Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Sample 1:

It is undoubtedly true that all parents want their children to become good citizens and there’s a wide belief that parents should teach and instill good behavior in their children. On the contrary, some people opine that school is the perfect place to learn good manners. In my perception, I firmly believe that parents are more responsible.

On the one hand, the bond between parents and their children is unique and nurtures holistic growth and development. Parents are primary teachers, and home is the first school for the children where they learn to develop their personality. Since children are impressionable and under the care of their parents, they tend to imitate their parents’ behavior and absorb their qualities in nearly all aspects of early life. Hence, parents have an undeniable role in teaching concepts of good and evil and moral values to their children.

On the other hand, a group of people vehemently argue that schools should take responsibility for teaching and inculcating good qualities like obedience, honesty, resilience, hard work, consistency, etc as the Children spend most of their time in school. In addition, teachers have a significant influence on children. They play an equally essential role in molding the character of a child. Besides teaching academic lessons, teachers can instill moral and ethical values in children that would help the children in their future lives.

To sum up, I’d conclude that both entities have their unique impact on children. But schools cannot replace the role and responsibility of parents in making a child become a responsible person as schools deal with a vast number of children and the mindset of every child varies. Also, children are more attached to their parents, so their behavior reflects their parents.

Sample 2:

It is quite true that we continue developing our personalities throughout our lives. However, young age is rather a crucial time that moulds our characteristics. Some people believe that families define who we are going to become, while others favour the notion that schools are liable to teach us morality and guide us toward a better future. As far as my perception is concerned, I agree with the former thought. I will be explaining both points of view in the upcoming paragraphs.

Our family is the first environment where we immerse ourselves ever since we were born. The values that our parents deliver and the behaviour they convey surely leave a colossal impact on our personalities. It is also an important process for a parent to nurture a righteous perspective in their child at the beginning. It is nothing less than creating a masterpiece on a blank canvas before it gets contaminated.

Those who believe that school should be the adequate place to educate children so that they can acquire the right attitude in their lives and have decent morality to be good members of the overall society have put their belief in teachers. In a way, teachers offer standard expectations that our society has for people, providing ideas and knowledge with less deviation and less bias from students. It is also necessary for young children to meet other people from varying backgrounds. This helps cultivate diversity and respect for other races.

Concluding this essay, I would say that although there are disputes with views, for me, trying to develop the characteristics of a child until they are ready enough to tackle the world as they go is mainly done by parents. Hence, I believe that our families play an important role and the schools come second.

Sample 3:

The duty of raising virtuous children is a tough ordeal. If there is any deficiency in the moral education of a child, they are bound to face social obstacles when they grow up. The consensus on who is responsible for schooling juveniles on the value of being ethical and right-minded is divided. Some believe that the onus falls upon the guardians of a child, whereas others believe that school teachers are more responsible in this context. I am a firm believer in the idea that the mantle of teaching positive life skills to an infant is that of the parents. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I will elaborate on both sides of this discussion.

It is a commonly known fact that our parents are the first individuals to interact and associate with us. Subsequently, they become the most consequential influence in our lives to a point where we adopt their mannerisms and behaviour into our personalities. Thus, the burden of being as cautious as a person can be, and to be veracious at all times has to be borne by the parents since such characteristics are inherently taken on by youngsters.

Nevertheless, we must address the impact of the time spent at school on a child’s life and how it can transform an individual for the better or the worse. During adolescence, school is considered to be a second home for children and teachers are liable for their students nearly as much as their parents. Therefore, keeping in mind the amount of time spent under the guidance of schoolteachers, the charge of educating young children on vital life skills should innately fall upon educators.

Finally, I would like to conclude by saying that the youth are the future of our society. That being said, the efforts invested towards nurturing the younger generation should be shared by everyone, although, in my opinion, this duty is heavier on immediate family members.

Sample 4:

It is a widely held belief that parents should teach the children how to be good members of society, but there is a strong counter-argument amongst sections of people that school is the right place to teach children. However, I think that schools should consider this as their responsibility instead of relying on parents to do this job.

On the one hand, there are many reasons why assigning parents to teach their children to be good members of society is supported by some people. Firstly, most of the children mimic their parents’ activities and thus parents have a greater role in setting good examples for their kids. For example, parents who regularly argue with others may find that their child both imitates them and considers this bad practice as an ideal life tactic to solve a disagreement. Secondly, parents are closer to children, and they can teach their kids the important aspects of being a good member of society. For instance, parents may teach their children and guide them to assist poor people by providing the food prepared by their parents.

On the other hand, other people, myself included, totally agree that school is the right place to learn how to be good members of society. One of the reasons why this view is held is that nowadays children do not have sufficient time to spend with their parents because both of the parents might be employed, or they may keep their child in a hostel. Actually, in school children will learn education - hence the school must also include these qualities as a part of the course structure so that the child may follow them. Besides, the school also allows children to communicate with people from all walks of life, ranging from their peers to dustmen or healthcare workers, from which there is a fair chance that children will learn to behave with different types of people in an appropriate way.

All things considered, while parents are important to the character formation of their offspring, in my mind, the school’s roles are much more significant.

Sample 5:

The question of who should impart the values and skills necessary for children to become responsible members of society remains contentious. This essay will explore the contrasting perspectives on whether parents or schools hold the primary responsibility for instilling these qualities. I firmly advocate that while schools play a role, parents should predominantly undertake the task of teaching children how to be exemplary members of society.

Proponents of the idea that schools should bear this responsibility highlight the structured educational environment as an ideal setting for cultivating social values. Schools provide a formal curriculum that includes moral education programmes and extracurricular activities promoting teamwork and social harmony. For example, through civic education courses or community service initiatives, schools aim to instil values of citizenship and responsibility.

On the contrary, advocates of the viewpoint that parents should impart societal values argue that familial influences are crucial in shaping a child's character. Parents serve as the primary role models, imparting moral values, empathy, and social etiquette through everyday interactions. For instance, children observe and imitate the behaviour of their parents, learning essential traits like respect, kindness, and responsibility.

I believe that, while schools undeniably contribute to a child's social development, parents should play a central role in teaching children how to be good members of society. The familial environment offers continuous and personalized guidance crucial for character development. Parents serve as constant influencers, shaping a child's worldview and moral compass from an early age providing a strong foundation for their role in society.

In conclusion, the debate surrounding the role of parents versus schools in shaping good citizens highlights the significance of both influences. Nevertheless, the enduring and personalized guidance provided by parents creates a substantial impact on a child's development into a responsible and contributing member of society.

Sample 6:

The question of where children learn to become responsible members of society - at home or school, has sparked heated debate for generations. Some argue that parents, as the primary caregivers, hold the ultimate responsibility for shaping their children's moral compass. Others believe that schools provide the ideal platform for fostering social responsibility. I believe that schools play a more crucial role in instilling a sense of civic duty and social awareness in children.

Proponents of parental influence point to the undeniable impact of early childhood experiences. Parents set the first examples of behaviour and interaction, and their values and actions are readily absorbed by their children. For instance, parents who actively participate in community service projects are more likely to raise children who are empathetic and engaged in social causes. Additionally, parents can tailor their teachings to each child's individual needs and personality, leading to a more personalized and effective approach.

On the contrary, proponents of teachers guiding young children to become responsible citizens argue that schools offer several unique advantages that are difficult to replicate within the home environment. Firstly, schools provide a diverse social setting where children interact with individuals from various backgrounds and perspectives. This fosters tolerance, understanding, and the ability to navigate diverse social situations, which are crucial for responsible citizenship in a multicultural world. Secondly, schools employ trained professionals who possess expertise in child development and social-emotional learning. These educators can implement structured programmes and activities designed to explicitly teach social responsibility, including conflict resolution, empathy building, and ethical decision-making.

In conclusion, while parents undoubtedly play an important role in shaping their children's values, schools offer a unique and crucial environment for instilling a sense of social responsibility. Through their diverse student body, skilled educators, and structured programmes, schools can create a foundation for responsible citizenship, preparing children to become active and contributing members of society.

Sample 7:

It is a widely held belief that parents should teach children how to be good members of society but there is a strong counter-argument amongst sections of people that school is the right place to teach children. However, I am of the opinion that this is a matter to be debated in light of several factors before any conclusion can be drawn.

It is generally believed that parents should guide the children on how to deal with society. This is mainly because children will obey the words of parents rather than the teachers. In many books, we can see that parents are the first teachers. Parents should teach basic qualities like respect, obedience, and honesty. Parents should teach those qualities at an early age so that their children can imbibe these qualities into them. For instance, my uncle’s daughter is just studying 5th class, but she respects elderly people. Since their parents taught her the qualities which she must inculcate in her.

Education starts at home and the things learned from early childhood become part of someone's personality and characteristics. Hence, the things kids learn from their parents have a lasting impression on people. So, parents should be careful about teaching their kids the moral values and responsibilities to society. Children by nature mimic their family members and thus parents can teach their kids how to be good members of society by performing their duties correctly. Most children obey their parents more than anyone else and the instructions the parents give thus have better chances to be obeyed by children. Not all parents can spend sufficient time with their children because of their ever-increasing business outside of homes and for those students, teachers play an important role. Some students listen to the teachers they like and follow their instructions like written laws. Thus, teachers can contribute towards teaching morality and responsibilities to the children.

On the other hand, there are certain groups of people who vehemently contend that school is the right place to learn how to be good members of society. One of the reasons why this view is held is that nowadays children do not have sufficient time to spend with their parents because both of the parents might be employed, or they may keep their child in a hostel. In school children will learn the education. The school must also include these qualities as a part of the course structure so that the child may follow them.

Thus, it is evident from all discussion that both the arguments carry equal strength and significance, and neither can be refuted outright. I personally subscribe to the proposition that school is the right place to learn how to be good members of society.  

Sample 8:

As society has developed, different people have different opinions about how children should be taught ways of living so that they can contribute their part and become good members of society. Some people think that parents should be leading from the front and some think that schools are the best place to teach these rules to the children. However, I think that parents should consider this as their responsibility instead of relying on the school to do this job.

Now let us discuss whether parents do this job and become successful in carrying out this task. This will not only help their children to live a good life but also teach them the rules and provide them with guidelines on how to behave with juniors, respect elders, deal with day-to-day matters, and respond to difficult situations etc., which you cannot expect from the school to teach as school is basically associated with academics. While schools aim to teach children how to be responsible members of society, the level of time, attention, sincerity, and dedication required for this can only come from parents.

Schools mostly teach academic lessons and punctuality to the students. They do not fully focus on moral values a child should learn and practice and in fact, they do not have sufficient scope to do so. Parents, on the other hand, have a good chance to do it. In many cases, the kids mimic the parents and thus the parents can make some examples to teach their kids. The kids mostly look at the teacher as some outsiders who would teach them the academic lesson, not personal values. Parents spend much more time with children than the teachers do. Teachers sometimes do not know the personal choices of students and thus can’t evaluate them perfectly. Not all teachers would take the responsibility to teach the students the responsibilities of a good member of society.

Schools cannot replace the role and responsibility of parents because it deals with a large number of children and each and every child has his/ her own state of mind, understanding level, thinking level and it is not possible for teachers to understand each and every child and teach him/her accordingly but the parents know their children by birth know his likes, dislikes, how he can understand etc. I would like to give an example that my parents always considered first their own role to teach me only academics lessons but also how to live life successfully as they have spent their lives and the mistakes that they have made should not be repeated by me.

In the end, I would like to conclude that parents should be the leading this part of this job and should not expect this role from the school and time will tell that their efforts will not go in vain and will not only help their children but also coming generations.

Sample 9:

In today’s world, socialism and being a member of society are crucial values in our life. Contributing positively to society is a target for everyone. Some people see that directing children to participate and being a member of society is something that should be ensured by the parents’ duty, while another camp believes that it is a school’s task. Both sides of this debate will be analysed before drawing a conclusion.

On the one hand, assigning parents to teach their children to be good members of society is supported by some people. For example, parents may teach their children and guide them to assist poor people by providing the food prepared by their parents. This example shows how parents may take the lead to guide their children to be positive and valued in society. Therefore, this idea is supported by many. The parents are closer to the children, and they can teach their kids the important aspects of being a good member of society. Most children mimic their parents’ activities and thus the parents have a greater role in setting good examples for their kids.

On the other hand, many believe that school plays a golden role in children’s lives. For instance, a school may prepare a campaign for their students to clean certain areas in their city. Such an attitude gives children practical experience in contributing to society. Thus, many argue that it would be better to leave this to the school. The teachers on behalf of the school have a big role in teaching the students those responsibilities. Since students listen to their teachers’ suggestion and command, they are more likely to obey the things their teachers would teach. Finally, the curriculum and textbooks can include such topics to increase awareness among the students.

In conclusion, the debate will always remain between both camps for assigning this responsibility. In my opinion, schools should take this task on their shoulders as the children spend most of their daytime there.

Sample 10:

It is considered by some that parents should teach their children about the ways to be good and civilised members of society while others hold the opinion that these values should be taught by the school. However, in my opinion, I believe that parents and school are both equally important to instil moral values, among children, to be a good citizen.

On one hand, parents are the first teachers, and home is the first school where children learn about life lessons. Educating children about love, empathy, kindness, and socially acceptable behaviour is a must at home. In addition, children should be taught to help the needy members of the community because parents know their children well. Hence, they can teach their kids about social responsibilities effectively, which should not be ignored.

On the other hand, school is the place where children are taught skills on various subjects that help to be self-reliant. When children gain education and various skills in school, it will help them in future to become self-dependent. This will also empower them to contribute towards society using their skills. For example, educated children may help to teach the alphabet and help to read and write, to illiterate members of society. Thus, in my opinion, children should be taught to be socially responsible by parents as well as at school. When children get such an education of skills, love, and kindness they can grow to become helpful members of society.

In conclusion, the most effective method to help children to become a morally and socially responsible part of society is to teach them at home and also at school.

Sample 11:

We have been developing our personality throughout our entire life, yet the crucial time to mould our characteristic could happen at a rather young age. Some believe it is our families that define who we will become while others argue that it is the school’s utmost responsibility to teach us morality and to give us guidance. In my own perception, I am more positive with the former.

Family is the first environment that we immersed ourselves in ever since we were born. The behaviour our parents deliver and the value they convey certainly have a colossal impact on our personality. It is also a vital process for a parent to teach their child the righteous perspective toward society at the very beginning. It is like creating a masterpiece on a pure canvas before it is contaminated.

For people who believe that school should be the right place to educate students into obtaining the correct attitude of their lives and having the decent morality to become a good member of our society, they put their faith in the teachers. Teachers provide standard expectations that our society has for its members, offering knowledge and ideas with less bias and less possibility of deviation from the student. It is also essential for young children to meet other people, their classmates that are from various backgrounds, in order to help cultivate their ability to cherish and respect diversity.

In conclusion, both points of view have their own dispute, yet for me, trying to build a child’s characteristic until they are already studying in schools seems to be a little too slow. Many values could have been buried deep in our mind. Thus, I believe it’s our family that should play the important role for this rather than the school afterwards.

Sample 12:

It is important to encourage children to become good members of society. This means things like being a law-abiding citizen, contributing to your community and being prepared to work and study hard. But who is best placed to do this?

One argument is that parents should teach children these things. They are, after all, with their children for long periods of time and they generally know their children inside-out. This makes them ideally placed to discuss behaviour with their children and also their reaction to events they might see in the media. For example, if a child is unkind to another person, or if they see a news story about a political leader clearly lying on television, parents can explain why this is unacceptable behaviour. In so doing children will learn the difference between right and wrong and so they will be less likely to do the same thing themselves. Furthermore, parents can lead by example, showing their children how to be a good citizen through their actions. They could, for instance, get involved in voluntary work at a local food bank, and by doing this, their children will actually see why it is important to give back to their community.

However, an alternative view is that schools should take responsibility for this crucial part of a child’s education. Teachers, unlike parents, are usually well trained to deliver important life lessons and, armed with good resources, they can quickly and effectively ensure that children learn what it is to be a good citizen. Indeed, many schools already do this; in the United Kingdom, for example, many schools now teach personal and social education as part of the school curriculum, and, at high school level, this subject includes the obligations of citizenship, and the importance of contributing towards one’s own community through voluntary work.

Personally, I feel that schools and parents should be jointly responsible for teaching children to become good citizens. Parents are well-placed to lead by example and through discussion, while teachers are able to do the same thing in a more explicit way as part of the school curriculum. In other words, it should be a team effort.

Sample 13:

A child’s education has never been about learning information and basic skills only. It has always included teaching the next generation how to be good members of society. Therefore, this cannot be the responsibility of the parents alone. 

In order to be a good member of any society the individual must respect and obey the rules of their community and share their values. Educating children to understand the need to obey rules and respect others always begins in the home and is widely thought to be the responsibility of parents. They will certainly be the first to help children learn what is important in life, how they are expected to behave and what role they will play in their world.

However, learning to understand and share the value system of a whole society cannot be achieved just in the home. Once a child goes to school, they are entering a wider community where teachers and peers will have just as much influence as their parents do at home. At school, children will experience working and living with people from a whole variety of backgrounds from the wider society. This experience should teach them how to co-operate with each other and how to contribute to the life of their community.

But to be a valuable member of any community is not like learning a simple skill. It is something that an individual goes on learning throughout life, and it is the responsibility of every member of society to take responsibility for helping the younger generation to become active and able members of that society.

Sample 14:

The question of who should primarily teach children how to be good members of society elicits divergent opinions. While some argue that schools should take the lead, others contend that parents bear this responsibility. I believe that both parents and schools have roles to play in shaping children into responsible citizens, but parental influence should be prioritised.

Advocates of the school-centric approach point to the structured environment of education as conducive to nurturing social values. Schools offer formal curricula, including moral education programs and extracurricular activities promoting teamwork and social unity. For example, through civic education courses or community service initiatives, schools aim to instill values of citizenship and responsibility.

However, proponents of parental influence argue that familial interactions are fundamental in shaping a child's character. Parents serve as primary role models, imparting moral values, empathy, and social manners through daily interactions. Children observe and emulate their parents' behaviour, learning crucial traits like respect, kindness, and responsibility.

In my opinion, while schools play a role in social development, parents should assume the central responsibility for teaching children how to be good members of society. The familial environment provides continuous and personalised guidance crucial for character formation. Parents serve as consistent influencers, shaping a child's worldview and moral compass, thus laying a strong foundation for their societal role.

In conclusion, both parents and schools contribute to the development of responsible citizens, but parental influence should be prioritised. The combination of formal education provided by schools and the enduring guidance offered by parents ensures that children grow into individuals who contribute positively to society.

Sample 15:

The debate over where the primary responsibility lies for teaching social competencies to the next generation is multifaceted. While some contend that this duty solely rests with parents, others, myself included, argue that educational institutions play a crucial role in shaping individuals into good members of society. In this essay, I will explore both perspectives in detail.

It is undeniable that family environments offer unique advantages for the development of children. Within the familial setting, children are often more receptive to the influence of their parents due to the intimate and nurturing atmosphere. Additionally, parents possess valuable insights into their children's personalities, allowing them to adapt their guidance to suit individual needs effectively. Moreover, instilling fundamental moral values such as courage, integrity, and empathy is widely regarded as a parental responsibility, as it forms the cornerstone of a child's ethical framework.

However, the notion that social competencies can be exclusively cultivated within the confines of the home overlooks the pivotal role of educational institutions. Schools serve as microcosms of society, exposing children to diverse perspectives and fostering interaction with peers and teachers from varied backgrounds. Through collaborative projects and social activities, students learn essential skills such as teamwork, communication, and conflict resolution, which are indispensable for navigating the complexities of adult life.

In conclusion, while parents undoubtedly utilise significant influence over their children's moral and social development, the role of educational institutions should not be underestimated. Both entities share a collective responsibility in preparing the next generation to become productive members of society. By working collaboratively, parents and educators can create an environment favourable to the holistic growth of children, equipping them with the necessary tools to succeed in an ever-evolving world.

Sample 16:

The debate about who should teach kids to be good members of society is common. Some say parents should, while others argue schools are better. I think we need to think about both sides before deciding. Many believe parents should guide kids because children usually listen to them more than anyone else. Parents are often seen as the first teachers and should teach important values like respect, honesty, and obedience early on. For example, my sister's son is only in the fifth grade, yet he shows respect to older people. This is because his parents taught him the important qualities he should adopt.

What kids learn at home sticks with them for life, shaping who they become. Parents play a big role in showing kids how to behave in society. However, not all parents can spend a lot of time with their kids due to work or other reasons. In those cases, teachers become important. Some kids listen to teachers they like and follow their advice closely.

On the other side, some strongly believe schools are the best place to teach kids how to be good members of society. They argue that since parents are often busy with work, children spend more time at school. Schools should include moral values in their curriculum so kids can learn them alongside regular subjects.

In conclusion, both parents and schools have important roles in teaching kids about society. Neither side should be ignored. Personally, I think schools are crucial for this because they have more time with kids during the day.

Sample 17:

A child is the future of any nation. To shape a better future of any society, it is essential that they must be taught good values. Everyone agrees with this view but there is a debate on who should be solely responsible for teaching them these values - parents or schools. As far as my opinion is concerned, I believe the responsibility should be equally divided between the two. I will be explaining both viewpoints in the upcoming paragraphs.

Parents or family are the first type of socialisation for the children. It is through them that they learn how to talk, behave and express their thoughts. They leave a lasting impression on the minds of young ones. They have the opportunity and responsibility to teach the children virtues that can be further groomed or added up by the second type of socialisation agent, which is teachers or schools. For example, when a child learns that outsiders must be greeted when they visit home, teachers refine that behaviour by making children learn how to be hospitable to guests.

Those who believe that the responsibility must lie solely with the school put too much faith in teachers. The way children behave is certainly impacted by their interaction with parents as it is them who stay around children continuously in their first few years. Teachers offer the knowledge and necessary skills to the children. They broaden children’s views and make them learn to respect diversity. However, if the responsibility solely lies on their shoulders, a child might not completely flourish. Any child learns by practice and the seed of good behaviour that is planted by the teachers must be germinated by the family.

To conclude, while family plays a vital role in the beginning years of the child, schools play a vital role in later stages. However, both need to work in tandem to make a child grow into a well-balanced individual.

Sample 18:

Raising a child is not a child’s play. Even a bit of neglect can impact the growth of the child in the most unexpected ways. In such a scenario, there seems to be no consensus as to who should be responsible for teaching good behaviour to the children. While some believe that the onus falls upon parents, others think school should be taking care of that. I think that the mantle of raising the child into well-behaved beings lies on the shoulders of parents. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I will discuss both opinions.

It is a commonly known fact that parents are a child’s first teachers. A child is not born with a set of traits, it is parents who fill in such characteristics at the early stages of a child’s development. Whatever parents do, children imitate that and learn it. Often funny videos of children talking over the phone can be seen over social media, or them doing their makeup- all of which they pick up by observing their parents. It can be said that they inculcate the mannerism which their parents show. Therefore, it is upon parents to only exhibit the behaviours which they want their child to learn and ensure that they learn the positive traits as they learn too quickly in the first few years only from their parents.

However, some are in the opinion that the place where children spend their maximum time after home is school. Therefore, teachers become innately responsible for looking after the growth and development of the child. There is so much information that parents are oblivious about their children due to their work schedule, but teachers know. It is because of the rapport they build with the students. Therefore, it is necessary that teachers look after the welfare of children and imbibe good qualities in them.

No matter which side we dwell upon, a child should be seen as the collective responsibility of the society he or she grows up in. However, the onus lies more on the parents as they are the ones who bring them into life and spend the maximum time with them in the initial years.

Sample 19:

The child is the father of the man. What it means is that the behaviour of a child goes a long way to build his or her personality. For this, so many agents of socialisation play an important role. The perspective seems contested as to whether parents should be responsible for inculcating values in children or schools. In this essay, I will explore both aspects and give my opinion on the same.

Whatever values we inherit in the early stages, we get them from our parents. As a child, we often look up to our parents and put them on the pedestal of righteousness. They teach us how to behave, act and have the right perspectives. They are the first teachers and home thus become the first school for us. Hence, under their umbrella, we evolve into our best selves.

However, some people argue that schools should be the place where children learn good values. It is true to some extent as it is not necessary that in this fast-paced world, where every parent is thriving to give the best life to their children, have time for them. Most of the parents are working as professionals, which leaves them with little time with their young ones. Children spend most of their time in school and remain with their friends. Hence, schools should ensure that they are inculcating the right values in each and every child as when they learn from each other, they learn the right things.

To conclude, it is true that parents play an important role in shaping the lives of individuals but schools have an upper hand as every child goes through years of learning at school. Thus, it becomes pivotal that schools ensure that the child grows holistically as the onus of responsibility lies more on them than parents.

Sample 20:

The debate on whether parents should teach children how to be good members of society encompasses diverse viewpoints, revealing its advantages and drawbacks. This essay critically assesses these perspectives.

There are myriad arguments in favour of my stance. Recent research not only outlines the significance of studies as well as people, but also points out the importance of education and coping with vicissitudes. Besides, it provides a brief overview of expanding cultural understanding, followed by enhancing global perspectives. Examples of this can be seen all over the world, especially in affluent nations. Further, the implications of technological advancements on these views are significant, justifying widespread support for the idea that parents should teach children how to be good members of society.

However, there are some arguments against the aforementioned view. Besides, its impact is far-reaching indeed as its influence extends to various facets of society, shaping not only individual experiences but also impacting on the academic research landscape. Therefore, it is apparent why many are against the notion that parents should teach children how to be good members of society.

In conclusion, while the viewpoint that parents should teach children how to be good members of society presents a complex array of advantages and disadvantages, my analysis leads me to firmly support the notion that its benefits substantially outweigh the drawbacks.

Sample 21:

Parents play a crucial role in shaping the values, beliefs, and behavior of their children. Many people believe that parents are primarily responsible for teaching their children how to be good members of society. On the other hand, some argue that schools are better equipped to instill the necessary social skills and values in children. In this essay, both views will be discussed, followed by my own opinion on the matter.

Those who believe that parents should be the primary teachers of social behavior argue that children learn most of their values and attitudes from their parents. Parents are the first and most influential role models for children, and they have the greatest impact on their development. Through their interactions with their children, parents can teach them important values such as respect, kindness, honesty, and responsibility. By providing a loving and nurturing environment, parents can help their children develop into empathetic and well-adjusted individuals who contribute positively to society.

On the other hand, proponents of the view that schools are the best place to learn social skills argue that schools are an integral part of a child's socialization process. In school, children interact with a diverse group of peers and teachers, which helps them develop social skills such as cooperation, communication, and conflict resolution. Schools also provide opportunities for children to learn about diversity, tolerance, and acceptance, which are essential for fostering a harmonious and inclusive society. Moreover, schools can educate children about social issues and promote civic engagement, encouraging them to become responsible and active members of their communities.

In my opinion, both parents and schools play important roles in teaching children how to be good members of society. Parents provide the foundation for children's moral development and instill core values that guide their behavior. However, schools complement the efforts of parents by providing children with opportunities to practice and refine their social skills in a structured and diverse environment. By working together, parents and schools can create a supportive and nurturing environment that fosters the social, emotional, and moral development of children.

In conclusion, both parents and schools have a significant impact on teaching children how to be good members of society. While parents are the primary educators of social behavior, schools play a vital role in enhancing children's social skills and values. By working together, parents and schools can ensure that children develop into responsible, compassionate, and ethical individuals who contribute positively to society.

Sample 22:

Who should be teaching children to be ideal members of society has sparked off a heated debate of late. Some believe that such responsibility is placed on parents’ shoulders, yet others contend that this should be taught by schools. However, I am inclined to the opinion that parents ought to bear the responsibility.

People who find schools very significant believe that children, in schools, are members of a small community that exerts enormous influence on their moral development. Children get in touch with other peers and get a fair chance to practice the values that teachers instil into them. And teachers also have the opportunity to guide them if something goes wrong. For example, if a boy does something offensive to another child, then teachers can help him to focus on his victim’s feelings. They can even use mild punishments, for example, not allowing the child to have playtime if the same thing occurs again and again. Parents would often be partial to their own children in such cases. Thus, teachers are in a better position to teach children important life lessons.

On the contrary, parents play as powerful and important role models for children. To put it another way, children’s behaviour is considerably affected by their parents. They follow everything their parents do or incorporate the values that are practised by parents since children are just like sponges. According to recent research conducted by the University of California, children can learn standards of behaviour from their parents’ examples. Thus, parents can instil social values by setting the right example for their children. Moreover, parents have a tremendous emotional bond with their children. This relationship lays a firm foundation for their children’s personalities. Apart from it, parents are with their children during the most crucial time when character development is at a vital stage. At an early age, children are like wet clay. Therefore, parents can mould them to be good social members, I believe.

In fine, it seems reasonable to assume that it is the prime responsibility of parents to imbibe certain social values in their children. Therefore, parents ought to practice those values in their lives as they are role models for their children.

Sample 23:

It is commonly argued that young individuals should be taught how to become good contributors to society. While some people believe that parents are the primary source of such education, others contend that schools are responsible for this task. In this essay, I will discuss both views. However, as far as my opinion goes, it is a shared responsibility.

On the one hand, parents are the primary source of learning and guidance for children. They are the first and foremost teachers for youngsters, and their responsibilities go beyond providing basic necessities. Parents can impart good values, morals, and principles to their children, which will shape their personalities and character. Children learn from their parents’ behaviour and actions, which can teach them how to interact with others and how to make ethical decisions. For instance, children who see their parents volunteering in their communities are more likely to develop an altruistic mindset and give it back to society.

On the other hand, schools play a significant role in shaping young individuals’ perspectives and personalities. Academies are an essential socialization tool for children, where they learn how to collaborate, communicate, and make decisions collectively. Schools can promote social responsibility by incorporating values such as kindness, respect, and empathy into the curriculum. Moreover, academies can also provide practical experiences and hands-on learning opportunities, such as community service projects, which can help children develop a sense of responsibility towards their communities.

In my view, both parents and schools play crucial roles in teaching children how to become good members of society. However, the level of responsibility each should take varies depending on the child’s age and developmental stage. Parents should focus on instilling good values and morals from an early age, while schools can complement this by reinforcing such values and providing practical experiences to apply them.

In conclusion, children need guidance and education on how to become good members of society. While parents and schools both have a role to play, it is essential to recognize the unique contribution of each. Ultimately, it is a collective responsibility that requires collaboration between parents and schools to ensure the next generation becomes responsible and compassionate citizens.

Sample 24:

Some people believe that it is the responsibility of parents to teach their children how to become ideal members of society, while others think that schools should be the primary place for learning such values. In my opinion, parents should take on this responsibility as they are the ones who are primarily accountable for the upbringing and development of their children.

Parents are the first teachers of their children and have a significant impact on their lives. They have the opportunity to instil the right values and beliefs in their children from a very young age. For instance, teaching youngsters the importance of honesty, kindness, respect, and responsibility can help them develop a strong sense of morality and ethics. Parents can also teach children to appreciate diversity and be empathetic towards others, which are important traits for living in a harmonious society.

Moreover, parents have a unique relationship with their children and can use this to their advantage in teaching them about social values. Juveniles are more likely to listen to and follow the advice of their parents than teachers or other authority figures. This means that parents have the potential to make a more significant impact on their children’s behaviour and beliefs.

On the other hand, schools also have a role in shaping the values and attitudes of children. Teachers can reinforce the values taught at home and help children learn how to interact respectfully with their peers. Schools can also provide a platform for children to learn about different cultures and beliefs, which can broaden their perspective and foster tolerance and understanding.

In conclusion, while schools can play a role in teaching children about social values, it is primarily the responsibility of parents to do so. Parents have a unique relationship with their children, and the values they ingrain at home can have a profound impact on their children’s conduct and attitudes.

Sample 25:

The topic of who is responsible for teaching children how to be good members of society has been a subject of debate for many years. Some people believe that parents should be the ones to teach their children about being good members of society, while others believe that it is the role of schools to do so. Both sides have valid arguments, and I believe that both parents and schools have important roles to play in shaping children's behavior and values.

On the one hand, parents are the first teachers of their children, and they have a profound impact on their children's development. They are the ones who provide children with a stable home environment, shape their attitudes and beliefs, and instill moral and ethical values. Family traditions and cultural values also play a key role in shaping children's behavior, and parents can pass these traditions and values down to their children, helping them to understand their place in the world and how they should behave.

On the other hand, schools are also crucial in shaping children's behavior and values. Teachers and the school environment play a major role in helping children develop social and emotional skills, and in providing them with a well-rounded education. By learning from their teachers and from each other, children can develop a sense of community and learn about the importance of cooperation, empathy, and respect for others.

In my opinion, both parents and schools have important roles to play in teaching children how to be good members of society. While parents are responsible for instilling the basic values and beliefs in children, schools can help to broaden their knowledge and understanding of the world. A collaborative effort between parents and schools can provide children with the support they need to develop into well-rounded, responsible adults.

In conclusion, the question of who is responsible for teaching children how to be good members of society is a complex one, with valid arguments on both sides. However, I believe that a collaborative effort between parents and schools is the best way to provide children with the guidance and support they need to become responsible, compassionate members of society. By working together, parents and schools can help to shape the next generation of leaders and citizens.

Sample 26:

Some people argue that parents should be responsible for teaching children to become good members of society, while others claim that school is where they should learn this. I agree with the former point of view because children's behavior mirrors that of their parents.

On the one hand, it can be argued that school provides an ideal environment in which to foster good behavior. There, children learn that good acts get rewarded, whereas bad ones get punished. For example, if a child is always helpful to others, they in turn would reciprocate when the child needs a favor. By contrast, bullies would be criticized by their teachers and avoided by their peers. However, I do not think this is a good way for children to learn the difference between right and wrong because, at their age, they may feel overwhelmed by the bad consequences their misbehavior brings.

On the other hand, children tend to imitate their parents' behavior. Thus, if parents set good examples, moral values and good behavior would come naturally to children. For instance, when a child sees their parents always give a hand to the elderly couple next door, they would pick up on this and help them as well. I think this method is preferable because it creates a loving and caring environment for children to learn to become good community members.

In conclusion, parents should take responsibility for teaching their children to become good members of society, because their behavior is always a reflection of their upbringing.