A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas. What problems can this cause? How might these problems be reduced?

Sample 1:

The improvement in a country’s living standard often entails urban development, leaving rural areas stagnant behind. This can engender several problems in both urban and rural parts of the country, which can be addressed by some viable approaches outlined in the essay below. 

The disparity in the distribution of a higher standard of living favoring urban areas can pose some compelling challenges for a nation. Chief among these is the widening socioeconomic gap between the two regions, given that improved urban living standards are synonymous with better job opportunities with desirable wages, along with enhanced infrastructure, services and healthcare there. This will exacerbate the existing urban-rural inequalities within the nation. Another pressing problem is population issues, including overpopulation in urban regions and the “brain drain” phenomenon in the countryside. Particularly, owing to a more decent living standard in cities, rural dwellers, including talented ones, will continuously migrate to cities for better opportunities, leading to brain drain in the countryside. As a result, the countryside lacks an intellectual labor force, while urban areas face a population explosion and its consequent problems, such as traffic congestion and pollution, will be even more severe. 

To address these problems, the involvement of governments plays a crucial role. Governments can invest in rural economic development programs, including providing incentives for businesses to set up in rural areas and promoting industries based on agriculture. These can help to boost the rural economy and provide employment opportunities. Furthermore, the welfare of rural dwellers should also be dedicated, which can be done by improving transport, infrastructure, healthcare and digital connectivity. By doing so, rural areas can access markets, information, and services adequately. Also, providing quality education and skill development programs in rural areas can help people find employment locally. This reduces the need to migrate to cities, contributing to alleviating the population explosion in cities and its problems.

In conclusion, increasing socio-economic imbalances and population issues are subject to the fact that a higher living standard in a nation facilitates urban growth. These can be tackled by a combination of methods aimed at elevating the countryside’s economy and quality of life. 

Sample 2:

When standards of living increase, it is primarily urban residents, not those in the countryside, who benefit. In my opinion, this can lead to opposite problems related to population density and is best mitigated by governmental action.

Inequality in terms of standard of living engenders population problems for cities and rural regions. Cities have become over-populated in the last century as they offer a wider range of educational, occupational, and recreational options. Elevated population density means that although residents can enjoy a higher standard of living generally, they must also overcome concomitant effects from overcrowding such as more traffic, less sanitary conditions, and higher crime rates. The inverse problem exists outside cities as residents leave and locals struggle to earn a living in sparsely populated towns and villages.

These related problems can best be countered by the authorities. There are various initiatives that could be implemented. One real-world example of this would be in Japan where the government in recent years has addressed dwindling population numbers in the countryside by auctioning off country homes cheaply. Prospective home-owners are often able to buy houses nearly for free if they agree to live and work in a town with few residents. Another possible measure would be for governments to invest more in urban infrastructure. Since migrations to cities are likely inevitable, this is a more pragmatic tactic.

In conclusion, the inverse issues created for rural and urban areas by rising standards of living can be effectively controlled if governments intervene. This issue will only become more pressing as the global middle class continues to grow.

Sample 3:

Improving living standards in a particular country is generally advantageous for urban citizens compared to the ones living in the countryside. This situation is likely to result in some serious problems unless prevented by a set of effective counter measures.

To start, a disproportionate positive effect of growing living standards gives rise to two major issues, the most significant one of which is rural migration. This is because more and more rural dwellers choose to move to cities in search of better life quality as well as opportunities when quality of life in the countryside is inferior to that of cities. As a result, uncontrolled growth of urban population occurs, creating further problems for a country. Furthermore, contentment level among rural residents may decline as a result of not benefitting from a nationwide rise in life quality as much as their urban counterparts. This will eventually mean a fall in productivity levels, which is often followed by inefficiencies and possibly financial losses in the food supply chain.

Having established the severity of the situation, there are some practical solutions to consider. Channeling more financial investment into the countryside is often the first line of response. It works since this form of investment can be used to build plants and factories, hence creating more job opportunities for the common man. Having a secure job gives rural dwellers an incentive to stay in the country. Making countryside life appealing is another possible solution. This can be done by helping people there meet their basic needs for living such as food, warm housing, and healthcare. The government can take this idea a step further with the creation of leisure centers to foster a jovial spirit in the countryside.

In conclusion, while the main issues stemming from an uneven rise in living standards are uncontrolled rural migration and less happy rural dwellers, solutions range from directing more funds to the countryside to making the countryside life attractive.

Sample 4:

Nowadays cities are getting more benefits than rural areas, but there are so many problems. Though there are many facilities, we have to face some causes to live there. Here I am going to share a few problems which occur there and the solution for them.

We all know that the city looks so good, neat and has a good atmosphere but even though it was improved with many facilities, some places look good and neat in atmosphere. Yes, sanitizing. The government of India appointed few workers to sanitize our surroundings, but workers in some areas were doing their job as well, especially in the main cities, but in most of the places they were not doing their job, once in a week or once in two weeks they were cleaning the garbage, or they were complaining of non-payments of money and stop working,

As we all know, in villages there are more animals compared to urban areas, but they are keeping their society clean and natural, by planting trees, using biodegradable garbs as fertilizers. It helps them to lead happy and healthy lives. The most notable thing in rural lifestyles is they avoid using non-biodegradable things like plastics. Mostly they use aluminum vessels, mud vessels and steel vessels. Even they avoid plastic covers, instead they use cotton bags, etc.

As a city resident we should take steps to keep our surroundings neatly as if the sanitizing workers were not doing their jobs, but we cannot blame them, so form a group for social service (FASS) and take some actions like avoiding plastics, non-biodegradable products to use, to keep our surroundings neat and good.

Sample 5:

Nowadays, the availability of modern facilities is increasing because of advanced technology worldwide. However, the advancement of living standards has more positive effects in urban areas than in the countryside. It can generate a number of problems, and there are also some solutions to reduce the issues, which I have discussed in detail in the next paragraph.

To begin with, there are some issues that can take place in the nation; first and foremost, one is that people start to migrate from rural areas to urban areas. This is because people want to enjoy a luxurious lifestyle, and job opportunities are also higher in cities, so they leave their native places and move to urban areas. In addition, the education institutes and hospitals have new technology. People can be educated and also receive good treatment if they live in a developed area. Thus, cities’ populations can increase drastically.

Furthermore, some solutions can help to tackle these issues. The first one is that the government should develop villages by building new roads, schools, and houses. These are people’s basic needs, so when they get this facility at their native place, they do not need to find any other place to survive. The government can also give loans to people willing to start their own businesses in the countryside. This can develop more jobs in that area so that individuals can earn independently in villages.

In conclusion, although people can face many problems, such as an increase in the number of people in cities, the government can solve them by providing loans and basic needs to the village’s people. It can motivate people to stay in their native places and reduce city migration.

Sample 6:

Due to a higher ability to live in cities, the countryside negatively encourages the public to move outside. It has been causing issues such as overcrowding, and thus, the government might deal with that by making the village a good place for citizens to live.

First, because of the population, when people reach the city to change their lives, many rural areas suffer, and residential places become empty. Everybody travels and abandons the elderly public alone. As a result, a huge number of young members prefer modern areas. These days, big cities cannot handle many communities, creating many problems such as unemployment, and parents hardly ever find a school for their minors. For example, in Canada, most citizens enjoy living in Toronto, so the percentage of tax increases, and many people have a difficult time finding jobs, which puts the government under pressure to solve that issue.

On the other hand, the government must tackle the issue in the countryside, such as finding jobs or old school. In spite of public travel to have a new job, hence financial stability, or parents whose juveniles want a good education, the government might stop new people from leaving their areas for the city. The solution could be building many schools and increasing the salary for varied work. For instance, many rural places in America have the best standard for local people. Likewise, the biggest city and the minors from the countryside have useful learning than the idea of leaving for another place is needless for them.

In conclusion, it has raised the quality of living in the city rather than the countryside, which many individuals and the forceful for government to solve.

Sample 7:

The improvement in the standard of living is a significant indicator of a nation’s progress. However, it often favours urban areas over rural regions, leading to economic inequality, inadequate infrastructure and services, and brain drain. This essay will discuss the problems caused by these disparities and propose strategies to mitigate them.

The urban-rural divide results in increased economic disparities between urban and rural areas. Consequently, rural regions face limited job prospects, lower income levels, and higher poverty rates. This perpetuates social and economic inequalities within the country. Another consequence of the urban-rural divide is the inadequate provision of essential services and infrastructure in rural areas. While urban areas receive greater investments in transportation networks, healthcare facilities, and educational institutions, rural regions suffer from a lack of quality infrastructure. The urban-rural divide also gives rise to a phenomenon known as brain drain, where talented individuals from rural areas migrate to cities in search of better opportunities. Consequently, this exacerbates the developmental gap between urban and rural regions, depriving rural areas of essential talent. 

To address the urban-rural divide, governments should leverage information and communication technology (ICT) to bridge the gap. This includes providing rural areas with broadband connectivity, online education, telemedicine, and e-commerce platforms. Additionally, by encouraging rural-urban partnerships, fostering knowledge exchange, and attracting investments in rural enterprises, governments can foster balanced and inclusive growth. By implementing these strategies, governments can effectively reduce the disparities in the standard of living between urban and rural areas, ensuring equitable progress and improving the lives of people in both regions.

In conclusion, addressing the urban-rural divide requires a comprehensive approach. Governments should prioritize promoting rural industries, improving infrastructure and services, and providing equal access to education and healthcare. Leveraging information and communication technology (ICT) can also play a crucial role in bridging the gap between urban and rural areas. By implementing these strategies, societies can work towards reducing disparities in the standard of living and achieving inclusive progress. It is essential for policymakers to take proactive measures to ensure a balanced and equitable development across urban and rural regions.

Sample 8:

The gap in the standard of living between cities and rural areas has been widening as a byproduct of economic progress made in any country. This trend has given rise to quite a few problems, which can be accordingly solved.

Several acute problems can come up due to the growing inequality between urban and rural areas. The first to be mentioned is the unplanned and uncontrolled sprawling of urban development. City planners are finding it harder and harder to accommodate an increasing number of people who leave their towns and villages. Forcibly, those people are subject to appalling living conditions in the outskirts of cities.

No better method to alleviate this problem could be devised rather than to shift the economic focus and channel more governmental funds from big cities to rural areas. This money could be spent on raising the number of enterprises located in less priviledged parts of the country and public facilities to increase people’s comfort of life. The job opportunities provided can act as an incentive to hold dwellers of rural areas in their places of origin. This method can be able to “kill two birds with one stone” as it does not only make economic sense in the countryside. Moreover, urbanization can take place at a more sustainable pace and a country, as a whole, will benefit greatly.

The issue of economic imbalance between rural and city areas can bring large-scale and long-term adverse impacts to the society. The good news is this is not an insurmountable problem, if more priority were given to the development of rural areas.

Sample 9:

In recent times, several countries have witnessed an upward trend in living standards, resulting in detrimental consequences such as pollution and a rise in the cost of living for the populace. To mitigate these detrimental impacts, government intervention is imperative to balance the economy across regions and address alternative forms of pollution.

The improvement in the quality of life has resulted in several adverse outcomes. The majority of products in the contemporary era are indirectly contributing to the escalation of costs. This is primarily attributable to various factors, including manufacturing, distribution, and reservation costs. Consequently, the development of social welfare has indirectly raised the cost of public infrastructure. For instance, the cost of medical healthcare in Vietnam has become excessively costly, mainly due to the prices of modern technology and medicines. Another prominent drawback is the rapid development of life quality, contributing to pollution in several countries. Infrastructure, including schools, hospitals, and businesses, is mainly concentrated in certain areas. As a result, these facilities will experience a surge in visitors from around the country, leading to significant citizen consumption that releases carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere, contaminating nearby rivers and lakes. Many major cities worldwide face this issue, as exemplified by New Delhi, the capital city of India.

Several viable solutions exist to alleviate these issues, all of which require government intervention. Investing in and constructing more facilities in rural areas is an effective solution. Notably, funding in those areas will balance the economy between regions, prevent large-scale migration, and alleviate overcrowding in large cities. Investing more in local areas entails generating more employment for the indigenous population and providing essential infrastructure. For example, Vietnam’s government has been investing heavily in provinces like Bac Ninh, Ninh Binh, and Phu Quoc to balance the economy between regions while creating tourist destinations.

In conclusion, the rise in living standards has brought about major drawbacks, such as increased costs for various products and potential harm to the environment. To address these issues, government intervention is crucial to balance the economy and safeguard the ecosystem.

Sample 10:

Every data seems to indicate that enormous growth is happening in every field. It is important for a thriving economy - technology, agriculture, services, and industry. This development transforms into better purchasing power and an associated overall better standard of living.

It has been found that a rise in the standard of living in a country only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas. The reasons for such a disparity lie in many factors contributing to the rising economic differences between households in urban and rural areas.

Migration due to the absence of opportunities in the countryside and the rising cost of every facility. This includes education, healthcare, infrastructure, food, clothing and travel is forcing rural populations to move into cities for a better life. With fluctuating prices of essential and non-essential commodities, the fear of having a bleak future is looming large on the less-privileged demographics.

Although all the major cities are overcrowded with people forced to live in congested spaces. The fascination of making more money is alluring the youth to make the shift to big cities. Making better money coupled with an absence of parental control are making the youth aspire for freedom - a freedom that seems elusive in rural set-ups.

Also, the overcrowding of cities is leading to major irreversible environmental issues like high pollution. Because of the increased number of vehicles plying on the roads and deforestation due to an uptick in living requirements to accommodate the incoming footfall. These are major concerns for a sustainable future of the country and the world.

This ensuing migration also results in the vanishing of many valuable traditional crafts. Since the youth refuse to work for longer hours in lieu of small amounts of wages. They find assistance and clerical jobs located in cities to be better paying and more fulfilling.

The government must take notice of the ever-broadening gap between city and rural dwellers. Introduction of intervention measures to arrest the migration via the building of quality educational centres with highly-trained teachers. In addition, a fully-functional hospital with advanced technology, wide roads ensuring fast connectivity. Moreover, employing new technologies in the agricultural field and skilling the youth for digital integration is necessary.

If the rural population are made to believe that they can do equally well living in their native places. Then the standard of living in rural areas will become aspirational. This will uplift the standard of living of the country uniformly.

Sample 11:

A rise in the standard of living in a country only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas. This statement evokes many emotions as many of us like to believe that the soul of a country lies in its rural landscape.

The standard of living that is a prominent marker of progress depends on various factors. These include highly ranked universities, healthcare with the best pool of medical talent. In addition, it also needs recreation and cultural spaces, living spaces entailing modern amenities and more.

Rural spaces, although high in cultural and traditional values, often lack the amenities required to consistently live well. Amenities important for one’s transformation - right from education, healthcare and accommodation of desirable quality - aren’t available in the countryside.

The out-migration from rural areas to urban ones is the result of wanting a life fulfilled in every manner. With access to institutions of excellence, one can hope to get into the workforce with a bigger paycheck. This has the capacity for increased purchasing power and a staircase for building generational wealth.

However, this leads to rural areas’ progress being stuck in the tunnel. A place that’s sparsely populated would not be able to start and build successful businesses. With no cash flow, the demand-supply chain would break down and this would result in livelihood losses resulting in forced migrations. This is the main reason for a poor standard of living in rural spaces.

The truth is that cities are accommodating far more people than they can support. This has led to a haphazard development without taking into account the environmental costs. Extreme weather, suffocating air quality, absence of green covers and less space per person are all points of grave concern.

The government must do the needful by employing measures to create an ecosystem serving all the necessities and wants of the rural population. Digital literacy programs, education and healthcare-related missions and heavy investment in infrastructure and logistics. These are some of the programmes that must be dealt with urgently in an expert manner.

The situation has to be made favourable to ensure an equitable lifestyle for all the people of a country. After all, a truly developed country is one that provides equality for all its residents.

Sample 12:

The idea of a local infrastructure development in urban areas is a first priority and leads to spending less funds for rural regions. And there are bigger problems occurring with the transition. Now, I will state the reasons and find the approximate solutions to cope with the issue.

Speaking about the situation, the urban areas develop at a hasty pace as it attracts influx of people from rural lands. As there is better infrastructure, health facilities, and job opportunities compared to the countryside, this makes people go to cities which leads to overpopulation. On top of that, there is overpricing in rent, and groceries, and an increase in road traffic. An example can be in cities, people are required to pay a heavy price for houses, almost double that of houses in rural areas. Moreover, the country that follows rural emigration is seen to witness underdevelopment in rural territories because the lack of working people makes it difficult to reach high productivity.

Such problems must be solved by the government and individuals. Firstly, the authorities can provide the basic infrastructure to the village people. With better health and schools in such areas, they will not migrate to towns and cities, which will fix the problem of overpopulation. Secondly, introducing benefits just like that in China where they offer incentives to people working in rural areas is a solution to tackle migration to towns and cities.

Concludingly, the issue of rising living standards in certain urban areas within a country can be detrimental to a deep extend as it may lead to overly populated regions, and expensive housing. Therefore, the only means that promise rural areas effective productivity and maintain living standards are fair incentives and enhanced infrastructure.

Sample 13:

In the wake of globalization, numerous countries are undergoing an upward trend in the levels of living standard for people, thereby engendering pernicious environmental issues, and increasing the cost of living among natives. It is a fact that city-bred citizens tend to enjoy premium facilities and living conditions compared to their counterparts living in rural areas. This essay will substantiate the problems kindred with urbanization, and potential solutions to help mitigate the imbalance in living standards. 

To commence with, the handy access to countries beyond boundaries through collaborations, knowledge, and technological exchange, there is a creation of a pool of job and academic opportunities which facilitates migration. Notwithstanding, rural inhabitants are denuded of availing the same utilities and resources as evinced by numerous surveys. Apart from this, urbanization provokes barely any development for workers in the countryside which impedes a conducive lifestyle. An instance is of the farmers in India receiving meager support from governments when incentives or welfare is concerned. Hence, these myriad issues exacerbate the quality of life of the village dwellers. 

There are viable solutions that can fulfill the provisions that augment the development in rural areas. To alleviate the impending issues, there should be proactive intervention from the government's end. It can aim for investing funds for the workers and installing a superior framework for the students so that the educational standards and living-and-working conditions are ameliorated. This will ensure proper balance in the economic flow between regions, and thwart overcrowding in cities ensuing out of large-scale rural-urban migration. 

In conclusion, urban settlers enjoy benefits and luxuries more than most rural communities because of the fragmented concerns leading to imbalance. However, the government has the authority to intervene forthwith to balance the economy and remediate the differences in living standards.