Many people say that smoking should be banned while others say it is not a good idea. What is your opinion on this?

Sample 1:

Banning smoking is a controversial issue as many people strongly support this ban while others disagree with it. It has been around for centuries and in many countries, public smoking is prohibited and against the law while it is open in many other countries. There are discussions and arguments about whether smoking should be banned completely or not.

First of all, smoking is detrimental to health. It causes lung cancer which ultimately leads to death. It might take a long time to show symptoms, but it always happens. Secondly, it is a waste of money as smokers spend a lot of money on cigarettes. Addiction to smoking leads to addiction to marijuana, yaba etc. Eventually, addicted people get involved in different types of crimes. They start collecting money by stealing, lying and robbing and the severity of the crime keeps on increasing. Moreover, smoking not only harms the smoker but also the people around them. Recent studies on smoking suggest that passive smoking is as harmful as active smoking.

On the contrary, the tobacco industry is the source of huge tax for the government. Government makes the best utilization of the tax money by building schools, mosques, overhaul streets etc. Thousands of people work in cigarette-related industries, and this creates huge job opportunities. If smoking is banned completely, these people will become unemployed. Another vague benefit of smoking is that smokers believe smoking refreshes their minds and relieves them from tension and stress, though it has not been scientifically proved. Some people think that banning smoking is like imposing restriction on people's freedom and they completely oppose the idea of imposing restrictions on smoking.

From this point of view, we see that there are opinions for and against the banning of smoking. I believe the government should think rationally and wisely before they make any decision about prohibiting smoking. Personally, I believe that public smoking should be prohibited, and any violation of this rule should be penalized but a complete ban on smoking should be made slowly and with proper planning.

Sample 2:

A complete ban on smoking is controversial as many people strongly support it while others disagree. In many countries, public smoking is forbidden, but it is still widespread in many other countries. I, however, believe that smoking should be banned, but it should be done slowly and with proper planning and steps.

First of all, smoking is severely detrimental to public health. It causes lung cancer which ultimately leads to death. Secondly, smoking is a complete waste of money, and addiction to smoking sometimes leads to enslavement to other illegal substances. Eventually, many addicted people get involved in different types of crimes to manage the money they need to abuse illegal substances. Finally, smoking not only harms the smoker but also the people around them. Recent studies on smoking suggest that passive smoking is as harmful as active smoking.

Having said that, the tobacco industry is a huge source of tax for the government. The authority makes the best utilization of the tax money by building schools, parks, overhaul streets and other public facilities that serve ordinary people. Millions of people work in cigarette-related industries, and if smoking is banned completely, these people will lose their jobs. Some smokers believe that smoking relieves them from tension and stress, though it has not been scientifically proven. Finally, some people think that banning smoking is like restricting people's freedom.

In conclusion, I believe that the government should take initiatives rationally to prohibit smoking. Public smoking should be prohibited, and any violation of this rule should be penalized, but a complete ban on smoking should be made slowly and with proper planning.

Sample 3:

Banning smoking is a contentious issue since many individuals strongly support this ban even though some disagree. It has existed for centuries, and in many states, public smoking is illegal and contrary to the law, although it is available in some different nations. One will find talks and disagreements about whether smoking ought to be banned entirely or not.

It causes lung cancer that ultimately results in death. It may take a while to reveal symptoms, but it continually occurs. Second, it is a waste of cash as smokers invest a good deal of cash in cigarettes. Finally, hooked people become involved in various forms of crimes. They begin amassing cash by stealing, robbing, and lying, and also, the intensity of the offense keeps on rising. Additionally, smoking not just damages the smoker but also individuals around them. Recent research on smoking implies that passive smoking is equally as dangerous as smoking.

On the contrary, the tobacco business is the origin of enormous tax for authorities. Thousands of individuals work in cigarette-associated businesses, and this produces massive job opportunities. If smoking is prohibited entirely, these individuals will end up unemployed. Another vague advantage of smoking is that smokers believe smoking calms their heads and relieves them from anxiety and anxiety, though it has not been clinically proved. Many people today feel that banning smoking is similar to imposing restrictions on people’s liberty, and they oppose the notion of imposing limitations on smoking.

I think authorities should think logically and sensibly before they make any conclusion about forbidding smoking. I feel that people smoking should be banned and any breach of the rule should be punished, but a complete ban on smoking should be made gradually and with good planning.

Sample 4:

People have different opinions about restricting smoking as some people believe that smoking should be prohibited, while some disagree with this. The next essay will discuss both opinions in detail, followed by my opinion and a fair decision.

On the one hand, it is clear if several men and women dislike the controversial idea that smoking should be banned in all areas. Firstly, they believe that everybody has their right to do things they like. Smoking is a preference, and it is up to the individual themselves whether they would like to smoke or not. Secondly, prohibiting smoking will also affect the financial condition as cigarette mills absorb so many employments. If smoking is wholly banned, then a number of factories will be closed and will lead to a higher unemployment rate. Last, the government’s high amount of tax in the tobacco businesses will no longer be accessible also.

On the other hand, it is a fact that smoking has numerous negative consequences for the smokers themselves. Besides that, smoking could also have a severe threat to passive smokers. Individuals who do not smoke but inhale secondhand smoke may have a possibility of lung cancer. Therefore, many men and women think that smoking should be banned entirely, as it could severely impact both active and passive smokers.

In my view, I support the notion that smoking should be banned in all areas because smoking is harmful to our health. However, before implementing the idea, the government has to have an alternative plan for the cigarette factories’ workers because they may be unemployed. The authorities could enlarge and develop a brand-new business; consequently, these workers could be allocated to the new area.