Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that having these people to give a talk to teenagers is the best way to tell them about the dangers of committing a crime. Do you agree or disagree?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
Crime education is of paramount importance in any country, but the way it can be conducted is often a subject of debate in society. While I agree that asking those who are released from prison to have a talk to school students is a good education method, I also believe that there are better alternatives to the problem, as will now be discussed.
On the one hand, I agree that students may be aware of the consequences of engaging in criminal activities when attending a talk given by ex-prisoners. Their life stories are often vivid and persuasive, and this can attract the attention of school students easily. These ex-criminals are real examples that people have to pay for their unlawful activities, which can raise awareness about law-abiding citizens among young people. The success of a series of educational programs on Vietnamese Television channels about the price that offenders have to pay proves that the narrative forms of crime education can work. It is hoped that a speech of used-to-be wrongdoers is promoted at all school levels in future.
However, I believe that a combination of different education methods would produce a more desirable result compared to a former prisoner holding a talk. Primarily, parents should act as pioneers to educate children at an early age about social evils and how to avoid them. It has long been acknowledged that the home environment has a profound effect on the development of a child, and a significant percentage of juvenile crime stems from insufficient education criminals receive in their childhood. Teachers at schools also play an important role in raising the awareness of students about crime. Moral lessons ought not to be neglected in the classroom, and a positive education environment should be promoted, contributing to crime prevention.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that a talk given by ex-offenders, albeit effective, is not the best education method for crime education.
Sample 2:
It is true that we should hate crimes, not the criminals as they are also the human being. Evidence shows that good individuals are forced to commit a crime and are convicted, and many ex-prisoners become normal members of our society. Since they have suffered from isolation and punishment, they can share their experience with teenagers and encourage them to abide by the laws and rules.
To begin with, rehabilitated offenders have experience about the prison life and the types of wrongdoing people get involved in. They can share those experience with the teenagers and young people are more likely to accept advice from someone who speaks from real life experience. This can be a great arrangement to let adolescents know how someone gets involved in a crime and how they suffer for this. It would discourage them from committing crimes and become good citizens. I presume those teenagers will have many questions and the ex-prisoners are the best persons to answer those, and this will have a powerful impact on the fresh minds.
Moreover, people who have been punished by the law would benefit from this arrangement as well. They would feel better by sharing their stories and this is a great way to stay away from crimes for these people. They would also feel connected to the society and would be glad for doing something good. Alternative ways of educating young people about the menaces of committing a crime are letting teachers educate students. However, in my opinion, this is not that efficient as students would treat those as class lectures, not real-life interesting stories to listen to carefully. Educating students through stories and films can also be effective but they are not as much interactive as sessions with ex-prisoners.
To conclude, we should educate our young generation about the consequences of committing crimes, and I believe they would learn this better from reformed prisoners who speak from their experience.
Sample 3:
It is true that several people have changed themselves to be a better person after they had been released from prison. And it is believed that they are better at giving advice to young people about the negative effect of crime. I personally agree with the statement and the following essay will discuss in detail about it.
To begin with, it is a fact that the public usually has negative images of ex-prisoners, but not all of them have a bad personality. As some prisons provide technical skills and personal development programs to their prisoners, many of them have successfully followed these positive programs. These courses have changed their character and provided them with adequate skill, therefore, they were accepted back in the society. Many of them have learned their lessons during imprisonment, as they worked harder and became more successful than the regular people. Apart from psychopath criminals, an ordinary person, who has committed crimes and has been sentenced to be imprisoned often understands the value of life and thus changes radically.
But in many countries, the crime rate among young people has been increasing significantly in the past few years. I believe that the best way to reduce the rate is by having some campaigns and testimonials from former prisoners who have changed their life. With their shares, it is hoped that it will open and broaden the view of young people about the dangerous side of crime. They would also become an effective mentor because they understand the condition of these teenagers, as they had experienced the same situation before. With their guidance, it is hoped that many teenagers will improve their life and become a better person.
In conclusion, I totally agree that some former prisoners who had changed their life would be a good advisor for the young generation. Their unpleasant experience would be a valuable lesson for the young people and hope that the teenagers would avoid crime activities in the future.
Sample 4:
There is no doubt that crime rates have dramatically increased over the last few years. Some criminals managed to become good human beings during their stay in prisons. One of the reasons is that they have practically seen the problems and sacrifice they had to make. Some people argue that these are the best examples of creating awareness about crimes in teenagers. However, others state that a person with a criminal background will not leave indispensable impressions on people’s minds.
Firstly, it is the duty of government and the people to identify the aspects of crimes in teenagers. After that, there should be workshops and seminars which should highlight the consequences of committing crimes. It is also the responsibility of parents and guardians to keep an eye on their children’s activities. While making little efforts, one can save many criminal activities in their surroundings.
Secondly, people who were part of immoral doings and became good citizens after prison could help teenagers in eradicating this sort of sins. They have personally experienced all the suffering they had to go through after compelling crime. They know the possible reason, why and how youngsters get involved in such cruel doings. Their worlds would leave undeniable impressions on people’s minds and will help to eliminate crime from the society.
Finally, I strongly believe that once a criminal is not always a criminal. If one has regret about his past and has changed himself should be treated like a normal human being. Furthermore, they could help teenagers from remaining away from crimes while telling them about their sacrifice of time, health and family.
Sample 5:
In recent years, imprisonment is assumed as the finest method of punishment to offenders of law because after running the punishment time, the majority of people tend to be good members of the society. This condition derives plenty of people think that the prisoners are convenient speakers to talk to adolescents about the precarious of breaking the laws. I personally agree with that statements and I have some reasons to support it which will be explained briefly in the following paragraph.
First and foremost, detention given to the criminals is usually followed by training and education that will be utilised in their future life. For instance, they are taught about religion and how to survive their life in the right way such as lessons for becoming a tailor or a painter. Those lessons make them likely to be better inhabitants and might be easier to be accepted in their circumstances after completing their penalty.
Furthermore, due to the experiences obtained as long as running punishment, they seem to become suitable speakers to tell the teens about the difficulties that might be faced when living in a prison. To illustrate, they can share how regretful they are after committing a bad action and how they felt and repented because they cannot meet their family and cannot act freely like others. This story will certainly be remembered by the adolescents since they hear about those bad impacts directly from the prisoners so they will think twice if they want to disobey the applied rule.
In a nutshell, it can be concluded that majority of people become better citizens after obtaining lessons at the jail and because of the experiences acquired in the jail, they are likely to be suitable people to tell the teenagers about drawbacks which occur owing to be a criminal.
Sample 6:
It is true that imprisonment helps the offenders to develop an acceptable character in the society and family. Even though ex-offenders can teach about the consequences of crime very clearly, I am of the opinion that they are not role models for teenagers due to various reasons.
To start with, teenagers should not learn the effects of illegal activities from the ex-lawbreakers as this way of learning may cause to generate a tendency for imitating such activities in children’s minds, especially who have a lack of maturity and curiosity. Moreover, since ex-offenders have the past history of crime, they are not ideal individuals to teach the younger generation effectively. Social stigma is another factor, which means that social leaders often try to keep away the ex-prisoners from the mainstream of society owing to social status issues. Consequently, they are reinforced to engage in criminal activities repeatedly and they would also be terribly isolated.
Again, each society has their own prestigious law enforcement system to promote legal awareness in children, which is more effective teaching than learning from the ex-offenders. As such, ex-prisoners are not required to guide teenagers in spite of jail life experience for a certain period of time. An ideal example would be the organisation of awareness programmes of the police department in school settings in India.
In contrast, there is another line of thought that ex-prisoners are the ideal teachers to make awareness among children regarding the detrimental effects of criminal offences because they have real life exposure in such tough situations. Apart from this, these bitter lessons about punishments can create a strong influence in children, which in turn can generate an innate fear in them to involve any criminal activity. Eventually, children would deter lawbreaking activities, and they would become productive citizens in future. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that the ex-prisoners have a clear criminal background and an inner desire to perform such activities again.
To conclude, despite certain advantages, ex-offenders cannot be effective mentors in teaching ill effects of offences due to many challenges.
Sample 7:
There is an age-old argument that states some people who have spent time in prison become good citizens later. Even though some may disagree with this, I firmly believe it to be true. Records show that sane people who committed crimes in the past were probably coerced by their situation or acted in self-defense. In such cases, the person is not immoral for the most part and retains their values and virtues. Therefore, they can be considered good citizens and integrated into society post their term.
In other cases, some deliberate offenders, who undergo rehabilitation while serving their sentences, experience a shift in their attitude and mindset. The isolation from their families, friends, and society allows them to introspect their misdeeds. Furthermore, their interactions with other inmates give them a fresh perspective of life that helps them metamorphose into good citizens.
Interestingly, this argument gives rise to a new topic of concern, i.e., whether these ex-offenders should be accepted back into society. It is no secret that integration into normal life can be an uphill struggle due to prejudices and discrimination. As a community, we must separate the crime from the criminal because, in the end, they are humans. Although it may sound cliche, everyone is entitled to a prospect of redeeming themselves. When such opportunities are presented to those who have been in prison, it allows them to work towards becoming a good citizen.
Few prisons host different programs that equip the inmates with technical skills. Alongside that, they also have personality development classes. All these efforts taken by the prison prepare an offender to go back into their lives. Where they can fend for themselves and contribute towards their community and country. After all, being a good citizen is not just confined to following the rules. Individuals should also be able to serve society.
Change is a time-consuming and tricky process, especially for offenders. Nevertheless, it is not unattainable, especially when paired with appropriate efforts, empathy, and the right attitude. In conclusion, I would like to assert that some people who have been to prison can become good citizens later.
Sample 8:
It is often believed that imprisonment can bring about changes in a convict, i.e., a person who has served time in prison can become a good citizen later. Although the premise is riveting, the idea is debatable.
Let us first understand the argument's background. A person who has been sent to prison is associated with a felony. Therefore, he or she has violated laws or morals, inflicted harm and suffering to fellow members of society. In most cases, their crimes were premeditated, where they knew their actions would result in loss, trauma, and damage. The question is, a man who has carried out planned crimes, is he capable of change? He who is accused of heinous crimes is doubtful to change and become a good citizen in the future.
However, there are two sides to this coin. Many a time, it can be that the offender is not a deliberate criminal. Their situations compel them to choose the wrong path. For example, an educated but unemployed man may turn towards robbery in an attempt to provide for his family. In such cases, he is not a conscious criminal but forced by circumstances to act like one. Through proper rehabilitation and opportunities, he can be elevated out of it. Such convicts can become good citizens later and get back to normal life even after serving a prison sentence.
Now comes the other side of the coin. Here we see those criminals who have meticulously designed the crime and accomplished it. Evidence shows that some of these criminals have no regrets for their misdeeds. Crime was the way of life for them until before imprisonment. Hence, these people have little to no chances of changing into good citizens later. Integrating them back into society with the hope of transformation can be preposterous and have dire consequences for everyone around.
From the above premises, it can be inferred that only a few of those who have been to prison can become good citizens later. The argument can only turn into reality if the convict realizes their mistakes and works towards self-improvement.
Sample 9:
Before getting into the depths of the age-old argument that some people who have been to prison become good citizens later. First, it is important to understand the attributes a good citizen should possess. Well, there are divided opinions, but some traits that everyone must have to be a good citizen stay unwavering. A good citizen should be law-abiding, respectful towards the country, its institutions, and fellow countrymen. Additionally, he pledges to care for society and contribute to its well-being and growth.
Offenders are usually not considered to be good citizens because they fail to respect and follow the law. Moreover, their actions give rise to violence, trauma, loss, and misery for other people. As an appropriate punishment for their misdeeds, imprisonment becomes inevitable. How many believe that during this period of incarceration, several convicts experience a positive change in their attitude and perspective. During the days spent in isolation, away from their friends and families, inmates contemplate their actions together with acknowledging their mistakes. Such introspection transforms them, and so, people who undergo this process often become good citizens later in life.
There is a section of convicts, who are not wilful criminals, but their situations coerced them to commit crimes. A said crime could have resulted from an act of self-defense. Here, the guilty are already repenting of his actions and would redeem himself. These people do not abandon their values and were good citizens before a fateful incident. Hence, through careful and empathetic rehabilitation, they can be brought back to normal life and into society.
Anyway, there exist deliberate criminals who despite being aware of the consequences have planned and carried out multiple crimes. They often have no remorse for their misdeeds. There is no prospect of their transformation. Hence it would be illogical to believe that they can become good citizens later.
In the end, the idea that some people who have been in prison can become good citizens later is bewitching. Although it can only be true for those who wish to change in a true sense.
Sample 10:
It is true that ex-prisoners can become normal, productive members of society. I completely agree with the idea that allowing such people to speak to teenagers about their experiences is the best way to discourage them from breaking the law.
In my opinion, teenagers are more likely to accept advice from someone who can speak from experience. Reformed offenders can tell young people about how they became involved in crime, the dangers of a criminal lifestyle, and what life in prison is really like. They can also dispel any ideas that teenagers may have about criminals leading glamorous lives. While adolescents are often indifferent to the guidance given by older people, I imagine that most of them would be extremely keen to hear the stories of an ex-offender. The vivid and perhaps shocking nature of these stories is likely to have a powerful impact.
The alternatives to using reformed criminals to educate teenagers about crime would be much less effective. One option would be for police officers to visit schools and talk to young people. This could be useful in terms of informing teens about what happens to lawbreakers when they are caught, but young people are often reluctant to take advice from figures of authority. A second option would be for schoolteachers to speak to their students about crime, but I doubt that students would see teachers as credible sources of information about this topic. Finally, educational films might be informative, but there would be no opportunity for young people to interact and ask questions.
In conclusion, I fully support the view that people who have turned their lives around after serving a prison sentence could help to deter teenagers from committing crimes.
Sample 11:
It is the case that, recently, educating young generations about the repercussions of committing an offence has become a subject of concern in the modern world. From my own perspective, although there are several reasons why ex-prisoners are able to make teenagers aware of this severe issue, there are more reasonable grounds that various better alternatives still need applying.
On the one hand, the idea of accepting advice from those who were previously incarcerated is justified to some extent. One explanation is that ex-criminals are real examples because they had to pay for their unlawful activities by undergoing the process of imprisonment and rehabilitation. Young people, in fact, are likely to get a close insight into the difficult life in prison, which is told vividly and persuasively, hence, these stories have the capability of drawing students' attention as well as raising their awareness to be law-abiding citizens. In addition, it is an effective way for these lawbreakers to reform. Sharing experience with other people establishes the connection to society, which enables those who were penalized by law to believe in a meaningful life and deter them from reoffending as well as being good members of the community.
On the other hand, there are other useful methods that should be followed to teach the young about the consequences of engaging in criminal activities. First of all, the parental role is important in educating about social evils to children at an early age. It is believed that the home environment has a profound influence on the development of a child, in reality, an enormous proportion of juvenile delinquents stem from insufficient education from their childhood. Besides, it is essential for schools to make a contribution to preparing the young with criminal prevention knowledge. After the moral classes in the educational program, students stand chances to discuss together and draw their own lesson.
In conclusion, while listening to ex-offenders' stories is effective in a few aspects, there are better ways for crime education.
Sample 12:
Educating school students on the consequences of carrying out a crime has long been a contentious issue. There is a common belief that talks by ex-prisoners should be held at school to inform students of the threat to society when a crime is committed. While this practice is beneficial in a few ways, there are many better methods to educate students about the dangers of crimes.
There are certain benefits of having reformed criminals talking to students about the hazards that are associated with crime. The most obvious benefit is that students may learn from those who truly understand crime. Those who committed a crime have likely gathered knowledge about the dangers of crime for the victims, not only from their own offenses but also from communication with other criminals. In addition, this method may also educate students about the threat to the offenders themselves when they commit a crime. To explain, ex-prisoners are those who have undergone a long process of imprisonment and rehabilitation, so their life-stories are often a great source of real-life experience of not only what prisoners are deprived of but also how remorseful they feel.
However, there are better solutions to teach students about the negative effects of partaking in criminal activity. The most viable measure may be to introduce criminology as a subject at school. While the life-stories of ex-prisoners are often biased, criminology knowledge is based on empirical data and research and as such, tends to be more reliable than anecdotal evidence. With this method, students can learn all the necessary knowledge about crime, including the dangers of it, through the lens of science and therefore have a holistic view on crime and the associated dangers. Another useful measure could be to film the harsh daily lives of prisoners and show it to school students. Notwithstanding the benefits of giving talks, films with vivid imagery can be much more visually attractive and thus more effective in informing students of the harsh reality of life in incarceration.
In conclusion, talks by ex-prisoners may keep students informed of the dangers of carrying out a crime. The government, however, should adopt stronger measures such as introducing criminology as a school subject and showing students documentaries about the lives of prisoners.
Sample 13:
We indeed need to hate offences, not criminals since they are also individual beings. Evidence proves that great people are forced to commit a crime and are convicted, and many ex-prisoners become ordinary members of society.
First, rehabilitated offenders have experience about prison life, and the kinds of wrongdoing people get involved. They could share those experiences with teenagers, and young people are more likely to accept guidance from somebody who speaks from real-life experience. This can be a fantastic arrangement to allow the adolescents to understand how someone gets involved with a crime and how they suffer for this. It would discourage them from committing crimes and become good citizens. I presume those teenagers will have many questions, and also the ex-prisoners would be the best men to answer people, which will have a powerful impact on the fresh minds.
Additionally, people who were penalized by the law would benefit from this arrangement too. They would feel better by sharing their stories, and this is a fantastic way to keep away from offences for these folks. They would also feel connected to society and are glad for doing something great. Alternative ways of educating young people about the menaces of committing a crime are letting teachers educate students. However, in my view, this isn’t that efficient as students would take care of those as class lectures, not real-life intriguing stories to hear carefully. Educating students through stories and movies can also be powerful, but they are not as interactive as ex-prisoners.
To conclude, we must instruct our young generation about the consequences of committing crimes and that I believe they would learn this better from reformed offenders who speak from their experience.
Sample 14:
It is correct that several people have changed themselves to become a much better person after being released from prison. And it is believed that they are better in advising young people about the negative effect of crime. I agree with the announcement, and the subsequent essay will talk in detail about it.
First, it is a fact that the public typically has negative graphics to ex-prisoners, but not all of them have a terrible personality. As some prisons offer technical skills training and personal development programs for their prisoners, many of them have followed these positive programs. These classes have changed their personality and supplied them with adequate ability; therefore, they have been approved back in society. A number of them have learned their lessons during imprisonment, as they worked harder and became much more effective than the typical people. Apart from psychopath offenders, an ordinary person who has committed offences and has been sentenced to be imprisoned frequently understands life’s value and changes radically.
The best way to reduce the speed is by having some campaigns and testimonials from former prisoners who have changed their lives. With their stocks, it is hoped it will open and broaden the young folks’ view about the dangerous side of crime. They would also become an effective mentor because they know those teenagers’ status, as they had experienced the same situation before. Lots of teens will enhance their life and become a better individual with their guidance.
In summary, I agree that some former offenders who had changed their life could be a good advisor for the young generation. Their unpleasant experience would be an essential lesson to the young folks and expect that the teenagers would prevent criminal activities later on.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
- 250+ Công thức giải nhanh môn Toán 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay Vật lí 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay lớp 12 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa, KTPL (chương trình mới) ( 36.000₫ )
- Tuyển tập 30 đề thi đánh giá năng lực Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, TP Hồ Chí Minh (2 cuốn) ( 150.000₫ )
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Some people take the view that criminal behavior is a product of an individual's inherent nature, while others argue that it is the outcome of poverty and societal factors. Although there are cogent arguments for the former view, I still lean towards the social issues and poverty theory.
Those who argue that crime is rooted in an individual's personality traits and moral compass suggest that some individuals are simply predisposed to engage in criminal behavior due to factors such as personality. They argue that some people either have a natural inclination towards aggression, violence, and rule-breaking. These individuals are believed to engage in criminal activities by choice despite having access to legal means of earning a living. In fact, some serial killers are known for their violent and sadistic crimes, which were often carried out with a sense of pleasure or enjoyment.
In my view, crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty. This is because individuals may turn to criminal behavior when they are faced with limited opportunities, financial insecurity, and social inequality. These conditions can lead to frustration, hopelessness, and despair, which can ultimately push individuals towards criminal behavior as a means of survival or escape. For example, a young person who grows up in a community with few employment possibilities may feel that their only option for financial survival is to engage in drug dealing.
In conclusion, while there are certainly some individuals who exhibit consistent patterns of aggressive or antisocial behavior, these traits alone are not sufficient to explain why people commit crimes. Therefore, I believe that the majority of crime is driven by socioeconomic factors.
Sample 2:
Opinions differ as to whether crime is caused by social issues and poverty or by people’s evil nature. Personally, I agree with the former view.
It is understandable why some people claim that our nature is the root of crime. Perhaps they have witnessed some children commit wrongdoing at some point in their lives. For example, many physically strong children tend to bully others at school, while others may perform mischievous acts like lying to adults or stealing money from their parents. These experiences lead people to believe that humans are purely good or bad by nature, and those who engage in misconduct at a young age will likely become criminals.
However, the point mentioned above is deeply flawed. Everyone possesses their own good and bad nature, and it is the environment that triggers people’s evil side and causes them to commit crime. One major cause of crime in many countries is inadequate education. Poorly educated youngsters may struggle to discern between right and wrong; therefore, they are more likely to commit crimes without even knowing. Poverty is another root cause of crime because those living in impoverished conditions may turn to stealing or robbing as the final solution to make ends meet. A corrupt political system can also be a breeding ground for crime because the politicians there have to comply with the corruption, regardless of their personal intentions.
In conclusion, though some might think that crime results from a person’s bad nature, I believe it is more likely caused by social problems, such as poor education, corrupt political systems, and poverty. People are both good and bad by nature, and the environment in which they live determines whether they become criminals.
Sample 3:
When it comes to crime rates, some individuals claim that criminal activity is solely the result of innate characteristics, while others argue that it is the outcome of societal issues and impoverishment. In my opinion, socioeconomic challenges and inequality are more likely to prompt people to engage in illegal behaviours.
On the one hand, criminality could represent the result of an inherent personality. In some cases, crime is merely the result of a person’s impulsive actions and lack of moral compass. Various factors such as upbringing, personal beliefs, and psychological disorders may all play a role when it comes to criminal activity. Some people, for example, may have grown up in environments in which illegal conduct is normalised, causing them to assume that such behaviour is acceptable. Similarly, those with mental health disorders like sociopathy or psychopathy may be inclined to committing crimes due to their inability to empathise with victims.
On the other hand, societal problems and economic hardship may contribute to criminal conduct. Poverty with limited access to food, clothing, shelter, healthcare, and schooling can push people to the brink of desperation, prompting them to resort to criminal behaviour as a means of survival. People who are financially strapped in various urban areas, for instance, may turn to illegal activities like drug trafficking or burglary in order to make ends meet. Once poverty and crime are intertwined, it may ultimately develop into a vicious cycle that is challenging to escape. Furthermore, socioeconomic issues such as discrimination, inequality, and corruption may promote crime through fostering an environment of dissatisfaction and rage. Those who experience discrimination or who believe the system is stacked against them are more inclined to turn to illegal behaviour as a form of protest or vengeance.
To summarise, aside from personal psychological factors, I believe that social difficulties and poverty can have a greater impact on crime rates.
Sample 4:
Crime has been studied by many scientific disciplines, with some people ascribing it to social problems and poverty, and others thinking that it is caused by the criminal’s nature. In this, I believe that unlawful behavior is more likely the result of defective personal qualities.
Several explanations can support crime being a function of inferior socioeconomic factors. Firstly, poverty reduces access to education and employment, causing hopelessness and desperation as a result. Having been deprived of opportunities, people may turn to crime to get by. Furthermore, people whose environment is rife with social problems may be accustomed to illegal behavior, making it easier for themselves to engage in criminal activities later on. A child who grows up in a neighborhood with drug problems could turn into a drug dealer himself, since he has witnessed drug abuse and addiction as a norm. It could, therefore, be argued that social issues and poverty create criminals.
However, the view that crime is a result of the perpetrator’s nature is no less convincing. Proponents of this belief claim that certain traits, such as impulsivity, aggression, and callousness, predispose individuals to immoral or unethical behavior. People with these traits become less considerate when they perceive any threat to their self-interest, making them likely to ignore the consequences of their actions. Others, meanwhile, carry undiagnosed psychological disorders, and their condition makes them more prone to committing crimes. A large share of the prison population, especially repeat offenders, are affected by sociopathy, a disorder usually characterized by inhibited compassion towards others. It is not well-understood otherwise, and education has only been partially effective in mitigating sociopathy’s effects. For these reasons, criminals’ nature is definitely worth looking at as a cause of their offenses.
In conclusion, while both views can be supported by evidence, I believe one’s personality is a more indicative factor of whether they are likely to commit crimes. Hence, it is crucial that parents and guardians pay attention to how they shape their children’s nature.
Sample 5:
For millennia, philosophers and scientists have held countless debates on personality. Some believe in the inherent crooked nature of humanity while others argue that they are the product of their environment. This essay wishes to explore both sides of the argument.
Nativists believe that personalities and manners are inherent and genetic, so crime is innate. Credible evidence of this would be the correlation between lead exposure and crime rate. In the 1940s, the USA was the prime consumer of lead-based products, such as paint and gasoline, so babies conceived, born, and raised during this period were lead-poisoned. They later suffered from poorer impulse control and higher aggressivity. As adults, they contributed to the surplus in levels of violent crime. However, it should be noted that genes do not cause behavior but influence it through their effects on the body's response to the environment.
Supporters of Environmentalism concede that criminal behaviors are determined by family and other people, education opportunities, as well as physical circumstances. This school of thought is supported by several studies. some of them focused on the negative link between vegetation and crime. It was shown that in neighborhoods with more greenery, fewer crimes were reported. One explanation for this was that the environment gave its residents a sense of safety and security.
It should be noted that the nature-nurture debate has not been taken as seriously as it used to be. Essentially, every facet of personality development results from interaction between genes and environment. If the authorities aim at reducing the rate of crime and violence, they should take action in improving residential areas as well as enhancing healthcare.
Sample 6:
Many people consider that innate characteristics are responsible for the fact that some people choose to turn to a career of crime. While I accept that crime may result from individual characteristics of violence or greed, I would argue that it is largely a consequence of social issues and poverty.
There is a belief that a person’s nature determines whether or not they become a criminal. Firstly, some argue that an individual who is cruel turns to crime more easily than a kind person. For instance, a child bullying other boys or girls at school may turn into a violent criminal in the future. Secondly, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness could also breed future offenders, who seek to acquire easy money without working for it. A number of youngsters choose to steal from others, instead of working hard to make an honest living. These are strong reasons for thinking that those who have an inborn bad nature are more likely to break the law.
Nevertheless, it seems to me that social issues and poverty are the main causes behind crime. There are many problems in society which might lead to an increase in the crime rate. For example, unemployment pushes people into resorting to crime because they simply cannot find a job. As a consequence, the number of offenders has climbed in many countries over recent decades. Another reason is that, more broadly, poverty in general leads to a rise in crime. If people do not have enough money to make ends meet, they will be tempted to pursue illegal activities just to support themselves and their families.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that the principal causes of crime are a result of social conditions and problems.
Sample 7:
The causes of crime have long been a topic of debate. While some argue that crime stems from a person's inherent nature, I do believe it is the result of social problems and poverty
On the one hand, advocates of the view that crime results from a person's nature suggest that individuals with cruel tendencies are more likely to engage in criminal activities. This is because cruelty often correlates with a lack of empathy, disregard for others' well-being, and aggressive behavior, all of which can lead to crime. For example, a child who bullies others at school may grow up to become a violent criminal. Additionally, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness can breed future offenders who seek easy money without working for it. Many young people, lured by the prospect of quick and easy money, turn to cybercrime, engaging in online scams, hacking, and identity theft.
On the other hand, some, myself included, argue that crime is primarily a result of social problems and poverty, a perspective I support. Social issues, such as unemployment, can push people towards crime as they struggle to find legitimate employment. The widening gap between the rich and the poor exacerbates this issue, as seen in places like Rio De Janeiro, where high crime rates are prevalent in impoverished areas. Poverty is another significant factor; individuals struggling to make ends meet may resort to illegal activities to support themselves and their families. This explains why people in dire need often turn to theft or other crimes for survival.
In conclusion, while inherent personal traits can contribute to criminal behavior, social problems and poverty play a more significant role in driving people towards crime. Addressing these underlying issues is crucial for reducing crime rates.
Sample 8:
Crime is a complex issue that elicits varied perspectives regarding its origins. While some argue that crime is primarily a consequence of social problems and poverty, others contend that it stems from an individual’s inherent nature. I contend that the interplay between societal factors and individual predispositions contributes significantly to criminal behavior.
I concur with the notion that crime often finds its roots in social problems and poverty, where the impact of socioeconomic conditions significantly steers an individual’s choices. For example, in underprivileged areas, the absence of adequate educational facilities, job prospects, and robust social support structures may force individuals into a corner, compelling them to turn to illicit means for survival. Moreover, when societal disparities are rife and systemic issues remain unaddressed, it can exacerbate the situation, causing individuals to resort to criminal activities as a perceived solution to their economic struggles or as a means to voice their grievances about prevalent social injustices.
However, I am also of the opinion that the origins of crime are not solely tethered to external factors; rather, an individual’s innate disposition can also play a crucial role. Some individuals might exhibit inherent psychological disorders that predispose them to engage in unlawful activities, regardless of their social background. Furthermore, the absence of strong moral values or ethical guidance in an individual’s upbringing can be a contributing factor, irrespective of their socioeconomic circumstances. Instances abound where individuals from affluent backgrounds have succumbed to criminal behavior due to the lack of a strong moral compass in their formative years, indicating that individual nature can play a pivotal role in shaping criminal inclinations.
In conclusion, I believe crime’s origin is not solely attributed to either social problems or an individual’s nature; rather, it is a complex interplay between societal factors and personal inclinations.
Sample 9:
There are divergent opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. Some people argue that external factors such as poverty or other social issues are to blame for most crimes, while others contend that people who engage in criminal activity are intrinsically bad in nature. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and provide my own opinion.
On the one hand, those who believe that social problems are the primary cause of criminal behavior argue that people are driven to commit crimes due to their difficult and disadvantaged circumstances. For example, individuals facing extreme poverty or unemployment may resort to stealing or other illicit activities as a means of survival. Proponents of this view also point out that issues such as substance abuse or mental illness can exacerbate criminal tendencies, emphasizing the importance of addressing underlying social difficulties to reduce crime rates.
On the other hand, there is a counterargument that criminal behavior arises from individual traits such as impulsivity, selfishness, or a lack of empathy. This perspective suggests that some people have a natural tendency to engage in harmful behavior, regardless of environmental factors. In support of this view, critics of the social circumstance theory point out that there are people who grow up in difficult circumstances but do not resort to crime, indicating that innate character traits play a significant role.
In my view, it is likely that both factors play a role in criminal behavior. While social issues can be a significant driver of crime, it is also true that some individuals may be more inclined to engage in criminal activity due to inherent character flaws. Therefore, addressing both the root causes of social problems and providing intervention programs that focus on individual development could be effective in reducing crime rates.
In conclusion, there are varying opinions regarding the root causes of criminal behavior. While some argue that criminal activity is solely attributable to social problems, others believe that individual traits play a more significant role. In my opinion, it is essential to consider both perspectives and work towards comprehensive solutions to reduce the prevalence of crime in our society.
Sample 10:
Crime is a complex issue with multiple contributing factors. While some argue that most crimes result from circumstances like poverty and social problems, I believe they are caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature.
On one hand, there are several factors that lead people to believe that most crimes stem from circumstances. Firstly, individuals who grow up in deprived environments often lack access to basic needs such as education, healthcare, and stable employment, leading them to potentially turn to crime as a means of survival or escape from their circumstances. For example, high crime rates in low-income neighborhoods can be attributed to individuals struggling to meet basic needs such as food, housing, and healthcare, and with limited access to education and job opportunities, they may resort to criminal activities like theft or drug dealing to make ends meet. Secondly, exposure to violence and crime from a young age can normalize these behaviors. For instance, children from households with domestic violence may become desensitized to violent behavior and replicate it in their own relationships.
On the other hand, I do believe that crime is caused by individuals who are inherently bad in nature. Firstly, those who commit crimes may have a predisposition to violence and deviant behavior, regardless of their upbringing or environment. Ted Bundy, for instance, despite his stable upbringing and education, committed numerous murders. His actions suggest an inherent predisposition to violence and deviance, highlighting the role of personal moral character in criminal behavior. Secondly, some research indicates that genetic and environmental factors can increase the likelihood of engaging in criminal activities. For instance, a longitudinal study conducted by the National Institute of Justice followed a group of individuals from childhood into adulthood and found that those with a family history of criminal behavior were more likely to engage in similar activities.
In conclusion, while circumstances like poverty and social problems contribute to crime, I believe that personal moral character and inherent predispositions play a more significant role in criminal behavior.
Sample 11:
Crime is a prevalent issue in modern society and understanding its root causes is important for its effective prevention and control. Some people argue that most crimes are the result of circumstances such as poverty or other social problems. Others believe that criminal behaviour stems from individuals who are bad in nature. In my opinion, most crimes are the consequence of socioeconomic circumstances.
Individuals who believe that crime is the result of inheriting bad nature think that even though people who live in affluent societies with minimal social problems, are subjected to face crimes. They believe that personal choices and moral failings are significant contributors to criminal behaviour. For example, studies have indicated that people who possess personality traits such as impulsivity and aggressiveness are more likely to engage in criminal activities.
On the other hand, proponents of the view that crime is a result of poverty and social issues argue that individuals coming from poor backgrounds are forced to commit crimes because of necessity. When a person’s basic needs such as food, shelter and security are unmet, they may resort to illegal activities as a means of survival. For instance, incidents like theft and burglary are more common in economically deprived societies where everyone is striving to make ends meet. Furthermore, social problems such as lack of education, unemployment and substance abuse exacerbate the situation. Without access to quality education, many individuals cannot secure well-paying jobs, leading them to seek alternative, often illegal, means of income.
In my opinion, poverty and social problems create an environment where crime can flourish. When individuals are deprived of opportunities and resources, the temptation to break the law becomes stronger. Additionally, the social environment, including peer influence and community norms, plays a crucial role in shaping behaviour.
In conclusion, addressing these root causes through social policies aimed at reducing poverty, improving education, and providing employment opportunities is essential for effective crime prevention. By creating a more equitable and supportive society, the incidence of crime can be significantly reduced.
Sample 12:
Throughout history, people tended to believe that crimes were committed by those who were innately bad, but in the modern era a more liberal approach has led to the idea that crimes are often acts of desperation, committed by people whose circumstances are bleak. This essay will explore both perspectives, concluding that the latter is usually true.
First of all, it should be noted that some crimes are committed by people who appear innately driven towards such acts. These people may have some sort of hereditary psychological condition that means they do not feel empathy for others, or a predilection towards violence. This is a controversial perspective and although it feels true for many, it is hard to prove. Many of the most violent criminals have traumatic backgrounds, such as child abuse, neglect, or sexual assault, which suggests that they were not born with their criminal compunctions, but rather that these developed very early, which thus places them more into the circumstances than nature category. However, the lines are blurry.
Certainly, it does seem as though most criminals are created out of difficult circumstances. To understand this, one just has to look at impoverished communities around the world. These are places where crime flourishes because the people there are desperate and forced to do immoral things in order to survive. In such states of despair, people tend to put themselves first and overlook social norms, laws, and the usual empathic perspective that would stop most people from hurting others. In such areas, people tend to be conditioned for a young age to ignore the law or even social decency, joining gangs and becoming influenced by dangerous people. This tends to be a problem due to a lack of resources, opportunities, and education in such areas.
In conclusion, it appears likely that most crime is the result of people’s unfortunate circumstances, meaning that criminals are not inherently bad. However, there may be some people who were born with a certain compunction towards violent or criminal activity.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
There are numerous reasons to support the fact that hard work and determination are two key factors for success in life. However, as an alternative argument financial condition and looks of the person may also be the primary criteria for success.
Some people believe that financial status and appearance are important for success. They advocate that the looks of a person determine his confidence, which is a vital factor in success. No one can complete any task without considering himself capable of that. Hence, the confidence of the person plays a very key role. Furthermore, money is another important factor as it provides the support to lead the career of your choice. Without financial security, it makes the way to success much more challenging. In a way, money saves the energy and time of a person. It creates numerous opportunities to progress in a rapid way in the career of their desire. Based on this view, the utmost need for success is financial stability and appearance.
On the other side, people have certain justifications to agree with the view that ambition along with hard work is the key to success. People believe that the way to success has no shortcuts, and the primary criteria is to acquire knowledge and practical experiences through hard work. We can have monetary support from someone. However, no one can help us in developing our skills which needs the efforts of my own only. The second most important thing to reach our ultimate goal is our determination. It is because no dream can be fulfilled without ambition and persistence. Hence, one should be hardworking and have the strong willpower to attain the goal of his life.
To sum up, although appearance and financial position have a great impact on achievement, hard work and determination are the most dominant factors in the way of success.
Sample 2:
It is true that there are numerous ways for people to succeed in life. While some people believe that wealth and physical attractiveness are two aspects that influence a person's success. I would contend that people can achieve the pinnacle of their careers when they work hard and are determined.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why having money and being physically attractive help people succeed in life. The first explanation is that having money helps people fulfil their deepest goals, such as those for strength and size. Extremely wealthy individuals, for instance, have endless opportunities to advance quickly in their careers and achieve the recognition they desire in their communities. Furthermore, one of the key elements affecting success is one's appearance. For instance, individuals would have a greater probability of landing a job if they display a confident body posture or wear attire. In addition to having excellent abilities and experiences.
On the other hand, it is evident that perseverance and hard effort are essential qualities that are crucial to ensuring success in the industry. First of all, putting in a lot of effort enables people to get some worthwhile life experiences. To demonstrate my thesis, let's use the example of a young student who practises their assignments often. By doing so, they reduce the likelihood that they will make the same mistakes again and are more likely to perform well on formal exams. Second, determination inspires us to develop goals that serve as the cornerstone of success. This makes it a necessary talent to help people solve complicated challenges in all circumstances. Further keep pushing forward in order to accomplish long-term objectives.
In conclusion, I feel that hard work and determination are the main factors to acquire the maximum performance. Even though money and attractiveness have an impact on achievement.
Sample 3:
Being successful is a dream of every human being. Working hard and dedication is considered to be pivotal to gain success for many people, whereas others have a different viewpoint and believe that money and attractive personality leads to progress in life. This essay will highlight both opinions and also elaborate on why working hard and determination are far more considerable than cash and physical appearance. To begin with, for some people certain goals and ambitions entail success. Since when someone is working hard, he/she would be able to succeed in that particular task eventually. As a result, people gain prosperity and rewards which pave the way to earn revenues. Likewise, in order to be a successful person, goal-oriented behaviour is required. For instance, while preparing for my RN exam, I had to burn midnight candles. Consequently, now I am working as an RN in a renowned hospital, where I am earning a handsome amount of salary and have succeeded in achieving my ambition. Thus, for a high-status in life, one should adopt the way of working hard rather than finding shortcuts for success.
Conversely, according to other groups of people, with money and great personality people could be famous in no time as everyone gets attracted towards the glamorous lifestyle. Because having the ability to buy anything encourages to gain the attention of other people. That's why with wealth and good health people become popular among their communities. For instance, there are some Bollywood singers who are not talented as compared to others, but by flaunting their wealth in front of the audience they are more recognised even without having any struggle. Overall, to some extent money and physical appearance are the reasons to attain prosperity.
To conclude, to boost progress is quite challenging. Even though money is the necessity of life which is required to achieve success, hard work and dedication are enormously countable to achieve success in one's life.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo