Câu hỏi:

06/01/2025 447

More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Xem lời giải

Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!

Bắt đầu thi

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

In today’s modern era, people tend to purchase clothes, cars and other items from well-known brands. The chief reasons that could explain this phenomenon are the credibility of famous brands and people’s desire to show off their status. Personally, I opine that this is a largely negative development as it leads to the growing disparity between the wealthy and the poor.

There are two main factors that shed light on why people want to buy famous brands’ items. First, noted brands offer goods of better quality in comparison with small brands. It can be seen that innumerable counterfeit products are sold at cheaper prices, meaning that buyers can only use them for a short period of time. In contrast, those from popular brand names can be more expensive, but they are credible and give people a sense of satisfaction when using them. Second, people nowadays want to show off their social status or their wealth. A standout example for this is cars from luxurious brands such as Porsche and Mercedes. These are often exorbitant due to their materials and unique features. Hence, they are considered a tool for the rich.

From my perspective, it is apt to say that this trend has a negative impact on the development of society as this might cause various social problems related to the rich and the poor. As impoverished people are rarely provided with lucrative jobs, they might find it extremely challenging to make their ends meet, not to mention buying things from luxurious brands. On the contrary, the wealthy are eligible to not only accommodate their lives with fundamental necessities but also afford expensive goods that could bring them happiness. This discrepancy between rich people and the destitute could result in tension and conflicts within a society.

In conclusion, purchasing things from famous brands is becoming ubiquitous as they are of high quality and could show off the wealth of buyers. However, I argue that this may pose a serious threat to the safety and stability of society.

Sample 2:

Nowadays, purchasing items such as cars or clothes from famous brands is becoming increasingly popular among a large number of people. The reasons behind this trend will be outlined in the following essay and, in my opinion, it could bring both positive and negative consequences in equal measure.

To begin with, the tendency of using large brand products mostly stems from people’s beliefs on personal possessions reflecting wealth, social status, and appearance. More specifically, many people associate clothes and accessories from popular brand names such as Nike or Adidas with high quality and fashionable designs. Therefore, these items are more suitable for enhancing people’s appearance than the products from smaller brands. In addition, some types of goods like cars from luxurious brands are usually sold at exorbitant prices because of their expensive materials or unique features. Hence, these items are often considered as a tool for the rich to show off their social status or their wealth.

On the other hand, more people purchasing goods from famous brands can bring both merits and drawbacks to the business world. Countries where famous brands are based are more likely to have a strong and healthy economy. For instance, the US – the home country of many large brands, such as Apple and Microsoft, has been the strongest economic superpower since the late 20^th century partly since the products of these enterprises are favorable not only in domestic but also in foreign markets. However, the rise of dominant brand names can be a factor leading to monopoly as large companies will attempt to dominate and finally wipe out smaller rivals to maintain their positions.

In conclusion, the tendency of consuming goods from famous brands largely comes from people’s perception of personal belongings showing their wealth, social status and appearance. This trend can bring both positive and harmful effects to the business market and, therefore, should be well-considered by the government to prevent large-scale monopoly.

Sample 3:

The majority of people show their desire to buy high-end goods from famous brands. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons for this trend and whether it is positive or negative.

The reason for this issue lies in the fact that we are living in a consumer culture and owning such things from famous brands seems to be a good way to create a good self-image. Advertising manipulates people by saying that buying products from certain brands are essential for them to affirm their social status. For example, advertisers focus on selling the brand image with glamorous celebrities, wearing a trendy outfit or driving the latest model of cars. Therefore, we might associate brands of those products with a higher status and make a purchase decision without considering its price or quality.

The positive effect of this consumer trend is that consumerism can boost the economy as it can create businesses and jobs in retail and manufacturing industries. However, I think that this trend is mainly negative for both individuals and society. First, some people become addicted to shopping and fashion, and some of these shopaholics might overspend and get into debt. In terms of societal problems, a materialistic lifestyle is being encouraged, which means that we judge others’ social position on the materials they own rather than the good moral qualities and behaviours they show.

In conclusion, many people are big fans of famous brands as a result of advertising and our desire to enhance our self-image. In spite of the economic advantages, I think the disadvantages of this trend are far more dangerous to our society.

Sample 4:

In the contemporary world, where economic conditions have generally improved, an increasing number of individuals aspire to acquire clothing, automobiles, and various items from renowned brands. This essay aims to delve into the factors contributing to this trend and elucidate why it is more favorable than worrisome.

The growing preference for high-end goods can be ascribed to two main factors. Firstly, the elevation in living standards motivates people to possess more functional and appealing clothing items and vehicles, which may not be offered by less popular small businesses. Additionally, esteemed brands like Apple and Nike are known for selling durable, high-quality products with a lengthy guarantee. This advantage is particularly appealing to contemporary consumers who often have busy schedules and cannot afford the time for extensive product repairs.

While the surge in the consumption of products from well-known businesses may have some disadvantages, such as widening the social divide and endangering small companies, the advantages of this trend can outweigh the drawbacks. Primarily, the desire for superior quality products serves as a motivation for individuals to strive harder to attain them, fostering market competition and encouraging companies to continually innovate. Another noteworthy aspect is that, due to their durability and functionality, products from popular brands are less prone to damage, consequently reducing environmental waste.

In conclusion, the aspiration for better products and the exceptional quality of items can account for the growing popularity of well-known companies. Despite certain drawbacks, this trend is a positive development due to its benefits for consumers, businesses, and the environment.

Sample 5:

The trend of purchasing items with a well-known label is a major topic of concern in today’s society. This happens because people often associate a famous brand with quality, and sometimes because most of their peers are using the same products. As far as this is concerned, the positive aspects are more significant than the negative ones.

Popular brand names often attract a great number of customers. This is primarily because products with major brands are often of great quality and reliability. In today’s world, negative feedback can be spread so fast that these brands have to try their best not to incur any criticism which can ruin their reputation. In addition to this, some people purchase items with a well-known name because they want to be a member of the society of people using that product. Apple, for example, has successfully built a community of hundreds of millions of users of the iOS operating system. The consequence of this is that new smartphone users are likely to choose an Apple one so that they have access to the aforementioned community, which means they can communicate and interact with other Apple product users effectively.

Overall, this trend brings more benefits than drawbacks to society. The only disadvantage that is worth mentioning is that companies that own famous brands may become monopolistic, which may be disadvantageous for consumers in the long term because these companies may lose the motivation to improve themselves. Laws and governmental policies, however, are now readily available to prevent any company from reaching the state of monopoly, so this disadvantage may be out of the question. This trend is of greater benefit, in the sense that buyers of a product with a well-known name are assured of product quality. These people, as a result, are less likely to worry about the chance of buying a low-quality item. When they buy more products with popular brand names, they may eventually attain the state of having all of their possessions up to a modern perception of what is a good product.

In conclusion, the two most prominent reasons as to why people purchase products from famous companies are product quality assurance and the desire to be a part of a community owning and using the same range of items. This development is positive for society at large, despite the only drawback being the chance it may turn a company into a monopolistic one. I predict that this trend will continue into the future, and consumers may thrive in a society where the quality of every single product is standardized, which is guaranteed by its brand name.

Sample 6:

Sample 7:

People preferring to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items is a negative development because it’s making our society more materialistic and consumer-driven. This may cause other values such as environmental awareness, child labour, and fair working practices to get pushed aside if the more famous brands are not so conscious of these issues.

The reasons people prefer to buy famous brands of clothes is because of status, to show their wealth because of the quality associated with these famous brands

Another reason is the advertisements for these products and endorsements by famous celebrities. It is well known in advertising that a lot of people want to be seen as successful and wealthy. Brands take advantage of this with endorsements from celebrities and other notable personalities.

A lot of people see these brands and they wanted to be associated with the brand because of certain celebrity endorsements. For example, Nike has an active and athletic brand and people also want to be seen as athletic, active and as winners and this largely explains sports endorsements as well. The famous Spanish tennis player Rafael Nadal earns millions of dollars per year from Nike for celebrity endorsements to wear Nike clothing at his games. This in turn generates demand as people aspire to be like Rafael Nadal and one way they can get closer is by wearing the same clothes as he does.

The increase in preference for famous brands of clothes and other products is a negative development because it can create problems for people who do not have the money to buy expensive brands.

Due to the capitalist nature of these famous brands, important values such as ecological manufacturing, equal working conditions and prohibiting child labour may become secondary. Many famous brands do not have the best track record for fair working practices and other crucial issues.

Sample 8:

It is irrefutable that branded products and services have become increasingly popular nowadays. This essay intends to discuss the reasons for this increasing brand consciousness. While there are some drawbacks of this trend, I consider it to be far more beneficial.

There are many reasons why people are going after brands. The first reason is that these are considered a status symbol. Brands speak about the person who is buying them. Secondly, advertising and the media have spread awareness about these brands like wildfire. Branded items are also shown to have better quality and thus people prefer them over other products. Moreover, these brands have come within the pocket of the ordinary person. With the growing economy, the purchasing power of people has gone up, which also makes them go for brands.

The increasing brand focus and consciousness has many advantages. The main advantage is that companies now emphasize quality and customer service. Businesses know that to survive in today's competitive world, they need to have a good brand reputation, and hence people are offered better services. To cite an example, if a person buys a branded cell phone, but unfortunately it stops working for some reason, he gets a full replacement, provided it is within the warranty period. Companies also benefited as it becomes easier to introduce new products into the market. They need to spend less on marketing, if they already have a good brand image. Another positive effect is that these brands have led to the emergence of another big industry, which is imitations or copies. This secondary industry is catering to a far bigger population and is adding a lot to the economy.

On the downside, brands provide a feeling of inadequacy among those people who cannot afford them. Sometimes, people end up overspending on such items and this upsets the family budget. Some people may even resort to petty crime such as shoplifting, pickpocketing and chain snatching. Finally, people are becoming workaholics to buy such products and are failing to draw a line between work and leisure and also between work and family, which is adding to their stress and strain.

To sum up, brand heedfulness can be attributed to many reasons. Despite the few drawbacks, I believe this rising lure of branded products to be a positive development overall.

Sample 9:

For a variety of reasons, there has been an increase in the number of people who are obsessed with famous brands when buying new clothes, cars, watches and other items. In my opinion, this is largely detrimental to a lot of people.

The first reason for such an obsession with purchasing brand name products is the influence of modern advertising. On a daily basis, we are bombarded by countless TV commercials and magazine advertisements that encourage us to associate certain brands with a higher social status. As a result, an increasing number of people are convinced that owning and using those advertised products is a symbol of success.

Another cause is the rising living standard in most countries. With many people earning a better salary, the pursuit of a higher quality of life has been popular. This stimulates consumers with higher affordability to choose products of prestigious brands, which are widely believed to be more durable, well designed and dedicatedly produced.

Although being a loyal customer to famous brands allows people to enjoy both material and spiritual satisfactions, I strongly believe that this kind of shopping preference has significant negative impacts. Firstly, as the concept that big brands represent wealth and success prevails, people living on a tight budget are also likely to be lured to follow this trend, which will cause them to spend the money borrowed from the bank and finally end up with serious debt troubles. In addition, being addicted to famous brands leads people to buy things that may not suit them best. For example, to follow the latest trend set by influential brands, many people would buy shoes and clothes that neither fit their personalities nor their lifestyles.

In conclusion, due to the influence of advertising and the rise in people’s incomes, the popularity of buying famous brand goods has been increasing, which, from my point of view, generates undesirable outcomes.

Sample 10:

People in the present period like to buy clothing, automobiles, and other products from well-known labels. The legitimacy of well-known companies and people’s desire to flaunt their status are the main factors that could explain this tendency. Personally, I believe that this is a generally lousy development because it contributes to the widening gap between the rich and the poor.

There are two primary explanations for why individuals choose to purchase goods from well-known companies. First, compared to smaller businesses, well-known brands provide goods of higher quality. In addition, it is clear that numerous fake goods are offered for sale at reduced costs and are solely intended for temporary use by consumers. In contrast, while those from well-known brands may cost more, they are reliable and provide users with a sense of satisfaction. Second, many today like to flaunt their riches or social status. Luxury automobiles from manufacturers like Porsche and Mercedes serve as a prime illustration of this. Due to their materials and distinctive qualities, these are frequently very expensive. As a result, they are viewed as a tool for the wealthy.

From my vantage point, it is appropriate to state that this trend has a detrimental effect on the advancement of society because it may result in a number of societal issues involving the rich and the poor. Poor people frequently lack lucrative employment opportunities, making it incredibly difficult for them to make ends meet and afford luxury goods. Contrarily, those who are wealthy are able to not only provide for their basic needs but also acquire luxury items that can make them happy. There may be tension and disputes in society as a consequence of this disparity between the wealthy and the poor.

In conclusion, buying products from well-known brands is increasingly common because they are high-quality and allow consumers to flaunt their riches. But this would seriously jeopardize societal stability and safety.

Sample 11:

Recently, there has been a growing preference for products from renowned brands. There are several reasons for this trend, which I perceive as negative. Global giants such as Coca-Cola in beverages, BMW in automobiles, and Apple in smartphones have gained widespread recognition for their superior quality.

When consumers opt for branded goods, they are also assured of performance, durability, and excellent customer service. Purchasing an iPhone, for instance, ensures stability, a lifespan of 1-2 years, and worldwide repair availability.

The inclination towards well-known brands also arises from a desire for social acceptance. Everyone desires to belong, and buying widely recognized products signifies membership in a specific community. In my view, the dominance of famous brands is highly detrimental as it stifles healthy competition among companies.

Consider smartphones, for example: in recent years, the market has become dominated by the giants Apple and Samsung, leaving smaller brands and startups struggling to gain traction. This monopoly stifles innovation, as the future of technology and trends is dictated by just one or two major corporations.

Moreover, various large corporations like Microsoft or Facebook have profoundly influenced society in their own manner, and by continuously supporting these brands, we grant them even more authority, potentially posing a significant threat to both the government and society as a whole.

In summary, certain individuals tend to purchase renowned brands due to their superior products and the sense of belonging. I firmly believe this trend is detrimental not only to smaller businesses but also to society as a whole.

Sample 12:

Today, shoppers go shopping concerning not only the products themselves, but also their brands. It seems that clothes are not just for warmth and beauty, and cars are not simply for traveling. They all represent certain identities or classes. Under such a background, we may infer the main reason causing it, which is the influence of the mass media. Overall, this is a negative trend for consumers, especially those who are not wealthy.

Referring to the causes of this issue, I am convinced that advertisers are the first to be blamed. It is well known that almost every high-end brand of bags, clothes and cars puts brand marketing as the core of their budgets. That is to say, the greatest proportion, sometimes over 80%, of the cost is spent on advertising. Why? What these brands attract consumers is definitely not the practical function of those products, but their hidden value, which means brands offer you certain degree of fame or jealousy from others by wearing their clothes, carrying their bags and driving their cars. This is why people are crazy about famous brands, for showing off, and keep changing or updating still-usable ones when their social status is even slightly promoted.

This tendency has definitely brought more drawbacks than one. The most direct one is that prices go up, together with profits for manufacturers. Customers today keep purchasing things whose cost of raw materials only accounts for around two to five per cent of their retail prices. Their money is mostly spent on creating some illusionary images that maintain a stupid sense of superiority. If this were to be generally accepted by everyone someday, the result would have to be that no one puts quality or design, the two ingredients for a product, in the first place. What's worse, those people, who are not wealthy enough, but desire a life of higher social classes, will pursue high-end brands beyond their reach at the price of anything, anything you can imagine. Debts, crimes, suicides and tragedies happen subsequently.

To reach a conclusion, the main reason for this topic can be attributed to the fact that, in order to increase their profits, advertisers, the true fashion designers, persuade customers to purchase unnecessary goods for fame. From an overall view, this leads to more negative impacts on consumers, small or middle manufacturers and even the bigger picture of the market.

Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay

Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:

Xem thêm »

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Câu 1

Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of a bad person's nature. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some people take the view that criminal behavior is a product of an individual's inherent nature, while others argue that it is the outcome of poverty and societal factors. Although there are cogent arguments for the former view, I still lean towards the social issues and poverty theory.

Those who argue that crime is rooted in an individual's personality traits and moral compass suggest that some individuals are simply predisposed to engage in criminal behavior due to factors such as personality. They argue that some people either have a natural inclination towards aggression, violence, and rule-breaking. These individuals are believed to engage in criminal activities by choice despite having access to legal means of earning a living. In fact, some serial killers are known for their violent and sadistic crimes, which were often carried out with a sense of pleasure or enjoyment.

In my view, crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty. This is because individuals may turn to criminal behavior when they are faced with limited opportunities, financial insecurity, and social inequality. These conditions can lead to frustration, hopelessness, and despair, which can ultimately push individuals towards criminal behavior as a means of survival or escape. For example, a young person who grows up in a community with few employment possibilities may feel that their only option for financial survival is to engage in drug dealing.

In conclusion, while there are certainly some individuals who exhibit consistent patterns of aggressive or antisocial behavior, these traits alone are not sufficient to explain why people commit crimes. Therefore, I believe that the majority of crime is driven by socioeconomic factors.

Sample 2:

Opinions differ as to whether crime is caused by social issues and poverty or by people’s evil nature. Personally, I agree with the former view.

It is understandable why some people claim that our nature is the root of crime. Perhaps they have witnessed some children commit wrongdoing at some point in their lives. For example, many physically strong children tend to bully others at school, while others may perform mischievous acts like lying to adults or stealing money from their parents. These experiences lead people to believe that humans are purely good or bad by nature, and those who engage in misconduct at a young age will likely become criminals.

However, the point mentioned above is deeply flawed. Everyone possesses their own good and bad nature, and it is the environment that triggers people’s evil side and causes them to commit crime. One major cause of crime in many countries is inadequate education. Poorly educated youngsters may struggle to discern between right and wrong; therefore, they are more likely to commit crimes without even knowing. Poverty is another root cause of crime because those living in impoverished conditions may turn to stealing or robbing as the final solution to make ends meet. A corrupt political system can also be a breeding ground for crime because the politicians there have to comply with the corruption, regardless of their personal intentions.

In conclusion, though some might think that crime results from a person’s bad nature, I believe it is more likely caused by social problems, such as poor education, corrupt political systems, and poverty. People are both good and bad by nature, and the environment in which they live determines whether they become criminals.

Sample 3:

When it comes to crime rates, some individuals claim that criminal activity is solely the result of innate characteristics, while others argue that it is the outcome of societal issues and impoverishment. In my opinion, socioeconomic challenges and inequality are more likely to prompt people to engage in illegal behaviours.

On the one hand, criminality could represent the result of an inherent personality. In some cases, crime is merely the result of a person’s impulsive actions and lack of moral compass. Various factors such as upbringing, personal beliefs, and psychological disorders may all play a role when it comes to criminal activity. Some people, for example, may have grown up in environments in which illegal conduct is normalised, causing them to assume that such behaviour is acceptable. Similarly, those with mental health disorders like sociopathy or psychopathy may be inclined to committing crimes due to their inability to empathise with victims.

On the other hand, societal problems and economic hardship may contribute to criminal conduct. Poverty with limited access to food, clothing, shelter, healthcare, and schooling can push people to the brink of desperation, prompting them to resort to criminal behaviour as a means of survival. People who are financially strapped in various urban areas, for instance, may turn to illegal activities like drug trafficking or burglary in order to make ends meet. Once poverty and crime are intertwined, it may ultimately develop into a vicious cycle that is challenging to escape. Furthermore, socioeconomic issues such as discrimination, inequality, and corruption may promote crime through fostering an environment of dissatisfaction and rage. Those who experience discrimination or who believe the system is stacked against them are more inclined to turn to illegal behaviour as a form of protest or vengeance.

To summarise, aside from personal psychological factors, I believe that social difficulties and poverty can have a greater impact on crime rates.

Sample 4:

Crime has been studied by many scientific disciplines, with some people ascribing it to social problems and poverty, and others thinking that it is caused by the criminal’s nature. In this, I believe that unlawful behavior is more likely the result of defective personal qualities.

Several explanations can support crime being a function of inferior socioeconomic factors. Firstly, poverty reduces access to education and employment, causing hopelessness and desperation as a result. Having been deprived of opportunities, people may turn to crime to get by. Furthermore, people whose environment is rife with social problems may be accustomed to illegal behavior, making it easier for themselves to engage in criminal activities later on. A child who grows up in a neighborhood with drug problems could turn into a drug dealer himself, since he has witnessed drug abuse and addiction as a norm. It could, therefore, be argued that social issues and poverty create criminals.

However, the view that crime is a result of the perpetrator’s nature is no less convincing. Proponents of this belief claim that certain traits, such as impulsivity, aggression, and callousness, predispose individuals to immoral or unethical behavior. People with these traits become less considerate when they perceive any threat to their self-interest, making them likely to ignore the consequences of their actions. Others, meanwhile, carry undiagnosed psychological disorders, and their condition makes them more prone to committing crimes. A large share of the prison population, especially repeat offenders, are affected by sociopathy, a disorder usually characterized by inhibited compassion towards others. It is not well-understood otherwise, and education has only been partially effective in mitigating sociopathy’s effects. For these reasons, criminals’ nature is definitely worth looking at as a cause of their offenses.

In conclusion, while both views can be supported by evidence, I believe one’s personality is a more indicative factor of whether they are likely to commit crimes. Hence, it is crucial that parents and guardians pay attention to how they shape their children’s nature.

Sample 5:

For millennia, philosophers and scientists have held countless debates on personality. Some believe in the inherent crooked nature of humanity while others argue that they are the product of their environment. This essay wishes to explore both sides of the argument.

Nativists believe that personalities and manners are inherent and genetic, so crime is innate. Credible evidence of this would be the correlation between lead exposure and crime rate. In the 1940s, the USA was the prime consumer of lead-based products, such as paint and gasoline, so babies conceived, born, and raised during this period were lead-poisoned. They later suffered from poorer impulse control and higher aggressivity. As adults, they contributed to the surplus in levels of violent crime. However, it should be noted that genes do not cause behavior but influence it through their effects on the body's response to the environment.

Supporters of Environmentalism concede that criminal behaviors are determined by family and other people, education opportunities, as well as physical circumstances. This school of thought is supported by several studies. some of them focused on the negative link between vegetation and crime. It was shown that in neighborhoods with more greenery, fewer crimes were reported. One explanation for this was that the environment gave its residents a sense of safety and security.

It should be noted that the nature-nurture debate has not been taken as seriously as it used to be. Essentially, every facet of personality development results from interaction between genes and environment. If the authorities aim at reducing the rate of crime and violence, they should take action in improving residential areas as well as enhancing healthcare.

Sample 6:

Many people consider that innate characteristics are responsible for the fact that some people choose to turn to a career of crime. While I accept that crime may result from individual characteristics of violence or greed, I would argue that it is largely a consequence of social issues and poverty.

There is a belief that a person’s nature determines whether or not they become a criminal. Firstly, some argue that an individual who is cruel turns to crime more easily than a kind person. For instance, a child bullying other boys or girls at school may turn into a violent criminal in the future. Secondly, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness could also breed future offenders, who seek to acquire easy money without working for it. A number of youngsters choose to steal from others, instead of working hard to make an honest living. These are strong reasons for thinking that those who have an inborn bad nature are more likely to break the law.

Nevertheless, it seems to me that social issues and poverty are the main causes behind crime. There are many problems in society which might lead to an increase in the crime rate. For example, unemployment pushes people into resorting to crime because they simply cannot find a job. As a consequence, the number of offenders has climbed in many countries over recent decades. Another reason is that, more broadly, poverty in general leads to a rise in crime. If people do not have enough money to make ends meet, they will be tempted to pursue illegal activities just to support themselves and their families.

In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that the principal causes of crime are a result of social conditions and problems.

Sample 7:

The causes of crime have long been a topic of debate. While some argue that crime stems from a person's inherent nature, I do believe it is the result of social problems and poverty

On the one hand, advocates of the view that crime results from a person's nature suggest that individuals with cruel tendencies are more likely to engage in criminal activities. This is because cruelty often correlates with a lack of empathy, disregard for others' well-being, and aggressive behavior, all of which can lead to crime. For example, a child who bullies others at school may grow up to become a violent criminal. Additionally, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness can breed future offenders who seek easy money without working for it. Many young people, lured by the prospect of quick and easy money, turn to cybercrime, engaging in online scams, hacking, and identity theft.

On the other hand, some, myself included, argue that crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty, a perspective I support. Social issues, such as unemployment, can push people towards crime as they struggle to find legitimate employment. The widening gap between the rich and the poor exacerbates this issue, as seen in places like Rio De Janeiro, where high crime rates are prevalent in impoverished areas. Poverty is another significant factor; individuals struggling to make ends meet may resort to illegal activities to support themselves and their families. This explains why people in dire need often turn to theft or other crimes for survival.

In conclusion, while inherent personal traits can contribute to criminal behavior, social problems and poverty play a more significant role in driving people towards crime. Addressing these underlying issues is crucial for reducing crime rates.

Sample 8:

Crime is a complex issue that elicits varied perspectives regarding its origins. While some argue that crime is primarily a consequence of social problems and poverty, others contend that it stems from an individual’s inherent nature. I contend that the interplay between societal factors and individual predispositions contributes significantly to criminal behavior.

I concur with the notion that crime often finds its roots in social problems and poverty, where the impact of socioeconomic conditions significantly steers an individual’s choices. For example, in underprivileged areas, the absence of adequate educational facilities, job prospects, and robust social support structures may force individuals into a corner, compelling them to turn to illicit means for survival. Moreover, when societal disparities are rife and systemic issues remain unaddressed, it can exacerbate the situation, causing individuals to resort to criminal activities as a perceived solution to their economic struggles or as a means to voice their grievances about prevalent social injustices.

However, I am also of the opinion that the origins of crime are not solely tethered to external factors; rather, an individual’s innate disposition can also play a crucial role. Some individuals might exhibit inherent psychological disorders that predispose them to engage in unlawful activities, regardless of their social background. Furthermore, the absence of strong moral values or ethical guidance in an individual’s upbringing can be a contributing factor, irrespective of their socioeconomic circumstances. Instances abound where individuals from affluent backgrounds have succumbed to criminal behavior due to the lack of a strong moral compass in their formative years, indicating that individual nature can play a pivotal role in shaping criminal inclinations.

In conclusion, I believe crime’s origin is not solely attributed to either social problems or an individual’s nature; rather, it is a complex interplay between societal factors and personal inclinations.

Sample 9:

There are divergent opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. Some people argue that external factors such as poverty or other social issues are to blame for most crimes, while others contend that people who engage in criminal activity are intrinsically bad in nature. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and provide my own opinion.

On the one hand, those who believe that social problems are the primary cause of criminal behavior argue that people are driven to commit crimes due to their difficult and disadvantaged circumstances. For example, individuals facing extreme poverty or unemployment may resort to stealing or other illicit activities as a means of survival. Proponents of this view also point out that issues such as substance abuse or mental illness can exacerbate criminal tendencies, emphasizing the importance of addressing underlying social difficulties to reduce crime rates.

On the other hand, there is a counterargument that criminal behavior arises from individual traits such as impulsivity, selfishness, or a lack of empathy. This perspective suggests that some people have a natural tendency to engage in harmful behavior, regardless of environmental factors. In support of this view, critics of the social circumstance theory point out that there are people who grow up in difficult circumstances but do not resort to crime, indicating that innate character traits play a significant role.

In my view, it is likely that both factors play a role in criminal behavior. While social issues can be a significant driver of crime, it is also true that some individuals may be more inclined to engage in criminal activity due to inherent character flaws. Therefore, addressing both the root causes of social problems and providing intervention programs that focus on individual development could be effective in reducing crime rates.

In conclusion, there are varying opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. While some argue that criminal activity is solely attributable to social problems, others believe that individual traits play a more significant role. In my opinion, it is essential to consider both perspectives and work towards comprehensive solutions to reduce the prevalence of crime in our society.

Sample 10:

Crime is a complex issue with multiple contributing factors. While some argue that most crimes result from circumstances like poverty and social problems, I believe they are caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature.

On one hand, there are several factors that lead people to believe that most crimes stem from circumstances. Firstly, individuals who grow up in deprived environments often lack access to basic needs such as education, healthcare, and stable employment, leading them to potentially turn to crime as a means of survival or escape from their circumstances. For example, high crime rates in low-income neighborhoods can be attributed to individuals struggling to meet basic needs such as food, housing, and healthcare, and with limited access to education and job opportunities, they may resort to criminal activities like theft or drug dealing to make ends meet. Secondly, exposure to violence and crime from a young age can normalize these behaviors. For instance, children from households with domestic violence may become desensitized to violent behavior and replicate it in their own relationships.

On the other hand, I do believe that crime is caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature. Firstly, those who commit crimes may have a predisposition to violence and deviant behavior, regardless of their upbringing or environment. Ted Bundy, for instance, despite his stable upbringing and education, committed numerous murders. His actions suggest an inherent predisposition to violence and deviance, highlighting the role of personal moral character in criminal behavior. Secondly, some research indicates that genetic and environmental factors can increase the likelihood of engaging in criminal activities. For instance, a longitudinal study conducted by the National Institute of Justice followed a group of individuals from childhood into adulthood and found that those with a family history of criminal behavior were more likely to engage in similar activities.

In conclusion, while circumstances like poverty and social problems contribute to crime, I believe that personal moral character and inherent predispositions play a more significant role in criminal behavior.

Sample 11:

Crime is a prevalent issue in modern society and understanding its root causes is important for its effective prevention and control. Some people argue that most crimes are the result of circumstances such as poverty or other social problems. Others believe that criminal behaviour stems from individuals who are bad in nature. In my opinion, most crimes are the consequence of socioeconomic circumstances.

Individuals who believe that crime is the result of inheriting bad nature think that even though people who live in affluent societies with minimal social problems, are subjected to face crimes. They believe that personal choices and moral failings are significant contributors to criminal behaviour. For example, studies have indicated that people who possess personality traits such as impulsivity and aggressiveness are more likely to engage in criminal activities.

On the other hand, proponents of the view that crime is a result of poverty and social issues argue that individuals coming from poor backgrounds are forced to commit crimes because of necessity. When a person’s basic needs such as food, shelter and security are unmet, they may resort to illegal activities as a means of survival. For instance, incidents like theft and burglary are more common in economically deprived societies where everyone is striving to make ends meet. Furthermore, social problems such as lack of education, unemployment and substance abuse exacerbate the situation. Without access to quality education, many individuals cannot secure well-paying jobs, leading them to seek alternative, often illegal, means of income.

In my opinion, poverty and social problems create an environment where crime can flourish. When individuals are deprived of opportunities and resources, the temptation to break the law becomes stronger. Additionally, the social environment, including peer influence and community norms, plays a crucial role in shaping behaviour.

In conclusion, addressing these root causes through social policies aimed at reducing poverty, improving education, and providing employment opportunities is essential for effective crime prevention. By creating a more equitable and supportive society, the incidence of crime can be significantly reduced.

Sample 12:

Throughout history, people tended to believe that crimes were committed by those who were innately bad, but in the modern era a more liberal approach has led to the idea that crimes are often acts of desperation, committed by people whose circumstances are bleak. This essay will explore both perspectives, concluding that the latter is usually true.

First of all, it should be noted that some crimes are committed by people who appear innately driven towards such acts. These people may have some sort of hereditary psychological condition that means they do not feel empathy for others, or a predilection towards violence. This is a controversial perspective and although it feels true for many, it is hard to prove. Many of the most violent criminals have traumatic backgrounds, such as child abuse, neglect, or sexual assault, which suggests that they were not born with their criminal compunctions, but rather that these developed very early, which thus places them more into the circumstances than nature category. However, the lines are blurry.

Certainly, it does seem as though most criminals are created out of difficult circumstances. To understand this, one just has to look at impoverished communities around the world. These are places where crime flourishes because the people there are desperate and forced to do immoral things in order to survive. In such states of despair, people tend to put themselves first and overlook social norms, laws, and the usual empathic perspective that would stop most people from hurting others. In such areas, people tend to be conditioned for a young age to ignore the law or even social decency, joining gangs and becoming influenced by dangerous people. This tends to be a problem due to a lack of resources, opportunities, and education in such areas.

In conclusion, it appears likely that most crime is the result of people’s unfortunate circumstances, meaning that criminals are not inherently bad. However, there may be some people who were born with a certain compunction towards violent or criminal activity.

Câu 2

Some people think success in life comes from hard work and determination. Others think money and appearance are more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

There are numerous reasons to support the fact that hard work and determination are two key factors for success in life. However, as an alternative argument financial condition and looks of the person may also be the primary criteria for success.

Some people believe that financial status and appearance are important for success. They advocate that the looks of a person determine his confidence, which is a vital factor in success. No one can complete any task without considering himself capable of that. Hence, the confidence of the person plays a very key role. Furthermore, money is another important factor as it provides the support to lead the career of your choice. Without financial security, it makes the way to success much more challenging. In a way, money saves the energy and time of a person. It creates numerous opportunities to progress in a rapid way in the career of their desire. Based on this view, the utmost need for success is financial stability and appearance.

On the other side, people have certain justifications to agree with the view that ambition along with hard work is the key to success. People believe that the way to success has no shortcuts, and the primary criteria is to acquire knowledge and practical experiences through hard work. We can have monetary support from someone. However, no one can help us in developing our skills which needs the efforts of my own only. The second most important thing to reach our ultimate goal is our determination. It is because no dream can be fulfilled without ambition and persistence. Hence, one should be hardworking and have the strong willpower to attain the goal of his life.

To sum up, although appearance and financial position have a great impact on achievement, hard work and determination are the most dominant factors in the way of success.

Sample 2:

It is true that there are numerous ways for people to succeed in life. While some people believe that wealth and physical attractiveness are two aspects that influence a person's success. I would contend that people can achieve the pinnacle of their careers when they work hard and are determined.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why having money and being physically attractive help people succeed in life. The first explanation is that having money helps people fulfil their deepest goals, such as those for strength and size. Extremely wealthy individuals, for instance, have endless opportunities to advance quickly in their careers and achieve the recognition they desire in their communities. Furthermore, one of the key elements affecting success is one's appearance. For instance, individuals would have a greater probability of landing a job if they display a confident body posture or wear attire. In addition to having excellent abilities and experiences.

On the other hand, it is evident that perseverance and hard effort are essential qualities that are crucial to ensuring success in the industry. First of all, putting in a lot of effort enables people to get some worthwhile life experiences. To demonstrate my thesis, let's use the example of a young student who practises their assignments often. By doing so, they reduce the likelihood that they will make the same mistakes again and are more likely to perform well on formal exams. Second, determination inspires us to develop goals that serve as the cornerstone of success. This makes it a necessary talent to help people solve complicated challenges in all circumstances. Further keep pushing forward in order to accomplish long-term objectives.

In conclusion, I feel that hard work and determination are the main factors to acquire the maximum performance. Even though money and attractiveness have an impact on achievement.

Sample 3:

Being successful is a dream of every human being. Working hard and dedication is considered to be pivotal to gain success for many people, whereas others have a different viewpoint and believe that money and attractive personality leads to progress in life. This essay will highlight both opinions and also elaborate on why working hard and determination are far more considerable than cash and physical appearance. To begin with, for some people certain goals and ambitions entail success. Since when someone is working hard, he/she would be able to succeed in that particular task eventually. As a result, people gain prosperity and rewards which pave the way to earn revenues. Likewise, in order to be a successful person, goal-oriented behaviour is required. For instance, while preparing for my RN exam, I had to burn midnight candles. Consequently, now I am working as an RN in a renowned hospital, where I am earning a handsome amount of salary and have succeeded in achieving my ambition. Thus, for a high-status in life, one should adopt the way of working hard rather than finding shortcuts for success.

Conversely, according to other groups of people, with money and great personality people could be famous in no time as everyone gets attracted towards the glamorous lifestyle. Because having the ability to buy anything encourages to gain the attention of other people. That's why with wealth and good health people become popular among their communities. For instance, there are some Bollywood singers who are not talented as compared to others, but by flaunting their wealth in front of the audience they are more recognised even without having any struggle. Overall, to some extent money and physical appearance are the reasons to attain prosperity.

To conclude, to boost progress is quite challenging. Even though money is the necessity of life which is required to achieve success, hard work and dedication are enormously countable to achieve success in one's life.

Câu 3