2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án (Phần 11)

Sample 1:

People have mixed arguments on whether advertising encourages consumers to buy in quantity rather than promoting quality. People are of the opinion that advertising is just a way to entice more customers to buy their products without a clear idea about its quality. I somehow confer with this statement. Companies spend millions of dollars on ads to boost their sales without giving customers a clear picture about the quality of the product. People buy these products solely because of the advertisements and sometimes later regret the purchase. Companies entice customers by offering discounts, cashbacks, even vouchers for their next purchase. As a result, people buy such products in bulk. It thereby helps companies to make a sale and boost their number. I have come across several advertisements that captivate the reader’s attention by printing 80% or 90% discounts in large fonts. These are ways to captivate the reader's attention and force them to make a sale. For example, when we go out to buy clothes, instead of buying a single piece of clothing that is highly priced. We are often attracted to stores that have a sale sign hung at their door. Seeing the low prices we impulsively buy several pieces of clothing, without checking their quality. The same goes while buying any product that is marked a price lower than the MRP. It only adds to the company's profit but is a major setback for the consumers. Scratch cards, vouchers, cashbacks are another advertising scams. Offering a 10-15 percent discount on buying products that are above 1 or 2k, forces customers to buy these products. The discount offered is almost negligible if customers are forced to purchase products above a certain cost. Even though advertisements make us aware of the different products available in the market. It is also sometimes techniques used by companies to lure in the customers. Moreover, I believe customers must not impulsively make a purchase solely based on advertisement. There is some critiquing required in such cases from the customer's end as well.

Sample 2:

TV, radio or even roadside hoardings we see advertisements all around us. Advertisements are a great way to sell a product and boost the number of sales. Even social media nowadays is used as a platform for advertising. Companies believe that advertising is a powerful medium to entice their customers, make a sale, however neglecting the feedback of the customers. I do not believe that every company is just trying to make a sale and boost their numbers. There are some out there that are promoting quality as well. Purchasing items on big e-commerce platforms like Myntra, Flipkart, Amazon, is a complete waste of time.

In a year they hold several discount offers which is only to entice customers to buy stock that they are unable to sell. Selling the old stock usually has defective products, at least 60 percent of the time the products are defective. By the time we initiate a return, the item is already out of stock. Companies use several tactics to attract customers. Gaudy colors, captions, videos or even hiring celebrities to promote the sale season are all a part of their advertising technique. What we do not understand is that they are solely trying to make a sale and not promoting the quality of the products. Make-up companies leave no stone unturned to sell their products. Fairness creams almost never work. The color of a person is hereditary and has to do with the melanin production. Women are still lured into buying them due to the misleading advertisements. Women buy such products in bulk believing that would bring significant changes in their skin. However, fairness creams, sunscreen lotion with 50 plus SPF are all a scam; they never work 100 percent. Advertisements are a means of making people aware of the different products out there so that they can choose accordingly. I believe it is also the customer’s responsibility to first analyze and read other people’ s reviews before purchasing any product that too in bulk. Customers shouldn’t be tempted by the catchy advertisement, instead focus on the quality of the product so that their money is not wasted.

Sample 3:

In our day-to-day life we are encircled by advertisements. Ads make us aware of the different range of products available in the market but are also sometimes misleading. It is an unfair notion of companies to make their ads as attractive as possible to tempt customers to buy more products and boost their sales numbers. We are surrounded by ads. Social media, televisions, radio, newspapers, websites, all are clustered with ads. Some have discounted offers, cash backs, scratch cards, thereby forcing customers to click on the particular link and make a purchase. People are also now using apps like youtube to lure in the customers to buy their products. Google has such algorithms that clicking on ads links can also help companies earn money. Anyway, as advertisements have become a trend company are also spending more money on making their ads as appealing as possible. I believe these advertising tactics somewhat get to people and they make an impulsive purchase. Youngsters are the easy target for these companies. They are easily lured into making a purchase. Children are attracted by the toys that they see in advertisements and thereby force their parents to buy the product. Of course, children do not understand the concept of quality and it is hard for parents to refuse their request. I believe customers need to be more vigilant while buying products. They should watch out for the reviews posted by other customers, if they are buying a product in bulk. In the case of an offline purchase companies should also have a return policy of a week, so that disappointed customers can return back the products. The products must also be under warranty so that any defects or faults can be rectified, and customers are satisfied with the product.

Sample 4:

Advertisements play an important role in informing individuals about the availability of products. Thus, they are the primary source of information and motivating people for shopping. However, I believe that adverts encourage individuals to purchase items in bulk. In this essay, we will analyse how adverts make use of offers to persuade people to buy products wholesale.

To begin with, most of the companies provide some deals on buying a greater number of objects. A good illustration for this is the lux company which agrees to give soap free on purchase of two soaps. By advertising such proposals, people are induced to buy extra soaps than actually required. Thus, it is apparent that the aim of such a proposition is to invoke people for acquiring objects in large number rather than quality products.

In addition, some companies provide some prizes on buying their product. For instance, they announce a free abroad trip for those who are able to find a hidden code on the cover of the item. With the hope of getting an opportunity to travel abroad, individuals keep on buying the product either until the offer expires or until they win a trip. Therefore, the theory of adverts focusing on selling products in large numbers is difficult to debunk.

After analysing the purpose of adverts, it is obvious that by offering gifts they provoke society by buying excess things rather than quality. As it is seen that people prefer shopping for those goods which provide some gifts rather than goods of good quality. It is hoped that the government will enforce some regulations on the adverts for the product for declaring unnecessary gifts. 

Sample 5:

Today, many people are becoming convinced that advertising is more concerned with encouraging bulk purchases than with encouraging the production of quality goods through competition.

Advertising can be viewed from two standpoints. One is that it is primarily concerned with getting people to purchase items that they would not otherwise buy. The other is that it continues to inform consumers, thereby promoting competition between producers and service providers. I believe that the truth lies somewhere between the two.

Many kinds of advertising nowadays clearly encourage large purchases, in particular through offering consumers such deals as “two for the price of one”, offering large containers at a lower cost, or through offering substantial discounts for purchasing several of the same products at once. Such items could include everyday household goods, washing powder for example, or items that are regularly consumed more than one at a time, such as cans of drinks. In fact, many enterprises successfully specialize in supplying goods in bulk to consumers. The idea is that people will consume more quickly if they have many of the items at home rather than having to go out and buy the items individually every time they need them. 

On the other hand, some products are naturally not available for bulk purchase. This is especially true of items that are particularly expensive or items that a person is unlikely to change for new ones in a relatively period of time, for example cars and houses. 

Advertisements for such products are more likely to stress the quality of the product than its price, since most people will not simply go for the cheapest one, but for one that meets their expectations in other ways.

To conclude, I believe that advertisers should take the market for their products into consideration when advertising and decide accordingly whether they wish to focus on selling in bulk or on competing on the basis of the quality of their products.

Sample 6:

Whether it is on TV, radio or hoardings at the side of the road, advertisements have become part of our lives. Advertising is a powerful and persuasive medium. I agree with the former half of the given statement that adverts encourage people to buy in quantity. However, I disagree that adverts do not promote quality. I shall put forth my arguments to support my views in the following paragraphs.

On the one hand, advertisements make us pile up things in the home which we may never ever use. For example, we get lured by the one-on-one scheme that companies promote just to sell their old stock in bulk. For example, recently, I bought three pairs of jeans of Levis brand because there was a two-on-one offer. What I did not realise then was that the designs were outdated and defective. Now those jeans are just occupying space in my almirah.

Because of advertisements, sometimes we buy what tempts us without the insight of what we need actually. Impressive images, videos, or captions are bound to leave an imprint on us. For example, the media is flooded with advertisements for beauty products, and they all claim to make you fair in a few days. Women, and these days, even men are crazy about these things and buy these things even without consulting their dermatologist.

On the other hand, advertisements are very crucial given the fast pace of life today. The advertisements open our eyes to all the latest facilities and trends and with that give us the chance and opportunity of choosing from the wide range of products available for we have little time to make discoveries about what is required. Advertising links producers and consumers by providing relevant information on the latest products and services. Thanks to advertising, we know that there are so many nice things available. Moreover, an overwhelming majority of consumers are sensible enough to consider their options before they decide on a particular item.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that adverts promote quantity, but they tell us about quality too. The onus lies in us to look into our real needs and not be swayed by adverts.

Sample 1:

The purpose of advertising is to tell the consumer about any new product or service or any new promotion on the existing product and service. We need it so we can make good decisions when we go shopping. Advertising tells us when new and improved products become available and lets us know which ones have the best price.

Through advertisements, we learn about new products. For example, many grocery stores now sell prepackaged lunches. These are very convenient for busy parents. They can give these lunches to their children to take to school. Busy parents don’t have time to look at every item on the store shelf, so without advertisements, they might not know about such a convenient new product.

Even products we are familiar with may be improved, and advertising lets us know about this. Most people use cell phones, but new types of cell phone service become available all the time. There are different plans that give you more hours to talk on the phone, you can send text messages and photos, and next week probably some even newer type of service will be available. By watching advertisements on TV, it is easy to find out about new improvements to all kinds of products.

Advertisements keep us informed about prices. Prices change all the time, but everyone can look at the ads in the newspaper and see what the latest prices are. Advertisements also inform us about sales. In fact, some people buy the newspaper only in order to check the prices and plan their weekly shopping.

Advertisements improve our lives by keeping us informed about the latest products developments and the best prices. Advertisements serve a useful purpose.

Sample 2:

I think that everyone can divide all advertising products and services into useless ones and useful ones. It is like looking through an information desk when you pay attention to those messages that interest you. Take me for example.

I do not like jewellery. It does not mean I do not have it at all, I have a couple of inexpensive rings as gifts from my parents. I just think people pay too much attention to this stuff. I believe it is the result of mass advertising. Every day when I am watching TV, listening to the radio or reading the paper I notice many ads about getting an expensive ring, chain, necklace or earrings. From my point of view, these kinds of advertising contaminate people's minds. In this case, you are encouraged to buy things you do not really need. They make you believe you need such products in order to succeed or be happy.

From the other side, I think that advertisements of the new detergents with up-to-date formulas to help you maintain your cloth in perfect conditions, the new cars with some extra futures that make your travelling more comfortable and sports goods that make your life healthier may help you to improve your life.

Recently my husband and I saw an ad on the Internet about a very interesting and inexpensive vacation to Japan for a week. Is not it awesome? We like travelling. So now we are planning to find out more about it and, maybe, make reservations. I believe that, without advertisements, we would be unaware of plenty of opportunities that may make our life happier, easier and less stressful.

My point is that every person has his own scale of values. So if he is vegetarian he will consider an ad about meat products useless for him.

Sample 3:

In a literal sense, sdvertising is an art of showcasing a product to its future consumers. When a company or a person advertises a product, he is conveying how the product would benefit the consumer with its unique and best features. Since the inception of consumer markets merchants have been using sdvertising and marketing to sell their product and increase their reach to maximum consumers. I am in absolute discord with the statement that advertising insists on people buying things they do not need. In my view, advertising is a key tool in the market mechanism and can benefit customers and ultimately merchants in several ways like spreading awareness, increasing competition, discourage monopoly and help the overall economy.

Advertising has helped and is continuing to help spread the right information and makes a consumer cognizant of what is available in the market. It helps drive the competition upwards, benefiting the end customer by getting varied options to choose. For example, when 'Colgate' came in the market as the first toothpaste, consumers did not have any other option other than 'Colgate' until other companies like 'Close-up' started advertising their product. This resulted in a boost in the competition which ultimately slashed the prices of the product. Thus, advertising plays a very important role in engaging the end customer such that the buyer gets the best worth of what he is spending. While a consumer is the end target and beneficiary of any product produced by a merchant, a consumer is also the best judge of the decisions he takes in terms of what he wants to buy. In my opinion, it is inappropriate to blame the advertising for an increased consumer spending. To curb the unnecessary spending both people and government have to work collectively. People need to be wary of their spending and pay heed to their finances by managing them smartly. A government can play its part in authorising and monitoring the right contents to be published to the public. Hence, right and smart advertising can help a nation and its population in great ways by exploiting the benefits of advertising.

To draw the conclusion, barring a few disadvantages advertising can be used as a tool to enhance the growth of an economy by increasing the spending, bringing the right products to the consumer, boosting the competition. Even the government can use smart adverts to make people aware of managing their finances and increase financial literacy. All in all, I would recommend healthier advertising to benefit the consumer, merchant and ultimately the world economy.

Sample 4:

I agree with the viewpoint that “advertising anchorages us to buy things that we really do not need.” Another word for advertisement is ‘a tool of marketing strategy’. To introduce their product or services or to promote their product or services, this advertisement will be highly useful.

If we have never seen an advertisement of a product and first time see that product in the market, we never want to buy. That is, we do not like to just try. If we have already seen that product in the advertisement, we may want to buy it and see how it works. That is by seeing an advertisement over and over again, we indirectly become familiar with that product before we buy and use it. To make us familiar with the products, the product owners make sure we watch their advertisements again and again.    

In the advertisement, they show only the advantages of the product. That is an advantage for the marketers, but a disadvantage for the customers. While the marketing people encourage us to buy the things, we need to identify its disadvantages only after experiencing the product or services.  

Some products are really essential for our life while some are not at all essential. Sometimes we purchase products that are optional for us. We may experience a new detergent powder since it was telecasted several times.  This is the insisting part of advertisements on customers’ mind.

Each customer is different. All are not the same. The same product will not convince all the public. Some products target children, kinder joy, chocolates, toys, cartoon products and etc. Even though parents know that a product is not good for their children, they are insisted on buying the product by the children. Children get attracted to a product after they see the advertisement on television. Finally, I would conclude that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need.               

Sample 5:

Promotion of new products is appealing to customers. People watch them in electronic media and in newspapers and feel that it will be useful for their needs. On the other hand, we often waste our money and time after observing the fascinating advertisement. In my opinion, it is useful for market trends. The advertisement has multidimensional impacts on economics and society, its benefits outweigh disadvantages.

Most people do not like monotonous life. They keep on changing their surroundings and personality. The requirements of humans change with their ages. The advertisement is the method to introduce new products to people. Every person is busy in his day-to-day routine, and they do not have enough time to wander in shops and malls. Moreover, through different media, one can see his favourite models in a good mood for describing the advantages of products.

Few media heads do not keep an eye over the validity of the information given in the description of promotion. Young people like their heroes like mentors and follow their footprints. In third world countries, health hazard products like cigarette are being advertised. As a result, man will buy the things which he does not need currently. These new purchases will be made at the cost of many other useful objects which he may be requiring actually.

In conclusion, advertisements are very useful for boosting the economy and it helps people to seek accurate products. A government should maintain the standard of promoting the products and injurious things must be banned in the media.

Sample 6:

Many people believe that advertisement entices people to purchase unnecessary products, while others feel that it provides consumers with information about commodities that improve their lifestyles. This essay will discuss both perspectives and a reasonable opinion will be offered at the end of the discussion.

Some argue that advertisement helps people to improve their lifestyle. This is because, through the medium of the adverts, consumers get useful information regarding new products. A good example here is the new Tesla Pi phone ad campaign, which provides information that Tesla uses solar panels for harvesting energy from the sun. The users can charge their phones without connecting to a socket. People, thus, are able to surf the internet, play games or stream movies without the fear of the battery running out quickly and they can learn all these from the adverts. Despite this, I would argue that advertising encourages us to buy things we do not need.

On the other hand, others say that commercials provoke people to buy unnecessary commodities since they trigger emotional needs. Put simply, marketers put stress on emotional needs to satisfy their customers. Shampoo, for example, cleans hair. An advertiser, at a basic level, might try to convey the message of why their shampoo cleans one’s hair better than other brands. However, it is now well-established that shampoo cleans hair, so marketers do not need to convey the message. What they do instead is try to place emphasis on an emotional connection and say, for instance, that shampoo coupled with conditioner cleans someone’s hair and makes him or her handsome and glamorous. This is because emotional advantage often means more than rational advantage. Therefore, feeling glamorous and empowered is perhaps more important than just having clean hair, and not only do the consumers want to buy shampoo, but they also want to purchase conditioner as well for these emotional benefits.

In conclusion, although advertising sometimes helps to obtain useful information about products, this essay finds that it oftentimes motivates consumers to purchase unnecessary products by igniting emotional needs.

Sample 7:

Advertising has become an integral part of our daily lives, influencing our consumer behaviour and shaping our perceptions of products and services. While some argue that advertisements manipulate us into purchasing unnecessary items, others contend that they inform us about innovative products that can enhance our lives. This essay will examine both perspectives and argue that adverts increase our desire to purchase products and take services that we do not need.

On the one hand, proponents of the benefits of advertising argue that it plays a vital role in informing consumers about new products that have the potential to improve their lives. Through advertisements, individuals become aware of innovative solutions and advancements in various industries, ranging from health and technology to household and personal care. For example, commercials showcasing energy-efficient appliances or eco-friendly alternatives can educate consumers on sustainable choices that benefit both their well-being and the environment.

Conversely, those who believe that advertising encourages unnecessary consumption opine that it creates artificial needs. Advertisements often employ persuasive techniques, such as emotional appeals and clever slogans, to create a desire for products that individuals may not genuinely require. It can lead to impulsive buying decisions and contribute to the accumulation of material possessions that offer little value or utility. For instance, flashy commercials promoting the latest fashion trends or high-tech gadgets can generate a sense of urgency to purchase, even if the item does not serve a practical purpose in the consumer’s life.

My personal opinion on this issue is that advertisements are primarily made to create a false sense of urgency to allure us to purchase products that have no utility for us. Therefore, we should be careful of the impulsive buying habits that most adverts are aimed at creating among us.

In conclusion, advertising can encourage unnecessary consumption and highlight unique features of a product or service that are actually not. From my perspective, responsible and ethical advertising practices are crucial to mitigating this problem, and consumers should buy things that they really need not because they have been advertised to them.

Sample 8:

In today’s consumer-driven world, advertising plays a pivotal role in shaping our purchasing decisions and influencing our choices. Some argue that advertising encourages us to buy unnecessary items, while others contend that it informs us about innovative products that can enhance our lives. In my view, both perspectives hold merit, and the impact of advertising largely depends on the nature of the advertisement and the consumer’s discernment.

To begin with, it is undeniable that advertising often lures consumers into purchasing items they do not genuinely need. Advertisers use persuasive techniques, such as emotional appeals and celebrity endorsements, to create a desire for products that may be superfluous in our lives. For example, many people are enticed by the allure of the latest smartphone models, even if their current devices meet their communication needs. This excessive consumption can be detrimental to both individuals and the environment.

On the other hand, advertisements also have the potential to introduce us to new products and innovations that genuinely improve our lives. They serve as a valuable source of information about technological advancements, health and wellness products, and other beneficial offerings. For instance, medical advertisements can educate us about life-saving medications and treatments, leading to better health outcomes.

Furthermore, advertising can empower consumers by offering them choices. Individuals can make informed decisions based on their preferences and needs when presented with a range of options. This fosters competition among businesses, which can lead to better quality products and lower prices. Moreover, advertisers should prioritise ethical practices and promote products that genuinely benefit society rather than solely aiming for profit. Balancing the positive and negative aspects of advertising is crucial to harnessing its potential for the betterment of individuals and society.

In conclusion, advertising is a double-edged sword. While it can indeed encourage unnecessary consumption, it also informs us about products that can enhance our lives. Ultimately, consumers are responsible for exercising discernment and making conscious choices.

Sample 9:

Advertising, a key factor for the success of any business. It is a medium through which consumers are made aware of new products or enhancements made to the existing products. Some argue that it makes people buy things which they don’t need, and few refute it stating it does help them in improving their lives. These would be further discussed in the following points.

To start with, few are of the opinion that advertising lures them to buy products which are not required. This can be seen with people who are obsessed with gadgets. Whenever they come across any attractive product which has got impressive functionality, they prefer buying it, even if they don’t require it. Hence, it is evident that few believe that advertising encourages them to buy unnecessary products.

On the contrary, few support advertising, stating that it helps them in improving their lives. For instance, advertisements for new fitness products or new and improved groceries items make people improve their lifestyle. Thus, it can be seen that why many are in support of advertising.

To conclude, after analyzing the above points, it is clear that few buy unnecessary products based on their features and few buy it based on their benefits. As far as I am concerned, I believe advertising spread awareness of new products to consumers, which at the end of the day benefits all.

Sample 10:

In the modern world, advertising has become a crucial instrument for product promotion. While some contend that advertisements raise public awareness of goods that could enhance our lives, others hold the view that advertisements encourage individuals to purchase pointless items. I firmly feel that the latter is more accurate.

In the first place, advertising is the clearest approach to let people know how good a product is. The fact that they were able to make, disseminate, and, frequently, secure a celebrity endorsement is more significant than the advertisement’s actual message. For instance, KFC frequently secures the most well-known football stars to significant endorsement deals, demonstrating the food’s continuous relevance and quality. When a less well-known business provides an advertisement, it shows that they are making enough money to support whatever goods or services they offer.

Second, advertising develops wants rather than just filling them. The majority of people might live happier lives with fewer items, but because advertising drives cravings by engaging in customer behavior, those early wants gradually to turn into habits. The popularity of Apple products over the past 20 years and the part that advertising played in that increase would be a fair illustration of this. Along with their high quality, Apple computers and smartphones are renowned for giving consumers a sense of belonging. They were made more dominant by fashionable advertisements like the “think different” initiative. For many people hooked into the Apple ecosystem of elevated consumer products, the urge to join the Apple ecosphere and seem cool has now evolved into a fundamental necessity.

In conclusion, it can be concluded that advertisements leave a lasting effect on consumers’ minds, leading them to purchase an unwanted item. So it’s highly advised to do your homework before making a purchase.

Sample 11:

In today's world, advertisement has become a significant tool for marketing a product. While some argue that advertisement increases awareness about products that may improve our lives, others are of the opinion that advertisement induces people to buy unnecessary things. I strongly believe that the latter is more correct, as will be explained.

To promote a product, companies generally propagate only its the brighter side, thus providing an incomplete picture of the product. When only positive aspects are known, there is an inclination to buy that product; thus, we end up purchasing something which is not required. One such example is herbal products and weight loss supplements. In data published by the magazine India Today, the use of herbal products to reduce weight has seen significant increase in the recent years, whereas health experts are of the opinion that weight can only be controlled through proper diet and exercise. Many of my friends who used such medicines have later repented their choice.

Moreover, children are easily attracted by advertisements. Nowadays, most teenagers like to own a smart phone which is a result of mass advertisement. Recently a school in the UK banned children from using mobile phones inside school premises, as cellphones were the major cause of distraction which affected their studies.

In conclusion, it can be said that an advertisement creates an impression on the consumer’s mind and people end up buying an undesired product. Thus, thorough research before buying is strongly recommended.

Sample 1:

People have different views about whether animal testing for medical research is necessary or not. From my perspective, animal testing plays an integral role in the medicine industry, in spite of the drawbacks it brings.

There are two major reasons why some people oppose the idea of using animals for medical experiments. Firstly, it is believed that such experiments are cruel and inhumane, and therefore should be prohibited. Every year, many animals are subjected to medical experimentation and have to suffer physical pain and even deprivation of food and water. Additionally, in order to implement research on animals, large amounts of money are expended on the establishment of facilities and human resources. This can be a burden on a country’s national budget, preventing the government from investing in other more important aspects like education and housing.

Despite the above-mentioned disadvantages, in my opinion, animal testing is necessary. Humans are still reliant on animal testing for many purposes, including developing new medications and checking the safety of medical products. In fact, the most powerful supercomputers are currently unable to understand the workings of the human body, and complex organs such as the brain and heart, which is crucial for medical research and development. More importantly, due to biological similarities, medical research needs to be implemented on animals, which will bring about better outcomes in medical research compared to other methods. Over many years, chimpanzees, the closest relatives of humans, have been used to investigate advanced treatments for cancer and heart disease, and until now, there is still no better alternative.

In conclusion, although animal testing may be cruel and cost a significant amount of money, it still needs to be conducted because of the unique benefits.

Sample 2:

Many believe that using animals for scientific testing purposes is fundamentally immoral, while others see it as a necessary evil. In my opinion, even though it is decidedly unethical, the overall impact on human progress justifies its continuance.

Detractors of animal testing often point out that animals have rights. We would never condone this type of testing on a human, even with one with a low IQ and it follows that we should treat animals with some measure of respect. The strongest argument supporting this is the level of cruelty involved in animal testing. Many drugs that are tested on animals have painful side-effects and the test subjects may die slow, painful deaths. This is undeniably unjustifiable regarding testing in non-essential medical fields such as cosmetics.

Despite the moral quagmire detailed above, I believe animal testing does enough to advance medical testing to warrant its use. Some cursory research will reveal the importance of animal testing in fields such as diabetic medicine, cancer research, experimental surgery, and stem cells. Testing insulin for diabetics on dogs may be the most well-known example of this kind of impactful research. Many other advances in medicine, often attributed to animal testing, have saved countless human lives to an extent that would be impossible if researchers were working under the moral constraints of human test subjects.

In conclusion, animal testing is the best way to make breakthroughs in medicine and should be strongly encouraged. Governments should work with medical institutions to implement more medical testing on animals across the board.

Sample 3:

Some believe that animal testing is necessary to develop effective and safe drugs for human consumption, while others argue that this treatment is morally wrong and therefore should be completely banned. In my opinion, despite the cruelty imposed on experimented creatures, this should remain a common practice due to its significant implication for major medical breakthroughs.  

Detractors of animal experimentation argue its undeniable inhumanity. As well as being subjected to unsanitary and confined living conditions, the creatures used for experimental purposes are also tortured through various barbaric procedures ranging from being starved, electrocuted and injected with poisonous substances. As a result, most of them suffer from malnutrition, excruciating pain and face a strong likelihood of being killed in the process. Furthermore, experimenters usually breed these animals for future research, which leads to an endless cycle of torment lasting many generations. A pertinent example of this is that small rodents including rats and hamsters are injected with cancerous cells and die painfully shortly thereafter as a consequence. 

However, these experiments still play a crucial role in ensuring safety and potency of potential human medicine. Rats are scientifically proven to have the same genetic material as humans; thus a possible human reaction can be inferred from testing on these animals first. Medical researchers can use these testing results to devise drugs with minimal side effects when adopted for humans. This advancement in the pharmaceutical industry could engender better remedies to possibly treat previously fatal and incurable diseases. Prior successful experiments have led to the creation of new treatments that not only prolong the life expectancy of immunocompromised patients but also make considerable progress in the fight against cancer.

In conclusion, although testing on animals can be seen as a brutal action, the positive ramifications associated with medicinal development make this an essential and required practice to enhance welfare for humanity as a whole. Scientists should consider giving these experimented creatures the best possible living environment to partly compensate for their suffering. 

Sample 4:

It is argued by a few masses that using animals for the experimentation of medicines or products that are made for their usage is indispensable. However, others believe this act is unkind behaviour towards them. In my perspective, it is inhumane to use poor creatures for testing as they also have a right to live, which is highly beneficial for our ecosystem.

According to the former point of view, animal testing is beneficial for humanity as it reduces the chances of mishappenings to the human body. To elaborate it, human beings are the most precious species on this planet. Direct exposure to any product or medicine can put their life at risk. Therefore, if the products or medicine are first trailed on animals, these invaluable creatures would be saved from a certain illness or death. For instance, to try the result of corona vaccine initially was trailed on animals. Only then was it used by the public? This animal testing saved a lot of lives.

According to the second school of thought, it is a brutal act because it can cause the extinction of the animal population. To explicate, when trials fail and are tested on other animals, it becomes a threat to the survival of animals. Some may die or become disabled. Thus, it will be difficult for them to live with physical impairment in their natural habit. To exemplify it, when animals such as monkeys, lions or rodents are used for testing, a massive population declines. The extinction of such species indirectly creates an imbalance in biodiversity.

To conclude, thus it is clear that trials on animal species are beneficial for humanity as they can save thousands of human lives. But, to save humanity, putting animal life at risk is cruel as they can survive on this planet with the same kind of disability.

Sample 5:

Most individuals think it is essential to inject medicines or products into the animal before they are available for human consumption. At the same time, others say that this is brutality towards animals. This practice has its own brighter and darker sides. This disquisition delves into both the perspectives and my own stance.

Embark on, and humans are more important than animals. They are the assets of the world. Because human specialities are more than the animals, like, thinking capacity, talking and so on. Therefore, we give more importance to these human beings. Because of this, scientists who invented medicines will be applied to animals’ kinds in order to find the results after long procedures. Mostly living beings like rats, monkeys and so on are used for this. Due to the high number of these species, people think that there is no problem with injecting newly formulated medicinal products into animals.

On the other hand, some humans, as well as animal lovers, will try to feel less comfortable with experimenting on animals in the medical procedure. They say it seems to be a massive cruelty to these creatures. It will badly affect them when the results of such procedures fail. There is some advanced technology in order to find the exact results of using such medicines through humans. For instance, a computer program which shows the suitability of a new drug on the human immune system can be used for medical research. This will safeguard the mammals from suffering such cruelties.

In my view, I think that experimenting the medicines on animals may lead to harmful consequences, and it will be very cruel to them. I suggest that more advanced methods should be used to ascertain the result of newly invented medicines rather than using them on animals.

Therefore, it can be conclusively stated that using mammals for examination is an unacceptable trend and should be replaced with modern solutions and technology.

Sample 1:

Vegetarians tend to avoid consuming meat and fish for the purpose of keeping body health and concerning on environmental issue. Both purposes will be discussed in this essay as well as provide several convincing explanations.

Vegetarians tend to consider health factors to stop consuming meat and fish because those kinds of food sources affect the blood tension of those who suffer from chronic disease such as cancer, obesity, etc. Other reasons from a health point of view of people become vegetarian because they need to lose weight or to have a better body shape. Moreover, choosing to consume vegetables rather than meat or fish becomes a trend to keep the body healthy.

On the other hand, being a vegetarian is one of the ways to protest the policy of the government or criminal action against environmental issues such as cruel animal slaughtering, fish-bombing, etc. Moreover, being vegetarian is believed to be the best solution for keeping the balance of the ecosystem among humans and animals.

However, another reason not to eat meat or fish is related to ethical concern on how there are several values or rules in a certain community that forbid to eat both food sources. They believe that animals, like human beings, should be respected and their lives should be preserved.

To conclude, vegetarians who consider health issues and environmental issues, as well as ethical concern, have their own reasons. In addition, both views are merely positive to keep the body healthy individually as well as to conserve the sustainability of animal lives globally.

Sample 2:

It is a fact that several groups of people prefer not to consume any kind of meat and fish, as they believe that being vegetarian bring many benefits for their health and for the world as a whole. To a certain extent, I would agree with the opinion, but I think that people should also consume meat and fish in a proportional portion as they contain rich ingredients that are needed by the human body.

For a number of reasons, some people choose not to eat fish or meat. Firstly, it is believed that several types of meats and fish contain fats which are considered unhealthy for the human body. People who consume those kinds of meat or fish have a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases such as heart attack or cholesterol. Secondly, as the demand for meat and fish increases, it would have a negative impact on the environment. The increasing number of farming activities would require bigger areas, which might reduce the number of forest areas. And then with over-exploitation of fishing activities, several types of fish would extinct, and it would make the sea ecosystem become imbalance.

On the other hand, many food scientists have found out that there are several types of vitamins and proteins that could only be obtained from meat and fish. For example, salmon fish generates a certain type of oil which is beneficial for our blood circulation process. And then, red meat is needed as the source of nutrition for the human’s brain. However, the main problem of those who consume meat and fish is that most of them consume the food in an inappropriate portion. As a consequence, many of them have problems with obesity or diabetes.

Sample 3:

It is generally believed that there are many health and environmental benefits to vegetarianism. While I do agree with this view, I do not think that vegetarianism is for everyone.

The consumption of animal products certainly has some health consequences. It hurts the environment as well. Some studies have shown that vegetarians tend to live longer than their meat or fish-eating counterparts. The environmental impacts of non-vegetarianism are even worse. Countless animals are raised, abused and slaughtered to fulfil the demand for meat and fish worldwide. Framing livestock is one of the major causes of greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. If we can reduce the consumption of meat, the need for raising more animals also reduces. As a result, the land that is being used to raise them can be altered to grow vegetables which in turn produce clean air for the whole planet. Obviously, cutting down on the consumption of animal products benefits the whole world.

However, meat and fish are an integral part of many cuisines; therefore, being a vegetarian is not an option in many regions of the world. To illustrate, sushi is the most popular Japanese delicacy and without the addition of its main ingredient, fish, sushi will not be complete. Meat consumption is particularly common in cold countries. There are also some regions where it is difficult to grow vegetables and cereals. Furthermore, fish and meat are excellent sources of proteins and some fatty acids crucial for good health. For this season, meat consumption is essential for people engaging in strenuous physical activities. Being vegetarian, for example, is not a viable option for a bodybuilder or an athlete.

In conclusion, even though there are advantages to vegetarianism, I believe that this lifestyle is not for everyone. Even so, in my opinion, everyone should make an effort to cut down on their consumption of animal foods. That way they can improve their health and save the planet from tons of greenhouse gases.

Sample 4:

Nowadays, people are free to make a lot of options related to food. Some of them argue that eating meat or fish has a fundamentally beneficial influence on our planet and own life, while many others contend that it has a detrimental effect as well. To my view of thinking, meat and fish are one of the most important foods for our normal health condition, so it is harmful to refuse it absolutely.

Firstly, meat and fish provide a lot of useful vitamins. It is extremely necessary for our normal vital processes such as growing or maturing. Lack of this material causes serious disabilities. Moreover, the number of fish and animals should be regulated due to the shortage of feed in the water and earth, which is needed. On the other hand, the destruction of fish and animals could cause the disappearance of specific species. For instance, there are a lot of special species of fish that are written into a red book but still killing illegally. This negative aspect provides harmful acquaintances which should be solved globally.

In my opinion, people should not refuse it totally because it has a negative influence on their health. I am convinced that this problem could be solved by a smaller quantity of meat and fish. This solution guarantees a smaller request for these products and a positive effect on the balance of living organisms on earth.

Taking these points into consideration, I would like to say that there are some advantages and disadvantages brought by eating meat and fish. However, in my opinion, the supply of this product should be regulated very carefully, saving the balance of these organisms, but nobody should refuse this material wholly due to useful materials which are taken.

Sample 5:

A healthy diet plays a very important role in maintaining people’s health. Some people argue that we should eat no fish and meat to have our own health better and it is also valuable to the world. In my opinion, I agree that this will bring many advantages but also causes several drawbacks.

First of all, it is undeniable that by dint of eating like a vegetarian, people will have a nice body and more chance to avoid several chronic diseases. To specify, vegetables and fruits, which contain a rich source of vitamins and minerals, will enable people to keep fit and healthy body. Moreover, with a low amount of fats, cholesterol, or saturated fats, people will not have to worry about gaining weight or obesity as well as other related health issues like high blood pressure or heart diseases. For example, since I ate more vegetables, my body became stronger, and my weight stayed unchanged over time.

On the contrary, it is obvious that by no means could this kind of diet have no negative effect on our health and lifestyles. As a consequence of eating no meat and fish, people will not gain sufficient proteins and fats so that they will not have enough energy for their daily activities. For instance, my mother trys to eat as a vegetarian for several days, but she always feels tired and cannot perform anything well.

On the other hand, thanks to the vegetarian meals we can contribute to save the world. In more detail, the fact is that every year, the food processing industry consumes a large amount of clean water to produce meat or beef and release tons of waste and smoke to the environment. Additionally, due to the overfishing for food, many species of fish in sea, rivers, lakes are endangered and facing extinction. Therefore, if we remove meat and fish from our meals, we can prevent this.

In conclusion, it is not always good if we only eat vegetables, but we should reduce the amount of meat and fish as well as eat more vegetables for healthier living.

Sample 6:

Healthy diet plays a key role in an individual’s maintenance towards their health and associated attributes. There have been several arguments regarding avoidance of consumption of meat and fish as it damages the health of individuals. However, in my opinion, I believe that this will yield several advantages and disadvantages as well in the long run.

First and foremost, consumption of vegetables and ensuring a dietary schedule as vegetarians will help develop a nice body. Moreover, this will also lead to decreased chances of chronic diseases. Vegetables are considered a rich source of vitamins and minerals. Vitamins and minerals play a potential role in ensuring a fit and healthy human body.

Additionally, eliminating meat and fish from regular diet schedules will help with lowered amounts of fats, cholesterol, and saturated fats within the body of individuals. This will also reduce the risks associated with high blood pressure or heart diseases.

Consuming vegetarian diets will lead to a little contribution towards saving the world. To be more specific, the food processing sector consumes a considerable amount of clean water each year to create meat or beef, as well as releasing tonnes of garbage and smoke into the environment. Furthermore, numerous fish species in oceans, rivers, and lakes are vulnerable and on the verge of extinction owing to overfishing for food. As a result, if we exclude meat and fish from our diet, we can avoid this.

To summarize, eating exclusively veggies is not necessarily a good thing, but for a better lifestyle, we should eat less meat and fish and eat more vegetables.

Sample 7:

In today’s era individuals are free to choose from varied options associated with their food consumption. There are arguments that eating meat or fish has a fundamental benefit for our planet and self life. However, many quote that this has a detrimental impact on the global index and human health conditions. I believe that meat and fish are key essential aspects of an individual's diet and have a potent role to play in daily normal health condition. Thus, it is harmful to eliminate these from everyday diet.

Meat and fish are addressed as one of the potential sources of vitamins and minerals for the human body. Thus, these are of extreme importance for vital living processes such as growing and maturing.

Lack of these dietary fibers leads to serious disabilities within the human body. There is a need to regulate and maintain an appropriate balance between feeding in the water and on earth. Nevertheless, increased consumption of fish and animals could cause the disappearance of specific species. There are several particular species of fish, for example, that are listed in a red book yet are nonetheless hunted illegally. This negative feature creates unhealthy relationships, which should be addressed on a worldwide scale.

I think that there is a necessity for maintaining a balance between perseverance and consumption of meat and fish. Complete eradication of these from a regular diet will have a negative influence on human health. Thus, consuming a balanced or even smaller amount of meat will help address this issue.

Sample 8:

Healthy diet is an essential source of well-being for individuals. Some claim that we should avoid eating fish and meat in order to improve our personal health and that it is also beneficial to the environment. In my perspective, this will have numerous benefits, but it will also have some disadvantages.

To begin with, people are descended from animals, and they have long relied on both flora and wildlife to suit their requirements. Because everyone's nutritional demands are varied, plants cannot provide all of the nutrients necessary for a human body. Omega-3, for example, is essential to improve the memory of humans and can only be found in sea-based creatures. As a result, it is permissible to rely on many species to maintain personal health.

With time immemorial and appropriate evolutions, bodily requirements have also changed. There are several cultures globally that strictly follow vegetarian diet and are mostly dependent upon plant-based food for centuries. Excessive fishing and animal poaching has contributed towards changing environmental conditions. These environmental conditions are responsible for contributing towards global warming. Thus, the human race is required to consider vegetables as the only source of their desired nutrients and vitamins.

Taking everything into account, I believe that people should not consume meat since human bodies have evolved over time and that being a vegan or vegetarian increases life expectancy. In addition, the ecosystem is suffering as a result of the widespread extinction of other species. Governments can aid in the mitigation of this problem by raising public awareness through campaigns or other forms of communication.

Sample 9:

Many individuals choose to embrace a vegetarian lifestyle, refraining from consuming meat and fish, driven by the belief that it promotes personal well-being and contributes positively to the planet's welfare. I hold a strong conviction regarding the significance of considering individual situations and making informed decisions that align with personal values and dietary requirements.

Firstly, plant-based diets can be nutritionally balanced and provide adequate protein, vitamins, and minerals. To brief, vegetarian diets are associated with lower risks of certain health conditions, such as heart disease, obesity, and certain types of cancer, which help reduce cholesterol levels and ultimately contribute to overall well-being. Additionally, livestock production contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, and water pollution. Adopting a plant- based diet can reduce carbon footprints and alleviate pressure on natural resources. The production of plant-based protein, for instance, requires fewer resources, such as land and water, as compared to animal farming.

Furthermore, adopting a balanced and conscientious approach to food choices is crucial. Elaborating on this, by practicing moderate consumption of ethically and sustainably sourced meat and fish, individuals can obtain vital nutrients and maintain a well-rounded diet while also considering cultural aspects and environmental sustainability. Moreover, cultural and personal preferences can influence dietary choices, as the food holds significant connections to identity and longstanding traditions. For example, someone from a specific cultural background may prioritize certain traditional dishes as a way to preserve their heritage and maintain a sense of cultural belonging.

In conclusion, despite adopting a vegetarian diet can have potential benefits for personal health and the environment, I firmly accord that the decision should be guided by individual circumstances, values, and dietary preferences, with an understanding of the cultural significance of meat consumption.

Sample 10:

Many prefer to avoid meat or fish in their diets. They think that it is good for health while also beneficial for the environment. I believe that while adopting a vegetarian diet is advantageous to healthy living as well as the environment, eating meat and fish is more important because it has high nutritional value.

Some argue that following a vegetarian diet is beneficial to an individual’s health and the planet as well. This is because a vegetarian diet plan means a high intake of fibre, unsaturated fat, vitamins C and A, and so on, thus leading to healthy living. Recent studies reveal that vegetarians tend to have a reduced risk of non-communicable diseases like diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and so forth. It also means the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as factory farm livestock produces methane during food digestion and excretion. Despite this, I would argue that eating meat and fish is of crucial importance in making up for the deficiency of proteins.

However, meat and fish are essential for health. Both are the key source of proteins, a nutrient crucial for our muscular health. Meat and fish are rich in proteins that are of high biological value, meaning that they comprise all the essential amino acids needed to support our body functions in the right balance. For example, the Spanish Society of Community Nutrition recommends that people should intake three weekly servings of lean meat. Furthermore, fish intake is particularly important for pregnant and breastfeeding women and people during childhood. I, therefore, believe that a moderate intake of meat and fish is of profound importance.

In conclusion, although avoiding meat and fish is vital not just for healthy living but for the environment also, these foods should be eaten, because they remain the best source of proteins and that is why moderately eating them is a healthy choice.

Sample 11:

The number of vegetarians in a community may depend on various factors, for example the traditions of the country, the wealth of the country, the religion or the age group. Therefore, the reasons why people choose to exclude meat and fish from their diet may also vary.

Some people become vegetarian because they believe that this will benefit their health. Undoubtedly, eating too much meat, especially too much red meat, is not to be recommended. Moreover, the fact that there are healthy populations in some parts of the world where no one eats meat proves that it is not, as some people claim, an essential part of the human diet. However, it is important to ensure that enough protein, for example, is included in the diet from other sources. Where vegetarianism is not a tradition, this may require some careful planning.

In my experience, it is quite common for people to become vegetarians because they feel that it is selfish to eat meat or because meat production increases global warming. They may also feel that if no one ate meat, there would be no food shortage, because meat production uses up food resources. This idealistic point of view is very attractive, but it is hard to judge whether it is in fact correct.

In some families, if a teenager decides to become a vegetarian, they may do so partly out of a spirit of rebellion, because this behaviour can be interpreted as a criticism of their parents’ way of life. However, provided that they continue to eat healthily, the parents should not raise objections, in my opinion. Vegetarianism is a valid choice in life. Moreover, research shows that vegetarians tend to be healthier in many ways than meat-eaters.

Personally, I think that being a vegetarian is a good idea in principle as there are proven health benefits and probably social benefits as well. However, it does not suit everybody, and I doubt whether it will ever be a universal choice.

Sample 12:

The question of whether it is right to eat the flesh of living animals has been debated for thousands of years, mostly by philosophers and religious groups, but more lately also by people who believe it is wrong to kill beings for sustenance and that this way of life has detrimental effects on our health as well as for humanity. Supporters of both points of view seem to have moral and practical arguments to defend their position.

Supporters of a vegetarian diet claim that overconsumption of meat brings about a series of health problems. Animal fat has been blamed for an increase in cancer and heart disease, which account for an extremely high number of deaths in the western world. They believe that more nutrients can be found in a wide range of non-animal food comprising grains, nuts, legumes, fruit and of course vegetables. These are held to contain all the nutrients, vitamins and minerals we need while not having a negative effect on our body. They also claim that our mental well-being will be enhanced as mind and body are closely linked. It is also true that most meat is heavily treated with antibiotics and various chemicals and that sea food nowadays may be contaminated with degraded plastic or heavy metals.

However, an even greater number of experts tell us that the consumption of meat is beneficial and that abstinence for long periods would lead to a lack of certain vitamins, minerals and proteins. This is especially true, we are told, for young growing children whose bodies are still forming. Parents are not generally willing to risk their children’s health by experimenting on them with a non- western diet. In countries where such a diet is common or mainstream, they have centuries if not millennia of experience. Furthermore, fruit and vegetables are just as contaminated as meat products, if not more so. Apples receive 23 pesticide treatments per season in large farms. One would have to buy only organic produce, which is currently beyond most families’ means.

Another side of the argument to be considered is the benefit of vegetarianism to the planet or humanity. Vegetarianism seems to have moral high ground. I do not think that any sane person enjoys seeing an animal being slaughtered. It is a disturbing site to most people unless they have been hardened by repeated practice in killing. They shut themselves off from empathy for the animal. The strategy seems to be that of disconnecting from the act of killing. The need to detach from the act and not reflect on it suggests that there may be a moral problem. If it were the right thing to do, a pure, healthy act such as picking an apple or drinking water, there would be no necessity to remove one’s mind from it. Morally, non-killing or non-violence as it is called in India appears to be noble.

Lastly, perhaps a policy of non-violence beginning in our dining room would extend beyond to a mentality of non-violence also towards our fellow man. A few hundred years from now people might well look back on us and be horrified that we killed other creatures in order to consume them. I believe that overeating meat is detrimental to our health, but that the negative effects of food may depend more on how it is grown and produced. A stick of celery might be more damaging than a meat base dish if it contains an excessive quantity of chemical compounds.

Sample 1:

It is increasingly common for people to fill their homes with many types of household appliances. I believe this tendency can be both beneficial and harmful, depending on one’s perspective.

On the one hand, excessive purchasing of domestic appliances can be environmentally detrimental. The growing consumer demand has led to a surge in new products and models being constantly introduced to the market. Consequently, some manufacturers over-exploit the earth's finite natural resources to keep up with consumerism and dispose of improperly treated toxic waste into the environment. Beyond that, many consumers purchase unnecessary household items in vain attempt to keep up with what is currently trendy. Therefore, redundant goods are quite often quickly discarded, ultimately ending up in large landfills, where they often take thousands of years to degrade and, while doing so, release toxic chemicals into the surrounding soil.

On the other hand, this trend has significantly improved business profitability and people’s lives. Regarding the former, applicance manufacturers have thrived in recent decades, thanks to the booming demand for more effective household tools. Growing businesses create job opportunities and contribute to government funding for infrastructure and social welfare projects. A further benefit is that devices such as dishwashers or robot vacuums help improve the well-being of modern families. Such appliances can handle the most time-consuming household chores, thus giving family members more quality time with one another, and lowering the risk of domestic conflicts over dividing responsibilities between spouses.

In conclusion, the trend towards owning more electrical devices is beneficial for both manufacturers and consumers, due to increased business activities and improved living standards. However, it is a negative phenomenon for the environment with the over exploitation of resources and contamination of natural ecosystems.

Sample 2:

A majority of families have possessed more than one piece of electrical device, and the issue is whether it does more good than harm or not. In my opinion, the use of a wide range of household goods can be both positive and negative.

It cannot be denied that our life became better thanks to the sophisticated design of household goods. For instance, television and contents like movies or shows can be informative, entertaining and educational, and we can enjoy them without leaving our home. A microwave oven and a rice cooker can make cooking a manageable and less time-consuming process. Thus, the time and energy saved from doing domestic chores allow people to work and rest better. Those examples indicate that the more free time is saved due to having appliances, the more time we can manage to improve the quality of life.

On the other hand, the opponents may argue that it can be a potential threat to the health of family members and the environment as a whole. Firstly, the convenience brought about by the appliances also encourages owners to adopt a sedentary lifestyle. For instance, washing machines deprive users of the possibility to consume a huge number of calories by doing housework. More importantly, mass production to meet the increasing demand of household goods will drive the exploration of natural resources and result in pollution. The electricity required is usually generated from fossil fuels, which adds to the environmental cost.

In conclusion, the increased use of electrical appliances at home brings both advantages and disadvantages. However, unless the environmental drawbacks are solved, I think that it seems to be a negative development.

Sample 3:

Nowadays, more and more householders consume a variety of household goods like television, microwave oven and rice cooker. In my opinion, this is an advanced movement in modern life, not only benefit for consumers in general, but also making great profits for business in particular.

First, from the user’s perspective, electrical equipment such as microwave oven and rice cooker significantly assist consumers to perform their daily tasks faster and more convenience. So that, they can spend more time with their family to build profound connection within family members, which is more important than wasting time in kitchen for unnecessary activities due to old and inconvenient equipment. Besides that, due to the fast past of life, people are fully occupied by works and tend to eat fast and unhealthy meals like fast foods to save time. A microwave oven and rice cooker are the eminent solution for this issue because people are now able to straightforward cook and enjoy delicious meals at home without suffering long and hard cooking processes.

Second, from an enterprise perspective, developing household goods like television, microwave oven and rice cooker has established a potential and profitable market. Thanks to enormous demand of those household goods, more factories have been opened and operated, resulting in tackling unemployment problem and encouraging development of relative industries like electric, semi-conductor, and other material productions. Furthermore, good business will contribute more taxed money which can be used to enhance the quality of life by building more hospitals, schools, infrastructure and to support citizens around.

In conclusion, the development of using household goods has notable contribution in modern life, benefit for both consumers and manufactures as mentioned above.