Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than the works of the other parts in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
Some people say that museums and art galleries should focus on works produced by local artists and preserve local history and culture instead of showcasing international artworks and artefacts. I disagree with this viewpoint because I believe that the diversity of cultures and art forms is what makes these entities valuable and useful.
First and foremost, limiting museums and galleries to only display local works would be a disservice to visitors. Art is a universal language, and people from all over the world come to museums and galleries to learn about different cultures and art forms. By limiting exhibits to local works, museums and galleries would be depriving visitors of the opportunity to experience art from other cultures and learn about them.
Moreover, showcasing art and cultures from other countries also promotes cultural understanding and appreciation. By learning about other cultures, people can become more open-minded and accepting of diversity, which is especially important in today's globalized world. Art can be used as a tool to promote empathy and understanding, and museums and galleries have a responsibility to showcase a diverse range of artworks and cultures to fulfil this role.
Lastly, museums and galleries often collaborate with institutions from other countries to bring in exhibitions that showcase their art and culture. This exchange is crucial in fostering international relationships and promoting diplomacy. If museums and galleries were to only focus on local works, this exchange of culture would be limited, and it would be harder to establish these connections.
In conclusion, museums and galleries should not concentrate solely on local work, but rather embrace the diversity of cultures and art forms to promote understanding, empathy, and cultural exchange. By showcasing a variety of artworks and cultures, these institutions can fulfil their role as promoters of cultural appreciation and education.
Sample 2:
Museums and art exhibits have long been at the forefront of preserving and representing cultural values and histories, being utilized by almost all countries throughout the centuries. However, whether they should mainly represent local cultures rather than international collections is open to dispute. I personally believe that traditional museums should focus on outlining the cultural aspects and artworks of the country while having separate museums with items from other countries does not hurt the national feeling.
Educating people about the history and traditions of a country is the primary reason we have museums in the first place. They conserve important cultural specimens, artefacts, artworks and other items to boast about our past and help researchers dig deeper into history. Such museums, which primarily signify our tradition, should comprise things we, as a nation, can be proud of, rather than having internationally acclaimed artworks or sculptures. For instance, many national museums in Europe solely focus on preserving artefacts and artworks from the country and they are quite popular among international tourists.
Having said that, the concept of a museum, in the modern era, has changed to a great extent. We now have aviation museums, war memorials, motor museums, computer museums, archaeological museums and the list goes on. To make these types of museums popular and useful, we have to have international collections. For instance, the Motor Museum in Australia has a collection from more than 20 countries, and they serve their purpose just fine.
To conclude, national and traditional museums should focus on nurturing national history and heritage, but we also need museums with international collections to make them more functional and famous. One does not necessarily diminish the necessity and usefulness of the other.
Sample 3:
Museums and art galleries help visitors better understand the role of history, showcase important artworks, and preserve significant items. But many people opine that the collection should include only the artefacts and artworks of the host country. I disagree with this opinion since art is a medium to express thoughts and ideas beyond boundaries, and the history of nations is interconnected.
Art is an important medium of free expression, and history extends beyond the border. So the collection of a museum should not be confined to geographical boundaries. For example, "Mona Lisa" is a legendary artwork by Leonardo Da Vinci who was an Italian artist in the 15th century. Despite being Italian, Da Vinci is an iconic genius for the whole world. Mona Lisa is now preserved at the Louvre Museum in France, and having this artwork and many other famous international paintings and sculptures, France can only boast of its fine collection that showcases masterpieces, great artworks and world history to the global audience.
Moreover, history is not confined within boundaries, and if this was the case, we would have taught our students only our national history. The fate of nations was interconnected throughout history, and it still is. So when we want to teach our children about our history, we must teach them about international events. Since one of the primary objectives of museums is to teach people about history, they must have artworks and collections from the international arena.
Finally, when we display artefacts and works from foreign countries, we are connecting nations all over the world. Each culture has something new to teach and the cultural richness of a nation depends on how they accept a new culture. From this perspective, having museums that comprise collections only from the host country is a bad idea.
To conclude, museums and art galleries that have international artefacts and artworks besides having national collections are far rich and practical in exchanging cultural aspects and showcasing history.
Sample 4:
Museums and art galleries essentially showcase significant histories and artworks to the general audience both to educate them and preserve important artefacts. Though some people advocate for an international collection in such important places, I firmly believe that local works and national history should always get the highest priority.
To begin with, a single museum can not represent all the important histories of the world due to space and budget issues, and the organisers of public art galleries need an exorbitant amount of money to display famous foreign artworks or sculptures. Thus, a museum should focus on becoming a place where people would learn about their own history and culture rather than being a place where they would wonder what the collections are all about. Visitors of a museum or an art gallery, which even include schoolgoers, should be able to relate the items they see so that they get inspired to foster nationalism and learn about their country, heritage and culture.
Moreover, museums and art exhibits are frequently visited by foreigners who want to get a glimpse of the local culture and history rather than seeing items that they have already seen in other museums perhaps in some other countries. So, museums and similar other places become more acceptable when they conserve local culture and present national history. For instance, most of the tourists in my country find the national museum more interesting than other museums we have because our national museum offers a true insight into our past and heritage.
To conclude, museums and art galleries have significant roles in teaching people about their past and nurturing the talents of enthusiastic artists. It is more important that they have local collections and not foreign relics and arts which have little or no meaning to people who visit them.
Sample 5:
Some people insist that museums and art exhibitions ought to focus on showing local works to visitors instead of artefacts and artworks from overseas. I, however, disagree with this notion and believe that exhibitions of a wider range of artworks, including foreign ones, are quite beneficial to local people and culture.
The primary reason I disagree that museums and art centres should concentrate mainly on displaying local artworks is that it restricts the opportunities for spectators and artists to watch, enjoy and learn about diversified global artworks. Diversification helps citizens learn and appreciate various artworks which eventually enrich the culture of a nation. Since local museums and art galleries are perhaps the most accessible venues for residents and aspiring artists to learn about arts and history, their collections should be as rich as possible.
Another rationale behind my view is that art galleries would offer more benefits when they display artworks created in other regions. This is because exhibitions of galleries could thus let children comprehend brilliant aspects of different nations and their cultures. Art galleries are one of the most common destinations for school trips, and the impressions that students get from these galleries may broaden their horizons. Thus, displaying diversified arts is imperative to develop children’s knowledge and understanding of other cultures.
To conclude, a variety of artworks and artefacts in museums and art galleries would have more positive influences on cultural advancements and developing global perspectives of children and people alike. It is expected that museums and art centres would focus on these important issues when deciding the type of collection they are going to have.
Sample 6:
These days, there has been a debate about whether museums and art galleries should prioritise showcasing local works over artworks and cultures from other countries. Some people argue that museums and galleries should focus on local works over displaying items from foreign countries to better promote the local culture and community while also avoiding creating confusion and cultural rip-off. In this essay, I will argue in favour of prioritising local works in museums and galleries over international items.
Firstly, museums and galleries have a responsibility to promote local culture and artists. Displaying works by local artists can support the local economy and encourage emerging talent. It can also help to preserve local traditions and heritage. For example, showcasing traditional crafts and art forms from a particular region can attract tourists and create a sense of pride and identity for local people.
Secondly, exhibiting international artworks and cultures can sometimes lead to cultural appropriation and misrepresentation. This can occur when cultural artefacts are taken out of their original context and displayed in a way that is insensitive or inaccurate. Additionally, displaying international artworks can sometimes lead to a sense of cultural superiority, where foreign works are seen as more valuable or interesting than local ones.
In conclusion, it is important to promote local culture and artists, and museums and art galleries should primarily aim to focus on the art and history of the nation. By doing so, museums and galleries can fulfil their role as cultural institutions that educate and inspire their audiences while promoting local culture and art.
Sample 7:
It is sad but true that the museums and art galleries represent the cultural and historical works of non-native nations, and as a result some experts claim these places should exhibit the local lifestyle and society. I firmly agree with such a viewpoint. Both the viewpoint and my preference are elaborated below.
The first and foremost reason for my inclination is that every country requires its students to study their nation's history, but these lessons can feel impersonal and abstract. The opportunity to view authentic historical documents in a museum can revitalize history and inspire patriotism. The Rutgers Institution exemplifies this in the United States, which houses significant historical and cultural artifacts. Reflecting on the struggles and accomplishments of their ancestors can help visitors from various regions and ethnic groups find common ground.
However, it cannot be denied that more can be learned from international art by the general public. The majority of people are well-versed in the history of their own country but have a limited understanding of other cultures. Visiting a museum containing objects from all over the world is therefore an enlightening experience. For instance, the British Museum in London is renowned for housing one of the world's largest collections of culturally significant artifacts. By viewing and reading the plaques for a variety of artworks, both young students and adults can gain a deeper appreciation for the traditions, cultures, and events that underpin the modern world. This can eventually lead to a more inclusive and culturally diverse society.
To recapitulate, it is crucial and mandatory to know the historic background, customs, and traditions of the native country, and therefore, it is the duty of the legislation to present such work in art galleries and museums.
Sample 8:
Museums and art galleries play an essential role in the dissemination of diverse knowledge to the public. Some individuals believe that these institutions should prioritise local art and history over global art. Nonetheless, I disagree vehemently with this viewpoint because international works benefit the public in numerous ways.
To begin with, the purpose of museums and art galleries is to facilitate the study of cultural heritage. By focusing solely on local history and art, these institutions confine the public's knowledge to domestic borders. In contrast, exhibiting art and history from other regions of the world demonstrates multiculturalism by allowing individuals to comprehend distinct histories and cultures, thereby promoting globalisation. The Vatican Museum, for instance, displays works from several European countries, allowing the world's smallest nation to serve as a bridge to explain the cultural values of various nations under one roof.
Moreover, international historical and cultural works would provide individuals with an understanding of the critical international issues that many nations face concurrently. Numerous museums choose to host informative international exhibitions on significant political and social issues, which may be more enlightening than the media. According to a survey, 88% of visitors to the Melbourne Art Gallery felt more informed about poverty, war, and trade after visiting the museum than after reading the news.
In the nutshell, I do not support the notion that museums and art galleries should prioritise the history and art of their own country over international works, as the latter create a platform for globalisation and multinational knowledge.
Sample 9:
Museums and art galleries have been at the forefront of preserving and representing cultural values and histories for centuries in virtually every country. However, it is debatable whether they should highlight traditional and local cultures or an international collection. Personally, I believe that traditional museums should highlight the country's cultural aspects and artworks, whereas the presence of separate museums containing objects from other nations does not diminish the national spirit.
One of the primary purposes of museums is to educate the public about a country's history and traditions. They preserve significant cultural specimens, artefacts, and other items to commemorate our past and to aid historians in their research. These museums, which primarily represent our heritage, should include items of which we as a nation can be proud, as opposed to internationally acclaimed artworks or sculptures. Numerous national museums in Europe, for instance, focus exclusively on preserving artefacts and works of art from the nation, and they are extremely popular with international tourists.
Nevertheless, the modern museum concept has evolved substantially. There are now aviation museums, memorials to war, automobile museums, computer museums, and archaeological museums, among others. These types of museums require international collections to be popular and useful. The Motor Museum in Australia, for instance, has collections from over twenty nations that serve their purpose admirably. Museums with international collections are an excellent way to promote tourism, as they frequently attract tourists.
To sum up, National and traditional museums should prioritise the preservation of national history, whereas museums with international collections are necessary to make them more functional and well-known. The necessity and utility of one category does not necessarily diminish the necessity and utility of another.
Sample 10:
Some feel that museums and art galleries ought to primarily focus on showcasing local, rather than international, works. In my opinion, despite the importance of domestic pieces for national cohesion, there is greater value in international items.
Those who advocate for domestic art in national museums and exhibition halls point out the unifying effect. Students in every country are expected to learn their national history but these lessons can often feel impersonal and abstract. The chance to visit a museum and see authentic documents from the past revitalises history and can inspire patriotism. A standout example of this would be The Smithsonian in the United States, which houses key historic and cultural artifacts. Visitors from different parts of the country and disparate ethnic groups can potentially find common ground by reflecting on the struggles and achievements of their forefathers.
Regardless, the citizenry as a whole can learn more from international artworks. Most people have learned their own nation’s history well but possess limited understanding of other cultures. Going to a museum featuring items from around the world is therefore an enlightening experience. For example, The British Museum in London famously contains one of the world’s largest collections of culturally significant artifacts from around the world. By seeing and reading the plaques for a variety of artworks both young students and adults alike have the opportunity to broaden their understanding of the traditions, cultures, and events that underpin the modern world. Over time, this can lead to a more inclusive, culturally diversified society.
All in all, the patriotic positives of locally themed collections are outweighed by the educational benefits of globally sourced institutions. There must be a degree of balance but those in positions of authority should emphasise cultural diversity.
Sample 11:
Museums and art galleries play an important role in offering multifaceted knowledge to the public. Some individuals opine that these institutions should primarily focus on their local history and art instead of global works of art. I, however, largely disagree with this viewpoint as international works provide various benefits to the public.
Museums and art galleries offer a medium to understanding cultural heritage. By focusing on local history and art only, such institutions limit the knowledge of the public to the domestic borders. Conversely, if art and history from other parts of the world are displayed, museums and art galleries exhibit multiculturalism, allowing people to understand distinct histories and cultures, and thus, enhancing globalization. For example, the Vatican Museum exhibits works from several European countries, allowing the smallest country in the world to be a bridge to explaining the cultural values of distinct nations under one roof.
Moreover, international historical and cultural works would allow individuals to gain information on critical international issues that many countries face together. Many museums choose to have educational international exhibitions of important political and social issues, which may be more informative than the media. For instance, the Melbourne Art Gallery has collections from across the globe in order to depict thoughts on poverty, war and trade, and in a survey, 88% of visitors declared that they felt more informed about such issues from the museum than from the news.
Countries might fear the loss of cultural heritage owing to having a multicultural setup of museums, however, that is not the case, one never tends to diverge and bias the topics of history on the basis of nativity.
In conclusion, I disagree to a large extent with the belief that museums and art galleries should focus on the history and art of their own country rather than international works, as with the latter, these museums and galleries build a platform for globalization and multinational knowledge.
Sample 12:
The debate over whether museums and art galleries should primarily exhibit artworks that reflect the history and culture of their own country, as opposed to global works, is a topic of considerable interest. This essay will discuss both viewpoints before concluding with a personal perspective.
Supporters of the notion that museums should focus on domestic artworks argue that this approach is vital for preserving national heritage. In Vietnam, for instance, the War Remnants Museum in Ho Chi Minh City powerfully encapsulates the country's turbulent history, thereby fostering a sense of national identity and pride among visitors. By showcasing artifacts unique to a nation's history, museums serve as custodians of cultural legacy, ensuring that future generations remain connected to their roots. However, this perspective might overlook the benefits of cultural exchange. In an increasingly interconnected world, exposure to diverse cultures fosters understanding and tolerance.
However, I believe that embracing global art is equally important. For example, the Hanoi Fine Arts Museum, by displaying both Vietnamese and international art, acts as a bridge connecting Vietnam to the world. This approach not only enriches the viewers' experience but also promotes cultural dialogue and mutual respect. In a globalized era, understanding different cultures is imperative, and art serves as a universal language facilitating this understanding. It's not necessary to limit the scope of learning and inspiration to national boundaries when the world offers a rich tapestry of artistic expression.
In conclusion, while emphasizing national art and history is crucial for preserving cultural identity, incorporating international artworks offers invaluable insights into the global community. Museums and galleries, by adopting a more inclusive approach, can become platforms for cultural exchange and global understanding, which is essential in today's interconnected world.
Sample 13:
Museums and art galleries have played a major role in preserving and conveying historical values for a long time. While many people suggest that they should focus purely on displaying works that represent the nation’s culture and history, others with contradicting views affirm that international works are also of great worth. Personally, I think both viewpoints are equally valid.
On the one hand, there are reasons why it is believed that artifacts and works of national value should be given priority. Firstly, museums and art galleries should be places that honor indigenous history and culture. By going to these museums and galleries, people will gain a deeper understanding of their nation, along with the golden ages and hard times that the country has been through. The exhibitions therefore serve an educational purpose as they instill patriotism and promote a sense of national pride in the citizens of that country. Apart from that, such places also help to preserve traditional and historical values. In the 21st century, many ethnic minorities are in grave danger of losing their culture, and therefore, the display of their works and artifacts will help to preserve their culture and the cultural diversity of a nation.
On the other hand, showing international works of art has several merits. Works from other parts of the world help to diversify the content of museums and art galleries. Admittedly, even though the value of museums and art galleries cannot be denied, their failure in adopting changes and updating collections has discouraged people from visiting these places. For that reason, international works will add appeal and aid museums and galleries in attracting more visitors. Furthermore, if museums display international works, people will have more chance to gain knowledge and insight into other cultures as well.
In conclusion, the ultimate goal of museums and galleries is to spread knowledge and wonder far and wide. Therefore, my suggestion is that local artifacts and works should be prioritized, while those of other nations can still be exhibited but in separate museums and galleries.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Đang tải chế độ Học...
Hot: 1000+ đề thi giữa kì 1 lớp 1-12 đầy đủ các môn (Update 2026) (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
Đăng ký VIP để học và luyện thi không giới hạn
Trọn bộ quyền lợi trên Vietjack, trong một tài khoản.
- Phòng luyện thi cấp tốc: ĐGNL - ĐGTD, Tốt nghiệp THPT, Ôn vào 10, Ôn vào 6, Ôn Giữa kì/Cuối kì
- Hơn 200K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
- Với 3tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
- Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
- Xem hàng ngàn bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
- Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
- Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện
- Đăng ký ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Today technology has changed how people interact with each other. I believe the biggest effects it has had on relationships are that it has reduced in-person interaction and that it has led to the development of online relationships. This has been a positive development because often cyber relationships are more meaningful than in-person relationships.
Technology has reduced face-to-face interaction. For instance, it is not uncommon to see two people sitting at the same table in a restaurant, checking their phones every 30 seconds, and only talking to each other occasionally.
Technology has also given rise to online relationships. Nowadays anyone that has access to the Internet and computers can create a free Facebook or Twitter account and build their social networks on these platforms no matter where on the planet they reside. Take, for example, Chinese teenagers who like collecting insects. On the Internet, they can find and connect with others who share this particular hobby, even if those people live in the Amazon rainforest.
This should be seen as a positive trend because cyberspace relationships can be very meaningful. Today it is very common that those in a person's immediate circle do not support what they pursue. For example, many street artists are looked down on by their family members. Fortunately, Facebook groups give them the power to build their own communities where they can support each other. The inspiration and motivation they obtain there can drive them to work hard to move toward their goals.
In conclusion, technology has reduced in-person interaction and has meanwhile enabled online relationships. This has definitely been a positive trend because online relationships are often more satisfying and meaningful than face-to-face ones.
Sample 2:
Technology is a crucial tool for communication in modern times. It is flourishing in each and every field of communication. Though this invention has changed the way people interact around the world, it has both positive and negative impact on the relationship of people.
To embark on, with regard to the positive development, technological advancement has made communication between organizations more convenient and time-saving. Many companies and organizations use tools like social media, email and forum to influence a larger number of audiences. This also serves as an advanced mode of learning since schools adopt the method of smart classrooms. With the availability of ecommerce, freelance websites, social media marketing, people can easily buy and sell products and services with effortless communication.
On the other hand, the drawbacks of technology on the relationships of people cannot be ignored. Though technology has advanced greatly, it still lacks the emotional touch of communication. It has affected the love and affection people crave with communication. Millennials today are more fascinated by the virtual world, thereby forgetting the practical side of life. Modern modes of communication are making people busy and less productive. Sharing personal information on social media also invades people’s privacy. For example, individuals spending hours on social media interaction interacting with people from around the world and wasting their valuable time. In fact, family vacation which was previously a private affair has now become a public affair.
To sum up, communication technology can be a blessing or a curse depending upon how people make use of it. Even though it is an easy method of interaction, the relationships formed through technological interaction lack trust and emotion. Hence, people should give preference to face-to-face communication.
Sample 3:
It is evident that technology has transformed the ways of communication and influenced relationships in a variety of ways. In my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects of this.
The principal way in which relationships have been affected is that they tend to be at a distance rather than face-to-face. The advent of the internet has made it easy for business owners to communicate across the world, with remote job opportunities one call away. Online educational programs are available for people residing in different countries, and it is no longer a dream to attend live classes from the comfortable environment of a home. Not only this, the social platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube have revolutionized relationships, be it making online friendships with people from other countries or staying in touch with loved ones. Based on this perspective, technology has influenced relationships in a positive way.
However, despite these advances, the quality of interaction has significantly declined in several respects. If people are developing most of their relationships online, this means that they may also have less fact-to-face contact. This kind of contact on a personal level is important for human beings to feel wanted and a part of society. This may be a particular problem for children's social development as they used to be seen playing out on the streets but are now too often indoors. Technology can also mean people are detached from what is going on around them even when they are out, as can be seen by the many people staring into their mobile phones as they travel or walk around.
In conclusion, technology has brought some positive developments in the ways people interact with each other. However, there are also some negative impacts of technology on the types of relationships people make.
Sample 4:
Technology has hardly left any human feeling untouched. Instead, it has played a great role in manipulating and transforming it to a great extent. One of the most highly impacted aspects in this context is human interaction.
Technology has laid its hands on human behavior and has greatly influenced the pattern of human interaction since its introduction. From social media platforms to FaceTime applications, staying in touch has become easier with time. However, it has its downsides as well. With such high-end digital connections, intimate relationships have seen a significant decrease ever since.
These changes result from the freedom of hiding genuine emotions that technology brings. People can now fake caring about someone, express false love, and connect just for the sake of words. This has led to loosened family bonds, false promises between partners, and much more. People do interact with each other, but this interaction is often fake and untrue. Technology's significant impact on human interaction leads to various unwanted consequences. A surge in depression cases, suicides, and unwise decisions have been recorded as a result of such interactions.
Hence, technology has influenced the way people interact both positively and negatively. Undoubtedly, it has helped humans connect from miles away with their loved ones yet has made relations less meaningful and degraded their overall quality.
Sample 5:
Technology has brought vast changes in human behavior since its introduction. Moreover, with its rapid advancement and new changes, it is impacting relationships more rapidly. Interactions have recently been made more accessible due to technology. People can now connect easily and from the ease of their homes. However, it also has its downsides. A detailed study of this significant impact on human relationships due to technology can be understood with various examples.
In recent years, technology has helped humans stay connected at all times. With technology spreading its arms, connections can be made even in the most unexpected and tribal areas of the world. However, this has ultimately transformed human behavior and the way people interact with each other.
A prime example of this change is how people interact since social media's introduction. The introduction of social media platforms has made it easier for people to connect with their loved ones, even at a distance. However, it has entirely transformed how people interact with their close surroundings. This has also led to the expression of fake feelings and false expressions.
Overall, technology has transformed the entire interaction cycle of human beings without letting us realize it. More connections over the internet have paved the way for broken real-life relationships and have ultimately degraded the quality of relationships.
Sample 6:
There has been a change in the different aspects of social relations as affected by technology which we can introduced as more of a post-positively than post-negatively impact.
First, technology has immensely extended the speed and convinience of communication and thus the worth of relationships. For example, a university learner who is learning in another country can use video-calling to speak with the parents daily. An instantaneous means of communication makes it easier to avoid having to wait for a letter to arrive for a day or more as is the norm. Furthermore, social networks allow a person to get acquanted with like-minded strangers with similar interests, career choices, or hobbies, therefore create friendships that last a lifetime.
Despite this perception, this development is fairly beneficial to the masses. Improved communication technology reduces pressure and creates the need for belonging. For instance, when there is negative information, people get to act quickly. Also, positive information is more effective when shared immediately and it helps enhance interpersonal relationships. In addition, this has led to the growth of businesses and the eradication of geographical barriers whereby a company can comfortably and easily transact business with an organization in another country at any given time.
Altogether, it can be highlighted that technology plays a vital role in changing social relations by providing more effective and pleasant means of communication. It has made interpersonal communication better, provided businesses with links and connections as well as made everyone have equal access to information. Thus, it can be concluded that the purpose and use of technology have been mainly beneficial for interactions and relationships for the majority of people.
Sample 7:
It is true that new technologies have had an influence on communication between people. Technology has affected relationships in various ways, and in my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects.
Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, telephones and the Internet allow businesspeople in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. For example, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.
On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between people in different countries was much more difficult when communication was limited to written letters or telegrams. Nowadays, interactions by email, phone or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings, and many of us benefit from these interactions, either in work or social contexts. On the other hand, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result ofisolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these 'virtual' relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships.
In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionized communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.
Sample 8:
There has been a complex alteration in the various aspects of social relations due to technological advancement resulting in more positive impact than negatives.
First of all, the usage of technology has tremendously augmented the speed and ease of interaction making the relations’ depth richer. For example, a university student studying in another country can utilize video-calling to maintain quotidian contact with his or her parents. Real-time messaging banishes the lengthy wait for the letter, which was taken as conventional before. Besides, one is able to interact with strangers with similar interests, jobs, or hobbies, hence fostering friendships that endure a lifetime.
This development is predominantly propitious for the people. Advanced communication technology reduces stress and creates a feeling of belongingness. For instance, the sectional publicity of negative information can be quickly followed by timely responses. And just as to promote the fast exchange of positive messages, cooperation is strengthened between people. In addition, this technological advancement has boosted business development and erased hegemonic constraints and restrictions that enable business organizations to freely and easily connect with global organizations at any time.
Therefore, one is able to deduce that relations in society have been significantly mediated by technology in the manner in which humans interact offering more effective and fulfilling ways. It has made interpersonal communication easier, created business relationships and opportunities, and given equal opportunity for information access. Hence, the major impact of technology is analyzing and interpreting common interaction and relationship profiles that can be deemed more beneficial and helpful for most people.
Sample 9:
The advent and rapid development of technology have fundamentally transformed the dynamics of interpersonal interactions among individuals. This has also transformed the way we form relationships and bond with each other. This essay contends that the evolution of technology has, in fact, catalyzed a positive shift in the types of relationships people form, fostering connectivity and enhancing social engagement.
Technology has diversified the ways individuals establish and maintain relationships. Social media platforms, for instance, have facilitated connections among individuals globally, transcending geographical barriers. Additionally, online dating applications have revolutionized how people meet and form romantic relationships, offering a wide array of choices and opportunities to connect with like-minded individuals. Technology has also gifted us swift and interactive communication with loved ones no matter the distance. For instance, someone living abroad can make video calls and talk to his or her family members whenever they want. This has reduced the communication gap and significantly enhanced our options to contact others in real-time unlike in the past when sending handwritten letters was perhaps the best option to convey messages or contact someone.
This evolution in the types of relationships forged through technology signifies a positive development. Online connectivity allows individuals to maintain contact with friends, family, and acquaintances across vast distances. Moreover, digital platforms enable marginalized groups, such as those with disabilities or introverted personalities, to establish meaningful connections they may struggle to form in traditional social settings. For instance, social networking sites provide platforms for introverted individuals to express themselves and interact comfortably, fostering self-confidence and social skills.
In conclusion, the impact of technology on relationship dynamics has been transformative, offering diverse avenues for connectivity and social interaction. The ability to form connections across distances and the empowerment of individuals who face social barriers underscore the positive aspects of technological advancements. Embracing these changes in relationship dynamics signifies a positive shift towards enhanced connectivity and inclusivity in contemporary society.
Sample 10:
The ubiquitous presence of technology has undoubtedly redefined the landscape of human interaction, altering the very nature of how we build and maintain relationships. While the advancements of the digital age offer a plethora of tools for communication and connection, a closer examination reveals a disturbing trend – the erosion of genuine, meaningful relationships.
With technology, we make friends more often than ever. We also have a variety of tools to connect with others and remain in touch with people we care about. But one undeniable consequence of this technology-driven relationship is the rise of superficial and fleeting interactions online. Social media platforms, while fostering a sense of instant connectivity, often facilitate shallow exchanges and curated self-presentation. In the pursuit of likes and followers, meaningful conversations and authentic connections are often sacrificed, fostering a culture of virtual intimacy that lacks the depth and genuineness of face-to-face interaction.
As a result, of the constant bombardment of digital stimuli can contribute to social anxiety and a fear of missing out, hindering our ability to develop genuine relationships. The pressure to maintain an online presence and curate a perfect digital persona can lead individuals to withdraw from real-world interactions, hindering their ability to connect authentically with others. And this is a disturbing outcome of our digital relationship. Additionally, the ease of virtual communication can discourage individuals from developing the interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence necessary for navigating the complexities of face-to-face interaction. For example, a young adult accustomed to online communication might struggle to hold engaging conversations in person, leading to feelings of awkwardness and missed opportunities for meaningful connections.
In conclusion, while technology undoubtedly offers tools for communication and connection, it is crucial to recognize its limitations and potential pitfalls. By prioritizing face-to-face interaction, fostering genuine conversations, and actively engaging with our communities, we can strive to counteract the negative effects of technology on our relationships and cultivate a more meaningful and fulfilling social life.
Sample 11:
There is no doubt that many things have changed in the last few decades; some changes are for the better and some changes are for the worse. One of the fields which were greatly affected by the advent of technology is the way of interaction and communication.
Without any doubt, technology has changed the way we lead our lives, and these changes have been prominent over the last decade. There are several improvements in life due to the positive effects of technology and there are some negative impacts as well. One area that has dramatically changed is the way we communicate and maintain our relationship nowadays. And in my opinion, technology has positively affected our communication and the way we make relationships and maintain it. Despite some negative effects, most of us enjoy the positive things technology has bought for us. In the past, the ways of interaction were very limited. Unleash your imagination; if you want to speak with your friend, you would have to go directly to his house or send him a message which may take a few days to get a response. I completely believe that technology has a great tangible effect on our communication. Nowadays, it's very easy to interact with your relatives - and even with the government and organisations - either by emails, mobiles, chatting, etc. and I think that this has improved and enhanced the relationships.
We no longer need to visit a relative or friend to get updates. Alternatively, we can let them know our updates instantly. Besides personal communications, official and business communications have become easier. Email campaigns offer a good marketing opportunity for business owners and people can complain about a certain thing using emails without exposing their identity. Not all of the people have the availability of technology, and they still use the old form of communication. People now can deceive others using identity theft and fraud identity. The personal touch of communication like handwritten letters, face-to-face communications were more effective in some cases. Like meeting your friend is still more important than just writing him an email.
We make so many friends via chatting or social networking which would not have been possible without the advancement of technology and its contribution to communication. Cell phones, emails and social networking have enhanced the way of communicating and we can talk to anyone with a minimum cost. It's now not unusual to prepare for a visit and even several visits to your relatives and friends on the same day, while in the past this may have taken several weeks or months.
To conclude, despite all that, I still see some failings in the development of the means of interaction. For instance, the very high cost each person spends every day on communication. Another defect is that many elderly people are not accustomed to this modern technology. But that doesn't have a great effect on the positive role technology has made in the field of interaction between people and I think these defects are very easy to be solved.
Sample 12:
A true relationship between two people requires face to face communication and time to truly get to know each other. Regardless of what humans think, all individuals admire the feeling of being wanted even if it’s a lie. The digital world has created the sense that it is passable to be who anyone wishes to be online. However, I believe that the way people know each other online and the type of relationships they make virtually have changed for the worse.
Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, most are being turned inward, forgetting the true definition of a friend. Human beings have feelings, and they feel broken at times and do not always smile but the Internet only shows one's happy moments keeping one from fully being known. The types of friendships people make these days are quick and short-lasting. In real life friendship, people see each other at one’s best and worst time and remain there for one another. This can never be compared to a social network friendship. One can only get to know someone by spending time together for the reason that the Internet cannot replace shared experience and personal communication. However, due to the Internet, people can make friends anywhere in the world which was quite impossible in the past era. Finding school and college friends and getting in touch with them is an advantage that the Internet offers to us. However, true friendship is not possible if two people do not spend time together, share their common interests, talk a lot and help each other both in good and bad times.
Rightfully, life is meant to be lived and have many physical experiences, bonding with another person’s physical presence. Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, they are spending time online to make friends. This is, in my opinion, a negative aspect of the digital era.
In conclusion, making friends beyond boundaries and getting in touch with childhood friends could be the advantages of the digital era but the way we are becoming dependent on the technology and the way we are pretending to maintain our friendship online have negative consequences on our personal, moral and social aspects.
Sample 13:
It is true that technology in recent years has altered the path that people communicate with each other. There are many ways that technology affects our relationships, and in my opinion, this is a beneficial development.
To begin with, the most obvious transformation in people’s relationships is how they communicate with each other. By this, I mean that the Internet has converted the world into a small village and nowadays people around the world can reach each other easily and rapidly. For example, a friend who lives in the UK can chat and talk with their friends in China using a mobile phone or social network.
Another field in which technology affects our life is the way that people make friends. In other words, it has been observed that these days we can make friends from all nationalities without any effort or travel, and this helps with culture interchange and help people who suffer.
In my thought, this has a positive impact on the community for two reasons. Firstly, human life has become more convenient, this provides people with more opportunity to spend their leisure time with their kin. For instance, with the Internet, we can shop and work from our dwelling house without going outside anymore. Secondly, travel around the globe has become usable and cheap. As a result, people visiting each other and spend a lot of time together hence more connected society emerges.
To conclude, as we have found out there is no easy answer to this question. Nevertheless, technology makes a huge difference in peoples' lives in terms of communication and I believe that this is a positive impact in our society.
Sample 14:
From the last century to the present days, there have been many changes in the way people interact with each other as there have been evolutionary changes in technological fields. One may say this transformation has negative effects on relationships between people or positive effects. I believe that there have been more positive effects than negative ones among the people due to the reasons that in few seconds of time people can contact their dearest ones and technology gives strength to people by making them closer to each other even if they are not.
From the introduction of telecommunication and electronic mail, the lives of people turned out to be easier and communication among people became easier and more convenient. They can contact their families and friends using these advanced services over the countries. Without visiting their homes frequently, they can make money or accomplish their goals. For example, a military man has to serve his country at the borders, and it is uneasy to go home and spend some time with his family and acquaintances thoroughly. However, he can make contact with his family via telephone and other services. With the help of telecommunication and electronic mail, he can keep in touch with his family and buddies. In this way, technology makes people close to each other. This absolutely positive development as we have huge benefits using technology.
With the absence of one's dearest one, he used to be all alone before the introduction of technology. But it is possible to get in touch with his sweetheart. And also, he can send and receive the money within seconds over the thousands of miles using the latest money transfer machines. As a result, he can look over and take care of his family's financial problems and needs without his presence at his home. For instance, my uncle who stays in the United States calls his family and others via ‘Skype’ daily whereas, my dad who used to work in Dubai could not keep in touch with us as at that time the telecommunication had not installed in my village. Thus, that made my father bound to visit us frequently. Consequently, he spent a large amount of money travelling and could not communicate with us as frequently as he wanted to.
In many positive ways, technology has affected the relationships between people, and I would say these are positive developments. Imagine without technology, what would happen to the people and the world. In many ways, we are getting the help of using technology.
Sample 15:
Technological developments in this modern era have transformed the way we socialise. Advancements in communication networks have played a vital role in bringing people closer. In my opinion, there are both pros and cons of this development and this essay will analyse how technology has changed the types of relationships made by people.
In ancient times, people used letters and telegrams to interact with each other. With the advent of modern communication systems like the telephone and the Internet, people can collaborate more effectively. For instance, we can interact through emails rather than letter and businessman can have online meetings through the conference calls.
Another reason is the widespread use of social networks over the internet; for instance, Facebook, where men and women can now make friends online and interact with them through the post, message and online chat. Video conferencing in the form of Skype has improved instructor and student relationship. Online messaging platforms like mIRC have given people the luxury to choose their own discussion-based chat rooms. There are more ways to socialise now than there used to be in the past.
All these advancements in technology come up with their merits and demerits. Letters, memos and telegrams are replaced by emails and text messages. Human resource hiring can be done through online video conferencing which has eliminated the need for physical presence and travelling requirement. We can now mingle more through Facebook, Pinterest, Google+, Instagram and Orkut and so on. Though one can regard these as positive developments, they do have some negative aspects. These developments have isolated people and discouraged real-world interaction. For instance, youth, in particular, prefers to choose to mix up with people online rather than socialising with them in the real world.
To conclude, technology has no doubt revolutionised the way we interact and hang out but has greatly reduced real-world interaction. Though these virtual relations tend to be positive, we should not deny the importance of physical interaction in our lives.
Sample 16:
Everything has two sides, and the effects of technology on people’s relationships are not an exception. We cannot deny how much technology has transformed the individual reaction with others in his family and the surrounding community.
In my opinion, technology has affected and transformed our life aspects and dealing with other people in a good way. Recently, we have had different fast and cheap methods to call our family and friends. Moreover, some technologies are giving us chances to see and talk with them at the same time. In addition, we are informed on a daily basis with the last updates and news about our friends and family, so we can remember birthdays, graduation parties and even marriage anniversaries. Furthermore, these methods make it faster and easier to call and congratulate another individual.
On the other hand, many people believe that technology is affecting individual relationships badly. They opine that, if we did not have these kinds of technology, we would have been visiting each other regularly.
Not only that, but individuals will not be isolated from each other, especially those who are addicted to using social networking platforms. As a matter of fact, people rarely talk to each other face-to-face. In particular, people’s personalities are changing so much, because of addiction to using Facebook. It’s one of the vital reasons to decrease confidence and self-esteem.
As can be seen, even if we have some bad effects of technology and how it changed the way people contact each other, we still have much more effects. We can obtain many easy and cheaper methods to contact each other. In fact, technology has enhanced our life and the way we are contacting each other.
Sample 17:
Today, various brand-new methods of telecommunications have tremendously influenced social behaviour. Although their impacts have benefited human lifestyle, they have had some costs as well. However, before evaluating their advantages and disadvantages, it is better to reveal how these breakthroughs affect the ways people relate to each other.
In the old times, when someone wanted to communicate, there were extremely limited means of doing so. Indeed, he should write a letter or have a face-to-face conversation. Likewise, it was possible to be acquainted with new faces either by meeting them personally or being introduced by family and friends.
On the other hand, substantial technological progress has happened in recent years. For instance, smartphones can be utilised both by direct calls and via different applications. Alternatively, the internet can be used either by offline methods like e-mail or by online protocols like chatting programs. Moreover, social networking is another rich aspect of the internet by which everybody is able to find new friends or search for old, missed ones, and it can be used to interact with current relatives as well. Clearly, not only have modern technologies facilitated human interactions, but they also diversified his relationships.
On the debit side, excessive use of virtual connections might weaken the personal relationship with reality. While it seems that people are aware of each other’s statuses on a daily basis, even up-to-the-minute, they may overlook loved ones’ emotional states due to the negligence of their presence.
All in all, contemplating the pros and cons of these phenomena simultaneously, I should say it depends on the person who utilises these state-of-the-art technologies. If he applies them wisely, their pluses will definitely overshadow their pitfalls. After all, in my viewpoint, humankind can eventually address this issue in favour of his civilisation. Hence, I assume it as a mainly positive development in the long run.
Sample 18:
People used to communicate by meeting each other while it has nowadays totally changed since technological advancement. Some assert that utilising technology in daily communication brings more harm than good things. I personally agree with this view and this essay will look into the reason with some considerations.
The first effect of technology usage is that it reduces the sense of togetherness among people. Since they do interaction via telecommunication such as a mobile phone or the internet, it reduces the personal relationship. People cannot catch moments during interaction because they communicate in unreal situations. Take social media as an example, most teenagers talk to their friend via utilising Facebook, Viber, WhatsApp or others. They tend to interact with each other via sending messages thus they can feel the situation or even communication sense just by reading the messages. By contrast, direct communication tends to develop a sense of belonging among people. They will be more comfortable expressing their feelings thus it is easy to get along together.
In addition, it will deteriorate the human behaviour. By using electronic devices in the daily life of communication, it is hard for them to get involved in a social environment. It will decrease their self-confidence to speak in public because they usually interact through devices rather than through face-to-face communication. Moreover, utilising technology in interaction is not free thus you should they should prepare much budget just for communication.
It is true that technology usages enable people to keep in touch with people who live in different places. However, it is not capable of providing a sense of feeling as well as direct communication.
To sum up, by communicating directly, it will help people keep close to each other and able to talk towards them easily and expressively.
Sample 19:
The 21st century has been a game-changer in all aspects of human life. The same case is with relationships which have also taken on a new dimension with technological advancement. Nowadays, relationships are much more fragile, materialistic, mistrustful and doubtful as compared to previous times. I reckon that overall, this development has been quite negative which will be analysed in our paragraphs to follow.
To start with, nowadays technology has made relationships between humans quite suspicious. People are getting involved in relationships just on social networking websites without even knowing who is actually communicating with them. For instance, there have been many cases in which the person you are in contact with is actually fake and fraud. He is just playing and making a fool of you, and you believe that you are making a friend or falling in love with him. Consequently, when you know the truth, it is just like a bolt from the blue and your feeling is eradicated. This is evident from the argument above the reality that technological relationships can be quite painful sometimes.
Further, in the new era connections between people can be quite fragile and weak as compared to the strength of relationships before the advent of technology. People without practically meeting each other and actually knowing their strengths and weaknesses tend to trust each other too much and when they face the true facts the relationships are affected and, in some cases, broken down. For instance, a survey was conducted by Indian newspaper regarding the success of technology relationships and the result was reconciling with the point that relationships are very poor, and the failure rate was quite high.
To sum up, these technological relationships have altered the connectivity between two people. I firmly believe that drawbacks outweigh much more as compared to the fruits of these new relationships. However, it is recommended that people should be extremely careful and cautious in making any sought of relationships on social networking websites, chatting software etc.
Sample 20:
Technology has been affecting many aspects of human life including the way people interact with one another. Some believe that it has more benefits for people’s connection than drawbacks, while others contradict it. I personally argue with the former opinion, and through this essay, I am going to explain my reasons.
Initially, the first reason that I am going to elaborate is the way technology better enhances communication among people. A large number of communication gadgets has been invented in order to help communication between people, even for those who are separated by spacious distance, getting simpler and quicker. Thus, by giving an easier chance to be connected, this development has been encouraging society’s sense of togetherness. They do not have to visit their colleagues which are in different regions or cities to ask about their condition, for instance, because they could just pick up their phone and call their friends.
Subsequently, the variety of communication technology has been developed even further. The purpose is not only to make it easier but also to achieve a better quality of communication. We can mention video call, voice messenger and social media as the parts of it. The users are not limited by the elder method of phone call anymore. They can communicate more interactively by using video call. Therefore, they can communicate with others in the wider range of connection by using social media such as Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. This situation will globally lead people into a worldwide relationship.
On the other hand, there has been a developing trend that people are becoming more individualistic as the effect of technological development. The decreasing opportunity of direct interaction among them is accused as the root of this problem. However, it depends on us as the users to utilise technology wisely. If we can maintain a balance between communication technology and the conventional way of communication, the problem will certainly disappear.
Eventually, the advantages of using technology as part of our communication types outweigh the disadvantages, as long as we can manage it to be the helper, not the loser.
Sample 21:
It is true that some people have shifted their way to keep in touch with others due to the innovation of technology. The massive use of devices in communication, particularly phones and the internet, can be identified as the main difference compared to the past. People rely on those technologies to connect with families, friends and colleagues. Personally, I reckon that this trend may lead people to have a better relationship due to the effectiveness and low cost of communication.
To begin with, the interaction of individuals is presently not limited in one model. It means that people have many choices to stay connected with others than before. Technology offers some applications such as email, Facebook or Twitter. Those social media serve advantages to enhance and build a relationship with others. For example, in workplaces, employees do not have to meet in a certain place to discuss something. Rather they can use video conference to do a meeting. Therefore, various types of communication tools can help people to choose their preference and purpose in communication.
Furthermore, the usage of technology in communication leads to some positive things. It can be assumed that the easiness and effectiveness which are offered by these devices maximise the quality of people life in term of maintenance the relation of people. In addition, these communication tools allow people to spend less money and time. In other words, individuals do not have to visit someone when they want to talk or know friends’ news. Young people nowadays have friends from different countries and can have more friends. They can share their thoughts and updates instantly, which was quite impossible in the past. Some people might argue that people rely too much on technology and that’s they keep a less personal relationship with others. However, I disagree and want to say that technology has made it possible to connect with a dear one, make new friends and build up relationships in a more convenient way.
In conclusion, people always pick the best and most efficient way of communication, and the widespread use of the internet, mobile phone and other ways of communication have positively impacted our life and the way we make and keep our relationship.
Sample 22:
It is commonly noticed that people surrounding us stay connected with other people via social networking sites or other applications and technology have totally changed the way people used to communicate, make friends and keep their relationship. This paradigm shift happened basically because of the advances in technology and widespread use of such technological applications. Shall we welcome this shift or be wary about the changes? In this essay, I am going to discuss how technology has affected the types of relationships people make and whether it is considered as a positive or negative development.
First and foremost, I think that the development of technology has enhanced the relationships people make and maintain. For instance, when a student studies abroad and stays far away from his or her family and friends, social networking sites and other applications can help the student stay connected with his or her family and friends through Skype, for instance. In my opinion, in this case, this is a positive development to deal with homesickness or maintain our interactions with people we care about. Compared to the past decade, when technology was not so advanced, people had to depend on letters to communicate with each other and that was a time-consuming method, and it incurred higher cost. In contrast, in today’s world, people just have to be on laptops or smartphones and can have direct communication and interaction with family and friends. They can see each other contrary to the past method of interchanging written words. In this way, people can keep a close relationship with family and friends. We can now make friends beyond borders and that enhances our perspective about other nations and customs. Online groups, social platforms and social networking sites bring people together who have common interests and there are many events those people meet and plan for the betterment of society.
In fact, the implication of technology on people’s relationships is a controversial issue. On the one hand, it is a positive development for helping people stay connected with family and friends and making new friends. On the other hand, it can estrange the relationships people make. The argument that it has a negative influence on people’s relationships is based on the scenario that people will avoid face-to-face communication in the long run. Recent research indicates that virtual communication will weaken the communication skill of a person. I still remember a film that I watched had a scene that showed four friends having meals in a restaurant. When they sat together, they did not interact with each other face-to-face but through social applications by sending out the emotions in the social group to show their feelings. This example shows a worrying trend as people enjoy interacting virtually more than face to face due to their reliance on technology. It is important to create awareness to the public that actual communication is more important than virtual interaction to minimise its repercussion.
Overall, as far as I am concerned, the advancement of technology has both positive and negative effects on the kind of relationships people make. We have to be aware that actual interaction is more important to enhance a relationship. We shall connect with family and friends virtually only if we are apart from them.
Sample 23:
Face-to-face communication and enough time to get to know each other well are prerequisites for a real relationship. People all like to feel wanted, even if it’s a false sense, despite what other people may believe. The perception that one can be whoever one wants to be online has been shaped by the digital age. But I think that relationships people form virtually and the way people get to know each other online have changed, mostly negatively.
Most are becoming more inward-focused and have forgotten what it means to be a true friend to those around them, rather than being genuine friends. People are emotional creatures who occasionally feel sad and aren’t always happy, but the Internet only shares positive experiences, preventing people from knowing each other completely. Nowadays, people tend to form fast and transient friendships. In real life friendships, individuals support one another through each other’s highs and lows. This is not at all like friendship on social media. Because the Internet cannot take the place of in-person interactions and shared experiences, getting to know someone requires spending time together.
It is only fitting that life be experienced fully, forming bonds with the physical presence of others. Rather than truly being friends with those in their immediate vicinity, they are utilizing social media to establish connections. I consider this to be a drawback of the digital age.
In conclusion, the digital age may have brought about benefits like reaching out to old friends and forming new ones, but it has also had unfavorable effects on our moral, social, and personal lives due to our growing reliance on technology and the ways we pretend to keep up our online friendships.
Sample 24:
Since communication with others comprises a very essential aspect of our daily life, any alteration in the way we communicate with each other will have a profound effect on our social and professional life. This essay will first discuss how technology has influenced the way we relate with each other presently and will then address the question of whether this influence has been positive or negative.
There are several ways in which the new communication technology has influenced people’s way of interaction with each other. Firstly, social media applications have revolutionized the way we communicate. The reason why many people believe this is that nowadays, you can connect with your family and friends instantly through many social media applications such as the Facebook and twitter applications. It is also possible to say that people are now more encouraged to share their opinions openly via the Internet. One good illustration for this is the substantial number of friends that people who use social media applications have in their contact list.
However, the impact of social media in one’s social life may not always be positive. This is because people are now increasingly abandoning face to face interactions and prefer carrying out their communication behind closed doors. This is causing more people, especially youths, to lose out on many aspects of personal communication. A particularly good example here is a study conducted in the USA showing that more than 75% of high school students are spending more than 50% of their free time on the Internet.
To sum up, modern technological advances in communication have incredibly influenced the way people interact, and although there are many perks associated with the use of recent technology there are also drawbacks that people must take care of.
Sample 25:
In this contemporary era, the means of communication have updated dramatically with the evolution of cutting-edge technologies. In my perspective, I foster that it is a constructive movement, and this treatise will elucidate my stance in the forthcoming paragraphs with credible illustrations.
To start with, the recent improvements in various aspects of technology have revolutionized the entire world such that the public claim that it makes them establish their communication among their peers in a feasible manner. There are many applications which can be downloaded and installed on our electronic gadgets, such as Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, which enable people to exchange messages, photos and videos. The latest breakthrough, instant calling and face-time features for long periods of time with minimal charges incurred, have made humans have a face-to-face interaction virtually. Many organizations are working tirelessly to achieve these updates frequently and are intuitive. For instance, old people who reside in the suburbs are overwhelmed with amusement since they are frequently having a chat with their children who live either in metro cities or in foreign lands. Thus, it creates a remarkable bonding among families who are far away from one another in distant locations.
In a similar fashion, there are multiple websites on the internet which attract youngsters in modern society. They are fascinated by browsing these sites to find new individuals in nearby areas and are meeting up for casual dates to understand each other. Additionally, some are using these to search for pristine friends and are gradually chatting almost every day. This eventually encourages them to identify partners or peers who have similar interests. By sharing their emotions, they feel relaxed and rejuvenated rather than having trepidation or stress. Hence, it plays a significant role in commencing new bonds for the youth.
Taking everything into consideration, the latest innovations in technology have drastically impacted the entire human population to have noteworthy coordination with parents and grandparents and explore new friends. This essay has exposed a plethora of merits and the advantageous impact of technology on the public worldwide.
Sample 26:
In recent years, with the development of information technology and the evolution of the internet, people interact and communicate better and more effectively than in the past. With new technology, people interact via devices where the technology has been converged. Now it is possible to make calls, watch TV, play video games, listen to music and access internet with only one device. Many people believe that technology may improve the type of the relationships people make whereas others do feel that it has negative effects.
It is believed by some people that technology has a positive effect in the way people interact because it is more convenient on daily basis, and the use of new channels to communicate is often free. For example, if you are looking for a job. You do not have to go to the office nor pay stamps to send your CV. You can do this by email by simply clicking on the “submit” button. It is effective because it saves time, and it is simple to apply. Another significant example is the use of social media platforms. It enables people to share experiences and send information instantaneously which can be seen by everyone, so it improves the way people socialise. Moreover, new channels of communication can help maintain good relationships in business between jobseekers and employers as well as with family and friends on a daily basis.
It is argued by others that technology has a negative impact on the type of relationship people make because it can lead to a development of antisocial behaviours. For instance, teenagers who play video games can find themselves in total confusion between the real world and the virtual world. The law is different because in the real world people have to follow rules whereas in the virtual world there are no constraints. It influences the behaviour of people in a negative way. Moreover, it can create a certain form of addiction for some, leading them to become completely isolated and unaware of what is good and right. Also, the use of the internet can spread bad behaviours such as bullying or the promotion of negative images, comments which will have an impact in people’s lives. For example, on Facebook, several teenagers committed suicide after being bullied by their friends. So, the inappropriate use of technology can lead to healthy issues such as addiction or fatal death.
To sum up, the development of technology has changed the type of relationships people make in both a positive and negative fashion. People use new channels in their daily life because it is convenient as well as cheap. However, the use of the internet needs to be carefully monitored and used appropriately to prevent children and vulnerable people from developing addictions, which could lead to harmful or even fatal consequences.
Sample 27:
Today, more than ever, in regard to determining whether or not advances in technology influence the sorts of relationships people make, various views have been set forward. The expansion of modern means of communicating is the continuing debate that causes so much controversy. This matter is evidenced by some experts who believe that they pose a direct threat to social lives and might come at the expense of severe social isolation and a sedentary lifestyle. Others understand the significance of communication and adhere to the concept that these types of relationships are integral pieces of social communication. Consequently, they are regarded as rewarding. Nevertheless, the opinion set forth by the second category is more logical. In the following paragraphs, I will shed light on my attitudes on this matter.
To begin with, previously, communication among people looked bleak. People used to fulfill and make an appointment to observe each other, and according to the simple fact that communities had busy folks, and they seem doomed to possess far-reaching communication.
In the next place, modern means of communicating control people’s attention. They are the fastest and easiest way of togetherness. Individuals are at the mercy of the digital world to get in touch with others in the remotest part of the world, leading to saving their own time and hanging out every second. This issue questions the requirement to have face to face connections.
In this hectic way of life, the truth is that the responsibility of real-time discussions, visualization of each other, information exchange which enables a person to share a variety of information like activities, events, interests, thoughts fall upon these ways of communication. Thanks to tremendous advances in technology.
In summary, all in all, rather than devoting a fantastic deal of time and energy solely concerning face to face interaction, the trend today is toward utilizing modern means of communication to get in touch with other individuals. The pivotal role in these ways of communicating performed in interpersonal communication is hard to dismiss. However, many men and women do not appreciate it.
Sample 28:
In recent years, the innovation of techonology has led to various changes in the way people interact. As a result, this causes some specific effects on people’s relationships which are generally considered as beneficial impacts on the society.
Conspicuously, the improvement in techonological devices such as computers with internet connection and mobile phones affect people’s relations in different aspects. Firstly, it helps to diversify kinds of relationships instead of just several traditional ones in the past. Besides people’s interactions in real life, many connections are beign bult through a virtual life on the internet especially via facebook or online games. Secondly, the convenience of communicating between people is likely to make people’s relationships more sociable and hardly understandable. In fact, many friendships are not based on trust or sincerity but benefits which are generally hard to be perceived in a virtual life.
Although the development of technology somehow makes people’s relationships more complicated, I still believe that people are actually beneficial from this. Thanks to internet availability, gaps between people are shortened in magical ways. For example, no matter how far the distance between two people, they still can talk directly to each other provided with the internet access. What’s more, people have never been able to save as much time and communicating expenses as at the present. Instead of waiting for months to receive a response from a posted letter, it just takes some seconds for the letter to be delivered through email even to many partners at the same time.
In conclusion, taking advantage of technological development to facilitate interaction between people is beneficial not only for building a good relationship but also for doing business.
Sample 29:
Technology is expanding in every field, and connectivity will be no exception. Nonetheless, due to its other pitfalls that cause discussion on its positive and negative effects, this enormous shift in the ways of interaction cannot be regarded as fruitful straight away.
One of the essential advantages of focusing on in terms of positive development is that technology makes connectivity simpler and more convenient. Because of recent events such as Skype, video conferencing, Whatsapp, and social networking sites, such as Facebook, people are hardly a click away from the nears and dears. To a great extent, these advances have made us social. Second, there are enormous opportunities for letters and telephone calls to be sent and for requests to be made. Customers used to be on the S.T.D and I.S.D booth in long queues, but now mobile phones and sophisticated gizmos make it easier for everyone to communicate openly.
On the other hand, certain disadvantages cannot be overlooked as people of today not only spend a long time using computers but also do not want to meet their relatives and friends face-to-face, leading to a fading relationship. One of my school friends, for example, visited me personally on various occasions, such as at festivals and birthdays. Still, nowadays, she sends messages to welcome me and sends salutations to my post. Even most members of the family suffer from asphyxia, which is an unusual illness that flares. For imitating relationships, this is a troubling question.
To recap, despite numerous disadvantages, nobody can afford to tackle this ever-fast digital technology that has to make our lives easier.
Sample 30:
Technological advancements have revolutionized how millions of people interact with each other, and it has gone to a whole new level. With it, how we make relationships has also been affected. The essay will expound on how individuals can now build relationships across the world, and then opine that this is an incredibly positive development.
Unprecedented in human history, modern technology has made it extremely convenient for people to communicate and get in touch with family, relatives, friends or old classmates. Besides, people can communicate instantaneously with someone they have never been acquainted with before and in geography, they have never been to with the help of digital applications like WhatsApp or Viber. They can even find someone on a freelancing platform to have their job done. This is quite different from the conventional relationships we develop by meeting in person; it is, nevertheless, hard to downplay these relationships. Moreover, social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn, provide people with a platform that allows them to live chat and comment on someone else’s matter instantly. Strangely enough, some of them even find their dates online and make friends in a distant country without ever meeting them.
Overall, the phenomenon is a real boon to mankind. The revolution in communication that modern technology brings forth has eroded the traditional notions of national sovereignty. It has blurred the line between national and international boundaries and wielded enormous influence on the values of the national identity so as to transform global citizens; whose ideas, values, ethics, and orientations are no longer moulded by the local culture and environment. Rather global ideals and values are incessantly aired on the web and social media to make a better world. Most importantly, the communication revolution paved the way for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, towards which the globe is rapidly heading.
In conclusion, leading-edge technology has altered our mode of interaction forever, transcending national and cultural barriers so that individuals can frankly chat, talk and can readily keep in touch, and it is a windfall achievement that will transform a new world where things, like culture, sect, and so on, that split people will not exist.
Sample 31:
Technology has revolutionised the way people interact with each other in recent times. However, this has led to a decline in the quality of relationships people make. The impact of technology on relationships is a double-edged sword, and while some may argue that it has been a positive development, I believe that it has had negative effects.
One of the ways that technology has affected relationships is that people are becoming more isolated and less likely to engage in face-to-face interactions. The rise of social media platforms and instant messaging services have made it easier for people to communicate remotely, but it has also led to a decrease in the frequency and quality of in-person interactions. People are now more likely to spend their time on social media rather than meeting up with friends or family members. Moreover, technology has made it easier for people to be dishonest and insincere in their interactions. For instance, people can now hide behind the anonymity of the internet and present a false version of themselves. This has led to a decline in trust and authenticity in relationships.
Another way that technology has affected relationships is that people are now more reliant on their devices than on their relationships. People can now find entertainment and fulfil their social needs through technology, making it less necessary to build and maintain meaningful relationships.
In conclusion, while technology has undoubtedly had many positive effects on society, its impact on relationships has been mostly negative. It has led to a decrease in in-person interactions, a decline in genuineness and trust, and an increased reliance on devices over relationships. It is crucial that people recognize these negative effects and take steps to mitigate them by prioritising in-person interactions and being more sincere and honest in their relationships.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In different parts of the world, traditional foods are becoming less common due to the increasing popularity of international fast food. While some people believe that fast food is a good option, I think that consuming traditional foods is much more beneficial. This essay will demonstrate the author’s point of view.
On the one hand, there are compelling reasons why many people are in favor of fast food. Firstly, it is convenient and time-saving. Instead of having to prepare a meal for hours, people can easily grab a bite at any fast-food restaurant, which is ubiquitous in many megacities. This type of food is also suitable for those with fast-paced lifestyles. In addition, fast food is famous for its delicious taste. This can explain the successful franchises of various fast-food chains all over the world such as McDonald’s, KFC, and so on.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that eating traditional food is more advantageous. One of the most substantial benefits of traditional meals is the nutritional value that they contain. A homemade meal can provide a sufficient amount of protein, fiber, and many other nutrients, which has proved to be effective in maintaining good health. This is because traditional food is usually made from fresh ingredients and without any preservatives. More importantly, I would argue that consuming traditional food rather than fast food is a good way to preserve culture as each flavor has its own uniqueness and is a representation of the national cuisine. By making and eating traditional food, people are contributing to cultural preservation, and thus passing it down to the next generation.
In conclusion, even though fast-food consumption has been an accelerating trend in recent years due to its conveniences, I sincerely believe that the benefits of eating traditional food are more significant.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng ký để học cùng Vietjack. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Bằng việc đăng ký, bạn đồng ý với Điều khoản sử dụng và Chính sách bảo mật của Vietjack.
Nhắn tin Zalo
Hỏi bài tập