Câu hỏi:
07/01/2025 511Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
It is true that many museums and historical places attract a multitude of tourists instead of local inhabitants. There are several reasons leading to this, and solutions should be adopted to solve this issue.
Museums are more often visited by tourists for a number of reasons. Firstly, people who live in the neighborhood are often familiar with their traditional customs and history. Therefore, they lean towards devoting their spare time to exploring the unseen or unknown at other places. Meanwhile, tourists tend to go to places that they have never been to, so that they can have a better understanding of local cultures and arts. In addition, the expense of entrance fees to these historical sites may be a deterrent to many local people. Take the ancient citadel of Hue in Vietnam for example. When going to this place, visitors have to pay around 7 dollars, which is a great amount of money for average Vietnamese people.
However, there are a range of measures that the government could take to address this issue. The first step is for the authorities to arrange appealing exhibits or programs at these sites. For example, some didactic as well as recreational competitions should be held to stimulate the locals’ curiosity and interest, and therefore they could attract them to pay a visit to these places. Another measure that can be taken is to lower admission fees or offer discount tickets to the locals to encourage them to visit these historical attractions.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that in many regions, tourists have more interest in visiting museums and historical areas than local residents do. However, there are many measures that can be taken to tackle this problem.
Sample 2:
These days, a lot of museums and historical sites seem to appeal mainly to tourists, rather than locals. This essay will discuss a number of plausible reasons why this is occurring, and a number of possible ways to attract more local people.
There may be a variety of factors contributing to the low numbers of local people visiting museums and historical sites. Firstly, it is possible that most local people have already visited such places and may already have significant knowledge of their own culture and history, and therefore do not feel the need to return to these places often, or even at all. Therefore, the majority of people visiting are mostly tourists. Furthermore, many local people probably prefer to spend their free time and holidays visiting other areas outside of their hometown or country, because they are more interested in learning about other cultures and history, rather than their own.
Although it does seem to be quite a difficult task attracting more locals to visit their own museums and historical sites, there are a number of solutions that could encourage them to do so. One possible solution may be for local governments to continually upgrade museums by rotating artefacts and displays, in order to arouse more interest from locals. Different exhibitions could be displayed and promoted more often, focusing on different themes, or aspects of the culture. Secondly, governments could also encourage and fund annual trips for local school children to museums and historical sites. And lastly, free entry to such places for locals may also encourage more local visitors.
In conclusion, attracting local people to visit museums and historical sites in their area may be a difficult process, however, there are a number of ways that locals could be encouraged to do so.
Sample 3:
Tourists are generally drawn to museums and historical locations when visiting new countries. However, records have shown local people’s low attendance at these attractions. I will put forward some explanations before solutions can be drawn to tackle this problem.
There are several reasons why tourists, instead of the local people, come to museums and historical places. First, these locations can provide visitors with a comprehensive overview of the traditions in the particular locality they are situated in. As a result, such destinations are generally more appealing to the newcomers than to the locals, those without the need to familiarise themselves with the traditional values of the region. Moreover, because the layout of museums and historical houses is likely to remain unchanged through the years, they can be visually unattractive to the local inhabitants, who may have been to these sites at least once in their younger years.
Several measures can be prompted to promote locals’ attendance rate at buildings for historical relics and museums. The main solution is to change the public’s perception of such places as sites for only monotonous activities. Should civic events, including weddings, anniversaries, and concerts be allowed to be held in these locations, they would attract substantial public attention to historical values. Another resolution is that historians and preservationists should be featured more frequently in the media, with their articles on the tremendous worth of museums and historical remains.
To conclude, historical areas and museums can be uninteresting for local citizens because they can be too familiar with the culture that these places depict. To better this, there should be more media coverage on historical assets and more open-door policies to use such locations as spots for more public-oriented activities.
Sample 4:
In terms of local people’s attendance, museums and historical places have always paled in comparison with other recreational centres. This essay will present some reasons why this has occurred and put forward some solutions to resurrect the interest of local people in visiting these places.
The small and dwindling number of local visitors to museums can firstly be attributable to the low frequency with which activities are held. In other words, the renewals of existing exhibits or the organization of new programs and events are few and far between. For this reason, little interest is aroused in those who have once been to museums or places of historical significance. Furthermore, museums and historical sites do not come cheap. In fact, to get admission to these places, visitors are often required to pay a substantial amount of money, which can be worth a day’s salary.
In order to drum up more interest of local people in coming to museums, a number of ways can be employed. What can be done first of all is to organise activities which incorporate art performances with appropriate content. This not only encourages the attendance of local people but also represents a great opportunity to educate them about the history of their places of origin. In addition, the authorities can also lower the admission fee or offer discounts to local inhabitants.
To conclude, many reasons can be given as to why local people lose their enthusiasm for museums and places of historical importance. However, the revival of these places is within our grasp should proper actions be taken.
Sample 5:
Museums and other venues of cultural significance have been disappointed in their surprising lack of visits from the local population, instead having most visitors coming from abroad. In this essay, I will outline why I believe the lack of interest from local populations arises from the fact that they are already part of the culture and thus do not feel the need to discover it. In order to remedy this, I argue that museums should constantly change their exhibitions to uphold variety and pull in more domestic visitors.
I believe that it is almost counter-intuitive that the local populace, who have been affected the most by cultural and historical sites in their town, have the least interest. It may merely be the case that the reason why foreign tourists are the main visitors is because they come to experience local sites and cultures for the first time, and as such are more attracted to these places of cultural and historical significance due to their novelty. This is why many Parisians do not visit the Eiffel Tower, for example, because they already see it every day, and spending money to explore it is simply a waste.
Thus, I argue that in order to attract the local populace, most museums should use a system of special exhibits that are replaced after a few months. This instills a sense of urgency as the exhibit is only available for a limited time, which may foster the interest of the local populace. The Modern Art Museum in London regularly hosts various exhibitions, for instance, attracting millions of visitors from London every year. This way, locals might find it more worthwhile to explore local museums, since there is something new to see every time.
Overall, I argue that the reason why many local people do not visit their museums or historical sites is due to a lack of novelty, and as such, this can be fixed by a more dynamic exhibition.
Sample 6:
Museums and historical sites are often frequented by tourists while local populations may show less interest. This disparity in visitation can be attributed to various factors, including a lack of awareness, high admission fees, and a sense of familiarity that can lead to indifference. Recognizing these factors, it is crucial to implement strategies to encourage local engagement and appreciation of these cultural landmarks.
One key reason for the lack of local interest is a lack of awareness of the historical and cultural significance of these sites. Locals may not be informed about the stories, artifacts, and events these museums and sites represent, leading to a sense of indifference or a lack of appreciation. This lack of awareness can be addressed through targeted educational programs and campaigns. Schools can incorporate museum visits into their curriculums, while community organizations can host workshops and lectures on the history and importance of local historical sites.
Another significant deterrent for local visitors is the cost of admission. Museums and historical sites often charge high admission fees, making them inaccessible to many local residents. This can be especially challenging for families and individuals with limited financial resources. Addressing this barrier requires a more inclusive pricing structure. Offering discounted or free admission for local residents on specific days or during special events can significantly increase accessibility and encourage more locals to visit.
Furthermore, the familiarity of these sites to local residents can sometimes lead to a sense of complacency. Local individuals may have seen these sites countless times and believe they already know everything there is to know, leading to a perceived lack of novelty. To counter this complacency, creative initiatives are needed to foster a sense of renewed interest and appreciation. This could involve organizing interactive exhibitions, interactive tours, or workshops that provide a fresh perspective on the history and significance of these places. Events like cultural festivals, community gatherings, or local art exhibits centered around the museum or historical site can also encourage local participation and make these places more engaging.
In conclusion, while tourism plays a vital role in supporting museums and historical sites, it is essential to recognize and address the gap in local engagement. By creating awareness through education, increasing accessibility through financial incentives, and fostering a sense of excitement through engaging events, more locals can be encouraged to discover and appreciate the cultural treasures within their own communities. This will not only enrich their own lives but also contribute to the vibrant cultural landscape of their city.
Sample 7:
While museums and historical sites are ubiquitous attractions that draw streams of foreign visitors, they are largely ignored by local residents. There are a number of ways to rationalize this as well as some feasible solutions to turn the situation around.
The primary reason why local people hardly visit these places is because humans naturally take lightly the things they have ready access to. Take the Ho Chi Minh Mausoleum for a locally relevant example. It is unlikely that any of Hanoi’s residents hasn’t come across the building and the generous campus that surrounds it, yet few have taken the effort to enter and admire what’s inside. On the other hand, the daily queue in front of the mausoleum is more often than not comprised of people from other parts of the country and foreigners.
Another reason for the absence of local attention towards museums and historical sites is the lack of appeal of these places themselves. Save for the few most frequented by foreign visitors, most of the historical and cultural attractions are in terrible shape. Subpar hygiene and poor arrangements inside these buildings are among the many consequences caused by a modest budget for conservation.
However, a number of measures can be taken to revive the interest of local people in their city’s historical attractions. Firstly, more funding should be dedicated to the restoration of these places. While damage and imperfections caused by wars can be seen as charms, certain sanitary standards should be adhered to in order to ensure a pleasant experience for visitors. Secondly, artifacts and items curated in museums should be arranged in such a way that is appealing to the younger audience. A more youthful revamp in lieu of the traditional stiff and serene atmosphere will go a long way in getting small children as well as teenagers excited to learn more about the rich history and heritage that museums and historical sites offer.
In conclusion, various solutions can be adopted to attract more local visitors to museums and historical sites.
Sample 8:
Although most places have sites of historical interest and a variety of museums to visit, it is predominantly tourists who come to see them, not local people. This essay will examine the reasons for this before suggesting some possible methods of attracting local people.
The main factor is the different motivations of tourists and local people. For a tourist, the aim when visiting another country, city or region, is to learn about that new place and possibly to understand its culture and history. Visiting historical sites and museums is an excellent way to do this. On the other hand, local people have often lived in the area for much of their lives and have either learned this at school or understand it through personal experience. In addition, tourists are on holiday and have set aside time and money for these activities. However, local people may be too busy working and prefer to prioritise their spending on such things as school, shopping and socialising.
Despite this, attendance of local people could be encouraged in a variety of ways. First and foremost, the perception of museums and historical sites could be changed by holding events at these places. For example, they could hold cultural festivals or galas for the community to celebrate a unique aspect of that particular place. Another possibility is to have special promotions, such as a reduced price or free tickets provided in local newspapers and magazines. Related to this, concession cards could also be provided to local people, so they are encouraged to come more regularly.
In conclusion, tourists have different motivating factors to local people, which accounts for the reasons that they are more likely to visit museums and historical sites. That said, it is possible to encourage attendance by local people through cultural events and promotions.
Sample 9:
It is currently observed that most visitors at many historical locations and exhibitions are from other places rather than locals. This tendency might stem from ticket prices and the perceived attractiveness of these places, but it can be addressed through effective measures by management.
To begin with, there are two compelling reasons why many locals do not visit museums or historically rich destinations in their areas. The foremost one is the price of entrance tickets. Specifically, some local people consider entrance tickets excessively high, causing them to prioritize more affordable pastime options. For example, London’s museums usually cost between $30 to $50 per visit, which is significantly more costly than a casual outing. Additionally, people are generally uninterested in learning more about regional attractions with which they might already be familiar. For instance, many Hanoians have never entered the Temple of Literature because they have been taught about its construction and cultural values repeatedly at school.
However, those in charge of museums and historical places can attract more local visitors through several methods. The most reasonable approach is to lower ticket prices for nearby residents. Managers might offer special discounts or even eliminate entrance fees for them. Although this might result in a reduction in ticket sales, it can be compensated for by an increase in sales of souvenirs or refreshments during visits. Furthermore, it is imperative to offer thrilling experiences to all visitors. An illustrative example of this is the Military Museum in Ho Chi Minh City, where virtual reality has been adopted to allow people to immerse themselves in the tense atmosphere of battlefields. As this attraction has gone viral on Vietnamese social media, the number of local visitors has risen significantly in recent years.
In conclusion, local people do not visit museums and historical attractions mainly because of costly entrance fees and a low level of interest due to familiarity. However, if the management of these locations reduces ticket prices for residents and invests in enriching the visiting experience, they will soon welcome more locals as visitors to their sites.
Sample 10:
It is observed that while many museums and historical sites are popular among tourists, local attendance is relatively low. This essay will examine various reasons behind this phenomenon and propose solutions to enhance the appeal of these venues to locals.
Several factors contribute to the lack of interest among local people in visiting museums and historical sites. Primarily, locals often find these places too familiar, as almost every resident has visited the top attractions in their city or country. For instance, most people living in France have visited the Eiffel Tower, a famous historical monument. However, they do not frequently revisit it since it has remained unchanged for nearly 100 years. Additionally, locals acquire historical knowledge through school education, which may make museum exhibits and historical sites seem redundant. In contrast, tourists are drawn to new experiences and yearn to explore local culture and history through these sites. The blame for the low attendance among locals should also fall on museums which have outdated and monotonous collections as well as inadequate strategies to attract visitors mainly due to funding shortages. This further discourages local visits.
To make museums and historical sites more appealing to local people, a multifaceted approach is required. Firstly, museums should regularly introduce new collections and invest in new exhibitions, while historical sites should organize fresh activities to rekindle local interest. For example, the Central Museum in Indonesia frequently changes its exhibition themes and collaborates with various artists to attract both local and foreign visitors. Additionally, museums and historical sites can invest in technology that offers three-dimensional visual effects to create more engaging and immersive experiences. Many museums worldwide have adopted this technology, allowing visitors to immerse themselves in specific historical eras and thus gain historical knowledge more intriguingly rather than just walking around and reading information boards. Implementing these initiatives requires substantial funding, so the government should allocate more resources to these facilities or seek investments from businesses. With increased financial support, museums and historical sites can enhance their offerings and attract more local visitors.
In conclusion, various factors explain why locals find museums and historical sites uninteresting. However, a concerted effort from both facility managers and the government can encourage more frequent visits from local people.
Sample 11:
Millions of people visit Big Ben and the houses of parliament in London every year but surprisingly most of these visitors come from outside the UK. In fact, many famous monuments and attractions seem to appeal mainly to visitors rather than to locals. In my view this is because of a lack of knowledge about attractions by locals. Also, people often lack the free time and motivation needed to fully explore and know their home region compared to travelling overseas. To tackle this phenomenon, history in schools should include local knowledge and locations as well as national or international knowledge. In addition, the government should encourage domestic tourism and give incentives for people to travel more domestically.
To begin with, many schools and colleges do not emphasise the importance of regional culture to students, so they are often unaware of historical places and events in their own towns. For example, many Vietnamese people can describe famous sights in South Korea but can often not describe these locations in their own country. To address this, the education system should emphasise local knowledge and history by encouraging students to visit local attractions as well as learning about places overseas.
A second key issue is free time. Many people have limited vacation time and will often choose to travel internationally rather than stay locally when they have a few days off. The government could boost domestic tourism by promoting local events and locations, providing financial incentives to tourist attractions and by making sure that tourist authorities cater to local as well as visiting tourists.
In conclusion, the best way for tourism to develop is by making sure local sights and events are well-known and promoted both to a national and international market as well as to local consumers. If this is done properly, then tourism and the economy as a whole will thrive.
Sample 12:
A large part of the attraction of a town or a city to visitors are places of educational and cultural values such as museums and historical sites. Unfortunately, many of these places, while appealing to outside visitors, are not doing well in capturing the interests of the local people. In this essay, I will outline some of the factors that I believe lead to this situation and propose a few solutions to help improve it.
A number of causes may be attributed to the fact that local people tend not to frequent the museums and historical sites in their area. Perhaps they are simply already too familiar with these places, having lived near them for a long time, that revisiting these places holds little value to them. The advertising method of museums and historical places could be another reason. Although most of the advertisements of these places can easily reach the outside world through foreign TV commercials or online websites, the same news may not get through to the local people who do not use the same information sources.
To solve this issue, some certain measures could be adopted. Firstly, to provide the local people with a stronger incentive to revisit, museums and historical sites can organize special and time-limited events especially targeted at local people. For example, they can host events like craft markets, book fairs, or cultural festivals during local holidays; or they can offer local people season tickets and reduced prices for repeat visits. Secondly, museums and historical sites can publicize their activities through channels that local people are more likely to access, such as through the local newspaper, the local radio, or through talks to schoolchildren at the local school. In this way, local citizens interested in these places can find out about them more easily and, as a result, will be more likely to visit them.
In conclusion, a lack of activities aimed at local people and unsuitable means of advertising may be some of the reasons why few local people want to go to museums and historical sites near where they live. Certain solutions aimed at changing these two factors, therefore, may be effective in drawing more interest and engagement from local visitors.
Sample 13:
Museums and historical places around the world hold significance as they have valuable artifacts that are not available elsewhere. Though museums attract a lot of tourists, the locals do not consider local museums and historical places entertaining.
There are several reasons why local residents do not find museums interesting. First and foremost, the local habitants have been brought up in those areas and have seen the historical places of their area hence these historical places might not arouse their interest anymore. The locals prefer visiting faraway lands and exploring other historical places in comparison to the local places. The hefty entrance fee that historical museums charge may not seem feasible to the locals.
There are several actions that can be taken with the intention of appealing to the local population to visit the local museums. Primarily, community activities being organized by the museum like exhibitions and cultural events will help gain its popularity as most of these historical places are non-profit organizations. The media can also use used as a source to commercialize and promote museums at a local level. A subsidized amount of fee charged from the natives will also attract a large number of local history enthusiasts to pay a visit to these historical sights.
To conclude, museums and historical landmarks play a crucial role in understanding the culture and the historical background of a particular area. If the locals pay more attention to local museums, it will make them more popular on a larger scale and therefore attract more tourists. The government can also provide attractive offers to natives to visit the historical sights.
Sample 14:
It is common for tourists to visit historical places and museums rather than native people. In my opinion, because it is a familiar area, they are not interested in seeing it, and thus, the country must positively encourage locals.
On the one hand, there are many reasons behind the issue of less-active visitors to historical sites and museums by citizens than foreigners. Even though the historical area is unique, it is a common place for native people. They do not want to see it again. Additionally, they have seen historical sites and museums. Hence, they do not have any desire to spend their money at these places or waste their time. While native individuals have visited the nearest areas and enjoyed their time. Recently, it has been feeling boring, and they have become less interested in seeing them. For example, in London, the rate of visitors to the museum was about 96% international visitors, compared to the locals.
On the other hand, the government should address this issue. To tackle it, the government can offer various incentives to engage citizens, such as promoting the importance of museums through social media and providing free tickets. This can encourage more locals to visit nearby cultural sites. For example, in South Korea, the government has established rules for historical sites, offering discounts to citizens and free entry during festivals.
In conclusion, historical places and museums are not only meant for tourists but also for the community. Promoting these sites could attract locals to these places of culture and history and encourage them through education.
Sample 15:
Historical locations and museums are mostly preserved for tourist attractions. Tourists can range from people from other nations, the locals where the tourist attraction center is located. But it is often said that local people do not visit historical sites. This essay will highlight the reasons why locals do not go to historical sites and solutions to how they can be attracted.
Firstly, Locals, most of the time, are not thrilled by historical sites and museums. This is a result of being told stories about how the place came to be. And as a result, they do not find any spectacular reason why they have to go there to see what is being preserved or showcased. In addition, since most of these locals grew up in the vicinity and most likely they might have walked past the historical site several times, asking them to pay a certain amount of money as a tourist to view the site or museum will make no sense to them, and it will be viewed as a waste of money.
However, Locals can be enticed to visit the museum or historical sites by subsidizing the entrance fees to these sites. For example, if the entrance fee is five thousand nairas, they can be made to pay one-fifth of the price. Also, promos can be put in place for locals. For instance, the first five locals who visit the site on a particular day will be granted free access. Once a few local people have been able to see how interesting and advantageous going to historical sites is, they will publicize it to others, and it might motivate them to visit as well.
Furthermore, the role of education should not be under-emphasized. Since most of these historical locations are in rural areas, they might not see value associated with going to such places. But if the government educates them on the importance of visiting these places, they might be interested in going there.
In conclusion, local people do not seem fascinated with visiting historical locations due to not knowing the purpose it serves and how it can be beneficial to them. I believe with proper education and using suitable means to entice them to these locations, and more locals will be enthusiastic to visit these historical locations.
Sample 16:
It is said that people are losing their enthusiasm for visiting local museums and places of historical importance. This essay will put forward explanations for this before suggesting solutions to tackling this problem.
There are many reasons why museums and historical places are not frequented by local people. The main one is that local people find paying a visit to local tourist attractions boring and a waste of time. In other words, such places would be visually unattractive and arouse little interest in locals, for the simple reason that they have been familiar with those places through school courses or personal experiences. Another significant reason is that the authorities charge a substantial amount of admission fee, giving rise to a reduction of the number of locals visiting historic sites. As a result, the destinations would be generally more appealing and worthy to the tourists than to the locals.
To encourage local residents to visit historical relics and museums, several measures can be prompted. First and foremost, authorities can change the perception of museums and historical sites by organizing cultural events and regular exhibitions, including weddings, concerts and celebrations. These renewals would provide the public with a new experience and attract media attention to historical values. Another solution is to offer free tickets and special promotions for local people at weekends. For example, the Confucian temple in China has set specific days on which free entrance is available for everyone to commemorate and honour traditional occasions. Therefore, a growing number of locals would be encouraged to come more regularly.
In conclusion, people avoid visiting museums or historical places due to their familiarity with those destinations and high entrance fees. The government can promote these sites by conducting interesting programmes and offering free or subsidised entry.
Sample 17:
It is a fact that local people are not very keen to visit historical places and museums. The museum and historical places are the prime attraction for tourists only. In my opinion, there are certain reasons behind this tendency. Government can issue several measures to motivate locals to visit these places more often.
The primary reason behind this trend is that most of the local people are acquainted with their history and culture. They feel no further interest in discovering the same culture by visiting the local museums repeatedly. The local people consider it a waste of time and prefer to discover the history and culture of other places. Another important aspect is the paucity of promotional activities. Historical places are mostly operated by local governments. The government body does not find it very useful to spend money on the development and advertisement of these historic sites. Lastly, we often observed entry fees in the museum which may be a factor that refrains local people to visit heritage places in a frequent manner.
There are certain steps that the government can consider attracting local residents to visit these historical buildings and museums. Firstly, the government may organise exhibitions and cultural programmes in these places to provide the local people with a unique experience each time they visit. Another step that the authority can consider is to offer free tickets to the local schools as well as children. This will persuade the parents to bring their children to these heritage places. This will help the children to understand their history and culture in a much better way.
Summing up, it is quite evident that local residents do not feel it worth visiting museums and historical sites. It is because the local people believe that they do not have much to learn from these sites. On contrary, foreigners are curious about learning new cultures and history and hence visit these places. It is the responsibility of the government to encourage native people to visit these places by conducting innovative programmes or offering free entry.
Sample 18:
In this term of local people’s attendance, museums and historical areas, sites, places have always paled and compared with other recreational centers and areas. This answer in the form of an essay should be able to present some reasons why this has been shown and put forward some answer or solution to build the interest of local people in going to these places.
The small and countable number of local visitors or people to museums can first be attributable to the low area with which activities are held. In other words, the renewal of these existing exhibits or the organization of new programs and events are few and far between. For this reason, little interest is gained in those who have once been to museums or places of historical significance. Also, museums and historical sites do not allow cheap. In fact, to get inside these places, visitors are frequently required to pay a fixed amount of money, which can be worth a day’s salary to a common man or family.
To generate some more interest from local people in coming to museums or any kind of historical place or site, several ways can be employed. Some methods that can be used to engage the local audience as a daily visit to these historical sites and places are that first, we should advertise a bit and organize activities that incorporate art performances with decent and reliable content. This not only encourages the attendance of local audiences, people but also represents a great opportunity to educate and tell them about the history of their places of origin and also to tell them about their culture. In addition, the organizers or people at these places can also lower the entrance fee or offer discounts to local inhabitants or audiences.
To conclude, many reasons can be shown with facts as to why local people lose their interest in museums and places of historical importance. However, the future of these places is within our hands, and we should take proper actions for this.
Sample 19:
Many museums and historical sites attract tourists more than locals. This is due to locals often taking these sites for granted and finding repeated visits monotonous. To increase local engagement, strategies like educational integration and targeted campaigns focusing on local identity can be employed, fostering a deeper appreciation for cultural heritage among residents.
This trend can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, locals often take their cultural heritage for granted, assuming that these sites will always be available for future visits. Unlike tourists' drive to explore the historical and cultural significance of the sites, locals feel a sense of permanence that diminishes the urgency to explore these places. Additionally, the content and exhibitions may not change frequently, leading locals to believe that once they have visited, there is little new to see. As a result, the experience can become monotonous, discouraging repeated visits and sustained interest.
To encourage greater participation from local residents, proactive measures can be implemented. Firstly, museums can enhance outreach efforts through campaigns that appeal to the residents, emphasising the relevance of their collections to local history and identity. By showcasing exhibits that highlight connections to community narratives or hosting events that celebrate local heritage, institutions can bolster the pride of local residents, thereby enticing them to the sites. Additionally, educational integration is crucial for attracting local residents. Collaborating with schools to integrate museum visits into educational curricula can cultivate a lifelong appreciation for cultural heritage from a young age, leading to increased visitation from generations to come.
Sample 20:
Many museums and historical sites are predominantly frequented by tourists rather than local inhabitants. This essay will explore the reasons behind this trend and propose solutions to encourage more local visits.
Specific drivers can contribute to the indifference of locals to heritage sites. Chief of which is the familiarity local people have with these sites. Having grown up in the vicinity, they may feel they already possess sufficient knowledge about the history and significance of these places. For example, a resident who has extensively studied the local museum's exhibits during school trips might not feel compelled to revisit. This perceived redundancy diminishes their interest in these cultural landmarks. Moreover, event saturation further contributes to the low local attendance. Over time, locals might have participated in numerous events and exhibitions at these sites, leading to a sense of repetition and boredom.
To attract more local visitors, proactive solutions can be applied by local governments. Firstly, by introducing special discounts, free entry days, or affordable membership plans, museums and historical sites can create incentives for locals to visit. Managers can grant free emission to encourage residents to engage with their cultural heritage regularly. Furthermore, enhancing marketing and outreach efforts can also play a crucial role in attracting local visitors. For instance, featuring exhibits in local newspapers, running targeted social media campaigns, and distributing flyers in community centres and libraries can raise awareness and interest among residents.
In conclusion, while familiarity and repetitive events lead to the decreased attendance of local residents at museums and historical sites, targeted solutions like offering discounts and improving local marketing can significantly increase local engagement.
Sample 21:
It is undeniable that museums and historical sites are more popular with tourists than with local people. There are several reasons why this is the case, and the authorities can take certain actions to improve patronage among local populations.
Among the reasons why these destinations appeal more to out-of-town travellers, locals' familiarity with these venues may be the primary cause. As opposed to tourists who regard historical sites with novelty and excitement, townspeople have grown accustomed to these locations as well as their history and cultural significance. Therefore, few locals feel the compulsion to pay these sites a visit. Time constraints may be another factor worth considering. For tourists, they are presented with limited opportunities to explore the host city's historical and cultural landmarks, which is why many make full use of their sojourn to this endeavour. In contrast, such urgency does not apply to local people, who are able to frequent these venues whenever occasions arise.
In order to entice local patrons, governments can organise exhibitions and other social functions featuring local celebrities at these locations. Such events would not only make these sites less mundane for locals, but also help draw in supporters and acquaintances of the guest performers. Another feasible solution for local authorities is offering free entry to local schoolchildren. This serves a dual purpose: to inculcate their city's heritage in youngsters, and to attract their parents to these destinations.
To conclude, I believe the fact that locals are familiar with historical sites and that they are not pressed for time inhibits them from visiting these locations. So as to boost traffic from local populations, government bodies need to introduce schemes involving locals such as hosting exhibitions and issuing free tickets for students from local schools.
Sample 22:
Museums and historical sites play a crucial role in educating individuals about the past and cultural heritage. However, there is a noticeable trend where tourists tend to outnumber local residents in their visits to these places. This essay delves into the reasons behind this phenomenon and proposes strategies to attract more local visitors.
One primary explanation for the disparity in visitation between tourists and locals is that the latter may perceive themselves as well-informed about their own history and culture. Local residents may have acquired knowledge about these sites through academic institutions or through informal sources like familial narratives. Conversely, tourists are drawn to these destinations due to their novelty and the opportunity to delve into a different cultural and historical context. Additionally, local residents often face time constraints due to their daily obligations, which hinder their ability to frequent museums and historical sites. In contrast, tourists, being in a vacation mode, possess more leisure time to engage in exploration and visitation.
To enhance the appeal of museums and historical sites among local residents, several measures can be implemented. One effective approach is to organize tailored events or programs that cater to the interests of the local community. For instance, museums can host exhibitions showcasing local artwork, musical performances, or educational sessions on local history. These initiatives have the potential to make cultural institutions more alluring to local residents. Moreover, offering discounts or complimentary entry to museums can serve as a compelling incentive for local individuals to visit these sites. The perception of museums as expensive venues might deter many locals from attending. Hence, by introducing affordable pricing schemes or designated days with free entry for residents, museums can attract a more diverse local audience.
In conclusion, the preference of tourists over local residents in visiting museums and historical sites can be attributed to locals’ perceived familiarity with their own heritage and time constraints. To reverse this trend and entice a greater number of local visitors, museums can diversify their offerings by organizing culturally relevant events and implementing pricing strategies that make visits more accessible to the local community.
Sample 23:
Many cultural attractions, such as museums and historical sites, tend to attract more tourists than local residents. This essay will explore the reasons behind this trend and propose potential solutions to encourage more locals to visit these sites.
One primary reason locals do not frequent museums and historical sites is a lack of promotion aimed at this market. These places often target tourists in their marketing campaigns, leaving locals unaware of new exhibits or special events. For example, a local museum might advertise heavily in travel brochures and tourist websites but neglect local media outlets. Another contributing factor is the routine nature of daily life. Local residents are often busy with work, school, and other commitments, making it difficult to find time to visit cultural sites. Consequently, visiting these places becomes a low priority compared to other obligations.
To address this issue, museums and historical sites can develop marketing strategies specifically aimed at local residents. This can include advertising in local newspapers, radio stations, and social media platforms. For instance, a historical site could run a campaign on local radio stations, highlighting new exhibits and special events. Additionally, creating more flexible visiting hours can accommodate the busy schedules of local residents. Offering evening or weekend hours can make it easier for locals to visit. For example, a museum could extend its hours on certain days to allow working adults and schoolchildren to visit after their usual commitments.
In conclusion, the tendency for museums and historical sites to be visited more by tourists than locals is due to factors such as lack of local promotion and busy daily routines. By developing targeted marketing strategies and offering flexible visiting hours, these cultural attractions can become more appealing to local residents.
Sample 24:
Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists rather than local people. This phenomenon raises questions about why locals are less interested and what can be done to attract them.
Several explanations exist for why tourists frequently visit museums and historical sites more than local residents. One reason for this trend is that people often overlook what is readily available to them. Many local people prefer to spend their free time and holidays exploring new areas outside their hometown or country. They find excitement in discovering different cultures and histories, which makes their own local attractions less appealing. Additionally, it is possible that most local people have already visited these places and possess significant knowledge about their culture and history, reducing the need to revisit them.
To address this issue, museums and historical sites can take several steps to attract local visitors. Firstly, local governments could continually upgrade museums by rotating artefacts and displays to generate more interest among locals. For instance, different exhibitions focusing on various cultural themes could be displayed and promoted more frequently. Secondly, reducing admission fees or offering discount tickets to locals can encourage more frequent visits. Governments could also fund annual trips for local school children to these sites, fostering an early interest in their heritage.
In conclusion, various factors contribute to the fact that museums and historical sites attract more tourists than locals, and by enhancing exhibits and providing financial incentives, museums and historical sites can attract more local visitors.
Sample 25:
In numerous regions, museums and historical sites often draw a significant number of tourists while local residents may not be as inclined to visit. This discrepancy can be attributed to various factors, and implementing strategic measures is crucial to make these cultural attractions more appealing to the local population.
One significant factor contributing to tourists' preference for visiting museums and historical sites over locals is the perception of familiarity among residents. Those living in the vicinity may regard these attractions as mundane or commonplace, presuming they can explore these venues at any time. For example, individuals residing in Hanoi might overlook the Vietnam Museum of Ethnology, assuming they can visit it whenever convenient. Unfortunately, they often end up never experiencing these cultural treasures firsthand. In contrast, tourists approach these sites with fresh eyes, seeing them as unique and culturally enriching experiences.
To address this issue and attract more local visitors, educational outreach programs should be implemented to enhance awareness of the historical and cultural significance of local museums and sites. To this end, collaborations with schools and community organizations can facilitate guided tours, workshops, and interactive events aimed at fostering a deeper connection with the local heritage. For instance, partnerships with schools can lead to organized field trips, providing students with firsthand experiences to instill a greater appreciation for their cultural legacy. By fostering a renewed sense of connection and appreciation for their cultural heritage, these measures aim to make these sites more appealing and accessible to the local population, ensuring the preservation and celebration of their rich history.
In conclusion, the tendency for museums and historical sites to attract more tourists than local residents can be attributed to the locals' perception of these attractions as commonplace. To address this, educational outreach programs are essential.
Sample 26:
In contemporary society, there is an increasing tendency that more visitors from another city visit museums and historical tourist attractions than natives. The reason and solution of this social trend are elaborated on in this essay.
There are several causes leading to this social phenomenon, the main reason is that the historical tourist attractions are a shortcut to understanding local culture for visitors, the local fine arts like painting and artifact are displayed and the folk opera can be watched as well. They can even interact with artists, those museums have been seen as a tourist spot for the visitors, they can have a lot of fun during their visit. In addition, there ate souvenir shops in art exhibition hall so tourists can buy souvenirs as a memorial for the trip.
To address this problem, effective measures should be adopted in no time. First, the local authority should play an essential role in coping with this situation. They should provide a discount or coupon for local citizens to encourage them to visit museums more often and let them know more about their hometown. Secondly, schools and colleges should also make a joint effort with the government, they can assist museums to hold various kinds of activities like reading festival or culture competition for natives to broaden their horizons, only by this can let natives get involved as more as possible. In fact, many citizens don't know where to go during their weekends to learn new things or have a relax, exhibition hall with so many activities provides a place for them to leisure.
According to the analysis presented above, the expensive ticket and lack of activities are main reasons resulting in the current situation. The government and schools should join efforts to reverse this disturbing issue.
Sample 27:
Many museums and historical sites have become an attraction to tourists although they fail to increase the number of local visitors. This essay will analyze some main reasons for this as well as measures to encourage more local people to visit such places.
The causes for a huge difference in the number of the two mentioned types of visitors are varied.
First, people who live in the neighborhood seem to be familiar with their traditional customs and history. Going to those places would be therefore a waste of time and money owing to the entrance cost; and people would not pay an amount of money to see what they have already known. Meanwhile, tourists from other places tend to pay a visit to museums to know more about a new culture when travelling to a new region. Second, the design of museums and historical sites almost remained unchanged throughout decades, which can be visually unattractive to local residents who have been there at least once in earlier years. However, these places always pick tourists’ curiosity during their first trip.
Some measures can be taken to stimulate more local inhabitants to visit museums and historical places. To begin with, those places should serve both education and entertainment purposes. More game zones should be constructed or didactic as well as recreational competitions should be conducted to increase the number of the locals who come to enjoy their time. Furthermore, if the layout of museums and historical sites is renovated with more decorations and ornate designs of the interior, not only tourists but also more local visitors will come.
In conclusion, there are two principal causes for the locals’ disinterest in spending their time in nearby museums and historical places as mentioned, and actions should be taken to encourage people to go to such places.
Sample 28:
A lot of countries, especially tourists, are more attracted to museums and historical places in spite of resident people. The interest of museums and historical sites is very low in local people. However, some people discuss this point and consider why only a few native people visit their famous sites and what measures should be taken for encouraging visitors.
First of all, local people should have sufficient knowledge about their history and culture. This is the main reason behind the decline of local people’s interest in art galleries. If they visit the same place, again and again then this will not be productive for them. They will not get new things to learn about their past from the museum but for tourists, it is the best place to gain knowledge about the over past culture and heritage. So, they tend to visit often new places. Moreover, the price of tickets is very high, and people do not want to spend more money which is not beneficial for them.
To solve this, the government can construct more museums that contain new types of information apart from over history like a museum of arms and ammunition or maybe aircraft or ships through which we can get enormous knowledge about the latest technology. Advertisements can also attract the countryside people. Tickets price should be affordable and for senior citizens or children under the age of 12 should be free of cost. The government should renovate the old museum and set up new facilities for hygiene and amusement.
To conclude, the local authority should start new things that catch their eyes and make them happy. To attract local people a lot of efforts should be made by the government, but prices should be reasonable and a variety of facilities should be organized.
Sample 29:
Although most people have sites of historical interest and a variety of museums to visit, it is predominantly tourists who come to see them, not local people who visit museums and historical sites. In this essay, I will discuss some reasons and solutions in upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, there are several reasons why local people do not visit local places of history and museums. First and foremost, today individuals are busy with their domestic chores and they are happy with their sedentary lifestyle. Secondly, it can be seen that Punjab boasts of a number of museums and historical places, but local people do not visit them because the majority of the population in Punjab is hardworking and they have long working hours and after coming back from work so that time they have very less energy to visit historical places. Sometimes many people feel waste of the time to visit these places.
On the other hand, there are some solutions which can attract local people to visit museums and historical buildings because these places depict the history and culture of our forefathers. So schools can impact knowledge about historical places among the students so that they gain interest in respect for such places. For example, schools can give their students assignments related to the history of culture and studies should get more information about muses and old historical buildings from their parents.
To conclude, local people do not visit local places due to the fact that they are busy with their life if museums can create new exhibition every season, then the number of people visit their historical sites will increase eventually.
Sample 30:
It is an observable fact that many museums and historical attractions are essentially visited by tourists and a few local residents show their interest in such places. This essay will first discuss why familiarity and the expensive entrance fees are the primary reasons for this phenomenon, followed by a discussion of how attractive exhibitions and cheap entry fees can encourage locals to visit these sites.
There are two cogent reasons why museums and historical places are not appealing to local residents. One of the most reasonable causes is their familiarity with these sites and historical context. In simple words, local inhabitants are already familiar with their traditional customs and historical backdrop. Therefore, they do not really find these places attractive. By contrast, sightseers tend to visit places that they have never been to so that they can enrich their understanding of local culture, heritage and arts. On top of that, the expense of entry fees to these historical destinations may act as a deterrent to many local people. A case in point is the Taj Mahal in India. A visitor has to pay ten dollars to visit this place which is a considerable amount of money for average Indian people.
However, a package of measures could be designed to encourage locals to visit museums and historical sites. First, the authorities can organize appealing exhibits or programmes at these places. Didactic plays, for example, ought to be arranged in order to illustrate and commemorate historical events to attract more local inhabitants. Another measure that can be adopted is to lower the entry ticket fee for domestic visitors to encourage them to visit museums and historical buildings. New York is a good example here that offers free entry to museums and historical sites on a particular day of the month. As a result, many New Yorkers visit them.
To conclude, locals often do not visit museums and historical attractions because of their familiarity with these sites. If the authorities, however, arrange exciting programmes along with reduced entrance fees, many locals might visit these places.
Sample 31:
Historical places have long been a staple destination for tourists recently. However, in recent years there is not an inclination for local people to visit these sites and these places are always packed with tourists. There are several reasons for this problem and various measures can be taken by governments to improve this situation.
The high cost of entrance fee and monotonous atmosphere are the main causes of discouragement of local people to go to museums. From an economic standpoint, this amount might be desirable for the tourists who choose travelling and they are aware of this cost. However, indigenous people are less likely to spend for visiting the place that they have already known what they expect to see. At the same time, the boring ambience of historical sites is another reason. Since locals have basic knowledge about the history of their country, there is nothing interesting in persuading them to visit there. Therefore, these places can be found a waste of money and time entirely.
Encouraging locals and lower admission fees are the keys to solving this problem. One should note that it is the government’s responsibility to put forward so as to boost the proficiency of historical sites. They can encourage people of the country to visit these places and transfer their observation to the next generation. People find these places more enjoyable if especial events and festivals are held there. Besides, imposing especial offer, discounts and free entrance at weekends, for instance, would be another way to attract the attention of local residents.
To sum up, the lack of local represents will only address if several steps such as rewarding local and making museums enjoyable taken into consideration.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Some people take the view that criminal behavior is a product of an individual's inherent nature, while others argue that it is the outcome of poverty and societal factors. Although there are cogent arguments for the former view, I still lean towards the social issues and poverty theory.
Those who argue that crime is rooted in an individual's personality traits and moral compass suggest that some individuals are simply predisposed to engage in criminal behavior due to factors such as personality. They argue that some people either have a natural inclination towards aggression, violence, and rule-breaking. These individuals are believed to engage in criminal activities by choice despite having access to legal means of earning a living. In fact, some serial killers are known for their violent and sadistic crimes, which were often carried out with a sense of pleasure or enjoyment.
In my view, crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty. This is because individuals may turn to criminal behavior when they are faced with limited opportunities, financial insecurity, and social inequality. These conditions can lead to frustration, hopelessness, and despair, which can ultimately push individuals towards criminal behavior as a means of survival or escape. For example, a young person who grows up in a community with few employment possibilities may feel that their only option for financial survival is to engage in drug dealing.
In conclusion, while there are certainly some individuals who exhibit consistent patterns of aggressive or antisocial behavior, these traits alone are not sufficient to explain why people commit crimes. Therefore, I believe that the majority of crime is driven by socioeconomic factors.
Sample 2:
Opinions differ as to whether crime is caused by social issues and poverty or by people’s evil nature. Personally, I agree with the former view.
It is understandable why some people claim that our nature is the root of crime. Perhaps they have witnessed some children commit wrongdoing at some point in their lives. For example, many physically strong children tend to bully others at school, while others may perform mischievous acts like lying to adults or stealing money from their parents. These experiences lead people to believe that humans are purely good or bad by nature, and those who engage in misconduct at a young age will likely become criminals.
However, the point mentioned above is deeply flawed. Everyone possesses their own good and bad nature, and it is the environment that triggers people’s evil side and causes them to commit crime. One major cause of crime in many countries is inadequate education. Poorly educated youngsters may struggle to discern between right and wrong; therefore, they are more likely to commit crimes without even knowing. Poverty is another root cause of crime because those living in impoverished conditions may turn to stealing or robbing as the final solution to make ends meet. A corrupt political system can also be a breeding ground for crime because the politicians there have to comply with the corruption, regardless of their personal intentions.
In conclusion, though some might think that crime results from a person’s bad nature, I believe it is more likely caused by social problems, such as poor education, corrupt political systems, and poverty. People are both good and bad by nature, and the environment in which they live determines whether they become criminals.
Sample 3:
When it comes to crime rates, some individuals claim that criminal activity is solely the result of innate characteristics, while others argue that it is the outcome of societal issues and impoverishment. In my opinion, socioeconomic challenges and inequality are more likely to prompt people to engage in illegal behaviours.
On the one hand, criminality could represent the result of an inherent personality. In some cases, crime is merely the result of a person’s impulsive actions and lack of moral compass. Various factors such as upbringing, personal beliefs, and psychological disorders may all play a role when it comes to criminal activity. Some people, for example, may have grown up in environments in which illegal conduct is normalised, causing them to assume that such behaviour is acceptable. Similarly, those with mental health disorders like sociopathy or psychopathy may be inclined to committing crimes due to their inability to empathise with victims.
On the other hand, societal problems and economic hardship may contribute to criminal conduct. Poverty with limited access to food, clothing, shelter, healthcare, and schooling can push people to the brink of desperation, prompting them to resort to criminal behaviour as a means of survival. People who are financially strapped in various urban areas, for instance, may turn to illegal activities like drug trafficking or burglary in order to make ends meet. Once poverty and crime are intertwined, it may ultimately develop into a vicious cycle that is challenging to escape. Furthermore, socioeconomic issues such as discrimination, inequality, and corruption may promote crime through fostering an environment of dissatisfaction and rage. Those who experience discrimination or who believe the system is stacked against them are more inclined to turn to illegal behaviour as a form of protest or vengeance.
To summarise, aside from personal psychological factors, I believe that social difficulties and poverty can have a greater impact on crime rates.
Sample 4:
Crime has been studied by many scientific disciplines, with some people ascribing it to social problems and poverty, and others thinking that it is caused by the criminal’s nature. In this, I believe that unlawful behavior is more likely the result of defective personal qualities.
Several explanations can support crime being a function of inferior socioeconomic factors. Firstly, poverty reduces access to education and employment, causing hopelessness and desperation as a result. Having been deprived of opportunities, people may turn to crime to get by. Furthermore, people whose environment is rife with social problems may be accustomed to illegal behavior, making it easier for themselves to engage in criminal activities later on. A child who grows up in a neighborhood with drug problems could turn into a drug dealer himself, since he has witnessed drug abuse and addiction as a norm. It could, therefore, be argued that social issues and poverty create criminals.
However, the view that crime is a result of the perpetrator’s nature is no less convincing. Proponents of this belief claim that certain traits, such as impulsivity, aggression, and callousness, predispose individuals to immoral or unethical behavior. People with these traits become less considerate when they perceive any threat to their self-interest, making them likely to ignore the consequences of their actions. Others, meanwhile, carry undiagnosed psychological disorders, and their condition makes them more prone to committing crimes. A large share of the prison population, especially repeat offenders, are affected by sociopathy, a disorder usually characterized by inhibited compassion towards others. It is not well-understood otherwise, and education has only been partially effective in mitigating sociopathy’s effects. For these reasons, criminals’ nature is definitely worth looking at as a cause of their offenses.
In conclusion, while both views can be supported by evidence, I believe one’s personality is a more indicative factor of whether they are likely to commit crimes. Hence, it is crucial that parents and guardians pay attention to how they shape their children’s nature.
Sample 5:
For millennia, philosophers and scientists have held countless debates on personality. Some believe in the inherent crooked nature of humanity while others argue that they are the product of their environment. This essay wishes to explore both sides of the argument.
Nativists believe that personalities and manners are inherent and genetic, so crime is innate. Credible evidence of this would be the correlation between lead exposure and crime rate. In the 1940s, the USA was the prime consumer of lead-based products, such as paint and gasoline, so babies conceived, born, and raised during this period were lead-poisoned. They later suffered from poorer impulse control and higher aggressivity. As adults, they contributed to the surplus in levels of violent crime. However, it should be noted that genes do not cause behavior but influence it through their effects on the body's response to the environment.
Supporters of Environmentalism concede that criminal behaviors are determined by family and other people, education opportunities, as well as physical circumstances. This school of thought is supported by several studies. some of them focused on the negative link between vegetation and crime. It was shown that in neighborhoods with more greenery, fewer crimes were reported. One explanation for this was that the environment gave its residents a sense of safety and security.
It should be noted that the nature-nurture debate has not been taken as seriously as it used to be. Essentially, every facet of personality development results from interaction between genes and environment. If the authorities aim at reducing the rate of crime and violence, they should take action in improving residential areas as well as enhancing healthcare.
Sample 6:
Many people consider that innate characteristics are responsible for the fact that some people choose to turn to a career of crime. While I accept that crime may result from individual characteristics of violence or greed, I would argue that it is largely a consequence of social issues and poverty.
There is a belief that a person’s nature determines whether or not they become a criminal. Firstly, some argue that an individual who is cruel turns to crime more easily than a kind person. For instance, a child bullying other boys or girls at school may turn into a violent criminal in the future. Secondly, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness could also breed future offenders, who seek to acquire easy money without working for it. A number of youngsters choose to steal from others, instead of working hard to make an honest living. These are strong reasons for thinking that those who have an inborn bad nature are more likely to break the law.
Nevertheless, it seems to me that social issues and poverty are the main causes behind crime. There are many problems in society which might lead to an increase in the crime rate. For example, unemployment pushes people into resorting to crime because they simply cannot find a job. As a consequence, the number of offenders has climbed in many countries over recent decades. Another reason is that, more broadly, poverty in general leads to a rise in crime. If people do not have enough money to make ends meet, they will be tempted to pursue illegal activities just to support themselves and their families.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that the principal causes of crime are a result of social conditions and problems.
Sample 7:
The causes of crime have long been a topic of debate. While some argue that crime stems from a person's inherent nature, I do believe it is the result of social problems and poverty
On the one hand, advocates of the view that crime results from a person's nature suggest that individuals with cruel tendencies are more likely to engage in criminal activities. This is because cruelty often correlates with a lack of empathy, disregard for others' well-being, and aggressive behavior, all of which can lead to crime. For example, a child who bullies others at school may grow up to become a violent criminal. Additionally, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness can breed future offenders who seek easy money without working for it. Many young people, lured by the prospect of quick and easy money, turn to cybercrime, engaging in online scams, hacking, and identity theft.
On the other hand, some, myself included, argue that crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty, a perspective I support. Social issues, such as unemployment, can push people towards crime as they struggle to find legitimate employment. The widening gap between the rich and the poor exacerbates this issue, as seen in places like Rio De Janeiro, where high crime rates are prevalent in impoverished areas. Poverty is another significant factor; individuals struggling to make ends meet may resort to illegal activities to support themselves and their families. This explains why people in dire need often turn to theft or other crimes for survival.
In conclusion, while inherent personal traits can contribute to criminal behavior, social problems and poverty play a more significant role in driving people towards crime. Addressing these underlying issues is crucial for reducing crime rates.
Sample 8:
Crime is a complex issue that elicits varied perspectives regarding its origins. While some argue that crime is primarily a consequence of social problems and poverty, others contend that it stems from an individual’s inherent nature. I contend that the interplay between societal factors and individual predispositions contributes significantly to criminal behavior.
I concur with the notion that crime often finds its roots in social problems and poverty, where the impact of socioeconomic conditions significantly steers an individual’s choices. For example, in underprivileged areas, the absence of adequate educational facilities, job prospects, and robust social support structures may force individuals into a corner, compelling them to turn to illicit means for survival. Moreover, when societal disparities are rife and systemic issues remain unaddressed, it can exacerbate the situation, causing individuals to resort to criminal activities as a perceived solution to their economic struggles or as a means to voice their grievances about prevalent social injustices.
However, I am also of the opinion that the origins of crime are not solely tethered to external factors; rather, an individual’s innate disposition can also play a crucial role. Some individuals might exhibit inherent psychological disorders that predispose them to engage in unlawful activities, regardless of their social background. Furthermore, the absence of strong moral values or ethical guidance in an individual’s upbringing can be a contributing factor, irrespective of their socioeconomic circumstances. Instances abound where individuals from affluent backgrounds have succumbed to criminal behavior due to the lack of a strong moral compass in their formative years, indicating that individual nature can play a pivotal role in shaping criminal inclinations.
In conclusion, I believe crime’s origin is not solely attributed to either social problems or an individual’s nature; rather, it is a complex interplay between societal factors and personal inclinations.
Sample 9:
There are divergent opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. Some people argue that external factors such as poverty or other social issues are to blame for most crimes, while others contend that people who engage in criminal activity are intrinsically bad in nature. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and provide my own opinion.
On the one hand, those who believe that social problems are the primary cause of criminal behavior argue that people are driven to commit crimes due to their difficult and disadvantaged circumstances. For example, individuals facing extreme poverty or unemployment may resort to stealing or other illicit activities as a means of survival. Proponents of this view also point out that issues such as substance abuse or mental illness can exacerbate criminal tendencies, emphasizing the importance of addressing underlying social difficulties to reduce crime rates.
On the other hand, there is a counterargument that criminal behavior arises from individual traits such as impulsivity, selfishness, or a lack of empathy. This perspective suggests that some people have a natural tendency to engage in harmful behavior, regardless of environmental factors. In support of this view, critics of the social circumstance theory point out that there are people who grow up in difficult circumstances but do not resort to crime, indicating that innate character traits play a significant role.
In my view, it is likely that both factors play a role in criminal behavior. While social issues can be a significant driver of crime, it is also true that some individuals may be more inclined to engage in criminal activity due to inherent character flaws. Therefore, addressing both the root causes of social problems and providing intervention programs that focus on individual development could be effective in reducing crime rates.
In conclusion, there are varying opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. While some argue that criminal activity is solely attributable to social problems, others believe that individual traits play a more significant role. In my opinion, it is essential to consider both perspectives and work towards comprehensive solutions to reduce the prevalence of crime in our society.
Sample 10:
Crime is a complex issue with multiple contributing factors. While some argue that most crimes result from circumstances like poverty and social problems, I believe they are caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature.
On one hand, there are several factors that lead people to believe that most crimes stem from circumstances. Firstly, individuals who grow up in deprived environments often lack access to basic needs such as education, healthcare, and stable employment, leading them to potentially turn to crime as a means of survival or escape from their circumstances. For example, high crime rates in low-income neighborhoods can be attributed to individuals struggling to meet basic needs such as food, housing, and healthcare, and with limited access to education and job opportunities, they may resort to criminal activities like theft or drug dealing to make ends meet. Secondly, exposure to violence and crime from a young age can normalize these behaviors. For instance, children from households with domestic violence may become desensitized to violent behavior and replicate it in their own relationships.
On the other hand, I do believe that crime is caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature. Firstly, those who commit crimes may have a predisposition to violence and deviant behavior, regardless of their upbringing or environment. Ted Bundy, for instance, despite his stable upbringing and education, committed numerous murders. His actions suggest an inherent predisposition to violence and deviance, highlighting the role of personal moral character in criminal behavior. Secondly, some research indicates that genetic and environmental factors can increase the likelihood of engaging in criminal activities. For instance, a longitudinal study conducted by the National Institute of Justice followed a group of individuals from childhood into adulthood and found that those with a family history of criminal behavior were more likely to engage in similar activities.
In conclusion, while circumstances like poverty and social problems contribute to crime, I believe that personal moral character and inherent predispositions play a more significant role in criminal behavior.
Sample 11:
Crime is a prevalent issue in modern society and understanding its root causes is important for its effective prevention and control. Some people argue that most crimes are the result of circumstances such as poverty or other social problems. Others believe that criminal behaviour stems from individuals who are bad in nature. In my opinion, most crimes are the consequence of socioeconomic circumstances.
Individuals who believe that crime is the result of inheriting bad nature think that even though people who live in affluent societies with minimal social problems, are subjected to face crimes. They believe that personal choices and moral failings are significant contributors to criminal behaviour. For example, studies have indicated that people who possess personality traits such as impulsivity and aggressiveness are more likely to engage in criminal activities.
On the other hand, proponents of the view that crime is a result of poverty and social issues argue that individuals coming from poor backgrounds are forced to commit crimes because of necessity. When a person’s basic needs such as food, shelter and security are unmet, they may resort to illegal activities as a means of survival. For instance, incidents like theft and burglary are more common in economically deprived societies where everyone is striving to make ends meet. Furthermore, social problems such as lack of education, unemployment and substance abuse exacerbate the situation. Without access to quality education, many individuals cannot secure well-paying jobs, leading them to seek alternative, often illegal, means of income.
In my opinion, poverty and social problems create an environment where crime can flourish. When individuals are deprived of opportunities and resources, the temptation to break the law becomes stronger. Additionally, the social environment, including peer influence and community norms, plays a crucial role in shaping behaviour.
In conclusion, addressing these root causes through social policies aimed at reducing poverty, improving education, and providing employment opportunities is essential for effective crime prevention. By creating a more equitable and supportive society, the incidence of crime can be significantly reduced.
Sample 12:
Throughout history, people tended to believe that crimes were committed by those who were innately bad, but in the modern era a more liberal approach has led to the idea that crimes are often acts of desperation, committed by people whose circumstances are bleak. This essay will explore both perspectives, concluding that the latter is usually true.
First of all, it should be noted that some crimes are committed by people who appear innately driven towards such acts. These people may have some sort of hereditary psychological condition that means they do not feel empathy for others, or a predilection towards violence. This is a controversial perspective and although it feels true for many, it is hard to prove. Many of the most violent criminals have traumatic backgrounds, such as child abuse, neglect, or sexual assault, which suggests that they were not born with their criminal compunctions, but rather that these developed very early, which thus places them more into the circumstances than nature category. However, the lines are blurry.
Certainly, it does seem as though most criminals are created out of difficult circumstances. To understand this, one just has to look at impoverished communities around the world. These are places where crime flourishes because the people there are desperate and forced to do immoral things in order to survive. In such states of despair, people tend to put themselves first and overlook social norms, laws, and the usual empathic perspective that would stop most people from hurting others. In such areas, people tend to be conditioned for a young age to ignore the law or even social decency, joining gangs and becoming influenced by dangerous people. This tends to be a problem due to a lack of resources, opportunities, and education in such areas.
In conclusion, it appears likely that most crime is the result of people’s unfortunate circumstances, meaning that criminals are not inherently bad. However, there may be some people who were born with a certain compunction towards violent or criminal activity.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Television has become an integral part of our daily lives, and its influence on children cannot be underestimated. While some argue that children can learn effectively through television and should be encouraged to watch it both at home and school, I strongly disagree with this notion. In this essay, I will present arguments against the idea of promoting excessive television watching among children.
Firstly, television watching is a passive activity that lacks the interactivity and engagement required for optimal learning outcomes. While children may absorb information from television programmes, they often lack the opportunity to actively participate, ask questions, and engage in critical thinking. In contrast, traditional educational settings such as classrooms promote active learning, where students can interact with teachers and peers, ask questions, and engage in discussions. This active involvement enhances comprehension, critical thinking skills, and the ability to apply knowledge in real-world situations. This is why young children do not learn effectively from watching TV.
Furthermore, excessive television viewing can have detrimental effects on children's physical and mental well-being. Prolonged sedentary behaviour associated with watching television can contribute to a sedentary lifestyle, leading to various health issues such as obesity, cardiovascular problems, and poor posture. Moreover, excessive screen time can adversely affect children's cognitive development and attention span. Research has shown that excessive exposure to screens, including television, can lead to attention deficits and decreased academic performance. In contrast, encouraging children to engage in physical activities, interactive play, and reading promotes their overall well-being and cognitive development.
In conclusion, television is not a substitute for interactive and engaging learning experiences. Moreover, excessive television viewing can have negative effects on children's learning, physical health, and cognitive development. Therefore, it is important to encourage children to participate in interactive learning environments, such as classrooms, rather than watching TV.
Sample 2:
Television, as a learning tool, could be useful if children watch the right programmes for a limited duration of time each day. I do believe that TV can be a very powerful learning tool for children, and that is why they should be allowed to watch TV programmes both at home and school, but within the teacher's and parent's watch.
To begin with, though I am no longer a student, I can still learn better by watching TV rather than reading books. Whenever I tune on to the History Channel, BBC or National Geographic Channel, I can learn new things. This is also true for school-going children. My younger brother, who is a college student with a History major, heavily relies on History Channel documentaries to enhance his knowledge of history.
Moreover, TV programmes are the audio-visual presentation of an event, story or fact, and thus have lasting impressions on our brains. If the right programmes are chosen for children, they will learn faster by watching TV. For instance, one of our neighbours allows her 3 years old daughter to watch Rhymes on the internet TV channels, and she can recite most of those rhymes. According to her mother, the girl has learned more effectively by watching animated cartoons that have rhymes than by reading books. Since TV is a powerful learning tool, we can use it in school for educational purposes.
In conclusion, as parents and teachers, we must pick suitable educational programmes for our youngsters both in school and at home. I believe that TV is a good pedagogical tool, and hence its use in the school and home for both educational and recreational purposes should be allowed.
Sample 3:
Modern technology has undoubtedly made learning easier and better. Most children's parents encourage them to watch shows to gain information and acquire new knowledge. While I agree that watching television has some positive effects on a child, I believe this trend has a more detrimental effect on our children and society in general.
First and foremost, watching television can have some positive effects on children. There are, in fact, considerable advantages to incorporating television into homes and educational institutions. Many informative broadcasters, like National Geographic and Discovery, exist solely for educational reasons. Moreover, viewing television may increase the concentration and attention of some people. For instance, children with autism and behaviour problems have a concentration weakness; research has demonstrated that these children have enhanced their focus and concentration and are capable of watching television for prolonged periods. Therefore, it is obvious that somehow this trend has some beneficial consequences.
Similarly, I believe that watching television has several negative adverse effects. Spending time watching television can divert attention from healthy pastimes like outdoor activity with colleagues, leading to weight gain and feelings of loneliness. In addition, some programmes are created for entertainment, not teaching; these programmes have violent scenes and inappropriate terminology, which hurt children's brains. In addition, prolonged watching television may prevent reading a book and informative articles. Consequently, children would lack intellectual and problem-solving abilities. The negative impacts of television on the psychological and physical well-being of children can be determined.
In summation, I believe that television watching has more drawbacks than benefits. Under the supervision of both their parents and educators, children may spend more time watching purely for informative and educational reasons.
Sample 4:
Nowadays, television sets are now utilized as an educational tool. Many people believe that teenagers can absorb more efficiently while watching television. I fully agree with the concept that television might benefit youngsters in increasing their knowledge. This essay will look into the several reasons for this approval.
I feel that television is incredibly good for youngsters for two primary reasons. First, kids have access to a plethora of informative television channels, such as National Geographic and discovery, which are quite captivating to watch. This option might, in my opinion, considerably expand students’ understanding of Biology and Geography. Another consideration is that watching television helps reduce the school-related anxiety that teenagers are prone to. If, for instance, a youngster receives a poor grade in a specific subject, classmates would likely tease him or her. Consequently, I would suggest that televisions may be advantageous in some instances. It is evident that, by viewing the news on television, students receive a significant amount of information and learn about the world's various cultures and critical problems.
In contrast, I feel that we should not push youngsters to watch television constantly because it makes them less productive and inactive. Moreover, numerous studies have already demonstrated that televisions not only make individuals idle but also cause overweight. I believe that many schools offer physical education classes, even though television can make children less active.
In summation, although it is obvious that television makes an individual less active, I am convinced that teenagers learn more efficiently while watching television, for the reasons I have explained throughout.
Sample 5:
In this 21st century, digitalization has replaced all the old-schooled theories in educational institutes. Moreover, it is claimed that teenagers can effectively study while watching television at home and school. Although I agree that youngsters sometimes can learn from watching television, I do not consider it to be a good idea to encourage this activity.
Firstly, children's study is occasionally enhanced by television viewing. Numerous television programmes provide visual information and tales that enhance the process of learning interesting as well as the content easier to understand. It is a good way to encourage students to learn, particularly when they are tired of academics and assignments. Some applications, for instance, present appealing stories of literature, enhancing children's comprehension. These tools also make it simpler for youngsters to memorize poetry, as it is challenging and tiring for young children to remember poetry by continuously repeating them.
In contrast, I believe that prolonged watching of television may damage a child's academic performance. First, television programmes can serve as a distraction from their academics, especially when they are not attentive. Some programmes employ games to assist youngsters to learn more efficiently, yet youngsters may become more involved in the pleasure and so acquire little. Furthermore, continuous TV viewing alone could lead to an absence of human engagement. If children have queries while watching the television, their instructors cannot immediately address them, which would be most likely to lead to misunderstandings.
To conclude, even though viewing television encourages children to take an interest in learning, I believe that youngsters should not consume too much television because it has a negative consequence on their academics.
Sample 6:
With the development of technology, the media plays an important role in the field of education. Many people are of the opinion that when students are taught with the help of computers, mobile phones, and even television, they learn productively. As far as I am concerned, educating a child with the help of television at school and home is commendable, but there should be a limit to the exposure, otherwise, there may be a hindrance to their mental and physical development.
Childhood is a period when everyone enjoys the simple pleasures of life. Running with friends, pursuing adventures, enjoying ice cream and chocolates are some of the activities that make them happy. Nowadays, children are glued to their television or computer screens. There is no scope for physical activity, and they become obese or unhealthy. If the children continuously come in contact with television at home as well as at school, the rays from the screen may affect their eyesight.
Apart from this, when children watch television at home and school, they become addicted. For example, when a child is shown animated videos to understand certain topics, they get an excuse to watch videos on youtube. They tell their parents that the teacher had asked them to watch those videos to understand the topic better. In this way, the parents are bound to allow them and are unable to keep track of their activity. Moreover, some programs on television show excessive violence, which excites the children. They may try to copy their favourite superhero and get hurt in the process. The crime shows may even instigate them to behave in a rude or anti-social way which ultimately becomes detrimental to their development.
Yet, it is irrefutable that television is an effective tool to educate children and adults alike. While shows on National Geography, Animal Planet and Discovery tap on the scientific evolution of a child’s mind, cartoons or game shows help them relax after a long day of study and activities.
To put it in a nutshell, even though watching television both at home and school might help the children, the negative effects outweigh the positive side. So, according to me, elders should keep an eye on their wards and allow them limited time to watch television at home and school.
Sample 7:
As a professional in the field of education, I strongly disagree with the idea that children should be encouraged to watch television regularly at home and at school. While it is true that television can be a source of information and entertainment, it is not a suitable medium for effective learning for children.
First and foremost, excessive television viewing can have detrimental effects on a child’s physical and mental health. Studies have shown that children who spend too much time in front of a screen are at a higher risk of obesity, sleep disturbances, and attention problems. Moreover, the content of television programs is often not age-appropriate and can expose children to violence, inappropriate language, and negative behaviors.
Furthermore, watching television does not promote active learning or critical thinking skills. Unlike interactive educational activities, such as reading, writing, and hands-on experiments, television viewing is a passive experience that does not engage children in the learning process. It is important for children to develop their cognitive abilities and problem-solving skills through active participation in educational activities, rather than passively absorbing information from a screen.
Instead of encouraging children to watch television regularly, it is essential to provide them with alternative and more effective learning opportunities. Schools should focus on creating a stimulating and interactive learning environment, where children can engage in hands-on activities, discussions, and group projects. At home, parents should limit screen time and encourage their children to participate in outdoor activities, sports, and hobbies that promote physical and mental well-being.
In conclusion, while television can be a source of entertainment, it is not an effective medium for children to learn. Instead of promoting regular television viewing, it is crucial to provide children with active and engaging learning experiences that foster their overall development.
Sample 8:
Some parents believe that watching television is bad for their children. So, they try to restrict their children from watching TV. In a different way, others think that there is nothing bad in watching TV programmes. Personally, I think that watching TV brings tremendous benefits to children unless they spend a lot of their valuable time in front of a TV set daily. It is recommended that children should spend less than a couple of hours daily watching TV programmes, and those programmes should be suitable for them. For the following reasons, which I will mention below, I believe that television plays an essential role in a child’s development.
First of all, television helps a child to extend his or her range of interests. Children can find out many new things and make many exciting discoveries for themselves. In addition to this practical benefit, television improves children’s vocabulary, their memory and gives them the opportunity to gain more knowledge. It is essential for a child’s growth. Of cause, someone can say that there are plenty of different resources of information such as books and teachers. But, I think, in our modern world children must learn faster and use all contemporary technology in order to succeed.
Secondly, watching cognitive programs helps children to learn more about wildlife, our environment and about the importance of preserving our forest and wild animals that live there. However, scientists say that a child should not watch TV for more than 40 minutes successively and not more than 2-3 hours per day. For example, my mother always made us have a break after watching TV more than half an hour and let our eyes rest for several minutes before turning on the TV again. She did not let us watch the TV all day long as well. I think it is the best solution.
To sum up, I believe that television gives children and all people the opportunity to learn what cannot be learnt from books. Television and movies, in particular, allow people to feel the reality and see what they will most likely not be able to see in their lives. Personally, when I was a child, I liked to watch cognitive programs about wild animals. Unfortunately, my family had only one TV, but these programs were the only ones we all wanted to watch. So, we gathered in our living room and watched them in complete silence. I always remember those moments with a smile.
Sample 9:
It is irrefutable that TV is a very efficient teacher. However, I disagree that children should be motivated to watch TV both at home and at school. I shall put forth my arguments to support my views in the following paragraphs.
There is no doubt that TV can be a powerful means of delivering information and a nice part of the learning process. Being an audiovisual medium more effective result can be achieved. What is seen is retained longer in the minds of children. There are some things which can be very easily taught by visual illustrations. Even boring subjects like history can be made interesting with the help of TV.
However, if TV is to be used as an educational tool, then very strict monitoring would be needed as to what children watch on TV. All those talk shows and soap operas we can see every day are a complete waste of time and can even have negative effects by distracting children from their studies. Moreover, most so-called educational programmes like National Geographic cannot replace books and academic lectures because they tend to entertain people and have not an aim to give deep and concentrated knowledge. It is highly unlikely that TV channel directors would abandon their profits and change talk shows to lectures and video lessons.
Furthermore, if children watch TV in school also then their interaction with the teacher would be limited. Teachers teach a lot of things apart from academics. They can come down to the level of the student and can also stimulate children to learn. What is more, children would read less when they learn everything from TV. Reading is an active activity as compared to TV which is a passive activity. So, it would be detrimental to the holistic development of children.
To put it in a nutshell I pen down saying that, although TV is a very good educational medium, it should be used within limits and whatever children learn from TV should also be carefully monitored by parents and teachers.
Sample 10:
Nowadays, many educational institutes are focusing on the usage of screens for learning in kids. Some people are of the view that learning through screen should be encouraged for young kids. My opinion, I completely disagree with acquiring knowledge through television screens. In this essay, I am going to support my opinion before giving a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, screening for long hours for educational purposes is likely to put strain on the eyes of youngsters. This is because television screens are likely to release rays that may impact vision in young kids. As a result of this, the younger kids will need to wear glasses at every age. Additionally, vision impairment due to screening is not restricted to weak eyesight but also to severe headaches for days or even blurry vision. For instance, nowadays, ophthalmologists believe that long hours of screening are the main cause of vision impairment in kids. Also, they emphasize the limitation of screen time for kids at a young age.
Secondly, viewing learning programs on tv continuously is likely to impact young kids' physical and mental well-being. As when kids do screen time, they are unlikely to do any form of physical movement. Hence, sitting constantly and just watching videos online will make youngsters lethargic and tired. Moreover, learning through screens, even at home, will result in obesity, leading to other personality development issues in young ones. Along with that, learning without a screen tends to enhance analytical and cognitive capabilities in kids. For instance, when learning through screens, kids only make use of a few of their senses, while off-screen learning involves the usage of many other senses. Undoubtedly, off-screen learning involves eyes, ears, hands, and touch, which also helps develop the brain in young kids.
In conclusion, learning through tv screen can impact the eyes in young kids and may lead to vision impairment. Also, constant viewing of tv screens is not good for the physical and mental well-being of young ones.
Sample 11:
It is acknowledged that children may benefit from watching television programs, such as educational programs. However, I disagree with the recommendation that watching television should be a regular activity at school and st home, as this would produce more negative outcomes than positive ones.
It has received wide cognition that many television programs can moticate children’s learning enthusiasm, thus encouraging them to expand their knowledge in terms of normal school subjects and after-school activities. However, there are still many problems associated with the increased time of sitting in front of a TV screen.
If children spend time watching television every day at school and at home, they may face the probability of suffering obesity, eye problems and back problems. When they are studying at school, it would be advisable for them to focus on learning, acquiring knowledge on academic subjects. Besides, more active and aggressive activities should be encouraged as they are in a physical state when they should participate in more sports activities. But watching television seems to do more harm than good in their physical development.
Furthermore, it is true that children waste a lot of time playing electronic gadgets after school, resulting in the fact that many of them have become highly addicted to these gadgets. If they are asked to watch television regularly, they would certainly lack interpersonal interaction. It would be more beneficial if they play games with their parents or do the housework.
In conclusion, although television programs would do good to children’s learning in some ways, they definitely would cause more disadvantageous effects if watching them becomes a daily routine for children.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Bài tập chức năng giao tiếp (Có đáp án)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
15000 bài tập tách từ đề thi thử môn Tiếng Anh có đáp án (Phần 1)
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
Bộ câu hỏi: Thì và sự phối thì (Phần 2) (Có đáp án)
Trắc nghiệm Tiếng anh 12 Tìm từ được gạch chân phát âm khác - Mức độ nhận biết có đáp án
Bộ câu hỏi: Cấp so sánh (có đáp án)
Hãy Đăng nhập hoặc Tạo tài khoản để gửi bình luận