Some people say that it is acceptable to test medicine intended for people on animals. Others, however, believe that it is not right to use animals in this research. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Sample 1:

People have different views about whether animal testing for medical research is necessary or not. From my perspective, animal testing plays an integral role in the medicine industry, in spite of the drawbacks it brings.

There are two major reasons why some people oppose the idea of using animals for medical experiments. Firstly, it is believed that such experiments are cruel and inhumane, and therefore should be prohibited. Every year, many animals are subjected to medical experimentation and have to suffer physical pain and even deprivation of food and water. Additionally, in order to implement research on animals, large amounts of money are expended on the establishment of facilities and human resources. This can be a burden on a country’s national budget, preventing the government from investing in other more important aspects like education and housing.

Despite the above-mentioned disadvantages, in my opinion, animal testing is necessary. Humans are still reliant on animal testing for many purposes, including developing new medications and checking the safety of medical products. In fact, the most powerful supercomputers are currently unable to understand the workings of the human body, and complex organs such as the brain and heart, which is crucial for medical research and development. More importantly, due to biological similarities, medical research needs to be implemented on animals, which will bring about better outcomes in medical research compared to other methods. Over many years, chimpanzees, the closest relatives of humans, have been used to investigate advanced treatments for cancer and heart disease, and until now, there is still no better alternative.

In conclusion, although animal testing may be cruel and cost a significant amount of money, it still needs to be conducted because of the unique benefits.

Sample 2:

Many believe that using animals for scientific testing purposes is fundamentally immoral, while others see it as a necessary evil. In my opinion, even though it is decidedly unethical, the overall impact on human progress justifies its continuance.

Detractors of animal testing often point out that animals have rights. We would never condone this type of testing on a human, even with one with a low IQ and it follows that we should treat animals with some measure of respect. The strongest argument supporting this is the level of cruelty involved in animal testing. Many drugs that are tested on animals have painful side-effects and the test subjects may die slow, painful deaths. This is undeniably unjustifiable regarding testing in non-essential medical fields such as cosmetics.

Despite the moral quagmire detailed above, I believe animal testing does enough to advance medical testing to warrant its use. Some cursory research will reveal the importance of animal testing in fields such as diabetic medicine, cancer research, experimental surgery, and stem cells. Testing insulin for diabetics on dogs may be the most well-known example of this kind of impactful research. Many other advances in medicine, often attributed to animal testing, have saved countless human lives to an extent that would be impossible if researchers were working under the moral constraints of human test subjects.

In conclusion, animal testing is the best way to make breakthroughs in medicine and should be strongly encouraged. Governments should work with medical institutions to implement more medical testing on animals across the board.

Sample 3:

Some believe that animal testing is necessary to develop effective and safe drugs for human consumption, while others argue that this treatment is morally wrong and therefore should be completely banned. In my opinion, despite the cruelty imposed on experimented creatures, this should remain a common practice due to its significant implication for major medical breakthroughs.  

Detractors of animal experimentation argue its undeniable inhumanity. As well as being subjected to unsanitary and confined living conditions, the creatures used for experimental purposes are also tortured through various barbaric procedures ranging from being starved, electrocuted and injected with poisonous substances. As a result, most of them suffer from malnutrition, excruciating pain and face a strong likelihood of being killed in the process. Furthermore, experimenters usually breed these animals for future research, which leads to an endless cycle of torment lasting many generations. A pertinent example of this is that small rodents including rats and hamsters are injected with cancerous cells and die painfully shortly thereafter as a consequence. 

However, these experiments still play a crucial role in ensuring safety and potency of potential human medicine. Rats are scientifically proven to have the same genetic material as humans; thus a possible human reaction can be inferred from testing on these animals first. Medical researchers can use these testing results to devise drugs with minimal side effects when adopted for humans. This advancement in the pharmaceutical industry could engender better remedies to possibly treat previously fatal and incurable diseases. Prior successful experiments have led to the creation of new treatments that not only prolong the life expectancy of immunocompromised patients but also make considerable progress in the fight against cancer.

In conclusion, although testing on animals can be seen as a brutal action, the positive ramifications associated with medicinal development make this an essential and required practice to enhance welfare for humanity as a whole. Scientists should consider giving these experimented creatures the best possible living environment to partly compensate for their suffering. 

Sample 4:

It is argued by a few masses that using animals for the experimentation of medicines or products that are made for their usage is indispensable. However, others believe this act is unkind behaviour towards them. In my perspective, it is inhumane to use poor creatures for testing as they also have a right to live, which is highly beneficial for our ecosystem.

According to the former point of view, animal testing is beneficial for humanity as it reduces the chances of mishappenings to the human body. To elaborate it, human beings are the most precious species on this planet. Direct exposure to any product or medicine can put their life at risk. Therefore, if the products or medicine are first trailed on animals, these invaluable creatures would be saved from a certain illness or death. For instance, to try the result of corona vaccine initially was trailed on animals. Only then was it used by the public? This animal testing saved a lot of lives.

According to the second school of thought, it is a brutal act because it can cause the extinction of the animal population. To explicate, when trials fail and are tested on other animals, it becomes a threat to the survival of animals. Some may die or become disabled. Thus, it will be difficult for them to live with physical impairment in their natural habit. To exemplify it, when animals such as monkeys, lions or rodents are used for testing, a massive population declines. The extinction of such species indirectly creates an imbalance in biodiversity.

To conclude, thus it is clear that trials on animal species are beneficial for humanity as they can save thousands of human lives. But, to save humanity, putting animal life at risk is cruel as they can survive on this planet with the same kind of disability.

Sample 5:

Most individuals think it is essential to inject medicines or products into the animal before they are available for human consumption. At the same time, others say that this is brutality towards animals. This practice has its own brighter and darker sides. This disquisition delves into both the perspectives and my own stance.

Embark on, and humans are more important than animals. They are the assets of the world. Because human specialities are more than the animals, like, thinking capacity, talking and so on. Therefore, we give more importance to these human beings. Because of this, scientists who invented medicines will be applied to animals’ kinds in order to find the results after long procedures. Mostly living beings like rats, monkeys and so on are used for this. Due to the high number of these species, people think that there is no problem with injecting newly formulated medicinal products into animals.

On the other hand, some humans, as well as animal lovers, will try to feel less comfortable with experimenting on animals in the medical procedure. They say it seems to be a massive cruelty to these creatures. It will badly affect them when the results of such procedures fail. There is some advanced technology in order to find the exact results of using such medicines through humans. For instance, a computer program which shows the suitability of a new drug on the human immune system can be used for medical research. This will safeguard the mammals from suffering such cruelties.

In my view, I think that experimenting the medicines on animals may lead to harmful consequences, and it will be very cruel to them. I suggest that more advanced methods should be used to ascertain the result of newly invented medicines rather than using them on animals.

Therefore, it can be conclusively stated that using mammals for examination is an unacceptable trend and should be replaced with modern solutions and technology.