Câu hỏi:

06/01/2025 209

A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas. What problems can this cause? How might these problems be reduced?

Xem lời giải

Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!

Bắt đầu thi

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

The improvement in a country’s living standard often entails urban development, leaving rural areas stagnant behind. This can engender several problems in both urban and rural parts of the country, which can be addressed by some viable approaches outlined in the essay below.

The disparity in the distribution of a higher standard of living favoring urban areas can pose some compelling challenges for a nation. Chief among these is the widening socioeconomic gap between the two regions, given that improved urban living standards are synonymous with better job opportunities with desirable wages, along with enhanced infrastructure, services and healthcare there. This will exacerbate the existing urban-rural inequalities within the nation. Another pressing problem is population issues, including overpopulation in urban regions and the “brain drain” phenomenon in the countryside. Particularly, owing to a more decent living standard in cities, rural dwellers, including talented ones, will continuously migrate to cities for better opportunities, leading to brain drain in the countryside. As a result, the countryside lacks an intellectual labor force, while urban areas face a population explosion and its consequent problems, such as traffic congestion and pollution, will be even more severe.

To address these problems, the involvement of governments plays a crucial role. Governments can invest in rural economic development programs, including providing incentives for businesses to set up in rural areas and promoting industries based on agriculture. These can help to boost the rural economy and provide employment opportunities. Furthermore, the welfare of rural dwellers should also be dedicated, which can be done by improving transport, infrastructure, healthcare and digital connectivity. By doing so, rural areas can access markets, information, and services adequately. Also, providing quality education and skill development programs in rural areas can help people find employment locally. This reduces the need to migrate to cities, contributing to alleviating the population explosion in cities and its problems.

In conclusion, increasing socio-economic imbalances and population issues are subject to the fact that a higher living standard in a nation facilitates urban growth. These can be tackled by a combination of methods aimed at elevating the countryside’s economy and quality of life.

Sample 2:

When standards of living increase, it is primarily urban residents, not those in the countryside, who benefit. In my opinion, this can lead to opposite problems related to population density and is best mitigated by governmental action.

Inequality in terms of standard of living engenders population problems for cities and rural regions. Cities have become over-populated in the last century as they offer a wider range of educational, occupational, and recreational options. Elevated population density means that although residents can enjoy a higher standard of living generally, they must also overcome concomitant effects from overcrowding such as more traffic, less sanitary conditions, and higher crime rates. The inverse problem exists outside cities as residents leave and locals struggle to earn a living in sparsely populated towns and villages.

These related problems can best be countered by the authorities. There are various initiatives that could be implemented. One real-world example of this would be in Japan where the government in recent years has addressed dwindling population numbers in the countryside by auctioning off country homes cheaply. Prospective home-owners are often able to buy houses nearly for free if they agree to live and work in a town with few residents. Another possible measure would be for governments to invest more in urban infrastructure. Since migrations to cities are likely inevitable, this is a more pragmatic tactic.

In conclusion, the inverse issues created for rural and urban areas by rising standards of living can be effectively controlled if governments intervene. This issue will only become more pressing as the global middle class continues to grow.

Sample 3:

Improving living standards in a particular country is generally advantageous for urban citizens compared to the ones living in the countryside. This situation is likely to result in some serious problems unless prevented by a set of effective counter measures.

To start, a disproportionate positive effect of growing living standards gives rise to two major issues, the most significant one of which is rural migration. This is because more and more rural dwellers choose to move to cities in search of better life quality as well as opportunities when quality of life in the countryside is inferior to that of cities. As a result, uncontrolled growth of urban population occurs, creating further problems for a country. Furthermore, contentment level among rural residents may decline as a result of not benefitting from a nationwide rise in life quality as much as their urban counterparts. This will eventually mean a fall in productivity levels, which is often followed by inefficiencies and possibly financial losses in the food supply chain.

Having established the severity of the situation, there are some practical solutions to consider. Channeling more financial investment into the countryside is often the first line of response. It works since this form of investment can be used to build plants and factories, hence creating more job opportunities for the common man. Having a secure job gives rural dwellers an incentive to stay in the country. Making countryside life appealing is another possible solution. This can be done by helping people there meet their basic needs for living such as food, warm housing, and healthcare. The government can take this idea a step further with the creation of leisure centers to foster a jovial spirit in the countryside.

In conclusion, while the main issues stemming from an uneven rise in living standards are uncontrolled rural migration and less happy rural dwellers, solutions range from directing more funds to the countryside to making the countryside life attractive.

Sample 4:

Nowadays cities are getting more benefits than rural areas, but there are so many problems. Though there are many facilities, we have to face some causes to live there. Here I am going to share a few problems which occur there and the solution for them.

We all know that the city looks so good, neat and has a good atmosphere but even though it was improved with many facilities, some places look good and neat in atmosphere. Yes, sanitizing. The government of India appointed few workers to sanitize our surroundings, but workers in some areas were doing their job as well, especially in the main cities, but in most of the places they were not doing their job, once in a week or once in two weeks they were cleaning the garbage, or they were complaining of non-payments of money and stop working,

As we all know, in villages there are more animals compared to urban areas, but they are keeping their society clean and natural, by planting trees, using biodegradable garbs as fertilizers. It helps them to lead happy and healthy lives. The most notable thing in rural lifestyles is they avoid using non-biodegradable things like plastics. Mostly they use aluminum vessels, mud vessels and steel vessels. Even they avoid plastic covers, instead they use cotton bags, etc.

As a city resident we should take steps to keep our surroundings neatly as if the sanitizing workers were not doing their jobs, but we cannot blame them, so form a group for social service (FASS) and take some actions like avoiding plastics, non-biodegradable products to use, to keep our surroundings neat and good.

Sample 5:

Nowadays, the availability of modern facilities is increasing because of advanced technology worldwide. However, the advancement of living standards has more positive effects in urban areas than in the countryside. It can generate a number of problems, and there are also some solutions to reduce the issues, which I have discussed in detail in the next paragraph.

To begin with, there are some issues that can take place in the nation; first and foremost, one is that people start to migrate from rural areas to urban areas. This is because people want to enjoy a luxurious lifestyle, and job opportunities are also higher in cities, so they leave their native places and move to urban areas. In addition, the education institutes and hospitals have new technology. People can be educated and also receive good treatment if they live in a developed area. Thus, cities’ populations can increase drastically.

Furthermore, some solutions can help to tackle these issues. The first one is that the government should develop villages by building new roads, schools, and houses. These are people’s basic needs, so when they get this facility at their native place, they do not need to find any other place to survive. The government can also give loans to people willing to start their own businesses in the countryside. This can develop more jobs in that area so that individuals can earn independently in villages.

In conclusion, although people can face many problems, such as an increase in the number of people in cities, the government can solve them by providing loans and basic needs to the village’s people. It can motivate people to stay in their native places and reduce city migration.

Sample 6:

Due to a higher ability to live in cities, the countryside negatively encourages the public to move outside. It has been causing issues such as overcrowding, and thus, the government might deal with that by making the village a good place for citizens to live.

First, because of the population, when people reach the city to change their lives, many rural areas suffer, and residential places become empty. Everybody travels and abandons the elderly public alone. As a result, a huge number of young members prefer modern areas. These days, big cities cannot handle many communities, creating many problems such as unemployment, and parents hardly ever find a school for their minors. For example, in Canada, most citizens enjoy living in Toronto, so the percentage of tax increases, and many people have a difficult time finding jobs, which puts the government under pressure to solve that issue.

On the other hand, the government must tackle the issue in the countryside, such as finding jobs or old school. In spite of public travel to have a new job, hence financial stability, or parents whose juveniles want a good education, the government might stop new people from leaving their areas for the city. The solution could be building many schools and increasing the salary for varied work. For instance, many rural places in America have the best standard for local people. Likewise, the biggest city and the minors from the countryside have useful learning than the idea of leaving for another place is needless for them.

In conclusion, it has raised the quality of living in the city rather than the countryside, which many individuals and the forceful for government to solve.

Sample 7:

The improvement in the standard of living is a significant indicator of a nation’s progress. However, it often favours urban areas over rural regions, leading to economic inequality, inadequate infrastructure and services, and brain drain. This essay will discuss the problems caused by these disparities and propose strategies to mitigate them.

The urban-rural divide results in increased economic disparities between urban and rural areas. Consequently, rural regions face limited job prospects, lower income levels, and higher poverty rates. This perpetuates social and economic inequalities within the country. Another consequence of the urban-rural divide is the inadequate provision of essential services and infrastructure in rural areas. While urban areas receive greater investments in transportation networks, healthcare facilities, and educational institutions, rural regions suffer from a lack of quality infrastructure. The urban-rural divide also gives rise to a phenomenon known as brain drain, where talented individuals from rural areas migrate to cities in search of better opportunities. Consequently, this exacerbates the developmental gap between urban and rural regions, depriving rural areas of essential talent.

To address the urban-rural divide, governments should leverage information and communication technology (ICT) to bridge the gap. This includes providing rural areas with broadband connectivity, online education, telemedicine, and e-commerce platforms. Additionally, by encouraging rural-urban partnerships, fostering knowledge exchange, and attracting investments in rural enterprises, governments can foster balanced and inclusive growth. By implementing these strategies, governments can effectively reduce the disparities in the standard of living between urban and rural areas, ensuring equitable progress and improving the lives of people in both regions.

In conclusion, addressing the urban-rural divide requires a comprehensive approach. Governments should prioritize promoting rural industries, improving infrastructure and services, and providing equal access to education and healthcare. Leveraging information and communication technology (ICT) can also play a crucial role in bridging the gap between urban and rural areas. By implementing these strategies, societies can work towards reducing disparities in the standard of living and achieving inclusive progress. It is essential for policymakers to take proactive measures to ensure a balanced and equitable development across urban and rural regions.

Sample 8:

The gap in the standard of living between cities and rural areas has been widening as a byproduct of economic progress made in any country. This trend has given rise to quite a few problems, which can be accordingly solved.

Several acute problems can come up due to the growing inequality between urban and rural areas. The first to be mentioned is the unplanned and uncontrolled sprawling of urban development. City planners are finding it harder and harder to accommodate an increasing number of people who leave their towns and villages. Forcibly, those people are subject to appalling living conditions in the outskirts of cities.

No better method to alleviate this problem could be devised rather than to shift the economic focus and channel more governmental funds from big cities to rural areas. This money could be spent on raising the number of enterprises located in less priviledged parts of the country and public facilities to increase people’s comfort of life. The job opportunities provided can act as an incentive to hold dwellers of rural areas in their places of origin. This method can be able to “kill two birds with one stone” as it does not only make economic sense in the countryside. Moreover, urbanization can take place at a more sustainable pace and a country, as a whole, will benefit greatly.

The issue of economic imbalance between rural and city areas can bring large-scale and long-term adverse impacts to the society. The good news is this is not an insurmountable problem, if more priority were given to the development of rural areas.

Sample 9:

In recent times, several countries have witnessed an upward trend in living standards, resulting in detrimental consequences such as pollution and a rise in the cost of living for the populace. To mitigate these detrimental impacts, government intervention is imperative to balance the economy across regions and address alternative forms of pollution.

The improvement in the quality of life has resulted in several adverse outcomes. The majority of products in the contemporary era are indirectly contributing to the escalation of costs. This is primarily attributable to various factors, including manufacturing, distribution, and reservation costs. Consequently, the development of social welfare has indirectly raised the cost of public infrastructure. For instance, the cost of medical healthcare in Vietnam has become excessively costly, mainly due to the prices of modern technology and medicines. Another prominent drawback is the rapid development of life quality, contributing to pollution in several countries. Infrastructure, including schools, hospitals, and businesses, is mainly concentrated in certain areas. As a result, these facilities will experience a surge in visitors from around the country, leading to significant citizen consumption that releases carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere, contaminating nearby rivers and lakes. Many major cities worldwide face this issue, as exemplified by New Delhi, the capital city of India.

Several viable solutions exist to alleviate these issues, all of which require government intervention. Investing in and constructing more facilities in rural areas is an effective solution. Notably, funding in those areas will balance the economy between regions, prevent large-scale migration, and alleviate overcrowding in large cities. Investing more in local areas entails generating more employment for the indigenous population and providing essential infrastructure. For example, Vietnam’s government has been investing heavily in provinces like Bac Ninh, Ninh Binh, and Phu Quoc to balance the economy between regions while creating tourist destinations.

In conclusion, the rise in living standards has brought about major drawbacks, such as increased costs for various products and potential harm to the environment. To address these issues, government intervention is crucial to balance the economy and safeguard the ecosystem.

Sample 10:

Every data seems to indicate that enormous growth is happening in every field. It is important for a thriving economy - technology, agriculture, services, and industry. This development transforms into better purchasing power and an associated overall better standard of living.

It has been found that a rise in the standard of living in a country only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas. The reasons for such a disparity lie in many factors contributing to the rising economic differences between households in urban and rural areas.

Migration due to the absence of opportunities in the countryside and the rising cost of every facility. This includes education, healthcare, infrastructure, food, clothing and travel is forcing rural populations to move into cities for a better life. With fluctuating prices of essential and non-essential commodities, the fear of having a bleak future is looming large on the less-privileged demographics.

Although all the major cities are overcrowded with people forced to live in congested spaces. The fascination of making more money is alluring the youth to make the shift to big cities. Making better money coupled with an absence of parental control are making the youth aspire for freedom - a freedom that seems elusive in rural set-ups.

Also, the overcrowding of cities is leading to major irreversible environmental issues like high pollution. Because of the increased number of vehicles plying on the roads and deforestation due to an uptick in living requirements to accommodate the incoming footfall. These are major concerns for a sustainable future of the country and the world.

This ensuing migration also results in the vanishing of many valuable traditional crafts. Since the youth refuse to work for longer hours in lieu of small amounts of wages. They find assistance and clerical jobs located in cities to be better paying and more fulfilling.

The government must take notice of the ever-broadening gap between city and rural dwellers. Introduction of intervention measures to arrest the migration via the building of quality educational centres with highly-trained teachers. In addition, a fully-functional hospital with advanced technology, wide roads ensuring fast connectivity. Moreover, employing new technologies in the agricultural field and skilling the youth for digital integration is necessary.

If the rural population are made to believe that they can do equally well living in their native places. Then the standard of living in rural areas will become aspirational. This will uplift the standard of living of the country uniformly.

Sample 11:

A rise in the standard of living in a country only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas. This statement evokes many emotions as many of us like to believe that the soul of a country lies in its rural landscape.

The standard of living that is a prominent marker of progress depends on various factors. These include highly ranked universities, healthcare with the best pool of medical talent. In addition, it also needs recreation and cultural spaces, living spaces entailing modern amenities and more.

Rural spaces, although high in cultural and traditional values, often lack the amenities required to consistently live well. Amenities important for one’s transformation - right from education, healthcare and accommodation of desirable quality - aren’t available in the countryside.

The out-migration from rural areas to urban ones is the result of wanting a life fulfilled in every manner. With access to institutions of excellence, one can hope to get into the workforce with a bigger paycheck. This has the capacity for increased purchasing power and a staircase for building generational wealth.

However, this leads to rural areas’ progress being stuck in the tunnel. A place that’s sparsely populated would not be able to start and build successful businesses. With no cash flow, the demand-supply chain would break down and this would result in livelihood losses resulting in forced migrations. This is the main reason for a poor standard of living in rural spaces.

The truth is that cities are accommodating far more people than they can support. This has led to a haphazard development without taking into account the environmental costs. Extreme weather, suffocating air quality, absence of green covers and less space per person are all points of grave concern.

The government must do the needful by employing measures to create an ecosystem serving all the necessities and wants of the rural population. Digital literacy programs, education and healthcare-related missions and heavy investment in infrastructure and logistics. These are some of the programmes that must be dealt with urgently in an expert manner.

The situation has to be made favourable to ensure an equitable lifestyle for all the people of a country. After all, a truly developed country is one that provides equality for all its residents.

Sample 12:

The idea of a local infrastructure development in urban areas is a first priority and leads to spending less funds for rural regions. And there are bigger problems occurring with the transition. Now, I will state the reasons and find the approximate solutions to cope with the issue.

Speaking about the situation, the urban areas develop at a hasty pace as it attracts influx of people from rural lands. As there is better infrastructure, health facilities, and job opportunities compared to the countryside, this makes people go to cities which leads to overpopulation. On top of that, there is overpricing in rent, and groceries, and an increase in road traffic. An example can be in cities, people are required to pay a heavy price for houses, almost double that of houses in rural areas. Moreover, the country that follows rural emigration is seen to witness underdevelopment in rural territories because the lack of working people makes it difficult to reach high productivity.

Such problems must be solved by the government and individuals. Firstly, the authorities can provide the basic infrastructure to the village people. With better health and schools in such areas, they will not migrate to towns and cities, which will fix the problem of overpopulation. Secondly, introducing benefits just like that in China where they offer incentives to people working in rural areas is a solution to tackle migration to towns and cities.

Concludingly, the issue of rising living standards in certain urban areas within a country can be detrimental to a deep extend as it may lead to overly populated regions, and expensive housing. Therefore, the only means that promise rural areas effective productivity and maintain living standards are fair incentives and enhanced infrastructure.

Sample 13:

In the wake of globalization, numerous countries are undergoing an upward trend in the levels of living standard for people, thereby engendering pernicious environmental issues, and increasing the cost of living among natives. It is a fact that city-bred citizens tend to enjoy premium facilities and living conditions compared to their counterparts living in rural areas. This essay will substantiate the problems kindred with urbanization, and potential solutions to help mitigate the imbalance in living standards.

To commence with, the handy access to countries beyond boundaries through collaborations, knowledge, and technological exchange, there is a creation of a pool of job and academic opportunities which facilitates migration. Notwithstanding, rural inhabitants are denuded of availing the same utilities and resources as evinced by numerous surveys. Apart from this, urbanization provokes barely any development for workers in the countryside which impedes a conducive lifestyle. An instance is of the farmers in India receiving meager support from governments when incentives or welfare is concerned. Hence, these myriad issues exacerbate the quality of life of the village dwellers.

There are viable solutions that can fulfill the provisions that augment the development in rural areas. To alleviate the impending issues, there should be proactive intervention from the government's end. It can aim for investing funds for the workers and installing a superior framework for the students so that the educational standards and living-and-working conditions are ameliorated. This will ensure proper balance in the economic flow between regions, and thwart overcrowding in cities ensuing out of large-scale rural-urban migration.

In conclusion, urban settlers enjoy benefits and luxuries more than most rural communities because of the fragmented concerns leading to imbalance. However, the government has the authority to intervene forthwith to balance the economy and remediate the differences in living standards.

Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay

Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:

Xem thêm »

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Câu 1

Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of a bad person's nature. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some people take the view that criminal behavior is a product of an individual's inherent nature, while others argue that it is the outcome of poverty and societal factors. Although there are cogent arguments for the former view, I still lean towards the social issues and poverty theory.

Those who argue that crime is rooted in an individual's personality traits and moral compass suggest that some individuals are simply predisposed to engage in criminal behavior due to factors such as personality. They argue that some people either have a natural inclination towards aggression, violence, and rule-breaking. These individuals are believed to engage in criminal activities by choice despite having access to legal means of earning a living. In fact, some serial killers are known for their violent and sadistic crimes, which were often carried out with a sense of pleasure or enjoyment.

In my view, crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty. This is because individuals may turn to criminal behavior when they are faced with limited opportunities, financial insecurity, and social inequality. These conditions can lead to frustration, hopelessness, and despair, which can ultimately push individuals towards criminal behavior as a means of survival or escape. For example, a young person who grows up in a community with few employment possibilities may feel that their only option for financial survival is to engage in drug dealing.

In conclusion, while there are certainly some individuals who exhibit consistent patterns of aggressive or antisocial behavior, these traits alone are not sufficient to explain why people commit crimes. Therefore, I believe that the majority of crime is driven by socioeconomic factors.

Sample 2:

Opinions differ as to whether crime is caused by social issues and poverty or by people’s evil nature. Personally, I agree with the former view.

It is understandable why some people claim that our nature is the root of crime. Perhaps they have witnessed some children commit wrongdoing at some point in their lives. For example, many physically strong children tend to bully others at school, while others may perform mischievous acts like lying to adults or stealing money from their parents. These experiences lead people to believe that humans are purely good or bad by nature, and those who engage in misconduct at a young age will likely become criminals.

However, the point mentioned above is deeply flawed. Everyone possesses their own good and bad nature, and it is the environment that triggers people’s evil side and causes them to commit crime. One major cause of crime in many countries is inadequate education. Poorly educated youngsters may struggle to discern between right and wrong; therefore, they are more likely to commit crimes without even knowing. Poverty is another root cause of crime because those living in impoverished conditions may turn to stealing or robbing as the final solution to make ends meet. A corrupt political system can also be a breeding ground for crime because the politicians there have to comply with the corruption, regardless of their personal intentions.

In conclusion, though some might think that crime results from a person’s bad nature, I believe it is more likely caused by social problems, such as poor education, corrupt political systems, and poverty. People are both good and bad by nature, and the environment in which they live determines whether they become criminals.

Sample 3:

When it comes to crime rates, some individuals claim that criminal activity is solely the result of innate characteristics, while others argue that it is the outcome of societal issues and impoverishment. In my opinion, socioeconomic challenges and inequality are more likely to prompt people to engage in illegal behaviours.

On the one hand, criminality could represent the result of an inherent personality. In some cases, crime is merely the result of a person’s impulsive actions and lack of moral compass. Various factors such as upbringing, personal beliefs, and psychological disorders may all play a role when it comes to criminal activity. Some people, for example, may have grown up in environments in which illegal conduct is normalised, causing them to assume that such behaviour is acceptable. Similarly, those with mental health disorders like sociopathy or psychopathy may be inclined to committing crimes due to their inability to empathise with victims.

On the other hand, societal problems and economic hardship may contribute to criminal conduct. Poverty with limited access to food, clothing, shelter, healthcare, and schooling can push people to the brink of desperation, prompting them to resort to criminal behaviour as a means of survival. People who are financially strapped in various urban areas, for instance, may turn to illegal activities like drug trafficking or burglary in order to make ends meet. Once poverty and crime are intertwined, it may ultimately develop into a vicious cycle that is challenging to escape. Furthermore, socioeconomic issues such as discrimination, inequality, and corruption may promote crime through fostering an environment of dissatisfaction and rage. Those who experience discrimination or who believe the system is stacked against them are more inclined to turn to illegal behaviour as a form of protest or vengeance.

To summarise, aside from personal psychological factors, I believe that social difficulties and poverty can have a greater impact on crime rates.

Sample 4:

Crime has been studied by many scientific disciplines, with some people ascribing it to social problems and poverty, and others thinking that it is caused by the criminal’s nature. In this, I believe that unlawful behavior is more likely the result of defective personal qualities.

Several explanations can support crime being a function of inferior socioeconomic factors. Firstly, poverty reduces access to education and employment, causing hopelessness and desperation as a result. Having been deprived of opportunities, people may turn to crime to get by. Furthermore, people whose environment is rife with social problems may be accustomed to illegal behavior, making it easier for themselves to engage in criminal activities later on. A child who grows up in a neighborhood with drug problems could turn into a drug dealer himself, since he has witnessed drug abuse and addiction as a norm. It could, therefore, be argued that social issues and poverty create criminals.

However, the view that crime is a result of the perpetrator’s nature is no less convincing. Proponents of this belief claim that certain traits, such as impulsivity, aggression, and callousness, predispose individuals to immoral or unethical behavior. People with these traits become less considerate when they perceive any threat to their self-interest, making them likely to ignore the consequences of their actions. Others, meanwhile, carry undiagnosed psychological disorders, and their condition makes them more prone to committing crimes. A large share of the prison population, especially repeat offenders, are affected by sociopathy, a disorder usually characterized by inhibited compassion towards others. It is not well-understood otherwise, and education has only been partially effective in mitigating sociopathy’s effects. For these reasons, criminals’ nature is definitely worth looking at as a cause of their offenses.

In conclusion, while both views can be supported by evidence, I believe one’s personality is a more indicative factor of whether they are likely to commit crimes. Hence, it is crucial that parents and guardians pay attention to how they shape their children’s nature.

Sample 5:

For millennia, philosophers and scientists have held countless debates on personality. Some believe in the inherent crooked nature of humanity while others argue that they are the product of their environment. This essay wishes to explore both sides of the argument.

Nativists believe that personalities and manners are inherent and genetic, so crime is innate. Credible evidence of this would be the correlation between lead exposure and crime rate. In the 1940s, the USA was the prime consumer of lead-based products, such as paint and gasoline, so babies conceived, born, and raised during this period were lead-poisoned. They later suffered from poorer impulse control and higher aggressivity. As adults, they contributed to the surplus in levels of violent crime. However, it should be noted that genes do not cause behavior but influence it through their effects on the body's response to the environment.

Supporters of Environmentalism concede that criminal behaviors are determined by family and other people, education opportunities, as well as physical circumstances. This school of thought is supported by several studies. some of them focused on the negative link between vegetation and crime. It was shown that in neighborhoods with more greenery, fewer crimes were reported. One explanation for this was that the environment gave its residents a sense of safety and security.

It should be noted that the nature-nurture debate has not been taken as seriously as it used to be. Essentially, every facet of personality development results from interaction between genes and environment. If the authorities aim at reducing the rate of crime and violence, they should take action in improving residential areas as well as enhancing healthcare.

Sample 6:

Many people consider that innate characteristics are responsible for the fact that some people choose to turn to a career of crime. While I accept that crime may result from individual characteristics of violence or greed, I would argue that it is largely a consequence of social issues and poverty.

There is a belief that a person’s nature determines whether or not they become a criminal. Firstly, some argue that an individual who is cruel turns to crime more easily than a kind person. For instance, a child bullying other boys or girls at school may turn into a violent criminal in the future. Secondly, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness could also breed future offenders, who seek to acquire easy money without working for it. A number of youngsters choose to steal from others, instead of working hard to make an honest living. These are strong reasons for thinking that those who have an inborn bad nature are more likely to break the law.

Nevertheless, it seems to me that social issues and poverty are the main causes behind crime. There are many problems in society which might lead to an increase in the crime rate. For example, unemployment pushes people into resorting to crime because they simply cannot find a job. As a consequence, the number of offenders has climbed in many countries over recent decades. Another reason is that, more broadly, poverty in general leads to a rise in crime. If people do not have enough money to make ends meet, they will be tempted to pursue illegal activities just to support themselves and their families.

In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that the principal causes of crime are a result of social conditions and problems.

Sample 7:

The causes of crime have long been a topic of debate. While some argue that crime stems from a person's inherent nature, I do believe it is the result of social problems and poverty

On the one hand, advocates of the view that crime results from a person's nature suggest that individuals with cruel tendencies are more likely to engage in criminal activities. This is because cruelty often correlates with a lack of empathy, disregard for others' well-being, and aggressive behavior, all of which can lead to crime. For example, a child who bullies others at school may grow up to become a violent criminal. Additionally, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness can breed future offenders who seek easy money without working for it. Many young people, lured by the prospect of quick and easy money, turn to cybercrime, engaging in online scams, hacking, and identity theft.

On the other hand, some, myself included, argue that crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty, a perspective I support. Social issues, such as unemployment, can push people towards crime as they struggle to find legitimate employment. The widening gap between the rich and the poor exacerbates this issue, as seen in places like Rio De Janeiro, where high crime rates are prevalent in impoverished areas. Poverty is another significant factor; individuals struggling to make ends meet may resort to illegal activities to support themselves and their families. This explains why people in dire need often turn to theft or other crimes for survival.

In conclusion, while inherent personal traits can contribute to criminal behavior, social problems and poverty play a more significant role in driving people towards crime. Addressing these underlying issues is crucial for reducing crime rates.

Sample 8:

Crime is a complex issue that elicits varied perspectives regarding its origins. While some argue that crime is primarily a consequence of social problems and poverty, others contend that it stems from an individual’s inherent nature. I contend that the interplay between societal factors and individual predispositions contributes significantly to criminal behavior.

I concur with the notion that crime often finds its roots in social problems and poverty, where the impact of socioeconomic conditions significantly steers an individual’s choices. For example, in underprivileged areas, the absence of adequate educational facilities, job prospects, and robust social support structures may force individuals into a corner, compelling them to turn to illicit means for survival. Moreover, when societal disparities are rife and systemic issues remain unaddressed, it can exacerbate the situation, causing individuals to resort to criminal activities as a perceived solution to their economic struggles or as a means to voice their grievances about prevalent social injustices.

However, I am also of the opinion that the origins of crime are not solely tethered to external factors; rather, an individual’s innate disposition can also play a crucial role. Some individuals might exhibit inherent psychological disorders that predispose them to engage in unlawful activities, regardless of their social background. Furthermore, the absence of strong moral values or ethical guidance in an individual’s upbringing can be a contributing factor, irrespective of their socioeconomic circumstances. Instances abound where individuals from affluent backgrounds have succumbed to criminal behavior due to the lack of a strong moral compass in their formative years, indicating that individual nature can play a pivotal role in shaping criminal inclinations.

In conclusion, I believe crime’s origin is not solely attributed to either social problems or an individual’s nature; rather, it is a complex interplay between societal factors and personal inclinations.

Sample 9:

There are divergent opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. Some people argue that external factors such as poverty or other social issues are to blame for most crimes, while others contend that people who engage in criminal activity are intrinsically bad in nature. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and provide my own opinion.

On the one hand, those who believe that social problems are the primary cause of criminal behavior argue that people are driven to commit crimes due to their difficult and disadvantaged circumstances. For example, individuals facing extreme poverty or unemployment may resort to stealing or other illicit activities as a means of survival. Proponents of this view also point out that issues such as substance abuse or mental illness can exacerbate criminal tendencies, emphasizing the importance of addressing underlying social difficulties to reduce crime rates.

On the other hand, there is a counterargument that criminal behavior arises from individual traits such as impulsivity, selfishness, or a lack of empathy. This perspective suggests that some people have a natural tendency to engage in harmful behavior, regardless of environmental factors. In support of this view, critics of the social circumstance theory point out that there are people who grow up in difficult circumstances but do not resort to crime, indicating that innate character traits play a significant role.

In my view, it is likely that both factors play a role in criminal behavior. While social issues can be a significant driver of crime, it is also true that some individuals may be more inclined to engage in criminal activity due to inherent character flaws. Therefore, addressing both the root causes of social problems and providing intervention programs that focus on individual development could be effective in reducing crime rates.

In conclusion, there are varying opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. While some argue that criminal activity is solely attributable to social problems, others believe that individual traits play a more significant role. In my opinion, it is essential to consider both perspectives and work towards comprehensive solutions to reduce the prevalence of crime in our society.

Sample 10:

Crime is a complex issue with multiple contributing factors. While some argue that most crimes result from circumstances like poverty and social problems, I believe they are caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature.

On one hand, there are several factors that lead people to believe that most crimes stem from circumstances. Firstly, individuals who grow up in deprived environments often lack access to basic needs such as education, healthcare, and stable employment, leading them to potentially turn to crime as a means of survival or escape from their circumstances. For example, high crime rates in low-income neighborhoods can be attributed to individuals struggling to meet basic needs such as food, housing, and healthcare, and with limited access to education and job opportunities, they may resort to criminal activities like theft or drug dealing to make ends meet. Secondly, exposure to violence and crime from a young age can normalize these behaviors. For instance, children from households with domestic violence may become desensitized to violent behavior and replicate it in their own relationships.

On the other hand, I do believe that crime is caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature. Firstly, those who commit crimes may have a predisposition to violence and deviant behavior, regardless of their upbringing or environment. Ted Bundy, for instance, despite his stable upbringing and education, committed numerous murders. His actions suggest an inherent predisposition to violence and deviance, highlighting the role of personal moral character in criminal behavior. Secondly, some research indicates that genetic and environmental factors can increase the likelihood of engaging in criminal activities. For instance, a longitudinal study conducted by the National Institute of Justice followed a group of individuals from childhood into adulthood and found that those with a family history of criminal behavior were more likely to engage in similar activities.

In conclusion, while circumstances like poverty and social problems contribute to crime, I believe that personal moral character and inherent predispositions play a more significant role in criminal behavior.

Sample 11:

Crime is a prevalent issue in modern society and understanding its root causes is important for its effective prevention and control. Some people argue that most crimes are the result of circumstances such as poverty or other social problems. Others believe that criminal behaviour stems from individuals who are bad in nature. In my opinion, most crimes are the consequence of socioeconomic circumstances.

Individuals who believe that crime is the result of inheriting bad nature think that even though people who live in affluent societies with minimal social problems, are subjected to face crimes. They believe that personal choices and moral failings are significant contributors to criminal behaviour. For example, studies have indicated that people who possess personality traits such as impulsivity and aggressiveness are more likely to engage in criminal activities.

On the other hand, proponents of the view that crime is a result of poverty and social issues argue that individuals coming from poor backgrounds are forced to commit crimes because of necessity. When a person’s basic needs such as food, shelter and security are unmet, they may resort to illegal activities as a means of survival. For instance, incidents like theft and burglary are more common in economically deprived societies where everyone is striving to make ends meet. Furthermore, social problems such as lack of education, unemployment and substance abuse exacerbate the situation. Without access to quality education, many individuals cannot secure well-paying jobs, leading them to seek alternative, often illegal, means of income.

In my opinion, poverty and social problems create an environment where crime can flourish. When individuals are deprived of opportunities and resources, the temptation to break the law becomes stronger. Additionally, the social environment, including peer influence and community norms, plays a crucial role in shaping behaviour.

In conclusion, addressing these root causes through social policies aimed at reducing poverty, improving education, and providing employment opportunities is essential for effective crime prevention. By creating a more equitable and supportive society, the incidence of crime can be significantly reduced.

Sample 12:

Throughout history, people tended to believe that crimes were committed by those who were innately bad, but in the modern era a more liberal approach has led to the idea that crimes are often acts of desperation, committed by people whose circumstances are bleak. This essay will explore both perspectives, concluding that the latter is usually true.

First of all, it should be noted that some crimes are committed by people who appear innately driven towards such acts. These people may have some sort of hereditary psychological condition that means they do not feel empathy for others, or a predilection towards violence. This is a controversial perspective and although it feels true for many, it is hard to prove. Many of the most violent criminals have traumatic backgrounds, such as child abuse, neglect, or sexual assault, which suggests that they were not born with their criminal compunctions, but rather that these developed very early, which thus places them more into the circumstances than nature category. However, the lines are blurry.

Certainly, it does seem as though most criminals are created out of difficult circumstances. To understand this, one just has to look at impoverished communities around the world. These are places where crime flourishes because the people there are desperate and forced to do immoral things in order to survive. In such states of despair, people tend to put themselves first and overlook social norms, laws, and the usual empathic perspective that would stop most people from hurting others. In such areas, people tend to be conditioned for a young age to ignore the law or even social decency, joining gangs and becoming influenced by dangerous people. This tends to be a problem due to a lack of resources, opportunities, and education in such areas.

In conclusion, it appears likely that most crime is the result of people’s unfortunate circumstances, meaning that criminals are not inherently bad. However, there may be some people who were born with a certain compunction towards violent or criminal activity.

Câu 2

Some people think success in life comes from hard work and determination. Others think money and appearance are more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

There are numerous reasons to support the fact that hard work and determination are two key factors for success in life. However, as an alternative argument financial condition and looks of the person may also be the primary criteria for success.

Some people believe that financial status and appearance are important for success. They advocate that the looks of a person determine his confidence, which is a vital factor in success. No one can complete any task without considering himself capable of that. Hence, the confidence of the person plays a very key role. Furthermore, money is another important factor as it provides the support to lead the career of your choice. Without financial security, it makes the way to success much more challenging. In a way, money saves the energy and time of a person. It creates numerous opportunities to progress in a rapid way in the career of their desire. Based on this view, the utmost need for success is financial stability and appearance.

On the other side, people have certain justifications to agree with the view that ambition along with hard work is the key to success. People believe that the way to success has no shortcuts, and the primary criteria is to acquire knowledge and practical experiences through hard work. We can have monetary support from someone. However, no one can help us in developing our skills which needs the efforts of my own only. The second most important thing to reach our ultimate goal is our determination. It is because no dream can be fulfilled without ambition and persistence. Hence, one should be hardworking and have the strong willpower to attain the goal of his life.

To sum up, although appearance and financial position have a great impact on achievement, hard work and determination are the most dominant factors in the way of success.

Sample 2:

It is true that there are numerous ways for people to succeed in life. While some people believe that wealth and physical attractiveness are two aspects that influence a person's success. I would contend that people can achieve the pinnacle of their careers when they work hard and are determined.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why having money and being physically attractive help people succeed in life. The first explanation is that having money helps people fulfil their deepest goals, such as those for strength and size. Extremely wealthy individuals, for instance, have endless opportunities to advance quickly in their careers and achieve the recognition they desire in their communities. Furthermore, one of the key elements affecting success is one's appearance. For instance, individuals would have a greater probability of landing a job if they display a confident body posture or wear attire. In addition to having excellent abilities and experiences.

On the other hand, it is evident that perseverance and hard effort are essential qualities that are crucial to ensuring success in the industry. First of all, putting in a lot of effort enables people to get some worthwhile life experiences. To demonstrate my thesis, let's use the example of a young student who practises their assignments often. By doing so, they reduce the likelihood that they will make the same mistakes again and are more likely to perform well on formal exams. Second, determination inspires us to develop goals that serve as the cornerstone of success. This makes it a necessary talent to help people solve complicated challenges in all circumstances. Further keep pushing forward in order to accomplish long-term objectives.

In conclusion, I feel that hard work and determination are the main factors to acquire the maximum performance. Even though money and attractiveness have an impact on achievement.

Sample 3:

Being successful is a dream of every human being. Working hard and dedication is considered to be pivotal to gain success for many people, whereas others have a different viewpoint and believe that money and attractive personality leads to progress in life. This essay will highlight both opinions and also elaborate on why working hard and determination are far more considerable than cash and physical appearance. To begin with, for some people certain goals and ambitions entail success. Since when someone is working hard, he/she would be able to succeed in that particular task eventually. As a result, people gain prosperity and rewards which pave the way to earn revenues. Likewise, in order to be a successful person, goal-oriented behaviour is required. For instance, while preparing for my RN exam, I had to burn midnight candles. Consequently, now I am working as an RN in a renowned hospital, where I am earning a handsome amount of salary and have succeeded in achieving my ambition. Thus, for a high-status in life, one should adopt the way of working hard rather than finding shortcuts for success.

Conversely, according to other groups of people, with money and great personality people could be famous in no time as everyone gets attracted towards the glamorous lifestyle. Because having the ability to buy anything encourages to gain the attention of other people. That's why with wealth and good health people become popular among their communities. For instance, there are some Bollywood singers who are not talented as compared to others, but by flaunting their wealth in front of the audience they are more recognised even without having any struggle. Overall, to some extent money and physical appearance are the reasons to attain prosperity.

To conclude, to boost progress is quite challenging. Even though money is the necessity of life which is required to achieve success, hard work and dedication are enormously countable to achieve success in one's life.

Câu 3