Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
While some people think that it is the responsibility of producers and suppliers to reduce product packaging, others feel that the responsibility lies with consumers. This essay will analyse both sides of the argument.
On one hand, I believe that companies do have a significant responsibility to limit the amount of packaging that they package their products in. One reason for this is that many consumers have very little awareness about the negative impacts that the excessive amounts of product packaging are having on the environment; therefore, manufacturers and supermarkets need to minimise the amount of plastic packaging that is used to store and sell their products, or preferably use only biodegradable, recyclable, or environmentally friendly materials. In addition, many people cannot afford to be selective about which products they buy, which is a further reason why all companies need to be more responsible.
On the other hand, individuals also have a responsibility to protect the environment from further destruction and pollution by limiting their consumption of products that are packaged in non-biodegradable materials. By boycotting certain products from companies who are not being environmentally responsible, consumers can put pressure on these companies to change their attitude towards the materials that they use to package their products. As a result, companies will be forced to act more environmentally responsible by changing and reducing product packaging. Consumers have the power to bring about change but must act together in order for it to happen.
In conclusion, companies and individuals both need to take responsibility for the amount of packaging that is used to package goods. The government also needs to play a significant role in this issue by creating and enforcing laws that companies must adhere to with regards to plastic packaging, and by educating individuals about the environmental destruction and pollution caused by packaging waste.
Sample 2:
While some argue that major retailers and producers are accountable for the reduction in packaging, other people contend that the onus is on consumers who should avoid products with unnecessary wrapping. The essay will elaborate on both perspectives and the reasons why I lean towards the former.
On the one hand, individuals should be environmentally conscious consumers by not opting for products that contain too much packaging to some extent. The first reason is that it can act as a deterrent to the production of non-ecofriendly products. More specifically, as they favour eco-friendly casings and boycott environmentally harmful ones, the low sales figures of the latter can discourage manufacturers to continue producing them and turn to produce the former instead. Furthermore, consumers are heavily reliant on social media and reviews now when choosing products, so if they actively promote products with less packaging, or in contrast, give negative ratings online to those heavily packaged, then that would be very effective.
On the other hand, manufacturers and supermarkets should be responsible for the declining volume of packaging for several reasons. Chief of these is that producers can simplify packaging. To be more specific, they can utilize innovative packaging designs that use less materials without compromising the product’s quality or safety. This practice can reduce the number of materials used, making it easier for consumers to handle and dispose of. Another appealing justification is that supermarkets can select products with minimal packaging or packaging made from sustainable materials. To illustrate, they can set requirements for the packaging used by the products they sell, such as mandating the use of recyclable materials or setting limits on the amount of packaging allowed per product.
In conclusion, both viewpoints have their own valid arguments, however, I am of the opinion that supermarkets and producers should bear the responsibility for reducing the amount of packaging since they can make packaging simpler and choose goods with little packaging or sustainable materials. It is advisable that manufacturers should implement these measures to promote environmental awareness among citizens.
Sample 3:
It is often argued that curtailing the over-packaging of products is the onus of supermarkets and manufacturers rather than consumers. From my point of view, I am largely in agreement with the latter viewpoint.
On the one hand, supermarkets and manufacturers are responsible for using less packaging because they are the ones who have instituted unnecessary packaging on a large scale. There is no discernible reason, in light of its dire environmental impact, that toothpaste manufacturers have historically chosen to pack tubes in extra boxes or supermarkets have opted to wrap bananas and apples in Styrofoam trays, covered with plastic. These redundant practices contribute greatly to both the initial production of plastic and its subsequent disposal in landfills. Since supermarkets and manufacturers are the ones with the power to reform their own policies, it is only logical that they should be responsible.
On the other hand, only consumers can force the hands of large corporations by boycotting their products. This is best evidenced in cities where it used to be common to package fruits and vegetables in plastic, such as Chiang Mai in Thailand. Consumer awareness movements among locals have had a discernible impact on companies. It is now much more common to find bananas bare or simply wrapped in natural leaves and vegetables tied together with a single piece of string to lessen their environmental footprint. This same practice employed in cities around the world will have the largest possible impact on the environment.
In conclusion, the only pragmatic way to persuade shareholder-controlled corporations to reform packaging policies is by putting consumer pressure on their bottom lines. If customers make more of an effort to steer clear of heavily packaged products in favour of more environmentally conscious ones, this will lead to a shift in thinking when it comes to the environmental toll of plastics.
Sample 4:
In today's world, the issue of excessive packaging of consumer products has become a subject of debate as most of the packaging uses non-biodegradable plastics that harm the environment. Some argue that manufacturers and supermarkets should bear the responsibility of reducing packaging, while others believe that customers should play a more active role in avoiding products with excessive packaging. This essay will discuss both perspectives and assert that while manufacturers and supermarkets should take the initiative to reduce packaging, customers' choices can also play a significant role in promoting sustainability.
On the one hand, many believe that the burden of reducing packaging should lie with manufacturers and supermarkets. As key players in the supply chain, they can implement changes that can lead to significant reductions in packaging waste. By adopting sustainable practices, such as using eco-friendly materials and employing efficient packaging techniques, they can minimize the environmental impact caused by excessive packaging. For instance, in recent years, some leading supermarkets have made significant strides in reducing single-use plastics and implementing recycling programmes, demonstrating that they are capable of driving positive change.
On the other hand, others think that customers possess considerable power to influence packaging practices through their purchasing decisions. When consumers actively choose products with minimal or recyclable packaging, they signal to manufacturers and retailers that they value sustainability and environmental consciousness. This demand-driven approach can incentivize companies to rethink their packaging strategies and make eco-friendly choices. By embracing a culture of conscious consumption, customers can be catalysts for positive change in the market.
In my opinion, the responsibility to reduce packaging waste should be shared by manufacturers, supermarkets and customers. While manufacturers should prioritize sustainable practices, customers can exert influence through their preferences. By working together, these stakeholders can create a more sustainable future, where excessive packaging becomes a thing of the past, and responsible consumption becomes the norm.
In conclusion, addressing the issue of excessive packaging requires a joint effort from manufacturers, supermarkets, and customers alike. By collaborating, we can make meaningful progress towards a more sustainable and eco-conscious society.
Sample 5:
The reduction of product packaging is regarded as helpful to protecting the environment and saving resources. Some argue that this responsibility belongs to producers and suppliers, while others suggest that consumers also need to make their contribution. This essay will discuss both of these views and present my perspective.
To start with, producers and suppliers ought to take proactive action to reduce packaging because it is easier for them to do this than consumers. Manufacturers have control over the input, that is, the production process, which involves packaging. Similarly, supermarkets, department stores, shopping malls, and the like can determine how much material should be used to wrap certain products, such as fresh food. As a result, it is possible for both of them to make sure the amount of packaging is cut down in the first place.
Despite that, consumers also have a vital role to play. If shoppers consistently boycott products with redundant packaging or insist on carrying their own reusable bags when shopping, manufacturers and distributors eventually have to adapt to this tendency. In fact, the latter movement, in which people bring their own shopping bags to supermarkets in order to avoid taking extra ones on the spot, has been established in many countries. Over time, these shopping centers automatically provide less packaging, which is not only economical but also environmentally friendly. Likewise, if purchasers refuse to buy products with bulky coverings, manufacturers will also have to rethink their method.
In conclusion, although there are varying opinions regarding whose responsibility it is to lessen the amount of product packaging, I espouse the view that it should be a common duty between consumers and producers as well as distributors.
Sample 6:
There are widely differing views on whether producers and retailers or consumers should be responsible for curtailing the over-packaging of products. From my perspective, curbing excessive product packaging necessitates a collective effort from both the supply and demand sides.
On the one hand, it is reasonable to place the responsibility of minimizing goods packaging on manufacturers and supermarkets. This is mainly because they are those who use redundant packaging materials in their mass production in the first place, and worse still, they tend to favor virgin material for such a process so as to reduce manufacturing overheads. This has resulted in innumerable landfill sites mostly containing non-biodegradable waste, posing a serious environmental threat. Thus, it is up to producers and retail chains to adopt more environmentally-friendly practices in order to rectify this situation.
On the other hand, cutting back on packaging also warrants a shift in consumers’ shopping habits. As packaging plays an important role in attracting customers’ attention, manufacturers and supermarkets are often unwilling or hesitant to adopt eco-friendly packaging, a practice that could adversely affect the visual appeal of their products and, by extension, their sales figures. Therefore, if consumers convert to products with green packaging, producers and retailers would be pressured into reforming their packaging policies. This can be seen in the case of Kinh Do, a confectionery corporation, which has recently decided to do away with unnecessary plastic ornaments and switch to paper bags as a result of their growing group of environmentally conscious patrons.
In conclusion, both the producing and consuming ends need to shoulder a fair share of responsibility in the fight against the rising issue of plastic waste caused by heavily packaged products.
Sample 7:
Plastic is the leading cause of pollution, and its use should be regulated. In this essay, I will discuss whether companies or customers should have the responsibility to avoid over-packaging.
On the one hand, the main reason why manufactures and supermarkets should take responsibility lies on the fact that they often pack their products for protection from damage during the distribution or storage. Of course, there are some alternative options with environmental benefits, but using plastic is more lucrative. Therefore, many people think that they must cover the cost of recycling and collecting packaging materials, especially plastic. Otherwise, supermarkets or retailers should offer discounts to customers who purchase either products with disposable and eco-friendly package or ones without package.
On the other hand, I think that customers should start avoiding such unnecessary over packing of products. Many people prefer over-packaged products as they believe more packaging can protect products like foods from contamination and give them a more hygienic feeling. However, over-packaged is unnecessary, and this is just a common misconception that needs to be dispelled. Unless consumer behaviour changes, the amount of packaging of goods will be increasing, let alone reducing it. Also, customers can avoid buying over-packaged goods, making consumer pressure on manufacturers and sellers. For example, many supermarkets and restaurants now use fewer plastic containers and use more recycle paper under consumer pressure.
In conclusion, although it is important to make manufacturers and supermarkets responsible for overpackaging, customers should take matters into their own hands and reduce the consumption of products which require more packaging.
Sample 8:
In today’s consumer-driven society, the debate over who should shoulder the responsibility for reducing excessive packaging - manufacturers and supermarkets or the consumers themselves - is increasingly pertinent. This essay contends that while both stakeholders have a role to play, manufacturers and retailers bear the primary responsibility due to their control over packaging design and material selection.
Manufacturers and supermarkets wield significant influence over the environmental footprint of packaging through choices in design, materials, and volume. They possess the technological and innovative capacity to pioneer sustainable packaging solutions that are less reliant on plastics and other non-biodegradable materials. For instance, adopting biodegradable materials or designing products with minimal packaging can significantly reduce waste. Furthermore, these entities can drive change by educating consumers about recycling and the environmental impact of their purchasing decisions. Implementing these measures requires a shift in corporate philosophy to prioritize sustainability over convenience or cost-savings, demonstrating a commitment to environmental stewardship.
Conversely, consumers play a crucial role in shaping market trends through their purchasing choices. By deliberately selecting products with minimal or sustainable packaging, individuals can signal to manufacturers and retailers the growing market demand for environmentally friendly products. This consumer-driven demand serves as a powerful incentive for businesses to innovate and adopt greener practices. Yet, the success of this approach hinges on broad consumer awareness and proactive behavior, which can be challenging to foster without comprehensive education and appealing incentives. Engaging in such practices not only promotes sustainability but also empowers consumers to actively participate in the environmental stewardship movement.
In summary, manufacturers and supermarkets hold the key to minimizing packaging waste, given their capacity for innovation and production changes. While consumer choices matter, the primary onus is on these businesses to spearhead sustainable practices, guiding us towards an eco-friendlier future.
Sample 9:
The debate regarding who should shoulder the responsibility of reducing product packaging - manufacturers and supermarkets, or consumers - is a contentious one. While some argue that manufacturers and supermarkets are the primary contributors and thus should take the lead, others believe that consumer choices have the power to shape the industry. In this essay, I will discuss both these views and put forth my perspective, which advocates for a shared responsibility between all parties involved.
The viewpoint that manufacturers and retailers should take the initiative in reducing packaging finds its roots in the very process of product creation and distribution. Manufacturers have a direct influence on the packaging of a product, right from the design stage. By opting for lean packaging strategies and eco-friendly materials, they can significantly reduce the environmental footprint of their goods. Furthermore, supermarkets can reinforce this initiative by choosing to stock only those products that adhere to strict packaging guidelines. An instance of such a practice can be seen in the policies of Tesco, the British multinational groceries chain, which has committed to eliminating hard-to-recycle materials from its own brand products.
Conversely, the school of thought favouring consumers' responsibility rests on the power of market demand. The argument goes that if consumers consistently choose products with less packaging, manufacturers will be forced to adjust their practices to meet market preferences. Boycotting brands that excessively package their products and advocating for eco-conscious practices can create a consumer-driven push for change. The increasing popularity of package-free shops in various parts of the world is a testament to the potential influence of consumer choice on industry practices.
In evaluating these perspectives, I am led to believe that the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods is not a binary one. Instead, it necessitates a synergistic effort from manufacturers, supermarkets, and consumers alike. Manufacturers and retailers can proactively innovate and implement minimalistic packaging designs, while consumers can incentivise these practices through their purchasing choices.
In conclusion, it is evident that tackling the challenge of excessive packaging requires an integrated approach, with manufacturers, retailers, and consumers all playing their respective roles. As we move towards a more sustainable future, this shared responsibility becomes not just an option, but a necessity, paving the way for an eco-friendlier consumer industry.
Sample 10:
The issue of excessive packaging for consumer goods has elicited a myriad of views on the parties responsible for curtailing it. Some argue that the onus lies with producers and retail outlets, while others contend that consumers can influence the packaging process by avoiding over-packaged products. This essay will delve into these perspectives and propose that the responsibility should be collectively borne by both manufacturers and consumers.
Advocates for the first viewpoint posit that manufacturers and retailers are instrumental in determining packaging strategies. Given their direct control over production processes, manufacturers can opt for minimalistic packaging and environmentally friendly materials. For instance, they can transition from plastic to more sustainable alternatives like recycled paper or biodegradable materials. Furthermore, retailers can lend support by eschewing partnerships with companies notorious for generating substantial packaging waste. A salient example of this would be the decision by Vinmart, Vietnam's largest supermarket chain, to boycott products with excessive packaging, leading to a remarkable reduction in customer-generated waste.
On the flip side, proponents of consumer responsibility argue that buyers wield significant influence over packaging through their purchasing decisions. Consumers can take a standby gravitating towards products with minimal packaging and boycotting brands that demonstrate scant regard for environmental sustainability. This could result in a disruption of revenue streams for those companies, prompting them to reconsider their packaging policies. For example, the recent surge in consumer demand for zero-waste products has forced numerous companies to reevaluate and diminish their reliance on packaging.
In synthesizing the perspectives above, I concur that tackling the issue of overpackaging necessitates a concerted effort from both manufacturers and consumers. While manufacturers have the authority to reform packaging norms directly, consumers can exert substantial pressure through informed purchasing choices.
In conclusion, the key to addressing the packaging problem lies not in the hands of a single party, but in a joint effort between manufacturers, retailers, and consumers. As we stride towards a sustainable future, it is imperative that we understand and execute our individual roles in conserving our environment.
Sample 11:
Opinions are divided as to whether the onus of scaling down the over-packaging of products should be shouldered on the ‘supermarkets and manufacturers’ or the ‘consumers’. The essay will expound both of the views, but in my opinion, both should take responsibility as it is directly related to the environment.
It goes without saying that supermarkets and manufacturers are the main producers of consumer products, and therefore the real cause of this issue lies in them. They use unnecessary packaging on a large amount so as to make the consumer goods attractive which have no association with the quality of the products. Rather, it causes damaging impacts on the environment. For example, supermarkets tend to wrap fruits in Styrofoam trays covered with foil paper or toothpaste manufacturers have been choosing the tube in extra boxes. These common practices contribute substantially to the production of plastic as well as disposals in landfills. Thus, the opinion that manufacturers, as well as large markets who sell the products to the end-users, should take the responsibility to reduce the amount of over-packaging is justified.
On the other hand, consumers are the mainstay of any business. To put it another way, the more people are likely to buy goods with over-packaging, the more they are manufactured. In contrast, if consumers lower the purchase of such items, it would definitely decrease their production. A recent campaign for biodegradable packaging led by environmentalists is a perfect example of how consumers make decisions that have dramatically reduced the production of plastics. The campaign aims to raise public awareness of environmental issues of plastics, and therefore people boycott plastic packaging. So, in the same token consumers can prohibit the prevalent practice of over-packaging as manufacturers and sellers would be bound to follow what consumers prefer and want.
To conclude, supermarkets and manufacturers should have the onus of curtailing the over-packaging of consumer goods since they are the prime producer of over-packaging products. But consumers have to be proactive as well to prevent the over-packaging of goods as it harms the environment.
Sample 12:
Some people believe that the responsibility for minimizing packaging waste lies with manufacturers and supermarkets, while others argue that consumers should take action by choosing products with less packaging. In my opinion, a collective effort is required to mitigate the situation.
It is reasonable for producers and retail organizations to have the primary responsibility to alleviate the issue. Regarding the role of companies, they have the resources and expertise to develop more sustainable packaging solutions. For example, they could invest in researching how to make use of eco-friendly materials or re-design their products so that the least amount of packaging is required. Concerning the responsibilities of supermarkets, they can help educate customers on the importance of reducing waste resulting from consumer products and how they can make a difference. This could include providing information on how to recycle or dispose of packaging properly.
Alongside this, each consumer can also make certain contributions to this matter. Individuals can start with simple changes to their shopping habits, such as opting for products with minimal packaging materials or those with biodegradable alternatives, avoiding single-use plastics, and properly discarding packaging waste after use. Consumers also have the power to influence the market by supporting companies that prioritize sustainability and avoiding those that do not. This can put pressure on companies to be more environmentally responsible, as they may lose customers and revenue if they do not respond to consumer demands.
In conclusion, decreasing packaging waste is a complex issue that requires collaboration between manufacturers, retailers, and customers. All parties have a role to play in tackling this problem, and it is essential that we work together to create a more sustainable future.
Sample 13:
Packaging is an integral part of the consumer experience, but it has generated a significant amount of waste and pollution. Some people believe that manufacturers and supermarkets should take the initiative to reduce packaging, while others argue that customers should actively avoid purchasing over-packaged goods. In my opinion, both parties share responsibility for reducing packaging waste.
On the one hand, manufacturers and supermarkets play a crucial role in the packaging of goods. They have the power to determine the amount of packaging used in their products and can implement more sustainable practices. By using eco-friendly materials and minimizing packaging, they can actively contribute to waste reduction and environmental conservation. Additionally, retailers can influence consumer behavior by promoting and offering incentives for purchasing products with less packaging. In this way, businesses have a responsibility to set the standard and take the lead in reducing packaging waste.
On the other hand, consumers can also play a significant role in reducing packaging waste by making conscious purchasing decisions. By actively avoiding products with excessive packaging, customers can send a strong message to companies, encouraging them to adopt more sustainable practices. For instance, if a significant number of consumers choose to purchase loose fruits and vegetables instead of pre-packaged ones, it would send a message to retailers that there is a demand for more environmentally friendly packaging options. Furthermore, individuals can opt for reusable shopping bags and containers, which can significantly decrease the amount of waste generated. In this way, consumers have the power to drive change and encourage more responsible packaging practices.
In conclusion, my opinion is that the responsibility for reducing packaging waste lies with both manufacturers and consumers. A collaborative effort from both parties is essential to address the environmental challenges posed by excessive packaging.
Sample 14:
Opinions are divided as to who should be held responsible for reducing use of packaging. Some people believe that the obligation should be attributed to manufacturers and supermarkets, while others think it should be up to customers to purchase goods with minimal packaging. This essay aims to examine both viewpoints, as well as stating my personal opinion on the matter.
On the one hand, suppliers and distributors of goods should assume the primary role in minimising packaging. This is because many consumers are unaware of the environmental impacts of plastic packages and would still continue using them due to their accessibility. Therefore, should manufacturers and supermarkets take the initiative to limit plastic packaging, and instead promote packages made from biodegradable materials, customers may be convinced to switch to environment-friendly options. Additionally, since manufacturers and retailers have greater influence over society compared to individuals, any changes they make would have more extensive effects. Take my local shops as an example. Many of them now use only paper containers and bags for take-aways, which has generated interest in the green movement from the locals, some of whom are taken to carrying tote bags while going shopping.
On the other hand, consumers should also do their part in cutting down plastic packaging. The most meaningful thing they could do is placing pressure on suppliers to reduce packages made from plastic and to consider alternatives such as paper, leaves, or other environmentally friendly materials. More specifically, buyers have the power to boycott businesses or products with excessive plastic packaging, and to support the ones which use eco-friendly wrappings. However, in order to force change from corporations, collective effort is needed.
To conclude, it is my belief that manufacturers and supermarkets are chiefly responsible for lowering plastic use in packages as they have significant power and influence. That is not to say consumers are incapable of producing change, but it is vital that they show solidarity in order to attract attention from businesses.
Sample 15:
There are some opposite ideas relating to reducing the amount of packaging on products. Some people stand for the idea that supermarkets and producers are responsible for meanwhile others consider that responsibility should belong to consumers.
Supermarkets are places where packaging on products is used the most. Apart from the packing of producers, consumers will use more plastic bags to hold each item they picked. There are thousands of goods sold every day, which means thousands of plastic bags, as well as cartons, are used. Consequently, tons of garbage are released into the environment. To attract clients, manufacturers have designed a wide range of packaging with many different materials such as plastic, glass, and paper. Not only that, but suppliers also increasingly invest in wrapping their products in order to draw their clients’ attraction as well as enhance competitiveness. It is admitted that packaging is originated mostly from factories. Therefore, suppliers have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging on products as well.
Besides, consumers should take responsibility to reduce packaging on products because they are the ones who just consume products finally. It is consumers’ behavior that will affect significantly producers because sellers’ objective is to satisfy buyers’ demand. On the one hand, consumers can show their expectations to use products with eco-packaging. On the other hand, consumers can boycott suppliers, which use a lot of packaging on products. So, users play an important role in reducing wrapping products.
For me, people should have the responsibility to reduce packaging on products. From manufacturers and supermarkets to consumers, all have to be aware of protecting the environment by reducing the packaging of products.
Sample 16:
The issue of excessive packaging has sparked debate regarding the responsibility for its reduction. While some argue that corporations and retailers should lead by selling fewer packaged items, others contend that the onus lies on consumers to make conscious choices.
Advocates for reducing packaging assert that manufacturers and shopping malls have the most significant role in addressing this issue. For instance, manufacturers can enforce sustainable packaging practices by using biodegradable and recyclable materials, such as compostable plastics or cardboard. They can also employ innovative packaging designs that minimize materials while ensuring product safety. Relatedly, shopping malls can collaborate with manufacturers to establish refill stations, where customers can bring their own containers and refill products like detergents, spices, or personal care items, reducing the need for excessive packaging. By taking these initiatives, those who sell consumer products can effectively reduce waste and contribute to a more sustainable future.
On the other hand, proponents of consumer responsibility emphasize that individuals have the power to drive change through their purchasing decisions. Consumers should actively seek out products with minimal packaging, such as bulk foods, where items are sold in loose quantities, allowing customers to bring their own containers. They can also support businesses that offer alternatives to single-use packaging, such as stores that provide reusable bags or incentivize customers to employ reusable bags. These lifestyle changes may also involve actively participating in recycling programs and supporting initiatives that promote waste reduction, such as community composting or zero-waste campaigns. Truly dedicated individuals can even join local environmental groups or online communities to share tips and strategies.
In conclusion, the reduction of packaged products necessitates effort from primarily consumers. Through specific actions like seeking out minimal packaging options, and supporting businesses with sustainable practices, consumers can collectively contribute to a healthier planet for future generations.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Đang tải chế độ Học...
Hot: 1000+ đề thi giữa kì 1 lớp 1-12 đầy đủ các môn (Update 2026) (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
Đăng ký VIP để học và luyện thi không giới hạn
Trọn bộ quyền lợi trên Vietjack, trong một tài khoản.
- Phòng luyện thi cấp tốc: ĐGNL - ĐGTD, Tốt nghiệp THPT, Ôn vào 10, Ôn vào 6, Ôn Giữa kì/Cuối kì
- Hơn 200K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
- Với 3tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
- Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
- Xem hàng ngàn bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
- Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
- Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện
- Đăng ký ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Today technology has changed how people interact with each other. I believe the biggest effects it has had on relationships are that it has reduced in-person interaction and that it has led to the development of online relationships. This has been a positive development because often cyber relationships are more meaningful than in-person relationships.
Technology has reduced face-to-face interaction. For instance, it is not uncommon to see two people sitting at the same table in a restaurant, checking their phones every 30 seconds, and only talking to each other occasionally.
Technology has also given rise to online relationships. Nowadays anyone that has access to the Internet and computers can create a free Facebook or Twitter account and build their social networks on these platforms no matter where on the planet they reside. Take, for example, Chinese teenagers who like collecting insects. On the Internet, they can find and connect with others who share this particular hobby, even if those people live in the Amazon rainforest.
This should be seen as a positive trend because cyberspace relationships can be very meaningful. Today it is very common that those in a person's immediate circle do not support what they pursue. For example, many street artists are looked down on by their family members. Fortunately, Facebook groups give them the power to build their own communities where they can support each other. The inspiration and motivation they obtain there can drive them to work hard to move toward their goals.
In conclusion, technology has reduced in-person interaction and has meanwhile enabled online relationships. This has definitely been a positive trend because online relationships are often more satisfying and meaningful than face-to-face ones.
Sample 2:
Technology is a crucial tool for communication in modern times. It is flourishing in each and every field of communication. Though this invention has changed the way people interact around the world, it has both positive and negative impact on the relationship of people.
To embark on, with regard to the positive development, technological advancement has made communication between organizations more convenient and time-saving. Many companies and organizations use tools like social media, email and forum to influence a larger number of audiences. This also serves as an advanced mode of learning since schools adopt the method of smart classrooms. With the availability of ecommerce, freelance websites, social media marketing, people can easily buy and sell products and services with effortless communication.
On the other hand, the drawbacks of technology on the relationships of people cannot be ignored. Though technology has advanced greatly, it still lacks the emotional touch of communication. It has affected the love and affection people crave with communication. Millennials today are more fascinated by the virtual world, thereby forgetting the practical side of life. Modern modes of communication are making people busy and less productive. Sharing personal information on social media also invades people’s privacy. For example, individuals spending hours on social media interaction interacting with people from around the world and wasting their valuable time. In fact, family vacation which was previously a private affair has now become a public affair.
To sum up, communication technology can be a blessing or a curse depending upon how people make use of it. Even though it is an easy method of interaction, the relationships formed through technological interaction lack trust and emotion. Hence, people should give preference to face-to-face communication.
Sample 3:
It is evident that technology has transformed the ways of communication and influenced relationships in a variety of ways. In my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects of this.
The principal way in which relationships have been affected is that they tend to be at a distance rather than face-to-face. The advent of the internet has made it easy for business owners to communicate across the world, with remote job opportunities one call away. Online educational programs are available for people residing in different countries, and it is no longer a dream to attend live classes from the comfortable environment of a home. Not only this, the social platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube have revolutionized relationships, be it making online friendships with people from other countries or staying in touch with loved ones. Based on this perspective, technology has influenced relationships in a positive way.
However, despite these advances, the quality of interaction has significantly declined in several respects. If people are developing most of their relationships online, this means that they may also have less fact-to-face contact. This kind of contact on a personal level is important for human beings to feel wanted and a part of society. This may be a particular problem for children's social development as they used to be seen playing out on the streets but are now too often indoors. Technology can also mean people are detached from what is going on around them even when they are out, as can be seen by the many people staring into their mobile phones as they travel or walk around.
In conclusion, technology has brought some positive developments in the ways people interact with each other. However, there are also some negative impacts of technology on the types of relationships people make.
Sample 4:
Technology has hardly left any human feeling untouched. Instead, it has played a great role in manipulating and transforming it to a great extent. One of the most highly impacted aspects in this context is human interaction.
Technology has laid its hands on human behavior and has greatly influenced the pattern of human interaction since its introduction. From social media platforms to FaceTime applications, staying in touch has become easier with time. However, it has its downsides as well. With such high-end digital connections, intimate relationships have seen a significant decrease ever since.
These changes result from the freedom of hiding genuine emotions that technology brings. People can now fake caring about someone, express false love, and connect just for the sake of words. This has led to loosened family bonds, false promises between partners, and much more. People do interact with each other, but this interaction is often fake and untrue. Technology's significant impact on human interaction leads to various unwanted consequences. A surge in depression cases, suicides, and unwise decisions have been recorded as a result of such interactions.
Hence, technology has influenced the way people interact both positively and negatively. Undoubtedly, it has helped humans connect from miles away with their loved ones yet has made relations less meaningful and degraded their overall quality.
Sample 5:
Technology has brought vast changes in human behavior since its introduction. Moreover, with its rapid advancement and new changes, it is impacting relationships more rapidly. Interactions have recently been made more accessible due to technology. People can now connect easily and from the ease of their homes. However, it also has its downsides. A detailed study of this significant impact on human relationships due to technology can be understood with various examples.
In recent years, technology has helped humans stay connected at all times. With technology spreading its arms, connections can be made even in the most unexpected and tribal areas of the world. However, this has ultimately transformed human behavior and the way people interact with each other.
A prime example of this change is how people interact since social media's introduction. The introduction of social media platforms has made it easier for people to connect with their loved ones, even at a distance. However, it has entirely transformed how people interact with their close surroundings. This has also led to the expression of fake feelings and false expressions.
Overall, technology has transformed the entire interaction cycle of human beings without letting us realize it. More connections over the internet have paved the way for broken real-life relationships and have ultimately degraded the quality of relationships.
Sample 6:
There has been a change in the different aspects of social relations as affected by technology which we can introduced as more of a post-positively than post-negatively impact.
First, technology has immensely extended the speed and convinience of communication and thus the worth of relationships. For example, a university learner who is learning in another country can use video-calling to speak with the parents daily. An instantaneous means of communication makes it easier to avoid having to wait for a letter to arrive for a day or more as is the norm. Furthermore, social networks allow a person to get acquanted with like-minded strangers with similar interests, career choices, or hobbies, therefore create friendships that last a lifetime.
Despite this perception, this development is fairly beneficial to the masses. Improved communication technology reduces pressure and creates the need for belonging. For instance, when there is negative information, people get to act quickly. Also, positive information is more effective when shared immediately and it helps enhance interpersonal relationships. In addition, this has led to the growth of businesses and the eradication of geographical barriers whereby a company can comfortably and easily transact business with an organization in another country at any given time.
Altogether, it can be highlighted that technology plays a vital role in changing social relations by providing more effective and pleasant means of communication. It has made interpersonal communication better, provided businesses with links and connections as well as made everyone have equal access to information. Thus, it can be concluded that the purpose and use of technology have been mainly beneficial for interactions and relationships for the majority of people.
Sample 7:
It is true that new technologies have had an influence on communication between people. Technology has affected relationships in various ways, and in my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects.
Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, telephones and the Internet allow businesspeople in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. For example, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.
On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between people in different countries was much more difficult when communication was limited to written letters or telegrams. Nowadays, interactions by email, phone or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings, and many of us benefit from these interactions, either in work or social contexts. On the other hand, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result ofisolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these 'virtual' relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships.
In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionized communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.
Sample 8:
There has been a complex alteration in the various aspects of social relations due to technological advancement resulting in more positive impact than negatives.
First of all, the usage of technology has tremendously augmented the speed and ease of interaction making the relations’ depth richer. For example, a university student studying in another country can utilize video-calling to maintain quotidian contact with his or her parents. Real-time messaging banishes the lengthy wait for the letter, which was taken as conventional before. Besides, one is able to interact with strangers with similar interests, jobs, or hobbies, hence fostering friendships that endure a lifetime.
This development is predominantly propitious for the people. Advanced communication technology reduces stress and creates a feeling of belongingness. For instance, the sectional publicity of negative information can be quickly followed by timely responses. And just as to promote the fast exchange of positive messages, cooperation is strengthened between people. In addition, this technological advancement has boosted business development and erased hegemonic constraints and restrictions that enable business organizations to freely and easily connect with global organizations at any time.
Therefore, one is able to deduce that relations in society have been significantly mediated by technology in the manner in which humans interact offering more effective and fulfilling ways. It has made interpersonal communication easier, created business relationships and opportunities, and given equal opportunity for information access. Hence, the major impact of technology is analyzing and interpreting common interaction and relationship profiles that can be deemed more beneficial and helpful for most people.
Sample 9:
The advent and rapid development of technology have fundamentally transformed the dynamics of interpersonal interactions among individuals. This has also transformed the way we form relationships and bond with each other. This essay contends that the evolution of technology has, in fact, catalyzed a positive shift in the types of relationships people form, fostering connectivity and enhancing social engagement.
Technology has diversified the ways individuals establish and maintain relationships. Social media platforms, for instance, have facilitated connections among individuals globally, transcending geographical barriers. Additionally, online dating applications have revolutionized how people meet and form romantic relationships, offering a wide array of choices and opportunities to connect with like-minded individuals. Technology has also gifted us swift and interactive communication with loved ones no matter the distance. For instance, someone living abroad can make video calls and talk to his or her family members whenever they want. This has reduced the communication gap and significantly enhanced our options to contact others in real-time unlike in the past when sending handwritten letters was perhaps the best option to convey messages or contact someone.
This evolution in the types of relationships forged through technology signifies a positive development. Online connectivity allows individuals to maintain contact with friends, family, and acquaintances across vast distances. Moreover, digital platforms enable marginalized groups, such as those with disabilities or introverted personalities, to establish meaningful connections they may struggle to form in traditional social settings. For instance, social networking sites provide platforms for introverted individuals to express themselves and interact comfortably, fostering self-confidence and social skills.
In conclusion, the impact of technology on relationship dynamics has been transformative, offering diverse avenues for connectivity and social interaction. The ability to form connections across distances and the empowerment of individuals who face social barriers underscore the positive aspects of technological advancements. Embracing these changes in relationship dynamics signifies a positive shift towards enhanced connectivity and inclusivity in contemporary society.
Sample 10:
The ubiquitous presence of technology has undoubtedly redefined the landscape of human interaction, altering the very nature of how we build and maintain relationships. While the advancements of the digital age offer a plethora of tools for communication and connection, a closer examination reveals a disturbing trend – the erosion of genuine, meaningful relationships.
With technology, we make friends more often than ever. We also have a variety of tools to connect with others and remain in touch with people we care about. But one undeniable consequence of this technology-driven relationship is the rise of superficial and fleeting interactions online. Social media platforms, while fostering a sense of instant connectivity, often facilitate shallow exchanges and curated self-presentation. In the pursuit of likes and followers, meaningful conversations and authentic connections are often sacrificed, fostering a culture of virtual intimacy that lacks the depth and genuineness of face-to-face interaction.
As a result, of the constant bombardment of digital stimuli can contribute to social anxiety and a fear of missing out, hindering our ability to develop genuine relationships. The pressure to maintain an online presence and curate a perfect digital persona can lead individuals to withdraw from real-world interactions, hindering their ability to connect authentically with others. And this is a disturbing outcome of our digital relationship. Additionally, the ease of virtual communication can discourage individuals from developing the interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence necessary for navigating the complexities of face-to-face interaction. For example, a young adult accustomed to online communication might struggle to hold engaging conversations in person, leading to feelings of awkwardness and missed opportunities for meaningful connections.
In conclusion, while technology undoubtedly offers tools for communication and connection, it is crucial to recognize its limitations and potential pitfalls. By prioritizing face-to-face interaction, fostering genuine conversations, and actively engaging with our communities, we can strive to counteract the negative effects of technology on our relationships and cultivate a more meaningful and fulfilling social life.
Sample 11:
There is no doubt that many things have changed in the last few decades; some changes are for the better and some changes are for the worse. One of the fields which were greatly affected by the advent of technology is the way of interaction and communication.
Without any doubt, technology has changed the way we lead our lives, and these changes have been prominent over the last decade. There are several improvements in life due to the positive effects of technology and there are some negative impacts as well. One area that has dramatically changed is the way we communicate and maintain our relationship nowadays. And in my opinion, technology has positively affected our communication and the way we make relationships and maintain it. Despite some negative effects, most of us enjoy the positive things technology has bought for us. In the past, the ways of interaction were very limited. Unleash your imagination; if you want to speak with your friend, you would have to go directly to his house or send him a message which may take a few days to get a response. I completely believe that technology has a great tangible effect on our communication. Nowadays, it's very easy to interact with your relatives - and even with the government and organisations - either by emails, mobiles, chatting, etc. and I think that this has improved and enhanced the relationships.
We no longer need to visit a relative or friend to get updates. Alternatively, we can let them know our updates instantly. Besides personal communications, official and business communications have become easier. Email campaigns offer a good marketing opportunity for business owners and people can complain about a certain thing using emails without exposing their identity. Not all of the people have the availability of technology, and they still use the old form of communication. People now can deceive others using identity theft and fraud identity. The personal touch of communication like handwritten letters, face-to-face communications were more effective in some cases. Like meeting your friend is still more important than just writing him an email.
We make so many friends via chatting or social networking which would not have been possible without the advancement of technology and its contribution to communication. Cell phones, emails and social networking have enhanced the way of communicating and we can talk to anyone with a minimum cost. It's now not unusual to prepare for a visit and even several visits to your relatives and friends on the same day, while in the past this may have taken several weeks or months.
To conclude, despite all that, I still see some failings in the development of the means of interaction. For instance, the very high cost each person spends every day on communication. Another defect is that many elderly people are not accustomed to this modern technology. But that doesn't have a great effect on the positive role technology has made in the field of interaction between people and I think these defects are very easy to be solved.
Sample 12:
A true relationship between two people requires face to face communication and time to truly get to know each other. Regardless of what humans think, all individuals admire the feeling of being wanted even if it’s a lie. The digital world has created the sense that it is passable to be who anyone wishes to be online. However, I believe that the way people know each other online and the type of relationships they make virtually have changed for the worse.
Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, most are being turned inward, forgetting the true definition of a friend. Human beings have feelings, and they feel broken at times and do not always smile but the Internet only shows one's happy moments keeping one from fully being known. The types of friendships people make these days are quick and short-lasting. In real life friendship, people see each other at one’s best and worst time and remain there for one another. This can never be compared to a social network friendship. One can only get to know someone by spending time together for the reason that the Internet cannot replace shared experience and personal communication. However, due to the Internet, people can make friends anywhere in the world which was quite impossible in the past era. Finding school and college friends and getting in touch with them is an advantage that the Internet offers to us. However, true friendship is not possible if two people do not spend time together, share their common interests, talk a lot and help each other both in good and bad times.
Rightfully, life is meant to be lived and have many physical experiences, bonding with another person’s physical presence. Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, they are spending time online to make friends. This is, in my opinion, a negative aspect of the digital era.
In conclusion, making friends beyond boundaries and getting in touch with childhood friends could be the advantages of the digital era but the way we are becoming dependent on the technology and the way we are pretending to maintain our friendship online have negative consequences on our personal, moral and social aspects.
Sample 13:
It is true that technology in recent years has altered the path that people communicate with each other. There are many ways that technology affects our relationships, and in my opinion, this is a beneficial development.
To begin with, the most obvious transformation in people’s relationships is how they communicate with each other. By this, I mean that the Internet has converted the world into a small village and nowadays people around the world can reach each other easily and rapidly. For example, a friend who lives in the UK can chat and talk with their friends in China using a mobile phone or social network.
Another field in which technology affects our life is the way that people make friends. In other words, it has been observed that these days we can make friends from all nationalities without any effort or travel, and this helps with culture interchange and help people who suffer.
In my thought, this has a positive impact on the community for two reasons. Firstly, human life has become more convenient, this provides people with more opportunity to spend their leisure time with their kin. For instance, with the Internet, we can shop and work from our dwelling house without going outside anymore. Secondly, travel around the globe has become usable and cheap. As a result, people visiting each other and spend a lot of time together hence more connected society emerges.
To conclude, as we have found out there is no easy answer to this question. Nevertheless, technology makes a huge difference in peoples' lives in terms of communication and I believe that this is a positive impact in our society.
Sample 14:
From the last century to the present days, there have been many changes in the way people interact with each other as there have been evolutionary changes in technological fields. One may say this transformation has negative effects on relationships between people or positive effects. I believe that there have been more positive effects than negative ones among the people due to the reasons that in few seconds of time people can contact their dearest ones and technology gives strength to people by making them closer to each other even if they are not.
From the introduction of telecommunication and electronic mail, the lives of people turned out to be easier and communication among people became easier and more convenient. They can contact their families and friends using these advanced services over the countries. Without visiting their homes frequently, they can make money or accomplish their goals. For example, a military man has to serve his country at the borders, and it is uneasy to go home and spend some time with his family and acquaintances thoroughly. However, he can make contact with his family via telephone and other services. With the help of telecommunication and electronic mail, he can keep in touch with his family and buddies. In this way, technology makes people close to each other. This absolutely positive development as we have huge benefits using technology.
With the absence of one's dearest one, he used to be all alone before the introduction of technology. But it is possible to get in touch with his sweetheart. And also, he can send and receive the money within seconds over the thousands of miles using the latest money transfer machines. As a result, he can look over and take care of his family's financial problems and needs without his presence at his home. For instance, my uncle who stays in the United States calls his family and others via ‘Skype’ daily whereas, my dad who used to work in Dubai could not keep in touch with us as at that time the telecommunication had not installed in my village. Thus, that made my father bound to visit us frequently. Consequently, he spent a large amount of money travelling and could not communicate with us as frequently as he wanted to.
In many positive ways, technology has affected the relationships between people, and I would say these are positive developments. Imagine without technology, what would happen to the people and the world. In many ways, we are getting the help of using technology.
Sample 15:
Technological developments in this modern era have transformed the way we socialise. Advancements in communication networks have played a vital role in bringing people closer. In my opinion, there are both pros and cons of this development and this essay will analyse how technology has changed the types of relationships made by people.
In ancient times, people used letters and telegrams to interact with each other. With the advent of modern communication systems like the telephone and the Internet, people can collaborate more effectively. For instance, we can interact through emails rather than letter and businessman can have online meetings through the conference calls.
Another reason is the widespread use of social networks over the internet; for instance, Facebook, where men and women can now make friends online and interact with them through the post, message and online chat. Video conferencing in the form of Skype has improved instructor and student relationship. Online messaging platforms like mIRC have given people the luxury to choose their own discussion-based chat rooms. There are more ways to socialise now than there used to be in the past.
All these advancements in technology come up with their merits and demerits. Letters, memos and telegrams are replaced by emails and text messages. Human resource hiring can be done through online video conferencing which has eliminated the need for physical presence and travelling requirement. We can now mingle more through Facebook, Pinterest, Google+, Instagram and Orkut and so on. Though one can regard these as positive developments, they do have some negative aspects. These developments have isolated people and discouraged real-world interaction. For instance, youth, in particular, prefers to choose to mix up with people online rather than socialising with them in the real world.
To conclude, technology has no doubt revolutionised the way we interact and hang out but has greatly reduced real-world interaction. Though these virtual relations tend to be positive, we should not deny the importance of physical interaction in our lives.
Sample 16:
Everything has two sides, and the effects of technology on people’s relationships are not an exception. We cannot deny how much technology has transformed the individual reaction with others in his family and the surrounding community.
In my opinion, technology has affected and transformed our life aspects and dealing with other people in a good way. Recently, we have had different fast and cheap methods to call our family and friends. Moreover, some technologies are giving us chances to see and talk with them at the same time. In addition, we are informed on a daily basis with the last updates and news about our friends and family, so we can remember birthdays, graduation parties and even marriage anniversaries. Furthermore, these methods make it faster and easier to call and congratulate another individual.
On the other hand, many people believe that technology is affecting individual relationships badly. They opine that, if we did not have these kinds of technology, we would have been visiting each other regularly.
Not only that, but individuals will not be isolated from each other, especially those who are addicted to using social networking platforms. As a matter of fact, people rarely talk to each other face-to-face. In particular, people’s personalities are changing so much, because of addiction to using Facebook. It’s one of the vital reasons to decrease confidence and self-esteem.
As can be seen, even if we have some bad effects of technology and how it changed the way people contact each other, we still have much more effects. We can obtain many easy and cheaper methods to contact each other. In fact, technology has enhanced our life and the way we are contacting each other.
Sample 17:
Today, various brand-new methods of telecommunications have tremendously influenced social behaviour. Although their impacts have benefited human lifestyle, they have had some costs as well. However, before evaluating their advantages and disadvantages, it is better to reveal how these breakthroughs affect the ways people relate to each other.
In the old times, when someone wanted to communicate, there were extremely limited means of doing so. Indeed, he should write a letter or have a face-to-face conversation. Likewise, it was possible to be acquainted with new faces either by meeting them personally or being introduced by family and friends.
On the other hand, substantial technological progress has happened in recent years. For instance, smartphones can be utilised both by direct calls and via different applications. Alternatively, the internet can be used either by offline methods like e-mail or by online protocols like chatting programs. Moreover, social networking is another rich aspect of the internet by which everybody is able to find new friends or search for old, missed ones, and it can be used to interact with current relatives as well. Clearly, not only have modern technologies facilitated human interactions, but they also diversified his relationships.
On the debit side, excessive use of virtual connections might weaken the personal relationship with reality. While it seems that people are aware of each other’s statuses on a daily basis, even up-to-the-minute, they may overlook loved ones’ emotional states due to the negligence of their presence.
All in all, contemplating the pros and cons of these phenomena simultaneously, I should say it depends on the person who utilises these state-of-the-art technologies. If he applies them wisely, their pluses will definitely overshadow their pitfalls. After all, in my viewpoint, humankind can eventually address this issue in favour of his civilisation. Hence, I assume it as a mainly positive development in the long run.
Sample 18:
People used to communicate by meeting each other while it has nowadays totally changed since technological advancement. Some assert that utilising technology in daily communication brings more harm than good things. I personally agree with this view and this essay will look into the reason with some considerations.
The first effect of technology usage is that it reduces the sense of togetherness among people. Since they do interaction via telecommunication such as a mobile phone or the internet, it reduces the personal relationship. People cannot catch moments during interaction because they communicate in unreal situations. Take social media as an example, most teenagers talk to their friend via utilising Facebook, Viber, WhatsApp or others. They tend to interact with each other via sending messages thus they can feel the situation or even communication sense just by reading the messages. By contrast, direct communication tends to develop a sense of belonging among people. They will be more comfortable expressing their feelings thus it is easy to get along together.
In addition, it will deteriorate the human behaviour. By using electronic devices in the daily life of communication, it is hard for them to get involved in a social environment. It will decrease their self-confidence to speak in public because they usually interact through devices rather than through face-to-face communication. Moreover, utilising technology in interaction is not free thus you should they should prepare much budget just for communication.
It is true that technology usages enable people to keep in touch with people who live in different places. However, it is not capable of providing a sense of feeling as well as direct communication.
To sum up, by communicating directly, it will help people keep close to each other and able to talk towards them easily and expressively.
Sample 19:
The 21st century has been a game-changer in all aspects of human life. The same case is with relationships which have also taken on a new dimension with technological advancement. Nowadays, relationships are much more fragile, materialistic, mistrustful and doubtful as compared to previous times. I reckon that overall, this development has been quite negative which will be analysed in our paragraphs to follow.
To start with, nowadays technology has made relationships between humans quite suspicious. People are getting involved in relationships just on social networking websites without even knowing who is actually communicating with them. For instance, there have been many cases in which the person you are in contact with is actually fake and fraud. He is just playing and making a fool of you, and you believe that you are making a friend or falling in love with him. Consequently, when you know the truth, it is just like a bolt from the blue and your feeling is eradicated. This is evident from the argument above the reality that technological relationships can be quite painful sometimes.
Further, in the new era connections between people can be quite fragile and weak as compared to the strength of relationships before the advent of technology. People without practically meeting each other and actually knowing their strengths and weaknesses tend to trust each other too much and when they face the true facts the relationships are affected and, in some cases, broken down. For instance, a survey was conducted by Indian newspaper regarding the success of technology relationships and the result was reconciling with the point that relationships are very poor, and the failure rate was quite high.
To sum up, these technological relationships have altered the connectivity between two people. I firmly believe that drawbacks outweigh much more as compared to the fruits of these new relationships. However, it is recommended that people should be extremely careful and cautious in making any sought of relationships on social networking websites, chatting software etc.
Sample 20:
Technology has been affecting many aspects of human life including the way people interact with one another. Some believe that it has more benefits for people’s connection than drawbacks, while others contradict it. I personally argue with the former opinion, and through this essay, I am going to explain my reasons.
Initially, the first reason that I am going to elaborate is the way technology better enhances communication among people. A large number of communication gadgets has been invented in order to help communication between people, even for those who are separated by spacious distance, getting simpler and quicker. Thus, by giving an easier chance to be connected, this development has been encouraging society’s sense of togetherness. They do not have to visit their colleagues which are in different regions or cities to ask about their condition, for instance, because they could just pick up their phone and call their friends.
Subsequently, the variety of communication technology has been developed even further. The purpose is not only to make it easier but also to achieve a better quality of communication. We can mention video call, voice messenger and social media as the parts of it. The users are not limited by the elder method of phone call anymore. They can communicate more interactively by using video call. Therefore, they can communicate with others in the wider range of connection by using social media such as Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. This situation will globally lead people into a worldwide relationship.
On the other hand, there has been a developing trend that people are becoming more individualistic as the effect of technological development. The decreasing opportunity of direct interaction among them is accused as the root of this problem. However, it depends on us as the users to utilise technology wisely. If we can maintain a balance between communication technology and the conventional way of communication, the problem will certainly disappear.
Eventually, the advantages of using technology as part of our communication types outweigh the disadvantages, as long as we can manage it to be the helper, not the loser.
Sample 21:
It is true that some people have shifted their way to keep in touch with others due to the innovation of technology. The massive use of devices in communication, particularly phones and the internet, can be identified as the main difference compared to the past. People rely on those technologies to connect with families, friends and colleagues. Personally, I reckon that this trend may lead people to have a better relationship due to the effectiveness and low cost of communication.
To begin with, the interaction of individuals is presently not limited in one model. It means that people have many choices to stay connected with others than before. Technology offers some applications such as email, Facebook or Twitter. Those social media serve advantages to enhance and build a relationship with others. For example, in workplaces, employees do not have to meet in a certain place to discuss something. Rather they can use video conference to do a meeting. Therefore, various types of communication tools can help people to choose their preference and purpose in communication.
Furthermore, the usage of technology in communication leads to some positive things. It can be assumed that the easiness and effectiveness which are offered by these devices maximise the quality of people life in term of maintenance the relation of people. In addition, these communication tools allow people to spend less money and time. In other words, individuals do not have to visit someone when they want to talk or know friends’ news. Young people nowadays have friends from different countries and can have more friends. They can share their thoughts and updates instantly, which was quite impossible in the past. Some people might argue that people rely too much on technology and that’s they keep a less personal relationship with others. However, I disagree and want to say that technology has made it possible to connect with a dear one, make new friends and build up relationships in a more convenient way.
In conclusion, people always pick the best and most efficient way of communication, and the widespread use of the internet, mobile phone and other ways of communication have positively impacted our life and the way we make and keep our relationship.
Sample 22:
It is commonly noticed that people surrounding us stay connected with other people via social networking sites or other applications and technology have totally changed the way people used to communicate, make friends and keep their relationship. This paradigm shift happened basically because of the advances in technology and widespread use of such technological applications. Shall we welcome this shift or be wary about the changes? In this essay, I am going to discuss how technology has affected the types of relationships people make and whether it is considered as a positive or negative development.
First and foremost, I think that the development of technology has enhanced the relationships people make and maintain. For instance, when a student studies abroad and stays far away from his or her family and friends, social networking sites and other applications can help the student stay connected with his or her family and friends through Skype, for instance. In my opinion, in this case, this is a positive development to deal with homesickness or maintain our interactions with people we care about. Compared to the past decade, when technology was not so advanced, people had to depend on letters to communicate with each other and that was a time-consuming method, and it incurred higher cost. In contrast, in today’s world, people just have to be on laptops or smartphones and can have direct communication and interaction with family and friends. They can see each other contrary to the past method of interchanging written words. In this way, people can keep a close relationship with family and friends. We can now make friends beyond borders and that enhances our perspective about other nations and customs. Online groups, social platforms and social networking sites bring people together who have common interests and there are many events those people meet and plan for the betterment of society.
In fact, the implication of technology on people’s relationships is a controversial issue. On the one hand, it is a positive development for helping people stay connected with family and friends and making new friends. On the other hand, it can estrange the relationships people make. The argument that it has a negative influence on people’s relationships is based on the scenario that people will avoid face-to-face communication in the long run. Recent research indicates that virtual communication will weaken the communication skill of a person. I still remember a film that I watched had a scene that showed four friends having meals in a restaurant. When they sat together, they did not interact with each other face-to-face but through social applications by sending out the emotions in the social group to show their feelings. This example shows a worrying trend as people enjoy interacting virtually more than face to face due to their reliance on technology. It is important to create awareness to the public that actual communication is more important than virtual interaction to minimise its repercussion.
Overall, as far as I am concerned, the advancement of technology has both positive and negative effects on the kind of relationships people make. We have to be aware that actual interaction is more important to enhance a relationship. We shall connect with family and friends virtually only if we are apart from them.
Sample 23:
Face-to-face communication and enough time to get to know each other well are prerequisites for a real relationship. People all like to feel wanted, even if it’s a false sense, despite what other people may believe. The perception that one can be whoever one wants to be online has been shaped by the digital age. But I think that relationships people form virtually and the way people get to know each other online have changed, mostly negatively.
Most are becoming more inward-focused and have forgotten what it means to be a true friend to those around them, rather than being genuine friends. People are emotional creatures who occasionally feel sad and aren’t always happy, but the Internet only shares positive experiences, preventing people from knowing each other completely. Nowadays, people tend to form fast and transient friendships. In real life friendships, individuals support one another through each other’s highs and lows. This is not at all like friendship on social media. Because the Internet cannot take the place of in-person interactions and shared experiences, getting to know someone requires spending time together.
It is only fitting that life be experienced fully, forming bonds with the physical presence of others. Rather than truly being friends with those in their immediate vicinity, they are utilizing social media to establish connections. I consider this to be a drawback of the digital age.
In conclusion, the digital age may have brought about benefits like reaching out to old friends and forming new ones, but it has also had unfavorable effects on our moral, social, and personal lives due to our growing reliance on technology and the ways we pretend to keep up our online friendships.
Sample 24:
Since communication with others comprises a very essential aspect of our daily life, any alteration in the way we communicate with each other will have a profound effect on our social and professional life. This essay will first discuss how technology has influenced the way we relate with each other presently and will then address the question of whether this influence has been positive or negative.
There are several ways in which the new communication technology has influenced people’s way of interaction with each other. Firstly, social media applications have revolutionized the way we communicate. The reason why many people believe this is that nowadays, you can connect with your family and friends instantly through many social media applications such as the Facebook and twitter applications. It is also possible to say that people are now more encouraged to share their opinions openly via the Internet. One good illustration for this is the substantial number of friends that people who use social media applications have in their contact list.
However, the impact of social media in one’s social life may not always be positive. This is because people are now increasingly abandoning face to face interactions and prefer carrying out their communication behind closed doors. This is causing more people, especially youths, to lose out on many aspects of personal communication. A particularly good example here is a study conducted in the USA showing that more than 75% of high school students are spending more than 50% of their free time on the Internet.
To sum up, modern technological advances in communication have incredibly influenced the way people interact, and although there are many perks associated with the use of recent technology there are also drawbacks that people must take care of.
Sample 25:
In this contemporary era, the means of communication have updated dramatically with the evolution of cutting-edge technologies. In my perspective, I foster that it is a constructive movement, and this treatise will elucidate my stance in the forthcoming paragraphs with credible illustrations.
To start with, the recent improvements in various aspects of technology have revolutionized the entire world such that the public claim that it makes them establish their communication among their peers in a feasible manner. There are many applications which can be downloaded and installed on our electronic gadgets, such as Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, which enable people to exchange messages, photos and videos. The latest breakthrough, instant calling and face-time features for long periods of time with minimal charges incurred, have made humans have a face-to-face interaction virtually. Many organizations are working tirelessly to achieve these updates frequently and are intuitive. For instance, old people who reside in the suburbs are overwhelmed with amusement since they are frequently having a chat with their children who live either in metro cities or in foreign lands. Thus, it creates a remarkable bonding among families who are far away from one another in distant locations.
In a similar fashion, there are multiple websites on the internet which attract youngsters in modern society. They are fascinated by browsing these sites to find new individuals in nearby areas and are meeting up for casual dates to understand each other. Additionally, some are using these to search for pristine friends and are gradually chatting almost every day. This eventually encourages them to identify partners or peers who have similar interests. By sharing their emotions, they feel relaxed and rejuvenated rather than having trepidation or stress. Hence, it plays a significant role in commencing new bonds for the youth.
Taking everything into consideration, the latest innovations in technology have drastically impacted the entire human population to have noteworthy coordination with parents and grandparents and explore new friends. This essay has exposed a plethora of merits and the advantageous impact of technology on the public worldwide.
Sample 26:
In recent years, with the development of information technology and the evolution of the internet, people interact and communicate better and more effectively than in the past. With new technology, people interact via devices where the technology has been converged. Now it is possible to make calls, watch TV, play video games, listen to music and access internet with only one device. Many people believe that technology may improve the type of the relationships people make whereas others do feel that it has negative effects.
It is believed by some people that technology has a positive effect in the way people interact because it is more convenient on daily basis, and the use of new channels to communicate is often free. For example, if you are looking for a job. You do not have to go to the office nor pay stamps to send your CV. You can do this by email by simply clicking on the “submit” button. It is effective because it saves time, and it is simple to apply. Another significant example is the use of social media platforms. It enables people to share experiences and send information instantaneously which can be seen by everyone, so it improves the way people socialise. Moreover, new channels of communication can help maintain good relationships in business between jobseekers and employers as well as with family and friends on a daily basis.
It is argued by others that technology has a negative impact on the type of relationship people make because it can lead to a development of antisocial behaviours. For instance, teenagers who play video games can find themselves in total confusion between the real world and the virtual world. The law is different because in the real world people have to follow rules whereas in the virtual world there are no constraints. It influences the behaviour of people in a negative way. Moreover, it can create a certain form of addiction for some, leading them to become completely isolated and unaware of what is good and right. Also, the use of the internet can spread bad behaviours such as bullying or the promotion of negative images, comments which will have an impact in people’s lives. For example, on Facebook, several teenagers committed suicide after being bullied by their friends. So, the inappropriate use of technology can lead to healthy issues such as addiction or fatal death.
To sum up, the development of technology has changed the type of relationships people make in both a positive and negative fashion. People use new channels in their daily life because it is convenient as well as cheap. However, the use of the internet needs to be carefully monitored and used appropriately to prevent children and vulnerable people from developing addictions, which could lead to harmful or even fatal consequences.
Sample 27:
Today, more than ever, in regard to determining whether or not advances in technology influence the sorts of relationships people make, various views have been set forward. The expansion of modern means of communicating is the continuing debate that causes so much controversy. This matter is evidenced by some experts who believe that they pose a direct threat to social lives and might come at the expense of severe social isolation and a sedentary lifestyle. Others understand the significance of communication and adhere to the concept that these types of relationships are integral pieces of social communication. Consequently, they are regarded as rewarding. Nevertheless, the opinion set forth by the second category is more logical. In the following paragraphs, I will shed light on my attitudes on this matter.
To begin with, previously, communication among people looked bleak. People used to fulfill and make an appointment to observe each other, and according to the simple fact that communities had busy folks, and they seem doomed to possess far-reaching communication.
In the next place, modern means of communicating control people’s attention. They are the fastest and easiest way of togetherness. Individuals are at the mercy of the digital world to get in touch with others in the remotest part of the world, leading to saving their own time and hanging out every second. This issue questions the requirement to have face to face connections.
In this hectic way of life, the truth is that the responsibility of real-time discussions, visualization of each other, information exchange which enables a person to share a variety of information like activities, events, interests, thoughts fall upon these ways of communication. Thanks to tremendous advances in technology.
In summary, all in all, rather than devoting a fantastic deal of time and energy solely concerning face to face interaction, the trend today is toward utilizing modern means of communication to get in touch with other individuals. The pivotal role in these ways of communicating performed in interpersonal communication is hard to dismiss. However, many men and women do not appreciate it.
Sample 28:
In recent years, the innovation of techonology has led to various changes in the way people interact. As a result, this causes some specific effects on people’s relationships which are generally considered as beneficial impacts on the society.
Conspicuously, the improvement in techonological devices such as computers with internet connection and mobile phones affect people’s relations in different aspects. Firstly, it helps to diversify kinds of relationships instead of just several traditional ones in the past. Besides people’s interactions in real life, many connections are beign bult through a virtual life on the internet especially via facebook or online games. Secondly, the convenience of communicating between people is likely to make people’s relationships more sociable and hardly understandable. In fact, many friendships are not based on trust or sincerity but benefits which are generally hard to be perceived in a virtual life.
Although the development of technology somehow makes people’s relationships more complicated, I still believe that people are actually beneficial from this. Thanks to internet availability, gaps between people are shortened in magical ways. For example, no matter how far the distance between two people, they still can talk directly to each other provided with the internet access. What’s more, people have never been able to save as much time and communicating expenses as at the present. Instead of waiting for months to receive a response from a posted letter, it just takes some seconds for the letter to be delivered through email even to many partners at the same time.
In conclusion, taking advantage of technological development to facilitate interaction between people is beneficial not only for building a good relationship but also for doing business.
Sample 29:
Technology is expanding in every field, and connectivity will be no exception. Nonetheless, due to its other pitfalls that cause discussion on its positive and negative effects, this enormous shift in the ways of interaction cannot be regarded as fruitful straight away.
One of the essential advantages of focusing on in terms of positive development is that technology makes connectivity simpler and more convenient. Because of recent events such as Skype, video conferencing, Whatsapp, and social networking sites, such as Facebook, people are hardly a click away from the nears and dears. To a great extent, these advances have made us social. Second, there are enormous opportunities for letters and telephone calls to be sent and for requests to be made. Customers used to be on the S.T.D and I.S.D booth in long queues, but now mobile phones and sophisticated gizmos make it easier for everyone to communicate openly.
On the other hand, certain disadvantages cannot be overlooked as people of today not only spend a long time using computers but also do not want to meet their relatives and friends face-to-face, leading to a fading relationship. One of my school friends, for example, visited me personally on various occasions, such as at festivals and birthdays. Still, nowadays, she sends messages to welcome me and sends salutations to my post. Even most members of the family suffer from asphyxia, which is an unusual illness that flares. For imitating relationships, this is a troubling question.
To recap, despite numerous disadvantages, nobody can afford to tackle this ever-fast digital technology that has to make our lives easier.
Sample 30:
Technological advancements have revolutionized how millions of people interact with each other, and it has gone to a whole new level. With it, how we make relationships has also been affected. The essay will expound on how individuals can now build relationships across the world, and then opine that this is an incredibly positive development.
Unprecedented in human history, modern technology has made it extremely convenient for people to communicate and get in touch with family, relatives, friends or old classmates. Besides, people can communicate instantaneously with someone they have never been acquainted with before and in geography, they have never been to with the help of digital applications like WhatsApp or Viber. They can even find someone on a freelancing platform to have their job done. This is quite different from the conventional relationships we develop by meeting in person; it is, nevertheless, hard to downplay these relationships. Moreover, social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn, provide people with a platform that allows them to live chat and comment on someone else’s matter instantly. Strangely enough, some of them even find their dates online and make friends in a distant country without ever meeting them.
Overall, the phenomenon is a real boon to mankind. The revolution in communication that modern technology brings forth has eroded the traditional notions of national sovereignty. It has blurred the line between national and international boundaries and wielded enormous influence on the values of the national identity so as to transform global citizens; whose ideas, values, ethics, and orientations are no longer moulded by the local culture and environment. Rather global ideals and values are incessantly aired on the web and social media to make a better world. Most importantly, the communication revolution paved the way for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, towards which the globe is rapidly heading.
In conclusion, leading-edge technology has altered our mode of interaction forever, transcending national and cultural barriers so that individuals can frankly chat, talk and can readily keep in touch, and it is a windfall achievement that will transform a new world where things, like culture, sect, and so on, that split people will not exist.
Sample 31:
Technology has revolutionised the way people interact with each other in recent times. However, this has led to a decline in the quality of relationships people make. The impact of technology on relationships is a double-edged sword, and while some may argue that it has been a positive development, I believe that it has had negative effects.
One of the ways that technology has affected relationships is that people are becoming more isolated and less likely to engage in face-to-face interactions. The rise of social media platforms and instant messaging services have made it easier for people to communicate remotely, but it has also led to a decrease in the frequency and quality of in-person interactions. People are now more likely to spend their time on social media rather than meeting up with friends or family members. Moreover, technology has made it easier for people to be dishonest and insincere in their interactions. For instance, people can now hide behind the anonymity of the internet and present a false version of themselves. This has led to a decline in trust and authenticity in relationships.
Another way that technology has affected relationships is that people are now more reliant on their devices than on their relationships. People can now find entertainment and fulfil their social needs through technology, making it less necessary to build and maintain meaningful relationships.
In conclusion, while technology has undoubtedly had many positive effects on society, its impact on relationships has been mostly negative. It has led to a decrease in in-person interactions, a decline in genuineness and trust, and an increased reliance on devices over relationships. It is crucial that people recognize these negative effects and take steps to mitigate them by prioritising in-person interactions and being more sincere and honest in their relationships.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In different parts of the world, traditional foods are becoming less common due to the increasing popularity of international fast food. While some people believe that fast food is a good option, I think that consuming traditional foods is much more beneficial. This essay will demonstrate the author’s point of view.
On the one hand, there are compelling reasons why many people are in favor of fast food. Firstly, it is convenient and time-saving. Instead of having to prepare a meal for hours, people can easily grab a bite at any fast-food restaurant, which is ubiquitous in many megacities. This type of food is also suitable for those with fast-paced lifestyles. In addition, fast food is famous for its delicious taste. This can explain the successful franchises of various fast-food chains all over the world such as McDonald’s, KFC, and so on.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that eating traditional food is more advantageous. One of the most substantial benefits of traditional meals is the nutritional value that they contain. A homemade meal can provide a sufficient amount of protein, fiber, and many other nutrients, which has proved to be effective in maintaining good health. This is because traditional food is usually made from fresh ingredients and without any preservatives. More importantly, I would argue that consuming traditional food rather than fast food is a good way to preserve culture as each flavor has its own uniqueness and is a representation of the national cuisine. By making and eating traditional food, people are contributing to cultural preservation, and thus passing it down to the next generation.
In conclusion, even though fast-food consumption has been an accelerating trend in recent years due to its conveniences, I sincerely believe that the benefits of eating traditional food are more significant.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng ký để học cùng Vietjack. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Bằng việc đăng ký, bạn đồng ý với Điều khoản sử dụng và Chính sách bảo mật của Vietjack.
Nhắn tin Zalo
Hỏi bài tập