Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?

Sample 1:

Some people opine that people can do away with traditional libraries because technology has given us the facility of virtual or online libraries. Although technology has reduced our need to go to libraries, traditional libraries can never become redundant and maintaining them is not a waste of money.

On the one hand, it can be a waste of money to keep libraries open. The advent of new technologies like computers and the Internet has transformed traditional libraries from venues containing a large number of printed documents into paperless libraries containing only digitized documents. This has led to the creation of virtual libraries in which the user has access to information at any time and anywhere in the world by using the modern tools of communications, such as computers and Internet facilities. Therefore, it is unnecessary to spend money on traditional libraries because fewer and fewer users use them.

However, libraries still play an important role these days. Firstly, a person goes to a library not only to search and get information from books but also to sit and study there. The peaceful and scholarly ambiance of the library helps one to concentrate more on one's work and study. Secondly, virtual libraries can be accessed only by those who are computer literate. For elderly or disadvantaged individuals who rarely have a chance to be exposed to cutting-edge technologies like computers or smartphones, it is much more challenging to access information online than going to a traditional library.

In conclusion, advancement should be welcomed in every field but the importance of the libraries for their fundamental role cannot be put aside, and funding them is not wasting financial resources.

Sample 2:

It is often argued that maintaining public libraries is no longer necessary in today’s world because the development of computer technology has allowed us to get information on the Internet in a much easier way. While I accept that there are clear benefits of online libraries over public libraries, I believe that it is still worth spending money on maintaining public libraries.

There are two main advantages of online sources of information. Firstly, the storage of information in online sources is much greater in comparison with any traditional libraries. This facilitates the research needs of individuals in different aspects of the information world. Secondly, researchers can easily acquire information on the internet whenever they want without the need to attend the library, like in the past. This is therefore particularly beneficial to those who have a hectic schedule and cannot visit these places during operating hours.

However, the maintenance of local libraries is still necessary because of their distinguishing features which can never be substituted by online sources. Libraries, in some countries, are still one of the most popular means of accessing information among senior citizens, regardless of the availability of online information. In fact, these people are mostly technophobes, or in other words, incapable of using technology, and therefore the physical libraries are their preferred option. Furthermore, public libraries can be considered a more reliable source of information, compared with online sources. Indeed, there is an influx of inaccurate and unreliable information on the Internet, while the sources in libraries are often more carefully categorized and selected by library staff members.

In conclusion, despite the obvious benefits of computer technology in providing information, in my opinion, there are sufficient grounds to reject the view that spending money on maintaining public libraries is unnecessary.

Sample 3:

It is sometimes argued that, with the introduction of computers, the authorities should not waste money on the maintenance of public libraries. While this could be the case for several reasons, my view is that traditional libraries have important functions that computers cannot perform and therefore should be maintained for public access.

To a certain extent, computer technology can render libraries unimportant. Indeed, physical libraries provide readers with paper books or DVDs, for example, in limited numbers at certain times of the day, while an Internet-connected computer can bring even a limitless supply of digital-based information that can be accessed 24/7. There is also less effort involved in searching for digitalised information on a website or an ebook than in a large library. In addition, large sums of money need to be spent on staff members’ salaries or providing up-to-date reading materials which of course take up additional space. In contrast, much lower costs are required to maintain and upgrade e-libraries where huge amounts of data are stored thanks to digital technology.

However, in my view, there are certain roles of traditional libraries that computers cannot take over. Firstly, in a physical library, it is not difficult to find comfortable and quiet spaces to enjoy reading a book. This is highly beneficial, given the increasing number of sources of noise surrounding us these days. Secondly, library users have access to more reliable sources of information. Contrarily, a great deal of online content we have today is not censored, which possibly leads to a misinformed public.

In conclusion, although computers to a certain extent can replace traditional libraries in maintaining a well-informed society, I believe it would be wrong to say keeping libraries open is a waste of money.

Sample 4:

In the twenty-first century, it is becoming less common for people to use libraries, even though in the last century they were incredibly popular throughout the world. Now that the internet can be easily accessed from most phones and computers, some people think that libraries are just a waste of money. This essay will argue that this is not entirely true.

The first reason why libraries are still necessary even in the age of Google is that they provide trustworthy access to reputable sources of information. Sadly, although the internet has democratised information and made it freely available throughout the world, there is still an incredible amount of misinformation and many sources that people trust are in fact very unreliable. Libraries contain many books published by respected authors and reliable editors, meaning that they should be treated with more reverence than a website that pops up on a search engine.

Secondly, even though most of the collected knowledge of humanity can be found on the internet, most people trust what they read on social media. These sorts of posts are inherently unreliable because they are shared only by people of the same political belief, and these groups amplify messages they like rather than what is in fact true. Sadly, that means that the internet is often divided into highly biased sources of information that cannot be entirely trusted. Libraries are less likely to stock such dubious material and can thus be considered better for people looking for real facts.

In conclusion, libraries may seem outdated, but perhaps they are necessary in the modern world because they can provide us with more reliable information than we would normally find online.

Sample 5:

Undoubtedly, the ever-going development of computer technology has benefited us greatly in the field of education. Therefore, there are a handful of people who consider governmental funding in libraries to be a waste. I completely disagree with this point of view, as modern methods of learning or e-books can never replace public libraries.

The foremost reason for this is the accuracy of information. Although technological advancement has paved the way for the increasing amount of knowledge and information updated online, its reliability has been brought into question. It is obvious that there has been little censorship in numerous websites from the Internet, therefore, the accuracy of information cannot be measured or identified. To illustrate, Wikipedia, a popular website providing a lot of academic knowledge,

contains various false facts as its "authors" are allowed to post anything without any supervision.

Investing in libraries should also be seen as a responsibility that belongs to the government. In reality, there are still many places in the world where computers and the Internet are rare or not available. Nevertheless, citizens from those areas still need proper books and materials to serve their education. Without appropriate finance for local libraries, low level of education would likely become common and eventually lead to a series of social issues. Because of this, public libraries seem to be of enormous importance to them.

To conclude, I support the state maintenance of public libraries as this would hold the most vital position in everyone's education for the aforementioned reasons. Even though technology can assist learning to a certain extent, it cannot be compared to the traditional way of reading books among students.

Sample 6:

People are using libraries less frequently in the twenty-first century, despite the fact that they were quite popular in the previous century. Some individuals believe that libraries are a waste of money now that the internet is freely accessible from most phones and laptops. This essay will argue that this isn't completely accurate.

The first reason libraries are still important in the era of Google is that they give secure access to credible information sources. Unfortunately, despite the fact that the internet has democratised knowledge and made it freely available throughout the world, there is still a great deal of disinformation out there, and many people's trusted sources are really quite untrustworthy. Libraries include numerous books written by well-known writers and edited by reputable editors; therefore, they should be viewed with greater respect than a website found using a search engine. Second, despite the fact that the internet contains the vast majority of humanity's collective information, most individuals believe what they read on social media.

These kinds of posts are inherently untrustworthy since they are only shared by individuals who have the same political beliefs, and these groups magnify ideas that they enjoy rather than what is real. Regrettably, this implies that the internet is frequently divided into extremely biassed information sources that cannot be completely trusted. Libraries are less likely to have such questionable materials on hand, making them a better option for those seeking the truth. Finally, while libraries may appear to be obsolete, they may be important in today's society since they may supply us with more trustworthy information than we can get online.

Sample 7:

Libraries play an important part in the growth of any civilization in the modern day by giving knowledge. The vast majority of individuals believe that governments should not invest money in libraries since computers have mostly replaced libraries. I mostly disagree with this remark because I believe that the general public has its own value.

To begin with, libraries are the greatest place to go for information. First and foremost. Libraries provide a vast selection of books in any language, making them useful for obtaining any sort of knowledge. Nowadays, everyone enjoys going to the library since it has a wide variety of books that are not available online.

Furthermore, the library is a relaxing and peaceful environment. A person can completely concentrate on studying due to a good and comfortable atmosphere, and it also provides books for rent so that the people may profit from reading books. As a result, the person saves money because the books are given at a low cost. Further, sustaining public libraries is not a waste of money because they provide global knowledge and are helpful to individuals who do not have access to a computer or the internet at home. People who are in financial trouble, for example, can simply rent books. Computers, on the other hand, have their own set of advantages. To begin with, thousands of data can be readily saved on a computer, saving both time and space. Apart from that, computer systems are highly beneficial to the elderly, as many elderly people avoid going to the library owing to health concerns. In summary, I believe that public libraries are vital for people, and that computer systems cannot replace them since libraries offer their own set of benefits that cannot be overlooked.

Sample 8:

In today's culture, there are many different schools of thought on whether spending on public library maintenance is no longer essential because advanced technology can do the same job. In my opinion, there are several reasons why I am opposed to such a concept.

First and foremost, papers in state-run libraries allow users to access reliable knowledge that cannot be found on the internet. This is due to publishers' efforts to safeguard their reputation by giving filtered, sorted, and up-to-date material that is extremely useful for academic study. In contrast, the quality of internet content that we might discover is not guaranteed; as a result, individuals may be exposed to exaggerated or false information, resulting in unanticipated conflicts or serious repercussions. There are various forums, for example, where people discuss medication therapy. Users, on the other hand, are not held accountable for what they say; instead, they provide incorrect or even false information, creating serious health concerns for those who receive it. Furthermore, libraries provide a conducive setting for working or learning. By spending a significant sum of money in public reading rooms, they are transformed into fantastic spaces with enough infrastructure for individuals to do their jobs.

This is especially useful for residents who have to live in hot, cramped quarters that make it difficult to do their jobs. In addition, the calm atmosphere in libraries can help us concentrate better and encourage creativity, which could lead to increased overall performance. Users of online platforms, on the other hand, are frequently distracted by notifications from social media and other apps, resulting in decreased productivity. In conclusion, while cutting-edge technology has numerous advantages, the public has its own qualities. The development of both is critical for governments.

Sample 9:

It is widely thought that money allocated to supporting library services should be better spent as various technological devices can be an alternative to traditional libraries. I tend to agree with this idea as public libraries are less attractive in the eyes of the public and more subsidies should be given to digital books.

To begin with, an increasingly large number of book lovers are now finding themselves reliant on computer technology for reading. This can be evidenced by the fact that sales of e-readers such as Kindles, and reading applications on mobile phones and computers, are surging all over the world. Moreover, people who are too occupied with their work as well as household responsibilities are turning to audiobooks as a convenient substitute since this innovation allows them to multitask and use their time more effectively. As a result, public libraries are sparsely attended although the membership fees are usually negligible.

Instead of wasting money on an obsolete service, public funds could be of more use when spent on measures to promote digital books. Library running expenses, which sometimes include exorbitant costs to preserve hard copies, should be used to scan books and make them available to the mass population of internet users. In this way, reading would definitely be better promoted, and more people would be motivated to look for books to expand their knowledge.

In conclusion, taxpayers’ money should not be spent on maintaining public libraries as computer technology can perfectly replace traditional ‘brick and mortar’ locations. Instead, innovative technologies, such as e-book readers or audiobooks should be more widely encouraged. In this way public libraries could become smaller and merely offer free access to computers to facilitate online reading for those without modern technology. 

Sample 10:

For centuries libraries have been in the service of man. These libraries are the repositories of never-ending knowledge known as books. Some people opine that we can do away with traditional libraries because technology has given us the facility of virtual or online libraries. I, however, believe that even though technology has reduced our need to go to libraries, our traditional libraries can never become redundant.

With the advent of new technologies in the field of computers and telecommunications, revolutionary changes have taken place in the field of Library and Information Science. The shape of traditional libraries containing a large number of printed documents is in the process of being transformed to paper less libraries containing a large number of digitized documents. The facilities offered by networking have not left libraries untouched. Modern libraries are not only digitized but networked also. This has led to the creation of virtual libraries, i.e. libraries without walls through which the user has access to information at any time, anywhere in the world by using modern tools of communication, such as computers and Internet facilities.

However, one should keep in mind that a person goes to a library not only to search for and get information from books but also to sit and study there. The ambience and the peaceful and scholarly atmosphere of the library help one to concentrate more on one’s work and study. Thus, libraries will never become redundant. They will always be there to indicate the presence of a well-read and educated society.

Another important point is that it is very difficult to always read books from the computer monitor. Traditional books can be issued from the library and read in the comfort of your bed. Virtual libraries can be accessed only by those who are computer literate. The access to virtual libraries can be affected by power cuts and network failures. Moreover, in a traditional library, you are guided by the librarians if you need any help in searching for the book.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that advancement should be welcomed in every field but the importance of the libraries for their fundamental role cannot be put aside. This tendency will add more crowns of success to the importance of libraries.

Sample 11:

Today, computer technology is becoming more and more advanced. Therefore, many people think that it is wasteful to spend money on maintaining public libraries. However, I firmly believe that libraries can never be replaced by any other means of information provision.

On the one hand, the development of computer science has brought about a lot of benefits to our lives. Anyone can obtain and store a great amount of information online easily instead of going to public libraries to search for them. People can also read books on the move with their portable devices such as iPhones, iPads, and so on. Furthermore, people do not have to repeatedly keep in mind the deadlines to return the borrowed books.

On the other hand, public libraries still have many advantages over the Internet. First, a library always plays an important role as a reliable learning resource. Individuals could get access to sufficient data for their studies when they use public libraries. Second, individuals have more chances to make new friends and exchange learning experiences when studying in a library. This opportunity can rarely be found in studying in front of a computer. Compared with only studying via the Internet, students can study in a quieter and more professional environment for academic purposes, such as doing research or graduate theses.

In conclusion, I believe that both public libraries and computer technology are necessary for people to enrich their knowledge. Therefore, public libraries will not disappear or be replaced by computer science in the future for their unique features and benefits.

Sample 12:

When it comes to the issue about whether public libraries deserve to be kept, some people may argue that public libraries should exist since virtual books cannot replace them, but I cannot agree with this opinion.

Admittedly, public libraries may create a better atmosphere of study for individuals than computers do. For people who are not well-motivated and self-disciplined, studying on the Internet may be easily interrupted since there exists more attractive information online, such as scandal and gossip of celebrities. However, when individuals are surrounded with learners who concentrate on their study, they may be also engaged in study better since no one laughs or shout loudly in the library usually. Nevertheless, modern technology actually makes traditional libraries obsolete to some degree.

To begin with, computer technology allows users to find what they need more efficiently. In the past, learners have to spend some time arriving at libraries and they still needed some time to pick up the very books they were looking for. However, current technology transforms books into virtual ones and clients can find the specific books after entering some key words in a search engine. Thus, compared to orthodox libraries, the Internet actually serves to save more time for learners.

In addition, by cancelling public libraries, governments could save more money. Running a public library is actually costly since governments need to recruit a lot of employees to guarantee the daily operation. On the contrary, if public libraries are substituted by virtual libraries and database, only a smaller number of employees need to be kept to maintain those electronic devices and the site of public libraries could also be utilized for other purposes, such as establishing shopping malls. Therefore, such economic factors also explain why public libraries do not need to be preserved.

In sum, it is costly to run public libraries, and modern technology may function better, considering that searching information on the Internet is faster and running public libraries is expensive.