In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Sample 1:

There is no doubt that fast food is bad for our health and that people typically eat too much of it. However, there is quite a lot of debate over whether governments should step in and reduce the amount of fast food that people are eating. This essay will argue that they should certainly try to convince people to eat less fast food by taxing it.

Some people might say that it’s up to an individual to eat less fast food, and that governments have no right to govern our diets. However, humans have evolved throughout the millennia of scarcity to crave substances that were once quite rare and nutritious, like sugar and fat, but which are now so commonplace that they are in fact bad for us. Many people simply lack the ability to resist that temptation, and they gorge on sugary snacks every day, rotting their teeth and developing obesity and diabetes. They should be able to have the willpower to say no, but it is quite clear that they do not.

On the other hand, governments have a vested interest in maintaining a healthy population, and even if they try to avoid exerting too much control over the lives of their people, the obesity epidemic is fast becoming a health crisis. The only responsible thing to do is to make some effort to cut fast food consumption in the wider population before these health problems spiral to an even worse extent. Governments around the world have already taxed particularly unhealthy items with substantial degrees of success. This should continue as it appears to lower sugar and fat consumption significantly.

In conclusion, there are arguments both for and against government intervention, but it is probably best that governments intervene because it seems people simply cannot resist the allure of fast food.

Sample 2:

The growth of the fast-food industry has, without doubt, impacted on the eating habits and the health of many societies around the world. Diabetes, high cholesterol, heart and respiratory problems are all on the rise due to fatty and sugar-rich food. However, the question is whether higher tax would improve this situation or not.

From an economic point of view, higher tax might seem sensible. In countries such as the USA, Australia and Britain, the healthcare system spends a large part of its budget on people with diet-related health problems. It could be argued that these people have caused their own illnesses because of their choice of food. In this case, why should they expect the state to pay for their treatment? The tax could help fund the healthcare system.

However, we also need to consider which socio-economic group consumes fast food as the main part of their diet. Statistics indicate that lower income groups eat more of this food than wealthier people. One possible reason for this is that fast food is far cheaper than fresh produce. This is because many governments offer large subsidies to farmers who provide products for the fast-food industry, such as corn, wheat and beef. Fruit and vegetables, on the other hand, are not subsidised. Research suggests that many families simply cannot afford to buy healthy food or pay higher taxes on fast food. For them, fast food is not a choice but a necessity.

In conclusion, imposing a higher tax on fast food does not seem to be the answer. If the government chose to do this, it would only lead to greater poverty and families facing further hardship.

Sample 3:

Overeating fast food is believed to be a direct contributor to a number of serious health problems in different parts of the world. Therefore, some argue that imposing high taxes on such food should be considered a potential solution. While I completely agree with this proposal, I also believe that additional measures should be implemented alongside the tax increase to make it more effective.

Increasing the tax on the purchase of food items filled with fat, sugar, and other such additives will make them unaffordable to some consumers. While this can lead to fewer purchases and ultimately better health in consumers, some express concerns that such high taxes on these products will harm businesses. Simply put, over the past few decades, fast food chains have been able to open numerous branches and create jobs by offering these foods as affordable alternatives to more expensive, healthier options. Some argue that if the government removes this pricing advantage, fewer people may purchase such food, potentially leading to restaurant closures and job losses. However, in my opinion, by taxing unhealthy food and using the revenue generated to provide incentives for these restaurants to add more nutritious options to their menus, a wider range of consumers may be attracted to their establishments, ultimately helping the businesses thrive without any job losses.

While the above-mentioned tax increase could be beneficial, I believe that many people are addicted to fast food, and they may continue purchasing it regardless of the cost. Therefore, it is essential that the government requires the food industry to include clear warning labels on products, informing consumers of high levels of fat, sugar, or sodium, and the associated health risks, such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. As people generally value their well-being, this informative labeling may encourage them to reduce their consumption of these unhealthy, ready-made foods in favor of healthier choices.

In conclusion, in addition to a tax increase, the government should adopt a more comprehensive approach by also mandating clear nutritional labeling, to ensure the policy has a meaningful and lasting impact. Implementing such policies is a step in the right direction toward promoting a healthier population.

Sample 4:

Nowadays, people are always on the go and rarely spend time cooking by themselves. In this case, fast food becomes an important part of their life. However, the number of people who suffer from diabetes, high cholesterol, cancer, etc as a consequence of overeating fast food is increasing day by day. Some people think that it is necessary for the government to apply heavy taxes on fast food. Personally, I partly agree with this idea because of the following reasons.

On the one hand, it cannot be denied that implementing high tax on junk food would discourage consumers, especially children, from eating so much it. Clearly, only when they have to pay a big amount of money for the food causing their health problems, can they stop buying it. As a result, they will turn to spend their part time cooking at home to save money. Take Denmark as a telling example, it was one of the first countries to introduce high tax on fast food such as butter, potato chips and many processed foods. In addition, the fast-food processing companies would have to face the threat of bankruptcy because of high taxes. Therefore, the consumers will have less choice of fast food, and it leads to the reduction of fast food in their meals.

On the other hand, imposing heavy tax is believed not to be the only way to solve this problem, other effective methods need to be considered. First of all, governments should restrict the sale of junk food or limit advertising, especially on school campus. Health education is said to be the second strategy. Not only children need to be aware of the danger of fast food which causes them to suffer from many severe diseases such as: obesity, heat-attack… but their parents also supply nutritious food as well as encourage them to participate in outdoor activities.

In conclusion, it is clear that government needs to pay more attention to reducing the rate of people suffering from sickness caused by fast food. However, it is up to each individual’s choice of the food he/she wants to eat, they need to care more about their meals and exercise regularly in order to have a healthier life.

Sample 5:

More and more individuals have become obese in some nations as a consequence of excessive junk food consumption. Consequently, it is imperative for governments to implement a heavier tax on this kind of food. Although this policy is ineffective towards those who are busy, I believe that its adoption is necessary to ensure the overall well-being of the population.

Detractors argue that this policy is unlikely to be successful for a particular segment of the population. A fast-moving world means that most individuals do not have time to cook meals for themselves, which makes fast food a convenient and ideal choice for them. As a result, busy individuals typically still buy and consume fast food despite higher prices to save time. Recent surveys conducted for regular fast-food customers indicate that they mostly choose this unhealthy food mainly because they find preparing home-cooked meals time-consuming.

However, a higher tax rate would lead to costlier fast food and consequently fewer consumers. Fast food restaurants generally will raise their products’ prices to limit losses from heavier taxation to maintain profits at a desirable level. Buyers would therefore be unable to purchase fast food as much as before as this food becomes more expensive. They might then switch to other affordable options that are possibly healthier for them. A pertinent example of this is that in Vietnam, where fast food is sold at a much higher price, the number of citizens with obesity-related diseases in this country is relatively low. 

In conclusion, although busy workers may still have to continue eating fast food, I think that a higher tax rate plays a crucial role in solving the obesity epidemic.

Sample 6:

With the changing lifestyle in modern society, eating habits have also changed drastically among people. Consequently, folks across the world are suffering from diseases like obesity, indigestion, diabetes, and so on. To counter this problem, it is asserted that ruling bodies should increase the tax on junk food items. However, I do not think it will serve the purpose, instead, the government has better solutions on hand which could be more effective. 

Imposing a higher tax on fast-food items would leave the government incapacitated in this matter. Primarily, if despite knowing the ill effects of junk food on their health, people do not abandon the habit of eating such food items. Then a small amount of tax cannot prevent them from consuming fast food. Moreover, the buying capacity of the individuals is increasing day by day, whether middle class or affluent class people. So again, the method of levying more charges will not discourage people from buying and eating unhealthy food.

Rather than imposing higher taxes, authorities can work on the root cause. For instance, they can ban the sale of fast food at the eating outlets. Furthermore, it is seen nowadays that hotels, restaurants, and cafes are present at every nook and cranny which attract people. So, the ruling bodies can hamper the proliferation of fast-food selling places. Besides this, the government can ban the use of harmful ingredients in food preparations such as monosodium glutamate, artificial food sweeteners, and coloring agents. All these ingredients have notable effects on health and thus cause severe diseases such as cancer, food poisoning, obesity, and many more.  

In conclusion, I strongly believe that imposing heavy taxes on fast food will not help significantly in inhibiting people from consuming such food items. However, the government needs to take stringent steps to ban this kind of food. 

Sample 7:

Nowadays, a high proportion of people consume fast food around the globe. This has caused some severe health problems for these people. Everyone loves fast food because it is delicious. Additionally, people can save time preparing food for their children, especially workaholic parents. However, they ignore the harmful effects of fast food, such as obesity. Therefore, I agree that governments shall impose a tax on fast food.

First of all, I think a higher tax shall be imposed on fast food because the health of the citizens is essential to the country’s development. For instance, if a person consumes fast food daily, he is likely to face the problem of obesity after a while, followed by high blood pressure and high cholesterol. With the health problems suffered, he is likely to be the worker with the lowest productivity. It will affect the economy of the country as a result.

Secondly, fast food can impact people’s choices when choosing what food to consume. People undeniably decide to devour junk food as it is cheaper and can be prepared within minutes. With an increased tax imposed, people will not choose these foods as the cost of consuming fast food will burden their expenditures. Consequently, people will prefer home-cooked food, which is much healthier and cheaper.

Regardless, imposing a tax on fast food will not reduce the number of people suffering from health problems. The fast-food advertisements telecasted in the multimedia, such as television, could be a reason for people to consume fast food. As fast-food advertisements are often relayed during dinnertime, children are attracted to the images of fried chicken. The result is that children will ask their parents to take them to fast-food restaurants and enjoy the meals there. It explains why children face health hazards at a younger age. Therefore, I suggest governments limit the time of fast-food advertisements broadcast on television. The advertisements should be beamed at midnight instead of at dinnertime.

In conclusion, I agree that with the higher taxes imposed on fast food, the number of people ingesting fast food will decrease significantly, thereby reducing the health problems people face.

Sample 8:

It is widely acknowledged that consumption of fast food has become a complex problem, leading to a growing number of individuals experiencing health problems. In my opinion, though it is essential to impose a higher tax on fast food, it is important to also consider other factors, such as individual responsibility for maintaining their own health, which deserve greater consideration.

Firstly, it is worth considering that taxing unhealthy foods makes them relatively more expensive, potentially encouraging people to buy more healthy alternatives. Broader taxes that increase the prices of various types of unhealthy food, such as fried chicken, pizza, or hamburger, could be effective tools for tackling obesity, as individuals may reconsider their food choices and opt for healthier options that contain less fat or more nutrition. Governments should, therefore, impose higher tariffs on fast food to make it more expensive than other foods, which would have positive effects on public health.

Nevertheless, it is undeniable that personal preference and individual responsibility play a significant role in dietary decisions for their health. In fact, it is likely that the full effects of their decision-making about what to eat may not be considered by individuals themselves at the time of consumption. Some people may be oblivious of the long-term effects of a high-sugar diet on their health or, indeed, of which products are high in sugar.

Children are a particularly compelling example of this; it is unlikely that they are fully able to understand the effects of consuming excessive sugar on their future health and wellbeing. In such a scenario, they choose to consume more fast food irrespective of the cost. Thus, education and awareness campaigns may be more effective than punitive taxation measures in promoting healthier eating practices.

In conclusion, although the pervasiveness of higher taxes on fast food is acknowledged, I believe it is imperative to take the measure with considerations of personal choice in mind by empowering individuals with knowledge and raising awareness campaigns to address the root causes of unhealthy eating habits.

Sample 9:

Nowadays, there is a high proportion of people consuming fast food around the globe. This has caused some severe health problems for these people. Everyone loves fast food because it is delicious. In addition, people can save time preparing food for their children, especially the parents who are workaholics. They ignore the bad effects of fast food such as obesity. Therefore, I agree that governments shall impose tax on fast food to some extent.

First of all, I think a higher tax shall be imposed on fast food because the health of the citizens is important to the development of the country. For instance, if a person has his daily meals with the consumption of fast food, he is likely to face the problem of obesity after a period of time. Besides, high blood pressure and high cholesterol will be followed. With the health problems suffered, he is likely to be the worker with the lowest productivity. This will affect the economy of the country as a result.

Secondly, the reason why a higher tax shall be imposed on fast food is because it can remove the choice of people when making a choice as to what type of food to consume. It is undeniable that people choose to eat fast food as it is cheaper, and it can be prepared within minutes. With a higher tax imposed, people will not choose fast food as the cost of consuming fast food will become a burden to their expenditures. Consequently, people will prefer home-cooked food which is much healthier and cheaper.

Many people make the assumption that imposing a higher tax on fast food will not reduce the number of people who suffer health problems. They argue that the advertisements of fast food telecast on multimedia such as television could be a reason for people to consume fast food. As fast-food advertisements are often relayed during dinner time, children are attracted to the images of the fried chicken. The result of this is children will ask their parents to take them to fast-food restaurants and enjoy the meals there. This explains why children face health issues at a younger age. Therefore, I suggest governments can limit the time fast-food advertisements broadcast on television. The advertisements should be beamed during midnight instead of dinnertime.

In conclusion, I agree that with the higher taxes imposed on fast food, the number of people consuming fast food will decrease significantly and thereby the health problems faced by the people will decrease as a result. However, to solve the problem effectively, the government should take action by changing the time of advertisement broadcast-ed on television. It is undoubted that fast-food advertisements portray fast food during dinnertime can affect people in making decisions as to what to eat, especially when they are hungry.

Sample 10:

Nowadays, it is doubtless that food-related illnesses are increasing in our modern society. Furthermore, the issue regarding the impact that eating junk food could have on our health is widely debated. As far as governments’ decisions about taxing fast-food consumers in concerned, I believe that they should find another strategy in order to promote a healthier way of eating.

Firstly, governments should not impose extra taxes on eating habits. Every human being is basically free to act as he or she likes, our behavior should be dictated by some moral and ethical principles, rather than by the fear of a fee. For instance, every patient can refuse therapy, even if he is in a life-threatening condition, if he thinks that it is better for himself. In the same way, everyone should be left free to eat whatever they want, even if it causes some sort of disease. Governments should, therefore, improve awareness campaigns to prevent food-related diseases, in order to sensitize the citizens towards harmful behaviors, rather than simply add a tax to the food people buy.

Furthermore, another alternative to the imposition of new taxes could be an improvement in citizens’ knowledge about nutrition. By giving people the right information about a proper dietary intake, governments could benefit from minor costs in terms of healthcare. For example, in my opinion, nutrition and health courses should be implemented and organized in every school, from the lowest level of education, up to the highest ones. Thus, in the future, we would witness an increasing self-consciousness about diet-related diseases, such as diabetes and cardiovascular accidents.

In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the given opinion, because I believe that governments should pursue other strategies in order to face these problems. Only by increasing the knowledge about the risks of harmful eating behavior, and from widespread information about the rules of a healthy lifestyle, it is possible to fight against these medical conditions. In this specific case, prevention is the key.

Sample 11:

An increasing number of people suffering from health problems occurs in some countries because consuming fast food frequently impacts on health problems. Tackling this problem should be the government’s responsibility to impose a higher tax on this sort of meal. I believe that the government is positively formed to prevent their citizens from eating unhealthy meals, but imposing a higher tax does not surely decline a fast-food consumer.

Firstly, the higher tax on fast food can increase its price, leading people to prefer cooking their own meals. Secondly, most restaurants will emphasize serving a variety of healthy foods. This policy may reduce the availability of unhealthy meals, as many restaurants may choose not to pay the high tax. Another advantage is that the government will collect significant revenue from the fast-food tax, which can be used to improve health services for those suffering from health problems.

The availability of fast food does not solely consist of unhealthy meals. Although there are junk food restaurants, there are also some that serve healthy meals. For example, seafood restaurants offer dishes that are highly nutritious. This situation is unfair to those restaurants that prioritize healthy options. Therefore, the government should not impose a higher tax on all types of fast food, as many people nowadays do not have the time to cook and often rely on fast food.

In conclusion, I would argue that step of increasing tax will not diminish the number of fast food consumer, nevertheless the government should restrict any selling of unhealthy fast food. However, people’s health depends on their decision-making for what kind of food should be consumed.

Sample 12:

In the present era, the world’s people are facing the ultimate fact that our young generations are experiencing severe health-related illnesses from the very beginning of their life, and it is due to excess junk food consumption. To forbid the worrying conditions, the state is approaching some essential steps and one of them is an enhancement of taxes on convenience food. Thus, I partially agree with the given opinion. As in today’s world, it is one of the most sparkling heated debates. I believe that our leaders should have an eye for finding out some other solutions because only increasing the taxes on fast foods will not hamper the ratio of junk food intake.

First of all, as we know that, our teenagers are the prime customers for convenience meals, where most of them are unaware of devastating health hazards of eating junk food. At the same time, we can ask, is it their fault? I don’t think so. They should be made aware of the long-term consequences of junk food consumption, and it is plausible in several ways. For example, broadcasting health related adverts on children’s TV channels, introducing topics into their conventional education regarding dangerous health effects on fast food taking. In addition, parents could play an important role in combating this worldwide problem by giving their children proper advice and guidelines for having a balanced diet.

Moreover, nowadays people are leading a busy pace of life. Thus, they scarcely think of their regular diet, even some of them have no idea about what they are eating. Therefore, people are depending on takeaway meals for their daily livelihood. The government should impose rules on the working schedules so that folks could enjoy their meals with adequate nutritious knowledge.

To conclude, in some of the global areas, folks are becoming more habituated to convenience food despite realising that they will suffer from heart diseases, obesity and dyslipidaemia in very near future, where only raising the food revenue will not slow down the tasty and unsafe junk food consumption.

Sample 13:

In many parts of the world, there are increasingly more people having health issues because of the excessive consumption of fast food. While some argue that increasing tax on junk food will discourage people from eating it, I believe the drawbacks of this action to people’s health are more serious. 

The main reason why people support a higher fast-food tax is that it may encourage consumers to eat other healthier foods such as vegetables and nuts. However, such a change in diet is often unacceptable, so most people will refuse to eat new foods. There will also be less choice of food as not all sold on supermarket shelves are affordable. This will reduce the variation in the meals and sometimes cause a lack of nutrition. Thus, imposing a higher tax may limit the quality of daily meals on the table. 

Another issue of a heavier tax on fast food is the negative impact on low-income people. Being one of the cheapest dishes to fill a person’s stomach, junk food is necessary for the poor to survive. But if fast food prices climb higher, they will be forced to make a cut in their budget for food. A child who often eats a medium hamburger for his lunch at the school canteen, for example, has to buy one with a smaller size, which is insufficient for his normal needs. Consequently, the health of the poor will be negatively affected.

In conclusion, raising the tax on fast food can force a small number of people to eat healthier food but will eventually limit their choice of food and damage the health of more vulnerable people. What governments can do to improve their citizens’ well-being is by making healthier alternatives more accessible and affordable.

Sample 14:

It is a proven fact that what we eat has a significant impact on how we feel. This is the rationale for some people's contention that governments ought to impose a tax on junk food. This essay will explain why I firmly concur with this viewpoint. Because it is spreading through our population and affecting how to fit our school-age children.

Eating processed food and junk food is incredibly bad for people of all ages. They have high levels of unsaturated fats, calories, and salts, all of which contribute to major health issues. The most prevalent of which are cardiac arrest, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. This sedentary, Western-influenced lifestyle is a result of chain restaurants and businesses. Especially the ones that sell frozen dinners and fast foods spend a large portion of their profits on advertising. It ultimately convinces customers to purchase their products. For instance, we can observe that KFC, McDonald's, and Pizza Hut are consistently packed with customers whenever we visit. In addition, eating sausages, chilled or canned food, such as mushrooms and fish, is now increasingly popular among most families because they are ready to eat. The only way to solve this issue is for governments to impose taxes. Sales taxes on manufacturers may be increased in order to limit their sales, which would then halt customers.

Teenagers and school-going gentry who receive unhealthy food in their school cafeterias are at risk as well. Children between the ages of 6 and 12 are seen to enjoy burgers and pizza, but the problem is that the obesity rate is also rising quickly. We can say that the epidemic of obesity is now sweeping throughout many continents, mainly in Europe, America, and then Asia. According to estimates, for example, the percentage of fat students in Pakistani schools was just 10% in 1975. But it is currently 40%. According to the report, millions of individuals suffer health risks each year as a result of their poor eating habits.

In conclusion, an unhealthy diet that is high in fat depletes our health because our body is controlled by what we consume. Governments could put taxes on easily available and frozen foods to address this problem. If the authorities changed our lifestyle to keep our children safe and healthy, I think it would be a good move.

Sample 15:

Today, considerable changes in people's eating habits can be seen as a result of incremental changes in their lifestyle. People choose fast food over a balanced diet. That is why it has been up for debate for a long time whether it is crucial for any government to raise the tax on junk food. Specifically in order to protect citizens from health problems. I sort of agree with the earlier statement, and this essay will explain why with relevant justifications.

There are a number of arguments in favour of the idea that taxes should be raised in order to deter the sale of goods of this nature. But the most obvious one is that fast food is far less expensive than healthy food. The largest fast-food chain, McDonalds, is the least expensive place to dine in Australia, for example. Simply put, these prepared meals are less expensive, and if the government started to apply more taxes, the cost of these goods would rise. As a result, people will begin to consider their purchases more carefully.

If affordability is the only factor driving consumerism, increasing taxes will simply serve to decrease the consumption of these foods. There are other additional aspects, including immediate accessibility, taste, and marketing. It follows that significant changes cannot be made solely by lowering the pricing of these goods. People ought to be inspired to lead healthy lifestyles, which include consuming home-cooked meals. Therefore, rather than wasting time on new measures to impose additional taxes, governments should focus more on inspiring people.

However, as there are more people experiencing health problems as a result of consuming fast food, governments must adopt preventive measures. But raising the price alone won't stop people from buying them, so the agencies need to propose more effective solutions to this problem.

Sample 16:

All around the world, the health issues brought on by consuming fast food in excess have reached epidemic levels. Some believe that in order to deter people from consuming junk food, a hefty tax must be placed on it. This will, in my opinion, only dissuade middle- and lower-income groups.

First of all, raising the tax will make fast food unaffordable for the poor. They'll have to prepare healthy meals at home as a result. They may experience some discomfort, but their health will benefit from this. Taxes won't stop wealthy consumers from consuming fast food, though. They will keep consuming it. Therefore, raising the tax on fast food will only have a minor impact on its consumption.

It is therefore doubtful that raising awareness of the negative impacts of fast food will be very beneficial. The majority of people who eat fast food are actually aware of its negative effects on their health. For example, a poll was done in Singapore, one of the world's industrialised countries. It indicated that people feel compelled to consume fast food due to their hectic schedules, despite being aware of the health risks.

Making wholesome food more inexpensive and available would be a better option. Because they can be prepared quickly, one of the key factors driving up fast food consumption. Foods that are ready to eat are also offered in supermarkets. Because more convenient healthy options are not readily available, many individuals choose fast food.

In conclusion, raising the tax on fast food will only discourage people with low incomes from consuming it. Making healthy options more available and affordable is the best solution if governments truly want to decrease the use of fast food.

Sample 17:

Nowadays, more and more people are affected by health issues such as diabetes and heart disease which are linked to overconsumption of cheap, mass-produced food. Some people believe the only solution is to make fast food less affordable by taxing it highly. Despite the severity of the problem, I think this is quite wrong. Increasing the tax on fast food would unfairly penalise people and may not necessarily bring about the desired health benefits.

‏First, fast food is about more than just nutrition. Many teenagers spend money on fast food not because they need to eat out but because this is how they socialise. Fast-food restaurants provide a safe, convenient place for young people to meet friends. For another group, low-income families, fast food can provide an inexpensive treatment for their children. Denying people a small pleasure in life could affect their social lives or happiness.

‏Another important point is that if the reason for taxing fast food is to reduce obesity, it may be ineffective. It is true that fast food is high in sugar, salt and fat, all of which cause weight gain and are detrimental to our health. However, we also know that there are other factors which contribute to the risk of obesity, such as lack of exercise and inappropriate portion size. While home-cooked food is generally healthy, this is not always the case. I personally know a family that used to eat high-fat, home-cooked food in enormous portions. They all suffered from health problems due to obesity.

‏On the other hand, I do understand the point of view of those who say drastic action is needed. If fast food were taxed and became expensive, people would be forced to seek out healthier options. In addition, food producers would have an incentive to provide healthier foods. However, there is likely to be resistance from consumers and producers who want to have a wider choice.

‏To conclude, although imposing a higher tax on fast food could have some positive effects, these would be outweighed by the drawbacks. For one thing, some sectors of society would feel victimised, and there is also the fact that simply raising taxes would not result in a much healthier society. What we really need is greater awareness of diet and cheaper healthy food.