The graph shows the number of people taking part in 4 kinds of sports in a particular region between 1985 and 2005.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The graph shows the number of people taking part in 4 kinds of sports in a particular region between 1985 and 2005.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
The line chart illustrates how many people participated in 4 distinct types of sports in a particular area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, rugby was the most popular sport in the first half of the period while tennis took the lead in the second half. In addition, rugby saw a downward trend while tennis took the opposite direction; moreover, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable.
In 1995, the number of people playing rugby stood at just under 250, surpassing the figure for tennis players by around 100. Basketball and badminton had comparatively lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 participants in turn.
Afterwards, the number of people participating in rugby plunged, hitting a low of 50 in 2005, equal to the figure for badminton in the same year. In contrast, the trend for tennis was upward, with its participation rate increasing to roughly 220 people at the end of the period, establishing it as the leading sport. Finally, the figures for basketball and badminton underwent negligible changes, hovering around 80 and 50 participants respectively.
Sample 2:
The line graph illustrates how many people participated in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005. Overall, there was a significant decrease in the number of people playing rugby in this region, whereas tennis showed a gradual upward trend to become the most popular sport in the second half of the period. Additionally, throughout the period, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable and comparable, with the latter sport remaining the least common.
In the first decade, rugby had the highest number of players, despite witnessing a steady fall from nearly 250 to exactly 200 participants. From 1995 onwards, this sport kept losing popularity as its figure plummeted, reaching parity with badminton (at 50 people) in the final year.
In contrast, tennis was gaining popularity and had become the dominant category by the end of the timeframe. Specifically, starting at the second highest (at 150), the number of people engaging in tennis rose continually, overtaking that of rugby in 1995 before ending at approximately 250 players.
Meanwhile, roughly 80 people played basketball initially, after which it stayed virtually unchanged until the end of the period. Badminton almost exactly mirrored this trend, albeit at a lower rate, consistently hovering around the 50 mark.
Sample 3:
The line chart compares the number of participants in basketball, tennis, badminton and rugby over a 20-year period from 1985 in a specific area.
Overall, more people played tennis throughout the period, and it was the most common sport since 1995, while rugby's popularity declined. Notably, basketball and badminton mostly had stable numbers of players.
In terms of tennis and rugby, both sports indicated inverted trends. Although rugby started at the highest point with nearly 250 players, the figure declined continually to about 200 players in 1995, when this sport was no longer the most popular. Since then, the number of people playing rugby dropped more steeply, reaching 50 in 2005. In contrast, from 1985 onwards, the figure for tennis increased steadily from second place with 150 participants. By 2005, it had reached its highest point of roughly 220 players.
In comparison, there were far fewer people who took up basketball and badminton. However, these sports remained relatively stable, with basketball having about 70 participants every year, while badminton was always the least popular with approximately 50 players each year.
Sample 4:
The line graph provides information about the number of individuals engaging in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, while tennis underwent a surge in popularity, rugby experienced a decrease in participation within this region over time, with basketball and badminton remaining relatively stable. Moreover, the most drastic shift in popularity was witnessed in rugby.
At the start of the period, in 1985, rugby was the most played sport, with 240 individuals participating, and it significantly outnumbered the next sport, tennis, which had only 150 participants. Thereafter, the number of people playing rugby dropped to 200 in 1995, before plummeting to a 20-year low of 50 in the final year. This stood in stark contrast to the rise in the popularity of tennis, which saw a steady increase in participants to a peak of about 220 in 2005, making it by far the most played sport at the end of the period.
Turning to the remaining sports, in the first year, 80 individuals played basketball, almost 25 more than badminton. Over the following decade, the participant numbers for basketball rose to about 90, while those for badminton dropped to a low of 45 in 1995. In the remaining period, these two sports maintained their popularity, as the numbers participating stayed at roughly the same level until 2005.
Sample 5:
The line chart delineates the participation levels in four distinct sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Primarily, rugby emerged as the most favored sport in the initial half of the period, while tennis took precedence in the latter half. Moreover, rugby exhibited a declining trend, whereas tennis experienced a converse trajectory. Meanwhile, the engagement rates for basketball and badminton remained relatively consistent.
In 1985, the number of rugby participants stood at just below 250, exceeding the tennis players by approximately 150 individuals. Simultaneously, basketball and badminton showcased lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 individuals involved in each sport, respectively.
Subsequently, rugby participation plummeted significantly, reaching a nadir of 50 participants in 2005, akin to the number engaged in badminton during the same year. Conversely, tennis experienced an upward trend, escalating to nearly 220 individuals by the conclusion of the period, solidifying its status as the predominant sport. In contrast, the figures for basketball and badminton remained relatively stable, with approximately 80 and 50 participants, respectively, throughout the entire duration.
Sample 6:
The given line graph delineates the participation levels in 4 different sports, namely basketball, tennis, badminton, and rugby within a specific region over a span of 20 years.
Overall, it is evident that the number of individuals participating in tennis witnessed a consistent and notable increase, contrasting sharply with the downward trend observed in rugby participation. Meanwhile, while basketball and badminton recorded lower participation rates compared to other sports, they remained relatively stable throughout the entire period.
Turning to the number of tennis players, the figures began at a relatively moderate level of 150 individuals in 1985. Subsequently, it experienced a gradual and consistent increase in participation, reaching a pinnacle of nearly 230 participants by 2005. In stark contrast, the trend of rugby involvement presented a distinctive pattern. Commencing at a relatively high level of almost 240 people, the numbers steadily declined over time and by the end of the 20-year period, rugby participants had dwindled to 50, matching the level of engagement observed in badminton. Interestingly, a point of convergence occurred in 1995, where both tennis and rugby shared a similar number of participants, with approximately 200 individuals engaging in each sport.
In regard to the remaining sports participants, the numbers for both badminton and basketball remained relatively stable over the given time frame. Beginning with approximately 50 individuals engaging in badminton and around 80 individuals involved in basketball in 1985, these figures persisted with little variation until 2005. Consequently, by the end of the period, both sports witnessed a culmination with nearly the same number of participants as they had at the beginning.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The given bar chart compares five different countries in terms of their film production from 2007 to 2009.
Overall, the number of films produced in countries B, C, and E increased, whereas a decline was observed in the remaining countries. Notably, country A remained the most prolific producer despite a slight drop, followed by country B.
At the start of the period, with 90 films released, country A was by far the largest film producer. Meanwhile, B made 50 films, more than triple the figure for D, at just around 15 units. The movie production in countries C and E was relatively modest, with each releasing only 10 movies in 2007.
Thereafter, the number of films that country A distributed modestly declined to 80 units in 2009, still ranking first. In contrast, country B saw a significant rise, increasing by 20 films, to end the period at 70 films. C and E also experienced moderate increases, with figures rising to around 20 and 11 films, respectively. D experienced a slight drop in its film production in 2008, after which it recovered to around 15 films in the following year.
Sample 2:
The bar chart delineates film production across five countries from 2007 to 2009.
It is perceptible that country A led in film production, followed by country B, while countries C, D, and E exhibited significantly lower outputs. Notably, country B experienced the most substantial increase, whereas country A saw a slight decline, and the other nations demonstrated minimal changes.
In 2007, country A produced approximately 87 films, a figure that remained unchanged in 2008 before decreasing to 80 in 2009. Conversely, country B’s film production increased from 50 in 2007 to 53 in 2008, and subsequently surged to 67 in 2009, representing the most significant rise among all countries surveyed.
Countries C, D, and E each produced fewer than 20 films annually. Country C’s output rose from 8 in 2007 to 18 films in 2009. Similarly, country E’s production increased from 9 to 12 films over the same period. In contrast, country D’s number declined from 13 in 2007 to 8 films in 2008, before recovering to 12 films in 2009.
Sample 3:
The depicted bar chart elucidates the volume of films produced annually between 2007 and 2009 by five designated nations, labelled A through E.
A synopsis of the data reveals that Country A maintained the preeminent position in film production throughout the period, albeit with a minor decrement in its output by the end of the timeframe. Concurrently, Countries B, C, and E exhibited ascending trajectories in their film production capabilities, with Country B notably amplifying its output. In contrast, Country D’s production figures oscillated over the years, displaying no consistent trend.
Further elaborating, Country A initiated the period with a robust count of approximately 88 films in 2007, retained a similar tally the following year, but slightly regressed to around 80 films by 2009. Contrastingly, Country B, starting from a baseline of about 50 films in 2007, experienced substantial growth, escalating to roughly 70 films by the conclusion of 2009, signalling significant industry expansion.
For Countries C and E, the increments were less pronounced but still indicative of growth. Country C nearly doubled its production from an initial count of about 8 films to approximately 19 by 2009, whereas Country E saw a moderate rise from 9 to 11 films. In divergence, Country D’s production was erratic, commencing at 15 films, dipping to 9, and rising again to around 13 by the end of the period, underscoring an unstable production pattern compared to its counterparts.
Sample 4:
The chart presents the annual film production totals from 2007 to 2009 for five distinct countries labelled A, B, C, D, and E.
A broad overview reveals that Country A consistently led in film production over the observed period, although it experienced a slight decline in output by 2009. Meanwhile, Countries B, C, and E showed trends of increasing film production, with Country B notably ramping up its output significantly. Country D, however, displayed fluctuating production levels with no clear trend.
In detail, Country A's film production started at its peak in 2007 with approximately 88 films, maintained a similar level in 2008, but slightly reduced to around 80 films by 2009. On the other hand, Country B showed a remarkable growth from producing about 50 films in 2007 to approximately 70 films by 2009. This upward trajectory indicates a robust expansion in Country B's film industry over these years.
Country C and Country E also demonstrated growth, albeit less dramatically. Country C's output nearly doubled from about 8 films in 2007 to around 19 films in 2009, while Country E modestly increased its production from 9 to 11 films over the same period. Conversely, Country D's film industry showed instability, starting at 15 films in 2007, dropping to 9 in 2008, and partially recovering to 13 films in 2009. This indicates a less predictable pattern compared to the other countries.
Sample 5:
The bar chart illustrates how many movies were produced in five nations, namely A, B, C, D and E from 2007 to 2009.
Overall, country A registered the highest numbers of films in 3 years compared to that of other remaining countries. Another noteworthy feature is that while there was an upward tendency of film numbers in country B, C and E, a downward trend was seen in case of country A and D, between 2007 and 2009.
In 2007, about 50, 8 and 9 films were produced in country B, C and E, respectively. When it comes to country B, this figure rose to 70. Moreover, we can also notice that there was a slight increase in country C and E with 19 and 11 films, respectively, in the year 2009.
A contrast trend was seen in country A. In 2007, country A produced approximately 88 movies. This figure remained stable in 2008 before dropping slightly to 80 films in the year 2009. The number of films produced in country D fluctuated. There were about 15 films produced in 2007. After that, this number decreased to about 9 films before rising again to reach about 13 movies by the year 2009.
Sample 6:
The line graph illustrates how many films were made by five different nations between 2007 and 2009.
Overall, there were decreases in the number of films produced in countries A and D, whereas the opposite was true in the cases of the remaining nations. Additionally, countries A and B remained by far the largest film producers.
From 2007 to 2008, country A produced nearly 90 films each year, but by 2009 the figure had declined slightly to 80. Despite this drop, country A still made more films than the other countries in question. Country D followed a similar trend, albeit at a much lower rate, beginning at around 15 films, hitting a low of just under 10 a year later, before rising back to about 14 in the final year.
Meanwhile, roughly 50 films were shot by country B from 2007 to 2008, after which the production saw a significant increase to 70 films in 2009. Much smaller, yet more consistent rises were observed in the numbers of films made in countries C and E, growing from nearly 10 to almost 20 and from 10 to 11 films over the period, respectively.
Sample 7:
The bar chart provides information about movie production in five different countries (labelled A-E) from 2007 to 2009.
Overall, country A had the highest number of films produced. It is also notable that while there was a decline in the figures for country A and D, the opposite was true for those of country B, C and E.
In 2007, around 86 films were made by country A. The figure remained unchanged one year later before slightly decreasing to exactly 80 films in 2009. Starting at about 15 movies in 2007, the number of films released by country D fell to just under 10 in 2008 and rose again to 12 in 2009.
However, the opposite trend could be seen in the figures for the other countries. Between 2007 and 2009, the number of movies made by country B witnessed a rise of 20 movies from 50 films to 70 films. Similarly, despite standing at only under 10 films in 2007, the number of movies made by country C underwent a gradual increase to 18 movies by 2009. As for country E, the figure only experienced a minimal rise from around 9 movies in 2007 to 11 in 2009.
Sample 8:
The bar chart compares film production in five different countries in the years 2007, 2008 and 2009. Overall, country A produced the most films during the given three-year period followed by country B, while the film industry was not as strong in countries C, D, and E. The largest increase was in country B while country A experienced a small decrease and there were minimal rises in the other nations.
Leading the chart in 2007, country A produced approximately 87 movies, and this figure remained unchanged the next year before decreasing to 80 in 2009. On the contrary, a reverse trend was witnessed in B’s film production. Only manufacturing 50 movies in 2007, country B produced 3 more films the next year and about 17 films in 2009, which was the most significant rise among all the countries surveyed.
With substantially lower output, countries C, D, and E were responsible for fewer than 20 movies each year. Specifically, about 8 films were manufactured in C in the first year, before this figure increased twofold in 2008 and finally reached 18 movies in 2009. Country E also experienced an upward trend, increasing from approximately 9 films to around 12 films by the end of the period. In contrast, country D decreased sharply from around 13 films in 2007 to 8 in 2008 (the lowest number among all countries that year) before recovering to 12 films produced in 2009.
Sample 9:
The bar chart illustrates the number of films produced by five countries, labeled A to E, over a three-year period from 2007 to 2009.
Overall, country A consistently produced the highest number of films each year. While countries B, C, and E experienced an upward trend in movie production, countries A and D saw a decline over the same period.
Country A produced 87 films in both 2007 and 2008, before experiencing a slight decline to 80 films in 2009. In contrast, country D’s film production started at 15 films in 2007, dropped significantly to 9 films in 2008, and then rose slightly to 12 films in 2009.
Conversely, countries B, C, and E exhibited a positive trend. Country B saw a notable increase in film production, rising from 50 films in 2007 to 70 films in 2009. Similarly, country C’s film output increased from 8 films in 2007 to 13 films in 2008 and continued to grow to 17 films in 2009. Country E also showed a gradual increase in production, with the number of films rising from 9 in 2007 to 11 in 2009.
Sample 10:
The provided bar chart highlights how many films were produced by five nations over the course of three years, starting from 2007.
From an overall perspective, the numbers of films made in countries C, D and E fell far behind compared to those in countries A and B. In addition, while film production in countries B, C and E witnessed an upward trend, the opposite was true for the remaining nations.
Country A registered the same figures in the first 2 years, at approximately 87, and the same pattern could be observed in country B, with exactly 50 films made in 2007, which was slightly smaller than the figure for the next year. However, in 2009, the number of films produced in country A saw a slight drop to 80 while that in country B soared to 70, securing second place when it comes to film making.
Both countries C and E produced fewer than 10 films in the first year. However, the film-making industry in the former then saw a more rapid increase to about 17 in the last year while the latter managed to introduce just over 10. Meanwhile, in 2007, country D headed the list among the bottom three, with the number nearly the same as country C's peak, but it then plummeted to under 10 in the next year, followed by a moderate recovery of around 5.
Sample 11:
The bar graph depicts the quantity of motion pictures produced by five different nations, over a triennium starting 2007. Overall, countries A and D created less movies over the given years, while a reverse trend was witnessed in the other nations. Additionally, the number of films developed by country A and B were much higher than the remaining three countries.
Regarding the major film creators, country A produced a significant number of films in each of the first two years at nearly 90, which then fell to precisely 80 films in 2009. Moreover, ranking second throughout the period, country B produced around 50 movies each year from 2007 to 2008, before surging to 70 in 2009.
Concerning the minor movie producers, country C started at approximately 8 films and exhibited continuous increases to roughly 20 films by 2009, becoming the largest producer in this group. Country E's production witnessed a similar rise, however, with a lesser extent, which ascended constantly from around 9 to about 11 films over the surveyed period. Conversely, after a plunge from roughly 15 to just below 10 movies from 2007 to 2008, country D recovered to nearly its initial number in the end.
Sample 12:
The bar chart delineates the trend of cinematic production across five distinctive nations (referred to as A-E) from 2007 to 2009.
Overall, the data reveals that Nation A led in terms of film production volume during the period under consideration. It is also worth noting that the cinematic output of Nations A and D witnessed a contraction, in stark contrast to Nations B, C, and E, which saw their movie production figures escalating.
In 2007, Nation A was responsible for the creation of approximately 86 films. This number held steady for the following year, only to undergo a slight contraction, falling to a precise count of 80 movies in 2009. Nation D’s film production trajectory was less stable, with an initial output of nearly 15 movies in 2007, dropping to just below 10 in 2008, before rebounding modestly to 12 by the end of 2009.
Conversely, Nations B, C, and E demonstrated growth in their cinematic output over this timeframe. Nation B saw a surge of 20 movies in its production, climbing from 50 in 2007 to 70 by 2009. Nation C, despite its relatively low base of fewer than 10 films in 2007, realized a steady ascension to reach a total of 18 movies by 2009. Similarly, Nation E experienced a marginal uptick in its production numbers, inching up from roughly 9 movies in 2007 to 11 in 2009.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo