Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that having these people to give a talk to teenagers is the best way to tell them about the dangers of committing a crime. Do you agree or disagree?

Sample 1:

Crime education is of paramount importance in any country, but the way it can be conducted is often a subject of debate in society. While I agree that asking those who are released from prison to have a talk to school students is a good education method, I also believe that there are better alternatives to the problem, as will now be discussed.

On the one hand, I agree that students may be aware of the consequences of engaging in criminal activities when attending a talk given by ex-prisoners. Their life stories are often vivid and persuasive, and this can attract the attention of school students easily. These ex-criminals are real examples that people have to pay for their unlawful activities, which can raise awareness about law-abiding citizens among young people. The success of a series of educational programs on Vietnamese Television channels about the price that offenders have to pay proves that the narrative forms of crime education can work. It is hoped that a speech of used-to-be wrongdoers is promoted at all school levels in future.

However, I believe that a combination of different education methods would produce a more desirable result compared to a former prisoner holding a talk. Primarily, parents should act as pioneers to educate children at an early age about social evils and how to avoid them. It has long been acknowledged that the home environment has a profound effect on the development of a child, and a significant percentage of juvenile crime stems from insufficient education criminals receive in their childhood. Teachers at schools also play an important role in raising the awareness of students about crime. Moral lessons ought not to be neglected in the classroom, and a positive education environment should be promoted, contributing to crime prevention.

In conclusion, it is my opinion that a talk given by ex-offenders, albeit effective, is not the best education method for crime education.

Sample 2:

It is true that we should hate crimes, not the criminals as they are also the human being. Evidence shows that good individuals are forced to commit a crime and are convicted, and many ex-prisoners become normal members of our society. Since they have suffered from isolation and punishment, they can share their experience with teenagers and encourage them to abide by the laws and rules.

To begin with, rehabilitated offenders have experience about the prison life and the types of wrongdoing people get involved in. They can share those experience with the teenagers and young people are more likely to accept advice from someone who speaks from real life experience. This can be a great arrangement to let adolescents know how someone gets involved in a crime and how they suffer for this. It would discourage them from committing crimes and become good citizens. I presume those teenagers will have many questions and the ex-prisoners are the best persons to answer those, and this will have a powerful impact on the fresh minds.

Moreover, people who have been punished by the law would benefit from this arrangement as well. They would feel better by sharing their stories and this is a great way to stay away from crimes for these people. They would also feel connected to the society and would be glad for doing something good. Alternative ways of educating young people about the menaces of committing a crime are letting teachers educate students. However, in my opinion, this is not that efficient as students would treat those as class lectures, not real-life interesting stories to listen to carefully. Educating students through stories and films can also be effective but they are not as much interactive as sessions with ex-prisoners.

To conclude, we should educate our young generation about the consequences of committing crimes, and I believe they would learn this better from reformed prisoners who speak from their experience.

Sample 3:

It is true that several people have changed themselves to be a better person after they had been released from prison. And it is believed that they are better at giving advice to young people about the negative effect of crime. I personally agree with the statement and the following essay will discuss in detail about it.

To begin with, it is a fact that the public usually has negative images of ex-prisoners, but not all of them have a bad personality. As some prisons provide technical skills and personal development programs to their prisoners, many of them have successfully followed these positive programs. These courses have changed their character and provided them with adequate skill, therefore, they were accepted back in the society. Many of them have learned their lessons during imprisonment, as they worked harder and became more successful than the regular people. Apart from psychopath criminals, an ordinary person, who has committed crimes and has been sentenced to be imprisoned often understands the value of life and thus changes radically.

But in many countries, the crime rate among young people has been increasing significantly in the past few years. I believe that the best way to reduce the rate is by having some campaigns and testimonials from former prisoners who have changed their life. With their shares, it is hoped that it will open and broaden the view of young people about the dangerous side of crime. They would also become an effective mentor because they understand the condition of these teenagers, as they had experienced the same situation before. With their guidance, it is hoped that many teenagers will improve their life and become a better person.

In conclusion, I totally agree that some former prisoners who had changed their life would be a good advisor for the young generation. Their unpleasant experience would be a valuable lesson for the young people and hope that the teenagers would avoid crime activities in the future.

Sample 4:

There is no doubt that crime rates have dramatically increased over the last few years. Some criminals managed to become good human beings during their stay in prisons. One of the reasons is that they have practically seen the problems and sacrifice they had to make. Some people argue that these are the best examples of creating awareness about crimes in teenagers. However, others state that a person with a criminal background will not leave indispensable impressions on people’s minds.

Firstly, it is the duty of government and the people to identify the aspects of crimes in teenagers. After that, there should be workshops and seminars which should highlight the consequences of committing crimes. It is also the responsibility of parents and guardians to keep an eye on their children’s activities. While making little efforts, one can save many criminal activities in their surroundings.

Secondly, people who were part of immoral doings and became good citizens after prison could help teenagers in eradicating this sort of sins. They have personally experienced all the suffering they had to go through after compelling crime. They know the possible reason, why and how youngsters get involved in such cruel doings. Their worlds would leave undeniable impressions on people’s minds and will help to eliminate crime from the society.

Finally, I strongly believe that once a criminal is not always a criminal. If one has regret about his past and has changed himself should be treated like a normal human being. Furthermore, they could help teenagers from remaining away from crimes while telling them about their sacrifice of time, health and family.

Sample 5:

In recent years, imprisonment is assumed as the finest method of punishment to offenders of law because after running the punishment time, the majority of people tend to be good members of the society. This condition derives plenty of people think that the prisoners are convenient speakers to talk to adolescents about the precarious of breaking the laws. I personally agree with that statements and I have some reasons to support it which will be explained briefly in the following paragraph.

First and foremost, detention given to the criminals is usually followed by training and education that will be utilised in their future life. For instance, they are taught about religion and how to survive their life in the right way such as lessons for becoming a tailor or a painter. Those lessons make them likely to be better inhabitants and might be easier to be accepted in their circumstances after completing their penalty.

Furthermore, due to the experiences obtained as long as running punishment, they seem to become suitable speakers to tell the teens about the difficulties that might be faced when living in a prison. To illustrate, they can share how regretful they are after committing a bad action and how they felt and repented because they cannot meet their family and cannot act freely like others. This story will certainly be remembered by the adolescents since they hear about those bad impacts directly from the prisoners so they will think twice if they want to disobey the applied rule.

In a nutshell, it can be concluded that majority of people become better citizens after obtaining lessons at the jail and because of the experiences acquired in the jail, they are likely to be suitable people to tell the teenagers about drawbacks which occur owing to be a criminal.

Sample 6:

It is true that imprisonment helps the offenders to develop an acceptable character in the society and family. Even though ex-offenders can teach about the consequences of crime very clearly, I am of the opinion that they are not role models for teenagers due to various reasons.

To start with, teenagers should not learn the effects of illegal activities from the ex-lawbreakers as this way of learning may cause to generate a tendency for imitating such activities in children’s minds, especially who have a lack of maturity and curiosity. Moreover, since ex-offenders have the past history of crime, they are not ideal individuals to teach the younger generation effectively. Social stigma is another factor, which means that social leaders often try to keep away the ex-prisoners from the mainstream of society owing to social status issues. Consequently, they are reinforced to engage in criminal activities repeatedly and they would also be terribly isolated.

Again, each society has their own prestigious law enforcement system to promote legal awareness in children, which is more effective teaching than learning from the ex-offenders. As such, ex-prisoners are not required to guide teenagers in spite of jail life experience for a certain period of time. An ideal example would be the organisation of awareness programmes of the police department in school settings in India.

In contrast, there is another line of thought that ex-prisoners are the ideal teachers to make awareness among children regarding the detrimental effects of criminal offences because they have real life exposure in such tough situations. Apart from this, these bitter lessons about punishments can create a strong influence in children, which in turn can generate an innate fear in them to involve any criminal activity. Eventually, children would deter lawbreaking activities, and they would become productive citizens in future. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that the ex-prisoners have a clear criminal background and an inner desire to perform such activities again.

To conclude, despite certain advantages, ex-offenders cannot be effective mentors in teaching ill effects of offences due to many challenges.

Sample 7:

There is an age-old argument that states some people who have spent time in prison become good citizens later. Even though some may disagree with this, I firmly believe it to be true. Records show that sane people who committed crimes in the past were probably coerced by their situation or acted in self-defense. In such cases, the person is not immoral for the most part and retains their values and virtues. Therefore, they can be considered good citizens and integrated into society post their term.

In other cases, some deliberate offenders, who undergo rehabilitation while serving their sentences, experience a shift in their attitude and mindset. The isolation from their families, friends, and society allows them to introspect their misdeeds. Furthermore, their interactions with other inmates give them a fresh perspective of life that helps them metamorphose into good citizens.

Interestingly, this argument gives rise to a new topic of concern, i.e., whether these ex-offenders should be accepted back into society. It is no secret that integration into normal life can be an uphill struggle due to prejudices and discrimination. As a community, we must separate the crime from the criminal because, in the end, they are humans. Although it may sound cliche, everyone is entitled to a prospect of redeeming themselves. When such opportunities are presented to those who have been in prison, it allows them to work towards becoming a good citizen.

Few prisons host different programs that equip the inmates with technical skills. Alongside that, they also have personality development classes. All these efforts taken by the prison prepare an offender to go back into their lives. Where they can fend for themselves and contribute towards their community and country. After all, being a good citizen is not just confined to following the rules. Individuals should also be able to serve society.

Change is a time-consuming and tricky process, especially for offenders. Nevertheless, it is not unattainable, especially when paired with appropriate efforts, empathy, and the right attitude. In conclusion, I would like to assert that some people who have been to prison can become good citizens later.

Sample 8:

It is often believed that imprisonment can bring about changes in a convict, i.e., a person who has served time in prison can become a good citizen later. Although the premise is riveting, the idea is debatable.

Let us first understand the argument's background. A person who has been sent to prison is associated with a felony. Therefore, he or she has violated laws or morals, inflicted harm and suffering to fellow members of society. In most cases, their crimes were premeditated, where they knew their actions would result in loss, trauma, and damage. The question is, a man who has carried out planned crimes, is he capable of change? He who is accused of heinous crimes is doubtful to change and become a good citizen in the future.

However, there are two sides to this coin. Many a time, it can be that the offender is not a deliberate criminal. Their situations compel them to choose the wrong path. For example, an educated but unemployed man may turn towards robbery in an attempt to provide for his family. In such cases, he is not a conscious criminal but forced by circumstances to act like one. Through proper rehabilitation and opportunities, he can be elevated out of it. Such convicts can become good citizens later and get back to normal life even after serving a prison sentence.

Now comes the other side of the coin. Here we see those criminals who have meticulously designed the crime and accomplished it. Evidence shows that some of these criminals have no regrets for their misdeeds. Crime was the way of life for them until before imprisonment. Hence, these people have little to no chances of changing into good citizens later. Integrating them back into society with the hope of transformation can be preposterous and have dire consequences for everyone around.

From the above premises, it can be inferred that only a few of those who have been to prison can become good citizens later. The argument can only turn into reality if the convict realizes their mistakes and works towards self-improvement.

Sample 9:

Before getting into the depths of the age-old argument that some people who have been to prison become good citizens later. First, it is important to understand the attributes a good citizen should possess. Well, there are divided opinions, but some traits that everyone must have to be a good citizen stay unwavering. A good citizen should be law-abiding, respectful towards the country, its institutions, and fellow countrymen. Additionally, he pledges to care for society and contribute to its well-being and growth.

Offenders are usually not considered to be good citizens because they fail to respect and follow the law. Moreover, their actions give rise to violence, trauma, loss, and misery for other people. As an appropriate punishment for their misdeeds, imprisonment becomes inevitable. How many believe that during this period of incarceration, several convicts experience a positive change in their attitude and perspective. During the days spent in isolation, away from their friends and families, inmates contemplate their actions together with acknowledging their mistakes. Such introspection transforms them, and so, people who undergo this process often become good citizens later in life.

There is a section of convicts, who are not wilful criminals, but their situations coerced them to commit crimes. A said crime could have resulted from an act of self-defense. Here, the guilty are already repenting of his actions and would redeem himself. These people do not abandon their values and were good citizens before a fateful incident. Hence, through careful and empathetic rehabilitation, they can be brought back to normal life and into society.

Anyway, there exist deliberate criminals who despite being aware of the consequences have planned and carried out multiple crimes. They often have no remorse for their misdeeds. There is no prospect of their transformation. Hence it would be illogical to believe that they can become good citizens later.

In the end, the idea that some people who have been in prison can become good citizens later is bewitching. Although it can only be true for those who wish to change in a true sense.

Sample 10:

It is true that ex-prisoners can become normal, productive members of society. I completely agree with the idea that allowing such people to speak to teenagers about their experiences is the best way to discourage them from breaking the law.

In my opinion, teenagers are more likely to accept advice from someone who can speak from experience. Reformed offenders can tell young people about how they became involved in crime, the dangers of a criminal lifestyle, and what life in prison is really like. They can also dispel any ideas that teenagers may have about criminals leading glamorous lives. While adolescents are often indifferent to the guidance given by older people, I imagine that most of them would be extremely keen to hear the stories of an ex-offender. The vivid and perhaps shocking nature of these stories is likely to have a powerful impact.

The alternatives to using reformed criminals to educate teenagers about crime would be much less effective. One option would be for police officers to visit schools and talk to young people. This could be useful in terms of informing teens about what happens to lawbreakers when they are caught, but young people are often reluctant to take advice from figures of authority. A second option would be for schoolteachers to speak to their students about crime, but I doubt that students would see teachers as credible sources of information about this topic. Finally, educational films might be informative, but there would be no opportunity for young people to interact and ask questions.

In conclusion, I fully support the view that people who have turned their lives around after serving a prison sentence could help to deter teenagers from committing crimes.

Sample 11:

It is the case that, recently, educating young generations about the repercussions of committing an offence has become a subject of concern in the modern world. From my own perspective, although there are several reasons why ex-prisoners are able to make teenagers aware of this severe issue, there are more reasonable grounds that various better alternatives still need applying.

On the one hand, the idea of accepting advice from those who were previously incarcerated is justified to some extent. One explanation is that ex-criminals are real examples because they had to pay for their unlawful activities by undergoing the process of imprisonment and rehabilitation. Young people, in fact, are likely to get a close insight into the difficult life in prison, which is told vividly and persuasively, hence, these stories have the capability of drawing students' attention as well as raising their awareness to be law-abiding citizens. In addition, it is an effective way for these lawbreakers to reform. Sharing experience with other people establishes the connection to society, which enables those who were penalized by law to believe in a meaningful life and deter them from reoffending as well as being good members of the community.

On the other hand, there are other useful methods that should be followed to teach the young about the consequences of engaging in criminal activities. First of all, the parental role is important in educating about social evils to children at an early age. It is believed that the home environment has a profound influence on the development of a child, in reality, an enormous proportion of juvenile delinquents stem from insufficient education from their childhood. Besides, it is essential for schools to make a contribution to preparing the young with criminal prevention knowledge. After the moral classes in the educational program, students stand chances to discuss together and draw their own lesson.

In conclusion, while listening to ex-offenders' stories is effective in a few aspects, there are better ways for crime education.

Sample 12:

Educating school students on the consequences of carrying out a crime has long been a contentious issue. There is a common belief that talks by ex-prisoners should be held at school to inform students of the threat to society when a crime is committed. While this practice is beneficial in a few ways, there are many better methods to educate students about the dangers of crimes.

There are certain benefits of having reformed criminals talking to students about the hazards that are associated with crime. The most obvious benefit is that students may learn from those who truly understand crime. Those who committed a crime have likely gathered knowledge about the dangers of crime for the victims, not only from their own offenses but also from communication with other criminals. In addition, this method may also educate students about the threat to the offenders themselves when they commit a crime. To explain, ex-prisoners are those who have undergone a long process of imprisonment and rehabilitation, so their life-stories are often a great source of real-life experience of not only what prisoners are deprived of but also how remorseful they feel.

However, there are better solutions to teach students about the negative effects of partaking in criminal activity. The most viable measure may be to introduce criminology as a subject at school. While the life-stories of ex-prisoners are often biased, criminology knowledge is based on empirical data and research and as such, tends to be more reliable than anecdotal evidence. With this method, students can learn all the necessary knowledge about crime, including the dangers of it, through the lens of science and therefore have a holistic view on crime and the associated dangers. Another useful measure could be to film the harsh daily lives of prisoners and show it to school students. Notwithstanding the benefits of giving talks, films with vivid imagery can be much more visually attractive and thus more effective in informing students of the harsh reality of life in incarceration.

In conclusion, talks by ex-prisoners may keep students informed of the dangers of carrying out a crime. The government, however, should adopt stronger measures such as introducing criminology as a school subject and showing students documentaries about the lives of prisoners.

Sample 13:

We indeed need to hate offences, not criminals since they are also individual beings. Evidence proves that great people are forced to commit a crime and are convicted, and many ex-prisoners become ordinary members of society.

First, rehabilitated offenders have experience about prison life, and the kinds of wrongdoing people get involved. They could share those experiences with teenagers, and young people are more likely to accept guidance from somebody who speaks from real-life experience. This can be a fantastic arrangement to allow the adolescents to understand how someone gets involved with a crime and how they suffer for this. It would discourage them from committing crimes and become good citizens. I presume those teenagers will have many questions, and also the ex-prisoners would be the best men to answer people, which will have a powerful impact on the fresh minds.

Additionally, people who were penalized by the law would benefit from this arrangement too. They would feel better by sharing their stories, and this is a fantastic way to keep away from offences for these folks. They would also feel connected to society and are glad for doing something great. Alternative ways of educating young people about the menaces of committing a crime are letting teachers educate students. However, in my view, this isn’t that efficient as students would take care of those as class lectures, not real-life intriguing stories to hear carefully. Educating students through stories and movies can also be powerful, but they are not as interactive as ex-prisoners.

To conclude, we must instruct our young generation about the consequences of committing crimes and that I believe they would learn this better from reformed offenders who speak from their experience.

Sample 14:

It is correct that several people have changed themselves to become a much better person after being released from prison. And it is believed that they are better in advising young people about the negative effect of crime. I agree with the announcement, and the subsequent essay will talk in detail about it.

First, it is a fact that the public typically has negative graphics to ex-prisoners, but not all of them have a terrible personality. As some prisons offer technical skills training and personal development programs for their prisoners, many of them have followed these positive programs. These classes have changed their personality and supplied them with adequate ability; therefore, they have been approved back in society. A number of them have learned their lessons during imprisonment, as they worked harder and became much more effective than the typical people. Apart from psychopath offenders, an ordinary person who has committed offences and has been sentenced to be imprisoned frequently understands life’s value and changes radically.

The best way to reduce the speed is by having some campaigns and testimonials from former prisoners who have changed their lives. With their stocks, it is hoped it will open and broaden the young folks’ view about the dangerous side of crime. They would also become an effective mentor because they know those teenagers’ status, as they had experienced the same situation before. Lots of teens will enhance their life and become a better individual with their guidance.

In summary, I agree that some former offenders who had changed their life could be a good advisor for the young generation. Their unpleasant experience would be an essential lesson to the young folks and expect that the teenagers would prevent criminal activities later on.