Câu hỏi:
06/01/2025 239
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
Wealthy nations often provide financial support to developing countries, but some people think that it is better to give poor countries a more practical kind of support. I completely agree with this opinion.
One of the problems with financial assistance is that it often does not reach its intended receivers. Instead, it is misused by corrupt government officials, who use this money for their own sake, while those in real need receive little or nothing at all. Another thing that needs to be considered is that giving money to poor countries does not help address the root causes of poverty, one of which lies in a lack of access to basic education.
Therefore, instead of donating money, it is better to invest in the education system of poorer nations. A more practical way to offer help is to deploy teachers, build more educational institutions, and provide more resources like textbooks and school supplies. A lack of education is one of the primary reasons why so many people in underdeveloped countries get stuck in a vicious cycle of extreme poverty. Due to their inability to read and write, many have to work in labour-intensive or dangerous jobs for extremely low wages and they have to keep borrowing money to cover their basic daily expenses. Thus, when people are given the chance to go to school, they will be more likely to get a well-paid job, improve their living standards, and eventually lift themselves out of poverty.
In conclusion, I totally agree with the opinion that financial aid cannot help tackle the problem of poverty in developing countries, and that instead of pouring billions of dollars into the governments of poor countries, that amount should be invested in paying teachers’ salaries, constructing more educational facilities, and offering more resources.
Sample 2:
It is commonplace for wealthier countries to provide money to underdeveloped countries, yet the assistance fails to reduce poverty. Others argue that wealthy countries should help developing nations in ways other than monetary aid. Although financial aid is not a complete solution, it may be crucial in assisting developing nations. Moreover, other types of support are also required to battle poverty effectively.
Financial aid is crucial in providing immediate relief during times of crisis, such as natural disasters and pandemics. In these situations, necessities such as food, medicine, and shelter are urgently needed, and financial assistance can provide these resources to those in need. The COVID-19 pandemic, for example, has devastated many poorer countries, exacerbating existing challenges such as healthcare and economic inequalities. Financial aid provided by wealthier nations has played a critical role in mitigating the impact of the virus and supporting struggling communities. While financial aid is not a complete solution to poverty, it remains an essential tool in providing immediate relief and support during times of crisis.
To truly combat poverty, however, it is essential to complement financial assistance with other types of aid. Technical expertise and assistance, for example, can play a crucial role in helping poorer nations develop their economies and improve their education systems and infrastructure. More affluent countries can share their knowledge and experience in these areas through partnerships with businesses, educational institutions, and governments. By working together, developed and developing nations can identify and address the specific needs of poorer countries, creating sustainable change beyond short-term relief. Additionally, this can lead to long-term economic benefits for both developed and developing nations, fostering mutual understanding and cooperation.
In conclusion, I believe there is still a significant role that financial assistance may play in assisting low-income nations. In addition, expertise and help from the technological realm are also required in the fight against poverty.
Sample 3:
It is widely observed that wealthier countries often provide financial aid to underdeveloped nations. However, it has been argued that this approach alone does not effectively alleviate poverty. Instead, developed countries should offer alternative forms of assistance to address the needs of poor nations. While financial aid may not be a comprehensive solution, it remains essential, and other types of support should be implemented in conjunction to combat poverty more effectively.
In terms of immediate relief during crises like natural disasters or pandemics, financial aid plays a crucial role. It allows for the provision of urgent necessities such as food, medicine, and shelter for those in need. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted many impoverished countries, exacerbating existing healthcare and economic inequalities. Financial aid from wealthier nations has played a vital role in mitigating the pandemic's impact and supporting vulnerable communities. While financial aid alone may not solve poverty, it serves as a crucial tool in providing immediate relief and support during critical times.
However, to achieve long-term poverty reduction, financial assistance must be complemented by other forms of aid. Technical expertise and assistance, for example, can play a pivotal role in helping poorer nations develop their economies, improve education systems, and build infrastructure. Collaborative partnerships between developed and developing nations can facilitate knowledge sharing and experience exchange in these areas. By addressing the specific needs of poorer countries through sustained cooperation, we can foster sustainable change beyond short-term relief. Moreover, this collaborative effort can yield long-term economic benefits for both developed and developing nations, fostering mutual understanding and cooperation.
In conclusion, while financial assistance is crucial in assisting low-income nations, it is imperative to supplement it with other forms of aid. Technical expertise and assistance should be provided to address long-term poverty reduction effectively. By combining financial aid with other types of support, we can strive to create a more sustainable and inclusive environment for developing nations.
Sample 4:
Developed nations are frequently seen providing economic assistance to third-world countries. However, it does not always help reduce poverty; therefore, it is argued that less affluent nations must be provided with an alternative form of aid which will help them in the long run. This essay discusses why developing countries can be better off from such assistance and the types of help offered.
Firstly, when developed countries give money to undeveloped countries, it will help citizens in these countries solve short-term problems, and it will not last long. When inhabitants in emerging countries receive money from donations, they use it to pay the temporary cost or issues. For instance, in 2005, the United States donated about 20 billion to some undeveloped countries, but still, it only helped people solve the problem f for two months. After two months, they continued poorly.
Moreover, developed countries should invest in healthcare and education rather than loan money to other countries. When the younger generation receives a quality education and everyone has access to proper medical treatment and hospitality, it will help eliminate unemployment and prevent people from resorting to unlawful activities. So developed countries must avail themselves in building good schools, universities, and hospitals. Moreover, they can help stabilize the government in these countries and monitor whether the political environment is conducive to growth. Although money helps feed the hungry lot, it is only a temporary solution.
However, before providing help with other aid to developing countries, developed countries should give financial assistance to developing countries because people say that money does solve most problems.
To summarize, I favour the opinion that rich countries should provide practical help to improve the economic status of developing countries. However, financial assistance can only help to a certain extent and is not the definite way to eliminate poverty.
Sample 5:
In order to solve poverty in poor countries, some wealthy nations tend to donate money to them. However, due to the ineffectiveness of financial aid, some people believe that other measures should be implemented. I firmly agree with this view, as corruption never allows such resources to be spent wisely.
Some might argue that financial aid gives local governments more power to resolve issues like poverty. Since they know their country and people better, they might be more suitable to decide where the money should be spent. Indeed, a true government will always prioritize its people’s welfare, but unfortunately, it usually is not the case in many third-world countries. For instance, the USA supported the local government of Afghanistan for decades by providing billions of dollars. However, the latter did not prosper as it should have because of its systematic corruption at the government level. As a result, it collapsed once again with its people still being one of the poorest in the world.
Therefore, powerful countries need to identify the needs of disadvantaged nations and send experts to train locals to be able to become economically independent. For instance, Afghanistan is known for its rich sources of minerals and raw materials. If the US had sent industry experts and built factories to help locals increase their domestic production levels and earn money through exports, the country would have become industrialized within a decade and stopped needing foreign aid. Additionally, building schools and training local teachers to take charge of a standard education system would have had far-reaching benefits, as each well-trained student could bring fresh ideas and start a business, creating jobs for others. Eventually, all these measures would have improved the economic health of the country and eradicated poverty by eliminating nationwide unemployment.
In conclusion, providing financial resources to local authorities might seem an easy way of fighting poverty in the world, but not every government is trustworthy enough to spend money wisely. Therefore, investing that aid in the nation’s infrastructure, instead, is a more sensible solution, as it targets education and unemployment to resolve the problem.
Sample 6:
Financial aid is frequently provided by wealthy nations to impoverished nations, yet this type of aid alone fails to resolve the issue of poverty. Hence, it is recommended that wealthy nations offer alternative forms of aid. In my opinion, I believe that while financial aid is still an important form of assistance, rich countries should also explore other forms of aid.
On the one hand, financial aid can certainly help provide immediate relief. Firstly, financial aid can be helpful in addressing immediate needs such as food, shelter, and medical care. For example, after a natural disaster, financial aid can help provide emergency relief to affected communities, which is crucial in helping to contain the epidemic and save lives. Secondly, providing financial aid to poor countries can contribute to global stability by promoting political and economic stability in those countries. For instance, this can help reduce the risk of conflict and prevent the spread of extremism and terrorism.
On the other hand, financial aid alone does not solve poverty in the long term. Financial aid can sometimes lead to dependency, as poor countries become reliant on aid rather than building their own economies. One example of financial aid leading to dependency is the case of Haiti’s earthquake. After the earthquake, Haiti received a significant amount of aid from foreign governments and international organizations. However, the aid created a culture of dependency, as the Haitian government became reliant on aid rather than developing its own economy. Additionally, there are other available forms of assistance that can help poor countries break the cycle of poverty. As proof, education is a crucial form of aid, as it can help poor countries develop a skilled workforce that is capable of driving economic growth and development.
In conclusion, financial aid is still an important form of assistance, but it is not a solution to poverty in poor countries. Rich countries should explore other forms of aid such as technical expertise, education, and training to help build sustainable economies and address the root causes of poverty.
Sample 7:
Although poorer countries usually receive financial aid from more developed nations, such assistance does not help eradicate poverty. Thus, it is believed that developed countries should provide other types of help to their underdeveloped and developing counterparts, with which I completely agree.
Despite its impact on poorer countries’ economies, monetary support is only a short-term solution and cannot help these countries escape poverty. In some developing and underdeveloped countries, corruption is among the serious problems which have been existing for years. Even if rich nations provide financial assistance to their poorer counterparts, the money may not reach the right recipients, who are unfortunate people living on the breadline. Furthermore, there are still some problems which stem from poor management of government or administrative systems in poor countries. Those problems could not be tackled by financial aid since a country has no right to interfere with another country’s internal affairs.
Since financial assistance could not contribute much to the alleviation of poverty, developed countries should offer other forms of support to their poorer counterparts. One way is for richer countries to provide occupational courses to increase the level of education in poorer countries. One of the root causes of poverty in underdeveloped countries is the lack of education, which could be solved by developed countries offering basic training courses for employment in poor countries. Furthermore, providing proper technical training could be another type of effective help for poor countries. Thanks to the advanced technical understanding provided by developed countries, poor countries can upgrade their industries, enhance their global competitiveness, and therefore eliminate poverty.
In conclusion, rather than giving direct financial support, I think developed countries should share other resources, such as their knowledge and understanding, with poorer countries and thus help them curb poverty.
Sample 8:
Currently, the gap between affluent and poor nations is expanding. Even today, millions of people in developing countries lack access to health care and education. Since their governments lack the financial resources to enhance their citizens' standard of living, some believe that wealthy nations should provide financial assistance. I agree with this recommendation. In my opinion, rich nations should support poor nations.
Firstly, wealthy nations have excess finances. By providing financial assistance to underdeveloped nations, the global quality of life can be raised. Poverty is the underlying cause of numerous societal evils. It is a well-known fact that numerous antisocial elements thrive in disadvantaged countries. In general, the impoverished are unhappy with their own life. They are also furious with the wealthy. Obviously, many of them exhibit criminal tendencies. They cannot be reformed without an improvement in their living conditions. By offering financial aid to needy nations, wealthy nations can alleviate poverty in those nations and contribute to a more peaceful world.
In addition to financial support, wealthier nations should employ other means to aid the needy. The strategies will focus on enhancing the motivation, survival abilities, and knowledge of the recipients. Therefore, they will be able to govern their country effectively and enhance their living conditions. As a result, living conditions in less developed countries will improve and they will be able to rely on their own resources.
In conclusion, I believe that high levels of corruption and weak governance are the primary causes of poverty in underdeveloped nations. However, this can be resolved by instituting the appropriate rules and regulations.
Sample 9:
It has been suggested that wealthier nations should always provide adequate financial aid to developing nations in order to relieve poverty. In addition to providing monetary assistance, prosperous nations should prioritise providing humanitarian aid to developing nations. In my opinion, suitable services for teaching and training the citizens of these impoverished nations should be made available.
To commence with, financial assistance to a country in need may initially appear to be a solution because it temporarily alleviates a country's economic problems. However, merely financial aid will not work in the long run for various reasons. First, financial aid does not always reach those in need. Some of the poorest nations have corrupt administrations that misappropriate foreign help for their own gain. Consequently, the poor will remain impoverished even after receiving foreign aid. Therefore, if these financial aids are implemented effectively, they can be substantial or even more effective in providing actual support.
Secondly, prosperous nations should establish their firms in these less developed nations. Therefore, a rise in investment will allow the country's citizens to have access to employment opportunities. On the other hand, the process of giving economic aid should not be halted, as the above-mentioned processes require time to produce the best results. A congruous combination of these variables would produce a more favourable outcome in the future.
In conclusion, I support the view that rich countries should provide practical assistance to enhance the economic situation of poor countries but, providing just economic assistance to poor countries will temporarily mitigate the gravity of the issue.
Sample 10:
Nowadays, rich nations are becoming richer while poor nations are becoming poorer. Some people believe that developed nations should send financial aid to developing nations, while others argue that financial aid cannot fix this issue. However, wealthy nations provide needy nations with assistance other than financial aid. This idea has both benefits and drawbacks. I concur with the former view.
On the one hand, many people feel wealthy nations should provide financial aid to developing nations. In accordance with this criterion, rich nations provide this assistance, which is beneficial to underdeveloped nations as a result of wars and natural calamities. While some state authorities aid this country financially and provide food and essentials to its citizens, others provide shelter to those who have lost their houses as a result of the war.
On the contrary, a number of individuals believe wealthy nations should provide assistance in other ways besides financial aid. While financial aid is necessary, developed nations also provide other sorts of assistance, such as excellent education, water supply, electrical infrastructure, etc., since if only money aid were provided, the issues of poverty could not be resolved. For instance, in the majority of nations, pupils learn with the fewest available resources since these nations lack good schools and quality education. Therefore, prosperous nations should provide educational and medical aid.
In conclusion, I believe that wealthy nations should provide financial aid and great education to young people so that they can advance their careers and the nation as a whole. Moreover, they should also provide employment opportunities so that the standard of living could be improved.
Sample 11:
The global dialogue on financial aid reveals a critical consensus: merely transferring funds from affluent nations to impoverished ones falls short of eradicating poverty. I contend that alternative forms of assistance can prove more effective, focusing on sustainable development and capacity building. This essay will explore the significance of investing in education and infrastructure, alongside fostering local economies, as transformative strategies that surpass the temporary relief offered by financial aid.
Financial aid, though crucial for immediate crisis alleviation, often bypasses the fundamental factors perpetuating poverty. Conversely, strategic investments in education serve as a powerful lever for empowerment, equipping individuals with essential skills and knowledge for self-improvement and community upliftment. For instance, literacy and vocational training are instrumental, enabling people to acquire better employment opportunities and effectively break the relentless cycle of poverty. Additionally, a well-educated populace is pivotal in fostering a society adept at making informed choices, thereby significantly enhancing governance and curbing corruption, ultimately leading to more transparent and accountable societal structures.
In a similar vein, the construction and enhancement of infrastructure, including roads, healthcare facilities, and systems for clean water, create a solid foundation for sustained economic advancement. Improved access to comprehensive healthcare services markedly reduces disease spread and boosts population longevity. Simultaneously, upgraded transportation networks crucially support trade and access to broader markets. Encouraging the development and expansion of small and medium-sized enterprises, wealthy countries can vitalize local economies, generate substantial employment opportunities, and stimulate innovation. This multifaceted approach not only underpins self-reliance but also plays a significant role in fostering a global economy characterized by greater equity and inclusivity.
In conclusion, financial aid offers a short-term fix to poverty's symptoms, whereas investments in education, infrastructure, and economic empowerment tackle its root causes. Shifting focus to these areas enables affluent countries to foster sustainable development and self-reliance in poorer nations, creating a deeper and more enduring impact. This strategic shift in aid approach aims for poverty's eradication, not merely its alleviation.
Sample 12:
The provision of financial aid by affluent nations to their poorer counterparts has long been a staple of international assistance. However, this approach is increasingly scrutinized for its inability to resolve the underlying issues of poverty. I argue that a more effective strategy lies in non-monetary aid forms, specifically targeting education, infrastructure, and economic empowerment, to enact lasting change.
Direct financial assistance, while crucial for alleviating immediate short-term needs, often overlooks the deeper systemic barriers to sustainable development. In stark contrast, education serves as a powerful catalyst for empowering individuals with the essential knowledge and skills necessary for achieving economic self-sufficiency. Targeted initiatives, such as comprehensive vocational training and extensive literacy programs, equip individuals with valuable tools to significantly improve their employability and enhance their entrepreneurial capacities. This form of empowerment transcends mere individual benefits, fostering broader socio-economic development within communities and instigating a positive ripple effect that benefits society at large.
Furthermore, the pivotal role of infrastructure development in promoting sustained economic growth is undeniably profound. Strategic investments in critical sectors like healthcare, transportation, and sanitation create a solid foundation for a healthier, more mobile, and highly productive population. For example, innovative rural electrification projects have the transformative power to revolutionize communities by providing widespread access to information, facilitating digital education initiatives, and unlocking new markets for local products. Such endeavors not only stimulate vibrant economic activity but also contribute to the creation of a more interconnected and resilient economy, showcasing the far-reaching impacts of well-thought-out infrastructural advancements.
In conclusion, prioritizing education, infrastructure, and economic empowerment over financial aid offers a more sustainable poverty solution. These measures tackle poverty's root causes, encouraging development, self-sufficiency, and resilience. Such a holistic approach enables richer nations to contribute more meaningfully to eradicating global poverty, providing not just immediate relief but a roadmap to enduring prosperity.
Sample 13:
The provision of financial aid to poor countries by their more affluent counterparts has been a widely debated topic. It is often argued that such monetary assistance does not effectively solve poverty and that wealthy nations should consider alternative forms of support. This essay will contend that while financial aid may not be an all-encompassing solution to poverty, it remains a critical component in alleviating the plight of impoverished nations. Consequently, it is essential that rich countries continue to provide financial assistance while concurrently exploring other means of support.
Financial aid to poor countries plays a crucial role in addressing various development challenges. For instance, it enables the implementation of vital infrastructure projects, such as the construction of schools and hospitals, which significantly improve the quality of life for citizens. Additionally, financial assistance can be employed in emergency situations like natural disasters, where quick and substantial monetary support is indispensable. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that relying solely on financial aid may not solve the poverty issues in the long run.
Alternative forms of help, such as capacity building and technological transfer, can be more effective in promoting self-sufficiency and sustainable development in poorer nations. Capacity building entails equipping individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge to create a robust and resilient economy. This can be achieved through vocational training, educational exchanges, and mentorship programs, which empower locals to become agents of change in their communities. Furthermore, technological transfer facilitates access to advanced tools and systems, enabling developing nations to leapfrog stages of development, thereby stimulating economic growth and reducing poverty.
In conclusion, it is evident that financial aid to poor countries, though not an absolute solution, remains a vital component in the global fight against poverty. However, it is important for wealthy nations to also engage in capacity building and technological transfer to support sustainable development and self-reliance in impoverished nations. Only through a multifaceted approach can the issue of poverty be effectively addressed, leading to a more equitable and prosperous world.
Sample 14:
Nowadays, developed countries are frequently giving monetary assistance to the low-income countries, whereas direct financial support is already a proven ineffective approach which has been leading us to look for an efficient alternative mechanism. I strongly agree with this statement, and I believe that rich countries’ generous investment in poor nation’s public transportation and technical education would be a sustainable support to the least developed ones.
A nation’s overall economy vastly depends on its public transportation system which is directly connected to the productivity of the masses of the country. We know that general people predominantly use public transport, such as bus, train etc. If these means are efficient enough, the commuters will need less travel time and save a significant number of productive hours, which will eventually benefit the overall national economy. Some of the mega cities in poor nations are also the worst in terms of traffic congestion with unplanned routes and outdated vehicles. In peak period of a day, commuters spend hours in traffic jam. If they could spend this amount of time at work, it would have been an incredible addition to the national economy.
In addition, rather than giving direct fund, proving proper technological training could be another effective help to the poor countries, because they need the advanced technical understandings to upgrade their industries and enhance their global competitiveness. In fact, only when a country can keep pace with global competitiveness, it can get rid of the poverty trap. However, this assistance should be well studied. For instance, if a country has cheap labours, it should be provided with the labour-intensive industrial resources and trained with the relevant knowhows. As a result, the poor country would generate employment and rise with overall economic growth.
In conclusion, direct monetary grant might help an underdeveloped country only for a short term. When it is about a sustainable economic progress, along with proper investment in poor countries’ transportation system, developed nations should help them also with technical assistance aiming their industrial improvement.
Sample 15:
It is believed by a majority of people that wealthy nations’ financial aid to third world countries is ineffective and other efforts should have been made instead. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with this opinion due to two main reasons.
One point supporting my view is related to the ineffectiveness of providing financial assistance to developing countries. The main problem of the authorities in many developing countries is related to their lack of strong financial management, money disbursement transparence, and capable human resources to carry out projects. Therefore, a large proportion of the provided aid amounts tends to be embezzled by governmental officers, meaning insignificant amounts left to reach the needy groups. As the intended purposes of support would not be realized, problems such as poor infrastructure, a lack of medical supplies, or low-tech farming would continue lingering and trap developing countries like Nepal and Cambodia in the inescapable cycle of poverty.
Another reason for my agreement lies in the ensured sustainable development of developing countries once provided with practical technologies in replacement for meaningless financial assistance. Specifically, technical aids including sharing expertise, knowledge, and skills would transfer valuable know-how and technical capabilities to locals in order to build their capabilities and skills for future development. Once high-tech and value-added industries are developed, this internal force would eventually be the driving factor to trigger local business, job opportunities as well as economic growth, therefore promoting self-sufficiency and long-term economic growth in poor nations. In contrast, such problems could not be thoroughly addressed by providing monetary aid since funds might be quickly depleted or misused by inexperienced locals.
In conclusion, I am convinced by the idea of wealthy nations converting their current impractical financial aid into other types of assistance to underdeveloped countries. This is due to the fact that positive promotion of self-reliance within the locality would trigger local entrepreneurship as well as avoid the possible misuse of funds by inexperienced recipients.
Sample 16:
Developed nations have more money than they need, so they give financial assistance to undeveloped and developing nations. I certainly agree with the view that this financial aid hasn’t solved all the problems plaguing poor countries. However, it has definitely improved the situation in those countries to a certain extent.
Corruption is one of the biggest problems that poor nations face. Even if rich nations give financial aid, the money does not reach the people who need it. Millions of people living in poor countries lack education. They are not even aware of their rights and accept poverty as if it was their birthright. If a nation is to progress, it needs empowered people who are aware of their rights and who have the capability to fight for it.
An honest and efficient administrative system is required for the development of any nation. Corrupt officials and ignorant people who are not aware of their rights have never helped any nation. Unfortunately, developed nations that give financial assistance cannot do much to improve the government or administrative system present in poor nations. No nation can interfere in another nation’s internal affairs beyond a certain level. So, other than giving financial assistance there is not much that rich nations can do to help poor nations.
To conclude, I certainly agree with the view that foreign aid hasn’t solved the problems of poor countries. However, this does not mean that developed nations should stop giving financial assistance. They should continue to give money but the purpose of giving financial assistance should be the empowerment of people. Eradication of poverty is equally important but as they say teaching a man how to fish is much better than giving him a fish.
Sample 17:
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid.
It is observed quite frequently that the underdeveloped nations only receive financial assistance from the developed nations, which does not completely help improve the nation’s economic situation. Other fundamental amenities and help provided by developed countries can also have a significant contribution to eradicating poverty. I completely agree and believe that financial aid can help improve the country’s economy and various factors like improving social-political conditions, education, employment, etc., play an important role in it.
First and foremost, Monetary support is considered one of the major factors in improving the financial status. Still, it is only a short-term solution and does not have a solid impact on stabilizing the economy of the country. In other words, it cannot solve the root cause of impoverishment. For example, the United States has donated about some billion to some under-developed nations. Still, it got utilized within 2-3 months to solve some immediate issues, but the underlying problems were unattended.
To improve the country’s economic status permanently, one should offer, for example, a wide range of educational courses for youth in the IT sectors, consulting, etc., which can help secure a better education and bring them massive opportunities for finding well-paid jobs. Additionally, employment can be initiated by developed nations like the US, Canada and UK, opening their national companies in developing or under-developed countries which offer jobs to the local citizens. This can decrease the unemployment rate effectively.
Thus, to conclude, I am in favour of the opinion that the rich countries should help in practical ways like providing education courses, employment, better health care facilities, transportation facilities, etc. to gradually improve the economic condition.
Sample 18:
It’s often noted that developed nations give financial help to poor countries to curb poverty, but some people think that developed countries should give other resources instead of financial aid. The developed government should use financial and other resources to overcome poverty in poor countries.
On the one hand, it’s often noticed that poor countries’ governments utilize financial aid to fulfil the needs of the country’s people. But in poor countries, often corrupted people have not allocated the given funds to their citizens, but leaders used to buy their things for their comfort. For example, one Asian country, Sri Lanka, often get millions of dollars from the USA and the world bank for development, but it doesn’t reach their citizens. As a result, unbreakable inflation was noted in 2022 and had to declare a financial emergency in the country.
In addition, if developed countries provide basic training skills for employment in poor countries, it will improve the economy, and people will learn some skills they can utilize to get jobs. Also, developed countries should invest in building hospitals and schools to overcome literacy and enhance the chances of job opportunities. Moreover, lack of education is a deep root of poverty in poor countries. If developed nations share their agricultural practices with poor countries, it will help the poor nations grow needy things for their own country’s people. This helps to enhance the yield and also enhance the income of citizens.
In conclusion, I think developed countries should share other resources like infrastructure and knowledge with poor countries, so it helps to curb poverty, while financial aid is not very helpful in overcoming poverty in countries.
Sample 19:
Poor countries are often given financial aid from richer nations in an attempt to provide the citizens of those disadvantaged countries with a better standard of living and quality of life. However, this kind of aid rarely solves the issue of poverty, and therefore I completely agree that richer nations should provide other forms of help.
Firstly, in order to truly help people from poorer nations in the long term, governments and citizens should be provided with good quality education. For example, only in recent times have people from richer countries spread awareness and education to those from poorer nations about the simple, yet life-saving practices of hand washing and personal hygiene. This has resulted in significant improvements in the general health and well-being of people in poorer countries and reduced the rate of preventable disease and infection. Furthermore, by providing education on the latest techniques in farming and agriculture, people from poorer nations will be able to farm more efficiently, giving them more access to food, which will essentially provide them with adequate nutrition to ward off hunger and disease.
Secondly, rather than simply providing money, richer nations should provide governments from poorer countries with access to new technology and equipment. By providing such countries with specialised farming machinery, or life-saving medicines and medical equipment, the lives of poorer people will be significantly enhanced. Furthermore, while many poorer countries may have access to significant amounts of natural resources, such as fossil fuels, minerals, and precious metals, they often do not have the technology or equipment to mine and refine such resources. As a result, many wealthier countries often take advantage of this situation and mine the resources of those poorer countries while paying them a fraction of their worth.
In conclusion, while giving financial aid to poor nations can be beneficial in the short term, providing education and technology will benefit them more in the long run.
Sample 20:
Developed nations are often seen providing economic assistance to the third world nations. However, it does not always help in reducing poverty and therefore it is argued that less affluent nations must be provided with an alternatives form of aid. This essay discusses why poor countries can be better off from such assistance and types of help that can be offered.
One of the main reasons why developing nations should be assisted in other ways is because money can solve problems only for the temporary period. It is not a long-lasting approach to tackling poverty. To illustrate, a developed nation can build schools for poor nations but the expenses that incur later in regard to student's fees and teacher's wages may force to close the institution. This is because foreign aid may not be able to support for longer periods. Thus, it is highly essential that developed countries should find alternatives when helping the poorer nations.
There are different kinds of aid that affluent nations can provide to address this problem. First and foremost, young people could be given necessary training in various fields such as technology, modern agriculture, teaching, technical skills, communication etc. This helps them to find employment in their own countries or they can apply for jobs in other rich nations. Another important option is investing in prosperous and promising sectors in poor nations. If first world nations such as the USA opens its companies in third world countries like India, Pakistan, Nepal etc. many people can be highly benefited as such industries can create many local jobs.
In conclusion, there are many advantages if rich nations can provide alternative forms of aid instead of capital because financial support is only the short-term approach to tackling the issue. In future, it is suggested that such new approaches need to be continued.
Sample 21:
Wealthy nations often contribute financially to their less prosperous counterparts, but this has shown to be inadequate in eradicating poverty. I therefore concur that rich countries should opt for other methods of assistance, as opposed to monetary aid, for countries that are economically challenged.
The frequent transfer of funds from wealthy to impoverished nations may provide a short-term solution, but it falls short of liberating these nations from the harsh cycle of poverty. It is notable that corruption is rampant in many underprivileged nations. Thus, the funds dispatched may not reach the hands of those struggling in dire poverty. Additionally, challenges rooted in flawed governance or bureaucracy cannot be resolved with financial aid alone, as it is not the place for one country to interfere in another’s domestic concerns.
Given the lack of effectiveness of financial aid in eliminating poverty, well-off countries should consider alternate forms of aid for poorer countries. One such method could be offering skill-based education to improve the educational standards in the struggling countries. Education, or the lack thereof, is often a major cause of poverty in disadvantaged countries and this could be rectified by more prosperous countries offering basic job training. Moreover, technical training could be another viable form of aid. By disseminating advanced technical knowledge, countries in need could modernize their industries, elevate their global competitiveness, and thereby, take strides towards alleviating poverty.
In conclusion, I advocate for affluent countries to provide more resourceful forms of aid, such as knowledge and technical expertise, rather than direct monetary contributions. This strategy, I believe, will enable struggling nations to combat poverty more effectively.
Sample 22:
Assisting underprivileged nations has long been a priority for wealthier countries, often through financial aid. However, critics argue that providing mere monetary support does not effectively eliminate poverty. Instead, developed nations should offer alternative forms of help to less affluent countries. I firmly support this perspective.
A critical issue with financial aid is its susceptibility to corruption and mismanagement. In several developing countries, funds intended for crucial sectors like healthcare or education often fall into the wrong hands, sidestepping the intended beneficiaries. Moreover, while developed nations provide substantial financial assistance to underdeveloped countries, it usually offers short-term relief without a sustainable impact. For instance, despite the United States allocating around $20 billion to several underdeveloped nations in 2005, it failed to address long-term solutions and after two months, they continued poorly.
Redirecting focus from monetary contributions to investing in the educational framework of impoverished nations seems more viable. This strategy involves deploying teachers, constructing educational facilities, and improving resources like textbooks. The lack of education plays a pivotal role in perpetuating severe poverty in underdeveloped areas. Access to education acts as a catalyst, empowering individuals by opening doors to better employment opportunities and ultimately breaking the cycle of poverty.
In conclusion, I think by emphasizing educational infrastructure rather than solely providing financial aid, developed nations can play a more impactful role in lifting underprivileged communities out of poverty. This approach offers sustainable solutions by nurturing the foundation of knowledge and skills needed for lasting socio-economic progress.
Sample 23:
It is common to see industrial countries offering economic help to developing ones. Yet, it does not always assist in eliminating poverty; hence, it is believed that less wealthy countries must be supplied with an alternative kind of long-term aid. This essay examines why developing nations may benefit from such aid and the forms of assistance provided.
First, when rich nations provide money to underdeveloped countries, it will assist the residents of these countries in resolving short-term issues, but it will not be long-lasting. When residents in developing nations get money via contributions, they utilize it to pay for temporary expenses or problems. In 2005, for instance, the United States provided over $20 billion to underdeveloped nations; nevertheless, this assistance only lasted two months and was not beneficial in sustainable development.
In addition, affluent nations should invest in healthcare and education instead of lending money to other nations. When the younger generation has a decent education and everyone has access to adequate medical care and hospitality, it will help eradicate unemployment and discourage individuals from engaging in illegal acts. Thus, wealthy nations must invest in constructing quality schools, colleges, and hospitals. In addition, they may assist in stabilizing the governments of these nations and assess if the political climate is favourable to development. It is true that money helps in feeding the hungry, but this is only a temporary solution.
Nevertheless, before offering other forms of aid to poor nations, rich nations should provide financial support, since money is said to alleviate the majority of issues.
In conclusion, I am in favor of the notion that wealthy nations should aid in improving the economic situation of developing nations. Financial aid can only alleviate poverty to a limited amount and is not the definitive solution.
Sample 24:
It is said that support funds that are given to Third World countries will not solve the poverty issue and therefore developed countries should think of other kinds of help, which are more effective. To a certain point, I would agree that there should be an alternative kind of help for the poor countries, but financial support would also be needed for a short time period.
Many experts believe that financial support that is given to poor countries is not effective and efficient; therefore, there should be other kinds of help which could be considered. Firstly, it is a fact that illiteracy has become one of the major issues in poor countries, and developed countries could send some of their teachers to improve the education system there. It is hoped should the literacy rate increase, the number of unemployment will gradually reduce. Secondly, people of the poor countries are suffering due to the low quality of the health system there. Building more qualified hospitals and improving the quality of the medical staff would be an effective way to help them. And lastly, many third world countries have a bad infrastructure and public transportation facilities. By building more roads and improving the public transports there, it is hoped that people of these poor countries would be more productive as they will have easier access to their workplaces.
It can be seen that all of the alternative ideas are long term projects, and people would only see the improvement after ten or fifteen years minimum. For a short period of time, financial aid is still needed by the Third World countries; as governments could not provide decent health and education system, and many people are starving and sick. However, since corruption is also a serious problem in poor countries, strict monitoring of the financial support should be a priority, to ensure that the fund is appropriately utilised.
In conclusion, to a certain extent, I would agree that financial aid given by advanced countries to poor nations would not be the best solution in solving the poverty issue. However, since resolving poverty problem would be a long-term project, financial help should also be given for a short period of time, but it should be strictly controlled.
Sample 25:
I fully agree with the given statement as monetary help often failed to improve the condition of poor nations. So other forms of improvement schemes and help could be a better solution to help the poor countries.
It is true that donation provided by rich countries has not solved the problem of poverty in the developing country like Bhutan, Afghanistan etc. It is important to understand why rich countries provide money. The reasons behind this are to accelerate the development of poor countries by establishing industries, tourism and other pre-requisites. Some of the causes for failure of the donation programme are corruption, poor governance, scarcity of skilled population and lack of proper planning.
Firstly, corruption is mostly prevalent in the developing countries like Nepal, Congo etc. according to data from Transparency International. Most importantly, corruption is deeply rooted in almost all fields like health sector, civil service etc. and exists involvement of simple clerks to high-level bureaucrats and politicians. The cause of corruption may be rooted in the lack of handsome salary, lack of severe punishments, selfishness and the slack of rules and laws etc. If money allocated for development projects is misused, then the quality of the projects is reduced, or it may not be finished in time. In fact, scenarios like these affect the rate of development in the developing countries.
Secondly, the sustainable and harmonious development cannot be achieved without effective and efficient administration which is lagging in the poor countries. Succeeding in any project is a daunting task for management committees. First, the problems arise at the local levels where local people ask for unfeasible demands such as the job for each household, high compensation for land etc. If these problems are addressed, then, other problems like the strike of employees occur or negligence of contractor occur. Is it possible to complete projects at the specified time? No, it takes decades to complete the projects or strands in the middle forever.
Thirdly, there are problems in formulating plans and policies. Even though they are formulated, the authorities cannot implement them in a scientific way. So, funds freeze for the next financial year. These are only some instances of how money provided by donors is used.
Education, expertise support, training, monitoring the development, conducting research, establishing factories are better alternatives than giving money to the poor nations and these should be embraced by the rich nations to truly help the poor countries.
Sample 26:
Developed countries have been providing financial aid to Third World countries for decades, but it has not changed the economic plight of the poor countries. I totally agree that this aid should be replaced by other more effective types of help because of corruption and poor economic management.
The primary reason why the financial aid provided by the first world countries is not being effective in achieving the results they are intended to achieve is because of the level of corruption prevalent in these poor countries. A major portion of the aid is misappropriated by officials before it trickles down to the people. As most of these leaders are not democratically elected and have a strong grip on power, people have little leverage to change this and hence they benefit less, and their situations remain unchanged.
The second reason why this financial aid is not effective is that the governments which are the recipients of this assistance do not have sound economic policies and good governance in place. This means that these governments are not capable of managing the funds properly and the aid will be lost or misused before it reaches the people. Therefore, ensuring governments are capable of managing the funds before they receive them is crucial in achieving positive outcomes from this financial aid.
In conclusion, I reiterate my strong view that other types of support are necessary because financial aid is often misused by recipient countries due to corruption and financial mismanagement. Therefore, I recommend longer term more tenable strategies be put in place to ensure financial aid can be phased out.
Sample 27:
It is true that an enormous amount of money has been poured into impoverished nations to help them escape from poverty. While this solution is sometimes effective, I personally believe that financial aid does not fully tackle the problem, and other types of aid need to be implemented.
Firstly, money given to destitute nations does not always reach people in need. In developing countries, lack of transparency and an ineffective management system has enabled prevalent corruption in government. It is therefore likely that monetary support from other countries would bring about benefits to only governmental officials instead of the poor. Another problem with giving out money is that in most cases recipient countries do not have necessary resources such as manpower, technology, infrastructure or management system in place to make the best use of financial aid. For instance, in my country, a large amount of money from foreign governments was spent on building health care centers in rural areas, but those centers were soon abandoned or operated at less than one tenth capacity due to lack of health care professionals, lack of electricity and clean water, etc. Another illustration would be in the agricultural field. We received monetary support from international funds to increase productivity of crops, but we had no experience in conducting research before implementing a project, in project management and evaluation. As a consequence, a large amount of money was wasted on ineffective programs proposed by incompetent leaders.
Furthermore, it is undeniable that financial aid can sometimes do more harm than good and worsen the situation in poor countries. Some developed countries gave out monetary support to ruling oligarchy in Africa under the name of economic development, but for hindered political reasons as well. They might want to gain international preference, to win support from their citizens before an election, or to enhance their political influence in recipient countries, etc. In such cases how the money would be spent was not their concern. Leaders in recipient countries therefore used the money to strengthen their position, by enriching themselves or purchasing weapons to suppress opponents. Had it not been for the financial aid, people in these poor countries might have been able to overthrow their incompetent, greedy authority. Financial aid in this case became an obstacle for revolutions against dictatorship, social progress and poverty eradication.
In conclusion, monetary support alone could not eliminate poverty. Other types of help such as technological support, staff training, infrastructure development and management system improvement is required to handle the problem.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
- Sổ tay Giáo dục Kinh tế & Pháp luật 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay Lịch Sử 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay lớp 12 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa, KTPL (chương trình mới) ( 36.000₫ )
- Bộ đề thi tốt nghiệp 2025 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Anh, Sinh, Sử, Địa, KTPL (có đáp án chi tiết) ( 36.000₫ )
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Some people take the view that criminal behavior is a product of an individual's inherent nature, while others argue that it is the outcome of poverty and societal factors. Although there are cogent arguments for the former view, I still lean towards the social issues and poverty theory.
Those who argue that crime is rooted in an individual's personality traits and moral compass suggest that some individuals are simply predisposed to engage in criminal behavior due to factors such as personality. They argue that some people either have a natural inclination towards aggression, violence, and rule-breaking. These individuals are believed to engage in criminal activities by choice despite having access to legal means of earning a living. In fact, some serial killers are known for their violent and sadistic crimes, which were often carried out with a sense of pleasure or enjoyment.
In my view, crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty. This is because individuals may turn to criminal behavior when they are faced with limited opportunities, financial insecurity, and social inequality. These conditions can lead to frustration, hopelessness, and despair, which can ultimately push individuals towards criminal behavior as a means of survival or escape. For example, a young person who grows up in a community with few employment possibilities may feel that their only option for financial survival is to engage in drug dealing.
In conclusion, while there are certainly some individuals who exhibit consistent patterns of aggressive or antisocial behavior, these traits alone are not sufficient to explain why people commit crimes. Therefore, I believe that the majority of crime is driven by socioeconomic factors.
Sample 2:
Opinions differ as to whether crime is caused by social issues and poverty or by people’s evil nature. Personally, I agree with the former view.
It is understandable why some people claim that our nature is the root of crime. Perhaps they have witnessed some children commit wrongdoing at some point in their lives. For example, many physically strong children tend to bully others at school, while others may perform mischievous acts like lying to adults or stealing money from their parents. These experiences lead people to believe that humans are purely good or bad by nature, and those who engage in misconduct at a young age will likely become criminals.
However, the point mentioned above is deeply flawed. Everyone possesses their own good and bad nature, and it is the environment that triggers people’s evil side and causes them to commit crime. One major cause of crime in many countries is inadequate education. Poorly educated youngsters may struggle to discern between right and wrong; therefore, they are more likely to commit crimes without even knowing. Poverty is another root cause of crime because those living in impoverished conditions may turn to stealing or robbing as the final solution to make ends meet. A corrupt political system can also be a breeding ground for crime because the politicians there have to comply with the corruption, regardless of their personal intentions.
In conclusion, though some might think that crime results from a person’s bad nature, I believe it is more likely caused by social problems, such as poor education, corrupt political systems, and poverty. People are both good and bad by nature, and the environment in which they live determines whether they become criminals.
Sample 3:
When it comes to crime rates, some individuals claim that criminal activity is solely the result of innate characteristics, while others argue that it is the outcome of societal issues and impoverishment. In my opinion, socioeconomic challenges and inequality are more likely to prompt people to engage in illegal behaviours.
On the one hand, criminality could represent the result of an inherent personality. In some cases, crime is merely the result of a person’s impulsive actions and lack of moral compass. Various factors such as upbringing, personal beliefs, and psychological disorders may all play a role when it comes to criminal activity. Some people, for example, may have grown up in environments in which illegal conduct is normalised, causing them to assume that such behaviour is acceptable. Similarly, those with mental health disorders like sociopathy or psychopathy may be inclined to committing crimes due to their inability to empathise with victims.
On the other hand, societal problems and economic hardship may contribute to criminal conduct. Poverty with limited access to food, clothing, shelter, healthcare, and schooling can push people to the brink of desperation, prompting them to resort to criminal behaviour as a means of survival. People who are financially strapped in various urban areas, for instance, may turn to illegal activities like drug trafficking or burglary in order to make ends meet. Once poverty and crime are intertwined, it may ultimately develop into a vicious cycle that is challenging to escape. Furthermore, socioeconomic issues such as discrimination, inequality, and corruption may promote crime through fostering an environment of dissatisfaction and rage. Those who experience discrimination or who believe the system is stacked against them are more inclined to turn to illegal behaviour as a form of protest or vengeance.
To summarise, aside from personal psychological factors, I believe that social difficulties and poverty can have a greater impact on crime rates.
Sample 4:
Crime has been studied by many scientific disciplines, with some people ascribing it to social problems and poverty, and others thinking that it is caused by the criminal’s nature. In this, I believe that unlawful behavior is more likely the result of defective personal qualities.
Several explanations can support crime being a function of inferior socioeconomic factors. Firstly, poverty reduces access to education and employment, causing hopelessness and desperation as a result. Having been deprived of opportunities, people may turn to crime to get by. Furthermore, people whose environment is rife with social problems may be accustomed to illegal behavior, making it easier for themselves to engage in criminal activities later on. A child who grows up in a neighborhood with drug problems could turn into a drug dealer himself, since he has witnessed drug abuse and addiction as a norm. It could, therefore, be argued that social issues and poverty create criminals.
However, the view that crime is a result of the perpetrator’s nature is no less convincing. Proponents of this belief claim that certain traits, such as impulsivity, aggression, and callousness, predispose individuals to immoral or unethical behavior. People with these traits become less considerate when they perceive any threat to their self-interest, making them likely to ignore the consequences of their actions. Others, meanwhile, carry undiagnosed psychological disorders, and their condition makes them more prone to committing crimes. A large share of the prison population, especially repeat offenders, are affected by sociopathy, a disorder usually characterized by inhibited compassion towards others. It is not well-understood otherwise, and education has only been partially effective in mitigating sociopathy’s effects. For these reasons, criminals’ nature is definitely worth looking at as a cause of their offenses.
In conclusion, while both views can be supported by evidence, I believe one’s personality is a more indicative factor of whether they are likely to commit crimes. Hence, it is crucial that parents and guardians pay attention to how they shape their children’s nature.
Sample 5:
For millennia, philosophers and scientists have held countless debates on personality. Some believe in the inherent crooked nature of humanity while others argue that they are the product of their environment. This essay wishes to explore both sides of the argument.
Nativists believe that personalities and manners are inherent and genetic, so crime is innate. Credible evidence of this would be the correlation between lead exposure and crime rate. In the 1940s, the USA was the prime consumer of lead-based products, such as paint and gasoline, so babies conceived, born, and raised during this period were lead-poisoned. They later suffered from poorer impulse control and higher aggressivity. As adults, they contributed to the surplus in levels of violent crime. However, it should be noted that genes do not cause behavior but influence it through their effects on the body's response to the environment.
Supporters of Environmentalism concede that criminal behaviors are determined by family and other people, education opportunities, as well as physical circumstances. This school of thought is supported by several studies. some of them focused on the negative link between vegetation and crime. It was shown that in neighborhoods with more greenery, fewer crimes were reported. One explanation for this was that the environment gave its residents a sense of safety and security.
It should be noted that the nature-nurture debate has not been taken as seriously as it used to be. Essentially, every facet of personality development results from interaction between genes and environment. If the authorities aim at reducing the rate of crime and violence, they should take action in improving residential areas as well as enhancing healthcare.
Sample 6:
Many people consider that innate characteristics are responsible for the fact that some people choose to turn to a career of crime. While I accept that crime may result from individual characteristics of violence or greed, I would argue that it is largely a consequence of social issues and poverty.
There is a belief that a person’s nature determines whether or not they become a criminal. Firstly, some argue that an individual who is cruel turns to crime more easily than a kind person. For instance, a child bullying other boys or girls at school may turn into a violent criminal in the future. Secondly, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness could also breed future offenders, who seek to acquire easy money without working for it. A number of youngsters choose to steal from others, instead of working hard to make an honest living. These are strong reasons for thinking that those who have an inborn bad nature are more likely to break the law.
Nevertheless, it seems to me that social issues and poverty are the main causes behind crime. There are many problems in society which might lead to an increase in the crime rate. For example, unemployment pushes people into resorting to crime because they simply cannot find a job. As a consequence, the number of offenders has climbed in many countries over recent decades. Another reason is that, more broadly, poverty in general leads to a rise in crime. If people do not have enough money to make ends meet, they will be tempted to pursue illegal activities just to support themselves and their families.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that the principal causes of crime are a result of social conditions and problems.
Sample 7:
The causes of crime have long been a topic of debate. While some argue that crime stems from a person's inherent nature, I do believe it is the result of social problems and poverty
On the one hand, advocates of the view that crime results from a person's nature suggest that individuals with cruel tendencies are more likely to engage in criminal activities. This is because cruelty often correlates with a lack of empathy, disregard for others' well-being, and aggressive behavior, all of which can lead to crime. For example, a child who bullies others at school may grow up to become a violent criminal. Additionally, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness can breed future offenders who seek easy money without working for it. Many young people, lured by the prospect of quick and easy money, turn to cybercrime, engaging in online scams, hacking, and identity theft.
On the other hand, some, myself included, argue that crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty, a perspective I support. Social issues, such as unemployment, can push people towards crime as they struggle to find legitimate employment. The widening gap between the rich and the poor exacerbates this issue, as seen in places like Rio De Janeiro, where high crime rates are prevalent in impoverished areas. Poverty is another significant factor; individuals struggling to make ends meet may resort to illegal activities to support themselves and their families. This explains why people in dire need often turn to theft or other crimes for survival.
In conclusion, while inherent personal traits can contribute to criminal behavior, social problems and poverty play a more significant role in driving people towards crime. Addressing these underlying issues is crucial for reducing crime rates.
Sample 8:
Crime is a complex issue that elicits varied perspectives regarding its origins. While some argue that crime is primarily a consequence of social problems and poverty, others contend that it stems from an individual’s inherent nature. I contend that the interplay between societal factors and individual predispositions contributes significantly to criminal behavior.
I concur with the notion that crime often finds its roots in social problems and poverty, where the impact of socioeconomic conditions significantly steers an individual’s choices. For example, in underprivileged areas, the absence of adequate educational facilities, job prospects, and robust social support structures may force individuals into a corner, compelling them to turn to illicit means for survival. Moreover, when societal disparities are rife and systemic issues remain unaddressed, it can exacerbate the situation, causing individuals to resort to criminal activities as a perceived solution to their economic struggles or as a means to voice their grievances about prevalent social injustices.
However, I am also of the opinion that the origins of crime are not solely tethered to external factors; rather, an individual’s innate disposition can also play a crucial role. Some individuals might exhibit inherent psychological disorders that predispose them to engage in unlawful activities, regardless of their social background. Furthermore, the absence of strong moral values or ethical guidance in an individual’s upbringing can be a contributing factor, irrespective of their socioeconomic circumstances. Instances abound where individuals from affluent backgrounds have succumbed to criminal behavior due to the lack of a strong moral compass in their formative years, indicating that individual nature can play a pivotal role in shaping criminal inclinations.
In conclusion, I believe crime’s origin is not solely attributed to either social problems or an individual’s nature; rather, it is a complex interplay between societal factors and personal inclinations.
Sample 9:
There are divergent opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. Some people argue that external factors such as poverty or other social issues are to blame for most crimes, while others contend that people who engage in criminal activity are intrinsically bad in nature. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and provide my own opinion.
On the one hand, those who believe that social problems are the primary cause of criminal behavior argue that people are driven to commit crimes due to their difficult and disadvantaged circumstances. For example, individuals facing extreme poverty or unemployment may resort to stealing or other illicit activities as a means of survival. Proponents of this view also point out that issues such as substance abuse or mental illness can exacerbate criminal tendencies, emphasizing the importance of addressing underlying social difficulties to reduce crime rates.
On the other hand, there is a counterargument that criminal behavior arises from individual traits such as impulsivity, selfishness, or a lack of empathy. This perspective suggests that some people have a natural tendency to engage in harmful behavior, regardless of environmental factors. In support of this view, critics of the social circumstance theory point out that there are people who grow up in difficult circumstances but do not resort to crime, indicating that innate character traits play a significant role.
In my view, it is likely that both factors play a role in criminal behavior. While social issues can be a significant driver of crime, it is also true that some individuals may be more inclined to engage in criminal activity due to inherent character flaws. Therefore, addressing both the root causes of social problems and providing intervention programs that focus on individual development could be effective in reducing crime rates.
In conclusion, there are varying opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. While some argue that criminal activity is solely attributable to social problems, others believe that individual traits play a more significant role. In my opinion, it is essential to consider both perspectives and work towards comprehensive solutions to reduce the prevalence of crime in our society.
Sample 10:
Crime is a complex issue with multiple contributing factors. While some argue that most crimes result from circumstances like poverty and social problems, I believe they are caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature.
On one hand, there are several factors that lead people to believe that most crimes stem from circumstances. Firstly, individuals who grow up in deprived environments often lack access to basic needs such as education, healthcare, and stable employment, leading them to potentially turn to crime as a means of survival or escape from their circumstances. For example, high crime rates in low-income neighborhoods can be attributed to individuals struggling to meet basic needs such as food, housing, and healthcare, and with limited access to education and job opportunities, they may resort to criminal activities like theft or drug dealing to make ends meet. Secondly, exposure to violence and crime from a young age can normalize these behaviors. For instance, children from households with domestic violence may become desensitized to violent behavior and replicate it in their own relationships.
On the other hand, I do believe that crime is caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature. Firstly, those who commit crimes may have a predisposition to violence and deviant behavior, regardless of their upbringing or environment. Ted Bundy, for instance, despite his stable upbringing and education, committed numerous murders. His actions suggest an inherent predisposition to violence and deviance, highlighting the role of personal moral character in criminal behavior. Secondly, some research indicates that genetic and environmental factors can increase the likelihood of engaging in criminal activities. For instance, a longitudinal study conducted by the National Institute of Justice followed a group of individuals from childhood into adulthood and found that those with a family history of criminal behavior were more likely to engage in similar activities.
In conclusion, while circumstances like poverty and social problems contribute to crime, I believe that personal moral character and inherent predispositions play a more significant role in criminal behavior.
Sample 11:
Crime is a prevalent issue in modern society and understanding its root causes is important for its effective prevention and control. Some people argue that most crimes are the result of circumstances such as poverty or other social problems. Others believe that criminal behaviour stems from individuals who are bad in nature. In my opinion, most crimes are the consequence of socioeconomic circumstances.
Individuals who believe that crime is the result of inheriting bad nature think that even though people who live in affluent societies with minimal social problems, are subjected to face crimes. They believe that personal choices and moral failings are significant contributors to criminal behaviour. For example, studies have indicated that people who possess personality traits such as impulsivity and aggressiveness are more likely to engage in criminal activities.
On the other hand, proponents of the view that crime is a result of poverty and social issues argue that individuals coming from poor backgrounds are forced to commit crimes because of necessity. When a person’s basic needs such as food, shelter and security are unmet, they may resort to illegal activities as a means of survival. For instance, incidents like theft and burglary are more common in economically deprived societies where everyone is striving to make ends meet. Furthermore, social problems such as lack of education, unemployment and substance abuse exacerbate the situation. Without access to quality education, many individuals cannot secure well-paying jobs, leading them to seek alternative, often illegal, means of income.
In my opinion, poverty and social problems create an environment where crime can flourish. When individuals are deprived of opportunities and resources, the temptation to break the law becomes stronger. Additionally, the social environment, including peer influence and community norms, plays a crucial role in shaping behaviour.
In conclusion, addressing these root causes through social policies aimed at reducing poverty, improving education, and providing employment opportunities is essential for effective crime prevention. By creating a more equitable and supportive society, the incidence of crime can be significantly reduced.
Sample 12:
Throughout history, people tended to believe that crimes were committed by those who were innately bad, but in the modern era a more liberal approach has led to the idea that crimes are often acts of desperation, committed by people whose circumstances are bleak. This essay will explore both perspectives, concluding that the latter is usually true.
First of all, it should be noted that some crimes are committed by people who appear innately driven towards such acts. These people may have some sort of hereditary psychological condition that means they do not feel empathy for others, or a predilection towards violence. This is a controversial perspective and although it feels true for many, it is hard to prove. Many of the most violent criminals have traumatic backgrounds, such as child abuse, neglect, or sexual assault, which suggests that they were not born with their criminal compunctions, but rather that these developed very early, which thus places them more into the circumstances than nature category. However, the lines are blurry.
Certainly, it does seem as though most criminals are created out of difficult circumstances. To understand this, one just has to look at impoverished communities around the world. These are places where crime flourishes because the people there are desperate and forced to do immoral things in order to survive. In such states of despair, people tend to put themselves first and overlook social norms, laws, and the usual empathic perspective that would stop most people from hurting others. In such areas, people tend to be conditioned for a young age to ignore the law or even social decency, joining gangs and becoming influenced by dangerous people. This tends to be a problem due to a lack of resources, opportunities, and education in such areas.
In conclusion, it appears likely that most crime is the result of people’s unfortunate circumstances, meaning that criminals are not inherently bad. However, there may be some people who were born with a certain compunction towards violent or criminal activity.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Television has become an integral part of our daily lives, and its influence on children cannot be underestimated. While some argue that children can learn effectively through television and should be encouraged to watch it both at home and school, I strongly disagree with this notion. In this essay, I will present arguments against the idea of promoting excessive television watching among children.
Firstly, television watching is a passive activity that lacks the interactivity and engagement required for optimal learning outcomes. While children may absorb information from television programmes, they often lack the opportunity to actively participate, ask questions, and engage in critical thinking. In contrast, traditional educational settings such as classrooms promote active learning, where students can interact with teachers and peers, ask questions, and engage in discussions. This active involvement enhances comprehension, critical thinking skills, and the ability to apply knowledge in real-world situations. This is why young children do not learn effectively from watching TV.
Furthermore, excessive television viewing can have detrimental effects on children's physical and mental well-being. Prolonged sedentary behaviour associated with watching television can contribute to a sedentary lifestyle, leading to various health issues such as obesity, cardiovascular problems, and poor posture. Moreover, excessive screen time can adversely affect children's cognitive development and attention span. Research has shown that excessive exposure to screens, including television, can lead to attention deficits and decreased academic performance. In contrast, encouraging children to engage in physical activities, interactive play, and reading promotes their overall well-being and cognitive development.
In conclusion, television is not a substitute for interactive and engaging learning experiences. Moreover, excessive television viewing can have negative effects on children's learning, physical health, and cognitive development. Therefore, it is important to encourage children to participate in interactive learning environments, such as classrooms, rather than watching TV.
Sample 2:
Television, as a learning tool, could be useful if children watch the right programmes for a limited duration of time each day. I do believe that TV can be a very powerful learning tool for children, and that is why they should be allowed to watch TV programmes both at home and school, but within the teacher's and parent's watch.
To begin with, though I am no longer a student, I can still learn better by watching TV rather than reading books. Whenever I tune on to the History Channel, BBC or National Geographic Channel, I can learn new things. This is also true for school-going children. My younger brother, who is a college student with a History major, heavily relies on History Channel documentaries to enhance his knowledge of history.
Moreover, TV programmes are the audio-visual presentation of an event, story or fact, and thus have lasting impressions on our brains. If the right programmes are chosen for children, they will learn faster by watching TV. For instance, one of our neighbours allows her 3 years old daughter to watch Rhymes on the internet TV channels, and she can recite most of those rhymes. According to her mother, the girl has learned more effectively by watching animated cartoons that have rhymes than by reading books. Since TV is a powerful learning tool, we can use it in school for educational purposes.
In conclusion, as parents and teachers, we must pick suitable educational programmes for our youngsters both in school and at home. I believe that TV is a good pedagogical tool, and hence its use in the school and home for both educational and recreational purposes should be allowed.
Sample 3:
Modern technology has undoubtedly made learning easier and better. Most children's parents encourage them to watch shows to gain information and acquire new knowledge. While I agree that watching television has some positive effects on a child, I believe this trend has a more detrimental effect on our children and society in general.
First and foremost, watching television can have some positive effects on children. There are, in fact, considerable advantages to incorporating television into homes and educational institutions. Many informative broadcasters, like National Geographic and Discovery, exist solely for educational reasons. Moreover, viewing television may increase the concentration and attention of some people. For instance, children with autism and behaviour problems have a concentration weakness; research has demonstrated that these children have enhanced their focus and concentration and are capable of watching television for prolonged periods. Therefore, it is obvious that somehow this trend has some beneficial consequences.
Similarly, I believe that watching television has several negative adverse effects. Spending time watching television can divert attention from healthy pastimes like outdoor activity with colleagues, leading to weight gain and feelings of loneliness. In addition, some programmes are created for entertainment, not teaching; these programmes have violent scenes and inappropriate terminology, which hurt children's brains. In addition, prolonged watching television may prevent reading a book and informative articles. Consequently, children would lack intellectual and problem-solving abilities. The negative impacts of television on the psychological and physical well-being of children can be determined.
In summation, I believe that television watching has more drawbacks than benefits. Under the supervision of both their parents and educators, children may spend more time watching purely for informative and educational reasons.
Sample 4:
Nowadays, television sets are now utilized as an educational tool. Many people believe that teenagers can absorb more efficiently while watching television. I fully agree with the concept that television might benefit youngsters in increasing their knowledge. This essay will look into the several reasons for this approval.
I feel that television is incredibly good for youngsters for two primary reasons. First, kids have access to a plethora of informative television channels, such as National Geographic and discovery, which are quite captivating to watch. This option might, in my opinion, considerably expand students’ understanding of Biology and Geography. Another consideration is that watching television helps reduce the school-related anxiety that teenagers are prone to. If, for instance, a youngster receives a poor grade in a specific subject, classmates would likely tease him or her. Consequently, I would suggest that televisions may be advantageous in some instances. It is evident that, by viewing the news on television, students receive a significant amount of information and learn about the world's various cultures and critical problems.
In contrast, I feel that we should not push youngsters to watch television constantly because it makes them less productive and inactive. Moreover, numerous studies have already demonstrated that televisions not only make individuals idle but also cause overweight. I believe that many schools offer physical education classes, even though television can make children less active.
In summation, although it is obvious that television makes an individual less active, I am convinced that teenagers learn more efficiently while watching television, for the reasons I have explained throughout.
Sample 5:
In this 21st century, digitalization has replaced all the old-schooled theories in educational institutes. Moreover, it is claimed that teenagers can effectively study while watching television at home and school. Although I agree that youngsters sometimes can learn from watching television, I do not consider it to be a good idea to encourage this activity.
Firstly, children's study is occasionally enhanced by television viewing. Numerous television programmes provide visual information and tales that enhance the process of learning interesting as well as the content easier to understand. It is a good way to encourage students to learn, particularly when they are tired of academics and assignments. Some applications, for instance, present appealing stories of literature, enhancing children's comprehension. These tools also make it simpler for youngsters to memorize poetry, as it is challenging and tiring for young children to remember poetry by continuously repeating them.
In contrast, I believe that prolonged watching of television may damage a child's academic performance. First, television programmes can serve as a distraction from their academics, especially when they are not attentive. Some programmes employ games to assist youngsters to learn more efficiently, yet youngsters may become more involved in the pleasure and so acquire little. Furthermore, continuous TV viewing alone could lead to an absence of human engagement. If children have queries while watching the television, their instructors cannot immediately address them, which would be most likely to lead to misunderstandings.
To conclude, even though viewing television encourages children to take an interest in learning, I believe that youngsters should not consume too much television because it has a negative consequence on their academics.
Sample 6:
With the development of technology, the media plays an important role in the field of education. Many people are of the opinion that when students are taught with the help of computers, mobile phones, and even television, they learn productively. As far as I am concerned, educating a child with the help of television at school and home is commendable, but there should be a limit to the exposure, otherwise, there may be a hindrance to their mental and physical development.
Childhood is a period when everyone enjoys the simple pleasures of life. Running with friends, pursuing adventures, enjoying ice cream and chocolates are some of the activities that make them happy. Nowadays, children are glued to their television or computer screens. There is no scope for physical activity, and they become obese or unhealthy. If the children continuously come in contact with television at home as well as at school, the rays from the screen may affect their eyesight.
Apart from this, when children watch television at home and school, they become addicted. For example, when a child is shown animated videos to understand certain topics, they get an excuse to watch videos on youtube. They tell their parents that the teacher had asked them to watch those videos to understand the topic better. In this way, the parents are bound to allow them and are unable to keep track of their activity. Moreover, some programs on television show excessive violence, which excites the children. They may try to copy their favourite superhero and get hurt in the process. The crime shows may even instigate them to behave in a rude or anti-social way which ultimately becomes detrimental to their development.
Yet, it is irrefutable that television is an effective tool to educate children and adults alike. While shows on National Geography, Animal Planet and Discovery tap on the scientific evolution of a child’s mind, cartoons or game shows help them relax after a long day of study and activities.
To put it in a nutshell, even though watching television both at home and school might help the children, the negative effects outweigh the positive side. So, according to me, elders should keep an eye on their wards and allow them limited time to watch television at home and school.
Sample 7:
As a professional in the field of education, I strongly disagree with the idea that children should be encouraged to watch television regularly at home and at school. While it is true that television can be a source of information and entertainment, it is not a suitable medium for effective learning for children.
First and foremost, excessive television viewing can have detrimental effects on a child’s physical and mental health. Studies have shown that children who spend too much time in front of a screen are at a higher risk of obesity, sleep disturbances, and attention problems. Moreover, the content of television programs is often not age-appropriate and can expose children to violence, inappropriate language, and negative behaviors.
Furthermore, watching television does not promote active learning or critical thinking skills. Unlike interactive educational activities, such as reading, writing, and hands-on experiments, television viewing is a passive experience that does not engage children in the learning process. It is important for children to develop their cognitive abilities and problem-solving skills through active participation in educational activities, rather than passively absorbing information from a screen.
Instead of encouraging children to watch television regularly, it is essential to provide them with alternative and more effective learning opportunities. Schools should focus on creating a stimulating and interactive learning environment, where children can engage in hands-on activities, discussions, and group projects. At home, parents should limit screen time and encourage their children to participate in outdoor activities, sports, and hobbies that promote physical and mental well-being.
In conclusion, while television can be a source of entertainment, it is not an effective medium for children to learn. Instead of promoting regular television viewing, it is crucial to provide children with active and engaging learning experiences that foster their overall development.
Sample 8:
Some parents believe that watching television is bad for their children. So, they try to restrict their children from watching TV. In a different way, others think that there is nothing bad in watching TV programmes. Personally, I think that watching TV brings tremendous benefits to children unless they spend a lot of their valuable time in front of a TV set daily. It is recommended that children should spend less than a couple of hours daily watching TV programmes, and those programmes should be suitable for them. For the following reasons, which I will mention below, I believe that television plays an essential role in a child’s development.
First of all, television helps a child to extend his or her range of interests. Children can find out many new things and make many exciting discoveries for themselves. In addition to this practical benefit, television improves children’s vocabulary, their memory and gives them the opportunity to gain more knowledge. It is essential for a child’s growth. Of cause, someone can say that there are plenty of different resources of information such as books and teachers. But, I think, in our modern world children must learn faster and use all contemporary technology in order to succeed.
Secondly, watching cognitive programs helps children to learn more about wildlife, our environment and about the importance of preserving our forest and wild animals that live there. However, scientists say that a child should not watch TV for more than 40 minutes successively and not more than 2-3 hours per day. For example, my mother always made us have a break after watching TV more than half an hour and let our eyes rest for several minutes before turning on the TV again. She did not let us watch the TV all day long as well. I think it is the best solution.
To sum up, I believe that television gives children and all people the opportunity to learn what cannot be learnt from books. Television and movies, in particular, allow people to feel the reality and see what they will most likely not be able to see in their lives. Personally, when I was a child, I liked to watch cognitive programs about wild animals. Unfortunately, my family had only one TV, but these programs were the only ones we all wanted to watch. So, we gathered in our living room and watched them in complete silence. I always remember those moments with a smile.
Sample 9:
It is irrefutable that TV is a very efficient teacher. However, I disagree that children should be motivated to watch TV both at home and at school. I shall put forth my arguments to support my views in the following paragraphs.
There is no doubt that TV can be a powerful means of delivering information and a nice part of the learning process. Being an audiovisual medium more effective result can be achieved. What is seen is retained longer in the minds of children. There are some things which can be very easily taught by visual illustrations. Even boring subjects like history can be made interesting with the help of TV.
However, if TV is to be used as an educational tool, then very strict monitoring would be needed as to what children watch on TV. All those talk shows and soap operas we can see every day are a complete waste of time and can even have negative effects by distracting children from their studies. Moreover, most so-called educational programmes like National Geographic cannot replace books and academic lectures because they tend to entertain people and have not an aim to give deep and concentrated knowledge. It is highly unlikely that TV channel directors would abandon their profits and change talk shows to lectures and video lessons.
Furthermore, if children watch TV in school also then their interaction with the teacher would be limited. Teachers teach a lot of things apart from academics. They can come down to the level of the student and can also stimulate children to learn. What is more, children would read less when they learn everything from TV. Reading is an active activity as compared to TV which is a passive activity. So, it would be detrimental to the holistic development of children.
To put it in a nutshell I pen down saying that, although TV is a very good educational medium, it should be used within limits and whatever children learn from TV should also be carefully monitored by parents and teachers.
Sample 10:
Nowadays, many educational institutes are focusing on the usage of screens for learning in kids. Some people are of the view that learning through screen should be encouraged for young kids. My opinion, I completely disagree with acquiring knowledge through television screens. In this essay, I am going to support my opinion before giving a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, screening for long hours for educational purposes is likely to put strain on the eyes of youngsters. This is because television screens are likely to release rays that may impact vision in young kids. As a result of this, the younger kids will need to wear glasses at every age. Additionally, vision impairment due to screening is not restricted to weak eyesight but also to severe headaches for days or even blurry vision. For instance, nowadays, ophthalmologists believe that long hours of screening are the main cause of vision impairment in kids. Also, they emphasize the limitation of screen time for kids at a young age.
Secondly, viewing learning programs on tv continuously is likely to impact young kids' physical and mental well-being. As when kids do screen time, they are unlikely to do any form of physical movement. Hence, sitting constantly and just watching videos online will make youngsters lethargic and tired. Moreover, learning through screens, even at home, will result in obesity, leading to other personality development issues in young ones. Along with that, learning without a screen tends to enhance analytical and cognitive capabilities in kids. For instance, when learning through screens, kids only make use of a few of their senses, while off-screen learning involves the usage of many other senses. Undoubtedly, off-screen learning involves eyes, ears, hands, and touch, which also helps develop the brain in young kids.
In conclusion, learning through tv screen can impact the eyes in young kids and may lead to vision impairment. Also, constant viewing of tv screens is not good for the physical and mental well-being of young ones.
Sample 11:
It is acknowledged that children may benefit from watching television programs, such as educational programs. However, I disagree with the recommendation that watching television should be a regular activity at school and st home, as this would produce more negative outcomes than positive ones.
It has received wide cognition that many television programs can moticate children’s learning enthusiasm, thus encouraging them to expand their knowledge in terms of normal school subjects and after-school activities. However, there are still many problems associated with the increased time of sitting in front of a TV screen.
If children spend time watching television every day at school and at home, they may face the probability of suffering obesity, eye problems and back problems. When they are studying at school, it would be advisable for them to focus on learning, acquiring knowledge on academic subjects. Besides, more active and aggressive activities should be encouraged as they are in a physical state when they should participate in more sports activities. But watching television seems to do more harm than good in their physical development.
Furthermore, it is true that children waste a lot of time playing electronic gadgets after school, resulting in the fact that many of them have become highly addicted to these gadgets. If they are asked to watch television regularly, they would certainly lack interpersonal interaction. It would be more beneficial if they play games with their parents or do the housework.
In conclusion, although television programs would do good to children’s learning in some ways, they definitely would cause more disadvantageous effects if watching them becomes a daily routine for children.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.