Câu hỏi:

07/01/2025 14

Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Sách mới 2k7: Bộ 20 đề minh họa Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa…. form chuẩn 2025 của Bộ giáo dục (chỉ từ 110k).

20 đề Toán 20 đề Văn Các môn khác

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

As the younger generations struggle to apply for jobs, they begin to wonder if holding interviews is the best way to assess candidates. I moderately agree that in some cases, interviews are not the best method.

There are many reasons why people are skeptical about using interviews to examine candidates’ qualities. Firstly, an interview does not fully reflect candidates’ abilities, especially for candidates applying to technical positions in the IT and engineering industries. For these positions, the best way to assess their abilities is through tests, such as programming tests, case studies, or teamwork sessions with other candidates. Secondly, it is hard to evaluate candidates through interviews because they can lie. Many people admitted to having lied at least once, especially when asked about their past experiences or projects. For example, many told recruiters that they significantly contributed to projects that they hardly participated in.

However, I still think that recruiters should combine interviews with other evaluations because they are still efficient. The first advantage is that the interview gives both employers and applicants a chance to see if applicants are suitable for the company’s culture. For example, employers can observe candidates’ manners, dress codes, or attitudes, whereas candidates can see how other workers are treated. Another advantage of interviews is that they are quick and easy to conduct. Most employers will spend only 30 minutes interviewing candidates before usually giving a tour around the workplace. This is also the most direct way to communicate with applicants because both parties can discuss sensitive topics that otherwise would be inappropriate to touch on, such as salary, benefits, or workplace culture.

In conclusion, I agree that for technology companies, using only interviews as an assessment during their hiring process is not sufficient. However, recruiters should not eliminate or replace interviews.

 

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Câu 1:

Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 69

Câu 2:

Many people put their personal information online (address, telephone number, and so on) for purposes such as signing up for social networks or online banking. Is this a positive or negative development?

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 26

Câu 3:

Some people think that the detailed criminal description in newspapers and TV has bad influences, so this kind of information should be restricted in the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 24

Câu 4:

The natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problems does it cause? How can we solve these problems?

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 23

Câu 5:

Nowadays, it is not only large companies that are able to make films as digital technology enables anyone to produce films. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 22

Câu 6:

People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 21

Câu 7:

Some people think that only staff who have worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to a higher position. What is your view on this?

Xem đáp án » 07/01/2025 20

Bình luận


Bình luận