Câu hỏi:

10/01/2025 194

Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country’s police force or military force, while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Xem lời giải

Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!

Bắt đầu thi

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Gender equality in traditionally male-dominated professions such as those in the police or the army has been a highly controversial topic of late. While some argue that women are less suited for these career paths, I believe that the roles they serve are as important as men’s.

On the one hand, many people advocate that women are less fit for duty than men, for the reason that jobs in the police or the army are physically demanding and occupationally hazardous. It is often the case that soldiers or policemen have to carry heavy equipment like heavy firearms or bulletproof vests while they are on a mission, and men are often fitter for the job. This is because men generally innately possess more raw strength and speed than women given the same amount of training, according to many studies on the subject. The said strength and speed also prove necessary when they are faced with danger, which is typical both in the world of fighting criminals or maintaining social order. A subtle difference in physical abilities when they are in a criminal pursuit, for example, could mean the difference between life and death.

On the other hand, I personally think that candidates of both genders are suitable for these occupations for several reasons. Firstly, the duties of policemen or soldiers are not only performed in the front line. For instance, in the military force, female applicants are more suitable for working as nursing staff. Nurturing instincts and the tenderness in women’s nature are bound to make them more suited for taking care of injured soldiers. Secondly, the police force or the army both have a rigorous scanning process in terms of recruitment. Many women who long for working in these fields have passed official training courses and possess sufficient qualifications. Therefore, these applicants’ wishes should be taken into consideration without gender bias.

In conclusion, although some say that women are less likely to perform well as policewomen or soldiers because of their physical abilities, I suppose that they are equally suited for the above-mentioned jobs due to the fact that the tasks involved in these fields are diverse in nature and that the best applicants will be selected during the hiring process, irrespective of their genders.

Sample 2:

Opinions are divided regarding whether women should be treated as equals to their male counterparts in the armed forces or if they are ill-suited to this line of work. In the following essay, I aim to examine both sides of the argument and present my personal view.

On the one hand, opponents of gender equality in police and military forces may state the following reasons to support their claim. Firstly, biological limitations in terms of physical strength and mental capacity are often mentioned as discouragements to women. According to this rationale, it is thought that they should be relegated to medical or clerical tasks instead of allowing them to play leadership or combat roles. Additionally, further integrating women is believed to disrupt cohesion in the armed forces, which are commonly operated under masculine norms. As a result, cooperation or bonding might be strained since female needs and input have to be taken into account.

On the other hand, there are some reasons why service men and women should receive equal treatments. For one thing, by incorporating women into every department, including management, they would have more authority to support fellow female members. It is reported that women often suffer from high rates of sexual assault and other forms of harassment in the military. Thus, if women hold positions of power in the field, they would be able to penalize such acts as well as campaigning for changes in the force. Also, they would serve as role models for other enlisted women, who would in turn be encouraged to stand up for their rights.

In conclusion, I believe that both genders should be treated equally in the police force or military force despite arguments to the contrary.

Sample 3:

Ever since the international feminist movement began to gain momentum during the 1970s, many people claim that women should have an equal role in majors that have been dominated by men, such as the police or the army. However, others argue that such fields have certain features that women cannot satisfy and therefore, they are not suitable candidates.

On the one hand, it is understandable why many people cast doubt on females joining the police or military force. It has been proven that men are generally stronger than women in terms of physical strength, which makes them suitable contenders for these fields. Such advantage leads to the impression that if these tasks are handled by men, they will be done with the utmost in efficiency and performance. Another factor that contributes to this belief is that women are naturally the ones that give birth; hence, there will be time that they need to be absent from work to nurture their children. Because of this, the majority of important tasks in the police or army tends to be done by men, as they do not have maternity leave like women.

Having said that, it would be nonsensical to neglect female candidates who want to take part in these fields. Although it is hard to deny the fact that most males are more well-built than females, policewomen and female militants are believed to be more patient and thoughtful, especially towards other women and young children, than their male counterparts. This could be a huge benefit, especially in the police, when they have to address critical and stressful situations that involve women and children. Another reason why many believe that women should be given the chance to prove themselves in these areas is egalitarianism. Many women, such as Marie Curie, have proven themselves to be as good as their male colleagues in scientific areas, which used to be dominated by men. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that women can be as good as men in the above-mentioned fields.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that gender must not influence the decision whether someone should work in a certain field. Therefore, as long as a candidate can satisfy the requirements of becoming a policeman or militant, he or she should be allowed to join the force.

Sample 4:

The debate on whether women should participate equally with men in a country’s police or military force has garnered significant attention. While some argue that women are equally capable and should be given the same opportunities, others contend that these roles may not be suitable for women due to various physical and psychological reasons. In my opinion, women should play an equal role in these forces to bring far greater results for a nation and society.

Opponents of hiring women in a nation's police and military forces argue that women may not be suitable for certain aspects of police and military work due to physical limitations. They point out that combat roles, in particular, require a high level of physical endurance and strength, which men, on average, are more likely to possess. Moreover, some believe that the presence of women in combat units could disrupt unit cohesion and effectiveness. For example, during intense combat situations, differing physical abilities and the potential for gender-related interpersonal issues could potentially hinder operational efficiency.

On the other hand, proponents of gender equality in the police and military forces assert that women possess the same intellectual and emotional capabilities as men. Modern warfare and policing increasingly rely on technology and strategy rather than sheer physical strength, thereby diminishing the relevance of traditional gender roles. For instance, women have excelled as military strategists and leaders in various countries, including the United States and the United Kingdom. Additionally, incorporating women into these forces promotes diversity and inclusivity, which can lead to more comprehensive problem-solving and decision-making processes. For instance, having female police could help handle female victims and criminals more effectively. In addition to that, a female victim is more likely to talk to a female officer than she could to a male officer.

In my view, women are equally talented as men and can bring diversity to the defence force of a country and therefore should not be precluded from serving in the police or military.

In conclusion, while some express concerns regarding the suitability of women for certain roles in the police and military, these should not overshadow the benefits of gender equality and diversity. Women can undoubtedly play an equal and effective role alongside men in these vital institutions and bring positive results to society and the country.

Sample 5:

While some opine that females are equally adept as men in playing important roles in a country's police or defence force, others beg to disagree. This essay will discuss both views and opine that the roles of women in these sectors are definitely crucial and they are no less qualified than men in performing their duties.

On the one hand, some believe that females are not suitable to perform their duties in the police force or army due to the difficult job situations and challenges those jobs pose and therefore they should not be accepted in those jobs. They cite the delicate physical structures and kind nature of females. In addition, they point out that emotionally women are tender and cannot take harsh decisions that are often required in such jobs. For instance, a woman could excel over men in teaching children in school or taking care of patients in a hospital as a doctor but when it comes to fighting and killing enemies in a battleground, that might not go well with their natural capability and tender nature. This is why they are against enrolling women in such positions.

On the other hand, others argue that both men and women should be equally accepted in a nation's defence force as they have the same capability and talent to perform these jobs. They keep arguing that having both genders in the police force can maintain social justice far better than the policy in which a country has all-male police. This is because a woman can deal with a female criminal or victim than their male counterpart. They can also bring a diversity of talents to the defence forces. As a prime example, British female defence officers were extremely successful in exposing the Germans' schemes in World War II. Had they not been allowed to participate in the army plans, the fate of the war could have been different.

In conclusion, while some may think that females cannot become suitable police or army personnel, and therefore should not be hired in these fields, others have compelling reasons to agree to hire them in those sectors. Personally, I believe that having both genders in a country's police and defence forces has far greater benefits and therefore should be promoted.

Sample 6:

In recent years gender equality in employment has been the topic of heated debate. While some may argue that women are less suited for certain jobs such as with the police or the military, I believe that female candidates should be treated the same as their male counterparts.

Those who consider women to be unsuited for some kinds of jobs including the police or the military often hold that opinion because such jobs are extremely physically demanding. As the female body has smaller muscles and less physical strength compared to male body, women may have difficulty engaging in strenuous activity which can be exhausting even for men. In military service, female soldiers are more likely to struggle while defending themselves than their male peers when they are forced to move around carrying heavy firearms in the battle, which can increase their risk of mission failure. Because of the hazards and extreme conditions, they may encounter, some people advocate that women are not suitable for work in these fields.

Nevertheless, I believe that female applicants should be considered for police or military placements without a gender bias, because women are more suited to certain tasks. In the police service, female officers can perform important roles on some occasions such as a body search where male officers are restricted from touching female convicts. In the military service, female nursing staff are more likely to care better for injured soldiers since maternal instinct makes them dedicated and heart-warming professionals. Furthermore, for the sake of fairness to all, job seekers should have an equal opportunity to choose their jobs freely, regardless of gender. Many women have the desire to work in the police and the military and some of them have relevant expertise and qualifications. Therefore, they should not be discriminated against in employment opportunities for these jobs.

In conclusion, although some say that women are incompatible with police and military duties because of the high physical demands, I believe that they should be treated as equal to men. This is because there are certain roles with the police and the military that are more suitable for women than men, and therefore both genders should have equal employment opportunities.

Sample 7:

There are many people who assert that men and women should have an equal role to play in a nation’s law enforcement and military, while opponents of this viewpoint claim that these kinds of jobs are not suitable for women. Personally, I believe that both male and female citizens are equally suitable to be a soldier or law enforcer.

It is not hard to see why some people consider women to be unfit for the military and police force. They assume that women are less physically capable and therefore cannot carry out their duties as effectively as their male counterparts. This is supposedly because women tend to have less muscle mass and stamina, so female soldiers or officers are unable to perform feats of strength that men can. Take competitive sports as an example, we have different leagues for men and women since most women simply do not have the strength and endurance to compete with men at the highest level. Thus, the opponents against women serving in the army or police force believe that this kind of job is less well-suited for the allegedly weaker sex. However, I believe that the use of modern firearms has negated the size and strength disparity between the two genders, and so men and women should both serve if they meet certain standards of fitness.

There are several other reasons why I support women joining the military and police force. Firstly, history has shown countless examples of women being effective soldiers and military commanders. For instance, Lady Trieu, a Vietnamese warrior who was skilled in martial arts, led an army of resistance to drive away foreign invaders. In World War II, many Russian women served in the military as snipers or pilots, and their achievements brought fear to their enemies while inspiring respect from their male comrades. These examples are evidence that being female does not hinder soldiers from carrying out their duties. Secondly, many policewomen can de-escalate situations better than men, who have a tendency to be aggressive and use excessive force. In America, most police shootings were done by male officers, so many experts argue for the addition of more female officers to temper aggressive police behavior.

In conclusion, I believe that men and women should have an equal chance to serve their country as soldiers or police officers despite any physical disadvantages that women may have.

Sample 8:

The debate over whether women should be treated equally to men in roles such as police officers and military personnel is a complex and multifaceted issue. It raises critical questions about gender equality, societal perceptions, and the capabilities required for these demanding professions. While some argue that women can perform just as effectively as men in these roles, others contend that the physical and psychological demands make men more suited for such positions. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting an opinion on the matter.

On one hand, advocates for gender equality in law enforcement and military positions highlight the importance of fairness and equal opportunity. They argue that women can offer valuable skills and perspectives that enrich these fields. Diversity in the workforce has been shown to improve problem-solving, enhance community relations, and provide a broader array of responses to the varied situations that officers or soldiers may encounter. Furthermore, advancements in training techniques and technology have reduced the need for brute strength and emphasized strategic thinking, teamwork, and emotional intelligence - qualities in which many women excel. Historical precedents also support the argument that women can perform on par with men in high-stress roles; examples include women serving effectively in combat roles, special forces, and peacekeeping missions globally.

Conversely, detractors argue that the inherent physical demands of police and military jobs create a gender disparity that cannot be overlooked. They point to statistics suggesting that men, on average, possess greater upper-body strength and faster reaction times, qualities that can be advantageous in combat or crisis situations. Critics may also express concern about the potential for compromised safety if fitness standards are adjusted to accommodate female recruits, fearing that this could lead to a reduction in overall effectiveness. Additionally, some hold traditional views on gender roles, believing that men are more naturally suited for such professions that require physical confrontation and high-risk decision-making.

Ultimately, the significant question surrounding this debate is not merely about gender but about competency and capability. It is crucial to examine job requirements and ensure all candidates, regardless of gender, meet these standards. A recruitment process that emphasizes skill, situational judgment, and physical fitness, rather than merely gendered qualifications, can create an efficient and equitable workplace. It is also important to recognize that capability in the context of police and military jobs is not solely based on physical attributes; psychological resilience, communication skills, and adaptability are equally, if not more, important.

In conclusion, while there are valid concerns on both sides of the argument, it is essential to approach the issue of women's inclusion in law enforcement and military roles with a balanced perspective. Equal treatment should not come at the cost of effectiveness or safety; thus, maintaining rigorous standards for all candidates should be paramount. By fostering an environment of equality and efficiency simultaneously, society can benefit from the diverse skills that both women and men bring to these essential fields. In my opinion, women should be evaluated solely on their individual capabilities, thus allowing the best candidates, regardless of gender, to serve in these critical functions.

Sample 9:

The debate on whether women should be allowed to work in law enforcement agencies and armed forces is quite charged. Many are in favor of allowing females to join active combat duties in police and military though others offer resistance on this issue.

Females have proven their worth on several battle fronts in the history of mankind, be it Joan of Arc, or be the Queens of Jhansi in India who led their armies, mostly composed of men from the front against the formidable foes. Thus, overlooking their candidature and depriving them of a chance to serve on such posts just because they are women would be quite unjust.

Nevertheless, women fighting along with men has certain pitfalls. As it is suggested by many commentators, law enforcement agencies and armed forces require high fitness standards and need combatants to be agile, an area where men outstrip their women counterparts by miles, whether it is sneaking into or evacuating from enemy territory. Various studies carried out to assess training programs reveal that mixed-gender units were sluggish while all male units in both police and army were quick in expediting their tasks.

Moreover, one can hardly deny the threats females may face when fighting it out on streets, or battlefields: they are vulnerable to sexual assault, in case they land among criminals or are captured by enemy forces. This could be catastrophic and devastating for the women on combat duties, and an embarrassment for the establishment that employs them.

In hindsight, I strongly feel that the changing paradigm needs to reset the aspirations of society. It is necessary to allow females to take up jobs in police and military - the traditional bastions of males. If given opportunities, the women will prove their birth.

Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay

Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:

Xem thêm »

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Câu 1

Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages. Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Peer pressure is a pervasive phenomenon that significantly influences the behaviours of young individuals. While some argue that it plays a crucial role in positively shaping the lives of the youth, others contend that the disadvantages of peer pressure are very detrimental.

Peer pressure, when harnessed positively, can have several advantages. Firstly, it can foster a sense of belonging and camaraderie among individuals within the same age group. Young people often seek acceptance and affirmation from their peers, and this can contribute to their emotional well-being and self-esteem. A further benefit is that positive peer pressure can encourage healthy behaviours, such as exercising or avoiding risky activities. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to quit smoking if their friends promote a smoke-free lifestyle.

However, peer pressure can also have distinct disadvantages. The most pressing concern is the potential for negative influences on impressionable minds. Young people may succumb to the pressure of engaging in harmful behaviours, such as substance abuse, criminal activities, or reckless behaviours like driving without a seatbelt, due to peer pressure, which can lead to long-lasting negative consequences and jeopardise their future.

Moreover, excessive pressure from peers can stifle individuality and creativity as young people may conform to the norms of their peer group instead of pursuing their own aspirations and dreams. This conformity may limit their personal growth and hinder their ability to think independently.

In conclusion, I would argue that peer pressure has more disadvantages as although it can foster a sense of belonging and promote healthy behaviours, it also carries the risk of leading young people astray and stifling their individuality. It is imperative for parents, educators, and society at large to guide young people in making informed choices and navigating the complexities of peer influence.

Sample 2:

The peer group tends to exert influence on the way teenagers behave. While many believe that the influence of peers is immensely important, others opine that it has its obvious drawbacks. I believe that the benefits peer pressure brings outweigh the disadvantages because it can instil a positive attitude towards education, despite the primary drawback, namely substance use, or so on it may cause.

Without any doubt, the influence of peers can inspire young people to build positive behaviours, make good choices, and strive for academic excellence. When friends place emphasis on education and academic performance, it can exert a positive impact on the young’s attitude toward learning. In fact, students who maintain a friend circle who are diligent students may feel a strong motivation to study diligently. Take my brother’s case for example. He works harder to obtain good marks in exams because his friends are determined to achieve academic excellence. They possess a solid work ethic, and now so does he.

However, peer pressure can also exert influence on young people to engage in deviant behaviours. It may make young adults feel obliged to take on bad habits like substance abuse to feel like they are part of the circle and not levelled as boring or weak. For example, if a group of friends get involved in substance abuse, underage drinking, and delinquent activities, a child may feel obligated to conform to these behaviours to avoid exclusion.

Considering all these, I would like to mention that there is no concrete evidence to endorse the view that peer pressure is the primary reason for unacceptable behaviours and substance abuse. There are other factors, like genetics, mental health issues, and social influences, that play a profound role in this case.

To reiterate, the fact that peer pressure can encourage to conform to a positive attitude toward learning clearly outweighs the flawed argument that it can influence young people to develop delinquent behaviour and bad habits.

Sample 3:

The debate surrounding peer pressure often hinges on whether its advantages outweigh its disadvantages or if it is the opposite. While peer pressure can sometimes encourage positive behaviours and foster social connections, I believe its drawbacks are significant and can have long-lasting consequences.

On the one hand, proponents of peer pressure argue that it can motivate individuals to adopt healthy habits, such as regular exercise, academic diligence, and community involvement. Positive peer pressure can serve as a source of encouragement, support, and accountability, leading to personal growth and self-improvement. For example, a teenager may be more likely to participate in volunteer work if their friends are also involved, leading to a greater sense of civic responsibility and altruism.

However, the disadvantages of peer pressure often outweigh these benefits. Negative peer pressure can lead individuals to engage in risky behaviours, such as substance abuse, reckless driving, and delinquent activities, in order to fit in or gain acceptance from their peers. The desire to conform to social norms and avoid rejection can override rational decision-making and moral judgment, leading to harmful consequences for both individuals and society. For instance, adolescents may experiment with drugs or alcohol due to peer pressure, resulting in addiction, legal troubles, and impaired cognitive function. Moreover, peer pressure can contribute to the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes, discrimination, and bullying within peer groups. Individuals who deviate from social norms or express dissenting opinions may face ostracism, ridicule, or even physical violence from their peers, leading to feelings of isolation, low self-esteem, and mental health issues.

In conclusion, while peer pressure can sometimes promote positive behaviours and social connections, its disadvantages far outweigh any potential benefits.

Sample 4:

Peer pressure refers to the influence young individuals experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviors. This essay will critically evaluate the drawbacks and benefits of peer pressure on young people.

Peer pressure often leads young individuals to engage in risky behaviors. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.

On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire young individuals to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young individuals to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive peer groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active peer groups and engaging in behaviors aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.

In conclusion, although peer pressure encourages risky behaviors and hinders personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantage make it positive on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.

Sample 5:

Peer pressure is the influence exerted by a peer group that encourages people to change their attitudes, values, or behaviours to fit into group norms. It plays a significant part in adolescent life. I agree that peers can help make a particular place comfortable for an individual but majorly they play an active role in helping an individual indulge in risky behaviours. So, in my opinion, the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages.

Peer pressure plays a crucial role in shaping adolescent behaviour and attitudes. It helps people promote unity and harmony in society. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to excel academically or engage in community service due to the influence of their high-achieving peers. It tends to encourage people to conform to societal norms and values. Moreover, it can help young people in preparing for the realities of adulthood. This is because it exposes them to different viewpoints and assists them in learning how to navigate social dynamics, which in turn enhances their social skills and emotional intelligence.

However, there can be several ill effects of being influenced by one’s peers. Firstly, it may encourage youth to engage in dangerous activities such as smoking, drinking, or drug usage to make them fit into their groups. Excess peer pressure is the major cause of stress, anxiety, and low self-esteem in the younger generation as it builds this feeling that they are not able to match the expectations of their peers. In extreme cases, it can even lead to depression and other mental health issues. This can also stifle individuality and creativity, preventing young people from discovering their true selves and potential.

In addition to this, there can be a loss of personal identity as young people may feel compelled to adopt the attitudes, behaviours, and tastes of their peers, even if they conflict with their values and beliefs. It also leads to academic pressure as students may feel forced to achieve the same grades as their peers, leading to unhealthy competition and burnout. This can result in a lack of motivation and interest in learning, which can have long-term effects on their academic and career prospects.

In conclusion, peer pressure does have an indispensable role in the societal development of young individuals. However, it also provides people with a sense of comfort and security in their formative years. However, its disadvantages such as promoting risky behaviours, causing mental health issues, stifling individuality, and leading to academic pressure are more significant. Therefore, parents, educators, and society as a whole must provide guidance and support to young people to help them navigate the complexities of peer pressure.

Sample 6:

Many feel that peer pressure can have a positive impact on an individual, while others claim that its effects are unequivocally detrimental. In my opinion, despite providing motivation for self-development, the downsides associated with mental health decline and behavioral problems make this phenomenon decidedly negative.

On the one hand, peer pressure can encourage personal development. Individuals leading sedentary lifestyles might be persuaded into going to the gym by their peers and therefore cultivate healthy exercise habits in the long term. Relatedly, those surrounded by punctual friends may be influenced to arrive on time not only for social gatherings, but this habit could possibly extend to important business meetings. The adoption of these good daily habits can engender higher levels of self-confidence, which better prepares an individual to strive for excellence in various aspects of life.

However, peer pressure can be the source of mental health deterioration. When observing other people of the same age reaching major milestones and success in life, an individual may feel compelled to make comparisons and potentially feel dissatisfied with oneself and their current achievements. A pertinent example of this can often be seen in classroom settings, where a student may develop anxieties related to other students and in rarer instances, more concerning mental problems. Negative peer pressure also makes an individual gravitate towards self-destructive behavior. Some teenagers may be tempted by their peers into smoking cigarettes or drinking alcohol in order to gain approval and inclusion within a given social group.

In conclusion, in spite of motivational advantages concomitant with peer pressure, the related mental health problems and risky behavior are unequivocally negative. Individuals should focus on personal growth instead of fixating on others’ achievements.

Sample 7:

In the vibrant tapestry of adolescence, peer pressure emerges as a potent force, shaping behaviors and attitudes among the youth. This essay posits that while peer influence harbors potential benefits, such as fostering social integration and encouraging positive habits, its drawbacks, particularly in promoting conformity and risky behaviors, significantly overshadow its advantages.

Peer pressure, often perceived as a vehicle for conformity, exerts a formidable influence on young individuals, compelling them to align with the group’s norms and values. This phenomenon, while reinforcing social cohesion, frequently nudges adolescents towards compromising their individuality and adopting behaviors that may not align with their personal or moral values. For instance, the prevalent trend of underage drinking can be attributed to the desire to fit in, illustrating how peer influence can foster detrimental habits rather than constructive ones.

Moreover, the inclination to engage in risky behaviors under peer influence constitutes a significant drawback. Adolescents, in their quest for acceptance and fear of ostracization, may find themselves partaking in activities fraught with peril, such as reckless driving or substance abuse. These actions, while momentarily gratifying, can have long-lasting adverse effects on their health and wellbeing, underscoring the inherent dangers of succumbing to peer pressure.

Conversely, peer pressure can serve as a catalyst for positive change, encouraging young people to adopt beneficial habits and attitudes through the influence of their contemporaries. For example, peers who prioritize academic excellence and healthy living can inspire similar values in their circle. However, while the potential for positive influence exists, it is frequently overshadowed by the more immediate and compelling lure of negative behaviors that promise social acceptance.

In summary, while peer pressure may occasionally lead to positive changes, its inclination towards promoting conformity and risky behaviors is a greater issue. The negatives, especially its encouragement of harmful habits and the erosion of individuality, clearly outweigh the positives. This underscores the importance of creating environments that champion personal integrity over conformity, vital for nurturing resilient and well-rounded individuals.

Sample 8:

In adolescence, young people are often influenced by their peer group, a force that can wield both immense power and significant peril. While there's undeniable value in the emotional support, encouragement, and sense of belonging that peers can offer, I argue that the drawbacks of peer pressure - especially the inclination toward conformity at the expense of individuality and the propensity for rash decision-making - far outweigh these advantages.

When young people carefully select their social circles, peer pressure can, indeed, serve as a catalyst for positive change. Consider an aspiring scholar who surrounds themselves with academically driven friends aiming for Ivy League schools. In this context, the group's collective ambition propels the individual toward academic excellence. Moreover, at an age when the brain is highly malleable, the right peer pressure can stimulate not just intellectual growth but also emotional intelligence. It can teach young people the intricacies of interpersonal dynamics, as they navigate the highs and lows of relationships, including conflict resolution and empathy.

Nevertheless, the potential pitfalls of peer pressure should not be underestimated, especially given the vulnerability of adolescents who are still in the process of forming their values and judgments. This makes them susceptible to external influences that may not always align with their best interests. For instance, research indicates that the popularity of smoking in high schools directly correlates with an uptick in teenage smoking rates; youngsters may succumb to the vice merely to conform. Additionally, the fear of ostracization can lead adolescents to limit their friendships to a monolithic group, thereby reducing their exposure to diverse perspectives and impeding their emotional growth, ultimately stunting their psychological development.

In conclusion, peer pressure is a double-edged sword; while it may catalyze academic aspiration and emotional development when managed judiciously, it can also usher in detrimental consequences. Given that young individuals are prone to impulsive actions and less-than-ideal decision-making, the perils introduced by peer pressure must be acknowledged and carefully managed.

Sample 9:

The influence of peer pressure is undeniably a double-edged sword, wielding the power to either uplift or undermine an individual's life trajectory. Picture a young prodigy immersed in a social milieu comprising peers laser-focused on gaining admission to prestigious Ivy League institutions. Such an environment becomes a crucible for the cultivation of academic rigor, driving the young mind toward unparalleled scholastic achievements.

Additionally, during the formative years of adolescence, the brain's neuroplasticity is at its zenith, making it an ideal period for the enhancement of emotional intelligence. Within this context, positive peer pressure becomes instrumental in instilling essential life skills such as empathy, resilience, and conflict resolution. For example, facing challenges together, whether it's academic competition or personal disagreements, teaches valuable lessons about collaboration and emotional regulation.

Yet, the specter of the adverse effects looms large, especially when considering the malleable and impressionable nature of youth. Focused research illustrates that social trends among teenagers, such as the unfortunate resurgence of smoking, can be attributed to the pervasive influence of peer pressure. The desire to conform eclipses rational judgment, compelling young people to engage in detrimental behaviors just to maintain their social standing.

Moreover, the dread of social exclusion often coerces adolescents into narrowing their social circles to homogenous groups, thereby stifling their emotional and intellectual growth. When confined to a single, like-minded cohort, the opportunity to interact with diverse perspectives and develop a more nuanced understanding of the world is severely curtailed.

In conclusion, the multifaceted impact of peer pressure should not be casually dismissed. While it has the capacity to be a catalyst for personal and academic growth, the pitfalls are equally compelling. The key, therefore, lies in a judicious selection of one's social circle and a heightened self-awareness that enables an individual to sift through external influences to embrace only those that align with their authentic selves.

Sample 10:

Youngsters have always been influenced by the conduct of acquaintances belonging to the same age group. While this has certain shortfalls, the favors it brings are far more in number, which shall be elucidated in the following paragraphs.

The impact of conduct of acquaintances on youngsters is overwhelming and although this can have an adverse impact on the young psyche, it will be unjustified to profess that these eclipse the favorable effects; it is the other way round.

To begin with, undeniably, the consequence of the push afforded by classmates, friends, colleagues and social contacts, have been found to be coaxing individuals into establishing their definitive academic, professional, social and even health goals with great enthusiasm. To corroborate, several individuals pursuing weight loss objectives have admitted that it was their social network that persuaded them to work to shed their flab and attain a trimmer waist. Similarly, millions of IT professionals credit joining this industry to their classmates and friends whose success and encouragement pushed the former to follow the precedents and embrace this occupation.

Moreover, it is quite commonly seen that the persona is partly carved by the interaction with the outer world, especially with those in social circles and friendship, and this determines the level of intellect of an individual. To illustrate, those with a high level of enlightenment about the surroundings, general and specific issues such as geo-politics and environment, generally hail from peer groups that comprise intelligent people.

However, the only conspicuous downside of this phenomenon is youngsters starting to harbor unrealistic expectations about various spheres of their life, chasing unattainable goals, becoming frustrated if those objectives are not accomplished, and going astray. Nonetheless, such situations can be circumvented by adopting a prudent approach and identifying their own limitations.

In hindsight, it can be safely asserted that the allegation of shortcomings of peer pressure exceeding its pros lacks substance; it is this force that has guided an umpteen number of triumphant personalities who owe their accomplishments to these undercurrents.

Sample 11:

Peer pressure is a phenomenon widely observed among young people, influencing their behaviors, decisions, and perceptions. While some advocate for its importance in shaping social dynamics and fostering development, others highlight its distinct disadvantages. The debate revolves around whether the negatives of peer pressure outweigh the positives.

Advantages of peer pressure are evident in various aspects of adolescent life. It often plays a role in introducing new ideas, interests, and experiences. Young individuals may be motivated to adopt positive habits like academic excellence, sports participation, or community engagement through encouragement and inspiration from peers. Additionally, peer pressure can facilitate social integration and help young people develop critical social skills, fostering a sense of belonging and camaraderie within their peer groups.

However, the disadvantages of peer pressure cannot be disregarded. The most glaring issue arises when negative influences lead to risky or harmful behaviors. Young individuals might succumb to peer pressure to engage in substance abuse, delinquency, or other irresponsible actions, driven by the desire for acceptance or fear of exclusion. This can result in detrimental consequences, affecting not only their immediate well-being but also their long-term prospects and mental health.

Furthermore, excessive reliance on peer approval might hinder personal growth and individuality. Young people may conform to societal norms or trends without considering their own values, preferences, or aspirations. This conformity might lead to a lack of independent thinking and decision-making skills, affecting their ability to navigate challenges and make informed choices in the future.

The disadvantages of peer pressure, particularly when it leads to negative outcomes or inhibits personal development, can have a lasting impact on individuals. The pressure to conform can overshadow one’s authenticity and hinder the exploration of unique talents and interests.

In evaluating whether the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of peer pressure, it’s crucial to consider context and moderation. Positive peer influence can foster growth, but when peer pressure leads to detrimental behavior or stifles individuality, its drawbacks become more pronounced. Finding a balance where individuals are positively influenced without compromising their values or well-being is crucial in navigating the complexities of peer pressure.

In conclusion, while peer pressure can offer positive reinforcement and social integration, its disadvantages, especially when it results in negative behaviors or stifles individuality, should not be overlooked. Striking a balance between positive peer influence and personal autonomy is essential for young individuals to develop into well-rounded, independent individuals capable of making informed decisions while benefiting from the positive aspects of social interaction.

Câu 2

Tests and examinations are a central feature of school systems in many countries. Do you think the educational benefits of testing outweigh any disadvantages?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

In today’s school systems, tests and examinations are major features in many countries, where some citizens believe that these tests play an important role. Whereas on the same scale others argue that they are not mandatory. However, I feel that testing should not be major a one in the school system for the following reasons.

Firstly, a common advantage of examinations is that they differentiate between the best and poor performers, i.e., hard-working students are smart in tests compared to others. Similarly, school kids feel that if they want to upgrade for the next standard they should appear and pass exams. Hence this concept creates responsibility for studies. However, many nations in the world are preferring this testing format in education.

On the other hand, a few drawbacks are noticed such as slow learners cannot perform well in the test and this creates inferior complexity among students. If opportunity, time and new learning techniques are imparted to students, they can perform better in tests.

Moreover, suicide trends are seen by this examination system. Hence, developed countries are exempting testing features. This phenomenon created confusion in parents, children and teachers whether to continue with the test pattern or simply promote students to the next higher class. This brought a drastic change in many countries which headed toward the exemption of tests.

In conclusion, testing candidates has both advantages and disadvantages, with the major advantage being that slow learners benefit significantly from the exam system. If passing an exam is not mandatory, students can still improve, even if maturity and seriousness towards studies are not observed in childhood. However, tests do not always accurately reflect students' merit and are thus often biased.

Sample 2:

Much could be said about different ways of testing or checking students at schools or universities. The most popular ones have always been causing very exciting discussions and debates around the world. We all do realise that teachers need to have a system that helps them to test their students’ knowledge, so they can see how effective their teaching methods are. The question is, do we really need to put so much pressure on these features? Are they really so effective?

The first thing about tests and exams is that they do check the level of information the students managed to learn from the lectures. The questions usually cover the area that has been thought about at school, so if students can answer them correctly it means that the teaching was successful.

The other, equally important aspect is that due to the tests or exams that students are facing at school they get motivated to study more in order to get better marks and to improve their knowledge. Sometimes it might be just the fact that it is called an exam, that makes students get together and study harder.

On the other hand, some students might feel discouraged by the same fact that makes the others motivated what of course results in low marks in the actual exam. They also think that the results are very often not relevant to the efforts they put into studying. Because the marking system is not fair, they just do not feel like studying more for the exam.

Furthermore, many students find exams of different kinds very stressful, especially school ones. They often think that there could be another way of testing, less stressful, that should be introduced in schools or universities. The supporters of this opinion often bring out the fact that most students start smoking actually because of the stress they are exposed to at school. And that is definitely not beneficial for you or your health.

To put things together, is there really such a big need for exams at school? Is there really no other way to check how effective the teaching methods are? That is of course not that easy, but still, I am deeply convinced that things can be changed. It requires all the sides involved to think and come up with new ideas that could later be put into schools and that wouldn’t be that stressful anymore, so students can actually start enjoying them.

Sample 3:

Being the main characteristic of most academic institutions, the examination system helps a school to evaluate the knowledge and skills of its current and prospective students. It is well known that there are lots of debates around available scoring systems used by many schools. Some people believe that current testing methods are not effective anymore, while others think that it is not necessary to replace or amend the current scoring methods. In my opinion both sides are partially right.

It is well-documented that test questions reflect the academic material used at school lectures and seminars. Such questions cover the most part of the subject taught and evaluate the level information acquainted by the students during the classes. Besides, upcoming examinations make students to learn harder the appropriate field of study. Without evaluation, I think many students would lose their interest in learning.

On the other hand, modern testing systems require students to obtain huge amounts of academic information within a short period of time. It is widely believed that only knowledge of subjects is not enough to pass the test with higher results. The students are also required to possess strong time management skills in order to get high scores during examinations within the time limit. I think that this situation makes lots of students feel pressure which eventually leads to lower scores.

In my opinion, examinations at schools should be less stressful where students can reveal their true knowledge and will not be demotivated. I think that the time limit of the test questions should be extended since the students can have enough time to think and apply the knowledge, can get higher scores, and will be stimulated to learn further.

Sample 4:

In recent years, there has been a vast increase in discussions about how the examination systems should be at schools. Now students are undertaking too many tests and exams at school which do have many advantages both for the students and the teachers, but at the same time they also have certain drawbacks as well. The administration departments at schools need to think seriously about the outcomes of the examination systems they have, to test the students. In this essay I would like to give my own opinion after discussing both sides of the argument.

The first good thing about the exams and tests is that it is a method to test students how well they are learning from the lectures delivered in the class and how successful teachers are in conveying their knowledge. For instance, if a whole group of students show poor grades in a subject then the teacher teaching that subject can be encouraged to work harder and improve his or her teaching skills to bring the students to the top. This is a strong point that favours the argument because teachers are the key figures in a school system and exams are mandatory to check their level of teaching.

The other, equally important factor in favour of the issue is that exams encourage students as well to study, do more reading and writing and thus improve their general knowledge. If there are no exams and tests, then students will not put any effort into learning and education. Exams produce a state of terror that forces children to study. Moreover, exams bring students together, they do combine studies which help them to learn the essence of teamwork and they develop communication skills. Lastly, exams develop a sense of competition which also draws students towards books.

On the other hand, exams do have some disadvantages as well. While competition can be encouraging for some, it is a major source of immense pressure on students, often leading to depression. When students do not get good grades, they are discouraged and at the same time they are forced, both by the teachers and the parents, to work hard, putting them under more pressure. Now more and more students are involved in drug addiction to relieve exam pressure.

To recapitulate, I concede that exams can be discouraging for the students in some ways, but this does not mean that they should be removed from the system. The advantages of exams outweigh their disadvantages. Students should be tested and then upgraded but at the same time weaker students should be given special help to improve.

Câu 3