khoahoc.vietjack.com

Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 914 Lưu

Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

It is believed that oral communication is more effective than written communication. In my opinion, deciding which one is more powerful than the other depends on certain circumstances.

When it comes to situations that require body language and facial expressions, spoken words are better than written ones. Dating is an excellent example of this. It is more important to set up a face-to-face conversation with the person we have feelings for than to sit at home and send text messages. Emotion icons, photos or videos can never replace a real smile or the expression of different feelings during a dinner date. Another thing is that meeting and talking directly with each other helps us to have a better understanding of the person we are communicating with. We can easily guess the true feelings of the person we are talking face to face with through his or her facial expressions and gestures, but we cannot do that just by reading some written text.

However, I think that in terms of law and business, written communication is much more important than spoken words. In court, for example, our words might count for nothing if we do not have valid evidence, such as written documents, to support our arguments. Speaking of business, it would be much quicker, more time-saving and more convenient for a company to send emails regarding promotions and sales to a group of targeted customers than to meet and talk with every one of them.

In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that spoken words are more effective in situations when we need to use our gestures and show emotions, while written communication is preferable in law and business.

Sample 2:

When it comes to imparting and exchanging information, some people believe that speaking is more powerful than writing. Personally, I think that both methods can be effective forms of communication, but it depends on the specific circumstance as to which is the most appropriate at the time.

On the one hand, speaking is an extremely effective and efficient mode of communication in certain contexts. Oral communication enables people to emotionally connect with their listeners. The tone of someone’s voice can powerfully convey a wide range of emotions, and that is why some people are able to inspire and influence others simply through a powerful speech, or a song, or piece of poetry. Secondly, misunderstandings can also be easily prevented when people interact face to face. For example, if one person is confused about what the other is saying, he can immediately ask for further explanation to ensure that their message is completely understood.

On the other hand, writing can also be an effective tool in everyday communication. In the workplace, written messages, emails, and documents are effective tools, while speech may sometimes be ignored or interpreted in different ways, written forms are usually stated very clearly. Employees can therefore reread documents repeatedly to avoid miscommunication. Additionally, written documents are usually required in legal procedures. This is the reason why many important documents including memos, reports, job descriptions, and e-mails are usually kept in written form.

In conclusion, both spoken and written modes of communication have their own purposes, benefits and drawbacks, and people have to carefully consider which mode to apply in each specific situation.

Sample 3:

Communication plays an important part in the development of individuals. The thought that oral conversation is more successful than composed language is debatable. Some individuals guarantee that talking helps convey emotions and sentiments. Others think written language is more useful in transferring data. I am in agreement with the view that spoken communication is more beneficial than the written form.

When used properly, speaking can be an extremely effective and efficient way of communicating. People who use oral communication can make emotional connections with their listeners. People can effectively pass on many different feelings by using their voices, and this is why they are able to inspire others and influence them simply through a compelling speech, a song, or a poem. Your words can be interpreted differently when you use a certain tone, for instance, an emphatic voice while trying to convey a vehement sentence can make an extensive impact on the listener. In addition, face-to-face interactions also make it easier to avoid the misconceptions.

Furthermore, listening helps people to remember and comprehend more. Spoken communication helps us understand the pronunciations and accents of the speaker, something that is impossible through written communication. It may be better to use verbal communication when information is urgently needed, such as an emergency at stake or when the receiver has no access to writing instruments, such as young children.

Nevertheless, some people might argue that correspondence is better for someone who can’t convince others through speech, but it cannot always be a solution. Speaking skills provide a sense of accomplishment and personal development that writing cannot.

In conclusion, I am convinced that verbal interactions are more influential than written ones as the sense of understanding is quite efficient when body language and facial expressions are used.

Sample 4:

Whether written or oral is a more powerful form of communication has long been a subject of debate. Personally, I argue that neither of the forms could be said to be superior since there are nuances that can only be conveyed through either the spoken or written medium.

On the one hand, speeches have always been used as the primary method of addressing large masses of people, for they are more effective at conveying feelings of passion and excitement. Speakers, by lowering and increasing the volume of their voice, can alter the energy of an audience that writers cannot do as easily through the written word. It is no mistake that every political leader conveys their ideas and inspires their people through speeches: successful politicians of the past, such as Obama or Tony Blair, were also great orators who can excite a crowd?

On the other hand, the separation and impartiality of the written form allow the medium to paint more colorful and detailed worlds. The impersonal nature of writing also allows the written form to convey things that would be rejected through the spoken word, and engage in darker, more mature content that provokes the mind. This is why many people still read books since they help to paint a more vivid picture of the subject they are trying to convey. Due to the added layer of engagement required in reading as opposed to listening, readers can explore worlds in greater depth than listeners can.

Overall, I argue that speeches and the written word have different uses for they have distinct strengths and weaknesses, and it cannot be said that one is more powerful than the other.

Sample 5:

Many people opine that oral communication is more powerful than written communication. In this essay, I will explain why I disagree with this idea.

This idea often stems from the fact that spoken communication is the oldest form of communication. Also, it is used as the most common medium for the exchange of information as speakers can give utterance synchronously to their listeners who then are able to respond in real time. In contrast, written form, despite the longer response time, as a more reliable means of communication in the legal, academic and business world should be mentioned. Written documents and correspondences such as agreements, letters, emails, or books are kept as a source of reference while spoken conversations, even recorded, are not legalised and invalid in most cases.

Second, oral communication can facilitate face-to-face communication when speakers can not only use oral and verbal form but also non-verbal tools to convey the emotional message. For example, many political figures are articulate thanks to a combination of inspired words and their ability to read their audiences’ true feelings from facial expressions to adjust their delivery and meaning of speech. Therefore, it is believed that spoken communication is more important than the written one. Of course, writers might not have such luxury, but they seem to pay more attention, and actually have time to do so, to convey their ideas through written language with precise grammar and vocabulary, which are often simplified in spoken language. There are examples of books or pieces of text that are full of enthusiasm and represent effectively complex notions or emotional expressions.

In conclusion, it is difficult to decide whether spoken or written communication is more important than the other.  Both these mediums can play a key role in different circumstances and communication purposes.

Sample 6:

People communicate with each other via different platforms every day. Various types of communication can take place, but the two chief forms are spoken and written communication. Some believe that the former can have stronger impacts on humans compared to the latter. I totally disagree with this opinion as both are equally powerful and useful when used appropriately.

Speaking and listening to people can be effective in many situations. First, many people prefer to talk to others when it comes to personal issues as it is more intimate and is easy to express sympathy and empathy. Second, it is much faster to communicate with somebody by calling as opposed to writing or texting, especially when it comes to an emergency such as calling for an ambulance or seeking help from the police. Finally, an oral discussion is a much more convenient way to exchange ideas, clarify meaning and misunderstanding, or resolve conflicts as people can ask questions and seek responses immediately. Given that, spoken messages can easily be forgotten if not noted down, and speakers often have to repeat the message many times over to

reach the listeners unless the speech is recorded.

On the other hand, reading and writing are also widely used for their benefits. Writing books or journals is a great way to pass on your knowledge to a large audience as many readers can access the books at the same time. Furthermore, written documents can last a lifetime and can be translated into different languages, so they can reach a mass audience generation after generation. Although reading culture is deteriorating among the young, more people than ever before are engaging in online written communication such as writing a Twit or posting a status on their Facebook account.

In conclusion, both forms of communication are powerful in their own ways, and humans need to apply each one appropriately to become effective communicators.

Sample 7:

In modern times communication plays a vital role in our daily life. Communication is the key to interacting and building a reputation with people around. Oral communication is seen to be more successful than writing. Talking helps a person express emotion which does not happen in written texts. Some people also think that written language is more useful for communicating. I definitely go with the fact that spoken communication is much more effective than written ones.

Speaking is considered the most effective way to communicate with others. If the words are used properly, talking can display all kinds of emotions like anger, happiness, frustration, etc. The individuals using spoken communication can connect with the ones they are communicating with. They can rely on listeners. Voices convey actual emotions, and they are able to influence people through their speech. A speech can be compelling, and motivating, for the listeners. For instance, the listeners can understand the tone of the speaker’s mood. He or she can understand from the voice whether the said words were assertive or declarative. Moreover, face-to-face communication also makes communication easier. The chances of miscommunication diminish.

Additionally, listening can help people to memorize and understand more. Moreover, spoken communication helps to understand the accent and pronunciation of the speaker. Sometimes a few words are difficult to understand or pronounce. It is better to have verbal communication rather than writing. Also, during the time of emergency, a call to the receiver can help rather than writing and waiting for a reply.

Nevertheless, some people do prefer written communication as they can’t be convinced through their speech. It is difficult for them to reply then and there. But speaking skills can be enhanced through exercising the skills. It also helps in personal development and confidence building.

Lastly, to conclude, I believe that verbal communication has more advantages than written communication. Verbal communication helps to understand the body language and facial expression of the speaker which is not understandable in written communication.

Sample 8:

In today's fast-paced society, spoken communication is often preferred over written communication. I agree with the view that spoken communication is more beneficial than written communication. In this essay, I will explain the advantages and disadvantages of spoken communication to justify my opinion. From my perspective, interaction through our own voices has more beneficial impacts on our daily lives. Firstly, direct communication with people helps to convey emotions in a way that written communication cannot. This is an indispensable and crucial factor in creating long-term interactions. To seize various opportunities and to know people better, verbal communication is the best way. For example, the other day I was standing in line for admission to college. I talked to a few of the students standing with me in the long line. The wait was long, so we got time to speak to each other. Hence, from my freshman year onwards, I already have friends and many known faces thanks to striking up face-to-face conversations with different students. With the passing days, we connected more and more. The reason spoken communication is preferred is that body language and facial expressions can be observed, which helps to understand whether the speaker is talking about something good or bad. On the other hand, written communication restricts us from understanding and sympathizing with emotional feelings. As written communication lacks tone, voice, mood, emotions, and more, this can create misunderstanding as well. Secondly, spoken interaction can be enhanced through exercising the skills. It also helps in personal development and confidence building. For instance, in debate, directly speaking our views in front of a large group of people and waiting for their refusal, helps in the practice of critical thinking and quick response. In contrast, writing our opinions down and sending them may be good for introverts but waiting for a response might create a mishap. Hence, this might create disputes, and this online conversation will end quickly. In conclusion, I believe that verbal communication has more advantages than written communication. Verbal communication helps to understand the body language and facial expression of the speaker which is not understandable in written communication. It also allows for better emotional expression, personal development and opportunities for building relationships. Additionally, it allows for immediate feedback and helps to build critical thinking and quick response skills. Therefore, spoken communication is more beneficial in many aspects of our lives, from personal to professional.

Sample 9:

Some people are in favour of the power of speaking more than that of writing in communication. However, I believe that it all depends on the situations to decide which mode of meaning creation is more important than the other.

For some cases, oral speech conveys ideas and opinions most effectively. In programs like live political debates on television in elections, the sharpest weapon for would-be prime ministers or presidents is obviously their eloquent speeches. In such a live show, spontaneous answers to unexpected questions are usually decisive factors for the persuasive presentation of political stances which can earn them votes. Additionally, in closing sales, the power of convincing a lead to make purchasing decisions is largely dependent on the art of speaking of the salesperson, not on written texts in the product brochure. The power of speaking is also palpable in conflict resolution where typed ideas are not as detailed and well supported as oral reasoning and explanations. That is why people often have to talk their problems out instead of exchanging limited and even easily misunderstood texts.

However, for other purposes, written communication is better for task completion. Indeed, written texts are considered more formal than spoken ones, so in case of an invitation to an important event like a wedding, or a ceremony, letters of invitation are nearly the only means of communication accepted. Also, for working circumstances, the need to keep track of the correspondence among relevant parties is significant, and this inherently requires people to communicate by emails, faxes, or text messages instead of speaking face-to-face or via technological devices. Moreover, in special events like birthdays, or Christmas, a card with elaborated handwritten messages usually means much more than a ready-to-give wish on the tip of one's tongue.

In conclusion, both spoken and written communication are equally necessary for people to function in life, but it is a situational issue when one of them is more powerful than the other.

Sample 10:

It is argued that speaking is a more effective means of communication compared to written forms. However, I strongly disagree with this notion as both of them are capable of having a great influence on human society.

It is undeniable that verbal communication is potent as the emotions of the speaker can be conveyed simultaneously with the intended message. Listeners often experience a wide range of emotions, such as passion, excitement or even intimacy in the tone of the speaker, thus, rendering the main idea aiming at them more convincing and powerful. In contrast, reading about that same idea off a piece of paper may not be as effective because without proper manners of speaking, the audience may fail to comprehend the undertone of the message. For example, politicians often deliver speeches live rather than sending emails or letters because they have a higher chance of winning the general public with an eloquent manner, which can only be conveyed through speaking. As a result, their campaigns can gain more support from the appropriate use of spoken communication.

However, that does not mean written communication is ineffective. The power of such means lies in its reliability which is due to its unchangeability. When a piece of information is printed or written down, there is hardly anything that can be done to alter the meaning of the stored message. Therefore, the possibility of misinterpretation can be mitigated, protecting the authenticity of the information. The power of written words is often shown in contracts or legal documents; such materials are always subject to paperwork because they require a high level of legitimacy, which is better provided by written communication than the spoken one.

In conclusion, the two means of communication are equally powerful depending on the nature of the message. Each method has its own potential, so its use should be carefully considered to get a desired result.

Sample 11:

There is no doubt that there are many ways for two people to communicate, especially with the development of technology. It is frequently argued that written communication is not as effective as vocal communication. Personally, I share this opinion, and the supporting evidence for my viewpoint will be discussed in the lines that follow.

To begin with, the effectiveness of oral communication is the most important defense. It goes without saying that the likelihood of misinterpretation or misunderstanding is extremely low when people communicate face-to-face. Because in-person communication includes eye contact, mannerisms, body language, and other elements that are absent in printed language, people are able to elaborate on their points much more. This is possibly the reason why a sizable majority prefers verbal communication to convey their thoughts and feelings more effectively.

Additionally, verbal communication is the only practical way to send messages on time in the hectic world of today. Today, everyone has a cell phone, making it possible to make contact with anyone anywhere in the world. They can communicate verbally quickly, whereas individuals find reading and sending letters or emails to be much more time-consuming. According to a new Oxford University report, the use of email has decreased by 70% over the past five years due to the growing use of cellular telephones.

To sum up, I’d want to reiterate that verbal communication is unquestionably the most successful form of communication, given the low likelihood of miscommunication and its practicality in contemporary society when written communication sometimes looks laborious and unproductive.

Sample 12:

It is claimed that verbal types of communication are stronger than written ones. Personally, I completely agree with this idea because of some reasons which will be explained in this essay.

To begin with, spoken communication is a powerful way of influencing other people. Firstly, when one gives a speech verbally, they can use their powerful voice as well as gestures to make their talk more convincing. This helps them easily express their emotions and trigger empathy from listeners. For example, many motivational speakers have the ability to tell touching stories which could literally bring tears to people’s eyes. By contrast, if individuals read written messages, it could be difficult for them to visualize the writer’s ideas. Secondly, oral presentations can reach a large audience. For instance, it is possible to deliver a speech in front of thousands of participants in a public event, while it could be hard to publish sufficient documents to provide for the same amount of audience.

At the same time, written communication is less effective in terms of conveying messages. One reason for this is that in many underdeveloped areas around the world, a considerable number of citizens are illiterate. This means they cannot read books or newspapers, and oral speeches seem to be the only way to approach these people. Additionally, it takes a significant amount of time and effort to collect and publish the ideas of an author. Therefore, by the time the necessary information comes to the reader in the form of a book or a newspaper, it may have already become outdated.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that spoken ways of delivering messages are more influential, because they can heighten listeners’ feelings and reach a broader audience quickly. At the same time, in my view, written communication has a smaller impact, as it is time-consuming and also useless for illiterate individuals.

Sample 13:

Some people are of the opinion that spoken communication may have an edge over its written counterpart. From my perspective, both spoken and written forms are important in equal measure, and therefore I completely disagree with the statement.

Spoken language, on the one hand, facilitates our daily communication. Virtually all social activities that human beings engage in such as making purchases, exchanging information or chatting with friends entail people uttering words to one another, and it is not an overstatement to say lack of oral communication may render us unable to carry out any essential tasks in life.

Additionally, when combined with body language, facial expressions, and eye contact, oral communication exhibits strong emotional messages. Whilst political figures make persuasive, well-articulated speeches as an effective tool of persuasion and manipulation, women make full use of their sweet, melodious voices to talk their beloved ones into buying things they want to.

Written language, on the other hand, appears to be relegated and ignored. This is unfortunate because written communication has advantages that would make it a superior choice in some situations over oral communication. From a legal perspective, written language, in the form of legal documents, is instrumental in safeguarding the rights of the people.

Most contracts are carefully drawn up in written forms and require signatures, and therefore they are solid and hard to be breached. In contrast, so-called ‘agreements’ or ‘promises’ in oral forms, in most cases, are invalid.

Moreover, written language is a very efficient representation of complex notions, emotional expressions, and philosophies. Great minds store their ideas in books and novels, and those books have been instrumental in spreading their ideas to a much wider range of audiences. We can see written language as a way of indirectly conversing with not only one, but hundreds, thousands, or even millions of people.

In conclusion, my firm conviction is that both spoken and written communication are equally important in our society. Whereas spoken language enables us to do everyday tasks and effectively show our emotions, written language plays a pivotal role in legal matters and allows for great ideas to be spread to a lot of people.

Sample 14:

Regarding conveying and exchanging information, some individuals argue that speaking holds more power than writing. From my perspective, I believe that both approaches can serve as effective means of communication, yet the suitability depends on the particular context.

On the one hand, speaking is an extremely effective and efficient mode of communication in certain contexts. Oral communication enables people to emotionally connect with their listeners. The tone of someone’s voice can powerfully convey a wide range of emotions, and that is why some people are able to inspire and influence others simply through a powerful speech, or a song, or piece of poetry. Secondly, misunderstandings can also be easily prevented when people interact face to face. For example, if one person is confused about what the other is saying, he can immediately ask for further explanation to ensure that their message is completely understood.

On the contrary, writing can also serve as an effective tool in daily communication. In the workplace, written messages, emails, and documents are potent instruments, whereas speech might sometimes be disregarded or construed differently, written forms are generally expressed very clearly. Hence, employees can review documents repeatedly to prevent miscommunication. Moreover, written documents are typically indispensable in legal proceedings. This elucidates why many crucial documents including memos, reports, job descriptions, and emails are usually documented.

In summary, both verbal and written means of communication serve distinct purposes, advantages, and disadvantages, necessitating individuals to meticulously contemplate which approach to adopt in each specific circumstance.

Sample 15:

The fact that oral languages came into existence tens of thousands of years before written ones across virtually all civilizations makes many people think that spoken communication is more powerful than its written counterpart. This essay argues against this one-dimensional ideology and claims that both forms of communication are equally influential in its own right.

On the one hand, the power of spoken communication derives from its ability to convey information directly and more effectively during face-to-face interactions. Exposed to not only words but also visible emotions and body language, listeners can fully grasp the messages being conveyed and how strongly the speakers really believe in those messages. The revolutionary “I Have a Dream” speech by Dr. Martin Luther King perfectly illuminates this argument. While each word in this historic speech is undoubtedly moving and inspirational, it was the strong, relentless emotions that Dr. King displayed in his speech that rallied support from people all around the globe to his anti-segregation movement.

On the other hand, what constitute the strength of written communication are the official recognition and the social prestige that written documents command. Simply put, written communication is permanent and there are many ways to distinguish the writings of figures of authority, such as signatures or stamps, and hence, it carries more weight. The Constitution of the United States, for example, was written in the 18th century but is still upheld and respected up until this day because it was written by the revered founders of the country, Benjamin Franklin and George Washington. Documents written by famous people in positions of power, as a result, will be more widely accepted and withstand the test of time due to their association with personal reputations.

All things considered, it is imprudent to conclude that one form of communication is better than the other, as both forms have their own strengths and weaknesses, and it depends on the purpose of the users to determine which one is more powerful.

Sample 16:

In this day and age, some people hold the belief that oral communication outclasses written communication in all aspects. While it cannot be denied that spoken communication is important, I do believe that an effective means of communication depends on the situation.

On the one hand, spoken communication entails not only words but also intonation and body gestures, which enormously contribute to the impact that the speakers exert on others. For further elucidation, in certain circumstances, presenting is a more effective approach to convey messages given that a speaker can appeal to more people with a unique tone and attractive body language than a long monotonous essay. A prime example is that in most of the electoral campaigns, candidates often deliver speeches to seek advocates instead of writing letters because their devotion and dedication can be more easily illustrated through words and gestures.

On the other hand, writing is undeniably an effective communication method because of its formality and reliability. To elaborate, a piece of writing often uses formal or academic terms, and it is rarely changed after being printed or made public. Therefore, the readers feel that they are respected, and the possibility of the information being misinterpreted or distorted is minimized. For instance, the power of written communication is demonstrated in the case of a letter sent to a customer or a legal document, indicating the fact that in some situations, oral communication is not preferable.

In conclusion, I am convinced that both speaking and writing are effective methods of communication, and a specific circumstance is the key factor to deciding which outperforms the other.

Sample 17:

People have different views about which method is more useful to communicate between speaking and writing. Some people argue that face to face meeting is more effective to deliver information, while others say that texts are better for that. However, I believe that both these viewpoints are worth considering in depth since they have their own benefits and usage of each method is distinguished according to situations.

First of all, it is true that spoken communication is the most common method to deliver information. Many people tend to converse with others before they write it as a document because talking is convenient and commonplace in people’s lives. For instance, speaking plays an important role when people tell their personal or secret stories to others. In addition, speaking is a powerful method to convey information in an emergency circumstance because it is faster than other communication skills. Meanwhile, people can develop a faith and create a relationship by looking each other’s eyes or sharing a similar emotion during face-to-face meeting. 

On the other hand, writing can enable people to deliver messages in a logical and systematic way. This is because information can be transferred without any distortion and makes people to find a faulty easily. This is the reason why people write a document during contract negotiations. Furthermore, texts are suitable to deliver complex and long-winded stories which are hard to convey by speaking and it is proper to preserve messages for long time or inform to the public at once.

In conclusion, both methods used to communicate have their own characteristics. When people want to deliver messages promptly or with emotion, speaking is more preferable. However, people who need to give concrete information without distortion should select writing to communicate with others. Therefore, I believe that people need to choose the communication method depending on situations they encountered.

Sample 18:

Some people claim that verbal communication is more effective than written communication. In my opinion, this varies from person to person, and sometimes also depends on the context in which the question is to be referred to the other person. Thus, both forms of communication hold equal importance.

Spoken communication is often considered to be more versatile, as during a conversation, the listener can easily capture the emotions of the speaker. Eyes reflect the soul, and facial gestures can easily determine whether the speaker is fake or real. Prominent politicians and influencers around the world use this form of communication while conveying their thoughts. A passionate speech can arouse the emotions of the listeners. If we read history, we will read about brilliant orators who even made revolutions with the power of their fiery speeches. However, this form of communication does not always produce the desired result, as when misunderstandings arise in face-to-face communication, things may go out of control and people might end up deeply scared of an otherwise beautiful relationship. Conversational interactions are also not very suitable for conveying unpleasant messages.

On the other hand, the written form of communication is better for those who do not have the ability to persuade others orally. Some people can't deliver a perfect speech, but their words say a lot about them. The pen is mightier than the sword is not just a saying. Some writers shock the world when they present their ideas and opinions. However, written communication often reaches only a limited section of society.

In conclusion, like the fingers of the human hand, no two people are alike. Some may have excellent oratory skills, while others may excel at written communication. Therefore, it is difficult to say whether written communication is more powerful than verbal communication because it depends entirely on the circumstances and the written or spoken skills of the communicator.

Sample 19:

Nowadays, great emphasis is put on developing communication skills in order to succeed in the job place and in businesses. However, there is a debate going on which mean of communication is the most effective. I am in staunch support of the notion that conveying an argument through speaking is always far better than through writing, as the former involves gestures and expressions helpful to convey ideas more efficiently, and room for the misconception is little compared to that in writing.

To begin with, verbal communication involves hand movements and facial expressions, making it easier for recipients to understand information. That is to say, the audiences not only can listen to what is being said but also in what mood it is being said. For instance, recent research conducted by an American motivational firm revealed that around 70% of their employees follow verbal instructions more precisely than the written ones. The seriousness of instructions is sensed through expressions and body language; therefore, spoken communication is given more weightage than the textual one.

Moreover, there is a lesser chance of ambiguity in a face-to-face interaction than the written correspondence. This is because one has the liberty to ask any question to clear his misconception, rather than developing a wrong understanding. A survey carried out by Oxford University, for example, showed that about 80% of their teachers said that the response of students in verbal lectures is better than that in written lessons. The reason behind this is that the students perfect their concepts by asking questions from the tutors, which is not possible in the case of textual handouts where there are chances of developing wrong concepts and ideas leading to poorer grades.

To conclude, I am ardently in favor of the view that spoken interaction is more instrumental than the written one, as the chance of understanding the ideas are way more than in written communication because of body gestures, facial expressions, and minimal misconceptions.

Đang tải chế độ Học...

Hot: 1000+ đề thi giữa kì 1 lớp 1-12 đầy đủ các môn (Update 2026) (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay

ĐẶC QUYỀN VIP

Đăng ký VIP để học và luyện thi không giới hạn

Trọn bộ quyền lợi trên Vietjack, trong một tài khoản.

  • Phòng luyện thi cấp tốc: ĐGNL - ĐGTD, Tốt nghiệp THPT, Ôn vào 10, Ôn vào 6, Ôn Giữa kì/Cuối kì
  • Hơn 200K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 3tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem hàng ngàn bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện
  • Đăng ký ngay

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Today technology has changed how people interact with each other. I believe the biggest effects it has had on relationships are that it has reduced in-person interaction and that it has led to the development of online relationships. This has been a positive development because often cyber relationships are more meaningful than in-person relationships.

Technology has reduced face-to-face interaction. For instance, it is not uncommon to see two people sitting at the same table in a restaurant, checking their phones every 30 seconds, and only talking to each other occasionally.

Technology has also given rise to online relationships. Nowadays anyone that has access to the Internet and computers can create a free Facebook or Twitter account and build their social networks on these platforms no matter where on the planet they reside. Take, for example, Chinese teenagers who like collecting insects. On the Internet, they can find and connect with others who share this particular hobby, even if those people live in the Amazon rainforest.

This should be seen as a positive trend because cyberspace relationships can be very meaningful. Today it is very common that those in a person's immediate circle do not support what they pursue. For example, many street artists are looked down on by their family members. Fortunately, Facebook groups give them the power to build their own communities where they can support each other. The inspiration and motivation they obtain there can drive them to work hard to move toward their goals.

In conclusion, technology has reduced in-person interaction and has meanwhile enabled online relationships. This has definitely been a positive trend because online relationships are often more satisfying and meaningful than face-to-face ones.

Sample 2:

Technology is a crucial tool for communication in modern times. It is flourishing in each and every field of communication. Though this invention has changed the way people interact around the world, it has both positive and negative impact on the relationship of people.  

To embark on, with regard to the positive development, technological advancement has made communication between organizations more convenient and time-saving. Many companies and organizations use tools like social media, email and forum to influence a larger number of audiences. This also serves as an advanced mode of learning since schools adopt the method of smart classrooms. With the availability of ecommerce, freelance websites, social media marketing, people can easily buy and sell products and services with effortless communication.

On the other hand, the drawbacks of technology on the relationships of people cannot be ignored. Though technology has advanced greatly, it still lacks the emotional touch of communication. It has affected the love and affection people crave with communication. Millennials today are more fascinated by the virtual world, thereby forgetting the practical side of life. Modern modes of communication are making people busy and less productive. Sharing personal information on social media also invades people’s privacy. For example, individuals spending hours on social media interaction interacting with people from around the world and wasting their valuable time. In fact, family vacation which was previously a private affair has now become a public affair.

To sum up, communication technology can be a blessing or a curse depending upon how people make use of it. Even though it is an easy method of interaction, the relationships formed through technological interaction lack trust and emotion. Hence, people should give preference to face-to-face communication.

Sample 3:

It is evident that technology has transformed the ways of communication and influenced relationships in a variety of ways. In my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects of this.

The principal way in which relationships have been affected is that they tend to be at a distance rather than face-to-face. The advent of the internet has made it easy for business owners to communicate across the world, with remote job opportunities one call away. Online educational programs are available for people residing in different countries, and it is no longer a dream to attend live classes from the comfortable environment of a home. Not only this, the social platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube have revolutionized relationships, be it making online friendships with people from other countries or staying in touch with loved ones. Based on this perspective, technology has influenced relationships in a positive way. 

However, despite these advances, the quality of interaction has significantly declined in several respects. If people are developing most of their relationships online, this means that they may also have less fact-to-face contact. This kind of contact on a personal level is important for human beings to feel wanted and a part of society. This may be a particular problem for children's social development as they used to be seen playing out on the streets but are now too often indoors. Technology can also mean people are detached from what is going on around them even when they are out, as can be seen by the many people staring into their mobile phones as they travel or walk around. 

In conclusion, technology has brought some positive developments in the ways people interact with each other. However, there are also some negative impacts of technology on the types of relationships people make. 

Sample 4:

Technology has hardly left any human feeling untouched. Instead, it has played a great role in manipulating and transforming it to a great extent. One of the most highly impacted aspects in this context is human interaction.

Technology has laid its hands on human behavior and has greatly influenced the pattern of human interaction since its introduction. From social media platforms to FaceTime applications, staying in touch has become easier with time. However, it has its downsides as well. With such high-end digital connections, intimate relationships have seen a significant decrease ever since.

These changes result from the freedom of hiding genuine emotions that technology brings. People can now fake caring about someone, express false love, and connect just for the sake of words. This has led to loosened family bonds, false promises between partners, and much more. People do interact with each other, but this interaction is often fake and untrue. Technology's significant impact on human interaction leads to various unwanted consequences. A surge in depression cases, suicides, and unwise decisions have been recorded as a result of such interactions.

Hence, technology has influenced the way people interact both positively and negatively. Undoubtedly, it has helped humans connect from miles away with their loved ones yet has made relations less meaningful and degraded their overall quality.

Sample 5:

Technology has brought vast changes in human behavior since its introduction. Moreover, with its rapid advancement and new changes, it is impacting relationships more rapidly. Interactions have recently been made more accessible due to technology. People can now connect easily and from the ease of their homes. However, it also has its downsides. A detailed study of this significant impact on human relationships due to technology can be understood with various examples.

In recent years, technology has helped humans stay connected at all times. With technology spreading its arms, connections can be made even in the most unexpected and tribal areas of the world. However, this has ultimately transformed human behavior and the way people interact with each other.

A prime example of this change is how people interact since social media's introduction. The introduction of social media platforms has made it easier for people to connect with their loved ones, even at a distance. However, it has entirely transformed how people interact with their close surroundings. This has also led to the expression of fake feelings and false expressions.

Overall, technology has transformed the entire interaction cycle of human beings without letting us realize it. More connections over the internet have paved the way for broken real-life relationships and have ultimately degraded the quality of relationships.

Sample 6:

There has been a change in the different aspects of social relations as affected by technology which we can introduced as more of a post-positively than post-negatively impact.

First, technology has immensely extended the speed and convinience of communication and thus the worth of relationships. For example, a university learner who is learning in another country can use video-calling to speak with the parents daily. An instantaneous means of communication makes it easier to avoid having to wait for a letter to arrive for a day or more as is the norm. Furthermore, social networks allow a person to get acquanted with like-minded strangers with similar interests, career choices, or hobbies, therefore create friendships that last a lifetime.

Despite this perception, this development is fairly beneficial to the masses. Improved communication technology reduces pressure and creates the need for belonging. For instance, when there is negative information, people get to act quickly. Also, positive information is more effective when shared immediately and it helps enhance interpersonal relationships. In addition, this has led to the growth of businesses and the eradication of geographical barriers whereby a company can comfortably and easily transact business with an organization in another country at any given time.

Altogether, it can be highlighted that technology plays a vital role in changing social relations by providing more effective and pleasant means of communication. It has made interpersonal communication better, provided businesses with links and connections as well as made everyone have equal access to information. Thus, it can be concluded that the purpose and use of technology have been mainly beneficial for interactions and relationships for the majority of people.

Sample 7:

It is true that new technologies have had an influence on communication between people. Technology has affected relationships in various ways, and in my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects.

Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, telephones and the Internet allow businesspeople in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. For example, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.

On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between people in different countries was much more difficult when communication was limited to written letters or telegrams. Nowadays, interactions by email, phone or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings, and many of us benefit from these interactions, either in work or social contexts. On the other hand, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result ofisolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these 'virtual' relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships.

In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionized communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.

Sample 8:

There has been a complex alteration in the various aspects of social relations due to technological advancement resulting in more positive impact than negatives.

First of all, the usage of technology has tremendously augmented the speed and ease of interaction making the relations’ depth richer. For example, a university student studying in another country can utilize video-calling to maintain quotidian contact with his or her parents. Real-time messaging banishes the lengthy wait for the letter, which was taken as conventional before. Besides, one is able to interact with strangers with similar interests, jobs, or hobbies, hence fostering friendships that endure a lifetime.

This development is predominantly propitious for the people. Advanced communication technology reduces stress and creates a feeling of belongingness. For instance, the sectional publicity of negative information can be quickly followed by timely responses. And just as to promote the fast exchange of positive messages, cooperation is strengthened between people. In addition, this technological advancement has boosted business development and erased hegemonic constraints and restrictions that enable business organizations to freely and easily connect with global organizations at any time.

Therefore, one is able to deduce that relations in society have been significantly mediated by technology in the manner in which humans interact offering more effective and fulfilling ways. It has made interpersonal communication easier, created business relationships and opportunities, and given equal opportunity for information access. Hence, the major impact of technology is analyzing and interpreting common interaction and relationship profiles that can be deemed more beneficial and helpful for most people.

Sample 9:

The advent and rapid development of technology have fundamentally transformed the dynamics of interpersonal interactions among individuals. This has also transformed the way we form relationships and bond with each other. This essay contends that the evolution of technology has, in fact, catalyzed a positive shift in the types of relationships people form, fostering connectivity and enhancing social engagement.

Technology has diversified the ways individuals establish and maintain relationships. Social media platforms, for instance, have facilitated connections among individuals globally, transcending geographical barriers. Additionally, online dating applications have revolutionized how people meet and form romantic relationships, offering a wide array of choices and opportunities to connect with like-minded individuals. Technology has also gifted us swift and interactive communication with loved ones no matter the distance. For instance, someone living abroad can make video calls and talk to his or her family members whenever they want. This has reduced the communication gap and significantly enhanced our options to contact others in real-time unlike in the past when sending handwritten letters was perhaps the best option to convey messages or contact someone.

This evolution in the types of relationships forged through technology signifies a positive development. Online connectivity allows individuals to maintain contact with friends, family, and acquaintances across vast distances. Moreover, digital platforms enable marginalized groups, such as those with disabilities or introverted personalities, to establish meaningful connections they may struggle to form in traditional social settings. For instance, social networking sites provide platforms for introverted individuals to express themselves and interact comfortably, fostering self-confidence and social skills.

In conclusion, the impact of technology on relationship dynamics has been transformative, offering diverse avenues for connectivity and social interaction. The ability to form connections across distances and the empowerment of individuals who face social barriers underscore the positive aspects of technological advancements. Embracing these changes in relationship dynamics signifies a positive shift towards enhanced connectivity and inclusivity in contemporary society.

Sample 10:

The ubiquitous presence of technology has undoubtedly redefined the landscape of human interaction, altering the very nature of how we build and maintain relationships. While the advancements of the digital age offer a plethora of tools for communication and connection, a closer examination reveals a disturbing trend – the erosion of genuine, meaningful relationships.

With technology, we make friends more often than ever. We also have a variety of tools to connect with others and remain in touch with people we care about. But one undeniable consequence of this technology-driven relationship is the rise of superficial and fleeting interactions online. Social media platforms, while fostering a sense of instant connectivity, often facilitate shallow exchanges and curated self-presentation. In the pursuit of likes and followers, meaningful conversations and authentic connections are often sacrificed, fostering a culture of virtual intimacy that lacks the depth and genuineness of face-to-face interaction. 

As a result, of the constant bombardment of digital stimuli can contribute to social anxiety and a fear of missing out, hindering our ability to develop genuine relationships. The pressure to maintain an online presence and curate a perfect digital persona can lead individuals to withdraw from real-world interactions, hindering their ability to connect authentically with others. And this is a disturbing outcome of our digital relationship. Additionally, the ease of virtual communication can discourage individuals from developing the interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence necessary for navigating the complexities of face-to-face interaction. For example, a young adult accustomed to online communication might struggle to hold engaging conversations in person, leading to feelings of awkwardness and missed opportunities for meaningful connections.

In conclusion, while technology undoubtedly offers tools for communication and connection, it is crucial to recognize its limitations and potential pitfalls. By prioritizing face-to-face interaction, fostering genuine conversations, and actively engaging with our communities, we can strive to counteract the negative effects of technology on our relationships and cultivate a more meaningful and fulfilling social life.

Sample 11:

There is no doubt that many things have changed in the last few decades; some changes are for the better and some changes are for the worse. One of the fields which were greatly affected by the advent of technology is the way of interaction and communication.

Without any doubt, technology has changed the way we lead our lives, and these changes have been prominent over the last decade. There are several improvements in life due to the positive effects of technology and there are some negative impacts as well. One area that has dramatically changed is the way we communicate and maintain our relationship nowadays. And in my opinion, technology has positively affected our communication and the way we make relationships and maintain it. Despite some negative effects, most of us enjoy the positive things technology has bought for us. In the past, the ways of interaction were very limited. Unleash your imagination; if you want to speak with your friend, you would have to go directly to his house or send him a message which may take a few days to get a response. I completely believe that technology has a great tangible effect on our communication. Nowadays, it's very easy to interact with your relatives - and even with the government and organisations - either by emails, mobiles, chatting, etc. and I think that this has improved and enhanced the relationships.

We no longer need to visit a relative or friend to get updates. Alternatively, we can let them know our updates instantly. Besides personal communications, official and business communications have become easier. Email campaigns offer a good marketing opportunity for business owners and people can complain about a certain thing using emails without exposing their identity. Not all of the people have the availability of technology, and they still use the old form of communication. People now can deceive others using identity theft and fraud identity. The personal touch of communication like handwritten letters, face-to-face communications were more effective in some cases. Like meeting your friend is still more important than just writing him an email.

We make so many friends via chatting or social networking which would not have been possible without the advancement of technology and its contribution to communication. Cell phones, emails and social networking have enhanced the way of communicating and we can talk to anyone with a minimum cost. It's now not unusual to prepare for a visit and even several visits to your relatives and friends on the same day, while in the past this may have taken several weeks or months.

To conclude, despite all that, I still see some failings in the development of the means of interaction. For instance, the very high cost each person spends every day on communication. Another defect is that many elderly people are not accustomed to this modern technology. But that doesn't have a great effect on the positive role technology has made in the field of interaction between people and I think these defects are very easy to be solved.

Sample 12:

A true relationship between two people requires face to face communication and time to truly get to know each other. Regardless of what humans think, all individuals admire the feeling of being wanted even if it’s a lie. The digital world has created the sense that it is passable to be who anyone wishes to be online. However, I believe that the way people know each other online and the type of relationships they make virtually have changed for the worse.

Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, most are being turned inward, forgetting the true definition of a friend. Human beings have feelings, and they feel broken at times and do not always smile but the Internet only shows one's happy moments keeping one from fully being known. The types of friendships people make these days are quick and short-lasting. In real life friendship, people see each other at one’s best and worst time and remain there for one another. This can never be compared to a social network friendship. One can only get to know someone by spending time together for the reason that the Internet cannot replace shared experience and personal communication. However, due to the Internet, people can make friends anywhere in the world which was quite impossible in the past era. Finding school and college friends and getting in touch with them is an advantage that the Internet offers to us. However, true friendship is not possible if two people do not spend time together, share their common interests, talk a lot and help each other both in good and bad times.

Rightfully, life is meant to be lived and have many physical experiences, bonding with another person’s physical presence. Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, they are spending time online to make friends. This is, in my opinion, a negative aspect of the digital era.

In conclusion, making friends beyond boundaries and getting in touch with childhood friends could be the advantages of the digital era but the way we are becoming dependent on the technology and the way we are pretending to maintain our friendship online have negative consequences on our personal, moral and social aspects.

Sample 13:

It is true that technology in recent years has altered the path that people communicate with each other. There are many ways that technology affects our relationships, and in my opinion, this is a beneficial development.

To begin with, the most obvious transformation in people’s relationships is how they communicate with each other. By this, I mean that the Internet has converted the world into a small village and nowadays people around the world can reach each other easily and rapidly. For example, a friend who lives in the UK can chat and talk with their friends in China using a mobile phone or social network.

Another field in which technology affects our life is the way that people make friends. In other words, it has been observed that these days we can make friends from all nationalities without any effort or travel, and this helps with culture interchange and help people who suffer.

In my thought, this has a positive impact on the community for two reasons. Firstly, human life has become more convenient, this provides people with more opportunity to spend their leisure time with their kin. For instance, with the Internet, we can shop and work from our dwelling house without going outside anymore. Secondly, travel around the globe has become usable and cheap. As a result, people visiting each other and spend a lot of time together hence more connected society emerges.

To conclude, as we have found out there is no easy answer to this question. Nevertheless, technology makes a huge difference in peoples' lives in terms of communication and I believe that this is a positive impact in our society.

Sample 14:

From the last century to the present days, there have been many changes in the way people interact with each other as there have been evolutionary changes in technological fields. One may say this transformation has negative effects on relationships between people or positive effects. I believe that there have been more positive effects than negative ones among the people due to the reasons that in few seconds of time people can contact their dearest ones and technology gives strength to people by making them closer to each other even if they are not.

From the introduction of telecommunication and electronic mail, the lives of people turned out to be easier and communication among people became easier and more convenient. They can contact their families and friends using these advanced services over the countries. Without visiting their homes frequently, they can make money or accomplish their goals. For example, a military man has to serve his country at the borders, and it is uneasy to go home and spend some time with his family and acquaintances thoroughly. However, he can make contact with his family via telephone and other services. With the help of telecommunication and electronic mail, he can keep in touch with his family and buddies. In this way, technology makes people close to each other. This absolutely positive development as we have huge benefits using technology.

With the absence of one's dearest one, he used to be all alone before the introduction of technology. But it is possible to get in touch with his sweetheart. And also, he can send and receive the money within seconds over the thousands of miles using the latest money transfer machines. As a result, he can look over and take care of his family's financial problems and needs without his presence at his home. For instance, my uncle who stays in the United States calls his family and others via ‘Skype’ daily whereas, my dad who used to work in Dubai could not keep in touch with us as at that time the telecommunication had not installed in my village. Thus, that made my father bound to visit us frequently. Consequently, he spent a large amount of money travelling and could not communicate with us as frequently as he wanted to.

In many positive ways, technology has affected the relationships between people, and I would say these are positive developments. Imagine without technology, what would happen to the people and the world. In many ways, we are getting the help of using technology.

Sample 15:

Technological developments in this modern era have transformed the way we socialise. Advancements in communication networks have played a vital role in bringing people closer. In my opinion, there are both pros and cons of this development and this essay will analyse how technology has changed the types of relationships made by people.

In ancient times, people used letters and telegrams to interact with each other. With the advent of modern communication systems like the telephone and the Internet, people can collaborate more effectively. For instance, we can interact through emails rather than letter and businessman can have online meetings through the conference calls.

Another reason is the widespread use of social networks over the internet; for instance, Facebook, where men and women can now make friends online and interact with them through the post, message and online chat. Video conferencing in the form of Skype has improved instructor and student relationship. Online messaging platforms like mIRC have given people the luxury to choose their own discussion-based chat rooms. There are more ways to socialise now than there used to be in the past.

All these advancements in technology come up with their merits and demerits. Letters, memos and telegrams are replaced by emails and text messages. Human resource hiring can be done through online video conferencing which has eliminated the need for physical presence and travelling requirement. We can now mingle more through Facebook, Pinterest, Google+, Instagram and Orkut and so on. Though one can regard these as positive developments, they do have some negative aspects. These developments have isolated people and discouraged real-world interaction. For instance, youth, in particular, prefers to choose to mix up with people online rather than socialising with them in the real world.

To conclude, technology has no doubt revolutionised the way we interact and hang out but has greatly reduced real-world interaction. Though these virtual relations tend to be positive, we should not deny the importance of physical interaction in our lives.

Sample 16:

Everything has two sides, and the effects of technology on people’s relationships are not an exception. We cannot deny how much technology has transformed the individual reaction with others in his family and the surrounding community.

In my opinion, technology has affected and transformed our life aspects and dealing with other people in a good way. Recently, we have had different fast and cheap methods to call our family and friends. Moreover, some technologies are giving us chances to see and talk with them at the same time. In addition, we are informed on a daily basis with the last updates and news about our friends and family, so we can remember birthdays, graduation parties and even marriage anniversaries. Furthermore, these methods make it faster and easier to call and congratulate another individual.

On the other hand, many people believe that technology is affecting individual relationships badly. They opine that, if we did not have these kinds of technology, we would have been visiting each other regularly.

Not only that, but individuals will not be isolated from each other, especially those who are addicted to using social networking platforms.  As a matter of fact, people rarely talk to each other face-to-face. In particular, people’s personalities are changing so much, because of addiction to using Facebook. It’s one of the vital reasons to decrease confidence and self-esteem.

As can be seen, even if we have some bad effects of technology and how it changed the way people contact each other, we still have much more effects. We can obtain many easy and cheaper methods to contact each other. In fact, technology has enhanced our life and the way we are contacting each other.

Sample 17:

Today, various brand-new methods of telecommunications have tremendously influenced social behaviour. Although their impacts have benefited human lifestyle, they have had some costs as well. However, before evaluating their advantages and disadvantages, it is better to reveal how these breakthroughs affect the ways people relate to each other.

In the old times, when someone wanted to communicate, there were extremely limited means of doing so. Indeed, he should write a letter or have a face-to-face conversation. Likewise, it was possible to be acquainted with new faces either by meeting them personally or being introduced by family and friends.

On the other hand, substantial technological progress has happened in recent years. For instance, smartphones can be utilised both by direct calls and via different applications. Alternatively, the internet can be used either by offline methods like e-mail or by online protocols like chatting programs. Moreover, social networking is another rich aspect of the internet by which everybody is able to find new friends or search for old, missed ones, and it can be used to interact with current relatives as well. Clearly, not only have modern technologies facilitated human interactions, but they also diversified his relationships.

On the debit side, excessive use of virtual connections might weaken the personal relationship with reality. While it seems that people are aware of each other’s statuses on a daily basis, even up-to-the-minute, they may overlook loved ones’ emotional states due to the negligence of their presence.

All in all, contemplating the pros and cons of these phenomena simultaneously, I should say it depends on the person who utilises these state-of-the-art technologies. If he applies them wisely, their pluses will definitely overshadow their pitfalls. After all, in my viewpoint, humankind can eventually address this issue in favour of his civilisation. Hence, I assume it as a mainly positive development in the long run.

Sample 18:

People used to communicate by meeting each other while it has nowadays totally changed since technological advancement. Some assert that utilising technology in daily communication brings more harm than good things. I personally agree with this view and this essay will look into the reason with some considerations.

The first effect of technology usage is that it reduces the sense of togetherness among people. Since they do interaction via telecommunication such as a mobile phone or the internet, it reduces the personal relationship. People cannot catch moments during interaction because they communicate in unreal situations. Take social media as an example, most teenagers talk to their friend via utilising Facebook, Viber, WhatsApp or others. They tend to interact with each other via sending messages thus they can feel the situation or even communication sense just by reading the messages. By contrast, direct communication tends to develop a sense of belonging among people. They will be more comfortable expressing their feelings thus it is easy to get along together.

In addition, it will deteriorate the human behaviour. By using electronic devices in the daily life of communication, it is hard for them to get involved in a social environment. It will decrease their self-confidence to speak in public because they usually interact through devices rather than through face-to-face communication. Moreover, utilising technology in interaction is not free thus you should they should prepare much budget just for communication.

It is true that technology usages enable people to keep in touch with people who live in different places. However, it is not capable of providing a sense of feeling as well as direct communication.

To sum up, by communicating directly, it will help people keep close to each other and able to talk towards them easily and expressively.

Sample 19:

The 21st century has been a game-changer in all aspects of human life. The same case is with relationships which have also taken on a new dimension with technological advancement. Nowadays, relationships are much more fragile, materialistic, mistrustful and doubtful as compared to previous times. I reckon that overall, this development has been quite negative which will be analysed in our paragraphs to follow.

To start with, nowadays technology has made relationships between humans quite suspicious. People are getting involved in relationships just on social networking websites without even knowing who is actually communicating with them. For instance, there have been many cases in which the person you are in contact with is actually fake and fraud. He is just playing and making a fool of you, and you believe that you are making a friend or falling in love with him. Consequently, when you know the truth, it is just like a bolt from the blue and your feeling is eradicated. This is evident from the argument above the reality that technological relationships can be quite painful sometimes.

Further, in the new era connections between people can be quite fragile and weak as compared to the strength of relationships before the advent of technology. People without practically meeting each other and actually knowing their strengths and weaknesses tend to trust each other too much and when they face the true facts the relationships are affected and, in some cases, broken down. For instance, a survey was conducted by Indian newspaper regarding the success of technology relationships and the result was reconciling with the point that relationships are very poor, and the failure rate was quite high.

To sum up, these technological relationships have altered the connectivity between two people. I firmly believe that drawbacks outweigh much more as compared to the fruits of these new relationships. However, it is recommended that people should be extremely careful and cautious in making any sought of relationships on social networking websites, chatting software etc.

Sample 20:

Technology has been affecting many aspects of human life including the way people interact with one another. Some believe that it has more benefits for people’s connection than drawbacks, while others contradict it. I personally argue with the former opinion, and through this essay, I am going to explain my reasons.

Initially, the first reason that I am going to elaborate is the way technology better enhances communication among people. A large number of communication gadgets has been invented in order to help communication between people, even for those who are separated by spacious distance, getting simpler and quicker. Thus, by giving an easier chance to be connected, this development has been encouraging society’s sense of togetherness. They do not have to visit their colleagues which are in different regions or cities to ask about their condition, for instance, because they could just pick up their phone and call their friends.

Subsequently, the variety of communication technology has been developed even further. The purpose is not only to make it easier but also to achieve a better quality of communication. We can mention video call, voice messenger and social media as the parts of it. The users are not limited by the elder method of phone call anymore. They can communicate more interactively by using video call. Therefore, they can communicate with others in the wider range of connection by using social media such as Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. This situation will globally lead people into a worldwide relationship.

On the other hand, there has been a developing trend that people are becoming more individualistic as the effect of technological development. The decreasing opportunity of direct interaction among them is accused as the root of this problem. However, it depends on us as the users to utilise technology wisely. If we can maintain a balance between communication technology and the conventional way of communication, the problem will certainly disappear.

Eventually, the advantages of using technology as part of our communication types outweigh the disadvantages, as long as we can manage it to be the helper, not the loser.

Sample 21:

It is true that some people have shifted their way to keep in touch with others due to the innovation of technology. The massive use of devices in communication, particularly phones and the internet, can be identified as the main difference compared to the past. People rely on those technologies to connect with families, friends and colleagues. Personally, I reckon that this trend may lead people to have a better relationship due to the effectiveness and low cost of communication.

To begin with, the interaction of individuals is presently not limited in one model. It means that people have many choices to stay connected with others than before. Technology offers some applications such as email, Facebook or Twitter. Those social media serve advantages to enhance and build a relationship with others. For example, in workplaces, employees do not have to meet in a certain place to discuss something. Rather they can use video conference to do a meeting. Therefore, various types of communication tools can help people to choose their preference and purpose in communication.

Furthermore, the usage of technology in communication leads to some positive things. It can be assumed that the easiness and effectiveness which are offered by these devices maximise the quality of people life in term of maintenance the relation of people. In addition, these communication tools allow people to spend less money and time. In other words, individuals do not have to visit someone when they want to talk or know friends’ news. Young people nowadays have friends from different countries and can have more friends. They can share their thoughts and updates instantly, which was quite impossible in the past. Some people might argue that people rely too much on technology and that’s they keep a less personal relationship with others. However, I disagree and want to say that technology has made it possible to connect with a dear one, make new friends and build up relationships in a more convenient way.

In conclusion, people always pick the best and most efficient way of communication, and the widespread use of the internet, mobile phone and other ways of communication have positively impacted our life and the way we make and keep our relationship.

Sample 22:

It is commonly noticed that people surrounding us stay connected with other people via social networking sites or other applications and technology have totally changed the way people used to communicate, make friends and keep their relationship. This paradigm shift happened basically because of the advances in technology and widespread use of such technological applications. Shall we welcome this shift or be wary about the changes? In this essay, I am going to discuss how technology has affected the types of relationships people make and whether it is considered as a positive or negative development.

First and foremost, I think that the development of technology has enhanced the relationships people make and maintain. For instance, when a student studies abroad and stays far away from his or her family and friends, social networking sites and other applications can help the student stay connected with his or her family and friends through Skype, for instance. In my opinion, in this case, this is a positive development to deal with homesickness or maintain our interactions with people we care about. Compared to the past decade, when technology was not so advanced, people had to depend on letters to communicate with each other and that was a time-consuming method, and it incurred higher cost. In contrast, in today’s world, people just have to be on laptops or smartphones and can have direct communication and interaction with family and friends. They can see each other contrary to the past method of interchanging written words. In this way, people can keep a close relationship with family and friends. We can now make friends beyond borders and that enhances our perspective about other nations and customs. Online groups, social platforms and social networking sites bring people together who have common interests and there are many events those people meet and plan for the betterment of society.        

In fact, the implication of technology on people’s relationships is a controversial issue. On the one hand, it is a positive development for helping people stay connected with family and friends and making new friends. On the other hand, it can estrange the relationships people make. The argument that it has a negative influence on people’s relationships is based on the scenario that people will avoid face-to-face communication in the long run. Recent research indicates that virtual communication will weaken the communication skill of a person. I still remember a film that I watched had a scene that showed four friends having meals in a restaurant. When they sat together, they did not interact with each other face-to-face but through social applications by sending out the emotions in the social group to show their feelings. This example shows a worrying trend as people enjoy interacting virtually more than face to face due to their reliance on technology. It is important to create awareness to the public that actual communication is more important than virtual interaction to minimise its repercussion.

Overall, as far as I am concerned, the advancement of technology has both positive and negative effects on the kind of relationships people make. We have to be aware that actual interaction is more important to enhance a relationship. We shall connect with family and friends virtually only if we are apart from them.

Sample 23:

Face-to-face communication and enough time to get to know each other well are prerequisites for a real relationship. People all like to feel wanted, even if it’s a false sense, despite what other people may believe. The perception that one can be whoever one wants to be online has been shaped by the digital age. But I think that relationships people form virtually and the way people get to know each other online have changed, mostly negatively.

Most are becoming more inward-focused and have forgotten what it means to be a true friend to those around them, rather than being genuine friends. People are emotional creatures who occasionally feel sad and aren’t always happy, but the Internet only shares positive experiences, preventing people from knowing each other completely. Nowadays, people tend to form fast and transient friendships. In real life friendships, individuals support one another through each other’s highs and lows. This is not at all like friendship on social media. Because the Internet cannot take the place of in-person interactions and shared experiences, getting to know someone requires spending time together.

It is only fitting that life be experienced fully, forming bonds with the physical presence of others. Rather than truly being friends with those in their immediate vicinity, they are utilizing social media to establish connections. I consider this to be a drawback of the digital age.

In conclusion, the digital age may have brought about benefits like reaching out to old friends and forming new ones, but it has also had unfavorable effects on our moral, social, and personal lives due to our growing reliance on technology and the ways we pretend to keep up our online friendships.

Sample 24:

Since communication with others comprises a very essential aspect of our daily life, any alteration in the way we communicate with each other will have a profound effect on our social and professional life. This essay will first discuss how technology has influenced the way we relate with each other presently and will then address the question of whether this influence has been positive or negative.

There are several ways in which the new communication technology has influenced people’s way of interaction with each other. Firstly, social media applications have revolutionized the way we communicate. The reason why many people believe this is that nowadays, you can connect with your family and friends instantly through many social media applications such as the Facebook and twitter applications. It is also possible to say that people are now more encouraged to share their opinions openly via the Internet. One good illustration for this is the substantial number of friends that people who use social media applications have in their contact list.

However, the impact of social media in one’s social life may not always be positive. This is because people are now increasingly abandoning face to face interactions and prefer carrying out their communication behind closed doors. This is causing more people, especially youths, to lose out on many aspects of personal communication. A particularly good example here is a study conducted in the USA showing that more than 75% of high school students are spending more than 50% of their free time on the Internet.

To sum up, modern technological advances in communication have incredibly influenced the way people interact, and although there are many perks associated with the use of recent technology there are also drawbacks that people must take care of.

Sample 25:

In this contemporary era, the means of communication have updated dramatically with the evolution of cutting-edge technologies. In my perspective, I foster that it is a constructive movement, and this treatise will elucidate my stance in the forthcoming paragraphs with credible illustrations.

To start with, the recent improvements in various aspects of technology have revolutionized the entire world such that the public claim that it makes them establish their communication among their peers in a feasible manner. There are many applications which can be downloaded and installed on our electronic gadgets, such as Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, which enable people to exchange messages, photos and videos. The latest breakthrough, instant calling and face-time features for long periods of time with minimal charges incurred, have made humans have a face-to-face interaction virtually. Many organizations are working tirelessly to achieve these updates frequently and are intuitive. For instance, old people who reside in the suburbs are overwhelmed with amusement since they are frequently having a chat with their children who live either in metro cities or in foreign lands. Thus, it creates a remarkable bonding among families who are far away from one another in distant locations.

In a similar fashion, there are multiple websites on the internet which attract youngsters in modern society. They are fascinated by browsing these sites to find new individuals in nearby areas and are meeting up for casual dates to understand each other. Additionally, some are using these to search for pristine friends and are gradually chatting almost every day. This eventually encourages them to identify partners or peers who have similar interests. By sharing their emotions, they feel relaxed and rejuvenated rather than having trepidation or stress. Hence, it plays a significant role in commencing new bonds for the youth.

Taking everything into consideration, the latest innovations in technology have drastically impacted the entire human population to have noteworthy coordination with parents and grandparents and explore new friends. This essay has exposed a plethora of merits and the advantageous impact of technology on the public worldwide.

Sample 26:

In recent years, with the development of information technology and the evolution of the internet, people interact and communicate better and more effectively than in the past. With new technology, people interact via devices where the technology has been converged. Now it is possible to make calls, watch TV, play video games, listen to music and access internet with only one device. Many people believe that technology may improve the type of the relationships people make whereas others do feel that it has negative effects.

It is believed by some people that technology has a positive effect in the way people interact because it is more convenient on daily basis, and the use of new channels to communicate is often free. For example, if you are looking for a job. You do not have to go to the office nor pay stamps to send your CV. You can do this by email by simply clicking on the “submit” button. It is effective because it saves time, and it is simple to apply. Another significant example is the use of social media platforms. It enables people to share experiences and send information instantaneously which can be seen by everyone, so it improves the way people socialise. Moreover, new channels of communication can help maintain good relationships in business between jobseekers and employers as well as with family and friends on a daily basis.

It is argued by others that technology has a negative impact on the type of relationship people make because it can lead to a development of antisocial behaviours. For instance, teenagers who play video games can find themselves in total confusion between the real world and the virtual world. The law is different because in the real world people have to follow rules whereas in the virtual world there are no constraints. It influences the behaviour of people in a negative way. Moreover, it can create a certain form of addiction for some, leading them to become completely isolated and unaware of what is good and right. Also, the use of the internet can spread bad behaviours such as bullying or the promotion of negative images, comments which will have an impact in people’s lives. For example, on Facebook, several teenagers committed suicide after being bullied by their friends. So, the inappropriate use of technology can lead to healthy issues such as addiction or fatal death.

To sum up, the development of technology has changed the type of relationships people make in both a positive and negative fashion. People use new channels in their daily life because it is convenient as well as cheap. However, the use of the internet needs to be carefully monitored and used appropriately to prevent children and vulnerable people from developing addictions, which could lead to harmful or even fatal consequences.

Sample 27:

Today, more than ever, in regard to determining whether or not advances in technology influence the sorts of relationships people make, various views have been set forward. The expansion of modern means of communicating is the continuing debate that causes so much controversy. This matter is evidenced by some experts who believe that they pose a direct threat to social lives and might come at the expense of severe social isolation and a sedentary lifestyle. Others understand the significance of communication and adhere to the concept that these types of relationships are integral pieces of social communication. Consequently, they are regarded as rewarding. Nevertheless, the opinion set forth by the second category is more logical. In the following paragraphs, I will shed light on my attitudes on this matter.

To begin with, previously, communication among people looked bleak. People used to fulfill and make an appointment to observe each other, and according to the simple fact that communities had busy folks, and they seem doomed to possess far-reaching communication.

In the next place, modern means of communicating control people’s attention. They are the fastest and easiest way of togetherness. Individuals are at the mercy of the digital world to get in touch with others in the remotest part of the world, leading to saving their own time and hanging out every second. This issue questions the requirement to have face to face connections.

In this hectic way of life, the truth is that the responsibility of real-time discussions, visualization of each other, information exchange which enables a person to share a variety of information like activities, events, interests, thoughts fall upon these ways of communication. Thanks to tremendous advances in technology.

In summary, all in all, rather than devoting a fantastic deal of time and energy solely concerning face to face interaction, the trend today is toward utilizing modern means of communication to get in touch with other individuals. The pivotal role in these ways of communicating performed in interpersonal communication is hard to dismiss. However, many men and women do not appreciate it.

Sample 28:

In recent years, the innovation of techonology has led to various changes in the way people interact. As a result, this causes some specific effects on people’s relationships which are generally considered as beneficial impacts on the society.

Conspicuously, the improvement in techonological devices such as computers with internet connection and mobile phones affect people’s relations in different aspects. Firstly, it helps to diversify kinds of relationships instead of just several traditional ones in the past. Besides people’s interactions in real life, many connections are beign bult through a virtual life on the internet especially via facebook or online games. Secondly, the convenience of communicating between people is likely to make people’s relationships more sociable and hardly understandable. In fact, many friendships are not based on trust or sincerity but benefits which are generally hard to be perceived in a virtual life.

Although the development of technology somehow makes people’s relationships more complicated, I still believe that people are actually beneficial from this. Thanks to internet availability, gaps between people are shortened in magical ways. For example, no matter how far the distance between two people, they still can talk directly to each other provided with the internet access. What’s more, people have never been able to save as much time and communicating expenses as at the present. Instead of waiting for months to receive a response from a posted letter, it just takes some seconds for the letter to be delivered through email even to many partners at the same time.

In conclusion, taking advantage of technological development to facilitate interaction between people is beneficial not only for building a good relationship but also for doing business. 

Sample 29:

Technology is expanding in every field, and connectivity will be no exception. Nonetheless, due to its other pitfalls that cause discussion on its positive and negative effects, this enormous shift in the ways of interaction cannot be regarded as fruitful straight away.

One of the essential advantages of focusing on in terms of positive development is that technology makes connectivity simpler and more convenient. Because of recent events such as Skype, video conferencing, Whatsapp, and social networking sites, such as Facebook, people are hardly a click away from the nears and dears. To a great extent, these advances have made us social. Second, there are enormous opportunities for letters and telephone calls to be sent and for requests to be made. Customers used to be on the S.T.D and I.S.D booth in long queues, but now mobile phones and sophisticated gizmos make it easier for everyone to communicate openly.

On the other hand, certain disadvantages cannot be overlooked as people of today not only spend a long time using computers but also do not want to meet their relatives and friends face-to-face, leading to a fading relationship. One of my school friends, for example, visited me personally on various occasions, such as at festivals and birthdays. Still, nowadays, she sends messages to welcome me and sends salutations to my post. Even most members of the family suffer from asphyxia, which is an unusual illness that flares. For imitating relationships, this is a troubling question.

To recap, despite numerous disadvantages, nobody can afford to tackle this ever-fast digital technology that has to make our lives easier.

Sample 30:

Technological advancements have revolutionized how millions of people interact with each other, and it has gone to a whole new level. With it, how we make relationships has also been affected. The essay will expound on how individuals can now build relationships across the world, and then opine that this is an incredibly positive development.

Unprecedented in human history, modern technology has made it extremely convenient for people to communicate and get in touch with family, relatives, friends or old classmates. Besides, people can communicate instantaneously with someone they have never been acquainted with before and in geography, they have never been to with the help of digital applications like WhatsApp or Viber. They can even find someone on a freelancing platform to have their job done. This is quite different from the conventional relationships we develop by meeting in person; it is, nevertheless, hard to downplay these relationships. Moreover, social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn, provide people with a platform that allows them to live chat and comment on someone else’s matter instantly. Strangely enough, some of them even find their dates online and make friends in a distant country without ever meeting them.

Overall, the phenomenon is a real boon to mankind. The revolution in communication that modern technology brings forth has eroded the traditional notions of national sovereignty. It has blurred the line between national and international boundaries and wielded enormous influence on the values of the national identity so as to transform global citizens; whose ideas, values, ethics, and orientations are no longer moulded by the local culture and environment. Rather global ideals and values are incessantly aired on the web and social media to make a better world. Most importantly, the communication revolution paved the way for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, towards which the globe is rapidly heading.

In conclusion, leading-edge technology has altered our mode of interaction forever, transcending national and cultural barriers so that individuals can frankly chat, talk and can readily keep in touch, and it is a windfall achievement that will transform a new world where things, like culture, sect, and so on, that split people will not exist.

Sample 31:

Technology has revolutionised the way people interact with each other in recent times. However, this has led to a decline in the quality of relationships people make. The impact of technology on relationships is a double-edged sword, and while some may argue that it has been a positive development, I believe that it has had negative effects.

One of the ways that technology has affected relationships is that people are becoming more isolated and less likely to engage in face-to-face interactions. The rise of social media platforms and instant messaging services have made it easier for people to communicate remotely, but it has also led to a decrease in the frequency and quality of in-person interactions. People are now more likely to spend their time on social media rather than meeting up with friends or family members. Moreover, technology has made it easier for people to be dishonest and insincere in their interactions. For instance, people can now hide behind the anonymity of the internet and present a false version of themselves. This has led to a decline in trust and authenticity in relationships.

Another way that technology has affected relationships is that people are now more reliant on their devices than on their relationships. People can now find entertainment and fulfil their social needs through technology, making it less necessary to build and maintain meaningful relationships.

In conclusion, while technology has undoubtedly had many positive effects on society, its impact on relationships has been mostly negative. It has led to a decrease in in-person interactions, a decline in genuineness and trust, and an increased reliance on devices over relationships. It is crucial that people recognize these negative effects and take steps to mitigate them by prioritising in-person interactions and being more sincere and honest in their relationships.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

In different parts of the world, traditional foods are becoming less common due to the increasing popularity of international fast food. While some people believe that fast food is a good option, I think that consuming traditional foods is much more beneficial. This essay will demonstrate the author’s point of view.

On the one hand, there are compelling reasons why many people are in favor of fast food. Firstly, it is convenient and time-saving. Instead of having to prepare a meal for hours, people can easily grab a bite at any fast-food restaurant, which is ubiquitous in many megacities. This type of food is also suitable for those with fast-paced lifestyles. In addition, fast food is famous for its delicious taste. This can explain the successful franchises of various fast-food chains all over the world such as McDonald’s, KFC, and so on.

On the other hand, I strongly believe that eating traditional food is more advantageous. One of the most substantial benefits of traditional meals is the nutritional value that they contain. A homemade meal can provide a sufficient amount of protein, fiber, and many other nutrients, which has proved to be effective in maintaining good health. This is because traditional food is usually made from fresh ingredients and without any preservatives. More importantly, I would argue that consuming traditional food rather than fast food is a good way to preserve culture as each flavor has its own uniqueness and is a representation of the national cuisine. By making and eating traditional food, people are contributing to cultural preservation, and thus passing it down to the next generation.

In conclusion, even though fast-food consumption has been an accelerating trend in recent years due to its conveniences, I sincerely believe that the benefits of eating traditional food are more significant.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP