend as people enjoy interacting virtually more than face to face due to their reliance on technology. It is important to create awareness to the public that actual communication is more important than virtual interaction to minimise its repercussion.
Overall, as far as I am concerned, the advancement of technology has both positive and negative effects on the kind of relationships people make. We have to be aware that actual interaction is more important to enhance a relationship. We shall connect with family and friends virtually only if we are apart from them.
Sample 23:
Face-to-face communication and enough time to get to know each other well are prerequisites for a real relationship. People all like to feel wanted, even if it’s a false sense, despite what other people may believe. The perception that one can be whoever one wants to be online has been shaped by the digital age. But I think that relationships people form virtually and the way people get to know each other online have changed, mostly negatively.
Most are becoming more inward-focused and have forgotten what it means to be a true friend to those around them, rather than being genuine friends. People are emotional creatures who occasionally feel sad and aren’t always happy, but the Internet only shares positive experiences, preventing people from knowing each other completely. Nowadays, people tend to form fast and transient friendships. In real life friendships, individuals support one another through each other’s highs and lows. This is not at all like friendship on social media. Because the Internet cannot take the place of in-person interactions and shared experiences, getting to know someone requires spending time together.
It is only fitting that life be experienced fully, forming bonds with the physical presence of others. Rather than truly being friends with those in their immediate vicinity, they are utilizing social media to establish connections. I consider this to be a drawback of the digital age.
In conclusion, the digital age may have brought about benefits like reaching out to old friends and forming new ones, but it has also had unfavorable effects on our moral, social, and personal lives due to our growing reliance on technology and the ways we pretend to keep up our online friendships.
Sample 24:
Since communication with others comprises a very essential aspect of our daily life, any alteration in the way we communicate with each other will have a profound effect on our social and professional life. This essay will first discuss how technology has influenced the way we relate with each other presently and will then address the question of whether this influence has been positive or negative.
There are several ways in which the new communication technology has influenced people’s way of interaction with each other. Firstly, social media applications have revolutionized the way we communicate. The reason why many people believe this is that nowadays, you can connect with your family and friends instantly through many social media applications such as the Facebook and twitter applications. It is also possible to say that people are now more encouraged to share their opinions openly via the Internet. One good illustration for this is the substantial number of friends that people who use social media applications have in their contact list.
However, the impact of social media in one’s social life may not always be positive. This is because people are now increasingly abandoning face to face interactions and prefer carrying out their communication behind closed doors. This is causing more people, especially youths, to lose out on many aspects of personal communication. A particularly good example here is a study conducted in the USA showing that more than 75% of high school students are spending more than 50% of their free time on the Internet.
To sum up, modern technological advances in communication have incredibly influenced the way people interact, and although there are many perks associated with the use of recent technology there are also drawbacks that people must take care of.
Sample 25:
In this contemporary era, the means of communication have updated dramatically with the evolution of cutting-edge technologies. In my perspective, I foster that it is a constructive movement, and this treatise will elucidate my stance in the forthcoming paragraphs with credible illustrations.
To start with, the recent improvements in various aspects of technology have revolutionized the entire world such that the public claim that it makes them establish their communication among their peers in a feasible manner. There are many applications which can be downloaded and installed on our electronic gadgets, such as Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, which enable people to exchange messages, photos and videos. The latest breakthrough, instant calling and face-time features for long periods of time with minimal charges incurred, have made humans have a face-to-face interaction virtually. Many organizations are working tirelessly to achieve these updates frequently and are intuitive. For instance, old people who reside in the suburbs are overwhelmed with amusement since they are frequently having a chat with their children who live either in metro cities or in foreign lands. Thus, it creates a remarkable bonding among families who are far away from one another in distant locations.
In a similar fashion, there are multiple websites on the internet which attract youngsters in modern society. They are fascinated by browsing these sites to find new individuals in nearby areas and are meeting up for casual dates to understand each other. Additionally, some are using these to search for pristine friends and are gradually chatting almost every day. This eventually encourages them to identify partners or peers who have similar interests. By sharing their emotions, they feel relaxed and rejuvenated rather than having trepidation or stress. Hence, it plays a significant role in commencing new bonds for the youth.
Taking everything into consideration, the latest innovations in technology have drastically impacted the entire human population to have noteworthy coordination with parents and grandparents and explore new friends. This essay has exposed a plethora of merits and the advantageous impact of technology on the public worldwide.
Sample 26:
In recent years, with the development of information technology and the evolution of the internet, people interact and communicate better and more effectively than in the past. With new technology, people interact via devices where the technology has been converged. Now it is possible to make calls, watch TV, play video games, listen to music and access internet with only one device. Many people believe that technology may improve the type of the relationships people make whereas others do feel that it has negative effects.
It is believed by some people that technology has a positive effect in the way people interact because it is more convenient on daily basis, and the use of new channels to communicate is often free. For example, if you are looking for a job. You do not have to go to the office nor pay stamps to send your CV. You can do this by email by simply clicking on the “submit” button. It is effective because it saves time, and it is simple to apply. Another significant example is the use of social media platforms. It enables people to share experiences and send information instantaneously which can be seen by everyone, so it improves the way people socialise. Moreover, new channels of communication can help maintain good relationships in business between jobseekers and employers as well as with family and friends on a daily basis.
It is argued by others that technology has a negative impact on the type of relationship people make because it can lead to a development of antisocial behaviours. For instance, teenagers who play video games can find themselves in total confusion between the real world and the virtual world. The law is different because in the real world people have to follow rules whereas in the virtual world there are no constraints. It influences the behaviour of people in a negative way. Moreover, it can create a certain form of addiction for some, leading them to become completely isolated and unaware of what is good and right. Also, the use of the internet can spread bad behaviours such as bullying or the promotion of negative images, comments which will have an impact in people’s lives. For example, on Facebook, several teenagers committed suicide after being bullied by their friends. So, the inappropriate use of technology can lead to healthy issues such as addiction or fatal death.
To sum up, the development of technology has changed the type of relationships people make in both a positive and negative fashion. People use new channels in their daily life because it is convenient as well as cheap. However, the use of the internet needs to be carefully monitored and used appropriately to prevent children and vulnerable people from developing addictions, which could lead to harmful or even fatal consequences.
Sample 27:
Today, more than ever, in regard to determining whether or not advances in technology influence the sorts of relationships people make, various views have been set forward. The expansion of modern means of communicating is the continuing debate that causes so much controversy. This matter is evidenced by some experts who believe that they pose a direct threat to social lives and might come at the expense of severe social isolation and a sedentary lifestyle. Others understand the significance of communication and adhere to the concept that these types of relationships are integral pieces of social communication. Consequently, they are regarded as rewarding. Nevertheless, the opinion set forth by the second category is more logical. In the following paragraphs, I will shed light on my attitudes on this matter.
To begin with, previously, communication among people looked bleak. People used to fulfill and make an appointment to observe each other, and according to the simple fact that communities had busy folks, and they seem doomed to possess far-reaching communication.
In the next place, modern means of communicating control people’s attention. They are the fastest and easiest way of togetherness. Individuals are at the mercy of the digital world to get in touch with others in the remotest part of the world, leading to saving their own time and hanging out every second. This issue questions the requirement to have face to face connections.
In this hectic way of life, the truth is that the responsibility of real-time discussions, visualization of each other, information exchange which enables a person to share a variety of information like activities, events, interests, thoughts fall upon these ways of communication. Thanks to tremendous advances in technology.
In summary, all in all, rather than devoting a fantastic deal of time and energy solely concerning face to face interaction, the trend today is toward utilizing modern means of communication to get in touch with other individuals. The pivotal role in these ways of communicating performed in interpersonal communication is hard to dismiss. However, many men and women do not appreciate it.
Sample 28:
In recent years, the innovation of techonology has led to various changes in the way people interact. As a result, this causes some specific effects on people’s relationships which are generally considered as beneficial impacts on the society.
Conspicuously, the improvement in techonological devices such as computers with internet connection and mobile phones affect people’s relations in different aspects. Firstly, it helps to diversify kinds of relationships instead of just several traditional ones in the past. Besides people’s interactions in real life, many connections are beign bult through a virtual life on the internet especially via facebook or online games. Secondly, the convenience of communicating between people is likely to make people’s relationships more sociable and hardly understandable. In fact, many friendships are not based on trust or sincerity but benefits which are generally hard to be perceived in a virtual life.
Although the development of technology somehow makes people’s relationships more complicated, I still believe that people are actually beneficial from this. Thanks to internet availability, gaps between people are shortened in magical ways. For example, no matter how far the distance between two people, they still can talk directly to each other provided with the internet access. What’s more, people have never been able to save as much time and communicating expenses as at the present. Instead of waiting for months to receive a response from a posted letter, it just takes some seconds for the letter to be delivered through email even to many partners at the same time.
In conclusion, taking advantage of technological development to facilitate interaction between people is beneficial not only for building a good relationship but also for doing business.
Sample 29:
Technology is expanding in every field, and connectivity will be no exception. Nonetheless, due to its other pitfalls that cause discussion on its positive and negative effects, this enormous shift in the ways of interaction cannot be regarded as fruitful straight away.
One of the essential advantages of focusing on in terms of positive development is that technology makes connectivity simpler and more convenient. Because of recent events such as Skype, video conferencing, Whatsapp, and social networking sites, such as Facebook, people are hardly a click away from the nears and dears. To a great extent, these advances have made us social. Second, there are enormous opportunities for letters and telephone calls to be sent and for requests to be made. Customers used to be on the S.T.D and I.S.D booth in long queues, but now mobile phones and sophisticated gizmos make it easier for everyone to communicate openly.
On the other hand, certain disadvantages cannot be overlooked as people of today not only spend a long time using computers but also do not want to meet their relatives and friends face-to-face, leading to a fading relationship. One of my school friends, for example, visited me personally on various occasions, such as at festivals and birthdays. Still, nowadays, she sends messages to welcome me and sends salutations to my post. Even most members of the family suffer from asphyxia, which is an unusual illness that flares. For imitating relationships, this is a troubling question.
To recap, despite numerous disadvantages, nobody can afford to tackle this ever-fast digital technology that has to make our lives easier.
Sample 30:
Technological advancements have revolutionized how millions of people interact with each other, and it has gone to a whole new level. With it, how we make relationships has also been affected. The essay will expound on how individuals can now build relationships across the world, and then opine that this is an incredibly positive development.
Unprecedented in human history, modern technology has made it extremely convenient for people to communicate and get in touch with family, relatives, friends or old classmates. Besides, people can communicate instantaneously with someone they have never been acquainted with before and in geography, they have never been to with the help of digital applications like WhatsApp or Viber. They can even find someone on a freelancing platform to have their job done. This is quite different from the conventional relationships we develop by meeting in person; it is, nevertheless, hard to downplay these relationships. Moreover, social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn, provide people with a platform that allows them to live chat and comment on someone else’s matter instantly. Strangely enough, some of them even find their dates online and make friends in a distant country without ever meeting them.
Overall, the phenomenon is a real boon to mankind. The revolution in communication that modern technology brings forth has eroded the traditional notions of national sovereignty. It has blurred the line between national and international boundaries and wielded enormous influence on the values of the national identity so as to transform global citizens; whose ideas, values, ethics, and orientations are no longer moulded by the local culture and environment. Rather global ideals and values are incessantly aired on the web and social media to make a better world. Most importantly, the communication revolution paved the way for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, towards which the globe is rapidly heading.
In conclusion, leading-edge technology has altered our mode of interaction forever, transcending national and cultural barriers so that individuals can frankly chat, talk and can readily keep in touch, and it is a windfall achievement that will transform a new world where things, like culture, sect, and so on, that split people will not exist.
Sample 31:
Technology has revolutionised the way people interact with each other in recent times. However, this has led to a decline in the quality of relationships people make. The impact of technology on relationships is a double-edged sword, and while some may argue that it has been a positive development, I believe that it has had negative effects.
One of the ways that technology has affected relationships is that people are becoming more isolated and less likely to engage in face-to-face interactions. The rise of social media platforms and instant messaging services have made it easier for people to communicate remotely, but it has also led to a decrease in the frequency and quality of in-person interactions. People are now more likely to spend their time on social media rather than meeting up with friends or family members. Moreover, technology has made it easier for people to be dishonest and insincere in their interactions. For instance, people can now hide behind the anonymity of the internet and present a false version of themselves. This has led to a decline in trust and authenticity in relationships.
Another way that technology has affected relationships is that people are now more reliant on their devices than on their relationships. People can now find entertainment and fulfil their social needs through technology, making it less necessary to build and maintain meaningful relationships.
In conclusion, while technology has undoubtedly had many positive effects on society, its impact on relationships has been mostly negative. It has led to a decrease in in-person interactions, a decline in genuineness and trust, and an increased reliance on devices over relationships. It is crucial that people recognize these negative effects and take steps to mitigate them by prioritising in-person interactions and being more sincere and honest in their relationships.
Lời giải
Dịch câu hỏi:
Một số người tin rằng đọc truyện từ sách thì tốt hơn so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử đối với trẻ em. Bạn đồng ý hay không đồng ý với ý kiến này ở mức độ nào?
Đáp án:
Sample 1 (Mẫu 1):
While it has been said that reading books for pleasure rather than watching TV is more beneficial for one’s imagination and acquiring language skills, I contend that the role of the former in boosting intelligence and language ability is equal to the latter.
On the one hand, books are instrumental in enhancing children’s imagination and development. A kid reading a fairy tale with illustrations will have to think, fantasize and use their creativeness to comprehend ideas and reasoning, which in turn sharpen their mental skills. Moreover, reading books helps to improve language skills. Spending time reading a book which is not written in our mother tongue leads to the development of a strong language base referring to its vocabulary or comprehending the meaning of a word in different contexts. Besides, reading out a book for children is also an effective way to help them improve their communication skill, which is greatly stimulated as the kids grab a spoken word and use it in daily conversations.
On the other hand, watching TV is considered an important activity as reading in order to cultivate one’s imaginativeness regarding its characteristics of programs. Firstly, when audiences watch a tourism channel for example, they are exposed to a wide range of knowledge by seizing images of worldwide landscapes or feel tastes of specialties in various geographical regions. The broadcasting of quiz shows serves as an efficient learning tool for both children and adults who prefer taking challenges which involve critical thinking. Secondly, the role of TV in boosting linguistic competence is pivotal. Recent English programs not only support audience to remember words easily by associating them with vivid images shown on the screen but catch their constant attention with entertaining aspects.
In conclusion, while the benefits of reading are undeniable, they cannot outweigh the role of TV in enhancing a person’s imaginativeness and language skills.
Dịch:
Mặc dù người ta nói rằng đọc sách để giải trí thay vì xem TV có lợi hơn cho trí tưởng tượng và khả năng ngôn ngữ, tôi cho rằng vai trò của việc đọc sách trong việc nâng cao trí thông minh và khả năng ngôn ngữ là ngang bằng với việc xem TV.
Một mặt, sách đóng vai trò quan trọng trong việc phát triển trí tưởng tượng và sự phát triển của trẻ em. Một đứa trẻ đọc một câu chuyện cổ tích có minh họa sẽ phải suy nghĩ, tưởng tượng và sử dụng sự sáng tạo của mình để hiểu các ý tưởng và lý luận, từ đó rèn luyện kỹ năng tư duy. Hơn nữa, đọc sách giúp cải thiện kỹ năng ngôn ngữ. Dành thời gian đọc một cuốn sách không phải tiếng mẹ đẻ giúp xây dựng nền tảng ngôn ngữ vững chắc, từ việc học từ vựng đến hiểu nghĩa của từ trong các ngữ cảnh khác nhau. Ngoài ra, đọc sách thành tiếng cho trẻ em cũng là một cách hiệu quả để giúp chúng cải thiện kỹ năng giao tiếp, vì trẻ sẽ nắm bắt được từ ngữ nói và sử dụng chúng trong các cuộc hội thoại hàng ngày.
Mặt khác, xem TV được coi là một hoạt động quan trọng không kém việc đọc sách trong việc nuôi dưỡng trí tưởng tượng của con người nhờ vào đặc điểm của các chương trình truyền hình. Thứ nhất, khi khán giả xem một kênh du lịch, họ sẽ được tiếp cận với một kho tàng kiến thức phong phú qua hình ảnh các danh lam thắng cảnh trên thế giới hoặc trải nghiệm hương vị của các đặc sản từ nhiều vùng địa lý khác nhau. Các chương trình đố vui cũng là một công cụ học tập hiệu quả cho cả trẻ em và người lớn, những người thích thử thách tư duy phản biện. Thứ hai, vai trò của TV trong việc nâng cao năng lực ngôn ngữ là rất quan trọng. Các chương trình tiếng Anh hiện nay không chỉ giúp khán giả ghi nhớ từ vựng dễ dàng hơn bằng cách liên kết chúng với hình ảnh sống động trên màn hình mà còn thu hút sự chú ý của người xem nhờ yếu tố giải trí.
Tóm lại, mặc dù lợi ích của việc đọc sách là không thể phủ nhận, nhưng chúng không thể vượt trội hơn vai trò của TV trong việc nâng cao trí tưởng tượng và kỹ năng ngôn ngữ của một người.
Sample 2 (Mẫu 2):
Many people believe that reading books is far more beneficial for children than watching television or playing computer games. Personally, I completely agree with this opinion and will analyze the issue in the following essay.
To begin with, children can better improve their imagination through reading books as opposed to watching television or playing computer games. By reading stories, children have to use their imagination to visualize all the events described in the book. While reading, they will create images, thoughts and opinions in their mind, and therefore enhance their imagination and creativity. Meanwhile, this can hardly be the case for watching television, as it already provides the viewers with vibrant colourful images and sounds. Consequently, it is reasonable to say that reading books helps to improve children’s imagination compared to watching television or playing computer games.
Additionally, reading stories from a book also develops children’s verbal abilities more so than watching television or playing computer games. Children are exposed to a wide range of vocabulary and sentence structures when reading, and therefore reading books can provide great opportunities for children to advance their ability to describe things, which leads to better writing skills. Meanwhile, rather than text, sound and image are the two key elements of television and computer games, which does little to improve children’s vocabulary.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the advantages of reading books far outweigh those of watching television or playing computer games as this activity helps to enhance both imagination and language ability.
Dịch:
Nhiều người tin rằng đọc sách mang lại nhiều lợi ích hơn cho trẻ em so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử. Cá nhân tôi hoàn toàn đồng ý với quan điểm này và sẽ phân tích vấn đề trong bài luận dưới đây.
Trước hết, trẻ em có thể cải thiện trí tưởng tượng tốt hơn thông qua việc đọc sách thay vì xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử. Khi đọc truyện, trẻ phải sử dụng trí tưởng tượng để hình dung tất cả các sự kiện được mô tả trong sách. Trong quá trình đọc, chúng sẽ tạo ra hình ảnh, suy nghĩ và ý kiến trong đầu, nhờ đó nâng cao trí tưởng tượng và sự sáng tạo. Trong khi đó, điều này khó có thể xảy ra khi xem TV, vì TV đã cung cấp sẵn cho người xem hình ảnh đầy màu sắc và âm thanh sống động. Do đó, có thể nói rằng đọc sách giúp cải thiện trí tưởng tượng của trẻ tốt hơn so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử.
Ngoài ra, đọc truyện từ sách cũng giúp phát triển khả năng ngôn ngữ của trẻ tốt hơn so với xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử. Trẻ em tiếp xúc với một lượng lớn từ vựng và cấu trúc câu khi đọc, nhờ đó việc đọc sách mang lại cơ hội tuyệt vời để trẻ nâng cao khả năng miêu tả, điều này dẫn đến việc cải thiện kỹ năng viết. Trong khi đó, yếu tố chính của TV và trò chơi điện tử là âm thanh và hình ảnh chứ không phải văn bản, do đó, chúng không giúp ích nhiều cho việc mở rộng vốn từ vựng của trẻ.
Tóm lại, tôi tin chắc rằng lợi ích của việc đọc sách vượt trội hơn hẳn so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử, vì hoạt động này giúp nâng cao cả trí tưởng tượng và khả năng ngôn ngữ.
Sample 3 (Mẫu 3):
Nowadays, due to the popularity of technology and its adverse impact on children, many people argue that reading storybooks is more beneficial to children than watching TV programs or playing video games. This essay supports this position for the following reasons.
Firstly, reading books can help children improve their academic achievements. Children reading books regularly are likely to have competent literacy skills, which is important for their study because schools often require students to comprehend a great deal of knowledge from reading various subjects’ content. Hence, being competent in literacy skills can provide children with an added advantage when completing their assignments. Children with an advantage in literacy skills tend to have higher results in school exams, because they not only have wider knowledge but also better reading and writing skills.
More importantly, reading stories as a way of entertainment is instrumental in cultivating children’s creativity. In this technological world, when children depend too much on TV and computers in various life aspects, engrossing in books is an undeniably wonderful stress reliever to keep children away from electronic devices. Besides, reading books encourages children to use their imagination to comprehend the plots and characters of these stories, which in turn sharpens their creativity. For instance, when immersing into Harry Potter for relaxation, children have to use their creativity to fantasize and understand the magical world with the existence of many fictional characters such as witches, dragons, or monsters.
In conclusion, I once again affirm that engaging in stories from books can bring more benefits for children than spending time on TV and video games, because children can gain both educational benefits and great joy when enjoying book stories.
Dịch:
Ngày nay, do sự phổ biến của công nghệ và những tác động tiêu cực của nó đối với trẻ em, nhiều người cho rằng đọc truyện có lợi hơn cho trẻ em so với việc xem các chương trình truyền hình hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử. Bài luận này ủng hộ quan điểm đó vì những lý do sau đây.
Thứ nhất, đọc sách có thể giúp trẻ cải thiện thành tích học tập của mình. Trẻ em đọc sách thường xuyên có xu hướng có kỹ năng đọc viết tốt, điều này rất quan trọng đối với việc học tập của chúng vì các trường học thường yêu cầu học sinh tiếp thu một lượng lớn kiến thức từ nhiều môn học khác nhau. Do đó, việc thành thạo kỹ năng đọc viết có thể mang lại lợi thế cho trẻ khi hoàn thành bài tập. Những trẻ có lợi thế về kỹ năng đọc viết có xu hướng đạt điểm cao hơn trong các kỳ thi ở trường, vì chúng không chỉ có kiến thức rộng hơn mà còn có kỹ năng đọc và viết tốt hơn.
Quan trọng hơn, đọc truyện như một hình thức giải trí giúp nuôi dưỡng trí sáng tạo của trẻ. Trong thời đại công nghệ, khi trẻ em quá phụ thuộc vào TV và máy tính trong nhiều khía cạnh của cuộc sống, việc đắm chìm vào sách là một cách giải tỏa căng thẳng tuyệt vời giúp trẻ tránh xa các thiết bị điện tử. Hơn nữa, đọc sách khuyến khích trẻ sử dụng trí tưởng tượng để hiểu cốt truyện và nhân vật trong các câu chuyện, từ đó giúp rèn luyện khả năng sáng tạo. Chẳng hạn, khi đắm chìm vào thế giới của Harry Potter, trẻ sẽ phải vận dụng trí sáng tạo để hình dung và hiểu về thế giới phép thuật với sự tồn tại của các nhân vật hư cấu như phù thủy, rồng hay quái vật.
Tóm lại, tôi một lần nữa khẳng định rằng đọc truyện từ sách mang lại nhiều lợi ích hơn cho trẻ em so với việc xem TV hay chơi trò chơi điện tử, vì trẻ có thể nhận được cả lợi ích giáo dục lẫn niềm vui khi đọc sách.
Sample 4 (Mẫu 4):
Many people believe that reading books is more beneficial for children compared to watching TV or playing computer games. Personally, I completely agree with this opinion and will analyze my point of view in the essay below.
To begin with, children can better improve their imagination through reading books in comparison with watching TV or playing games. By reading stories, children have to use their imagination to create a vision and visualize all events described by words in the book. While reading, they will create images, thoughts and opinions in their mind, thus enhancing their imagination and creativity. Meanwhile, this can hardly be the case for watching TV, as TV already provides them with the full image and vibrant colours. Consequently, it is reasonable to say that reading books helps children produce more imaginative responses compared to watching TV.
In addition, reading stories from a book also develops children’s verbal abilities compared to watching TV or playing computer games. Children will be exposed to a wide range of vocabulary as well as sentence structures when reading. Therefore, reading books can provide great opportunities for children to advance their vocabulary level, which can lead to their better writing skills. Meanwhile, when it comes to TV shows or computer games, sounds and images are two key elements rather than texts. That is to say, books are far better than TV or games at increasing children’s vocabulary.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the advantages of reading books far outweigh those of watching TV or playing games for children since this activity does good to both their imagination and language ability.
Dịch:
Nhiều người tin rằng đọc sách mang lại nhiều lợi ích hơn cho trẻ em so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi trên máy tính. Cá nhân tôi hoàn toàn đồng ý với quan điểm này và sẽ phân tích quan điểm của mình trong bài luận dưới đây.
Trước hết, trẻ em có thể cải thiện trí tưởng tượng của mình tốt hơn thông qua việc đọc sách so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi. Khi đọc những câu chuyện, trẻ phải sử dụng trí tưởng tượng để hình dung và mường tượng tất cả các sự kiện được mô tả bằng ngôn từ trong sách. Trong quá trình đọc, trẻ sẽ tạo ra hình ảnh, suy nghĩ và ý kiến trong tâm trí, từ đó nâng cao trí tưởng tượng và khả năng sáng tạo. Trong khi đó, điều này khó có thể xảy ra khi xem TV, vì TV đã cung cấp sẵn hình ảnh đầy đủ và màu sắc sống động. Do đó, có thể nói rằng đọc sách giúp trẻ tạo ra những phản ứng giàu trí tưởng tượng hơn so với xem TV.
Ngoài ra, việc đọc những câu chuyện từ sách cũng giúp phát triển khả năng ngôn ngữ của trẻ tốt hơn so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử. Khi đọc, trẻ sẽ tiếp xúc với một loạt từ vựng phong phú cũng như các cấu trúc câu đa dạng. Vì vậy, đọc sách có thể mang đến cơ hội tuyệt vời để trẻ nâng cao vốn từ vựng của mình, từ đó cải thiện kỹ năng viết. Trong khi đó, khi nói đến các chương trình truyền hình hay trò chơi điện tử, âm thanh và hình ảnh là hai yếu tố chính thay vì văn bản. Điều đó có nghĩa là sách vượt trội hơn TV hay trò chơi trong việc mở rộng vốn từ vựng cho trẻ.
Tóm lại, tôi tin chắc rằng lợi ích của việc đọc sách vượt trội hơn nhiều so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi đối với trẻ em, vì hoạt động này có lợi cho cả trí tưởng tượng và khả năng ngôn ngữ của trẻ.
Sample 5 (Mẫu 5):
According to some, reading stories from books is superior to watching TV or playing video games for children. I disagree with this sentiment, however, since there is not much evidence for the idea that books are inherently more beneficial to children, and that they should be given both mediums in order to aid their developmental processes.
On one hand, child psychologists now believe that there may be far more benefits to playing video games which could be beneficial to their long-term development. Games are famous for improving spatial awareness and logic amongst younger children and can also serve to teach morality on a far better level than many books, as they purposely place the player in ethical scenarios with long-term consequences. For example, games such as Undertale are revered for their capabilities in teaching hard-hitting moral philosophy in a hands-on, proactive approach that teaches the player the consequences of their actions.
On the other hand, reading books is the only real way of improving literacy, which is essential for young children if they want to have a well-paying job in the future. Child literacy is often used as a measure to compare the educational performance of different countries, as a literate population can better absorb instructions needed to carry out their future professions. Therefore, improving a child’s ability to read in the home through stories can be an effective way to improve their chances of financial success in the future.
Overall, I believe that while the traditional book is still hugely beneficial to children, TV, and video games have been shown to contribute to some aspects of their abilities as well. As such, I believe that both should be consumed by the younger generations in moderation.
Dịch:
Theo một số người, đọc truyện từ sách có lợi hơn so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử đối với trẻ em. Tuy nhiên, tôi không đồng tình với quan điểm này vì không có nhiều bằng chứng cho thấy sách vốn dĩ có lợi hơn cho trẻ em, và rằng trẻ nên được tiếp cận với cả hai phương tiện này để hỗ trợ quá trình phát triển của mình.
Một mặt, các nhà tâm lý học trẻ em hiện nay tin rằng chơi trò chơi điện tử có thể mang lại nhiều lợi ích lâu dài hơn. Trò chơi nổi tiếng với khả năng cải thiện nhận thức không gian và tư duy logic ở trẻ nhỏ, đồng thời có thể dạy về đạo đức hiệu quả hơn nhiều so với sách, bởi vì chúng cố ý đặt người chơi vào những tình huống đạo đức với hệ quả dài hạn. Ví dụ, trò chơi như Undertale được đánh giá cao nhờ khả năng truyền tải triết lý đạo đức sâu sắc theo cách tiếp cận chủ động, giúp người chơi hiểu rõ hậu quả từ hành động của mình.
Mặt khác, đọc sách là cách duy nhất để cải thiện khả năng đọc viết, điều này rất quan trọng đối với trẻ nhỏ nếu chúng muốn có một công việc lương cao trong tương lai. Trình độ biết chữ của trẻ em thường được sử dụng để so sánh hiệu suất giáo dục giữa các quốc gia, vì một dân số có trình độ học vấn cao có thể tiếp thu tốt hơn những hướng dẫn cần thiết để thực hiện nghề nghiệp của họ sau này. Do đó, việc cải thiện khả năng đọc của trẻ tại nhà thông qua các câu chuyện có thể là một cách hiệu quả để nâng cao cơ hội thành công tài chính sau này.
Tóm lại, tôi tin rằng mặc dù sách truyền thống vẫn mang lại nhiều lợi ích lớn cho trẻ em, nhưng TV và trò chơi điện tử cũng đã được chứng minh là đóng góp vào một số khía cạnh phát triển của chúng. Vì vậy, tôi cho rằng cả hai phương tiện này đều nên được trẻ em tiếp cận một cách có kiểm soát.
Sample 6 (Mẫu 6):
Numerous individuals argue that reading books offers more advantages to children than watching TV or playing computer games. From my perspective, I wholeheartedly support this notion and will elaborate on my standpoint in the ensuing essay.
Firstly, children can enhance their imagination more effectively through reading books compared to watching TV or playing games. When reading stories, children are required to utilize their imagination to construct mental images and visualize the events described in the book. Through reading, they generate mental images, thoughts, and viewpoints, thereby boosting their imaginative and creative abilities. In contrast, this is less likely to occur while watching TV, as television already presents them with complete images and vivid colors. Consequently, it is fair to argue that reading books stimulates children to produce more imaginative responses than watching TV.
Moreover, reading stories from books also enhances children’s language skills in contrast to watching TV or playing computer games. When children read, they encounter a wide array of vocabulary and sentence structures. Consequently, reading books offers significant opportunities for children to enhance their vocabulary, which, in turn, contributes to improved writing skills. Conversely, TV shows or computer games primarily rely on sounds and visuals rather than text. Therefore, books surpass TV or games in enriching children’s vocabulary.
In summary, I am firmly convinced that the benefits of reading books outweigh those of watching TV or playing games for children, as reading contributes positively to both their imaginative faculties and language proficiency.
Dịch:
Nhiều người cho rằng đọc sách mang lại nhiều lợi ích hơn cho trẻ em so với xem TV hay chơi trò chơi điện tử. Theo quan điểm của tôi, tôi hoàn toàn đồng ý với nhận định này và sẽ trình bày quan điểm của mình trong bài viết sau đây.
Thứ nhất, trẻ em có thể phát triển trí tưởng tượng hiệu quả hơn thông qua việc đọc sách so với xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi. Khi đọc truyện, trẻ cần phải sử dụng trí tưởng tượng của mình để xây dựng hình ảnh và hình dung các sự kiện được mô tả trong sách. Thông qua việc đọc, trẻ tạo ra những hình ảnh, suy nghĩ và quan điểm trong tâm trí mình, qua đó nâng cao khả năng sáng tạo và tưởng tượng. Ngược lại, điều này ít có khả năng xảy ra khi xem TV, vì truyền hình đã cung cấp sẵn hình ảnh hoàn chỉnh và màu sắc sống động. Do đó, có thể lập luận rằng đọc sách kích thích trẻ tạo ra những phản ứng sáng tạo hơn so với việc xem TV.
Hơn nữa, đọc truyện cũng giúp nâng cao kỹ năng ngôn ngữ của trẻ hơn so với xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử. Khi đọc sách, trẻ tiếp xúc với một loạt từ vựng và cấu trúc câu phong phú. Do đó, việc đọc sách mang lại cơ hội quan trọng để trẻ mở rộng vốn từ vựng của mình, từ đó cải thiện kỹ năng viết. Ngược lại, các chương trình truyền hình hoặc trò chơi điện tử chủ yếu dựa vào âm thanh và hình ảnh thay vì văn bản. Vì vậy, sách vượt trội hơn TV hay trò chơi trong việc giúp trẻ mở rộng vốn từ.
Tóm lại, tôi tin chắc rằng lợi ích của việc đọc sách vượt trội hơn so với xem TV hay chơi trò chơi điện tử đối với trẻ em, vì việc đọc sách có tác động tích cực đến cả khả năng tưởng tượng và trình độ ngôn ngữ của trẻ.
Sample 7 (Mẫu 7):
Reading stories in books is a basic way for children to obtain knowledge and open their minds. Although watching TV and playing computer games are also popular educational methods among children, I believe that reading books is better and offers more advantages than watching TV and playing computer games.
Learning by reading is more effective compared to TV and games because it is an active activity. Like any other skill, reading takes practice. To fully understand the content, children have to give all their attention to the text. Also, more than just understanding a certain topic, children tend to develop imagination, as they imagine the characters from the description they read, which helps them to learn more efficiently and deeply in the future.
Furthermore, reading stories also helps children master language development, as by reading stories, children learn pronunciation and vocabulary. It also increases a child’s attention span and develops the ability to concentrate. It develops children’s ability to express themselves more confidently, easily, and clearly in spoken and written terms. It develops and fosters a child’s natural curiosity.
On the other hand, the knowledge disseminated by vivid pictures on screen is easier for children to imbibe, but too many moving objects and colorful images can distract children, especially some young kids, from other important tasks. Playing computer games also can be very addictive, as a result of which children fail to do their homework. Additionally, spending too much time in front of a computer screen or watching TV can lead to health problems such as short-sightedness. Therefore, reading is better for both efficiency and health purposes.
In conclusion, it can be reiterated that reading stories in books is better than watching TV and playing on computers, as it is a more effective way to learn and is better for health.
Dịch:
Đọc truyện trong sách là một cách cơ bản để trẻ em tiếp thu kiến thức và mở rộng tư duy. Mặc dù xem TV và chơi trò chơi điện tử cũng là những phương pháp giáo dục phổ biến đối với trẻ em, nhưng tôi tin rằng đọc sách vẫn tốt hơn và mang lại nhiều lợi ích hơn so với xem TV và chơi trò chơi điện tử.
Học tập qua việc đọc hiệu quả hơn so với TV và trò chơi vì đây là một hoạt động chủ động. Giống như bất kỳ kỹ năng nào khác, đọc cần được rèn luyện. Để hiểu được nội dung, trẻ phải tập trung hoàn toàn vào văn bản. Hơn nữa, không chỉ đơn thuần là hiểu một chủ đề nào đó, trẻ còn có xu hướng phát triển trí tưởng tượng, vì chúng hình dung các nhân vật dựa trên mô tả mà chúng đọc được, điều này giúp chúng học hiệu quả hơn và sâu sắc hơn trong tương lai.
Hơn nữa, đọc truyện cũng giúp trẻ làm chủ khả năng phát triển ngôn ngữ, vì khi đọc truyện, trẻ học cách phát âm và mở rộng vốn từ vựng. Đọc sách cũng giúp tăng khả năng tập trung và phát triển khả năng chú ý của trẻ. Nó giúp trẻ diễn đạt bản thân một cách tự tin, dễ dàng và rõ ràng hơn trong cả lời nói lẫn văn viết, đồng thời nuôi dưỡng trí tò mò tự nhiên của trẻ.
Mặt khác, kiến thức được truyền tải qua những hình ảnh sống động trên màn hình sẽ dễ dàng thấm nhuần hơn đối với trẻ. Tuy nhiên, quá nhiều hình ảnh chuyển động và màu sắc có thể khiến trẻ, đặc biệt là một số trẻ nhỏ, mất tập trung vào những nhiệm vụ quan trọng khác. Việc chơi trò chơi điện tử cũng có thể gây nghiện, khiến trẻ xao nhãng việc học tập. Ngoài ra, dành quá nhiều thời gian trước màn hình máy tính hoặc TV có thể dẫn đến các vấn đề sức khỏe như cận thị. Do đó, đọc sách vẫn là lựa chọn tốt hơn về cả hiệu quả học tập lẫn sức khỏe.
Tóm lại, có thể khẳng định rằng đọc truyện trong sách tốt hơn so với xem TV và chơi trò chơi điện tử, vì đây là một phương pháp học tập hiệu quả hơn và có lợi cho sức khỏe hơn.
Sample 8 (Mẫu 8):
Modernization has brought about abundant conveniences in all aspects of life, with no exception regarding novel entertainments for the youth. While little objections exist against television programs and digital games being adolescents’ contemporary pastimes, conservatives still strongly advocate towards the priority of traditional quality time enjoyments, one of which is book explorations. From a personal perspective, I perceive that both points of view display compelling arguments, and therefore should be equally examined.
Factually speaking, the comprehension of printed texts has proven its superiority against digital counterparts in regard to the benefits towards children’s neural developments. Much large-scale research publicly confirms television and computers’ detrimental impacts on humans’ neural activities, resulting in dementia, depression and focus deterioration. Reading books, on the other hand, affect brains in ways that an exercise equivalently does to physical well-being. It is, moreover, an undisputed view that reading books plays a crucial role in the success of all outstanding individuals in the modern world, from Elon Musk to Barack Obama.
Yet, early exposure to technologies would also be of significant advantage to youngsters dwelling in this rapidly evolving time. While access to books certainly helps towards critical thinking, children’s early acquaintance with digital platforms’ unique cultures and insights would enable them to have better success in this increasingly ever-changing world. For instance, potential networks with fellow digital natives and knowledge of new, on-demand skills are among many positive consequences from gaming quests, which critical thinking may not offer as directly. As said, having technological literacy as a part of life equals less risk of falling behind in a digitally embedded reality.
In conclusion, while opinions divide on whether a conventional approach to children’s entertainment would outweigh that of modern means, I believe both perspectives have plentiful merits to bring about for children’s developments.
Dịch:
Sự hiện đại hóa đã mang lại vô số tiện ích trong mọi lĩnh vực của cuộc sống, bao gồm cả những hình thức giải trí mới cho giới trẻ. Mặc dù có rất ít sự phản đối đối với các chương trình truyền hình và trò chơi điện tử khi chúng trở thành những thú vui phổ biến của thanh thiếu niên thời nay, nhưng những người theo chủ nghĩa truyền thống vẫn mạnh mẽ ủng hộ việc ưu tiên những hình thức giải trí chất lượng truyền thống, một trong số đó là việc đọc sách. Theo quan điểm cá nhân, tôi nhận thấy rằng cả hai quan điểm đều có những lập luận cạnh tranh và do đó, cần được xem xét một cách công bằng.
Trên thực tế, khả năng tiếp thu văn bản in đã chứng tỏ sự vượt trội so với các phương tiện kỹ thuật số về lợi ích đối với sự phát triển não bộ của trẻ. Nhiều nghiên cứu quy mô lớn đã công khai xác nhận tác động tiêu cực của truyền hình và máy tính đối với hoạt động thần kinh của con người, gây ra chứng mất trí nhớ, trầm cảm và suy giảm khả năng tập trung. Ngược lại, đọc sách ảnh hưởng đến não bộ theo cách tương tự như việc tập thể dục đối với sức khỏe thể chất. Hơn nữa, không ai có thể phủ nhận rằng đọc sách đóng vai trò quan trọng đối với thành công của những cá nhân xuất sắc trên thế giới hiện đại, từ Elon Musk đến Barack Obama.
Tuy nhiên, việc tiếp xúc sớm với công nghệ cũng có thể mang lại những lợi ích đáng kể cho giới trẻ trong thời đại phát triển nhanh chóng này. Trong khi đọc sách chắc chắn giúp phát triển tư duy phản biện, thì việc trẻ làm quen sớm với văn hóa và hiểu biết độc đáo của các nền tảng kỹ thuật số sẽ giúp chúng thành công hơn trong một thế giới ngày càng thay đổi. Ví dụ, các kết nối tiềm năng với những người cùng thế hệ kỹ thuật số khác và kiến thức về các kỹ năng mới theo nhu cầu là một trong nhiều hậu quả tích cực của các trò chơi điện tử, điều mà tư duy phản biện không thể mang lại trực tiếp. Như đã nói, có kiến thức về công nghệ như một phần của cuộc sống đồng nghĩa với việc giảm nguy cơ bị tụt hậu trong một thực tế ngày càng gắn liền với kỹ thuật số.
Tóm lại, trong khi vẫn còn những ý kiến trái chiều về việc liệu một cách tiếp cận truyền thống đối với giải trí của trẻ em có vượt trội hơn so với phương tiện hiện đại hay không, tôi tin rằng cả hai quan điểm đều có những lợi ích to lớn đối với sự phát triển của trẻ.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo