All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
There have been calls for large corporations to build sports and social facilities for the local communities where they operate. In my view, I would agree on the grounds that these facilities can strengthen communal bonds and promote a company’s image in a positive light.
Firstly, as most people are increasingly beset with professional and familial duties, they often lack the time to participate in communal activities and forge meaningful connections with one another. By constructing sports and social facilities, these companies can grant these people the appropriate setting for them to participate in common activities. This is evident in cities well-known for quality of life such as Hanoi where most of the parks there have been built by Vinaconex, one of the largest companies in Vietnam. Hence, most of the local denizens are able to engage in conversation with each other and forge new relationships during holiday seasons or through recreational activities held in those parks.
Secondly, the provision of communal facilities can create a positive image of the sponsoring companies. These facilities promulgate a sense that the sponsors are giving back to the community and fulfilling public promises of social responsibility. This can therefore build trust between these large companies and the local people. To cite one instance, Nostrand Ltd., a latex manufacturer based in upstate New York, provided funding for local sports centers in various towns across the state, enabling their citizens to engage in various community-based sports. A by-product of this act is residents there now appreciate the brand and purchase the company’s products at a higher rate.
In conclusion, large companies should be encouraged to provide sports and social facilities for local communities as they can help strengthen communal bonds and promote their brand. Such facilities will continue to flourish in the near future because of these decided benefits.
Sample 2:
It has been suggested that big businesses should support local communities by providing facilities for people to socialise and play sports. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this point of view as supporting local communities should not be the responsibility of businesses.
Firstly, the provision of such facilities should be the duty of the government, not businesses. Governments collect taxes from citizens, and therefore should be responsible for providing facilities that enhance people’s quality of life. In other words, taxpayers’ money should be used to provide them with a decent standard of living. The welfare of people in the community should not be the concern of local businesses. Instead, they should solely focus on their own growth, making profits, maintaining a competitive edge, and ensuring their development. For example, it seems unfair to force multinational companies into solving local problems that should be handled by local governments.
Secondly, it is better for companies to allocate their resources to other aspects of their business. Most businesses do not have the funds available to simultaneously support the local community and promote their own growth. Sports and social facilities might be too expensive, deterring companies from further developing. It would be better if money could be spent on other aspects of work, such as salary increases, bonuses, and extra time off. This certainly benefits employees, increasing the level of job satisfaction among them, thereby encouraging them to work more diligently. As a result, this contributes to the national economy, helping create a motivated and committed workforce.
In conclusion, I believe that promoting social development and sports in local areas should not be the obligation of large companies but rather that of governments, so that companies can fully concentrate on business growth and employee productivity.
Sample 3:
Opinions vary on whether the provision of sports and social facilities to the local community an obligation for all companies should be. Although I may acknowledge the benefits of this suggestion, I still firmly think that this should not be mandatory for all.
Those who are in favor of companies providing sports and social facilities may have several cogent arguments. They may well argue that by doing so, companies can enhance their public image. For instance, Google, Apple, and other technology giants have been known to invest in local community projects, which has boosted their reputation as organizations that fulfill their corporate social responsibility. Furthermore, providing sports and social facilities can have a direct positive impact on employees of the company. Access to these amenities can improve employee well-being, reduce stress, and increase overall job satisfaction, which can make them more likely to be productive and engaged in their work and in turn ultimately benefits the company.
Nevertheless, I am firmly against the notion that all companies should be responsible for providing these facilities. One primary concern is that not all companies have the financial capability to undertake such initiatives. Small and medium-sized enterprises, in particular, may struggle to allocate funds for community projects without compromising their core business operations. Another reason is that the responsibility of providing sports and social facilities traditionally should mainly fall within the realm of government and public institutions as these entities are better positioned to assess community needs and allocate resources accordingly. While corporate involvement is beneficial, it should complement, rather than replace, public efforts.
In conclusion, while it is beneficial for companies to provide sports and social facilities to the local community, this should not be an obligation for all companies. Large corporations with the necessary resources can and should contribute to community development as part of their corporate social responsibility initiatives; however, smaller businesses should not be compelled to undertake such projects if it jeopardizes their financial stability.
Sample 4:
Whether sports and social facilities should be built by large corporations for the local community has become a topic of discussion. From my viewpoint, I strongly believe that this practice is reasonable and beneficial for both the locals and the businesses.
First of all, that large corporations build community facilities would improve the local’s welfare tremendously. Benefits and funds allocated to different areas in a country will vary depending on their economic and political importance. That is why in Vietnam, provinces like Hai Phong are less developed than Ho Chi Minh City or Hanoi, thus locals of Hai Phong do not have the chance to experience top-notch facilities as in big cities. Nevertheless, Hai Phong is home to various factories of well-known brands. If these businesses help pay for the construction of sports and recreational facilities in the province, Hai Phong’s citizens would have equal quality of life as Hanoians. Since the government cannot invest uniformly throughout a country, large enterprises building local facilities would be a great help in improving the country’s social welfare.
Moreover, providing sports and social facilities for the local community is a way for businesses to fulfill their corporate social responsibility. As a matter of fact, all corporations are bound to give back to the community in one way or another. However, in comparison to doing charities or organizing marathons, providing the community with sports and social facilities would leave a more lasting impact and on a much larger scale. Not only that people from different social classes can make use of the given installations, but these facilities would last for many years to come, reminding the locals of the businesses’ good deeds.
In conclusion, it is recommended that large businesses give back to the community by equipping them with sports and social facilities. In this way, the community’s welfare and the companies’ image would simultaneously be promoted positively.
Sample 5:
Whether large corporations should provide sports and social facilities within their local communities has been a cause for debate in recent years. While some claim that corporations should only be driven towards generating profit, I believe otherwise, as there are causes for doing so, and significant benefits that may arise from this.
On the one hand, this might be a frivolous idea because a corporation's usual responsibility is to its shareholders, and not the broader community. It is often believed that large organizations, firstly, should focus on staying profitable to sustain their own health. By emphasizing their core business and maximizing profits, corporations could indirectly contribute to society by creating employment, improving the economy in the locality where they operate as a result. Public welfare, furthermore, is chiefly the government's responsibility, not businesses’. Instead of having companies build sports and community facilities, the state can utilize tax revenue and fund the aforementioned public amenities and services instead.
There might be a case to argue for corporate sponsorship of sports and social facilities, however. Initially, large companies have an ethical obligation to contribute to their local communities. These gargantuan organizations, which may operate globally and generate substantial profits, should devote some of their resources for the public good, because they were able to take advantage of rules and regulations where they operate for business gain. Besides that, an initiative such as this fosters community spirit and a positive environment. A local area would appear livelier and more reputable if recreational and social facilities exist for the community to gather at and participate in various activities. This, in turn, has the added effect of enabling it to attract further investment, sparking economic growth.
In conclusion, despite the claim that large companies ought to be profit-driven, I agree with them contributing to their local communities by establishing sports facilities and the like for public use. However, rather than being mandated, such a contribution should be encouraged and incentivized by the state, so that all parties involved may derive maximum benefit.
Sample 6:
The role of large companies in supporting their local communities has long been debated, particularly regarding whether they should provide sports and social facilities. While some argue that this responsibility falls outside their primary business objectives, others contend that such initiatives can yield numerous benefits. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my opinion.
Those who oppose the idea of large companies funding community sports and social facilities argue that these corporations should focus on their core business activities. They believe that diverting resources to non-essential projects could negatively impact a company's profitability and competitive edge. For instance, the allocation of funds to build a community sports center might limit investment in research and development, potentially stifling innovation. Moreover, the responsibility for public amenities traditionally lies with the government, which is better equipped to manage such projects efficiently. However, it is also argued that companies have a social obligation to give back to the communities where they operate, as this can enhance their reputation and foster goodwill among local residents.
However, I believe that providing sports and social facilities can significantly benefit both the community and the company itself. Firstly, these facilities can promote a healthier lifestyle among residents, reducing the prevalence of chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart conditions. For example, in Vietnam, where urbanization has led to a more sedentary lifestyle, access to community sports centers can encourage regular physical activity. Furthermore, the presence of such amenities can foster a sense of community and improve social cohesion, making the area more attractive to potential employees and investors. If companies invested in these facilities, they would likely see a positive impact on employee morale and productivity, as a healthier and happier workforce is more engaged and efficient.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides, I am convinced that large companies should indeed provide sports and social facilities for their local communities. Not only does this fulfill a social responsibility, but it also offers tangible benefits that can enhance both community well-being and corporate success. By investing in such initiatives, companies can create a more supportive environment for their employees and contribute to the overall development of the areas in which they operate.
Sample 7:
Exercise and social interaction are obviously essential for human life in general. As a result, some argue that businesses ought to offer local communities sports and social amenities. Since people can take pleasure in it and share their expertise, in my opinion, it appears to be advantageous to the majority.
In today's world, one way that people can lend a helping hand to their communities is by bringing up a cultural exposition and permitting members of the general public to display their own works of handicraft there. If they charge a fee to get in, not only will they be able to provide entertainment for their guests, but they will also be able to collect cash. In addition, it has the potential to serve as a tourism destination in each region, which has the dual effect of benefiting both society and the economy. In addition to this, the populace might pick up tidbits of information by working together as a team with a large corporation. Despite this, the events could end up costing a significant amount of money.
But there are many businesses on Earth. Several people from different places, families, and communities work for the same business. Putting in place sports and social facilities could be good for both societies and businesses. For a sports facility, a company might hold a sports event or sports day that local people can join. As a result, this may get most people to care more about their health and bodies. Also, it is likely to help people in the community get along well with each other.
In conclusion, even if a substantial budget is necessary, it is well worth it to have the sports and social facilities available because there are many benefits associated with doing so. It has the potential to enhance both the community and the general welfare of the population.
Sample 8:
Organizations are often urged to provide recreational and entertainment facilities such as gyms, cafes, and movie theaters for the local community. For many reasons, this is an assertion with which I agree wholeheartedly.
To begin with, amenities should be offered to the whole society as local communities are the most important group of society. It would be mutually beneficial to both the company’s sector and the communal group. In the first place, a great number of residents invest a significant portion of their free time in order to acquire the advantages of provided facilities; thus, they end up shelling out a significant amount of money. Therefore, businesses have the opportunity to boost their revenues by capitalizing on this repeated pattern.
Building hospitals and shopping centers can make people's lives better. This makes people more likely to try new things and do well in their communities. Second, making games and activities for the public helps people stay healthy. In addition, this trend of increasing numbers of businesses adopted in the modern era has resulted in the creation of a large number of jobs as well as a diverse array of entertainment options for people. This will not only boost the overall income but also enhance the economical condition of the economy in the global platform.
To conclude, I am of the opinion that the preceding remarks lend support to the viewpoint that businesses ought to build social and sports facilities for domestic consumers because, in the long run, there will be benefits for both parties involved.
Sample 9:
Every individual, organization, and government in a community bears a unique obligation toward its members and toward society as a whole. This idea that the party needs to provide social amenities for the general population is one with which I fully disagree. In this essay, I will first provide a discussion of the topic at hand, then move on to offer a conclusion that is supported by logic.
Every nation has private teams that support its economy. They can offer an appropriate environment for the schooling of common people, as well as recruit individuals and pay them regular incomes. As a result, they assist in reducing unemployment. In addition, they may offer their personnel greater amenities including health care, sports facilities, and educational amenities. As a result, their workforce works harder and more enthusiastically, which ultimately produces positive results. More staff are required as a result of increased financial activity and additional benefits. The government can reduce unemployment with the aid of such a function.
However, if the club participates in additional activities, such as promoting social facilities, it is possible that its members will become distracted from the primary objective. In contrast, because members of private groups are responsible for paying their own costs and expenses along with their benefits, these groups are cost conscious. Additionally, they do not enjoy spending money in this sector. If kids are forced to participate in these activities, they probably won't do very well.
To sum up, to the best of my knowledge, it is preferable for the general public, businesses, and the government for this activity to be carried out by an organization that is not-for-profit or charitable, and businesses stand to gain more if they improve working conditions for their employees.
Sample 10:
It is often argued that major corporations are obliged to construct sporting and social facilities for local residents. I largely agree with this view, considering the positive contributions of such initiatives to the local community and companies themselves.
It is understandable why some individuals oppose the idea of placing community obligations on corporations. Specifically, establishing and maintaining such facilities often requires tremendous investment, which could otherwise be allocated towards core business activities. For instance, instead of building a public sports complex, a company could use these funds to develop innovative products or enhance operational efficiency. This redirection of resources is essential for staying competitive and ensuring long-term growth, both of which are aligned with a company’s primary business goals. Additionally, as companies usually prioritize areas where they operate, solely relying on them for such facilities may lead to unequal access across different communities. To address this issue, the government should play a key role in providing sports and social facilities using taxpayer funds.
Despite the opposition to the proposed social responsibilities for large corporations, I believe they should still contribute to the expansion of public infrastructure. Firstly, as regular physical activity is important for preventing chronic diseases and promoting overall well-being, the corporate provision of sporting facilities can foster a healthier community. For example, funded by Google, the recreational centers in Mountain View, California offer residents a space to exercise, socialize, and relax, thereby reducing stress and enhancing their mental health. Secondly, the construction of community facilities can enhance a company’s reputation and strengthen its brand loyalty. When a company invests in the local community, it sends a strong message about its commitment to social obligations, potentially promoting customer loyalty and attracting more talented candidates who strictly value corporate social responsibility.
In summary, although some individuals may argue against placing community obligations on corporations due to potential financial strain and unequal access, I believe that such initiatives should still be highly encouraged as they would contribute to a healthier society and better brand recognition.
Sample 11:
The debate over whether large corporations should offer sports and social facilities in their local communities has been ongoing. While some argue that corporations should focus solely on profit generation, I disagree, as there are compelling reasons and significant benefits associated with such initiatives.
On one hand, it may seem frivolous to expect corporations to prioritize community welfare over profitability. It is commonly held that corporations should first and foremost ensure their profitability and sustainability. By focusing on their core business and maximizing profits, corporations indirectly contribute to society by creating jobs and boosting local economies. Public welfare, moreover, is primarily the responsibility of governments, not businesses. Instead of companies investing in sports and community facilities, governments can utilize tax revenues to fund such public amenities and services.
However, there is a case to be made for corporate sponsorship of sports and social facilities. Large corporations have an ethical obligation to contribute to their local communities. These global entities, which often earn substantial profits, should allocate resources to the public good, considering the benefits they derive from the regulatory environments in which they operate. Such initiatives also promote community spirit and a positive atmosphere. Communities with recreational and social facilities tend to be more vibrant and attractive, thereby fostering economic growth.
In conclusion, while it is argued that corporations should prioritize profit, I support their involvement in providing sports and social facilities for the community. Rather than mandatory, such contributions should be encouraged and incentivized by governments to maximize benefits for all stakeholders.
Sample 12:
There is a lot of debate about who should pay for recreational facilities in communities. Although some people believe the business sector should provide these facilities, it is my opinion that this is the role of government.
Some people think that companies should do more to support local communities. By providing sports and social facilities, it is argued that companies can directly benefit communities. Sports facilities will mean the local people are healthier and social facilities will provide meeting places and cultural attractions which will enrich people’s lives. However, it is likely that companies will see this as a way to advertise and may build facilities simply to improve the image of their brand.
Personally, I believe that the government should be responsible for providing recreational facilities. If they are provided by the government, facilities can be advertising-free, aimed solely at improving life in the community. Taxes on businesses could be used to fund these facilities, but the building and maintenance should be carried out by the government. All local businesses could be taxed, which would be more effective than just a few companies providing facilities. This solution provides facilities that will improve the community and are paid for by the business sector.
In conclusion, it is important that public facilities remain advertising free and so I believe it is better for the government to provide recreational facilities which could be funded by taxes on businesses. Before the government decides what to build in each area, local communities must be consulted to see what they really need and want.
Sample 13:
Major businesses are expected to contribute to society in the form of providing sporting and other communicative benefits. I strongly agree with this statement because it is their obligation to give back to people which can accelerate social prosperity.
Companies’ profit and revenue depends on people’s favour to their products and service; therefore, the businesses owe to the societies to give them back which could be in terms of donating infrastructure and services. This is resemblance to a win for both ends because a society is benefited from the given facilities, and at the same time, the contributing company can project its presence to a wider group of prospective consumers. Furthermore, from the society’s point of view, it might be too difficult to build sporting arenas and other congregational event spaces spending people’s hard-earned money, whereas big farms can easily build structures that facilitate a community’s engagement, healthcare, education, and employment etc.
Not only assisting with economic problems, but also it stimulates the cultural activities. If there are no places to play sports or gather around, people cannot present their work, share their thoughts, and care each other more directly. In fact, getting together somewhere boosts up emotional attachment among the community members. Furthermore, having the facilities, they can invite music concerts or sport competitions when famous athletes or singers can cause an occasion to bring the people under an umbrella of togetherness which flourishes a community to its best.
To conclude, I believe that big businesses are obliged to provide the society such structural facilities that can help its members to thrive. This social contribution is beneficial to both companies and societies as businesses showcase their presence, and the people are assisted with finance and culture.
Sample 14:
In today’s fast-paced and highly competitive world, the role of companies in contributing to the well-being of local communities has become increasingly important. While some argue that companies should focus solely on their core business activities, I firmly believe that they have a responsibility to provide sports and social facilities for local communities.
First and foremost, companies have a moral obligation to give back to the communities in which they operate. By providing sports and social facilities, they can contribute to the physical and mental well-being of local residents. This can have a positive impact on the overall quality of life in the community and foster a sense of belonging and togetherness among its members.
Moreover, offering sports and social facilities can also be beneficial for companies themselves. By promoting a healthy and active lifestyle, they can improve the physical fitness and overall health of their employees. This, in turn, can lead to increased productivity, reduced absenteeism, and lower healthcare costs. Additionally, providing social facilities such as community centers or event spaces can enhance the company’s reputation and create a positive image in the eyes of the public.
Furthermore, investing in sports and social facilities can help companies build stronger relationships with the local community. By organizing events, tournaments, or social gatherings, companies can create opportunities for interaction and collaboration between their employees and local residents. This can lead to a greater sense of unity and cooperation, ultimately benefiting both the company and the community as a whole.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities. Not only does this fulfill their moral obligation to give back, but it also brings about numerous benefits for both the company and the community. It is imperative for companies to recognize the importance of investing in the well-being of local communities and take proactive steps to contribute to their development.
Sample 15:
A bone of contention here is whether large-scale organizations should support the local community by setting up recreational facilities. While there are obvious financial implications involved in this decision, I stand in firm agreement that the aforesaid approach can be proven as a win-win situation for both companies and the general public.
To commence with, the local inhabitants are likely to benefit immensely from this approach’s implementation. To be precise, the availability of a well-equipped sports club in the neighbourhood with sponsorships could pave the way to success for many young athletics, who often are deprived of such facilities owing to the limited funds. In addition, setting up free local commuting, bus shelters, medical camps in the community is beneficial for many people in need. For instance, the ITC organization sponsors the annual marathon in Chennai and sponsors the winner, consequently supporting local runners.
Probing further, the large-scale companies are expected to be equally in gain. First, sponsoring the social events can be a shortcut to increase brand visibility and build a company’s positive image. To put it simply, the large firms can gain the local population’s trust via these events and get their visible support in the company’s future endeavours. To exemplify, Cognizant, a multinational firm, has a dedicated department called corporate social responsibility to support the local community, which has earned it a good reputation on humanitarian grounds.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down stating that sponsorship of sports or social events by the gigantic firms can be equally beneficial for them and local people. Hence companies should contribute more which would be ploughed back to them in the form of goodwill and raising its profile.
Sample 16:
It is a saying that exercising and socializing is a necessity of human life. Thus, some experts suggest that companies should provide sports and social facilities intended for local communities. According to me, it is a beneficiary approach for the majority of the people as it allows them to enjoy and exchange their knowledge. As of today's date, there are several organizations functioning globally. A given organization consists of a number of workers that originate from a different place, family and community. Organizing sports and social facilities helps with the provision of a positive impact on both societies and organizations. This will lead to encouraging more awareness based on health and body. Additionally, it helps with building the foundation for a good relationship between people and community. People can also consider supporting localities by organizing cultural exhibitions and allowing the public to cooperate and display their handicrafts or relevant skills. Along with entertaining visitors, it will also help with generating a sufficient amount of revenue in return. Moreover, it will work as a tourist attraction for the concerned area where it is being organized that will help with enhancement and upliftment of the society and economy at the same time. This will also help with development of skills and knowledge. This will also provide individuals with opportunities to work for big giants and build their own reputation. However, these events might cost a lot of investment for an organization, but eventually it is a positive investment. This will help with building the reputation of the organization and ensure a long-term positive relationship. These initiatives will help with improvement of the lives of locals, help with declining rates of poverty and further ensure decreased crime rates. This will help with increased socialization and communication within their own communities and further ensure that there is a positive bond being built and established. To conclude with, there are a number of advantages that sports, and social facilities will help with, such as raising a lot of funds and several others. It can improve and uplift the living standards of communities.
Sample 17:
Needless to mention that companies intend to sustain sports and local facilities in order for local communities. I strongly agree with the statement as there are a number of factors and these have been discussed in the preceding sections below. I believe that efforts provided by organizations towards creating facilities for employees will build a friendly and productive environment. These will help with building an appropriate workplace environment, develop goals and ensure appropriate employee appreciation. To understand, we can quote the example of Jack Ma, who is the creator of Alibaba and is a successful businessman in today’s era. However, before he started his business, he made an attempt towards building lifelong friendships amongst the members of his concerned team. He was able to yield productivity due to the application of concepts of sports and social facilities that ensured improved relationships and increased productivity for his concerned team. These have proved to be beneficial in the long term to ensure appropriate productivity for his concerned workplace and ensure that employees get appropriate breaks and not unnecessary ones that lead to a loss of productivity at the workplace. It is true that companies always intend to develop their business opportunities in order to ensure increased turnover, improve the quality of the product or service and quality of work for the workers associated with the organization. However, there are few bad outcomes of these kinds of sports and social facilities for local communities, such as making workers irresponsible, and further this will also lead to loss of ability of the workers to ensure productivity on a daily basis. This will also lead the individuals to forget their responsibilities associated with modern companies at the global level. In order to conclude with, providing opportunities for workers to solemnly depend upon the managers of concerned organizations for the purpose of management of worker’s condition at a workplace. On the other hand, organizing sports and social events for local communities is a positive approach towards providing excitement and enjoyment.
Sample 18:
These days companies and global organizations are opting for exploration of several avenues towards ensuring promotion of their companies as well as their products and services. It is a compelling measure to ensure provision of these relevant facilities for local communities. The major move that can be considered is to provide immense support to the individuals that think this is a good initiative. People in today’s era are burdened with responsibilities both in the fields of professional and personal life. Thus, it becomes complicated to ensure active aprticfiaption in communal activities. Organizing these social and sports facilities will help these individuals to actively engage themselves and be part of fun activities and engage with communities at the same time. It will help them with provision of a potential break from their daily life that might be a burden or might seem boring to them. These will help with engaging in active communication with individuals with different mindsets. Additionally, organizations considering these kinds of activities will help embrace the young talents present within the companies. Moreover, these kinds of opportunities will help with showcasing talents and become a part of the limelight. This will also help organizations with opting for brand ambassadors for their product or services. This will encourage communities to educate their children and become a part of these kinds of potential organizations. These events in the long run might turn out to be profitable for the companies as well and help with reaching out to more people and uphold their goods. For instance, a football match or series is organized by a sports company to promote their products. This will provide youngsters and players to avail and use the products and provide helpful reviews that will ensure free and appropriate promotion of their products. Moreover, this will help with appreciation of values and stocks owned by the company and will definitely increase the interest and consumer base for the organization. I would like to conclude this essay by highlighting a certain set of rules that can be built by an organization to regulate and ensure the participation of young employee bases and people from local communities.
Sample 19:
Many believe that substantial businesses should construct sports and communal amenities for the local populace. While I admit that this practice can help promote companies' image, I still mostly disagree with this opinion as this may distract them from their main target and governments should undertake responsibilities of looking after their citizens.
The first reason for my belief is that offering leisure structures and public gathering places to the masses can be a distraction for companies' business activities. This is because their primary goal is to survive in a hyper-competitive global market and any extra social obligations can be exorbitantly expensive. Therefore, this action can decrease their competitiveness and impact their financial stability by diverting resources to irrelevant purposes rather than investing in research and development or in-house training, thus driving them away from their core operations.
Moreover, I also consider that these social responsibilities should be associated with governmental initiatives. In fact, the general public pay tax in hopes of the authorities providing them with improved public welfare. By allocating the state budget to develop sports centres and communal venues, policymakers can be seen as more reliable and promote unity amongst the citizenries.
However, I concede that this can help enterprises enhance their brand awareness. If companies showcase their commitment to the physical and mental well-being of the public, they can gain more support. Therefore, this can somehow increase the profit since businesses can attract more loyal customers that align with companies' sets of values, increasing their market share.
In conclusion, I somewhat believe that companies should not bear the role of developing sports and community infrastructure for society because they might deviate from their main objectives and governments are responsible for such construction. However, I acknowledge that this can assist corporations in articulating a positive organisational image to consumers. Where possible, large conglomerates should cooperate with the government to provide beneficial amenities to the population.
Sample 20:
The provision of sports and social amenities by companies for local communities is a topic that sparks debate. I am inclined to support this notion to a certain extent due to various reasons.
On the one hand, offering sports and social facilities can significantly benefit the community. Individuals require venues for physical activities and social interactions. For instance, companies can establish parks or sports centers, which can contribute to the well-being and contentment of the residents. Such initiatives may not only enhance the physical health of the individuals but also foster a sense of community spirit. Furthermore, by demonstrating a commitment to the welfare of the locality, companies can improve their public image, potentially attracting more clientele.
On the contrary, it is essential to acknowledge that not all companies possess the financial capacity to develop such amenities. Smaller enterprises, in particular, may face constraints in terms of financial resources. The construction and upkeep of sports and social facilities entail substantial expenses. Imposing such obligations on small companies could jeopardize their sustainability. Moreover, the responsibility of providing public amenities like parks and sports centers predominantly lies with the government. Governments have access to greater resources and thus are better equipped to ensure the availability of essential facilities for all communities.
In conclusion, although the idea of companies offering sports and social facilities for local communities is appealing, its practicality may be limited. Smaller businesses may lack the financial means to engage in such initiatives, while the primary responsibility for providing these amenities rests with the government. Therefore, while companies contributing to community well-being is beneficial, expecting them to solely shoulder this responsibility may not be feasible in all cases.
Sample 21:
Nowadays, companies are exploring various strategies to promote their brand and products, with one compelling measure being the provision of facilities for local communities. I totally agree with this practice because it not only benefits the residents but also serves the interests of the companies themselves.
Firstly, organizing sports and social events allows community members to engage in enjoyable activities, thereby improving their quality of life. For example, at Google's campus in Mountain View, California, the company hosts diverse sports and social events like the annual Google Soccer Tournament and community fitness classes. These events not only provide fun and engaging activities but also foster a sense of community well-being. As a result, the residents' lives are enhanced, and Google's image as a socially responsible and community-oriented company is strengthened.
Secondly, providing such facilities helps companies reach a broader audience and promote their products. In many countries, companies sponsor public areas such as beaches or parks and, in return, are allowed to advertise in these spaces. For instance, when a sports company organizes a football match and uses its own products, the participants and spectators get to experience these products firsthand. This exposure often leads to increased brand recognition and sales, as players and onlookers are more likely to purchase the products they have tried and enjoyed during the events.
In conclusion, companies should indeed provide sports and social facilities for local communities, as it enhances residents' quality of life and offers significant promotional opportunities for the companies.
Sample 22:
Some individuals argue that large corporations should invest in providing sports and social facilities for the local community. Although there are potential benefits to this approach, I firmly believe that it is not the responsibility of big companies.
There are several positive effects if large corporations provide sports and social amenities. Many local areas suffer from a shortage of such facilities, which can be costly to establish. As a result, if large corporations invest in these areas, local residents can benefit significantly, promoting their mental and physical well-being. Moreover, local governments may experience less financial pressure, which can be directed to other essential services. Additionally, corporations can gain benefits from such investments, including brand advertising, contributing positively to the community, and enhancing their corporate image.
However, I disagree that it is the duty of large corporations to fund sports and social facilities. Primarily, these companies have other core responsibilities such as product development and employee training. Diverting funds to community facilities could impose a significant financial burden and impede their primary operational goals. Furthermore, there are numerous other ways for corporations to contribute to the local community, such as creating employment opportunities for local residents or offering work experience programs.
In conclusion, while there are arguments in favor of large corporations investing in social and sports facilities, I personally believe that this should not be considered their responsibility. Instead, their focus should remain on their primary business activities, and there are alternative ways to support the local community.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Đang tải chế độ Học...
Hot: 1000+ đề thi giữa kì 1 lớp 1-12 đầy đủ các môn (Update 2026) (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
Đăng ký VIP để học và luyện thi không giới hạn
Trọn bộ quyền lợi trên Vietjack, trong một tài khoản.
- Phòng luyện thi cấp tốc: ĐGNL - ĐGTD, Tốt nghiệp THPT, Ôn vào 10, Ôn vào 6, Ôn Giữa kì/Cuối kì
- Hơn 200K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
- Với 3tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
- Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
- Xem hàng ngàn bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
- Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
- Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện
- Đăng ký ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Today technology has changed how people interact with each other. I believe the biggest effects it has had on relationships are that it has reduced in-person interaction and that it has led to the development of online relationships. This has been a positive development because often cyber relationships are more meaningful than in-person relationships.
Technology has reduced face-to-face interaction. For instance, it is not uncommon to see two people sitting at the same table in a restaurant, checking their phones every 30 seconds, and only talking to each other occasionally.
Technology has also given rise to online relationships. Nowadays anyone that has access to the Internet and computers can create a free Facebook or Twitter account and build their social networks on these platforms no matter where on the planet they reside. Take, for example, Chinese teenagers who like collecting insects. On the Internet, they can find and connect with others who share this particular hobby, even if those people live in the Amazon rainforest.
This should be seen as a positive trend because cyberspace relationships can be very meaningful. Today it is very common that those in a person's immediate circle do not support what they pursue. For example, many street artists are looked down on by their family members. Fortunately, Facebook groups give them the power to build their own communities where they can support each other. The inspiration and motivation they obtain there can drive them to work hard to move toward their goals.
In conclusion, technology has reduced in-person interaction and has meanwhile enabled online relationships. This has definitely been a positive trend because online relationships are often more satisfying and meaningful than face-to-face ones.
Sample 2:
Technology is a crucial tool for communication in modern times. It is flourishing in each and every field of communication. Though this invention has changed the way people interact around the world, it has both positive and negative impact on the relationship of people.
To embark on, with regard to the positive development, technological advancement has made communication between organizations more convenient and time-saving. Many companies and organizations use tools like social media, email and forum to influence a larger number of audiences. This also serves as an advanced mode of learning since schools adopt the method of smart classrooms. With the availability of ecommerce, freelance websites, social media marketing, people can easily buy and sell products and services with effortless communication.
On the other hand, the drawbacks of technology on the relationships of people cannot be ignored. Though technology has advanced greatly, it still lacks the emotional touch of communication. It has affected the love and affection people crave with communication. Millennials today are more fascinated by the virtual world, thereby forgetting the practical side of life. Modern modes of communication are making people busy and less productive. Sharing personal information on social media also invades people’s privacy. For example, individuals spending hours on social media interaction interacting with people from around the world and wasting their valuable time. In fact, family vacation which was previously a private affair has now become a public affair.
To sum up, communication technology can be a blessing or a curse depending upon how people make use of it. Even though it is an easy method of interaction, the relationships formed through technological interaction lack trust and emotion. Hence, people should give preference to face-to-face communication.
Sample 3:
It is evident that technology has transformed the ways of communication and influenced relationships in a variety of ways. In my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects of this.
The principal way in which relationships have been affected is that they tend to be at a distance rather than face-to-face. The advent of the internet has made it easy for business owners to communicate across the world, with remote job opportunities one call away. Online educational programs are available for people residing in different countries, and it is no longer a dream to attend live classes from the comfortable environment of a home. Not only this, the social platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube have revolutionized relationships, be it making online friendships with people from other countries or staying in touch with loved ones. Based on this perspective, technology has influenced relationships in a positive way.
However, despite these advances, the quality of interaction has significantly declined in several respects. If people are developing most of their relationships online, this means that they may also have less fact-to-face contact. This kind of contact on a personal level is important for human beings to feel wanted and a part of society. This may be a particular problem for children's social development as they used to be seen playing out on the streets but are now too often indoors. Technology can also mean people are detached from what is going on around them even when they are out, as can be seen by the many people staring into their mobile phones as they travel or walk around.
In conclusion, technology has brought some positive developments in the ways people interact with each other. However, there are also some negative impacts of technology on the types of relationships people make.
Sample 4:
Technology has hardly left any human feeling untouched. Instead, it has played a great role in manipulating and transforming it to a great extent. One of the most highly impacted aspects in this context is human interaction.
Technology has laid its hands on human behavior and has greatly influenced the pattern of human interaction since its introduction. From social media platforms to FaceTime applications, staying in touch has become easier with time. However, it has its downsides as well. With such high-end digital connections, intimate relationships have seen a significant decrease ever since.
These changes result from the freedom of hiding genuine emotions that technology brings. People can now fake caring about someone, express false love, and connect just for the sake of words. This has led to loosened family bonds, false promises between partners, and much more. People do interact with each other, but this interaction is often fake and untrue. Technology's significant impact on human interaction leads to various unwanted consequences. A surge in depression cases, suicides, and unwise decisions have been recorded as a result of such interactions.
Hence, technology has influenced the way people interact both positively and negatively. Undoubtedly, it has helped humans connect from miles away with their loved ones yet has made relations less meaningful and degraded their overall quality.
Sample 5:
Technology has brought vast changes in human behavior since its introduction. Moreover, with its rapid advancement and new changes, it is impacting relationships more rapidly. Interactions have recently been made more accessible due to technology. People can now connect easily and from the ease of their homes. However, it also has its downsides. A detailed study of this significant impact on human relationships due to technology can be understood with various examples.
In recent years, technology has helped humans stay connected at all times. With technology spreading its arms, connections can be made even in the most unexpected and tribal areas of the world. However, this has ultimately transformed human behavior and the way people interact with each other.
A prime example of this change is how people interact since social media's introduction. The introduction of social media platforms has made it easier for people to connect with their loved ones, even at a distance. However, it has entirely transformed how people interact with their close surroundings. This has also led to the expression of fake feelings and false expressions.
Overall, technology has transformed the entire interaction cycle of human beings without letting us realize it. More connections over the internet have paved the way for broken real-life relationships and have ultimately degraded the quality of relationships.
Sample 6:
There has been a change in the different aspects of social relations as affected by technology which we can introduced as more of a post-positively than post-negatively impact.
First, technology has immensely extended the speed and convinience of communication and thus the worth of relationships. For example, a university learner who is learning in another country can use video-calling to speak with the parents daily. An instantaneous means of communication makes it easier to avoid having to wait for a letter to arrive for a day or more as is the norm. Furthermore, social networks allow a person to get acquanted with like-minded strangers with similar interests, career choices, or hobbies, therefore create friendships that last a lifetime.
Despite this perception, this development is fairly beneficial to the masses. Improved communication technology reduces pressure and creates the need for belonging. For instance, when there is negative information, people get to act quickly. Also, positive information is more effective when shared immediately and it helps enhance interpersonal relationships. In addition, this has led to the growth of businesses and the eradication of geographical barriers whereby a company can comfortably and easily transact business with an organization in another country at any given time.
Altogether, it can be highlighted that technology plays a vital role in changing social relations by providing more effective and pleasant means of communication. It has made interpersonal communication better, provided businesses with links and connections as well as made everyone have equal access to information. Thus, it can be concluded that the purpose and use of technology have been mainly beneficial for interactions and relationships for the majority of people.
Sample 7:
It is true that new technologies have had an influence on communication between people. Technology has affected relationships in various ways, and in my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects.
Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, telephones and the Internet allow businesspeople in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. For example, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.
On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between people in different countries was much more difficult when communication was limited to written letters or telegrams. Nowadays, interactions by email, phone or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings, and many of us benefit from these interactions, either in work or social contexts. On the other hand, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result ofisolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these 'virtual' relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships.
In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionized communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.
Sample 8:
There has been a complex alteration in the various aspects of social relations due to technological advancement resulting in more positive impact than negatives.
First of all, the usage of technology has tremendously augmented the speed and ease of interaction making the relations’ depth richer. For example, a university student studying in another country can utilize video-calling to maintain quotidian contact with his or her parents. Real-time messaging banishes the lengthy wait for the letter, which was taken as conventional before. Besides, one is able to interact with strangers with similar interests, jobs, or hobbies, hence fostering friendships that endure a lifetime.
This development is predominantly propitious for the people. Advanced communication technology reduces stress and creates a feeling of belongingness. For instance, the sectional publicity of negative information can be quickly followed by timely responses. And just as to promote the fast exchange of positive messages, cooperation is strengthened between people. In addition, this technological advancement has boosted business development and erased hegemonic constraints and restrictions that enable business organizations to freely and easily connect with global organizations at any time.
Therefore, one is able to deduce that relations in society have been significantly mediated by technology in the manner in which humans interact offering more effective and fulfilling ways. It has made interpersonal communication easier, created business relationships and opportunities, and given equal opportunity for information access. Hence, the major impact of technology is analyzing and interpreting common interaction and relationship profiles that can be deemed more beneficial and helpful for most people.
Sample 9:
The advent and rapid development of technology have fundamentally transformed the dynamics of interpersonal interactions among individuals. This has also transformed the way we form relationships and bond with each other. This essay contends that the evolution of technology has, in fact, catalyzed a positive shift in the types of relationships people form, fostering connectivity and enhancing social engagement.
Technology has diversified the ways individuals establish and maintain relationships. Social media platforms, for instance, have facilitated connections among individuals globally, transcending geographical barriers. Additionally, online dating applications have revolutionized how people meet and form romantic relationships, offering a wide array of choices and opportunities to connect with like-minded individuals. Technology has also gifted us swift and interactive communication with loved ones no matter the distance. For instance, someone living abroad can make video calls and talk to his or her family members whenever they want. This has reduced the communication gap and significantly enhanced our options to contact others in real-time unlike in the past when sending handwritten letters was perhaps the best option to convey messages or contact someone.
This evolution in the types of relationships forged through technology signifies a positive development. Online connectivity allows individuals to maintain contact with friends, family, and acquaintances across vast distances. Moreover, digital platforms enable marginalized groups, such as those with disabilities or introverted personalities, to establish meaningful connections they may struggle to form in traditional social settings. For instance, social networking sites provide platforms for introverted individuals to express themselves and interact comfortably, fostering self-confidence and social skills.
In conclusion, the impact of technology on relationship dynamics has been transformative, offering diverse avenues for connectivity and social interaction. The ability to form connections across distances and the empowerment of individuals who face social barriers underscore the positive aspects of technological advancements. Embracing these changes in relationship dynamics signifies a positive shift towards enhanced connectivity and inclusivity in contemporary society.
Sample 10:
The ubiquitous presence of technology has undoubtedly redefined the landscape of human interaction, altering the very nature of how we build and maintain relationships. While the advancements of the digital age offer a plethora of tools for communication and connection, a closer examination reveals a disturbing trend – the erosion of genuine, meaningful relationships.
With technology, we make friends more often than ever. We also have a variety of tools to connect with others and remain in touch with people we care about. But one undeniable consequence of this technology-driven relationship is the rise of superficial and fleeting interactions online. Social media platforms, while fostering a sense of instant connectivity, often facilitate shallow exchanges and curated self-presentation. In the pursuit of likes and followers, meaningful conversations and authentic connections are often sacrificed, fostering a culture of virtual intimacy that lacks the depth and genuineness of face-to-face interaction.
As a result, of the constant bombardment of digital stimuli can contribute to social anxiety and a fear of missing out, hindering our ability to develop genuine relationships. The pressure to maintain an online presence and curate a perfect digital persona can lead individuals to withdraw from real-world interactions, hindering their ability to connect authentically with others. And this is a disturbing outcome of our digital relationship. Additionally, the ease of virtual communication can discourage individuals from developing the interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence necessary for navigating the complexities of face-to-face interaction. For example, a young adult accustomed to online communication might struggle to hold engaging conversations in person, leading to feelings of awkwardness and missed opportunities for meaningful connections.
In conclusion, while technology undoubtedly offers tools for communication and connection, it is crucial to recognize its limitations and potential pitfalls. By prioritizing face-to-face interaction, fostering genuine conversations, and actively engaging with our communities, we can strive to counteract the negative effects of technology on our relationships and cultivate a more meaningful and fulfilling social life.
Sample 11:
There is no doubt that many things have changed in the last few decades; some changes are for the better and some changes are for the worse. One of the fields which were greatly affected by the advent of technology is the way of interaction and communication.
Without any doubt, technology has changed the way we lead our lives, and these changes have been prominent over the last decade. There are several improvements in life due to the positive effects of technology and there are some negative impacts as well. One area that has dramatically changed is the way we communicate and maintain our relationship nowadays. And in my opinion, technology has positively affected our communication and the way we make relationships and maintain it. Despite some negative effects, most of us enjoy the positive things technology has bought for us. In the past, the ways of interaction were very limited. Unleash your imagination; if you want to speak with your friend, you would have to go directly to his house or send him a message which may take a few days to get a response. I completely believe that technology has a great tangible effect on our communication. Nowadays, it's very easy to interact with your relatives - and even with the government and organisations - either by emails, mobiles, chatting, etc. and I think that this has improved and enhanced the relationships.
We no longer need to visit a relative or friend to get updates. Alternatively, we can let them know our updates instantly. Besides personal communications, official and business communications have become easier. Email campaigns offer a good marketing opportunity for business owners and people can complain about a certain thing using emails without exposing their identity. Not all of the people have the availability of technology, and they still use the old form of communication. People now can deceive others using identity theft and fraud identity. The personal touch of communication like handwritten letters, face-to-face communications were more effective in some cases. Like meeting your friend is still more important than just writing him an email.
We make so many friends via chatting or social networking which would not have been possible without the advancement of technology and its contribution to communication. Cell phones, emails and social networking have enhanced the way of communicating and we can talk to anyone with a minimum cost. It's now not unusual to prepare for a visit and even several visits to your relatives and friends on the same day, while in the past this may have taken several weeks or months.
To conclude, despite all that, I still see some failings in the development of the means of interaction. For instance, the very high cost each person spends every day on communication. Another defect is that many elderly people are not accustomed to this modern technology. But that doesn't have a great effect on the positive role technology has made in the field of interaction between people and I think these defects are very easy to be solved.
Sample 12:
A true relationship between two people requires face to face communication and time to truly get to know each other. Regardless of what humans think, all individuals admire the feeling of being wanted even if it’s a lie. The digital world has created the sense that it is passable to be who anyone wishes to be online. However, I believe that the way people know each other online and the type of relationships they make virtually have changed for the worse.
Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, most are being turned inward, forgetting the true definition of a friend. Human beings have feelings, and they feel broken at times and do not always smile but the Internet only shows one's happy moments keeping one from fully being known. The types of friendships people make these days are quick and short-lasting. In real life friendship, people see each other at one’s best and worst time and remain there for one another. This can never be compared to a social network friendship. One can only get to know someone by spending time together for the reason that the Internet cannot replace shared experience and personal communication. However, due to the Internet, people can make friends anywhere in the world which was quite impossible in the past era. Finding school and college friends and getting in touch with them is an advantage that the Internet offers to us. However, true friendship is not possible if two people do not spend time together, share their common interests, talk a lot and help each other both in good and bad times.
Rightfully, life is meant to be lived and have many physical experiences, bonding with another person’s physical presence. Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, they are spending time online to make friends. This is, in my opinion, a negative aspect of the digital era.
In conclusion, making friends beyond boundaries and getting in touch with childhood friends could be the advantages of the digital era but the way we are becoming dependent on the technology and the way we are pretending to maintain our friendship online have negative consequences on our personal, moral and social aspects.
Sample 13:
It is true that technology in recent years has altered the path that people communicate with each other. There are many ways that technology affects our relationships, and in my opinion, this is a beneficial development.
To begin with, the most obvious transformation in people’s relationships is how they communicate with each other. By this, I mean that the Internet has converted the world into a small village and nowadays people around the world can reach each other easily and rapidly. For example, a friend who lives in the UK can chat and talk with their friends in China using a mobile phone or social network.
Another field in which technology affects our life is the way that people make friends. In other words, it has been observed that these days we can make friends from all nationalities without any effort or travel, and this helps with culture interchange and help people who suffer.
In my thought, this has a positive impact on the community for two reasons. Firstly, human life has become more convenient, this provides people with more opportunity to spend their leisure time with their kin. For instance, with the Internet, we can shop and work from our dwelling house without going outside anymore. Secondly, travel around the globe has become usable and cheap. As a result, people visiting each other and spend a lot of time together hence more connected society emerges.
To conclude, as we have found out there is no easy answer to this question. Nevertheless, technology makes a huge difference in peoples' lives in terms of communication and I believe that this is a positive impact in our society.
Sample 14:
From the last century to the present days, there have been many changes in the way people interact with each other as there have been evolutionary changes in technological fields. One may say this transformation has negative effects on relationships between people or positive effects. I believe that there have been more positive effects than negative ones among the people due to the reasons that in few seconds of time people can contact their dearest ones and technology gives strength to people by making them closer to each other even if they are not.
From the introduction of telecommunication and electronic mail, the lives of people turned out to be easier and communication among people became easier and more convenient. They can contact their families and friends using these advanced services over the countries. Without visiting their homes frequently, they can make money or accomplish their goals. For example, a military man has to serve his country at the borders, and it is uneasy to go home and spend some time with his family and acquaintances thoroughly. However, he can make contact with his family via telephone and other services. With the help of telecommunication and electronic mail, he can keep in touch with his family and buddies. In this way, technology makes people close to each other. This absolutely positive development as we have huge benefits using technology.
With the absence of one's dearest one, he used to be all alone before the introduction of technology. But it is possible to get in touch with his sweetheart. And also, he can send and receive the money within seconds over the thousands of miles using the latest money transfer machines. As a result, he can look over and take care of his family's financial problems and needs without his presence at his home. For instance, my uncle who stays in the United States calls his family and others via ‘Skype’ daily whereas, my dad who used to work in Dubai could not keep in touch with us as at that time the telecommunication had not installed in my village. Thus, that made my father bound to visit us frequently. Consequently, he spent a large amount of money travelling and could not communicate with us as frequently as he wanted to.
In many positive ways, technology has affected the relationships between people, and I would say these are positive developments. Imagine without technology, what would happen to the people and the world. In many ways, we are getting the help of using technology.
Sample 15:
Technological developments in this modern era have transformed the way we socialise. Advancements in communication networks have played a vital role in bringing people closer. In my opinion, there are both pros and cons of this development and this essay will analyse how technology has changed the types of relationships made by people.
In ancient times, people used letters and telegrams to interact with each other. With the advent of modern communication systems like the telephone and the Internet, people can collaborate more effectively. For instance, we can interact through emails rather than letter and businessman can have online meetings through the conference calls.
Another reason is the widespread use of social networks over the internet; for instance, Facebook, where men and women can now make friends online and interact with them through the post, message and online chat. Video conferencing in the form of Skype has improved instructor and student relationship. Online messaging platforms like mIRC have given people the luxury to choose their own discussion-based chat rooms. There are more ways to socialise now than there used to be in the past.
All these advancements in technology come up with their merits and demerits. Letters, memos and telegrams are replaced by emails and text messages. Human resource hiring can be done through online video conferencing which has eliminated the need for physical presence and travelling requirement. We can now mingle more through Facebook, Pinterest, Google+, Instagram and Orkut and so on. Though one can regard these as positive developments, they do have some negative aspects. These developments have isolated people and discouraged real-world interaction. For instance, youth, in particular, prefers to choose to mix up with people online rather than socialising with them in the real world.
To conclude, technology has no doubt revolutionised the way we interact and hang out but has greatly reduced real-world interaction. Though these virtual relations tend to be positive, we should not deny the importance of physical interaction in our lives.
Sample 16:
Everything has two sides, and the effects of technology on people’s relationships are not an exception. We cannot deny how much technology has transformed the individual reaction with others in his family and the surrounding community.
In my opinion, technology has affected and transformed our life aspects and dealing with other people in a good way. Recently, we have had different fast and cheap methods to call our family and friends. Moreover, some technologies are giving us chances to see and talk with them at the same time. In addition, we are informed on a daily basis with the last updates and news about our friends and family, so we can remember birthdays, graduation parties and even marriage anniversaries. Furthermore, these methods make it faster and easier to call and congratulate another individual.
On the other hand, many people believe that technology is affecting individual relationships badly. They opine that, if we did not have these kinds of technology, we would have been visiting each other regularly.
Not only that, but individuals will not be isolated from each other, especially those who are addicted to using social networking platforms. As a matter of fact, people rarely talk to each other face-to-face. In particular, people’s personalities are changing so much, because of addiction to using Facebook. It’s one of the vital reasons to decrease confidence and self-esteem.
As can be seen, even if we have some bad effects of technology and how it changed the way people contact each other, we still have much more effects. We can obtain many easy and cheaper methods to contact each other. In fact, technology has enhanced our life and the way we are contacting each other.
Sample 17:
Today, various brand-new methods of telecommunications have tremendously influenced social behaviour. Although their impacts have benefited human lifestyle, they have had some costs as well. However, before evaluating their advantages and disadvantages, it is better to reveal how these breakthroughs affect the ways people relate to each other.
In the old times, when someone wanted to communicate, there were extremely limited means of doing so. Indeed, he should write a letter or have a face-to-face conversation. Likewise, it was possible to be acquainted with new faces either by meeting them personally or being introduced by family and friends.
On the other hand, substantial technological progress has happened in recent years. For instance, smartphones can be utilised both by direct calls and via different applications. Alternatively, the internet can be used either by offline methods like e-mail or by online protocols like chatting programs. Moreover, social networking is another rich aspect of the internet by which everybody is able to find new friends or search for old, missed ones, and it can be used to interact with current relatives as well. Clearly, not only have modern technologies facilitated human interactions, but they also diversified his relationships.
On the debit side, excessive use of virtual connections might weaken the personal relationship with reality. While it seems that people are aware of each other’s statuses on a daily basis, even up-to-the-minute, they may overlook loved ones’ emotional states due to the negligence of their presence.
All in all, contemplating the pros and cons of these phenomena simultaneously, I should say it depends on the person who utilises these state-of-the-art technologies. If he applies them wisely, their pluses will definitely overshadow their pitfalls. After all, in my viewpoint, humankind can eventually address this issue in favour of his civilisation. Hence, I assume it as a mainly positive development in the long run.
Sample 18:
People used to communicate by meeting each other while it has nowadays totally changed since technological advancement. Some assert that utilising technology in daily communication brings more harm than good things. I personally agree with this view and this essay will look into the reason with some considerations.
The first effect of technology usage is that it reduces the sense of togetherness among people. Since they do interaction via telecommunication such as a mobile phone or the internet, it reduces the personal relationship. People cannot catch moments during interaction because they communicate in unreal situations. Take social media as an example, most teenagers talk to their friend via utilising Facebook, Viber, WhatsApp or others. They tend to interact with each other via sending messages thus they can feel the situation or even communication sense just by reading the messages. By contrast, direct communication tends to develop a sense of belonging among people. They will be more comfortable expressing their feelings thus it is easy to get along together.
In addition, it will deteriorate the human behaviour. By using electronic devices in the daily life of communication, it is hard for them to get involved in a social environment. It will decrease their self-confidence to speak in public because they usually interact through devices rather than through face-to-face communication. Moreover, utilising technology in interaction is not free thus you should they should prepare much budget just for communication.
It is true that technology usages enable people to keep in touch with people who live in different places. However, it is not capable of providing a sense of feeling as well as direct communication.
To sum up, by communicating directly, it will help people keep close to each other and able to talk towards them easily and expressively.
Sample 19:
The 21st century has been a game-changer in all aspects of human life. The same case is with relationships which have also taken on a new dimension with technological advancement. Nowadays, relationships are much more fragile, materialistic, mistrustful and doubtful as compared to previous times. I reckon that overall, this development has been quite negative which will be analysed in our paragraphs to follow.
To start with, nowadays technology has made relationships between humans quite suspicious. People are getting involved in relationships just on social networking websites without even knowing who is actually communicating with them. For instance, there have been many cases in which the person you are in contact with is actually fake and fraud. He is just playing and making a fool of you, and you believe that you are making a friend or falling in love with him. Consequently, when you know the truth, it is just like a bolt from the blue and your feeling is eradicated. This is evident from the argument above the reality that technological relationships can be quite painful sometimes.
Further, in the new era connections between people can be quite fragile and weak as compared to the strength of relationships before the advent of technology. People without practically meeting each other and actually knowing their strengths and weaknesses tend to trust each other too much and when they face the true facts the relationships are affected and, in some cases, broken down. For instance, a survey was conducted by Indian newspaper regarding the success of technology relationships and the result was reconciling with the point that relationships are very poor, and the failure rate was quite high.
To sum up, these technological relationships have altered the connectivity between two people. I firmly believe that drawbacks outweigh much more as compared to the fruits of these new relationships. However, it is recommended that people should be extremely careful and cautious in making any sought of relationships on social networking websites, chatting software etc.
Sample 20:
Technology has been affecting many aspects of human life including the way people interact with one another. Some believe that it has more benefits for people’s connection than drawbacks, while others contradict it. I personally argue with the former opinion, and through this essay, I am going to explain my reasons.
Initially, the first reason that I am going to elaborate is the way technology better enhances communication among people. A large number of communication gadgets has been invented in order to help communication between people, even for those who are separated by spacious distance, getting simpler and quicker. Thus, by giving an easier chance to be connected, this development has been encouraging society’s sense of togetherness. They do not have to visit their colleagues which are in different regions or cities to ask about their condition, for instance, because they could just pick up their phone and call their friends.
Subsequently, the variety of communication technology has been developed even further. The purpose is not only to make it easier but also to achieve a better quality of communication. We can mention video call, voice messenger and social media as the parts of it. The users are not limited by the elder method of phone call anymore. They can communicate more interactively by using video call. Therefore, they can communicate with others in the wider range of connection by using social media such as Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. This situation will globally lead people into a worldwide relationship.
On the other hand, there has been a developing trend that people are becoming more individualistic as the effect of technological development. The decreasing opportunity of direct interaction among them is accused as the root of this problem. However, it depends on us as the users to utilise technology wisely. If we can maintain a balance between communication technology and the conventional way of communication, the problem will certainly disappear.
Eventually, the advantages of using technology as part of our communication types outweigh the disadvantages, as long as we can manage it to be the helper, not the loser.
Sample 21:
It is true that some people have shifted their way to keep in touch with others due to the innovation of technology. The massive use of devices in communication, particularly phones and the internet, can be identified as the main difference compared to the past. People rely on those technologies to connect with families, friends and colleagues. Personally, I reckon that this trend may lead people to have a better relationship due to the effectiveness and low cost of communication.
To begin with, the interaction of individuals is presently not limited in one model. It means that people have many choices to stay connected with others than before. Technology offers some applications such as email, Facebook or Twitter. Those social media serve advantages to enhance and build a relationship with others. For example, in workplaces, employees do not have to meet in a certain place to discuss something. Rather they can use video conference to do a meeting. Therefore, various types of communication tools can help people to choose their preference and purpose in communication.
Furthermore, the usage of technology in communication leads to some positive things. It can be assumed that the easiness and effectiveness which are offered by these devices maximise the quality of people life in term of maintenance the relation of people. In addition, these communication tools allow people to spend less money and time. In other words, individuals do not have to visit someone when they want to talk or know friends’ news. Young people nowadays have friends from different countries and can have more friends. They can share their thoughts and updates instantly, which was quite impossible in the past. Some people might argue that people rely too much on technology and that’s they keep a less personal relationship with others. However, I disagree and want to say that technology has made it possible to connect with a dear one, make new friends and build up relationships in a more convenient way.
In conclusion, people always pick the best and most efficient way of communication, and the widespread use of the internet, mobile phone and other ways of communication have positively impacted our life and the way we make and keep our relationship.
Sample 22:
It is commonly noticed that people surrounding us stay connected with other people via social networking sites or other applications and technology have totally changed the way people used to communicate, make friends and keep their relationship. This paradigm shift happened basically because of the advances in technology and widespread use of such technological applications. Shall we welcome this shift or be wary about the changes? In this essay, I am going to discuss how technology has affected the types of relationships people make and whether it is considered as a positive or negative development.
First and foremost, I think that the development of technology has enhanced the relationships people make and maintain. For instance, when a student studies abroad and stays far away from his or her family and friends, social networking sites and other applications can help the student stay connected with his or her family and friends through Skype, for instance. In my opinion, in this case, this is a positive development to deal with homesickness or maintain our interactions with people we care about. Compared to the past decade, when technology was not so advanced, people had to depend on letters to communicate with each other and that was a time-consuming method, and it incurred higher cost. In contrast, in today’s world, people just have to be on laptops or smartphones and can have direct communication and interaction with family and friends. They can see each other contrary to the past method of interchanging written words. In this way, people can keep a close relationship with family and friends. We can now make friends beyond borders and that enhances our perspective about other nations and customs. Online groups, social platforms and social networking sites bring people together who have common interests and there are many events those people meet and plan for the betterment of society.
In fact, the implication of technology on people’s relationships is a controversial issue. On the one hand, it is a positive development for helping people stay connected with family and friends and making new friends. On the other hand, it can estrange the relationships people make. The argument that it has a negative influence on people’s relationships is based on the scenario that people will avoid face-to-face communication in the long run. Recent research indicates that virtual communication will weaken the communication skill of a person. I still remember a film that I watched had a scene that showed four friends having meals in a restaurant. When they sat together, they did not interact with each other face-to-face but through social applications by sending out the emotions in the social group to show their feelings. This example shows a worrying trend as people enjoy interacting virtually more than face to face due to their reliance on technology. It is important to create awareness to the public that actual communication is more important than virtual interaction to minimise its repercussion.
Overall, as far as I am concerned, the advancement of technology has both positive and negative effects on the kind of relationships people make. We have to be aware that actual interaction is more important to enhance a relationship. We shall connect with family and friends virtually only if we are apart from them.
Sample 23:
Face-to-face communication and enough time to get to know each other well are prerequisites for a real relationship. People all like to feel wanted, even if it’s a false sense, despite what other people may believe. The perception that one can be whoever one wants to be online has been shaped by the digital age. But I think that relationships people form virtually and the way people get to know each other online have changed, mostly negatively.
Most are becoming more inward-focused and have forgotten what it means to be a true friend to those around them, rather than being genuine friends. People are emotional creatures who occasionally feel sad and aren’t always happy, but the Internet only shares positive experiences, preventing people from knowing each other completely. Nowadays, people tend to form fast and transient friendships. In real life friendships, individuals support one another through each other’s highs and lows. This is not at all like friendship on social media. Because the Internet cannot take the place of in-person interactions and shared experiences, getting to know someone requires spending time together.
It is only fitting that life be experienced fully, forming bonds with the physical presence of others. Rather than truly being friends with those in their immediate vicinity, they are utilizing social media to establish connections. I consider this to be a drawback of the digital age.
In conclusion, the digital age may have brought about benefits like reaching out to old friends and forming new ones, but it has also had unfavorable effects on our moral, social, and personal lives due to our growing reliance on technology and the ways we pretend to keep up our online friendships.
Sample 24:
Since communication with others comprises a very essential aspect of our daily life, any alteration in the way we communicate with each other will have a profound effect on our social and professional life. This essay will first discuss how technology has influenced the way we relate with each other presently and will then address the question of whether this influence has been positive or negative.
There are several ways in which the new communication technology has influenced people’s way of interaction with each other. Firstly, social media applications have revolutionized the way we communicate. The reason why many people believe this is that nowadays, you can connect with your family and friends instantly through many social media applications such as the Facebook and twitter applications. It is also possible to say that people are now more encouraged to share their opinions openly via the Internet. One good illustration for this is the substantial number of friends that people who use social media applications have in their contact list.
However, the impact of social media in one’s social life may not always be positive. This is because people are now increasingly abandoning face to face interactions and prefer carrying out their communication behind closed doors. This is causing more people, especially youths, to lose out on many aspects of personal communication. A particularly good example here is a study conducted in the USA showing that more than 75% of high school students are spending more than 50% of their free time on the Internet.
To sum up, modern technological advances in communication have incredibly influenced the way people interact, and although there are many perks associated with the use of recent technology there are also drawbacks that people must take care of.
Sample 25:
In this contemporary era, the means of communication have updated dramatically with the evolution of cutting-edge technologies. In my perspective, I foster that it is a constructive movement, and this treatise will elucidate my stance in the forthcoming paragraphs with credible illustrations.
To start with, the recent improvements in various aspects of technology have revolutionized the entire world such that the public claim that it makes them establish their communication among their peers in a feasible manner. There are many applications which can be downloaded and installed on our electronic gadgets, such as Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, which enable people to exchange messages, photos and videos. The latest breakthrough, instant calling and face-time features for long periods of time with minimal charges incurred, have made humans have a face-to-face interaction virtually. Many organizations are working tirelessly to achieve these updates frequently and are intuitive. For instance, old people who reside in the suburbs are overwhelmed with amusement since they are frequently having a chat with their children who live either in metro cities or in foreign lands. Thus, it creates a remarkable bonding among families who are far away from one another in distant locations.
In a similar fashion, there are multiple websites on the internet which attract youngsters in modern society. They are fascinated by browsing these sites to find new individuals in nearby areas and are meeting up for casual dates to understand each other. Additionally, some are using these to search for pristine friends and are gradually chatting almost every day. This eventually encourages them to identify partners or peers who have similar interests. By sharing their emotions, they feel relaxed and rejuvenated rather than having trepidation or stress. Hence, it plays a significant role in commencing new bonds for the youth.
Taking everything into consideration, the latest innovations in technology have drastically impacted the entire human population to have noteworthy coordination with parents and grandparents and explore new friends. This essay has exposed a plethora of merits and the advantageous impact of technology on the public worldwide.
Sample 26:
In recent years, with the development of information technology and the evolution of the internet, people interact and communicate better and more effectively than in the past. With new technology, people interact via devices where the technology has been converged. Now it is possible to make calls, watch TV, play video games, listen to music and access internet with only one device. Many people believe that technology may improve the type of the relationships people make whereas others do feel that it has negative effects.
It is believed by some people that technology has a positive effect in the way people interact because it is more convenient on daily basis, and the use of new channels to communicate is often free. For example, if you are looking for a job. You do not have to go to the office nor pay stamps to send your CV. You can do this by email by simply clicking on the “submit” button. It is effective because it saves time, and it is simple to apply. Another significant example is the use of social media platforms. It enables people to share experiences and send information instantaneously which can be seen by everyone, so it improves the way people socialise. Moreover, new channels of communication can help maintain good relationships in business between jobseekers and employers as well as with family and friends on a daily basis.
It is argued by others that technology has a negative impact on the type of relationship people make because it can lead to a development of antisocial behaviours. For instance, teenagers who play video games can find themselves in total confusion between the real world and the virtual world. The law is different because in the real world people have to follow rules whereas in the virtual world there are no constraints. It influences the behaviour of people in a negative way. Moreover, it can create a certain form of addiction for some, leading them to become completely isolated and unaware of what is good and right. Also, the use of the internet can spread bad behaviours such as bullying or the promotion of negative images, comments which will have an impact in people’s lives. For example, on Facebook, several teenagers committed suicide after being bullied by their friends. So, the inappropriate use of technology can lead to healthy issues such as addiction or fatal death.
To sum up, the development of technology has changed the type of relationships people make in both a positive and negative fashion. People use new channels in their daily life because it is convenient as well as cheap. However, the use of the internet needs to be carefully monitored and used appropriately to prevent children and vulnerable people from developing addictions, which could lead to harmful or even fatal consequences.
Sample 27:
Today, more than ever, in regard to determining whether or not advances in technology influence the sorts of relationships people make, various views have been set forward. The expansion of modern means of communicating is the continuing debate that causes so much controversy. This matter is evidenced by some experts who believe that they pose a direct threat to social lives and might come at the expense of severe social isolation and a sedentary lifestyle. Others understand the significance of communication and adhere to the concept that these types of relationships are integral pieces of social communication. Consequently, they are regarded as rewarding. Nevertheless, the opinion set forth by the second category is more logical. In the following paragraphs, I will shed light on my attitudes on this matter.
To begin with, previously, communication among people looked bleak. People used to fulfill and make an appointment to observe each other, and according to the simple fact that communities had busy folks, and they seem doomed to possess far-reaching communication.
In the next place, modern means of communicating control people’s attention. They are the fastest and easiest way of togetherness. Individuals are at the mercy of the digital world to get in touch with others in the remotest part of the world, leading to saving their own time and hanging out every second. This issue questions the requirement to have face to face connections.
In this hectic way of life, the truth is that the responsibility of real-time discussions, visualization of each other, information exchange which enables a person to share a variety of information like activities, events, interests, thoughts fall upon these ways of communication. Thanks to tremendous advances in technology.
In summary, all in all, rather than devoting a fantastic deal of time and energy solely concerning face to face interaction, the trend today is toward utilizing modern means of communication to get in touch with other individuals. The pivotal role in these ways of communicating performed in interpersonal communication is hard to dismiss. However, many men and women do not appreciate it.
Sample 28:
In recent years, the innovation of techonology has led to various changes in the way people interact. As a result, this causes some specific effects on people’s relationships which are generally considered as beneficial impacts on the society.
Conspicuously, the improvement in techonological devices such as computers with internet connection and mobile phones affect people’s relations in different aspects. Firstly, it helps to diversify kinds of relationships instead of just several traditional ones in the past. Besides people’s interactions in real life, many connections are beign bult through a virtual life on the internet especially via facebook or online games. Secondly, the convenience of communicating between people is likely to make people’s relationships more sociable and hardly understandable. In fact, many friendships are not based on trust or sincerity but benefits which are generally hard to be perceived in a virtual life.
Although the development of technology somehow makes people’s relationships more complicated, I still believe that people are actually beneficial from this. Thanks to internet availability, gaps between people are shortened in magical ways. For example, no matter how far the distance between two people, they still can talk directly to each other provided with the internet access. What’s more, people have never been able to save as much time and communicating expenses as at the present. Instead of waiting for months to receive a response from a posted letter, it just takes some seconds for the letter to be delivered through email even to many partners at the same time.
In conclusion, taking advantage of technological development to facilitate interaction between people is beneficial not only for building a good relationship but also for doing business.
Sample 29:
Technology is expanding in every field, and connectivity will be no exception. Nonetheless, due to its other pitfalls that cause discussion on its positive and negative effects, this enormous shift in the ways of interaction cannot be regarded as fruitful straight away.
One of the essential advantages of focusing on in terms of positive development is that technology makes connectivity simpler and more convenient. Because of recent events such as Skype, video conferencing, Whatsapp, and social networking sites, such as Facebook, people are hardly a click away from the nears and dears. To a great extent, these advances have made us social. Second, there are enormous opportunities for letters and telephone calls to be sent and for requests to be made. Customers used to be on the S.T.D and I.S.D booth in long queues, but now mobile phones and sophisticated gizmos make it easier for everyone to communicate openly.
On the other hand, certain disadvantages cannot be overlooked as people of today not only spend a long time using computers but also do not want to meet their relatives and friends face-to-face, leading to a fading relationship. One of my school friends, for example, visited me personally on various occasions, such as at festivals and birthdays. Still, nowadays, she sends messages to welcome me and sends salutations to my post. Even most members of the family suffer from asphyxia, which is an unusual illness that flares. For imitating relationships, this is a troubling question.
To recap, despite numerous disadvantages, nobody can afford to tackle this ever-fast digital technology that has to make our lives easier.
Sample 30:
Technological advancements have revolutionized how millions of people interact with each other, and it has gone to a whole new level. With it, how we make relationships has also been affected. The essay will expound on how individuals can now build relationships across the world, and then opine that this is an incredibly positive development.
Unprecedented in human history, modern technology has made it extremely convenient for people to communicate and get in touch with family, relatives, friends or old classmates. Besides, people can communicate instantaneously with someone they have never been acquainted with before and in geography, they have never been to with the help of digital applications like WhatsApp or Viber. They can even find someone on a freelancing platform to have their job done. This is quite different from the conventional relationships we develop by meeting in person; it is, nevertheless, hard to downplay these relationships. Moreover, social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn, provide people with a platform that allows them to live chat and comment on someone else’s matter instantly. Strangely enough, some of them even find their dates online and make friends in a distant country without ever meeting them.
Overall, the phenomenon is a real boon to mankind. The revolution in communication that modern technology brings forth has eroded the traditional notions of national sovereignty. It has blurred the line between national and international boundaries and wielded enormous influence on the values of the national identity so as to transform global citizens; whose ideas, values, ethics, and orientations are no longer moulded by the local culture and environment. Rather global ideals and values are incessantly aired on the web and social media to make a better world. Most importantly, the communication revolution paved the way for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, towards which the globe is rapidly heading.
In conclusion, leading-edge technology has altered our mode of interaction forever, transcending national and cultural barriers so that individuals can frankly chat, talk and can readily keep in touch, and it is a windfall achievement that will transform a new world where things, like culture, sect, and so on, that split people will not exist.
Sample 31:
Technology has revolutionised the way people interact with each other in recent times. However, this has led to a decline in the quality of relationships people make. The impact of technology on relationships is a double-edged sword, and while some may argue that it has been a positive development, I believe that it has had negative effects.
One of the ways that technology has affected relationships is that people are becoming more isolated and less likely to engage in face-to-face interactions. The rise of social media platforms and instant messaging services have made it easier for people to communicate remotely, but it has also led to a decrease in the frequency and quality of in-person interactions. People are now more likely to spend their time on social media rather than meeting up with friends or family members. Moreover, technology has made it easier for people to be dishonest and insincere in their interactions. For instance, people can now hide behind the anonymity of the internet and present a false version of themselves. This has led to a decline in trust and authenticity in relationships.
Another way that technology has affected relationships is that people are now more reliant on their devices than on their relationships. People can now find entertainment and fulfil their social needs through technology, making it less necessary to build and maintain meaningful relationships.
In conclusion, while technology has undoubtedly had many positive effects on society, its impact on relationships has been mostly negative. It has led to a decrease in in-person interactions, a decline in genuineness and trust, and an increased reliance on devices over relationships. It is crucial that people recognize these negative effects and take steps to mitigate them by prioritising in-person interactions and being more sincere and honest in their relationships.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In different parts of the world, traditional foods are becoming less common due to the increasing popularity of international fast food. While some people believe that fast food is a good option, I think that consuming traditional foods is much more beneficial. This essay will demonstrate the author’s point of view.
On the one hand, there are compelling reasons why many people are in favor of fast food. Firstly, it is convenient and time-saving. Instead of having to prepare a meal for hours, people can easily grab a bite at any fast-food restaurant, which is ubiquitous in many megacities. This type of food is also suitable for those with fast-paced lifestyles. In addition, fast food is famous for its delicious taste. This can explain the successful franchises of various fast-food chains all over the world such as McDonald’s, KFC, and so on.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that eating traditional food is more advantageous. One of the most substantial benefits of traditional meals is the nutritional value that they contain. A homemade meal can provide a sufficient amount of protein, fiber, and many other nutrients, which has proved to be effective in maintaining good health. This is because traditional food is usually made from fresh ingredients and without any preservatives. More importantly, I would argue that consuming traditional food rather than fast food is a good way to preserve culture as each flavor has its own uniqueness and is a representation of the national cuisine. By making and eating traditional food, people are contributing to cultural preservation, and thus passing it down to the next generation.
In conclusion, even though fast-food consumption has been an accelerating trend in recent years due to its conveniences, I sincerely believe that the benefits of eating traditional food are more significant.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng ký để học cùng Vietjack. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Bằng việc đăng ký, bạn đồng ý với Điều khoản sử dụng và Chính sách bảo mật của Vietjack.