Câu hỏi:
07/01/2025 7Everyone should stay at school until 18. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sách mới 2k7: Bộ 20 đề minh họa Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa…. form chuẩn 2025 của Bộ giáo dục (chỉ từ 110k).
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
In most of the countries, it is mandatory to complete secondary education for employment. While some people are critical of this mandate, I absolutely believe that compulsory education is a deeply rooted process which makes an adult out of an adolescent.
Education teaches us the necessary social, cognitive and emotional skills which have become a prerequisite to success in today’s world. Subsequently, as high school education becomes better, the graduates have a better chance at landing good opportunities, both in terms of growth and employment. For example, the subjects taught in school, like English, Science, Mathematics and so on, help a child create a sound base, which will help him in the future, should he choose to explore the said fields as viable career options.
Continuing on the same note, a classroom setting doesn’t just nourish theoretical and practical knowledge of a child, but also his social skills, as a classroom is a place where children interact, often solving problems together. For example, group assignments, often found in educational settings, instil the important skill of teamwork. Hence, education should be mandatory for everyone.
To conclude, knowledge gained from books, teachers and interactions is impressive. Therefore, the authorities should make sure that people at least complete their secondary education, which is, they study till 18 years of age.
Sample 2:
Education plays a crucial role in shaping an individual's future, and there is a growing consensus that staying in school until the age of 18 is essential. I completely agree with this viewpoint because it ensures a solid educational foundation and equips young people with critical skills needed for modern society.
Firstly, remaining in school until 18 provides individuals with a robust educational foundation, leading to better job prospects, higher incomes, and overall socioeconomic advancement. Generally, individuals with higher levels of education have greater access to a wider range of job opportunities. Completing high school equips students with essential skills and knowledge that are prerequisites for entry-level positions in many industries. For instance, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) reports a strong correlation between educational attainment and employment opportunities. Individuals with higher levels of education tend to have lower unemployment rates and access to a wider range of job options. This demonstrates that a solid educational background can significantly enhance an individual's career prospects and economic stability.
Secondly, staying in school until 18 allows young people to develop critical thinking, problem-solving, and technical skills necessary to thrive in an increasingly complex world. The skills and knowledge required to navigate society, and the workforce are constantly evolving, driven by rapid technological advancements. Remaining in school until 18 enables students to acquire and refine these skills through comprehensive coursework and hands-on experiences. For example, modern education systems incorporate technology and critical thinking exercises into their curricula, preparing students to effectively utilize and adapt to new technologies. This continuous learning process is crucial for young people to remain competitive and adaptable in a fast-changing job market.
In conclusion, staying in school until 18 is essential for ensuring that individuals have a solid educational foundation and the critical skills needed for success in today's complex world.
Sample 3:
There is a disagreement regarding the issue of whether or not people should go to school until they are 18 years old. Some people believe that we have to stay in school before becoming an adult while others insist that it is not necessary to take lessons in school until the age of eighteen. In my opinion, I personally agree with the former because it is beneficial for people to go to school. I think studying in school provides us with opportunities related to jobs and relationships.
Firstly, I think that people ought to study in school until they become an adult since it offers students a chance to get their job. It is well known that most companies hire employees who at least graduated from high school these days. Corporations want to employ laborers who studied basic knowledge in school because working in a company requires skills to handle various tasks such as writing, communication, and calculation. These are fundamental abilities that can be learned only from school. Therefore, it is important for people to stay in school since they are able to obtain essential knowledge for holding jobs.
Furthermore, I believe that going to school plays a vital role in forming social networks. It is obvious that relationships are crucial for people to survive, so a famous philosopher said that human beings are social animals. Schools give us an opportunity to make numerous friendships that can help people communicate and cooperate with others. Although one person may have brilliant talents to achieve difficult things, it is impossible to solve every matter by oneself without anyone’s helps in daily life. Thus, people should stay in school to build a variety of relationships that have positive effects on their lives.
In conclusion, I agree that it is mandatory for people to go to school until 18 years old because it provides us with two advantages. First of all, schools offer people a chance to apply for companies, also it helps students make friends that can affect positively in their lives.
Sample 4:
In many countries, school attendance is mandatory for all children up to a specific age. In India this is 14 years of age. In the UK and many other countries, it is 16, although the UK government now has plans to raise the school leaving age to 18. I agree that children should be in school till the age of 18. In the following paragraphs, I intend to put forth my arguments to support my views.
The most important reason for raising the school leaving age to 18 is that the age of 14-18 is the most impressionable age of a child’s life. During this period of adolescence, the children undergo physical and hormonal changes because of which they are under a lot of pressure. Therefore, lengthening compulsory schooling helps protect childhood. While at school students will be protected from some of the pressures in life. They have the rest of their adulthood to work, make budgets balance and make choices. Providing them with space to grow for as long as possible can make them better prepared for adult life.
Secondly, more education provides the opportunity to acquire more skills and therefore more options. It has been shown many times that those with more education find it easier to find work and that they are more likely to find that work satisfying. What is more, raising the school-leaving age is a crucial investment in society’s future. Doing so increases the economic potential of the future workforce, and so will bring increased tax revenues in the long term.
However, the opponents claim that extending the period of compulsory education requires a huge investment in teachers, books and new school buildings which would be very expensive. They also say that many families need their children to make an economic contribution to the family income and working early can help these families to survive. Finally, just being in school does not guarantee that a student is learning. Unwilling students become disruptive and damage the education of others in their class.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, as every garden has weeds, similarly compulsory schooling also has some drawbacks. However, these drawbacks are nothing as compared to the vast benefits this approach would bring and the cost needed to implement would be negligible if compared to the huge economic potential of the future workforce. Therefore, I believe that everyone should stay in school until the age of eighteen.
Sample 5:
Education is essential to be able to live meaningfully. That is a general notion. A person who is in school till eighteen would have finished his basic education. It should be compulsory for all youngsters as it is beneficial for them; however, if there is an interest in non-academic education such as in sports or fine arts, that should be encouraged. Staying in school till eighteen does not necessarily mean they will be successful in their lives. In many countries, it is the norm that young people go to school till eighteen, and dropouts would have problems finding a career. In ancient cultures like in India, getting educated did not always mean attending school; it meant learning essential skills for life and then choosing to specialize in any field.
While most students who study until eighteen are more or less sure of a fair chance at beginning their career, the dropouts would often find it difficult. Getting a school certificate can mean the difference between a manual hard-working type of life or an easier, more comfortable life. In developing countries, it is necessary that all children and young people stay in school till they finish basic school education and being ready for university. It can change a country’s fortune. In the case of the Philippines and India, there is a direct benefit of mass education; it lifts the population out of poverty. Not staying in school till eighteen or completing high school could mean disaster for any country. It is clear that to be educated is the most desirable easy path to a fairly comfortable beginning.
On the other hand, it is worth noticing that many successful entrepreneurs are school dropouts, and they employ thousands of school graduates. That is the irony; some of the biggest corporations in the world were started by so-called less educated folk.
To conclude, one must follow one heart when it comes to the direction of their lives, and that includes education; if the choice is to be the proverbial sheep, then staying in school till eighteen is a must but not a guarantee of success.
Sample 6:
It is considered by some people that everyone should go to school until they are 18 years old. I completely agree with this opinion as I think that studying at school is valuable.
To begin with, staying in school until reaching the age of 18 may be unnecessary. First of all, if students who are younger than 18 years old decide their future job and are ready to work, it is reasonable to start pursuing what they want. Wasting several years on studying what they do not want in high school can be extremely inefficient for this point of view. Secondly, education is not confined to schools. People may learn not only in school but also at home or through other means, such as online courses, libraries, museums, and community centers.
Nevertheless, students have to stay in school until they are 18 years old. First and foremost, schools provide a variety of educational opportunities and activities that may not be available at home. Even if they know what they want and what they plan to do for their future careers at an earlier age, they still need time to explore and experience other aspects of life in a school environment, where they can interact with peers and teachers. In addition, ensuring that public education keeps students in school until they are 18 will reduce the risk of them falling into educational gaps. Everyone needs to acquire sufficient knowledge to live independently and succeed in life.
In conclusion, it is both effective and efficient for children to study in educational institutions until they are 18 years old. Therefore, it is crucial for students to stay in school until they reach 18 to fully benefit from these opportunities and to build a strong foundation for their future.
Sample 7:
I firmly believe that extending compulsory education to the age of 18 would be highly beneficial for individuals and society as a whole. While some argue that this would stifle individual aspirations, I believe that the advantages of a more comprehensive and robust education outweigh any potential drawbacks.
Firstly, staying in school until 18 would allow young people to gain a deeper understanding of various academic disciplines, fostering intellectual curiosity and critical thinking skills. A more extended period of formal education would enable students to explore their interests and talents more thoroughly, equipping them with the knowledge and skills necessary to thrive in today’s complex and ever-evolving world. Furthermore, it would provide them with a strong foundation for further education or vocational training, opening up a wider range of career paths and opportunities.
Moreover, staying in school until 18 could provide valuable social and emotional benefits. It would foster a sense of community and belonging, allowing young people to develop strong social bonds and learn how to navigate interpersonal relationships effectively. It could also provide a structured environment for young people to develop essential life skills, such as time management, problem-solving, and decision-making. This could help them become more responsible, independent, and adaptable individuals, contributing positively to society.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that extending compulsory education to the age of 18 would be a valuable investment in the future of individuals and society. While some may argue that this could stifle individual aspirations, the benefits of a more comprehensive and robust education, including enhanced intellectual development, social and emotional growth, and increased career opportunities, outweigh any potential drawbacks. By equipping young people with the knowledge, skills, and resilience they need to succeed in a complex and rapidly changing world, we can create a more informed, adaptable, and engaged citizenry.
Sample 8:
It is often said that if one wants to succeed in life, that person needs a proper education. While there may be arguments for making school compulsory until the age of 18, I disagree that this should apply to everyone.
Perhaps the strongest reason for not leaving school early is that it prepares you for your working career. If students leave school early with only a basic education, they are unlikely to be able to find any skilled work. Indeed, the education people receive between the ages of 16 and 18 is crucial for anyone who does not want a lifetime of unskilled work in a factory.
Another compelling reason for remaining in school until 18 is that school provides moral and social education. This is particularly important for those between 16 and 18 who have many temptations and benefit from the organised framework that school provides. Young people who stay in school until the age of 18 tend to be more responsible and help build a stronger society.
There are, however, equally strong arguments against making school compulsory until the age of 18. One such argument is that not everyone is academic and that some people benefit more from vocational training. For instance, someone who wants to become a car mechanic may find better training and more satisfaction in an apprentice scheme. Another related argument is that, in today’s world, young people are maturing ever more quickly and are able to make their own life decisions by the age of 16.
In a word, I believe that all individuals should be encouraged to stay in school until 18 both for social and career reasons. However, it would be a mistake to make this compulsory, bearing in mind the fact that different people have different needs and abilities as well as the possibilities of other forms of vocational training.
Sample 9:
Some people think that all children should stay at school until the age of eighteen. Although staying at school until adulthood can produce a number of benefits, I personally disagree with this idea for a number of reasons, which will be outlined in this essay.
On the one hand, the idea that children should continue to study at school until the age of eighteen does have a number of benefits. Firstly, most young people under the age of eighteen have very little real-world experience and have very little idea of what career they will pursue, and therefore staying at school until the age of eighteen will allow them further opportunity to develop their education and time to decide upon a suitable career path. Furthermore, forcing children to stay at school until the age of eighteen will create a more educated future generation of people which may help to reduce some social and unemployment problems.
On the other hand, there are also a number of drawbacks that this idea may bring with it. For instance, many children these days do not fit-in with the current education system and forcing them to participate in school can cause many problems. For example, these kinds of students are usually very disruptive in a classroom, and this affects other students who are trying to learn. In addition to this, many children choose to follow careers that do not require them to continue studying in school past the age of sixteen. For example, for those who wish to pursue a career that requires more practical based learning, such as a qualified builder, electrician or machinery operator, it is quite unnecessary to remain at school until the age of eighteen.
In conclusion, although there would be a number of positive effects from children remaining at school until a later age, I personally feel that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits mentioned above.
Sample 10:
In contemporary society, the proposition that adolescents ought to remain in formal education until the age of 18 has sparked a vibrant debate. This discourse examines the balance between extending educational opportunities and recognizing diverse pathways to adulthood.
Advocates for mandatory education until 18 argue that it equips young individuals with essential knowledge and skills, fostering a well-informed and competent future workforce. Within the Vietnamese context, this approach could significantly contribute to elevating the overall educational standard, aligning with the nation's aspirations towards becoming a knowledge-based economy. For instance, if young people were required to pursue their studies until this age, Vietnam might witness an increase in skilled professionals across various sectors, from technology to healthcare, bolstering economic resilience and innovation. Yet, this perspective might not fully account for the nuanced needs of all students, particularly those whose strengths lie outside the academic realm or who are eager to enter vocational training or entrepreneurship early.
However, I believe that while education is fundamentally important, a blanket mandate for full-time education until 18 may not serve every individual's best interests. The diversity of talents and career aspirations among young people necessitates a more flexible approach to education. For example, in Vietnam, many successful entrepreneurs and artisans began their careers without completing traditional full-time education until 18, instead opting for specialized training or starting their enterprises at a younger age. This pathway should be recognized as equally valid, provided that young individuals are making informed decisions about their futures.
In conclusion, while advocating for extended education until 18 is well-intentioned, aiming to prepare young people for the complexities of the modern world, it is crucial to acknowledge and support alternative educational and vocational pathways. A more inclusive approach, accommodating the varied talents and aspirations of the youth, would arguably contribute more effectively to both individual fulfillment and societal progress.
Sample 11:
Whether every student should stay at school or not is a debatable topic. Some people argue that students should be allowed to leave school before completing their secondary education so that they can pursue their own interests. However, some people disagree with this fact. I agree that it is very important to complete education before adulthood. Education is a very integral part of one’s career. It should be completed before plunging into the professional world. Education can enrich students with the knowledge and skills that are required to survive in today's world. It is very important for everyone to learn the basics of human life and morals which can be attained through education. Youth is considered to be the developmental unit of every country. They should be provided with adequate knowledge and opportunities. Their knowledge plays an important role in the development of a country.
It is proven that students who have completed their higher education get better job opportunities than those who do not complete their education. For example, it is very important to learn a worldwide foreign language like English. It will help them to communicate and work with people around the world. Learning a global language helps to get jobs abroad and in other countries. This can be learned if the students complete their education in school properly.
Life on the school campus is very important. People need to socialize, and they learn this at school. Socializing helps a child to mature and learn a variety of skills. Students are able to spend time with their peers and teachers. This helps them to be familiar with communal life and also prepares them for their workplace interaction. Students gain a huge amount of knowledge from their classrooms, textbooks, teachers, and school environment. Not only book knowledge but also real-life knowledge is gained. These play a vital role in framing the students' future and also preparing them for their future prospects.
Hence, it is very important for a child to complete their education. I believe that higher secondary education exists for a reason and that cannot be broken. The authorities should also take part in this by stopping students from leaving school before they complete their school education. parents should be encouraged to keep their children at school until they are prepared.
Sample 12:
It is essential to be regular in school until the student attains 18. I am for this view. Every student must go to school until he is 18. Here are some positive and negative impacts of not attending school.
Schooling provides huge opportunities to acquire skills, knowledge, and moral values. Which are essential in future life. School life also provides the students an opportunity to mingle with other students, which makes them learn how to socialize with others. They get to know many moral values like how to behave in a public place, how to interact with each other, etc. All this learning will help them in their professional life in the future and will widen their job opportunities. Educating all the children will also reduce illegal activities and child employment. For example, if all the children in a village complete their schooling. Instead of helping their family in the field of farming. Then they will acquire the basic skills and knowledge that are essential to get a better-paid job than farming. Then their family can also get relieved from poverty.
On the other hand, if they do not have proper schooling, or drop out of school early, then they can get engaged in criminal activities. As they get enough spare time, and do not get proper guidance or cannot build the basic intelligence to decide. Whether it is good or bad for themselves, they fall into the wrong pockets. They will become lazy, and as it is well-known, a lazy mind is a devil’s paradise. They will lose their capability to work hard and will get engaged in criminal activities. For example, one of my distant relatives in my village did not send their son to school as they had some family issues. Therefore, their son used to ramble about here and there without any planning and did not have any moral, social, or cultural values. Thus, slowly he started losing his capability to work, and ability to make wise decisions. Eventually, he joined a racket.
Thus, these two instances highlight both the positive and negative impacts of completing schooling until the age of 18. Therefore, it is important for everyone to stay in school until they reach 18.
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Câu 1:
Câu 2:
Câu 3:
Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences, so this kind of information should be restricted in the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Câu 4:
The natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problems does it cause? How can we solve these problems?
Câu 5:
Câu 6:
Câu 7:
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
500 bài Đọc hiểu ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 21)
Topic 1: Family life
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Đề kiểm tra cuối kì I Tiếng Anh 12 (Mới nhất) - Đề 11
Topic 31: Global warming (Phần 2)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
Đề thi cuối học kỳ 1 Tiếng Anh 12 Global Success có đáp án (Đề 1)
về câu hỏi!