2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án (Phần 17)

Sample 1:

In recent years, there has been a growing debate about whether movies and TV shows are effective in teaching history despite their occasional lack of historical accuracy. While some people argue that these forms of media are unreliable and do not accurately represent historical events, others believe that they can be valuable tools for learning about the past. In this essay, I will argue that movies and TV shows can indeed be useful for studying history, even if they are not always entirely accurate.

Firstly, movies and TV shows can provide a more engaging and memorable way to learn about history compared to traditional textbooks or lectures. These visual media can transport viewers to another time and place, allowing them to experience historical events and cultures firsthand. Moreover, they can evoke emotions and create a connection with characters, which can make historical events more relatable and easier to remember.

Secondly, while movies and TV shows may not be entirely accurate, they can still offer valuable insights into historical events and perspectives. Even if the specifics of a particular scene or character are not accurate, the overall themes and messages of a film or show can still be relevant and informative. For example, the portrayal of the American Civil War in the movie “Gone with the Wind” may not be entirely accurate, but it still provides a glimpse into the social and political tensions of the time.

However, it is important to note that movies and TV shows should not be the only source of historical information. They should be viewed as supplementary tools to traditional resources, such as textbooks and scholarly articles. It is also crucial to critically evaluate the accuracy of the media being consumed and to seek out additional sources to verify historical information.

In conclusion, while movies and TV shows may not be entirely accurate, they can still be useful tools for studying history. They offer a more engaging and memorable way to learn about the past, and they can provide valuable insights into historical events and perspectives. However, it is important to view them as supplementary sources and to critically evaluate their accuracy.

Sample 2:

Movies and TV shows have become a popular medium for learning about historical events and periods. While it is true that these forms of entertainment often take creative liberties with historical accuracy, I believe that they can still be a valuable tool for studying history to a certain extent.

Firstly, movies and TV shows have the ability to bring history to life in a way that textbooks and lectures cannot. They have the power to engage viewers on an emotional level, allowing them to develop a deeper understanding and connection to the events being portrayed. For example, a well-made historical drama can provide a vivid and immersive experience of a particular time period, making it easier for audiences to grasp the social, political, and cultural dynamics of that era.

Moreover, movies and TV shows can spark an interest in history and encourage further research and learning. While it is important to acknowledge the inaccuracies present in these forms of media, they can serve as a starting point for individuals to explore and investigate the actual historical facts. This can lead to a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the subject matter.

However, it is crucial for viewers to approach historical movies and TV shows with a critical mindset. They should be aware of the potential inaccuracies and distortions and seek out additional sources to verify the information presented. Relying solely on entertainment media for historical knowledge can lead to misconceptions and misunderstandings.

In conclusion, while movies and TV shows may not always provide a completely accurate portrayal of history, they can still be a valuable and engaging way to learn about the past. When approached with caution and supplemented with further research, they can contribute to a more enriched understanding of historical events and periods.

Sample 3:

A commonly held belief is that the purpose of films and sitcoms is solely to entertain people. However, I am in complete agreement with the view that despite being inaccurate at times, they can support learning if utilised appropriately by the teachers to impart historical knowledge. 

One of the significant benefits of using historical shows and films in the teaching process is that the lessons become engaging for students who get easily bored by traditional history lessons. However, it is for the teacher to identify appropriate movies/series and relate them to the subject matter. For instance, the movie ‘Just Mercy’ which is based on a true story, can definitely be shown to students as it talks about the history of Civil Rights in the United States.

Another significant reason why these media should be a part of the learning process is that in a multi-sensory teaching environment, learning is faster, and retention is stronger. Students can relate better to movies and TV series which bring history to life. For instance, a movie like ‘Hidden Figures’ can showcase to the students the critical role that women of colour played in the growth and success of the U.S. space program at NASA, despite the odds they faced. 

In conclusion, history can be quite a boring subject if taught the traditional way. Hence, although the historical events one sees on celluloid and on the TV screen are made larger than life and sometimes exaggerated as well, they can make history much more interesting and fascinating to the students and should therefore definitely be used as tools to enhance learning.

Sample 4:

It is believed by some that films and television programs are a potent method to study events of earlier times even though they may not be precise. I completely agree with the given viewpoint as these sources have the power to create interest in the minds of their audience.

Firstly, making oneself aware of historical events through movies and shows will be an entertaining way to learn, mainly because of the flamboyance in their various aspects, be it the costumes or the sets. Although there may be some over-dramatisation, it is still a better way to learn as opposed to just reading historical books, which is a tedious task. Moreover, there is no assurance that these books have a flawless account of past events. For example, many history students are not interested in reading the gruesome details of events like the partition of India and Pakistan; however, movies showcasing the same information usually become blockbusters, and as a result, people are made aware of such events in an entertaining way.

Moreover, learning something through audio and visual effects lasts longer in one’s memory. One may forget what was read in a textbook, but one usually remembers scenes watched in a movie. Such content also has the power to bring out certain emotions in the spectators. For instance, many have heard of the 1984 riots that occurred in India against Sikhs, but the emotions that the television series Jogi has been able to extract from the audience are almost impossible when reading about the same in a textbook.

To conclude, I believe learning about history by watching films and shows is an effective way, given the enjoyment that they bring and also the deep-rooted impact that they leave.

Sample 5:

In a globalized world, it is natural for history TV shows to be global and to have an influence on the human mind to learn about history. The movies and TV shows aim to inform, educate, and entertain people. In this essay, I will explain that movies and TV shows are good ways to enhance the knowledge of history despite the effect of a lack of historical accuracy. Before concluding this topic, both views will be described.

Why do millions of people wish to study movies and TV shows because of their dynamism? Many people believe that movies and TV shows have more influence on the human mind than reading books, which helps them with Laurent’s results. Moreover, it is medically proven that in a story when we depict on screen, the human mind easily acquires and stores it for a long time in mind. Due to the limited length of the film, makers skip the major parts of history chapters and only display important stories.

On the contrary, movies and TV shows are less accurate than real history. Film directors and editors decide, although many factors influence when they make this crucial decision, what to publish and what to broadcast. Most of the time, movies and TV shows are broadcast for entertainment rather than as an education. Moreover, it is a challenging job to make films on history, and filmmakers tend to withhold or censor the board. On top of that, ancient movies that represent history need a big-picture set and a high budget. For example, The Bollywood historical movie “Mughal–a–Azam” took 10 years to make, and the director of this movie sold all his property to complete it.

In conclusion, it is the right approach to acquire education from movies and TV Shows, but it is only worth it if the knowledge is accurate. In the present scenario, filmmakers broadcast movies for entertainment more than education point of view. In this industry, everyone wants a large slice of the cake in the form of profit, not educating the people.

Sample 6:

Despite the lack of accuracy in historical movies and TV shows, some people prefer to learn from them. This essay discusses the extent of the need for accuracy in historical documents.

Imitating the historical events that happened in the past is challenging. People need help to picture everything that is written in words. It is important to create a picture that everyone will like without making it out of the page. So, when a filmmaker tends to direct historical fiction, it’s nearly impossible and unnecessary to pinpoint every detail that is embedded in scripts.

On the other hand, people like to watch historical movies rather than read them. It’s more time-consuming and boring. This is mainly because scripts contain every detail. When a movie is made, the director likes to add some extra genres like a romantic sequel, action block, and so on. It helps the viewers travel through time without fail.

In conclusion, People prefer to watch historical TV shows and movies, even though they may be inaccurate, because of the engagement that movies and TV shows give to their viewers.

Sample 7:

In today’s advanced technological world, many learning methods are available for people. Some individuals believe that digital platforms, such as movies and TV shows, are the best choice for learning about past moments, despite imperfections. I agree and disagree with this statement and will support my decision in the following paragraphs.

First and foremost, on the agreement side, one reason is that visual pictures create a clear frame in people’s minds. Therefore, we can better understand our history by watching shows and movies. For instance, Ramayana and Mahabharata, Indian spiritual serials, both depict ancient history that is not easily understood by reading but becomes more accessible when people watch it on digital screens with various characters playing different roles.

On the other hand, although it positively impacts people, several negative points cannot be neglected. One of them is that it may be unrealistic. This means that when someone creates a video, they can add their own stories to attract more audiences. For example, one of the most popular Hindi movies, “Jodha Akbar,” is famous because of the songs used in it, while in reality, there was no such music at the time. Thus, we can say creators can share unreal information through movies, which can lead to the spread of incorrect knowledge among people.

In conclusion, despite the drawbacks, such as false information, we can gain a lot of knowledge by watching movies and TV shows that are based on history.

Sample 8:

For a decade, the way sharing information has totally changed, especially in recent years, there are many changes that have taken place in the education system; one group of school believe that the audio-visual way of learning is the best for students to learn history and I firmly agree with the writer notion. This essay shall discuss the reasons for my inclination in forthcoming paragraphs.

The first and foremost reason is that now people are living in the era of advanced technology, each and everything is connected to the internet, and the education system is no exception. Nowadays, individuals are becoming more technophiles and young age folks are more towards technology, and the most common reason is that it is easy to access with less boring. For instance, younger person in the family has more knowledge because they are highly attached to new technology.

Furthermore, no one wants to learn bearing subjects and theories in the academy, such as history but cinemas and tv shows can attract pupils to learn about history because they are more attractive and catchy themes. The Indian tv series, series Jodha Akbar was very popular among adolescents. Due to the audio-visuals, juveniles can easily understand and remember the stages of history. Nonetheless, there are few shows regarding history that are not much appropriate to the real story, but that shown could be neglected.

To reiterate, movies and TV shows result in better education, but few sceptics ruin the real story history by putting their own thoughts. Ergo, audio and visuals are fascinating ways of education.

Sample 9:

It is argued that films and television programs are better for learning about past life, despite inaccuracies in the content of history. I completely agree with this statement, as these mediums save individuals time and money. Additionally, they have persuasive power, which can improve people’s living standards.

To begin with, displaying historical events through documentaries saves people time and money. If individuals want to stay well-informed about past life, they would need to travel and spend a significant amount of money. Multimedia helps people access information about history at no extra cost, allowing them to watch the required information on television at home or elsewhere. Although there may be some distortions in the content, it is better to gain something rather than have an empty mind. For example, to learn about the Indus Civilization’s Mohenjo-Daro, a person spends a lot of money, and sometimes, when they don’t feel satisfied, they consider it a useless effort. Movies and TV programs satisfy their desire to learn more about history in an economical way, even with the addition of some fictional characters or technology.

Moreover, multimedia has persuasive power that can transform the lives of ordinary people. When individuals learn about significant events from historical books, they aren’t as influenced as when they watch those events in a film. Films touch the hearts of the public and make them feel proud of their rich culture. As a result, individuals develop a sense of nationalism, which is beneficial for a nation. Although some discrepancies distinguish films from printed material, moving pictures evoke empathy and love for those who have contributed to history. Examples include movies about the 1857 revolt, 1984, and the latest one on farmers’ protests, which have changed the lives of ordinary people. They feel the victims’ suffering and have raised their voices against injustice.

To conclude, it is clear that movies or other TV programs are better for acquiring information about past life, despite containing some distortions. Films or TV serials save time and money for people and influence their lives by adding fictional characters or episodes, making individuals feel proud of their rich heritage.

Sample 1:

In today's world, there is a debate on whether new advancements in forensic science should be utilized to re-examine old criminal cases. While I agree that there are valid reasons for employing this technology in such situations, I also recognize that there are certain drawbacks that need to be considered.

On one hand, utilizing new scientific forensic techniques in old cases can help protect the privacy and well-being of the victims. Regardless of how much time has passed since the crime was committed, it is evident that unresolved cases leave a lasting impact on the victims, causing emotional trauma. By utilizing advanced technology, investigators can potentially uncover new evidence or re-evaluate existing clues, providing closure and justice to the victims.

Furthermore, in the age of information technology, it is becoming increasingly accessible for everyone to use algorithms and machine learning techniques. This accessibility can greatly aid in the investigation of old cases, as it allows for a more efficient and thorough examination of the available evidence. By utilizing new forensic techniques, law enforcement agencies can improve their chances of identifying the culprits and preventing them from committing further crimes, thus protecting innocent individuals from harm.

However, it is important to acknowledge the drawbacks of employing new forensic science in old cases. Firstly, the cost associated with using the latest technology can be substantial. In cases where the evidence is scarce and difficult to gather, the utilization of information technology can quickly become expensive. Victims and their families may be required to bear the financial burden of employing forensic experts or acquiring specialized equipment to solve the case. For instance, in South Korea, the cost of such services can amount to approximately $1,000 per case, including consultation, data tracking, and recovery.

In conclusion, while I agree that utilizing new forensic technology in old cases can provide numerous benefits, such as protecting victims and preventing further crimes, the cost implications need to be carefully considered. It is essential to ensure that the financial burden does not fall solely on the victims and their families. Further discussions and planning must take place to strike a balance between the need for justice and the practicality of utilizing new forensic science in old cases.

Sample 2:

There are interesting debates surrounding the application of forensic science to reopen old judicial cases. I believe that if there is a good chance of true justice being done, then it is absolutely essential and justified that we consider this option. After all, access to justice is a fundamental right to which every citizen is entitled.

The most significant outcome of taking a second look at old cases based on forensic evidence is the possibility of those wrongly convicted being exonerated for a crime that they were never truly responsible for. One can imagine the joy and happiness this could bring to the families of those wrongly convicted. Moreover, it would also ensure that the actual criminal who is guilty of the crime, is convicted and punished appropriately. 

We also have cold cases which have been reopened and solved, thanks to forensic science. For instance, there was the case of the murder of a 22-year-old man in Delhi that remained unsolved for 8 long years. Despite the police suspecting that he was killed by his bride and her lover, they could not do anything, for lack of evidence. Finally, the case was resolved only after it was handed over to forensic experts.

In conclusion, my viewpoint is that the law enforcement authorities should resort to forensics to reopen and solve the erstwhile, unresolved criminal cases and convict the guilty. Forensic expertise should also be used to reopen old cases, convict the guilty and exonerate the innocents that were accused on account of a lack of genuine evidence. In the ultimate analysis, fair justice is what matters.     

Sample 3:

There has been an ongoing debate about the current emphasis of criminal forensics, with some maintaining that this advancing science should be used to reopen cold cases. In my opinion, the primary focus of this practice should be on deterring future criminals, though past crimes can be looked at in service of fairness.

Those who argue that advances in forensic sciences should be used to reinvestigate cold cases highlight humanitarian reasons. They emphasize that there are many criminal cases where the perpetrators are still at large or have been wrongly identified due to a lack of evidence, partly the result of less developed forensic techniques in the past. As science in general, and forensic technology specifically, develops, the victims of these cold cases and their families can now seek justice, as offenders can be better identified by modern technologies. This is self-evidently justified as those who have been wronged have been waiting for years, with some spending their entire lives without being granted the opportunity to prove their innocence.

Old cases aside, criminal forensics should be primarily exploited to prevent crimes from happening in the first place. This is because with these advances, individuals may rethink committing crimes for an increased fear of being identified and captured, effectively deterring would-be criminals. These novel technologies include techniques such as blood spatter analysis, dental identification, bone analysis, and advanced crime scene recreation. Though this technology can be used with greater certainty to deliver justice for cold cases for humanitarian purposes, its potential is not yet fully realised. With government grants and funding from the private sector for the research, development, and promotion of these criminal forensic techniques, there is a strong likelihood that crime rates will continue to decline for decades to come. This concomitant declining crime rate is arguably one of the greatest achievements in the history of criminal justice.

In conclusion, while old cases can be reinvestigated to bring justice to those who have been wrongfully convicted, forensic sciences should be prioritised for the prevention of future crimes. The future use and popularity of this technology is contingent upon governments and the private sector working in tandem to fund and promote this approach.

Sample 4:

In recent years, there have been many significant advancements in the field of forensic science. Many people are of the perception that newer sciences could be effective in investigating older cases. Despite some marginal concerns in this view, I contend that such recent developments could deliver remarkable breakthroughs.

People who criticize new forensic sciences being tried in past cases point out the high probability that the investigation will hit a dead end. With the passage of time, not only would the older evidence be degraded but also the chances to retrieve new tinformation are marginal. Moreover, any traces of data from unpreserved evidence may raise questions about their credibility as they could be tampered with. Hence, there is only a negligible chance of finding beneficial information to solve past cases.

Nonetheless, there has been an exponential growth in forensics with the advent of newer sciences and many of them proved imperative in many old cases. Compared to the past where it took months to get results of samples from the crime scenes, modern technologies complete most of the analysis in minutes. With advanced sciences, the data drawn could automatically filter out various databases and even shortlist suspects. For instance, many culprits who escaped to foreign lands were tracked down even when they lived there disguising themselves as another person.

In conclusion, it is believed by many that the modern-day sciences in forensic has a role in uncovering many old crimes although some people contend against this view.  Even though there are some minor concerns regarding the success rates of such measures, I argue that the adoption of newer technologies would undoubtedly have a crucial role in uncovering the truth in many past cases.

Sample 5:

Day by day technology takes place in every area, whether art or science fields. Forensics investigation is a tool of the crime control department. It helps through various methods like criminal fingerprints, DNA test and so. In previous cases, inspection by newly developed methods seems to be a waste of money, except in cases that were closed due to insufficient investigation. Further, the essay shall describe in which range I agree with the statement in the following paragraphs.

To begin with, there are several reasons for reopening past cases and investigating them with new methods. The first and foremost reason is that some people are dissatisfied with previous investigations and feel that justice was not served. To provide justice, re-investigation using new technology becomes an essential tool. For example, many cases faced difficulties in gathering evidence, but now, with the help of forensic departments, the pieces of the puzzle are being solved, and the law is catching the real criminals instead of closing cases due to a lack of resources.

However, some cases do not require re-investigation, as they are often reopened for personal or revenge purposes. In such cases, the investigation costs are wasted, and time is squandered. For example, reopening cases can be expensive, and with new cases being registered daily, law firms should prioritize focusing on new cases to control crime, rather than wasting resources on old ones. Additionally, the criminals from old cases may already be dead or have been punished in other cases, so the priority should be addressing new criminal activity.

In conclusion, law firms should use new technology to control crime, and only if certain past cases require it to identify the criminal should the technology be applied. However, before reopening cases, thorough research is needed to ensure the correct use of new technology.

Sample 6:

Owing to the revolutionized era, science has progressed at an exceptional rate. With the advancements of science and technology in the field of criminal forensics, a section of society asserts that this technology will be helpful to re-examine old cases. I extend my support towards the given notion since this practice would be beneficial in a number of ways. 

On the one hand, a plethora of aspects promotes my idea. The primary is the usage of high-tech devices in solving unsolved past offences. In brief, these gadgets aid the investigators to probe the hidden side of crime, such as the usage of fingerprint analysis, microphones, and DNA identifiers. The cops can use such devices to reconsider the old reports. For instance, with the assistance of a fingerprint identifier, the authorities can opt for a biometric scan of the accused site to match the impressions to that of a doubtful person. These gadgets have been proven remarkably accurate and reliable in some cases that have been recently re-explored.

Another factor is in some cases, the wrong person has been charged with a criminal infraction, which a person has not even committed, and this is followed by a delay in justice for the innocents and their families; however, the actual one is roaming freely in the outer world instead of being behind the bars. These technological advancements will help to serve legal justice to the demanding person and bring peace and harmony to society.

Yet another rationale is forensic science reduces crime rates as well since earlier, due to a lack of modern technologies, plenty of illegal activities such as the unwanted trade of drugs and arms were carried out without any restriction; nevertheless, with the advent of forensic science, many real-time pieces of evidence can be gathered which can help to carry out investigation more efficiently. 

On the other hand, criminal forensics has a few demerits as well because the evidence is prone to manipulation which may end up in an unrighteous verdict. It happens especially in old cases. For instance, a hair sample at the crime scene that resembles a suspect's hair gets dressed up in this scientific certainty that is not justified, and it results in wrongful convictions. 

To conclude, after this discussion, this particular branch of science plays a significant role in the field of crime on multiple occasions and serves justice to the guilt-free.

Sample 7:

The use of new science related to criminal forensics in old cases has been a topic of discussion in recent years. Some believe that it can provide new evidence and information that can help to uncover the truth and bring closure to families. However, I strongly disagree with the notion that new science should be used to re-examine old cases.

One of the main reasons for my disagreement is the potential for bias and subjective interpretations of the evidence. New science and technology can provide new information, but it can also lead to subjective interpretations of the evidence. This can result in false conclusions and can lead to further confusion and speculation about the case. Furthermore, the use of new science in old cases can also open up the possibility of wrongful convictions, which can cause harm to individuals and their families.

Another reason for my disagreement is the potential for the revictimization of families and individuals. Reopening old cases and exposing them to new evidence and new interpretations can cause emotional distress for those who have already suffered as a result of the crime. The process of re-examining old cases can also bring new scrutiny and attention to individuals who have moved on from the event and may not be prepared to deal with it again.

In conclusion, I believe that the use of new science in old cases should be approached with caution. While it has the potential to provide new information and evidence, it can also lead to subjective interpretations and false conclusions. The use of new science in old cases can also result in the revictimization of individuals and families who have already suffered. It is important to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of using new science in old cases and to ensure that it is used in a manner that is fair and impartial.

Sample 8:

The use of new science in criminal forensics to examine old cases has become a topic of great interest and debate. Those who support this approach believe that it has the potential to provide new evidence and information that can bring closure to families and restore confidence in the justice system. In my view, I wholeheartedly agree that new science should be used to re-examine old cases.

One of the benefits of using new science in old cases is that it can provide a second chance for justice. Advances in DNA analysis, for example, have led to the exoneration of individuals who were wrongly convicted. This can bring closure to families who have suffered for years without knowing the truth and restore public confidence in the justice system. Furthermore, new science can also help to identify the real culprits, increasing the likelihood of justice being served.

Another advantage of using new science in old cases is that it can bring new light to cases that have already been closed. The implementation of new technology in investigating old crimes can provide new information and evidence that was previously missed. This can help to provide answers for families and bring closure to long-standing cases. Moreover, it can bring new insights into crime and the motive behind it, leading to a better understanding of the case.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that the use of new science in old cases can provide a second chance for justice and help to uncover new evidence and information. The implementation of new science in old cases should be done in a responsible manner and with a thorough analysis of the evidence. This will ensure that justice is served and that the use of new science in old cases is done in a manner that is fair and impartial. New science has the potential to bring closure to families, restore public confidence in justice to families, and bring a new understanding to long-standing cases.

Sample 1:

Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.

Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.

At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.

In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.

Sample 2:

Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.

To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.

Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.

To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.

Sample 3:

There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.

The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.

There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.

In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.

Sample 4:

Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.

To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.

However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.

In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.

Sample 5:

Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.

In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.

In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.

Sample 1:

These days, our society has benefited significantly from the internet in terms of many aspects. However, whereas some suppose that social isolation may be a problem given by the internet, others believe that people stay closer and closer thanks to the internet. I will analyse both sides before my conclusion is drawn.

To begin with, the internet is obviously beneficial in some ways. Firstly, it is making people more connected in communication. What I mean is that in this modern era, it is convenient to keep in touch with others from other continents thanks to the internet via emails and social networks. Secondly, there is no doubt that the internet is the most effective tool to share valuable and memorable moments, photos and posts together with friends and family. This may enable these members to capture their happy experience and provide them with a strong sense of intimacy.

On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why people tend to object to the internet. First and foremost, many think that the internet allows people to connect from a distance, which will deteriorate social bonds. Specifically, when people just need their mobile phones or computers to make a call, they no longer have to maintain face-to-face meetings, so they are gradually becoming less sociable. Furthermore, this virtual world may not guarantee a good social life for many people. It means a person can easily feel isolated if he only uses the internet to keep entertained without any real conversation.

In conclusion, no one can deny the advantages of the internet. From my perspective, I believe that the internet will nourish solid relationships because it will keep many people connected regardless of far distance.

Sample 2:

The internet has radically changed the way we communicate. Many believe it has enabled people to achieve closure on their relationship, while others refute claiming that people and communities have become more alienated with the advent of the internet. This essay will expound on both notions. In my opinion, due to our over-reliance on internet technology, our relationship has deteriorated.

The internet brings people closer, especially through the exponential increase in the use of social media platforms. People are able to communicate from miles apart, anywhere on the globe through the internet. They can share ideas, experiences and cultures, and even make online friends through social networking sites like Facebook. Even people can be more cognizant of others’ crises and can respond almost immediately. A case in point is the Egyptian revolution of 2011. The social media sites contributed substantially by uniting citizens to succeed in the uprising. Thus, the internet brings us together in an unprecedented way.

However, many put forward the view that people live in almost complete seclusion these days with the emergence of the internet. With the burgeoning popularity of the internet, people spend hours in the virtual world. In fact, they withdraw themselves from physical dealings with each other and thus get socially isolated. Besides, many social pieces of research show that people tend to maintain their online network of like-minded friends only. This means that if someone expresses a different opinion, one may strike him out from his network. Consequently, it does not develop camaraderie. Moreover, social media awareness does not translate into real change. People press a like button only rather than actively engage with campaigns in real life.

To reiterate, although the internet offers amazing opportunities than any time in history to expand our network and reach out to people we may otherwise never meet, it seems to me that the internet leads to seclusion. Therefore, we should emphasize the real-world relationship rather than the friends we make in a virtual world.

Sample 3:

The impact of the internet on social connections is a topic of contention. While some argue that it has brought people closer together, others assert that the internet has led to increased isolation among individuals and communities. I strongly believe that the internet has contributed to a sense of isolation rather than fostering closer relationships. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and give arguments for my opinion.

Proponents of the idea that the internet brings people closer together emphasize its role in connecting individuals across geographical boundaries. Social media platforms, for instance, enable people to interact with friends, family, and even strangers from different parts of the world. Virtual communities and online forums allow individuals to engage in discussions, share experiences, and develop friendships beyond physical limitations. For instance, platforms like Facebook or Twitter connect individuals separated by continents, allowing long-lost friends to rekindle relationships and enabling families residing in different countries to regularly communicate and share life updates.

However, detractors argue that while the internet offers connectivity, it often leads to superficial relationships and a sense of isolation. As people spend more time engrossed in online interactions, face-to-face communication diminishes. Real-life social interactions dwindle, leading to a decline in genuine connections. Moreover, excessive screen time can result in social withdrawal, affecting mental health and reducing community engagement. For example, excessive use of screens, especially among teenagers, might lead to reduced face-to-face interactions, causing a decline in participation in community events or local gatherings, potentially impacting their sense of belonging and social connection.

From my perspective, the internet has inadvertently contributed to isolation by creating a facade of connectivity that lacks depth. While it offers virtual connections, these often lack the richness and depth of real-life interactions.

In conclusion, despite the internet's ability to facilitate connections, I think that it has primarily contributed to people and communities becoming more isolated. The allure of online connectivity often comes at the cost of genuine, meaningful relationships and reduced community engagement.

Sample 4:

The impact of the internet on social connectivity is a subject of fierce debate. While some argue that it has fostered closer relationships, others claim that it has caused increased isolation. This essay will explore both perspectives and lean towards the view that the internet has brought people closer together.

Critics argue that the internet has led to increased social isolation. They point to instances where individuals, particularly younger generations, spend excessive time online, withdrawing from real-world interactions. For instance, studies show a rise in social anxiety among adolescents, largely attributed to prolonged internet usage.

On the contrary, proponents of the idea that the internet brings people closer together emphasize its role in connecting individuals across geographical boundaries. Social media platforms, for instance, enable people to interact with friends, family, and even strangers from different parts of the world. Virtual communities and online forums allow individuals to engage in discussions, share experiences, and develop friendships beyond physical limitations.

The internet, through its vast array of communication tools and platforms, has undoubtedly enriched social connections. Video calls, social media interactions, and shared interest forums have diminished the barriers of distance and fostered a sense of community among diverse individuals. The ability to instantly connect with people globally has redefined relationships and opened doors to cross-cultural understanding and cooperation.

In conclusion, while concerns about internet-induced isolation are valid, the overwhelming evidence suggests that the internet has predominantly enhanced social connectivity. Its role in bringing people together, transcending geographical limitations, and enabling diverse interactions signifies its pivotal role in fostering a more interconnected global community.

Sample 5:

In the age of the internet, an increasing number of individuals are turning to online platforms to meet new people and socialize. While some argue that this digital era has brought people closer together, others contend that it has led to heightened isolation. This essay will explore both perspectives and offer insights into the complex relationship between online interactions and social connectivity.

The internet has undeniably expanded our social horizons by enabling us to connect with individuals worldwide. Social media platforms, online communities, and dating apps have facilitated the discovery of like-minded people, fostering valuable relationships. Moreover, the internet’s ability to transcend geographical boundaries has allowed families and friends separated by distance to maintain close ties through video calls and instant messaging.

On the flip side, excessive reliance on online interactions can result in digital isolation. Some individuals become so engrossed in virtual relationships that they struggle with face-to-face social skills, leading to a sense of disconnection from the real world. Additionally, the internet’s tendency to customize content to user preferences can create filter bubbles, limiting exposure to diverse perspectives and reinforcing existing biases.

In conclusion, the impact of using the internet to meet new people and socialize is a multifaceted issue. While it undoubtedly increases connectivity and broadens horizons, it can also lead to digital isolation and filter bubbles if not used judiciously. The key lies in finding a balance between online and offline interactions, leveraging the internet’s potential to enhance our lives while ensuring it doesn’t replace the richness of face-to-face human connections.

Sample 1:

People hold widely differing views on whether following domestic news or world news is more important. Although it is true that concentrating on news from all over the world is beneficial to some extent, I would argue that keeping abreast of national news is a wiser choice.

On the one hand, it is undeniable that being aware of international news has certain benefits. To begin with, following international news can keep people up-to-date with information about global environmental issues. For example, this type of news often provides people with up-to-the-minute reports about the harmful effects of climate change. Therefore, they would realize the urgency of the current environmental situation, thereby taking actions to improve it. Furthermore, if people prefer world news, they can be well-informed about global pandemics. As a result, preventive measures could be promptly taken to prevent deadly diseases from spreading further.

On the other hand, I believe that national news is of greater importance for a number of reasons. The first one is that since this kind of news can keep people informed about any changes in the job market in their country, they would be able to make timely corresponding adjustments to their skills and knowledge. Thus, it would be easier for them to find a suitable and promising career path, which could lead to a happier life in general. Additionally, focusing on domestic news would help people to be more aware of events relating to national politics that may have a direct impact on their lives. To illustrate, when people have sufficient information about presidential candidates in the upcoming election, they would know who they should cast their vote for, which is an important decision as the future of their country depends on it.

In conclusion, while I acknowledge the importance of keeping up with what is happening around the world, I am still of the opinion that domestic news should be paid more attention to.

Sample 2:

People have different views on the importance of national and international news. Personally, I believe both types of news are equally essential.

As regards news in the country, it enables residents to get updated on current issues which may have a direct effect on them. In particular, those who spend their time reading local newspapers on a daily basis will be able to inform themselves of what is happening around their neighborhood such as crime and other social evils. For example, “Tuoi Tre” newspaper, a famous publisher in my country recently published a lot of articles about the hidden dangers of making friends online. There have been many cases of murder and fraud committed by anonymous users, and those stories will help people become more cautious when talking to strangers. National news, therefore, is useful for our everyday life.

However, the role of worldwide news is just as important because it provides people with more well-rounded perspectives. When people read news from other countries, they can also develop an understanding of foreign cultures and locals’ lifestyle which may be completely different from theirs. Take the COVID 19 pandemic as an example, thanks to the availability of news reports and online articles, we can see attitudes vary significantly from country to country. Such differences can be a result of governmental policies, education and ways of life of a region. By making comparison and careful consideration, we can learn from each other’s mistakes as well as achievements. Thus, international news at the same time, allows us to be more well-equipped for a globalized world.

In conclusion, national news allows readers to catch up with the latest information that can directly affect them. However, international news is also advantageous to individuals’ development in today’s world.

Sample 3:

It is essential to consider the impacts of international news on schoolchildren. Although some claim that schools should make international news an element of the curriculum, I agree with those who believe that forcing students to acquire international news is unnecessary.

Firstly, it is claimed that the study of international news is of great significance for children. This is because, in an increasingly interconnected world, today's young generation needs to learn to be able to engage in communication with people from different cultures. Therefore, staying updated with international affairs, especially regarding economic and political news, enables them to develop as global citizens, and better prepare for the world of work when it finally comes around. The argument goes that if students were not taught anything about international news, they could risk being left behind in a world of constant changes.

However, I believe that requiring students to learn global news may breed resentment towards the subject. The reason for this is that teenagers are naturally averse to learning anything which seems imposed upon them, given that they are already overloaded with many other required courses and homework. This resentment may then lead to poor performance at school, negatively affecting their mental health. In contrast, if they are encouraged to read international affairs as a leisure activity rather than as a school subject, this should promote reading for pleasure.

In conclusion, while others think that global news should be a part of school programs to improve students' awareness of current affairs, I feel that they should be encouraged to read the news just as a hobby to avoid resentment towards the news.

Sample 4:

Many readers now feel it is more important to stay informed concerning international news items, rather than local ones. In my opinion, though international news can be interesting, local stories contain greater relevance and are therefore more important.

Consumers of international news point out its entertainment value. The majority of people reading news from other countries recognize it has essentially no impact on their own life. However, many articles from abroad also tend to hold greater appeal. An individual in the United Kingdom, for example, might become bored of local politics and repetitive, provincial stories. There is likely to be more excitement gained in reading about global conflicts, trade disputes, foreign elections, political unrest and environmental catastrophes in distant nations. The reader may not be aware of their own intentions, but these stories are primarily a way to pass the time and be entertained.

However, the entertainment value of international news is less important than relevant local reporting. For example, local news has become essential reading during the recent Covid-19 pandemic. Individuals have little choice but to read articles about the particular strain in their nation, the number of active cases, and the restrictions being urged or mandated by public authorities. If an individual is unaware of such news, they may violate a rule and put themselves and others at risk. The value of local news applies to less pressing emergency situations as well and may include stories about local elections, corruption in politics, crime rates, and various other stories of interest.

In conclusion, despite the value of international news as a source of entertainment, local news should be prioritized given its actual significance. Individuals should strive to ignore as much news as possible and only stay informed about pertinent issues.

Sample 5:

It is a commonly debated topic whether people should be more focused on news in their own country or on international news. Some argue that staying informed about domestic affairs is crucial as it directly impacts their daily lives and reflects their national identity. Meanwhile, others contend that being aware of international news is equally, if not more, essential, as it widens their perspective and helps them understand the interconnectedness of the world better. Both viewpoints hold merit, and in my opinion, striking a balance between the two is crucial.

Those who advocate for focusing on news within their country argue that it is vital to stay informed about events that directly affect their lives. Domestic news encompasses a range of topics, including politics, economy, environment, and social issues. By keeping up-to-date with these matters, individuals can actively participate in discussions and decisions that shape their communities. For instance, knowledge about local politics empowers citizens to vote wisely and contribute to the development and progress of their country. Moreover, being aware of domestic news allows people to remain cognizant of social challenges and engage in efforts to address them, ultimately fostering positive change in their immediate surroundings.

On the other hand, there are valid reasons why some individuals believe it is more important to be aware of international news. In today's increasingly globalized world, events occurring in one country often have far-reaching consequences that can impact the lives of people elsewhere. For instance, economic crises, political conflicts, and natural disasters in one nation can have ripple effects on the global economy, politics, and environment. Understanding and monitoring such international developments fosters a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of countries and how they are all impacted by shared challenges. Furthermore, being aware of international news allows one to develop a global perspective and empathy towards different cultures and societies. It broadens one's knowledge and helps in appreciating the diversity and richness of our world.

While the argument for focusing on domestic news is rooted in the belief that individuals have a responsibility towards their country, and the argument for international news emphasizes an understanding of global interconnectedness, it is ideal to strike a balance between the two. It should not be an either/or situation. Staying informed about domestic news is indeed essential, as it keeps citizens engaged and active participants in their nation's progress. However, this should not come at the cost of neglecting international news. Understanding global events and trends helps people make informed decisions and promotes a sense of global citizenship.

In conclusion, the debate over whether one should focus more on news in their country or international news is consequential and complex. Both viewpoints have their merits, as domestic news directly impacts individual lives, whereas international news fosters a global perspective and understanding. Striking a balance between the two is crucial to be an informed and engaged citizen of the world. By staying knowledgeable about both domestic and international affairs, individuals can actively contribute to the betterment of their country while appreciating the interconnected nature of our global community.

Sample 6:

Most would argue a basic understanding of events at both a national and international level is important. Whether one is more important than the other, however, is difficult to say. Both opinions will be analysed in this essay before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.

On one hand, many people believe their nation’s interior issues should take reporting precedence over exterior ones. For example, elderly people in Canada, who tend to travel less than their younger counterparts, often focus on local news issues. The reason for this is that these domestic stories apply more directly to day-to-day life in Canada, and this is an area of news Canada’s elderly people are interested in. As this example shows, it is understandable why some people focus their attention more on national news reports than international ones.

However, on the other hand, others feel thoroughly understanding international events is more important than focusing on local news. People who typically share this point of view usually defend it by arguing that as cultures, economies and borders blur, a proper understanding of the world is necessary to retain competitiveness. Young people, such as university students, act as good examples here as their lifestyles employ more foreign travel and thus require a working knowledge of developments on the global stage. Thus, it is understandable why this point of view has garnered support.

After analysing all sides of the above debate, I agree that being equally versed in both national and international news is important. Thus, it is clearly impossible to state that one of these reporting types is better than the other.