Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sample 1:

Traffic congestion has become the bane of citizens in many parts of the world. In order to mitigate this problem, some suggest that public transportation, such as trains and subway lines should be constructed. Meanwhile, others are firm in their belief that building wider roads makes more sense. Both of these methods will be analysed below.

On the one hand, building trains is an effective method to improve traffic condition. There is compelling evidence to support investment in public transportation. In countries where subway systems are up to standard, the number of private vehicles that participate in traffic is small, and city dwellers can save hours of delay and also thousands of dollars on travel expenses. That is not to mention a significant number of gallons of fuel saved, which means slowing down the exploitation of natural resources.

There are, however, others who express doubts on this approach. Their suggestion is that a better way to alleviate traffic jam is to make bigger road systems. The undeniable fact is that in many developing countries today, roads are narrow and in a desperate state of disrepair, which greatly obstructs the travels to their destinations. Someone’s small accidents, a flat tyre, for example, can bring traffic to a halt, which is a commonly-seen problem in roads that have only two lanes.

To conclude, both methods discussed above provide sustained relief on our roadways; however, it is my opinion that the method to build trains and subway makes more sense in terms of environmental protection.

Sample 2:

The high volume of traffic is a huge problem for many big cities. Therefore, there is a widely held view among a number of people that governmental bodies should pour money in building such public transport systems as train and subway lines. Others, however, argue that road expansion is the more proper way. To my mind, though widening streets benefits us, this can not alleviate traffic congestion.

It is not by chance that developing public vehicles is considered one of the common approaches to reduce traffic jams. To day, people have indeed used too many private vehicles whose disadvantages can be listed. The long line of cars at peak hours is a typical example, which may lead to lengthy delays. This can also cause other serious consequences such as traffic accidents. Accordingly, it is widely believed that building underground tunnels can solve heavy traffic jams due to empty spaces beneath the ground.

However, according to others, road extension is a better alternative because this solution does not demand more efforts. Also, extending road does not seem as costly as developing underground transport systems. Another reason for this is that bigger roads will create more spaces for vehicle owners, helping them to circulate easily during peak hours. By doing so, traffic congestion can be alleviated.

In my opinion, road expansion is not a long-term measure because people tend to drive their vehicles regularly on newly widened streets. In other words, traffic jams might continue to occur. Therefore, government should take other solutions into consideration for safer transportation.

Sample 3:

The methods of mitigating traffic congestion have been a heated topic of controversy. Some people argue that the construction of larger roads is the answer for the problem. However, I contend that such a solution is ineffective in the long term, while the option to construct railways and subways is a far better measure.

There is a common fallacy that governmental spending on building larger roads could sustainably address the problem of traffic congestion. An increase in road size could reduce the traffic intensity in the short term, but larger roads also mean that the citizens are encouraged to purchase more individual vehicles. This leads to the fact that the roads, albeit larger, would soon be filled with intense traffic again. For instance, traffic jams returned to Shanghai’s main streets not long after they were expanded in the early 1990s. In brief, if this solution is implemented, traffic jams would still persist in the long run.

Rail and subway systems, however, could ensure that traffic congestion is properly addressed. Unlike cars and buses, trains are capable of transporting hundreds of people simultaneously and thus would meet the transport demand of a vast number of passengers. Moreover, trains do not have to go through intersections and traffic lights, and dedicated lines ensure their travel is hardly interrupted. In other words, trains are always on time regardless of the level of traffic. This level of punctuality would encourage many people to choose railways and subways as their primary means of transport, and the number of individuals vehicles would decrease accordingly. As a result, traffic congestion could be tackled successfully.

The existing data provides a concrete foundation to conclude that building more and larger roads in an unsustainable measure, while train and subway lines would be a much more effective solution for the problem of traffic congestion.

Sample 4:

Traffic congestion has become an aching problem of many administrations all over the world. To mitigate the problem, it is suggested that public transportation such as trains and subway lines should be erected. Meanwhile, a school of thought claims that building more and larger roads makes more sense. In my view, both methods contribute equally to the effort of preventing traffic jams.

On the one hand, building trains and subways is an effective method to improve the traffic situation. In actual fact, in countries where public transportation is up to standards, the number of private vehicles participating in the traffic tends to be small. Therefore, city dwellers can save hours of delaying and an abundance of money spent on traveling expenses. A stark example of this is Netherlands, a European nation whose subway system is considered the most developed in the world, has the lowest frequency of traffic jams. For many consecutive years, Netherlands has ranked on top of the worldwide chart as the place for best driving experiences.

On the other hand, some individuals hold the belief that a more effective way to alleviate the issue is to erect wider road systems. There is no denying the fact that in some third world countries, roads are relatively narrow and in a desperate state of disrepair, which greatly obstruct travelers to their destinations. If better road systems are to be build and maintained, the rate of traffic congestion would decline significantly. For instance, Kansas City, known as the least congested large city in the world, owns one of the most comprehensive freeway systems.

To conclude, both methods discussed above provide sustainable relief on the current situation of traffic, as they play an equal part in curbing the severity of traffic jams around the world.

Sample 5:

It is indubitable that traffic congestion is a growing anxiety in many parts of the world. In order to mitigate this problem, some suggest that roads should be fabricated. Others, however, believe that public transportation, such as trains and subway lines should be constructed. Both of these methods will be analysed below. I, personally side with the latter view.

On the one hand, expanding the road network could naturally ease traffic jams. Obviously, more and more private vehicles would be accommodated, and commute time would reduce. This strategy would also be good from the economic perspective also. The cost of road construction is much lower than that of subway lines. The money thus saved can be used for other key sectors, such as healthcare and education.

On the other hand, construction of mega rail systems is a more effective method to improve traffic condition. There is compelling evidence to support the investment in such public transportation. In countries where subway systems have been made up to standard, the number of private vehicles has come down. Trains can carry a much larger number of passengers than any other form of transport. Additionally, city dwellers can save time and also money on traveling expenses. For instance, in New Delhi, many people now prefer to travel by Metros rather than their private vehicles because of the comfort and the quality.

I personally believe that in places where the budget of the governments is constrained, a combination of both approaches is needed. For example, in India, the road networks are being expanded in almost all places, but subways lines are also being added slowly and steadily in many cities. In the foreseeable future, the expanded road networks are also going to prove inadequate, and so subway lines would remain the only solution.

To conclude, both methods discussed above can provide relief on our traffic congestion. However, it is my opinion that the method to build trains and subway makes more sense in the long run.