Câu hỏi:

07/01/2025 160

Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

There is an ongoing debate about whether a person is successful or not has everything to do with luck. I strongly oppose this statement for various reasons.

Firstly, this belief is not entirely accurate in multiple ways. Many people believe that natural talent, which is a form of luck, that makes a person successful. However, there is only so much that innate talent can do for you if hard work is not present. For example, students who are extremely bright kids score poorly on the college entrance exam or do not contribute to anything significant in their careers. Moreover, many people think luck plays a role in helping people build their connections. However, I believe that partnerships and opportunities come only to those who genuinely put effort into maintaining that connection or grasping that opportunity. For example, there are multiple encounters that a person has in their lives, but to turn those encounters into personal relationships depends on one’s communication skills.

Secondly, even if luck does play a part in one’s success, believing that success relates to it can be dangerous. People who have this mindset tend to beat themselves up all the time or procrastinate in accomplishing their goals. Because they think everything correlates with luck, they will blame themselves for not being destined to gain success or spend time waiting for the perfect moment. Moreover, people who believe in this correlation also downplay others’ achievements. For example, many people tend to disregard others’ hard work or efforts the moment they find out that those people come from a rich background or are naturally gifted.

In conclusion, I oppose the statement that whether or not a person can achieve their goals depends on luck. I believe that this statement has no sound foundation to it and is a dangerous misconception to have.

Sample 2:

Many individuals hold the belief that luck significantly contributes to the achievement of one's goals. Although it is true that luck plays a role in success, I contend that hard work and patience are far more crucial factors determining whether individuals accomplish their objectives.

On the one hand, I acknowledge the importance of luck in facilitating success. For instance, individuals born into affluent families often enjoy privileged access to quality education, which enhances their prospects of securing promising careers. Consequently, those from moneyed backgrounds tend to have higher chances of success compared to those who are not as fortunate. Additionally, a successful business venture is often considered a matter of luck. For example, individuals who start a business just before an unexpected economic downturn or engage with untrustworthy partners are more likely to encounter failures. Conversely, those who fortuitously encounter the right people at the right time often find success in their investments.

However, I firmly believe that hard work and patience are the most critical factors on the path to success. Firstly, substantial effort and unwavering dedication are necessary to accomplish significant achievements. Take, for instance, Michael Jordan, who became one of the greatest basketball players in the world through rigorous training, including shooting hundreds of jump shots every day during his summers. Secondly, the attainment of goals requires time and persistence; overnight success is a rarity. Consider Thomas Edison, who failed a thousand times before successfully inventing the world-changing light bulb. If he had relied solely on luck rather than exercising patience, he may not have achieved such eminence as an inventor.

In conclusion, the influence of luck on success cannot be dismissed. However, I maintain that hard work and patience hold greater importance in the pursuit of goals.

Sample 3:

The notion that success is mainly attributed to a stroke a luck has been a subject of controversy. In my opinion, I am far from wholeheartedly agreeing with this statement because I firmly believe that individual achievements are the result of perseverance and personal abilities.

There is no denying that being lucky can sometimes lead to unexpected accomplishments. For instance, consider the case of Archimedes, one of the most renowned ancient Greek physicists. In his attempt to address the King's doubt regarding the purity of his golden crown, this great scholar fortuitously came up with the answer when he found himself floating in the bath. Therefore, thanks to his chance discovery, Archimedes' principle cemented a cornerstone for subsequent empirical experiments in physics and the overall flourishing of this field.

However, it is important to recognise that achievement solely based on fortuitousness is inherently unpredictable. The capricious nature of luck means that it cannot be considered a reliable strategy for individuals striving to accomplish their goals. Meanwhile, there is a compelling argument for more controllable intrinsic factors, with persistence, knowledge, and skills being the driving force behind individual attainments. One illustration of this is the game-changing breakthrough by Pierre and Marie Curie. While radioactivity was initially discovered accidentally, had it not been for their expertise in chemistry and physics, let alone their strong will to uncover the answer, radiation and its revolutionary medical applications in cancer treatment would not have emerged. Similarly, in today's circumstances, a student is likely to fail a university entrance examination if they lack sufficient subject-related knowledge and exam skills. Equally important is the perseverant attitude maintained throughout the studying process, regardless of past failures.

In conclusion, while it is evident that luck plays a role in goal achievement, success relying on fortuitousness alone seems unpredictable. Alternatively, it is primarily the result of individual qualities, involving determination, knowledge, and skills. Hence, I find the assumption that successfully attaining aims is solely a matter of luck only appealing to some extent.

Sample 4:

How influential luck is to a person's success is an interesting topic of debate. While some believe that luck is the primary factor, I am inclined to disagree with this point of view, as hard work is also a significant contributor to people’s achievement.

The idea that luck is the chief determinant related to accomplishing somebody’s goal is not without merit. It might be easier to reach success if people were born into fortunate circumstances. Anderson Cooper, who is one of the most critically acclaimed broadcast journalists and recognizable faces on TV today, is a descendant of the elite Vanderbilt family. This gave him access to better education and resources, allowing him to attain the career he has had. Furthermore, some people may be lucky enough to bloom at the right time, which can give them a pioneer’s advantage in their field. Arnold Schwarzenegger was one of the most popular action movie stars decades ago, thanks to his imposing physique at his prime, yet nowadays, hardly any actor can make a career out of action movie roles.

However, luck is far from the be-all and end-all in a person's success. I would consider diligence and dedication to be more instrumental, as they lay the foundation for fortune to do the most work. Though Arnold’s aforementioned example can be interpreted as one of somebody who peaked at the right time, it should be noted that he had already been a successful bodybuilder by the start of his acting career. Arnold, undoubtedly, had to put time in on uplifting himself before his talent could be noticed. Had he not strived to be the best from the beginning, his life would not have turned out the way it had. Taking this point into consideration, it is clear that fortune is not the greatest contributor to somebody's accomplishment.

In my opinion, while luck plays a role in producing success, hard work and determination are ultimately essential. People who seek to achieve an aim in life should remember to make tangible effort toward their goals before hoping to be favored by Lady Luck.

Sample 5:

The debate whether luck is the primary determinant of success in achieving targets has been heated constantly. My position is that hard work and determination are far more important than luck, while we must not consider luck as the main precursor of the attainment of one’s goals.

I advocate the notion that the role of being diligent and determined is more significant than luck. Thomas Edison, one of the greatest inventors in the 20th century, is an excellent example of such a notion. He conducted numerous experiments with the filament until the finest light bulb was produced; and his hard work, rather than luck, was acknowledged by all the human races. Another clear evidence of this notion is the case of Nguyen Ngoc Ky. This disabled man could not write by hand, but he was determined enough to teach himself to write with his foot. The fact that he would then become one of the greatest teachers in the history of education in Vietnam provides a concrete foundation that even with bad luck, determination could result in goal achievement.

By contrast, I believe the saying that fortune has a major part to play is just a fallacy. One clear reason is that although there may have been a number of people reaching their goals with good luck, such good luck in most cases only comes to people who have worked hard. Take Mendeleev as an example. As a research chemist, he worked tirelessly for a few decades, until one day in his dream, the complete arrangement of the elements appeared. we could ascribe the appearance of this arrangement to luck, but no one could deny the extreme effort that Mendeleev had exerted. Another clear reason for my belief is that luck could only lead people to short-term achievements, and there is nothing to ascertain that it would continue to exist in the long run. The over-reliance on good fortune, as a result, would prevent people from achieving their long-term or life-long aims.

In brief, I think the importance of luck in determining goal attainment is overstated, while there are much more significant factors to consider, namely hard work and determination.

Sample 6:

People have different views about what elements contribute the most to a person’s success. While I accept that luck does have an important role in helping people reach their targets, I would argue that hard work and determination are much more crucial factors leading to the achievement of an individual.

On the one hand, I agree that luck can be an important factor. Some people are fortunate enough to be born in a wealthy family, which allows them to have better education or to easily start their own business without having to borrow money from someone else. As a result, these people tend to have better opportunities to succeed than those coming from poor families. Furthermore, some individuals are lucky to be given great talents which others do not have. For example, Mozart was able to play music when he was very young, or Lionel Messi already had great football skills when he was born.

However, I would argue that although luck can be necessary, it is not the most crucial factor leading to success. Firstly, people need to work really hard and put much effort into their jobs if they want to be successful. For instance, before becoming one of the best football players in the world, Cristiano Ronaldo had to go through intense training hours every day for many years. Secondly, a person is less likely to reach his targets if he does not have determination. On the way leading to success, there might be many difficulties, and people need to keep moving forward to overcome those challenges.

In conclusion, while I agree that luck is important in helping people become successful, I believe that hard work and determination are the most important elements.

Sample 7:

It is argued that some people’s success is mostly attributable to luck instead of their own hard work. However, I completely disagree with this opinion.

I believe that only determined and industrious people will be successful in whatever they do. Hard-working people usually attain their goals. For instance, Steve Jobs spent thousands of hours coding and experimenting to bring out the great Macintosh operating system that we use nowadays. Another clear case of success through determination is Nick Vujicic, an Australian motivational speaker, who suffered from a rare disorder which resulted in the absence of four limbs. Despite not having any hands or legs, Vujicic earned a bachelor’s degree with a double major in accountancy and financial planning; he had his own family, and now he travels around the world to inspire people as a motivational speaker. And the famous KFC Restaurant founder. After all the struggles is his life, Col. Sanders started his own business at the age of 65, and his age has never been a matter to have his own success.  

On the other hand, by contrast, luck is only a small factor in determining one’s achievement. Firstly, people cannot solely be dependent on luck to become successful. If a student does not study for an exam, chances are he or she will fail, no matter how lucky he or she may be. Secondly, luck only contributes to short-term fortune. For instance, a person who wins a lottery is definitely lucky because winning a lottery does not require you to do anything to earn it. It purely depends on luck; yet he or she cannot win the lottery for the rest of his or her life.

In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that in order to achieve objectives in life, one must be extremely determined and hard-working to follow his or her passion till the end. 

Sample 8:

The influence of luck on personal success has been a subject of debate and speculation. While some argue that luck plays a pivotal role in determining the outcomes of our endeavors, I firmly disagree with this stance as I think that there are more essential elements.

Those who advocate for the role of luck in one's journey towards success may have some valid arguments. They may well argue that random chance and external circumstances can certainly impact the trajectory of an individual's life. It is therefore reasonable to state that unexpected opportunities can sometimes play a part in opening doors to success. This was the case of J.K. Rowling as a small publishing house decided to take a chance on her book, and its subsequent success propelled Rowling to literary stardom. Had she not encountered this stroke of luck, her manuscript may have remained undiscovered. However, relying solely on luck as the primary driver of achievement overlooks the intricate interplay of personal qualities and deliberate actions.

In addition to luck, there are two crucial factors that hold more significance in shaping one's success. Chief among these is that individual attributes such as determination, resilience, and adaptability contribute significantly to overcoming challenges and achieving goals. These qualities enable individuals to persevere in the face of adversity, learn from failures, and adapt their strategies accordingly. Secondly, persistent effort, characterized by consistent hard work, dedication, and a growth mindset, is essential in honing skills, acquiring knowledge, and seizing opportunities. It is through sustained effort that individuals cultivate expertise and demonstrate the strength required to overcome obstacles on their path to success.

In conclusion, while luck undoubtedly has a role to play in shaping outcomes, it is not the sole determinant of personal success. The belief that luck alone can make or break an individual's achievements undermines the importance of personal attributes and continuous effort.

Sample 9:

Some are of the belief that luck is the determining factor when accomplishing a given goal. In my opinion, luck is pivotal in individual situations, but its importance decreases over larger sample sizes.

The main argument for the primacy of luck is highly visible, singular examples. This translates to extremely successful individuals. For instance, Bill Gates and Steve Jobs were exceptionally intelligent and hard-working but they would never have become leading figures in history if they had not grown up in California in the 1970s during the computer boom. It is likely they would still be successful regardless of their era and place of birth, but the extent of influence would be more limited. This same principle applies for the average individual as there are moments in one’s life that are best credited to good luck or an advantageous situation.

However, the significance of luck decreases over time. Take, for example, an average person. They may be born into a wealthy family and have a good start in life; they are lucky from the onset. Nonetheless, if they are not hard-working, there is a strong chance they will not be able to accomplish their goals in life. The reverse is true of someone born into a bad situation. There are exceptions, where the situation is dire or the period in history precludes success, but most people who apply themselves over a long period of time will ‘make their own luck’. This is because as sample sizes become larger, the influence of variance naturally decreases. It still requires some extraordinary luck to attain huge aims but more modest ones result from repeated action rather than fortune.

In conclusion, luck is decisive in particular instances but not more generally. It is therefore more important to place greater value on working hard in the long-term than on the off-chance of being lucky.

Sample 10:

It is a widespread belief that the achievement of one's goals primarily depends on chance. However, I strongly disagree with this notion as it overlooks the undeniable role of hard work and determination in attaining success. In this essay, I will elaborate on how one's efforts and personal qualities play a crucial role in realizing their aspirations.

To begin with, it is undeniable that relentless effort is the key to success. Individuals who have reached remarkable heights in their respective fields, such as Bill Gates and Elon Musk, have devoted countless hours towards their goals. Bill Gates, for instance, dedicated himself to the computer industry, investing time and energy into his company on a daily basis. Similarly, Elon Musk actively engages with his engineers to construct rockets for his enterprise. These exceptional individuals exemplify the correlation between persistent effort and the accomplishment of their objectives. It is evident that luck alone is insufficient to propel individuals towards achievement; a significant amount of effort must be invested.

Moreover, success is not solely determined by luck, but also by the possession of essential qualities and traits. Even if luck were to favor someone, they would still need to make conscious efforts in order to capitalize on it. Developing skills and characteristics relevant to one's goals is crucial. For instance, in areas such as business, education, and building relationships, individuals must concentrate their efforts and develop the necessary traits. In essence, the opportunity to achieve one's goals is directly proportional to the amount of effort exerted by an individual.

In conclusion, the attainment of one's objectives necessitates a focus on individual effort and the cultivation of essential traits. It is evident that every successful person has invested substantial time and energy in their endeavors. While luck may play a minor role, it is insignificant compared to the monumentous impact of one's efforts. Without doubt, reaching one's goals is only possible through persistent and dedicated hard work.

Sample 11:

Many people claim that luck plays the most instrumental role in helping them achieve their goals in life. Personally, I vehemently disagree with this notion as hard work, determination and perseverance are more important factors than luck for attaining different goals.

There are multifarious reasons to strengthen my viewpoint. Firstly, there are several people who despite all odds reach the pinnacle of success through sheer dedication and hard work. For instance, late APJ Abdul Kalam faced so much hardship in his childhood; however, he conquered all formidable challenges through untiring perseverance and grit. Needless to say, he achieved whatever he aimed at during his presidential tenure and in his scientific career. 

Secondly, anything which is achieved just through luck does not last long unless achievers put in diligent efforts to sustain it. To illustrate, people open businesses for their children; nevertheless, their businesses only grow if these children devote time and show dedication towards their work. For example, people may come into a lot of money due to sheer luck; however, if they do not know how to invest that money, they will soon squander it.

Lastly, there are people who are born with physical disabilities but still they have a success story to tell. Take, for instance, Helen Keller who was deaf and blind, but with her determination and unparalleled efforts she became an eminent author and political activist. Although she was not born with fortunes, she fought against all odds and became an epitome of hard work and determination.

To conclude, I firmly reiterate that luck does not play a major role in achieving success and factors such as perseverance, commitment and dedication are more imperative in attaining goals.

Sample 12:

Numerous people claiming that those who become successful had a few unfair advantages in life. They even insisted that individual’s good fortune is purely correlated to luck instead of great merit. I completely disagree with this opinion, as I believe that success is the result of individual’s hard work, talent and determination.

To have been born in a rich family is an enormous stroke of luck, but to sustain and maintain that level of success requires enormous amount of talent and hard work. Some accomplished individuals believe that in order to achieve someone’s desires, a person should pose a brilliant intelligence and extraordinary ability above others. For example, intelligent people are more likely achieved higher education, employed in a multi-national company, and received higher pay checks. They prospered because most of them focuses on growing their core strengths and take up demanding jobs rather than rely on any significant extent of luck to strike them.

In contrast, there are plenty of instances that people who are less intelligent and poses a mediocre talent but, in some way, become wealthy and successful. Some people think, anyone can become successful no matter what an individual’s background or race. But only the luckiest people end up on the highest peak of success. It shows that the most successful people in the world are not necessarily the brightest and most talented but the luckiest. However, if people will only anticipate for luck and forget to act, the opportunity is going to be wasted.

In conclusion, good fortune probably will take part in someone’s success in life but great talent, hard work normally the key factors in success. Therefore, I disagree that a persons’ achievement is merely due to luck, luck may place us in an advantageous position, yet we still need skills and effort to think critically and stretch our ingenuity. 

Sample 13:

People have different views about the decisive factors to attaining set goals. While I accept that fortune has a role to play in people's accomplishments, I also claim that without effort and determination, people are unable to achieve and maintain their success for a long run.

On the one hand, being lucky does contribute to some individuals attain their desired outcomes. Being born in a wealthy family undoubtedly paves the way for people to access a better academic base and financial resources to fulfill their ambitions. However, others may struggle to place these foundations for themselves without a sense of wealth from their family background. It is also worth mentioning that many are blessed with certain innate talents or abilities which help to remove obstacles to reaching their objectives. If it were not for these gifted capacities, those with intensive punishing training would not ever reach a comparable level especially in fields that being naturally talented can be more highly appreciated than trained skills such as painting or music composing.

On the other hand, even a streak of luck cannot ensure triumph when there is no constant sweat and dedication. An unexpected fluke might bring sudden fame and wealth, but all will fade away with the flow of time when energy and time are not invested to notch up and attain the stretch of endeavour. An example for the point made would be those lottery winners who recklessly spend the fortune earned at ease will finally return their previous status without reaching any further destinations within the matter of time. Even with provided foundation, people born with silver spoon can easily demolish the whole fortune mounted over family generations if they do not cultivate needed skills and knowledge.

In conclusion, although a run of luck can contribute to people achieving their desired status, but it is certainly not the key to a guaranteed wanted results when effort and dedication are not present.

Sample 14:

It is argued that the individual’s destiny may or may not play a key role in accomplishing specific objectives. Some will agree with the point that fate is significant in achieving targets or endeavours; however, some will oppose and will stick to their sheer talent and hard work to achieve success. Both luck and hard work are essential in attributing goals.

On the one hand, we strive to achieve goals by working day and night. We give our best, and with much determination, we sometimes sacrifice our sleep and enjoyment to get what we want. If we have worked hard, no challenge can stop us as we know our contribution inside out, and we are well aware of the solutions and how to tackle them. Sometimes, we do get immediate results with good luck, but to have extraordinary success, we need to go the extra mile with great perseverance. For instance, we plan on making money through gambling or the lottery, trusting our luck to gain prominence. However, sometimes, the situation can turn the tables around, and we could lose a hefty amount making us miserable. The fruit of hard work is never taken back, and it has a steady result with fewer downfalls as compared to luck.

On the contrary, sometimes, fate is also involved in deciding the result of the objective. We may encounter environmental challenges like heavy rains causing floods that can stop us from attending the central conference meeting, which would either make or break the deal. Similarly, our health issues would also make us give up the months of hard work we had put in to achieve our target. For example, a student studies hard for the entrance tests for months, and with hard work and persistence, he/she scores well in the mock tests, which boosts his/her confidence for the main exam. However, a day before the main exam, he/she falls sick, which enables him/her from giving the exam, and months of hard work go in vain shattering the dreams of getting into good universities.

To conclude, luck is a belief, and hard work is our path to achieving our goals. These two should work collaboratively to give desired results. One should always possess and believe in both luck and hard work.

Sample 15:

The notion that the fruition of one's aspirations hinges predominantly on fortune is a perspective that merits scrutiny. I contend that success is a blend of luck, hard work, and strategic planning, with the latter two bearing greater significance. The ensuing discourse will explore the pivotal roles of perseverance and judicious decision-making in achieving life's objectives, alongside acknowledging the element of chance.

Hard work and persistence stand as the cornerstones of achievement. Numerous anecdotal evidence and empirical studies underscore that individuals who dedicate themselves to their goals, persist through challenges, and continuously hone their skills tend to reach their aspirations more consistently than those who rely solely on luck. For instance, the stories of accomplished individuals in various fields, from science to the arts, often highlight decades of dedication and relentless effort rather than serendipitous breaks. This suggests that while luck may open doors, enduring success is largely a result of sustained hard work.

Strategic planning and adaptability further debunk the myth that luck is the primary determinant of success. Life's most successful figures are not merely hard workers; they are strategic thinkers who plan their paths meticulously and adapt to changing circumstances with agility. They anticipate challenges, mitigate risks, and seize opportunities with precision actions that are less about luck and more about foresight and adaptability. Consider the tech entrepreneurs of the 21st century who, through strategic foresight and adaptability, have transformed our world; their success stories are testaments to the power of planning and flexibility over mere chance.

In conclusion, while luck may play a role in the initial stages of a person's journey towards their aims, it is the amalgamation of hard work, strategic planning, and adaptability that primarily dictates success. These elements ensure not only the achievement of goals but their sustainability in the long term. Thus, attributing success to luck alone undermines the profound impact of personal effort and strategic execution in shaping one’s destiny.

Sample 16:

It is often debated whether a person's success in life hinges predominantly on serendipity or if it is shaped by other factors. While I concede that luck can occasionally play a part in one's success, I robustly contend that it is primarily a person's abilities, efforts, and courage that determines their triumph.

One critical reason to substantiate my argument is that individual competence and relentless perseverance are pivotal to personal prosperity. For instance, individuals who climb the corporate ladder are not just fortuitous but often have demonstrated considerable diligence, resilience, and an uncanny knack to seize opportunities. This was exemplified by the late Steve Jobs, co-founder of Apple Inc. Although initially fired from his own company, Jobs' unfaltering determination and innovative prowess allowed him to stage a triumphant comeback and revolutionize the technology industry, proving success often necessitates tenacity rather than mere fortune.

Conversely, individuals who sustain valuable relationships in their personal and professional lives typically do so not by the whims of chance, but through their exceptional communication skills, empathy, and respect for diversity. A prime example is Mahatma Gandhi, whose powerful words and non-violent philosophies garnered support worldwide, leading India to independence. His success was underpinned not by luck, but by his compelling communication and unflinching commitment to his cause.

On the other hand, an over-reliance on luck can prove detrimental to personal growth. Waiting for serendipity to strike might breed complacency, fostering a passive attitude towards personal development. Relying on the whims of fate rather than actively honing one's skills can stagnate career progression and personal advancement.

In conclusion, while good fortune may occasionally contribute to one's success, it is not the primary determinant. Substantial factors like personal skills, knowledge, courage, and above all, self-effort play a much more significant role. It is vital to remember that rather than banking on serendipity, one should persistently strive for self-improvement, as success is more often the result of diligence and resilience than a mere stroke of luck.

Sample 17:

The correlation between success and luck has long been a topic of contentious debate. Although serendipity may play a sporadic role in shaping an individual's trajectory, I strongly advocate that the achievement of life's goals is predominantly underpinned by personal endeavour, talent, and perseverance.

A key proposition substantiating my perspective is the indispensable role of hard work and aptitude in paving the way to success. For instance, those rising through the ranks in their professional fields are often not merely beneficiaries of luck, but industrious workers with the audacity to seize opportunities and showcase their competence. A compelling illustration of this is the illustrious trajectory of the renowned physicist, Albert Einstein. Initially deemed a slow learner, his groundbreaking theories in physics were not the product of fortuitous luck, but rather of tenacious effort and an extraordinary aptitude for understanding the universe's mechanics.

Furthermore, maintaining fruitful relationships in life does not usually arise from the whims of chance, but rather from the consistent efforts to foster understanding and connection. One notable exemplar is Nelson Mandela. His successful struggle against apartheid was not marked by luck but by his exceptional ability to unite people under a shared cause, demonstrating the potency of empathy, communication, and respect over mere fortune.

Conversely, an excessive reliance on luck can inadvertently breed passivity, hindering an individual's self-growth. Expecting fortuitous happenstance to deliver success can lead to complacency, neglecting the importance of self-improvement and personal skill enhancement. In the words of the philosopher Seneca, "Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity."

In conclusion, while luck may occasionally have a hand in how a person achieves their aims in life, it is not the primary catalyst. Attributes such as skill, knowledge, courage, and diligence are significantly more pivotal in the quest for attaining life's objectives.

Sample 18:

Attaining great success has been constantly considered as a major topic of debates among citizens in recent years. While a group of people are convinced of the predominant role that luck plays, I personally advocate the notion that there are other determinant factors involved in someone's achievement.

On the one hand, it is undeniable that in some cases, people reach their goals by luck. Typically, entrepreneurs who desire to success in their career have to possess specific prosperity when they operate their business. The emphasis on fortune when it crosses their path and meets the preparation is important to seize the golden opportunity. Good fortune has also generated some cases of success in entertainment industry, the field which may have witnessed many ordinary people whose names unexpectedly become popular and emerge as a phenomenon. In fact, they could be experts in some domains or even possess no typical talent and luck serves the key factor in their success in capturing public attention.

On the other hand, the role of diligence and determination should be considered as the determining factor leading to one's attainment. It could be explained that luck might only show up temporarily and without needed skills, preparation and persistence, people could fail in achieving their long-term targets. In fact, many extraordinary achievers assure that their goals are attained by their continuous effort and passion to the fields they pursue. Jack Ma, one of the self-made billionaires with humble beginnings, is the prime example. After being rejected by almost 30 employers, he never stopped by treating those failures as opportunities to propel himself to become an inspirational figure for people these days.

In conclusion, luck may lead to success in a few cases, but lifelong achievement will only come and be recognized if the best effort and perseverance are dedicated to the work.

Sample 19:

It is argued that people's success mostly depends on luck instead of other elements. While I agree that luck can have a significant impact on helping people achieve their goals. I would argue that hard work and determination are far more important than luck.

On the one hand, l accept that luck can be considered as a contributory factor to an individual's success. ln fact, there are some people who are fortune enough to be born in a rich family, which can help them easily achieve their targets because they have better educational opportunities and better career prospects than those coming from poor families. Moreover, some individuals are born with natural talents, which might help them succeed in their own career. A striking example of this is Mozart, a naturally gifted composer, who can compose many works at the age of five.

On the other hand, I would argue that luck is not the key element leading to success. First, industrious people tend to attain their goals. For example, Ronaldo had to undertake many years of intensive training to become a professional and talented football player. Second, determination can help people reach their goals. Take Nick Vujicic as a good example. Although he does not have any hands and legs, he can overcome difficulties by his own determination in order to become an Australian motivational speaker.

In short, in my opinion, luck might have an important role in one’s success, but it is not the most crucial factor leading to success.

Bình luận


Bình luận

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some people take the view that criminal behavior is a product of an individual's inherent nature, while others argue that it is the outcome of poverty and societal factors. Although there are cogent arguments for the former view, I still lean towards the social issues and poverty theory.

Those who argue that crime is rooted in an individual's personality traits and moral compass suggest that some individuals are simply predisposed to engage in criminal behavior due to factors such as personality. They argue that some people either have a natural inclination towards aggression, violence, and rule-breaking. These individuals are believed to engage in criminal activities by choice despite having access to legal means of earning a living. In fact, some serial killers are known for their violent and sadistic crimes, which were often carried out with a sense of pleasure or enjoyment.

In my view, crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty. This is because individuals may turn to criminal behavior when they are faced with limited opportunities, financial insecurity, and social inequality. These conditions can lead to frustration, hopelessness, and despair, which can ultimately push individuals towards criminal behavior as a means of survival or escape. For example, a young person who grows up in a community with few employment possibilities may feel that their only option for financial survival is to engage in drug dealing.

In conclusion, while there are certainly some individuals who exhibit consistent patterns of aggressive or antisocial behavior, these traits alone are not sufficient to explain why people commit crimes. Therefore, I believe that the majority of crime is driven by socioeconomic factors.

Sample 2:

Opinions differ as to whether crime is caused by social issues and poverty or by people’s evil nature. Personally, I agree with the former view.

It is understandable why some people claim that our nature is the root of crime. Perhaps they have witnessed some children commit wrongdoing at some point in their lives. For example, many physically strong children tend to bully others at school, while others may perform mischievous acts like lying to adults or stealing money from their parents. These experiences lead people to believe that humans are purely good or bad by nature, and those who engage in misconduct at a young age will likely become criminals.

However, the point mentioned above is deeply flawed. Everyone possesses their own good and bad nature, and it is the environment that triggers people’s evil side and causes them to commit crime. One major cause of crime in many countries is inadequate education. Poorly educated youngsters may struggle to discern between right and wrong; therefore, they are more likely to commit crimes without even knowing. Poverty is another root cause of crime because those living in impoverished conditions may turn to stealing or robbing as the final solution to make ends meet. A corrupt political system can also be a breeding ground for crime because the politicians there have to comply with the corruption, regardless of their personal intentions.

In conclusion, though some might think that crime results from a person’s bad nature, I believe it is more likely caused by social problems, such as poor education, corrupt political systems, and poverty. People are both good and bad by nature, and the environment in which they live determines whether they become criminals.

Sample 3:

When it comes to crime rates, some individuals claim that criminal activity is solely the result of innate characteristics, while others argue that it is the outcome of societal issues and impoverishment. In my opinion, socioeconomic challenges and inequality are more likely to prompt people to engage in illegal behaviours.

On the one hand, criminality could represent the result of an inherent personality. In some cases, crime is merely the result of a person’s impulsive actions and lack of moral compass. Various factors such as upbringing, personal beliefs, and psychological disorders may all play a role when it comes to criminal activity. Some people, for example, may have grown up in environments in which illegal conduct is normalised, causing them to assume that such behaviour is acceptable. Similarly, those with mental health disorders like sociopathy or psychopathy may be inclined to committing crimes due to their inability to empathise with victims.

On the other hand, societal problems and economic hardship may contribute to criminal conduct. Poverty with limited access to food, clothing, shelter, healthcare, and schooling can push people to the brink of desperation, prompting them to resort to criminal behaviour as a means of survival. People who are financially strapped in various urban areas, for instance, may turn to illegal activities like drug trafficking or burglary in order to make ends meet. Once poverty and crime are intertwined, it may ultimately develop into a vicious cycle that is challenging to escape. Furthermore, socioeconomic issues such as discrimination, inequality, and corruption may promote crime through fostering an environment of dissatisfaction and rage. Those who experience discrimination or who believe the system is stacked against them are more inclined to turn to illegal behaviour as a form of protest or vengeance.

To summarise, aside from personal psychological factors, I believe that social difficulties and poverty can have a greater impact on crime rates.

Sample 4:

Crime has been studied by many scientific disciplines, with some people ascribing it to social problems and poverty, and others thinking that it is caused by the criminal’s nature. In this, I believe that unlawful behavior is more likely the result of defective personal qualities.

Several explanations can support crime being a function of inferior socioeconomic factors. Firstly, poverty reduces access to education and employment, causing hopelessness and desperation as a result. Having been deprived of opportunities, people may turn to crime to get by. Furthermore, people whose environment is rife with social problems may be accustomed to illegal behavior, making it easier for themselves to engage in criminal activities later on. A child who grows up in a neighborhood with drug problems could turn into a drug dealer himself, since he has witnessed drug abuse and addiction as a norm. It could, therefore, be argued that social issues and poverty create criminals.

However, the view that crime is a result of the perpetrator’s nature is no less convincing. Proponents of this belief claim that certain traits, such as impulsivity, aggression, and callousness, predispose individuals to immoral or unethical behavior. People with these traits become less considerate when they perceive any threat to their self-interest, making them likely to ignore the consequences of their actions. Others, meanwhile, carry undiagnosed psychological disorders, and their condition makes them more prone to committing crimes. A large share of the prison population, especially repeat offenders, are affected by sociopathy, a disorder usually characterized by inhibited compassion towards others. It is not well-understood otherwise, and education has only been partially effective in mitigating sociopathy’s effects. For these reasons, criminals’ nature is definitely worth looking at as a cause of their offenses.

In conclusion, while both views can be supported by evidence, I believe one’s personality is a more indicative factor of whether they are likely to commit crimes. Hence, it is crucial that parents and guardians pay attention to how they shape their children’s nature.

Sample 5:

For millennia, philosophers and scientists have held countless debates on personality. Some believe in the inherent crooked nature of humanity while others argue that they are the product of their environment. This essay wishes to explore both sides of the argument.

Nativists believe that personalities and manners are inherent and genetic, so crime is innate. Credible evidence of this would be the correlation between lead exposure and crime rate. In the 1940s, the USA was the prime consumer of lead-based products, such as paint and gasoline, so babies conceived, born, and raised during this period were lead-poisoned. They later suffered from poorer impulse control and higher aggressivity. As adults, they contributed to the surplus in levels of violent crime. However, it should be noted that genes do not cause behavior but influence it through their effects on the body's response to the environment.

Supporters of Environmentalism concede that criminal behaviors are determined by family and other people, education opportunities, as well as physical circumstances. This school of thought is supported by several studies. some of them focused on the negative link between vegetation and crime. It was shown that in neighborhoods with more greenery, fewer crimes were reported. One explanation for this was that the environment gave its residents a sense of safety and security.

It should be noted that the nature-nurture debate has not been taken as seriously as it used to be. Essentially, every facet of personality development results from interaction between genes and environment. If the authorities aim at reducing the rate of crime and violence, they should take action in improving residential areas as well as enhancing healthcare.

Sample 6:

Many people consider that innate characteristics are responsible for the fact that some people choose to turn to a career of crime. While I accept that crime may result from individual characteristics of violence or greed, I would argue that it is largely a consequence of social issues and poverty.

There is a belief that a person’s nature determines whether or not they become a criminal. Firstly, some argue that an individual who is cruel turns to crime more easily than a kind person. For instance, a child bullying other boys or girls at school may turn into a violent criminal in the future. Secondly, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness could also breed future offenders, who seek to acquire easy money without working for it. A number of youngsters choose to steal from others, instead of working hard to make an honest living. These are strong reasons for thinking that those who have an inborn bad nature are more likely to break the law.

Nevertheless, it seems to me that social issues and poverty are the main causes behind crime. There are many problems in society which might lead to an increase in the crime rate. For example, unemployment pushes people into resorting to crime because they simply cannot find a job. As a consequence, the number of offenders has climbed in many countries over recent decades. Another reason is that, more broadly, poverty in general leads to a rise in crime. If people do not have enough money to make ends meet, they will be tempted to pursue illegal activities just to support themselves and their families.

In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that the principal causes of crime are a result of social conditions and problems.

Sample 7:

The causes of crime have long been a topic of debate. While some argue that crime stems from a person's inherent nature, I do believe it is the result of social problems and poverty

On the one hand, advocates of the view that crime results from a person's nature suggest that individuals with cruel tendencies are more likely to engage in criminal activities. This is because cruelty often correlates with a lack of empathy, disregard for others' well-being, and aggressive behavior, all of which can lead to crime. For example, a child who bullies others at school may grow up to become a violent criminal. Additionally, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness can breed future offenders who seek easy money without working for it. Many young people, lured by the prospect of quick and easy money, turn to cybercrime, engaging in online scams, hacking, and identity theft.

On the other hand, some, myself included, argue that crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty, a perspective I support. Social issues, such as unemployment, can push people towards crime as they struggle to find legitimate employment. The widening gap between the rich and the poor exacerbates this issue, as seen in places like Rio De Janeiro, where high crime rates are prevalent in impoverished areas. Poverty is another significant factor; individuals struggling to make ends meet may resort to illegal activities to support themselves and their families. This explains why people in dire need often turn to theft or other crimes for survival.

In conclusion, while inherent personal traits can contribute to criminal behavior, social problems and poverty play a more significant role in driving people towards crime. Addressing these underlying issues is crucial for reducing crime rates.

Sample 8:

Crime is a complex issue that elicits varied perspectives regarding its origins. While some argue that crime is primarily a consequence of social problems and poverty, others contend that it stems from an individual’s inherent nature. I contend that the interplay between societal factors and individual predispositions contributes significantly to criminal behavior.

I concur with the notion that crime often finds its roots in social problems and poverty, where the impact of socioeconomic conditions significantly steers an individual’s choices. For example, in underprivileged areas, the absence of adequate educational facilities, job prospects, and robust social support structures may force individuals into a corner, compelling them to turn to illicit means for survival. Moreover, when societal disparities are rife and systemic issues remain unaddressed, it can exacerbate the situation, causing individuals to resort to criminal activities as a perceived solution to their economic struggles or as a means to voice their grievances about prevalent social injustices.

However, I am also of the opinion that the origins of crime are not solely tethered to external factors; rather, an individual’s innate disposition can also play a crucial role. Some individuals might exhibit inherent psychological disorders that predispose them to engage in unlawful activities, regardless of their social background. Furthermore, the absence of strong moral values or ethical guidance in an individual’s upbringing can be a contributing factor, irrespective of their socioeconomic circumstances. Instances abound where individuals from affluent backgrounds have succumbed to criminal behavior due to the lack of a strong moral compass in their formative years, indicating that individual nature can play a pivotal role in shaping criminal inclinations.

In conclusion, I believe crime’s origin is not solely attributed to either social problems or an individual’s nature; rather, it is a complex interplay between societal factors and personal inclinations.

Sample 9:

There are divergent opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. Some people argue that external factors such as poverty or other social issues are to blame for most crimes, while others contend that people who engage in criminal activity are intrinsically bad in nature. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and provide my own opinion.

On the one hand, those who believe that social problems are the primary cause of criminal behavior argue that people are driven to commit crimes due to their difficult and disadvantaged circumstances. For example, individuals facing extreme poverty or unemployment may resort to stealing or other illicit activities as a means of survival. Proponents of this view also point out that issues such as substance abuse or mental illness can exacerbate criminal tendencies, emphasizing the importance of addressing underlying social difficulties to reduce crime rates.

On the other hand, there is a counterargument that criminal behavior arises from individual traits such as impulsivity, selfishness, or a lack of empathy. This perspective suggests that some people have a natural tendency to engage in harmful behavior, regardless of environmental factors. In support of this view, critics of the social circumstance theory point out that there are people who grow up in difficult circumstances but do not resort to crime, indicating that innate character traits play a significant role.

In my view, it is likely that both factors play a role in criminal behavior. While social issues can be a significant driver of crime, it is also true that some individuals may be more inclined to engage in criminal activity due to inherent character flaws. Therefore, addressing both the root causes of social problems and providing intervention programs that focus on individual development could be effective in reducing crime rates.

In conclusion, there are varying opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. While some argue that criminal activity is solely attributable to social problems, others believe that individual traits play a more significant role. In my opinion, it is essential to consider both perspectives and work towards comprehensive solutions to reduce the prevalence of crime in our society.

Sample 10:

Crime is a complex issue with multiple contributing factors. While some argue that most crimes result from circumstances like poverty and social problems, I believe they are caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature.

On one hand, there are several factors that lead people to believe that most crimes stem from circumstances. Firstly, individuals who grow up in deprived environments often lack access to basic needs such as education, healthcare, and stable employment, leading them to potentially turn to crime as a means of survival or escape from their circumstances. For example, high crime rates in low-income neighborhoods can be attributed to individuals struggling to meet basic needs such as food, housing, and healthcare, and with limited access to education and job opportunities, they may resort to criminal activities like theft or drug dealing to make ends meet. Secondly, exposure to violence and crime from a young age can normalize these behaviors. For instance, children from households with domestic violence may become desensitized to violent behavior and replicate it in their own relationships.

On the other hand, I do believe that crime is caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature. Firstly, those who commit crimes may have a predisposition to violence and deviant behavior, regardless of their upbringing or environment. Ted Bundy, for instance, despite his stable upbringing and education, committed numerous murders. His actions suggest an inherent predisposition to violence and deviance, highlighting the role of personal moral character in criminal behavior. Secondly, some research indicates that genetic and environmental factors can increase the likelihood of engaging in criminal activities. For instance, a longitudinal study conducted by the National Institute of Justice followed a group of individuals from childhood into adulthood and found that those with a family history of criminal behavior were more likely to engage in similar activities.

In conclusion, while circumstances like poverty and social problems contribute to crime, I believe that personal moral character and inherent predispositions play a more significant role in criminal behavior.

Sample 11:

Crime is a prevalent issue in modern society and understanding its root causes is important for its effective prevention and control. Some people argue that most crimes are the result of circumstances such as poverty or other social problems. Others believe that criminal behaviour stems from individuals who are bad in nature. In my opinion, most crimes are the consequence of socioeconomic circumstances.

Individuals who believe that crime is the result of inheriting bad nature think that even though people who live in affluent societies with minimal social problems, are subjected to face crimes. They believe that personal choices and moral failings are significant contributors to criminal behaviour. For example, studies have indicated that people who possess personality traits such as impulsivity and aggressiveness are more likely to engage in criminal activities. 

On the other hand, proponents of the view that crime is a result of poverty and social issues argue that individuals coming from poor backgrounds are forced to commit crimes because of necessity. When a person’s basic needs such as food, shelter and security are unmet, they may resort to illegal activities as a means of survival. For instance, incidents like theft and burglary are more common in economically deprived societies where everyone is striving to make ends meet. Furthermore, social problems such as lack of education, unemployment and substance abuse exacerbate the situation. Without access to quality education, many individuals cannot secure well-paying jobs, leading them to seek alternative, often illegal, means of income.

In my opinion, poverty and social problems create an environment where crime can flourish. When individuals are deprived of opportunities and resources, the temptation to break the law becomes stronger. Additionally, the social environment, including peer influence and community norms, plays a crucial role in shaping behaviour. 

In conclusion, addressing these root causes through social policies aimed at reducing poverty, improving education, and providing employment opportunities is essential for effective crime prevention. By creating a more equitable and supportive society, the incidence of crime can be significantly reduced.

Sample 12:

Throughout history, people tended to believe that crimes were committed by those who were innately bad, but in the modern era a more liberal approach has led to the idea that crimes are often acts of desperation, committed by people whose circumstances are bleak. This essay will explore both perspectives, concluding that the latter is usually true.

First of all, it should be noted that some crimes are committed by people who appear innately driven towards such acts. These people may have some sort of hereditary psychological condition that means they do not feel empathy for others, or a predilection towards violence. This is a controversial perspective and although it feels true for many, it is hard to prove. Many of the most violent criminals have traumatic backgrounds, such as child abuse, neglect, or sexual assault, which suggests that they were not born with their criminal compunctions, but rather that these developed very early, which thus places them more into the circumstances than nature category. However, the lines are blurry.

Certainly, it does seem as though most criminals are created out of difficult circumstances. To understand this, one just has to look at impoverished communities around the world. These are places where crime flourishes because the people there are desperate and forced to do immoral things in order to survive. In such states of despair, people tend to put themselves first and overlook social norms, laws, and the usual empathic perspective that would stop most people from hurting others. In such areas, people tend to be conditioned for a young age to ignore the law or even social decency, joining gangs and becoming influenced by dangerous people. This tends to be a problem due to a lack of resources, opportunities, and education in such areas.

In conclusion, it appears likely that most crime is the result of people’s unfortunate circumstances, meaning that criminals are not inherently bad. However, there may be some people who were born with a certain compunction towards violent or criminal activity.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Television has become an integral part of our daily lives, and its influence on children cannot be underestimated. While some argue that children can learn effectively through television and should be encouraged to watch it both at home and school, I strongly disagree with this notion. In this essay, I will present arguments against the idea of promoting excessive television watching among children.

Firstly, television watching is a passive activity that lacks the interactivity and engagement required for optimal learning outcomes. While children may absorb information from television programmes, they often lack the opportunity to actively participate, ask questions, and engage in critical thinking. In contrast, traditional educational settings such as classrooms promote active learning, where students can interact with teachers and peers, ask questions, and engage in discussions. This active involvement enhances comprehension, critical thinking skills, and the ability to apply knowledge in real-world situations. This is why young children do not learn effectively from watching TV.

Furthermore, excessive television viewing can have detrimental effects on children's physical and mental well-being. Prolonged sedentary behaviour associated with watching television can contribute to a sedentary lifestyle, leading to various health issues such as obesity, cardiovascular problems, and poor posture. Moreover, excessive screen time can adversely affect children's cognitive development and attention span. Research has shown that excessive exposure to screens, including television, can lead to attention deficits and decreased academic performance. In contrast, encouraging children to engage in physical activities, interactive play, and reading promotes their overall well-being and cognitive development.

In conclusion, television is not a substitute for interactive and engaging learning experiences. Moreover, excessive television viewing can have negative effects on children's learning, physical health, and cognitive development. Therefore, it is important to encourage children to participate in interactive learning environments, such as classrooms, rather than watching TV.

Sample 2:

Television, as a learning tool, could be useful if children watch the right programmes for a limited duration of time each day. I do believe that TV can be a very powerful learning tool for children, and that is why they should be allowed to watch TV programmes both at home and school, but within the teacher's and parent's watch.

To begin with, though I am no longer a student, I can still learn better by watching TV rather than reading books. Whenever I tune on to the History Channel, BBC or National Geographic Channel, I can learn new things. This is also true for school-going children. My younger brother, who is a college student with a History major, heavily relies on History Channel documentaries to enhance his knowledge of history. 

Moreover, TV programmes are the audio-visual presentation of an event, story or fact, and thus have lasting impressions on our brains. If the right programmes are chosen for children, they will learn faster by watching TV. For instance, one of our neighbours allows her 3 years old daughter to watch Rhymes on the internet TV channels, and she can recite most of those rhymes. According to her mother, the girl has learned more effectively by watching animated cartoons that have rhymes than by reading books. Since TV is a powerful learning tool, we can use it in school for educational purposes.

In conclusion, as parents and teachers, we must pick suitable educational programmes for our youngsters both in school and at home. I believe that TV is a good pedagogical tool, and hence its use in the school and home for both educational and recreational purposes should be allowed.

Sample 3:

Modern technology has undoubtedly made learning easier and better. Most children's parents encourage them to watch shows to gain information and acquire new knowledge. While I agree that watching television has some positive effects on a child, I believe this trend has a more detrimental effect on our children and society in general.

First and foremost, watching television can have some positive effects on children. There are, in fact, considerable advantages to incorporating television into homes and educational institutions. Many informative broadcasters, like National Geographic and Discovery, exist solely for educational reasons. Moreover, viewing television may increase the concentration and attention of some people. For instance, children with autism and behaviour problems have a concentration weakness; research has demonstrated that these children have enhanced their focus and concentration and are capable of watching television for prolonged periods. Therefore, it is obvious that somehow this trend has some beneficial consequences.

Similarly, I believe that watching television has several negative adverse effects. Spending time watching television can divert attention from healthy pastimes like outdoor activity with colleagues, leading to weight gain and feelings of loneliness. In addition, some programmes are created for entertainment, not teaching; these programmes have violent scenes and inappropriate terminology, which hurt children's brains. In addition, prolonged watching television may prevent reading a book and informative articles. Consequently, children would lack intellectual and problem-solving abilities. The negative impacts of television on the psychological and physical well-being of children can be determined.

In summation, I believe that television watching has more drawbacks than benefits. Under the supervision of both their parents and educators, children may spend more time watching purely for informative and educational reasons.

Sample 4:

Nowadays, television sets are now utilized as an educational tool. Many people believe that teenagers can absorb more efficiently while watching television. I fully agree with the concept that television might benefit youngsters in increasing their knowledge. This essay will look into the several reasons for this approval.

I feel that television is incredibly good for youngsters for two primary reasons. First, kids have access to a plethora of informative television channels, such as National Geographic and discovery, which are quite captivating to watch. This option might, in my opinion, considerably expand students’ understanding of Biology and Geography. Another consideration is that watching television helps reduce the school-related anxiety that teenagers are prone to. If, for instance, a youngster receives a poor grade in a specific subject, classmates would likely tease him or her. Consequently, I would suggest that televisions may be advantageous in some instances. It is evident that, by viewing the news on television, students receive a significant amount of information and learn about the world's various cultures and critical problems.

In contrast, I feel that we should not push youngsters to watch television constantly because it makes them less productive and inactive. Moreover, numerous studies have already demonstrated that televisions not only make individuals idle but also cause overweight. I believe that many schools offer physical education classes, even though television can make children less active.

In summation, although it is obvious that television makes an individual less active, I am convinced that teenagers learn more efficiently while watching television, for the reasons I have explained throughout. 

Sample 5:

In this 21st century, digitalization has replaced all the old-schooled theories in educational institutes. Moreover, it is claimed that teenagers can effectively study while watching television at home and school. Although I agree that youngsters sometimes can learn from watching television, I do not consider it to be a good idea to encourage this activity.

Firstly, children's study is occasionally enhanced by television viewing. Numerous television programmes provide visual information and tales that enhance the process of learning interesting as well as the content easier to understand. It is a good way to encourage students to learn, particularly when they are tired of academics and assignments. Some applications, for instance, present appealing stories of literature, enhancing children's comprehension. These tools also make it simpler for youngsters to memorize poetry, as it is challenging and tiring for young children to remember poetry by continuously repeating them.

In contrast, I believe that prolonged watching of television may damage a child's academic performance. First, television programmes can serve as a distraction from their academics, especially when they are not attentive. Some programmes employ games to assist youngsters to learn more efficiently, yet youngsters may become more involved in the pleasure and so acquire little. Furthermore, continuous TV viewing alone could lead to an absence of human engagement. If children have queries while watching the television, their instructors cannot immediately address them, which would be most likely to lead to misunderstandings.

To conclude, even though viewing television encourages children to take an interest in learning, I believe that youngsters should not consume too much television because it has a negative consequence on their academics.

Sample 6:

With the development of technology, the media plays an important role in the field of education. Many people are of the opinion that when students are taught with the help of computers, mobile phones, and even television, they learn productively. As far as I am concerned, educating a child with the help of television at school and home is commendable, but there should be a limit to the exposure, otherwise, there may be a hindrance to their mental and physical development.

Childhood is a period when everyone enjoys the simple pleasures of life. Running with friends, pursuing adventures, enjoying ice cream and chocolates are some of the activities that make them happy. Nowadays, children are glued to their television or computer screens. There is no scope for physical activity, and they become obese or unhealthy. If the children continuously come in contact with television at home as well as at school, the rays from the screen may affect their eyesight.

Apart from this, when children watch television at home and school, they become addicted. For example, when a child is shown animated videos to understand certain topics, they get an excuse to watch videos on youtube. They tell their parents that the teacher had asked them to watch those videos to understand the topic better. In this way, the parents are bound to allow them and are unable to keep track of their activity. Moreover, some programs on television show excessive violence, which excites the children. They may try to copy their favourite superhero and get hurt in the process. The crime shows may even instigate them to behave in a rude or anti-social way which ultimately becomes detrimental to their development.

Yet, it is irrefutable that television is an effective tool to educate children and adults alike. While shows on National Geography, Animal Planet and Discovery tap on the scientific evolution of a child’s mind, cartoons or game shows help them relax after a long day of study and activities.

To put it in a nutshell, even though watching television both at home and school might help the children, the negative effects outweigh the positive side. So, according to me, elders should keep an eye on their wards and allow them limited time to watch television at home and school.

Sample 7:

As a professional in the field of education, I strongly disagree with the idea that children should be encouraged to watch television regularly at home and at school. While it is true that television can be a source of information and entertainment, it is not a suitable medium for effective learning for children.

First and foremost, excessive television viewing can have detrimental effects on a child’s physical and mental health. Studies have shown that children who spend too much time in front of a screen are at a higher risk of obesity, sleep disturbances, and attention problems. Moreover, the content of television programs is often not age-appropriate and can expose children to violence, inappropriate language, and negative behaviors.

Furthermore, watching television does not promote active learning or critical thinking skills. Unlike interactive educational activities, such as reading, writing, and hands-on experiments, television viewing is a passive experience that does not engage children in the learning process. It is important for children to develop their cognitive abilities and problem-solving skills through active participation in educational activities, rather than passively absorbing information from a screen.

Instead of encouraging children to watch television regularly, it is essential to provide them with alternative and more effective learning opportunities. Schools should focus on creating a stimulating and interactive learning environment, where children can engage in hands-on activities, discussions, and group projects. At home, parents should limit screen time and encourage their children to participate in outdoor activities, sports, and hobbies that promote physical and mental well-being.

In conclusion, while television can be a source of entertainment, it is not an effective medium for children to learn. Instead of promoting regular television viewing, it is crucial to provide children with active and engaging learning experiences that foster their overall development.

Sample 8:

Some parents believe that watching television is bad for their children. So, they try to restrict their children from watching TV. In a different way, others think that there is nothing bad in watching TV programmes. Personally, I think that watching TV brings tremendous benefits to children unless they spend a lot of their valuable time in front of a TV set daily. It is recommended that children should spend less than a couple of hours daily watching TV programmes, and those programmes should be suitable for them. For the following reasons, which I will mention below, I believe that television plays an essential role in a child’s development.

First of all, television helps a child to extend his or her range of interests. Children can find out many new things and make many exciting discoveries for themselves. In addition to this practical benefit, television improves children’s vocabulary, their memory and gives them the opportunity to gain more knowledge. It is essential for a child’s growth. Of cause, someone can say that there are plenty of different resources of information such as books and teachers. But, I think, in our modern world children must learn faster and use all contemporary technology in order to succeed.

Secondly, watching cognitive programs helps children to learn more about wildlife, our environment and about the importance of preserving our forest and wild animals that live there. However, scientists say that a child should not watch TV for more than 40 minutes successively and not more than 2-3 hours per day. For example, my mother always made us have a break after watching TV more than half an hour and let our eyes rest for several minutes before turning on the TV again. She did not let us watch the TV all day long as well. I think it is the best solution.

To sum up, I believe that television gives children and all people the opportunity to learn what cannot be learnt from books. Television and movies, in particular, allow people to feel the reality and see what they will most likely not be able to see in their lives. Personally, when I was a child, I liked to watch cognitive programs about wild animals. Unfortunately, my family had only one TV, but these programs were the only ones we all wanted to watch. So, we gathered in our living room and watched them in complete silence. I always remember those moments with a smile.

Sample 9:

It is irrefutable that TV is a very efficient teacher. However, I disagree that children should be motivated to watch TV both at home and at school. I shall put forth my arguments to support my views in the following paragraphs.

There is no doubt that TV can be a powerful means of delivering information and a nice part of the learning process. Being an audiovisual medium more effective result can be achieved. What is seen is retained longer in the minds of children. There are some things which can be very easily taught by visual illustrations. Even boring subjects like history can be made interesting with the help of TV.

However, if TV is to be used as an educational tool, then very strict monitoring would be needed as to what children watch on TV. All those talk shows and soap operas we can see every day are a complete waste of time and can even have negative effects by distracting children from their studies. Moreover, most so-called educational programmes like National Geographic cannot replace books and academic lectures because they tend to entertain people and have not an aim to give deep and concentrated knowledge. It is highly unlikely that TV channel directors would abandon their profits and change talk shows to lectures and video lessons.

Furthermore, if children watch TV in school also then their interaction with the teacher would be limited. Teachers teach a lot of things apart from academics. They can come down to the level of the student and can also stimulate children to learn. What is more, children would read less when they learn everything from TV. Reading is an active activity as compared to TV which is a passive activity. So, it would be detrimental to the holistic development of children.

To put it in a nutshell I pen down saying that, although TV is a very good educational medium, it should be used within limits and whatever children learn from TV should also be carefully monitored by parents and teachers.

Sample 10:

Nowadays, many educational institutes are focusing on the usage of screens for learning in kids. Some people are of the view that learning through screen should be encouraged for young kids. My opinion, I completely disagree with acquiring knowledge through television screens. In this essay, I am going to support my opinion before giving a reasoned conclusion.

On the one hand, screening for long hours for educational purposes is likely to put strain on the eyes of youngsters. This is because television screens are likely to release rays that may impact vision in young kids. As a result of this, the younger kids will need to wear glasses at every age. Additionally, vision impairment due to screening is not restricted to weak eyesight but also to severe headaches for days or even blurry vision. For instance, nowadays, ophthalmologists believe that long hours of screening are the main cause of vision impairment in kids. Also, they emphasize the limitation of screen time for kids at a young age.

Secondly, viewing learning programs on tv continuously is likely to impact young kids' physical and mental well-being. As when kids do screen time, they are unlikely to do any form of physical movement. Hence, sitting constantly and just watching videos online will make youngsters lethargic and tired. Moreover, learning through screens, even at home, will result in obesity, leading to other personality development issues in young ones. Along with that, learning without a screen tends to enhance analytical and cognitive capabilities in kids. For instance, when learning through screens, kids only make use of a few of their senses, while off-screen learning involves the usage of many other senses. Undoubtedly, off-screen learning involves eyes, ears, hands, and touch, which also helps develop the brain in young kids.

In conclusion, learning through tv screen can impact the eyes in young kids and may lead to vision impairment. Also, constant viewing of tv screens is not good for the physical and mental well-being of young ones.

Sample 11:

It is acknowledged that children may benefit from watching television programs, such as educational programs. However, I disagree with the recommendation that watching television should be a regular activity at school and st home, as this would produce more negative outcomes than positive ones.

It has received wide cognition that many television programs can moticate children’s learning enthusiasm, thus encouraging them to expand their knowledge in terms of normal school subjects and after-school activities. However, there are still many problems associated with the increased time of sitting in front of a TV screen.

If children spend time watching television every day at school and at home, they may face the probability of suffering obesity, eye problems and back problems. When they are studying at school, it would be advisable for them to focus on learning, acquiring knowledge on academic subjects. Besides, more active and aggressive activities should be encouraged as they are in a physical state when they should participate in more sports activities. But watching television seems to do more harm than good in their physical development.

Furthermore, it is true that children waste a lot of time playing electronic gadgets after school, resulting in the fact that many of them have become highly addicted to these gadgets. If they are asked to watch television regularly, they would certainly lack interpersonal interaction. It would be more beneficial if they play games with their parents or do the housework.

In conclusion, although television programs would do good to children’s learning in some ways, they definitely would cause more disadvantageous effects if watching them becomes a daily routine for children.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Vietjack official store
Đăng ký gói thi VIP

VIP +1 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 1 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +3 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 3 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +6 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 6 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +12 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 12 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay