Although more and more people read the news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree?

Sample 1:

Some people believe that despite the spreading popularity of the online media, traditional newspaper will still hold the most vital position among news readers. In my opinion, this idea is rather absurd as the Internet has become increasingly dominant due to the benefits it offers.

The first thing that attracts people to reading news on the online sources is their easy access. With the presence of the Internet around almost every corner of the world, people with a portable device such as a mobile phone can access huge storage of news. In fact, latest events, for example IS Terrorist attacks, would be updated immediately on CNN or New York Times. By contrast, with prolonging procedures including editting and printing, traditional newspaper might not be able to compete with the Internet in terms of the updating speed.

Another benefit with which the Internet can, from my point of view, take over the position of printed newspaper is the new experience it brings to readers. One limitation of newspaper is that it cannot convey visual messages to the people who read news on a regular basis. Meanwhile, non-stop progress of the technology industry has unfolded the possibility to upload videos and voice records on various online websites. For instance, soccer fans these days can rewatch their favorite matches anytime they want with only a laptop connected to the Internet, which a mere paper cannot do.

In conclusion, I disagree that printed newspaper would continue to be the most crucial source of information because more and more people will be drawn to use the Internet.

Sample 2:

Despite the overall increase in digital news, many people believe that society will still get most of its information from newspapers. I personally contend that newspapers are struggling to find traction in the modern world due to their cost and inflexibility, and as time goes on, they will flounder and be replaced.

Firstly, newspaper subscriptions of all kinds are decreasing since they are more expensive than the free online news. There is little benefit to getting newspapers delivered to the front door today, as with a touch of a smartphone, information from all over the world can be readily available at one’s fingertips. Thus, digital news is both more affordable and more convenient to the masses, and companies who refuse to make the transition to online platforms suffer dramatically from lower financial returns. This is, for instance, why we see many traditional news sources going bankrupt and being replaced by online social media platforms such as Twitter or Facebook.

Secondly, digital news allows for more varied content to be offered than print media. More specifically, the former can incorporate video recordings, digital audio and high-quality images, something that is simply not possible on newspapers. To read the news in newspapers is to miss out on the range of what can be communicated by news apps nowadays, which are able to provide a much more illustrative depiction of the real world. This is why traditional newspapers such as the Guardian or the Washington Post have moved many of their operations online: to make their content more diverse and thus to attract more readers.

Overall, I argue that the benefits of digital news, both in cost and variety, compared to newspapers are significant. Thus, I argue that in the future, internet news will become the primary source of information for most people in society.

Sample 3:

Many traditionalists believe that while people have access to the Internet, conventional newspapers will continue as the major source of news. I totally disagree with this view.

The speed and convenience of the Internet in this digital age have led to the increasing popularity of online news. Firstly, the Internet is able to provide up-to-the-minute news as it happens, 24 hours a day every day. As long as I have my smart phone or laptop with me, I can connect almost instantly to the Internet, surf the websites and access the news of my choice across the globe. Secondly, more and more people now have access to the Internet and this trend appears set to continue. The more widespread the accessibility of the Internet, the more people will come to rely on it as their new’s source.

In contrast, newspapers have drawbacks which affect their popularity. One major disincentive of relying on newspapers as a news source is the cost. Competing with freely available news online, newspaper publishers are facing the reality of falling circulation figures. Some major American newspapers have now’ introduced online versions alongside their printed editions in an attempt to arrest this trend. Another disadvantage of newspapers is the amount of paper consumed in their production. With growing environmental awareness, there is a body of public opinion which rejects buying newspapers because this involves cutting trees and transporting them to paper mills. While this may not be a major factor at present, the environmental argument will almost certainly gain ground in the future.

In conclusion, I would argue that newspapers will continue to decline in importance, and more and more people will use the Internet to access the news.

Sample 4:

It is common at the present time to see people getting updates on the latest news from the internet rather than the traditional method of reading a newspaper. I would argue that electronic sources of news will gradually replace that of the newspaper. 

Newspapers remain an important source of news for several reasons.  The first of these is that the older generation still prefer to read their news this way, which is because they have traditionally bought a newspaper over the years and so do not wish to change or simply do not know how to do so online in some cases. In addition to this a newspaper also comes with other supplements, such as magazines and television guides, and sources of entertainment, such as crosswords. This makes it more attractive for some than going online.  

However, though newspapers may not disappear completely, the Internet is likely to become the more dominant source of news over time. This is primarily because younger people tend to read the news online and prefer not to pay for it, so those reading newspapers, the older generations, will gradually decline. This links in with the second reason, which is that as media companies start to see a drop income from newspapers, printing them will become unprofitable and they will be forced to find ways to make money from news online. 

In conclusion, although newspapers remain popular today, they will gradually be replaced by the desire to read the news through electronic sources. This may be a sad loss given their history, but unfortunately it is an unavoidable development. 

Sample 5:

It is argued that although many people read news on the internet, newspapers prevail over digital news and will continue to outweigh its importance for the majority of people. This essay will discuss how it disagrees with the given statement. I believe online news is more accessible and convenient in comparison to newspapers, and online news is more versatile and more inclusive.

As my first point, I believe that the accessibility and convenience of digital news cannot be replicated with a newspaper. Online news allows people to consume news in an immediate manner, where any news story can be accessed by the tips of our fingers, is an incomparable advantage. This is even more relevant when we consider how fast-paced life can be, and how digital news can serve this purpose so efficiently. In our speedy times, the more sedentary nature of newspapers seems less fitting. Newspapers evoke a sense of study, leisure and sitting somewhere comfortable enough to enjoy your paper. This however contrasts the ease in which people can otherwise access news online. Moreover, not only is online news readily available, it is equally as easy to circulate and share amongst friends, leading to more of a cultural awareness amongst people. Take for example the situations in which you want to be updated with the news but don’t have the leisure of time. This could be on the way to work, queueing to board a flight, or simply travelling between destinations, where such situations create pools of time that are ideal for a quicker digestion of news.

Secondly, online news is more versatile and more inclusive. Online news offers a more versatile range of content as you can read news from hundreds of sources. The immediate benefits of this lies in reading numerous writing styles from a multitude of news sources. When reading a paper, you are reading their house style and thus reading a particular style of writing. Whereas, online news stretches across multiple styles of writing and encompasses a global perspective with more linguistic variation. As well as this, news can be digested in the form of video. Some people may find that they would rather watch a short video and be updated in this manner. A newspaper simply cannot perform this action. Consuming news online can create a chain of engagement where one article can lead to another, to a review, to an interview, to trending stories and so on. The individual reading news online means that their library of knowledge can easily be topped up and they can gain a more informed perspective by reading news from different sources. Due to the myriad ways of online news, this also makes it more inclusive to print news where it can be read in all languages, including its video element that may be more suited to people. If for example an article needs to be used in a lesson at school, it is more engaging and inclusive for the teacher to provide their students with its digital format. If a portion of the students have English as a second language, then the teacher can easily supply them with the article in its many languages. Furthermore, students are likely to be more receptive to supplementary video material alongside text.

To summarise, I believe that reading the news on the internet has more advantages in terms of its accessibility, levels of engagement and inclusive nature, than reading a newspaper and is therefore a more significant source of news for the masses.

Sample 6:

Some believe that despite the rise in consumption of online news, newspapers will always be the primary news source for most. In my opinion, though newspapers may remain more trustworthy, online news will surely only become more popular in the future.

Those who argue for the primacy of newspapers point out their reputations. Before publication, newspaper articles are researched thoroughly, often for several months, by accomplished and professional writers who then pass their articles on to editors who verify the information and approve inclusion in the next edition. Most individuals are dimly aware of this process and therefore more likely to carefully read and trust reputable papers like The New York Times and Washington Post. This stands in marked contrast to online news, which is written hastily and published instantly, often with the intended purpose of generating clicks and advertising revenue rather than accurately informing their audience.

Nonetheless, the majority of people already receive most news from sources other than newspapers. This includes television and podcasts, but websites and social media now dominate the media landscape. Most individuals find articles through websites like Facebook and Twitter that allow for the direct posting of links, which can then redirect users to a primary news source. Other more popular social media, including YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok, are more likely to aggregate and summarize or respond to recent news stories. Their potential audience is far wider than the dwindling circulations of physical newspapers.

In conclusion, despite the reliability of newspapers, there is little that can curb the growing ubiquity of online news. Individuals must therefore be more discerning as to which influencers they trust.

Sample 7:

In the modern world, obtaining news on the Internet has become an accelerating trend. I have faith in the likelihood of this trend overshadowing the traditional way of reading newspapers to become the most crucial source of news.

The most obvious proof supporting my viewpoint is the decline in the popularity of traditional newspapers. Conventional newspapers’ nature is characterized by a thorough and time-consuming process of editing, printing, and distributing. This turns out to be a weakness that causes newspapers to fail to meet the instant quest for news of modern newsreaders. In addition, due to the fact that printed newspapers are geographically limited, their reach and exposure levels are becoming substantially lower than those of online news. Apparently, it is online press, not the traditional one, which helps news seekers all over the globe access local news as well as global news published by a variety of internationally prestigious newspapers including BBC, New York Times, and Wall Street Journal. Such availability of online news far outweighs that of printed news, steadily dominating the news industry.

Moreover, the advantages of online news significantly surpass those of printed newspaper. In this era of advanced technology and communication, the omnipresence of the Internet and the availability of Internet devices have boosted the popularity of online news to the extent that the concept of buying and reading a printed newspaper would become obsolete and inconvenient. Online platforms which facilitate fast-moving and immediate news updates will certainly become the utmost solution to satisfy increasing demand and busy news seekers. Thanks to Internet-based platforms, news about an incident happening half the world away could be retrieved within a few seconds after its commencement, which renders news updates one day later on conventional newspapers out of date.

In conclusion, despite the fact that printed newspapers still hold an important role, I firmly support the tendency that they will be eclipsed by online news.

Sample 8:

It is true that a growing number of people are using the Internet in order to find out the latest news. While newspapers are still popular, I strongly disagree that most people will continue to rely on them as a source of news.

The first reason for my view relates to the increasing use of the Internet around the world. Recently, a growing number of people have accessed online news via technological gadgets such as smart phones or tablets, so they do not need to buy a newspaper to obtain news. Even in more remote corners of the world, access to the Internet is becoming more widespread and the online community is growing daily.

Secondly, online news is always up-to-date while printed news needs time for editing, printing and delivering. In this fast-changing world, readers tend to expect updated information about what has just happened or is happening around them. Online news can be broadcast immediately with vivid pictures and relevant stories, making it more appealing to readers than printed news.

Finally, the Internet is a repository of information for people to dig for information that they need. Digital information can be stored in mass quantity, which allows internet users to search for events that occurred in the past. In contrast, newspapers are generally hard to preserve because of the corrosive effects of the environment and their sheer bulk makes storage difficult. This once again confirms the edge of online news.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that the Internet is even now replacing newspaper as the principal medium or accessing all the latest news.

Sample 9:

The advent of the Internet and other forms of media in the twenty first century has unquestionably brought about a metamorphosis in the way people seek knowledge and information. Newspapers, the one form of media which was once considered highly important, has now entered a state of significant and rapid decline in many places across the world. This has led to suggestions that newspaper will soon become a thing of the past. My way of thinking is that the death of newspapers is almost certain.

Firstly, many people are against reading newspapers because the process of making it is not environmentally sustainable. Even though newspapers today are losing their readerships, a staggering number of trees are being cut down every day to produce them. On the other hand, using digital tools to disseminate knowledge does not necessitate cutting down trees, disrupting animal lives and certainly proves to be more environmentally friendly.

Secondly, readers of newspapers are likely to receive out of date or incorrect information. The fact is that the process of making a newspaper is a long and complicated one, involving many stages such as writing, editing, printing and distribution. This means that by the time newspapers hit the shelves, there might be some changes to the events covered and it will already be too late to make any adjustments.

Nevertheless, some are skeptical about the view that newspapers will die out and their argument is that newspapers are a more reliable source of information than other types of media such as the Internet. However, the truth is that many journalists today display poor professionalism and low morality. Many do not think twice about writing incorrect information in order to increase the readership. This shows that the information in the newspapers is not any more trustworthy than on the Internet.

These points have strongly corroborated my view that the decline of newspapers is not overstated and there will be no place for newspapers in the near future.

Sample 10:

In light of advancements in technology and the proliferation of the Internet, there is an increasing number of people learning about the news on online platforms. Although I am of the opinion that newspaper will maintain its position as a major news provider for people, I believe that people will read most of their news from online newspapers rather than printed ones.

News captured online can be unreliable. This is because many news providers are competing with each other to grab people's attention to sell ads. The more viewers they have, the higher the price of the advertisements they can sell. Clickbait headlines are a prime example where the content of an article can sometimes be incompatible with the title of the article as long as it can induce people to click. Moreover, there is a great deal of fake news online because with an Internet connection, everybody can create online content that is accessible by millions of people. The information can be biased and subjective as there is no evaluation of the reliability and validity of the information posted.

On the other hand, newspapers are often considered a much more reliable and trustworthy source of information. This is because most major journals and newspapers are under the control of the government and the news is often written by professional journalists. Furthermore, access to the most significant and official information, especially those from the government, are often reported by reliable journalists and newspapers rather than by individuals or tabloids. However, it is undeniable that with the development of the Internet, online newspapers are gaining in popularity due to its convenience and speed. As a result, more and more people will subscribe to reputable newspapers such as BBC or The Telegraph to get their valuable and reliable news.

In conclusion, I believe that online newspapers are the future of news capturing for the majority because of its superior reliability and validity over other sources of news on the Internet.

Sample 11:

Most people still view traditional newspapers as being more important than traditional internet news sources. I vehemently disagree with this assertion since, in contrast to online news, newspapers are less readily available to individuals.

The fact that the internet is more accessible in a number of ways is the first and foremost reason why the majority of people will prefer it. Especially over the outdated practice of reading newspapers. This means that traditional news publishing processes are laborious and take longer than using the internet to convey news to readers. For instance, a local periodical may cover a story the day before it is published. The story is then printed, subject to editorial adjustments, and after receiving final approval, it is made available to the public. Thus, making the information one day old. Online articles can be read whenever it is convenient for the reader without having to wait for the local newspaper to print the next day's edition. As a result, a newspaper is superseded by the influential ways that the internet offers to learn about current events.

Furthermore, because of technological advancements, internet sources offer many advantages over printed ones, far outpacing newspapers in many ways. This is due to a few factors. First, the massive amount of paper used in the printing of news articles. It often encourages readers to turn to online sources in an effort to reduce waste and promote the environmentally friendly trend. Second, using internet applications, readers can receive critical information that, in some cases, demands quick broadcast. For instance, "TOI" has created a user-friendly web portal. It has features that allow the public to access it in a variety of languages. And it offers constant updates in a matter of seconds, covering all types of news globally. So, by increasing the use of internet channels that disseminate news to the public, newsreader preferences are making printed newspapers obsolete.

As a result, newspapers have historically played a significant role in bringing the news to the public's doorstep. But I am convinced that, given its favourable results, online news will continue to dominate newspaper popularity.

Sample 12:

There's no denying that more and more people are using the Internet to stay up to date on news. But some individuals still hold that traditional newspapers are still the preferred source for the majority of people. Despite the advantages that newspapers provide, I contend that internet news will quickly overtake print news in the 21st century.

On the one hand, I have to admit that even in the Internet age, printed newspapers continue to be a great means for many people to stay current. First off, readers feel at ease reading newspapers because of their physical quality. Many people enjoy the tactile experience of holding genuine paper in their hands. And many of them even have the practice of making notes or underlining passages while reading the newspaper. This activity unmistakably improves people's processes for digesting information and their enjoyment of reading. The reliability of print reading is another benefit. Newspaper editors and journalists constantly work to avoid publishing inaccurate information. Because it is very difficult to amend any news after it has been released to the public. This makes newspapers a more trustworthy source of information.

Despite the advantages of traditional newspapers that have been discussed, I still believe that online media will be more popular than print media. The fact that web news provides immediate access to reporting of events around the globe is its most important advantage. In other words, instead of waiting for the morning newspaper, consumers may get the most recent news on their phones or laptops. The low cost of this innovative medium for widespread news consumption contributes to its popularity. Readers can save a lot of money on newspaper subscriptions. As they don't have to pay anything to keep up with the most recent news or read an engaging article in an online magazine.

In conclusion, I think that internet news will finally capture the hearts of readers in the near future. Even though traditional newspapers may still be a great source of information.

Sample 13:

Young people are increasingly using the internet to read the news because it is the quickest method to keep up with the latest information. However, there are still just a few individuals who read newspapers printed on paper. Especially older people who aren't as familiar with modern technology. And this is related to the fact that they can't easily "use the internet, locate correct statements, and distinguish between information sources."

First and foremost, it is clear that we are in the midst of the digital era. Due to this, people use more electrical devices - such as computers, mobile phones, and so on - in their daily lives than they did in the past. These days, individuals choose to use their cell phones to get information and statements since they can always take them anywhere and at any time. Aside from when they are sleeping. And the demand for and client base for these gadgets are both growing quickly. For instance, I seldom ever purchase newspapers. As I constantly read news on the official websites or pages on the internet using my computer and mobile devices.

Second, trees are used to create the paper used to print newspapers. Since most people toss newspapers after reading them, it is bad for the environment. And we should use less paper in order to preserve nature. Although it is possible to recycle wastepaper, it is evident that many presses degrade over time and produce dirty paper. It makes recycling impossible for certain materials. For instance, there aren't many paper recycling firms, and there aren't many used newspaper recycling initiatives in Mongolia.

In light of these issues, newspapers, which until recently were the primary source of news in our culture, have begun to give the internet more prominence. As we know, firms have been paying close attention to their corporate social media platforms for the past ten years. So, I believe that most readers have shifted to a way of acquiring their news through official websites.

Sample 14:

Traditional newspaper was always the first and most crucial news source, but the arrival of the Internet era has brought a new competitor, online news. Personally, I believe that despite the importance of press, Internet news will soon be just as important.

On the one hand, it is believed by a great number of people that newspaper will continue to dominate, even in the age of technology advances. Firstly, not all of the world population are capable of accessing online news. In fact, people in various less developed countries do not own any electrical or technological devices, let alone the Internet. Secondly, as the majority of press publishing houses tend to hire professional journalists and editors, their articles tend to have more credibility and accuracy as well as reflect the truth. Finally, part of the population, especially the elderly, simply just do not adopt changes but rather stick to old goodies. They have been reading traditional newspaper for decades, and there should be no obligation for them to turn to Internet news now.

On the other hand, it seems logical that the preference of many people now is to read online news over traditional press. One of the key benefits that the Internet acquires is the ability for us to share the article, comment under it, and even contribute our own works to the news sites. On top of these undeniable advantages, online news producers can provide the audiences with real-time updated information, which newspaper can never achieve. If a brutal gunfire occurs, the latest information about the casualties will be posted online as soon as possible with contribution made not only by reporters but also those who witness the crime scene. Another factor that leads to the increasing figures for Internet news supporters is environment. By finding information about what is happening in the world online instead of purchasing a newspaper, we can save tons of paper and carbon footprint which is the major catalyst for environmental pollution.

In conclusion, I believe that although newspaper is currently a major news source, the Internet will soon be equally important in the foreseeable future.

Sample 15:

It is certainly true that the internet has reached into every facet of human lives and reading habits are no exception, with the majority of modern-day people opting for digital news. Many traditionalists believe that despite the upsurge in the popularity of the online medium, newspapers will continue to remain a vital source of news in the future. I vehemently disaccord with this notion and will explicate my stance in forthcoming paragraphs with credible examples.

To commence with, there is an irrefutable number of arguments in favour of my stance. Firstly, and the most conspicuous one is the convenience of reading. To elucidate this, the internet offers flexibility to access any news, of past or present events, at the click of a button. Unlike newspapers, digital news is always accessible on your smartphones, tabs, or computers. Another pivotal aspect is that online newspapers can be accessed for free or at a minimal cost, whereas physical copy is costlier than digital version owing to the publication cost. To instantiate, the monthly subscription of most newspapers is more than Rs 200, which makes them at least 80-90% costlier than e-newspapers.

Another paramount ground of my belief is that digitized news is up-to-date when compared to its physical version. In other words, unlike traditional newspaper which gets updated once a day, online platform information gets updated almost every hour. An apt illustration of this would be how masses keep themselves updated about minuscule details of any live event related to sports or entertainment via digital news. Last but not least, people are increasingly becoming conscious of the impact of printing on the environment. In contrast, digitized copies do not need any paper or ink and hence are more eco-friendly.

To recapitulate, I stand in firm agreement that traditional newspapers will continue to decline in importance, and the masses will gradually switch to the digital version.

Sample 16:

Whilst traditional newspapers are still very much in circuit and are institutions in their own right, I disagree with this statement because newspapers are generally less convenient, and digital news is obtained far easier.

To begin with, the dominant reason for disagreeing with the statement lies in my belief that the habit of reading newspapers is far less convenient in our modern fast-paced working world. The sedentary nature of newspapers; reading through them, creating them, delivering them- is far less expedient than reading news on the internet. Take for example a longstanding, established newspaper. The stories are covered the day before and there needs to be time for proofreading and editing. This results in the content already having a ripeness to them. Whereas news that can be consumed on someone’s phone is instant. Live news can be tracked, and you can constantly refresh the latest news. With information needing to be near instant in our society and fundamentally current, newspapers feel dated and less pertinent to our speedy times.

Additionally, by engaging with news in a digital manner, the reader has a more robust menu in terms of what they are able to consume. The infinite possibilities of what the internet can procure is far greater than that of a newspaper. There cannot be more content created from the newspaper, but an article can easily lead to another, to an interview of interest, to literary recommendations- by reading the news online, the individual has more ownership and authority in what they are reading, as well as a wider variety of content. Importantly, online news is also able to be translated and read in any language possible. A newspaper cannot immediately translate itself and suddenly become bilingual. Therefore, online news is comparatively more inclusive and offers a myriad of types of news.

In conclusion, in spite of newspapers having significance and maintaining a readership, I firmly believe that digital news is a more digestible, convenient and stimulating way to absorb news, and will continue to override newspapers.

Sample 17:

Some people believe that despite the widespread popularity of the online media, traditional newspaper will still hold the most vital position among news readers. In my opinion, this idea is rather absurd as the Internet has become increasingly dominant due to the benefits it offers.

The first thing that attracts people to reading news on the online sources is their easy access. With the presence of the Internet around almost every corner of the world, people with a portable device such as a mobile phone can access huge storage of news. In fact, latest events, for example IS Terrorist attacks, would be updated immediately on CNN or New York Times. By contrast, with prolonging procedures including editing and printing, traditional newspaper might not be able to compete with the Internet in terms of the updating speed.

Another benefit with which the Internet can, from my point of view, take over the position of printed newspaper is the new experience it brings to readers. One limitation of newspaper is that it cannot convey visual messages to the people who read news on a regular basis. Meanwhile, non-stop progress of the technology industry has unfolded the possibility to upload videos and voice records on various online websites. For instance, soccer fans these days can re-watch their favorite matches anytime they want with only a laptop connected to the Internet, which a mere paper cannot do.

In conclusion, I disagree that printed newspaper would continue to be the most crucial source of information because more and more people will be drawn to use the Internet.

Sample 18:

There is a common belief that newspapers will still be the most vital means of reading news despite the innovation that the Internet has brought to the information provision process. Personally, I disagree with this view.

At the outset, I admit that newspapers may remain as the most popular source of information for certain parts of society. Take the senior citizens as a salient example. Journals were present on virtually every corner of the world a few decades ago, and the unremitting availability of this type of publication shaped a long-lasting reading habit among the previous generation. This explains why those individuals are not willing to change their way of accessing information. In addition, to the understanding of some people, the information published by newspapers is better censored. This view is, to some extent, justifiable due to the fact that the majority of websites and social networks are open for all members to post about their opinions, creating a chaotic influx of online information.

However, from my perspective, it is not reasonable to state that most people will consider newspapers their primary means of reading news in the future. At its simplest, the Internet has revolutionized the way we are exposed to information, and how online platforms place the entire world at our fingertips is simply superior to the way gazettes or broadsheets provide us with daily news every morning. To exemplify, online newspapers can publish vivid live reports of events or football matches, while traditional newspapers only supply brief summaries of such occasions on the following day. Plus, the audience, with an Internet-connected device, is allowed to access news under the form of video clips, which are by no means available on newspapers.

All the aforementioned points lead me to a firm conclusion that the Internet will replace the newspapers as the most important source of news in the foreseeable future.

Sample 19:

In recent years, digitization has become an integral part of our life, and it has impacted almost every aspect of our life including our reading habits. While an increasing number of people prefer to read online news, it has been argued that newspapers will remain the main source of news and information. I do not agree with this view. In my opinion, reading newspapers is a force of habit and in future people will move to digital news.

There are many benefits to reading news on the internet. The most important benefit of online news is that it is up-to-date and convenient to read. Traditional newspapers get updated only once a day, but their online versions are updated almost every hour. Also finding information online is easy because one can easily search any topic by entering the keywords and read instant updates.  Secondly, reading digital news is easy and enjoyable because one does not have to turn pages like in a newspaper to find information.

In addition to this, digitized news can be accessed for free or at a minimal cost, whereas physical newspapers are costlier than their digital versions. For instance, the monthly subscription fee of most newspapers is more than Rs. 200, which makes them at least 85-90% costlier than e-newspapers. Last but not least, people around the globe understood the impact newspapers have on the environment, whereas digital news does not require any paper or ink to publish. Hence, it is considered eco-friendly.

In conclusion, people are fond of reading traditional newspapers. However, considering the advantages of digital news, I firmly believe that people will leave their habit, and switch to digital news, which will become the primary source of information in the near future.

Sample 20:

The Internet is beginning to rival newspapers as the best place to find information about what is happening in the world. I believe that this trend will continue, and the Internet will soon be just as important as the traditional press.

On the one hand, I believe that newspapers will continue to be a vital source of information, even in the Internet age. Firstly, newspapers are the most traditional means of communicating the news, and not everyone wants to or is able to use the Internet instead. For example, old people or those in rural areas might not have the ability or opportunity to get online, while many of us simply prefer newspapers even if we do have Internet access. Secondly, newspapers can be trusted as reliable sources of news because they employ professional journalists and editors. Finally, many people like the experience of holding and reading a paper rather than looking at a computer screen.

However, the Internet is likely to become just as popular as newspapers for a variety of reasons. The main reason is that it allows us much faster access to news in real-time and wherever we are, on different gadgets and mobile devices. Another key benefit of online news compared to newspapers is the ability to share articles, discuss them with other people, give our views, and even contribute with our own updates on social media. For example, there has been an explosion in the use of platforms like Twitter and YouTube where anyone can share their news and views. A final point is that this source of news is less damaging to the environment.

In conclusion, I disagree with the view that newspapers will continue to be the main source of news, because I believe that the Internet will soon be equally important.

Sample 21:

Multimedia is playing an important role in keeping people abreast of the outer world. Due to a hectic schedule, the majority of people prefer to read news online; however, in spite of it, newspapers will be the first choice of the masses in the long run. I entirely agree with the latter statement because it has been an old and authentic source of information, and it is inexpensive to buy.

To my mind, since time immemorial, it has been one of the oldest sources of information and authenticity too. People have had more faith in the press since its origin. They believe that information in the newspaper is verified first and then it is printed. So, it does not shatter the faith of the people in the press. A recent study found that being the oldest source of information; it is the first choice of oldsters. They start their day by reading the newspaper because of its credibility. So, they consider it a true source of information.

To continue, it does not cost people an arm and a leg. People do not have any financial burden to purchase it. All and sundry can purchase it. To exemplify it, buying newspapers is in access to everyone. On the contrary, reading news online requires an internet connection, which everyone cannot afford. So, being cheap in nature, it is purchased by everyone.

In conclusion, people would prefer to read newspapers more because it is a cheap source of information as well as people have more faith in it because it delivers genuine information which is not influenced by politics or any eminent personality.

Sample 22:

Since time immemorial newspapers have been an important source of news, but the case is a little different now. A big proportion of the population, especially the youth have switched to other means, to keep a track of what is happening around the world. I believe that newspapers are becoming obsolete and will no longer prevail in the future.

As the proverb goes, ‘time is money’, people can’t afford to spend a lot of time reading news from newspapers, which is detailed and sometimes irrelevant. We also know that certain newspapers are biased politically and can thus mould the thinking of the public. These factors make one think if switching completely to digital news is a solution.

Millennials tend to read only the gist of the news if it does not intrigue them, and there are applications specifically designed to serve the purpose. With the newspaper virtually in your pocket, it gets really convenient to read the news while travelling or having a short break. One can also apply specific filters to receive the type or genre of news they prefer. With such comfort and portability available, why would one want to go back to the traditional way?

Although from a different perspective, most old people prefer newspapers as they are not so familiar or comfortable with the latest technologies. Additionally, they have a lot of time on their hands and reading the whole newspaper helps them pass it easily.

To conclude, it’s best if the culture of newspapers is put to an end. This will prevent the wastage of paper (thus saving trees) and make news-reading effective.

Sample 23:

Some individuals are of the opinion that the newspaper is the most popular medium of getting news and it will prevail as the main source of news despite the growing number of pupils who enjoy reading news on the internet. In my opinion, this idea is rather illogical as the internet has become increasingly dominant because of the benefits it offers.

To begin with, easy access to the internet drives many people towards online news than traditional newspapers, for explaining this, with a few clicks of a button on technological devices e.g. smartphones or tablets, one can easily browse the internet almost everywhere if he/she has network connections. Even in more remote corners of the world, access to the internet is becoming more widespread and the online community is growing daily. For instance, the internet is now available and easily accessible in rural and remote places of Bangladesh, a developing country.

What’s more, in this fast-changing world, readers tend to expect updated information about what has just happened or is happening around them. For this reason, people are inclined to online news since it is always up-to-date whereas printed newspaper necessitates a certain amount of time to edit, print, and deliver which is a weakness that discourages modern readers to buy newspapers these days. In fact, online news can be broadcasted instantly or live with vivid pictures, videos, and relevant stories, making it more appealing to readers than printed news. For example, we often see live sports such as cricket, football on Facebook in order to inform sports lovers about the latest score and results.

To sum up, taking all the aforementioned ideas into consideration, I personally opine that people will be much more interested to use the internet rather than traditional newspaper in terms of obtaining news.

Sample 24:

The colossal earth of yesteryear has become a global village. This depicts the powerful impact of the internet. Whenever we need to know about some topic or any happening, we can quickly get through the online news feed. Despite this effortless activity, some people still rely on newspapers. I believe that online news feeds can never overcome the importance of newspapers due to some powerful reasons.

The first and foremost point is that online news is not a reliable source of news. The various websites platform is the source of speak, an influential speaker. Whatsoever you want to listen to, only that topic news is shown on the website. This is because the internet excesses your activity by analyzing the browsing choices. Secondly, we have myriads of people who do not know the internet excess. They are much comfortable purchasing the daily newspaper and get updated.

Furthermore, the world comprises countries, people who are not well enough to carry smartphones or the internet excess. For them, few rupees of newspapers are more than enough to know the happenings of their own countries and the world. Additionally, online news is entirely dependent on the availability of the internet. Still, there are many places where there is no internet access. So, we cannot rely entirely on online news since they are not accessible to various areas.

In summary, I reiterate that no one can deny online news’s importance as they are easily accessible, and many people like to use them. However, still, it can never cover up the importance of the newspaper because of various reasons. A newspaper might be a traditional way of updating oneself but still is the best and reliable way to explore the world and the country.

Sample 25:

In the present day, the internet has become easier to access, so reading news online that is very popular for everyone. But some people believe that reading newspapers are more crucial ever than source of news. In my viewpoint, I tend to disagree with this statement.

First of all, the reason is that reading news on the internet is very convenient for people. Just having a smart phone or laptop or whatever devices are connected with the internet, it is easy to read the news in anywhere and anytime because most of information is posted on the internet. Besides, reading news online is very rapidly, people do not need to go to the bookstore and buy a newpaper that waste their time. It is easily to find the news they want to read on the social network. So, the accessibility of the internet has become widespread and the new source of news to everyone.

Another reason is that reading news online less cause pollution for environment than using newspaper. For example, if the demand of reading newspaper increased, that would produce many papers by cutting trees and utilize the amount of expense for ruining products made by paper. That is major factors destroy forest and environment. In addition, using newspapers do not save for a long time but using the internet to read news that it is quickly to find to read the news again.

To sum up, I would argue that newspapers will decline, and more and more people will use the internet to access the news.