Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
Lawlessness is spreading throughout the nation, and it affects people in both urban and rural areas. According to some people, violence in the nation could be directly motivated by media images of hate or cruelty. From my perspective, the media is not responsible for local citizens' unchecked partiality.
As a start, studies show that children who are subjected to both parental and peer pressure are more likely to act immorally and cause damage to others. Mental health concerns, such as depression, may potentially cause individuals to engage in unethical behavior, as well. Mental illness, familial pressure, and ties to unethical organizations have all been linked to a rise in transgressions in undeveloped nations.
Facebook and Instagram, on the other hand, encourage this idea in terms of media exploitation. People are more likely than ever before to use excessively defamatory language and cursing. So, someone who uploads an intimate picture on social media will be deluged with sexually explicit remarks. The effect will be that a person could act blindly. All countries have seen a decline in their tolerance levels over time. The terrorist organization "DAESH" has also been using numerous media venues to disseminate its brutal message. They've gained the support of a big number of teenagers as a consequence.
Because of this, it is difficult to demonstrate that the media is to blame for the rising rate of violence in our society. Medicines, regulations, and laws are often included while discussing the factors that contribute to an increased chance of a violation.
Sample 2:
Violence is often shown on TV, either on new channels or on regular shows. Some people say that this makes people more violent, while others say that people are already violent. I agree with the idea that people are violent by nature, and this essay will show why I think that way.
First and foremost, the news has to tell the truth about what's going on in the world. In this truth, different parts of society attack each other over things like religion, different beliefs, political instigation, and many other things. For instance, the conflict between Palestine and Israel has been going on since 1948, and it doesn't look like it will end any time soon. This fight didn't start because of an episode of a TV show or because of bad reporting on TV. On the other hand, it began when one country took over another.
Children are the most influential generation because they are easily persuaded to commit crimes, to look brave in front of their peers after seeing violent scenes in movies and thriller shows. To give an example, some children's rags and bully the week are read by students at the school, which is likely to be a crime because of how much media affects people. Because of this, they turn to crime, which can hurt their education and careers.
In conclusion, I think that even though the younger generation is more used to seeing violence on TV, that is not the only reason why there is violence in society.
Sample 3:
It is true that a lot of violence is shown in the media in the present period, which might influence how individuals behave. Some individuals think that exposure to violent media might lead to more assaults in society. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this viewpoint.
First of all, research demonstrates that children are greatly impacted by violent video games and films. Children who play video games, for example, lack empathy for others' pain throughout their lives. Additionally, because the only goal of these games is to praise violent behavior, children are often encouraged to believe that engaging in violent behavior would provide them with a feeling of accomplishment. As a result, young children are exposed to the idea of violence via media like video games.
Second, because of the proliferation of media outlets, the public is instantly exposed to violent messages and information. These messages are widely available through text messages and videos, and they often encourage the use of violence. For instance, large scale riots are often started by violent videos that are circulated on numerous social media sites. Another issue that contributes to general societal dissatisfaction is the lack of trustworthiness of such films. Therefore, violence is promoted by a variety of media outlets.
In a nutshell, the media affects every aspect of our lives and is crucial in fostering a culture of violence. This is evident when examining the negative consequences of violent video games and other media. In order to lessen its impact on society, it is crucial that such violent material be reviewed and removed from different platforms.
Sample 4:
The impact of media violence on societal aggression has long been debated. Some argue that exposure to violence in the media encourages violent behaviour, while others believe that media content has little to no effect on real-world actions. I believe that although media violence can influence some individuals, it is not the sole factor in promoting societal violence.
The primary reason for the argument that media violence promotes societal violence is based on social learning theory. This theory suggests that individuals, especially children, learn and imitate behaviours they observe in the media. When they repeatedly see violent actions in movies, or shows, they may come to view such behaviour as acceptable or normal. This can lead to an increase in aggressive behaviour, as individuals may mimic the actions they have seen portrayed.
However, it is also important to consider other factors contributing to societal violence. Many studies indicate that personal circumstances, such as family environment and education, play a significant role in shaping behaviour. For instance, individuals raised in violent households are more likely to exhibit aggressive behaviour, regardless of their media consumption.
I believe, on the other hand, that while media violence can have an impact, it is not the primary cause of societal violence. People have the ability to distinguish between fiction and reality, and many viewers of violent media do not become violent themselves.
In conclusion, while media violence can influence certain individuals, it is not the main driver of societal violence. Other factors, such as family environment and socio-economic conditions, play a more substantial role. Therefore, it is essential to consider these elements when addressing the issue of violence in society rather than placing sole blame on the media.
Sample 5:
The debate on whether violence in the media promotes violence in society remains contentious. While some believe that exposure to violent content directly influences individuals to act aggressively, others argue that media alone cannot be blamed for societal violence. In my opinion, media violence does contribute to societal aggression to some extent, but it is not the predominant factor.
One reason supporting the view that media violence promotes societal violence is the desensitisation effect. Repeated exposure to violent scenes in films, television shows, and video games can make individuals less sensitive to real-life violence. This desensitisation can reduce empathy for victims of violence and lower inhibitions against aggressive behaviour.
However, it is essential to recognise that media is not the sole contributor to societal violence. Factors such as upbringing, mental health, and socio-economic conditions play significant roles in shaping behaviour. For instance, a person with a stable family environment and good mental health is less likely to be influenced by violent media content compared to someone with a troubled background.
On the other hand, it is crucial to consider that many people consume violent media without becoming violent themselves. This suggests that personal responsibility and societal influences are critical in moderating the impact of media violence.
In conclusion, while media violence can contribute to societal aggression, it is not the primary cause. Factors such as upbringing, mental health, and socio-economic conditions significantly influence behaviour. Addressing societal violence requires a comprehensive approach that considers these various elements rather than focusing solely on media content.
Sample 6:
The issue of whether violence in the media promotes violence in society is widely debated. Some contend that exposure to violent content directly leads to aggressive behaviour, while others believe that media violence has a minimal impact. I believe that media violence can influence societal behaviour to some degree, but it is not the sole or most significant factor.
The first reason for believing that media violence affects society is the influence of imitation. According to social learning theory, individuals, especially children, tend to mimic behaviours they observe. When they frequently see violent actions in movies, TV shows, or video games, they might imitate these behaviours, thinking they are acceptable ways to resolve conflicts.
However, attributing societal violence solely to media exposure ignores other crucial factors. Individual behaviour is influenced by a combination of elements, including family environment, education, and peer influence. For instance, a person raised in a supportive and non-violent family is less likely to resort to violence, regardless of their media consumption.
On the other hand, it is essential to recognise that not everyone who consumes violent media becomes violent. Many people can distinguish between fictional violence and real-life actions, suggesting that personal responsibility and context play significant roles. Additionally, parental guidance and societal norms can help mitigate the potential negative effects of media violence by promoting critical thinking and empathy.
In conclusion, while media violence can influence societal aggression to some extent, it is not the primary cause. Factors such as family environment, education, and personal responsibility play more substantial roles in shaping behaviour. A comprehensive approach addressing these various elements is necessary to tackle the issue of societal violence effectively.
Sample 7:
One of the most potent instruments in the modern world is the media, which has many advantages but also many disadvantages. Positive or negative media information frequently has an impact on people. I agree that violent media might encourage violent behavior in society but fail to ignore its benefits which is why I want to talk about its advantages and disadvantages in this essay.
Before discussing the disadvantages of the media, we must acknowledge its current level of influence over society. In addition to providing entertainment, the media and its contents inform people about current events, emerging trends, risks, and possible difficulties. One strategy to lessen violent crimes is to show violent instances in the media so that everyone is informed. For instance, news of a robbery in a specific region encourages others in that area to exercise greater caution and build defenses against criminal activity.
Despite that, there is also a significant drawback. Television shows like this encourage the younger generation to emulate them, which eventually brings out the worst traits in them and utterly destroys their moral sense. Children, for example, often act violently after being influenced by action scenes in movies or sports like kickboxing. Something like that can destroy a child's entire future.
Furthermore, it manipulates a number of adults, who then turn to violence and devastation in their daily lives. For example, the perpetrators of a number of real-life crimes have acknowledged that they were influenced by crime television. In addition, violent television shows and films, such as those involving vehicle chases, bike races, and physical torture, can cause adults to behave dangerously in real life, which can have disastrous results.
In conclusion, my opinion is, that if violence of any kind is replicated in real life, it could be dangerous and even life threatening. People ought to screen media content appropriately and get inspired by its advantages and discouraged by its disadvantages not the other way around.
Sample 8:
The media, with a plethora of benefits and drawbacks, is one of the most powerful tools in the contemporary world. Broadcast content, whether favorable or unfavorable, frequently affects individuals. Since I agree with the aforementioned topic, but cannot completely refute its advantages, I'm inclined to offer my perspective on its benefits and drawbacks in this essay.
First, before illustrating the media's drawbacks, let's admit how much of an influence it currently has on society. Digital contents not only entertain people but also educate them about current affairs, new trends, dangers, and potential challenges. Publicizing violent incidents to educate the public is one way to reduce violent crime. For example, hearing of a robbery in a particular neighborhood can prompt people there to increase their vigilance and fortify themselves against criminal activity.
Still, there's a big negative. These kinds of television programs breed envy in the younger generation, bringing out the worst in them and completely undermining their moral compass. In particular, action sequences in movies or combat sports can influence children to engage in brutality. That kind of behavior has the potential to ruin a child's entire future.
Moreover, it manipulates several adults, who subsequently live lives filled with violence and destruction. For instance, crime television has been acknowledged as a source of influence by the perpetrators of some real-life crimes. Moreover, adult behavior can be disastrously affected by violent television series and movies, that feature scenes of physical altercations, bike races, or heinous murders.
In summary, it could be risky and even fatal if barbarity of any kind is recreated in real life. Thus, I believe, multimedia broadcasting content should be evaluated properly so that people are inspired by its positive aspects and deterred by its negatives.
Sample 9:
In contemporary discourse, there exists a contention that the portrayal of violence in the media contributes to an increase in violent behaviour within society. I am inclined to agree with this viewpoint as the depiction of violence in various forms of media tends to desensitise individuals and can potentially influence their actions.
Firstly, the omnipresence of violent content in media platforms such as movies, video games, and television programmes desensitises individuals to violent behaviour. Repeated exposure to graphic imagery and explicit content numbs the sensitivity towards violence, making it seem commonplace. For instance, studies have shown a correlation between prolonged exposure to violent video games and an increase in aggressive behaviour among adolescents, indicating the potential influence of media content on behaviour.
Moreover, media representations often glamorise and normalise violent actions, shaping societal perceptions about the acceptability of such behaviour. Characters portrayed as heroes in movies or television series sometimes resort to violent means to solve conflicts, inadvertently sending a message that violence can be a justifiable means to an end. This normalization of aggression can lead to a skewed understanding of conflict resolution among impressionable audiences.
In conclusion, the media's pervasive portrayal of violence can indeed have a detrimental impact on society by desensitising individuals and normalising aggressive behaviour. While acknowledging the importance of artistic freedom and the complexities of societal influences, it is imperative to recognise the responsibility of media in shaping perceptions and behaviour. Thus, measures to regulate and monitor violent content in media platforms should be considered to mitigate its potential negative effects on societal behaviour.
Sample 10:
Many argue that the depiction of violence in the mass media encourages violence in society. I entirely agree with this opinion and believe that violent media content contributes to the prevalence of violence in society because it desensitizes human beings and influences individuals to show aggressive behaviour.
Regular exposure to violence in the media can desensitize people to real-life acts of violence. When the portrayal of violence in media becomes frequent, it may reduce emotional response and the feeling of shock associated with violent behaviour. Over time, people tend to lose their inhibitions about violence, thereby adopting a tolerant attitude towards aggressive behaviour. A recent study, for instance, has revealed that people who consume a substantial amount of violent media content, such as violent films or video games, may become desensitized to violence. This desensitization can make individuals less empathetic towards victims of violence and tend to engage in violent behaviour.
Likewise, media violence also promotes violence through glamorization. That is to say that the media often depicts violence in a way that glamorizes perpetrators as heroic, powerful and victorious. This, in turn, can create an overwhelming impression that violence is a necessary means of solving problems, achieving goals, or gaining dominance. Such depictions tend to encourage people, especially those who are vulnerable to aggressive tendencies, to view violence as a heroic act. For example, research carried out by psychologist L. Rowell Huesmann found that teenagers who watched extensive hours of violent TV shows associated with heroism when they were in primary school were more likely to exhibit higher levels of aggressive behaviour when they became adults.
To conclude, I think that media violence breeds violence in the community because it can desensitize individuals to violence and also encourage them to perform violent acts.
Sample 11:
It is often pointed out by many that the portrayal of violence in the media encourages violence in the community. I totally concur with this opinion because children and certain people may behave violently by watching it, and individuals also become numb to violence.
The prevalence of violence in mass media can make children aggressive. To commence with, children, nowadays, spend a considerable amount of time watching videos, like cartoons or films. Most of these programmes depict a sympathetic, strong and aggressive hero who can overcome every adverse situation by exercising miraculous power and thus solve his issues by brute force. Since children and many people are unable to discriminate between exact right and wrong, they can take the aggressive behaviours of the fictional characters as a model. A case in point is recent research, which reveals that young children tend to imitate the aggressive behaviours they watch on television.
Likewise, the gruesome portrayals of violence in media breed violence in the community through desensitising people. This is because repeated exposure to violence normalizes violence over time and this, in turn, causes violent incidents in society. Put simply, desensitised individuals tend to downplay egregious harm done to others, thereby behaving violently. Desensitized people, in fact, consider that violence is a normal way of life, and they resort to violence so as to solve conflicts. This is illustrated by the fact that people who are exposed to violent content may become desensitised to violence, emulate the violence, and show more aggressive behaviours.
To reiterate, the extensive viewing of media violence may cause behavioural issues because children, as well as many people, become aggressive by mimicking protagonists it may instil violence among desensitised people.
Sample 12:
From the last few decades, media has become part and parcel of our life, irrespective of age, gender or profession of a person. Different genres of programs, like comedy, romance, fantasy, animation have attracted audiences worldwide. But the genre that has enticed the maximum number of people is action which stimulates them to undertake certain wild activities. So, I think media does promote violence, and in this essay, I will further discuss my viewpoint.
Most of us like superhero movies like Avengers, Batman, Justice League, to name a few. Young children and sometimes, adults love to copy the frenzy shown in the action scenes of such movies. As a result, without supervision, they get hurt or incapacitate others in the process. For example, when a person riding a bike at a high speed hits another person walking on the pavement, he may get hurt. But the person he hits may die or become a cripple for life. Secondly, the image of a ‘manly’ personality is created by the ability to fight others and defeat enemies, not paying heed to the injuries they may suffer. Young minds take up these images and make it their passion and they are diverted from the correct path.
Crime shows or popular movies based on robbery, bank loots, murders, like Money Heist, Dhoom, Catch me if you can, etc, inspire people to initiate such actions. They either imitate those crimes in the same manner or take clues of how to grab the attention of the public and rise to instant fame. Sometimes, people are led astray by the violent, partial news shared on social media. They shape the young minds in such a way that they become passionate for a wrong cause and give in to terrorism. Moreover, fake news may lead to communal riots, which disturb the balance of society.
However, the history of human civilization shows that violence has been an integral part of our society way before the advent of media. The havoc caused by wars, both internal and global, raids by invaders, and atrocities like the Holocaust by Adolf Hitler during the Second World War are few examples of how violent humans can be, even without the aid of media.
Thus, to conclude, I would like to point out the fact that although humans might be violent by nature, the projection of violence in the media in various forms definitely has aggravated the rate of violent crimes in society. So, we should be aware of the type of programs to watch and keep ourselves in a positive mindset so that we are not affected by the violent scenes on media.
Sample 13:
In the last few decades, due to the evolution of media, the popularity of aggressive content on television and online games has increased drastically. While some argue that this trend makes people more violent, others insist that it has no impact on their conduct. In my opinion, despite the constant exposure to terrorising content in the media plays a significant role in encouraging violent behaviour, it is not the only element in promoting violence in humans.
Firstly, many individuals, especially youngsters are attracted towards online games, which include substantial violence and aggression. This creates a lasting impression on their mind and motivates them to imitate the same actions. For instance, a controversial, highly addictive online game called “PUBG” has played a key role in exposing children to a world of criminality.
Secondly, the portrayal of violent content in movies is unrealistically stylised and glamorous. Several action movies or crime series include gruesome acts of brutality. For example, several crime thrillers have a lot of elements of physical conflict, frauds, sadism and injustice, which in turn influence the public, especially the youngsters, to model these hazardous acts.
However, it is also known that humans are violent in nature by evolution as well. The history of human civilisation shows that violence has been an integral part of our society long before the advent of media. The merciless havoc caused by wars, both national and international, raids by invaders, and heinous atrocities such as the Holocaust by Adolf Hitler during the Second World War are few examples of how violent humans can be, even without the aid or influence of media.
To conclude, it is undoubtedly true that we are influenced by what we see, hear and experience. In my opinion, although the projection of violence in the media in various forms definitely has aggravated the rate of crimes by normalising violence and aggression, it is not the sole source and cause of violent behaviour in our society.
Sample 14:
A few individuals accept that savage media straightforwardly comes about in savage behaviour. The reference to violence reflected in news, social media and films contributes to behavioural implications in both children and adults. I agree with this idea that violent images and incitements have a negative impact on behaviour.
In fact, human behaviour learns from any act by adaptations and imitations. Psychology has clearly implied the impression that visual simulation can have on the mind of children and adults. When media broadcasts horrifying crimes, news or when any violent content is projected on screen or in newspapers, psychologists suggest these as the real factor instigating a crime in reality. Subsequently, violent or neo-noir films develop a passivity towards life, feeding an aggressive mood within the society. For example, a film on war and agony contributes to both patriotism and passive aggression.
Moreover, simulation games and VFX universes are becoming addictive among adolescents. A large portion of time spent by a teenager on such video games aiming at ‘headshots’ instigates their social behaviour in the real world. Peer aggression and violent behaviour has been seen to be a major contribution of these games. Since people kill each other as mercenaries in these games, their social life seems to be falling apart. Films such as "squid game", became popular in Japan and in Korea reflecting the desperation among human beings in actual life. It was reported how a number of people started killing each other due to this game, resulting in banning of such shows.
To conclude, I therefore agree that any visual impetus has a longer impact for better or for worse. As a result, seeing violence bring out aggression and violent change in behaviour among youngsters and adults.
Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In recent years, there have been a number of everyday problems that people in big cities have to cope with. This essay will discuss two major problems, pollution and information overload, which I believe should lead governments to encourage people to move to regional areas.
These days, increased levels of pollution have been a great cause for concern among residents of big cities. Due to high volumes of traffic, large quantities of pollutants are being released into the atmosphere, causing the degradation of air quality, which is said to be a significant contributor to various types of respiratory disease, such as lung cancer. Additionally, people in big cities are being bombarded with too much information from the media, including TV, social media, and advertising, with a large proportion of this information being fake or exaggerated. This can lead to confusion or, in some cases, social anarchy.
In my opinion, governments should do what they can to encourage city residents to move to regional areas. Firstly, it will reduce the number of vehicles in cities, which will definitely reduce the levels of air pollution, which is hazardous to the health of citizens. Furthermore, fewer people living in big cities will relieve the pressure on the housing supply, where many people are forced to live in small, uncomfortable spaces. Studies have shown that people’s living spaces have a direct impact on their mental health and how they perform at work.
In conclusion, severe air pollution and a bombardment of information are among the most serious problems facing city residents nowadays, and personally, I feel that authorities should encourage people to relocate to other areas to live.
Sample 2:
It is true that nowadays city residents have to encounter a large number of problems, especially those concerning environmental and social factors. However, encouraging people to migrate to smaller provincial towns, in my opinion, is not a viable solution to these problems.
As living in a metropolis, people are confronted with high level of air pollution, which is caused mainly by the exhaust fumes released into the atmosphere from petrol-driven vehicles. The more populated the city is, the higher the demand for traveling becomes, and as a result, the higher the level of air pollution will be. Living in this environment for a long time is supposed to be detrimental to human’s health as polluted air is the main contributor to respiratory diseases. Another problem involves social aspects such as the issue of unemployment. As many people moving to big cities do not have any skills or qualifications, they are unlikely to find a job. This higher unemployment rate can give rise to the increased criminal activities threatening inhabitants’ life.
Since dwelling in urban centers can have negative impacts, some governments tend to encourage the citizens to relocate to smaller regional towns, but I do not think this will be effective. The first reason for my belief is that this policy cannot guarantee a reduction in air pollution because people still have to commute to their workplace, which is usually located in city center. Indeed, living far away from cities means that people even have to travel a much longer distance to work, which, in fact, can increase the amount of exhaust emissions. The second reason is that finding jobs in the countryside is certainly not easier than in urban areas. Job opportunities in these places are much lower and people usually have to do low-paid jobs if they work in smaller and less developed towns.
In conclusion, it is obvious that living in big cities can create a number of problems, but encouraging people to migrate to suburban areas is, in my opinion, totally not a viable measure at least when it comes to addressing the problems concerning pollution and unemployment.
Sample 3:
It is true that people in major cities are confronting a number of problems in their routine life. This essay will discuss some of these problems and explain the writer’s view that citizens should be encouraged to relocate to the countryside or regional towns.
The urban population is grappling against two main problems out of many. The first issue is the lower quality of life due to the increasingly heavier burden on the existing urban infrastructure. This is because rural immigrants in pursuit of employment opportunities keep inundating the downtown areas of most major cities. For example, most schools and hospitals located in XYZ city are frequently overloaded, making these services inaccessible to the majority of people of lower classes. The second issue is the traffic jam due to the burgeoning car ownership. Arguably, cars take up more space than a motorbike while its capacity to accommodate passengers is far inferior to that of a bus. This weakness results in bumper-to-bumper traffic, particularly in downtown areas where many drivers have to inch along to get away from the terrible traffic.
I think government should encourage citizens to move away from major cities. This is due to the fact that this would relieve the current pressure on the infrastructure. Fewer people would need public services such as hospitals or schools and the roads would be more spacious, ensuring a smooth traffic flow with its resultant fewer accidents for city dwellers. In addition, the resources in the countryside or other less developed regions would be better exploited as there might be available workforce there. For instance, there would be more laborers during harvesting time in the countryside, or skilled or knowledgeable people would help with the construction work in smaller regions, spurring the growth of the local area as well as the nation as a whole.
In conclusion, there are many problems that people in cities are facing, and it is advisable that government encourage the residents to consider relocation to smaller regional areas with a view to solving these issues.
Sample 4:
It is true that nowadays people are shifting to larger cities. There are several negative consequences of this moot issue, and to cope with the current problems, the authorities should encourage individuals to move to smaller cities or even to the countryside.
To begin with, an enormous number of people create problems. One negative consequence is that the urban population would go on increasing and cause housing problems. This leads to the creation of underdeveloped slum areas, where underprivileged individuals must live in poor living conditions like lacking medical care or even drinking water. Another issue is the traffic jam due to the burgeoning car ownership. Arguably, cars take up more space than a motorbike while its capacity to accommodate passengers is far inferior to that of a bus. This weakness results in bumper-to-bumper traffic particularly in downtown areas where many drivers have to inch along to get away from the terrible traffic.
Governments should take steps to move a certain number of city dwellers to less populated areas. The main reason is that shifting people to towns or even the countryside helps to decrease the unemployment rate. This is because as more and more people apply for the same position within a company, it may intensify the competition among employees, making it significantly more difficult to be chosen. Towns, however, due to industrialization, are now able to provide different jobs for engineers or officers in new factories. Therefore, by encouraging job seekers to move to these newly developed areas, the government can lower the number of unemployed individuals in cities.
In conclusion, an increasing number of people living in cities certainly creates housing problems and traffic congestion, and governments should encourage its citizens to migrate to towns.
Sample 5:
More and more people live in cities today than at any point in the past and this trend will likely continue in the future. This has resulted in many problems including extreme overcrowding and governments should take measures to make living outside cities more attractive.
There are a wide range of drawbacks associated with the rise of modern cities but one of the most obvious issues is related to population density. The large number of people crammed into a relatively small area has caused expensive housing, increased traffic and severe pollution. For example, apartment prices in mega-cities like Tokyo and New York have soared to the point where only the wealthiest inhabitants can afford decent living standards. Regardless of financial status, all city dwellers have to deal with more and more traffic jams as the population increases while the area of cities remains fixed. Finally, all these people living and travelling in one place puts a tremendous strain on the environment and some cities, like Beijing in China, have become dangerously polluted.
In my opinion, governments have a duty to encourage citizens to move to more rural areas. If cities continue to expand unabated then the above problems will only get worse. We might one day find ourselves living in densely packed, heavily polluted cities that resemble scenes from a dystopian science fiction film. In order to prevent this from happening, the government can give tax breaks to companies that choose to locate offices and production facilities outside the city. This will provide more jobs for people who are willing to live in the countryside.
In conclusion, the concerns related to overcrowding in cities can and should be somewhat countered by governments incentivising living in rural areas. If this is done then we may still face problems related to cities in the future, but at least they will not be as serious.
Sample 6:
Residing in metropolitan cities has been stimulating some crucial issues in daily activities. Congestion and air pollution are problems related to living in big cities. Thus, these issues have to be tackled by governments through plausible actions such as enhancing numerous public transportations and controlling the price of basic needs instead of encouraging societies to relocate to smaller regional towns.
Societies face many issues in metropolitan cities as traffic jams and quality of air pollution. In big cities, some roads are dominated by private cars, then the number of people using these private cars is higher than in other cities. As a result, there is a phenomenon like congestion in the road that can occur with long duration. Mostly, people who are workers have to go to office and back home regularly using private cars. This situation has a bad impact on utilizing time because they spend more time just on the road and have a chance of becoming late to go to office. Another problem that has influenced widely on people is reducing air quality. When individuals live in larger cities is a risk to the respiratory system, an individual usually takes breath frequently which contains more emissions produced by private cars. Thus, individuals are able to get some diseases such as asthma.
What authorities should do is to deliver better public transportation. These facilities have to consider integration on reaching some ways, an efficiency of time and cost of transportation. If the government ponders this solution, individuals will use this type of transportation. For instance, after the government applied an integration of public transportation in Bandung, societies directly used public transportation. Therefore, the number of private cars has dropped.
To sum up, congestion and quality of air quality are common issues in metropolitan cities. Considering encouraging relocation to smaller cities is not the best solution, but governments can tackle some problems regarding living in metropolitan cities through improving of public transportation.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In today's digital age, the prevalence of online shopping has soared, with more and more individuals opting for the convenience and accessibility it offers. This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of online shopping for both consumers and businesses.
Online shopping provides numerous advantages for buyers. For individuals, the convenience of shopping from the comfort of their homes, at any time, and from any location is a major draw. This accessibility allows busy professionals and individuals with mobility constraints to easily access a wide array of products and services. Furthermore, online platforms often provide comprehensive product information and customer reviews, enabling consumers to make well-informed purchasing decisions. For instance, a working parent with a hectic schedule can conveniently shop for groceries, clothing, or electronic gadgets online, saving valuable time that would otherwise be spent navigating through physical stores.
Businesses also benefit significantly from the online marketplace. Setting up an e-commerce platform requires lower initial investments compared to establishing physical stores. This cost-effectiveness allows small and medium-sized enterprises to compete with larger corporations on a global scale. Moreover, online platforms enable companies to reach a broader customer base, transcending geographical boundaries and creating new opportunities for growth and expansion.
While online shopping offers numerous advantages, it also presents certain challenges for both consumers and businesses. One prominent concern is cybersecurity. With the rising incidence of online fraud and data breaches, consumers may feel apprehensive about sharing personal and financial information online, which can hamper their willingness to engage in e-commerce.
Moreover, the surge in online shopping has raised concerns about the viability of traditional brick-and-mortar stores. The shift towards online retail has led to decreased foot traffic in physical stores, resulting in reduced revenue and job losses in the retail sector. Additionally, e-commerce giants may dominate the online marketplace, making it challenging for smaller businesses to compete and survive.
The increasing popularity of online shopping signifies its benefits for individuals and businesses alike, offering convenience and broader market reach. However, cybersecurity concerns and the impact on traditional retail should not be overlooked. It is important to ensure a secure and sustainable future for both e-commerce consumers and businesses.
Sample 2:
Online shopping has become increasingly popular in recent years, with more and more people choosing to purchase their needs and wants through digital platforms. This shift in consumer behavior has brought about numerous advantages for both individuals and companies, but it also presents certain disadvantages that need to be considered.
One of the primary advantages of online shopping is the convenience it offers. Individuals can browse and buy products anytime and anywhere, without the need to travel to physical stores. This not only saves time but also eliminates travel expenses. Moreover, online shopping provides access to a wide range of products. Consumers can explore a vast variety and selection that may not be available in their local stores. Additionally, online shopping allows individuals to explore international markets and purchase products from around the world.
For companies, online shopping opens up new possibilities for business growth. It provides a global reach and allows companies to expand their customer base beyond geographical boundaries. Furthermore, operating an online store can significantly reduce operational costs compared to maintaining physical stores. Companies can save on expenses such as rent, utilities, and staff. Additionally, online platforms enable businesses to collect and analyze valuable customer data, which can help them make informed decisions and tailor their marketing strategies.
However, there are certain disadvantages associated with online shopping. One of the main drawbacks is the inability to physically examine products before purchasing. This could lead to potential dissatisfaction if the actual item received does not match the expectations based on online descriptions and images. Additionally, assessing the quality and authenticity of products can be challenging without a physical inspection.
Another concern is the security risks and privacy issues associated with online shopping. Online scams and fraudulent activities are prevalent, and individuals need to be cautious while providing their personal and financial information. Data breaches and identity theft pose significant risks in the digital landscape.
For companies, online shopping comes with intense competition and difficulty in building brand loyalty. With numerous options available to consumers, businesses need to stand out and continuously engage with their customer base. Furthermore, logistics and customer service can be challenging to manage efficiently in the online space.
In conclusion, online shopping offers significant advantages in terms of convenience, access to a wide range of products, and cost savings. Companies benefit from global reach and reduced operational costs. However, the inability to physically examine products and security risks are notable disadvantages. To make the most of online shopping, individuals should exercise caution and research before making purchases, while companies need to focus on building customer trust and providing excellent online experiences. Ultimately, informed decision-making and careful consideration of the advantages and disadvantages are essential in the realm of online shopping.
Sample 3:
Online shopping has revolutionized the way we shop. Consequently, more and more people these days prefer purchasing products online over the traditional method of going to stores. This trend, however, exerts both positive and negative impacts on individuals and businesses as well.
The burgeoning popularity of online shopping can be attributed to several decisive advantages. First of all, the most distinctive benefit is convenience. To illustrate, people can buy products from the comfort of their workplace, own home or virtually anywhere without the pressure of a salesperson. Besides being able to purchase from the comfort of their homes or workstation, customers can also save money. With ever-growing fuel prices, shopping online saves them the cost of driving to and from the shop. They can also save time by avoiding getting stuck in gridlocked traffic. As for online business owners, the startup cost is lower compared to physical retail stores. And let’s not forget, the shop owners do not have to hire staff to work and run the shop, thus saving a substantial amount of expenditure. Apart from this, online business owners can easily sell their products to customers worldwide.
Despite some distinctive benefits, shopping online suffers from some obvious drawbacks. Fraud is the biggest downside of online trading. Put simply, there is a constant risk of fraud: debit or credit card scams, identity theft, hacking, phishing, and counterfeit goods to mention but a few. Likewise, cut-throat competition is making life tougher for business owners. Online trading is global and any customer from any part of the globe can purchase from any seller of their preference. That is to say, the competition with online business is not merely engaging customers, rather staying ahead of other sellers.
In conclusion, while e-commerce reaps distinct advantages, it also confers some obvious disadvantages. As a consumer or business owner, people should know about the downsides of it before switching to e-commerce.
Sample 4:
In recent years, the rate of in-store shopping has plunged due to vast opportunities for buying different products including daily necessaries from hundreds of online stores. This essay will try to demonstrate chances such as convenience and product availability as the reasons behind the popularity of e-shopping whereas it will focus on swindling and isolation as the pitfalls of this issue.
Initially, the prime reason behind the popularity of e-shopping is convenience which can be easily understood from the thousands of virtual shops all over the world. To illustrate, people nowadays are busier than ever because of the fast pace of the world, and they want to save as much time as they can for relaxation. Virtual shopping gives this magnificent prospect of time-saving and so people enjoy taking it. Besides, superstores sometimes run out of products in the precise moment when people need them which online shops rarely have this crisis. For instance, I needed a flat screen monitor a few months ago but my local store had it out of stock. When I peeped into some online stores I found it easily on eBay.
Meanwhile, though shopping on the internet looks very promising, it is not without its setbacks. Many people, mostly the newcomers, regularly complain of getting tricked on virtual shopping and the rate of complaints is increasing at a faster rate. To explain, one of my friends has recently got swindled when he paid in advance for a smartwatch. Additionally, people often become isolated in their rooms through e-shopping which can affect their feelings and behaviour. As an example, a friend of mine started shopping online a couple of years ago even though the nearest superstore was only 500 metres away. His neighbours, nowadays, describe him as an ill-mannered and antisocial person which, needless to say, is the result of being home and becoming isolated from the outer world.
In brief, virtual shoppers obtain greater benefits if compared to in-store shoppers. Converting such shopping to a stress-free experience, it is turning out to be progressively more convenient. However, as clients may sometimes get deceived and become cut off from the social world, concerned authorities should look into the matter cautiously.
Sample 5:
More and more people are purchasing products online instead of visiting brick and mortar stores nowadays. Doing online shopping brings numerous benefits to both individuals and companies. I believe the advantages of using e-commerce platforms outweigh the disadvantages.
Shopping online has the following two advantages. Firstly, people can save time and money by buying goods online. It can take a substantial amount of time for some people to get to a store. Not everyone lives or works near the city center where the high street is located. Also, the price of the cost is usually cheaper on e-commerce platforms than in stores. Secondly, people with disabilities, the elderly, and parents with young children can benefit from online shopping as it allows them to receive the products at home. Such people might find it difficult to shop at stores because some have limitations in their mobility due to their circumstances.
However, doing online shopping has the following two disadvantages. Firstly, the packaging required for online shopping creates quite a lot of waste that cannot be reused or recycled. Therefore, it can create detrimental effects to our precious environment. Secondly, you need to predict what you will need in advance, since it still takes some time to receive the product from when you order it online, even though delivery times are constantly decreasing.
In conclusion, the merits of online shopping far outweigh its disadvantages, and thus, it is expected to continue booming and grow in popularity, as more and more people are turning from shopping in-stores to online shopping due to its convenience and price competitiveness.
Sample 6:
Online shopping is becoming increasingly popular nowadays, and more and more people prefer to buy online instead of going to stores. However, this trend has both pros and cons for individuals and companies.
The burgeoning popularity of shopping online can be attributed to numerous decisive benefits. Firstly, the most distinctive advantage is convenience. For example, people can buy products from the comfort of their workplace, own home, or virtually anywhere without the pressure of a salesperson. Besides purchasing from the comfort of their homes or workstation, customers can also save money. With ever-growing fuel prices, shopping online saves them the cost of driving to and from the shop. They can also save time by eluding getting stuck in gridlocked traffic than physical retail stores for online business owners. Furthermore, the shop owners don’t have to hire staff to work and run the shop, therefore, saving a substantial expenditure. Apart from this, online business owners can sell their products to customers without being curbed by geographical distances.
On the flip side, there are security concerns associated with online shopping. To begin with, individuals may suffer from financial loss because computer viruses and hackers constantly tap into online companies and steal customer identities and financial information. Likewise, the lack of support can complicate the exchange or refund process. For example, if a customer finds that the purchased goods are faulty, it may take several days to rectify the issue. In addition, online shoppers have to deal with complaints from customers due to defective goods. And this can affect the credibility of the online stores and eventually influence their business.
In conclusion, although shopping online has made one’s life easy and helped vendors eliminate global boundaries, it has equal cons that cannot be overlooked in this digital era.
Sample 7:
In today’s digital age, the trend of purchasing goods and services online has become increasingly popular. This shift towards online shopping has both advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies.
For individuals, the primary advantage of shopping online is convenience. With just a few clicks, they can browse through a wide range of products, compare prices, and make purchases without leaving the comfort of their homes. This not only saves time and effort but also provides access to a variety of products that may not be available locally. Additionally, online shopping often offers better deals and discounts, allowing individuals to save money on their purchases.
On the other hand, there are also disadvantages for individuals when it comes to online shopping. One of the main concerns is the risk of fraud and identity theft. Providing personal and financial information online can make individuals vulnerable to cybercrime. Furthermore, the inability to physically inspect products before purchase can lead to dissatisfaction with the quality or fit of the item.
For companies, the advantages of online shopping include the ability to reach a wider audience and reduce overhead costs. By having an online presence, companies can target customers beyond their local market and expand their customer base. Additionally, operating an online store eliminates the need for physical storefronts, reducing expenses related to rent, utilities, and staffing.
However, companies also face challenges when it comes to online shopping. One of the main disadvantages is the intense competition in the online marketplace. With countless businesses vying for attention, companies must invest in marketing and advertising to stand out. Additionally, the logistics of shipping and handling returns can be complex and costly for companies.
In conclusion, while online shopping offers convenience and cost-saving opportunities for both individuals and companies, it also presents risks and challenges. It is essential for both parties to weigh the pros and cons before engaging in online transactions.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo
Hỏi bài tập