Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sample 1:

Noise is such a problematic issue that it has raised big concerns recently. That is why some people argue that there should be strict control on the level of noise production, while others object to this idea, claiming that people have the right to make noise as loudly as they want. I believe that noise should be controlled for the betterment of human life quality.

On the one hand, it is understandable why there are supporters of loud noise. First, noise is indispensable to modern life. In the old-time, people did not have access to modern loud-producing equipment such as TV or music speakers and individual transports were not as popular. However, today people are so accustomed to noises such as blaring car horns or engine noise that they feel no strong objection to them and claim that noise control is unnecessary. Second, loud noise is integral in many critical occasions such as ceremonies or celebrations such as weddings or festivals.   Loud music is exciting, upbeat and can be pleasing to the ear that relieves people’s stress of work and study, refresh their mind and revitalize them. Undoubtedly, in this case, noise is an indispensable element.

Nevertheless, people’s health and life qualities can be reduced greatly under loud noise’s impacts. For one thing, loud noise such as blaring car horns or noise sounds from people’s clamorous arguments or from brassy nonstop traffic cause people an array of health problems such as cardiovascular problems, sleeplessness which dramatically lower human life quality. For another, unbearable noise interferes and distracts people from their work and study. In a recent survey about the effect of the learning environment on a student’s performance, 90% said that they work best in a quiet hushed environment such as the library while just 10% choose to work in noisy places such as parks or cafés. This example has indicated that booming noise is mainly responsible for low productivity and focus span/ attention.

To conclude, some people argue that they see no problem with excessive noise; therefore, noise levels should not be controlled. I disagree with that idea from every perspective and believe that blasting noise should be controlled effectively to improve humans’ health and productivity.

Sample 2:

There are those who opine that it is necessary to impose tough noise regulations, while others argue that creating loud noise is their natural right. This essay discusses both sides of the argument and why I believe that governments should introduce laws to control high levels of noise.

There are understandable reasons why some people believe introducing noise regulations is perceived to be imperative. The first reason is that loud noise can have negative impacts on people’s health. For example, being frequently exposed to high levels of noise from traffic or industrial activities can make people suffer from medical conditions such as hypertension, dull headaches or even hearing impairment. Another reason is that the distraction caused by noise can result in people having bad performance in terms of working and studying. For instance, students will have difficulty concentrating on their lesson if there is a construction site near their school.

On the other hand, others feel they should have the right to make as much noise as they want to for some reasons. First of all, there are other solutions than noise restrictions, such as technologies, for those who want to reduce the impact of loud noise. For instance, people who are bothered by high levels of noise can soundproof their house. In addition, creating loud noise is deemed a great way to release stress or to express excitement. For instance, football supporters often yell and chant slogans when cheering for their favorite football team. People therefore should have the right to express themselves in order not to feel limited by the need to mitigate the release of their excitement.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that both sides of the argument have their positive points. However, I am inclined to believe that it is better to impose laws to control the level of noise because the need to prevent people from the hazards of noise outweigh people’s right to express themselves.

Sample 3:

People of the twenty-first century are being plagued by noise pollution, a problem which is growing considerably in extent, frequency and severity. Due to numerous wide-ranging adverse effects brought about by noise, some are of the opinion that the government should enforce noise ordinances. However, it is also argued that individuals have the freedom to make as much noise as they want. Both sides of the argument will be analysed below.

Attempts should be made to regulate noise because noise is associated with many adverse health consequences. As studies show, a growing number of modern-day people are experiencing hearing impairment as a result of prolonged exposure to loud noise. No matter where it comes from - in their homes, at their workplaces or in other public places, noise is secretly killing the hearing ability of people of all ages, affecting their communication and also behaviors. In addition, noise can cause long-term effects on the psychlogical well-being through sleep disturbances. In fact, it is the culprit of frequent mood swings, decrements in work performance, memory loss and the decline in other mental functions. For these reasons, environmental noise should be kept under close control.

However, the argument that there should not be control on noise also has some convincing points. It can be said that noise restriction violates the basic human rights that every individual is entitled to. As long as people have freedom to eat whatever they desire, speak whatever is on their minds, they should also be given permission to make noise. Therefore, legislation to limit noise production can prove unfeasible.

In summary, the modern-day environment is being gradually degraded by noise. Nevertheless, the most effective method to control it is by education, not by force.

Sample 4:

It took centuries for the inhabitants of planet earth to transform into a civilised society. Norms and traditions that were earlier considered to be of great value are gradually replaced with modern etiquette and manners. Being a citizen of democratic society one has the right to act and express as per their likings such as making noise, but many people believe that freedom of expression in high decibel should be regulated. This essay will analyse both views before presenting an opinion.

On the one hand, people argue that they are free to do and act whatever they like. Proponents of this viewpoint say that this is their fundamental right, and making noise or living peacefully should be the sole preference of an individual. For instance, in sporting events, like football, the decibels are at their highest peak or celebrations like birthday parties at home where children shout on the top of their voice to make their presence felt. Moreover, clattering depends on the situation also, for instance, patient's attendants in third world countries shout on the administration staff and make noise if they are overcharged on their bills. They believe that by shouting they can suppress another party.

On the contrary, another school of thought believes that one should live peacefully and respect the rights of their neighbour, passersby, and dwellers and so on. They say that people should always raise their concerns with politeness and softness in attitude. Proponents of this viewpoint don't argue that noise in the form of music or parties should be regulated, and the government should define laws and policies to kerb it because they distract and discomfort individuals who are sick, studying or sleeping and so on. For instance, in the UK one can be jailed if found disturbing their neighbour through loud music or quarrel.

To recapitulate, the aforementioned provides solid arguments in favour of both views. I personally believe that noise levels by an individual should be strongly regulated through legislatures in residential areas, hospitals, libraries and so on. However, one should be allowed to enjoy and make noise in sporting arenas, parks, etc.

Sample 5:

It is often considered by many that they can make noises as per their wish, while other people believe that there should be strict rules to control the amount of noise an individual makes. In my opinion, noise pollution causes ample social and physical issues; hence, it should be controlled.

On the one hand, freedom to speak and making noise is one of the human rights. In other words, every citizen has a right to make sounds or noise as they prefer. For instance, in some special events such as birthday celebrations, dancing parties making noise is accepted in the current society. Moreover, making sounds is often considered as accepted behaviour, especially among small children. Making noise provides enjoyment among people obviously during joyful occasions. It helps to ventilate one’s emotions, particularly anger and sorrow.

On the other hand, noise pollution is often accepted as one of the major concerns of the current world due to several drawbacks. Firstly, unpleasant sound causes ample health issues. For example, the high-intensity sound could cause increased stress level, deafness, cardiovascular problems and even sleep disturbances. Secondly, noise would often affect wildlife. Animals would probably develop aggressive behaviour and get irritated due to the high frequency of unpleasant sounds. To cite an example, during thunder and lightning pet animals became frustrated as a result of high pitch sounds. Finally, it leads to trouble communicating. In other sense, communication between individuals becomes difficult owing to noise from the surrounding. In other words, communication gets distracted.

In conclusion, the noise would adversely affect society and one’s body. Hence, necessary steps to be taken to control it. In my opinion, people should abide rules to control noise formation for the welfare of the society and inhabitants.

Sample 6:

People hold different views about whether people should have the freedom to produce noise or comply with some regulations of it. In my view, it is important that noise making is put under control. On the one hand, it is understandable why some people believe in their rights to generate noise freely. As people these days often have to suffer from considerable stress at work or school, they tend to find an effective way to relieve it. In some cases, recreational activities such as karaoke singing or party holding can bring a certain amount of relaxation, mitigating stressful situations for everyone. If too strictly imposed, any restriction of noise may deter people from gaining access to one of the useful methods of relaxing.

However, I can understand the arguments against noise makers. Firstly, excessive levels of noise can cause serious disturbance to the nearby residents who also have the right to take a proper rest after a tiring day. Those who are affected by the loud sounds from their neighbors may not only be unable to relax but also have their levels of discomfort increased. In the long term, this will definitely have a negative impact on their quality of life. Another reason for this opinion is that too much noise can produce detrimental effects on the health of the unintentional hearers. For example, constant exposure to high pitch noise can result in auditory problems, for example, hearing loss. Hearing-impaired individuals are very likely to experience difficulty in their daily life.

In conclusion, although there are good reasons why people should be allowed to make as much noise as they wish, in my opinion, some appropriate controls are necessary.

Sample 7:

It is common knowledge that in today’s modern world, loud noise is a normal occurrence. There has been an argument over this issue, with many insisting that there ought to be tight restrictions on noise control, while others maintain that everyone should be free to make noise as they please. Each side has their own reasons, and in this essay, I will examine each view before stating my own.

There is some sense in the argument for the right to make noise. There are many activities essential to our lives that, unfortunately, result in loud noises. Any strict regulations on these activities can, therefore, greatly disturb our daily life. For example, the high volume of traffic is often seen as the main source of noise pollution, but it is so important to our dynamic world that any attempt to limit the flow of traffic can affect the life of many people. Not only is the emission of loud noise often inevitable, but it is also sometimes necessary. Festive activities or public celebrations, such as carnival parades or football games often require loud music and noise to create the right atmosphere. Therefore, a ban of all loud noises will either be impractical or likely affect many aspects of our normal life.

However, it is also important to keep the noise we create under control. Constant loud noises can inflict serious harm on our health, especially on our hearing. It is not unusual for people who are exposed to continuous blasts of high-volume sounds, such as construction workers or nightclub DJs, to lose some of their hearing ability or even become permanently deaf. Moreover, loud noises can be highly disruptive. For many people whose job requires concentration, from students to medical doctors, being in a noisy environment can hinder their work and lower their productivity. Thus, there must be certain regulations concerning our noise-making activities.

To sum up, both of these opposite sides of the debate seem to have valid reasons for their argument. It appears that we cannot afford to completely dismiss the noise problem, yet it is also advisable that we refrain from imposing too strict noise regulations. Personally, I believe that any decision regarding this matter should be made with consideration of the ideas from both sides.