Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether to begin learning a foreign language at primary school or at secondary school. This essay will further discuss whether extending foreign language study to the primary stages is beneficial and if disadvantages may occur in the later stages.
On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the benefits of practising a foreign language at primary school considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for believing this is that the children have the golden age period when they are at elementary school. One good illustration of this is some developed countries have been implementing the bilingual language in the primary school’s curriculum for decades, and most of the children can speak the second language as well as their native language. Another reason is that children are much more enthusiastic about exploring and learning new things at a young age. The timetable for them should allow more frequent, shorter sessions for maintaining learner’s enthusiasm and progress.
Opponents reckon that the students at secondary school are better prepared than at primary school for acquiring a new language. However, there is no actual evidence to support this view and children at their early ages (ranging from 5 to 10) can even learn faster and are better at pronunciation. For example, my second daughter had started to learn English when she was five years old and can speak English more fluently compared to her older sister, who just learnt English when she attended secondary school.
In my opinion, both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I tend to believe that learning a second language at an earlier age will have a more positive impact on most of the children around the world.
Sample 2:
Traditionally, children have begun studying foreign languages at secondary school, but introducing them earlier is recommended by some educationalists. This policy has been adopted by some educational authorities or individual schools, with both positive and negative outcomes.
The obvious argument in its favour is that young children pick up languages much more easily than teenagers. Their brains are still programmed to acquire their mother tongue, which facilitates learning another language, and unlike adolescents, they are not inhibited by self-consciousness.
The greater flexibility of the primary timetable allows for more frequent, shorter sessions and for a play-centred approach, thus maintaining learners’ enthusiasm and progress. Their command of the language in later life will benefit from this early exposure while learning other languages subsequently will be easier for them. They may also gain a better understanding of other cultures.
There are, however, some disadvantages. Primary schools’ teachers are generalists and may not have the necessary skill themselves. If specialists have to be brought in to deliver these sessions, the flexibility referred to above is diminished. If primary language teaching is not standardised, secondary schools could be faced with a great variety of levels in different languages within their intake, resulting in a classroom experience which undoes the earlier gains. There is no advantage if enthusiastic primary pupils become demotivated as soon as they change schools. However, these issues can be addressed strategically within the policy adopted.
Anything which encourages language learning benefits society culturally and economically, and early exposure to language learning contributes to this. Young children’s innate abilities should be harnessed to make these benefits more achievable.
Sample 3:
The discourse on the prime period for initiating foreign language education in children - primary versus secondary school - remains a pivotal one. This essay asserts that the advantages of early linguistic engagement substantially outweigh its potential downsides, focusing on enhanced cognitive development and early cultural integration as key benefits.
Embarking on foreign language learning during primary education is instrumental in bolstering cognitive prowess. At this developmental stage, children's brains exhibit remarkable plasticity, making them adept at absorbing new linguistic structures with relative ease compared to their older counterparts. This early linguistic immersion not only accelerates language acquisition but also enriches cognitive functions such as memory, attention, and multitasking capabilities. An illustrative example of this is observed in a longitudinal study by Stanford University, which demonstrated that children who learned a second language before the age of 5 exhibited significantly higher cognitive test scores in subsequent years. Beyond cognitive benefits, early language learning serves as a conduit for cultural immersion. It allows young learners to cultivate an authentic appreciation and understanding of different cultures from an early age, fostering a sense of global citizenship and empathy. Such exposure is invaluable in our interconnected world, laying the groundwork for more harmonious international relations in their future endeavors.
Despite these advantages, there are concerns regarding potential overload and distraction from primary language mastery. Nevertheless, empirical studies consistently refute this, showing that bilingualism can actually reinforce the mastery of both languages, enhancing linguistic dexterity and communication skills across the board.
In summation, the introduction of foreign languages at the primary school level presents a profound opportunity for cognitive and cultural development, far outweighing any suggested disadvantages. This approach not only prepares children for a globalized future but also equips them with a suite of cognitive and interpersonal skills that stand to benefit them throughout their lives. Hence, the early acquisition of a foreign language emerges as a highly beneficial educational strategy.
Sample 4:
The debate over the optimal stage for children to embark on learning a foreign language - primary as opposed to secondary school - garners significant attention. This essay posits that the merits of early language acquisition distinctly overshadow its drawbacks, particularly in terms of cognitive flexibility and cultural awareness.
Firstly, initiating foreign language study at the primary level significantly enhances cognitive development. Children at this age are at a peak learning phase, demonstrating an exceptional ability to assimilate new sounds and structures with ease, a phenomenon less pronounced in older learners. This early exposure not only sharpens their linguistic acuity but also fosters superior problem-solving skills and creativity. For instance, a study by the University of Edinburgh found that bilingual children outperformed monolingual peers in tasks requiring mental flexibility and innovation. Moreover, early language learning contributes to a deeper understanding and appreciation of diverse cultures. By interacting with a new language, children develop a broader perspective, becoming more empathetic and open-minded towards people from different backgrounds. This cultural sensitivity is imperative in our increasingly globalized world, where cross-cultural communication is a cornerstone of both personal and professional success.
Conversely, critics argue that introducing a foreign language at a young age could burden children, potentially hampering their proficiency in their native language. However, this concern is mitigated by evidence suggesting that bilingualism actually enhances linguistic skills in both languages, as the process of learning a second language can reinforce understanding and usage of the first.
In conclusion, the advantages of beginning foreign language education in primary school far surpass any perceived disadvantages. This approach not only cultivates advanced cognitive abilities and a global mindset in young learners but also equips them with valuable skills that benefit their personal and academic growth. Therefore, it is clear that early foreign language learning is a beneficial investment in a child's future.
Sample 5:
Some experts think that it is more advantageous for children to start studying a foreign language at primary school rather than at secondary school. Though there is a risk of failure and frustration, in my opinion, the advantage of teaching children a foreign language at their early stage obviously outweighs its disadvantages because they can learn fast enough compared to that of the other age groups.
It is undoubted that starting to learn a foreign language at primary school can be risky for some children, because of the amount of time which needs to be dedicated to this difficult learning process, and the eventuality to feel a deep sense of frustration in case of unsuccess. In effect, children who are involved in studying a foreign language must dedicate less time to games with their peers and to any kind of leisure activity. As a result, this attitude can damage their ability to socially interact and hinder their behavioural development. Moreover, children who do not succeed in learning a foreign language at primary school can feel depressed and frustrated, and this can seriously damage their self-esteem during adulthood.
On the contrary, it is undeniable that there are some important advantages related to this approach, such as the increased facility to learn a foreign language when this is taught at primary school, and the development of the capacity to solve complex problems more easily. In fact, it is demonstrated by past and recent studies that at an early age children’s brain can easily remember words’ sounds and meanings much better than that of adults, and consequently a new language can be easily learnt during childhood. In addition, today we know that when children speak two or more languages at an early age, they activate some particular brain regions, which are normally involved when they are required to solve complex mathematical or geometrical problems.
In conclusion, although children can have some major problems if they start learning a foreign language at a primary school level rather than later, because it might cost their time with peers and even success in the foreign language learning. However, as the primary class children are sharper in memory and problem solution skills, I believe it is more advantageous to teach them a foreign language than that of the disadvantages it can cause.
Sample 6:
Some experts believe that starting learning another language at primary level is better than at secondary level. I think the downside of this outweighs the upside because young pupils may have a great workload as a result.
On the one hand, young children are better language learners than older ones. Primary school-aged children are at an early stage of learning, and therefore tend to be very open to new ideas. That is to say, they are less likely to find the different pronunciation and grammar of a foreign language strange and difficult to learn than their counterparts at secondary school. However, I do not think this gives them a major advantage in life because many people have become successful, either professionally or financially, without mastering a second language.
On the other hand, studying a new language at primary level can greatly increase young pupils' workloads. One more language to learn means more classes to take and more schoolwork to do. Take China, where English is compulsory at all primary schools, as an example. Chinese schoolchildren often spend about half an hour every weekday just on their English homework. And to outperform their peers, many of them enrol in weekend English classes. I think this puts young children at a great disadvantage because at their age, they should spend more time enjoying leisure activities rather than burying themselves in endless academic tasks.
In conclusion, although primary school-aged children tend to be good at acquiring a foreign language, I believe this advantage is far outweighed by the disadvantage of the heavy workloads that come with it.
Sample 7:
In recent years, learning foreign languages play an important role at school. A number of experts suppose that children who start studying a foreign language in elementary school would be more advantageous than doing this in middle school. Discussed below are several benefits as well as drawbacks of this issue.
Undoubtedly, there are many benefits of studying foreign languages at young age. Firstly, children can be easier to accumulate knowledge in comparison with teenagers. This is because of the fact that in this period, their brains are in the process of remarkable development so it’s likely for them to memorize what they learn. Secondly, children at primary school probably have more time and chances to learn a foreign language. At this age, they are hardly worried about anything, so they may have a lot of opportunities to practice and enrich their knowledge. Moreover, learning foreign languages helps students more confident in communication. The way they speak a new language is also the way they show their style, ability and character in general. In addition, it is believed that languages are the key to discover the world. For instance, when a young child is good at an international language as English, he or she can get information from the Internet more easily.
In spite of the benefits, there still exist some drawbacks of learning foreign languages of students at primary school. For one thing, learning another language may make some students stressful because at this age, it would be difficult for them to focus on hard knowledge. Especially for those who don’t have an aptitude for languages, they could be bored and feed up with studying. For another, some students even have trouble with languages. As a result, they have to struggle with learning at school. They have less time for other activities and subjects.
To sum up, I agree that although there are some disadvantages, students should be learnt foreign language at primary school more than starting this at secondary one. It’s necessary for them to improve their knowledge and skills.
Sample 8:
Due to the advancements in communication systems, the relationamong nations has been increased markedly. As a result of this, learning a foreign language at an early age has become acontroversial issue in the global village. Some experts claim thatprimary school is the best place for learning another language insteadof secondary school. I firmly believe that there is a defensible basisfor this argument.
The proponents of this view discuss that there are many reasonsbehind of their claims. The most important one is about recentresearch. The studies have shown that the children between 4-9 ageshave a great opportunity to learn new languages. Also, they clarifytheir claims by an example, a survey among 200 pupils, has shownthat the abovementioned ages have a crucial role in children buildingcharacter and developing their personality. Moreover, give the specialcare and settle down proper curriculum could be much beneficial forthem in this way. Consequently, because of carefree mind childrencan catch more points in this level.
In parallel, I personally side with this idea. The key point to justifythis attitude could be illustrated by a personal tangible example. Acouple of years ago, I met a German family with an interesting story. To cut the long story short, Lucas, the first child of the family, hasstarted learning the English language at secondary school and nowthe level of his English skill is almost intermediate. Conversely, hissister has started English and France together at primary school. Now, she can speak very fluently both of them. On balance, beyond ashadow of a doubt, the primary school can pave the way for learninga foreign language easily. Although, it should be considered that themethod and atmosphere of the school play a key role in learning.
All in all, we should own up to the fact that learning a foreignlanguage has become a key factor in our lifelong. It goes withoutsaying, having a strong basis in a new language can uplift us towardsprosperity. Primary schools are the best places to enhance ourchildren's language ability. Also, in this special span, the pupil’s mindsare dead ready to catch an awful lot of new things and what couldbetter than learning a second language than that.
Sample 9:
It is widely believed that studying a foreign language in the first yearof school is more effective than in secondary school for children. Drawbacks and benefits of this topic will be covered in this essay.
On the one hand, pupils studying only three or four years in theschool even at that moment do not properly concentrate on thelessons. It could be difficult to compel children to learn somethingelse besides their curriculum subjects. For instance, my little sisteralways wants to play, even if there are loose ends. In addition, students of a primary school firstly should learn the fundamentals ofexact science such as mathematics and physics. Otherwise, theymight not understand them later. Furthermore, if a student does notknow his native language perfectly, it is useless to learn a foreigndialect for him.
On the other hand, this is a fact that children, who are approximatelybetween five and nine years, have the capacity to remember thingstwice as fast and effectively than people from other age groups. Forexample, when I was in the third-fifth grades, I used to memorisenew words very quickly and for a long period. However, now Icannot even learn many new phrases. Secondly, studying a foreignlanguage is very helpful. Students can understand the expression, lifestyle and culture of a different country and is helpful for enhancingtheir perspectives. English is an international language on which overone billion of people are communicating. Hence, being able to learn asecond language will give competitive advantages for the children.
To sum up, the minor disadvantages will never prevent us fromconcluding that knowing foreign phrases will be never excessive. Infuture knowing one more language might be very prestigious.
Sample 10:
Learning a foreign language is a new trend followed nowadays. Evenin schools’ curriculum, a subject with a different language is a must. Many believe that students at primary schools should start learning aforeign tongue and should not wait till secondary school level. I alsobelieve that it has several advantages. The growth of an individualbrain and increase in opportunities will support the argument. Firstly, learning a foreign language is helpful for the growth of achild’s brain. A study by United Nations has proved that learning anylanguage other than the native one activates various new parts of thebrain which were never used before. As a result, it increases thegrasping and learning-power of a child. Not only this, but it also accelerates the working of one’s brain. Therefore, making kids tolearn a new language at an early age will help them in their mentalgrowth.
Also, nowadays people are getting drifted towards multinationalcompanies. Here, opportunities are more for employees who know more than one language. Being multilingual helps a person get onsiteopportunities. Hence, getting growth in career depends on this. Infosys, for instance, gives priority to their employees who have agood command over the English language, for any vacancy they havein the USA. So, getting used to a language at an early age will makeone comfortable and confident.
Looking at the points discussed above, we can come to a conclusionthat advantages of learning a foreign language at an early ageoutweigh the disadvantages. Therefore, this practice must be followedby all the nations. I believe many countries will include a foreignlanguage in its school as a mandatory subject for the advantages ithas to offer.
Sample 11:
Some experts think that the best time for young people to learn anew language is at primary school. While this could bring manybenefits and drawbacks. I believe that the advantages are far morethan the disadvantages.
Learning a foreign language at primary could have some possibledisadvantages. Firstly, it could be a waste of time since children needto focus on other subjects such as math, science, and their ownmother tongue language, which they might need it more than theforeign one. Secondly, children may get confused because of learningmany languages at the same time and this could have a negativeimpact on their development. For example, it is claimed that bilingualchildren develop the ability to talk more slowly than monolingual kids.
On the other hand, I think that children learn faster at a young agebecause they are less self-conscious and shy. So, they can easily pickup the right pronunciation and try to copy it. Furthermore, childrenenjoy practising languages through games. Thus, learning andcopying others could be a fun in itself for them. In other words, forchildren learning languages is not a hard task as it is for adults. In addition, languages nowadays are as important as science and math. Acquiring an international language like English could be veryimportant for young people to get better job opportunities in thefuture.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the benefits of teaching childrenforeign languages as soon as possible outweigh the drawbacks.
Sample 12:
In today's modern world, language plays an indispensable role in both studies and jobs as well as during socialising. Thus, some professionals encourage the children nowadays to start learning a foreign language at primary school and claim that it will be too latefor children to learn it in secondary school. In this essay, we willexamine both the benefits and drawbacks of this issue. Undoubtedly, learning a totally new language is tiring and requires more time to master it. It, indirectly, increases the burden of aprimary school pupil who is supposed to learn new things in a stress-free environment. If they have to learn a new language in primary school, they will be loaded with more tonnes of homework every day. In fact, more time should be allocated to study more useful subjects such as Science and Mathematics. These subjects are considered asstepping stones to a prospective job. If one day they become ascientist or a doctor, they may contribute endlessly to our nation byinventing essential drugs in combating diseases.
However, there is another side of a coin always. To begin with, picking up a foreign language enables the children to develop a better foundation in a foreign language. They are more likely to speak it more confidently in front of the crowds. It is proven that children who learn a new language tend to make fewer mistakes in writing anessay. Not forgetting to mention that they will have the ability to express things more clearly as they have a better vocabulary than those who start late. In addition, they may come across with foreign cultures when learning a foreign language. To illustrate, it can be learnt from the literature and poems. By knowing the culture of others, they may not experience cultural shock and are able to adaptwell when staying in other countries for the purpose of studying. They are, obviously, become more knowledgeable and more open-mindedwhich help them to look at a specific issue from differentperspectives.
In conclusion, the benefits of learning a foreign language in primary education apparently outweigh the drawbacks. I believe a person equipped with more languages is definitely needed in our society tomake our country more prosperous and flourished in the decade tocome.
Sample 13:
Some authorities think that it is more favorable for pupils to begin studying languages at primary school instead of secondary school. This essay will argue that the advantages of this outweigh the drawbacks. The essay will first demonstrate that the earlier someone learns an additional language the more likely they are to master it and that it brings added cognitive benefits, followed by an analysis of how the primary disadvantage, namely confusion with their native tongue, is not valid.
The main reason to start kids off with foreign languages early is that this increases the likelihood they will achieve fluency in adulthood. That is to say that they will have far more years to perfect their skills, and it will seem perfectly normal to speak bilingually. For example, in countries such as Holland and Norway where English is taught from a very young age, more than 95% of adults speak it at an advanced level. Learning a second language also helps to improve overall cognitive abilities. In other words, it benefits the overall development of a child’s brain. A recent survey by Cambridge University found that children who studied a new language before the age of 5 were significantly more likely to score higher in Mathematics and Science.
Those opposed to this say that it causes the child to become confused between their mother tongue and the other language. However, there is actually no evidence to support this view and children from bilingual families do just as well in both languages. My own son was brought up speaking both Vietnamese and English and outperforms most of his classmates in both.
On balance, the fact that early foreign language learning leads to higher fluency and improved brain function clearly outweighs the flawed argument that it impairs uptake of native languages.
Sample 14:
Foreign languages have become a key component of school curriculum in many parts of the world. But whether children should learn them at primary or secondary school is a topic of frequent discussion. Some people argue that children should be introduced to international languages at primary level. Personally, I believe that the pros of this early exposure of foreign languages outnumber the cons.
To begin with, in today’s globalized world, it is almost impossible to deny the significance of being a bilingual or a multilingual. Our foreign language abilities play a defining role in every field, be it finding a dream job in a multinational company or settling in a new country. Therefore, teaching international languages to young pupils is a major step towards their bright future. More importantly, children’s minds are highly receptive when they are young. They can learn anything much more quickly than adults and are not afraid of making mistakes. These early language lessons can not only boost the confidence level of learners but also help them attain native-like fluency. These classes will also have a positive impact on children’s social life.
On the other hand, the negatives of making children learn an international language when they do not understand its value should not be overlooked. Most schools, especially the Asian ones, have many subjects like science, mathematics, history and geography etc. in their curriculum. As a result, young students have a lot to learn. So, including one more subject in the form of a foreign language definitely puts additional pressure on children. Some learners find it hard to cope with this extra work. It is often observed that if students do not get the support they need, they tend to lose their interest in the language.
To sum up, language acquisition is a gradual process. The sooner it begins, the better the results will be. I believe that careful lesson planning can make the entire learning experience enjoyable and rewarding for every child.
Sample 15:
It is widely believed that studying foreign language for children in the first education level is more effective than in secondary school. While some educationalists recommended it, I believe that the drawbacks to study second language in the first year are more than the benefits that might be gained by children.
Admittedly, learning other languages is important for children. It is more likely related to their intelligence. The earlier they introduced to some languages, the easier for them to understand it well. The study conducted by Cynthia Garcia Coll, a researcher of Brown University, discovered that children at the preteen age will master other languages effectively than those who start to learn after this period. The student at secondary school will experience some difficulties to memorize words and practice the language in daily life fluently. Thus, it is evident that introducing foreign language for children as soon as possible, in particular primary school is good for their development.
However, there is a huge risk of studying foreign language for children in the primary school. One of the major considerable reasons is that, as the first education level, pupils still adapt to use their natural language. They can be confused to distinguish both of native and second languages. Thus, they are likely to suffer dyslexia, a common disease found in children of primary school. The problems include diff1iculties in spelling words, reading quickly, writing words, and understanding what one reads. The second reason is children who practice bilingual will experience some difficulties to interact in the society. They become reluctant to adapt and isolated in the environment. Moreover, pupil studying another language is possible to lose their nationality soon. They become more likely to learn other languages and have a better understanding of other cultures than their own.
In conclusion, while studying foreign language in the primary school is beneficial, I believe that children will receive many more drawbacks absolutely. Therefore, introducing children to both of native and foreign languages in formal education should be trained appropriately.
Sample 16:
The growing influence of globalization into almost every walk of life has prioritized multilingualism as it is considered to be highly advantageous. But there is a certain debate as to when to learn it, some suggest learning the language at primary level, while others feel, secondary school is the right time to grab skills of a foreign language.
Learning a language of another country in the foundation schools is believed to be laden with multiple benefits; as the children are young and fresh, and they do not have too much pressure of studies. Besides this, the teaching methods applied in elementary schools involve games and other interesting activities to instill knowledge and understanding that makes learning and picking up linguistic skills fun and quite easy.
On the top of that, ‘Catching them young’ is the primary objective behind the concept of teaching kids about linguistic skills of an alien language. It is an established fact that when a language is learnt from the basic schooling level, the kids are able to get a wider exposure and seasoning that often goes a long way in improving and boosting the expression and the comprehension skills of the users, for instance, it is commonly observed that kids learning an alien language at elementary school fare better in the use of language than those who start later.
Nevertheless, teaching an alien language in secondary level would be a better option, as the kids grow up by then, and can easily differentiate between two languages. They can easily pick-up skills of multiple languages into their learning process; as they can adapt well to the complex strategies used in the study of languages.
I personally feel teaching an alien language at elementary school is a practical option. The learners at this age are more curiosity and receptive and enjoy more free time.
Sample 17:
The ideal age for children to start learning a foreign language is a topic of intense debate, with some advocating for primary school as the optimal time. This essay will examine both the benefits and disadvantages of introducing foreign language learning at the primary school level. Personally, I believe that the benefits of this approach outweigh any potential drawbacks.
One significant disadvantage of starting foreign language learning at primary school is the potential added burden on young learners. Some argue that children might already have a heavy academic workload in their early years of schooling, and adding foreign language learning could lead to stress and exhaustion. For instance, young students may struggle to manage their time effectively, leading to burnout and negatively impacting their overall learning experience.
On the other hand, introducing foreign language learning at the primary school level has numerous advantages. Younger minds are generally more receptive to language acquisition, and early exposure can foster natural language development and better cognitive development. Research has shown that children who start learning a foreign language early tend to develop better pronunciation and fluency while also showing superior learning capabilities. For example, a study conducted by Harvard University found that children who began learning a foreign language in primary school exhibited greater language proficiency compared to those who started in secondary school and their grades in other subjects were significantly better than their counterparts.
In my opinion, the benefits of starting foreign language learning at primary school significantly outweigh the potential drawbacks. Young learners possess remarkable cognitive flexibility and adaptability, making language acquisition a smoother process.
In conclusion, while there might be concerns about the added workload for young students, the advantages of introducing foreign language learning at the primary school level are substantial. I firmly believe that starting foreign language learning at primary school rather than secondary school is a beneficial approach to enhancing children's linguistic abilities and promoting overall development.
Sample 18:
The timing of introducing foreign language learning to children is a subject of ongoing debate, with some advocating for its initiation during primary school rather than secondary level. This essay will critically examine both the advantages and disadvantages of starting foreign language learning at the primary school level and argue that the potential drawbacks outweigh the benefits.
A significant advantage of early foreign language learning is the promotion of cultural awareness and global understanding among young learners. Learning a new language exposes children to different cultures, customs, and traditions, fostering a sense of curiosity and open-mindedness. For instance, research has shown that students who study foreign languages from an early age tend to develop a greater appreciation for cultural diversity and are more receptive to collaborating with individuals from different backgrounds.
On the contrary, one major disadvantage of introducing foreign language learning at the primary school level is the risk of putting heavy pressure on young learners. At such a tender age, children may already be grappling with foundational subjects and social adjustments, and the addition of a foreign language curriculum could impose excessive pressure on them. The early introduction of a new language might hinder their progress in core subjects and lead to burnout. Another significant disadvantage is the potential for shallow language learning outcomes. Young learners might not possess the cognitive maturity required to grasp complex grammar rules and nuances of foreign languages fully. As a result, they might only acquire superficial knowledge, leading to difficulties in achieving fluency and practical usage of the language. For instance, research has indicated that children who start learning a foreign language at a later stage tend to exhibit more sophisticated language proficiency, indicating that early exposure may not necessarily lead to better outcomes.
Considering the risks of overwhelming young learners and the potential for shallow language learning, it is evident that introducing foreign language instruction at the primary school level has more disadvantages than advantages.
In conclusion, while some argue in favour of starting foreign language learning during primary school, the potential drawbacks of overwhelming young learners and the risk of shallow language acquisition suggest that this approach may not be the most effective. Therefore, we should wait for a few more years before we introduce a second language to our children in primary schools.
Sample 19:
In this interconnected world where communication plays a pivotal role in success, the proper age for learning a foreign language has become a controversial issue with some linguists advocating for teaching children a second language in primary schools rather than in secondary schools. This essay will delve into both benefits and demerits of teaching children a foreign language in primary school and opine that it has more advantages than hindrances.
A big demerit of teaching learners a foreign language in elementary schools is that it affects their learning of their mother tongue. When they have to learn two or more languages, one their native tongue and one or more dominant global languages, they often end up prioritising foreign language learning over their first language. This is evident among the many English medium students in many developing countries who have excellent skills in English and French but not so much of the language spoken in their country.
On the contrary, one major advantage of teaching a foreign language to primary schoolgoers is that they learn the language naturally and become more adept at using it than those who learn it later. This is because cognitive development at this stage happens faster, and young children can learn the language with ease. A survey among two thousand university students conducted by the University of Metropolis has shown that learners who were exposed to a foreign language at elementary school have more mastery of it than those who were not. Moreover, those who learn a second language at a very early age, start developing an appreciation for other cultures and traditions. This helps them become more tolerant individuals and ready to embrace changes.
All in all, it is evident that the advantages of learning a foreign language overshadow the potential drawbacks this approach may have. Therefore, it is expected that elementary pupils would be exposed to a second language to reap the maximum benefits.
Sample 20:
Many language specialists suggest that teaching a foreign language at elementary school is more effective and beneficial for learners than introducing it at secondary school. In this essay, the drawbacks and benefits of this method will be analysed first and then expressed that it has more significant drawbacks than benefits.
A major advantage of introducing foreign language classes to primary school students is that it helps them become bilingual at an early age. Being bilingual at such a tender age improves their cognitive flexibility, problem-solving capacity, and academic performance. They tend to outperform monolingual learners in academic and extracurricular activities. To cite an example, most bilingual primary school students, according to statistics published by the Language Learners Research Institute in Spain, showcased better cognitive abilities and academic performance compared to their monolingual peers.
A significant drawback of teaching young learners a foreign language is that it puts extra burdens on young learners who are already dazzled with other academic subjects like mathematics, science, arts, literature and so on. This extra pressure may be a leading cause for them to develop apathy towards schools and learning as a whole. For instance, my seven years old sister liked school so much that she never wanted to miss it. Lately, she was coming up with every single excuse her young mind could fathom to avoid school. After some successful counselling sessions, it was revealed that she lost her interest to go to school because of academic pressure coupled with two language learning classes. This event has opened my eyes to how putting pressure on teaching extra languages can be negative for children when they are already overwhelmed with their academic work.
To conclude, learning foreign languages and being bilingual is important for learners. But when they are imposed on primary schoolgoers, they can apparently be more negative than useful.
Sample 21:
Many specialists believe that students in primary schools should start learning a foreign language as it offers more advantages than learning it at the secondary school level. This essay will discuss both the advantages and demerits of this policy and argue that it offers more noteworthy advantages including children's cognitive development and better academic performance.
A major drawback of early foreign language learning is the risk of linguistic confusion and mixing, particularly if the curriculum includes multiple foreign languages. Young children may struggle to distinguish between the different languages they are exposed to, leading to confusion and incorrect language usage. This phenomenon, known as language interference, can hinder language development and result in less proficiency in any of the languages learned. For example, a study published in the Journal of Educational Psychology found that children who were exposed to multiple foreign languages in primary school showed more instances of language mixing and confusion, affecting their language skills in the long run.
On the contrary, one principal benefit of learning a foreign language in elementary school is that it develops young learners' motor skills and cognitive power. This, in turn, helps them become more skilled in academic studies and extracurricular activities. Several studies by Neuroscience USA have proved that learning a second or a third language activates various new parts of the brain making children smarter and more intelligent. As a result, it increases the grasping and learning power of a child which give them a competitive advantage over their monolingual peers. For example, in a study conducted by researchers at a primary school in Germany, a group of students was introduced to Spanish language lessons starting from the first grade, while another group began learning Spanish in the seventh grade. After a year of language instruction, the students who started learning Spanish in the first grade showed significant improvements in their cognitive abilities, such as problem-solving, memory retention, and critical thinking skills.
Looking at both advantages and disadvantages, we can conclude that the advantages of learning a foreign language at an early age far outweigh the disadvantages. Therefore, this practice must be followed by education authorities.
Sample 22:
Some specialists in language studies think that if young children start learning a second language at primary schools, they will reap more benefits than those who attempt it in their secondary schools. This essay will analyse both its advantages and drawbacks of it and assert that the advantages of this method are far more substantial than the disadvantages.
The primary disadvantage of teaching primary school children a foreign language is that it could perhaps be a distraction for young minds. Those children need to learn the number system, reading and writing, and not memorise strange grammatical and punctuation rules of a language they perhaps will never use in their life. This could be a huge waste of time and a distraction for learners from acquiring more important skills. For instance, more than 60% of learners of a foreign language in primary schools never master the language and hardly use it in their adult life. Thus, the time spent teaching young children could be better utilised on more useful and practical subjects.
One tremendous advantage of early foreign language learning is the promotion of cultural awareness and global understanding among young learners. Learning a new language exposes children to different cultures, customs, and traditions, fostering a sense of curiosity and open-mindedness. By understanding and appreciating diverse perspectives, children are more likely to become global citizens who can engage effectively in an increasingly interconnected world. For instance, research has shown that students who study foreign languages from an early age tend to develop a greater appreciation for cultural diversity and are more receptive to collaborating with individuals from different backgrounds. Thus, by offering improved cognitive development and promoting cultural awareness, early foreign language learning at the primary school level can enrich the educational experience and provide valuable skills for young learners as they navigate an increasingly globalized world.
In conclusion, it is evident the benefits of teaching elementary children a foreign language far outweigh the drawbacks. Therefore, parents and teachers should take the initiative so that young learners get exposed to a foreign language as soon as they start primary school.
Sample 23:
Many educational specialists argue that second language learning should commence in first school instead of high school. While I contend that it could be too taxing for youngsters to learn two languages while at primary school, I agree with the experts overall and believe the benefits of doing this overpower the drawbacks.
To begin with, if a young child is learning not only his native language, but also one that is foreign to him, he may struggle so much that his acquisition of both suffers. This could happen because children at this age are already overloaded with new experiences to learn from. For instance, for the first time in most of their lives, they are entering classroom environments, learning to accept the authority of teachers and developing relationships with their peers. Having to study a second language on top of this, then, would likely make them feel too stressed and lead them to underperform in their studies.
Despite this problem, primary school age is still the optimum time to learn foreign languages. It has been identified as the golden age for this purpose since it is when the brain is particularly malleable and language acquisition skills are at their strongest. This window of rapid development begins to close as one enters puberty, and so it is ideal for pupils to begin acquiring new languages as early as possible. Furthermore, young children are less self-conscious than teenagers, which is particularly advantageous when practising a new language. If a young child mispronounces a word which makes people laugh, for example, he will probably not become too disheartened and should be able to move on easily. Adolescents, on the other hand, tend to get embarrassed in such situations and be less willing to try again for fear of failure.
In conclusion, even though studying multiple languages would initially be overwhelming for most primary school children, I think doing this is best because of the neurological and psychological advantages they would have.
Sample 24:
Linguistics suggests that to acquire foreign language proficiency, one should commence the process during primary school rather than in high school. Although there are numerous disadvantages, including stress and confusion, the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks due to early language acquisition.
It is often said that children’s brains are akin to sponges. Thus, parents advocate for early foreign language learning to enhance their children’s cognitive abilities. Unfortunately, this approach can lead to certain issues. For example, attempting to learn a foreign language while still mastering one’s native language can result in confusion. A perfect example is a Chinese child studying their complex written language alongside English, which utilizes a completely different writing system and syntax. Despite the child’s intellectual capabilities, this can lead to substantial confusion, particularly in written language acquisition.
Some parents contend that keeping children busy can stimulate their minds. As a result, children who engage in language studies in the afternoon or evening have ample time for various stimulating activities. However, there are limits to a child’s mental and physical stamina. After a long day of studying, they should be resting, but instead, they continue to study, adding to their stress levels. This not only burdens their minds but also takes a toll on their bodies. Instead of playing outside or enjoying their childhood, they are overwhelmed with homework from various subjects, especially the foreign language they are trying to learn.
Despite these significant disadvantages, the primary advantage lies in the fact that, upon overcoming these initial hurdles, these children become proficient in the foreign language by the time they reach high school. While they may have suffered confusion and stress in the past, they gain confidence and mastery of the language, making it second nature to them. Consequently, they become proficient in the language, while their peers are just beginning their journey. Therefore, while their counterparts struggle to balance academics and learning a new language, these early learners can focus on their studies, achieve higher scores, and enhance their chances of gaining admission to a better university.
In conclusion, despite the initial challenges, such as confusion and stress, it is advisable for children to embark on learning a foreign language at an early age. Despite these hurdles, they sow the seeds of proficiency, and as they progress to secondary education, they can fully utilize this language and concentrate on their studies.
Sample 25:
Traditionally, children begin studying foreign languages at secondary school. Many individual schools or educationalists have recommended to study foreign languages at an earlier stage. However, this policy may bring some advantages along with some disadvantages. This essay will further discuss whether extending foreign language study to the primary stages is beneficial and if disadvantages may occur in the later stages.
Obviously young children pick up languages much more easily than teenagers. Their brains are programmed to learn their mother tongue which also facilitates learning another language. At a young age, children are enthusiastic to explore and to learn new things. The primary timetable should allow more frequent shorter sessions for maintaining learner's enthusiasm and progress. Acquiring foreign languages can also help them to understand other cultures.
However, there are some disadvantages. Primary school teachers may not have the necessary language skills, or they are not well trained for those particular languages. If any language specialist is called, then the flexibility of sessions is diminished. Primary language teaching needs to be standardised, so that secondary schools do not face problems in their intake. Failing to undo the earlier gains. In some situations, it would become very stressful to the child when he has to learn three languages i.e. native languages and foreign languages. Some researchers have shown from their studies that such children have difficulties in deciding which language to speak and may end up learning nothing,
In conclusion, a standardised policy can be adopted at primary schools which can also benefit society culturally and economically. Young children's grasping power can make these benefits more achievable.
Sample 26:
In many nations, the study of a foreign language is inclusive in the academic syllabus of secondary schools. Many are of the perception that it is better to commence their studies from primary school. Despite some marginal benefits this offers, the disadvantages outweigh as this could make it hectic for young minds where they should be focusing on core subjects instead.
The primary reason why people support the foreign language study in early schools is the linguistic and communicative skills that the students can acquire at a younger age. If they are being taught a new language at a primary level, chances are that they can promptly reach to a level of proficiency than starting late. This is particularly true in some English-speaking countries where French is being taught from early age, where these students later could handle both the languages exceptionally well.
However, learning an additional language at primary school can prove hectic to the already packed schedule of students. Recent times have demanded individuals to have a good knowledge in Mathematics and Science, for which a thorough base from rudimentary levels is a must. Not only does the study of a foreign language trade the time to learn important subjects but also puts greater cognitive load on children. For instance, in India, a child who begins his school has three languages to learn already in the syllabus and an added foreign language subject could make their studies hectic.
In conclusion, many people believe that children should be taught a foreign language in elementary schools as it can enhance the communication skills from an early age. But the disadvantages overshadow the advantages as an added language subject could weaken the students’ focus on other important subjects.
Sample 27:
It is true that language acquisition is a complex process. Therefore, it is advisable to teach a foreign language at elementary school rather than secondary. According to me, the merits of this notion outnumbered its demerits.
To embark on, there are numerous benefits of teaching a foreign language to children at an early age. First of all, children have a receptive mind with good grasping power. This age is the learning stage of life. Whatever is learned in childhood, can remember longer in life. Besides that, children are less egoistic and are not afraid of committing a mistake in learning. As failures are the pillars of success while continuous practicing they may attain a reasonable level of language. Undoubtedly, a language consists of different dialects, grammatical rules, intonations, denotation, functions syntax, and style. By practicing these, a child can possess unmatchable linguistic skills. Secondly, everyone is in a mad race to fly board in this modern scenario, and possession of a foreign language equips them to communicate freely for easy survival. Moreover, polished communication skills have become a need for the hour of the cutthroat competitive world.
However, it is also a fact that going to school, doing homework, and taking part in extra-curricular activities is itself a time-consuming activity for students. If they are exposed to regular language teaching sessions that will make them pressurized and psychological illness. This type of burden will hamper their physical, mental, and psychological growth.
To conclude, even though, teaching a foreign language may aggravate their existing burden preparing the young mind for further survival has become mandatory by imparting linguistic skills.
Sample 28:
Traditionally, children have begun studying foreign languages at later stages in their educational careers, but some believe that it could be beneficial to introduce them earlier. While there are both advantages and disadvantages associated with this topic, the positive aspects take precedence over the drawbacks.
Young children are better able to learn languages for a variety of factors. First off, studies show that young children pick up languages better than teenagers. The younger brains are, the more they are able to retain information in the long-term. It has also been proven that young brains absorb material at a faster rate. Additionally, implementing language lessons in primary schools would allow for more flexibility within the school system. Younger children will be able to engage with the material more frequently through shorter sessions, thus maintaining their enthusiasm and progress.
However, there are some disadvantages when it comes to learning languages at an earlier age. Primary teachers may not be qualified to provide lessons in foreign languages, resulting in inadequate teaching. This could demotivate younger students and give them a negative experience in language learning. Further, school districts may not be able to carry on foreign language teaching from primary to middle schools. In this case, students would not only lose their progress, but they would also be demotivated due to the lack of consistency throughout their educational careers. However, these issues can be effectively addressed through consistent support in the school district and pose only a minor threat to the advantages.
Although there are a few disadvantages regarding the study of a foreign language during primary school, there are a plethora of advantages that outweigh the negative aspects. Young children’s innate abilities should be appreciated and fostered to their full advantage.
Sample 29:
Over the last half-century, the pace of change in the life of human beings has increased dramatically beyond our wildest expectations. This change has been driven by the booming breakthrough in science and technology. This makes the world seem like a small village and necessitates learning a foreign language. The latter facilities communication between people and eases the exchange of knowledge and experience. However, when to start learning a foreign language has been thought to be a contentious issue. Although, there are some commentators who advocate that learning a foreign language should start at high school. I am strongly inclined towards the view that children should be taught foreign language in the elementary schools.
Firstly, the intellectual abilities of children make it easy for them to acquire more than one language. For example, a recent study conducted in London has shown that children below 7 years could learn a second language four times faster than those above 15 years. Furthermore, starting to learn a foreign language at a young age allows the student to achieve a higher level of fluency when they become youngster. Consequently, this gives them better opportunities to study overseas or find good careers in the international organizations.
On the other hand, a strong argument can be made on the opposite side. Opponents believe that introduction of a foreign language could negatively influence their identity and their speaking of their mother tongue. For instance, a recent study published in Egypt has revealed that pupils who studied in international schools that taught English from grade one got lower marks in Arabic compared to their peers who were taught English later.
To sum up, it can be clearly seen that the pros of learning a foreign language in young age outweigh the cons. I do recommend that the ministry of education involves foreign language as an integral part of all the elementary schools.
Sample 30:
Some educationists believe that it is preferable for kids to start learning a foreign language at an early age rather than secondary school. This essay will consider both the views and define why taking a top priority of studying an alien language at primary school is enormously helpful with examples.
First and foremost, mixture of languages is a major downfall when young ones are encouraged to take up a second language at school. As the young brain is not completely developed to connect out the rules of languages, there is a great possibility that they will mix words from different dialects. Its often observed that children in secondary schools can address the given problem, as opposed to youths in primary schools. Secondly, academic achievements are often affected because mastering a new language, which typically includes complicated vocabularies and terminologies, forces the children from secondary school to devote more time on it than the mainstream subjects. Children fancy learning an overseas language. So, kids are found to pick up phrases and words of different languages promptly while having fun. This accounts for children being better at primary school as opposed to secondary school in learning a new language.
In conclusion, in my opinion with the consideration of positives being incredibly comfortable and more attractive they eclipse the discussed inconveniences.
Sample 31:
Learning a language is indeed a lengthy process. Hence, teaching a foreign language at middle school than at secondary school is preferable. The advantages of this idea outstripped its demerits.
To get started, there are several benefits to teaching children an early age a foreign language. First of all, with strong grasping capacity, children have a responsive mind. This age is the stage of lives studying. Something experienced in childhood can be remembered in life longer. In turn, children are less arrogant and are not afraid to make a learning error. Because mistakes are the foundations of success when practising constantly, they should reach a reasonable level of expression. A language is certainly made up of various dialects, grammar rules, intonations, dictionary meaning, syntax functions, and style. A child can possess uncompromising linguistic skills by practising these. Secondly, in this modern scenario, everyone is in a mad race to fly board and possession of foreign language equips them for easy survival communication. In addition, polished language skills have become a necessity for the hour of competition in the cutthroat world.
But it’s also a fact which going to school, doing assignments, participating in extra-curricular activities is a moment-consuming activity for students themselves. If they are subjected to daily language teaching sessions that will pressurize them and cause psychological illness, this kind of stress will hamper their physical, psychological and mental development.
In conclusion, while teaching the second language may worsen their extant burden, preparation the young mind for further survival by imparting linguistic skills has become compulsory.
Sample 32:
The question of whether it is more advantageous for students to begin learning a foreign language in elementary school as opposed to secondary school is the subject of debate. This essay will investigate both viewpoints and offer my opinion on the subject.
Proponents of early language learning argue that beginning in elementary education provides numerous benefits. Children have an increased capacity for language acquisition, and early exposure to a foreign language can result in improved pronunciation and fluency. In addition, acquiring a foreign language at a young age improves cognitive development, enhances problem-solving skills, and fosters cultural awareness and empathy.
However, opponents contend that introducing a foreign language too early could overwhelm children and hinder their progress in other essential subjects. Prior to learning a foreign language, they believe it is more necessary for children to establish a solid foundation in their native language and develop essential literacy and numeracy skills. They suggest that language learning in secondary school, when children's cognitive and linguistic abilities are more developed, may yield superior results.
In my opinion, both approaches have advantages. Early language instruction can provide a strong foundation and cultivate a lifelong appreciation for languages. It enables children to develop a natural and intuitive comprehension of diverse cultures and languages. Nonetheless, it is essential to establish a balance and ensure that language learning at the elementary level is age-appropriate, interactive, and enjoyable, without placing undue academic pressure on young students.
In addition, language instruction should continue throughout secondary education to build on the foundation established in elementary school. This ensures continuity and enables students to enhance their language skills as they advance academically.
Both early language acquisition and secondary school language programmes are advantageous. It is essential to consider the developmental readiness of children and to provide a balanced approach that combines early exposure to foreign languages with opportunities for ongoing language learning throughout their education.
Sample 33:
Language is the first way of communicating with others. It is not confined to just speaking rather it is a way of expressing feelings through actions or other mediums. But before conveying one’s feelings one should be able understand and comprehend words of other language. Hence, I agree to the belief that it is better for children to begin learning foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Today is a world of globalisation and surprisingly our globe is shrinking each day, every human is connected to each other despite being miles apart physically. As the connection is becoming stronger, language plays a critical role in establishing the bond overseas. Now as we debate about the advantages of early educating children foreign languages, we cannot deny the fact that kids are more aggressive and sharper minded in their early childhood days. Their inquisitive mind and a curiosity to reach the roots of any question helps them grasp concepts at a faster rate.
Children seek to burgeon (to develop and grow rapidly) in various domains, with this aspiration they even travel various countries for higher studies. If they already know the language of the other country, they would feel more confident and blend easily with the native students. This also enhances a feeling of togetherness and catalyzes teamwork and cooperation amongst the youth of different lands.
Also, children being the future of a country tend to become prominent leaders if they have developed the propensity to connect and bring the world together with the power of language.
Sample 34:
Language empowers young contemporaries to be more adept and academically successful, hence introducing a non-native language is inevitable during the early stage of life. This is why inaugurating a second language in primary school is a good idea. In my opinion, elementary school children should be exposed to a second language as it has more benefits than downsides.
Let us start by considering the disadvantages of offering a foreign language in primary school even though they are scarce. One of the main disadvantages is that children can get confused with their first language and could mix it up when they use both languages. For example, when learning French, native English students have a likelihood of getting confused and using certain words of English in French and vice versa.
However, teaching a second language to elementary students has many advantages. It actually enhances their intellectual abilities and proficiency. It is scientifically proven that learning a new language during the early phase of life is easier and it helps activate the different parts of our brain. With the introduction of a new language in the initial grade, we can offer students a chance to learn about a different culture and that would foster positive views in them towards other nations. Moreover, things learned in childhood have a far better impact on us and thus it ensures mastery of the language. In the present era of globalisation, effective communication skill is a must for career success and exposing children to learn a new language thus opens many windows of opportunity for them.
To conclude, I hope that the government will take the necessary steps to introduce a foreign language in elementary education in the coming future to pave the way for an intellectual and skilled generation.
Sample 35:
Mastery of a foreign language grants immense benefits and a second language course, in most countries, has become an integral part of the academic syllabus. When no doubt is dispensed about the advantages of learning a foreign language, opinions are often split when the best time is to start it. I personally feel that secondary school should be the ideal time to start learning a new language as it has more merits.
To begin with, if children are exposed to a foreign language at the very beginning of their academic life, they often end up learning both languages poorly. For instance, many teenagers these days do not show mastery of their native language, and this can be attributed to their overexposure to foreign languages in their childhood. Moreover, children begin their elementary school between 5-7 years, sometimes earlier. They should not be pressurised with a whole new language and its grammatical rules when they are already appalled by the tasks their teachers assign. The extra pressure of a new language can lead them to grow antipathy about attending schools.
Many people argue that pupils in primary schools have a better capacity to learn a new language than students in a secondary language. However, research reveals that young minds have these advantages until they turn 21. Considering this, a secondary-level student with better maturity and understanding would learn the language faster. Learning a language involves more than just memorising words and knowing the grammar. A language is key to the passageway of a different culture. Undoubtedly, secondary-level students are better prepared to unlock the door and walk through.
To conclude, high school pupils are better accommodated to learn a foreign language than primary-level students. Some dubious advantages of learning a new language at the primary level are outranked by the advantages of commencing it in high school.
Sample 36:
It is widely believed by many pedagogies that teaching a foreign language at primary school is more beneficial than waiting until secondary school. While some argue that there may be disadvantages to teaching a second language at the elementary stage, the benefits are numerous and are greater than the demerits.
One advantage of teaching a foreign language at an elementary school level is that children are more receptive to new languages and tend to pick them up more quickly. Research shows that children who are taught a foreign language at an early age develop stronger cognitive skills and better problem-solving abilities. Furthermore, language learning at a young age can foster intercultural communication and help children develop a more global perspective.
On the other hand, some experts argue that introducing a foreign language at a young age can be overwhelming and confusing for some children, especially those who are struggling with their mother tongue. Additionally, there is a concern that early language learning can lead to a lack of proficiency in both the target language and the child’s mother tongue.
Despite the potential disadvantages, the advantages of teaching a foreign language at primary school greatly outweigh them. Children who are exposed to a foreign language at an early age are more likely to become fluent in it, as well as to develop stronger language learning abilities in general. Moreover, the benefits of intercultural communication and a global perspective are increasingly important in today’s interconnected world.
In conclusion, teaching a foreign language at primary school is highly beneficial. While there may be some potential drawbacks, the advantages of learning a foreign language at an early age are numerous and can have a lasting impact on a child’s cognitive development, language learning abilities, and global perspective.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Đang tải chế độ Học...
Hot: 1000+ đề thi giữa kì 1 lớp 1-12 đầy đủ các môn (Update 2026) (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
Đăng ký VIP để học và luyện thi không giới hạn
Trọn bộ quyền lợi trên Vietjack, trong một tài khoản.
- Phòng luyện thi cấp tốc: ĐGNL - ĐGTD, Tốt nghiệp THPT, Ôn vào 10, Ôn vào 6, Ôn Giữa kì/Cuối kì
- Hơn 200K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
- Với 3tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
- Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
- Xem hàng ngàn bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
- Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
- Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện
- Đăng ký ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Today technology has changed how people interact with each other. I believe the biggest effects it has had on relationships are that it has reduced in-person interaction and that it has led to the development of online relationships. This has been a positive development because often cyber relationships are more meaningful than in-person relationships.
Technology has reduced face-to-face interaction. For instance, it is not uncommon to see two people sitting at the same table in a restaurant, checking their phones every 30 seconds, and only talking to each other occasionally.
Technology has also given rise to online relationships. Nowadays anyone that has access to the Internet and computers can create a free Facebook or Twitter account and build their social networks on these platforms no matter where on the planet they reside. Take, for example, Chinese teenagers who like collecting insects. On the Internet, they can find and connect with others who share this particular hobby, even if those people live in the Amazon rainforest.
This should be seen as a positive trend because cyberspace relationships can be very meaningful. Today it is very common that those in a person's immediate circle do not support what they pursue. For example, many street artists are looked down on by their family members. Fortunately, Facebook groups give them the power to build their own communities where they can support each other. The inspiration and motivation they obtain there can drive them to work hard to move toward their goals.
In conclusion, technology has reduced in-person interaction and has meanwhile enabled online relationships. This has definitely been a positive trend because online relationships are often more satisfying and meaningful than face-to-face ones.
Sample 2:
Technology is a crucial tool for communication in modern times. It is flourishing in each and every field of communication. Though this invention has changed the way people interact around the world, it has both positive and negative impact on the relationship of people.
To embark on, with regard to the positive development, technological advancement has made communication between organizations more convenient and time-saving. Many companies and organizations use tools like social media, email and forum to influence a larger number of audiences. This also serves as an advanced mode of learning since schools adopt the method of smart classrooms. With the availability of ecommerce, freelance websites, social media marketing, people can easily buy and sell products and services with effortless communication.
On the other hand, the drawbacks of technology on the relationships of people cannot be ignored. Though technology has advanced greatly, it still lacks the emotional touch of communication. It has affected the love and affection people crave with communication. Millennials today are more fascinated by the virtual world, thereby forgetting the practical side of life. Modern modes of communication are making people busy and less productive. Sharing personal information on social media also invades people’s privacy. For example, individuals spending hours on social media interaction interacting with people from around the world and wasting their valuable time. In fact, family vacation which was previously a private affair has now become a public affair.
To sum up, communication technology can be a blessing or a curse depending upon how people make use of it. Even though it is an easy method of interaction, the relationships formed through technological interaction lack trust and emotion. Hence, people should give preference to face-to-face communication.
Sample 3:
It is evident that technology has transformed the ways of communication and influenced relationships in a variety of ways. In my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects of this.
The principal way in which relationships have been affected is that they tend to be at a distance rather than face-to-face. The advent of the internet has made it easy for business owners to communicate across the world, with remote job opportunities one call away. Online educational programs are available for people residing in different countries, and it is no longer a dream to attend live classes from the comfortable environment of a home. Not only this, the social platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube have revolutionized relationships, be it making online friendships with people from other countries or staying in touch with loved ones. Based on this perspective, technology has influenced relationships in a positive way.
However, despite these advances, the quality of interaction has significantly declined in several respects. If people are developing most of their relationships online, this means that they may also have less fact-to-face contact. This kind of contact on a personal level is important for human beings to feel wanted and a part of society. This may be a particular problem for children's social development as they used to be seen playing out on the streets but are now too often indoors. Technology can also mean people are detached from what is going on around them even when they are out, as can be seen by the many people staring into their mobile phones as they travel or walk around.
In conclusion, technology has brought some positive developments in the ways people interact with each other. However, there are also some negative impacts of technology on the types of relationships people make.
Sample 4:
Technology has hardly left any human feeling untouched. Instead, it has played a great role in manipulating and transforming it to a great extent. One of the most highly impacted aspects in this context is human interaction.
Technology has laid its hands on human behavior and has greatly influenced the pattern of human interaction since its introduction. From social media platforms to FaceTime applications, staying in touch has become easier with time. However, it has its downsides as well. With such high-end digital connections, intimate relationships have seen a significant decrease ever since.
These changes result from the freedom of hiding genuine emotions that technology brings. People can now fake caring about someone, express false love, and connect just for the sake of words. This has led to loosened family bonds, false promises between partners, and much more. People do interact with each other, but this interaction is often fake and untrue. Technology's significant impact on human interaction leads to various unwanted consequences. A surge in depression cases, suicides, and unwise decisions have been recorded as a result of such interactions.
Hence, technology has influenced the way people interact both positively and negatively. Undoubtedly, it has helped humans connect from miles away with their loved ones yet has made relations less meaningful and degraded their overall quality.
Sample 5:
Technology has brought vast changes in human behavior since its introduction. Moreover, with its rapid advancement and new changes, it is impacting relationships more rapidly. Interactions have recently been made more accessible due to technology. People can now connect easily and from the ease of their homes. However, it also has its downsides. A detailed study of this significant impact on human relationships due to technology can be understood with various examples.
In recent years, technology has helped humans stay connected at all times. With technology spreading its arms, connections can be made even in the most unexpected and tribal areas of the world. However, this has ultimately transformed human behavior and the way people interact with each other.
A prime example of this change is how people interact since social media's introduction. The introduction of social media platforms has made it easier for people to connect with their loved ones, even at a distance. However, it has entirely transformed how people interact with their close surroundings. This has also led to the expression of fake feelings and false expressions.
Overall, technology has transformed the entire interaction cycle of human beings without letting us realize it. More connections over the internet have paved the way for broken real-life relationships and have ultimately degraded the quality of relationships.
Sample 6:
There has been a change in the different aspects of social relations as affected by technology which we can introduced as more of a post-positively than post-negatively impact.
First, technology has immensely extended the speed and convinience of communication and thus the worth of relationships. For example, a university learner who is learning in another country can use video-calling to speak with the parents daily. An instantaneous means of communication makes it easier to avoid having to wait for a letter to arrive for a day or more as is the norm. Furthermore, social networks allow a person to get acquanted with like-minded strangers with similar interests, career choices, or hobbies, therefore create friendships that last a lifetime.
Despite this perception, this development is fairly beneficial to the masses. Improved communication technology reduces pressure and creates the need for belonging. For instance, when there is negative information, people get to act quickly. Also, positive information is more effective when shared immediately and it helps enhance interpersonal relationships. In addition, this has led to the growth of businesses and the eradication of geographical barriers whereby a company can comfortably and easily transact business with an organization in another country at any given time.
Altogether, it can be highlighted that technology plays a vital role in changing social relations by providing more effective and pleasant means of communication. It has made interpersonal communication better, provided businesses with links and connections as well as made everyone have equal access to information. Thus, it can be concluded that the purpose and use of technology have been mainly beneficial for interactions and relationships for the majority of people.
Sample 7:
It is true that new technologies have had an influence on communication between people. Technology has affected relationships in various ways, and in my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects.
Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, telephones and the Internet allow businesspeople in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. For example, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.
On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between people in different countries was much more difficult when communication was limited to written letters or telegrams. Nowadays, interactions by email, phone or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings, and many of us benefit from these interactions, either in work or social contexts. On the other hand, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result ofisolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these 'virtual' relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships.
In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionized communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.
Sample 8:
There has been a complex alteration in the various aspects of social relations due to technological advancement resulting in more positive impact than negatives.
First of all, the usage of technology has tremendously augmented the speed and ease of interaction making the relations’ depth richer. For example, a university student studying in another country can utilize video-calling to maintain quotidian contact with his or her parents. Real-time messaging banishes the lengthy wait for the letter, which was taken as conventional before. Besides, one is able to interact with strangers with similar interests, jobs, or hobbies, hence fostering friendships that endure a lifetime.
This development is predominantly propitious for the people. Advanced communication technology reduces stress and creates a feeling of belongingness. For instance, the sectional publicity of negative information can be quickly followed by timely responses. And just as to promote the fast exchange of positive messages, cooperation is strengthened between people. In addition, this technological advancement has boosted business development and erased hegemonic constraints and restrictions that enable business organizations to freely and easily connect with global organizations at any time.
Therefore, one is able to deduce that relations in society have been significantly mediated by technology in the manner in which humans interact offering more effective and fulfilling ways. It has made interpersonal communication easier, created business relationships and opportunities, and given equal opportunity for information access. Hence, the major impact of technology is analyzing and interpreting common interaction and relationship profiles that can be deemed more beneficial and helpful for most people.
Sample 9:
The advent and rapid development of technology have fundamentally transformed the dynamics of interpersonal interactions among individuals. This has also transformed the way we form relationships and bond with each other. This essay contends that the evolution of technology has, in fact, catalyzed a positive shift in the types of relationships people form, fostering connectivity and enhancing social engagement.
Technology has diversified the ways individuals establish and maintain relationships. Social media platforms, for instance, have facilitated connections among individuals globally, transcending geographical barriers. Additionally, online dating applications have revolutionized how people meet and form romantic relationships, offering a wide array of choices and opportunities to connect with like-minded individuals. Technology has also gifted us swift and interactive communication with loved ones no matter the distance. For instance, someone living abroad can make video calls and talk to his or her family members whenever they want. This has reduced the communication gap and significantly enhanced our options to contact others in real-time unlike in the past when sending handwritten letters was perhaps the best option to convey messages or contact someone.
This evolution in the types of relationships forged through technology signifies a positive development. Online connectivity allows individuals to maintain contact with friends, family, and acquaintances across vast distances. Moreover, digital platforms enable marginalized groups, such as those with disabilities or introverted personalities, to establish meaningful connections they may struggle to form in traditional social settings. For instance, social networking sites provide platforms for introverted individuals to express themselves and interact comfortably, fostering self-confidence and social skills.
In conclusion, the impact of technology on relationship dynamics has been transformative, offering diverse avenues for connectivity and social interaction. The ability to form connections across distances and the empowerment of individuals who face social barriers underscore the positive aspects of technological advancements. Embracing these changes in relationship dynamics signifies a positive shift towards enhanced connectivity and inclusivity in contemporary society.
Sample 10:
The ubiquitous presence of technology has undoubtedly redefined the landscape of human interaction, altering the very nature of how we build and maintain relationships. While the advancements of the digital age offer a plethora of tools for communication and connection, a closer examination reveals a disturbing trend – the erosion of genuine, meaningful relationships.
With technology, we make friends more often than ever. We also have a variety of tools to connect with others and remain in touch with people we care about. But one undeniable consequence of this technology-driven relationship is the rise of superficial and fleeting interactions online. Social media platforms, while fostering a sense of instant connectivity, often facilitate shallow exchanges and curated self-presentation. In the pursuit of likes and followers, meaningful conversations and authentic connections are often sacrificed, fostering a culture of virtual intimacy that lacks the depth and genuineness of face-to-face interaction.
As a result, of the constant bombardment of digital stimuli can contribute to social anxiety and a fear of missing out, hindering our ability to develop genuine relationships. The pressure to maintain an online presence and curate a perfect digital persona can lead individuals to withdraw from real-world interactions, hindering their ability to connect authentically with others. And this is a disturbing outcome of our digital relationship. Additionally, the ease of virtual communication can discourage individuals from developing the interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence necessary for navigating the complexities of face-to-face interaction. For example, a young adult accustomed to online communication might struggle to hold engaging conversations in person, leading to feelings of awkwardness and missed opportunities for meaningful connections.
In conclusion, while technology undoubtedly offers tools for communication and connection, it is crucial to recognize its limitations and potential pitfalls. By prioritizing face-to-face interaction, fostering genuine conversations, and actively engaging with our communities, we can strive to counteract the negative effects of technology on our relationships and cultivate a more meaningful and fulfilling social life.
Sample 11:
There is no doubt that many things have changed in the last few decades; some changes are for the better and some changes are for the worse. One of the fields which were greatly affected by the advent of technology is the way of interaction and communication.
Without any doubt, technology has changed the way we lead our lives, and these changes have been prominent over the last decade. There are several improvements in life due to the positive effects of technology and there are some negative impacts as well. One area that has dramatically changed is the way we communicate and maintain our relationship nowadays. And in my opinion, technology has positively affected our communication and the way we make relationships and maintain it. Despite some negative effects, most of us enjoy the positive things technology has bought for us. In the past, the ways of interaction were very limited. Unleash your imagination; if you want to speak with your friend, you would have to go directly to his house or send him a message which may take a few days to get a response. I completely believe that technology has a great tangible effect on our communication. Nowadays, it's very easy to interact with your relatives - and even with the government and organisations - either by emails, mobiles, chatting, etc. and I think that this has improved and enhanced the relationships.
We no longer need to visit a relative or friend to get updates. Alternatively, we can let them know our updates instantly. Besides personal communications, official and business communications have become easier. Email campaigns offer a good marketing opportunity for business owners and people can complain about a certain thing using emails without exposing their identity. Not all of the people have the availability of technology, and they still use the old form of communication. People now can deceive others using identity theft and fraud identity. The personal touch of communication like handwritten letters, face-to-face communications were more effective in some cases. Like meeting your friend is still more important than just writing him an email.
We make so many friends via chatting or social networking which would not have been possible without the advancement of technology and its contribution to communication. Cell phones, emails and social networking have enhanced the way of communicating and we can talk to anyone with a minimum cost. It's now not unusual to prepare for a visit and even several visits to your relatives and friends on the same day, while in the past this may have taken several weeks or months.
To conclude, despite all that, I still see some failings in the development of the means of interaction. For instance, the very high cost each person spends every day on communication. Another defect is that many elderly people are not accustomed to this modern technology. But that doesn't have a great effect on the positive role technology has made in the field of interaction between people and I think these defects are very easy to be solved.
Sample 12:
A true relationship between two people requires face to face communication and time to truly get to know each other. Regardless of what humans think, all individuals admire the feeling of being wanted even if it’s a lie. The digital world has created the sense that it is passable to be who anyone wishes to be online. However, I believe that the way people know each other online and the type of relationships they make virtually have changed for the worse.
Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, most are being turned inward, forgetting the true definition of a friend. Human beings have feelings, and they feel broken at times and do not always smile but the Internet only shows one's happy moments keeping one from fully being known. The types of friendships people make these days are quick and short-lasting. In real life friendship, people see each other at one’s best and worst time and remain there for one another. This can never be compared to a social network friendship. One can only get to know someone by spending time together for the reason that the Internet cannot replace shared experience and personal communication. However, due to the Internet, people can make friends anywhere in the world which was quite impossible in the past era. Finding school and college friends and getting in touch with them is an advantage that the Internet offers to us. However, true friendship is not possible if two people do not spend time together, share their common interests, talk a lot and help each other both in good and bad times.
Rightfully, life is meant to be lived and have many physical experiences, bonding with another person’s physical presence. Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, they are spending time online to make friends. This is, in my opinion, a negative aspect of the digital era.
In conclusion, making friends beyond boundaries and getting in touch with childhood friends could be the advantages of the digital era but the way we are becoming dependent on the technology and the way we are pretending to maintain our friendship online have negative consequences on our personal, moral and social aspects.
Sample 13:
It is true that technology in recent years has altered the path that people communicate with each other. There are many ways that technology affects our relationships, and in my opinion, this is a beneficial development.
To begin with, the most obvious transformation in people’s relationships is how they communicate with each other. By this, I mean that the Internet has converted the world into a small village and nowadays people around the world can reach each other easily and rapidly. For example, a friend who lives in the UK can chat and talk with their friends in China using a mobile phone or social network.
Another field in which technology affects our life is the way that people make friends. In other words, it has been observed that these days we can make friends from all nationalities without any effort or travel, and this helps with culture interchange and help people who suffer.
In my thought, this has a positive impact on the community for two reasons. Firstly, human life has become more convenient, this provides people with more opportunity to spend their leisure time with their kin. For instance, with the Internet, we can shop and work from our dwelling house without going outside anymore. Secondly, travel around the globe has become usable and cheap. As a result, people visiting each other and spend a lot of time together hence more connected society emerges.
To conclude, as we have found out there is no easy answer to this question. Nevertheless, technology makes a huge difference in peoples' lives in terms of communication and I believe that this is a positive impact in our society.
Sample 14:
From the last century to the present days, there have been many changes in the way people interact with each other as there have been evolutionary changes in technological fields. One may say this transformation has negative effects on relationships between people or positive effects. I believe that there have been more positive effects than negative ones among the people due to the reasons that in few seconds of time people can contact their dearest ones and technology gives strength to people by making them closer to each other even if they are not.
From the introduction of telecommunication and electronic mail, the lives of people turned out to be easier and communication among people became easier and more convenient. They can contact their families and friends using these advanced services over the countries. Without visiting their homes frequently, they can make money or accomplish their goals. For example, a military man has to serve his country at the borders, and it is uneasy to go home and spend some time with his family and acquaintances thoroughly. However, he can make contact with his family via telephone and other services. With the help of telecommunication and electronic mail, he can keep in touch with his family and buddies. In this way, technology makes people close to each other. This absolutely positive development as we have huge benefits using technology.
With the absence of one's dearest one, he used to be all alone before the introduction of technology. But it is possible to get in touch with his sweetheart. And also, he can send and receive the money within seconds over the thousands of miles using the latest money transfer machines. As a result, he can look over and take care of his family's financial problems and needs without his presence at his home. For instance, my uncle who stays in the United States calls his family and others via ‘Skype’ daily whereas, my dad who used to work in Dubai could not keep in touch with us as at that time the telecommunication had not installed in my village. Thus, that made my father bound to visit us frequently. Consequently, he spent a large amount of money travelling and could not communicate with us as frequently as he wanted to.
In many positive ways, technology has affected the relationships between people, and I would say these are positive developments. Imagine without technology, what would happen to the people and the world. In many ways, we are getting the help of using technology.
Sample 15:
Technological developments in this modern era have transformed the way we socialise. Advancements in communication networks have played a vital role in bringing people closer. In my opinion, there are both pros and cons of this development and this essay will analyse how technology has changed the types of relationships made by people.
In ancient times, people used letters and telegrams to interact with each other. With the advent of modern communication systems like the telephone and the Internet, people can collaborate more effectively. For instance, we can interact through emails rather than letter and businessman can have online meetings through the conference calls.
Another reason is the widespread use of social networks over the internet; for instance, Facebook, where men and women can now make friends online and interact with them through the post, message and online chat. Video conferencing in the form of Skype has improved instructor and student relationship. Online messaging platforms like mIRC have given people the luxury to choose their own discussion-based chat rooms. There are more ways to socialise now than there used to be in the past.
All these advancements in technology come up with their merits and demerits. Letters, memos and telegrams are replaced by emails and text messages. Human resource hiring can be done through online video conferencing which has eliminated the need for physical presence and travelling requirement. We can now mingle more through Facebook, Pinterest, Google+, Instagram and Orkut and so on. Though one can regard these as positive developments, they do have some negative aspects. These developments have isolated people and discouraged real-world interaction. For instance, youth, in particular, prefers to choose to mix up with people online rather than socialising with them in the real world.
To conclude, technology has no doubt revolutionised the way we interact and hang out but has greatly reduced real-world interaction. Though these virtual relations tend to be positive, we should not deny the importance of physical interaction in our lives.
Sample 16:
Everything has two sides, and the effects of technology on people’s relationships are not an exception. We cannot deny how much technology has transformed the individual reaction with others in his family and the surrounding community.
In my opinion, technology has affected and transformed our life aspects and dealing with other people in a good way. Recently, we have had different fast and cheap methods to call our family and friends. Moreover, some technologies are giving us chances to see and talk with them at the same time. In addition, we are informed on a daily basis with the last updates and news about our friends and family, so we can remember birthdays, graduation parties and even marriage anniversaries. Furthermore, these methods make it faster and easier to call and congratulate another individual.
On the other hand, many people believe that technology is affecting individual relationships badly. They opine that, if we did not have these kinds of technology, we would have been visiting each other regularly.
Not only that, but individuals will not be isolated from each other, especially those who are addicted to using social networking platforms. As a matter of fact, people rarely talk to each other face-to-face. In particular, people’s personalities are changing so much, because of addiction to using Facebook. It’s one of the vital reasons to decrease confidence and self-esteem.
As can be seen, even if we have some bad effects of technology and how it changed the way people contact each other, we still have much more effects. We can obtain many easy and cheaper methods to contact each other. In fact, technology has enhanced our life and the way we are contacting each other.
Sample 17:
Today, various brand-new methods of telecommunications have tremendously influenced social behaviour. Although their impacts have benefited human lifestyle, they have had some costs as well. However, before evaluating their advantages and disadvantages, it is better to reveal how these breakthroughs affect the ways people relate to each other.
In the old times, when someone wanted to communicate, there were extremely limited means of doing so. Indeed, he should write a letter or have a face-to-face conversation. Likewise, it was possible to be acquainted with new faces either by meeting them personally or being introduced by family and friends.
On the other hand, substantial technological progress has happened in recent years. For instance, smartphones can be utilised both by direct calls and via different applications. Alternatively, the internet can be used either by offline methods like e-mail or by online protocols like chatting programs. Moreover, social networking is another rich aspect of the internet by which everybody is able to find new friends or search for old, missed ones, and it can be used to interact with current relatives as well. Clearly, not only have modern technologies facilitated human interactions, but they also diversified his relationships.
On the debit side, excessive use of virtual connections might weaken the personal relationship with reality. While it seems that people are aware of each other’s statuses on a daily basis, even up-to-the-minute, they may overlook loved ones’ emotional states due to the negligence of their presence.
All in all, contemplating the pros and cons of these phenomena simultaneously, I should say it depends on the person who utilises these state-of-the-art technologies. If he applies them wisely, their pluses will definitely overshadow their pitfalls. After all, in my viewpoint, humankind can eventually address this issue in favour of his civilisation. Hence, I assume it as a mainly positive development in the long run.
Sample 18:
People used to communicate by meeting each other while it has nowadays totally changed since technological advancement. Some assert that utilising technology in daily communication brings more harm than good things. I personally agree with this view and this essay will look into the reason with some considerations.
The first effect of technology usage is that it reduces the sense of togetherness among people. Since they do interaction via telecommunication such as a mobile phone or the internet, it reduces the personal relationship. People cannot catch moments during interaction because they communicate in unreal situations. Take social media as an example, most teenagers talk to their friend via utilising Facebook, Viber, WhatsApp or others. They tend to interact with each other via sending messages thus they can feel the situation or even communication sense just by reading the messages. By contrast, direct communication tends to develop a sense of belonging among people. They will be more comfortable expressing their feelings thus it is easy to get along together.
In addition, it will deteriorate the human behaviour. By using electronic devices in the daily life of communication, it is hard for them to get involved in a social environment. It will decrease their self-confidence to speak in public because they usually interact through devices rather than through face-to-face communication. Moreover, utilising technology in interaction is not free thus you should they should prepare much budget just for communication.
It is true that technology usages enable people to keep in touch with people who live in different places. However, it is not capable of providing a sense of feeling as well as direct communication.
To sum up, by communicating directly, it will help people keep close to each other and able to talk towards them easily and expressively.
Sample 19:
The 21st century has been a game-changer in all aspects of human life. The same case is with relationships which have also taken on a new dimension with technological advancement. Nowadays, relationships are much more fragile, materialistic, mistrustful and doubtful as compared to previous times. I reckon that overall, this development has been quite negative which will be analysed in our paragraphs to follow.
To start with, nowadays technology has made relationships between humans quite suspicious. People are getting involved in relationships just on social networking websites without even knowing who is actually communicating with them. For instance, there have been many cases in which the person you are in contact with is actually fake and fraud. He is just playing and making a fool of you, and you believe that you are making a friend or falling in love with him. Consequently, when you know the truth, it is just like a bolt from the blue and your feeling is eradicated. This is evident from the argument above the reality that technological relationships can be quite painful sometimes.
Further, in the new era connections between people can be quite fragile and weak as compared to the strength of relationships before the advent of technology. People without practically meeting each other and actually knowing their strengths and weaknesses tend to trust each other too much and when they face the true facts the relationships are affected and, in some cases, broken down. For instance, a survey was conducted by Indian newspaper regarding the success of technology relationships and the result was reconciling with the point that relationships are very poor, and the failure rate was quite high.
To sum up, these technological relationships have altered the connectivity between two people. I firmly believe that drawbacks outweigh much more as compared to the fruits of these new relationships. However, it is recommended that people should be extremely careful and cautious in making any sought of relationships on social networking websites, chatting software etc.
Sample 20:
Technology has been affecting many aspects of human life including the way people interact with one another. Some believe that it has more benefits for people’s connection than drawbacks, while others contradict it. I personally argue with the former opinion, and through this essay, I am going to explain my reasons.
Initially, the first reason that I am going to elaborate is the way technology better enhances communication among people. A large number of communication gadgets has been invented in order to help communication between people, even for those who are separated by spacious distance, getting simpler and quicker. Thus, by giving an easier chance to be connected, this development has been encouraging society’s sense of togetherness. They do not have to visit their colleagues which are in different regions or cities to ask about their condition, for instance, because they could just pick up their phone and call their friends.
Subsequently, the variety of communication technology has been developed even further. The purpose is not only to make it easier but also to achieve a better quality of communication. We can mention video call, voice messenger and social media as the parts of it. The users are not limited by the elder method of phone call anymore. They can communicate more interactively by using video call. Therefore, they can communicate with others in the wider range of connection by using social media such as Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. This situation will globally lead people into a worldwide relationship.
On the other hand, there has been a developing trend that people are becoming more individualistic as the effect of technological development. The decreasing opportunity of direct interaction among them is accused as the root of this problem. However, it depends on us as the users to utilise technology wisely. If we can maintain a balance between communication technology and the conventional way of communication, the problem will certainly disappear.
Eventually, the advantages of using technology as part of our communication types outweigh the disadvantages, as long as we can manage it to be the helper, not the loser.
Sample 21:
It is true that some people have shifted their way to keep in touch with others due to the innovation of technology. The massive use of devices in communication, particularly phones and the internet, can be identified as the main difference compared to the past. People rely on those technologies to connect with families, friends and colleagues. Personally, I reckon that this trend may lead people to have a better relationship due to the effectiveness and low cost of communication.
To begin with, the interaction of individuals is presently not limited in one model. It means that people have many choices to stay connected with others than before. Technology offers some applications such as email, Facebook or Twitter. Those social media serve advantages to enhance and build a relationship with others. For example, in workplaces, employees do not have to meet in a certain place to discuss something. Rather they can use video conference to do a meeting. Therefore, various types of communication tools can help people to choose their preference and purpose in communication.
Furthermore, the usage of technology in communication leads to some positive things. It can be assumed that the easiness and effectiveness which are offered by these devices maximise the quality of people life in term of maintenance the relation of people. In addition, these communication tools allow people to spend less money and time. In other words, individuals do not have to visit someone when they want to talk or know friends’ news. Young people nowadays have friends from different countries and can have more friends. They can share their thoughts and updates instantly, which was quite impossible in the past. Some people might argue that people rely too much on technology and that’s they keep a less personal relationship with others. However, I disagree and want to say that technology has made it possible to connect with a dear one, make new friends and build up relationships in a more convenient way.
In conclusion, people always pick the best and most efficient way of communication, and the widespread use of the internet, mobile phone and other ways of communication have positively impacted our life and the way we make and keep our relationship.
Sample 22:
It is commonly noticed that people surrounding us stay connected with other people via social networking sites or other applications and technology have totally changed the way people used to communicate, make friends and keep their relationship. This paradigm shift happened basically because of the advances in technology and widespread use of such technological applications. Shall we welcome this shift or be wary about the changes? In this essay, I am going to discuss how technology has affected the types of relationships people make and whether it is considered as a positive or negative development.
First and foremost, I think that the development of technology has enhanced the relationships people make and maintain. For instance, when a student studies abroad and stays far away from his or her family and friends, social networking sites and other applications can help the student stay connected with his or her family and friends through Skype, for instance. In my opinion, in this case, this is a positive development to deal with homesickness or maintain our interactions with people we care about. Compared to the past decade, when technology was not so advanced, people had to depend on letters to communicate with each other and that was a time-consuming method, and it incurred higher cost. In contrast, in today’s world, people just have to be on laptops or smartphones and can have direct communication and interaction with family and friends. They can see each other contrary to the past method of interchanging written words. In this way, people can keep a close relationship with family and friends. We can now make friends beyond borders and that enhances our perspective about other nations and customs. Online groups, social platforms and social networking sites bring people together who have common interests and there are many events those people meet and plan for the betterment of society.
In fact, the implication of technology on people’s relationships is a controversial issue. On the one hand, it is a positive development for helping people stay connected with family and friends and making new friends. On the other hand, it can estrange the relationships people make. The argument that it has a negative influence on people’s relationships is based on the scenario that people will avoid face-to-face communication in the long run. Recent research indicates that virtual communication will weaken the communication skill of a person. I still remember a film that I watched had a scene that showed four friends having meals in a restaurant. When they sat together, they did not interact with each other face-to-face but through social applications by sending out the emotions in the social group to show their feelings. This example shows a worrying trend as people enjoy interacting virtually more than face to face due to their reliance on technology. It is important to create awareness to the public that actual communication is more important than virtual interaction to minimise its repercussion.
Overall, as far as I am concerned, the advancement of technology has both positive and negative effects on the kind of relationships people make. We have to be aware that actual interaction is more important to enhance a relationship. We shall connect with family and friends virtually only if we are apart from them.
Sample 23:
Face-to-face communication and enough time to get to know each other well are prerequisites for a real relationship. People all like to feel wanted, even if it’s a false sense, despite what other people may believe. The perception that one can be whoever one wants to be online has been shaped by the digital age. But I think that relationships people form virtually and the way people get to know each other online have changed, mostly negatively.
Most are becoming more inward-focused and have forgotten what it means to be a true friend to those around them, rather than being genuine friends. People are emotional creatures who occasionally feel sad and aren’t always happy, but the Internet only shares positive experiences, preventing people from knowing each other completely. Nowadays, people tend to form fast and transient friendships. In real life friendships, individuals support one another through each other’s highs and lows. This is not at all like friendship on social media. Because the Internet cannot take the place of in-person interactions and shared experiences, getting to know someone requires spending time together.
It is only fitting that life be experienced fully, forming bonds with the physical presence of others. Rather than truly being friends with those in their immediate vicinity, they are utilizing social media to establish connections. I consider this to be a drawback of the digital age.
In conclusion, the digital age may have brought about benefits like reaching out to old friends and forming new ones, but it has also had unfavorable effects on our moral, social, and personal lives due to our growing reliance on technology and the ways we pretend to keep up our online friendships.
Sample 24:
Since communication with others comprises a very essential aspect of our daily life, any alteration in the way we communicate with each other will have a profound effect on our social and professional life. This essay will first discuss how technology has influenced the way we relate with each other presently and will then address the question of whether this influence has been positive or negative.
There are several ways in which the new communication technology has influenced people’s way of interaction with each other. Firstly, social media applications have revolutionized the way we communicate. The reason why many people believe this is that nowadays, you can connect with your family and friends instantly through many social media applications such as the Facebook and twitter applications. It is also possible to say that people are now more encouraged to share their opinions openly via the Internet. One good illustration for this is the substantial number of friends that people who use social media applications have in their contact list.
However, the impact of social media in one’s social life may not always be positive. This is because people are now increasingly abandoning face to face interactions and prefer carrying out their communication behind closed doors. This is causing more people, especially youths, to lose out on many aspects of personal communication. A particularly good example here is a study conducted in the USA showing that more than 75% of high school students are spending more than 50% of their free time on the Internet.
To sum up, modern technological advances in communication have incredibly influenced the way people interact, and although there are many perks associated with the use of recent technology there are also drawbacks that people must take care of.
Sample 25:
In this contemporary era, the means of communication have updated dramatically with the evolution of cutting-edge technologies. In my perspective, I foster that it is a constructive movement, and this treatise will elucidate my stance in the forthcoming paragraphs with credible illustrations.
To start with, the recent improvements in various aspects of technology have revolutionized the entire world such that the public claim that it makes them establish their communication among their peers in a feasible manner. There are many applications which can be downloaded and installed on our electronic gadgets, such as Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, which enable people to exchange messages, photos and videos. The latest breakthrough, instant calling and face-time features for long periods of time with minimal charges incurred, have made humans have a face-to-face interaction virtually. Many organizations are working tirelessly to achieve these updates frequently and are intuitive. For instance, old people who reside in the suburbs are overwhelmed with amusement since they are frequently having a chat with their children who live either in metro cities or in foreign lands. Thus, it creates a remarkable bonding among families who are far away from one another in distant locations.
In a similar fashion, there are multiple websites on the internet which attract youngsters in modern society. They are fascinated by browsing these sites to find new individuals in nearby areas and are meeting up for casual dates to understand each other. Additionally, some are using these to search for pristine friends and are gradually chatting almost every day. This eventually encourages them to identify partners or peers who have similar interests. By sharing their emotions, they feel relaxed and rejuvenated rather than having trepidation or stress. Hence, it plays a significant role in commencing new bonds for the youth.
Taking everything into consideration, the latest innovations in technology have drastically impacted the entire human population to have noteworthy coordination with parents and grandparents and explore new friends. This essay has exposed a plethora of merits and the advantageous impact of technology on the public worldwide.
Sample 26:
In recent years, with the development of information technology and the evolution of the internet, people interact and communicate better and more effectively than in the past. With new technology, people interact via devices where the technology has been converged. Now it is possible to make calls, watch TV, play video games, listen to music and access internet with only one device. Many people believe that technology may improve the type of the relationships people make whereas others do feel that it has negative effects.
It is believed by some people that technology has a positive effect in the way people interact because it is more convenient on daily basis, and the use of new channels to communicate is often free. For example, if you are looking for a job. You do not have to go to the office nor pay stamps to send your CV. You can do this by email by simply clicking on the “submit” button. It is effective because it saves time, and it is simple to apply. Another significant example is the use of social media platforms. It enables people to share experiences and send information instantaneously which can be seen by everyone, so it improves the way people socialise. Moreover, new channels of communication can help maintain good relationships in business between jobseekers and employers as well as with family and friends on a daily basis.
It is argued by others that technology has a negative impact on the type of relationship people make because it can lead to a development of antisocial behaviours. For instance, teenagers who play video games can find themselves in total confusion between the real world and the virtual world. The law is different because in the real world people have to follow rules whereas in the virtual world there are no constraints. It influences the behaviour of people in a negative way. Moreover, it can create a certain form of addiction for some, leading them to become completely isolated and unaware of what is good and right. Also, the use of the internet can spread bad behaviours such as bullying or the promotion of negative images, comments which will have an impact in people’s lives. For example, on Facebook, several teenagers committed suicide after being bullied by their friends. So, the inappropriate use of technology can lead to healthy issues such as addiction or fatal death.
To sum up, the development of technology has changed the type of relationships people make in both a positive and negative fashion. People use new channels in their daily life because it is convenient as well as cheap. However, the use of the internet needs to be carefully monitored and used appropriately to prevent children and vulnerable people from developing addictions, which could lead to harmful or even fatal consequences.
Sample 27:
Today, more than ever, in regard to determining whether or not advances in technology influence the sorts of relationships people make, various views have been set forward. The expansion of modern means of communicating is the continuing debate that causes so much controversy. This matter is evidenced by some experts who believe that they pose a direct threat to social lives and might come at the expense of severe social isolation and a sedentary lifestyle. Others understand the significance of communication and adhere to the concept that these types of relationships are integral pieces of social communication. Consequently, they are regarded as rewarding. Nevertheless, the opinion set forth by the second category is more logical. In the following paragraphs, I will shed light on my attitudes on this matter.
To begin with, previously, communication among people looked bleak. People used to fulfill and make an appointment to observe each other, and according to the simple fact that communities had busy folks, and they seem doomed to possess far-reaching communication.
In the next place, modern means of communicating control people’s attention. They are the fastest and easiest way of togetherness. Individuals are at the mercy of the digital world to get in touch with others in the remotest part of the world, leading to saving their own time and hanging out every second. This issue questions the requirement to have face to face connections.
In this hectic way of life, the truth is that the responsibility of real-time discussions, visualization of each other, information exchange which enables a person to share a variety of information like activities, events, interests, thoughts fall upon these ways of communication. Thanks to tremendous advances in technology.
In summary, all in all, rather than devoting a fantastic deal of time and energy solely concerning face to face interaction, the trend today is toward utilizing modern means of communication to get in touch with other individuals. The pivotal role in these ways of communicating performed in interpersonal communication is hard to dismiss. However, many men and women do not appreciate it.
Sample 28:
In recent years, the innovation of techonology has led to various changes in the way people interact. As a result, this causes some specific effects on people’s relationships which are generally considered as beneficial impacts on the society.
Conspicuously, the improvement in techonological devices such as computers with internet connection and mobile phones affect people’s relations in different aspects. Firstly, it helps to diversify kinds of relationships instead of just several traditional ones in the past. Besides people’s interactions in real life, many connections are beign bult through a virtual life on the internet especially via facebook or online games. Secondly, the convenience of communicating between people is likely to make people’s relationships more sociable and hardly understandable. In fact, many friendships are not based on trust or sincerity but benefits which are generally hard to be perceived in a virtual life.
Although the development of technology somehow makes people’s relationships more complicated, I still believe that people are actually beneficial from this. Thanks to internet availability, gaps between people are shortened in magical ways. For example, no matter how far the distance between two people, they still can talk directly to each other provided with the internet access. What’s more, people have never been able to save as much time and communicating expenses as at the present. Instead of waiting for months to receive a response from a posted letter, it just takes some seconds for the letter to be delivered through email even to many partners at the same time.
In conclusion, taking advantage of technological development to facilitate interaction between people is beneficial not only for building a good relationship but also for doing business.
Sample 29:
Technology is expanding in every field, and connectivity will be no exception. Nonetheless, due to its other pitfalls that cause discussion on its positive and negative effects, this enormous shift in the ways of interaction cannot be regarded as fruitful straight away.
One of the essential advantages of focusing on in terms of positive development is that technology makes connectivity simpler and more convenient. Because of recent events such as Skype, video conferencing, Whatsapp, and social networking sites, such as Facebook, people are hardly a click away from the nears and dears. To a great extent, these advances have made us social. Second, there are enormous opportunities for letters and telephone calls to be sent and for requests to be made. Customers used to be on the S.T.D and I.S.D booth in long queues, but now mobile phones and sophisticated gizmos make it easier for everyone to communicate openly.
On the other hand, certain disadvantages cannot be overlooked as people of today not only spend a long time using computers but also do not want to meet their relatives and friends face-to-face, leading to a fading relationship. One of my school friends, for example, visited me personally on various occasions, such as at festivals and birthdays. Still, nowadays, she sends messages to welcome me and sends salutations to my post. Even most members of the family suffer from asphyxia, which is an unusual illness that flares. For imitating relationships, this is a troubling question.
To recap, despite numerous disadvantages, nobody can afford to tackle this ever-fast digital technology that has to make our lives easier.
Sample 30:
Technological advancements have revolutionized how millions of people interact with each other, and it has gone to a whole new level. With it, how we make relationships has also been affected. The essay will expound on how individuals can now build relationships across the world, and then opine that this is an incredibly positive development.
Unprecedented in human history, modern technology has made it extremely convenient for people to communicate and get in touch with family, relatives, friends or old classmates. Besides, people can communicate instantaneously with someone they have never been acquainted with before and in geography, they have never been to with the help of digital applications like WhatsApp or Viber. They can even find someone on a freelancing platform to have their job done. This is quite different from the conventional relationships we develop by meeting in person; it is, nevertheless, hard to downplay these relationships. Moreover, social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn, provide people with a platform that allows them to live chat and comment on someone else’s matter instantly. Strangely enough, some of them even find their dates online and make friends in a distant country without ever meeting them.
Overall, the phenomenon is a real boon to mankind. The revolution in communication that modern technology brings forth has eroded the traditional notions of national sovereignty. It has blurred the line between national and international boundaries and wielded enormous influence on the values of the national identity so as to transform global citizens; whose ideas, values, ethics, and orientations are no longer moulded by the local culture and environment. Rather global ideals and values are incessantly aired on the web and social media to make a better world. Most importantly, the communication revolution paved the way for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, towards which the globe is rapidly heading.
In conclusion, leading-edge technology has altered our mode of interaction forever, transcending national and cultural barriers so that individuals can frankly chat, talk and can readily keep in touch, and it is a windfall achievement that will transform a new world where things, like culture, sect, and so on, that split people will not exist.
Sample 31:
Technology has revolutionised the way people interact with each other in recent times. However, this has led to a decline in the quality of relationships people make. The impact of technology on relationships is a double-edged sword, and while some may argue that it has been a positive development, I believe that it has had negative effects.
One of the ways that technology has affected relationships is that people are becoming more isolated and less likely to engage in face-to-face interactions. The rise of social media platforms and instant messaging services have made it easier for people to communicate remotely, but it has also led to a decrease in the frequency and quality of in-person interactions. People are now more likely to spend their time on social media rather than meeting up with friends or family members. Moreover, technology has made it easier for people to be dishonest and insincere in their interactions. For instance, people can now hide behind the anonymity of the internet and present a false version of themselves. This has led to a decline in trust and authenticity in relationships.
Another way that technology has affected relationships is that people are now more reliant on their devices than on their relationships. People can now find entertainment and fulfil their social needs through technology, making it less necessary to build and maintain meaningful relationships.
In conclusion, while technology has undoubtedly had many positive effects on society, its impact on relationships has been mostly negative. It has led to a decrease in in-person interactions, a decline in genuineness and trust, and an increased reliance on devices over relationships. It is crucial that people recognize these negative effects and take steps to mitigate them by prioritising in-person interactions and being more sincere and honest in their relationships.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In different parts of the world, traditional foods are becoming less common due to the increasing popularity of international fast food. While some people believe that fast food is a good option, I think that consuming traditional foods is much more beneficial. This essay will demonstrate the author’s point of view.
On the one hand, there are compelling reasons why many people are in favor of fast food. Firstly, it is convenient and time-saving. Instead of having to prepare a meal for hours, people can easily grab a bite at any fast-food restaurant, which is ubiquitous in many megacities. This type of food is also suitable for those with fast-paced lifestyles. In addition, fast food is famous for its delicious taste. This can explain the successful franchises of various fast-food chains all over the world such as McDonald’s, KFC, and so on.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that eating traditional food is more advantageous. One of the most substantial benefits of traditional meals is the nutritional value that they contain. A homemade meal can provide a sufficient amount of protein, fiber, and many other nutrients, which has proved to be effective in maintaining good health. This is because traditional food is usually made from fresh ingredients and without any preservatives. More importantly, I would argue that consuming traditional food rather than fast food is a good way to preserve culture as each flavor has its own uniqueness and is a representation of the national cuisine. By making and eating traditional food, people are contributing to cultural preservation, and thus passing it down to the next generation.
In conclusion, even though fast-food consumption has been an accelerating trend in recent years due to its conveniences, I sincerely believe that the benefits of eating traditional food are more significant.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng ký để học cùng Vietjack. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Bằng việc đăng ký, bạn đồng ý với Điều khoản sử dụng và Chính sách bảo mật của Vietjack.