As transport and accommodation problems are increasing in many cities, some governments encourage businesses to move to rural areas. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Sample 1:

The relocation of enterprises to the suburbs has been promoted by many governments due to the rising issues of transportation and housing in central places. From my perspective, the benefits of this practice surpass its drawbacks.

On the one hand, the alteration of enterprises’ places would exert negative effects on their interests relating to the unavailability of resources and potential customers. Chief among these is that infrastructure and human resources are not immediately accessible in the suburbs. For example, major banks would suffer from inadequacies of well-trained employees because they are out of reach for high-quality graduates from many universities. Not to mention that enterprises moving to the outskirts would impede their businesses as profits cannot be generated easily. For example, the failure in attracting customers of high-end clothes stores results in their lower revenues, which negatively impacts the businesses’ survival in the market.

On the other hand, the moving of businesses to the countryside plays a pivotal role in reducing the number of over-crowding related issues in the cities and employment problems in the countryside. Concerning the former advantage, the change in companies’ operation place requires their workers to move from the center to the outskirts, which would significantly decrease the amount of transportation and population in the central areas. Therefore, congestion and rising housing prices would be less problematic, thereby enhancing city citizens’ living standards. In addition, businesses moving to rural areas creates more job opportunities for workers who live in those places. By joining the workforce, those individuals can generate more gains, which is paramount in lessening income inequality between rural and urban citizens.

In conclusion, the governmental encouragement of altering companies’ places of business may cause difficulties for businesses due to their inaccessibility of resources and lower chances of stimulating profits. Nevertheless, such a practice is deemed more advantageous in terms of its potential in diminishing the adverse effects of rising transportation and accommodation costs.

Sample 2:

With increasing population and urbanization, accommodation and transport problems have become major issues in many large cities. To overcome these issues, many governments are encouraging businesses to move to rural areas. While this may have some advantages, it can also have some disadvantages which I believe outweigh the advantages.

On the one hand, moving businesses to rural areas can have several advantages. Firstly, it can reduce the pressure on the existing infrastructure of large cities. This can lead to better accommodation and transport facilities for residents. With fewer businesses and workers in the city, there will be fewer cars on the road, reducing the time and stress associated with commuting. Secondly, moving businesses to rural areas can create employment opportunities for the local people. These companies can create jobs in transportation, logistics, and other supporting industries. As a result, this can help to reduce unemployment and poverty in rural areas.

On the other hand, there are some disadvantages to moving businesses to rural areas. First and foremost, businesses may face difficulties in finding skilled labor. Rural areas typically have smaller populations, and therefore, a smaller pool of skilled workers. This can make it difficult for businesses to find workers with the necessary skills and qualifications, leading to a shortage of qualified workers, thereby reducing the efficiency of the business. Adding to this, moving businesses to rural areas can increase the cost of transportation and logistics. Rural areas are further away from major transportation hubs, and the roads may not be as well-maintained compared to urban areas. This can make it more challenging and costly to transport products.

In conclusion, while there are some advantages of moving businesses to rural areas, ultimately, I believe that the disadvantages outweigh these as reducing costs is the most important thing for businesses, and a thriving economy is more important than less congested cities.

Sample 3:

It is prevalent that governments are recommending firms to relocate to the countryside to alleviate issues regarding transport and housing in urban areas. Although this tendency poses a threat to the environment and may result in a shortage of skilled labour in rural areas, the benefits including more job opportunities for local people and the narrowed wealth gap between regions are more significant.

On the one hand, there are two drawbacks associated with encouraging enterprises to move to the countryside. The first is that it can trigger environmental damage in the area. This is explained by the fact that industrial activities implemented by these companies often release a substantial amount of waste. If such businesses pay scant attention to proper waste treatment, more untreated waste could be discharged into local water bodies and land, contaminating the living areas of rural residents. Another demerit is the lack of highly qualified labour. More specifically, as most people living in small towns and villages are less likely to receive sufficient education to pursue more intellectually involved professions, firms in such places often find it challenging to recruit skilled employees.

On the other hand, the relocation of corporations to the hinterland offers more noticeable benefits. The first one is there can be more employment opportunities for rural dwellers. To be more specific, although it may be hard to employ white-collar workers, businesses can still provide jobs for numerous blue-collar ones. As a result, they can acquire higher income and have a better quality of life. Additionally, this can minimise the financial gap between rural and urban areas. This is because an increasing number of companies operating in the countryside can enable the rural economy to thrive and attract more foreign investment, thus discouraging more people from residing in big cities.

In conclusion, I completely agree that the merits such as the provision of better job opportunities and the narrower financial gap in different areas over the demerits of environmental contamination and the shortage of highly skilled workers because these downsides can be tackled by offering relocation packages to skilled workers to convince them to work in rural regions and rigorous monitoring by environmental agencies to prevent any major environmental harm from discharge of waste.

Sample 4:

In large urban areas throughout the world, there has been a rise in accommodation and transport problems. This has caused businesses to consider relocating to rural areas, which can bring both loss and gain. In my opinion, the drawbacks of this decision outweigh the benefits.

Certain advantages exist for businesses which move to the countryside, the first of which is related to profitability. Rural areas tend to have lower property prices, helping businesses to reduce overheads. In some territories where governments provide tax breaks to incentivize rural businesses, it would also be beneficial to relocate one’s firm away from cities. Moreover, if companies start operating more in the countryside, more employment opportunities could be created for rural residents. This would certainly ease the influx of people migrating to the cities for employment, so overcrowding in urban regions, as a problem, may be alleviated.

However, the disadvantages are nothing to scoff at. One of the issues caused by moving business operations away from cities is the dearth of skilled labor. Rural areas’ usually smaller populations mean that the pool of skilled workers available is more limited. This would hamper businesses’ ability to recruit the right people, as a result. Additionally, businesses which decide to relocate to the countryside may experience transportation difficulties in that staff from urban areas will have trouble commuting. This is due to the change in traveling distance and more limited transportation options. Many of those workers, consequently, might try to leave the company if such a decision becomes official. The expenses incurred from retaining employees and training new replacements might end up canceling out any cost saving made.

In conclusion, despite the benefits in cost savings and government incentives, it might ultimately be detrimental for a business to operate in rural areas. As this decision’s disadvantages outweigh the gains, it is best taken cautiously.

Sample 5:

In the past, factories were often built close to city areas as the lack of transportation forbade people to do otherwise. However, this is not exactly the case today, when industries and businesses are moving from municipal and into countryside areas in flocks. This essay will elaborate on both positive and negative effects of this trend.

On the positive side, firstly, this movement makes perfect environmental sense. Due to industrial activities, residents of many cities around the world are still breathing in air and consume water dirty enough to cause numerous health diseases. Therefore, moving businesses out of the cities will rid human and other species of pollution. A further advantage of this trend is reducing the gap between the rich and the poor in a country, as countryside dwellers can opt to work in factories with higher pay, rather than agricultural work. This will eventually bring about peace and harmony to society.

On the negative side, doing business in the countryside also represents some notable drawbacks. To begin with, skilled workers are a rarity in rural areas. Most people living in small towns and villages do not receive sufficient education to undertake intellectual jobs. What is also disadvantageous is that based in regional areas, companies risk distancing themselves further from their customers, their suppliers and other partners in their business transactions, which can weaken their profitability.

In conclusion, moving business from cities to rural areas can be a smart decision. However, there are disadvantages that should be weighed carefully against the advantages.

Sample 6:

In many urban centers around the world, the escalating issues related to transport congestion and accommodation shortages have prompted governments to advocate for the relocation of businesses to rural areas. While this initiative has its merits, I believe the benefits of such a strategy can outweigh the drawbacks when implemented effectively.

One of the most significant advantages of relocating businesses to rural areas is the alleviation of urban congestion. For instance, cities like London and New York, plagued by traffic jams and overcrowded public transport systems, could experience considerable relief if businesses were dispersed to less populated regions. This decentralization would not only reduce the strain on existing infrastructure but also improve the quality of life for city dwellers by reducing commute times and improving air quality. Furthermore, this shift can contribute to a more balanced regional development, helping to address inequalities between urban and rural areas.

Moreover, relocating businesses to rural areas can stimulate local economies and create job opportunities. For example, the establishment of a manufacturing plant or a service center in a rural town can generate numerous employment opportunities, improve local infrastructure, and lead to an influx of investments in the region. This economic boost can have a ripple effect, positively impacting various sectors such as retail, real estate, and local services.

However, there are notable challenges associated with this approach. One significant concern is the potential lack of infrastructure and resources in rural areas to support new businesses. These regions might struggle with inadequate transportation links, limited access to skilled labor, and insufficient amenities. For instance, a high-tech company relocating to a rural area might face difficulties in recruiting specialized talent and ensuring reliable supply chains. Additionally, the transition period may be disruptive for both businesses and local communities, requiring substantial adjustments and investments to adapt to the new environment.

In conclusion, while there are valid concerns regarding the relocation of businesses to rural areas, the advantages such as reduced urban congestion and economic revitalization of rural regions are considerable. With careful planning and investment in infrastructure, the positive impacts can significantly outweigh the disadvantages, leading to more balanced and sustainable regional development.

Sample 7:

The main problems that the cities face these days are accommodation and transportation. Because of this, the higher authorities are cheering up the businesses to relocate to the rural areas. The opinion in driving a conclusion in this may seem a little contradictory and it may vary from person to person. In my perspective, there are more cons than pros.

On the one hand, migrating from the city to the countryside may result in less traffic and pollution. As a wide portion of people move out of the city, it creates more space and less pollution. People from rural areas tend to move to the city in search of a better job and thus a better life. On the contrary, if the respective authorities take necessary steps to provide employment opportunities in the suburbs by promoting more businesses there. Then people will settle down there.

On the other hand, the infrastructure facilities in a rural area may not be that good to support a business. As we are aware, today’s most enterprises are functioning on the foundation of the Internet. It is impossible to even think of running a business with a poor network connection for even just an hour. This may even impact the productivity of the business. And thus affecting the profitability. This is a kind of circle that tends to repeat itself. This may lead the business to a heavy loss and thereby affecting the lives of employees.

There may be numerous workers available in the rural areas. But they will not be as experienced and skilled as those in metropolitan areas. This is mainly due to the exposure to technological advancement in urban areas. Also, these days many businesses primarily focus on the customers. The majority of the customers are in the city. It may not be beneficial for the business, as they may not be able to provide their services to their customers like how they were able to in urban areas.
To summarize, moving to the suburbs may appear to be a feasible option for lowering traffic and pollution. But the after effect may be immeasurably higher. Many difficulties may arise as a reaction and some of them may not be in the vicinity of us to solve. Hence, I restate that the cons outweigh the pros.

Sample 8:

Many companies are encouraged to relocate to the suburbs by the government. This is in respect to the rising accommodation and transport issues. They think that moving to the countryside would reduce the precedent issues. In my opinion, the benefits are comparatively more in number than the drawbacks.

On the constructive part, the population density in the urban areas gets reduced. It may have an immense impact on reducing the traffic congestion and the pollution caused by vehicles.

This also means that the quantity of waste that is exposed to the cities reduces. Industries generally have a lot of waste as their derivative. It cannot be properly disposed of within the constrained land. This results in raging huge pollution which is harmful to the dense population.

Furthermore, as more enterprises locate in rural areas, rural residents will have the opportunity to better their living conditions. As a by-product, the people in the rural areas prosper as a result of the increased employment opportunities. Resulting in higher per capita income and a higher standard of living. Besides, the empowerment of the nation lies in upbringing the economic condition of the rural areas. By shifting the business to the suburbs, this can be developed to some extent.

Nevertheless, a lot of drawbacks are attached to this. The sudden shifting of businesses from cities to rural areas is not an easy task. It may result in disrupting the ecosystem by clearing lands for construction purposes. Though the congestion gets reduced, it may affect some other businesses like restaurants, shopping centers, etc. Their revenue may be reduced as the number of people is comparatively lower. If planned and executed properly, all of these issues can be resolved to a great extent.

However, there are a few drawbacks to moving the businesses to the suburbs. But in the long run, there will be a balance in the economy and population. Which will ultimately be beneficial for the entire nation and human beings. In my opinion, the benefits have the potential to outshine the drawbacks.

Sample 9:

The majority of industries and businesses are located in urban areas. And the challenges associated with this have prompted the idea of relocating industries and businesses to rural areas. Although there are some disadvantages, I believe there are many more advantages.

Moving large enterprises and factories to regional areas has several drawbacks. Including transportation constraints, the cost of rebuilding, security, difficulty in attracting new employees, and lack of communication channels. As a result, enterprises and the government would have to invest a significant amount of money even before beginning a business to set up these systems. Which most businesses would find difficult to accept. But it will provide major benefits to both city and rural residents.

However, relocating factories and other businesses from cities to the countryside will lighten key issues. Such as pollution, traffic congestion, and housing issues in many areas. Many cities are concerned with overpopulation, and decentralization would be a significant step toward reducing the urban population. Besides, the economic development of a country is often dependent on the development of the rural region. And this step will ensure that the rural area develops properly. Many cities are polluted as a result of industries, factories, and other large businesses. And this move would ensure a healthy living environment in urban regions.

The cost of labour and land rental for businesses or dwellings in rural areas is significantly lower than in metropolitan areas. As a result, businesses may be able to save a significant amount of money. Which can be utilized to increase business scale in manufacturing or invest in other industries. Housing would be more inexpensive as well. It is commonly observed that as a result of too many people seeking to live in the city. Land prices and even rents begin to rise high.

It seems to me that all of the benefits of shifting enterprises to the countryside significantly outweigh the disadvantages. It will help both metropolitan and rural residents to tackle the housing and transportation issues to a great extent.

Sample 10:

Enterprises are encouraged to relocate to the countryside to address housing and transport problems that are rising in urban areas. In my opinion, the merits outweigh the drawbacks.

There are considerable benefits of relocating firms out of metropolitan areas. The first benefit is that this policy can ease the housing shortage in big cities resulting from overpopulation. Large areas of land which are released due to the movement of companies could pave the way for the construction of more residential areas. As a result, this will lead to the fall of housing prices and more people will have the chance to settle in urban areas. Another merit might be that moving firms to rural areas can contribute to resolving the pressing problem of traffic congestion in metropolitan areas. The huge influx of commuters into the city every rush hour would be reduced as many of these people would now be travelling to their relocated jobs.

However, there are potential drawbacks of moving organizations from urban areas to the countryside. These companies will have to spend a huge amount of money rebuilding their premises. Also, this relocation will take them a long period of time to restart business activities, thereby giving their rivals a great chance to dominate the market. As a result, their competitiveness may be adversely affected.

In conclusion, the merits of easing the housing shortage and resolving the problem of traffic congestion in urban areas seem to outweigh the drawbacks of affecting the competitiveness of these relocated firms. Given this situation, it seems that governments should make it easy for them to implement the relocation by introducing tax incentives or tax relief.

Sample 11:

People of the current generation admire living in a big city instead of living in small towns or villages. The government of such regions encourages businesses to transfer to countryside areas to resolve transport and housing. In my opinion, it is more beneficial in several ways if companies move to rural areas.

The government encourages businesses to move to rural areas. If they move to the countryside people will also move there for jobs. There are several reasons why civilians prefer to live in the city but, their prime reason is the job. They live in the town so they can earn good money. If businesses are grown in cities, the population will also grow with it. Because of growth in the population of cities, that city will start facing several problems like pollution, traffic, inflation, epidemic. But the main problem for the town will be transportation and accommodation for their citizens. To create sufficient accommodation for the civilian government, we have to start making homes by replacing jungles and gardens. This creates lots of trouble in the environment too. So, if businesses do not move to rural areas, it will create problems for the government, civilians, and the environment.

There are a few disadvantages if the business will move to rural areas. Firstly, when they move to the new area, they are not sure that their current staff who are working in will move to rural areas as they can find something else to earn. Secondly, businesses will have a lot of costs to build their project again, so there are chances that companies will not make a profit sometimes. Finally, business there can be less accommodation, so the government has to build houses before the business starts there, and it has a risk of lots of costs.

To conclude I would like to say there are a few disadvantages if the business moves to ruler areas, but the pros are way better and more than cons. So, the government should encourage companies to move to rural areas.

Sample 12:

Many people believe that housing and transportation issues in many big cities today, governments should relocate businesses to the countryside. While I accept such policies can have some benefits, I would argue that the drawbacks it has are more significant.

On the one hand, moving businesses to suburban areas can solve some major problems. Firstly, by relocating big organizations, many transportation issues in the city centre could be solved. The relocations of businesses mean office workers will have to change their commuting habits. Every day, they will go outside the city centre, which helps to solve traffic congestion in the urban areas. Secondly, many workers will move to the countryside, resulting in a reduction of population density in the city. A smaller number of people living in the city means the housings problems will be less significant.

On the other hand, these policies can have some drawbacks. The first one is that far away businesses will adversely affect citizens’ lives. Moving businesses to rural areas means that people will have to spend more time on transportation. For example, supermarkets being moved to suburban areas will make daily shopping cost more time and energy for city shoppers. Additionally, the relocations will make the links between businesses disappear. The reason why many businesses choose to stay in the city is to save costs. Imagine if suppliers have to travel a hundred kilometres more to reach consumers, such changes can result in the loss of billions of dollars per year. By being located in the city, businesses can perform most effectively.

In conclusion, I believe that the drawbacks of business relocations outweigh their benefits.

Sample 13:

As transportation and housing issues worsen in many cities, some governments encourage firms to relocate to rural regions. During the course of this essay, I would analyse the given proposal objectively before drawing a rational conclusion.

Obviously, the mentioned relocation would have undoubtedly many advantages for businesses and society as a whole. First off, decreasing prices for resources like electricity, water, and other commodities could reduce operating costs. Additionally, governments offer significant advantages to organisations who are prepared to locate their facilities in villages or towns, such as tax exemptions and better value property. As an outcome, businesses can generate substantial profits, which eventually would strengthen the nation’s economy. Additionally, this gives locals employment possibilities, preventing employees from moving to cities in search of employment. By doing so, the issues existing in metropolitans would be indirectly solved. To be specific, Positive effects on urban areas include the resolution of concerns with housing, transportation congestion, and pollution due to the possible low population density.

On the other hand, nothing is free from drawbacks. The large-scale moving of businesses should not be one without potential flaws. To commence, it would be challenging to hire skilled employees with a sufficient level of expertise, which might cause the process to stall. Employers, in particular, would face an additional burden of training inexperienced workers, which could be a consequence of moving to an area with a low background in education. On top of that, modern businesses and industries rely heavily on the availability of the supply chain; thus, a lack of facilities and services makes it even more problematic for firms to set up their infrastructure.

To conclude, despite certain difficulties, governments should endeavour to relocate enterprises to villages or towns since it would benefit both the public and commercial firms.

Sample 14:

Currently, there is a trend that an increasing number of industries and businesses are being established not in big cities, but in some regional areas. Some people support this phenomenon because it brings numerous benefits, while others argue against it. This essay will discuss the issue from both perspectives.

It is true that we have obtained a lot of benefits with the moving of industries. To begin with, living conditions in metropolis have dramatically increased with fewer factories. A great many factories will cause environmental problems, in particular air pollution, which is utterly harmful to citizens. In addition, it can improve the development of economy rapidly. The product can be more efficient because the contact between two factories becomes more convenient. Another important point is that fewer industries provide more spaces for the improvement of big cities. Thus, the government can utilize these areas to establish basic living facilities, like parks and hospitals, which are extremely essential to the population.

Conversely, there are also some drawbacks of this phenomenon. First of all, it is inconvenient to city residents that all businesses move out from the metropolis to regional zones. Workers have no choice but to take a long trip to arrive at work. Moreover, longer distances mean higher cost of transportation, which wastes a great deal of energy. Last but not least, it leads to more pollution in these areas. Water pollution is a case in point. It is not only deleterious, but also difficult to recover.

In summary, although there are a few shortcomings of the change, it seems that the benefits outweigh the downsides, because it makes our daily lives better. As far as I am concerned, it is a good idea to persuade industries and businesses to move out from large cities to regional areas.

Sample 15:

Accommodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities. Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages? The movement of organizations from urban areas to less-developed provinces is a solution to various municipal problems, but we cannot turn a blind eye to the shortcomings of this trend. The essay will clarify both sides of the coin and demonstrate my view that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.

On the one hand, it is absurd to say that an organization can easily move from a major city to the countryside without suffering any losses. A change in terms of position may cost a firm, for example, a reduction in the quality of its workforce. Not every employee is willing to resettle in a faraway province, and they prefer seeking another career in the metropolis to maintain their current living standards. The enterprise, to handle such risk of brain drain, would have to hire local workers who are normally less competent. The expenses for their prerequisite training courses are significant, but an improvement in their professional performance would still not be guaranteed.

On the other hand, I believe that the advantages of this scenario are more important. Firstly, such relocation of organizations can reduce the population density in the urban areas. As a result, the influx of workers traveling in rush hours which causes traffic congestion would disappear. Secondly, the movement of companies’ headquarters makes way for the construction of more residential areas, so the citizens would no longer have to live in narrow houses and apartments anymore. Finally, factories carry along with them modern production lines to the suburban areas, hence the rural population might have access to such cutting-edge technological advancements, which have been by no means close to them ever.

In conclusion, I believe that governments should encourage companies to move to rural areas because of the mentioned considerable benefits.