Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 542 Lưu

Some people think that the internet has brought people closer together, while others think that people and communities are becoming more isolated due to the internet. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

These days, our society has benefited significantly from the internet in terms of many aspects. However, whereas some suppose that social isolation may be a problem given by the internet, others believe that people stay closer and closer thanks to the internet. I will analyse both sides before my conclusion is drawn.

To begin with, the internet is obviously beneficial in some ways. Firstly, it is making people more connected in communication. What I mean is that in this modern era, it is convenient to keep in touch with others from other continents thanks to the internet via emails and social networks. Secondly, there is no doubt that the internet is the most effective tool to share valuable and memorable moments, photos and posts together with friends and family. This may enable these members to capture their happy experience and provide them with a strong sense of intimacy.

On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why people tend to object to the internet. First and foremost, many think that the internet allows people to connect from a distance, which will deteriorate social bonds. Specifically, when people just need their mobile phones or computers to make a call, they no longer have to maintain face-to-face meetings, so they are gradually becoming less sociable. Furthermore, this virtual world may not guarantee a good social life for many people. It means a person can easily feel isolated if he only uses the internet to keep entertained without any real conversation.

In conclusion, no one can deny the advantages of the internet. From my perspective, I believe that the internet will nourish solid relationships because it will keep many people connected regardless of far distance.

Sample 2:

The internet has radically changed the way we communicate. Many believe it has enabled people to achieve closure on their relationship, while others refute claiming that people and communities have become more alienated with the advent of the internet. This essay will expound on both notions. In my opinion, due to our over-reliance on internet technology, our relationship has deteriorated.

The internet brings people closer, especially through the exponential increase in the use of social media platforms. People are able to communicate from miles apart, anywhere on the globe through the internet. They can share ideas, experiences and cultures, and even make online friends through social networking sites like Facebook. Even people can be more cognizant of others’ crises and can respond almost immediately. A case in point is the Egyptian revolution of 2011. The social media sites contributed substantially by uniting citizens to succeed in the uprising. Thus, the internet brings us together in an unprecedented way.

However, many put forward the view that people live in almost complete seclusion these days with the emergence of the internet. With the burgeoning popularity of the internet, people spend hours in the virtual world. In fact, they withdraw themselves from physical dealings with each other and thus get socially isolated. Besides, many social pieces of research show that people tend to maintain their online network of like-minded friends only. This means that if someone expresses a different opinion, one may strike him out from his network. Consequently, it does not develop camaraderie. Moreover, social media awareness does not translate into real change. People press a like button only rather than actively engage with campaigns in real life.

To reiterate, although the internet offers amazing opportunities than any time in history to expand our network and reach out to people we may otherwise never meet, it seems to me that the internet leads to seclusion. Therefore, we should emphasize the real-world relationship rather than the friends we make in a virtual world.

Sample 3:

The impact of the internet on social connections is a topic of contention. While some argue that it has brought people closer together, others assert that the internet has led to increased isolation among individuals and communities. I strongly believe that the internet has contributed to a sense of isolation rather than fostering closer relationships. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and give arguments for my opinion.

Proponents of the idea that the internet brings people closer together emphasize its role in connecting individuals across geographical boundaries. Social media platforms, for instance, enable people to interact with friends, family, and even strangers from different parts of the world. Virtual communities and online forums allow individuals to engage in discussions, share experiences, and develop friendships beyond physical limitations. For instance, platforms like Facebook or Twitter connect individuals separated by continents, allowing long-lost friends to rekindle relationships and enabling families residing in different countries to regularly communicate and share life updates.

However, detractors argue that while the internet offers connectivity, it often leads to superficial relationships and a sense of isolation. As people spend more time engrossed in online interactions, face-to-face communication diminishes. Real-life social interactions dwindle, leading to a decline in genuine connections. Moreover, excessive screen time can result in social withdrawal, affecting mental health and reducing community engagement. For example, excessive use of screens, especially among teenagers, might lead to reduced face-to-face interactions, causing a decline in participation in community events or local gatherings, potentially impacting their sense of belonging and social connection.

From my perspective, the internet has inadvertently contributed to isolation by creating a facade of connectivity that lacks depth. While it offers virtual connections, these often lack the richness and depth of real-life interactions.

In conclusion, despite the internet's ability to facilitate connections, I think that it has primarily contributed to people and communities becoming more isolated. The allure of online connectivity often comes at the cost of genuine, meaningful relationships and reduced community engagement.

Sample 4:

The impact of the internet on social connectivity is a subject of fierce debate. While some argue that it has fostered closer relationships, others claim that it has caused increased isolation. This essay will explore both perspectives and lean towards the view that the internet has brought people closer together.

Critics argue that the internet has led to increased social isolation. They point to instances where individuals, particularly younger generations, spend excessive time online, withdrawing from real-world interactions. For instance, studies show a rise in social anxiety among adolescents, largely attributed to prolonged internet usage.

On the contrary, proponents of the idea that the internet brings people closer together emphasize its role in connecting individuals across geographical boundaries. Social media platforms, for instance, enable people to interact with friends, family, and even strangers from different parts of the world. Virtual communities and online forums allow individuals to engage in discussions, share experiences, and develop friendships beyond physical limitations.

The internet, through its vast array of communication tools and platforms, has undoubtedly enriched social connections. Video calls, social media interactions, and shared interest forums have diminished the barriers of distance and fostered a sense of community among diverse individuals. The ability to instantly connect with people globally has redefined relationships and opened doors to cross-cultural understanding and cooperation.

In conclusion, while concerns about internet-induced isolation are valid, the overwhelming evidence suggests that the internet has predominantly enhanced social connectivity. Its role in bringing people together, transcending geographical limitations, and enabling diverse interactions signifies its pivotal role in fostering a more interconnected global community.

Sample 5:

In the age of the internet, an increasing number of individuals are turning to online platforms to meet new people and socialize. While some argue that this digital era has brought people closer together, others contend that it has led to heightened isolation. This essay will explore both perspectives and offer insights into the complex relationship between online interactions and social connectivity.

The internet has undeniably expanded our social horizons by enabling us to connect with individuals worldwide. Social media platforms, online communities, and dating apps have facilitated the discovery of like-minded people, fostering valuable relationships. Moreover, the internet’s ability to transcend geographical boundaries has allowed families and friends separated by distance to maintain close ties through video calls and instant messaging.

On the flip side, excessive reliance on online interactions can result in digital isolation. Some individuals become so engrossed in virtual relationships that they struggle with face-to-face social skills, leading to a sense of disconnection from the real world. Additionally, the internet’s tendency to customize content to user preferences can create filter bubbles, limiting exposure to diverse perspectives and reinforcing existing biases.

In conclusion, the impact of using the internet to meet new people and socialize is a multifaceted issue. While it undoubtedly increases connectivity and broadens horizons, it can also lead to digital isolation and filter bubbles if not used judiciously. The key lies in finding a balance between online and offline interactions, leveraging the internet’s potential to enhance our lives while ensuring it doesn’t replace the richness of face-to-face human connections.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.

Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.

At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.

In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.

Sample 2:

Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.

To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.

Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.

To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.

Sample 3:

There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.

The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.

There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.

In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.

Sample 4:

Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.

To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.

However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.

In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.

Sample 5:

Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.

In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.

In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.

Lời giải

The graph shows the number of people taking part in 4 kinds of sports in a particular region between 1985 and 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The line chart illustrates how many people participated in 4 distinct types of sports in a particular area from 1985 to 2005.

Overall, rugby was the most popular sport in the first half of the period while tennis took the lead in the second half. In addition, rugby saw a downward trend while tennis took the opposite direction; moreover, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable.

In 1995, the number of people playing rugby stood at just under 250, surpassing the figure for tennis players by around 100. Basketball and badminton had comparatively lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 participants in turn.

Afterwards, the number of people participating in rugby plunged, hitting a low of 50 in 2005, equal to the figure for badminton in the same year. In contrast, the trend for tennis was upward, with its participation rate increasing to roughly 220 people at the end of the period, establishing it as the leading sport. Finally, the figures for basketball and badminton underwent negligible changes, hovering around 80 and 50 participants respectively.

Sample 2:

The line graph illustrates how many people participated in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005. Overall, there was a significant decrease in the number of people playing rugby in this region, whereas tennis showed a gradual upward trend to become the most popular sport in the second half of the period. Additionally, throughout the period, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable and comparable, with the latter sport remaining the least common. 

In the first decade, rugby had the highest number of players, despite witnessing a steady fall from nearly 250 to exactly 200 participants. From 1995 onwards, this sport kept losing popularity as its figure plummeted, reaching parity with badminton (at 50 people) in the final year.

In contrast, tennis was gaining popularity and had become the dominant category by the end of the timeframe. Specifically, starting at the second highest (at 150), the number of people engaging in tennis rose continually, overtaking that of rugby in 1995 before ending at approximately 250 players.

Meanwhile, roughly 80 people played basketball initially, after which it stayed virtually unchanged until the end of the period. Badminton almost exactly mirrored this trend, albeit at a lower rate, consistently hovering around the 50 mark.

Sample 3:

The line chart compares the number of participants in basketball, tennis, badminton and rugby over a 20-year period from 1985 in a specific area.

Overall, more people played tennis throughout the period, and it was the most common sport since 1995, while rugby's popularity declined. Notably, basketball and badminton mostly had stable numbers of players.

In terms of tennis and rugby, both sports indicated inverted trends. Although rugby started at the highest point with nearly 250 players, the figure declined continually to about 200 players in 1995, when this sport was no longer the most popular. Since then, the number of people playing rugby dropped more steeply, reaching 50 in 2005. In contrast, from 1985 onwards, the figure for tennis increased steadily from second place with 150 participants. By 2005, it had reached its highest point of roughly 220 players.

In comparison, there were far fewer people who took up basketball and badminton. However, these sports remained relatively stable, with basketball having about 70 participants every year, while badminton was always the least popular with approximately 50 players each year.

Sample 4:

The line graph provides information about the number of individuals engaging in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.

Overall, while tennis underwent a surge in popularity, rugby experienced a decrease in participation within this region over time, with basketball and badminton remaining relatively stable. Moreover, the most drastic shift in popularity was witnessed in rugby.

At the start of the period, in 1985, rugby was the most played sport, with 240 individuals participating, and it significantly outnumbered the next sport, tennis, which had only 150 participants. Thereafter, the number of people playing rugby dropped to 200 in 1995, before plummeting to a 20-year low of 50 in the final year. This stood in stark contrast to the rise in the popularity of tennis, which saw a steady increase in participants to a peak of about 220 in 2005, making it by far the most played sport at the end of the period.

Turning to the remaining sports, in the first year, 80 individuals played basketball, almost 25 more than badminton. Over the following decade, the participant numbers for basketball rose to about 90, while those for badminton dropped to a low of 45 in 1995. In the remaining period, these two sports maintained their popularity, as the numbers participating stayed at roughly the same level until 2005.

Sample 5:

The line chart delineates the participation levels in four distinct sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.

Primarily, rugby emerged as the most favored sport in the initial half of the period, while tennis took precedence in the latter half. Moreover, rugby exhibited a declining trend, whereas tennis experienced a converse trajectory. Meanwhile, the engagement rates for basketball and badminton remained relatively consistent.

In 1985, the number of rugby participants stood at just below 250, exceeding the tennis players by approximately 150 individuals. Simultaneously, basketball and badminton showcased lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 individuals involved in each sport, respectively.

Subsequently, rugby participation plummeted significantly, reaching a nadir of 50 participants in 2005, akin to the number engaged in badminton during the same year. Conversely, tennis experienced an upward trend, escalating to nearly 220 individuals by the conclusion of the period, solidifying its status as the predominant sport. In contrast, the figures for basketball and badminton remained relatively stable, with approximately 80 and 50 participants, respectively, throughout the entire duration.

Sample 6:

The given line graph delineates the participation levels in 4 different sports, namely basketball, tennis, badminton, and rugby within a specific region over a span of 20 years.

Overall, it is evident that the number of individuals participating in tennis witnessed a consistent and notable increase, contrasting sharply with the downward trend observed in rugby participation. Meanwhile, while basketball and badminton recorded lower participation rates compared to other sports, they remained relatively stable throughout the entire period.

Turning to the number of tennis players, the figures began at a relatively moderate level of 150 individuals in 1985. Subsequently, it experienced a gradual and consistent increase in participation, reaching a pinnacle of nearly 230 participants by 2005. In stark contrast, the trend of rugby involvement presented a distinctive pattern. Commencing at a relatively high level of almost 240 people, the numbers steadily declined over time and by the end of the 20-year period, rugby participants had dwindled to 50, matching the level of engagement observed in badminton. Interestingly, a point of convergence occurred in 1995, where both tennis and rugby shared a similar number of participants, with approximately 200 individuals engaging in each sport.

In regard to the remaining sports participants, the numbers for both badminton and basketball remained relatively stable over the given time frame. Beginning with approximately 50 individuals engaging in badminton and around 80 individuals involved in basketball in 1985, these figures persisted with little variation until 2005. Consequently, by the end of the period, both sports witnessed a culmination with nearly the same number of participants as they had at the beginning.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP