Câu hỏi:

07/01/2025 56

Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Sách mới 2k7: Tổng ôn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa... kỳ thi tốt nghiệp THPT Quốc gia 2025, đánh giá năng lực (chỉ từ 70k).

Tổng ôn Toán-lý hóa Văn-sử-đia Tiếng anh & các môn khác

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

As the younger generations struggle to apply for jobs, they begin to wonder if holding interviews is the best way to assess candidates. I moderately agree that in some cases, interviews are not the best method.

There are many reasons why people are skeptical about using interviews to examine candidates’ qualities. Firstly, an interview does not fully reflect candidates’ abilities, especially for candidates applying to technical positions in the IT and engineering industries. For these positions, the best way to assess their abilities is through tests, such as programming tests, case studies, or teamwork sessions with other candidates. Secondly, it is hard to evaluate candidates through interviews because they can lie. Many people admitted to having lied at least once, especially when asked about their past experiences or projects. For example, many told recruiters that they significantly contributed to projects that they hardly participated in.

However, I still think that recruiters should combine interviews with other evaluations because they are still efficient. The first advantage is that the interview gives both employers and applicants a chance to see if applicants are suitable for the company’s culture. For example, employers can observe candidates’ manners, dress codes, or attitudes, whereas candidates can see how other workers are treated. Another advantage of interviews is that they are quick and easy to conduct. Most employers will spend only 30 minutes interviewing candidates before usually giving a tour around the workplace. This is also the most direct way to communicate with applicants because both parties can discuss sensitive topics that otherwise would be inappropriate to touch on, such as salary, benefits, or workplace culture.

In conclusion, I agree that for technology companies, using only interviews as an assessment during their hiring process is not sufficient. However, recruiters should not eliminate or replace interviews.

 

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Câu 1:

Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 508

Câu 2:

Some people today prefer to get online advice for medical problems and do not want to visit a doctor. Why is this? Is this a positive or a negative development?

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 237

Câu 3:

Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 205

Câu 4:

Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Is this a negative or positive development?

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 197

Câu 5:

In the past, people stored knowledge in books. Nowadays, people store knowledge on the Internet. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 194

Câu 6:

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 189

Câu 7:

In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food. Many people think that it is good to eat traditional foods while others believe that fast food is a good choice. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 189

Bình luận


Bình luận