2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án (Phần 16)

Sample 1:

Banning smoking is a controversial issue as many people strongly support this ban while others disagree with it. It has been around for centuries and in many countries, public smoking is prohibited and against the law while it is open in many other countries. There are discussions and arguments about whether smoking should be banned completely or not.

First of all, smoking is detrimental to health. It causes lung cancer which ultimately leads to death. It might take a long time to show symptoms, but it always happens. Secondly, it is a waste of money as smokers spend a lot of money on cigarettes. Addiction to smoking leads to addiction to marijuana, yaba etc. Eventually, addicted people get involved in different types of crimes. They start collecting money by stealing, lying and robbing and the severity of the crime keeps on increasing. Moreover, smoking not only harms the smoker but also the people around them. Recent studies on smoking suggest that passive smoking is as harmful as active smoking.

On the contrary, the tobacco industry is the source of huge tax for the government. Government makes the best utilization of the tax money by building schools, mosques, overhaul streets etc. Thousands of people work in cigarette-related industries, and this creates huge job opportunities. If smoking is banned completely, these people will become unemployed. Another vague benefit of smoking is that smokers believe smoking refreshes their minds and relieves them from tension and stress, though it has not been scientifically proved. Some people think that banning smoking is like imposing restriction on people's freedom and they completely oppose the idea of imposing restrictions on smoking.

From this point of view, we see that there are opinions for and against the banning of smoking. I believe the government should think rationally and wisely before they make any decision about prohibiting smoking. Personally, I believe that public smoking should be prohibited, and any violation of this rule should be penalized but a complete ban on smoking should be made slowly and with proper planning.

Sample 2:

A complete ban on smoking is controversial as many people strongly support it while others disagree. In many countries, public smoking is forbidden, but it is still widespread in many other countries. I, however, believe that smoking should be banned, but it should be done slowly and with proper planning and steps.

First of all, smoking is severely detrimental to public health. It causes lung cancer which ultimately leads to death. Secondly, smoking is a complete waste of money, and addiction to smoking sometimes leads to enslavement to other illegal substances. Eventually, many addicted people get involved in different types of crimes to manage the money they need to abuse illegal substances. Finally, smoking not only harms the smoker but also the people around them. Recent studies on smoking suggest that passive smoking is as harmful as active smoking.

Having said that, the tobacco industry is a huge source of tax for the government. The authority makes the best utilization of the tax money by building schools, parks, overhaul streets and other public facilities that serve ordinary people. Millions of people work in cigarette-related industries, and if smoking is banned completely, these people will lose their jobs. Some smokers believe that smoking relieves them from tension and stress, though it has not been scientifically proven. Finally, some people think that banning smoking is like restricting people's freedom.

In conclusion, I believe that the government should take initiatives rationally to prohibit smoking. Public smoking should be prohibited, and any violation of this rule should be penalized, but a complete ban on smoking should be made slowly and with proper planning.

Sample 3:

Banning smoking is a contentious issue since many individuals strongly support this ban even though some disagree. It has existed for centuries, and in many states, public smoking is illegal and contrary to the law, although it is available in some different nations. One will find talks and disagreements about whether smoking ought to be banned entirely or not.

It causes lung cancer that ultimately results in death. It may take a while to reveal symptoms, but it continually occurs. Second, it is a waste of cash as smokers invest a good deal of cash in cigarettes. Finally, hooked people become involved in various forms of crimes. They begin amassing cash by stealing, robbing, and lying, and also, the intensity of the offense keeps on rising. Additionally, smoking not just damages the smoker but also individuals around them. Recent research on smoking implies that passive smoking is equally as dangerous as smoking.

On the contrary, the tobacco business is the origin of enormous tax for authorities. Thousands of individuals work in cigarette-associated businesses, and this produces massive job opportunities. If smoking is prohibited entirely, these individuals will end up unemployed. Another vague advantage of smoking is that smokers believe smoking calms their heads and relieves them from anxiety and anxiety, though it has not been clinically proved. Many people today feel that banning smoking is similar to imposing restrictions on people’s liberty, and they oppose the notion of imposing limitations on smoking.

I think authorities should think logically and sensibly before they make any conclusion about forbidding smoking. I feel that people smoking should be banned and any breach of the rule should be punished, but a complete ban on smoking should be made gradually and with good planning.

Sample 4:

People have different opinions about restricting smoking as some people believe that smoking should be prohibited, while some disagree with this. The next essay will discuss both opinions in detail, followed by my opinion and a fair decision.

On the one hand, it is clear if several men and women dislike the controversial idea that smoking should be banned in all areas. Firstly, they believe that everybody has their right to do things they like. Smoking is a preference, and it is up to the individual themselves whether they would like to smoke or not. Secondly, prohibiting smoking will also affect the financial condition as cigarette mills absorb so many employments. If smoking is wholly banned, then a number of factories will be closed and will lead to a higher unemployment rate. Last, the government’s high amount of tax in the tobacco businesses will no longer be accessible also.

On the other hand, it is a fact that smoking has numerous negative consequences for the smokers themselves. Besides that, smoking could also have a severe threat to passive smokers. Individuals who do not smoke but inhale secondhand smoke may have a possibility of lung cancer. Therefore, many men and women think that smoking should be banned entirely, as it could severely impact both active and passive smokers.

In my view, I support the notion that smoking should be banned in all areas because smoking is harmful to our health. However, before implementing the idea, the government has to have an alternative plan for the cigarette factories’ workers because they may be unemployed. The authorities could enlarge and develop a brand-new business; consequently, these workers could be allocated to the new area.

Sample 1:

People have different views about the impacts of consumerism on our society. While a school of thought holds that money and material possessions are over-prioritized in our consumer society today, others believe that such a culture has significantly contributed to the improvement of our lives. Personally, I agree with the former view because this way of life has made humans greedier and more selfish and has put our mother nature in jeopardy.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why some people are in favour of a consumer society. Firstly, the ever-increasing demand to possess more can facilitate economic growth. For example, international trade in Vietnam has more than tripled over the last few decades due to the surge in demand for foreign products. Furthermore, consumer culture has also given rise to more employment opportunities as more human resources are needed for mass-production and manufacturing. As a result, more people are able to earn a higher income, which has significantly improved their standard of living and reduced the overall rate of poverty. However, the benefits that consumerism brings are only short-term because a sustainable society needs to develop in harmony with nature.

On the other hand, I would concur with those who believe that consumerism does more harm than good to human beings the world over. As most manufacturers aim to increase sales and tempt people to buy more to maximize their profits, many have embraced planned obsolescence and deliberately created short-lived consumer goods that are meant to be disposable. This has significantly contributed to the already overwhelming amount of waste being dumped in landfill sites, and thus exacerbating current environmental problems. Second, consumer societies often encourage people to associate wealth with happiness, meaning that the more they can own, the happier they will be. This can result in many placing material possessions over other traditional values such as compassion and empathy, which can eventually create a selfish and greedy generation.

In conclusion, while the growth of consumerism does bring about many benefits, I believe that the price we have to pay in terms of our environment and our traditional values is much more significant and thus, we should not give too much importance to financial and material possessions.

Sample 2:

Some believe that society places too much value on materialism, while others insist that such a lifestyle contributes to improving living standards. Although the latter is justifiable to a certain extent, the former is more convincing.

Among the various factors underlying the promotion of consumerism, the principal one is that material possessions form a tangible measurement of success. It is commonplace today for one to make hasty judgements about another’s achievements based on their residence and manner of dress. This motivates working adults, especially recent graduates, to strive to move up the career ladder, hence securing better pay and increased monetary benefits. An income rise is bound to create more consumer demand for higher-quality products and services. When manufacturing thrives, more jobs are created, which in turn benefits the society as a whole.

Despite this legitimate argument, consumer culture should be regarded as more detrimental than beneficial as it threatens work-life balance and leads to other negative implications. In order to afford more material possessions, many workers have become workaholics, and overworking is now a widely popular work practice. The less time workers spend on their personal lives, the more their sense of well-being is negatively impacted. Not only can their mental and physical health deteriorate, but their relationships with friends and family may also suffer. Worse is that the mindset of acquiring wealth at all costs is nurtured by many individuals, some of whom may even resort to wrongdoings like embezzlement and fraud. This partly explains today’s moral decadence and individualism, leading to increasing indifference and selfishness.

In conclusion, however advantageous consumerism is to economic activity, it indisputably harms quality of life and is responsible for several severe societal consequences.

Sample 1:

There exists a considerable gap of wealth between people in every society. Although narrowing this gap is effective for some people to raise their level of happiness, I do not believe that it is the best way for everyone to feel satisfied.

It is true that inequality among different classes is the underlying cause of numerous social problems. For example, a lot of crimes are committed by those who cannot make ends meet and cases of social unrest by the jobless frequently hit newspaper headlines around the world. In addition, compared with rich people, poor members of society have to struggle with many things, such as the rising housing prices, the expensive medical services, and the soaring cost of living. Therefore, a society of equalitarianism seems to be a good solution to all the problems mentioned above and be able to improve many people's senses of satisfaction.

Nevertheless, I would argue that to make a society a paradise requires far more than a narrowed wealth gap. This is because many people give priority to other factors rather than the wealth gap. Firstly, in places where air pollution is a grave problem, citizens pay more attention to their health than wealth. In this case, the government’s effort to purify dangerously polluted air weighs more than that made to narrow the income difference. In addition, people living in economically developed countries, such as the US and Germany, are much less concerned by the wealth gap and they would rather ask their government to focus on other social issues, ranging from animal rights to democracy.

In summary, the key to improving the happiness index of a country lies partly in how small the gap is between rich and poor people, but there are many other factors having more impacts in this regard.

Sample 2:

These days, with the development of society, there are more and more people wanting to make their life and even their society happier, and the measure which is considered the best way to do that is to close the gap between the rich and the poor. As for this opinion, I do not agree because eliminating differences between the rich and the poor is not the only and the most effective way to produce a happier society.

First and foremost, it can’t be denied that closing the gap between rich people and poor ones is not a bad idea, but it’s not enough to create a happy life for everyone. If the government enforces laws that help make the rich and the poor closer, the rich people working hard to earn money to have a fully equipped life may be very discouraged and bored due to the no-gap between them and others. They won’t have the energy to work and will give up their business. That creates harmful effects on the development of the economy. Moreover, we cannot just leave only small differences between the rich and the poor but should adopt some other solutions as well to produce a blissful society. We can hold some charity meetings to help the people in great need who have a poor living standard by raising funds, donating clothes, providing food and drinks, and so on. Also, the national government should allow the poor to have some privileges like paying lighter taxes than the rich or supporting them in living expenses. These will help poor people not to feel too stressed about how to pay the bills while the rich still feel satisfied with what they benefit from.

In a nutshell, eliminating the differences between the rich and the poor is not good enough to solve the desire of creating a happier and better society for everyone. Therefore, we should take other measures to fulfill that wish instead of doing that.

Sample 3:

It is suggested by some that minimizing the gap between the haves and have-nots can make society happier. While I agree that this assertion yields results, I believe that it is one of the range of options available to that end, and that a combination of other measures should also be used to improve people’s happiness levels.

Admittedly, reducing the difference between how much money the well-off and the poor make is important, as it creates and promotes equality in society. This can be achieved by placing a cap on earnings of the rich and imposing higher tax rates for top-earners, along with increasing the wages and salaries of low-earners. As a result of this initiative, the purchasing power of the poor increases, thereby allowing them to afford more, including but not limited to, white goods, a car and possibly even an apartment, and enjoy happier lives.

Enhancing general happiness, of course, isn’t limited to the above proposition; there are other equally important measures that can be taken. Firstly, governments should ensure that the poor have access to proper education. It is a lack of decent schools and further education that hinders many people’s job prospects, so building more public schools and other educational establishments should add to people’s happiness. Another way is to reform social services, such as healthcare. When there is a long queue in hospitals, or when people are unable to receive treatment for their illnesses due to exorbitant costs involved, it is unlikely that they will be happy. Therefore, governments should also focus on these two areas if they are to raise their populations’ happiness.

In conclusion, reducing the gap between the amount made by the rich and the poor can make a positive difference in raising human happiness. Nevertheless, should governments prioritize the improvement of two other areas – education and healthcare, then people’s happiness will be even more boosted.

Sample 1:

Extraterrestrials that may range from single-celled organisms to beings with a civilization far more advanced than humanity may exist on other planets of the universe. Scientists do not have any evidence to prove their existence to date. According to one camp of scientists, messages should be sent to those aliens to confirm their existence; however, the other camp expresses concern about hailing the attention of alien civilizations. I would delve into both the views in this essay.

Due to overexploitation, the earth is slowly becoming uninhabitable, to begin with. In the true spirit of exploration, astrobiologists want to explore the space for the existence of advanced life forms which would be beneficial for us in the future. Cosmologists like Stephen Hawking consider this advancement in the search for intelligent lives may get to a period in our future where we outgrow our evolutionary baggage. Furthermore, a search for extraterrestrial civilizations will make us not only technologically more proficient than we are, but more aware of the rarity and preciousness of life in the cosmos.

On the other hand, there are a plethora of risks in contacting extraterrestrials scientists currently have no idea what alien life-forms might look like, or how they might respond to contact from human civilization. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonize whatever planets they could reach. We don't know much about aliens, but we know about humans. If we look at history, contact between humans and less intelligent organisms has often been violent and has gone badly for the less advanced. A civilization reading one of our messages could be billions of years ahead of us. If so, they will be vastly more powerful and may not see us as any more valuable than we see bacteria.

In conclusion, even though I fear that an advanced alien civilization would have no problem wiping out the human race, the desire for the search for life beyond earth outgrows the risks and I strongly agree that it would give us a commitment to live. We are alive. We are intelligent. We must search for the signs of life in this universe.

Sample 2:

The prospect of intelligent extraterrestrial life and the idea of making contact with them has long been a topic of scientific debate and popular fascination. While some scientists advocate for reaching out, others caution against potential dangers. In this discussion, I will outline both viewpoints before presenting my personal stance.

Advocates for contacting extraterrestrial life argue that such an endeavour could be the most significant event in human history, fundamentally altering our understanding of the universe. Moreover, if successful, this contact could lead to an exchange of knowledge and technologies that could propel human civilization forward in unprecedented ways. It could potentially solve problems that seem insurmountable today, from resource shortages to curing diseases. Additionally, communicating with a more advanced civilization could provide us with unique insights into our own society, technology, and our potential future paths.

On the other hand, those who argue against contacting extraterrestrial life often reference the potential risks. They point out that history on Earth shows that contact between more and less technologically advanced civilizations often leads to the latter's downfall, as seen in colonization episodes. Extrapolating this to an interstellar scale, they caution that we could inadvertently attract the attention of a hostile alien civilization, leading to catastrophic consequences.

Moreover, they argue that our messages might reveal sensitive information about us, such as our level of technological advancement, which could be used against us. As physicist Stephen Hawking warned, aliens might be "looking for places to conquer and colonize," and thus, making our presence known might be dangerous.

Personally, I share the concerns of those who warn against broadcasting our existence to the cosmos. Given our limited knowledge about the universe and the potential existence of other intelligent life forms, it seems prudent to exercise caution. We cannot predict the intentions or capabilities of extraterrestrial civilizations, and the risks associated with contact could be existential.

However, I also acknowledge the potential benefits of such contact and understand the desire to reach out and explore the universe. Therefore, I believe a balanced approach is needed. This could involve continuing to search for signs of extraterrestrial life, while also developing international agreements and protocols on how, when, and what kind of messages should be sent out into the cosmos.

In conclusion, the issue of contacting extraterrestrial life is complex and multifaceted, with compelling arguments on both sides. Despite the allure of potential scientific and technological advancements, caution is paramount to avoid unforeseen dangers. This topic underscores the importance of international cooperation and thoughtful dialogue in our ongoing quest to understand the universe.

Sample 3:

There is an ongoing debate among scientists about the potential existence of intelligent life forms on other planets and whether or not we should attempt to make contact with them. Some scientists believe that the universe is so vast and diverse that it is highly probable that there are other advanced civilizations out there, and they argue that we should actively seek to communicate with them. On the other hand, some scientists warn that attempting to contact extraterrestrial beings could have dangerous consequences for humanity.

Proponents of sending messages to potential extraterrestrial civilizations argue that it is a natural progression of human curiosity and exploration. They believe that making contact with other intelligent life forms could lead to valuable scientific and technological advancements, as well as a better understanding of our place in the universe. Additionally, they argue that if there are indeed advanced civilizations out there, they may have already detected our signals and could be trying to contact us.

However, opponents of this idea caution that we have no way of knowing the intentions or capabilities of any potential extraterrestrial beings. They argue that making contact with an advanced civilization could potentially lead to disastrous consequences for humanity, as we may not be prepared for the potential risks involved. Furthermore, they point out that any messages we send into space could potentially attract the attention of hostile or malevolent beings that could pose a threat to our planet.

In my opinion, while the idea of communicating with intelligent life forms from other planets is undoubtedly intriguing, the potential risks and uncertainties involved are too great to justify actively seeking contact. Until we have a better understanding of the potential consequences and have established a more comprehensive plan for communication with extraterrestrial beings, it would be prudent to exercise caution in this matter.

Sample 4:

There is little doubt, on the basis of probability, that intelligent life on other planets exists. That, however, is where the common consensus ends; how and whether we should attempt to communicate with them is a question more fraught with complication. Some astronomers believe we need to know whether extraterrestrial beings are benign or hostile before we alert them to our presence. I believe that since any extraterrestrial being able to communicate with Earth can already hear us, there is little danger in reaching out. 

On the one hand, we know nothing about how an alien civilisation may respond to communication from Earth. They may well see humans as a threat – perhaps, even, an existential one – and seek to mitigate that threat by causing us harm. We should exercise some caution before we attempt to make contact. It does, after all, take many years for communication to travel through space, so there is little urgency.

On the other hand, if alien life forms are capable of receiving messages over such vast distances, they must be at least as technologically advanced as we on Earth. It is unlikely that their society is at precisely the same maturity as our own, suggesting they are in fact more advanced – and, therefore, will have identified us before we have identified them. Large quantities of information have already been sent into outer space, ranging from ‘leaked’ radio and TV signals to the thousands of Craigslist posts beamed from Earth in 2005.

For my part, I think the latter argument holds more sensible logic. If we are to worry about existential threats to life on Earth, we should start by addressing issues closer to home.

Sample 5:

The search for intelligent life beyond Earth and the idea of establishing communication with extraterrestrial beings have sparked intriguing debates among scientists and the general public. While proponents argue that contacting other worldly civilisations can expand our understanding of the universe, others caution against the potential hazards such connections might pose. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting my own stance.

On the one hand, there is no denying that reaching out to distinct extraterrestrial species can unravel enigmas of the cosmic realm. Despite remarkable achievements in space science, including pioneering space shuttle launches, historic moon landings, Mars expeditions, and the establishment of space stations, human curiosity about the puzzling cosmos remains insatiable. Thus, by exchanging information with advanced extraterrestrial civilisations, valuable insights into scientific and technological advancements beyond our current understanding can be cultivated. Consequently, this knowledge could have far-reaching implications for fields such as medicine, energy, and space exploration.

On the other hand, there are compelling arguments for abstaining from sending messages to aliens. Firstly, allocating significant financial resources for outer space communication may be unwarranted, given the uncertainty surrounding the existence of life on other celestial bodies. Thus, it is imperative to direct these resources toward addressing pressing social issues, such as education, poverty alleviation, economic development, and healthcare. Additionally, if they existed, there would be potential dangers involved. As alien creatures remain a mystery, their motives could be dubious and life-threatening. Consequently, establishing contact with extraterrestrial beings could lead to hostile invasions or the introduction of incurable contagious diseases, thereby endangering human civilisations.

In conclusion, while the idea of communicating with extraterrestrial species offers insights into the cosmos, there are other pressing needs of humanity that should be solved, not to mention that the presence of aliens is doubtful. Moreover, even if the contact were made, there could be associated risks from unidentified creatures on other planets. Therefore, I strongly oppose the notion of actively interacting with alien worlds. Instead, it is crucial to shift priority towards alleviating urgent social emergencies facing humans.

Sample 6:

Many scientific experts believe that there is an intellectual life available outside the earth and away should be invented to communicate with them, while others totally disapprove of this notion. Even though one could feel this is beneficial for the world, I wholeheartedly opine that it has a negative impact on the earth.

To begin with, in order to find a better place than the earth, researchers are continuously trying their level best to establish connections with the aliens. The main reason for doing so is that the world is highly populated, at the same time global warming has been increasing at jet speed with dwindling natural resources. For instance, ‘The times’ recently predicted by 2065, almost all the natural abundance, including water and air will be depleted leaving the land not suitable for inhabitants. Due to the current pressing trauma, scientists are enduring to connect with the livings in the cosmos for assistance or if possible to migrate to their planet when in need.

On the other hand, the extraterrestrial living force is assumed to be highly intelligent. Will they do not cause a threat to our globe? Certainly, they may cause outrageous danger to our planet. Mankind and aliens do not have a common language to communicate, as a result, trying to have a connection with them could be misinterpreted or lead to misunderstandings. Not only that but also their technological advancement could be greatly superior, as a result, they may tend to invade the world by wiping the living existence here. For example, many UFOs have been sighting recently, we do not know what is coming on our way.

In conclusion, although a plethora of scientific studies is taking place to invent a new planet for human existence in the future, in my perspective, the best way is to refrain from such findings as such unknown life could be a menace to the earth.

Sample 7:

Some scientists argue that there is life on other planets and it is good to send messages to contact them while other scientists believe that these kinds of activities will be a threat to human existence on earth. In my opinion, trying to interact with life forms on other planets may have negative impacts on human life and it is better to avoid it.

Some scientists believe that contacting life forms on other planets is beneficial. If human beings can contact them, their resources can be utilized for the betterment of human life. For example, human population is increasing, and natural resources are depleted. If we get alternative energy sources from them, it will be a great help for the human population on earth.

If the interaction with life on other celestial bodies has a positive impact on human beings, it will be good but there is no guarantee for this. This kind of positive relationship is just an expectation. If extra terrestrial beings are superior to us, they are more likely to have destructive effect on us. Superior species always dominate inferior species just like human beings dominate other forms of life on earth. Many other living beings on earth are under threat of extinction as human beings are superior to them. Similarly, extra terrestrial beings may wipe out human beings from the earth. Moreover, great scientists such as Stephen Hawking have already given us warning against interaction with life forms on other planets. Human beings can live happily on this planet if they utilize natural resources wisely instead of exploiting them. There is no need to search for resources from other planets when there is no guarantee that they can help human species.

In conclusion, in my opinion, relationships with the life on other planets may have negative effects on the life on earth. It is better to use the resources on earth wisely and live here happily instead of trying to colonize other planets.

Sample 8:

The universe is extremely large and there must be other forms of life somewhere in this vast space on a planet similar to Earth. While some scientists consider it wise to contact these extra-terrestrial intelligent living creatures as this may bring unprecedented benefits in terms of sharing of technology, others think that this may lead to problems such as conflicts and biological disasters. I agree with the former view.

It may prove extremely beneficial for humans to contact other intelligent living creatures on other planets. This may benefit both species in terms of sharing technology as well as resources. Some scientists believe that technology sharing may help us not only solve some of the pestering issues ranging from food shortage to climate change but also save millions of dollars spent on space exploration programs such as Mars Explorer. The technology of these aliens may answer many of our unanswered and unexplored questions. Moreover, our technology may help solve some of their problems.

Despite these benefits, there may be extremely adverse consequences of this contact as there may be some conflicts. Since both species are not aware of each other’s language and customs, there may be some miscommunication, and this may lead to planet wars. Moreover, sending messages without understanding the consequences of interaction may lead to biological disasters. There is a possibility that what is good and beneficial for one species may prove infectious for another. Their food, for instance, may be poisonous to humans and may contain microorganisms that may harm the health of life forms on the Earth.

In conclusion, I believe that contacting between two species from different plants will be immensely beneficial for both species. If contact is established, it will not only help solve some of the Earth’s problems but also enhance our knowledge of the universe. This will help in finding new sources of energy and food on new planets and bring inter-planet unity.

Sample 1:

Sports and adventure have always intrigued and beguiled humans since time immemorial, even at the stake of their security which makes it a very contentious topic of crossing thoughts. Some sports activities are extremely hazardous to human beings and still manage to attract many people. In this essay, we shall talk about the possible causes of this tendency and the solutions to curb the dangers due to sports.

The main reason that has beguiled human beings is their visceral predilection towards exploratory activities. The human brain has always caused them to behave in a certain way that enables them to perform certain precarious tasks, even if that means jeopardising their lives. For instance, in the conquest of getting at the pinnacle of Mt. Everest, many people succumbed to death, and even that didn’t cease people from conquering its peak time and again. Moreover, adventure sports like white water rafting and mountain climbing have always been propagated as a daunting task to do, which is not a cakewalk for normal people. This has made even more people go ahead and demonstrate their valiance and mettle in order to prove their candour and indomitable spirit to the world. Other than that, money and economic rewards are yet another reason.

Talking about the solutions that could be diacatholicon to check this menace would be to, first of all, educate the sports enthusiast or anyone who wishes to foray into the domain of dangerous sports of the possible dire consequences of such perilous sports. Other than that, making people aware of the proper precautionary measures can help assuage the risk of such threatening sports. For instance, people who wish to do bungee jumping could be made well-cognizant of the associated risks that could be proven minacious for the lives of the ones looking forward to attempting it. Above all, people for whom money is the major bait to undergo the waves of vulnerability should be educated and counselled about how life is the most prized possession they could ever have and hence, they should be vigilant of what they pick and choose.

Hence, we may conclude that though there are innumerable causes that enchant people to pass through the gates of risk and adventure, there are certainly some possible solutions that could help people to wake up their conscience and wisdom.

Sample 2:

Sports play an important role in our life. It helps to keep our body active, alert and healthy. Nowadays, there are so many dangerous games such as boxing, high speed racing and mountain climbing but even these sports are quite popular among people. There are numerous reasons why people like it and how to handle it safely.

The first and foremost reason is that sometimes people love to do adventures and thriller activities, so they take part in such types of games. Furthermore, some people are very ambitious, and they like to accept challenges in their life. For instance, Mary Kom is an Indian boxer, and she injured so many times during the game but she always ready to take challenges. In addition to it, people prefer to participate in some fighting games because they gain some skills in how to define themselves.

Moreover, most people think that more profit. They take part in more risky games which help them to solve the montery problem. Last but not the least, dangerous games give easily publicity to people. They gain name and fame in a short time after taking part in dangerous games.

There are some suggestions to deal with these games. Firstly, professional training should be provided to people by trainers that help them to reduce the risk. Secondly, the government also implements some rules and regulations regarding support and safety. Apart from that, awareness of danger also helps people handle it easily.

To put it in a nutshell, a pen down saying that games provide us with enjoyment and help us to forget all our worries and anxieties, but we should take proper training before participating in dangerous games.

Sample 3:

In recent years we have seen a considerable rise in dangerous or extreme sports. This essay shall discuss some of the main reasons why people engage in such sports and suggest ways in which some risks involved in such sports can be reduced.

The main reason why people go for dangerous sports is that they get the thrill out of them. They like taking risks. They like to challenge their abilities and potential. They feel a sense of satisfaction when they come face to face with fears while bungee jumping, rock climbing and so on.

In addition, going through a dangerous experience gives them courage and confidence to face the hurdles of their daily life.

Another reason for pursuing such sports is that there is a lot of fame and money involved in them. They get attention by doing stunts on motorcycles and jumping from tall buildings. They make headlines in newspapers and TV News Channels. They feel great when their name comes in the Guinness Book of World Records. Once they get famous, they get a lot of money also. For instance, many businesses hire them to endorse their products. They also get jobs on the basis of such skills.

Many steps can be taken to reduce the risks that are involved. Firstly, these sports should be done under strict supervision. All safety precautions should be taken. Such sports should be performed after sufficient training and under the supervision of adults. Sport companies which cater to such sports should require a licence to provide such training. Some people suggest banning some sports. However, I do not believe that banning is a good solution. We all know that forbidden fruits taste sweeter and people will do such sports in hiding which would increase the risks involved.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen it down saying that people do such sports for fun, for money and for fame. However, such sports should be performed after sufficient training from licensed companies and under some supervision.

Sample 4:

Nowadays, sporting events are an important element of life. Almost every country encourages their sportsmen to achieve the best standings and titles in contests such as World Cups, commonwealth games, and the Olympics. Furthermore, some activities such as boxing and motorsport involve high threats and sometimes it may eventually cost the lives of the participant. Considering the level of risk associated, participants play an active role in these kinds of sports. 

These are some of the important reasons people compete in a type of sport based on their personal interest. For example, Formula One motorsport, which is one of the toughest sports on the planet. The successful strategy is created through the combination of human and technological perfection. This combo is what makes F1 competition more interesting and drivers’ talent is so challenging to understand. Therefore, youngsters take an interest and grow into exceptional drivers who really can receive the award for their nation. Individuals occasionally enroll in extreme activities for acquiring wealth, since they are rewarded well for participating in activities with higher levels of exposure.

However, there is indeed a way to limit the number of injuries related to these games. Before auto-racing events, for instance, a thorough investigation of the vehicle's mechanical condition should be conducted. Additionally, drivers should wear high-quality headgear to reduce the risk of traumatic pain. 

To conclude, some activities are dangerous, people continue to be involved in them. People do it to make money or since they are hungry for success. Furthermore, safety protocols like using body armour and undergoing security screening can be applied to minimise the threat linked with these activities.

Sample 5:

In the 21st century, athletics has a crucial role to play in maintaining our well-being as well as being a vital aspect of our everyday activities. There are numerous different types of activities, including mixed martial arts, marine sports, track and field, and team sports. A few of these sports, such as combat sports and trekking, are deadly.

Thousands of individuals favour these hazardous sporting activities and continue to engage in them often. I believe people enjoy doing that because they might sense a crisis of trust, hence they attempt to retain it by engaging in such risky activities. In addition, certain people have difficulty interacting with those around them so they may be treated unfairly and disrespectfully, so they must study and practice violent sporting activities in order to protect themself. In addition to the different energies that several people carry, I believe that one of the most prominent elements is their need to unload their frustration by engaging in risky sports such as paragliding.

However, before actually commencing to practice, young athletes should be fully prepared by experienced instructors in order to avoid or minimize the risk associated with this sport. Moreover, age-related limitations should be imposed on such activities, as small teenagers should not be allowed to take part in them due to the involvement of great risks.

To conclude, as part of their responsibility to ensure the protection of their citizens, governments and associated regulatory authorities must create regulations to supervise and manage the use of these dangerous activities.

Sample 6:

Sporting events have a crucial role in people’s lives since they assist in both proper growth and development. Incredibly dangerous activities are prominent, as per the stated issue. Therefore, in this essay, I will analyze the various reasons behind such development and offer various solutions that governments could apply to combat the problems.

To begin with, the desire for all these kinds of high-risk activities is motivated primarily by the related fame and money. But when they attempt hazardous tasks, such as jumping from high rises, they receive a large amount of attention and their news about the act becomes the lead story on many news programs. In addition, they are happy when they break that record and apply it to the Record Books. Once they gained popularity, they acquired wealth. For example, several well-known multinational firms engage individuals to promote their brands, and they earn a substantial sum of money as a reward.

Secondly, these activities must be handled properly. All safety measures must be taken. Some sports require additional skills and adult supervision before initial participation. The authorities should only issue licences to firms that have the required equipment for all these activities. Many individuals believe that legalizing these activities is a remedy.

Nevertheless, I need not believe that restriction is a realistic alternative, since we all realize, prohibited fruits taste good and people will do these sports in private, thereby raising the risk related to them.

To conclude, people are engaging in such activities for pleasure, financial reward, recognition, and also to test their skills. However, certain sports are only played with thorough coaching under the guidance of experts.

Sample 7:

It is true that countless individuals are eager to participate in adventurous sports even though they are aware of the risks involved. There are various reasons for this; however, certain safety measures, if adopted and followed, can mitigate the dangers associated with these sports.

To begin with, one of the predominant reasons for the popularity of some dangerous sports such as paragliding, bungee jumping and scuba diving is that people tend to take part in these sports to overcome and conquer their phobias and fears. Many people suffer from aquaphobia and acrophobia, and to free themselves from these fears, they indulge in some adventurous yet life-threatening sports. These sports, they believe, will boost their confidence and make them intrepid. To exemplify this, I was extremely afraid of heights but to overcome this fear, I did paragliding not only once but thrice in a row on the same day even though I was aware of the risks involved. I am no longer afraid of tall buildings and extreme heights. Moreover, people have thrilling and exhilarating experiences after doing these sports. They feel more alive and younger.

To mitigate the dangers involved in these sports, the most effective measure is to use proper safety gears and equipment such as harness, ropes and specialized clothing. Before doing the sport, the participants should be checked thoroughly to ensure that their specialized safety kit and gear are functioning properly. This practice, therefore, would reduce the risks involved. In addition to what has been mentioned, the specialists and experienced professionals should provide 1-2 days of training for interested participants to avoid any dangers. For example, before doing skydiving, the professionals provide 2 days of coaching to the people who are going to take part in it. Moreover, participating in these hazardous sports must be avoided in extreme weather conditions, such as during rain and thunderstorms.

In conclusion, from a quick analysis of the situation, it is quite evident that people are inclined towards precarious sports as it helps them to conquer their fears. Undoubtedly, the dangers associated with these sports can be significantly reduced by taking proper safety measures.

Sample 8:

No doubt, everything in life has two sides, the good and bad. Sports are just another example, in some cases, it can be life-threatening, but still, a lot of people find it very enjoyable. I guess pleasure overcomes the danger, especially if it is assessed and controlled.

Dangerous games are sometimes very alluring and have a large amount of prize. People like to watch thrilling sports, and those sorts of games are often taken as challenges. Those are the main reasons people participate in dangerous games even after knowing the consequences.

To control such threats, standardisation must take place to put some guiding rules to decide whether a person is fit or not to practice a sport of dangerous nature, also to highlight environmental conditions needed to practice it safely to both practitioner and spectators, a good example would be the rally racing. Cars have to be inspected very carefully for mechanical failures by a highly qualified team prior and during the laps, very close monitoring for the road to avoid any obstacles that may cause harm or damage, also the car itself from the design point of view has to be safe to the driver against potential accidents that may contain front or side hits and in most cases extreme flips or fire.

Another clear example would be diving, a very enjoyable experience but dangerous and needs good preparation. Extensive training should take place in a simulated environment like a swimming pool before actual diving into deep water, the equipment has to be tested, a dive location readiness to be briefed prior to the dive and a common language to use underwater to communicate different basic sentences.

In conclusion, it is safe to practice any sport you like with enough planning and adequate training, no matter how dangerous it is, you just have to measure the risks and get over it with gradual skill improvements.

Sample 9:

Sport is a very important thing in our life, and it plays an integral role in keeping us healthy. There are many types of sports, for example, fighting sports, water sports, single and team sports. Some of these sports are dangerous like mixed martial arts and mountain climbing.

Many people prefer these dangerous sports and keep practising them regularly. I think they love to do so because they may feel a lack of confidence, so they try to maintain this point through doing these dangerous sports. Besides that, some people may have problems in dealing with others as they might be treated in an impolite and crude way, so they need to learn and practice fighting sports to be able to defend themselves. The most striking feature, in my opinion, is stress in addition to the negative energy that many people have, they need to release their stress by practising dangerous sports as windsurf for instance.

I tend to see that those people should be trained well by professional coaches before they start playing these to minimise any danger that may occur during this practice. Also, some restrictions should be made on these sports, and they should be related to age, as small children and young people should be avoided practising this kind of sport because they may still be young to deal with their dangers.

Last but not least, governments and the elevant regulatory authorities should set rules to guide and control the practising of these dangerous sports, as one of their responsibilities is to keep their citizens safe.

Sample 10:

There are many extreme sports today such as high-speed car or bike racing, mountain climbing and water sports. Despite many risks associated with these sports, many people love them because of their adventure and risk-loving attitude, to feel the sense of achievement and to attain celebrity status thereby earning money through sponsorship. Since these risks come with a price tag, they need to take several precautions while playing these sports like, following strict safety measures, learning from the experience of others and joining a group rather than attempting them individually.

Many people today are ambitious because of the reasons said. For example, the number of people today trying to climb Mount Everest is on the rise. It makes them stronger mentally and physically by handling life-threatening risks such as avalanche. Apart from these reasons, some like this type of sport to earn celebrity status. Once they earn this privilege, they are respected by society and organisations pay them to become brand ambassadors. For example, a recent Mt. Everest climber has been selected as an icon of a famous trekking equipment maker.

While adrenaline-raising sports are good, several precautions need to be taken while participating in them. Safety measures are most important because life is at stake. Having safety devices at reach can save one from serious injuries. Another easiest and suggested approach is to read blogs or books of people who succeeded and failed while trying them. It helps to form a list of what and what not to do. When these games are tried in a group, they can help each other during accidents and whenever an obstacle strikes.

In summary, as risks are associated with a price tag, strict precautions need to be in place to stay alive.
Sample 11:

People are becoming more and more carefree and can go way out of the ordinary when it comes to risky sports. Because of the fame and the monetary reward that some unsafe sports provide, it has been common practice among many sports professionals to go to the extremes of the risk limits. Below paragraphs shall discuss reasons why people dare to choose these sports, following recommendations to safeguard against such dangers.

There are several reasons why many people like threatening sports. The abundant amount of monetary income and astonishing fame allowing them to become global celebrities are some of the main factors which in turn lead to an adrenalin rush among the sports professionals to participate in unsafe sporting activities. The racing drivers are the people who daily undergo such high-risk conditions, for instance, however, they are willing to do it repeatedly due to the rewards that they receive through this.

Safety measures and standard instructions are always there in place for the majority of the mincing sports when it comes to practising them. Firstly, sports people should train oneself under experienced coaches, which will help them to get an overall idea about dangers associated with the particular sport. Secondly, a person ought to take proper precautions according to the standard guidelines outlined. For instance, racing drivers should always wear fire-proof jackets to better protect them from fire accidents. Finally, these kinds of activities should be performed after the careful inspection of a sporting venue and the sports equipment by safety experts.

In conclusion, many people like to participate in life-threatening sports activities for various reasons like money, popularity etc. However, one should be circumspect about the dangers of such activities and better follow safety guidelines and train well in advance before practising them. Also, governments can define some safety norms for unsafe sports.

Sample 12:

Some sports have a high level of risk. However, individuals still enjoy these activities due to their high adrenaline level and their popularity. In my opinion, it is still possible to handle these dangers by using proper equipment.

Firstly, some people like to be at risk by their nature. They like to take part in activities which cause adrenaline in their bodies. They believe it is the most enjoyable thing to do in life. For example, my friend John is a professional boxer. His nose is broken twice in competitions. Although he gets hurt badly, he believes he cannot quit boxing due to his high adrenaline level. This is one of the major reasons why people like to be a part of risky sports.

Secondly, dangers are quite popular in our societies. Since it has become common, some individuals like to be on the stage. For instance, my cousin Graham is a rally racer. He mentions that his activity helps him get attention, especially among the opposite sex. Therefore, he keeps on joining risky exhibitions.

In my opinion, these dangers can be controlled with appropriate tools. There are many products in order to protect people. For example, in Ice Hockey, manufacturers are creating strong helmets against hard hits. They are testing these products under laboratory conditions, moreover, they use extremely hard materials like fibre-plastic as a contributor.

In conclusion, it is a fact that people are going to continue to attend dangerous sports events because of their desire for adrenaline and popularity. I believe self-protection can be provided by choosing the correct equipment.