Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 819 Lưu

Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Many people sometimes face the dilemma of situations in which they must either accept what happens or try to make some changes. While some feel that acceptance is the optimal approach, I agree with those who believe that we should strive to better these situations.

On the one hand, it could be argued that people should be satisfied with what life brings to them. Advocates of this opinion argue that change is risky and requires massive effort. By accepting unfavourable situations, at least people may have a better sense of security, and this, psychologically, increases their happiness to some extent. For example, when a person tries to find another job, there is no guarantee that the new job can offer them more satisfaction. Also, in a few serious cases, such as wars or severe economic downturns, it could be hazardous and virtually impossible for an individual to change the situation.

However, I side with those who believe that people should do their best to move up in life. First, it is apparent that the advancement of human civilization has been made by those who strongly believe that there are always ways to make their lives better. Without this spirit, great inventions like light bulbs, electricity, computers or the Internet could have never come to life. Furthermore, the most compelling argument is that only by solving the existing problems, not by simply accepting them, can people discover their abilities, improve their skills and live their lives to the fullest. There have been instances of entrepreneurs, sports athletes or scientists in many countries who achieved stunning success thanks to their never give up mindset and continued effort. Therefore, I believe that in most cases, the effort to better unfavourable situations would be rewarded.

In conclusion, although in rare cases, making changes sometimes seems quite dangerous, in the vast majority of instances, not only does this action bring about great success, but also helps people identify their potential and live their lives in a more meaningful way. Therefore, on balance, I believe that striving to change unhappy situations is a much more sensible approach.

Sample 2:

Many people across the globe argue that accepting harsh realities, for example, undesirable jobs or shortage of money, is the best way to go ahead in life. Still, others claim that these conditions are part and parcel of life and can be improved. I strongly agree with the latter perspective.

In some cases, people succumb to affliction and insist that bad situations should be accepted, be it an unsatisfactory profession or lack of money. These people lack the courage to change their life. They believe that good or bad situations occur as part of their fate. For instance, a person who doesn’t like his job yet does not want to quit as he’s afraid of the unpredictable future. Consequently, he accepts the situation without making an effort to ameliorate it. As a matter of fact, there are some bad situations which are way beyond our control, such as a serious illness which eventually leads to death. In such cases, we need to cope with the loss rather than brooding over it.

However, a few people claim that certain situations can be refined if we make an attempt. A person can assess their current situation and change it as per their convenience. Suppose a person is unhappy with his current profession. In that case, he must look out for opportunities that will allow him to be happy and help him grow monetarily. Apart from this, the person can also learn new skills, build his resume, and get his desirable job. Thus, if a person is determined to change his lifestyle, he can definitely improve bad situations.

In conclusion, there are people who have baseless excuses to live in a state of a bad situation. But I believe that there’s always a better way to improve our negative circumstances and change our paths in order to have a good future.

Sample 3:

There are conflicting views about whether people should accept a bad situation or make efforts to improve it. While there are some justifications for accepting certain bad situations, making an attempt to overcome the negatives may be a better solution. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and express my view/perspective.

On the one hand, people who insist that bad situations should be accepted tend to lack the courage to change their life. For example, many people who stick to a bad job are afraid of quitting. They do not like their job, yet they do not want to quit because they are afraid of the uncertain future. They are worried that they may have to stay jobless for a while and struggle to pay their bills before they can find employment again. Consequently, they accept the bad situation without making an effort to improve it. There are also some bad situations that are beyond our power to improve. For example, there is not much we can do to prevent a serious illness or the untimely death of a dear one. In such situations, coping with the loss or the negative situation is a better idea than brooding over it.

On the other hand, there are certain situations that can be improved if we make an effort. For example, nobody has to suffer in a bad job when better jobs are available on the market. Of course, this might require learning a new skill or acquiring a qualification, but it is worth our while. Likewise, people suffering from poor health can see some visible improvements if they adopt an exercise routine and a healthy diet. Those in toxic relationships can regain their sanity by opting to break up. Obviously, there are several situations that can be improved with a little effort. Hence, the argument that all bad situations should be accepted without complaining does not hold water.

In conclusion, this essay discussed that although people sometimes have reasonable excuses to live in a bad situation, it is beneficial to try to improve adverse circumstances. In my opinion, it is better to try to get out of the negatives.

Sample 4:

Life is not a bed of roses for most people as they have ups and downs. When a person handles these waxes and wanes with strong willpower, it makes that individual sturdy. Despite this, many people give up on adverse situations while others deal with them and emerge as a fighter. In this essay, both these attitudes will be discussed in the subsequent paragraphs, ending with my opinion.

As far as the first set of people is concerned, they feel easily dejected when faced with a challenging condition. They blame it on fate and feel that it is the repercussions of the deeds they had done in their previous lives. It is due to the fact that they are not resolute enough to face the obstacle or have become so at home even with the hardship that they become aloof. Sometimes, it is easier to put the blame on something or someone else rather than persevere to change the circumstances. For instance, in case of any health issues or accidents, many people claim that it was meant to be as they are being punished for their sins. They do not realise that it might be the result of their negligence or carelessness. In the case of jobs, these individuals grumble that they are being deprived, yet do not take the initiative to protest against it or move on to better opportunities in the fear that they will be victimized or are incapable. So, the fear of the unforeseeable always pushes them back to the hellhole they are in, and they do not take risks.

On the other hand, the second group of people are pretty daring and believe that the key to life is accepting challenges and overcoming them. They do not accredit any force of luck for their plight and work hard to overcome their adversity. They gain an understanding of their predicament and work for its betterment. This helps them to rise from their own ashes like the mythical phoenix. Various examples can be observed in history. After the First World War, Germany was rendered economically and socially incapable. Yet, in the Second World War, it became one of the most formidable opponents the world had ever seen. Similarly, in the Second World War, Japan was almost burnt to the ground, and if one looks at it today, it has become one of the world’s leading developers of technologies. Another popular example is the 16th President of the U.S.A., Abraham Lincoln. Even after being rejected multiple times during various elections, he did not forsake his dream of becoming the President and remained determined. This persistence aided him in fulfilling his goal.

Therefore, in my opinion, one should always fight back or at least do their best to overcome the quagmire. It will not only help them to develop a firmer character but also encourage them to accomplish their goal.

Sample 5:

Many people find themselves in situations where they must either accept what life has given them or find a way to move up in the world. In my opinion, although accepting your situation in life may be pragmatic in some cases, it is still better to at least strive to improve your situation as it can usually be bettered to some degree.

On the one hand, the vast majority of people are unable to drastically change their situation and acceptance of this fact will make them feel more satisfied with their lives. The best example of this would be those people living in dire economic conditions. Recent research puts the Democratic Republic of Congo as one of the poorest nations on Earth, both due to a lack of developed infrastructure and internal strife in recent years. For a person living in a small village, ravaged by war or famine, it would be cruel to suggest that they should find a way to improve their lives when it might simply be impossible. Instead, such people may feel they are better off accepting that they cannot make any changes to their situation at the present moment and just focus on their own survival and that of their family. These situations are rare but do exist around the world in various countries, particularly if they are at war or are experiencing a severe economic downturn.

On the other hand, few would dispute the fact that in even the most difficult situations people can make their lives better through continued effort. Instances of people who worked hard and became successful abound in both developed and developing nations. Some relevant examples of this are the postwar situations of countries like Germany, Japan, and South Korea. All those countries were devastated by war to greater and lesser degrees, yet they are all currently economic powerhouses. In Japan, World War 2 left their population depleted of workers, a deep national debt due to reparations and infrastructure reduced to rubble. By not accepting their situation they were able to become leaders in technology through notable companies like Sony, Nokia and Toyota. The efficacy of the individuals who had to work hard to improve their lives is reflected in the overall progress of the country and should serve as an example to all war-torn nations.

To conclude, there are very few situations where it would be advisable to simply accept an unhappy situation because hard work over a long period will pay off to some degree in the vast majority of cases. By having a more positive attitude it is also more likely that your efforts to make a better life will be rewarded, while a more defeatist attitude is likely to reduce your chances of making changes in life.

Sample 6:

Navigating life's challenges, such as career dissatisfaction or financial constraints, sparks a debate: should we accept these realities or strive for betterment? This essay posits that while acceptance brings peace, active improvement is key to personal and societal progress. We will explore the virtues of acceptance for inner stability and the transformative power of seeking change for growth.

In life's intricate tapestry, individuals often find themselves at a crossroads with situations that may seem less than ideal, such as a job that lacks inspiration or financial resources that are insufficient. Some people advocate for acceptance of these conditions as an integral part of life's ebb and flow, suggesting that learning to endure unsatisfactory circumstances fosters resilience and inner peace. For instance, persevering in a job that doesn't ignite passion might still provide stability and security, which are pivotal for one’s mental and emotional well-being, especially during tumultuous times. This viewpoint champions the value of contentment and the art of finding satisfaction from within, rather than seeking external changes. Acceptance, in this light, becomes a pragmatic approach in scenarios where options are notably limited, thus promoting a sense of gratitude for what one already possesses and finding joy in the simpler aspects of life.

Contrastingly, advocates for change underscore the human capacity for growth and the relentless pursuit of fulfillment. They posit that to accept an unfavorable situation without seeking to improve it is to deny one’s innate potential. Addressing the scenario of an unsatisfactory job, they recommend proactive measures like exploring new opportunities or enhancing one's skill set. Such actions not only aim to boost personal satisfaction but also potentially contribute to societal progress. This outlook is anchored in the conviction that individuals hold the power to alter their circumstances, thus fostering a dynamic, ever-evolving society. It suggests that striving for betterment in challenging times can serve as a catalyst for significant personal and communal achievements, illustrating a forward-thinking approach to life's hurdles.

Reflecting on this discourse, it's evident that while acceptance offers peace in adversity, striving for improvement propels us forward. Embracing change and personal growth is not contrary to contentment but essential for it. A balanced approach, recognizing when to accept and when to seek change, is most prudent, guiding us through life's complexities with wisdom.

Sample 7:

Nowadays, some people think that a bad circumstance such as a job we do not like or not having enough money can be accepted, while others affirm that we must try to improve these situations. Though the expectation of improving the status quo might instead worsen the existing state of affairs, in my opinion, it is important to have a positive attitude and a never-ending quest for a better life.

Unfortunately, during their life some people can incur bad situations that they accept because they think that trying to ameliorate these circumstances can be very risky. It is undoubted that every time we want to make some changes in our daily life, we risk something and, as a result, we can also worsen our condition. For example, when individuals are engaged in a job that does not realize their expectations or when they do not earn enough money to accomplish their needs, some of them simply accept these events, because they are afraid to tackle new situations, which sometimes can be very challenging, or because they are tired of making additional efforts to ameliorate their condition.

On the contrary, other people involved in bad circumstances struggle to improve their current condition, putting all their energy into achieving a better future for them and their family. This is a positive attitude, which can solve different problems, such as economic difficulties or a job which is disliked. Moreover, we can thrive on these adversities if we put all our vigour to overcome them. As a result, we can achieve better conditions or, if we are not successful, we will obtain a positive result in any case, ameliorating our capacity to deal with hurdles. Furthermore, we acquire more respect for ourselves, and in the future, we will not have regrets, by having made all possible efforts to improve our situation.

In conclusion, regardless of the situation, though many people tend to accept life as it is on the ground of minimalism, I firmly believe it is worth working with zeal for improving the status quo.

Sample 8:

There are divergent views regarding how individuals should respond to undesirable situations. Some people contend that it is best to acquiesce to the situation and move forward, while others contend that individuals should strive to ameliorate such circumstances. In my view, the approach adopted should be contingent on the particular circumstances; nevertheless, in most cases, attempting to alter an unfavourable situation is the most judicious course of action.

Proponents of the former argument posit that individuals should concentrate on factors that are within their sphere of control. In certain instances, it may be impossible to transform the environment around them. For instance, when someone is diagnosed with an incurable illness, accepting their condition and endeavouring to derive pleasure from the time remaining to them may be a more practical choice than brooding over the negative aspects of their predicament.

However, advocates of the latter perspective contend that individuals should not settle for subpar circumstances and that striving to attain a better outcome is the preferable approach. It is plausible that assenting to an unsatisfactory job, for instance, could result in long-term regret and discontent. Therefore, it is preferable to explore alternative options, such as seeking a superior position or undertaking additional training, instead of accepting mediocrity.

In my opinion, it is imperative to assess each situation on a case-by-case basis and determine whether it can be improved. If it is feasible to do so, individuals should take the initiative to ameliorate the situation; if not, it is imperative to accept the situation and adapt to it. For example, if someone is encountering a scarcity of funds due to a global economic recession, there may be little they can do to better their situation in the short term. Nevertheless, they could explore alternative sources of income, such as freelancing, to supplement their earnings.

In conclusion, deciding whether to accept an undesirable situation or attempt to improve it is a complex matter, contingent on the specific circumstances. While embracing what cannot be altered may be advantageous in some scenarios, it is often more productive to take action and endeavour to attain a superior outcome.

Sample 9:

There is an argument that any unpleasing situations like poverty or engaging in unsatisfied employment need to be accepted as they are, while others support towards putting effort on improving such situations. I strongly believe that a person should try at his or her level best to overcome any obstacles coming along the way to success. This essay will discuss both these opinions with examples.

Accepting being poor or having a bad job without complaining can make people have peace in their minds without getting those negative things to affect the remaining happiness of their lives. For example, a man with a job which gives the minimum payment to cover his meals can think that it is the best opportunity for him to be happy about as he is better off than those who are starving to death. At the same time, people can be happy that they are not beggars and whatever the occupation they were offered is the best gift received from the God.

On the other hand, it is better to put some effort into improving the life conditions and sociodemographic background of a person, other than accepting only what is available and being idle. Lower-level workers in a company can work hard and impress the seniors with successful achievements allowing them to upgrade to the next level of their jobs. Achieving success in one's role at an organization can elevate the company as well, providing individuals with additional benefits.

In conclusion, the situation and conditions of life can be improved even with little effort towards success. Though there is an argument that it is the best thing to accept life as with whatever there, it is better to work with enthusiasm in improving the quality of life.

Sample 10:

Unfortunate situations are unavoidable, such as having an accident or being ill. Different people have different coping strategies, some would accept misfortunes while others would try to improve such situations. This essay will discuss both arguments to prove that acceptance, rather than struggle, is generally the better option.

Accepting the fact that unfortunate situations happen is seldom easy but doing so will generally bring tranquility, which is more important than the frustration of struggle. When the mind is undisturbed, it is more inclined to avoid unnecessary contemplation of past events, which can help avoid further conflicts. It is widely agreed that those who learn to release anxiety often lead happier, more fulfilling lives, as well as having much more satisfaction in various personal endeavors since they can recover more quickly from mistakes.

Trying to improve terrible incidents does not guarantee better outcomes and should not be encouraged. Actions done in the past cannot be reversed, any effort to fix what was already broken rarely succeeds and would likely lead to further failure. For example, when a child breaks his mother’s favorite porcelain vase, he should admit his mistake instead of trying to hide the evidence, which would lead to a more severe punishment if discovered.

In conclusion, when confronted with hardship in life, it is best to embrace actuality as this generates strong potential for contentment. Trying to fix what has already transpired should be avoided because it usually results in more errors.

Sample 11:

Accepting unfavourable working conditions or financial hardship is considered noble by some experts. However, a few others argue that it would be beneficial to keep trying to improve the current situation. Both parts are discussed in the ensuing paragraphs. My position is outlined below.

Explaining the former viewpoint, the first and foremost thing is that an individual should accept an unsatisfied job and other unfavourable issues in order to fulfil basic necessities. For instance, a man earns for his family to provide food, shelter and clothes even though he gets less paid or is not satisfied with his job by making compromises in his own happiness. In addition to this, the reason for accepting the conditions by the individual is that he could be powerless to do anything as fighting against the situations may cause him mental anguish. As a result of this, it will cause him to evolve into a tense person. 

Scrutinising my perception and the latter viewpoint, I believe that one should keep on trying to get out of worse situations. I firmly believe that, if one starts to take charge of their own lives then it will help oneself to create favourable circumstances. In addition to this, a person can excel when they take charge and put forth significant effort toward their goals. Furthermore, there is always a way forward, problems can be solved, and progress can be made. One example is India's Prime Minister, who began his career selling tea but rose through the ranks through hard work and intelligence.

To sum up and offer my position, I believe that people should never give up and should always try to improve bad situations. Some people believe that one should try to adapt to unfavourable circumstances.

Sample 12:

When the topic of situations arises, there are divided opinions. Some are of the notion that bad circumstances such as a dissatisfying work or insufficient funds has to be accepted whereas, a few others counterclaim that it is great to improve such situations by making efforts. In my opinion, I believe that efforts are to be made even in the worst situations. Both the opinions and my preference are discussed below. 

On the one hand, supporters of the former viewpoint say that those who think it's best to accept one's fate tend to be the kind of people who would rather wallow in misery than take action to improve their circumstances. Consider the case of someone who is unhappy with their employment yet refuses to leave it. Their lack of faith in the possibility of a positive outcome is evident here. The unpredictability of the future causes them to doubt it. They have no will or ambition to quit their dismal employment since they are struggling to make ends meet. If we choose to make peace rather than battle, we risk alienating our loved ones. 

However, I agree with those who advocate the latter, and I think we should keep trying until we succeed. You shouldn't stick around at a job where you're unhappy either with the work or the pay, because you'll never be able to develop your skills or advance in your career. So, if a job isn't paying enough or isn't rewarding the employee's efforts, it's time to look elsewhere. Likewise, if an employee is unhappy on the job, he should look for ways to make it better rather than accepting the situation. 

To put it in a nutshell, I think that people should try to change and improve unfavourable situations rather than just accepting them as they are.  

Sample 13:

The debate over whether to try to improve the situation or simply accept bad situations is never ending. There are times when it's best to just roll with the punches, but in most cases, you should put up a fight and try to change things. Both of these points of view will be addressed in this essay, and then I will give my own conclusion.

The first and foremost reason for the former viewpoint is, if people are unhappy in their jobs, it could be because they want to be comfortable in their life. They are unable to accept challenges and frequently change careers. As a result of this, they are doomed to remain unhappy for a considerable amount of time. It's unclear whether they're in a bad spot because of the circumstances or because they've chosen to do nothing to improve their situation.

However, I think things can be better through sheer force of will and persistence. For instance, the current Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who did not come from a politically powerful family, was able to become the Prime Minister of India. Motivated individuals, in my opinion, never accept a situation that prevents them from reaching their full potential, because they know what they're capable of and refuse to accept any excuses for falling short. They will not give up until they have achieved their goal. That maxim serves as the foundation for their daily lives.

In conclusion, I think it's important for people to have a sense of direction and to take charge of their own lives. When faced with adversity, we must do our best to turn it into an opportunity like turning lemons into lemonade and drinking it.

Sample 14:

People’s opinions differ as to whether we must accept negative circumstances when they occur or try to seek solutions in such situations. This essay will discuss both sides of this argument and elaborate on why I believe the latter is more convincing.

There are two primary reasons why many individuals argue that accepting difficult situations in life is the best option. To begin with, since unfortunate situations are often unavoidable, people should take a more philosophical view and accept them for what they are. In a marriage, for example, conflicts are inevitable due to differences in opinion, habit, or background between the spouses. Therefore, a husband needs to learn how to accept his wife for who she is, not who he wants her to be and vice versa; otherwise, they might put their relationship in jeopardy. Furthermore, the effort of always trying to deal with bad situations and striving to overcome those situations can lead to severe stress and anxiety. If people learn to embrace unfortunate things as inevitable events in life, they will be able to maintain a positive mood and lead a happier life.

Nevertheless, I would argue that we should have a proactive attitude and try to find answers to any predicament in our lives. The major merit of acting proactively is that it keeps us in the state of continuous learning and improvement, which will provide us with valuable opportunities to enhance our awareness and foster self-improvement. As a result, we are more likely to become successful in our personal lives and careers. What is more, focusing on improving bad situations will allow people to convert some of their destructive emotions into more constructive ones. For example, negative emotions like anger or fear can be diverted into the feeling of empowerment in our ability to address our problems regardless of how difficult they might be. If people merely want to ignore their undesirable circumstances and allow the destructive mental states to fester, their mental health, in the long term, would be adversely affected.

In conclusion, although accepting undesirable situations in life offers certain benefits, I believe that it would be better to focus on improving such situations. 

Sample 15:

It is undeniable that facing unfavorable circumstances is a common issue in today's society. While some individuals argue that accepting such situations is the best approach, others believe in the power of attempting to improve them. This essay will discuss both viewpoints before presenting my own opinion.

On the one hand, proponents of accepting a bad situation, such as being dissatisfied with one's job or experiencing a shortage of money, argue that this is the optimal strategy. They contend that attempting to improve the situation might not necessarily yield positive outcomes and could even worsen it further. By accepting the circumstances as they are, individuals can find peace of mind and avoid unnecessary stress. Moreover, accepting a bad situation can spur personal growth, as it allows individuals to develop resilience and adaptability in the face of adversity.

On the other hand, advocates for actively trying to improve a bad situation posit that this approach is more beneficial in the long run. By making efforts to change their circumstances, individuals have the potential to break free from the constraints of an unsatisfactory job or financial hardship. Moreover, attempting to improve the situation demonstrates a sense of determination and proactivity, which can lead to personal growth and increased opportunities. While success is not guaranteed, the act of trying itself can instill a sense of hope and motivation.

In conclusion, while accepting a bad situation can bring about some benefits, I firmly believe that attempting to improve such circumstances is the best course of action. By actively striving for change, individuals open doors for personal growth, increased possibilities, and ultimately, a better quality of life. The choice to improve and evolve is the driving force behind progress and should be embraced by those facing unfavorable situations.

Sample 16:

Many argue that admitting harsh realities, for example, undesirable jobs or lack of money is the most effective way to go on in life. Yet others put forward the view that a better way is to strive to ameliorate those stark conditions and work for success in life. In this case, I agree with the latter view.

On the one hand, many a person succumb to hardship, be it an unsatisfactory profession, scarcity of money or a bad relationship. The most prominent reason is their paradigm of thought. According to their claim, good or bad conditions are merely states of mind or a trick of fate. They believe that if people live in a lavish situation, but their mind perceives it as an awful condition, that reality will be terrible and vice versa. They also believe that they have nothing to do when fate has reserved something for them. A case in point is one of my distant uncles, who, despite having many opportunities, does not look for a better occupation. He feels happy with his condition expressing gratitude to God and he feels that this is what destiny has allowed him to have.

On the other hand, many others claim that people can translate their bad condition into a good one by assessing their current reality. In other words, they need to find out what their strength, weakness, and opportunity is. After knowing their advantages, lackings, and opportunities, they can devise a strategy. A good example here is one of my unemployed friends who assessed his situation that he was good at report writing but lacked necessary technical skills. Then he equipped him with technology skills he needed to be a freelance journalist. He set up his own business, and these days he is quite successful.

In conclusion, at one point or another life presents us with an unwanted turn of events. It may be an unsatisfactory situation that we are not prepared to deal with. In my opinion, we should keep our emotions in check so that we can make a more reasonable decision about how to deal with this difficult condition. We ought to learn new skills so as to improve our condition as well.

Sample 17:

Nowadays people are calling into question the acceptance of situations that are severely harsh. While some of the individuals claim that accepting these circumstances is superior, others insist on improving these conditions. In this essay, both sides will be scrutinized followed by my own take on the matter.

On the one hand, the benefits of accepting demanding situations are by no means negligible. To begin with, being in a hostile situation is highly likely to enhance people’s patience. Simply put, when one is under severe pressure and fails to change their position for the better on their own, they are just obliged to wait till, for example, an external factor can assist them. Consequently, they are being converted to more tolerant people. Furthermore, it is bound to prevent immediate reaction to these situations which can be destructive decisions. Because reacting impulsively to a hostile position might well result in an inappropriate response.

On the other hand, opponents of the mentioned view say that trying to figure out a solution to the problem is more beneficial. First of all, a hard-working person who always seeks to find a solution is more likely to achieve their goal. To be more exact, the more hard-working people are, the less harsh the situations they will confront. Take PhD candidates who would face a mathematical problem during their thesis as an example; they will potentially overcome the barrier by searching hard on the internet. Moreover, it may broaden individuals’ horizons and acquire some skills by learning substantial constructive information during their attempts to find an alternative.

In conclusion, although accepting a bad situation would increase human’s tolerance and prevent reacting compulsorily, I strongly believe, not only will the hard-working conquer the problem, but also, they will acquire knowledge in their way of finding a solution.

Sample 18:

Some people think it's better to accept difficult circumstances, such as a poor job or a lack of funds. Some argue that it is preferable to make an effort to ameliorate these circumstances. I completely agree that in order to improve our lives, we must work to alter the circumstances to our advantage.

In the current scenario employment takes up a large portion of our lives. Our lifestyle and mood are also directly influenced by our work. It is crucial that we are content at work as it may negatively affect our physical and mental well-being. For instance, our enthusiasm and freedom may be hindered if we work for an unsupportive leadership team that micromanages us. Instead of just accepting the situation, it is essential to voice our concerns and engage in a conversation with the person causing us problems.

There may also be instances in which we believe our pay is not commensurate in comparison to that of our colleagues. It is crucial that we stand up for ourselves rather than remain silent. We don't have to accept the lack of money that is negatively affecting our everyday life. If it still doesn't work out, we can always look for alternative organizations where our skills are respected.

Some people will still think it's acceptable to accept a difficult circumstance such as an unsupportive job or a shortage of money, while others think we should work to improve the situation. I will always maintain that it's more advantageous to keep trying to improve our circumstances than to accept them.

Sample 19:

There is conflict over how to respond to unpleasant circumstances, such as a discouraging job or facing financial difficulties. While some preach quiet acceptance, others believe in the pursuit of change. I totally agree with the latter viewpoint, which holds that changing our lives requires deliberate efforts to convert adversities into opportunities.

In the modern era, jobs demand a significant amount of our time. Work has a direct impact on our daily routine and temperament. We must be satisfied at work since it might have a detrimental impact on our physical and mental health. For example, enduring the enslavement of a micromanaging leadership team may drain our motivation and diminish our sense of independence. Rather than accepting the circumstance, we must voice our displeasure and begin a discourse with those responsible. 

There may also be times when we consider our compensation to be inadequate in juxtaposition to that of our coworkers. It is critical that we speak up for ourselves rather than keep silent. We do not have to endure the financial difficulties that are interfering with our daily lives as a consequence of insignificant pay. If our efforts to improve the situation fail, researching new employment possibilities where our talents are appreciated and valued becomes a prudent course of action. 

Some individuals will continue to perceive that it is appropriate to tolerate a subpar condition, such as an unsupportive job or financial insecurity, but others believe that we should seek to better the situation. I am perpetually convinced that it is favorable to continue striving to improve our circumstances rather than giving in to passive acceptance. 

Sample 20:

Divergent views exist regarding the necessity of either attempting to find solutions or accepting unfavourable circumstances as they arise. This essay will go through both sides of the debate and explain why I think the latter is more compelling.

Accepting challenging circumstances in life is the best course of action, according to numerous people, for two main reasons. Firstly, people should adopt a more philosophical perspective and accept unfortunate circumstances for what they are, as they are frequently unavoidable. Differing opinions, habits, or backgrounds between the spouses in a marriage, for instance, inevitably lead to conflicts. To avoid endangering their relationship, a husband must learn to accept his wife for who she is rather than for what he wants her to be. Furthermore, attempting to handle difficult circumstances and get out of bad ones constantly can cause a great deal of stress and anxiety. People can keep a cheerful attitude and live happier lives if they can accept bad things as inevitable events in life.

Despite this, I contend that we ought to be proactive and look for solutions to any problems we encounter. The primary benefit of taking proactive action is that it maintains our state of ongoing learning and development, which will offer us priceless chances to raise our consciousness and promote personal development. Our chances of success in both our personal and professional lives are increased as a result. Additionally, people can transform some of their destructive emotions into more constructive ones by concentrating on making bad situations better. For instance, unpleasant feelings like fear or rage can be transformed into a sense of empowerment when we solve our problems, no matter how challenging they may be. Long-term effects on mental health would result from people’s desire to just ignore their unfavourable circumstances and let the negative mental states fester.

In summary, even though there are advantages to embracing unfavourable circumstances in life, I continue to believe that it would be preferable to concentrate on making them better for the reasons outlined above.

Sample 21:

Some people claim that when there is an unsatisfying situation, the best approach is to accept it, while others feel that trying to make it better is preferable. Although accepting a bad situation means that there will be no risk, I agree with the latter point of view because only when the situation is improved can a person become happier.

On the one hand, it can be argued that staying in an unpleasant situation allows people to avoid risks. This is because when a person makes a change, things may not turn out the way they thought they would. As a consequence, they may even lose what they had. For example, if people quit the corporate job they hate but fail to find a new one, they will even lose the income their old job provided. However, I disagree with this argument because if a person endures a bad situation for too long, they may develop mental health problems.

On the other hand, those who try to improve their unsatisfactory situations can find ultimate happiness. Working hard to change the status quo gives people a goal to achieve in life. This makes them much happier since humans are goal-driven creatures. Take for example the Chinese entrepreneur Alex Wong, who went from being broke to owning a multimillion-dollar business. He shared in an interview that the whole journey made him feel very fulfilled. I think this approach is much better because an unhappy life is not worth living.

In conclusion, although those who play safe will not face any risks, I believe people should put effort into improving the unpleasant situations they are in because this allows them to live a happier life.

Sample 22:

People hold divergent perspectives on coping with adversity in life. While some advocate for embracing tough situations, I advocate for actively navigating through difficult times.

On one side of the debate, proponents argue that enduring challenging circumstances rather than instigating change can be the optimal approach in certain scenarios. They illustrate this by citing examples such as mothers with young children who opt to persevere in their careers despite dissatisfaction. The rationale behind this stance is that the demands of motherhood often leave little room for career adjustments, making women vulnerable in the job market. Additionally, they contend that financial hardships can be alleviated through frugal measures like reducing expenses or opting for cost-effective alternatives.

Conversely, I firmly believe that striving to ameliorate unfavorable situations yields greater benefits for individuals and society as a whole. On a personal level, accepting subpar working conditions or financial crises can lead to undue stress and strain in one’s well-being, ultimately impeding overall quality of life. Furthermore, societal progress hinges on the collective well-being and productivity of its citizens. A populace burdened by stress and health issues is ill-equipped to contribute meaningfully to the advancement of their nation.

In light of the aforementioned arguments, I contend that proactive efforts to improve adverse circumstances are more prudent than passive acceptance.

Sample 23:

When people are in unfavorable situations, it is arduous to advance forward. While some people argue that it is best to embrace bad circumstances, others believe it is better to strive for improvement. This essay will delve into these two arguments before declaring a position.

The rationale behind the argument from people who say that it is best to accept a bad situation is that they can’t simply change the status quo because of powerful outer forces. For example, the sharp rise in housing prices is something that individuals can’t solve. According to statistics from the government, the housing prices in the Seoul area have risen by nearly ten percent just over the last few months. Meanwhile, the average salary of people who live in Seoul has remained the same. Furthermore, one out of three people who are in their 20s live in shoddy single room apartments. Rising housing prices and how much money people are paid from their employers are outer forces that they can’t have any influence upon. Therefore, some people believe that it is better to be satisfied with their bad situation rather than putting too much effort to better their circumstances which seems implausible.

On the other hand, there are people who argue it is better to try and improve their bad situations. They usually quote the cases of many people who rose through the difficult time with their own efforts. For example, our parents’ generation was in much more difficult circumstances both economically and socially. To be specific, there was no civil government, and the country was run by a dictator who oppressed people’s basic human rights. Also, most of them were in abject poverty since the country was ruined by consecutive misfortunes ranging from war to economic debacles. Nonetheless, the generation believed that the future would be more promising as long as they strive to overcome those seemingly insurmountable obstacles. Thanks to that spirit, now most people in South Korea are above the poverty line and the country is run by democratically elected civil government. The generation is the manifestation of what happens when people never give up and move forward for a better future.

In summary, both arguments have their own strong logic. However, I am in favor of the latter since I believe that people can overcome any obstacles with one’s strong will. In addition, I don’t think the fatalistic spirit will do any good for people to better their circumstances.

Sample 24:

The debate over accepting or improving an unfavorable situation is ongoing, with strong arguments on both sides. While some argue for acceptance, citing inner peace and contentment, others advocate for improvement, emphasizing personal growth and success. I vouch for a balanced approach, considering the advantages and disadvantages of each option, to be the most effective way to deal with such situations.

On the one hand, proponents of accepting an unfavorable situation believe that it promotes contentment and inner peace. By focusing on the positive aspects of their lives, individuals can redirect their energy away from constantly striving for more. For example, someone with an unsatisfactory job may find happiness by focusing on their hobbies and family life.

On the other hand, supporters of improving a disadvantageous situation argue that accepting it can lead to complacency and a lack of motivation to change. Instead, they suggest that taking active steps toward improvement can result in personal growth and self-improvement. For instance, someone dissatisfied with one's job may opt to take a course to gain new skills or search for a better job opportunity to enhance their career prospects.

In my opinion, it is imperative to draw a balance between accepting an unchangeable situation and pursuing improvement opportunities. One should not hesitate to take steps towards betterment, if possible, while acknowledging and making the most of one's current circumstances.

In conclusion, the ongoing debate on whether to accept or improve an adverse situation has compelling arguments on both sides; nevertheless, I am inclined towards taking a stabilized attitude toward the given situation as accepting the constraints of what can be changed while also taking active steps to pursue opportunities for improvement is vital.

Sample 25:

We frequently experience undesirable situations in life, such as being stuck in an unfulfilling job or having money problems. While some people say that it is best to accept these circumstances, others contend that it is preferable to work for improvement. This essay will explore both viewpoints and offer my personal assessment of the situation.

On the one hand, those who advocated for accepting a horrible circumstance presented various strong justifications. They claim, firstly, that accepting a circumstance might help anxiety and tension levels decrease. People might lessen the incessant pressure to change their circumstances by accepting reality and finding peace with it. This method encourages mental health and frees up attention for other elements of life, like relationships and personal development.

Second, embracing a challenging circumstance can promote thankfulness and contentment. People might learn to appreciate the good things in their lives by becoming aware of the problems they face. It promotes a change of viewpoint that makes it possible for people to be content despite the limitations of their present circumstances. This acceptance might result in a life that is more balanced and peaceful, free from the relentless quest for success outside of oneself.

The case for attempting to make difficult circumstances better is valid, too. First off, taking proactive measures to fix bad work or deal with financial problems can result in professional and personal development. People can maximise their potential, acquire new abilities, and open doors to better possibilities by refusing to accept less. This strategy promotes self-determination and autonomy over one's life decisions.

I think it's important to find a happy medium between accepting a bad condition and working towards betterment. Acceptance fosters thankfulness and emotional stability, enabling people to be pleased with their situation. However, pursuing personal development and making an attempt to improve difficult circumstances are equally crucial. People can broaden their views, generate opportunities, and have a positive impact on both their own lives and the lives of those around them by taking a proactive attitude.

The importance of improvement is emphasised by some, while accepting a bad condition is supported by others. Finding harmony between different viewpoints can result in a life that is satisfying and meaningful. Acceptance brings comfort and contentment while working to improve oneself and society as a whole. In the end, accepting challenges and making conscious progress towards change are the keys to living a happy life.

Sample 26:

The idea about how to deal with a bad situation always has been a subject of debate. Some people think that accepting a bad situation is the best way while others feel that it does more harm than good. Although arguments on both sides are worth exploring, I believe that it is an effective way to engage in and change such situations.

First of all, those who think that a bad situation has to be accepted have valid reasons. To be specific, it is ture that improving a bad environment can give people a lot of difficulties and challenges. To illustrate, people have to spend their time and money to escape from the current negative situation. Meanwhile, people have some abilities to easily adapt to their arrangement. It is evident that this does not take a long time to feel uncomfortable about their bad situation.

On the other hand, there are those who feel that they have to face and improve this situation. It is commonly observed that people are able to build one’s ability and improve strong character by overcoming the condition. Moreover, by doing so, people find more various parts by learning and searching for new things to change their situations. My personal example can be a good example. When I was in university, I was not interested in my major. So, I decided to change my major and look for other subjects. From this process, I could experience that I wanted to learn well-rounded majors. Therefore, I registered for a double major course. In fact, this invaluable experience helped me to broaden my perspectives.

In conclusion, people tend to keep their ineffective situation or improve and change their life. Given this situation, I strongly believe that people have to improve their bad situation to widen their horizons and build new abilities.

Sample 27:

Some believe that it’s important to accept negative circumstances when they occur whereas others emphasise that it’s better to try to seek solutions in such situations. This essay discusses both perspectives and why I believe that the arguments for seeking solutions are stronger.

There are two main reasons why people believe that we must be accepting of bad circumstances. First of all, we often cannot avoid bad situations. Since these situations can’t always be avoided it’s best to just accept the reality. For instance, economic downturns can lead to the company we work for going bankrupt and in this case, we should not feel hard done by if we lose our job. In addition, unnecessary stress can be caused by dwelling on our current circumstances. If we are accepting of our circumstances this can allow us to maintain a positive mood and to continue enjoying our life despite a setback.

However, others argue that we should have a proactive attitude and find solutions to any negative predicament. The main benefit of this approach is that it may lead to extremeness which helps to motivate us to find solutions. For instance, if we lose our job, we should focus on finding a new job to solve the problem of being unemployed. Additionally, focusing on solutions can divert some of our negative emotions such as a feeling of bad luck or guilt into more positive emotions such as feelings of empowerment in our ability to solve our problems.

In conclusion, I believe both sides of the argument have merits. However, I believe it’s better to focus on finding solutions because it increases the likelihood of solving our problems and maintaining a positive mental attitude, which is far more important than the benefits of avoiding stress through accepting our circumstances.

Sample 28:

Many individuals are willing to put up with poor or unenjoyable conditions because of a lack of money or work they dislike. In contrast, others believe it is vital to do all possible to improve one's status. I feel it is essential to overcome pessimism and to follow a promising path.

On the one hand, some find it difficult to cope with a job they do not like. They begin to believe that if they change their job, their circumstances will become better as a result. However, it cannot be guaranteed that finding a new job will bring about any improvements to their circumstances. There may be massive differences in the level of work ethic and job security in different companies. Thus, for them, accepting the existing circumstances is always preferable to fighting a losing battle. The best example of this is that one has to accept the death of a dear one, as they can not do anything to reverse the situation.

On the other hand, some people view that actively working to rectify their circumstances is significantly better. It is so because they believe that everything will deteriorate if they never do anything. In other words, if someone has a paucity of money, it becomes necessary for them to find a job or find the right ways to earn money. Failing to do so may pose a threat to their survival. As a result, the rule of acceptance fails in this case. For example, according to a recent survey conducted by the Times of India, over 63% of people agreed that they confront odd situations and fight to improve them.

To summarize, except for a few uncontrollable conditions, such as the loss of a loved one or terminal illness, people should constantly strive to improve a terrible situation in order to live a better life.

Sample 29:

When it comes to dealing with a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or a lack of money, many people have opposing views. Many believe in accepting the situation as it is, while others believe that one should try and improve it until he/she is satisfied. However, I believe that people should always strive for job satisfaction and a salary that allows them to meet their financial needs.

People who tend to accept an unsatisfactory job are the ones who probably do not want to look further because of the fear of losing their safety net. Surveys done, especially on the private sector employees, claim that they are extremely unhappy with their current job, but they feel hesitant to try and look for a job at any other company. This hesitation is only because of the fear of failure and the risk associated with trying something new.

On the other hand, some people are willing to work hard for life satisfaction. They prefer to struggle while they are young and have the strength to face any downfalls that come along their way. These kinds of people are determined to have a life that is happy, satisfying and financially stable. I agree that, despite the hardship and risk involved, it is still worthwhile doing it well.

To conclude, I would say people who are willing to take risks and face failure for long-term satisfaction at work tend to improve the situation, while others just accept it as it is. However, I believe that one should try to strive for long-term happiness rather than settle down unhappily because of the fear of failure.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

In the current era, with the level of scientific advancement that has been achieved, technology has become a necessitous part of our existence and has eased many issues in our lives. This has led many people to think that all vehicles will be automated and will no longer require drivers in the imminent decades. From my perspective, I think the advantages of driverless automobiles eclipse their drawbacks.

Firstly, automated conveyances will reduce the risk of accidents caused by drivers. The element of human error, which is responsible for making 94% of all accidents, will be terminated. People will be able to travel safely even when they are too weary or otherwise unfit to drive. Additionally, senior citizens and others who may have problems with driving can commute safely in driverless cars. It will allow people to disburse the time spent commuting in other ways. Lastly, research has suggested that the introduction of automated vehicles on roads will reduce energy expenditure and pollution, which indicates that they will be a much more environmentally friendly option of transport.

However, there are some disadvantages to ushering in driverless modes of transport. Firstly, it will eliminate the jobs of several drivers whose livelihoods are directly contingent on them driving vehicles. Some people may also struggle with comprehending the technological aspects of automated transportation which may lead them to be fearful of such vehicles. Lastly, the costs involved in driverless conveyances may not be affordable, leading those to be inaccessible to several people.

Thus, in conclusion, it can be said that while automated transportation may have a few shortcomings, its beneficial aspects largely overshadow them, making driverless vehicles a welcome technological innovation for the future.

Sample 2:

In the future, vehicles can function without drivers, and the only ones inside will be passengers. In my opinion, the benefits this trend can bring totally outweigh the drawbacks.

On the one hand, the use of driverless vehicles may put human drivers out of work, which increases the unemployment rate in this sector. This situation can cause a number of financial and social problems that both the unemployed drivers and the authorities have to deal with. However, it can soon be compensated as there are still a range of other employment opportunities for unemployed bus or truck drivers. For example, businesses that use driverless vehicles will need more people in other departments such as vehicle maintenance, and this can bring work to those who have lost their job as drivers. 

On the other hand, autonomous cars can offer a number of benefits once broadly developed. First, they can reduce the number of road fatalities as computer drivers are not prone to common mistakes like drunk driving or speeding that human drivers often make. This can ensure better road safety in general. Second, this development is beneficial for those who are restricted from driving, such as the handicapped or the elderly. With driverless cars, they can travel by themselves and no longer have to depend on other people or public transport. 

In conclusion, I believe that the development of driverless vehicles is a beneficial trend. It may cause human drivers to lose their jobs, but these vehicles can increase road safety and allow even those unable to drive, like the handicapped, to travel on their own.

Sample 3:

In the face of rapid technological advancements, the emergence of driverless vehicles has become a reality, and it is projected that within a couple of decades, all cars will operate without human intervention. From my perspective, the benefits of driverless cars will far outweigh the potential drawbacks.

Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that driverless cars pose certain risks, including accidents and casualties, in the event of technological malfunction. As these vehicles are controlled by software and technology, the risk of devastating accidents due to bugs or hacking cannot be entirely eliminated. Furthermore, not all roads, particularly those in developing nations with poor infrastructure and insufficient road signals, are suitable for autonomous vehicles to operate smoothly.

However, the benefits of driverless cars far outweigh the potential risks. In terms of road safety, technology-made mistakes are significantly fewer than those made by human drivers. According to statistics, human drivers are responsible for hundreds, if not thousands, of casualties each day worldwide. With the introduction of autonomous cars, accidents would reduce dramatically, making roads safer for all. Additionally, millions of hours could be saved each day as individuals would no longer need to spend time driving, leading to increased productivity and a boost in the national economy.

In conclusion, driverless vehicles offer numerous benefits such as road safety and economic benefits. While there are potential drawbacks, these can be mitigated through proper regulation and addressing software-related issues. Overall, driverless cars represent a revolutionary technology that has the potential to greatly benefit society.

Sample 4:

As technological advancements continue to accelerate, the emergence of autonomous vehicles has become a tangible reality, with projections suggesting that within the next several decades, all cars will operate without the need for human intervention. In my opinion, the advantages of these driverless cars will far outweigh any potential drawbacks.

One of the primary drawbacks of autonomous cars is the risk of accidents and casualties resulting from technological malfunctions. The vehicles are controlled by software and technology, and while efforts are being made to minimize the potential for bugs or hacking, the possibility of devastating accidents cannot be entirely eliminated. Additionally, not all roads, particularly those in developing nations with inadequate infrastructure, are suitable for the operation of these vehicles.

Nevertheless, when it comes to road safety and casualties, technology-related mistakes are significantly fewer than those made by human drivers. Despite isolated incidents involving accidents with driverless cars, it is important to note that human drivers are responsible for a vast number of casualties on a daily basis worldwide. The widespread implementation of autonomous cars has the potential to greatly reduce accidents and improve road safety for all. Furthermore, the elimination of the need for human drivers would result in saving millions of hours each day, increasing productivity and boosting the national economy.

In conclusion, while there are potential drawbacks to the widespread use of driverless vehicles, the advantages, particularly in terms of road safety and economic benefits, far outweigh any potential negatives. It is expected that through proper regulation and addressing software-related issues, we can fully realize the benefits of this revolutionary technology.

Sample 5:

A future filled with driverless vehicles is an inevitability. In my opinion, though there are concomitant moral risks, the practical import for health of such a seismic shift will be positive on the whole.

Critics of this trend suggest that machines should not be responsible for the potential loss of human life. This argument rests on the fact that when there is an accident involving humans, it is possible to either assess blame and assign punishment or accept that human error played a role. In contrast, an individual severely injured as the result of a collision caused by a machine may justly feel that all human autonomy and free will is absent from their fate. This is analogous to a natural disaster with the crucial distinction being that humanity has engineered the situation. It is human nature to prefer to control a situation rather than surrender the outcome to an autonomous machine.

Proponents of automated vehicles, on the other hand, argue the tangible ramifications concerning public safety. The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that driverless vehicles cause fewer accidents than humans. The reason for this is that humans are prone to errors related to fatigue, distractions such as smartphones, and, in some cases, altered states. Machines might experience the occasional technical error; however, they are far more consistent by comparison. In fact, the few accidents that have occurred with automated vehicles were the fault of human drivers. If all cars were driverless, this would enable a greater level of sophistication that could, theoretically, all but eliminate automobile accidents.

In conclusion, though many accidents will occur without human agency playing a role, safer roads fully justify this innovation. Companies and consumers must be wary of the influence of automation while also embracing its most transparent benefits.

Sample 6:

Autonomous technology and its implementation vehicle manufacture have gained enormous publicity in the past few years. Since the first car with limited self-driving capabilities was on trial, progress in this field has gathered pace rapidly. For this reason, driverless vehicles are believed to rule the roadways in the future. While such development brings certain benefits, I believe that the drawbacks are far more significant.

On the one hand, there are some major advantages when automated vehicles are delivered on the roads. Firstly, these models provide easy access to individuals with physical difficulties. To illustrate, disabled travelers normally have to rely on other people if they need a ride. Yet when their cars can automatically handle driving, they enjoy the travel autonomy, getting food from a restaurant or picking up the laundry themselves. In other words, the mobility obstacles they have to encounter day to day will be surmounted. Secondly, automation may help reduce the detrimental effects that regular vehicles have on the environment. As drivers often misuse gas and brakes, they carelessly allow the car to burn more fuel than it needs; conversely, self-driving vehicles can be programmed to work in an energy-efficient way, and to travel on the most convenient routes, hence consuming less fuel, curbing the emissions released into the air.

On the other hand, I think the hurdles that stem from hands-free driving cannot be overlooked, one of which includes the difficulties in ensuring its reliability. Resembling a computer system, programmable driverless vehicles are prone to technical glitches, which cause them to malfunction on their journey. To make matters worse, if a collision occurs with passen- mat gers (occupants) on board, the consequence must be destructive. In addition, the fact that drivers are no longer needed for vehicle operation can deprive people of their livelihoods. For example, those who work in trucking, public transits, and delivery services would find their roles obsolete in an autonomous future. This can contribute to the increasing unemployment rate of the nation.

In conclusion, although the introduction of fully driverless vehicles could lead to both positive and negative consequences, I am of the opinion that its advantages are shadowed by the grave disadvantages.

Sample 7:

The advent of autonomous vehicles heralds a transformative era in transportation, envisaging a future where cars, buses, and trucks navigate without human intervention. This essay contends that the benefits of driverless vehicles, particularly in enhancing safety and optimizing traffic flow, substantially outweigh their potential drawbacks. The ensuing discussion will delve into the implications for road safety and traffic efficiency.

Primarily, the integration of driverless technology promises a significant reduction in traffic accidents, which are predominantly caused by human error. Autonomous vehicles, equipped with advanced sensors and artificial intelligence, can react to hazards more swiftly than a human driver, thereby mitigating the risk of collisions. For instance, Google's autonomous car project has demonstrated an exemplary safety record in trial phases, underscoring the potential for such technology to save lives. Moreover, driverless vehicles can communicate with each other to maintain optimal speed and distance, effectively reducing the incidences of traffic congestion and enhancing the overall flow on roadways.

Furthermore, the advent of autonomous transport systems offers the prospect of optimizing traffic management, leading to more efficient use of infrastructure and reduced environmental impact. Driverless vehicles can operate closer together and at higher speeds in a coordinated manner, maximizing road capacity and significantly curtailing traffic jams. This coordination could lead to smoother traffic patterns and lower emissions due to decreased idle times. Additionally, the increased efficiency and predictability in transportation networks can bolster economic productivity by reducing the time wasted in traffic, showcasing a profound impact beyond mere convenience.

In summary, despite challenges such as technological reliability and legal hurdles, the merits of driverless vehicles, notably in enhancing safety and improving traffic flow, are persuasive. They offer a significant reduction in road fatalities and the promise of transforming urban mobility into more efficient, less congested systems. Thus, the advantages of adopting autonomous vehicles decidedly eclipse the drawbacks, heralding a major leap towards a safer, more streamlined future in transportation.

Sample 8:

The horizon of transportation is on the brink of a revolution with the advent of driverless technology, promising a landscape where vehicles operate without human drivers, ferrying passengers alone. This essay posits that the advantages, particularly in revolutionizing urban mobility and reducing environmental impact, significantly outshine the drawbacks. The focus will be on the transformation of urban spaces and the environmental benefits.

Driverless vehicles stand to redefine urban landscapes significantly by liberating vast tracts of land currently consumed by parking lots and garages. With these vehicles in constant use rather than sitting idle, cities can repurpose these areas to facilitate the creation of lush green spaces and vibrant pedestrian zones, thus markedly enhancing the quality of urban life. For example, Singapore's ambitious Smart Nation initiative aims to reduce the need for private vehicle ownership, envisioning a future city enriched with more green spaces and communal areas, made possible through the adoption of autonomous vehicles. This visionary approach exemplifies how driverless technology could transform urban environments, making them more livable and sustainable.

Furthermore, the environmental advantages of driverless cars are both profound and wide-reaching. By utilizing advanced algorithms to optimize routes, these vehicles can significantly reduce traffic congestion, thereby lowering emissions. Additionally, autonomous vehicles can accelerate the shift towards electric cars, as their efficient operation aligns perfectly with the charging requirements of electric batteries. In pioneering cities like Los Angeles, where pilot programs for autonomous, electric fleets are already making strides, early data suggests a potential reduction in carbon emissions by up to an impressive 60% with a full transition to these cleaner, more efficient fleets. This underscores the critical role driverless technology can play in achieving environmental sustainability goals and reducing our carbon footprint on a global scale.

In conclusion, despite potential cybersecurity and ethical challenges, the benefits of driverless vehicles - transforming urban spaces and enhancing environmental sustainability - are clear. They promise a future of efficient, eco-friendly transport, leading to more livable, greener cities. Thus, embracing driverless technology is a key step forward in solving today's urban and environmental issues.

Sample 9:

While transportation revolution, driven by the relentless evolution of artificial intelligence, might introduce new concerns such as technological reliability and job displacement, the potential of these vehicles to significantly enhance road safety and boost productivity, coupled with the emergence of new job opportunities in sectors related to autonomous technology, solidifies my belief that the advantages of this transportation revolution outweigh the associated drawbacks.

Delving into the potential pitfalls first, one major apprehension is the reliability of this advanced technology. For instance, a glitch in the machine learning algorithms or sensor systems that guide these autonomous vehicles could have catastrophic implications for passenger safety and broader traffic flow. In addition, the transition towards driverless vehicles could significantly impact on the livelihood of those employed in the transportation industry, from taxi drivers to truck operators. This abrupt shift could exacerbate unemployment rates and subsequently stir social unrest. Nonetheless, juxtaposing these challenges with the benefits offered by autonomous vehicles offers a brighter outlook.

Technological concerns, while valid, are mitigated by the fact that meticulously maintained machines are less error-prone than humans, who often cause accidents due to driving under the influence, fatigue, or distraction. Thus, autonomous vehicles could contribute markedly to road safety enhancement. Additionally, self-driving vehicles could revolutionize productivity. Freed from the necessity to drive, professionals could utilize travel time for work tasks. A recent McKinsey study predicts productivity gains equivalent to 50 minutes per person per day with widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles. In addition, the technological shift causing job displacement is undoubtedly a pressing concern. However, history shows that when certain jobs become obsolete, new opportunities arise. The autonomous vehicle industry could create jobs in areas like data analysis, vehicle service, and software development.

In conclusion, despite apprehensions regarding technology reliability and job losses, I maintain that, with prudent regulation, autonomous vehicles hold the potential to significantly improve road safety and productivity. Therefore, while cars, buses and trucks will be driverless, the transition to this phase will promise a safer and more efficient journey in the future.

Sample 10:

As we witness the relentless march of technology, the prophecy of fully autonomous vehicles becoming the norm rather than an exception looms on the horizon. Despite the plausible challenges that this transition might present, I am firmly convinced that the potential benefits engendered by driverless vehicles profoundly outweigh the attendant disadvantages.

One of the fundamental challenges of this evolution pertains to the reliability of artificial intelligence. A slight malfunction in the system, such as a flaw in the navigation algorithms or sensor technology, could have dire implications for passenger safety and could disrupt the harmony of traffic flow. Furthermore, the tidal wave of automation threatens to engulf countless jobs in the transportation industry, potentially triggering spikes in unemployment and consequent social instability.

Nevertheless, these prospective impediments should be assessed in the context of the transformative advantages offered by autonomous vehicles. Technological worries, albeit valid, can be alleviated by the reality that machine errors, assuming regular maintenance and software updates, are substantially less frequent than human-induced accidents. Current traffic mishaps primarily stem from human fallibility, such as impaired or distracted driving. Autonomous vehicles, devoid of these frailties, could significantly elevate road safety standards.

Moreover, the dawn of self-driving vehicles could herald an era of unparalleled productivity. Liberated from the reins of the steering wheel, individuals could effectively utilise travel time for personal or professional purposes. A study by Stanford University suggests that the widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles could potentially save billions of productive hours annually. Furthermore, the challenge of job displacement, while significant, could trigger the emergence of new, unforeseen employment sectors, such as advanced vehicle maintenance, autonomous vehicle route management, and data analysis related to autonomous transport.

In conclusion, although the advent of autonomous vehicles presents genuine concerns pertaining to technological reliability and job loss, the potential for significant enhancements in road safety and productivity, coupled with the emergence of new employment sectors, tips the balance in favour of this technological revolution.

Sample 11:

There is a belief that some land vehicles such as cars, buses and lorries will serve without any drivers in the coming years. So, people in these machines will just be passengers. This situation may result in a lack of job opportunities and immediate interventions. In contrast, transferring drivers’ salaries into other areas and decreasing traffic accidents are essential benefits. In my opinion, considering these positive effects the advantages of non-driver vehicles outweigh the disadvantages.

Firstly, driverless vehicles mean losing jobs for some people. In this case, it will be hard to learn a new skill to afford living costs and it cannot be achieved in the short term. To be more precise, most drivers are non-university graduates, and they do not have any option to work except their current jobs. Secondly, there may not be any individuals to take action in an emergency, such as heart attack, to administer first aid or take the person to the hospital quickly.

On the other hand, it is an advantage to invest in other areas such as proper vehicle maintenance and purchasing environmentally-friendly ones. Thus, it will be more beneficial for society in the long term. These investments will be possible because there will not be any drivers who must be paid wages. Additionally, the most important benefit of this attempt is the possibility of less traffic accidents. According to a survey which was done globally by Allianz,  being sleepy and exhausted are mostly the reasons for car crashes. The rate of accidents can be decreased by eliminating drivers from the traffic.

In conclusion, there is an increasing trend to release driverless vehicles into the market. Although there are drawbacks such as less job positions and a lack of expert in emergent cases in vehicles, advantages, namely decreased traffic accidents and increased investments, outweigh disadvantages. 

Sample 12:

Driverless vehicles, such as automobiles, buses, lorries, and public transportation, will be available in the future as technology advances. Personally, I feel that automated cars will offer more advantages to traffic participation than drawbacks.

To begin with, self-driving automation can assist people reduce traffic accidents since some individuals do not follow traffic regulations. Furthermore, while employing autopilot vehicle services, businesses. It would not need to engage drivers to deliver their items to clients and assure the safety of passengers. Furthermore, it is appropriate for older and impaired travellers while moving someplace and reacting swiftly. When there is an impediment ahead or something unexpectedly passed by, such as animals or reckless pedestrians. For example, if you utilise a vehicle with an automatic driver, you may spend more time doing other things while driving.

Meanwhile, we still have numerous disadvantages, such as the loss of drivers, which will result in increased unemployment in the future. Another concern is that autonomous cars would have substantial repair or yearly maintenance expenditures, which would be both inconvenient and costly. For example, it would be a long-term procedure that wastes time and money for organisations. This would have removed all old moto drivers instead of driverless autos with training that costs an arm and a leg. However, if the government has a suitable policy for the people, problems will be handled, and automation may assist to drastically lowering the rate of accidents.

Finally, as far as I am concerned, I believe that autonomous cars will have more advantages than disadvantages. Furthermore, in recent years, numerous firms and academics have developed autonomous automobiles to meet the needs of inhabitants.

Sample 13:

Some individuals are opposed to self-driving automobiles, claiming that such technology would reduce driver employment prospects. Nevertheless, I feel that the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the negatives.

There are several benefits to autonomous automobiles, but I believe the most important thing is their safety. Vehicle-control technology can prevent major accidents by eliminating human mistakes. Despite the development and installation of new features that protect drivers' or passengers' safety. Such as airbags and alarm systems, the number of individuals killed in automobile accidents is steadily increasing nowadays. The rationale for this is that if humans continue to grasp handles in the driver's seat, stupid mistakes will never be avoided. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that a level 4 automatic driving system. It allows driving entirely without human intervention and may reduce incidents by more than 90%. This point is important because life should come first.

In terms of opponents' arguments emphasizing the significance of safeguarding present employees, our history gives a remedy to such worry. Whenever a new technology developed, such as during the industrial revolution. With the introduction of the Internet, the general people were concerned about their job security. Nonetheless, in such times, there were plenty of employment opportunities in the workplace, and totally new occupations were created instead of being lost. As a result, worrying about opponents is pointless.

In conclusion, while some individuals may be concerned about their jobs, the benefits of autonomous automobiles outweigh the risks. Safety considerations, per se, directly connected to human life, should be the most vital to account for.

Sample 14:

All vehicles, including automobiles, buses, and lorries, will be operated autonomously by artificial intelligence. The only individuals inside the car are passengers. When communities embrace driverless vehicles, I believe there will be more benefits than drawbacks.

For starters, having a driverless vehicle allows society to be more productive since people have time to do so while riding in the automobile. People can, for example, join an online meeting, read a book, or take a break while driving to work or another location. Furthermore, because autonomous cars do not require drivers, they can save money on driver expenses. This circumstance will have a favorable influence on the overheating costs of firms that have a large number of drivers to deploy their staff.

Then, because the cars will be handled by a robotic system rather than people, communities will gain from driverless vehicles. This is in terms of resource efficiency, particularly in public transit. For example, public transportation just needs a skilled programmer in the control centre to manage its mobilisation. They do not require driver allocation in all buses or other modes of transportation. Despite certain security concerns, researchers are creating artificial intelligence behaviour technology to minimise vehicle accidents. So robotic systems may learn from human behaviour when they have to make a judgement on the road.

In conclusion, driverless technology will provide more advantages to society in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. Nevertheless, there is a basic worry connected to security technology, which researchers will tackle.

Sample 15:

Some people have speculated that in the near future some modes of transport will be automated. Although there could be certain dangers connected to unemployment and flexibility, I tend to believe that there are more benefits.

Foremost amongst these advantages is the likelihood that less time would be spent on driver training. If driving is computerised, there will be less need to learn how to drive, so more time could be spent on more productive activities such as work. Related to this idea of efficient time use, less time will also be spent on reading maps and programming GPS for human use. Once cars, buses, and trucks have become driverless, people will be less distracted by having to read maps which could reduce traffic congestion and some road accidents. Similarly, driverless vehicles do not require sleep, so the chances of accidents related to the drivers falling asleep while driving could be minimised.

However, there could be certain risks connected to vehicles operating without a driver. In the case of driverless buses and lorries, people who used to drive such vehicles will be made redundant which could contribute to high levels of unemployment. Though this may be a problem in the short term, in the long term it may be possible for jobless drivers to find a new field. For example, former drivers can become new mechanics for driverless cars, so this could address any employment deficit. Less easily addressed might be the benefits that come with having a human driver. For instance, people may be more adept at driving in certain places such as mountain ranges which may require more versatile off-road driving skills.

To conclude, there are numerous positive aspects to the implementation of driverless vehicles including greater efficiency and safety. While these advantages may have drawbacks connected to unemployment, there is reasonable scope to address them.

Sample 16:

All automobiles, buses, and lorries will be operated automatically by artificial intelligence. Only passengers are present inside the car. When towns embrace autonomous cars, there will be more benefits that outweigh the drawbacks, in my view.

First, when societies have autonomous vehicles, they will be more efficient with their time since they will be able to become more productive in the automobile. People may, for instance, participate in an online meeting, read a book, or relax while travelling to the workplace or another location. Moreover, it may cut costs since autonomous cars do not need drivers, which eliminates driver-related expenses. This circumstance will have a good effect on the cost of overheating for companies with a large number of vehicles used to transport personnel.

Then, communities will get resource efficiency benefits from autonomous cars, particularly in public transit, since the vehicles will be driven by a robotic system rather than people. For instance, a skilled programmer in the control room is sufficient to oversee the mobilisation of public transit. They do not need driver assignments for every bus or other mode of transportation. Even if there are security concerns, researchers are creating behaviour technology in artificial intelligence to prevent vehicle accidents, so that robotic systems may learn about human behaviour while making decisions on the street.

In conclusion, driverless technology will give higher benefits to society in terms of efficacy and efficiency, despite a fundamental security risk for which researchers will uncover a solution. These benefits will come about despite the fact that driverless technology poses a lil danger.

Sample 17:

I feel that the advantages of autonomous vehicles outweigh their disadvantages, despite the fact that some individuals are opposed to them on the grounds that they may reduce employment prospects for drivers.

There are several benefits to autonomous automobiles, but I believe their safety is the greatest. As vehicle control technology may minimise human mistakes, it can lessen the severity of collisions. Despite the development and installation of new safety features for drivers and passengers, including airbags and alarm systems, the number of individuals killed in automobile accidents is rising quickly in the present day. The reason for this is because careless errors cannot be eliminated as long as humans continue to grasp handles in driving seats. On the other hand, it has been shown that a level 4 automated driving system, which permits driving without any human input, may reduce incidents by more than 90%. As life should take precedence over everything else, this notion is crucial.

Regarding the opposition's arguments emphasising the significance of safeguarding present employees, our past offers a remedy for this worry. Whenever a new technological innovation appeared, such as during the industrial revolution or the introduction of the Internet, the general population expressed concern about their job security. However, throughout such epochs, there were many employment prospects in the workplace, and instead of job loss, totally new occupations had been established. Therefore, worrying about adversaries is pointless.

In conclusion, the benefits of autonomous automobiles exceed the potential concerns of a part of the population over their employment. Safety problems per se, which are directly tied to the priceless lives of humans, should be given the highest priority.

Sample 18:

Current developments in the automotive industry indicate a future with self-driving automobiles, buses, and trucks. It may seem to be a scenario from a science fiction film, but the likelihood that it will become a reality is strong. This invention based on artificial intelligence may seem to be the perfect situation, but I believe the drawbacks outweigh the benefits.

People's trust is the most crucial element for the success of such developments; however, it seems that people are dubious. For instance, a pedestrian was recently killed in an accident involving a Tesla autonomous vehicle. People cannot accept even 0.1% inaccuracy, which is the primary drawback of this invention. Some may claim that, just as individuals do damage to others when driving, so do these vehicles. However, it is difficult to determine liability and administer justice in incidents involving autonomous cars.

On the other side, the primary argument in favour of these cars is that driving patterns will be uniform if all vehicles are driverless. Even if accidents occur, they may also attempt to limit the damage to human beings. Again, this needs people to constantly adhere to rules. It is practically difficult to attain such perfect conditions, and undesirable occurrences will occur. Extremely unusual situations are exceedingly challenging for artificial intelligence to predict. During each of these circumstances, the media will focus more on the negatives than the positives. It will build distrust among the populace.

Because it is a question of life and death, the disadvantages outweigh the rewards. Even the loss of one life is unacceptable, and people would see it as an injustice if no one is to blame. People may use AI in any other gadget except for automobiles and buses.

Sample 19:

Recently, there have been great strides made in technology required to transition to a system of driverless cars and it has been suggested that one day all vehicles will be automated, with humans merely passengers. This essay will argue that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

The primary reason for adopting driverless cars is the improvement in safety that would inevitably come. At present, cars are immensely dangerous and yet humans continue to drive them. The vast majority of accidents are caused by human error, but this would be totally eliminated in a system whereby all vehicles are automatically updated on the presence of other vehicles. Accidents would be reduced, thereby saving millions of lives per year. Beyond that, the system on which these cars function would ensure that they optimise their routes to avoid traffic, which would not only save people time but reduce the number of emissions produced by idling engines.

Of course, there are some disadvantages, but these are comparatively minor. One thing that worries most people is the loss of freedom that will come from driverless car systems. At present, in most western countries, the road is viewed as a symbol of freedom and people enjoy getting behind the wheel to move around. In a driverless car, this small pleasure would be diminished. However, this is of course trivial in comparison to the safety and environmental benefits of the proposed driverless system.

In conclusion, the advantages of driverless vehicles vastly outweigh the disadvantages. Although there are a few negatives, the fact that so many lives would be saved makes this future comparatively bright.

Sample 20:

With the rapid technological development, driverless vehicles are becoming a reality, and within a couple of decades, all cars will run without the intervention of a human driver. I personally believe that driverless cars will bring far more benefits than the possible drawbacks they have.

To begin with the drawbacks, driverless cars pose some risks, including accidents and casualties, should technology malfunction. Since the vehicles would be run and controlled by software and technology, the risk of devastating accidents due to bugs or hacking could not be eliminated. It will make us more susceptible to hackers and software glitches. An accident, in which a woman died, caused by a driverless car while still in beta mode, caused a great uproar a few years ago. Moreover, not all roads, especially those in poor nations with ditches, holes and insufficient road signals, are suitable for those automated cars to run smoothly.

However, technology-made mistakes are astronomically fewer than man-made blunders when it comes to road safety and casualties, and this is where driverless automobiles can make a significant improvement. Though we point out a single accident made by a driverless car, human drivers are responsible for hundreds, if not thousands, of casualties each day all around the world. With the introduction of automated cars, accidents would reduce remarkably, making roads safer for all. On top of that, millions of hours could be saved each day since we would no longer need to sit behind the wheel. It will increase our productivity and boost the national economy. 

In conclusion, driverless vehicles have many great benefits including road safety and economic benefits, and it is expected that we could eliminate the software related issues to reap the maximum benefits of this marvellous technology.

Sample 21:

Driverless cars, thanks to the phenomenal development of technology, are no longer fiction, but a reality, and it is expected that most vehicles will be autonomous in the future. Despite both benefits and demerits, the writer of this essay does think that the advantages of driverless vehicles do not outweigh the disadvantages. 

One of the major advantages of driverless vehicles is that they reduce the number of accidents on the road. Such cars provide better traffic efficiency since driverless vehicles can travel efficiently at an optimized and safe distance from each other by communicating among themselves in real-time, on the road, and by telling which routes to take. It reduces accidents and casualties to a great extent.

However, the systems or the technologies used to operate driverless vehicles can malfunction or stop working at any time, without any prior notice. And, if that happens, an autonomous vehicle could actually put the passengers in more danger than if a human driver was driving it. Besides, self-driving cars lack the ability to make judgments among multiple unfavourable scenarios and outcomes. For example, let’s say that a self-driving car had to face a situation with only two possible options: one is to veer to the left and strike a pedestrian, and the other one is to turn to the right and hit a tree, potentially injuring the passengers inside the vehicle. Now, since both options are undesirable, which option would the driverless car choose? The Moral Machine, developed by a group at MIT in the USA, is seeking to address this critical issue by collecting data on real-life people’s decisions, but the data collected, so far, shows broad differences amongst different groups of people, making it very difficult to programme any definitive answer for autonomous cars. Thus, autonomous cars are good to have but are not great to ride in!

So, based on the discussion above, we can fairly conclude that the shortcomings of driverless automobiles outweigh their possible benefits.

Sample 22:

The concept that all cars will be driverless has been gaining traction lately as advancements in technology have made it increasingly feasible and demonstrations have already been successful. The concept of a future where vehicles are solely occupied by passengers presents both benefits and drawbacks. However, in my opinion, the benefits of driverless vehicles outweigh the potential disadvantages.

One of the main drawbacks of driverless cars is the potential loss of jobs for millions of drivers. This is particularly concerning in industries, such as trucking, taxi service and ride-sharing, where driving is the primary occupation. Another major shortcoming of fully automated vehicles is the potential for hackers to gain control of the vehicle and cause mayhem. This could be a significant security concern, as technology is still in its infancy, and vulnerabilities may not yet have been identified.

On the other hand, several major advantages of driverless vehicles make them an attractive option for the future. To begin with, driverless automobiles are expected to remarkably reduce the number of road accidents caused by human error, as the vehicles are controlled by advanced software and sensors that are less prone to mistakes. Additionally, automated vehicles have the potential to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion, as they can communicate with one another and adapt to changing traffic conditions in real-time. Furthermore, driverless vehicles could also have positive impacts on the environment as they will reduce fuel consumption and emissions, for example.

In conclusion, while there could be some disadvantages to the notion of driverless conveyances, the advantages of such vehicles far outweigh the drawbacks. The fewer road accidents, improved traffic conditions, and environmental benefits that driverless vehicles will bring us, make them an appealing choice for the future.

Sample 23:

Due to the rapid development of technology, it is reasonable to claim that a wide range of vehicles will be autonomous in the near future. In my opinion, although this development raises certain safety concerns, the benefits in regard to reduced accidents and costs involved in traffic facilities make this development a change for the better.

Detractors of driver-free vehicles point out the potential unreliability of such vehicles. Specifically, some worry that when there is a technical problem such as malfunction of the navigation system, this may jeopardize passengers in both the vehicle and traffic. In fact, Tesla, a prominent corporation specializing in driverless automobiles, has received a number of complaints regarding the reliability of its driverless cars, making some skeptical about whether such cars are sophisticated enough to work consistently in varied weather and road conditions. However, the aforementioned issues have been minimized as technological advances.

I believe the popularity of driverless automobiles should be encouraged as it helps reduce human errors and expenditure on traffic facilities. Given numerous road accidents result from reckless driving behaviors such as speeding and driving while intoxicated, automated cars are a practical solution for such causes of accidents. This does not imply that automated cars are not prone to technical errors; however, these errors are rare, and in most cases, incidents with these cars have been the fault of human drivers. The wide application of driverless cars can also help governments save budgetary expenses on maintaining and upgrading traffic facilities. When vehicles are controlled by machines, there would be fewer need for installing speeding cameras, maintaining road signs and paying traffic police, allowing more funds for other key areas.

In conclusion, although some worry about the consistency of self-driving vehicles, I believe decreased spending on traffic facilities and increased road safety fully justify this innovation. Governments and corporations should therefore invest more in this promising technology.

Sample 24:

Recent years have seen the emergence of technologies to develop vehicles that can effectively drive themselves, and this may eventually make human drivers redundant. On the whole, I think that the benefits of this development will outweigh any drawbacks.

Automated vehicles have the potential to massively improve road safety because they could massively reduce accidents caused by human error. People are prone to making mistakes, often caused by getting tired or distracted while driving, leading to serious accidents. Computers which control vehicles don’t suffer from these weaknesses, and so as long as they are programmed correctly, errors like these should be eliminated. For instance, cars can be made to brake automatically in emergencies or if the distance from the car ahead is too small. Admittedly, we occasionally hear of fatalities caused by driverless vehicles being tested, but these are statistically insignificant when compared to deaths caused by human error both now and in the future.

An additional benefit to driverless vehicles would be a reduction in transport and haulage costs since there is no driver to pay. This would make food and other goods cheaper. For example, a major factor in food prices in supermarkets is the wages paid to delivery drivers.

However, there is a downside to this since drivers would lose their jobs. In modern economies, tens of thousands of people are employed as HGV drivers, as well as drivers of taxis and delivery vans, so the widespread adoption of automated vehicles would have a major impact on job opportunities. Nevertheless, this problem can be mitigated against with investment in training and job creation in other areas.

In conclusion, I do feel that despite the job losses it will entail, the benefits in terms of cost and road safety make driverless vehicles something to welcome.

Sample 25:

The debate relating to transportation has been in the spotlight for an extended period of time. Recently, there is a belief that automated vehicles like cars, buses and trucks will be dominated in the future. From a personal perspective, such a trend, though detrimental to a certain extent, could be considered as a major step forward.

On the one hand, the driverless system of transportation has proven itself to be adverse. To begin with, personal driver's security may be deteriorated. In fact, many criminals now are gradually having more sophisticated and cunning plans in stealing the important information of other people. Thus, just by successfully accessing the storage systems, hackers can take the necessary data and control over a whole engine, easily triggering accidents on the road. Moreover, this trend may cause people to be unemployed. To illustrate, thousands of individuals are likely to lose their job as a taxi driver or bus controller since all the vehicles are substituted by automated ones, which may affect negatively their quality of life.

On the other hand, this trend seems to be advantageous from two aspects, as follows. First, humans' safety will be guaranteed. There is no denying that the majority of accidents nowadays are attributed to drivers' inferior awareness like using stimulants or crossing the traffic light. Therefore, driverless vehicles are promised to decrease unwanted cases as they can automatically control the speed themselves and utilize computer-based system to avoid collisions. Second, this trend may bring about a civilized traffic system. The fact is that there will no longer be traffic congestion and need police on the road since no more human could break the rules and the distance between two cars might be rigorously calculated in order to minimize collisions.

In conclusion, in spite of several demerits mentioned above, this essay still believes that putting more driverless vehicles on the road is revolutionary to the contemporary society.

Sample 26:

In the future, all vehicles will be autonomous. Passengers will be the only people inside them. I believe businesses can cut costs by using driverless cars, and this advantage far outweighs any potential disadvantages.

One downside of self-driving cars might be that they could lead to large employment losses. Nowadays, in many countries, a great number of people are making a living by driving, be they truckers, bus drivers, or delivery couriers. Imagine all these people are made redundant by autonomous cars. That would raise the unemployment rates in these countries significantly. However, I think this can be avoided if drivers reskill to get themselves a job in a new sector.

On the positive side, driverless cars could help businesses reduce operating expenses. This is because, with these cars, they would not need to hire drivers to deliver their products or services to their customers. For example, the American logistics company UPS currently has hundreds of thousands of truck drivers and pays them an average of 60,000 dollars per year, which adds up to tens of billions of dollars annually. Replacing these drivers with autonomous cars would mean that these huge salary payments could be eliminated. I think this could create a great advantage for society as a whole because companies could devote the money they save on labor to other aspects of their business, which could mean cheaper, better goods for consumers.

In conclusion, although self-driving vehicles would result in many job losses, I believe this downside is greatly outweighed by the upside that these vehicles could help businesses save operating costs.

Sample 27:

Technological advancements in automobile industries are leading toward a future when vehicles would be driverless. The benefits of autonomous vehicles, run by artificial intelligence and software technology, would far outweigh the disadvantages.

The possible downside of autonomous vehicles pertains to the technology itself. Since they would be run by software technology, hackers could take control of a vehicle and use it for their own nefarious purposes. They could even evade police chasing or use vehicles to cause vandalism. Moreover, the situation would lead to an increase in unemployment in many parts of the world where millions of people are employed as drivers.

But the advantages of autonomous vehicles are many. To begin with, it would allow people to use their travel time more constructively. Imagine the millions of hours saved each day because manual driving would no longer be required. It would be added up to the total man-hours of people to boost the national economy. Moreover, human drivers often compete on the roads and create traffic gridlocks. It would be a thing of the past with driverless, AI-driven cars. Finally, driverless cars would eliminate the drunk-driving, man-made blunders behind the wheels and make the roads safer. It would thus save thousands of lives each year that are lost due to road accidents. A recent research data by the automobile industry points out that road accidents with driverless cars would reduce by 85% – which is a hugely encouraging figure.

In conclusion, autonomous vehicles can reduce accidents and make the road safer while also allowing people more time to enjoy or work. Considering the benefits it offers; it is realistic to conclude that its advantages far outweigh its drawbacks.

Sample 28:

All vehicles, including cars, buses and trucks, are expected to go driverless in the future, leaving behind the passengers travelling inside. In my view, the benefits cannot outweigh the disadvantages because driverless cars will lead to unemployment and financial burden.

Admittedly, there are certain benefits of driverless cars such as smooth drive and fewer accidents. Firstly, driverless vehicles can ensure a smoother drive because these are going to be equipped with adequate technology to follow exact traffic rules, managing a safer ride. Secondly, these cars will eliminate the risk of accidents caused by drunken or sleepless drivers. For instance, most of the accidents in my country occur on highways due to sleep deprived and overworked drivers.

On the other hand, despite the latest sophisticated technology, going driverless in public transport is very risky. If there is a medical emergency, for instance, the driverless car will not be able to stop instantly and reroute to hospital if required. Another notable point is the need to adjust decisions according to road traffic, driverless cars can never match a real person in this case.

Launching driverless vehicles will also mean snatching jobs away from a significant portion of the population. Most of these drivers have no other skills, therefore managing the economic burden of this unemployed lot will be difficult for many countries. Additionally, although some people might be able to afford these expensive cars, lower socio-economic countries are not financially ready for such a big change in their transport system.

In conclusion, despite the few benefits, there is compelling evidence that not all types of vehicles can be driven without drivers, and it will be deleterious in many scenarios.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some people opine that trees should be planted in the unoccupied regions of significant towns and cities. Others insist that it is more critical to build residential complexes there. In my opinion, planting trees in vacant cities is more effective than building homes there.

On the one hand, there are numerous benefits of planting trees for residents. Firstly, it is omniscient that in the present times, air pollution and noise pollution are booming with every passing day due to fewer trees leading to harmful diseases. Therefore, sowing plants and trees in the city’s open space is indispensable for living things and the environment. To illustrate, plants take up dust and harmful gases like carbon dioxide and provide pure air. With the help of trees, the air pollution levels would decrease. Secondly, planting trees gives shelter to numerous birds. Several bird species have become bygones, and some are on the verge of extinction with the minuscule number of plants. Hence, more and more dreams in cities are required.

Additionally, these plants assist in keeping the environment cool by various natural processes. Experts have discovered that tree leaves are excellent absorbers, especially carbon dioxide and dust, giving out oxygen and water vapour. Besides, trees play a consequential role in bringing rain, thereby making it a crucial factor in maintaining a balance in the environment that is being disturbed by humans.

On the flipper side, lack of shelter will have many extreme downsides. Firstly, in urban regions, the majority of people migrate. Undoubtedly, the price of rented houses is too high. More masses might become homeless, resulting in crime rates increasing. Secondly, economic development may suffer if there are only a few buildings in the town. Subsequently, fewer shopping malls, banks, restaurants, and other shops will impact financial earnings and affect daily lives. Ultimately, the construction of more houses in an urban area is essential.

In conclusion, I believe that a significant part of the vacant spaces should be utilised for afforestation. This will help enrich the area with pure air and oxygen, allowing people to have a healthy life.

Sample 2:

The utilization of open areas for planting or building more houses has become a debatable issue. In my opinion, I agree that trees and gardens play a vital role in human development. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall explain my point of view and give supporting reasons.

To begin with, the cultivation of more trees in urban settings benefits city dwellers in a variety of ways. For example, extra tree shade is generated when more trees are planted in open areas, which not only promotes the aesthetics of the city but also helps to lower the city’s temperature. Also, it provides more space for elderly people and youngsters to do some physical activities in this relaxing environment.

Additionally, these plants assist in reducing urban air pollution and noise levels and promote higher living standards. Experts have discovered that tree leaves are great absorbers, especially of carbon dioxide and dust. In addition, trees generate oxygen, which can help to reduce pollution in cities and improve air quality.

However, it is true that more housing means more places to live. But it cannot be ignored that people are suffering from urbanisation induced air pollution and the only solution to protect them is to plant more trees.

To sum up, due to mass urbanization, the need for trees and gardens has drastically increased to improve the quality of life in overcrowded cities. Moreover, trees and gardens are natural combats that can help protect against various man-made disasters.

Sample 3:

Many city and town planners believe that trees, instead of residential buildings, are crucial for the development of the modern city. In my agreement, I agree with this contention despite the legitimate benefits to increased housing in cities.

Those who would rather build more residential buildings argue that both town and city populations are surging. Population figures globally are on the rise, and it is logical to provide quality housing for all citizens. This is particularly true in rapidly growing nations such as China and India. The migration of individuals from the countryside to cities and outlying towns means that higher residential numbers have led to deteriorating sanitary conditions and increased pressure on the services that sustain cities such as public transportation. More housing would at least partly alleviate the issues that urban planners face and allow for more cogent plans for densely populated environments.

Nonetheless, the importance of trees transcends the purely practical. For the average city and town resident, trees have aesthetic value. Take for example some of the best-known cities in the world including Paris and New York City. The parks and gardens stand out and mitigate living apart from the natural world. Moreover, the more underprivileged segments of society are unlikely to be able to afford trips outside their immediate living vicinity. There is therefore a good chance that many younger children, particularly those in inner cities, will rarely experience nature and their lives will be limited to the dreary confines of the city. Over time, this can have a demoralising effect that is evidenced in the defeatist attitude common among less affluent children.

In conclusion, the importance of housing to meeting rising population demands does not overshadow the importance of trees. Towns and cities must naturally balance these concerns to foster better living environments for residents.

Sample 3:

Many people argue that the planting of trees should take precedence over the construction of additional accommodation for residents in town and cities. I largely agree that planting more trees brings about greater environmental benefits overall, though erecting more residence is justifiably beneficial.

Supporters of added residential areas argue that they help combat overpopulation and stimulate economic growth. The growing influx of rural inhabitants seeking greater opportunities for education, healthcare, and services has recently driven a boom in the world populations and created the modern mega-city. While this trend is economically beneficial, it has also led to inflated real estate prices, higher rates of unemployment and exacerbated social issues related to overcrowding. Hence, the construction of residential properties would not only provide city dwellers with places to reside but also effectively offset potential bubbles in the real estate market. This development would also create millions of employment opportunities within the building sector.

Nonetheless, these temporary fixes have concomitantly brought about more pressing environmental hazards, all of which can be sustainably mitigated by growing more trees. One salient example of this is a natural phenomenon called "the urban heat island". Compared to natural landscapes, buildings absorb and reradiato a higher volume of sunlight which is then trapped by the city's smog, resulting in wider temperature fluctuations, deteriorating infrastructures, and compromised human health and comfort. Urban vegetation, in the forms of trees, provides shade, emits water vapors that cool infrastructures, and shields residents from extreme ultraviolet exposure. At the same time, they are also effective natural curtains that absorb and filter pollutant particulates out of the air by trapping them on leaves and bark, while simultaneously releasing oxygen into the atmosphere, thus contributing towards more habitable living conditions that are far more beneficial for human health in the long run.

In conclusion, despite the short-term economic gains that extra housing offers, I believe with few reservations that planting more trees would have a greater overall impact as it would significantly improve the standard of living and reduce the severity of environmental changes. In my opinion, a combination of both would ensure the sustainable development of cities.

Sample 4:

It is believed that it is more meaningful to plant trees in open urban areas, rather than building more houses. While housing is needed to meet the demands of the growing population, I strongly agree that trees should be planted in open areas as trees provide environmental, social, and economic benefits.

Admittedly, housing is essential to meet the demands of the burgeoning population; however, high-rise buildings should be constructed instead of spreading out low-rise houses, allowing open spaces to be preserved for planting more trees. New housing can also be built in the countryside to convert villages into towns. In fact, many people are opting to live there because of the fresh air and quiet atmosphere.

The main benefit of planting trees in cities is to the environment. Trees help purify the polluted air in the cities and towns. Research has proven that 100 trees can remove tonnes of carbon dioxide annually. Trees are also known to cut down the everyday noise of cities, thus tackling noise pollution. To add to it, rainwater doesn't run off into drains if there are trees in urban areas. It is filtered into the ground, thus saving the city money that is spent on drains and artificial controls. Finally, trees provide shade to homes, roads, office areas, and parking spaces, thus reducing energy consumption. In parking lots also, trees help keep cars cooler, which leads to less pollution.

Planting trees in cities helps the city grow socially and economically as well. They provide an area where people can meet, socialize, and also exercise. Children also get close to nature, where they can play. The commercial value of an urban property with trees is more than one without trees. Retail outlets and businesses located in areas with trees attract more customers.

To sum up, although houses are needed in cities to live in, trees are needed more to strengthen and improve the quality of life in overcrowded cities. They play a vital role in combating climate change and provide numerous economic and social benefits.

Sample 5:

Nowadays, there is an increasing concern about greenery around the country. However, whether these trees should be planted in a city’s open places rather than giving way to more accommodation remains a controversial debate. I agree with the view that if housing supply in a city has surpassed demand, the open areas should mainly be covered by trees.

Firstly, with enough housing for locals to live, trees are needed to cool down the cities and towns. While many cities have to heavily rely on air-conditioning to decrease the indoor temperature during summer, with more trees planted, the outside temperature can be adjusted to a lower level. As a benefit, it will be cooler in people’s homes.

Moreover, trees can function well to clean up the toxic substances in the air. If we want more people to stay away from some health issues that are caused by environmental degradation, trees can definitely help. And this is something those housing buildings cannot contribute to.

Of course, when the majority of residents in some towns cannot be provided with comfortable housing, it is a different case. As shelter is one of the most important elements for human survival, it should be considered as a priority in these places. As long as shelter is not an urgent problem, then greenery can be prioritised for open areas.

In summary, both trees and housing play an important role in urban lifestyle. When most city residents already have a home to live in, open spaces ought to be given to trees. On the other hand, building more accommodation on the available land is a wiser choice, vice versa.

Sample 6:

In present, there are a plenty of wide empty spaces in both cities and towns which can take advantage to plant trees or construct more building. Some opinions suggest planning more greenery in these spaces due to their necessity, I completely agree with that valuable statement.

Initially, the main benefit of growing more trees in cities and towns is that it will promote the amount of fresh air. More trees mean more carbon dioxide will be absorbed leading to more oxygen is produced. It is a nice way out for the hottest issues in some big cities and towns nowadays when these places release a large amount of air pollution every day because of the crowd and overpopulation. Secondly, planting more greens is directly raise citizen's awareness about protecting environment. Residents take more responsibility to conserving and develoing more green space in their living area. In addition, when more people are concerned about the environment and health, they will immediately lead to a healthier lifestyle.

Moreover, green trees also decorate the cities looking more peaceful and beautiful, which will attract more tourists to come. Because of the new trends of visiting an enviromentally-friendly place, a green city or town will be an interesting destination for all visitors. Therefore, national tourism will be developed while national reputation also significantly climbs. Another benefit is that more jobs will be created for the environment such as sanitation workers. Consequently, the unemployment rate of those cities and towns will dramatically decrease.

In conclusion, for several reasons mentioned above, I maintain the opinion that the government should reserve spare spaces for growing more greens instead of building more houses.

Sample 7:

Many people have views on how to absolutely utilize vacant spaces in cities and towns. While some believe that planting trees in blank spaces in cities and towns is more necessary than building houses, I partly agree with this method.

On the one hand, I agree that planting trees in open spaces in cities and towns is essential to help citizens get a fresher atmosphere in cities and towns. Firstly, the atmosphere in big cities and towns is getting worse than before due to the appearance of industrial parks and increasing in vehicles. Therefore, planting trees has contributed a pure green space to big cities and towns, helping people get a better life. Secondly, the forest area of the world has been narrowed nowadays, so a lack of wood resources to serve business activities as well as constructing activities is an unavoidably serious problem. Thus, cultivating trees becomes one of the most useful measures to help people to solve partially emptied wood resources today.

On the other hand, I do not believe that the benefits of building houses in cities or towns are outweighed by planting trees. First and foremost, the population of big cities or towns is increasing these days because of the immigration of people from the countryside or mountainous areas. Therefore, building houses or apartments to meet accommodation for everyone is really indispensable. Besides, some economic centers need to be constructed to widen infrastructure as well as provide jobs for citizens here. Secondly, planting trees in big cities or towns, especially big trees along streets, will cause some grave traffic accidents for citizens in the rainy season when these trees are fallen down by a storm, strong winds, or are struck by lightning.

In summary, I can clearly come to the conclusion that although growing trees in cities or towns help to avoid wasting blank spaces, this solution has its negative impacts.

Sample 8:

It is an irrefutable fact that, nowadays, a great deal of attention has been paid to Green or sustainable planting; while some believe that it must be necessary to plant trees everywhere in society rather than constructing mud and mortar building in open areas, others reject this notion. However, I totally agree with the former statement that will analyse my views by taking examples to demonstrate my points and prove my arguments.

On the one hand, the advantages of planting more trees are indisputable. The most significant benefit is that trees purify the air and reduce CO2 emissions in an environment polluted by transportation and construction. Furthermore, clean and fresh air contributes to a stress-free life and helps maintain a healthy atmosphere around living spaces. For example, floods in Jagrata affect health, safety, and prosperity due to soil erosion caused by deforestation for urbanization. Therefore, increasing green spaces could be an effective solution to avoid these predictable problems.

On the other hand, although there has been a dramatic rise in the population almost in all nations due to the enhancement in healthcare amenities. As a result, the average death rate has decreased, yet the majority of the populace still resides in countries. For example, the unemployment problem has been contributed significantly by increasing the number of people who have been residing in multicultural cities.

In conclusion, from my viewpoint, it is most agreeable to focus more on planting trees for a friendly environment, though building houses are essential. However, the balance between them should be an effective solution for environmental protection.

Sample 9:

It is argued that growing trees in vacant places in sub-urban areas or metropolitan areas are crucial rather than constructing homes for the people. I completely agree with the statement as it will make the place pollution-free, and linking people with nature can heal their mental and physical problems.

First off, planting trees in open spaces will make the urban and town areas pollution free. To elaborate on it, people drive their vehicles to move from one place to another. When the fuel burns, it produces toxic gases. These gases mix in the environment and create pollution. Therefore, having more trees will absorb them and purify the air, and our biodiversity will not experience the problem of pollution. The absence of vegetation and congested places due to having more homes can exaggerate this problem. Thus, it is better to grow more trees. For instance, Chandigarh is a beautiful city for having more green spaces, and the rate of pollution is less than in any other city.

Moreover, greenery helps establish a link between human beings and nature and cures the public of various physical and mental illnesses. To explain it, nature has the power to heal the illnesses of humanity. Having plants, trees, and flowers all around makes the individuals feel ecstasy. In the lap of nature, people forget their anxiety and sadness and develop strong feelings of positivity. In addition, they do some exercises or run in the parks for gardens and burn their extra fat as well as improve the functions of the body organs. Individuals can keep themselves fit both psychologically and physiologically. For example, many physicians advise patients to walk over grass or to do meditation or yoga in a park or a garden. So, these places help a lot of humanity to cure itself. Even great writers or storytellers consider green spaces ideal for writing any work of art. Their writings also remove the depression of the person and make them cheerful.

To conclude, it is clear that planting trees in unoccupied places in cities or towns will make the place clear, and nature has the power to treat the physical as well as mental problems of individuals. They can get a feeling of glee at those places.

Sample 10:

As metropolitan areas are becoming more overpopulated and tree density is dropping, many people think we should focus on planting more trees rather than building housing. I strongly support this idea.  

There are many direct advantages as to why people should plant more trees in urban areas. Firstly, many scientists proved that trees improve a lot of environmental metrics within a short time. For example, planting more trees results in cleaner air, lower average temperature, and a reduced carbon footprint. Secondly, allocating more space to trees can improve the aesthetic look of cities. For example, cities can build more botanical gardens that host various flowers and other beautiful plants. From an architectural aspect, this can add more contrast between the sharp look of buildings and the softer look of plants and flowers.

Moreover, there are indirect benefits when there are more open spaces dedicated to trees. The first one is that to implement this policy, the government might need to demolish many old residential areas to have areas for parks. This decision is beneficial in many ways. For example, new apartment buildings can accommodate more people and ensure a higher quality of life. The second one is that with more parks, citizens can witness an improvement in both their physical and mental health. Children can hang out and exercise in these parks and botanical gardens, thus improving their physical health. Senior citizens and even working people can take afternoon or night walks to relax, thus improving their mental health.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that urban areas should plant more trees due to their various benefits, both directly and indirectly.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP