Câu hỏi:
07/01/2025 359Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
An increasing number of individuals these days decide to delay childbirth. This is primarily because they want to devote more time to their career and personal life, and I believe this trend results in a more developed society and happier family life overall.
Those who decide to have children later in life normally point out a desire to prioritize their career and personal life. For one, those who are at the early stages of their career often struggle to support themselves and their family. Individuals in entry-level positions may have to undertake extra tasks, work overtime, while also receiving low pay. Once they start a family, they are likely to be under undue strain as they need to incur various expenses relating to day care, baby supplies, and their children’s school fees later on. Similarly, young parents also may find it hard to enjoy their personal life. For example, the burden of taking care of an infant may prevent a young couple from travelling, moving to a better city, or switching careers. Therefore, it is reasonable for young people to postpone parenthood.
Having children later is positive overall for society and family life. Regarding society, parents with financial flexibility can better provide for their children. For instance, these children are likely to possess greater chances of attending quality schools and learning extracurriculars such as how to play a musical instrument or speak a foreign language. As a result, these children are considerably more likely to be better educated and more well-rounded individuals, potentially improving the quality of the future workforce. Delayed childbirth also can result in happier family life. Parents who are firmly established in their careers are likely to devote more time to caring for their children without worrying about financial decisions or having regular quarrels about money matters with their significant other.
In conclusion, the reasons why individuals delay childbirth are mainly occupational and personal, and I believe this shift is a positive development due to the beneficial impact on society and family life. This trend is already prevalent in many wealthy nations and should now be encouraged in less developed countries as well.
Sample 2:
In recent years, an increasing number of individuals are opting to have children later in life. This shift in family planning can be attributed to various socio-economic and personal factors. While this trend offers numerous advantages, it also presents certain challenges that warrant consideration. In my opinion, this trend has more benefits than drawbacks.
One of the primary reasons for delaying parenthood is the pursuit of higher education and career advancement. In today’s competitive job market, many individuals, particularly women, prioritise establishing their careers and achieving financial stability before starting a family. For example, a woman who completes her postgraduate studies and establishes herself in a professional role by her early thirties may feel more equipped to provide a stable environment for her children. Additionally, societal shifts towards gender equality have empowered women to make informed choices about their reproductive health, further contributing to this trend.
There are some disadvantages of this trend. Biological challenges associated with delayed childbearing, such as decreased fertility and increased risk of complications, cannot be overlooked. Additionally, older parents may face generational gaps with their children, potentially impacting their ability to relate and engage with them effectively.
However, the advantages of this trend are considerable. Delayed parenthood often results in children being born into more financially secure and emotionally mature families. Parents who have achieved their personal and professional aspirations are likely to provide a nurturing environment, enriched with resources and stability. For instance, older parents may have accumulated savings and have a clearer sense of their life goals, which can translate into better opportunities for their children.
In conclusion, while the trend of having children later in life is driven by valid socio-economic and personal reasons, and offers substantial benefits, it is not without its drawbacks. On balance, the advantages, such as increased financial stability and emotional maturity, tend to outweigh the disadvantages, provided that individuals make informed and well-supported reproductive choices.
Sample 3:
These days, an increasing number of married couples delay their parenthood. The career-oriented mentality is the root cause of this current trend, and I believe it is a negative development because it leads to decreased fertility and health issues.
Today, many individuals become very passionate about their higher studies and career development. They devote their twenties and thirties to achieving advanced degrees and distinguished careers. That is to say, young married couples are passionately engaging in their higher study and careers to ensure their career growth. For example, a career-oriented couple may prioritize their career dedicating time and energy to create a niche for themselves in their chosen profession. Once they manage to carve out a niche for themselves, then they may feel they are ready for parenthood in their late thirties or early forties.
However, delayed parenthood is associated with reduced fertility and increased health issues. In advanced maternal age, women’s ovarian reserve decreases, causing a decline in the quality and number of eggs available for fertilization. Consequently, women may face enormous challenges to conceive naturally and other increased health problems. For instance, a recent study finds that women in their late thirties and forties may face a greater likelihood of infertility, miscarriage, and gestational diabetes compared to their counterparts. Similarly, the adverse impacts of age also occur in men. From the age of forty, research finds that the rate of DNA fragmentation is higher which can cause genetic abnormalities in children. For these reasons, I think delayed parenthood is a negative development.
In conclusion, the reason behind late parenthood is that individuals are enthusiastically engaging in higher study and professional development. However, I feel that decreased fertility and other health problems associated with delayed parenthood are more significant downsides than some minor benefits that it may offer.
Sample 4:
These days many couples decide to have babies at least a few years after their marriage and they are in their early thirties when they become parents for the first time. I believe career, social changes, and escalating living expenses are some of the major reasons behind this trend. In my belief, the advantages of having children later in life outweigh its demerits.
To commence with, a growing number of people, including women, are now serious about their career development. This is perhaps the primary reason they do not expect to have children in the early stage of their marriage. It is intuitively obvious that with huge competition, unemployment and economic crisis, people around the world are constantly worried about their careers and salaries. As a result, many decide to postpone their first childbirth. Secondly, women's empowerment and social changes have altered the old way of life where a woman's sole responsibility was to look after the children. Since many wives are working these days, they decide to have babies after they reach a certain position in their career. Furthermore, social beliefs regarding giving birth to children have changed dramatically, and people are more concerned about living expenses than the number of babies they have, unlike in the past.
Undeniably, people who choose to concentrate on their careers first and then have babies can take better care of their children due to better careers and economic freedom. Having offspring early in life can escalate the expenditures and financial responsibilities of parents. Moreover, if they do not spend enough time with children, they grow up with psychological issues. Thus, by having early children, young parents might put their careers at risk as well as the future of their children. Reversely, having offspring in early life has few advantages. Such parents have new members in their family, and their isolation would be extirpated, and they will become more family-oriented.
In conclusion, despite the pleasure of having a new baby in the early years of marriage, parents who decide to have babies later can focus on their career, fulfil financial goals and have sufficient time to spend with the family.
Sample 5:
With paradigm shifts in social beliefs and people's fascination with careers, they tend to become parents at a later stage. Several reasons are responsible for this, and I believe that it has more negative consequences.
To begin with, the average year when people get married those days has increased significantly. As a result, childbirth is naturally delayed. According to a recent survey, many young people who start their careers after their university graduation are more focused on their jobs than having their own family. Besides, many young people are undecided whether to marry or not. Eventually, when they get married, many of them are already in their mid-thirties, and they take some time to settle and have some financial stability before having their first child. Furthermore, the old belief that a girl should manage a family and have children earlier has changed, and more wives work in offices than ever. The decline of the joint family has also contributed to this trend as couples solely decide to have a baby, unlike in the past.
If we notice the severe detrimental impacts this trend has, we will surely try to reverse it. The most cynical outcome of this trend is the number of couples who struggle to become parents. It is scientifically proven that the infertility rate among couples is higher who try to become pregnant after their mid-thirties. Some couples eventually break up their marriages due to this, and it brings unfathomable social problems. Furthermore, having a child in the early years of marriage makes the couple more family-oriented and this eventually helps them have a better future.
To conclude, late marriage, nuclear family structure, and more focus on jobs are the main reasons people become parents at a later stage in their lives. I think this trend has more adverse results than positive outcomes. So, it is expected that married people would carefully consider different negative and positive aspects of having babies later in their lives.
Sample 6:
It is evident that many couples choose to delay having children. This trend can be attributed to the growing financial pressure and the desire of prospective parents to fully prepare for the role; however, I consider this change to be completely disadvantageous given its effects on people’s health and family relationship.
To commence with, there are two primary factors contributing to delayed childbirth. Chief of these is the increasing financial responsibilities of upbringing a child. It is evident from the ascending inflation rate and price hikes in accommodation, nourishment, medical care and clothes for babies. That explains why young couples prioritise saving and establishing a stable source of income before embarking on parenthood. The second reason is the fact that being a good parent can be a daunting task for today’s youngsters. Effective parenting requires competent caregiving skills and a profound understanding of a child’s behaviour and characteristics which modern-day young people are generally short of. This shortage causes some to delay having children until they feel adequately ready to assume such a crucial role.
From my perspective, this trend is negative to both individuals’ well-being and familial connection. Regarding the former, postponing parenthood puts babies and their mothers’ health at risk. It is scientifically proven that women who conceive later in life, especially at the age of 35 and beyond, face an increased likelihood of miscarriage or complications during labour, while newborn babies are more likely to suffer from innate health problems such as down syndrome. Concerning the latter, delayed childbirth gives a rise to the age gap between children and their parents. This age disparity can, in turn, result in challenges in understanding one another, leading to a wider generation gap and potential familial conflicts that can strain relationships.
In conclusion, the fact that couples are having children at a later stage can be explained by the heightened monetary burdens as well as the need for more adequate parenting preparation, and in my opinion, this is a negative development considering the consequences on the overall well-being and family bond. That is why governments should provide incentive programs to encourage the young to start a family and have children at an earlier age.
Sample 7:
The decision to have children at a later age is becoming increasingly popular in modern society. While this trend can be explained by a combination of factors, the disadvantages of having children later in life likely outweigh the disadvantages.
It is necessary to first examine the causes of this phenomenon. Among them, increased availability of contraception can be cited as a prominent reason. Thanks to advances in medicine, women can afford to delay childbirth via pills or medical procedures, such as egg freezing. Additionally, many adults these days tend to place a larger emphasis on career development than they do reproduction. Fields such as finance, technological research and healthcare can be rather dynamic, requiring a significant investment of time. Consequently, there is no doubt that an individualistic focus on one’s profession takes time away from both males and females. These reasons prove that having children at an older age is a decision based on both circumstance and preference.
Positive and negative impacts are equally likely to occur as a result of this decision. One of the main advantages is that children can grow up in financially secure households. This provides children with a better quality of life, as parents can accommodate them with more resources and opportunities. However, older parents may struggle to keep up with their children. For parents whose age gap with their children is significant, their level of energy and enthusiasm might not be the same as younger parents’. This would translate to less physical and emotional support that a child can expect to receive than if they were born to young parents. Taking these points into consideration, it could be seen that this development possesses more drawbacks than it does advantages.
In conclusion, despite the reasons and benefits to support this decision by parents, it is usually more disadvantageous to give birth at a later age. Although the time to have children is based on individual circumstance and preference, it should not come too late.
Sample 8:
The choice to have children at a later age is gaining popularity in contemporary society. While various factors contribute to this trend, the drawbacks of delayed parenthood likely outweigh the advantages.
It is necessary to first examine the causes of this phenomenon. Notably, medical advancements, such as contraceptive pills and procedures like egg freezing, enable women to postpone childbirth. Moreover, many adults today prioritize career advancement over starting a family. Fields such as finance, technology, and healthcare demand substantial time investments, diverting attention from parenthood. These factors demonstrate that the decision to have children later in life is influenced by both circumstances and personal preferences.
Positive and negative impacts are equally likely to occur as a result of this decision. On the advantage side, children born to older parents often enjoy financial stability. This translates into a higher quality of life, as parents can provide them with greater resources and opportunities. However, older parents may struggle to keep up with the energy levels and enthusiasm of their children. When there is a significant age gap between parents and children, the physical and emotional support that younger parents typically offer may be diminished. Considering these factors, it becomes apparent that the disadvantages of delayed parenthood outweigh the advantages.
In conclusion, despite the reasons and benefits that support the decision to have children at a later age, it generally leads to more disadvantages. While the timing of parenthood is a personal choice influenced by individual circumstances and preferences, it should not be postponed indefinitely.
Sample 9:
In this modern era, the majority of couples prefer to have children in their later years of life. This essay intends to analyze the reasons behind this development. While there are several advantages associated with this trend, the disadvantages are far more.
To begin with, there are two main benefits of conceiving babies in later life. The prime advantage is that people can enjoy their life more with each other and can be able to know about one another. In this way, their mutual understandings become stronger, and they enjoy the time they spend with their young ones.
Securing the future is another significant reason. Individuals, at first, want to be financially secure in order to fulfill the desires of their families. It consumes a lot of time to get a job in this hyper competitive era. That is why they delayed having infants. Moreover, after becoming self-dependent, both genders can give a bright future to their children. For example, parents would be capable of enrolling their children in schools where they get good quality education and learn other skills meanwhile, which are not available in all schools.
However, the drawbacks cannot be underestimated. The main problem caused by giving birth later is related to the fertility of both genders. After a certain age, sometimes their fertility rate starts decreasing, due to which they face difficulties in conceiving babies, and pregnant women require special care. Not only this, many females are prone to death because of their lack of physical ability to give birth to a child. Also, a study shows that children who are born in later years are often born with some abnormalities, either in terms of physical or mental. As a result, they face problems to survive in this world.
In conclusion, although there are various merits of giving birth to a child, a single disadvantage is more dangerous for both mother and child as they are sometimes prone to death.
Sample 10:
Planning to have a baby is the most precious part of a married couple’s life. Nowadays, a number of people are giving preference to having children later after marriage. I believe that this trend has more advantages than loopholes.
To begin with, the main reason for this trend is that most people are working nowadays, they want to achieve all the luxurious facilities in their life and the same they want to give to their children in future. Moreover, a couple invests their entire budget to secure their parents and dependents for a better future. There are several advantages to it; firstly, they can give enough financial support to their children for future study. Secondly, they can deposit some amount for their older age. For example, in the early part of his existence, a person must spend most of the money on developing his own personality and other characteristics in order to be an incredible parent and son.
On the other hand, complications in pregnancy due to health issues, elaborate, humans can lose the opportunity to be fathers and mothers because of deciding to reproduce later. For example, research by doctors has published that due to our current lifestyle and increasing age, there are more chances of getting infertile. Furthermore, people are also losing sexual desire as age increases, which can also lead to infertility.
In conclusion, while there are legitimate concerns about infertility and health complications associated with delaying parenthood, the advantages - such as financial stability and the ability to invest in personal growth - outweigh these drawbacks. Furthermore, with the rapid advancements in reproductive technology, couples have more options than ever to achieve their dream of parenthood.
Sample 11:
In recent times, it is said that more people decide to have more children at an older age. This essay will discuss the reason why this is prevalent and also state some merits and demerits associated with it. The essay will be concluded by stating whether the advantages surpass the disadvantages or not.
To begin with, having children is a decision that couples should look into before concluding to have one either at the early stages of their lives or at a later stage. I believe the major reason more people make up their minds to have children later in life is for companionship. The fear of being alone after one’s spouse is dead has made people reconsider having kids at a much older age. Since children are a lifelong investment and will mostly be there for you, especially when you need someone to talk to and take care of you when you are well stricken in age prompts them to make this decision. For example, most people without children are mostly sent to adult homes when they get old. On the other hand, people with children are mostly looked after by their kids in old age.
Furthermore, the demerit of having a child at a later point in life can be devastating. Some people only decide to have kids due to societal pressure or peer pressure. Our society today sees couples without children as incapable, and there is this stigma on them that either of the couple has fertility issues or the wife is barren, whereas it was a decision not to have kids. Consequently, they may be forced to have kids they do not want, and this leads to maltreatment, abandonment, and lack of love for the child. Also, taking care of a child requires a lot of effort, and having advanced in age before having one does not help since the strength and agility of the couples would have diminished.
Conclusively, though having children is a blessing, I believe having them later in life might be a curse since the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
Sample 12:
There is a growing proportion of the world’s population who decide to have children later in life. The underlying reasons for this trend are varied, and I suppose that the merits would eclipse the downsides.
There are two main factors leading to the decision of delaying childbirth. The first one is because people have the propensity for prioritizing their careers over taking parental roles. Especially in the US and other developed countries, not only men but also women want to stabilize their finance before becoming parents so as to provide their kids with sufficient living condition for their future development. Another explanation for this is that many modern individuals have adopted a fear of taking unwanted custody due to the recent alarming rate of divorce. It is because premature marriages have become common, which usually goes with many couples’ doubt of their marital harmony, deterring their early desire for raising a child. There would be, consequently, fewer kids growing up without fatherhood or motherhood.
However, the drawbacks should not be overlooked. That too many couples following such a trend might exert adverse effects on the population structure, which potentially results in the future aging workforce and hinders social development in the long term. Additionally, it could both heighten the possibility of infertility among mothers at their old age and risk the new-born babies’ mental and physical health. Down Syndrome could be a typical example of the problems that those kids might have to suffer from.
In conclusion, the occupational prioritization and the hesitation over the likelihood of single-parent responsibility could be seen as the root of late childbirth, and I am convinced that the advantages are of more significance.
Sample 13:
Having babies later in life is regarded as a new mode of marriage, especially in these days when soon becoming adolescent parents might face plenty of troubles. It is easily seen that financial burden is one of the reasons why many spouses tend to delay their childbirth because giving birth early forces them to tighten budget. In this essay, I will lend more other detailed causes and efects to this trend.
The fact that pregnancy has been more common in older women stems from late–life marriage whose benefits are huge. Tying the knot early, in some cases, would cause constant quarrels about the rights of child-rearing between young couples due to their immature thoughts on marital values. In contrast, delayed marriage may secure better conditions for children’s future. This would help singles have more time to seek a financially stable job and broaden behavioral experience before deciding to live with someone forever. Besides, high remarriage rate led by the rise of divorce in recent years partly contributes to late childbirth. The reason is that the lack of compatibility forces many couples to end their first love and marry again. Therefore, they may start having children after age 35.
As mentioned above, the benefits of late childbirth are undeniable, however, elderly parents, as well as society also face up to threats that they can foresee. Indeed, raising kids at old age is more arduous than that at young age, not only because their health will decline but also because their children are too little to self-image. Moreover, having children when reaching over 35 can affect pregnancy due to aging health. As a result, babies are not healthy enough or even die premature death.
In conclusion, stable income and settled life make delayed marriage more appealing. The thing is we need to consider the pros and cons of this to decide what is right for a happy union.
Sample 14:
In recent years, the decision of parents to start a family later in life has become an increasingly popular trend. There are a number of reasons for this, and the trend has a significant impact on both family life and on the community as a whole.
There are two important reasons why more people nowadays are deciding against having children when they are young. Firstly, rather than embarking on parenthood, many individuals consider that building their own successful careers is top priority. If they had to split their time between working and bringing up their offspring when they were at the early stage of their careers, their performance at work and promotion prospects would be prejudiced. Secondly, delaying childbirth could give young people countless opportunities to enjoy their lives. For example, this choice may let young couples have a richer social life, pursue their interests and hobbies or even travel the world.
However, this tendency could have negative effects in terms of both family life and society. An important effect for a family is that raising children could be a huge challenge for older parents. Even though they have high socioeconomic status, as well as great experience and knowledge, it is not easy for them to communicate with and relate to their children, due to the generation gap. Another impact is that getting pregnant after 35 years of age carries more potential health risks. Specifically, this could increase the danger of miscarriage for older mothers and stillbirth, while babies could be at greater risk of having Down’s syndrome. Consequently, this could negatively affect the quality of the workforce in times to come.
In conclusion, there are a number of evident reasons for the trend in which people prefer giving birth late. As a result, this could negatively influence each family and all the society.
Sample 15:
In this day and age, the decision of parents to delay childbirth until later in their life has become a growing trend. A host of factors may contribute to this tendency, and I would contend that the merits this development entails outweigh its drawbacks.
There are some major compelling reasons why some young couples are deciding against embarking on early parenthood. Firstly, as people often desire to invest their time and effort in landing a well-paid job and climbing a high ladder in their career, having a child early can be an obstacle preventing them from achieving such career goals. Specifically, if they have to split their time equally between working and rearing children in the early stages of their careers, their work performance and promotion prospects may be negatively affected. Another reason causing the delay of early pregnancy is that some young couples also hold the belief that if they have children early, they cannot enjoy a rich social life and have no spare time to spend on their leisure pursuits.
It is justifiable why many people are convinced that it brings about more drawbacks than benefits. Firstly, it is widely believed that late childbirth oftentimes carries some potential health risks for both babies and old mothers. Particularly, getting pregnant after more than 35 years of age may increase the danger of having a miscarriage or stillbirth for older mothers, and even if the child is born, he or she is likely to suffer from Down Syndrome. As a result, this can adversely affect the quality of the future workforce. Another disadvantage of postponed parenthood is that raising children is considered a huge challenge for old parents. Specifically, even when they have a high socioeconomic status, they will still have difficulty communicating and relating to their offspring due to a big generation gap. This proves one of the main contributors to conflicts between parents and their children and further the distance among family members.
However, I still believe that the demerits of this trend surpass the advantageous effects of this tendency. Firstly, despite the potential health risks of late baby carriage that a mother may suffer, nowadays, thanks to recent leaps in the medical field, such health problems can be mitigated. Furthermore, when parents spend more time stabilizing their careers and their financial statuses, they can ensure a better life quality for their children. Another benefit of having infants later in life is that older parents can accumulate more life experience they gain through their early age. These hands-on experiences can assist them in bettering their parenting skills. This can even enable them to establish more effective communication with their children, contributing to alleviating the disadvantageous impacts of a potential generation gap.
In conclusion, I would contend that parents' desire to fulfill their career aspirations and enjoy a comfortable life without the responsibility of early childrearing are the driving factors behind the trend of delayed childbirth. Moreover, I believe that the merits of this development overshadow the downside.
Sample 16:
In the past, it was a natural step that a couple would get married fairly young, and then start a family. However, this is no longer the case, and the delay of childbirth is becoming very common. This essay will consider the reasons for this trend and the possible effects on families and society.
The driving force behind this trend is changing employment patterns. As more women have pursued an education and entered the workforce, they tend to marry later and have children later in their life. This is unavoidable in many cases because women cannot combine family and work well due to costly childcare. Another factor is all the other opportunities available to everyone. For example, many men and women choose to travel around the world or take the chance to work in another country, thus delaying settling down.
There are a number of possible impacts on families and society. Firstly, with regards to families, it can be more difficult for older women to get pregnant, and they may experience more health problems, such as a miscarriage, high blood pressure or diabetes, during pregnancy. Also, the parents may find the whole experience of bringing up children more tiring if they are older. In one respect it may be positive for society because if people are choosing to work for longer, a country will have a productive workforce. On the negative side though, in the long-term falling fertility rates will mean an aging population with a lack of young people to work and take care of the elderly.
In conclusion, there are several reasons that people are having children later in life, and this can have a number of impacts, both positive and negative. Given the fact that society continues to change, this trend is likely to continue well into the future.
Sample 17:
In modern society, there has been a major concern that many couples have delayed parenthood. Some explanations for this social trend will be put forward, before an analysis of its impacts on society and family life is given.
A few reasons can be given to justify the trend of giving birth at later stages of life. First, the labour market is increasingly competitive, and it is a norm that young parents defer having children to devote the whole time in the first years of their employment to lay a sound foundation for their future career. Second, it is believed that children are raised better by older parents. This seems valid due to the fact that older fathers and mothers are generally wealthier, more experienced, and more willing to take the responsibility of bringing up a child.
The trend exerts both advantageous and disadvantageous influence on society and families. On the one hand, children born to more prosperous and experienced parents can receive better and more comprehensive education, and thus contribute more to society when they grow up. In each household, the parents may also reap the benefits of this trend, as their first working years are not interrupted by pregnancy and childcare. On the other hand, when an aged couple decide to give birth, there are serious health risks for the woman in the prenatal and postnatal period. If any complicated maternal health problem arises, the life whole family would be turned upside down.
To conclude, the tendency to have children at later ages is caused by a number of factors, such as the competitiveness of the job market for young adults, and both the positive and negative impacts of it can be seen in families and society.
Sample 18:
Many people currently decide not to have babies when they are young and wait until they get older instead. There are some reasons for this tendency, and it could have some impacts on family life as well as society.
To begin with, there are several reasons why a number of individuals want to have children later in their life. Firstly, this choice allows them to have more time to enjoy life when they are young. For instance, it is easier for a young couple to travel when they do not have a baby to nurture. Secondly, people who are at the early stage of their career usually have lower income compared to when they are older. Therefore, many people decide to start raising a family after having accumulated enough money to ensure a better life for their children.
However, this tendency might bring about some negative effects on both family life and society. The first impact is that having children later will cause a significant age gap between two generations. This makes it harder for parents to understand and communicate with their offspring. Additionally, if people give birth when they are too old, the babies being born might be less physically healthy. This might adversely affect the quality of the future workforce if too many people decide to follow this trend.
In conclusion, there are some reasons why many people prefer to have children later in their life, and this tendency can result in some negative impacts on both family life and society.
Sample 19:
In recent years, there has been a noticeable shift in the timing of parenthood, with many individuals opting to have children at a later stage in life than in previous generations. This trend is attributed to various factors, and while there are advantages to delaying childbirth, I think there are more significant disadvantages that warrant consideration.
One of the primary reasons for delaying parenthood is the emphasis placed on career advancement and financial stability. The desire to secure a stable foundation for the family’s future drives many couples to delay having children until they feel economically prepared to support a family. Moreover, there has been a cultural shift in attitudes, encouraging individuals to delay marriage and childbirth until they have reached a certain level of maturity and life experience. This societal change underscores the belief that individuals should pursue personal growth and self-discovery before taking on the responsibilities of parenthood.
The advantages of delaying childbirth are evident, particularly in terms of financial stability and preparedness. Couples who delay having children can allocate more time to build stable careers, secure their financial situation, and create a conducive environment for raising a family. This deliberate approach enables parents to offer their children better educational opportunities and a more comfortable standard of living. However, I believe they are overshadowed by disadvantages associated with delaying parenthood. Advanced maternal and paternal age can lead to fertility issues, posing challenges for conception and increasing the risks of pregnancy complications. Additionally, a larger age gap between parents and children might result in a generation gap, potentially affecting communication and understanding between family members.
In conclusion, the decision to delay having children is influenced by various factors, including career priorities and changing societal norms. While the advantages include financial stability and a conducive environment for child-rearing, I think there are more drawbacks related to fertility issues and generation gaps.
Sample 20:
An increasing number of young couples today tend to delay childbirth. This essay discusses possible reasons for this and why the merits outweigh the drawbacks.
There are some reasons why many people decide to postpone parenthood. The main reason is that women nowadays lay more emphasis on their career than housewifely duties compared to those in the past. Also, many jobs today require them to be available around the clock, so it is really tough for modern women to balance work and family. Another reason might be that the increasing cost of living is adding to young couples’ hesitation in starting a family. If they have children at an early stage of marriage, they are quickly under immense pressure to earn enough money to cover both living expenses and childcare.
I believe that the merits of this trend outweigh the drawbacks. The first merit is that postponing childbearing can help people focus more on their job in order to climb the career ladder and earn a higher income. As a result, they can achieve financial security and thereby have a good preparation for bringing up their children in the future. Another advantage might be that deciding to delay parenthood also provides couples with more time to enjoy life with each other, thereby strengthening their relationship and contributing to a life-long marriage. For example, my parents spent a lot of time travelling before giving birth to me. This activity has helped them understand each other more and manage to build a strong family bond. However, the longer delaying childbirth is, the higher health risk women may face. For example, getting pregnant after 35 years of age may increase the risk of miscarriage or premature birth.
In conclusion, the emphasis of women on their career and the increasing cost of living are the two main reasons resulting in the delay in giving birth. I believe that the merits of being able to focus on working and enjoying life outweigh the drawbacks of health risks suffered by women who delay pregnancy.
Sample 21:
Nowadays, an increasing number of couples choose to have their first child in their later life. This trend can be attributed to several reasons. In this essay, I will discuss these reasons and evaluate whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
One of the primary reasons why people decide to have their first child at a later age is financial stability. Adults have the opportunity to accumulate financial resources and ensure their economic well-being before starting a family. By establishing a solid financial foundation, they can provide a better quality of life for their children. For instance, they can afford quality education, healthcare, and other essential needs.
Another factor contributing to the decision to have a first child in later life is emotional readiness. Older individuals tend to have greater emotional maturity and experience, which enables them to provide better care and support for their children. They have had more time to understand themselves and their needs, allowing them to be more patient, understanding, and nurturing parents with a deeper understanding of their child’s emotional needs.
Furthermore, older parents often possess a higher level of maturity and life experience. They are better equipped to face the challenges that come with raising children. Their life experiences have taught them valuable lessons and problem-solving skills, which they can apply in their parenting journey. This can result in a more stable and nurturing environment for the child’s growth and development.
Despite these advantages, there are some disadvantages to consider. One major concern is the potential health and physical risks associated with later pregnancies. Older parents may face higher risks of complications during pregnancy and childbirth. Additionally, the age gap between parents and children can create a generation gap, leading to potential difficulties in relating to each other and establishing a strong parent-child bond.
In conclusion, while there are some drawbacks, the advantages of having a first child in later life outweigh the disadvantages. Financial stability, emotional readiness, and the maturity and experience of older parents contribute to a nurturing and supportive environment for the child’s upbringing. However, it is essential for individuals to carefully consider the potential health risks and potential difficulties in bridging the generation gap. Ultimately, the decision should be based on personal circumstances and individual preferences.
Sample 22:
In contemporary society, a growing number of individuals in certain countries are opting to have their first child at a later stage in life. This can be attributed to a host of reasons, and I am convinced that the advantages of this development pale in comparison with its disadvantages.
There are a number of explanations for the increasing popularity of delayed parenthood in this day and age. Firstly, in today’s fast-paced and competitive world, individuals often prioritize establishing themselves professionally and achieving financial stability before starting a family. They may want to advance their careers, build a solid foundation, or pursue educational opportunities. Additionally, societal expectations have shifted, with more emphasis placed on personal fulfillment and self-actualization. As a result, individuals feel compelled to delay parenthood to ensure they have accomplished their personal aspirations before taking on the responsibilities of raising a child.
In my opinion, the trend towards deferred childbearing does more harm than good. While such a decision allows individuals to focus on personal and career development, the potential health risks associated with advanced maternal age pose significant concerns. Chief among these is that older mothers face a higher likelihood of fertility issues, complications during pregnancy, and an increased risk of genetic disorders in their children. This is compounded by the fact that the energy and stamina required for raising a child may be compromised in older parents, affecting their ability to provide adequate care. Finally, postponing parenthood would inadvertently create a significant age gap between the two generations, making it difficult for parents to understand and communicate with their offspring, thereby adversely affecting the family bond. Given these potential downsides, I firmly believe that the well-being of both mothers and their children should not take a back seat to one’s personal and professional aspirations.
In conclusion, the choice to have a first child later in life has become increasingly common due to various societal factors, and I am of the opinion that the drawbacks of this trend, such as potential health issues and the challenges in parent-child relationships, are weightier than its benefits.
Sample 23:
Having infants further down the road is viewed as a recent fad of marriage, particularly in running days when before long becoming juvenile guardians may confront a lot of difficulties. It is effectively seen that the monetary weight is one reason why numerous companions will quite often postpone their labor since conceiving an offspring early powers them to fix the spending plan. In this exposition, I will loan more other definite reasons and impacts of this pattern.
To initiate with, a developing number of individuals, including ladies, are currently focused on their vocation advancement. This is maybe the essential explanation they don’t anticipate having youngsters in the beginning phase of their marriage. It is naturally clear that with enormous rivalry, joblessness, and monetary emergency, individuals all over the planet
are continually stressed over their professions and pay. Therefore, many choose to defer their first labor. Furthermore, ladies’ strengthening and social changes have adjusted the prior lifestyle where a lady’s only liability was to care for the kids. Since many spouses are working nowadays, they choose to take infants after they arrive at a specific situation in their vocation.
In any case, old guardians, just as society additionally face dangers that they can anticipate. To be sure, bringing up kids at an advanced age is more difficult than that at a youthful age, on the grounds that their wellbeing will decrease as well as in light of the fact that their children may be too young to be self-sufficient, requiring more care and attention. Additionally, having kids when coming to the north of 35 can influence pregnancy because of maturing wellbeing. Thus, infants are not sufficiently beneficial or even kick the bucket rashly passing.
Taking everything into account, in spite of the delight of having another child in the early long stretches of marriage, guardians who choose to have babies later can zero in on their profession, satisfy monetary objectives, and have an adequate chance to enjoy with the family.
Sample 24:
Having a paradigm change in societal belief and people’s fascination with using a coveted career, they are inclined to become parents in a later period than yesteryear. There are a few notable causes of this, and I believe it has more negative effects.
Because of this, childbirth is delayed. As per a recent poll, many young men and women who begin their careers after their schooling tend to be more focused on their tasks than having their very own household. Finally, if they get married, they are already in their mid-thirties, and they require a while to settle and have monetary stability before getting their first child. What is more, the old belief that a woman ought to be well prepared to handle a household and have kids earlier has shifted, and many more wives operate in offices than ever before.
If we detect the harmful impacts of the tendency have, we will attempt to undo it. The negative outcome of the tendency is that the number of couples trying hard to get parents. It is scientifically demonstrated that couples’ infertility rate is greater who attempt to become pregnant following their mid-thirties. A few of the couples finally split their marriages because of this, which attracts unfathomable social issues. Additionally, having a kid in the first years of marriage creates a few more family-oriented, which finally helps them get a greater future.
In conclusion, late marriage, nuclear family construction, and much more focus on tasks are the key reasons people become parents in a later phase, and this has more negative results on the positive sides.
Sample 25:
There are growing numbers of men and women choosing to have children later in life these days. In my opinion, the financial advantages of this trend far outweigh any perceived downsides.
The most significant tradeoffs of this relate to opportunity and maturity. Many individuals decide early on in their career to wait until their mid to late 30s to have children. The natural risk here is that if the relationship ends before that point or they then have trouble conceiving, they may end up childless. This possibility is lower today due to advances in fertility science but still exists. Furthermore, having children is a maturing experience. If an individual waits until late in life to raise a child, then they delay the experience gained and may later regret their decision. Most parents would openly admit that parenthood is a life-altering milestone and a defining moment of adulthood.
Nonetheless, the disadvantages detailed above pale in comparison to the economic merits of delaying childbirth. Firstly, most young parents are not in an ideal situation in their career. Many working parents earn low salaries and work long hours. Once they have a child that means the majority of their day is occupied and they may feel trapped and overburdened. It is then difficult to switch careers or move to a new location as well as afford all the expenses incumbent on parents. This often results in parents becoming resentful and projecting their animosity towards their children or significant others. In contrast, parents who are firmly established in their careers, earn decent salaries, and have savings set aside have both the time and energy to devote to raising their children well without having to stress about making ends meet.
In conclusion, despite marginal risks concerning the opportunity and experience, it is an overall positive for financial reasons that many prospective parents are putting off childbirth. Therefore, this trend should be welcomed and encouraged.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Some people take the view that criminal behavior is a product of an individual's inherent nature, while others argue that it is the outcome of poverty and societal factors. Although there are cogent arguments for the former view, I still lean towards the social issues and poverty theory.
Those who argue that crime is rooted in an individual's personality traits and moral compass suggest that some individuals are simply predisposed to engage in criminal behavior due to factors such as personality. They argue that some people either have a natural inclination towards aggression, violence, and rule-breaking. These individuals are believed to engage in criminal activities by choice despite having access to legal means of earning a living. In fact, some serial killers are known for their violent and sadistic crimes, which were often carried out with a sense of pleasure or enjoyment.
In my view, crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty. This is because individuals may turn to criminal behavior when they are faced with limited opportunities, financial insecurity, and social inequality. These conditions can lead to frustration, hopelessness, and despair, which can ultimately push individuals towards criminal behavior as a means of survival or escape. For example, a young person who grows up in a community with few employment possibilities may feel that their only option for financial survival is to engage in drug dealing.
In conclusion, while there are certainly some individuals who exhibit consistent patterns of aggressive or antisocial behavior, these traits alone are not sufficient to explain why people commit crimes. Therefore, I believe that the majority of crime is driven by socioeconomic factors.
Sample 2:
Opinions differ as to whether crime is caused by social issues and poverty or by people’s evil nature. Personally, I agree with the former view.
It is understandable why some people claim that our nature is the root of crime. Perhaps they have witnessed some children commit wrongdoing at some point in their lives. For example, many physically strong children tend to bully others at school, while others may perform mischievous acts like lying to adults or stealing money from their parents. These experiences lead people to believe that humans are purely good or bad by nature, and those who engage in misconduct at a young age will likely become criminals.
However, the point mentioned above is deeply flawed. Everyone possesses their own good and bad nature, and it is the environment that triggers people’s evil side and causes them to commit crime. One major cause of crime in many countries is inadequate education. Poorly educated youngsters may struggle to discern between right and wrong; therefore, they are more likely to commit crimes without even knowing. Poverty is another root cause of crime because those living in impoverished conditions may turn to stealing or robbing as the final solution to make ends meet. A corrupt political system can also be a breeding ground for crime because the politicians there have to comply with the corruption, regardless of their personal intentions.
In conclusion, though some might think that crime results from a person’s bad nature, I believe it is more likely caused by social problems, such as poor education, corrupt political systems, and poverty. People are both good and bad by nature, and the environment in which they live determines whether they become criminals.
Sample 3:
When it comes to crime rates, some individuals claim that criminal activity is solely the result of innate characteristics, while others argue that it is the outcome of societal issues and impoverishment. In my opinion, socioeconomic challenges and inequality are more likely to prompt people to engage in illegal behaviours.
On the one hand, criminality could represent the result of an inherent personality. In some cases, crime is merely the result of a person’s impulsive actions and lack of moral compass. Various factors such as upbringing, personal beliefs, and psychological disorders may all play a role when it comes to criminal activity. Some people, for example, may have grown up in environments in which illegal conduct is normalised, causing them to assume that such behaviour is acceptable. Similarly, those with mental health disorders like sociopathy or psychopathy may be inclined to committing crimes due to their inability to empathise with victims.
On the other hand, societal problems and economic hardship may contribute to criminal conduct. Poverty with limited access to food, clothing, shelter, healthcare, and schooling can push people to the brink of desperation, prompting them to resort to criminal behaviour as a means of survival. People who are financially strapped in various urban areas, for instance, may turn to illegal activities like drug trafficking or burglary in order to make ends meet. Once poverty and crime are intertwined, it may ultimately develop into a vicious cycle that is challenging to escape. Furthermore, socioeconomic issues such as discrimination, inequality, and corruption may promote crime through fostering an environment of dissatisfaction and rage. Those who experience discrimination or who believe the system is stacked against them are more inclined to turn to illegal behaviour as a form of protest or vengeance.
To summarise, aside from personal psychological factors, I believe that social difficulties and poverty can have a greater impact on crime rates.
Sample 4:
Crime has been studied by many scientific disciplines, with some people ascribing it to social problems and poverty, and others thinking that it is caused by the criminal’s nature. In this, I believe that unlawful behavior is more likely the result of defective personal qualities.
Several explanations can support crime being a function of inferior socioeconomic factors. Firstly, poverty reduces access to education and employment, causing hopelessness and desperation as a result. Having been deprived of opportunities, people may turn to crime to get by. Furthermore, people whose environment is rife with social problems may be accustomed to illegal behavior, making it easier for themselves to engage in criminal activities later on. A child who grows up in a neighborhood with drug problems could turn into a drug dealer himself, since he has witnessed drug abuse and addiction as a norm. It could, therefore, be argued that social issues and poverty create criminals.
However, the view that crime is a result of the perpetrator’s nature is no less convincing. Proponents of this belief claim that certain traits, such as impulsivity, aggression, and callousness, predispose individuals to immoral or unethical behavior. People with these traits become less considerate when they perceive any threat to their self-interest, making them likely to ignore the consequences of their actions. Others, meanwhile, carry undiagnosed psychological disorders, and their condition makes them more prone to committing crimes. A large share of the prison population, especially repeat offenders, are affected by sociopathy, a disorder usually characterized by inhibited compassion towards others. It is not well-understood otherwise, and education has only been partially effective in mitigating sociopathy’s effects. For these reasons, criminals’ nature is definitely worth looking at as a cause of their offenses.
In conclusion, while both views can be supported by evidence, I believe one’s personality is a more indicative factor of whether they are likely to commit crimes. Hence, it is crucial that parents and guardians pay attention to how they shape their children’s nature.
Sample 5:
For millennia, philosophers and scientists have held countless debates on personality. Some believe in the inherent crooked nature of humanity while others argue that they are the product of their environment. This essay wishes to explore both sides of the argument.
Nativists believe that personalities and manners are inherent and genetic, so crime is innate. Credible evidence of this would be the correlation between lead exposure and crime rate. In the 1940s, the USA was the prime consumer of lead-based products, such as paint and gasoline, so babies conceived, born, and raised during this period were lead-poisoned. They later suffered from poorer impulse control and higher aggressivity. As adults, they contributed to the surplus in levels of violent crime. However, it should be noted that genes do not cause behavior but influence it through their effects on the body's response to the environment.
Supporters of Environmentalism concede that criminal behaviors are determined by family and other people, education opportunities, as well as physical circumstances. This school of thought is supported by several studies. some of them focused on the negative link between vegetation and crime. It was shown that in neighborhoods with more greenery, fewer crimes were reported. One explanation for this was that the environment gave its residents a sense of safety and security.
It should be noted that the nature-nurture debate has not been taken as seriously as it used to be. Essentially, every facet of personality development results from interaction between genes and environment. If the authorities aim at reducing the rate of crime and violence, they should take action in improving residential areas as well as enhancing healthcare.
Sample 6:
Many people consider that innate characteristics are responsible for the fact that some people choose to turn to a career of crime. While I accept that crime may result from individual characteristics of violence or greed, I would argue that it is largely a consequence of social issues and poverty.
There is a belief that a person’s nature determines whether or not they become a criminal. Firstly, some argue that an individual who is cruel turns to crime more easily than a kind person. For instance, a child bullying other boys or girls at school may turn into a violent criminal in the future. Secondly, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness could also breed future offenders, who seek to acquire easy money without working for it. A number of youngsters choose to steal from others, instead of working hard to make an honest living. These are strong reasons for thinking that those who have an inborn bad nature are more likely to break the law.
Nevertheless, it seems to me that social issues and poverty are the main causes behind crime. There are many problems in society which might lead to an increase in the crime rate. For example, unemployment pushes people into resorting to crime because they simply cannot find a job. As a consequence, the number of offenders has climbed in many countries over recent decades. Another reason is that, more broadly, poverty in general leads to a rise in crime. If people do not have enough money to make ends meet, they will be tempted to pursue illegal activities just to support themselves and their families.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that the principal causes of crime are a result of social conditions and problems.
Sample 7:
The causes of crime have long been a topic of debate. While some argue that crime stems from a person's inherent nature, I do believe it is the result of social problems and poverty
On the one hand, advocates of the view that crime results from a person's nature suggest that individuals with cruel tendencies are more likely to engage in criminal activities. This is because cruelty often correlates with a lack of empathy, disregard for others' well-being, and aggressive behavior, all of which can lead to crime. For example, a child who bullies others at school may grow up to become a violent criminal. Additionally, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness can breed future offenders who seek easy money without working for it. Many young people, lured by the prospect of quick and easy money, turn to cybercrime, engaging in online scams, hacking, and identity theft.
On the other hand, some, myself included, argue that crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty, a perspective I support. Social issues, such as unemployment, can push people towards crime as they struggle to find legitimate employment. The widening gap between the rich and the poor exacerbates this issue, as seen in places like Rio De Janeiro, where high crime rates are prevalent in impoverished areas. Poverty is another significant factor; individuals struggling to make ends meet may resort to illegal activities to support themselves and their families. This explains why people in dire need often turn to theft or other crimes for survival.
In conclusion, while inherent personal traits can contribute to criminal behavior, social problems and poverty play a more significant role in driving people towards crime. Addressing these underlying issues is crucial for reducing crime rates.
Sample 8:
Crime is a complex issue that elicits varied perspectives regarding its origins. While some argue that crime is primarily a consequence of social problems and poverty, others contend that it stems from an individual’s inherent nature. I contend that the interplay between societal factors and individual predispositions contributes significantly to criminal behavior.
I concur with the notion that crime often finds its roots in social problems and poverty, where the impact of socioeconomic conditions significantly steers an individual’s choices. For example, in underprivileged areas, the absence of adequate educational facilities, job prospects, and robust social support structures may force individuals into a corner, compelling them to turn to illicit means for survival. Moreover, when societal disparities are rife and systemic issues remain unaddressed, it can exacerbate the situation, causing individuals to resort to criminal activities as a perceived solution to their economic struggles or as a means to voice their grievances about prevalent social injustices.
However, I am also of the opinion that the origins of crime are not solely tethered to external factors; rather, an individual’s innate disposition can also play a crucial role. Some individuals might exhibit inherent psychological disorders that predispose them to engage in unlawful activities, regardless of their social background. Furthermore, the absence of strong moral values or ethical guidance in an individual’s upbringing can be a contributing factor, irrespective of their socioeconomic circumstances. Instances abound where individuals from affluent backgrounds have succumbed to criminal behavior due to the lack of a strong moral compass in their formative years, indicating that individual nature can play a pivotal role in shaping criminal inclinations.
In conclusion, I believe crime’s origin is not solely attributed to either social problems or an individual’s nature; rather, it is a complex interplay between societal factors and personal inclinations.
Sample 9:
There are divergent opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. Some people argue that external factors such as poverty or other social issues are to blame for most crimes, while others contend that people who engage in criminal activity are intrinsically bad in nature. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and provide my own opinion.
On the one hand, those who believe that social problems are the primary cause of criminal behavior argue that people are driven to commit crimes due to their difficult and disadvantaged circumstances. For example, individuals facing extreme poverty or unemployment may resort to stealing or other illicit activities as a means of survival. Proponents of this view also point out that issues such as substance abuse or mental illness can exacerbate criminal tendencies, emphasizing the importance of addressing underlying social difficulties to reduce crime rates.
On the other hand, there is a counterargument that criminal behavior arises from individual traits such as impulsivity, selfishness, or a lack of empathy. This perspective suggests that some people have a natural tendency to engage in harmful behavior, regardless of environmental factors. In support of this view, critics of the social circumstance theory point out that there are people who grow up in difficult circumstances but do not resort to crime, indicating that innate character traits play a significant role.
In my view, it is likely that both factors play a role in criminal behavior. While social issues can be a significant driver of crime, it is also true that some individuals may be more inclined to engage in criminal activity due to inherent character flaws. Therefore, addressing both the root causes of social problems and providing intervention programs that focus on individual development could be effective in reducing crime rates.
In conclusion, there are varying opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. While some argue that criminal activity is solely attributable to social problems, others believe that individual traits play a more significant role. In my opinion, it is essential to consider both perspectives and work towards comprehensive solutions to reduce the prevalence of crime in our society.
Sample 10:
Crime is a complex issue with multiple contributing factors. While some argue that most crimes result from circumstances like poverty and social problems, I believe they are caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature.
On one hand, there are several factors that lead people to believe that most crimes stem from circumstances. Firstly, individuals who grow up in deprived environments often lack access to basic needs such as education, healthcare, and stable employment, leading them to potentially turn to crime as a means of survival or escape from their circumstances. For example, high crime rates in low-income neighborhoods can be attributed to individuals struggling to meet basic needs such as food, housing, and healthcare, and with limited access to education and job opportunities, they may resort to criminal activities like theft or drug dealing to make ends meet. Secondly, exposure to violence and crime from a young age can normalize these behaviors. For instance, children from households with domestic violence may become desensitized to violent behavior and replicate it in their own relationships.
On the other hand, I do believe that crime is caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature. Firstly, those who commit crimes may have a predisposition to violence and deviant behavior, regardless of their upbringing or environment. Ted Bundy, for instance, despite his stable upbringing and education, committed numerous murders. His actions suggest an inherent predisposition to violence and deviance, highlighting the role of personal moral character in criminal behavior. Secondly, some research indicates that genetic and environmental factors can increase the likelihood of engaging in criminal activities. For instance, a longitudinal study conducted by the National Institute of Justice followed a group of individuals from childhood into adulthood and found that those with a family history of criminal behavior were more likely to engage in similar activities.
In conclusion, while circumstances like poverty and social problems contribute to crime, I believe that personal moral character and inherent predispositions play a more significant role in criminal behavior.
Sample 11:
Crime is a prevalent issue in modern society and understanding its root causes is important for its effective prevention and control. Some people argue that most crimes are the result of circumstances such as poverty or other social problems. Others believe that criminal behaviour stems from individuals who are bad in nature. In my opinion, most crimes are the consequence of socioeconomic circumstances.
Individuals who believe that crime is the result of inheriting bad nature think that even though people who live in affluent societies with minimal social problems, are subjected to face crimes. They believe that personal choices and moral failings are significant contributors to criminal behaviour. For example, studies have indicated that people who possess personality traits such as impulsivity and aggressiveness are more likely to engage in criminal activities.
On the other hand, proponents of the view that crime is a result of poverty and social issues argue that individuals coming from poor backgrounds are forced to commit crimes because of necessity. When a person’s basic needs such as food, shelter and security are unmet, they may resort to illegal activities as a means of survival. For instance, incidents like theft and burglary are more common in economically deprived societies where everyone is striving to make ends meet. Furthermore, social problems such as lack of education, unemployment and substance abuse exacerbate the situation. Without access to quality education, many individuals cannot secure well-paying jobs, leading them to seek alternative, often illegal, means of income.
In my opinion, poverty and social problems create an environment where crime can flourish. When individuals are deprived of opportunities and resources, the temptation to break the law becomes stronger. Additionally, the social environment, including peer influence and community norms, plays a crucial role in shaping behaviour.
In conclusion, addressing these root causes through social policies aimed at reducing poverty, improving education, and providing employment opportunities is essential for effective crime prevention. By creating a more equitable and supportive society, the incidence of crime can be significantly reduced.
Sample 12:
Throughout history, people tended to believe that crimes were committed by those who were innately bad, but in the modern era a more liberal approach has led to the idea that crimes are often acts of desperation, committed by people whose circumstances are bleak. This essay will explore both perspectives, concluding that the latter is usually true.
First of all, it should be noted that some crimes are committed by people who appear innately driven towards such acts. These people may have some sort of hereditary psychological condition that means they do not feel empathy for others, or a predilection towards violence. This is a controversial perspective and although it feels true for many, it is hard to prove. Many of the most violent criminals have traumatic backgrounds, such as child abuse, neglect, or sexual assault, which suggests that they were not born with their criminal compunctions, but rather that these developed very early, which thus places them more into the circumstances than nature category. However, the lines are blurry.
Certainly, it does seem as though most criminals are created out of difficult circumstances. To understand this, one just has to look at impoverished communities around the world. These are places where crime flourishes because the people there are desperate and forced to do immoral things in order to survive. In such states of despair, people tend to put themselves first and overlook social norms, laws, and the usual empathic perspective that would stop most people from hurting others. In such areas, people tend to be conditioned for a young age to ignore the law or even social decency, joining gangs and becoming influenced by dangerous people. This tends to be a problem due to a lack of resources, opportunities, and education in such areas.
In conclusion, it appears likely that most crime is the result of people’s unfortunate circumstances, meaning that criminals are not inherently bad. However, there may be some people who were born with a certain compunction towards violent or criminal activity.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Television has become an integral part of our daily lives, and its influence on children cannot be underestimated. While some argue that children can learn effectively through television and should be encouraged to watch it both at home and school, I strongly disagree with this notion. In this essay, I will present arguments against the idea of promoting excessive television watching among children.
Firstly, television watching is a passive activity that lacks the interactivity and engagement required for optimal learning outcomes. While children may absorb information from television programmes, they often lack the opportunity to actively participate, ask questions, and engage in critical thinking. In contrast, traditional educational settings such as classrooms promote active learning, where students can interact with teachers and peers, ask questions, and engage in discussions. This active involvement enhances comprehension, critical thinking skills, and the ability to apply knowledge in real-world situations. This is why young children do not learn effectively from watching TV.
Furthermore, excessive television viewing can have detrimental effects on children's physical and mental well-being. Prolonged sedentary behaviour associated with watching television can contribute to a sedentary lifestyle, leading to various health issues such as obesity, cardiovascular problems, and poor posture. Moreover, excessive screen time can adversely affect children's cognitive development and attention span. Research has shown that excessive exposure to screens, including television, can lead to attention deficits and decreased academic performance. In contrast, encouraging children to engage in physical activities, interactive play, and reading promotes their overall well-being and cognitive development.
In conclusion, television is not a substitute for interactive and engaging learning experiences. Moreover, excessive television viewing can have negative effects on children's learning, physical health, and cognitive development. Therefore, it is important to encourage children to participate in interactive learning environments, such as classrooms, rather than watching TV.
Sample 2:
Television, as a learning tool, could be useful if children watch the right programmes for a limited duration of time each day. I do believe that TV can be a very powerful learning tool for children, and that is why they should be allowed to watch TV programmes both at home and school, but within the teacher's and parent's watch.
To begin with, though I am no longer a student, I can still learn better by watching TV rather than reading books. Whenever I tune on to the History Channel, BBC or National Geographic Channel, I can learn new things. This is also true for school-going children. My younger brother, who is a college student with a History major, heavily relies on History Channel documentaries to enhance his knowledge of history.
Moreover, TV programmes are the audio-visual presentation of an event, story or fact, and thus have lasting impressions on our brains. If the right programmes are chosen for children, they will learn faster by watching TV. For instance, one of our neighbours allows her 3 years old daughter to watch Rhymes on the internet TV channels, and she can recite most of those rhymes. According to her mother, the girl has learned more effectively by watching animated cartoons that have rhymes than by reading books. Since TV is a powerful learning tool, we can use it in school for educational purposes.
In conclusion, as parents and teachers, we must pick suitable educational programmes for our youngsters both in school and at home. I believe that TV is a good pedagogical tool, and hence its use in the school and home for both educational and recreational purposes should be allowed.
Sample 3:
Modern technology has undoubtedly made learning easier and better. Most children's parents encourage them to watch shows to gain information and acquire new knowledge. While I agree that watching television has some positive effects on a child, I believe this trend has a more detrimental effect on our children and society in general.
First and foremost, watching television can have some positive effects on children. There are, in fact, considerable advantages to incorporating television into homes and educational institutions. Many informative broadcasters, like National Geographic and Discovery, exist solely for educational reasons. Moreover, viewing television may increase the concentration and attention of some people. For instance, children with autism and behaviour problems have a concentration weakness; research has demonstrated that these children have enhanced their focus and concentration and are capable of watching television for prolonged periods. Therefore, it is obvious that somehow this trend has some beneficial consequences.
Similarly, I believe that watching television has several negative adverse effects. Spending time watching television can divert attention from healthy pastimes like outdoor activity with colleagues, leading to weight gain and feelings of loneliness. In addition, some programmes are created for entertainment, not teaching; these programmes have violent scenes and inappropriate terminology, which hurt children's brains. In addition, prolonged watching television may prevent reading a book and informative articles. Consequently, children would lack intellectual and problem-solving abilities. The negative impacts of television on the psychological and physical well-being of children can be determined.
In summation, I believe that television watching has more drawbacks than benefits. Under the supervision of both their parents and educators, children may spend more time watching purely for informative and educational reasons.
Sample 4:
Nowadays, television sets are now utilized as an educational tool. Many people believe that teenagers can absorb more efficiently while watching television. I fully agree with the concept that television might benefit youngsters in increasing their knowledge. This essay will look into the several reasons for this approval.
I feel that television is incredibly good for youngsters for two primary reasons. First, kids have access to a plethora of informative television channels, such as National Geographic and discovery, which are quite captivating to watch. This option might, in my opinion, considerably expand students’ understanding of Biology and Geography. Another consideration is that watching television helps reduce the school-related anxiety that teenagers are prone to. If, for instance, a youngster receives a poor grade in a specific subject, classmates would likely tease him or her. Consequently, I would suggest that televisions may be advantageous in some instances. It is evident that, by viewing the news on television, students receive a significant amount of information and learn about the world's various cultures and critical problems.
In contrast, I feel that we should not push youngsters to watch television constantly because it makes them less productive and inactive. Moreover, numerous studies have already demonstrated that televisions not only make individuals idle but also cause overweight. I believe that many schools offer physical education classes, even though television can make children less active.
In summation, although it is obvious that television makes an individual less active, I am convinced that teenagers learn more efficiently while watching television, for the reasons I have explained throughout.
Sample 5:
In this 21st century, digitalization has replaced all the old-schooled theories in educational institutes. Moreover, it is claimed that teenagers can effectively study while watching television at home and school. Although I agree that youngsters sometimes can learn from watching television, I do not consider it to be a good idea to encourage this activity.
Firstly, children's study is occasionally enhanced by television viewing. Numerous television programmes provide visual information and tales that enhance the process of learning interesting as well as the content easier to understand. It is a good way to encourage students to learn, particularly when they are tired of academics and assignments. Some applications, for instance, present appealing stories of literature, enhancing children's comprehension. These tools also make it simpler for youngsters to memorize poetry, as it is challenging and tiring for young children to remember poetry by continuously repeating them.
In contrast, I believe that prolonged watching of television may damage a child's academic performance. First, television programmes can serve as a distraction from their academics, especially when they are not attentive. Some programmes employ games to assist youngsters to learn more efficiently, yet youngsters may become more involved in the pleasure and so acquire little. Furthermore, continuous TV viewing alone could lead to an absence of human engagement. If children have queries while watching the television, their instructors cannot immediately address them, which would be most likely to lead to misunderstandings.
To conclude, even though viewing television encourages children to take an interest in learning, I believe that youngsters should not consume too much television because it has a negative consequence on their academics.
Sample 6:
With the development of technology, the media plays an important role in the field of education. Many people are of the opinion that when students are taught with the help of computers, mobile phones, and even television, they learn productively. As far as I am concerned, educating a child with the help of television at school and home is commendable, but there should be a limit to the exposure, otherwise, there may be a hindrance to their mental and physical development.
Childhood is a period when everyone enjoys the simple pleasures of life. Running with friends, pursuing adventures, enjoying ice cream and chocolates are some of the activities that make them happy. Nowadays, children are glued to their television or computer screens. There is no scope for physical activity, and they become obese or unhealthy. If the children continuously come in contact with television at home as well as at school, the rays from the screen may affect their eyesight.
Apart from this, when children watch television at home and school, they become addicted. For example, when a child is shown animated videos to understand certain topics, they get an excuse to watch videos on youtube. They tell their parents that the teacher had asked them to watch those videos to understand the topic better. In this way, the parents are bound to allow them and are unable to keep track of their activity. Moreover, some programs on television show excessive violence, which excites the children. They may try to copy their favourite superhero and get hurt in the process. The crime shows may even instigate them to behave in a rude or anti-social way which ultimately becomes detrimental to their development.
Yet, it is irrefutable that television is an effective tool to educate children and adults alike. While shows on National Geography, Animal Planet and Discovery tap on the scientific evolution of a child’s mind, cartoons or game shows help them relax after a long day of study and activities.
To put it in a nutshell, even though watching television both at home and school might help the children, the negative effects outweigh the positive side. So, according to me, elders should keep an eye on their wards and allow them limited time to watch television at home and school.
Sample 7:
As a professional in the field of education, I strongly disagree with the idea that children should be encouraged to watch television regularly at home and at school. While it is true that television can be a source of information and entertainment, it is not a suitable medium for effective learning for children.
First and foremost, excessive television viewing can have detrimental effects on a child’s physical and mental health. Studies have shown that children who spend too much time in front of a screen are at a higher risk of obesity, sleep disturbances, and attention problems. Moreover, the content of television programs is often not age-appropriate and can expose children to violence, inappropriate language, and negative behaviors.
Furthermore, watching television does not promote active learning or critical thinking skills. Unlike interactive educational activities, such as reading, writing, and hands-on experiments, television viewing is a passive experience that does not engage children in the learning process. It is important for children to develop their cognitive abilities and problem-solving skills through active participation in educational activities, rather than passively absorbing information from a screen.
Instead of encouraging children to watch television regularly, it is essential to provide them with alternative and more effective learning opportunities. Schools should focus on creating a stimulating and interactive learning environment, where children can engage in hands-on activities, discussions, and group projects. At home, parents should limit screen time and encourage their children to participate in outdoor activities, sports, and hobbies that promote physical and mental well-being.
In conclusion, while television can be a source of entertainment, it is not an effective medium for children to learn. Instead of promoting regular television viewing, it is crucial to provide children with active and engaging learning experiences that foster their overall development.
Sample 8:
Some parents believe that watching television is bad for their children. So, they try to restrict their children from watching TV. In a different way, others think that there is nothing bad in watching TV programmes. Personally, I think that watching TV brings tremendous benefits to children unless they spend a lot of their valuable time in front of a TV set daily. It is recommended that children should spend less than a couple of hours daily watching TV programmes, and those programmes should be suitable for them. For the following reasons, which I will mention below, I believe that television plays an essential role in a child’s development.
First of all, television helps a child to extend his or her range of interests. Children can find out many new things and make many exciting discoveries for themselves. In addition to this practical benefit, television improves children’s vocabulary, their memory and gives them the opportunity to gain more knowledge. It is essential for a child’s growth. Of cause, someone can say that there are plenty of different resources of information such as books and teachers. But, I think, in our modern world children must learn faster and use all contemporary technology in order to succeed.
Secondly, watching cognitive programs helps children to learn more about wildlife, our environment and about the importance of preserving our forest and wild animals that live there. However, scientists say that a child should not watch TV for more than 40 minutes successively and not more than 2-3 hours per day. For example, my mother always made us have a break after watching TV more than half an hour and let our eyes rest for several minutes before turning on the TV again. She did not let us watch the TV all day long as well. I think it is the best solution.
To sum up, I believe that television gives children and all people the opportunity to learn what cannot be learnt from books. Television and movies, in particular, allow people to feel the reality and see what they will most likely not be able to see in their lives. Personally, when I was a child, I liked to watch cognitive programs about wild animals. Unfortunately, my family had only one TV, but these programs were the only ones we all wanted to watch. So, we gathered in our living room and watched them in complete silence. I always remember those moments with a smile.
Sample 9:
It is irrefutable that TV is a very efficient teacher. However, I disagree that children should be motivated to watch TV both at home and at school. I shall put forth my arguments to support my views in the following paragraphs.
There is no doubt that TV can be a powerful means of delivering information and a nice part of the learning process. Being an audiovisual medium more effective result can be achieved. What is seen is retained longer in the minds of children. There are some things which can be very easily taught by visual illustrations. Even boring subjects like history can be made interesting with the help of TV.
However, if TV is to be used as an educational tool, then very strict monitoring would be needed as to what children watch on TV. All those talk shows and soap operas we can see every day are a complete waste of time and can even have negative effects by distracting children from their studies. Moreover, most so-called educational programmes like National Geographic cannot replace books and academic lectures because they tend to entertain people and have not an aim to give deep and concentrated knowledge. It is highly unlikely that TV channel directors would abandon their profits and change talk shows to lectures and video lessons.
Furthermore, if children watch TV in school also then their interaction with the teacher would be limited. Teachers teach a lot of things apart from academics. They can come down to the level of the student and can also stimulate children to learn. What is more, children would read less when they learn everything from TV. Reading is an active activity as compared to TV which is a passive activity. So, it would be detrimental to the holistic development of children.
To put it in a nutshell I pen down saying that, although TV is a very good educational medium, it should be used within limits and whatever children learn from TV should also be carefully monitored by parents and teachers.
Sample 10:
Nowadays, many educational institutes are focusing on the usage of screens for learning in kids. Some people are of the view that learning through screen should be encouraged for young kids. My opinion, I completely disagree with acquiring knowledge through television screens. In this essay, I am going to support my opinion before giving a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, screening for long hours for educational purposes is likely to put strain on the eyes of youngsters. This is because television screens are likely to release rays that may impact vision in young kids. As a result of this, the younger kids will need to wear glasses at every age. Additionally, vision impairment due to screening is not restricted to weak eyesight but also to severe headaches for days or even blurry vision. For instance, nowadays, ophthalmologists believe that long hours of screening are the main cause of vision impairment in kids. Also, they emphasize the limitation of screen time for kids at a young age.
Secondly, viewing learning programs on tv continuously is likely to impact young kids' physical and mental well-being. As when kids do screen time, they are unlikely to do any form of physical movement. Hence, sitting constantly and just watching videos online will make youngsters lethargic and tired. Moreover, learning through screens, even at home, will result in obesity, leading to other personality development issues in young ones. Along with that, learning without a screen tends to enhance analytical and cognitive capabilities in kids. For instance, when learning through screens, kids only make use of a few of their senses, while off-screen learning involves the usage of many other senses. Undoubtedly, off-screen learning involves eyes, ears, hands, and touch, which also helps develop the brain in young kids.
In conclusion, learning through tv screen can impact the eyes in young kids and may lead to vision impairment. Also, constant viewing of tv screens is not good for the physical and mental well-being of young ones.
Sample 11:
It is acknowledged that children may benefit from watching television programs, such as educational programs. However, I disagree with the recommendation that watching television should be a regular activity at school and st home, as this would produce more negative outcomes than positive ones.
It has received wide cognition that many television programs can moticate children’s learning enthusiasm, thus encouraging them to expand their knowledge in terms of normal school subjects and after-school activities. However, there are still many problems associated with the increased time of sitting in front of a TV screen.
If children spend time watching television every day at school and at home, they may face the probability of suffering obesity, eye problems and back problems. When they are studying at school, it would be advisable for them to focus on learning, acquiring knowledge on academic subjects. Besides, more active and aggressive activities should be encouraged as they are in a physical state when they should participate in more sports activities. But watching television seems to do more harm than good in their physical development.
Furthermore, it is true that children waste a lot of time playing electronic gadgets after school, resulting in the fact that many of them have become highly addicted to these gadgets. If they are asked to watch television regularly, they would certainly lack interpersonal interaction. It would be more beneficial if they play games with their parents or do the housework.
In conclusion, although television programs would do good to children’s learning in some ways, they definitely would cause more disadvantageous effects if watching them becomes a daily routine for children.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Bài tập chức năng giao tiếp (Có đáp án)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
15000 bài tập tách từ đề thi thử môn Tiếng Anh có đáp án (Phần 1)
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
Bộ câu hỏi: Thì và sự phối thì (Phần 2) (Có đáp án)
Trắc nghiệm Tiếng anh 12 Tìm từ được gạch chân phát âm khác - Mức độ nhận biết có đáp án
Bộ câu hỏi: Cấp so sánh (có đáp án)
Hãy Đăng nhập hoặc Tạo tài khoản để gửi bình luận